3

I've come across the following tags:

It is my opinion that these tags should be completely removed from the system as they are too ambiguous.

What are your thoughts?

2
  • 5
    Not enough to make an answer, but kill em all! Oct 12 '13 at 23:52
  • 1
    @JorgeCastro "Kill em all" is an acceptable answer :)
    – Seth
    Dec 6 '13 at 0:10
5

In regards to ...

Aw, yeah!

Seriously though, I edited the tag out of every single one of those questions. I realize that moderators have access to a tool that greatly simplifies this, but I really wanted an excuse to post that image :P

4
  • Great job! That was no small task.
    – Seth
    Oct 16 '13 at 1:15
  • We have access to tools? I haven't found anything like this Nathan....
    – jrg
    Oct 16 '13 at 1:21
  • @jrg: I was sure there was a tool for that, but I just checked and indeed, I can't find anything. Oct 16 '13 at 1:49
  • I nearly thought I was being slack,
    – RolandiXor
    Dec 7 '13 at 3:44

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/7465/should-sharing-copy-and-text-be-burninated
meta.askubuntu.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-49
112611
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:WFURJBNMIUZ5DKGO6VAD2LRUCWSNKKZI
<urn:uuid:c328f898-456f-42a6-aa0d-381ba2c71cc8>
2021-12-01T02:59:06Z
151.101.1.69
text/html
sha1:24QIQ7CXZJIREJV5XNNH36XVS6BLBDZ4
<urn:uuid:abf70fbd-70f8-4ef1-8454-330832192c5f>
https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/7465/should-sharing-copy-and-text-be-burninated
response
<urn:uuid:d89f03ae-2cab-438c-bc4e-2c467bceb98f>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-102
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/