« first day (376 days earlier)      last day (551 days later) » 

12:52 PM
Hey BH folks, we're still waiting on vote resets, but in the mean time does anybody think they could get this question from C.SE cleaned up if it got migrated? There is a flag out on it and if it was a new question I'd migrate it in a heartbeat, but I'm inclined to just not touch.
 
 
5 hours later…
5:37 PM
@Caleb I'm not sure - I think the answers would all need to be deleted which kind of makes the migration pointless. Interested to know what others think though.
The OP hasn't been seen in a while :-(
 
6:02 PM
@JackDouglas I agree. The question itself is under-researched. I suspect the answer is easy to find via Google.
 
6:38 PM
@Caleb I wouldn't migrate it (old question, votes, answers that would be inappropriate here), but if somebody wanted to re-ask on BH with a little more effort, that'd be fine.
 
 
1 hour later…
7:41 PM
@MonicaCellio I agree (with you all) and re-ask on BH was what I suggested to the person who flagged it. They didn't agree with the reasons to avoid migration, but said they'd be happy with whatever BH community felt...
 

« first day (376 days earlier)      last day (551 days later) » 
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/6495281
chat.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-15
16685
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ESI2HJIJC75ZKZFVK7UI6ASRV7GLPZPQ
<urn:uuid:ac962f66-30c2-4eeb-8138-efe6703a395b>
2014-04-19T19:34:57Z
198.252.206.29
sha1:FVQFOQI5WFF2UTWFRYFAV4BJDL2HW4HK
<urn:uuid:96250937-70eb-4ed0-9e48-edb052efebe8>
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/6495281
response
<urn:uuid:6a7cd226-791f-464d-bdbb-2c83253bf241>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-147-4-33.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-15
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for April 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf