SideTaker sub-reply format - bottom to top, or top to bottom?

SideTaker format with the questions is for the most recent reply to be on top, which I'm fine with, for the main replies. But for the sub-replies, the replies to the replies, I would prefer them to go from top to bottom and not bottom to top. Does anyone else think that too? Just wondering, because it can get a bit confusing to follow the threads of the sub-replies.

If others agree, then we could maybe ask for it to be changed. But if I'm on my own in this, that's okay too, just wondering :)
By Sundial 8 years ago :: General
  • Rafael Morales
    MA-MS, MHT-MHRS
    I have extensive training and expertise in clinical, counseling, transpersonal/integral psychology and coaching. I provide support to those willing to work on themselves… $2.75/minute
       4.84/5
  • Rafael Richman
    Ph.D.
    Are you feeling stuck, trapped in the same patterns that repeat over & over? Are you feeling angry, alone, unappreciated & unheard? I can help you. $2.85/minute
       4.84/5
  • View More Experts
    15
https://www.sidetaker.com/page/question/3483/sidetaker-sub-reply-format--bottom-to-top-or-top-to-bottom
www.sidetaker.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-26
52643
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:SOBUXI7XWGKUGVXMH242K2UC56G2ZTGN
<urn:uuid:6fc59478-a4ea-47dd-9388-92dd50dd4174>
2018-06-21T06:10:00Z
104.28.1.15
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:TPUSLIFHDMLEOBEFN7MCTQVN4APQZ6HV
<urn:uuid:82c60176-eea9-4116-af6a-549ed6f8149c>
https://www.sidetaker.com/page/question/3483/sidetaker-sub-reply-format--bottom-to-top-or-top-to-bottom
response
<urn:uuid:d170fdb1-680f-4a4e-8949-55d21b9d2719>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-168-75-198.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-26
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf