W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:23:19 +0100
Message-ID: <54B813A7.6050602@few.vu.nl>
To: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Great that we agree, Bernadette!

Cheers,

Antoine

On 1/15/15 8:17 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> I agree with you! I think that Data Vocabularies BP should be enough
> to cover the R-MetadataDocum requirement.
>
> I also agree that ' code lists' deserve a better explanation. Let's
> work on this!
>
> Thanks!
> Bernadette
>
>
>
> 2015-01-14 21:10 GMT-03:00 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:
>> Hi Bernadette,
>>
>> I'd say that if a list of value becomes sufficiently important to deserve
>> documentation, it is certainly worth considering it as a vocabulary.
>>
>> This would solve your issue. Or at least reduce it to an editorial issue
>> rather than adding a BP: the section on vocabulary should cover 'lists' well
>> enough.
>>
>> I have tried to add a reference to 'code list' there. It's probably not
>> enough. That's part of the actions I've noted for myself at [1].
>> Please make suggestions!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Making_controlled_vocabularies_accessible_as_URI_sets
>>
>>
>> On 1/14/15 5:13 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
>> Tracker wrote:
>>>
>>> dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide
>>> metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices
>>> document(s)]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/120
>>>
>>> Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio
>>> On product: Best practices document(s)
>>>
>>> I think we should discuss the intersection among these BP.
>>>
>>> 1. For me it is not clear the difference between Document Metadata and
>>> Provide Metadata for humans as mentioned in the BP Provide metadata in
>>> different formats.
>>>
>>> 2. The BP Document Metadata mentions vocabularies and controlled lists.
>>> Since there is a specific BP to Document Vocabularies, then maybe we should
>>> have a specific BP to Document Controlled Lists.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 19:23:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:31 UTC
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0129.html
lists.w3.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-40
12357
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:JMCGYAAIGZMBQWPR2YVIN6RNICPGFALF
<urn:uuid:f7832b6b-e624-49ba-ab09-3f92f688fe80>
2020-09-28T02:41:14Z
128.30.52.41
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:HNX4KDME6AZFROTILIBZC5KOIREHIZOB
<urn:uuid:c73791db-3580-4f97-a6e9-787ab425f9f9>
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0129.html
response
<urn:uuid:38a03b79-5263-4d27-9fd4-5e6778ed2efd>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-17.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/