tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961882.post8801251338209541928..comments2021-04-07T11:29:31.563+00:00Comments on Open and Shut?: Let’s be open about Open AccessRichard Poynderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05433823131339077354noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961882.post-62375390925747876512013-10-22T06:27:56.754+00:002013-10-22T06:27:56.754+00:00Excellent article! We need more of this kind of wo...Excellent article! We need more of this kind of work all over the web.<br /><br />I wonder if you were aware of, and might be interested in, extending SourceWatch with this new-found knowledge (sourcewatch.org). Or perhaps the scholarly publishing industry and the open access movement has need of a separate, similarly focussed resource?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961882.post-56137857701035251702013-10-21T17:07:22.997+00:002013-10-21T17:07:22.997+00:00An interesting read, and I agree that education an...An interesting read, and I agree that education and further transparency are the only fair and honest ways to help authors make an informed choice for their work(s).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7961882.post-68453382135793285532013-10-21T15:38:21.150+00:002013-10-21T15:38:21.150+00:00WHATISINANAME.whocares? openscience.COM is virtua...<b>WHATISINANAME.whocares?</b><br /><br />openscience.COM is virtually a contradiction in terms.<br /><br />and who wants a .com (commerce) domain name for Open Science (whatever it means)?<br /><br />what&#39;s wrong with <a href="openscience.org" rel="nofollow">openscience.org</a> (q.v.)?<br /><br />and who cares about the buzzword.anything anyway? Call the URL whatever you like (but make it short): we&#39;re not selling a product…<br /><br />Equating OA with Gold OA (and ignoring or minimizing Green OA) is of course a long-standing problem of OA, on both sides of the divide: The publishing community does it out of self-interest; the research community does it out of ignorance. The difference is that publishers gain from the confusion, and researchers lose.<br /><br />But of course, transparency is the only honest route.Stevan Harnadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14374474060972737847noreply@blogger.com
https://poynder.blogspot.com/feeds/8801251338209541928/comments/default
poynder.blogspot.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-17
8186
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:CUCT5THKG34ZLL2UMDEJ2ZTIYMZZSFMV
<urn:uuid:37c0dab6-da3b-4835-ada8-c487f3a94b81>
2021-04-16T14:35:28Z
172.217.164.161
application/atom+xml
sha1:P2UN56VWBSKSLHEIVSGYFHMIV2DDTTA2
<urn:uuid:fc3276cc-c4cb-4999-820e-4c848f88e710>
https://poynder.blogspot.com/feeds/8801251338209541928/comments/default
response
<urn:uuid:0422b0e4-fd15-474a-bfc1-1f0f08aa2dbd>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-17
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-39.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/