↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

A reply to Gomez and Hart's ‘goldrush’

Overview of attention for article published in Geographical Journal, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A reply to Gomez and Hart's ‘goldrush’
Published in
Geographical Journal, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/geoj.12044
Authors

Katherine Crowley Née Donovan, John R Elliott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 22%
United Kingdom 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 56%
Social Sciences 2 22%
Psychology 1 11%
Philosophy 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,820,151
of 12,462,556 outputs
Outputs from Geographical Journal
#566
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,645
of 151,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geographical Journal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,462,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.
https://wiley.altmetric.com/details/1683459
wiley.altmetric.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-40
28046
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZBMLYHFA4ZSMVNUMSQGS2EE3CZCKOEPJ
<urn:uuid:0e26062b-766a-48e2-8f38-dfc7b9e909fe>
2020-09-19T22:33:15Z
151.101.250.2
text/html
sha1:KMJOQH5VP5L4VS3ZB2K7XPIACLNPGMHI
<urn:uuid:9bf6ede5-c91d-4812-913a-902ae7a453ce>
https://wiley.altmetric.com/details/1683459
response
<urn:uuid:38b21aa3-9d58-45d3-ad45-3ea7228fbbf8>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-139.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/