Social Media Usage at Universities How should it be done?

Draft version, originally published in: Frey, J.-C.; Ebner, M.; Schön, M., Taraghi, B. (2013) Social Media Usage at Universities – How should it Be Do...
Author: Toby Lawrence
1 downloads 0 Views 438KB Size
Draft version, originally published in: Frey, J.-C.; Ebner, M.; Schön, M., Taraghi, B. (2013) Social Media Usage at Universities – How should it Be Done?. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST) 2013, SciTePress 2013, Karl-Heinz Krempels, Alexander Stocker (Eds.), pp. 608-616, ISBN 978-989-8565-54-9, Aachen, Germany, 8 - 10 May, 2013

Social Media Usage at Universities – How should it be done?

1

Jennifer-Carmen Frey, Martin Ebner, Martin Schön, Behnam Taraghi1

Social Learning, Computer and Information Services, Graz University of Technology, Münzgrabenstraße 35a, Graz, Austria [email protected]

Keywords:

Social Media, Facebook, Google, Twitter, Higher Education

Abstract:

The social media hype these days is omnipresent, encouraging even public institutions to participate. This study seeks to reveal, which factors have to be kept in mind, when doing social media work at universities. It also is an attempt to provide a list of recommendations and possible fields of action to ensure an efficient presence in social web. Therefore we analyzed the present situation of university efforts and evaluated the success by measuring user engagement concerning different aspects of social media activities (e.g. content, publishing time, frequency of activities, existence of visual elements, additional links, etc.) The study shows, that it seems less important how many times a week a university is publishing, or how long the text messages are in detail, but that there is a significant relationship between the contents of a post, the time of its publishing and the used elements, pointing out that users actively perceive and interact with social media activities that encourage contact between both: the profile-owner with the community and the community amongst itself - especially if made in a personal, emotional or funny way, offering people ways to identify with the institution and to connect with it through well-known habits and traditions.

1

INTRODUCTION

Social software is still one of the most promising technologies with continuing success since the rise and popularization of the term Web 2.0 in 2005 (O’Reilly). Since these early stages, the social software objective has been named in nearly every summary or outlook of important technologies, as for instance in Gartner’s top 10 strategic technologies for the years 2007 to 2012 (cf. Gartner Inc.) or in the IEEE Spectrum magazine’s top 11 technologies of the decade (placed as number two) (2011). On the other side social software has a very broad range and therefore Ebner & Lorenz (2012) defined a three-dimensional cube represented by the axis Identity and Network Management, Information management and Information & Communication. In this cube the best fulfilling social software are so called social networks colloquially social media like Facebook, Google+ and Twitter. For marketers and organizations social networks provide the opportunity to reach a broad audience with the advance of direct communication to the target group and a low spreading loss. On the other side individuals get the chance to participate and

find new communicational possibilities for social interaction as well as new ways to filter and assess the massive overload of information mankind has to cope with nowadays. Therefore it seems naturally, that more and more sectors of human life – containing companies, non-profit-associations or governmental and public organization – are entering this field of operation: trying to use this software for their own purposes and benefit of its indwelling chances. While the success of the first pioneers in social networks is founded on their innovative and reckless use during the boosting time of the upcoming social media hype, today’s newcomers won’t benefit from that boost anymore. Who tries to join the social community now has to know about the characteristics of the present situation and start an individualized and conceptualized approach to establish a solid performance in the whole social web (Evans, 2010). This is also true assuming the fact that those who haven’t risked starting in a totally new field of opportunities while there were no conventions or inherent standards will most probably not risk starting in a settled system without concrete instructions.

According to this, there is a pressing need of research supplying approved and validated knowledge of the given field of expertise as current resources are most times based on personal experiences rather than scientific evidence. As for example there is a vast number of weblogs or other web resources, giving advice for social media marketers, e.g. Porterfield (2012), Honeysett (2012) or Baer (2013). This research study tries to supply verified answers for the persons in charge of the social media channels with a special focus on universities, giving an insight into the prerequisites and requirements and providing a set of recommendations for establishing and maintaining a stable and valuable performance in the social web. In a first step we analyzed the present field of social media performances of universities in an attempt to identify major factors for user engagement and as a result - for efficient social media activities. These factors are subsequently used to develop concrete social media strategies for the sector of academic institutions.

ry goals in this work. For this purpose, a list of post characteristics is defined that might influence the chance of reception and engagement of the stakeholders. These characteristics have been used later on for an accurate analysis of the collected data aiming to identify the constituents of an efficient social media post. All this finally is concluding in an approach to develop a set of social media strategies for academic institutions.

2

2.3

2.1

METHODS AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS User engagement and the efficiency of social media activities

To find out what are the main elements of an efficient and reasonable performance in social media for the specific field of universities, we analyzed the present approaches of engaging academic institutions. Therefore all activities of a university’s profile on a specific social media platform were documented and evaluated in relation to their corresponding user engagement. User engagement is an important instrument to measure the value and sustainability of social media activities. First and foremost it shows how many people actively perceived a piece of message and are affected by it in one way or the other. Furthermore it also defines the reach of the message, as generally user engagement increases the spread of a posting within the social media platform and – e.g. in the case of Facebook – also the spread of future postings through recommender algorithms that reward overall site activity with further reach. Hence, analyzing the characteristics of a post in comparison to its yielded user engagement should allow identifying important influencers of a post’s success or failure, which has been one of the prima-

2.2

Research questions

For the analysis of present social media activities, the following research questions have been investigated: § Are there primary influencers for the engagement of users in social media posts? § Which influencers can be identified? -­‐ Which characteristics determine relevant content for messages in social media? -­‐ Does the frequency of publishing social media messages influence the user engagement?

Present social media activities of universities

Out of the various possibilities in social media, the research study is strongly concentrating on social networking sites, as they represent the primary objective of social media displaying social structures and relationships and can be used to create and maintain a perceived presence in social. Within the range of social networking facilities, the world’s best-known platforms Facebook, Google+ and Twitter are chosen and a set of universities for every platform is defined, which should be investigated further. The universities differ in terms of language, origin, size and educational approach to display a broad and representative view of universities’ present activities in the social web. The chosen set contains US-American (e.g. Harvard University, Ohio State University) and English sites (e.g. University of Oxford, University of Cambridge), as well as sites from Germany (e.g. Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, LMU Munich, Austria (e.g. University of Innsbruck, Johannes Kepler University Linz) and Switzerland (e.g. HSG – University of St. Gallen, University of Basel). There are also a few institutions with technical background (e.g. Massachusetts Institute of Technology or Ilmenau University of Technology) and universities of applied sciences (e.g. FH Joanneum, Cologne University of Applied Sciences) included in the analyzed data. A

basic rate of user engagement has been the prerequisite for the selections of universities to guarantee reliable data within the examined time period.

2.3

Post characteristics and possible influencers

The research study tried to take into consideration a various amount of possible influencers of an appropriate and engaging post by classifying the posting and its characteristics into different categories. These categories are mainly determined by the special needs and use cases of universities to guarantee appropriate standards for the further development of social media strategies. The examined aspects of a postings are characterized by § time of publishing The time of publishing has been listed in local time. § addressed target group The addressed target group contains the categories staff, students, future students and the public. § used elements Used elements or components of a post can be videos, pictures, text and hyperlinks. Beside the influence of a single element also the importance of the composition of these elements is analyzed. § message length Here the number of characters used in a message is analyzed. § content characteristics (e.g. subject, function and time reference of a posting) Content characteristics contain the post subject, function and time reference. Table 1 shows a list of the specific categories defined for these characteristics.

Table 1: Analysed content characteristics. • • • •



subject research study university university teams, projects non academic

• • • • • •

function information promise interaction contact fun expression of emotions

time reference announcement • news/reports (after event) • seasonal • serial • without time reference •

Additionally we also tried to find a correlation between the user engagement and the frequency of published contents of the universities.

2.4

Measurement of user engagement on Facebook

During the examined time period, it became obvious that Facebook can be seen as a sort of exemplary standard for present social media efforts (further details are explained in the next chapter). As a consequence the study concentrated on a detailed investigation on the findings of the Facebook results. For that reason a method was designed to measure user engagement based on the characteristics of Facebook’s edge rank. To evaluate the user engagement of a given post in comparison to other posts, it is necessary to explain the process and prerequisites of user engagement in Facebook posts. An overview of the process is also shown in figure 1. Any published Facebook post has got different preconditions concerning the possible engagement rate. This is primary due to the reach of that specific post.

Figure 1: The process of user engagement.

Draft version, originally published in: Frey, J.-C.; Ebner, M.; Schön, M., Taraghi, B. (2013) Social Media Usage at Universities – How should it Be Done?. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST) 2013, SciTePress 2013, Karl-Heinz Krempels, Alexander Stocker (Eds.), pp. 608-616, ISBN 978-989-8565-54-9, Aachen, Germany, 8 - 10 May, 2013 There are different ways to reach the audience within Facebook. The post does either reach them in an organic, a viral or a paid way. While paid audience can only be reached by Facebook ads and promotions, the viral reach, meaning how many friends of fans did see that any of his or her friends engaged with the site, depends on a high percentage on the organic views of a Facebook post. The organic Facebook audience represents a subset of the site’s Fans. This subset is determined by the Facebook edge rank, a recommender algorithm assigning every posting a certain value for every single user of Facebook. The edge rank algorithm defines which users see a posting in his/her information stream and which do not. According to different resources on this topic and with due regard to the fact, that there are still some settings, that are not issued in these resources to keep some secret of the news stream composition, the Facebook edge rank consists of the following values (What is Edgerank?, 2013) & (Tarbaj, 2013): § Affinity (How strong is the relationship between the site/posted content and the user: how often does he/she interact with the site, how many friends of the user do interact with the site, is it a content the user typically tends to interact with, etc.) § Weight (Value to promote specific content in comparison to other content types, the specific values are not commonly known for that factor.) § Time decay (How many time has passed since the publication of a post.)

fanbases (Jochemich, 2013) proving that a grand amount of fans is influencing the overall interaction rate in a substantial way, we covered this fact by dividing the analyzed universities by scale into three different types. § universities with less than 5,000 fans § universities with more than 5,000 but less than 100,000 fans § universities with more than 100,000 fans

Considering all these factors, the possible reach of a Facebook post is determined by: § fans of a site § the interaction rate (visible as the talk-about count of a site) § further settings of the Facebook edge rank, which are not visible for users

2.5

To evaluate the Efficiency of a specific post p we therefore calculated an estimated user engagement est(p)considering the existing conditions of publication of that post and compared that value with the actual reaction act(p) it has achieved. Efficiency(p)= 100*act(p) (1) est(p) Assuming recent statistics, that show a significant decrease of interaction rates within large

For those types the average amounts of post reactions (sum of likes, shares and comments) per fan are calculated as well as the average amounts of post reactions per talk-about to provide comparable relative factors for the estimation of user engagement. These factors are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Relative factors for the estimation of user engagement. scale >100,000 fans 5,000-100,000 fans

Suggest Documents
https://kipdf.com/social-media-usage-at-universities-how-should-it-be-done_5b1942517f8b9a6c6a8b459f.html
kipdf.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-09
67634
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:YFTH5MQRPDBDW52TQPTZPZEEB3Y5KZ35
<urn:uuid:61209463-a150-42e4-81de-f03e7840663a>
2019-02-19T02:49:56Z
104.31.92.46
text/html
sha1:6TFK6OY342ZR3I2CKHTPMW5Y7YCTYRZV
<urn:uuid:7fbe3549-a3c3-4bf6-be67-cc36d6599d48>
https://kipdf.com/social-media-usage-at-universities-how-should-it-be-done_5b1942517f8b9a6c6a8b459f.html
response
<urn:uuid:fdbdaed9-55ff-4811-8118-5c0e16914128>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-09
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-166-118-163.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 0.11-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/