     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Chat, www.wikipediareview.com/chat
Selina
post Mon 27th February 2006, 4:03pm
Post #1


Cat herder
******

Group: Staffy
Posts: 1,513
Joined: Sun 19th Feb 2006, 10:28pm
Member No.: 1

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



http://wikipediareview.com/chat/
(also linked from "Live Chat" at the top)
Does it work? I can't test it, stuck behind firewall
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Selina
post Mon 27th February 2006, 4:19pm
Post #2


Cat herder
******

Group: Staffy
Posts: 1,513
Joined: Sun 19th Feb 2006, 10:28pm
Member No.: 1

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



hmmm, ok. Actually, I'll set it as the main one to that channel and to *also* join #wikipedia

That way people have more of a chance of seeing suspicious goings on in there and posting about em
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
blissyu2
post Mon 27th February 2006, 5:01pm
Post #3


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Just a small suggestion. I think the channel should be #wikipediareview rather than #thewikipediareview, since the domain name is wikipedia review and it might confuse some people. As for also joining #wikipedia, I don't know if that's a good idea. Wikipedia might not approve of such a thing, and it might be more trouble than its worth.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
blissyu2
post Mon 27th February 2006, 5:15pm
Post #4


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Okay. Glad we got in www.wikipediareview.com then. Did they register it because of this? That's a bit scary.

Maybe we should register http://www.thewikipediareview.com/ as well then just to be sure.

Oh and the link doesn't work, at least not for me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lir
post Mon 27th February 2006, 5:38pm
Post #5


Communist
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 978
Joined: Sun 26th Feb 2006, 10:27pm
Member No.: 4



QUOTE(qwerty @ Mon 27th February 2006, 11:07am) *

I already told you two months ago that Wikimedia had registered wikipediareview the day after I mentioned it.

But, of course, they aren't trying to censor us...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Blu Aardvark
post Mon 27th February 2006, 11:30pm
Post #6


Gone
*****

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun 26th Feb 2006, 10:46pm
Member No.: 2

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Mon 27th February 2006, 9:01am) *
As for also joining #wikipedia, I don't know if that's a good idea. Wikipedia might not approve of such a thing, and it might be more trouble than its worth.


I see no reason why we should enter #wikipedia. Myself, I refuse to go in there any more; I've been in the channel a total of two times, and the level of incivility and trollitude was sufficient that I am loathe to enter there a third time. Because of my involvement with this board, I am no longer a cabal-approved member, so I could reasonably expect much trolling diected at me.

Also, most of the time my computer is even on, I am connected to freenode. If I'm not in the channel, you should be able to reach me by /msg. I use the handle Blu_Aardvark.

QUOTE(Lir @ Mon 27th February 2006, 9:38am) *

But, of course, they aren't trying to censor us...


Lol. Actually, they had a very practical reason for not wanting us to use that particular channel. Not necessarily to censor us, but definately to make our voice less likely to be heard. See, if our channel was #wikipediareview, it would show up in the channel list, if sorted alphabetically, right among the #wikipedia official channels. And heaven forbid someone would come to IRC, see #wikipediareview, and actually learn something.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 7 16, 4:52am
 
     
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=76&pid=196&st=0
wikipediareview.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-30
80633
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:X3UQVQG3Q3UOD54AI2BJH7YHYLWEDUZ2
<urn:uuid:48a94fdd-d937-49f1-a3f3-edebe345690b>
2016-07-24T04:52:30Z
192.254.236.99
sha1:MC5CEE7FAR33JSGYECTSSTQPEA65CQ3K
<urn:uuid:e3f9d1d5-b09c-4250-99ef-c922b5a03ca6>
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=76&pid=196&st=0
length
response
<urn:uuid:dd97214e-a89f-480b-beab-d2c511240355>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-185-27-174.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-30
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf