Another Internet poll goes horribly wrong

[self snip] I was given a tip, and didn’t realize that this poll is over a year old and didn’t recall WUWT had previously covered it. Neither did Tom Nelson when he covered it last night, so I withdraw this article as it is not new.

http://t.co/tWap6uCzBe

Apologies to my readers.  – Anthony

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/04/14/another-internet-poll-goes-horribly-wrong/
wattsupwiththat.com
CC-MAIN-2023-06
205227
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:B5Y7J3E75ARY2YMBYK4STZPTTMET2SYV
<urn:uuid:bda35c30-47d7-4bcb-927a-8feec3f4c9f2>
2023-01-30T23:48:53Z
199.16.172.80
text/html
sha1:CWO2JD3ACZTIUYDKYSBUS6LO3EQSD4MW
<urn:uuid:76f5fdf7-8b2c-4784-8890-0b9bfacb9df6>
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/04/14/another-internet-poll-goes-horribly-wrong/
response
<urn:uuid:7cb26bb0-4ce6-4c35-b8a3-e58bf4cabe43>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-06
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January/February 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-47
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/