Trusting Community Reporting?

 Community Media, Debate, DIY-DMU, DMU, EMCMN  Comments Off on Trusting Community Reporting?
May 012018
 

John Naughton writing in The Guardian makes a very powerful point about the need for trusted sources of information in developing communities. With the use of Facebook as a tool for promoting fake news, which has led to violence in Myanmar and Sri Lanka, Naughton suggests that:

We have woken up to Facebook’s pernicious role in western democratic politics and are beginning to think about ways of addressing that problem in our bailiwicks. To date, the ideas about regulation that have surfaced seem ineffectual and so the damage continues. But at least liberal democracies have some degree of immunity to the untruths disseminated by bad actors who exploit Facebook’s automated targeting systems – provided by a free press, parliamentary inquiries, independent judiciaries, public-service broadcasters, universities, professional bodies and so on.

However, as Naughton goes on to point out:

Other societies, particularly the developing countries now most assiduously targeted by Facebook, have few such institutions and it is there that the company has the capacity to wreak the most havoc.

The importance of trust in our civic and community media is crucial to promoting peace and reconciliation, but do we have the right tools to do this as independent media producers and communities? Large media organisations spend a lot of time promoting their ‘brand’ identity so that it can be trusted and relied upon, but this appraoch isn’t available to small, independent, volunteer-led community media groups.

Is there a way, then, perhaps with something like the Mozilla Open Badges project, which independently verified people’s learning, to independently verify the output of reporters across different media platforms, networks and communities?

Trust is the currency that holds society togehter, and when trust dies, our social order suffers. How can we build a new infrastructure that enables trust to be implicity validated in our media use, and what would the criteria be that would demonstrate that a reporter or a media producer is a trusted source? If Uber and Tripadvisor can do this, why can’t news organisations and social media corporations put some funding and development time into producing trust tokens for community reporters?
http://robwatsonmedia.net/tag/fakenews/
robwatsonmedia.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-30
67612
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:A7TPEMQPL4WVSRECZLG3KT23ZWA7R5QX
<urn:uuid:e844b49b-9d9f-4608-bc3d-cf4628b85d40>
2018-07-19T17:35:52Z
192.163.218.72
text/html
sha1:VB2XPZ5PYNLA2YP2KY3GPBLBSWQY4GNT
<urn:uuid:0facb4a4-59e6-47c6-a5c1-cbbc9f94deb5>
http://robwatsonmedia.net/tag/fakenews/
response
<urn:uuid:1b738ea3-4fc6-408d-86f5-d0da6852f8d5>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-170-172-222.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-30
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf