63
References allow the reader to look up information and read more about particular phenomena or research that was discussed in the current study. While reading the study, the quality of the references should be considered. If, for instance, a study uses research from unprofessional or questionable sources, the validity of his arguments will also be questionable. Look for journals that are known and respected in the profession as this will help to determine the strength of the supporting material that led to the development of the original theory.
https://allpsych.com/research-methods/criticalanalysis/references/
allpsych.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-04
34862
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:S6KMX5JWF5PXLTIG3BRQZX3T2WXHNNEK
<urn:uuid:1f00823e-09b1-4b7f-9bb0-68a73909de60>
2021-01-20T15:32:51Z
192.169.220.85
text/html
sha1:BJCKZ2YYTFG7WWILDXJHS4HFG5XKZX5S
<urn:uuid:43c1a318-64b3-406a-8c8b-7d4c8ca8d242>
https://allpsych.com/research-methods/criticalanalysis/references/
response
<urn:uuid:272369e7-2449-45bc-b578-32be974738e6>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-04
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-103.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/