×
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SpaceShipRat -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The comments are usually more reliable than the article, but I've found /r/documentaries is an exception.

The comments there can be really off-base, probably because the content's so long, nearly no one watches it, so everyone's just guessing from the title and other comments.
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/apmwiv/reddit_users_are_the_least_valuable_of_any_social/egakchd/
www.reddit.com
CC-MAIN-2023-23
71547
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MRWWHIVYJMDXKPM7INUIJQDNIARQHSXW
<urn:uuid:1d324948-d20a-4e0c-90a2-7e1a68346f14>
2023-06-08T13:08:35Z
146.75.33.140
text/html
sha1:Z3DYYPTN2G4BX6PH3EM3F7R6AFBADU5S
<urn:uuid:a2c776b7-a1cb-475c-9ca6-8c744342889c>
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/apmwiv/reddit_users_are_the_least_valuable_of_any_social/egakchd/
response
<urn:uuid:6c2b765b-022a-4e5c-9859-4b58e297742a>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-23
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May/June 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-37
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/