↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking intertextuality in CDA

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Discourse Studies, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 235)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Rethinking intertextuality in CDA
Published in
Critical Discourse Studies, April 2019
DOI 10.1080/17405904.2019.1609538
Authors

Michael Farrelly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Lecturer 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 5 45%
Arts and Humanities 3 27%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,492,176
of 15,543,024 outputs
Outputs from Critical Discourse Studies
#30
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,241
of 270,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Discourse Studies
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,543,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
https://www.altmetric.com/details/59446863
www.altmetric.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-34
27670
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:BB6BCK7Z6QMQUNYBN62UOLJAMQJ7CWAL
<urn:uuid:e87a4bcc-2647-440c-8e57-0ac253b504af>
2020-08-07T11:08:23Z
151.101.250.2
text/html
sha1:CAYHASVZCQIP7LS7ZNNLR6PBH3NZFGIG
<urn:uuid:8cb889f8-a5f0-40a8-98eb-9f53e9ad57ac>
https://www.altmetric.com/details/59446863
response
<urn:uuid:b23bdb83-2f75-4457-b45a-85f9f427fc93>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-34
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-21.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/