View Single Post
  #122    
Old December 21st, 2010 (10:30 AM). Edited December 21st, 2010 by Miss Doronjo.
Miss Doronjo's Avatar
Miss Doronjo Miss Doronjo is offline
Gaiden
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Nature: Quirky
Posts: 4,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Fail View Post
I'd see the same thing as well. I'm a retro Nintendo nut, I'll admit though.

It'd be funny if we were actually allowed to request No No No, though. Or, even just a "Blank Emblem" that is just a pointless emblem. It wouldn't make much sense though. And the Smiley Overuser one- I don't like the idea of that one. I thought using too many smileys was an infractable offense.
I would think for emblems like the Smiley overuser emblem, it all should count towards the quality of posts, rather than the quantity. So I'd think it'll be an infractionable offense if say, a person only puts smiley's on their posts, compared to a person who made well thought of posts, with a smiley or two.

Hawthorne Guardian
Moderator of Video Games
Paired to: Perdition Haze

Pokémon:PhoenixRising
Sylvie
Reply With Quote
 
http://www.pokecommunity.com/showpost.php?p=6353581&postcount=122
www.pokecommunity.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-07
33270
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:C6DCJHXXDYNC3YLEO4BRWVANWFDLUXAP
<urn:uuid:04c1bf06-91ec-4a80-b67b-9be632cde358>
2016-02-12T14:45:56Z
104.25.66.33
sha1:PE4FKEEZFG6EG7HL4KLW76HH2XF7OXIZ
<urn:uuid:9f73f50e-f48d-46ac-97c9-2bf8c9cf3686>
http://www.pokecommunity.com/showpost.php?p=6353581&postcount=122
length
response
<urn:uuid:67360905-7914-4ab2-ae62-b43e94dc9c19>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-236-182-209.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-07
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf