Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Karelj

My older discussions on page: User talk:Karelj/Archiv

Review the HistoryEdit

@Karelj: if you check the history of the motd 2016-06-04: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Motd/2016-06-04&action=history I was the first one to include a media. Please select other day. Regards.--Lorgut

OK, I shifted your image (file) to 13-06-2016, because there were finished texts for my file in different languages and nobody want to change them.
And for future - if you want to give new video to this page, be very carefull, becase every new visitor of Commons will see it in moment of opening Commons page. For this reason there is neccessary 1) this video should be high quality and 2) you shoud good and clearly fill the description of video - text will appear under your added video on Commons home page. It is not enough just enough to copy 2 - 3 words, which you find saved with this video (sometimes is the decription there very good), but it is recommended, that this text will contain some links to some Wikipedia articles or Category in Commons. Regards, Karelj

A time for barnstarEdit

  Working Man's Barnstar
I hereby award you the Working Man's Barnstar for the work you're doing in closing FPC. Thank you!-- --Mbz1 (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very, very much. --Karel (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

FP clusoureEdit

Hi, I noticed you closed some nominations today (I did a few yesterday). Just a question as I have not done it before; I see you let them stay now on the FPC page while I removed them immediately. Is there a "non mentioned" period that they should remain there, or are they automatically removed later ? If it's done manually should it not be mentioned that they should stay for a while in the instructions. /Daniel78 (talk) 20:39, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Yesterday I left some nomination in state, when only votes were calculated but images were not sent to appropriate files. I wanted to do this today, but I found, that colleage Claus deleted it from FP list. I ask him to give this edit back and I am prepared ti finish my job. I think, that there is no automatic procedure for removing FP from list and there is no rule, how long they should stay on the page. --Karel (talk) 08:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for the info. /Daniel78 (talk) 08:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Early morning beach scene.JPGEdit

I'm obviously not a professional photographer; I don't claim to be. I thought this particular image had nice aesthetic value, and decided to give it a shot. I respectfully ask you withdraw your comment implying my work is a "joke" and provide a clear rationale as to why you find it so poor. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 22:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bürstegg Biberkopf.jpgEdit

I have uploaded a new version of this picture! Maybe you would like to change your vote! --Simonizer (talk) 06:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Notice on complaint + tipEdit

Hi! You should take a look at this Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Karelj_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29. You can find more help on {{duplicate}} # 3 and Commons:Deletion_guidelines#Duplicates. Also describing your edits would be good. Especially when you do an edit that has been reverted before. That way you can explain why. --MGA73 (talk) 22:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Plastic surgeryEdit

On a more serious note, Commons does need more female volunteers and I'm a little worried by how your comments might appear. That portrait was taken last year on my fortieth birthday, and I've had stitches on my face on two separate occasions. If either injury had happened a centimeter out of place the scars would be very visible, and I could have lost an eye. The personal appearance of a contributor has nothing to do with his or her photography or digital editing skills, but (society being what it is) women's appearances in general do tend to get scrutinized--often in contexts where physical appearance isn't even remotely relevant. You're welcome to your opinion regarding my work, but please review my work only--not my body. Durova (talk) 19:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh my God, this is exactly, what I did not want to start. You are now taking my stupid jokes seriously and, which is worse, as some action agints you personaly. Please, lets go back to the beginning of this awkward story:
I gave negative wote to your image with comment „Terrible“ what (I believe you see) was meant to describe kitsch. It was followed by strong criticism by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover and my answer to him was from my point of view ironic, but nothing like action against you. It was just comment of his comment. After that you was reacting by inserting your photo (which I appeciated as nice gesture) and my I answered: „Well, forget about surgery, please.“ I am sorry, but I wanted to talk with this: Please stop talking about surgery, it was just joke between me and Sarcastic ShockwaveLover and start to talk about aestetic value of image. Nothing more!
So please, believe me, I did not want to insult you personaly, this is not my style. So again, sorry, sorry sorry, but nothing from this here was not written with connection with your person, everything from my side was comment of kitsch image and reaction on my wote by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover. I hope, that you could understand from my "english" what I wanted to talk and that you will accept my apology for this paiful incident. --Karel (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
The key to successful humor is to understand one's audience. Durova (talk) 23:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Undeletion requestEdit

Please see COM:UNDEL#Podolská. Thanks. Wknight94 talk 16:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

User problemEdit

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−


Hello, Karelj!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

HeadingEdit

Zdravím. Vidím, že poctivě vyplňujete souřadnice šablonou "location". Zkuste se prosím ještě podívat, jak se používá její parametr "heading", který vyznačuje, jakým směrem jste z daného místa fotil. Parametr lze zadat buď anglickými zkratkami světových stran (včetně kombinací typu jihojihozápad atd.) anebo číselně azimutem. Většina z těch českých přispěvatelů, kteří k obrázkům vkládají souřadnice, už tento parametr používá. Pokud značky jednotlivých fotek jsou orientované, usnadňuje to i orientaci v mapových rozhraních, v nichž se zobrazují značky pořízených fotek, a leckdy to pomůže i ke snadnější identifikaci, co je vlastně na fotce vidět. Vaše fotky jsou velmi pěkné a tak si určitě zaslouží i co nejlepší popis. Díky. --ŠJů (talk) 11:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi KarelEdit

