On book reviews and the “stars” rating system

 

BookReviewStars

One of the authors I follow recently sent an email to all her fans to explain why book reviews are important to (self-published) authors. According to her, although many authors never make a fuss about reviews, they ultimately appreciate them because it means their books are being read.

However, the “stars” rating system is a different issue. Some (self-published) authors may become seriously concerned if their books receive less than three stars in reviews, because, in the words of this author:

“There are a number of bargain book blogs and mailing lists that can get you good sales when your book is listed there. Most of these sites take books only once they’ve gotten a certain number of reviews of a certain average star rating. Mostly, this is four stars…. From a business point of view, reviews are of more immediate importance to a self-published writer than a trade-published writer. An X number of reviews means you can get picked up by these blogs, and this means more income. This is why there is such a lively informal ‘trade’ in four-five-starred reviews by authors for other authors.”

I may sound naïve, but I truly believe the purpose of writing book reviews is to offer honest and constructive criticism to authors while sharing excellent books with other readers. I personally do not believe a book can be rated in any way, as it means differently for different people. Neither do I believe that rating with “stars” or other symbols needs to and/or should be part of the process of reviewing books. Instead, I think book reviews are to help readers understand a book and to let authors know that someone does appreciate their work. This is why platforms such as GoodReads are important where readers can review without rating.

And I sincerely agree with this author’s view: “I especially wish that these ad sites would drop their star rating requirements as a lazy shorthand for ‘quality’. They want the author’s ad money, and don’t want to look at the books themselves, so that’s how they judge whether a book is ‘good enough’ for their site. That’s what it comes down to.”

How do you feel about book reviews? Do you as a constant reader use the “stars” rating system? What are your usual criteria? I would very much like to know.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply, Please

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
https://christinesunflower.com/2016/02/09/on-book-reviews-and-the-stars-rating-system/
christinesunflower.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-43
73388
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:47S3YFHK3ZXF3RACAWNECVXGAYFIF7PA
<urn:uuid:db8ecedd-8f59-4169-b238-41cb84eb7bf1>
2018-10-23T22:39:37Z
192.0.78.24
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:K57BWG432UTGMMHO424OWGEMFHHUDKMK
<urn:uuid:cd4607a5-d5b8-4eae-ba2d-9891fb3ff3f8>
https://christinesunflower.com/2016/02/09/on-book-reviews-and-the-stars-rating-system/
response
<urn:uuid:d1fa6ec0-06f6-49ee-88a1-8faed00942c9>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-43
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for October 2018
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-65-99-88.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 0.11-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/