In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

202 A g r e e m e n t s u p p l e m e n t s AnnotAtions mAp loCAtion F, G, 2 threAD loCAtion Page 49 sCApe Author Nancy Lara-Grimaldi Entailment Mesh Annotations Limitations of Tagging demonstrate includes Figure 90 A g r e e m e n t s u p p l e m e n t s 203 relAteD ArtiFACts Robert, C. A. (2009). Annotation for knowledge sharing in a collaborative environment . Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1). Han, L., & Yan, H. (2009). A fuzzy biclustering algorithm for social annotations. Journal of Information Science, 35(4), 426–438. Retrieved September 27, 2009, from doi:10.1177/0165551508101862 Jörgensen, C. (2004). Unlocking the museum: A manifesto. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55(5), 462–464. Retrieved September 27, 2009, from Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts database. Pomerantz, J., & Marchionini, G. (2007). The digital library as place. Journal of Documentation , 63(4). Quint, B. (2009). The foresight of searchers, or how I love being right. Information Today, 26(5), 7–8. Retrieved September 27, 2009, from Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts database. Verhaart, M., & Kinshuk (2006). A dynamic personal portfolio using web technologies . Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction. Wu, P., Heok, A., &Tamsir, I. (2007). Annotating eb archives—structure, provenance, and context through archival cataloguing. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia, 13(1),55–75.RetrievedSeptember27,2009,fromdoi:10.1080/13614560701423620 Yang, S. (2008). An ontological website models-supported search agent for web services . Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 2056–2073. Retrieved September 27, 2009, from doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.024 Agreement DesCription Annotations are a mechanism whereby users can document their contexts (relationships and agreements). This is an important function that began back in the dark ages with glossing text and continues to this day with lists and tagging. An annotation is a summary of the contents of a particular book, article, or other document and is traditionally created by the author or publisher of the work. Library catalog records include concise summaries , or abstracts, of library holdings and system resources, which aid in locating appropriate resources. These metadata describe the contents of a particular item, whereas annotations may cover a wide range of notations. Annotations allow users to put documents into context relevant to their topic or subject area. Annotations may include personal observations, reactions, insights, interpretations, or any other type of notation for that matter. Similarly, wikis and blogs provide a means for users to add individual annotations to documents created by others. If libraries developed a client-side tool for members to create and share annotations, whose responsibility would it be to monitor it? Will this information be stored on library servers, and what policies must be developed for access and privacy? In her article, “Unlocking the Museum: A Manifesto,” Corinne Jorgenson proposes a new concept in the creation and distribution of annotated contents to allow “information consumers to become information producers.” She notes that a “revolutionary reconceptualization of practice which provides flexibility in the concept of the locus of authority in the description of documents could not only offer hope for tangible solutions to these problems of descriptions, but could facilitate the creation of new knowledge.…” ConversAtion stArters 1. How can the use of annotation facilitate knowledge creation? 2. Would users find value in creating, sharing, and reading annotations with friends, individuals, or groups of people? 3. What are the implications for libraries in providing this service to their members? 4. How can degrees of annotations at L0 and L1 benefit different users? 5. How do you organize the many different levels of annotation into a single, searchable format? ...

pdf

Additional Information

ISBN
9780262300087
Related ISBN
9780262015097
MARC Record
OCLC
827009814
Pages
424
Launched on MUSE
2015-01-01
Language
English
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.
http://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/1323805
muse.jhu.edu
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-04
26834
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:UQJ5JPR5P66BKHTL2LTX2TNV2SMVTTUB
<urn:uuid:9b87e695-969b-4769-b9a0-5f2a4b8afc8e>
2019-01-17T01:15:44Z
128.220.160.198
text/html
sha1:6UF5D7XN23RSGUJ7LSDJ5JVNP2QN6QQL
<urn:uuid:0abb9ca1-5713-4bda-a186-34faedde5e9c>
http://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/1323805
response
<urn:uuid:23809dbf-42c0-4017-a856-8a5ef486a45b>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-04
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-154-0-44.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 0.11-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/