Well, that photo i contest for a featured one, was already taken in magazines and i think is best someone can get out of compact camera. pozdrav, --Mile (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Zelenkavá atmosféraEdit

Zdravím, kolego, zeptám se, nad čím už chvíli dumám: má tento obrázek barevné příšeří jako záměrné, nebo by šlo upravit barevnou teplotu a trochu barvy vylepšit? --Gumruch (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

To "barevné příšeří" je spíše úmysl, podle mne vystihuje podmínky, které v době pořízení fotky panovaly. Ale pokud máte pocit, že by snímku výrazně prospělo projasnění barev, klidně to přehrajte opravenou verzí, já se s vámi o to přetahovat nebudu. S přáním hezkého dne, --Karel (talk) 18:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
No já tam nebyl, takže nevím, jak to tam vypadalo a jakou barevnou teplotu by měl snímek mít… :-) Na fotku jsem narazil na stránce cs:Magdalena Jetelová, tak jsem se tím trochu zabýval, ono to v náhledu padne do oka. Podívejte se na moji verzi, kterou jsem uploadoval, pokud se Vám zdá mimo mísu (jestli už není bílá moc do červena?), prosím revertujte to. Zdravím Vás, Gumruch (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Díky za opravu vyvážení barev, musím se přiznat, že v tomhle ohledu není na moje oko 100% spoleh. Nejsem samozřejmě barvoslepý, ale v rozlišení jemných barevných nuancí rozhodně nijak nevynikám. Navíc si i myslím, že co monitor počítače, to trochu jiný barevný pohled, určitě to nemáme všichni vyladěni stejně a co se na jednom zdá do modra to jiný může vidět spíše s převahou červené std. V každém případě děkuji za korekci a přeji mnoho dalších úspěšných wikieditací, --Karel (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Dachtein map.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:56, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

New proposal about changing the rules of FPCEdit

is here.Cheers.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

kódyEdit

Ahoj. Hrozně jednoduše:

kód jazyka (čeština) = CS
kód země (Česká rep.) = CZ

Koukam totiž, že se ti to trochu při souřadnicování pomíchalo (to se stává ale i hodně dalším lidem, Němci zase pletou GE a DE a výsledek je že souřadnicuju do Gruzie :-). --Aktron (talk) 10:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

A jsi si jistý, že je to tak skutečně? Mohl bys poslat odkaz na nějakou oficiální stánku, kde jsou ty zkratky popsány? Díky předem --Karelj (talk) 10:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Podívejte se na cs:ISO 3166-1 a cs:ISO 639-1, příp. cs:Seznam kódů ISO 639-1. (A samozřejmě tam uvedené reference.) --Mormegil (talk) 11:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
No to je teda pěknej pr... Já jsem si ten kód nevymyslel, prostě jsem to převzal z nějaké už hotové fotky, už ani nevím jaké, takže tam je to blbě taky a já mám takhle pošpatnělejch označení asi několik stovek. Ach jo! Ale samozřejmě, blb jsem já, měl jsem si to někde ověřit. --Karelj (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

FPCEdit

Hello! As you did not sign your vote there on FPC, I struck it. Feel free to remove my comment when you'll reiterate your vote, but please do not forget to sign it. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

CorydalisEdit

Karel, would you please update the Corydalis 'solida' picture descpriptions and and move them to the correct category 'Corydalis cava' ? Pls read also the comments (discussion, talk) pages for the respective files.

I have changed the Czech name of plant and cateory. I hope thaht now is everything OK. Thanks for your correstion, --Karelj (talk) 07:28, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

ID of Images File:Lamium purpureum east Bohemia 2.jpg and File:Lamium purpureum east Bohemia.jpgEdit

Dear Karelj,

I just corrected the species category of these two images, because they show Lamium purpureum instead of Glechoma hederacea. I also updated the description accordingly and moved them to the correct species page. Unfortunately I do not speak any Czech language. So would you please be so kind to check whether my correction of the Czech description is correct? Best regards -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 18:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for correction, I am not real botanic expert and my friend told me the wrong name of this plant. The Czech name is OK. I am thinking about the change of these two images names, but I know from previous experience, that this is relative difficult procedure. Have a nice day, --Karelj (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC).
Having the images renamed should be a rather simple procedure by adding Template:Rename to the image pages and letting an admin do the job. Unfortunately this procedure may result in some broken text links (e. g. the links in the headline of this topic). -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

File:File-Fontana di Trevi Roma 2011 2.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

File with wrong name, deletion request created. --Karelj (talk) 08:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chvalkovice castle 2011 3-CN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Cervus_eldii_in_Prague_ZooEdit

 Hans 08:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

ID of your image File:Jitrocel1.jpgEdit

Hi Karelj, I moved your photograph File:Jitrocel1.jpg to Category:Plantago media, because that is what can be seen on it, but not Plantago major. I changed the description accordingly and deleted the Czech name. If you know the Czech name for Plantago media, you might add it. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for correction, now everything is OK, I believe. Have a nice day, --Karelj (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Galerella sanguinea Zoo Praha 2011-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galerella sanguinea Zoo Praha 2011-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Brusel Don Quiote 1.jpgEdit

  File:Brusel Don Quiote 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 12:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Brusel Don Quiote 2.jpgEdit

  File:Brusel Don Quiote 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 12:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Brusel Montgomery.jpgEdit

  File:Brusel Montgomery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 07:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your Pangasius picturesEdit

Hello Karelj, your pictures File:Pangasius hypophthalmus 1.jpg, File:Pangasius hypophthalmus 2.jpg and File:Pangasius hypophthalmus 3.jpg certainly show Pangasius sanitwongsei as the animal has the filamentous finrays typical for that species. As I was just expanding the German Wikipedia article and looking for pictures I was glad to find those really nice ones and wanted to notify you of the wrong labelling. Yours, Cymothoa exigua (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello Cymothoa exigua, and thanks you for your observation. You know, I am not expert of fishes, but I like to photo and living objects are my favorites. I took these snaps in Prague see aquarium and the name of fish I read from caption near the reservoir. Maybe I made mistake and there were two different species in one reservoir, or there is wrong the whole description (I hope not, this will be big shame for Prageu aquarium). Anyway, when I saw pictures of Pangasius sanitwongsei from Google, I see, that you are right and these fishes are P. sanitwongsei . What do you suggest, should I ask for renaming pictures (I think, that I cannot do it myself) or just to change the descrption of pictures? Regards, --Karelj (talk) 20:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I guess the mistake may have been on the aquariums side - mislabelling is quite frequent, especially with pangasiids, as they are frequently sold just as "Pangasius" and people may have to guess which species it is. I have changed the descriptions already but I would recommend to ask for renaming, to avoid confusion. Regards, Cymothoa exigua (talk) 20:59, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
OK, renaming was done and all problems seem to be solved. Thanks for your finding again. Have a nice day,--Karelj (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Organizing Giotto categoryEdit

This file is alaready in teh category Stefaneschi tryptyc, which is already in the actegory Giotto di Bondone. No need to keep a double categorization. Don't revert thanks --Sailko (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Atmospheric_optical_phenomenaEdit

84.97.149.43 03:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Scopolia carniolica Prague 2012 1.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

I use one of your photosEdit

Hi Karelj!

I have use a photo of Dracaena guianensis from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") twice:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=34104


If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Karelj

This is my "contributor card", for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn


In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk)

ThanksEdit

Dear Karelj, I appreciate your support for the image called public drunkness. Due to the controversy around the name, I reuploaded and resubmitted it for FPC at #REDIRECT[[1]]. If you could vote on the new one I would appreciate it. Regards, --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Karelj (talk) 18:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

WLMEdit

Ahoj. Odstranil jsem šablonu WLM z této fotky. Byla nahrána na commons před termínem, což je proti pravidlům. --Aktron (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

OK, já to moc nečetl a spíše jsem hledal objekty, které do toho patří. Takže sorry, nechtěl jsem se nějak "neprávem obohatit", což by se mi bezpochyby podařilo - vyhrávám ve Sportce tak 1x z 5 sázek a to 5. cenu. :-) --Karelj (talk) 16:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Zdravím. Koukám, že se to (v tomto okamžiku) týká ještě čtyř dalších tvých fotek. Do soutěže jít nemohou, ale šablona s číslem památky je užitečná i u nesoutěžních snímků. --ŠJů (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Já tě nechtěl potrestat :-) Jen si projíždím tooly a dělám pořádek v soutěži. --Aktron (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for the Wikipedia PictureEdit

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Monolithos_1.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --71.219.46.200 17:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

LocationEdit

Please check the parameters on your firework photos. Prague is North AND East. Finavon (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your correctin, my mistake, sorry. --Karelj (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)So

San Pietro in VincoliEdit

Please check File:San Pietro in Vincoli Rome 2011 1.jpg. In my opinion this picture is taken in some other church and differences are significant. This is important because your photo is put on three wikipedias to illustrate this church article. Thanks!

Thank you very much for this notification. You were completely right, this image is from San Martino ai Monti. I am verry sorry, my great mistake. I removeved all images from articles, changed category and description and I will ask for renaming of picture. Again thanks for your attention. With regards, --Karelj (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC).

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Use of your picture for a bookEdit

Hi,

We’d like to use one of your pictures for a book that will be publish next fall. On wikimedia, it says that the picture is copyright free.

The title of the book is Secrets de plantes 2 and the name of the author is Fabien Girard. The initial print run will be 1000 copies.

We’d like to have your autorisation by e-mail to use this picture. If you accept, what is the exact name of the source that we must write beside the picture?

Here are the link of the picture.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Althaea_officinalis_Prague_2011_2.jpg

Stéphane Aubut Editor assistant for Les Éditions JCL

stephane@jcl.qc.ca

Error of nameEdit

Hello Karelj. This file is an error. It's not Serinus serinus but a male Carduelis spinus. Père Igor (talk) 19:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Père, thanks for notification. I shall belive you and I am asking for Renaming. But I must to say, that I am not 100% sure. Anyway, I am not expert, so I believe, hat you are right. With best regards, Karelj (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Carduelis spinus (« Tarin des aulnes » in french) are coming in my little garden almost each year (in february, march and april) but they are less numerous than ten years ago (6 in 2013 but 24 in 2001). You can see them in category:Birds of Dordogne. Père Igor (talk) 08:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
OK, OK, now I believe you, that you recognize this little bird correctly. This image was made in my weekendhouse in Jaroměř, east Bohemia. We feed there lot of birds during the winters for many many years and all family has pleasure from observation them. But you are right, this kind of birds starts to apear there in the end of winter or in the beggining of spring. Probably they are returning from the south, where they are spending the most of winter. With regards, --Karelj (talk) 21:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

použití fotografieEdit

Dobrý den,

nemám zkušenosti s autorskými právy obrázků na wikipedie, proto si dovoluji Vám napsat a zeptat se, zda a za jakých podmínek by bylo případně možné použít tuto http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rychnov_nad_Kn%C4%9B%C5%BEnou_from_air_K2-3.jpg Vaši fotografii jako titulní k materiálu týkajícího se Rychnova nad Kněžnou.

Děkuji za Vaši odpověď.

Michael Kabelka

Dobrý den pane Kabelko,
Váš zájem o moji fotografii mě velmi potěšil a tímto Vám sděluji, že dávám své svolení k jejímu použití ve vašem materiálu zcela volně a bezplatně. Budu rád, když se někde v tom materiálu objeví informace, že autorem fotografie je Karel Jakubec, ale ani to není nezbytnou podmínkou. A až bude materál hotov, mohl byste mi poslat odkaz na místo na webu, kde ho najdu, případně odkaz na číslo ISBN, půjde-li o tiskovinu? Předem děkuji, RNDr. Karel Jakubec --Karelj (talk) 22:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Dobrý den,

Vaše autorství bude u fotografie samozřejmě uvedeno. Materiál bude pravděpodobně k dispozici na webu města Rychnov nad Kněžnou. Jakmile bude hotov (pravděpodobně v řádu týdnů), pošlu Vám odkaz. Pokud na sebe uvedete emailový kontakt, rád Vám ho zašlu osobně. Moc jste nám pomohl.

Děkuji a jsem s pozdravem,

Michael Kabelka

Dobrý den, můj mail je: a1000102@aim-net.cz. Přeji úspěšnou práci na vašem materiálu a budu se těšit na zaslaný link. --Karelj (talk) 16:28, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

COM:OVERCATEdit

File:Litoměřice Sv Štěpán.jpg is in Category:Featured pictures of Litoměřice which is in Category:Featured pictures of the Czech Republic - and so, this one is not acceptable, reverted, thanks for your understanding --A.Savin 21:16, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Aquilegia bernardiiEdit

Dear,

In all the references I have consulted (Flora Europaea, Tela-botanica, GRIN and NCBI taxonomies, and the book Columbines by Robert Nold - ISBN 0-88192-588-8) I have found the name Aquilegia bernardii. Why is it reported in Wikispecies as Aquilegia bernardi?

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 15:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hallo,
I only added picture from Commons to existing page in Wikispecies. I am not real botany expert, so I do not want to decide, which name is 100 % correct. Please, see the history of this page (http://species.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aquilegia_bernardi&action=history) and ask author User:Open2universe, or if you are really sure, change the name of page in Wikispecies yourself. With best regards, --Karelj (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
The name of the Wikispecies page was obviously misspelled. I have, after correction of its content, transferred it to a new page Aquilegia bernardii. The misspelled page, which I have blanked, should be removed later by an administrator. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 20:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
PS: I have also corrected the link to it on Commons page Category:Aquilegia bernardii. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 20:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I believe, this is the best way. Have a nice day, --Karelj (talk) 20:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Buddleja davidii Prague 2013 1.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Buddleja davidii Prague 2013 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Revert wikikonferenceEdit

Ahoj, můžu se tě zeptat na tvůj důvod pro revert mé editace metadat u fotky Wikikonference Praha 2013 Karel 4.jpg? Za tu fotku ti moc děkuju, ale nechápu, proč jsi zrušil mou editaci, kterou jsem se snažil pomoct zlepšit její popis. Promiň, ale slovo "meeteing" rozhodně není anglicky, když už tak "meeting", jak jsem to upravil teď (ale nazvat konferenci "meetingem" je i tak trochu divné), a stejně tak je nepopiratelné, že na fotce je zobrazen Marek Blahuš, takže i ta kategorie tam má co dělat. Ohledně určitých a neurčitých členů v angličtině by bylo určitě možné vést diskuzi, tam si tolik jistý nejsem a byl to spíš jen pokus o uvedení všeho do alespoň trochu přijatelnějšího stavu v rámci mým schopností; ale zajímalo by mne, proč jsi takhle paušálně a bez vysvětlení zrušil tu mou editaci celou – co se ti na ní tak nelíbilo? 21:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Ahoj, sorry, to byl spíše chvilkový zkrat. Měl jsem toho tehdy nějak moc, současně se mi nějaký vandal začal hrabat v kytičkách z Alberovské botanické zahrady a dělat v nich bord... a tak jsem revertoval všechny změny z té chvíle. S tím meetingem máš samozřejmě pravdu a pokud jde o ty členy, je to opravdu jen věc názoru a obě verze by byly patrně možné. Takže ještě jednou omluva, nebylo to myšleno osobně a byl to pouze únik ze stresu z mé strany. Jinak, mimochodem, svůj předchozí příspěvek jsi nepodepsal a tak jsem zjišťoval kdo mi píše jen z Historie stránky.... --Karelj (talk) 10:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
OK, beru, a sorry za ten chybějící podpis, asi to bylo taky tím mým rozladěním. Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do...Edit

...not remove my user specific category. Fix your work with this file. --High Contrast (talk) 15:06, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your supprt. --High Contrast (talk) 00:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:CIAF 2013 RJF 7.jpgEdit

Hello!

Please get familiar with COM:OVERCAT. --High Contrast (talk) 20:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Karelj,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Gosau pohled 6.jpgEdit

Hi Karelj, could you solve the Mountain puzzle? What is the name of the mountain in the background? Any hint appreciated. I suppose it could be Gamsfeld, but I was not that sure. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Za titulkem obrázku se nepíše tečkaEdit

Vizte http://prirucka.ujc.cas.cz/?id=160#nadpis5. A i kdybyste z nějakého důvodu měl nezvratné přesvědčení, že se tam tečka píše, a měl neodbytnou potřebu ji tam revertovat zpět, tak při tom laskavě nerevertujte alespoň chybějící mezeru mezi čárkou a následujícím slovem. --Mormegil (talk) 08:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

K tématu asi následující: 1) Klasický pseudoargument - Na enwiki ti tak mají.
2) Hlavní - Mě se to tak líbí a hodlám v tom pokračovat.
3) K zamyšlení - nějak nevím, proč by se wikipesta vašich kvalit a vědomostí měl zabývat takovými prkotinami až pí...nami. A když už se zde procházíte, nechtěl byste zkusit přidat nějaký český popisek sám? Slibuju, že za něj nebudu přidávat tečku. Ale ono je s tím asi moc práce, hledat odkazy, atd atd, že?
„Na enwiki“?? WTF? Odkázal jsem vás na pravidla českého pravopisu. Popisků obrázků dne jsem na Commons udělal dost a dost. A pokud někdo neovládá český pravopis, a já popisek opravím, je to pořád vylepšení projektu. Na rozdíl od toho, když někdo cíleně vkládá chyby. --Mormegil (talk) 08:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

VoteEdit

Thank you so muchEdit

Hi Karelj: Thank you so much for fixing my brain dead edit on yet another chamomile flower. I really do know better and made a dumb mistake anyway. I really appreciate the catch! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)


Malta imagesEdit

Hi Karelj, just to let you know in case you have more images of that area.

Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Coordinates of 3 imagesEdit

Hi Karelj, I just noticed that you reverted my changes to the coordinates of three images (camera position). However, if you follow the link to one of the maps, you will find out, that those coordinates cannot possibly be correct. I just replaced the faulty coordinates with the correct ones.

Thank you and kind regards Gugganij (talk) 21:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

I am very sorry, I have just thouhgt, that you only changed the type of coordinates. But you are right, my coordinated were not correct and I very much appreciate your correction of my mistakes. I have returned back my canges now. Than you and appology.--Karelj (talk) 20:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
No worries :-) Gugganij (talk) 15:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Map of turistic interestant places on Malta 1.jpgEdit

  File:Map of turistic interestant places on Malta 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Buxtehude (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


File:Fortification and port of Valletta Malta 2014 1.jpgEdit

Hi Karelj, I corrected the categories of this image. The Valletta Lighthouse is not visible here. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 16:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ies, thanks for correction, I did not mentioned, thet there are two lighthouses near each of other.--Karelj (talk) 16:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


File:Valletta Saluting battery Malta 2014 7.jpgEdit

You've got exactly the right moment. Great image, congratulations! -- Ies (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks. --Karelj (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Motd/2015-05-17Edit

Hello Karelj, I have replaced your selection because File:Temple monkey sitting on a wall.ogv was already shown on the main page as Motd/2013-08-30. Thanks for your help on Motd, please continue! Greetings, --Pristurus (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

OK, I see you are right. But how can I know - I expected, that there will be template something like
  This file was selected as the media of the day for 30 August 2013. It was captioned as follows:
English: Temple monkey (Macaca sinica) sitting on a wall at the foot path heading to the Dambulla cave temple, Sri Lanka.

, but there is nothing in the description connected with this video. Could you tell me, the way to find, that some vidoe was selected as part of main page in past time, please? greetings, --Karelj (talk) 19:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Well, the template has to be added manually. So it is often forgotten/ not present on the file description pages. In such cases however you will find something like Motd/xxx-xx-xx in the section File usage on Commons of the file page. Greetings from Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!Edit

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Nitroglycerin.pngEdit

  File:Nitroglycerin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism is not appreciatedEdit

العربية | বাংলা | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Русский | Svenska | Tok Pisin | Українська | 中文（简体）‎ | +/−


  You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Don't do that. Yann (talk) 10:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

No, you do not that! --Karelj (talk) 10:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Movie of the dayEdit

Hi, When you add a new movie, you also need to add the description, in as many languages as possible. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

You probably do not look at the Movie of day frequently, becouse in opposite case, you should know that I have added movie many times with all description and so on. Today I have to solve some problams at home meantime, but don´t worry, everithing will be OK. As ussual. --Karelj (talk) 21:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Lake bled hd slovenie.webmEdit

Hi, I am not sure the license adequately covers the music. It is very unlikely the author of the images also composed the soundtrack and it may be safer to remove it or at least to clarify before nominating as MOTD. Up to you  . Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 06:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message, but I believe that following licence and its confirmation made by wikipedist INeverCry is good enough for nomination for MODT, including sounds. The licence is here:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.

Not really, this looks like license laundering as far as the music is concerned. I suggest you remove the soundtrack. — Racconish ☎ 13:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Well, and could you do it, please? I am not familiar with this type of editations. Karelj

LicensingEdit

This video, screenshot or audio excerpt was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license.
Their website states: "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license."
To the uploader: You must provide a link (URL) to the original file and the authorship information if available.
 
 
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

  This file, which was originally posted to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdsbxtq3q6M, was reviewed on by the administrator or reviewer INeverCry, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.

Karelj

Template:Motd/2016-06-23 (cs)Edit

I do not know Czech, but it does not seem to be proper description of the video. :-) --jdx Re: 01:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:Motd/2016-10-01 (cs)Edit

I believe that Czech "červen" is English "June" so the month is wrong. Soyuz MS-01 was finally launched in July, not June. --jdx Re: 09:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, my mistake. --Karelj (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Template:Motd/2016-11-10 (cs)Edit

Hello Karelj, I saw you translated Template:Motd/2016-11-10 (cs). Thank you! Just a note: The English original was slightly wrong. The video was taken by a quadcopter, not from a hot air balloon. Maybe you want to fix the translation? Sadly I do not speak Czech language :-( Raymond 08:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo, thanks for correction, the czech comment was repaired. But the banner connected with this file is little bit misleading:
 

This picture has been taken by members of the community project „Lokal K - Drohnenfotografie“.
The drone DJI Phantom III Advanced was purchased by Wikimedia Deutschland

 


--Karelj (talk) 10:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Misleading in which way? I would be happy to clarify the banner. Raymond 10:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
OK, when such a stupid person, as me, see big letters:Hot air balloon project - everthing is clear - video from balloon. Doing everthing in hurry (as is normal, I believe, in present time), I did not read the rest of text - and mistake was here. But I recomend to leave banner as it is for future time. --Karelj (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Now I see what you mean: Our English text was still wrong *facepalm* but with German interface language I have not seen it. My fault. I fixed English now. Sorry again. Raymond 11:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The PhotographerEdit

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thanks for correcting the category of File:干燥器p1.jpg.　-- Dqwyy (talk) 03:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the Barnstar. It is great honour for me! --Karelj (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Bombajský přístav a Mumbai HarbourEdit

Zdravím.

Na anglické Wikipedii mají jednak článek Mumbai Harbour (povšimněte si velkého "H" na počátku druhého slova), který má v podtitulku infoboxu napsáno, že pojednává o "Neighbourhood", a kromě toho článek Mumbai Port Trust, na který je přesměrováno i heslo Mumbai Port – a to je podle úvodní věty článek o přístavu.

Podle článku Mumbai Harbour je synonymem Front Bay, přičemž vztah mezi oběma pojmy vyjadřuje věta "Front Bay is home to the Mumbai Port, which lies in the south section of the western edge of the harbour."

Do češtiny je to těžko přeložitelné, protože "harbour" i "port" překládáme jako přístav - "harbour" je asi spíše celá zátoka využívaná jako přístav a "port" asi spíše infrastruktura v té zátoce. Nicméně pokud infobox článku Mumbai Harbour pojímá téma jako "neighbourhood", tak je tím asi míněna celá přístavní čtvrť, byť je to asi neformální urbanistická jednotka. Každopádně "Mumbai harbour" s malým "h" by asi název čtvrti už nebyl. Každopádně dvěma anglickým článkům by měly odpovídat dvě položky Wikidat, resp. dvě sady interwiki a dvě kategorie Commons, které budou navzájem v nějakém vztahu. --ŠJů (talk) 01:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

OK, omlouvám se, ale nevšiml jsem si rozdílu (malé a velké h-H) v názvu. Takže ještě jednou sorry. --Karelj (talk) 23:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paraglider near Nebelhorn.jpgEdit

Can I check you supported the version you intended? There are now three images in that nomination, and most of the support is for the third one (Lightroom edit) whereas the second one has some technical issues and the photographer is actually considering asking it to be deleted. -- Colin (talk) 11:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

OK, I think that versions II and III are same good, so I added my support also to third version. I hope, that support of both version is possible. --Karelj (talk) 11:34, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Curious Little Bird Looking at a Camera.webmEdit

Dear sir I am extremely glad to see my uploaded video being the Featured video on Commons on the 9th of February 2017 thanks for the same but as I see that it has the caption in English and other 3 language i would be glad to contribute the caption in Marathi and hindi variants too.. do assist me with the same...--Tiven2240 (talk) 01:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, Triven, your video is very nice. I shall try to explain, how to add caption in other language, but I an not sure, that it wiil be enough explicative.
First you will go on maim page of Commons using the language in which you plan to contribute (Hindi..) Then under the Picture of day you will click on Previous Media of day. On new page you will go down to the video with date 09-02-2019 and under the picture you will open Template:Motd/2017-02-09 (xx) (where xx is abrevation for your language). On the other screen you will open the description in English, click on Edit and you will see the English description in good format ({{{Motd description|1=Little bird Eurasian blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), looking at the camera.|2=en|3=2017|4=02|5=09}), copy it - (Ctrl-C) and paste in your Template (Ctrl-V). Then you will write desriprion of video in Hindi on the place of english text and change the letters on abrevation of Hindi language (I do not know it) anf finaly save the page.
Good luck, I hope, that this can halp you. Have a nice day, --Karelj (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations, well done! --Karelj (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

MOTDEdit

Since you seem to be running this these days, I'd like to suggest File:Jeff’s Earth - 4K.webm. Beautiful video.... I'm trying to get all of the NASA UHD stuff on Commons, though some is simply too big to upload. - Reventtalk 02:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for good proposal, really good, I shall give this video as MODT, when {LicenseReview} will be finished. Or, if you want, you can do it yourself, I am doing this job mainly because almost nobody else edits this page.--Karelj (talk) 10:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
OK, it is Video of day on 2017-02-22 from now. --Karelj (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Acteur

Category:Garlic_soupEdit

File:Vila Löw-Beer interior Brno 2016 8.jpgEdit

  File:Vila Löw-Beer interior Brno 2016 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Discasto talk 21:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Crazy_manEdit

Apocheir (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Media of the dayEdit

Hello.Thanks for choosing my video.You can also choose other videos uploaded by me from here.Greetings ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

You are wellcome, by time some of your video could be again as Media od day. The main thing is descripton of any video in English (or Czech :-)) because arabic language is totaly unknown for most of Wikipedian people. Have a nice day, --Karelj (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Media of the dayEdit

I just uploaded a video that is I am sure unlike anything anyone has seen, on commons ever. Tomorrow is Thanksgiving and I would like to use it, in place of the one you have in the que, I hope you don't mind.--Don (talk) 20:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

J Class Yachts race for the World Championship Newport Shipyard & Newport RI - by Don Ramey Logan
If you really wish to change video of day for some next day (I do not understand, which one it should be), just do it, I shall not fight with you about this. But there is , I believe, very reasonable possibility - to give this video as Video of day on 27th November, which date is still free without any suggestions. Do you think, is it possible to do like that? Karel --Karelj (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
I have no idea where to replace the file in the template. we can just wait to the 27th--Don (talk) 23:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
OK, so finely it will be on 28th Nov, Racoonish was faster and gave another video for 27th. --Karelj (talk) 17:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. --Don (talk) 04:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Question about species identificationEdit

Hi, Kareljǃ I'm here from the English WP wondering if you could confirm/corroborate your identification of the caiman in your photo File:Paleosuchus palpebrosus Prague 2011 3.jpg as Cuvier's dwarf caiman, Paleosuchus palpebrosus. The Mořský svět's website has no details of their exhibits. A valid concern has been raised in the image's use within an article that it could be a closely related species (the smooth-fronted caiman, Paleosuchus trigonatus). Unless you specifically remember details of this photograph, I am interested in finding out how you acquire the Latin species names when taking a photo of an animal. Do you write down the name of the species from interpretive signage at the institution, or endeavor to identify it yourself after your trip to see the animal? (Or maybe you have knowledge in caimans! :) ) Much appreciated. – Rhinopias (talk) 09:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Rhinopias! I am not the biolog or expert on caimans and that is why, I am sending to Commons only images of aminals (plants, trees...) from ZOO - garden or botanical gardens, when I could by practically sure, that the name of an object is correct. This is also the case of 3 photos Paleosuchus palpebrosus Prague 2011_1,_2,_3.jpg which were taken in Mořský svět and on original photo Nr. 2 (before cutting and further impovements) I can see the name of object: Paleosuchus palpebrosus. So if you agree, that the species on images 1 and 2 are Paleosuchus palpebrosus, then it is practically sure also image 3 is the same caiman species. And also, comparing some others (not mine own) images in Category:Paleosuchus palpebrosus, I do not see differences. With regards --Karelj (talk) 20:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks, Karelj! – Rhinopias (talk) 03:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Media of the dayEdit

I have one more sailing video loaded, can you place it in the que:

12 meter yachts

Thanks you!--Don (talk) 05:22, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank, your video is waiting for its time. --Karelj (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Zřícená Trojská lávkaEdit

Zdravím kolego, díky za poděkování :-) Právě na Commons načítám další snímky neštěstí, a to jak ty, které jsem pořídil včera mobilem, tak ty ze dnešky, jež jsem vyfotil zrcadlovkou. Takže pokud je potřebné, lze využít i další snímky tohoto případu. --Jan Polák (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Media of the day - next mondayEdit

Hi Karelj, would you mind if I move the Pinguin video to next Wednesday (2 days later)? I would like to put this one on Monday, as the demolishing of the church starts on this day. I know, it's a bit shortterm, but I could finish the video cut only yesterday. Thanks! --Elya (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Elya, I have no problems with the moving of video of day from tomorrow to Wednesday. Yours proposed video is very good and it is very sad, that the reason for its placement on main page is the destruction of such a nice buildind. Sorry for that. So move video as you need and everything will be OK. --Karelj (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Karelj, thank you very much, I tried to move everything. If you like, would you add the description in Template:Motd/2018-01-08 (cs)? There are empty template files from moving the old descriptions. Unfortunately, there are no articles about the mining pit or the town in the cs.wp so we cannot link them. Regards, --Elya (talk) 14:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, I think, that everything is OK now. With the only exception - demolishion of such nice peace od human work and art  :-) .... --Karelj (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

MOTDEdit

Happy New Year Karelj and congratulations for your good work at MOTD. There seems to be a problem with two of the files you nominated : for File:'Russia’s Tibet’ Opens to Jet-Age Tourism.theora.ogv, the link provided by the uploader does not contain the source file ; for File:A3800 F-WWDD LeBourget 2013.ogv, the video has been deleted at Youtube and the original uploader account closed. Could you please consider nominating some other files while we sort this out ? Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 16:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Happy New Year for you, too. Regarding these two above entioned files:
File:'Russia’s Tibet’ Opens to Jet-Age Tourism.theora.ogv was uploaded on Wiki in the November 2012, more than 5 years ago. It is also placed in the 5 different articles in Wikipedia and untill now nobody cared about its source or some author rights. So also I automaticall assumed, that these details were checked by somebody and everything was OK.
File:A3800 F-WWDD LeBourget 2013.ogv was uploaded on Wiki in the June 2013 from Youtube and I also expected, that during cca 5 years somebody checked it with positive result in that time. From my point of view, the fact, that this file is not on Youtube page now - this is not reason for deleting it from Commons.
So briefly - I do not see here reasons for deleting these two videos from Commons. But if you feel, that there is necesary to move them from Vidoes of day list, you should replace them with another files, which you consider to be good. I promise, that I shall not revert these changes and I shall add to them new czech description. --Karelj (talk) 17:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
I reviewed positively File:'Russia’s Tibet’ Opens to Jet-Age Tourism.theora.ogv thanks to the information provided by Jdx, but File:A3800 F-WWDD LeBourget 2013.ogv looks like license laundering to me. The file is now up for DR and you can share your opinion there. In the mean time, I have changed the file per your suggestion. Kindly change the Czech description. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 19:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
OK, done. --Karelj (talk) 23:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

RequestEdit

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Czech?

   Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 17:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

OK, done. --Karelj (talk) 17:51, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your translation! A2D2 (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Кинохроника. Общественный транспорт в Москве в середине 1920-х годов прошлого века.ogvEdit

Hi Karelj, I have nominated this file for deletion. Until the matter is resolved, could you please kindly withdraw the nomination for MOTD ? Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 11:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Racconish, I do not agree with you, that there is necessary to delete this file, but I do not start some "fight" and I have changed MODT for another video. I believe, that nobody will care about author rights for video almoast 100 years old, but... As you like.
I will be happy, if could make decission about status of video: File:TABAKALERA - obra guztiko Timelapsea. Timelapse completo de la obra.webm, it looks good, and if it is without problems from author rights, I like to give on main page for some next days. Thank you in advance. --Karelj (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Please feel free to participate in the DR for the first file. Concerning the 2nd one, it is unlikely the videast is also the author of the music. You can either overwrite with a silent version and ask an admin to remove the first version from history or put it up for DR and make a separate upload of a soundless version. — Racconish ☎ 18:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Rychtář Hlinsko 2018 2.jpgEdit

Hello again, how do you know this image is compatible with COM:PACKAGING ? Same question for File:Svijany v plechu 2017 2.jpg. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 19:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I have drunk all these beers personally and my stomach confirmed, that everyting here is OK and also that these beers are very tasty. :-) --Karelj (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
I trust you they are, but this is a matter of copyright, not taste. — Racconish ☎ 23:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Well, my answer was little bit ironic, little sorry for that. But, on other side, I do not believe, that we live in such Absurdistane, where an image of a beer bottle, which is possible to buy in any supermarket, in thousands food-shops, could have copyrights problems because of its label. On Commons there are placed hundreds, probably thousands of beer bottles and cans photoes and I never heard about situation, where any producer of beer or author of label caused any problems for Wikipedia. If because of anything else, it is nice, free of charge advertisement for this product in the world wide known internet medium. --Karelj (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Rychtář Hlinsko 2018 2.jpgEdit

  File:Rychtář Hlinsko 2018 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 20:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Svijany v plechu 2017 2.jpgEdit

  File:Svijany v plechu 2017 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 20:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Vévoda Vysoký Chlumec 11 2018 1.jpgEdit

  File:Vévoda Vysoký Chlumec 11 2018 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 20:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Svijany máz vánoce 2018 4.jpgEdit

  File:Svijany máz vánoce 2018 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 20:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Konrad Vrotislavice 2018 1.jpgEdit

  File:Konrad Vrotislavice 2018 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 20:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Karelj".
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Karelj
commons.m.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-09
363824
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:4QIO4UIUPIBFVXFG7GWILOBRA6KLU4S5
<urn:uuid:67c6acab-dca2-4ed1-b68d-b53e1c3fcba4>
2018-02-24T08:25:27Z
208.80.154.224
text/html
sha1:HA7OIDHHS2MUEXWQUBXSLHI2SWRJKAMM
<urn:uuid:12028765-0164-43cf-b8a4-c2265a8e1b00>
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Karelj
length
response
<urn:uuid:b04384c8-7762-490e-ad2e-7c6a04bf2faa>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-169-167-79.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-09
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf