It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Snopes might shut down.

page: 2
41
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 03:40 PM
link   
Snopes was good for urban legends and the like, but their political fact checking left much to be desired as their analyses was often rudimentary at best.

It really is not surprising that the site is faltering. The owner dumped his wife and ran off with porn star, Erin O'brien.




posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan






posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Awwww haters of an opinion other than your own.
Thanks for letting us all know, the site will now stay up for a good while longer.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Did Uncle George's check bounce? CTR must be next. If only Hillary had won......


+1 more 
posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
Awwww haters of an opinion other than your own.
Thanks for letting us all know, the site will now stay up for a good while longer.


Opinions aren't facts.

Guess you just proved how our educational system is a failure?



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:32 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

Were you university level educated in Australia too? Wonderful!
Someone's opinion on a website is what you say isn't a fact? ......okaaaaaay .........ha????

Actually, TBH I don't know what argument you are trying to make....there is a stretch happening there I sense, but I'm not sure I care enough to delve further to find out.
edit on 24-7-2017 by zazzafrazz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What's the matter? The politicians that paid them to lie are too busy worrying about email revelations to continue, as they need the funds for their own cases? Disney decided they weren't believable enough to continue? Draining the swamp has removed some of their disinformation sources?

ROTFL!!! I'd call this poetic justice.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: seeker1963

Were you university level educated in Australia too? Wonderful!
Someone's opinion on a website is what you say isn't a fact? ......okaaaaaay .........ha????

Actually, TBH I don't know what argument you are trying to make....there is a stretch happening there I sense, but I'm not sure I care enough to delve further to find out.


You are the one who made the comment of opinions. Not I! Snopes is suppose to check FACTS.

Care to take your foot out of you mouth?



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

Perhaps we can start with you taking your foot out of my mouth and what you THINK I said.




posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz

Actually, your post sounded like you wanted to donate to snopes because they share the same opinions as you.


Obviously I was not the only one thinking that FACTS and OPINIONS are two different things. And the snopes people are not doing a very good job if they come across as having a certain set of opinions...

Just saying.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: seeker1963

Perhaps we can start with you taking your foot out of my mouth and what you THINK I said.




I don't have to think anything, your words are enough to convict you! Opinions ARE NOT FACTS!



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: growler
only people that don't like facts don't like snopes


No. people who know they post BS don't like Snopes.


originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

While this subject is attracting attention, can I ask why it is that Snopes gets so much of a slating?

I really don't understand where it started, but it seems to be an article of faith on ATS that Snopes is some kind of disinformation project or similar.

Can anyone point me to the evidence for this belief?

(Genuine question. Thanks in advance to anyone who can solve this mystery).


They lie. On a couple of non-political matters, such as Disney and other cartoons, their own evidence, in cases they claimed were "false" proved they were true. They simply LIE.

In cases where it's clearly true, they also have had a way of rewording things, in such a fashion that they can claim "unsure" or whatever, instead of admitting the facts. When confronted with their own evidence, they act like they don't know what you are talking about. The political bias is very clear, if you spend any time reviewing that section. They claim a research staff, but it's basically a husband and wife team. They just aren't credible.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:44 PM
link   
I clarified with stating opinion of a site.
It's nice to see this is what I am reduced to debating here nowadays....can't even make a statement without being told you said something else.

Anyhow, BIG thanks to the OP and every else for letting people know they need help!
It is my opinion it is a good site, with faults here and there, but meah which one doesn't.



reply to: ReadingOne



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:45 PM
link   
Ohhh ... loooookkky ... Sum Ting Wong




Dey makey dirty rye about how much money dey correct. Maths don't add up.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

Ummm you literally are becoming hysterical .

I said opinion on a site. I never mentioned facts, you did.
If you need me to explain this a 4th time on this page let me know.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl


lmao




posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl

They'll get "bailed out" by a major news organization and push a narrative same as everyone else.

Snopes is like "pod people" now.

Sure they may "appear" legit, but ahhhh. . . . nope.

Just my conspiratorial opinion of course.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: seeker1963

Ummm you literally are becoming hysterical .

I said opinion on a site. I never mentioned facts, you did.
If you need me to explain this a 4th time on this page let me know.


Umm, I just questioned your logic and use of words, ie opinion versus facts.

Now whom is hysterical here?


#WordsMatter
edit on 24-7-2017 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-7-2017 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz

I was polite in my reply to you, I see no reason for you to be upset. And why are you complaining about discussing this? YOU chose to post in an open thread on a DISCUSSION forum, someone replying to you should not come as a great surprise. Also YOU were the one using the word "haters" in your post, and that is rather aggressive, isn't it? I think you should calm down quite a bit.

Maybe you just should have been more clear in your post, I was not the only one reading it as you supported snopes for their opinions.


edit on 24-7-2017 by ReadingOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl

Perhaps I am missing something. What numbers are not adding up?



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join



 
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1179869/pg2
www.abovetopsecret.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-13
65688
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:USDRBYF32PWRSZFDIYK2CFWIY24JLKVS
<urn:uuid:5b729bdc-3f77-4287-9362-4c8e34d7d99c>
2018-03-24T00:55:24Z
198.15.108.202
text/html
sha1:WZKDCR6F4RJSIACWX6WYDRKG76AAMNRC
<urn:uuid:83a23b77-e303-4836-accc-85177ce16b56>
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1179869/pg2
length
response
<urn:uuid:f016b935-d44f-40f9-81b6-7782b9f86bc7>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-233-130-109.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-13
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for March 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf