↓ Skip to main content

Intensive mothering in hard times: Foucauldian ethical self-formation and cruel optimism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Consumer Culture, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intensive mothering in hard times: Foucauldian ethical self-formation and cruel optimism
Published in
Journal of Consumer Culture, September 2019
DOI 10.1177/1469540519872067
Authors

Benedetta Cappellini, Vicki Harman, Alessandra Marilli, Elizabeth Parsons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,736,626
of 13,647,320 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consumer Culture
#104
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,981
of 191,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consumer Culture
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,647,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them
https://www.altmetric.com/details/66725798
www.altmetric.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-47
22104
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:J2IXZQPUUGA2WIB5JNE4FRALSDBFSD4P
<urn:uuid:b86cba61-55b9-4829-84cb-a28da7e756b2>
2019-11-19T20:01:23Z
151.101.250.2
text/html
sha1:76AHU7WIE4ESEVSX5BGNNR7XU4LK6QSA
<urn:uuid:c80dd2cc-befa-43f0-8293-9637c8103eb2>
https://www.altmetric.com/details/66725798
response
<urn:uuid:5c668788-a0b0-41ec-b93e-3131345830ec>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-47
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-5.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/