Forum » Topic: 'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763 The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:04:04 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 <![CDATA[Search]]> q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php SugarTits69 on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179712 Tue, 28 May 2013 10:11:55 +0000 SugarTits69 179712@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Me too... </p> Lindy Moone on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179710 Tue, 28 May 2013 10:10:50 +0000 Lindy Moone 179710@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Ooh, I like Dick's. </p> Dick Everyman on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179701 Tue, 28 May 2013 09:54:53 +0000 Dick Everyman 179701@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Just to add my two penny worth. </p> <p>You could substitute 'rages' for 'says' and leave off the ironic ending.</p> <p>Nice little ticker though Oxbridge. </p> Lindy Moone on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179694 Tue, 28 May 2013 09:22:53 +0000 Lindy Moone 179694@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Great idea but I agree that the flow is a little off. Not that I can think of anything better...</p> <p>'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail -- ironically, not ironically<br /> (or)<br /> 'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail -- not ironically, ironically</p> <p>was all I could come up with. </p> Sinnick on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179693 Tue, 28 May 2013 09:10:06 +0000 Sinnick 179693@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Agree with Jeni; note, Mr Wiltshire is doing something on the same lines - would be nice to complement each other ? </p> The All New Jeni B on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179667 Mon, 27 May 2013 23:35:44 +0000 The All New Jeni B 179667@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Oxy, I like this idea, but feel that it's a little 'clunky'.</p> <p>May I suggest that the latter part may be better as "...., without a hint of irony."?</p> <p>It could well just be me, but as it stands it doesn't flow.</p> <p>Stars all the same. </p> Sir Lupus on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179656 Mon, 27 May 2013 22:03:42 +0000 Sir Lupus 179656@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I guess they want to establish a monopoly. Or maybe they're embarrassed by the kinds of people who like to hang out with them. "OMG all these racists are following me around, and like all I've done is blame everything on foreigners and immigrants for the past 100 years...." </p> Oxbridge on "'Block hate-fuelled websites' says Daily Mail, apparently not ironically" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=61763#post-179621 Mon, 27 May 2013 18:05:19 +0000 Oxbridge 179621@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>More soon </p>
http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=61763
newsbiscuit.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-50
6726
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MI45S23HR6AHOBGODYHHC5PIDUNYARYS
<urn:uuid:f4cc9fa9-1b34-4699-99e4-0e555f6211ac>
2016-12-09T02:04:04Z
88.208.210.137
sha1:2JMRBHEGM6QQJTOODYEHDHZMR3MP5FLX
<urn:uuid:9c2e9ef8-2dec-40a7-9815-71ac34f5cb23>
http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=61763
response
<urn:uuid:cd98b403-5f88-4c69-bcd3-627fc0dcf735>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-31-129-80.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-50
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for November 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf