Who's to Blame?

My re-posting of “Academic Blogging” took much longer than I expected, mainly because of formatting problems. I broke it down into sections after posting it as a whole led to all sorts of strange events (green fonts, triple-sized letters, etc.). Even the simple act of transferring the content from an old post into a new one caused problems. I used a Word Document as a transitional stage, and perhaps that made things worse. (But doing it directly within Typepad didn’t work either.)

I tried to re-post everything when I found out that section 1 of Academic Blogging has a “3” in its URL, and vice-versa, but I encountered the same obnoxious formatting problems. So I let it be.

Perhaps the fault lies with Typepad. But based on past experience, I think these people are to blame.

February 23, 2006 in Blame | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
http://3lepiphany.typepad.com/3l_epiphany/blame/
3lepiphany.typepad.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-27
31681
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:7RGW42Z7ZX6SBIR2KNOHURSMIRNTETOU
<urn:uuid:d09d03de-12d0-44d5-83b7-0fe1d16051b0>
2015-07-08T06:31:24Z
190.93.246.9
sha1:DRTSXAVOAQG4UJJHEBHKGXN6YUGAF5TF
<urn:uuid:b76df480-783e-4d0c-a340-a391e585d2a3>
http://3lepiphany.typepad.com/3l_epiphany/blame/
length
response
<urn:uuid:6a257cc8-4f5d-40ce-a414-ecb0deb9fa30>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-179-60-89.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-27
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf