
ryanfromaustin - 5:25 pm on Dec 19, 2006 (gmt 0)


Am I the only person here who believes DMOZ has been of questionable value for years? It is so overrun with insiders that the quality of indexed content is inconsistent at best. Furthermore, the experience for many legitimate site owners of having to deal with their process is frustrating beyond belief.

Noone is searching DMOZ to find content - it only exists because a bunch of internet academics with too much time on their hands refuse to accept the reality of what is happening with the internet. In my opinion, DMOZ is mid-90's technology that should have died a long time ago. I hope it does go away and the sooner, the better.

[edited by: Webwork at 5:59 pm (utc) on Dec. 19, 2006]


Thread source: http://www.webmasterworld.com/directories/3191570.htm
Brought to you by WebmasterWorld: http://www.webmasterworld.com
http://www.webmasterworld.com/printerfriendlyv5.cgi?forum=17&discussion=3191570&serial=3193475&user=
www.webmasterworld.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-10
3283
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:V52FKE6GGF7VW2OEFTDCQBW527PAUJZY
<urn:uuid:db1394e6-71bf-4b65-b357-b3cb2f1eaee6>
2014-03-11T05:15:43Z
209.59.188.141
sha1:YMCFD2STKKZH6YT6SCXX4VNBJPHB5UKQ
<urn:uuid:6333b4c7-1c3d-4e50-a1bf-9b96f3ace28e>
http://www.webmasterworld.com/printerfriendlyv5.cgi?forum=17&discussion=3191570&serial=3193475&user=
response
<urn:uuid:9cca2561-dca0-4fb9-bd56-d2ecbb136196>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-183-142-35.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-10
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for March 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf