Talk:Skaze

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wrong links to WoT database[edit]

References 2 and 3 lead to a wrong interview. It seems to me that the numeration of the interviews sometimes change, causing links that don't give the fitting information. I'll surely try to repair those on my own, if I find the right interview but this time I'm not sure. The correct one might be {!{ref|?|769|210}}. If so should it be cited this way or directly to the annotations page? **Meg (talk) 10:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)**

They keep changing? :\ maaan, all our links are breaking recently :| *sigh* thanks for the heads up --Joe ST (talk) 10:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
https://coppermind.net/wiki/Talk:Skaze
coppermind.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-40
17881
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MGNMMSGNXOKSFBPT6Z3EIFK22YENHSUC
<urn:uuid:0ae763cb-c0db-4712-a555-5fa0da212064>
2022-10-06T08:05:07Z
172.67.69.136
text/html
sha1:CBAMCNLQTAHE75RIATO5N6KMEJRCDZ36
<urn:uuid:3653654c-098b-4a29-8b6a-57dd9be052db>
https://coppermind.net/wiki/Talk:Skaze
response
<urn:uuid:75a4fe14-60d8-4b90-80d9-e0120ab9542c>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September/October 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-88
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/