Journal article

Open-access mega-journals: the future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review

27 Mar 2017
CREATORS

113

29

Share

Description

Purpose

Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) represent an increasingly important part of the scholarly communication landscape. OAMJs, such as PLOS ONE, are large scale, broad scope journals that operate an open access business model (normally based on article-processing charges), and which employ a novel form of peer review, focussing on scientific “soundness” and eschewing judgement of novelty or importance. The purpose of this paper is to examine the discourses relating to OAMJs, and their place within scholarly publishing, and considers attitudes towards mega-journals within the academic community.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper presents a review of the literature of OAMJs structured around four defining characteristics: scale, disciplinary scope, peer review policy, and economic model. The existing scholarly literature was augmented by searches of more informal outputs, such as blogs and e-mail discussion lists, to capture the debate in its entirety.

Findings

While the academic literature relating specifically to OAMJs is relatively sparse, discussion in other fora is detailed and animated, with debates ranging from the sustainability and ethics of the mega-journal model, to the impact of soundness-only peer review on article quality and discoverability, and the potential for OAMJs to represent a paradigm-shifting development in scholarly publishing.

Originality/value

This paper represents the first comprehensive review of the mega-journal phenomenon, drawing not only on the published academic literature, but also grey, professional and informal sources. The paper advances a number of ways in which the role of OAMJs in the scholarly communication environment can be conceptualised.

Advertisement

 

PUBLICATION DETAILS

Resource Type: 
Identifiers: 
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082
APO URI: http://apo.org.au/node/74921
Peer Reviewed: 
No
http://apo.org.au/node/74921
apo.org.au
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-39
40511
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:IWLEGI6ZUFK7L33NIZWNGF4EF32HR2DI
<urn:uuid:e5b72674-ad28-4e9f-8b72-93e71e5a3a36>
2017-09-25T13:36:55Z
52.63.96.32
text/html
sha1:MHIKML2ISVJ34QLUFYRAYCCDRIVPZMKE
<urn:uuid:b71ba12f-1a2e-4fd3-b26c-c8e319d7705f>
http://apo.org.au/node/74921
length
response
<urn:uuid:894dc928-fdeb-4f13-94ed-6267148e108f>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-141-78-225.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-39
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf