Twittering about CILIP

Bob McGee (chief executive of CILIP) asks if CILIP should get involved with Twitter. Phil Bradley answers in no uncertain terms.

My own comment on the matter can be found on Phil Bradley’s post (together with a further plug for my CILIP vacancies rss feed). However, I think it is not without significance to this debate and CILIP’s attitude to technology, its own reform, and outreach, that I cannot comment on Bob McGee’s post itself as I am not a CILIP member. FTW.
http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog/2009/02/28/twittering-about-cilip/
www.aurochs.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-33
44795
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:KKFIEY2CWJ2UF3FVSS6PKHC5WEWUPEOK
<urn:uuid:d2175218-c8d2-4c30-9250-fd6a7817a268>
2022-08-08T00:32:54Z
5.77.32.230
text/html
sha1:7OF2L3HMPMGDSX6WX3DL6MU7FPWCSCXC
<urn:uuid:e65c5d4b-aab8-4aa2-83ea-24715cf34d13>
http://www.aurochs.org/aurlog/2009/02/28/twittering-about-cilip/
response
<urn:uuid:791774f4-5b94-4976-9a53-a73f62885a8c>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-33
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-65
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/