Statements appearing in these forums represent the opinions of the authors
of each post, not the opinion of WritersWeekly.com and/or BookLocker.com.
It is currently April 19th, 2015, 10:08 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: March 8th, 2004, 8:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 2nd, 2004, 3:40 pm
Posts: 31
Sams Technical Publishing is using an author contract very unfavorable to writers. The COO has no code of ethics and doesn't care what he does or to whom he does it. It's all about the benjamins. His dealings with staff and freelance help have been less than fair and honest.

Beware.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 9th, 2004, 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: January 13th, 2004, 4:38 pm
Posts: 426
Frankly, without more details, I don't find this kind of posting very useful. It would be helpful to know WHY you think the contract is unfavorable, and exactly what has been done to make you think they are not fair and honest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 9th, 2004, 12:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 2nd, 2004, 3:40 pm
Posts: 31
Sorry that wasn't helpful.

Well, first, the publisher sets unrealistic, tight deadlines with penalties for missed deadlines (which are often set at the last minute, w/o agreement btw parties). Second, the royalties he pays are lower than average market rate. Third, he expects authors (and illustrators) to jump through a lot of unnecessary hoops at his whim. Fourth, he keeps all copyright to everything: text, illustrations, etc., with little compensation for work-for-hire. And last, he is known for breaking contracts in order to ensure a bigger windfall for his company.

I won't even mention the lack of professionalism and ethics, or the demeaning way he talks about and treats people who don't go along with every word he says. No need to get into his sarcastic and dismissive attitude when clients, book sellers, advertisers or talent doesn't immediately agree to anything he says. And of course, why bother mentioning his inexperience, lousy track record or poor judgment?

After seeing several people get screwed and seeing the queue of authors lined up awaiting their turn, I just wanted to issue a warning: this company does not use fair business practices, and even a contract is meaningless.

Good luck to all!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://forums.writersweekly.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1253&view=next
forums.writersweekly.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-18
21486
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ELC7GRD7BJCSRILSOI2SDJHLJ6QWXT6W
<urn:uuid:71e7a488-167f-4b49-812f-292e605f4dc3>
2015-04-19T14:08:03Z
216.252.193.26
sha1:SB3FVLCI63V7N373LOCV7ISPNNZ4VHRO
<urn:uuid:73bd1be0-4ce3-4068-98ce-aa1ec8e7ca4a>
http://forums.writersweekly.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1253&view=next
response
<urn:uuid:2623ecbd-838b-46e5-9d13-bcb652e69651>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-235-10-82.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-18
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf