User talk:Romartus/Archive11

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< User talk:Romartus(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edit(s) of Wikipedian Security Agency DIE ROMARTUS (talk) to last version by Romartus)
(Tag)
Line 192: Line 192:
 
==Tag==
 
==Tag==
 
Maybe an error there. Wikipedia Security Guy or whatever his thing is removed the construction tag off his own page, not someone else's page. He said the article was complete, or at least open to others editing it. And since I'm here, congrats on all the recent writing and feature(s) and all that. More, more features (what do you think, a couple dozen pages ready?) [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 12:14 20-3-'12
 
Maybe an error there. Wikipedia Security Guy or whatever his thing is removed the construction tag off his own page, not someone else's page. He said the article was complete, or at least open to others editing it. And since I'm here, congrats on all the recent writing and feature(s) and all that. More, more features (what do you think, a couple dozen pages ready?) [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 12:14 20-3-'12
  +
:p.s. Oh well, when you've caught a lion better cage it. Poor Tasmania got caught in the crossfire.

Revision as of 12:30, March 20, 2012

Talking10

Where are my crystal balls Miss Givings?

Archive

Correspondence Below!

/me comes over with two glasses and a bottle of Scotch

Hey dude, I made an article (the first in a while), I think it could do with a swatch just to see if there's something that could improved on. Fancy having a look?:0)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:57, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

I will check it later. Do just want comments or some 'flourishes'..or was that 'flashes'...? Meanwhile in the blue half of Glasgow...a long wail from Ibrox can be heard....--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:04, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
Just a quick look, of course if the muse speaks, get in there so to speak... as for the Rangers thing, we can only hope that one half of Glasgow's horrible football/sectarian culture is closer to meeting its end.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:13, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
Hey nice adds, and I've done some stuff, looks pretty sweet... might be ready for VFH:D--Sycamore (Talk) 21:50, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
It's not bad at all but needs some fine tuning. To keep within the spirit of the writing, some of words like 'bumfuck' need to change to be replaced by something that means the same but is less direct. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:41, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

Zana Dark and Fair

Hello. I left a note under your note on Zana's talk page. One of my associate legal team members will look there later, and tell me if anyone has answered it. Money or things involved. Kindly yours, Aleister, member, uncy legal team 13:20 16-2-'12 (this counts as another hour)

OK thanks Aleister. I don't know how you expect Zana to answer there as she is banned and any sock puppetry will extend the infinite. The only other avenue is to go on IRC, though Zana is banned there too (I checked). --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:50, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
What, you asked me to represent you? OK, now you owe me lots of money and things. I don't have my documents with me, but in the conditions Zana was given she was asked not to revert any articles, unless it was into her user space, which she did with Turd (I believe that's the pages name). Then TFK asked her to either mainspace it or get rid of it, so she mainspaced it. Then DrSkullthumper saw that she had mainspaced it and booted her. This just seemed to me to be a comedy of errors like in the Marx Brothers, only Zeppo got to come back sometimes. Those two points - the direction to put deleted things onto her userspace followed by being asked to mainspace it, then being banned for mainspacing it - should free her from her exile, unless I am mistaken. This will count as 5 hours legal money. As you are Zana's legal guardian here, you can see if I am correct and then follow up with appropriate legal authorities, or, since you are now one of those, unban her yourself. That advice is another hour of legal. Should you need further assistance in this please let me know through contact with my secretary (who enjoys lots of contact). Sincerely, Aleister, at the bar 13:58 16-2-'12
I asked the good Doctor Skullthumper when on IRC. He said the infinite ban was because Zana had reverted TKF and RAHB on an edit regards Turd. I also saw your forum quote as well and I think I mentioned that too. Perhaps this needs more 'legal' work and an appeal to the Ministry of Love for a reconsideration. Ok..do you have a wig? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:13, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

Your edit conflicted me as the exact evidence was being introduced, from a wigged guy. So:

Exhibit one, the log from Turd (which was later redirected to Feces):

(cur | prev) 16:52, February 9, 2012 Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) m (19 bytes) (Please do not recreate deleted content) (rollback | undo)
(cur | prev) 09:02, February 7, 2012 Zana Dark (Talk | contribs) m (3,319 bytes) (undo)
(cur | prev) 07:20, February 7, 2012 Zana Dark (Talk | contribs) (3,184 bytes) (There are plenty of shorter, shittier (pun intended) articles for Zombiebaron to delete and Kermit to rollback. You guys gay for me or what?) (undo)
(cur | prev) 04:39, February 7, 2012 Thekillerfroggy (Talk | contribs) (19 bytes) (a lil bit. mainspace it or dont space it at all) (undo)
(cur | prev) 04:28, February 7, 2012 Zana Dark (Talk | contribs) m (33 bytes) (U care?) (undo)
(cur | prev) 06:19, February 5, 2012 RAHB (Talk | contribs) (19 bytes) (←Redirected page to Feces)

In this example of logs, Zana asked for permission to do something, in the words of the bard "U care?" (I think that she was user spacing it, if I recall my associate's research). TKF gave permission to mainspace it. The all the other stuff, Zombiebaron reverting TKF's directive, and maybe, pure conjuncture, Dr.ST read that line and thought that the rules applied to Zana had been broken, when if fact they weren't at all, at all. Give me my lawyer money now, or you will be sued by many lawyers, that's how we do things in lawyerworld. Aleister later in the hearings

No Win, No Fee. And I can see that wig has been rented Al (I saw it last on Paul Giamatti in John Adams) . Are we playing by American or British legal rules here? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:42, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
John Adams was horrible, the series not the guy, because Paul G is so unbelievable as a morose Adams. On this thing, it just seemed when TFK told Zana "mainspace it or don't space it at all", and then she mainspaced it and got banned for it, that there was no wrong done. Seems a simple misunderstanding of sequence of events. Maybe this was all there was to it, unless there are facts I'm not aware of because of my outdated (1931) legal books which have been passed down and used for legal matters for generations (us Chains family don't trust no modern law). Aleister 17:45 16-2-'12

Exhibit two: The terms of Zana's UN:Office stay include the first term:

||User Restrictions||

  • Zana shall not breach rule 2 under any circumstances, this includes reverting administrator edits (except to her own userspace) at any time.
It seems the key phrase here is "except to her own userspace", which she did with Turd, and then got permission to mainspace it from TFK, did so, and then was taken off-site. This does seem, to this legal team member registered to play guitar before the Supreme Court, fairly cut and dried. I may rest my case soon, but it's handcuffed to my wrist and damn if I will cut the wrist off just to slide it off. Aleister 2:18 17-2-'12
In the less important argument, you can say that "except to her own userspace" is the key term. True, there was a mixup where I mistakenly thought that her userspaced article was a work in progress and not deleted content when I gave her permission to mainspace it (after she created a userspace redirect, which is something you shouldn't do anyway). Skullthumper's reason (whose ban I am not going to overturn) missed the point by narrowing in on this misunderstanding, though. Both you and Skullthumper's reason are breezing past the most important part of her Office regulation:
"Zana shall not breach rule 2 under any circumstances".
In the logs for Turd (which I had not seen past my own edit until after Skully's ban), and her talk page, Zana displayed the same passive-aggressive, egotistical dickishness that earned her the last 3 infinite bans. If I had seen her edit summary immediately following my initial revert earlier, I would have banned her on the spot. So no, Zana Dark is not getting unbanned. You can keep playing legal if you want, but there are no loopholes that can bring her back. She has been given more passes than anyone reasonably ever needs. It ends now. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 10:10, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
And slowly the distant memory of Zana fades away into the shadows of the loopholes and the valley of three infinite bans. Ashes fly into the island of banning on the spot and the heavenly rings of the "IT ENDS NOW!!!" sea. RIP Zana Dark. Shhhhhhhhh. Silence. --ShabiDOO 00:35, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
Zana who? Pup 03:27 18 Feb '12
Just mentioning all of this because I checked and the ban seemed to have holes in it, which you kind of confirm, some miscomunication seems to have occurred there. Now the edit summary is the new reason for the already established ban. Was it really that dickish of a comment, seemed like a couple asides talking about the ongoing actions. Zana plays hard, yet lots of people like the good side of ZD, and as a new user I learned a lot from Zana. My legal language comes from joining her legal team, where I am licensed to play guitar before the United States Supreme Court. I understand your reason too, as you guys apparantly went through a lot with Zana, so what seems meh to some of us means more to you. Zana wouldn't have lasted very long anyway, given the rules about future conduct, but that's both or neither near or deer. Aleister 3:29 18-2-'12
Banzai! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:38, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

68.173.113.106 is now Cute Zekrom

I guess you know what that means...! Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective! 01:41, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Could I please have a copy of Pi at User:Qzekrom/Pi? Thanks! Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective! 02:45, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
? The article is the mainspace. Why do you need a copy? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:07, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
The old version, along with both articles titled Uncyclopedia's Article on Pi. Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective! 18:10, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
See User:Qzekrom/Pi. That is the December one. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:56, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

Your post was interrupted...

...in mid-thought, it seems. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usSun, Feb 19 '12 16:26 (UTC)

thanks Bizz. You were right. The phone went when I was adding my comment and I forgot to return. I appreciate the notification on my page. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:34, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

BTW

Do you ever do a non-minor edit? Pup 01:00 20 Feb '12

Depends if I go for shears or nail scissors. Why do you ask Mr Puppy? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:46, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Hello Romartus, I have a question

Hello Romartus, thanks for the article of the Debtocratic bankrupt Republic of Greece lol, I have made some small color fixes to the official flag of the country, and I want your opinion on it. New flag Image here:

debtocraticrepublicofgr.png

What do you think of the picture? About the edits I did to it: Notable change is that I added some coins above the hat, which are making the hat a more obvious reference to the bankruptcy of the country and the help it receives from Eurozone and the IMF. Also the flag's color has been corrected to be more close to the dark deep blue color, the official flag of the state. I could put the image in the Discussion Page of the corresponding article but just asking for your opinion ^_^ The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilentResident (talk • contribs)

Those are coins, I thought they were bubbles coming out of the hat, which made me smile. Romartus, doesn't seem like any admins are around. No one has changed the new features in a couple of days, and since I have my first of the year coming up this concerns me ungreatly. Thanks. Aleister 18:05 21-2-'12
Silent Resident, the new Greek flag is very apt. Good image. I hope you can add and tidy up the main article too. I threw in a few ideas, all grossly unfair to Greece but without being stupid. I will check the featuring page as that is something I haven't done yet. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:57, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
I don't how it's done Al - the featuring page. The instruction manual appears to be missing...--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:05, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Titus

Had to change that one line. It's debatable point, but I seem to recall that while it wasn't as common in society, homosexuality was prevalent in the military. The change doesn't disagree with the previous, but keeps some of the humour in, while playing again on a recurrent joke. Hope you don't mind Pup 12:26 27 Feb '12

Not at all Puppy. Thanks for the add/edit. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:27, February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Could you let us know when we should be alarmed?

09:15 	(Block log) . . Romartus (talk | contribs) blocked GarethPW (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (Block test (no cause for alarm yet))

Pup 10:34 29 Feb '12

I am detecting a possible sock puppet in action. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:41, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
Are you able to detect the IP address? Pup 10:45 29 Feb '12
The user pages for User:GarethPW, User:Stevie1751 and User:JoshRowland look they have been done by the same person. Check the user's creator logs. The activity looks suspicious. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:48, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not doubting you, just wondering if there were another way to verify it. I have built user pages for n00bs in the past, just as a welcoming gift. May not have any relevance here though. Pup 10:56 29 Feb '12
I have lifted the infinite test ban on GarethPW (now 2 hours). I have put all three names on a watch list and see what happens. I will advise the user about multiple accounts. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:06, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

About the Monkees article you had the idea for....

I think it is a wonderful idea! Why don't we start? --A rose for you the dorky contralto Mexico flag Samsung flag korea Flag of Brazil Flag of Bangladesh 12:29, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

I will put something in the main space today. Did you know Charles Manson auditioned for The Monkees?...Mickey Dolenz got the nod there. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:44, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
Nice one. Keep up the good work! --A rose for you the dorky contralto Mexico flag Samsung flag korea Flag of Brazil Flag of Bangladesh 03:43, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Multiple Accounts

No, I only have one account, they are just my friends. - GarethPW (talk) 21:52, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Why do you have identical user pages? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:43, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Can you help me to move the page IRAN back to where it was as opposed to where it is located at ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN? IamMahdi was at this page as well..IamMahdi is only an agent of the Islamic republic of Iran trying to suppress the identity of Iran and Iranians much like the government of Iran does to its people. Please move page back to IRAN.

You forgot to sign your post. I doubt if IamMahdi is an agent of the current Iranian government, sanctioned to come here to mess up the Iran page. I am going to leave it where it is for now but the page does need improving. You can always write an alternative Iranian page if you like on your user space first. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:43, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Omnes grando magna Romartvs!

That's Latin for "All hail the great Romartus!" but never mind that. What I'm really here for involves admins. There's a page on Uncyclopedia listing all of the active admins, but no matter how many times I see that page, I can't remember it. Now I don't want you to tell me the name of the article, no not at all. What I really want is for you to post on my talk page a list of all the currently active admins on Uncyclopedia.

Thank you, that's all; and once more from the top, Omnes grando magna Romartvs!

The link is here: UN:AA for the admins/bureaucrats. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:01, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, I know you're an admin, but, please, please, don't remove anything from my talk page? I like to look back and read from them or sometimes, it can be helpful in the future when you're trying to find a sock of a vandal. But, please with all due respect; please don't remove any content from my page. -- UserTalkContributions 17:39, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the good remark. I'll edit lots more later. And I hope everything is cool between us. -- UserTalkContributions 17:44, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Reverted as requested. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:50, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Can you delete these pages for me?

I've moved them to subpages of User:Qzekrom/ubx. Thanks! Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!01:22 07 Mar '12

On second thought, no. It doesn't help to delete them because other people might want to use those userboxes, so leave them there. User:Qzekrom/ubx/ImAPokemon and User:Qzekrom/ubx/wikipedia are personal copies for me. Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!01:25 07 Mar '12
Wait a second. I meant the other copies. Now the userboxes don't display properly on my userpage, because I've got a template transcluded onto it that contains transclusions of subpages. Can you please restore them? Thx! Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!00:09 09 Mar '12

BNW

Thanks for replying. (Note that SPIKE replied as well, on his page -- and then deleted the entire exchange. If this is common practice, what's the point of having talk pages at all? Why didn't he reply to me on mine?)

I don't believe that I was too confrontational in response to a deletion with an insulting comment, but YMMV.

Yes, my jokes were on the juvenile side -- but I thought the criterion here was "funny vs stupid," not "profound vs juvenile." Some of them, as SPIKE said, were indeed puns on characters' names; some weren't.

Oh well. It's his article.

Stumbo (talk) 06:07, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Well as long as it is resolved then the matter can be iced for now!. BTW. Can you tighten up your paragraphs and not leave so much space between each line? Otherwise a discussion like this can spread over a lot of electronic real estate! You'll know what I mean by looking at the discussions on this page. Regards humour/humor, I think it makes an article better if it is done within a certain style but can indeed be changed for something different. The best articles here are solo efforts, sometimes collabs or with others joining but going alone with the general tone of what is being attempted. When you have a whole range of approaches in one single article, the result is usually an unreadable mess. Good luck. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:12, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Can you restore some pages for me?

These are both userboxes that are transcluded onto my userpage, and it doesn't look that great right now. So please? I know it might look like I feel one way one week then another way the next, but no. I'm trying to make it easier to put my userpage together through a more modular design (i.e. all my userboxes in a separate file (/ubx), and all my personally created userboxes as subpages of /ubx). And I probably wasn't clear enough before. --Qzekrom sig trans Cute Zekrom! Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!23:21 09 Mar '12

Award from UN:REQ

Thumbs up2

This user created Constantine I, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Good for them us!
(If awarding yourself please update the award statistics)


Not a problem at all. :P I'm a long-time reader of Uncyclopedia and decided to make an account to help out just a bit more. You guys are hilarious by the way. :) Nicolas-1223 (talk) 12:38, March 13, 2012 (UTC)

Drop anchor, come on board. BTW if you add something to your user page you will cease to be a 'red linker', a grade of user above I.P. but below a regular user. If you want to be 'adopted' (i.e. make sure you don't get into a ruck with another user or worse), I can do that for you (see my user page to see what I mean). --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:17, March 13, 2012 (UTC)


I don't really understand that whole adoption thing. Could you explain it a little better?

Also, about Wikipedia linking on "borderline crap" articles, what exactly do you mean? What was a page I edited that was deemed borderline crap? Anyways, no problem, I'll try to make some material around here funnier if I feel the need to. :)

Nicolas-1223 (talk) 04:20, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

Hi Nic. Regards linking a page Jabba the Hutt to wikipedia, I judged that page in need of work as others were 'fly tipping' on it before your edit (adding one liners to an overall badly constructed article). I removed the real rubbish and restored the link for now. Many articles just need tidying up to make them look presentable. Also if you go into the history of a page (as in Wikipedia), sometimes you can find a better version of it before others anon started to dump their stuff in there. Regards writing, if the article isn't my own, I try to extend or improve it if possible, often by simply adding some images. Original work is also important and I might add, there is no real set style for humour here. Stuff I like, others don't and vice versa. If you go to the VFH page (go via Help to see what I mean), all users have a chance to vote for, vote against or abstain/comment on an article.
The adoption process here means that if a new user (noob) has a question, they can ask their adopter. By having an adopter means that if you get into a problem with an another admin on this site or get involved in what we call 'an edit war', you will have a friend on this site. If you want 'adoption', then I can put a ribbon on your user page to signify this. It is not compulsory to be 'adopted' (I wasn't when I came here for example) but it helps a new comer get more of a 'feel' for this site by asking people who have been here for some years. In my case, since December 2008. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:11, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
I wasn't adopted either, and I feel no resentment toward the cold hearted English bastard who turned down my request for adoption at all.                               Puppy's talk page05:11 18 Mar

Amero is featured

Alien-request

Many thanks for your positive vote--Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 15:03, Mar 17

St. Patty’s Day

Are you wearing green today? If not, don’t be surprised if I show up. Matthlock Bernie Soundgarden 800px-Flag of Moldova.svg Talal of Jordan Lionel Hutz 800px-Flag of India svg 22:57, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

No. I don't wear a kilt on St.Andrew's day or kill a dragon for St.George's Day. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:04, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
When do you wear a kilt?                               Puppy's talk page04:12 18 Mar

Reneet75

Your ICU on this one is too charitable, as it is the third matching pair I have seen recently (see also User:Reneet75) where Anon has sporked text from an unfunny external site (twice involving Greece). There is one guy (different IPs) who obviously wants Uncyc to become less funny. Spıke Ѧ 01:03 19-Mar-12

What he said                               Puppy's talk page02:01 19 Mar
Thanks, I see the page was deleted. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:51, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

The Pea Buddy Awards

We need you! Either prepare yourself mentally for the severity of the trials (don't sign up just yet, you cheat!) or commit your soul as a judge right now. May the Lord shine his blessings upon thee! Snowflake mini Mattsnow 00:30, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

I prefer not to do either. Thanks. You could ask Spike. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:35, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Tag

Maybe an error there. Wikipedia Security Guy or whatever his thing is removed the construction tag off his own page, not someone else's page. He said the article was complete, or at least open to others editing it. And since I'm here, congrats on all the recent writing and feature(s) and all that. More, more features (what do you think, a couple dozen pages ready?) Aleister 12:14 20-3-'12

p.s. Oh well, when you've caught a lion better cage it. Poor Tasmania got caught in the crossfire.
Personal tools
projects
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Romartus/Archive11?diff=prev&oldid=5460099
uncyclopedia.wikia.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-11
146269
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:6VOP2GAJTCC6PACG2UU7X4FYBDPRBK53
<urn:uuid:a163883e-5b57-4b01-a5cd-a2cd40cea00b>
2015-03-01T05:03:27Z
23.235.46.194
sha1:NZCMVKPRBPMZ3B6WVANLFKZ2PDHIAJTI
<urn:uuid:39264ec0-0777-448a-908e-99af3c65716c>
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Romartus/Archive11?diff=prev&oldid=5460099
response
<urn:uuid:11185939-4b80-44ec-a927-9be6cbfaf7cb>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-28-5-156.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-11
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for February 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf