Print This Post Print This Post

Is reading reviews OK?

Lee Catalano | Audiobooks | Thursday, August 30th, 2007

Here’s post no. 2 from Selected Audiobooks …

I’m not a subscriber to YALSA-BK, but some of my committee colleagues read it, and wrote to the Selected Audiobooks listserv about a recent spate of postings about audiobooks and whether it’s appropriate for teens to listen to (as opposed to reading) required and/or summer reading titles.

They noted that that discussion soon morphed into one about favorite audiobooks, and they realized that many of the books that YALSA-BK posters had said were their favorites had not — in fact — risen to the top for them. (In our listserv discussions about the YALSA-BK listserv discussion, no titles were mentioned, so I truly don’t know which books anyone here is talking about.) One colleague wondered if it was appropriate for a member of Selected Audiobooks to write about audiobooks that she’s enjoyed (and perhaps nominated) in a public forum like YALSA-BK. Is she inappropriately sharing what should remain an internal discussion and/or skewing an electronic conversation by posting an opinion as a member of our committee? Are we being unduly influenced by others’ opinions when we read reviews or listservs like YALSA-BK?

I leapt in with “heck, no!” to this query, since our committee deliberations are public (although our listserv discussions are not), and any of our opinions are just that — our own opinions. I went on (because I do go on and on …) to say that I thought that we represented the larger YALSA membership as committee members and that to share our opinions about why we thought something was great (or not so) as an audiobook was — in fact — a service to the membership. I share my opinions freely — and fully identified as my opinions — on my blog, which I am shyly sharing with you today [but for some reason the YALSA blog software doesn't like blogspot, so it's not linking here, so here's how you find it: readingwithmyears dot blogspot dot com]. I am sharing shyly, because my blog is very basic and is not nearly as entertaining as Betsy Bird’s or Tasha Saecker’s Kids Lit or Hip Librarians [whose blog address doesn't make the YALSA blog software happy either, but can be found by Googling hip librarians] or some other blog I don’t know about. I also said that I found reading others’ opinions helped me to consider other aspects of a book that I had overlooked or dismissed for one reason or another. I say, bring on all opinions!

But, truly what we want to know is … what do you think? Should we post our thoughts about audiobooks in public forums like YALSA-BK? Should we avoid all reviews and postings about titles we’re considering? Why don’t other committee members (BBYA, most notably) post to book discussion forums?

Posted by Lee Catalano

1 Comment

Leave a comment

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

What is 7 + 6 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to post your comment, you need to solve the security question.

RSS feed for comments on this post.
http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/2007/08/30/is-reading-reviews-ok/
yalsa.ala.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-48
46128
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZABNKUAPUX46SNP7H7JNWIWWP5DG4COX
<urn:uuid:02b771e0-f0fb-4c4b-8ad0-f2f2f4a7acbd>
2013-12-11T03:22:02Z
208.113.151.110
sha1:EC5LYLO6CA4HZGHIVAWDBRZT3JCZ4DSA
<urn:uuid:db0001eb-910e-472a-a26d-54d14c27801a>
http://yalsa.ala.org/blog/2007/08/30/is-reading-reviews-ok/
length
response
<urn:uuid:e271ca60-e044-4f01-8023-bacc80b51c69>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-33-133-15.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-48
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Winter 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf