11

Don't miss the article. No MWE for this one.

13
  • 8
    I believe the chat is a better place to share such information with the community, and, in fact. it has been shared there.
    – user121799
    Dec 18, 2018 at 5:06
  • Indeed. I rarely chat. Dec 18, 2018 at 6:33
  • 4
    @marmot but in chat it soon disappers from view. I think here is better for historical reason, even if it is off-topic.
    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 18, 2018 at 11:49
  • @CarLaTeX Originally it was on the main site. On this site it makes more sense, I agree.
    – user121799
    Dec 18, 2018 at 11:51
  • @marmot Yay, great article!
    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 18, 2018 at 11:54
  • 1
    @marmot It might make more sense on the main site. The question is related to tex and not to the software that powers tex.se (which is the topic of tex.meta) Dec 18, 2018 at 12:06
  • @samcarter My thinking is that this is not a question that can be answered (in the usual sense), and on meta it is possible to have a discussion.
    – user121799
    Dec 18, 2018 at 12:08
  • @marmot Discussion can happen on meta, but the discussion should be about "the workings and policies of TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange rather than discussing TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems itself." (tex.stackexchange.com/help/whats-meta) Maybe the question just does not fit in the stackexchange framework (It would be well suited for one of the tex mailing list, or texblog.net) Dec 18, 2018 at 12:11
  • @samcarter Yes, that's why I suggested the chat.
    – user121799
    Dec 18, 2018 at 12:13
  • @marmot Ah yes, that is a good advice :) Dec 18, 2018 at 12:14
  • Thank you for pointing out this article, which I will read religiously, hoping (but not believing) that he will have been asked what his purpose was when he allowed the tokens to be modified :-)
    – AndréC
    Dec 19, 2018 at 5:08
  • 4
    Once upon a time we had a blog... Dec 19, 2018 at 8:27
  • 1
    “It started out that computer scientists were worried nobody was listening to us. Now I’m worried that too many people are listening.” — That closing statement is pretty spot on, and shows infinitely more self-consciousness than most tech gurus.
    – gnucchi
    Dec 27, 2018 at 18:45

1 Answer 1

15

Yes, we are all reading

enter image description here

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/7968/question-are-you-all-reading-about-donald-knuth-the-yoda-of-silicon-valley-i
tex.meta.stackexchange.com
CC-MAIN-2024-18
115612
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:P3SA4LBF4E42BV65T74BVZGSEK3HW3JK
<urn:uuid:babcd220-fcff-4c2d-b1b8-16e2d2a6eaf6>
2024-04-22T01:01:31Z
172.64.144.30
text/html
sha1:YRC5QEPG5QMUJUKLILKFBDXFWAXMIFOZ
<urn:uuid:3c5f3a6c-c4d6-4851-b1f9-e262a9945d90>
https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/7968/question-are-you-all-reading-about-donald-knuth-the-yoda-of-silicon-valley-i
response
<urn:uuid:92bbf0aa-024e-4ee0-8bfc-91210cd28218>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-18
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-47
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/