     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Open Water 2: Adrift, Bad movie, worse article
thekohser
post Wed 9th July 2008, 2:48am
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



I happened to scan by the movie Open Water 2: Adrift on TMC tonight.

Not wanting to suffer through any more than the 25 minutes I already put into it, I turned to Wikipedia to "find out how it ends".

What a horridly-written article.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd turk
post Wed 9th July 2008, 3:10am
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon 5th May 2008, 12:56am
Member No.: 5,976



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 8th July 2008, 9:48pm) *

I happened to scan by the movie Open Water 2: Adrift on TMC tonight.

Not wanting to suffer through any more than the 25 minutes I already put into it, I turned to Wikipedia to "find out how it ends".

What a horridly-written article.


The movie deserves an article that bad. Truly stupid, on both fronts. Bad acting. Bad effects. Bad everything. This bad film simply oozed rottenness from every bad scene. Simply bad beyond all infinite dimensions of possible badness.

Well, maybe not that bad, but Lord, it wasn't good.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 1 17, 10:37am
 
     
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=bd9fa2f153b17ade8b939c51266533e3&showtopic=19088&pid=112454&st=0
wikipediareview.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-04
60158
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:TFG4GODOL7UP3XVMAJVUAFJA5RIFW4JX
<urn:uuid:faf60b0d-a5b6-4ae5-8dbf-72824dc2c95f>
2017-01-21T10:37:27Z
192.254.236.99
sha1:H7NT3EZTBUKIUHIBX6HL7IASA32OHGHX
<urn:uuid:157b3a46-0e3f-43a1-9a42-4feadd88b935>
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=bd9fa2f153b17ade8b939c51266533e3&showtopic=19088&pid=112454&st=0
length
response
<urn:uuid:b3464dc3-210c-465c-9182-c47e76b20cd9>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-171-10-70.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-04
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2017
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf