[Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] flagged revisions

private musings thepmaccount at gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 22:47:03 UTC 2009


Hi all,
It's been 10 days since the last note on flagged revisions, which is
sufficiently important to warrant a follow up at this point in my view. I'll
try and focus the questions a bit in order not to pester, but with the
intention of helping things forward;
see https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18244 for bug details.
* Flagged Revisions is approved for use on the English Wikipedia, my
understanding is that there really isn't that much technical work still to
do on the extension - is this true?
* Is there anything a regular editor such as myself can do to help
prioritise this in the hearts, minds and fingers of our wonderful
developers?
* Personally, I believe this function to be one of the most important
matters before the foundation currently, I further believe that this view is
relatively widely held (and sure, widely reviled too - but this is a wiki,
right!) - I've copied foundation-l in on this note with the intention of
further general discussion occurring there, and bug-specific chat only on
the wiki-tech list, I hope this is an appropriate use of resources :-)
I've offered appreciation, a dollop of charm, and a little bit of money to
try and keep this moving forward.... I'm not sure I'm above offering sex, so
please throw me a bone for the sake of the decorum of these lists, if
nothing else :-)
best,
Peter,
PM.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com>wrote:

> Am I confused or didn't enwp approved flagged revisions, but then it
> was held up due to "purely technical reasons" ... what is this crap
> now?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: K. Peachey <p858snake at yahoo.com.au>
> Date: Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] flagged revisions
> To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:08 PM, private musings<thepmaccount at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > with apologies for re-vitalising a slightly old thread -I have a couple
> of
> > follow ups, which it'd be great to try and make some progress on....
> > My understanding is that Aaron (whom I haven't 'met' - so hello!) has
> > completed work on a test configuration of flagged revisions - I hope it's
> > appropraite for me to ask directly on this list whether or not Aaron
> > considers this development complete? (my understanding is that the
> extension
> > is pretty much ready to go?)
> > There is understandably considerable interest in the timeframe for
> > installing flagged revisions, I would hope it would be a positive step to
> > set some timeframes a bit tighter than 'hopefully by wikimedia' ;-) - is
> > this list an appropriate context for such discusison, and if so
> (hopefullly)
> > - could someone appropriately empowered flesh out the next steps a bit
> more,
> > and maybe try and establish a timetable of sorts?
> > My intention in posting about this every so often is to ensure that such
> an
> > important development doesn't sort of slip through the cracks - I think
> > communication on this matter has to date been ok, but not great - it'll
> be
> > cool to improve it a bit :-)
> > cheers,
> > Peter,
> > PM.
> The implementations depend on a per wiki basis depending on consensus,
> for example, wikinews and a few others such as the German Wikipedia
> already run it.
>
> The en.wiki is currently also looking at a slightly modified version
> nicked named "Flagged Protections" which is basically designed to work
> the same way protection does, articles are only covered by it when
> protected to a certain level.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-June/052673.html
lists.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-21
7877
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:YT6TPMRBJT2OXWXRSWW6AQ566X6ZV64T
<urn:uuid:614789e1-5ab0-40b1-8252-a3f7ee3334a4>
2022-05-16T08:14:21Z
208.80.154.21
text/html
sha1:WFNSUBEJUQPILETTVJG7DIDLN7KE5JLM
<urn:uuid:354343df-e036-4e97-ab90-f1234b58ff36>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-June/052673.html
response
<urn:uuid:857bb0d9-87a7-430d-8302-5f12c10fdd93>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-21
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-5
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/