1

It started with this, now I see the direct offense here. Yes, I do remember the "flame threads" back to 1999, and - no, I don't consider it to be a sane way of making a dialogs. Note to moderators: I will respond to this paricular answer and all the next counter-constructive ones in the very way set by this person first. Please - either reason this person or I will not be responsible for ALL the foul language used. Insult is not the way dialogues are done, but silence is not the way of withstanding them either. Thank you for your time!

2

As commented on your other post:

The conversation has gotten heated and a bit personal a few times indeed. I've been away over the holidays but I'll keep an eye on it and take direct action if necessary.

1

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://tor.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/317/personal-offending-messages
tor.meta.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-49
100622
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:LDSJDRQCYCOXF56MRGYTGNOESWHDYJ2F
<urn:uuid:e18c2930-5fab-4313-ae9a-6f53d397e743>
2021-12-03T00:35:39Z
151.101.193.69
text/html
sha1:4JV7W2HFAN4S25BSIFNID4JFM7ITQEZO
<urn:uuid:1580dd42-d100-4bf9-8e1e-8368d3f0d908>
https://tor.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/317/personal-offending-messages
response
<urn:uuid:00c282fc-8145-4bec-bf34-fcd3b7ddf570>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-123
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/