ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] GA list

  • To: <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Hugh Dierker'" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ga] GA list
  • From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:45:06 +0100

I think in order to remain as the "official" GA we need to come under the
auspices of ICANN.  This will, in time, give us the necessary clout.

However, I see no problem in establishing a not-for-profit for the GA with
membership scheme/donations etc.

Best

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Baptista [mailto:baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 14 September 2007 13:25
> To: Hugh Dierker
> Cc: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GA
> Subject: Re: [ga] GA list
>
> All the GA is right now is a communications channel labeled " GA
> <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ".   Your concerns with respect to impaired
> functionality of the GA can be fixed by taking over the
> technical functions for this label to an approved domain -
> owned and operated by the GA.  Being those stakeholders
> capable of voting within that label.
>
> That would provide the GA with technical independence which
> is now dependent on the wims of ICANN - who ultimately
> controls this communication medium nd is responsible for the
> technical control of this communications channel of ours.
> Now that we have rules - let us stand up and consider independence.
>
> just a thought ;)
>
> regards
> joe baptista
>
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
> > The super delay in the list and archives to me is making it almost
> > impossible to keep our discussion straight. This can really impair
> > functionality of the GA.
> >
> > We are not using the GNSO secretariat for any function
> relating to our
> > business. Hopefully that will change. So yes I guess by
> default as our
> > only elected at this point I will act in a position to fulfull that
> > role. But not really - we just proceed absent any step to
> do with the
> > Secretariat.
> >
> > Of course we want someone to come up with a better
> mousetrap. I just
> > know we cannot have a lame duck Chair do anything
> spectacular. So the
> > election for a new chair is critical.
> >
> > However with up to three hour delays on the mailing list I
> do not see
> > participation flowing.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the
> > hottest shows
> >
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/tv/mail/tagline/tonightspicks/evt=48220/*http:
> > //tv.yahoo.com/%20>
> > on Yahoo! TV.
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Baptista                                www.publicroot.org
> PublicRoot Consortium
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
> Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>   Office: +1 (202) 517-1593
>      Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
>
>







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>
https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00117.html
gnso.icann.org
CC-MAIN-2024-10
6892
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:4LAY76CALVV2YGXRVBAUQOURT3MSM42P
<urn:uuid:03be72ac-b472-4fc8-b896-374e4b3ad581>
2024-03-03T13:40:47Z
192.0.32.42
text/html
sha1:OOG6IFIQNR7WHBUF6VN3XWVWG2OZVMYJ
<urn:uuid:c0a8fbdb-df6b-446b-9a4f-c46c427d5019>
https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg00117.html
response
<urn:uuid:6d8cdc93-4fab-4ba1-964b-e6c7d51e597a>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-10
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February/March 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-144
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/