ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-vi-feb10] Bouncing of Emails

  • To: "icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Bouncing of Emails
  • From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:11:40 -0800

Hi Mike-

To answer your question, when you sign up for an email list,  only the 
designated email alias is the one that can send emails to the list.   Some 
people may use multiple email accounts and that may be the cause of confusion 
regarding why emails don't seem to make the list.  

Brian,  have you sent any messages to the list?   As Milton pointed out,  they 
haven't surfaced on the archives. 
If so, please send Glen a request to add any other email accounts to the list.

Thanks,

Margie
___________
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
___________

________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Mike Rodenbaugh [icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:03 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] proposed rewording of Objective 5 - resend

Side questions to Staff re sending to lists from the wrong address...

When that happens, why does the recipient not get a bounce notice?!  That
really ought to happen, I know some of my emails have never gone anywhere
because I send from the wrong address and never realized it until far after
their relevance had passed (or never realized it).

More importantly, why can't I subscribe to send to lists from several emails
so I don't have to remember which one to send from..., yet only have the
list send to one of my addresses?  This seems like it ought to be feasible,
since I can think of it and it is a problem that afflicts anyone trying to
keep voluminous ICANN email separate from personal and business accounts....

Thanks for looking into it, if possible, and letting us know who on Staff
would handle this request.

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
http://rodenbaugh.com


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:05 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] proposed rewording of Objective 5 - resend


(sent during the meeting but from the wrong address and it was rejected)


The friendly amendment:

Using all information that has been collected by ICANN to date determine
whether ...

a.



On 17 Feb 2010, at 13:46, Milton L Mueller wrote:

>
>
> Objective 5: To determine whether the changes to the current restrictions
and/or practices concerning registry-registrar separation and equal access
contained in the options set out in DAGv3 constitute an unacceptable
deviation from current policies regarding registry-registrar sewparation.
>
> Rationale: this does not require research or an open-ended assessment of
the entire registry-registrar market, but a simple determination that the
DAGv3 proposals are an unauthorized policy change.
>
> --MM
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-vi-feb10/msg00193.html
forum.icann.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-20
6003
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:FNBRXBVUHARE5H4UEX4IKWHT3XN6OYDZ
<urn:uuid:2b214196-4a7e-46a7-a881-c43cbc9d9107>
2013-05-20T15:15:15Z
192.0.32.26
sha1:2AIGHB727YHS2ESSFETD3KIDFW54KWAT
<urn:uuid:301f7e38-fd48-4648-961e-60769fc62a9c>
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-vi-feb10/msg00193.html
response
<urn:uuid:c2b0bf2b-1763-4377-a16e-6d4413b0b8bb>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-60-113-184.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-20
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Spring 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf