Forum » Topic: Sad, sad, sad. http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274 The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Sun, 19 Apr 2015 01:13:09 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 <![CDATA[Search]]> q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php Doylem on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44705 Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:05:13 +0000 Doylem 44705@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Yes, I too have every confidence in the monkey/typewriter paradigm. I'm in no hurry... </p> bonjonelson on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44699 Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:44:43 +0000 bonjonelson 44699@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I must admit that I always search for the new arrghgarry posts and read them first. It's only a matter of time before he writes something of pure comic genius, and I'm not being sarcastic here. He's throwing all these random elements together, they don't quite work, but someday soon whether by luck or by judgment he's going to make something truly amazing and take us all by surprise. Mark my words. </p> arrghgarry on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44671 Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:16:28 +0000 arrghgarry 44671@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Thank you Golgo ,well Mr .Rik used to slag me off and then had kind words maybe one day me and phlegm will be spitting on the same page </p> Golgo13 on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44638 Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:10:46 +0000 Golgo13 44638@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I have to admit, I am a bit of an arrghgarry fan. I think there's something almost heroic in his refusal to conform with the house style, the ticker/NiB/FP formats or even with English as we know it. I've LOLed more at his stuff than anyone else's although there's a lot of stuff I either don't get or just isn't funny. </p> <p>The Des &amp; Stan piece is like Mozart - well-structured, nicely composed and a coherent theme. At the end, you think "bravo". Arrghgarry is like Shaun Ryder...half the time you're not sure what he's on about, but then he comes out with something good. </p> <p>I reckon you have to look at the misfiring ones as the necessary set-up for the ones that land a punch. </p> bonjonelson on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44615 Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:18:28 +0000 bonjonelson 44615@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Now that was funny! </p> arrghgarry on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44596 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:27:07 +0000 arrghgarry 44596@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I certainly need some grooming and probably a bath </p> riesler on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44538 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:14:09 +0000 riesler 44538@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>also some serious latex behaviour coming from the Vatican... </p> bonjonelson on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44535 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:09:29 +0000 bonjonelson 44535@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Some serious latent behaviour coming out here from Rikkor </p> Phlegm on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44528 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:43:27 +0000 Phlegm 44528@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I'm not gay, just mildly happy. </p> rikkor on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44519 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:29:39 +0000 rikkor 44519@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Phlegm, stop it. You are gay. No shame there, just a fact. </p> <p>A question. Are you "grooming" Our Garry? Is this the part when you make him feel useless and a crap writer? Then, you make him totally dependent upon your good opinion of him. Then the naughty stuff happens. Just arseking. </p> bonjonelson on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44421 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:21:49 +0000 bonjonelson 44421@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>One star for arrghgarry?</p> <p>That'll be me. </p> <p>Not because I don't like you, I have no idea who you are and I generally get on well with everyone, but because I always try to rate honestly. </p> <p>Even if you start voting down my submissions, if I see something you post that I like, I'll give it five stars, I'm not into playing games here - I just like to see good submissions, and to help people who are posting things that aren't funny to realise that they need to work more on their subs before posting.</p> <p>I've had plenty of posts that have had zero or one stars. Don't take it personally. </p> arrghgarry on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44413 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:46:32 +0000 arrghgarry 44413@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Phlegm I appreciate your time for writing this and I have taken points on board .I did take time to write one about a disabled soldier my longest piece and not a titter (no sexual reference implied)As for the Billy Jo spears ,I had no response to that ,I will take a look at it anbd see as you suggest if I can make it better.</p> <p>Cheers. </p> Phlegm on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44411 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:37:16 +0000 Phlegm 44411@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>There have been a couple that have been ok. Your Billy Jo Spears one could have been quite good if you'd thought about it for a while and honed it into a nice tidy one liner.</p> <p>The majority seem to have gone from initial thought to keyboard with no intervening review process, refining or spell checking. You seem to type without thinking most of the time. And a lot of what you write is just plain offensive. Offensive <em>can</em> be funny if done carefully and with subtlety. </p> <p>Unfortunately you're not a friend of subtlety, preferring to go for the jugular every time. Sadly most times you miss that too.</p> <p>You don't submit to the form either, your subs are neither headlines, being too long, nor NIBs, being too short.</p> <p>And you need to be a bit less arrogant and a lot less homophiobic. I am not gay but you seem to think it's highly amusing to call me a cock sucker. That shows your sense of humour is locked in a 1970's school playground and needs to be let out into the 21st Century occasionally.</p> <p>You spend a lot of time in a comically rich environment, where there are several excellent writers, alongside a couple of dozen very good ones and a few really bad ones. </p> <p>You might find it beneficial to read and learn from the good ones, hone your writing skills and be a bit more selective about what you submit, rather than continue to wallow with the old mopeds, shopping trolleys and other detritus at the shallow end.</p> <p>Well, you did ask. </p> arrghgarry on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44386 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:19:48 +0000 arrghgarry 44386@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Phlegm did you find anything that I put up ,funny ? </p> arrghgarry on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44379 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:09:43 +0000 arrghgarry 44379@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>So it`s some other twat then . </p> Phlegm on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44342 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:18:39 +0000 Phlegm 44342@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>@arrghgarry - I generally give you <em>no</em> stars because your stuff's so crap. One star would look like encouragement. </p> Gerontius on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44340 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:03:27 +0000 Gerontius 44340@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>or in your case, thank them </p> arrghgarry on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44296 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:06:27 +0000 arrghgarry 44296@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>you can click on private message too ,which gives a list of those present and those who`ve been on so you can try and figure out which Phlegm has been giving you one star. </p> FormerlyAlOPecia on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44276 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:25:37 +0000 FormerlyAlOPecia 44276@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Oh shit - now you are answering my questions before I have posted them! </p> FormerlyAlOPecia on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44275 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:25:04 +0000 FormerlyAlOPecia 44275@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Er - did I just enter an alternative Universe Golgo? </p> Golgo13 on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44274 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:25:02 +0000 Golgo13 44274@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Sorry. I deleted it as superfluous. </p> FormerlyAlOPecia on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44273 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:24:13 +0000 FormerlyAlOPecia 44273@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Or you can do it that way, which only involves one click. You learn something new every day! </p> Golgo13 on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44272 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:23:19 +0000 Golgo13 44272@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Yeah. </p> FormerlyAlOPecia on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44271 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:23:01 +0000 FormerlyAlOPecia 44271@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Click on "member" then "Forum" than at the bottom of the page it shows who's online, and who's been on since midnight. </p> MADJEZ on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44269 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:17:25 +0000 MADJEZ 44269@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>How do we know how many people logged on during a day ?</p> <p>I take it I was one of the 5 as I have no life and look every day. </p> Clucksy on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44241 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:41:18 +0000 Clucksy 44241@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Newbie saddo #6 tiptoes into room...sighs...wanders out again </p> Golgo13 on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44047 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:59:10 +0000 Golgo13 44047@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Coming up to 1:30am in GMT-land, and the FP from yesterday, albeit a good one, lingers. </p> Golgo13 on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44045 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:30:06 +0000 Golgo13 44045@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Give it some time...it's only 00:29 by my clock...they'll come in...Normally they get tanked up at the Wetherspoons over the road, and lurch in this here wine-bar when they get chucked out, what with the late licence. Maybe they're just stopping off for a kebab first...they'll be here...</p> <p>Of greater concern - no new FP yet. </p> rikkor on "Sad, sad, sad." http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=16274#post-44044 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:27:38 +0000 rikkor 44044@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Only five people decided to log on here today. I think the Shakers have more active members. PHWOAR! Members. </p> <p>Seriously, even the spammers can't take the time anymore. </p>
http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=16274
newsbiscuit.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-18
17820
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:GLSF6C57PPSWCZASIGTVA73C64HJMPFL
<urn:uuid:f54596fe-78ff-437b-99b1-630b84c9ea85>
2015-04-19T01:13:09Z
88.208.210.137
sha1:ENAAXY3Z2GK4CDE2J45ZLG5IF7A636QM
<urn:uuid:5e76b8ad-8e7b-4a3c-9a4b-18db22683889>
http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=16274
length
response
<urn:uuid:1b0d16de-d0e5-4af0-aed2-2d9f60985b87>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-235-10-82.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-18
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf