Talk:Grim Reaper

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Note to any and all....

A note to any and all who are unfortunate enough to read this article: (just joking, lol!) We need some help coming up with funny things for this article. Stikman and I seem to be stuck...So if you have any ideas to make the article funnier, feel free to contribute! I'd appreciate it! --The creator of THIS article, mwahahaha! 04:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Why not put in on Pee Review? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 08:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


edit Sucking?

Hmm, this article is quite bad so far.

I know...I'm really, really sorry. =( I'm new to Uncyclopedia, so I'm not exactly sure how to do things. I DID try to put the info in there, and soon I'm gonna add more...Could someone possibly help me with links, cleaning up, photos, etc.? I'd be grateful to anyone who helps me keep this article from sucking. =) (Note: I created the Grim Reaper article...) Thank you, --Cuke monster 00:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm well I think that this could become a good page. Me and my friend are trying to think of some ideas for this, so hopefully we all can get this as quite a good page :). I hav'nt been realy editing articles until recently tho. And cool that you created it! Lol. --Stikman 05:46, 17 October 2006 (PDT)

LOL TY! =) I thought it would be funny to make it...=P TYSM for helping to contribute to the page. Come up with any ideas? I'm thinking of some with my sis. --Cuke monster 03:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

lol! Very funny :)--Stikman 07:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

is the Elvis thing good? I thought a little random Elvis sighting might be funny... "The King has, once again, left the building..." --Cuke monster 05:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Yer I think it is and Woohoo! The No redeeming value thing has gone lol--Stikman 14:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Whoo we're doing good, lol! I added more to the conundrum piece. Is that funny? =P --Cuke monster 00:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah it is brilliant lol!--Stikman 10:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

edit anus

Yes very brilliant 66.141.174.129

edit irrelevant quote

That quote about the pie could have been an obscure reference to "the grim adventures of Billy and Mandy" in which two kids trick the grim reaper in becoming their friend forever and make him do loads of menial tasks. But then again it may have just been vandalism lol.

edit Wow

Hey, it looks pretty good! We need some more info, but it looks better than it did when we started! =-P --Cuke monster 20:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Aye lol --Stikman 23:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

edit So far...

I think it seems relativly good so far! --Stikman 13:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

edit Cowbell

What's with the four cowbell templates at the bottom lol? Surely one (or prehaps two) would suffice.

Well nvm they've gone now :) --Stikman 23:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


edit This article needs help? request

The humility does not mitigate the fact that this and too many others like it is SHIT. The attempts to improve it stink like diarrhoea too because they atttend to the same structure and idea of the article - which is SHIT - instead of doing something other than these sorry-arsed shaggy dog bollocks (see latest entry on Talk: Death for analysis of why these articles are IRRETREIVABLY SHIT. I know, I'm shouting. Actually I'm screaming because these articles are so basically and profoundly shit from the creator and anyone who thinks its worth 'improving' on to morons like me who can't be arsed to do better. Someone do something which isn't SHIT which means staying away from this WikiYankovic style SHIT - 84.71.113.160

Sign your comment please, especialy one such as that. Also, it hurt my eyes reading whatever drivel you spouted there. If you aren't going to do anything to improve it, it would be best to be quiet. You didn't even clearly state what was bad about it, apart from writing profanities... Other people liked this article, but I must admit it may not be to everyone's liking. --Stikman 18:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review

edit Grim Reaper

(Put proper link in title. ----OEJ 20:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC))

Humour: 9.9 Hi quality entertainment!
Concept: 10 Much needed page in Uncyclopedia
Prose and formatting: 10 Well written and styled, good for family outings
Images: 10 Appropriate and to the point
Miscellaneous: 9.9 I'll never take drugs again after reading this article.
Final Score: 49.8 It definately has enough cowbell...
Reviewer: User:Hawthorn Peebles/sig 20:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


edit Rewrite

I have taken this task upon myself to rewrite this article. No, no, don't thank me just yet. As of this writing, Grim Reaper is up for feature. BOOYAH! Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:28, Oct 15

As of THIS writing, Grim Reaper IS featured. And I voted for it. And for the trouble, I got a nice little template on my talk page. Necropaxx takes this WAY too seriously. -MafiaHatBrown Velosi-T Icons-flag-us {] Screech * Vomit * Mutilations [} 21:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Wow, that's a massive rewrite. I can only see a picture and two lines what I had originaly put! Nevermind though, you've improved it brilliantly! :D --91.105.109.179 18:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Aw, shucks. Thanks, I'm glad you liked it. Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:04, May 16

Jon Bon Jovi was funnier than Sheldon. Don't know why you changed it.--206.78.50.75 16:18, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

I have to agree. Why did you change it?--Lux Sky Waker 16:20, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Grim_Reaper
uncyclopedia.wikia.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-48
50079
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:W5DC3VZ2QUBGAL3HK4BCVRF5CQBMXPH7
<urn:uuid:9adefdc2-aac0-4d22-b60d-2ff00b2650c7>
2015-11-29T21:18:26Z
23.235.33.194
sha1:W25ZJW5HQAWT7KXMRG2PCO4TY5OPCLGS
<urn:uuid:9c80022d-1ffc-4b19-a690-d620e4946130>
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Grim_Reaper
response
<urn:uuid:28282c85-eae4-447a-8bd6-52118f0860dd>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-71-132-137.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-48
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for Nov 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf