User talk:Artethical

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Artethical, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Modernist (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Guide to referencing[edit]

Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

Contemporary fine art[edit]

Hello Modernist. I am a beginner here, but have high education in fine arts and contemporary culture. I have noticed your interventions on almost all the pages that interest me too, and they were always full of knowledge, balanced and intelligent. I am writing to ask if I can contact you when I doubt some informations and believe that they should be deleted, or when I have some suggestions that I cannot apply yet. Best regards Artethical (talk) 13:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Visual arts project[edit]

or [1] and add your name... then place the blue template on your user page if you want to. Modernist (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I've put some bits on your user page. Just delete what you don't want - or add more. Ty 00:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arts[edit]

another arts project..add your name, and I see that Ty helped you, cool user page, let me know if you need anymore help. Modernist (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I placed the second template on your user page..Modernist (talk) 11:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Giorgione[edit]

Please note books should only be added to "References2 if they have actually been used for the article. Other books go below in a "Further reading" section. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 14:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

I removed the word major from one of your edits, it is important to try to remain in concert with WP:NPOV, no disrespect intended to you or to your subject...Modernist (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Across the board[edit]

Its actually across the board, both men and women artists, old and new, famous, major, minor, somewhat obscure, midcareer, over the hill, superstars, stars, has beens, you name it...contemporary, Renaissance, they all need intelligent and accurate and more complete work..do your best, lots to do. Modernist (talk) 20:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

bibliography[edit]

I looked at the section, it's okay. You've made a good addition...Modernist (talk) 21:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I presume that's a comment on the Frida Kahlo page, and, if so, I agree. If they were used as refs, the footnotes should show this, and they don't. Have a look at the ref guide I've posted above, and in particular the "alternative system" section near the end. Don't worry too much about getting things wrong: see WP:BOLD. Edits are reversible, and as long as you leave an edit summary, it will be apparent why you have made an edit. If someone jumps on you, just explain you're a new editor and still finding your way. Ty 01:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Babel[edit]

I've added a language level box to your user page. If you're not a native speaker, change it or let me know for a variation of it, or delete if you don't want it. Ty 03:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Ettinger[edit]

Please see the thread on AN/I. This matter has been discussed at length and appropriate measures taken to deal with it. Basically, it has been agreed that Ettinger is notable and that her name belongs in certain other articles than the one about her, but that there are various articles where it does not legitimately belong. The former are being (semi-)protected, and her name is being removed from the latter. You are of course welcome to debate this with the relevant editors, but please don't go round mass reinserting the name, particularly where it has been removed by an established editor. Of course keep a watch out for vandalism which is being carried out by IPs concerning her. If you spot that, then it's probably best to add to the thread on AN/I. I hope this clarifies. Ty 23:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Bracha Ettinger[edit]

Actually a lot of editors have been trying to help and fix and sort these deletions out. Read the entire thread all 4 sections here:[2] and stay cool. Modernist (talk) 00:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

I did not do it naively, and the changes should not be reverted. I have no doubt that Ettinger is notable. However to call her a notable psychoanalyst on the level of Lacan, Kristeva, and Irigaray is a farce, as is treating the Matrixial gaze as in some way on the same level of importance as Mulvey's original concept. There is a huge line between notable enough for an article and notable enough to have been put in all the places she was. Phil Sandifer (talk) 03:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Ori Redler[edit]

Your accusations against Ori Redler are very severe and you are not providing any evidence.

Can you at least provide a link to support your claims? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Please go on his facebook and follow the list. This is a bit frightening. see also the list called Righteous Jews on the Google. you will see Brach's name added to this list, and there are many discussion. The follow something called hebrew university monitoring agains righteous jews. I am not a political person. Ettinger is not political either - she is simply humanist activist targeted.Artethical (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
I tried and i don't see it. Can you please tell me what do you click to see this list? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Gender studies[edit]

Please stop reverting this article. I do not doubt Ettinger's general notability, but the Google Scholar and Google Books links do nothing to establish her on the level of Kristeva, Freud, and Lacan. Phil Sandifer (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Phil Sandifer (talk) 15:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC) has opened an account to eliminate Ettinger from different pages. I am asking an administrator advice here.Artethical (talk) 17:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Artethical (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me? I've had my account since 2004, and I've been an administrator almost that long.. Phil Sandifer (talk) 17:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't wish to offend. I realize that I was taken by surprise and over-reacted. Apologies.Artethical (talk) 22:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Accusations[edit]

Artethical, please be very careful and stop making such accusations against Phil Sandifer and Ori Redler. This is unacceptable. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, many thanks.Artethical (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Culture[edit]

Hi. If you have some time can you help out here? The article was a total train wreck and I made major revisions. The previous version had some material from Raymond Williams in it, but all jumbled up with anthropology and cultural studies was not named as a distinct approach or set of approaches. I deleted redundancies and fringe views and reorganized the rest so that distinct approaches were clear. That said, I am pretty weak on cultural studies. So I made a place in the article for it, but what I wrote could be off and is surely incomplete (my strength is in anthropology). I'd appreciate it if you could look at it soon and flesh out the differences between how anthropology and cultural studies understand and look at culture, clarify anything I muddled, and correct any mistakes. I do not think this article should replace the articles on cultural anthropology or on cultural studies, but I do think these disciplines provide important contexts for explaining different approaches to culture. (also, I stuck to basics ... I did not go into the most recent approaches, and this is another area in which the article needs work) Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 23:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

New European Painting[edit]

See Talk:New European Painting. This is a very interesting subject, but comes across more like an essay than a wikipedia article, where everything must be derived from existing sources and established usage. You may be too far ahead of the game here. Ty 15:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

We're recruiting art lovers![edit]

Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you!
Collections Storage Archives of American Art.jpg
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Catherine de Zegher[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Catherine de Zegher, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://5th.moscowbiennale.ru/en/biennale/curatorial_team/zegher.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 21:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you I took care of everything and took off the notice Artethical (talk) 13:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Catherine de Zegher may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Violence Vortex into the Beauty Vortex, (2011); [[Bracha L. Ettinger]]: Art as Compassion, (2011) (with [[Griselda Pollock]]<ref>Catherine de Zegher and Griselda Pollock (eds.), ''Art as Compassion.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks _ I took care of this Artethical (talk) 13:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Catherine de Zegher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institute of Contemporary Art (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks I took care of this Artethical (talk) 13:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gender studies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Persephone Complexity. <ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdkbYsjlMA8 public lecture at EGS 2012)</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychoanalysis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lacan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gender studies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Persephone Complexity.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdkbYsjlMA8 public lecture at EGS 2012)</ref>
  • taken as always in movement and never fixed or stable.<ref>Reeser,''Masculinities in Theory'', 2010)</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Feminist theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lacan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

You're invited to join WikiProject Women artists![edit]

Archives of American Art - Georgette Seabrook - 2381 CROPPED.jpg

Hello Artethical! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch (talk) 09:57, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello from an AU student[edit]

Hi there I am an American University student in Washington DC. I am doing a research for my Wikipedia class about wikiprojects, and I chose the topic of feminism. I am supposed to contact members who contribute to the projects. SO, I would like to ask you if you can help me just answer a few questions related to your contributions: Why are you interested in Feminism? How often do you make changes, how much do you like contributing.

Thanks a lot, and hope to hear from you soon,

Sy1744a (talk) 09:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Artethical
en.wikipedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-44
84554
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:JJ63TLJO5T72UCPZWPN7ETCCKW52G3AW
<urn:uuid:b6816918-4a4a-40b2-b7d4-b692037aae78>
2016-10-24T14:50:06Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:GCUNKKWVS7FXRJ66ZLYUUK2LKDVODVAI
<urn:uuid:c24326d0-0361-4ed2-a60f-440a84c90d89>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Artethical
response
<urn:uuid:4d0f142b-19fb-4fd4-afac-4bf3ad48492c>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-171-6-4.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-44
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for October 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf