View Single Post
Old June 15th, 2017, 07:11 PM   #10
skyfox
Member
United States

skyfox is offline
 
skyfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 190
WOW! Seems 50/50. I was hoping for 90/10 sort of response. Thanks to all of you that replied. I guess more research is needed on the subject.

Cheers!!!!
  Reply With Quote
 
http://www.plctalk.net/qanda/showpost.php?s=7beddb9bd7eb19790f7b1d612029006d&p=740877&postcount=10
www.plctalk.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-04
13378
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:EOXRMLAV772CWGG5T3N2MHT5HTIQOYDC
<urn:uuid:3840cb59-90b7-4147-a967-76fb2976205f>
2019-01-17T03:27:49Z
208.67.16.116
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:P665LFZ6JOO2F7XXNLLM7GJ7JF2U6MAW
<urn:uuid:b555204c-827c-452c-9837-62dc59dc2b85>
http://www.plctalk.net/qanda/showpost.php?s=7beddb9bd7eb19790f7b1d612029006d&p=740877&postcount=10
response
<urn:uuid:70fc28e3-7704-4003-b1ce-73ad6ecc3b28>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-04
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-150-182-158.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 0.11-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/