Designing a Systematic Review Assessing Prevalence of Open Science Data Sharing

In a previous post I realized the need to do a systematic review of literature to determine prevalence of the use of figshare, both in terms of citation and in terms of actual studies of an open science platform such as figshare. To start with, I need to determine what Continue reading Designing a Systematic Review Assessing Prevalence of Open Science Data Sharing
https://notebooks.dataone.org/tag/journals/
notebooks.dataone.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-10
41645
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ILBY4ESMS6JOSIZKYDNAQY5IKMPMOJQQ
<urn:uuid:dd19599d-3f7e-4e32-94b9-03c3aa8e7d01>
2020-02-27T11:04:21Z
128.111.85.171
text/html
sha1:P2ZFTUVGR3E44YJZJG6JFIMH7C7XGRW7
<urn:uuid:4e05a6ae-2deb-4904-81e9-181ecf182f49>
https://notebooks.dataone.org/tag/journals/
response
<urn:uuid:d57570d1-e6f8-41af-b266-1089671ebb97>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-10
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-233.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/