W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: PDF in WCAG 2

From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:24:26 -0400
Message-ID: <01fd01c486e2$edad3960$6401a8c0@DAVIDPC>
To: "Kassia Krozser" <ktwice@pandemic.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Cc: "WAI-IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

of course, we could just provide a link to it where it appears and a link to
jump back there from it.

Johnnie Apple Seed

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kassia Krozser" <ktwice@pandemic.com>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Cc: "WAI-IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: PDF in WCAG 2




Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>
>> oh no, i don't think i can hack them. what i'm more concerned about is:
>> does a footnote that, is changed to an endnote change in content and
>> meaning?

> Still no answer on this then? Shame, it does pique my interest...

Setting aside the fact that many readers find endnotes irritating
because they require constant back and forth (or, if one is reading
online, scrolling up and down or switching between screens), resulting
in the loss of flow when reading, footnotes are generally short and
concise, in keeping with their position on a page. They are best used
for citing sources and short commentary necessary to strengthen an
argument being made in the text. Footnotes that take up considerable
page space are considered bad form.

Endnotes have the advantage of including more detailed information such
as tables, graphs, and lengthy quotations. They also have a disadvantage
in that readers require sufficient context in the note to understand
what the reference means, so they may require attention when written. If
a writer uses endnotes instead of footnotes, he or she should be aware
that many people don't do the necessary back and forth while reading, so
the text also needs to be written so that the argument is clearly
understood without benefit of the note.

The choice of using endnotes versus footnotes is largely a matter of
style, and certain disciplines seem to prefer one style over another.
Some works include both, leveraging the strengths of each type of note.
However, when making a choice, it's important to keep the reader in mind
-- if a work consists largely of references that point reader back to
source material without further detail, endnotes don't make sense. If
the references contain detailed information or further elucidation, then
footnotes don't make sense.

k2
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 18:23:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:08:57 UTC
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2004JulSep/0366.html
lists.w3.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-27
11797
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:OCNQGI56UQENYSMKSAC7F5RFSWMRFTCX
<urn:uuid:a4e8c5d8-5f33-4c34-91d1-d4eeafeed36c>
2015-07-02T23:30:03Z
128.30.52.56
sha1:46Q3PL6S4WMY3LCWORVWI3JCRQZFQKCZ
<urn:uuid:dcc2bc1e-cd9d-44e4-865f-bd2e95ca784d>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2004JulSep/0366.html
response
<urn:uuid:8425eafb-42a4-464b-b22e-f42df73199ae>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-179-60-89.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-27
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf