Read New Wikipedia Entries About Women With 'Women in Red'

Illustration for article titled Read New Wikipedia Entries About Women With Women in Red
Illustration: Logo by Women in Red

Wikipedia, the encyclopedia of everything, is mostly about men. According to Women in Red, an in-house Wikipedia improvement project, less than 18 percent of the site’s 1.5 million biography pages are about women. And that figure actually represents an improvement: in late 2014, the number was 15 percent. A lot of that progress is thanks to Women in Red itself, which was founded in 2015 to increase and improve the site’s coverage of women.

Advertisement

Of course, most of written history concerns men, since most humans in recorded history have lived under a patriarchal society. So there’s more source material about them. But that doesn’t fully explain Wikipedia’s skew. As the New Statesman reports, major articles leave out prominent women. “History of Chemistry,” for example, names 200 men and four women, ignoring major figures like Nobel-winning metabolics researcher Gerty Cori and CRISPR researcher Jennifer Doudna, who, according to her own Wikipedia page, “has made fundamental contributions in biochemistry and genetics.” It’s not that there aren’t more women worth covering; it’s that they’re being ignored.

Women in Red (named after the red text that signifies a link to a non-existent Wikipedia entry) is fighting that. The project organizes people working on Wikipedia entries about women. When a Wikipedia contributor creates, or significantly improves, an entry, they can add it to the project’s list. January’s list includes 182 entries, most of them new, covering women of the present and past. Most are still short. But if you look at their page history, you’ll see something encouraging.

Advertisement

Once someone creates even a stub of an entry, it’s common to see someone else come in and add more supporting material, or fit the entry into existing Wikipedia categories, or clean up some formatting. These new entries aren’t just getting dumped and ignored; they’re entering the ecosystem where more Wikipedia editors can improve them. Which is important, as the vast majority—as much as 90 percent—of Wikipedia editors are male.

Women in Red encourages editors to publicize their contributions, marking on the project page if they’ve shared a new contribution on social media. The project’s front page lists articles that have been nominated for special features like Wikipedia’s “Did You Know” section, as well as articles nominated for deletion. That way, project members can defend, promote, and improve each other’s pieces, to ensure they earn a real and permanent place on the site.

As a reader, you can bookmark Women in Red to find interesting new entries. You’ll notice what surprising omissions the world’s biggest encyclopedia has made until very recently. And when you’re ready, you can add your own contribution. Women in Red has a categorized list of thousands of women who don’t have Wikipedia entries yet—despite being mentioned elsewhere on the site.

Women in Red | Wikipedia (via Meanwhile...)

Advertisement

Staff Writer, Lifehacker | Nick has written for Gawker, Valleywag, the Daily Dot, and Urlesque. He currently runs the scripted comedy podcast "Roommate From Hell."

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

kinjaninja1492
KinjaNinja1492

Do you believe there is something that is preventing women from doing this ?
https://lifehacker.com/read-new-wikipedia-entries-about-women-with-women-in-re-1832329713
lifehacker.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-50
245816
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:OCSVAJSDTF3K5R5V7SWSMO5QJT4S5DAJ
<urn:uuid:e572bf70-bcf2-49af-9401-ec10cdb36e4c>
2020-12-05T18:41:17Z
151.101.194.166
text/html
sha1:EXDLRUXD66QEX42T3YUAB2B7WCKA3XGM
<urn:uuid:11b163bc-23a5-4448-9ead-68be668bf416>
https://lifehacker.com/read-new-wikipedia-entries-about-women-with-women-in-re-1832329713
response
<urn:uuid:95b8a8b9-9d82-4438-b86e-991a46350037>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-50
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-229.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/