Template talk:personal-image-abandoned

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] New Image Proposals

Now with all the new image proposals, how about one for the good ol' PIA? I suggest the dumped Tandy from invisibility? Elcool (talk)(contribs) 14:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't think we should change. — It's dot com 15:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I had made this before the above discussion took place, so I'm just going to throw it up here for posterity. Below are the three suggested templates, starting with the abandoned image. I'm assuming this is now a dead conversation, but if anyone feels like resurrecting it, that's fine too. Trey56 20:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Abandoned personal image
This personal image has been abandoned. It was most recently used by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]].
No pages should link to this file.
Another user may claim it, or it may be subject to deletion if deemed unnecessary by the community.
Personal image
This image is being used as one of the personal images allowed to [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]].
Personal image for signature
This image is a personal image in the signature of [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]].
Certain restrictions apply.
I really like those suggestions, and I think we should use those pictures. Loafing 20:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
I like them too, they're more Homestar-Runnery (Homestar-Runny?) than the ones with the game pieces or whatever they are. And the objection that the other ones come as a set is moot now. Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 20:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, me too! I wouldn't mind if they were a little bit smaller, though. – The Chort 21:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
I've gonna take a stab in the dark and revive this convo, since I like the idea too. The Goblin!! 01:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Umm...is anyone going to respong about this? The Goblin!! 04:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I think the images are great. wbwolf (t | ed) 04:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Love the new template design. Can we reach an agreement? I know it's been about a year since this page had any discussions, but maybe we can agree to change it out, even know not all templates and such would have to be Homestar-runner related, I think it's great. —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 19:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Woah. I didn't even notice these until Mas12806 brought this up. We need some our own pictures for templates, like what was recently made of the stub template. I say we go with this! --70.253.165.204 20:51, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
The new style looks awexome. Go for it!!!!!! Strongkinghomsarsmith 20:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Are you talking to me? You want me to change out the template(s)? Well, maybe we should send out for an admin or system operator to look at it first before the template(s) are/is changed out just to be safe. Do you want all of the current personal image templates replaced with these? —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 21:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Those are great images and templates. A change would be better than what we have now. I think they should all be's changed. Admin/Sysop thoughts? ThePizz Pick 01:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah Administrator/System Operator thoughts. Yeah I really don't have to wait for one, but I think it would be the mature thing to do because they're imporntant templates. If you think, ThePizz, that I should just change out the template right now, just say it. I'll be here. Hopefully. —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 04:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

It would probably be better to see what an admin or sysop thinks first, then depending on what they think, change/don't change the templates. ThePizz Pick 15:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Good choice. —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 17:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I contacted an admin to look over this page and grant permission to change it if his visit to the new deigns by Trey56 goes well. —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 17:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

As I said two years ago when this discussion was current, I don't think we should change. — It's dot com 03:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Another two years gone by, pretty big overwhelming support from those that commented (not 100%, but dang near) to adopt the above images. Don't know why nothing ended up getting done with this.. I just want to say that I much prefer the images shown above than the current ones, and add my support for the change. OptimisticFool 06:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

As my annony self said two years ago, support. I understand image tags are supposed to be serious, and that we normally don't Homestar Runner-fy templates that won't appear in the main namespace (see this), but I think the new images work very well without softening up their respective messages. My only complaint is that the images are a bit large. Soiled Bargains (talk|ctrb) 20:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Template_talk:personal-image-abandoned
www.hrwiki.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-05
29391
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:727DLNVE73SOL3YNCYNXONBW4SSXLOXF
<urn:uuid:94754a60-25de-4c16-b5cb-fac0a0944b6b>
2020-01-28T11:09:51Z
173.255.196.131
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:MSLGBNU3UZOIOUG7KPKL675ZU2L5EDRL
<urn:uuid:34e7f2a8-407a-47d9-9e68-6a0879a2eee5>
http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Template_talk:personal-image-abandoned
response
<urn:uuid:cbc9b84a-8fcc-40d2-af30-31ffa3869d22>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-05
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-141.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/