Hybrid open-access journal

Summary

A hybrid open-access journal is a subscription journal in which some of the articles are open access. This status typically requires the payment of a publication fee (also called an article processing charge or APC) to the publisher in order to publish an article open access, in addition to the continued payment of subscriptions to access all other content. Strictly speaking, the term "hybrid open-access journal" is incorrect, possibly misleading, as using the same logic such journals could also be called "hybrid subscription journals". Simply using the term "hybrid access journal" is accurate.[original research?]

Publishers that offer a hybrid open access option often use different names for it. The SHERPA/RoMEO site provides a list of publishers and the names of their options.[1] The Open Access Directory[2] provides a list of funds that support open access journals, and provides information about which funds will pay fees of hybrid open access journals.[3]

Origins of Hybrid Open Access

The concept was first proposed in 1998 when Thomas Walker suggested that authors could purchase extra visibility at a price.[4] The first journal recognized as using this model was Walker's own Florida Entomologist; it was later extended to the other publications of the Entomological Society of America. The idea was later refined by David Prosser in 2003 in the journal Learned Publishing.[5] The larger academic publishers began offering hybrid open access journals around the same time, with Springer and Wiley both having started by 2005. Within two years, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis and the Nature Publishing Group had followed suit.[6]

Gradual Uptake of Hybrid Open Access

The early uptake of Hybrid Open Access was slow, and differed between countries. A study in 2012 noted that "The number of hybrid journals has doubled in the past couple of years and is now over 4,300,"but concluded that there was "lack of success of this business model.", with only 1 to 2% of researchers making use of it.[7][8] However, the United Kingdom was a notable front runner in using the model, "its use of OA in hybrid journals and of delayed OA journals is more than twice the world average"[9] Growth slowly continued, and a 2018 large-scale survey of Open Access business models across global scholarly publishing estimated that between 3 and 8% of articles were published via Hybrid Open Access.[10] Research carried out a year later indicated that Hybrid Open Access had actually peaked around 2016.[11]

Growing Criticism

While hybrid Open Access began as an agreed method amongst publishers, scientists and libraries for a gradual transition towards full Open Access, it soon attracted various criticisms for being unfair.

'Double Dipping'

Since one source of funds to pay for open access articles is the library subscription budget, it has been proposed that there needs to be a decrease in the subscription cost to the library in order to avoid 'double dipping' where an article is paid for twice – once through subscription fees, and again through an APC. For example, the Open Access Authors Fund of the University of Calgary Library (2009/09) requires that: "To be eligible for funding in this [hybrid open access] category, the publisher must plan to make (in the next subscription year) reductions to the institutional subscription prices based on the number of open-access articles in those journals."[12] On 12 November 2009, Nature Publishing Group issued a news release on how open access affected its subscription prices.[13]

However, university libraries were unconvinced that the decrease in prices was occurring.[14] A report on work carried out by the University of Nottingham since 2006 to introduce and manage an institutional open access fund has been published by Stephen Pinfield in Learned Publishing.[15] In this article, the author comments that: "As publishers' income has increased from OA [open-access] fees in the hybrid model, there has been little or no let-up in journal subscription inflation, and only a small minority of publishers have yet committed to adjusting their subscription prices as they receive increasing levels of income from OA options." By 2018, this particular problem was considered so extreme in the area of open access book (as opposed to journal) publishing that the Anti Double Dipping Alliance was formed.[16]

Institutional Responses to Hybrid Open Access

Towards the start of Hybrid Open Access, some universities, research centers, foundations, and government agencies designated funds to pay publication fees (APCs) of fee-based open access journals, including hybrid. However, as criticism of hybrid has grown, a substantial number of such funds (40%) will not reimburse APCs in hybrid journals, including Harvard University, CERN, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Columbia University and the Norwegian Research Council.[3] The European Commission has also announced that the ninth framework program (Horizon Europe) will not cover the cost of APCs in hybrid journals.[17] Science Europe has set up a coalition of European research funders (cOAlition S) who have explicitly ruled out reimbursing APCs in hybrid journals from 2020 with the express aim of driving a more rapid transition towards full open access (see transformative journal).[18]

Publishers have argued against the above criticisms and reposonses, arguing that hybrid "as successfully meet[s] market demands and foster[s] growth in open access publishing."[19]

Advantages and disadvantages to the author

An author who wants to publish in an open-access format is not limited to the relatively small number of "full" open-access journals, but can also choose from the available hybrid open-access journals, which includes journals published by many of the largest academic publishers.

However, the author must still find the money. Many funding agencies are ready to let authors use grant funds, or apply for supplementary funds, to pay publication fees at open-access journals. (Only a minority of open-access journals charge such fees, but nearly all hybrid open access journals do so.) So far, the funding agencies that are willing to pay these fees do not distinguish between full and hybrid open-access journals. On 19 October 2009, one such funding agency, the Wellcome Trust, expressed concerns about hybrid open-access fees being paid twice, through subscriptions and through publication fees.[20]

If an author is unable to pay the fees or chooses not to do so, they often retain the right to share their work online by self-archiving in an open access repository.

Variations

The American Society of Plant Biologists has adopted a policy[21] that articles contributed by society members to its journal, Plant Physiology, will be made open access immediately on publication at no additional charge. Non-member authors can receive OA through payment of $1,000, but since membership is only $115/year,[22] it is expected this initiative will boost membership.

Partial open access exists when only research articles are open (as in BMJ), while articles in other categories are paywalled.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 10 April 2016. Retrieved 22 April 2016.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  2. ^ Robin Peek (ed.). "Open Access Directory". US: Simmons School of Library and Information Science. OCLC 757073363. Archived from the original on 30 January 2010. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  3. ^ a b "OA journal funds". Open Access Directory. Archived from the original on 29 March 2016. Retrieved 22 April 2016.
  4. ^ Walker, Thomas (1998). "Free Internet Access to Traditional Journals". American Scientist. 86 (5): 463. Bibcode:1998AmSci..86..463W. doi:10.1511/1998.5.463.
  5. ^ David Prosser (2003). "From here to there: a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access". Learned Publishing. 16 (3): 163–166. doi:10.1087/095315103322110923.
  6. ^ Communication, Office of Scholarly. "Hybrid open access – an analysis | Unlocking Research". Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  7. ^ Björk, Bo-Christer (August 2012). "The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment?". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63 (8): 1496–1504. doi:10.1002/asi.22709. hdl:10138/157318.
  8. ^ Björk, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David (2014). "How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals". Learned Publishing. 27 (2): 93–103. doi:10.1087/20140203. hdl:10138/157329.
  9. ^ Jubb, M.; Goldstein, S.; Amin, M.; Plume, A.; Aisati, M.; Oeben, S.; Pinfield, S.; Bath, P.; Salter, J. (16 September 2015). "Monitoring the transition to open access: A report for Universities UK". www.researchinfonet.org. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  10. ^ [No title found], doi:10.7717/peerj.4375/table-3 |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  11. ^ Pollock, Dan; Michael, Ann (21 October 2019). "News & Views: Have We Reached Peak Hybrid?". Delta Think. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  12. ^ Open Access Authors Fund[permanent dead link]
  13. ^ "Open Access uptake prompts 9% price reduction for The EMBO Journal and EMBO Reports". Archived from the original on 2 June 2017. Retrieved 14 November 2009.
  14. ^ Cheung, Melanie (6 February 2015). "The costs of double dipping". Research Libraries UK. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  15. ^ http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/alpsp/lp/2010/00000023/00000001/art00008 Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine Learned Publishing (January 2010)
  16. ^ "Anti Double Dipping Alliance for transparency in Open Access book publishing formed". Knowledge Unlatched. 7 May 2018. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  17. ^ "Horizon Europe impact assessment SWD(2018) 307". European Commission. Archived from the original on 13 August 2018. Retrieved 13 August 2018.
  18. ^ "cOAlition S - Making open access a reality by 2020". Science Europe. Archived from the original on 5 October 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2018.
  19. ^ By (19 February 2019). "Is Hybrid a Valid Pathway to Open Access? Publishers Argue Yes, in Response to Plan S". The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  20. ^ http://ukpmc.blogspot.com/2009/10/wellcome-trust-calls-for-greater.html Archived 22 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine Wellcome Trust calls for greater transparency from journals on open-access publishing costs
  21. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 4 April 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2008.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  22. ^ "membership". Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2006.

External links

  • Nine questions for hybrid journal programs by Peter Suber, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, issue No. 101, 2 September 2006.
  • More on society publishers with OA journals by Peter Suber, Open Access News, 3 November 2007.
  • When Is Open Access Not Open Access? by Catriona J. MacCallum, PLoS Biology, 2007; 5(10): e285.
https://www.knowpia.com/knowpedia/Hybrid_open-access_journal
www.knowpia.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-49
113903
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:PULBDR66FVPLZKRCYXR4RRFWGLMIALNL
<urn:uuid:cbc783c3-e927-43a7-9a52-1888b6260860>
2021-12-06T02:12:30Z
18.224.181.193
text/html
sha1:ZWCNZUPDSSDLSPED4A54DL5X3XQWGSWU
<urn:uuid:d23671b5-c751-44a0-b9ee-ba33db5261e4>
https://www.knowpia.com/knowpedia/Hybrid_open-access_journal
response
<urn:uuid:fdcbea3c-6612-448b-aad8-2b2206500ea3>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-155
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/