Talk:Community point of view

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Talk page archives:

My opinion? CPOV policy not necessary.[edit]

It seems unnecessary to me, because:

  • we have a {{personal opinion}} tag to mark things that look like community consensus but are not.
  • several members of the Wikimedia community do not edit Meta much.
  • some pages of cross-project interest (be bold is an example) might represent consensus on one project but not another.
  • some pages (privacy policy, new project policy, ...) are more from the Wikimedia Foundation than from the community.
  • we can "edit" pages, adding additional points of view or changing the points of view.
  • we can already remove or delete text from trolls and vandals.

The assumption behind the Community point of view was that everything in DocumentMode on this wiki must represent community consensus. --Kernigh 21:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Community_point_of_view
meta.wikimedia.org
CC-MAIN-2023-50
44793
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:XIRTQTUCPCQLCILFZR4MRCUZELMLKQH2
<urn:uuid:02775b18-7d9c-4009-8414-a6d9df230e08>
2023-11-30T14:28:51Z
208.80.154.224
text/html
sha1:RYTPU66U4J2LWNMHKXUJRKOWBZ3QFFED
<urn:uuid:0070ce1a-8e52-4923-ba09-de2fa6e24382>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Community_point_of_view
response
<urn:uuid:5142baa3-92c2-45dc-94b0-de76f9a7d220>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-50
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-47
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/