14

It seems that is used mostly for tagging questions, which are about or .

What's more, there is even no wiki excerpt for this tag. Maybe because it's hard to find any other possible usage of different than or . It looks like this two tags would be just enough.

5
  • 3
    They want to take my chee... ham!
    – Braiam
    Apr 30, 2015 at 20:37
  • 3
    With only 30 questions tagged with hamming it should be fairly easy to retag them.
    – Dijkgraaf
    Apr 30, 2015 at 22:10
  • 1
    You really should have dramatized this question more somehow... you know, hammed it up. May 1, 2015 at 3:01
  • 2
    There's also a Hamming window (not to be confused with the Hanning window)
    – Ben Voigt
    May 1, 2015 at 3:42
  • 1
    Stop ... hamming time! May 2, 2015 at 3:20

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/291990/should-hamming-tag-be-burninated
meta.stackoverflow.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-40
98805
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:K4LM47JIIWB5Q6FNXQBRM3TJZGADDJNC
<urn:uuid:071850ce-98be-460c-b824-64880dd377ed>
2022-10-02T06:43:30Z
151.101.193.69
text/html
sha1:QQNIWSQNTKY44GCASTMPDUHI3AYFKJRD
<urn:uuid:213ce0fa-4ff2-410d-a39e-cae7220ce268>
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/291990/should-hamming-tag-be-burninated
response
<urn:uuid:fc2f4567-42bc-4b42-872e-39e645ab6f0f>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September/October 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-72
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/