mailing-list etiquette (was Re: [Soekris] Annoying list)

Chuck Yerkes chuck+soekris at 2004.snew.com
Thu Jul 22 18:25:39 UTC 2004


Quoting Bernd Walter (ticso at cicely12.cicely.de):
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:57:38PM -0400, Henry Spencer wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > > [Note: trimmed the Cc:s - they're all list subscribers anyway]
...
> > Many people feel that if you ask a question on the list, you should be
> > willing to read the list for answers.
> 
> The list and an answer is a different thing.
> Say I send an answer to a list I read once a week and someone corrects
> me or the answer wasn't clear enough and more details are required.
> I wouldn't see this for a week unless I get a direct copy.
> You can't expect everyone to read the list on a short time base.

Sure I can.  And I do.
As for this reply, in fact.


And I've kind of got down rules to reject mail to a listaddress
(chuck+soekris) that doesn't have the list headers.  My only
hesitation is when list headers change.  So I'm looking at a
temp fail with a period report to me so I can fix things that
are wrong.



More information about the Soekris-tech mailing list
http://lists.soekris.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/2004-July/006328.html
lists.soekris.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-20
3874
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:XBAYGX4ETURRJUMLVZ2NWKOQ4KNW42TD
<urn:uuid:4c45ecd7-a3b4-4018-b99b-5b8d9c8df5b5>
2013-05-18T10:21:04Z
5.103.129.119
sha1:5QL7GCNMQCYW2JIBNJAKJXFOMDJ6XKAC
<urn:uuid:c61021af-2a31-418f-809e-3062a3f37aee>
http://lists.soekris.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/2004-July/006328.html
response
<urn:uuid:c10ae7dc-b685-40e9-9326-bd5549b3650a>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-60-113-184.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-20
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Spring 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf