Trusted/senior users (narrow focus)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

wikipedia has a strategic dilemma of encouraging quality edits by knowledgeable editors, while staying true to its open values. how will you measure quality? will you use number of active edits? (easy but misleading) is this becoming Wikipedia:Esperanza? wikipedia germany came to a different answer on editing articles than english. is this becoming like that?

98.169.251.4119:56, 19 January 2010
https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Thread:Talk:Task_force/Wikipedia_Quality/Trusted/senior_users_(narrow_focus)/reply_(12)
strategy.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-29
25924
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:V6XT3UGPPDM224KCTPX3UED5S7XKVUWZ
<urn:uuid:acf60d1f-9d47-45ca-9056-97c1f6700fb0>
2020-07-08T08:01:30Z
208.80.154.224
text/html
sha1:FEYBIBGE2A3TEFRDC3TZ73XEVVYHIKU3
<urn:uuid:800cb2ee-e567-471a-a416-2215818fdab0>
https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Thread:Talk:Task_force/Wikipedia_Quality/Trusted/senior_users_(narrow_focus)/reply_(12)
response
<urn:uuid:f428912b-3e8b-404d-bbf9-8aeed8ca1f5d>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-29
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-237.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/