Wrters but not Writers, does have some special meanings or just a typo?

proof of Wrters

the original image link

share

migrated from writers.stackexchange.com Nov 19 '11 at 15:59

This question came from our site for authors, editors, reviewers, professional writers, and aspiring writers.

    
I'm pretty sure that's a typo. I hadn't noticed that before! – Steven Drennon Nov 18 '11 at 19:49
    
it seems not be fixed in latest newsletter. – AntiGameZ Nov 27 '11 at 14:24
    
Yeah, and I don't know who to contact to get it corrected. If anyone else has any suggestions then please share! – Steven Drennon Nov 28 '11 at 17:07
1  
@StevenDrennon - I'm used to the SE team noting what happens on the individual Metas, but since no one has responded I will go to them more directly. – justkt Dec 2 '11 at 15:35

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

A fix has been deployed. Thanks for pointing this out.

share

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
http://meta.writers.stackexchange.com/questions/393/why-wrters-newsletter-in-writers-newsletter
meta.writers.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-48
62823
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:43Q7BA25DQMATSQXTUEHYGNW4O76JCXY
<urn:uuid:3eff643f-8050-4318-bfcd-abdc1353bb28>
2015-11-25T06:25:01Z
104.16.116.182
sha1:J54Z5SJG7HHMBROASDUDSLHB64QQSQRY
<urn:uuid:67148650-7459-4368-81f2-5f56c516b5ac>
http://meta.writers.stackexchange.com/questions/393/why-wrters-newsletter-in-writers-newsletter
response
<urn:uuid:88378b61-fa4d-4d4c-8c46-9d206c99fb41>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-71-132-137.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-48
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for Nov 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf