 

2 Responses to Publisher’s Spam Praises Erratum — Asks for More

  1. luispedro says:

    Actually, an erratum is probably well matched to these types of journals :)

  2. Arvixe says:

    It was obvious it’s a spam email from the start. Just check the email address

    On Sep 4, 2013, at 2:35 AM, wrote:

Leave a Reply -- All comments are subject to moderation, including removal.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,252 other followers

%d bloggers like this:
http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/09/17/publishers-spam-praises-erratum-asks-for-more/
scholarlyoa.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-48
58593
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:UVRNAZS677C6YLHWEXA3XO7M3VP23IGD
<urn:uuid:38b0c39a-87fe-4067-a6ce-6d3fc9655a9e>
2015-11-26T01:16:35Z
192.0.78.24
sha1:IWC3NYWWHIMNN4BKVJRDUCZXNGY7NWTR
<urn:uuid:8e17b019-1f04-4d4b-a315-3c1f9577d0f5>
http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/09/17/publishers-spam-praises-erratum-asks-for-more/
length
response
<urn:uuid:c31242b0-c510-4db7-ae7b-af5a525613ac>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-71-132-137.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-48
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for Nov 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf