A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review

« Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure? Does it perform to the high standards with which it is generally regarded? Studies of peer review have shown that it is prone to bias and abuse in numerous dimensions, frequently unreliable, and can fail to detect even fraudulent research. With the advent of Web technologies, we are now witnessing a phase of innovation and experimentation in our approaches to peer review. These developments prompted us to examine emerging models of peer review from a range of disciplines and venues, and to ask how they might address some of the issues with our current systems of peer review. (…) »

Source > f1000research.com, Tennant JP, Dugan JM, Graziotin D et al. [version 1; referees: awaiting peer review]. 2017, 6:1151 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12037.1)
https://lalist.inist.fr/?p=25861
lalist.inist.fr
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-29
38739
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MRCFMMMDV4FVVACK46XVDTGDJ4ONZZA6
<urn:uuid:42289275-951c-4bbb-9688-8120a8aa902e>
2020-07-07T09:53:01Z
193.54.109.71
text/html
sha1:Q764E4YKGYU4OY23EHUVEM5JXCIW4RAC
<urn:uuid:03552db6-2a35-443e-81d1-8a48618dcbff>
https://lalist.inist.fr/?p=25861
response
<urn:uuid:cfbd7400-437e-47d8-9463-0c7c3b9e6825>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-29
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-193.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/