tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14963990.post112275788937085894..comments2014-10-20T02:18:20.866-07:00Comments on The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics: About The Imaginary Journal of Poetic EconomicsHeather Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13726928948544472886noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14963990.post-64348401030634402972013-05-22T22:40:33.510-07:002013-05-22T22:40:33.510-07:00Dear Anonymous AND twitter handle-anonymous: to re...Dear Anonymous AND twitter handle-anonymous: to repeat what is stated above, this is a scholarly blog and anonymous comments are not posted. Please state your name, affiliation and disclose any connection / conflict of interest. For example, if you are defending Access Copyright, are you a current or past member of the Access Copyright Board, working for Access Copyright, receiving payouts etc.? Similarly, if you are defending the practices of traditional subscription-based publishers, you need to state clearly who you are and your involvement with any publishers. Heather Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13726928948544472886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14963990.post-69921210061167637602013-01-01T03:31:16.895-08:002013-01-01T03:31:16.895-08:00Hi Heather, this is a comment from @PubAdvisor in ...Hi Heather, this is a comment from @PubAdvisor in reference to your post: The dramatic growth of Open Access. I am a scientist who supports OA and its growth but who is also surprised by a peculiar narrative. That is: the rise of OA as a means to support exclusively the spreading of scholarly information. I am more concerned by the content of scholarly information rather than its instantaneous dissemination. Working at the base of scientific endeavour (in the lab) I know that a large amount of scholarly information is wrong. This problem will certainly increase with the growth of OA. What are your thoughts on the necessity of filtering reproducible information from the ever-increasing flood of data that has been and will be produced by the &quot;publish or perish&quot; paradigm in science? You seem to have noticed that discussion via blog commenting can be disruptive, useless and cluttering your site. Excluding this possibility, what else can be done to make use of filters? Are we going to move into a world of more information, including scholarly content, without the possibility to verify what is correct and what is not? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/112275788937085894/comments/default
poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-42
6704
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:PBFY67HOQTYN6B6ENUJP4VRFI46R64J6
<urn:uuid:7133984e-2977-46ed-b093-d8954b65fb26>
2014-10-21T00:29:43Z
74.125.228.44
sha1:U2OEGPIF3XMHSXHW2RM3HPX6KTKTUFG6
<urn:uuid:198f4e9e-8b10-4266-98e8-84e600531a32>
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/112275788937085894/comments/default
length
response
<urn:uuid:a124e4b6-d25c-469d-9245-82d786e132af>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-16-133-185.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-42
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for October 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf