Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Collections Assessment Surveys
Collections Assessment Surveys
Collections Assessment Surveys
Collections Assessment Surveys
Collections Assessment Surveys
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Collections Assessment Surveys

3,261

Published on

List of methodologies being reviewed by the Archival Collections Assessment working group, OCLC Research. More information here: …

List of methodologies being reviewed by the Archival Collections Assessment working group, OCLC Research. More information here: http://www.oclc.org/programs/ourwork/collectivecoll/archives/backlogtools.htm

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,261
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
39
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Historical Society of Pennsylvania<br />Mellon Collections Preservation and Backlog Processing Planning Project (2000-2002)<br />This comprehensive survey appears to be the first in a series of Mellon-funded projects aimed at collecting qualitative and quantitative data about unprocessed special collections material. The model developed in this project includes measures of the following for each collection surveyed: physical condition, quality of housing, physical access (arrangement), intellectual access (description), and research value (interest and quality of documentation). Between 2000 and 2002, project staff surveyed approximately 5,000 collections, including 3,000 manuscript collections; 300,000 maps, prints, drawings, broadsides, and photographs; and approximately 11,000 art objects and artifacts. <br />University of Virginia <br />Andrew W. Mellon Special Collections Assessment Project (2002-2004)<br />Modeled on the Historical Society of Pennsylvania project, this survey of the archival and manuscript holdings in the Special Collections Library resulted in data that has been used to determine cataloging and processing priorities and to generate time and cost estimates for the work associated with collections that require additional processing. Project staff collected several types of use data to measure current interest in the holdings of the Special Collections Library, developed a methodology to identify current and future research trends that those collections might support, and evaluated the ease with which staff can locate and serve collection materials to patrons and the ability for patrons to identify relevant materials in those collections. The survey procedure manual and the data collection form are available at the project website.<br />Columbia University<br />Mellon Special Collections Materials Survey (2003-2004)<br />Between October 2003 and July 2004, staff at Columbia University Libraries surveyed unprocessed collections held in the Rare Book and Manuscript Library, the Avery Architectural and Fine Art Library, and the C.V. Starr East Asian Library. In total, 1,588 survey hours were spent entering data on 569 collections and accounting for 26,299 units stretching 15,867 linear feet. These collections are composed of 8,703 feet of loose paper; 87,948 bound volumes of all types; 100,903 architectural drawings; 14,218 graphic works; 158,478 photographic materials; 136,457 negatives, slides, motion pictures and microfilm; 1,288 phonographs; 6,559 audiotapes, videotapes and computer media; 277 optical media items, and nearly 3,400 pieces of realia and memorabilia. <br />The project website includes a guide to the survey instrument/database and a description of the ratings, both of which are modeled on but vary from those developed at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Staff in the Rare Book and Manuscript Library are using the database to track accessions and as a source for box lists and other forms of preliminary and intermediate access tools; Preservation Department staff rely on it for preservation and conservation planning and for establishing departmental goals and priorities.<br />Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries (PACSCL)<br />Consortial Survey Initiative (2006-2008)<br />The Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries (PACSCL) Consortial Survey Initiative is a 30-month project funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to assess unprocessed, underprocessed, and underdescribed archival collections in a range of physical formats held in 22 Philadelphia area institutions. Modeled on the Historical Society of Pennsylvania project, the purpose of the survey is to collect data that can be used to (1) inform planning for, and prioritization of, collections work within individual institutions and across the consortium and (2) improve intellectual access to unprocessed and underprocessed collections by making collection-level records available to the public. As of the end of October, 2,100 collections totaling over 19,400 linear feet in 22 institutions have been surveyed. <br />Survey data is recorded in a shared, publicly-accessible database developed specifically for the project. Because it includes fields that allow institutions to maintain internally significant data, such as location and provenance information, the database can be used as a basic accessions or collection management system by individual institutions. The website includes links to project documentation including a survey checklist, a description of the ratings, and a guide to the database.<br />University of Michigan<br />Unprocessed Collections Survey Project (2009)<br />This project engaged masters-degree students at the School of Information in a pilot project aimed at determining the feasibility of a comprehensive survey of un- and underprocessed collections held by the Special Collections Library. Working mostly in teams of two, and using an assessment methodology derived from the Historical Society of Pennsylvania project, the 22 students collected quantitative and qualitative information on a total of 17 unprocessed collections of archival and manuscript material. Their findings, and the reports documenting their effort and their observations, will be used immediately to populate a web-accessible database that the Special Collections Library will employ to create and make available adequate and uniform collection-level descriptions; understand more fully the prevalence of unmet preservation challenges; inform collection management decisions; and establish and guide processing priorities. Project documentation includes a field-by-field description of the database tables and an illustrated procedure manual. <br />The Bancroft Library (University of California, Berkeley)<br />Manuscript Survey Project (February 2008 – January 2011)<br />With funds provided by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation, the Bancroft Library is undertaking a comprehensive survey of all manuscript holdings processed before 1996, including a backlog of some 595 collections representing 25,000 linear feet of archival and manuscript material that is currently unavailable for research. Project staff, working over a three-year period, will apply standard archival appraisal methodologies to each collection in order to determine its scope and content, identify preservation needs, make recommendations regarding arrangement and description, and estimate the resources required to make it fully accessible to researchers. The survey will yield updated, accurate, and detailed information that will be used to establish processing goals, develop funding priorities, and facilitate collection management decisions, including those involving the de-accessioning of out-of-scope materials. <br />Canadian Museum of Nature<br />Assessing and Managing Risks to Your Collections<br />The Canadian Museum of Nature regularly offers workshops on identifying, ranking, and mitigating risks to collections of cultural property. Based upon the Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model developed by the Canadian Museum of Nature, the workshop provides participants with a methodological approach to identifying types of risk, calculating magnitudes of risk, determining methods for controlling risks, and evaluating mitigation strategies. Participants receive a manual and a Risk Assessment Worksheet (in Excel) designed for use in a comprehensive collection risk assessment.<br />National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian Institution)<br />Angels Project (1996)<br />In conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Institute for Conservation, an Angels Project connects conservators with a collection that needs care. The project described in this report served as a pilot to develop and demonstrate “ideal” procedures for the processing, rehousing, and reformatting of an important collection of scientific illustrations.<br />Smithsonian Institution Archives<br />Collections Management System<br />The Smithsonian Institution Archives uses two survey tools within its collections management system (an in-house Access database).  There is a preservation assessment based upon the tool described in An Angel Project of Dinosaur Proportions, and a processing assessment that uses some of the same metrics found in the preservation assessment to generate a “level of processing need” report.  These two assessments can generate priority lists for the area of preservation backlog or processing backlog;  they can also be intersected to generate a prioritization list of collections that require both preservation and processing.   When seeking projects that are suitable for interns, volunteers, or staff these lists are frequently reviewed to find the most vulnerable collections.  The  system also has a component that reassesses collections and can assign a lower priority score once any degree of preservation intervention or processing has been applied.  Archivists track work done on collections in this manner and can generate statistics on the amount of effort, supplies, and improvements that have occurred.<br />North West Regional Archive Council (UK)<br />Logjam: Audit Toolkit (2003)<br />[note: in order to download the toolkit, you must search for “Logjam” and create a free user account]<br />Taking the form of a detailed audit, the Logjam project was designed to “scope the size and type of uncatalogued collections held in 30 of the region’s principle archive-holding institutions.” The work was undertaken by the North West Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (NWMLAC) on behalf of North West Regional Archive Council (NWRAC). The project represents one component of a strategy aimed at improving and expanding access to the region’s archives by making finding aids and collections more widely available and by developing a collaborative approach to cataloging backlogs. Specific goals of the project include (1) producing a detailed picture of the uncataloged archival collections held in each repository and in the region as a whole (2) describing the resources required to catalog these collections and (3) assigning priorities for cataloging these collections and (4) identifying priorities for future collaborative projects within the region.<br />Washington State University Libraries<br />Comprehensive Preservation Survey of Manuscript and Historical Photograph Collections (2004-2005)<br />With a grant from the Washington Preservation Initiative, a LSTA-funded program administered by the Washington State Library, the Washington State University Libraries assessed the physical condition of processed manuscript and photograph collections held by Manuscripts, Archives, and Special Collections.<br />Staff surveyed approximately 4,400 linear feet of manuscripts and 120 collections containing more than 500,000 photographic images. The project website includes links to survey forms, sample database records, and a photo gallery.<br />WGBH Media Library and Archives<br />Assessment for Scholarly Use<br />The WGBH Media Library and Archives (MLA) Assessment for Scholarly Use project, funded by the Andrew w. Mellon Foundation, was designed to achieve two goals: to determine the educational value of WGBH’s extensive archival collection for higher education research and instruction, and to accomplish this by designing an assessment instrument for surveying audio-visual collections that could be shared with other institutions. At the start of the project, the MLA housed approximately 29,000 programs with 570,000 related production elements and documents, numbers that suggest both the potential worth of this collection to the academic community and the complexity of evaluating its educational value. The study approached this challenge by (1) creating a framework and tool for collecting information about the archived programs (2) assembling a detailed composite portrait of the archival collection and (3) modeling potential approaches to analyzing and employing the data compiled through this work. The extensive project report includes the assessment tool and recommendations regarding its use by other institutions.<br />

×
http://www.slideshare.net/RLGPrograms/collections-assessment-surveys
www.slideshare.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-27
137395
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:KXWKVND4RS6YCCDRSPOSKXZPH4I6X3DJ
<urn:uuid:cb658898-1ca5-42fc-9ea4-3082fdbc4c17>
2015-07-03T12:44:02Z
108.174.2.138
sha1:OZHQWTNWF6W3MED72TXHVJHFKIHUX7X4
<urn:uuid:d55e19ec-b981-4b2b-acb9-823323821daa>
http://www.slideshare.net/RLGPrograms/collections-assessment-surveys
length
response
<urn:uuid:a5f2a3f9-61fd-4e7c-b783-794bd9047d50>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-179-60-89.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-27
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf