REVIEW PROCESS

The peer review process of ICITEM can be broadly summarized into 13 steps, although these steps can increase slightly between journals. All Authors must go through these predefined Review process of ICITEM.

This peer review process for Conference and journal publication is very much essential for the quality control mechanism. It is a process by which experts evaluate scholarly works, and its objective is to ensure a high quality of published science.

ICITEM assigns a minimum of 2 peer reviewers (up to 6) are chosen for the peer review. Peer reviewers are ideally experts in their field. ICITEM have an international reviewer’s panels that have a good track record of producing high quality reviews.

Maintained high quality: ICITEM is committed to select high quality research works for the Conferences and Journals at any cost.
Suggestion form Convener: “Write quality papers and innovate something very new and submit the papers into ICITEM. Do not rush into for publication. We only select high quality research papers.
https://www.icitem.com/review-process/
www.icitem.com
CC-MAIN-2024-10
16436
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:BDKX54UMWZT56PWYYFYC7N2JYTKHF2SM
<urn:uuid:3ba82c39-8eca-4592-86fb-d9dba506da9f>
2024-02-21T12:28:38Z
103.92.235.92
text/html
sha1:V52PBAQ44H7RK7F4GMGDORQK333ZAPJZ
<urn:uuid:7f96974e-9e87-4892-babc-0bfe430f0328>
https://www.icitem.com/review-process/
response
<urn:uuid:969095bd-e63b-4e62-b07e-62c48fe4e690>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-10
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February/March 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-150
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/