Skip to content

Adam

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Adam shared this idea  · 
  2. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Adam supported this idea  · 
  3. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Adam commented  · 

    Taking this idea one step further, it would be great if Universities could add their own resource types. You could have: Newspaper, Music Score, eThesis, eJournal and eBook just to name a few. Regarding the default resource types: I’m yet to see an “Audio-visual document” in our library’s collection.

  4. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    backlog  ·  Keji Adedeji responded

    We would like to review the dashboard can be shared with academics where permissions and roles are not given to them.

    However, this is not currently in our near term development focus so it has been moved to the longer term backlog.

    Ideas may be graduated from the backlog as we get through the ones that are planned.

    Adam supported this idea  · 
  5. 99 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We have been reviewing this idea following on from the list edit work that has been taking place and would like to now explore this piece further.

    This is an example of how an idea may be declined at a point in time but as we explore and develop new areas we do review all ideas past and present and consider them all.

    Adam supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Adam commented  · 

    This is a great idea because it means you have the option to publish the archived reading lists sooner. For example publish weeks 1 to 6 and hide weeks 7-12 while you update them.

Feedback and Knowledge Base
https://ideas.talis.com/users/29816719-adam
ideas.talis.com
CC-MAIN-2023-23
122909
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:UGKSX3MDN7VEF7W7352LEYA4XWK54QWV
<urn:uuid:6ab2d24f-a1f9-4e3d-a28b-4fc8d3851023>
2023-06-07T18:30:39Z
104.17.30.92
text/html
sha1:J7WVLH4QGWDMAEEGHBNVMWPHXEIRNFWV
<urn:uuid:343d10ef-f175-45d6-a5de-f81e91be59ec>
https://ideas.talis.com/users/29816719-adam
response
<urn:uuid:2090e033-d2a9-49fc-831b-d8848dff0a4f>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-23
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May/June 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-36
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/