The arXiv at 20: a global resource

Sep 28, 2011 By Bill Steele
Paul Ginsparg, professor of physics and information science and creator the arXiv, commemorates the website's 20th anniversary.

As the e-print arXiv of scientific publications celebrates its 20th anniversary, what started as an effort to "level the playing field" for researchers has created a whole new playing field on which the white lines are still not clearly drawn.

Long before Paul Ginsparg, professor of physics and , created the , it was common practice for scientists to circulate to their friends a few paper preprints of their articles before the articles appeared in scholarly journals. Ginsparg created a simple website -- at first housed in a single workstation on a cluttered desk -- to turn the preprints into "e-prints" made available electronically.

"I've heard a lot about how democratic the arXiv is," Ginsparg said Sept. 23 in a talk commemorating the anniversary. People have, for example, praised the fact that the arXiv makes scientific papers easily available to scientists in where subscriptions to journals are not always affordable. "But what I was trying to do was set up a system that eliminated the hierarchy in my field," he said. As a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, "I was receiving preprints long before graduate students further down the ," Ginsparg said. "When we have success we like to think it was because we worked harder, not just because we happened to have access."

The idea caught on, submissions multiplied, the subject matter expanded to include mathematics, astrophysics, and, most recently, biology, and the arXiv has inspired online repositories in other fields. Ten years ago Ginsparg joined the Cornell faculty, bringing the arXiv with him. It is maintained by Cornell University Library.

As of September 2011, the system had accumulated more than 700,000 papers, with more than 6,000 new submissions arriving each month; in 2010 65 million full-text articles were downloaded. The history of submissions reflects the history of , Ginsparg noted. The number of submissions in high-energy physics increased year by year but finally leveled out, meaning, Ginsparg said, that the field had reached saturation. Despite all this traffic, Ginsparg remarked, the system is still using some of the software written 20 years ago.

One of the surprises, Ginsparg said, is that electronic publishing has not transformed the seemingly irrational scholarly publishing system in which researchers give their work to publishing houses from which their academic institutions buy it back by subscribing to journals. Scholarly publishing is still in transition, Ginsparg said, due to questions about how to fund electronic publication and how to maintain quality control. The arXiv has no peer-review process, although it does restrict submissions to those with scientific credentials.

But the lines of communication are definitely blurring. Ginsparg reported that a recent paper posted on the arXiv by Alexander Gaeta, Cornell professor of applied and engineering physics, was picked up by bloggers and spread out from there. The paper is to be published in the journal Nature and is still under a press embargo, but an article about it has appeared in the journal Science.

Electronic publishing makes supporting data available alongside a paper and offers new ways to manage information, including searches, data mining and detection of plagiarism. "Concept searching," Ginsparg said, is a sought-after feature but is still in the works. And Facebook-style social interaction may become part of the system, he said.

But however wide the new field grows it is still level. The arXiv is, Ginsparg concluded, a global resource "where everybody has access to the same information on the same system."

Explore further: History books spark latest Texas classroom battle

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Paul Ginsparg reflects on arXiv 20th anniversary

Aug 15, 2011

Two decades ago, Paul Ginsparg, Cornell professor of physics, launched an electronic database to let fellow physicists share unpublished academic manuscripts without photocopying and paper mail. Fast forward ...

Stimulus grant will improve physics arXiv

Nov 18, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Stimulus funding will enhance Cornell's e-print arXiv of scientific papers to help users identify a work's main concepts, see research reports in context and easily find related work.

arXiv online scientific repository hits milestone

Oct 09, 2008

Reinforcing its place in the scientific community, the arXiv repository at Cornell University Library reached a new milestone in October 2008: Half a million e-print postings -- research articles published ...

Australia joins push for open access to particle physics

Jul 07, 2008

Australia has joined SCOAP3, an international consortium that aims to provide free access to major particle physics journals world-wide. Six of the Group of Eight universities in Australia have agreed to participate in the ...

Free articles get read but don't generate more citations

Jul 31, 2008

When academic articles are "open access" or free online, they get read more often, but they don't -- going against conventional wisdom -- get cited more often in academic literature, finds a new Cornell study.

Recommended for you

History books spark latest Texas classroom battle

Sep 16, 2014

As Texas mulls new history textbooks for its 5-plus million public school students, some academics are decrying lessons they say exaggerate the influence of Christian values on America's Founding Fathers.

Flatow, 'Science Friday' settle claims over grant

Sep 16, 2014

Federal prosecutors say radio host Ira Flatow and his "Science Friday" show that airs on many National Public Radio stations have settled civil claims that they misused money from a nearly $1 million federal ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

denijane
not rated yet Oct 02, 2011
I'm waiting for the time when arXiv will allow comments too. Because often when you read an article which is not exactly in your field, you cannot decide if the science is good or not really. The option to comment will allow valuable info, without the pressure of peer-reviewing. True, that could turn ugly, but I suppose if all people are either using their real names and credentials or if everyone is absolutely anonymous, that could work out well in the end.
But anyway, as a scientist from developing country, I'd like to say "Thank you arXiv for the access to all those quality (or not so) articles!" It really made a difference! I cannot even imagine what science was 15 years ago, when you had to have subscription to every journal out there to do your research. It's just a different world in science!
http://phys.org/news/2011-09-arxiv-global-resource.html
phys.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-41
62215
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:JJDWHXAXBWQFLXRP3VKWGUL2NNEAPKDR
<urn:uuid:1d0a7193-3264-4233-91d7-38540e4302b6>
2014-09-18T10:18:06Z
69.9.167.167
sha1:P44RFTZ66XU4YZCNEWCU44HDFTPHWJDL
<urn:uuid:369e0602-6a4f-4094-8fd2-f05308d55f5c>
http://phys.org/news/2011-09-arxiv-global-resource.html
length
response
<urn:uuid:03be85a2-d073-4bdf-81a1-b684ffbb14dd>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-196-40-205.us-west-1.compute.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-41
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for September 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf