  • Corpus ID: 16033564

Interdisciplinarity and the classification os scholarly documents by phenomena, theories, and methods

@inproceedings{Szostak2007InterdisciplinarityAT,
  title={Interdisciplinarity and the classification os scholarly documents by phenomena, theories, and methods},
  author={Rick Szostak},
  year={2007}
}
The paper argues that information science can best serve the needs of interdisciplinary scholarship (which is of increasing importance) by developing universal classifications of the phenomena studied by scholars and the theories and methods applied by scholars. Present systems of document classification are grounded in disciplinary terminology and thus serve interdisciplinary scholarship poorly. The second part of the paper outlines the importance of the recommended type of system of… 

Classifying by phenomena, theories and methods: Examples with focused social science theories

This paper shows how a variety of theories employed across a range of social sciences could be classified in terms of theory type. In each case, notation within the Integrated Level Classification is

Vickery's late ideas on classification by phenomena and activities

Classification was always a major interest for Brian Vickery. In his last years he contributed to the theoretical debate on classification with original ideas that are not well known yet, as some of

Classifying Phenomena Part 1: Dimensions

The independence of a phenomenon-based classification from the institutional divisions into disciplines contributes to giving knowledge organization a more proactive and influential role.

UDC as a non-disciplinary classification system for a high-school library

The paper addresses issues in establishing a user-friendly systematic collection arrangement following a merger of two high school and college library collections classified according to UDC and suggests that, in practice, one often needs to overcome the constraints of disciplinary classification.

Categories and Facets in Integrative Levels

Facets and general categories used in bibliographic classification have been based on a disciplinary organization of knowledge. However, facets and categories of phenomena independent from

An exploratory study of interdisciplinarity and breakthrough ideas

An exploratory study to understand how to measure the degree of interdisciplinarity involved in novel, significant research fields, and how those measures capture the integration of disparate ideas in novel configurations.

HOW AND WHY TO TEACH INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PRACTICE

This article addresses the interrelated questions of why it is important to teach students about the nature of interdisciplinarity and how this material might be best communicated to students. It is

Metadata About What? Distinguishing Between Ontic, Epistemic, and Documental Dimensions in Knowledge Organization

The spread of many new media and formats is changing the scenario faced by knowledge organizers: as printed monographs are not the only standard form of knowledge carrier anymore, the traditional kind of knowl- edge organization (KO) systems based on academic disciplines is put into question.

A Practical Application of FRBR for Organizing Information in Digital Environments

The findings showed that concerning specific subject areas, taggers exhibited different tagging behaviors representing distinctive features and tendencies, which led to the conclusion that there should be an increased awareness of diverse user needs by subject in terms of the practical implications of metadata generation.

Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database

Experience is being gained progressively, showing that freely faceted classification by phenomena, theories, and methods is feasible and working, and is being tested by indexing a corpus of about 3300 papers in the interdisciplinary domain of bioacoustics.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES

Classifying scholarly theories and methods

This paper develops a simple yet powerful typology of scholarly theory, based on the 5W questions: Who?, What?, Where?, When?, and Why?. It also develops a list of the twelve distinct methods used by

Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science

It is found that an exhaustive and universal classification of scholarly documents in terms of the phenomena that scholars study, and the theories and methods they apply, appears to be both possible and desirable.

A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval

Purpose – To suggest that a theory of classification for information retrieval (IR), asked for by Sparck Jones in a 1970 paper, presupposes a full implementation of a pragmatic understanding. Part of

The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory

The book guides the student and scholar through the vast array of approaches and frameworks that shape contemporary analysis of social reality. The principal focus is on post-classical modern social

Information Work at the Boundaries of Science: Linking Library Services to Research Practices

Libraries that wish to facilitate cross-disciplinary inquiry will need to design information environments that support learning, provide tools that function as boundary objects, and offer intermediary services that assist in the transfer and translation of information across scientific communities.

Levels of reality and levels of representation

CRG's analysis of levels and of their possible application to a new general classification scheme based on phenomena instead of disciplines, as it was formulated by Derek Austin in 1969, is examined in detail.

Learning About the Information Seeking of Interdisciplinary Scholars and Students

Kinds of research needed at both basic and applied levels and with respect to both scholars and students are discussed.

Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

This reference book on philosophy brings the subject up to date with entries on new concepts, new thinking about older themes, and entries relating to developing schools such as feminist philosophy

Why indexing fails the researcher

  • B. Weinberg
  • Computer Science
    The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 16, Issue 1
  • 1988
It is contended in this paper that indexing which is limited to the representation of aboutncss serves the novice in a discipline adequately, but docs not serve the scholar or researcher, who is concerned with highly specific aspects of or points-of-view on a subject.

"Comprehensive" Curricular Reform: Providing Students with a Map of the Scholarly Enterprise

Students can and should be prepared for lifelong learning and responsible citizenship. These ends may be achieved via the integration, into existing curricula, of a comprehensive overview of the
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Interdisciplinarity-and-the-classification-os-by-Szostak/28c697866fe9b756dd14b06e33b8d6ff0974dc7a
www.semanticscholar.org
CC-MAIN-2023-14
381072
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:PA6VKVSDN3Y4FICUXSJXBV45K4BCGNNO
<urn:uuid:49f488f1-3911-4e87-a916-51df0fd56058>
2023-03-20T10:06:49Z
18.154.227.128
text/html
sha1:6TX4CSQRL3OP42DVFXIJ6LC6HNKMJUJM
<urn:uuid:57127609-c5fe-4398-906c-a852474ae845>
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Interdisciplinarity-and-the-classification-os-by-Szostak/28c697866fe9b756dd14b06e33b8d6ff0974dc7a
response
<urn:uuid:c50d4d2e-a305-441e-9872-7abe84c799ae>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-14
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for March/April 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-81
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/