Jillian C. York

Jillian C. York is a writer and activist.

Does ‘Trending’ a Topic Matter?

This week, my friend Gilad Lotan of SocialFlow wrote an excellent blog post explaining how trending topics really work, in an attempt it seems, to put rumors of censorship to rest. Twitter has been dealing with these rumors for quite some time, and last December publicly explained that Trending Topics are about velocity, not volume, but their blog post (either because no one read it or no one cared) has done little to silence the calls.

When I was at ONI, we analyzed a number of trending topics that were controversial in some way or another and that people were claiming had been censored, including #Flotilla and#Wikileaks. In both cases, we found that, while the problem was likely algorithmic, it did seem odd that Twitter would choose not to interfere and set a genuinely newsworthy event to trend. Nonetheless, none of us felt it to be ‘censorship.’

Despite my work (or perhaps because of it), I find those calls to be somewhat obnoxious. First off, Twitter is a private company that has been transparent about their algorithms, like it or not. And they’re not denying you your right to speech, they’re simply not trending your speech. That’s like complaining about being left off Twitter’s recommended user list (*cough Scoble cough*).

I think there’s a question here though: How much do Trending Topics actually matter? First off, they have to represent one of two things: Either an intentionally-created hashtag (usually created with the purpose of trending) or a genuinely popular person or thing at that moment (e.g., a celebrity who has just died). In the case of the former, I think it’s a legitimate method of trying to get attention for a cause, but I don’t know that getting a hashtag on the sidebar matters all that much in the long run (I’ll elaborate in a moment). In terms of the latter, I think it’s certainly important – I wouldn’t have known when Farrah Fawcett (of Charlie’s Angels fame) died if it weren’t for spotting her name on the sidebar. Seriously.

But back to hashtags – As far as I can recall, #syria never really trended, but that hasn’t stopped people from using it, searching it, saving it as a search term, and following it. On the other hand, the ability of a well-worded tweet to go viral is proven: I once tweeted a pithy statement, only to find it retweeted 22,000 times.

I think that raises a bigger point: Trending Topics do not imply quality of content. There are certain hashtags full of valuable content all the time (think of some of the smaller, humor-focused ones, or even #ows or #occupywallstreet when they first started). Then there are other hashtags repeated ad nauseum for the sole purpose of getting the hashtag to trend – The #GiladShalit campaign and the #Gaza solidarity campaign have both done this at times, for example, filling up single tweets with only the hashtag. If I spot an interesting hashtag and click on it, only to find a bunch of garbage, chances are I’m not going to check back. On the other hand, if I spot a non-trending hashtag filled with quality tweets, I might save it as a search.

My point is that people complain about censorship, and there are certainly some valid criticisms of Twitter’s algorithm (I don’t like, for instance, that it’s different for different cities), but without much analysis of whether Trending a topic is actually that useful.

I would also add that I’ve been at several conferences where the hashtag of the conference trended locally – which really only implies (given that there were fewer than 500 people in attendance) that the cities in which those conferences took place had a low threshold for trending topics.

Lastly, a comment: Twitter does in fact censor profanity from the Trending list. Whether they did this with Jeff Jarvis’s #fuckyouwashington remains unknown, but I do find it rather absurd that a company that prides itself on free expression is for some reason abiding by unrequired FCC guidelines.

6 Comments

  1. What did you tweet that was RTed 22,000 times?!

  2. I took Lotan’s post as a starting point for a similar discussion, that might be interesting to you. For me, the interesting question is not whether Twitter is censoring its Trends list. The interesting question is, what do we think the Trends list is, what it represents and how it works, that we can presume to hold it accountable when we think it is “wrong?” What are these algorithms, and what do we want them to be?

    Can an algorithm be wrong? Twitter Trends, the specter of censorship, and our faith in the algorithms around us
    Oct 19, 2011

    originally posted on Culture Digitally: http://culturedigitally.org/2011/10/can-an-algorithm-be-wrong/
    reposted on Salon as “Our misplaced faith in Twitter Trends”: http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/our_misplaced_faith_in_twitter_trends/

  3. Hi everyone I recently wished to bring in myself. If you have any questions don’t hesitate to inquire. I’m sorry for my personal bad language

  4. Hello every person I simply wanted to bring in myself. For those who have questions don’t hesitate to ask. I’m sorry for my personal negative language

  5. Sennheiser Earbuds tend to be one of the most amazing fecal material technological know-how to provide superb noise, together with develop a excellent give to get for your own self and anybody you’re keen on. People best all kinds of other companies that are out there at this moment, together with can be purchased from superb fees also. The following product works out tricky to help you satisfy shoppers, and allows conducted thus with their excellent brand of headsets that will get the job done excellent for every work with. They are easy to, attractive, along with the directory simply moves on together with concerning. Have you already been listening to all the vocals and then a good tour bus passes and also people is usually talking excessive adjacent to people and you just miss that will “had to learn it” the main song you select or even what ever? Well that will not come to pass in such a headphone product. This shut headsets glasses maintain out in the open noises in the garden, making it less of a challenge and a lot more enjoyment to hear audio basically any place.

    Past, conditions and also wetness A temperatures or moisture can be too big shall be remarkably easier for making this headset diaphragm associated with abnormal because of contour. Inside the final results, it may possibly not really retrieve. Which means preserve some cash headphones stop the natural environment and in addition damp natural environment. Head mobile phones is truly a even more sophisticated precious solutions, if he does not vigilant preservation, actually useful ear bud also can never make use of for any longer time period. Any queen of top notch monster beats headphones if you are not to manage retain, truly, will never use to get a prolonged moment, not having your exemption, your monster beats tour that double involving greatest headsets. Consequently, any time there are the following full associated with bose earphones, please warily following the tactic on top of preservation.
    monster beats hd

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

© 2015 Jillian C. York

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑
http://jilliancyork.com/2011/10/18/does-trending-a-topic-matter/
jilliancyork.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-35
48822
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:7366EWIPVTSHWCWQGRJLQHZQJLH73WPZ
<urn:uuid:ca71a1f8-3f3b-485d-a5c0-a5e7885edc65>
2015-09-01T07:52:23Z
173.254.13.110
sha1:S32KUO3HK7X275NFBNV77C35VF4ARIH2
<urn:uuid:a881c97d-9225-4033-b551-c57188e95d58>
http://jilliancyork.com/2011/10/18/does-trending-a-topic-matter/
response
<urn:uuid:2a44636d-ece6-4e5f-b8ae-ae7da85b1267>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-171-96-226.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-35
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf