UNESCO Journalism and Disinformation Handbook

Journalism, 'Fake News' and Disinformation: A Handbook for Journalism Education and Training (UNESCO)

Written by experts in the fight against disinformation, this handbook explores the very nature of journalism with modules on why trust matters; thinking critically about how digital technology and social platforms are conduits of the information disorder; fighting back against disinformation and misinformation through media and information literacy; fact-checking 101; social media verification and combatting online abuse.

Bad news: there's no solution to false information online by Ben WerdmüllerBen Werdmüller

It's clearly impossible for the web as a platform to objectively report that a stated fact is true or false. This would require a central authority of truth - let's call it MiniTrue for short. It may, however, be possible for our browsers and social platforms to show us the conversation around an article or component fact. Currently, links on the web are contextless: if I link to the Mozilla Information Trust Initiative, there's no definitive way for browsers, search engines or social platforms to know whether I agree or disagree with what is said within (for the record, I'm very much in agreement - but a software application would need some non-deterministic fuzzy NLP AI magic to work that out from this text).

Imagine, instead, if I could highlight a stated fact I disagree with in an article, and annotate it by linking that exact segment from my website, from a post on a social network, from an annotations platform, or from a dedicated rating site like Tribeworthy. As a first step, it could be enough to link to the page as a whole. Browsers could then find backlinks to that segment or page and help me understand the conversation around it from everywhere on the web. There's no censoring body, and decentralized technologies work well enough today that we wouldn't need to trust any single company to host all of these backlinks. Each browser could then use its own algorithms to figure out which backlinks to display and how best to make sense of the information, making space for them to find a competitive advantage around providing context.

There is a lot to think about.
https://islandinthenet.com/tag/disinformation/
islandinthenet.com
CC-MAIN-2024-26
63982
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZB5L2SYT5BRKQPDUSUO4AKFS25QMYLLD
<urn:uuid:edad1d47-17fb-43f7-93da-7950d2954d39>
2024-06-14T07:02:17Z
142.93.124.147
text/html
sha1:NFRMILJPWFFD335CKWE5ZFSRF6RB5MGN
<urn:uuid:6081dd11-9958-4025-bb4d-cfe3985e1bad>
https://islandinthenet.com/tag/disinformation/
response
<urn:uuid:45aa423d-40fc-4adc-af77-fb2aafe07243>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-26
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-207
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/