-33

Why is the review on Stack Overflow so strict?

I only made one incorrect review and already got banned.

(Image took from last time). Now I have to wait for 8 days...

Enter image description here

0

1 Answer 1

39

Well, you missed that this is spam.

Prior to that you missed that this is also spam.

Before that one, you missed that this is vandalism. Failing suggested-edit audits is pretty bad; those are just random text crammed into a post, so they're pretty blatantly wrong.

Then before that you missed this one.

...there were a couple of other ones before that too, but you get the idea. That's all just this month.

Slow down, spend some extra time reading and considering the post you're looking at, and you'll be fine.

2
  • 19
    I'm curious as what made you think that you only made one mistake. Is it UI issue?
    – justhalf
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 6:48
  • 7
    @justhalf My bet is on cognitive dissonance ...
    – rene
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 8:27

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/345849/why-is-the-review-in-stack-overflow-so-strict
meta.stackoverflow.com
CC-MAIN-2024-38
106254
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:NDHMDLMKSRHVHMWFM3PZXOYA2JEPOHZA
<urn:uuid:856204fd-c7f5-4856-bd98-a15701595115>
2024-09-17T05:36:31Z
172.64.155.249
text/html
sha1:WQGCYHZF4JXDJBRYRTZMDCVD2BCLLJ3I
<urn:uuid:3e59584b-df71-4f47-a46a-d7fd94df7f4d>
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/345849/why-is-the-review-in-stack-overflow-so-strict
response
<urn:uuid:2d2b451d-76dc-4a00-ac86-03e8a7db8498>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-38
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-55
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/