Forum:RuneScape:Page Maintenance addition

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > RuneScape:Page Maintenance addition
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 11 June 2011 by Haloolah123.

Discussions other than Yew Grove threads have already started to die out quite a while ago, and even though we added the page maintenance project page, there is still not a lot of discussion on them. It is even worse for the [[RS:RFC|requests for comment]]. There are a lot of RfCs, and nobody answers any of them. Usually comment is not requested for no reason, but still almost all of the pages that need comments, are just ignored because (almost) nobody checks the RFC page. I suggest we add another section to the page maintenance page, with a limited amount of RFCs in a similar way as on the PM and RFC pages now. Because currently the Yew Grove is also dying down a bit, I suggest we add a clear notice at the top that the seperate page maintenance discussions are listed at PM, to get more comment on those. I hope this will increase activity on those discussions, and also get things that need comments resolved more quickly.

Discussion[edit source]

Support - As nom. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 08:52, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Support - As long as the pages already listed on RS:PM are removed, then this should help get these pages have more activity as they are quite lacking. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 09:02, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Get rid of RFC Wjen I see it it is usually non applicable, or called for in a thread that will require laborious amounts of work from several people to accomplish the consensus. This is why it gets ignored. It has no viability anymore, it has been overused so inappropriately that it no longer draws attention.--Degenret01 13:06, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Get rid of RfC - What Degen said. --LiquidTalk 13:13, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Remove RfCs - There are dead discussions with {{Rfc}} on them from December. Nobody checks them because they're basically discussions about minor things. They're completely useless, adding them to RS:PM will just waste people's time. Real Crazy 14:22, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Get rid of RfC - Exactly what Degen said. HaloTalk 18:26, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comment - If there are important things going on on talk pages, how will people be attracted to those talk pages? If we would advertise RFC some more, and keep the list short with only RFCs that are not as pointless as some of the current ones are. I do agree with Degen, but I think that for some discussions there should still be a way to get more input on the discussion. The amount of times RFC will be used just has to be reduced. That would probably stimulate more people to comment on these things. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 12:41, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Support/Remove RFC - RFCs seem to be rather useless, maybe no one has anything more to add to a topic, no need to let it sit around. Dragon 2h sword old.pngCallofduty4 Talk 00:21, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Support/Remove RFC - I'm all for this cause, but RFC has never been useful. Per cod4. --クールネシトーク 20:16, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - A notice will be added at the top of the yew grove stating this, and all requests for comment shall be removed/deleted. HaloTalk 23:34, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
https://runescape.wiki/w/Forum:RuneScape:Page_Maintenance_addition
runescape.wiki
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-31
39284
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:DACHB4LWZS4CUWF6JUQEIC7SHLWDKY3T
<urn:uuid:0bd0a958-2f76-48d4-9738-8ed862f89df4>
2021-08-04T10:03:36Z
104.22.66.222
text/html
sha1:UA65RB5EILGTM4HNXNYEWV6ARLSSXNAU
<urn:uuid:1b2cba60-d09a-402d-b171-1ece9873bd95>
https://runescape.wiki/w/Forum:RuneScape:Page_Maintenance_addition
response
<urn:uuid:30d0b3f4-56a7-4bf9-b0f5-86b4cc99426d>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-31
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for July/August 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-169.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/