Lost in Translation

Keyboard key conceptualizes accessible translation

Tashatuvango/iStock/Thinkstock

Automated translation is touted as a one click solution. But is it?

From time to time, the listserv lights up with the issue of translating websites into other languages and I’ve seen the interest increase as Web managers struggle to comply with competing mandates to serve their customers.

Many Web managers are tasked with installing the “magic button” solution on their websites to make them multilingual and comply with current mandates, such as Executive Order 13166 and the Justice Department’s 2011 Renewed Commitment Memo. So they turn to Google translate or some other automated system.

Not So Fast

There is no easy solution to the challenge of translating one language to another. Software created by linguists in reputable institutions can be considered a tool to perform basic work. However, automated translation is only a first step that can save time and money, but it should not be used alone. Here’s why:

  • All translations, adaptations, or localizations need the editing touch of a qualified translator/communicator who will communicate with the agency’s voice.
  • No machine can fully replace a human being for the interpretation of different and subtle meanings of a word within different contexts.
  • As content managers of government websites, we should advocate the concept of communication rather than translation to convey meaning.
  • The message needs to remain intact when it passes from the source language to the target language—the work of a translator is never about translating words but rather about deconstructing messages.
  • Machine translation dynamically generates pages making them invisible to search engines. When a person is searching for information to accomplish a task in a language other than English, your agency’s website will not come up in the search results because that content does not exist.
  • You can learn more about the pitfalls of machine translation in this Department of Labor presentation.

How to Start

Medical Interpreter Sign

Nuno Andre/iStock/Thinkstock

The “best practice” is to do the work the right way. If resources are limited, start small. Identify top tasks and translate that content, and then build from that. GobiernoUSA.gov, the Spanish language counterpart of USA.gov, has very strict policies and will not link to a machine-translated version of the website. Check out these examples of sites that excel in providing multilingual options:

  • CDC en español, the official Web portal in Spanish for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has a dedicated staff of translators.
  • MedlinePlus in Spanish provides comprehensive health information in Spanish.

Google Translate & Translation Trials

Some government websites are currently using Google Translate. This is not a best practice and should not be used as a sole solution. Consider the implications of a poor or inaccurate translation of health, financial, or legal information found on a government website. What is the point of having a button to translate a website if the information translated is unusable? Now consider the negative impact that could have on your agency. The Department of Health and Human Services and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality commissioned a study to assess the accuracy of Google translate on data extraction from non-English languages. This is the only formal study we’ve seen evaluating the accuracy of translation of this tool. Results show limited accuracy from various foreign languages to English, which cast doubt on the accuracy of translations from English to the same foreign languages.

Use of Disclaimers for Machine-Translated Websites

Some view disclaimers as the solution to justify an imperfect translation. Ask yourself and your managers: What are we trying to achieve? If an agency provides imperfect information but includes a disclaimer, the agency is essentially saying that it cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information they have provided. If so, how is this:

  • fulfilling a need?
  • fulfilling our mission?
  • serving the public?

Consider how you would react if you were reading information that had a disclaimer that said, very politely, that the agency can’t guarantee the integrity of the translation and, therefore, can’t guarantee the accuracy of the information it is giving you. A disclaimer on translated content works for the agency, but it does not work for the person trying to accomplish a task.

Tags:

Comments are closed.

Get the newest in DigitalGov delivered right to your inbox. 
Helping federal agencies deliver government information and services to the public anytime, anywhere and on any device.

Top
http://www.digitalgov.gov/2012/10/01/automated-translation-good-solution-or-not/
www.digitalgov.gov
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-40
124880
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:XOH7VG2HUHATBPWOLKZ55FVHXIISXPCY
<urn:uuid:2f4d2116-b4e6-41c6-8d11-d0ec660454f5>
2015-10-09T15:55:32Z
104.69.221.211
sha1:CXFKFHLPO6S6AZDUJ6TAIQEORPW6XDQX
<urn:uuid:2055b745-9c9d-4bbc-b7e8-4ba72ebaf91c>
http://www.digitalgov.gov/2012/10/01/automated-translation-good-solution-or-not/
response
<urn:uuid:df808aaf-0977-4b76-82a8-f540b871d090>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-137-6-227.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-40
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf