TY - JOUR UR - https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2463v3 DO - 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2463v3 TI - Cost hurdles to open access publishing: A citizen scientist perspective AU - Ng,Wenfa DA - 2017/01/26 PY - 2017 KW - open access KW - science publishing KW - publication fee KW - experiment KW - citizen scientist KW - simulation KW - citizen science KW - theory AB - Besides offering fun activities for non-scientists to explore the natural world through experiments, simulations or games, the evolving concept of citizen science is increasingly allowing some serious publication quality science to be published by the practitioners (citizen scientists) themselves. The latter is in contrast to the common perception of citizen science, where most citizen science projects such as Foldit are distribution of piecemeal segments of complex projects suitable for solution by individuals, and where the results are pooled together and informs the design and direction of more complex research initiatives. Usually novices in science publishing but nonetheless aware of the importance of journal articles as the primary medium for communicating new research to the wider community (scientific and general public), citizen scientists do encounter significant challenges in science publication. One challenge is in navigating the lengthy and time-consuming peer review process of most journals. But, as benefactors of open access publishing given that most journal articles are within pay walls inaccessible to citizen scientists without any research funding, open access publishing is one platform sought after or exist as an option for citizen scientists. Is the option open? Yes, at the preprint level where figshare, and PeerJ Preprints help provide an avenue for citizen scientists to have a published non peer reviewed article online, but no at the higher end gold (or immediate) open access journal article level where the manuscript needs to be peer reviewed. Even the biological sciences preprint server, bioRxiv, is closed to citizen scientists as publication on the server requires an institution affiliation with either a university or research institute. Most open access publishers charge a publication fee (in the hundreds to thousands of dollars per article) to defray the cost of maintaining an online presence for a peer reviewed manuscript as well as those for copyediting during final stages of journal article production. This is a significant barrier to cost constrained citizen scientists who want to contribute to the scientific discourse. For the scientific enterprise, this represent a loss, whose magnitude or severity cannot be quantified since ideas help seed new research ideas and fields. Thus, can we as a community provide citizen scientists worldwide a chance to publish gold open access peer reviewed articles without significant cost through a competitive publication fee subsidy scheme where each application is reviewed by the national science funding agency? If the above is possible, it would open up another area where ideas from citizen scientists could percolate into the scientific mainstream, where, as always, vibrancy and diversity of ideas power science forward. VL - 5 SP - e2463v3 T2 - PeerJ Preprints JO - PeerJ Preprints J2 - PeerJ Preprints SN - 2167-9843 ER -
https://peerj.com/preprints/2463.ris
peerj.com
CC-MAIN-2024-33
5507
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:EE7DSELMNHBU5RKEFTXDFQ64K2GHKH4I
<urn:uuid:1170b729-4f22-4cc0-b62f-3735e63ab0e1>
2024-08-13T19:51:23Z
44.210.228.188
text/plain
sha1:PSE2ZMPRI6NBMGB7XFYZ2X3W676Q6AIV
<urn:uuid:ee0e90f4-ffda-41be-b92d-76cb546b10de>
https://peerj.com/preprints/2463.ris
response
<urn:uuid:16ade4c0-9d67-4b6c-88e7-bec4e0688902>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-33
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-188
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/