Thursday, June 13, 2013

B - Are alternative metrics still alternative?

Buschman M, Michalek A. Are alternative metrics still alternative? Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2013;39(4):35-39

Alternative metrics provide a more complete view of peer response to scholarly writings. A better categorization of scholarly impact would cover usage, captures, mentions and social media in addition to citations. Metrics should include mentions in blogs and other nontraditional formats, open review forums, electronic book downloads, library circulation counts, bookmarks, tweets and more.
http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-13/AprMay13_Buschman_Michalek.html

No comments:
http://ese-bookshelf.blogspot.com/2013/06/b-are-alternative-metrics-still.html
ese-bookshelf.blogspot.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-30
97544
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:OSOCEHK2YXJEFP7H2Z2Y6P7FEKG36XN2
<urn:uuid:fdf47dc4-9188-4dd8-8a16-2118f34d1c21>
2018-07-16T18:25:30Z
172.217.7.161
text/html
sha1:WAPD6E444HJKYX3LVOHSUJXCFGOGJYDE
<urn:uuid:a35b1644-ab97-4c8d-888f-d7599c423cf0>
http://ese-bookshelf.blogspot.com/2013/06/b-are-alternative-metrics-still.html
response
<urn:uuid:eec0da1a-07d0-4fc2-9793-7a7cda27632a>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-61-216-17.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-30
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf