Learn all about Rocket Ovens from this winning Kickstarter now (sponsored friend)

How to perform a literature review with free and open source software

From Appropedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sunhusky.png By Michigan Tech's Open Sustainability Technology Lab.

Wanted: Students to make a distributed future with solar-powered open-source 3-D printing.
Contact Dr. Joshua Pearce or Apply here

MOST: Projects and Publications, Methods, Lit. reviews, People, Sponsors
Twitter updates @ProfPearce

OSL.jpg


Pearce Publications: Energy Conservation Energy Policy Industrial SymbiosisLife Cycle Analysis Materials Science Open Source Photovoltaic Systems Solar CellsSustainable Development Sustainability Education


Source[edit]

Abstract[edit]

As it provides a firm foundation for advancing knowledge, a solid literature review is a critical feature of any academic investigation. Yet, there are several challenges in performing literature reviews including: i) lack of access to the literature because of costs, ii) fracturing of the literature into many sources, lack of access and comprehensive coverage in many databases and search engines, and iii) the use of proprietary software lock-in strategies for bibliographic software, which can make porting literature reviews between organizations cumbersome and costly. These challenges often result in poor quality literature reviews completed by a single researcher unfamiliar with the approaches to the same research in other sub-fields and static reviews that are often lost to the scientific community. In this paper, an open source approach will be expanded to the application of improving the quality of literature reviews by providing best practices. Although there are many types and goals of literature reviews, it is found that all of them can be improved using a tool chain of free and open source software (FOSS) and methods. Specifically, this paper will provide a clear framework for i) comprehensive searching and obtaining access to the literature, ii) the use of FOSS for all steps including browsing, bibliographic software, and writing and iii) documenting a literature review to encourage collaboration of a dynamic document that lives into the future. This approach solves the current challenges of literature reviews and provides benefits of lower labor and economic costs, improved researcher control, and increased potential for collaboration. Finally, the challenges of using this approach and methods to overcome them are reviewed and future work is described.


Keywords[edit]

Wikis, Research Methodology, Open Access, Open Access Publishing, Scholarly Communication, Open Source Software, Academic Writing, Open Source/Open Access and Libraries, Open Source for Education, Open Education, Open Source and Free Software Studies, Literature Review, Open Source, Google Scholar Search, Systematic Literature Review, Research Writing, Linux Open Source System, Thesis Writing, Software Libre, Scholarly Publishing, Literature review writings, Google Scholar, Scholarly Publishers, Appropedia, Methodology and Review of Related Literature, Free and Open Source Software, Paywalls, Literature Reviews

See Also[edit]

Media[edit]
http://www.appropedia.org/How_to_perform_a_literature_review_with_free_and_open_source_software
www.appropedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-30
40118
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:BWFNP4TJVMTOUCIGIMPUCQQLXXQXNBUI
<urn:uuid:8923d0ed-ea6e-4dee-8061-8a1537e08697>
2018-07-18T02:38:46Z
66.33.193.178
text/html
sha1:AYUUM3C23FXIOO2INH7GWT3LXSD3VKEU
<urn:uuid:ef4bc072-ba16-4f35-9536-c6df947431df>
http://www.appropedia.org/How_to_perform_a_literature_review_with_free_and_open_source_software
response
<urn:uuid:d3b83e65-5f0a-474d-b8e5-5dd9c5c5b344>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-79-230-204.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-30
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf