Visitors vs content

Jump to: navigation, search

Except when it comes to issues like BLP and other matters that the WMF has the various Wikis abide by. I have dealt with various issues in which the WMF has made it clear that there should be various things fixed or dealt with. Now, what I am saying is that it is one thing to label it as a priority and another to do what is necessary to fulfill the priority. We need some teeth for the proposal.

Ottava Rima18:26, 26 January 2010
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Thread:Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board/Visitors_vs_content/reply_(4)
strategy.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-20
19548
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:TQILBQS5BPJXF26K3P3YPRZZ4EKOUO45
<urn:uuid:6e7af63e-b6bd-4e5e-b2bc-c5adbcf2f5af>
2013-05-24T15:18:45Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:Q2IW27GXUJWZNMOQDXAOBXWFNJXH5Q2D
<urn:uuid:fa3642be-d50a-42f2-9930-3f553093c2a3>
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Thread:Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board/Visitors_vs_content/reply_(4)
response
<urn:uuid:67397c10-6e36-4b12-9940-deda30b40fb8>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-60-113-184.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-20
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Spring 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf