The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular Liberty.com

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Agreed.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: i think it might be a bit premature (see in situ)

Agreed.

Agreed.
http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/2941498
www.dailypaul.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-18
94074
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5RD3BPOBAVLEDOVZTKLMESSWFOJHVLV4
<urn:uuid:810e7331-2726-4d58-8320-3a317e20d04f>
2015-04-27T07:30:50Z
97.65.137.56
sha1:RPHTZY7KYOERH6GB7EAZ3K6SVV3ITIFS
<urn:uuid:9cec4efd-e2f1-47ba-9088-7e7d9b81ba86>
http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/2941498
length
response
<urn:uuid:00885559-80fa-4bff-8a5d-0a96da824987>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-235-10-82.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-18
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf