3

I was looking at my declined flags, and found a declined Unclear what you're asking for this question.

Since March the OP has not given any new information that is required to properly answer this. One answerer wasted time on a wild suggestion of what might be off, and asked for more info (link to sheet).

I cannot reraise my VTC, so I'm bringing the question to attention via this way. Can it be closed as unclear?

| |
  • While it's good to be patient specially with those that ask their first question on this site, after a couple of days (or weeks if you prefer so) If the question is not clear down-vote it. – Rubén Aug 12 '19 at 17:03
  • 1
    The actual "declining" of the flag likely came from a "Leave Open" vote in the close votes queue, so it wasn't intentionally dismissed. – jonsca Aug 12 '19 at 22:45
1

The question has now been closed.

As I mentioned in my comment, this was not due to any misjudgement on your part; the flag was not explicitly moderator declined, but autodeclined when "Leave Open" was selected in the CV queue.

| |

You must log in to answer this question.
https://webapps.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4682/question-should-be-closed-as-unclear
webapps.meta.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-34
115288
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:57W6WHJD6XJL7LEE5STWLU45VHGLQ4Q4
<urn:uuid:2f26802e-2884-4165-b48e-1d7fe37dce8c>
2020-08-03T15:43:46Z
151.101.65.69
text/html
sha1:RN4IDHJOAIGYCVR6QLMEAN6JENLBDRKI
<urn:uuid:fb9efe59-9926-4868-864c-988ed8a76a9a>
https://webapps.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4682/question-should-be-closed-as-unclear
response
<urn:uuid:850d71df-65f4-4bd2-9086-dfc784093b21>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-34
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-230.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/