Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

SayItAintS0 writes:

Why was this story redone after the public had posted several comments?

Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.

Features
http://www.commercialappeal.com/comments/reply/?target=61:256296&comment=1177284
www.commercialappeal.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-48
99630
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:S33OLHS5MLQ4S7HIXD4V6AADY2RL47YZ
<urn:uuid:83c2da33-33e5-4286-97b2-9f2e07df2435>
2013-12-05T01:26:23Z
164.109.40.120
sha1:WSGBPHWJB3RW7FXFDOO6NJT66W6RHWPR
<urn:uuid:a28845b1-811d-4a18-a17b-84e440885e18>
http://www.commercialappeal.com/comments/reply/?target=61:256296&comment=1177284
response
<urn:uuid:72a18bf3-6485-49b4-b336-404a0533da6f>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-33-133-15.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-48
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Winter 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf