Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 50 (9182 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Wes Bailey
Post Volume: Total: 918,349 Year: 5,606/9,624 Month: 12/619 Week: 1/47 Day: 1/6 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Peanut gallery for Great Debate?
Adminnemooseus
Inactive Administrator


Message 12 of 24 (197552)
04-07-2005 7:09 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Jazzns
04-07-2005 6:38 PM


Adminnemooseus still says "No" to having a "Peanut Gallery" right now
In the context of , I think it is impossible to isolate the "Great Debate" from the "Peanut Gallery". Are we to expect that neither Jazzns or Faith will read the topic?
Coming from the evolution side, and more specificly having a geology degree, I've had to supress my urges to comment on some of Jazzns statements. But, in the context of a "GD", it is not for other members to do such, but for Faith to do such.
Painful as it may be, I still strongly feel that the "PG" needs to wait until the "GD" is closed. After it is closed, then we can start the "post mortum" examination. I would certainly find it interesting, to later have a "The evolution side picks on Jazzns 'Great Debate' statements" topic.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Jazzns, posted 04-07-2005 6:38 PM Jazzns has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Percy, posted 04-07-2005 7:27 PM Adminnemooseus has replied

Adminnemooseus
Inactive Administrator


Message 14 of 24 (197557)
04-07-2005 7:42 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Percy
04-07-2005 7:27 PM


Re: Adminnemooseus still says "No" to having a "Peanut Gallery" right now
The reactions of the audience are apparent to the debaters.
While a "real world" debate might have an audience, that audiences responses to statements would be limited to such as cheers and groans. They would not be shouting debate content up to the podiums.
Input of content in the "Peanut Gallery" would still be defacto input of content into the "Great Debate".
Would a "Cheers and Groans" peanut gallery topic be a useful thing? I don't think so.
All that said, Faith seems to now wish the "Great Debate" be terminated. Perhaps the post mortum is soon to come anyway.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Percy, posted 04-07-2005 7:27 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Percy, posted 04-07-2005 8:23 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024
https://evcforum.net/dm.php?control=page&t=12754&mlist=on&mbrid=473&p=1
evcforum.net
CC-MAIN-2024-33
53550
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZCTSRDL2T2EH5B5JFZGFHRHYQULN43TF
<urn:uuid:c632b887-386b-43ed-ada1-7c02c90b7597>
2024-08-04T21:52:22Z
66.148.122.44
text/html
sha1:ED2IPOCCXPIOY2M4PWYKFB6VY7AQ5PTX
<urn:uuid:421d1bd6-bcf6-4eae-960f-e2ac9b4a9c65>
https://evcforum.net/dm.php?control=page&t=12754&mlist=on&mbrid=473&p=1
response
<urn:uuid:ca2a4b28-bb97-42c1-8800-262881d536fc>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-33
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-137
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/