Ryan Singel:

Remnick isn’t swearing off the app store, but in remarks at a Condé Nast breakfast discussion in New York, he made it clear that The New Yorker had no intention of catering to Apple’s whims.

They and all other news and opinion publications should not have to remove or censor content. I get that Apple doesn’t want porn, but censoring fashion magazines and political comments is going a bit far.


This site is 100% member supported. Join today and see all posts two days before non-members.
https://brooksreview.net/2010/05/new-yorker%e2%80%99s-remnick-says-he-won%e2%80%99t-censor-to-make-apple-happy/
brooksreview.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-40
16543
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZJ45ULXTN3FIRVFXMX3J5UB3KITPKRNZ
<urn:uuid:35b48300-8eb4-4965-8355-6c1a926acbfa>
2016-09-26T07:03:26Z
199.19.86.162
sha1:GKTWANX2FKLCXNST36IRK3WWHWNVDWPQ
<urn:uuid:39f81d22-dbe5-491d-8a72-29689ec03f7c>
https://brooksreview.net/2010/05/new-yorker%e2%80%99s-remnick-says-he-won%e2%80%99t-censor-to-make-apple-happy/
response
<urn:uuid:fc89d124-15f5-4c21-8b9e-a10b438df242>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-143-35-109.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-40
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf