47 Interesting Science, History, And Art Posts That Were Shared By This Twitter Page

Infotainment has to be our favorite way to spend our coffee breaks and commutes. Equal parts informative and entertaining, it’s the kind of internet content that instantly hooks you in and doesn’t want to let go.

The next thing you know, you’ve spent the last couple of hours reading Wikipedia, jumping from articles about science and the animal kingdom to analyses of historical events and art movements. A single quality social media post can reignite your curiosity and remind you just how much fun it can be to learn new things about the world.

Listen beautiful relax classics on our Youtube channel.

The popular ‘Fascinating’ Twitter page, aka @fasc1nate, is home to some pretty interesting science, history, and art facts from around the world. We’ve collected some of their coolest pics and most mind-blowing facts to share with you today. You’ll find them below, so scroll on down and upvote the pics that got your attention the most. Go on, take a break, and have some fun. You deserve it.

#1

Image credits: fasc1nate

#2

Image credits: fasc1nate

#3

Image credits: fasc1nate

Created nearly a decade ago, all the way back in February 2013, the ‘Fascinating’ Twitter project has amassed over 216.5k followers in that time. The content shared resonated with a lot of people because it mixes photos that instantly grab their attention with bite-sized facts.

Their posts are a good starting point for someone hoping to look into a topic, whether it’s about animal behavior, plants, ancient archeology, or anthropology. We feel that as long as you’re interested in the world and learning something new, life continues to be a lot of fun.

#4

Image credits: fasc1nate

#5

Image credits: fasc1nate

#6

Image credits: fasc1nate

However, just because something’s posted online, has a pretty picture attached to it, and has gone viral, doesn’t automatically make it the truth. Part of living in the 2020s and navigating the digital landscape means that media and internet literacy should be given more attention. In short, this means checking the reliability of the source and verifying facts before pressing the like and share buttons on whatever social media platform you use the most often.

Many cool facts really do end up being true. However, social media also means that misinformation can (be) spread quickly, too. Whether intentionally or completely by accident.

#7

Listen beautiful relax classics on our Youtube channel.

Image credits: fasc1nate

#8

Image credits: fasc1nate

#9

Image credits: fasc1nate

Recently, Bored Panda had a chat about verifying the reliability of information with scientist Steven Wooding, a member of the Institute of Physics in the UK and part of the Omni Calculator team.

“If a claim comes from a single source (whether it is an authority figure or not), you have to be quite skeptical,” he told us.

#10

Image credits: fasc1nate

#11

Image credits: fasc1nate

#12

Image credits: fasc1nate

“Even if there are loads [of independent sources], they may have gotten locked into a ‘groupthink’ situation, and the claim is actually false. We should never have blind faith in authority figures. There is always a chance they could be wrong,” he explained that far from everything that we see, read, and hear is true.

Experimental bias and cherry-picking results are some of the most common ways that authority figures might mislead others. 

#13

Image credits: fasc1nate

#14

Image credits: fasc1nate

#15

Image credits: fasc1nate

“Often you just need to look at who funded the research. It’s not surprising that (in the past at least) research funded by a maker of cigarettes said that their product was safe,” the scientist told us.

While skepticism is important, too much of it can be detrimental to scientific efforts and progress. There has to be a reasonable balance between outright skepticism and blind faith in authority figures.

#16

Image credits: fasc1nate

#17

Image credits: fasc1nate

#18

Image credits: fasc1nate

“If the public were very skeptical, science would be hindered, and progress slowed. In areas such as healthcare and technology, science is delivering for people and making a difference in their everyday lives,” the scientist told Bored Panda.

“In the past few decades, [faith in the scientific community] has probably increased. Climate change is now more widely accepted than ever before now that its effects are clear to see. And science has got the world through the recent pandemic with innovative vaccines, anti-viral drugs, and data science,” he said.

#19

Image credits: fasc1nate

#20

Image credits: fasc1nate

#21

Image credits: fasc1nate

A while back, Lee McIntryre, from Boston University, spoke to us about media literacy. He pointed out that just because a fact or claim is constantly repeated doesn’t make it true.

“Repetition is important in making us believe things, whether they are true or not. There is a cognitive bias called the ‘illusory truth effect’ which is when we are repeatedly exposed to false information over and over and, over time, it begins to seem more plausible,” he said.

#22

Image credits: fasc1nate

#23

Image credits: fasc1nate

#24

Image credits: fasc1nate

“Social psychologists have known since the 1960s that repetition works, for truth or falsity. In fact, this idea goes back to Plato who said that it didn’t hurt to repeat a true thing,” the expert said, warning that some might use this effect as a way to spread propaganda, as they have in the past century to horrible effect.

Even well-educated individuals aren’t immune to making mistakes. For instance, someone might intellectually understand how the illusory truth effect works and how repetition ties into it. However, in real life, they might fall victim to it without even realizing it. Cognitive biases are an ever-present danger, even if we understand them.

#25

Image credits: fasc1nate

#26

Image credits: fasc1nate

#27

Image credits: fasc1nate

“It would be exhausting to fact-check every single news item we hear. In fact, insisting on this degree of skepticism is something that demagogues use to get us to be cynical, because when we doubt that it is possible to know the truth—even when it is staring us in the face—we are riper to their manipulation. So I’d say the best thing with news is to do a little investigation into finding a reliable source,” Lee told Bored Panda.

“Look for an organization that does investigative journalism (and doesn’t just repeat information from other sources), double sources its quotations, discloses conflicts of interest, etc. Once we’ve found that we can relax a bit and trust the reporting behind the stories. Do we still need to be on guard? Yes. Even The New York Times can make mistakes. Or individual reporters can have biases. But that doesn’t mean ‘all sources are equal.'”

#28

Image credits: fasc1nate

#29

Image credits: fasc1nate

#30

Image credits: fasc1nate

Some of the questions we need to ask when considering any claim or source include: “Is the story copyrighted? Is it dated? Is there a byline? Are other stories by the author solid? Is it published in a source that has been reliable in the past? Does it seem plausible—if not then you can do some research,” Lee explained.

“Will we get fooled sometimes in doing this? Yes. But we’re going to get fooled sometimes anyway. It’s analogous to how scientists form their beliefs. They are skeptics, but they also—at some point when the evidence is sufficient—give their assent. Scientists deal with warrant, not ‘proof.’ They are what philosophers call ‘fallibilists.’ You give your belief to things that are well-sourced with evidence, while always holding out the possibility that if further evidence comes to light that contradicts your belief, you should give it up because you might be wrong.”

#31

Image credits: fasc1nate

#32

Image credits: fasc1nate

#33

Image credits: fasc1nate

#34

Image credits: fasc1nate

#35

Image credits: fasc1nate

#36

Image credits: fasc1nate

#37

Image credits: fasc1nate

#38

Image credits: fasc1nate

#39

Image credits: fasc1nate

#40

Image credits: fasc1nate

#41

Image credits: fasc1nate

#42

Image credits: fasc1nate

#43

Image credits: fasc1nate

#44

Image credits: fasc1nate

#45

Image credits: fasc1nate

#46

Image credits: fasc1nate

#47

Image credits: fasc1nate

Source: boredpanda.com

No votes yet.
Please wait...
Loading...

Fatal error: Uncaught wfWAFStorageFileException: Unable to verify temporary file contents for atomic writing. in /var/www/u0393735/data/www/aworkstation.com/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php:52 Stack trace: #0 /var/www/u0393735/data/www/aworkstation.com/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php(659): wfWAFStorageFile::atomicFilePutContents('/var/www/u03937...', '<?php exit('Acc...') #1 [internal function]: wfWAFStorageFile->saveConfig('synced') #2 {main} thrown in /var/www/u0393735/data/www/aworkstation.com/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/storage/file.php on line 52
https://aworkstation.com/47-interesting-science-history-and-art-posts-that-were-shared-by-this-twitter-page/
aworkstation.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-49
145860
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ONM2ACKAPQGXCEPJ5AMXANNASP5VGFCH
<urn:uuid:7fd92ab2-caa9-47e5-b175-1f9c301ba400>
2022-11-30T21:58:48Z
172.67.185.218
text/html
sha1:DR4CFPSWOMXC5VQ2HH7TQ3OB5G43APP7
<urn:uuid:22aaf824-15c4-42c4-9b7f-0862a0bd3cc9>
https://aworkstation.com/47-interesting-science-history-and-art-posts-that-were-shared-by-this-twitter-page/
response
<urn:uuid:177d180b-067b-45c5-8b81-d0b1fd033f0d>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-148
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/