5 Pages and 15 sources of Annotated Biblography and 10 pages of paper from the annotated biblography sources. You only need to use 7 sources of the 15 biblography sources. The field you writing is Electrical Engineering

First of all, make sure you only use peer reviewed magazines or journals as resources. No Wikipedia or news sites.
Here are full instructions.
Before writing the Research Argument paper (see below), I would first need to see an Annotated Bibliography of at least 15 sources, with the understanding that you will need to use at least 7 of those in the essay.

Find sources on your topic or close enough to it (perhaps a little more broad if necessary), and for each one you will need to write a paragraph that describes the info in the article that was important to you in helping develop your argument. So its more than just a summary of each source.

Together, we can help narrow your topic for the 3rd paper.

The Paper

Imagine that you are now out of college and working in the field of Electrical Engineering. However, there is a controversy over a particular issue that is raging across the electrical engineering field. Youve been asked to write a scholarly paper for a journal in which you propose a solution to the controversy, based on research from other authors. Lets suppose their answers so far havent helped quell the controversy, so youll be building on their findings to present something new that adds to the conversation.

For this paper, youll find a current question or topic of controversy within your career field, research the current positions on that topic, then seek to argue your own, original point of view with the goal of convincing your audience that your position is valid.

For example, if you discuss the Coronavirus impact of small business owners, you should research at least two or more positions on this, then develop a position that presents a new angle on the problem, maybe some sort of compromise, or perhaps a way of looking at it that you dont think has been considered before. You will use your research to discuss how your point is valid. Commenting on your source material is absolutely essential for this paper.

Other examples: Genetically Modified Foods (agriculture, science), Enforcing Texting & Driving Laws (law enforcement, pre-law), Dangerous Cheerleading Moves (exercise science, sports), the audience being smarter about advertising (marketing), same-sex marriage honeymoons (Hospitality), and so on.

Were looking for something more than a simple pro-or-con, right-or-wrong, one side or the other essay. We want to find a thesis that really digs into the topic and gives us a new way of seeing it. Remember, this is to help the entire field youre working within.

Why do you think this way about the topic?
Why is your position a possible solution?
Why did your research lead you to this position?
Whyetc?

Its easy to say to your audience, You need to do this. So lets avoid that and show the audience why you came to the conclusion that you reached. Saying Americans need to exercise more isnt going to get anyone up and moving. But if you say By helping create community events like Fun Runs and Sports Leagues, we can encourage our neighbors and friends to exercise more in a relaxed social environment, the reader has a plan of action and understands whats behind it all.

Instead of pointing to a source and telling your reader, “I agree with what this author said,” try to see the sources as part of a larger conversationone person says something, and another person (you) responds to what they had to say. Show us source material and then follow-up with reasons why this source helps us understand your thesis more clearly. Always answer (not necessarily in this order or exactly this way) Why? How? What’s the connection? We want to know. As for the call to action, show us examples of why this action is a good one to take. Maybe another community tried it, or research suggests people will respond to it. Show us.

How do we do this?

Start with a topic that people within your field have several different opinions on.
Then examine what people are saying about the issue from all sides. Think of as many arguments that help explain why someone should either support or not support the source arguments. It not enough to just hold a position, but to explain why you hold it.
Read what others have written on the subject and formulate a response. Its very important to make sure that you have something to say about why you consider a source right, wrong, or a little of both. Your responses to these sources will help develop your thesis.
Decide how to go about showing your thesis as a valid argument. To do this, make sure you break down the argument into several different areas, each one giving you a solid idea to discuss in a body paragraph. Each para. should show another reason why your position is valid.
Conclude by revisiting your original argument, but instead of simply repeating it, show us how all of your body paras. tie together to support your thesis (without listing every idea again. Whats it all add up to?)

This will be an essay of at least 10 pages (plus a properly formatted works cited page) requiring at least 7 reputable sources (none of which can be Wikipedia).
https://www.topwritershub.net/5-pages-and-15-sources-of-annotated-biblography-and-10-pages-of-paper-from-the-annotated-biblography-sources-you-only-need-to-use-7-sources-of-the-15-biblography-sources-the-field-you-writing-is-ele/
www.topwritershub.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-21
43785
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:JMULLYPUDKOM33BGEJVTIFKNUK4YBKVQ
<urn:uuid:11f410b7-bbbb-4b7d-9184-276579ac9d06>
2021-05-14T22:25:35Z
67.212.182.234
text/html
sha1:IJXSH54HI4UV2GBGLQMZNK4OS2R3DIKF
<urn:uuid:0075c089-d81a-4fbd-8f34-92b95e0a67c9>
https://www.topwritershub.net/5-pages-and-15-sources-of-annotated-biblography-and-10-pages-of-paper-from-the-annotated-biblography-sources-you-only-need-to-use-7-sources-of-the-15-biblography-sources-the-field-you-writing-is-ele/
response
<urn:uuid:86e54ce2-c181-4d25-a17c-3939801babfa>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-21
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-223.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/