Peer Review Process

Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees by double-blind peer review for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully between 1 - 2 months. Please notice that may be paper submissions to Mutanaqishah the duration of the review process can be up to 3 months.

Reviewers examine the text of the aspects of quality and substance of the writing (not grammar texts), which includes the freshness, originality, usefulness and validity of citations and bibliography.

Reviewers received the manuscript double-blind review (anonymous author) of section editor or editorial secretariat. If it is not according to their competencies, the reviewer is entitled to refuse the manuscript and recommend it to other more competent reviewers. One manuscript is reviewed by one or two reviewers. The final decision of the manuscript is on Editor.  
https://ejournal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/mut/Peer_Review_Process
ejournal.iaingorontalo.ac.id
CC-MAIN-2024-10
18975
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:NHBSCEIM7TNFZCRCDJAMRTJPOBJMVDIG
<urn:uuid:322412ad-1050-4ceb-822a-8d075d363415>
2024-02-27T06:27:13Z
195.35.54.94
text/html
sha1:374DENVBRPQD64UQUACPKL5X4OWRW2PZ
<urn:uuid:d929a83d-e167-4dbe-b518-f4aeb6156a04>
https://ejournal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/mut/Peer_Review_Process
response
<urn:uuid:bde444fe-c044-4634-92ef-f18fce68cdf3>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-10
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February/March 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-126
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/