Commons:Visszaállítási kérések

(Redirected from Commons:Visszaállítási kérések)
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 42% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
العربية • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎magyar • ‎日本語 • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎polski • ‎پښتو • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska • ‎中文

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Törlés (Törlési irányelvek)


Finding out why a file was deleted

Először is nézd meg a törlési naplót, hogy miért törölték a fájlt. Ha a Commonson a képhez találsz egy piros linket, és arra kattintasz, akkor megnyílik egy szerkesztési ablak, de a baloldali navigációs menü Mi hivatkozik erre pontjából utánajárhatsz, hogy hol említették meg a fájlt (például egy törlési vitában). Másodsorban pedig olvasd el a Commons feltételeit, a licencfeltételeket és a törlési irányelveket.

Ha a törlésre adott indoklás nem érthető, vagy ha nem értesz vele egyet, akkor felveheted a kapcsolatot a képet törlő adminisztrátorral. Magyarázatot kérhetsz tõle vagy akár új bizonyítékot is benyújthatsz be a törlés indoka ellen. Felveheted továbbá a kapcsolatot egy másik adminisztrátorral is – a magyarul beszélő adminisztrátorok ebben a listában vannak. Ha a törlés hibás volt, akkor a fájlt visszaállítják.

Fellebbezés

Ha a törlés a jelenlegi Commons feltételek és licencfeltételek szerint indokolt volt, akkor az adott feltétel vitalapján emelhetsz panaszt a feltétel ellen.

Ha úgy gondolod, hogy a kép nem sértette a szerzői jogokat és a Commons feltételeinek is megfelel:

  • Először a vitát lezáró adminnal lenne érdemes kapcsolatba lépni. Megkérheted, hogy a bővebben fejtse ki az indoklását, vagy hogy mutasson be bizonyítékokat.
  • Ha nem szeretnél senkivel se közvetlenül kapcsolatba lépni, vagy ha egy adminisztrátor megtagadta a visszaállítást, esetleg több embert szeretnél bevonni a vitába, akkor a lentiek szerint ezen az oldalon kérvényezheted a visszaállítást.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Átmeneti visszaállítás Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

A fair use elvet engedélyező projektek felhasználói kérvényezhetnek egy két napos átmeneti visszaállítást, hogy a letörölt fájlt átvihessék a saját projektjükbe. A szerkesztőnek meg kell mondania, hogy melyik projektbe szeretné a fájlt átvinni, és be kell linkelni az adott projekt fair use állásfoglalását. A magyar Wikipédia nem fogad be fair use fájlokat. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Új kérés beadása

Kattints ide, és megnyílik az az oldal, ahova a visszaállítási kérésedet írhatod be. Ugyanezt kézzel is megcsinálhatod, ha a mai dátum melletti "szerkesztés" hivatkozásra bököl. A kérésedet a lap aljára írd be, és ne feledkezz meg az alábbiakról:

  • A Subject: mezőbe írj be egy megfelelő témát. Ha csak egyetlen egy fájl visszaállítását kéred, akkor melegen ajánlott az [[:Image:TöröltFájl.jpg]]. (Ne feledkezz meg az első kettőspontról, az hivatkozik a képre.)
  • Sorold fel a fájlt vagy fájlokat amire a visszaállítási kérésed vonatkozik, és mindegyik képhez adj meg egy hivatkozást (lásd feljebb). Ha nem emlékszel a fájl nevére, akkor a lehető legtöbb mindent adj meg. Ha egy kérésből nem derül ki, hogy mit is kellene visszaállítani, akkor az a kérés nagyon hamar archiválásra kerülhet.
  • Sorold fel indokaidat a visszaállításra.
  • Írd alá a kérésedet négy hullámvonallal(~~~~). Ha a Commonsban van felhasználói fiókod, akkor jelentkezz be. Ha te töltötted fel a képet, akkor így az adminok sokkal hamarabb megtalálják.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.


Nyitott visszaállítási kérések

Watch Edit

File:1911 Planul Urbanistic General al Capitalei.PNG and File:Planul Urbanistic al orașului București din 1911.PNG

The map is from year 1911 and the author is represented by the Romanian Army's Geographical Service.

The source from which the images were extracted: Sfințescu, Cincinat I.; Studiu asupra Planului General de Sistematizare al Capitalei; Tipografia Jockey-Club; București; România, 1919

I believe that the license may be revised per {{PD-RO-exempt}}. The image's information must be uptaded too, and if the photo will be recovered I will make it.--Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

What line in {{PD-RO-exempt}} do you believe covers maps? Эlcobbola talk 15:43, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Look in the lower left corner of the map, where it says "EDIȚIA OFICIALĂ" (means "official edition"). I think in this case (but I am not sure) that the map is assimilated with an published official document. --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

  •  Oppose The list of documents excluded from copyright protection in {{PD-RO-exempt}} does not include maps. The template does not say "official documents" but instead "official texts" which implies limitation to prose. Эlcobbola talk 19:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Otherwise, since the author is a "legal entity" as the Romanian Army's Geographical Service, the license could be revised per {{PD-Romania}} - "It is another kind of work, the author is a legal entity („persoană juridică” - not a person) and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication" (and the publication had occurred in 1902). --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

The legal entity approach with {{PD-Romania}} may have some merit; however, I am unable to find support in Romanian Copyright Law. Chapter V covers "Duration of Copyright Protection" and says nothing about 50 years for legal entities. Also, searching the document for "50" (i.e., to find references to 50 years after publication) yields no support either. Could it be this is the repealed article 29 in Chapter V? Otherwise, could you please find the chapter, article and section for the copyright duration of works by legal entities? I may just be missing it, but, if not, the template appears incorrect. Эlcobbola talk 14:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
It looks like that part is from Article 7 of the Decree No. 321 of 1956. That was probably eliminated in 1996 with the new law, but since the new law appears to not be retroactive, corporate works from before 1946 may be fine. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, look at Decree 321/1956, Art. 7, last sentence (explanation here on page 125, the fourth paragraph). --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 00:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC) P.S. The template must be completed: "....and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication (only if it was before March 14, 1946)"

File:Nagaland map.png Own work

File:Nagaland map.png should be undeleted. I can confirm that I made the map using government of india website by using inkscape tool. i have not voilated any cc laws. i have released the map in common domain. --Wikigringo (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Does {{EdictGov-India}} extend to maps on a website? From the text in the template I'd think that only official edicts published in certain gazettes and the like are exempt from copyright in India. Any other governmental work is still copyrighted and non-free. De728631 (talk) 21:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment There are multiple versions here. One map was uploaded in 2006 by Shizhao. In 2008, Wikigringo uploaded an entirely different map over the 2006 version, but reverted himself 6 minutes later. The 2006 "original" was then there until it was deleted 5 September 2015. For which version are you requesting restoration? Also, what is the "government of india website" you used? Эlcobbola talk 19:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
I think Wikigringo's version was then uploaded to File:Nagalandmap.png, which is still there. Out of curiosity though, what was the basis of deleting a file for "no source" after it was uploaded for nine years? Was it a valid tag to add? Shizhao is a longtime admin here, if I'm not mistaken. Carl Lindberg (talk) 11:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikigringo said above "I can confirm that I made the map," which suggests we are talking about his short-lived version, not the Shizhao version. However, regarding the Shizhao version, @Ellin Beltz: tagged it as no source, which seems technically appropriate as there was no reference to the underlying map's source. (The file is not old enough to fall under COM:GRANDFATHER.) That said, I'm inclined to  Support the Shizhao version, as the underlying map appears to be File:India-locator-map-blank.svg. Эlcobbola talk 14:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Nagalandmap.png has source and is in use, the original layer of File:Nagaland map.png has no source and is not old enough to grandfather. I have no objections to restoring the file as long as a source can be agreed upon. Also, we have several other maps of the area, see Category:Maps of Nagaland. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
I think what happened here is that Wikigringo got the deletion notice for File:Nagaland map.png, saw it had been deleted, and mistakenly believed the notice referred to File:Nagalandmap.png. That would explain the bizarre rationale ("I can confirm that I made the map") about a file made by Shizhao. @Shizhao: could you confirm the source of the file? Is it File:India-locator-map-blank.svg or something else? Эlcobbola talk 19:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ioana Ciolacu Portrait.jpg

Hi there,

So these files were deleted because of a violation probability. While I understand that one should be very careful with file permission, I assure you that this particular picture is my own and that I choose to upload it on wiki commons. Also, the following pictures File:Ioana Ciolacu backstage at Stella McCartney show in Paris.jpg File:Ioana Ciolacu and Stella McCartney backstage in Paris.jpg File:Ioana Ciolacu & Stella McCartney during DfT Awards 2013.jpg were given to me during 2013 by the owner (a company) to use it to promote my brand and were widely spread through internet, I think maybe we should discuss if I am allowed to put them here before deleting it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocomoto (talk • contribs) 08:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 Oppose Owning physical copies of photographs or artwork does not make you the copyright holder even if you were given permission to use them for promotion. Media hosted at Commons need to be free for anyone else to use for any purpose. This can only be achieved through a permission from the original copyright holder. In most cases this is the photographer. De728631 (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 Not done : OTRS permission from copyright holder/s required. --INeverCry 19:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Refueling at sea RAS.jpg

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am SSgt Vielguth the responsible mediaadmin in Northwood Headquartes which is responsible for the whole European Naval Force Operation Atalanta Mission. Every Picture we use is directly send to us by the deployed units photographers in the gulf of Aden and the Western Indian Ocean. The Northwood Headquarter is responsible for posting distributed content online and keeping Webpages like Wikipedia updated. The Copyright for these pictures belongs to EUNAVFOR Operation Atalanta.

With this message I request to undelete the mentioned file because no copyright has been violated.


Kindest regards

Sascha Vielguth Staff Sergeant Media Administrator at EUNAVFOR Operation Atalanta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eunavformedia (talk • contribs) 08:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Since EUNAVFOR do not allow commercial use this photo can not be hosted at Wikicommons. If in fact EUNAVFOR allow commercial use, please use the process at Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 Not done : OTRS permission from copyright holder/s granting an acceptable free license (see COM:L) required. --INeverCry 19:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bollywood Diva Mamta Kulkarni.jpg

that my own work and have legal right for its use there is no copy right violation here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sameerd033 (talk • contribs)

@Sameerd033: Please, prove that you are the author or have the autorisation by following COM:OTRS instructions. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 Not done : OTRS permission from copyright holder required. --INeverCry 19:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chaj-logo.png

Hello,

The Chaj logo is the property of the Stichting CHAJ kvk: 65994396 in the Netherlands. I am a member of the board and have the legal rights for this logo. This logo can be used under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) or GNU General Public License (GPL). If a statement is needed I will glad to provide one/ or post a statement on the site https://chajdenhaag.wordpress.com/2016/03/29/welkom-in-chaj/

Many thanks, Roy Cohen Member of the board of Stichting CHAJ kvk: 65994396 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roy.wonder.cohen (talk • contribs) 11:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 Not done : OTRS permission from copyright holder required. --INeverCry 19:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:J.C. Skilla - Lista Negra (MixTape) 2015 Capa Parte Da Frente.jpg

this image is my original work and i upload this on flickr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miguel Azevedo (talk • contribs) 16:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Are you the designer of the cover artwork or did you just photograph or scan the album cover? If you are the designer, please send an email with a permission as outlined in COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 Not done : OTRS permission from copyright holder required. --INeverCry 19:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Vissza%C3%A1ll%C3%ADt%C3%A1si_k%C3%A9r%C3%A9sek
commons.m.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-36
80996
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:Q46JRVBHPRAIQ5JSBNJNGHAOGW4ZIV2V
<urn:uuid:06c3de67-ea78-4d57-b44e-c302ff74c116>
2016-08-25T20:52:53Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:FITG4ATRZAYPVP7TBHG3QCTSC7RWDS2E
<urn:uuid:8993b4ba-7fbc-4850-8777-86e32ff00de5>
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Vissza%C3%A1ll%C3%ADt%C3%A1si_k%C3%A9r%C3%A9sek
response
<urn:uuid:e57647e5-a671-4bb2-8b2e-26cb67ceaa1f>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-153-172-175.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-36
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf