Information icon.svg At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

Fun talk:Cat

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


Recent edits[edit]

Personal attack on whom? No one is identified. Furthermore the remark abou not recognizing humour is the height of irony. — Unsigned, by: 2600:1002:b11f:4a29:4c14:2a1a:71de:7b2b / talk / contribs

For fuck's sake, please, this is not difficult! Sign your posts with (~~~~) or (if that's too fucking hard) by clicking on the fucking sign BUTTON: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) This keeps the place tidy and stops you looking like a complete arsing tool so please, just fucking do it already.
You inserted some pretty problematic claims about cat-lovers and clearly didn't understand that "facts about cats you won't believe" was just a joke. And you edit-warred. And put some passive-aggressive concern trolling into your edit rationales, which doesn't much help my perception of you. And you clearly can't even be arsed to sign your posts. Need I go on? --Goatspeed. Watch meCircularREmail2.gifasoningPrototype lab 20:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

“pretty problematic claims”?[edit]

For God's Sake[edit]

It's funspace, why is everyone so ANGRY?IveBeenFrank (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC) Has

Oh. It's just some dipshit, drive-by, humorless BoN concern troll who tried to put spiteful attacks into this article, and then later tried to whitewash our anarchism article, indicating that we've got ourselves yet another drive-by young anarchist tankie with more passion than sense. And then threw around accusations of me being the troll, starting a huge, Drink!-able fight above. Oh joy. --Goatspeed. Watch meCircularREmail2.gifasoningPrototype lab 21:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
How on earth can someone even be an anarchist tankie? Someone's got their words mixed up here, lol --Zoe Kirk (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Seriously, what's wrong with this page[edit]

It keeps getting vandalized and protected. Why? GeeJayK (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

We should have a more serious article on cats.[edit]

I believe that cats are an interresting subject for a serious article. There is many woo on cats, for exemple that they have 9 souls, and it would be interresting to debunk it. Yassine Mehdi (talk) 11:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun_talk:Cat
rationalwiki.org
CC-MAIN-2023-40
41076
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MXAHW7WFL6FMXKAKRQ4EH32KFQWW7HA6
<urn:uuid:506b4aee-495f-4a0e-91bf-4a9d1683ded8>
2023-09-24T10:03:30Z
198.74.57.109
text/html
sha1:WS7JBJJL7TO4QJLRI3DW34JYYT3BMAHV
<urn:uuid:ce4f0377-aca8-45d8-8600-f2bd516c15a6>
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun_talk:Cat
response
<urn:uuid:fba46f79-0355-4982-804b-9f509e8265b4>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September/October 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-48
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/