credible research sources and high school and pdf

Credible research sources and high school and pdf

File Name: credible research sources and high school and .zip
Size: 18191Kb
Published: 15.04.2021

International Journal of Educational Research

Defining Credible Sources For Research

Research Success for High School Students

This is a comprehensive guide to teaching students of all ages how to research.

Schools, businesses, government entities, churches, and libraries create websites so people can learn more about what they do. Individuals can create personal sites or blogs to write about their families, friends, work, or any other subject. Corporations can make websites to promote their products, and political activists can publish websites to promote their cause. Anyone with an idea and internet access can create a website and fill it with just about any content they want. As of , there are over 1.

International Journal of Educational Research

Schools, businesses, government entities, churches, and libraries create websites so people can learn more about what they do. Individuals can create personal sites or blogs to write about their families, friends, work, or any other subject. Corporations can make websites to promote their products, and political activists can publish websites to promote their cause.

Anyone with an idea and internet access can create a website and fill it with just about any content they want. As of , there are over 1. Website owners can print anything they want, true or not, without worrying about the consequences. As a result, life online has undoubtedly changed the procedures used to gather and assess information forever. Even in the cut-and-paste Age of Wikipedia , evaluating sources based on their authority, relevance, and accuracy is still a requirement for serious writers.

Fortunately, the oceans of data and globe-spanning inter-connectivity of the internet make verifying sources easier than ever as well. There are time-honored practices of using primary sources , identifying their authors, and verifying the accuracy of the information they provide. But writers can use additional tools to keep their sources credible and authoritative. Some, such as Grammarly's Plagiarism Checker , can be used to make sure the content being cited is original.

Other tools, such as the Online Writing Lab OWL at Purdue University, provide in-depth advice and examples for evaluating sources both on and off the web. The future of written communication is surely set not in stone, but in the glowing ether of cyberspace. Yet as long as humans continue to rely on the written word for the exchange of information, wisdom, and insight, effective and compelling writing will demand sources that are credible, authoritative, and accurate.

With so much content and so little oversite, determining which information is reliable can be a daunting task. But failing to do so could leave you looking foolish or worse. Thankfully, there are some easy steps you can take to evaluate the credibility of a website. How did you find your source? Top results in Google are often won by commercial websites with big budgets. Sources found via social media have the same problem.

Read the tips below to get an idea of what to look for online. This guide will help you whether you are a hobbyist web surfer or a professional or academic researcher. What's more, we have links to resources with even more in-depth information on things like primary and secondary sources. If we had to choose between getting your world news from The New York Times or Smitty's Basement Newspaper, most of us would grab the Times, because it's a name we know and trust.

The same is true for internet research. If you want to know the results of last week's election, visiting your favorite news outlet's website is a great place to start.

If you want tips on investing, pick an investing company you respect and see if their website provides the information you're looking for. There may be better information out there, but starting with a company you already trust is a good way to narrow your search. Then if you do decide to look up information from other sources, you can compare it to what you found first. Another helpful tip is to look at the date of an article as well as the dates attached to studies and resources within an article.

If an article cites a study done 10 years ago, it brings into question the reliability of the information. This is especially true if there are more recent studies available on the subject. Many website articles include links that visitors can click on for more information like those at the bottom of this page. If those links don't go anywhere, chances are the article is old. One dead link is probably nothing to worry about, but a bunch of them should raise a red flag.

The creator of a legitimate website will take the time to keep links up to date so visitors can learn more. The presence of dead links is a good indication that the website is no longer maintained.

One of the best ways to evaluate an article or other type of content published online is to check the author's credentials. If you're looking for information about toothaches, a certified dentist who has been practicing for over 20 years is a more reliable source than a hobbyist with a blog. If the author provides a list of references to validate their credentials, even better. Remember, you can write anything you want online, so just because someone says they're a dentist doesn't mean they actually are.

Many sites, including trusted news sites, leave the writing of articles to staff or freelance writers. These may not be professionals in the field they're writing about; however, the best of them will rely on professional sources and often include quotes from experts. One of the simplest ways to determine the credibility of an online resource is to look at the purpose of the website, which can often be learned from the ending of the site's address.

This is the bit after the last period in the domain name. For instance, WhoIsHostingThis. It the most popular TLD on the internet and can be used by any person, business, or other entity, which means if you're researching something,.

Make sure to start with those trusted sources, and then look for any potential bias. Businesses often use. Therefore, any information on their website is liable to have a bias toward getting a visitor to buy whatever it is that's for sale there. If you're looking for an honest comparison between iOS and Android, you should assume that anything you find on Apple.

Alternatively, an address that ends in. A visitor may find an article there written by a professor who is an expert on a particular topic. The professor may include their credentials at the end of the article as well as citations. These elements serve to make the website a more reliable online resource.

As a note, students are also able to contribute to many. It's a good idea to look for citations when dealing with a student's writing to ensure credibility. Also, if you're searching for information for a research paper, you probably need to look for peer-reviewed articles. Just because a professor publishes something on a. An address that ends in. If you're looking for reliable information about government policy, tax codes, or a political office, these sites are a great place to start.

The TLD. Much like. At the time of this writing, there were over top-level domains available, including everything from. While these unique TLDs may prove useful when you are looking for a particular type of service, they can't guarantee the credibility of any content.

It's always beneficial to read all online articles with a critical eye. If you're still not sure, do a little snooping. Read other articles on the site, particularly ones written by the same author.

Do you trust their opinion on other topics? Is the writing consistent and strong? Do articles seem unbelievable or even made up? Facebook feeds are notorious for posting articles from the fake news site The Onion as factual stories! Reading other articles may also help you detect a website's biases — nearly all sites have them — so you can better judge the information they're presenting.

The presence of many misspellings on a website is also a clue that it's not a credible resource. Someone who creates a legitimate website designed to provide people with factual information takes care with both spelling and grammar in order to appear more professional. The internet is a great source of information, but when accuracy counts, the library is still one of the best places to do research.

Most libraries now allow patrons to utilize their research tools online, so you can still do your research from the comfort of your computer chair. Libraries have access to research databases, many of which require a subscription and aren't available through traditional search engines. These databases allow you to search for articles in print and online journals and books.

Since many of these resources are peer-reviewed, the information you find in them is not only written by professionals but has been reviewed and approved by other professionals within their field.

Finally, no matter where you find information, it's a good idea to double-check it against other sources. You can do this by performing additional online research or checking some print publications at the library. If you find the same information on several other legitimate websites as well as in a print publication, it increases the odds that the information is accurate.

Now that you know the overview of finding and evaluating web resources, you can use this guide to help you with the process in a step-by-step manner. Once you have reviewed all of this info, you can decide whether you believe the source to be credible. Here is a more detailed graphic with animated elements to help you evaluate information sources on the web.

The step-by-step guide is probably better to use on a day-to-day basis, but this graphic contains a lot more detail. If you would like to use this graphic in your work, see right below it for more information. We are very proud of our data visualizations. Each one is the result of the work of many talented people over a long time researching, writing, editing, rendering.

And we get flooded with requests to use them. We are happy to oblige. But under strict guidelines. If you are an educational, governmental, or non-profit group, feel free to use it in your work. But please add a note to it saying that it is copyrighted and courtesy of WhoIsHostingThis.

If you wish to embed this graphic on your website, use the code below. Just click in the box. This will highlight the text.

Defining Credible Sources For Research

Once production of your article has started, you can track the status of your article via Track Your Accepted Article. Help expand a public dataset of research that support the SDGs. The International Journal of Educational Research publishes research manuscripts in the field of education. Work must be of a quality and context that the Editorial Board think would be of interest to an international readership. Proposals for special issues and individual papers can be on any contemporary educational topic of international interest. Reports of high quality educational research involving any discipline and methodology will be welcome. However, the journal's aim and scope is to ensure it publishes high quality research that could potentially inform research, policy and practice beyond the context of that in which the original work is undertaken.

In this activity, students evaluate a science news article to determine whether it is a trustworthy source of information. Science news articles are a great way to learn about new ideas, discoveries, and research. In this activity, students practice their reading comprehension and source evaluation skills by answering a series of questions about a science news article. They then synthesize their answers to determine whether the article is trustworthy. This activity can be used with any print or online news articles.

Research Success for High School Students

Activating prior knowledge is a great way for students to be engaged in a lesson. I keep this in mind as I present this warm-up activity on defining credible sources in a school setting. This allows students to think about what they already know so they can apply it to the overall objective of the lesson of defining credible sources. The first slide serves as an overview for students to understand what today's lesson will be up. I tell students that the two questions, how do we define a credible source and how do we determine the accuracy of sources, will guide our thinking today.

Credible sources are generally texts that can be trusted and authoritative. These would be texts with support in terms of reliable evidence facts, data, statistics and often referring to previous work by academic authors. The most common credible sources are scholarly journals, conference papers and books because these have been peer-reviewed read and approved for publication by other authors. However, there are good websites that can be used; generally ending in.

0 comments

Leave a reply
https://stpetersnt.org/and-pdf/507-credible-research-sources-and-high-school-and-pdf-572-436.php
stpetersnt.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-05
29197
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:N532Y4MZ5DQSK4ZYSA7ROTIYU2Q73NCW
<urn:uuid:61cb4ba0-7bbd-4e6a-8a47-62aade1340d9>
2022-01-29T13:57:16Z
104.21.84.194
text/html
sha1:R7HHY3V65H7UTELKGEEUPHFASCBX4AI6
<urn:uuid:54c7ef41-ecab-43ed-95c0-a7793766e468>
https://stpetersnt.org/and-pdf/507-credible-research-sources-and-high-school-and-pdf-572-436.php
response
<urn:uuid:dc6e3699-9850-411e-9e2e-97f8fc9b2d8b>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-05
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-106
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/