Google’s Featured Snippets are Worse than Fake News

Aside from simply not suggesting snippets for such subjective queries and sticking to short factual responses? I’m not sure how you would counter this. Respected sources generally don’t publish prospective articles disclaiming wild theories which haven’t been posed yet. Or dignifying some of those that have, with a response.

GOOGLE’S FEATURED SNIPPETS ARE WORSE THAN FAKE NEWS

Advertisements
https://paulfosterdesign.wordpress.com/2017/03/10/googles-featured-snippets-are-worse-than-fake-news/
paulfosterdesign.wordpress.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-51
50544
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:QESAT7L2IMDFBMDOLLLULC5ZOSGFPPMR
<urn:uuid:c60f28ad-c762-4eeb-b84f-7d0350b75060>
2017-12-15T10:22:04Z
192.0.78.13
text/html
sha1:GTPLJTKO32WAZFR4GISYS3VKIDFTIKVK
<urn:uuid:48c32fa6-0e5b-4e4f-be43-91da81bcf9f1>
https://paulfosterdesign.wordpress.com/2017/03/10/googles-featured-snippets-are-worse-than-fake-news/
length
response
<urn:uuid:7a38dbe8-7b7c-436a-939b-12f2a8346ec8>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-159-16-27.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-51
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for December 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf