dresden_kink_mods: black and white crescent moon and stars, sort of a burn out affect (Default)
dresden_kink_mods ([personal profile] dresden_kink_mods) wrote in [community profile] dresden_kink2011-03-21 09:04 pm
Entry tags:

Contact A Mod

Here's where you comment if you want to get a mod's attention. If you don't want to comment, email dfkm DOT mods AT gmail DOT com. If you have a problem with a specific comment, prompt or fill, please include a link to it.

If you have a serious fear of posting logged in, contact the mods and we can ban your account.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-13 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)
On the off chance posting here means you'll see this thread sooner before it potentially explodes:

http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/2675.html?thread=1951091#cmt1951091

(Anonymous) 2011-08-13 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Yet another anon, on what I think is the same thread ( http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/2675.html?thread=1951091#cmt1951091 ).

This is very annoying, IMO. This thread is now talking about gender roles and sexism (and occasionally doing so in a manner that is potentially hurtful to the OP) and while it's still in relation to DF, it has very little to do with fulfilling or world-building for the original prompt. From what I can tell, it's working against such a response.

It's now essentially a discussion about whether or not being male has anything to do with anything in DF-verse, from what I can tell.

In particular, this also bothers me: http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/2675.html?thread=1993075#cmt1993075

Even looking at the comment through sarcasm-glasses, it's being deliberately unfair to someone who doesn't want to see meta on a page for prompts and fills.

Please to be reminding anons that each page should be used for it's intended purpose? This anon would be grateful.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-13 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
(not to be particularly annoying to the mods, but here's an example of what I'm thinking of as being a "discussion" and not working towards a fill or any sort of world-building for a fill:

http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/2675.html?thread=2005107#cmt2005107

Comments like the above are both unfair to the comment is is in response to and annoying to see when they crop up in flat-view. It's also just one example, and not meant to be a comment on the anon who made it - it just happened to be the first example since I posted earlier.)

(Anonymous) 2011-08-13 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
DA here who has no desire to follow the discussion at:
http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/2675.html?thread=1951091#cmt1951091

Is there anyway mods can get them to move to the discussion/meta thread please? Because while they are discussing aspects of DF it doesn't really seem to be about what the prompter was actually looking for in a fill.

My inbox is imploding >.>
http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/757.html?thread=1993717
dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-17
30401
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:4OW6TRVWY754FVSJUKIAJEPPIGTWPPJ3
<urn:uuid:42a3c12a-2627-4384-994c-ced91f95237f>
2017-04-23T05:35:01Z
52.86.83.74
sha1:RRUNWG7AX6RPPT4NIJ43FQ754KJIEBKI
<urn:uuid:c0fdf075-17ad-4b72-a5b9-7ee8c3efce34>
http://dresden-kink.dreamwidth.org/757.html?thread=1993717
response
<urn:uuid:c7ca12f1-1f39-4433-9138-73470474c485>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-145-167-34.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-17
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2017
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf