The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

-28
votes
2answers
286 views

Poor conduct of high reputation user and abuses that follow

Please see the following question, which I feel was moderated only because I called out the user "creack" for his initial response and comments (which he or someone has deleted): Do I want a container ...
1
vote
0answers
87 views

Review privilege abuse

I have been trying to find the "correct" amount of editing to do when I see a posted question or answer with obvious issues. Fore front in my mind is that I want to make it clearer for the next ...
1
vote
0answers
81 views

Commenting on an audit gave it away

I got this question as an audit today: How to identify the color of image in c#? It read: I want to identify the total color present in image in c# and i want to change the individual color in ...
33
votes
0answers
499 views

A user keeps editing in the wrong tag — bootstrap and twitter-bootstrap

This user keeps adding in the bootstrap tag, along with the twitter-bootstrap tag in instances where it isn't about bootstrap loading. I've personally rejected 10 of these so far. Mods, can you ...
40
votes
2answers
3k views

What is this user up to?

I came upon this edit in the review queue, and I was initially thrown - it appears that the user needed approval for modifying his own answer! Looking closer though, revealed that it was a different ...
3
votes
0answers
81 views

What happens when a user is caught doing robo-reviews? [duplicate]

I think I read somewhere that users who don't review well are banned for 1 week from reviewing tasks. Seems like a pretty lame punishment, so I'm wondering the following: After the week ban, are ...
0
votes
1answer
99 views

Automated retrospective detection for robo-reviewers

Based on this question and the comments thereon as well as this question, it is clear that review audits fail to detect robo-reviewers properly. Should there not be some kind of automated detection ...
3
votes
1answer
61 views

How to deal with suggested edits that get approve but imho violate rule [duplicate]

I was reviewing suggested edit when it got approved. When looking at the post it was very clear to me that edit was invalid because someone other than OP was trying to "improve" the answer. Can ...
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/review-abuse
meta.stackoverflow.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-49
64033
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:636TFYI3TSLLIRAFTPKDAMLLTE34BORC
<urn:uuid:4ee90dc9-63ab-4e1d-b27a-697fa5c10eb3>
2014-11-26T03:17:40Z
198.252.206.16
sha1:P45OCN4E4HRBNDCWGKNTUW7CRH63OM4B
<urn:uuid:33318fb1-c169-4c09-8bc0-571d223c8cec>
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/review-abuse
response
<urn:uuid:be82232c-af8a-4860-ae74-8415ff7d7dc9>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-235-23-156.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-49
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for November 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf