Download
recap collections analysis music library n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
ReCAP Collections Analysis: Music Library PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
ReCAP Collections Analysis: Music Library

ReCAP Collections Analysis: Music Library

81 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

ReCAP Collections Analysis: Music Library

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. ReCAP Collections Analysis:Music Library Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator 11/30/2010

  2. Answers to Basic Questions • How many books transferred? • What is retrieval rate? • Where are Music Library collections delivered? • Music Library in overall picture of ReCAP? • Who is using Music Library collections? • What data are available to look at?

  3. Accession Statistics • FY10 : 11,534 • FY09 : 2,543 • FY08 : 934 • Music has accessioned 87,940 items since ReCAP opened in 2002 • This accounts for 2.36% of CUL’s total holdings at ReCAP (3.72 million)

  4. Retrievals • Total retrievals have typically increased every year and fluctuate monthly in phase with the academic calendar • Total deliveries of off-site Music collections to CUL departments: • FY10 : 1,966 • FY09 : 2,086 • FY08 : 1,689 • TOTAL (through Oct. 2010) : 13,425 • Retrieval Rate : 1.67%

  5. More Request Stats • 80.0% of Music Library collections are delivered to Music Circulation • 20.0% delivered to other circulation desks or ILL: • Butler : 8.20% • ILL : 5.82% • All others : 4.04% • 98.13% of requests for Music Library collections are physical delivery; only 1.87% are EDD

  6. More Request Stats • Total deliveries of CUL off-site collections to Music Circulation: • FY10 : 1,859 • FY09 : 2,019 • FY08 : 1,529 • TOTAL (through Oct. 2010) : 12,329

  7. More Request Stats • 87.2% of ReCAP deliveries to Music Circ are Music-owned collections; 12.8% of deliveries belong to other departments. • Other department collections: • Butler : 7.45% • Lehman : 1.09% • Burke : 0.84% • Business : 0.40%

  8. Circulation • Data available from July 2003 to present (since the inception of Voyager) • 95.9% of charges to Music Library collections are from onsite • Patron Group OFF is the majority user of all Music Library collections • Undergraduates account for 33% of onsite charges but only 21% of offsite

  9. Where to find data? • Bibliographic Record Statistics: posted by LITO, give an accurate reflection of item record counts. “Active Holding Records” under “Location Detail” • Circulation Statistics: posted by LITO in monthly and cumulative files. Definitions and analysis available on the ReCAP Data Center website. • ReCAP Statistics: General resources and analysis posted on the ReCAP Data Center.
https://fr.slideserve.com/hetal/recap-collections-analysis-music-library
fr.slideserve.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-49
89237
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:XNMCRNRJQM7V4EM7QW3IIII7TVPAIMUD
<urn:uuid:9603534a-90ae-47ea-a69d-93e226b45e38>
2021-12-01T09:27:19Z
54.244.11.189
text/html
sha1:45KQKV4OYZQDG2YUFEGSIKTJ2D4B5JDM
<urn:uuid:831cb3ec-0bf7-4f3d-b2ce-5701e6f69c33>
https://fr.slideserve.com/hetal/recap-collections-analysis-music-library
response
<urn:uuid:3c552010-8f3e-41c8-b11c-1e8642f95a0e>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-235
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/