\begin{center}
  {\bf\Large  A DEFENSE FOR TWO DIMENSIONS}\\
          or \\
  AN EXTRAORDINARY  PREFACE
\end{center}

In his classic book \textsf{Flatland} \cite{Abbott}, E. A. Abbott described
an imaginary two-dimensional world, embedded in three dimensions,
and populated
by two-dimensional figures that think, speak, and have all
the human emotions.
The author, a schoolmaster with a classics background 
who was interested in literature
and theology,
wrote his science fiction fantasy in pure mathematics 
for entertainment.  
He published it under a pseudonym to avoid any negative criticism
resulting from it reflecting poorly on his more formal works.
Apparently, he never
imagined that this work not only would entertain many generations
of physicists and mathematicians, but also 
would contain concepts that future scientists
would work on.

Almost 120 years after \textsf{Flatland} was written\footnote{The first edition
was published in 1880, while a 
second corrected edition was printed in 1884.  Beyond the mathematical
ideas explored, the book reflects
many attitudes that were normative in Western society in the late
nineteenth century, but that today are rejected as offensive and
ill-informed.},
much has happened to our ideas and concepts of spaces with
various dimensions. Relativity placed humans in a 
four-dimensional space-time; more recently, String Theory
claims that the dimensionality of our universe
has to be updated to 10 or 11 dimensions.
We have thus learnt to feel comfortable in a space of many dimensions.

We have also become more comfortable in spaces of
few dimensions. Two-dimensional 
science has grown to  one of the most important, well-controlled, and
well-developed areas of today's physics and mathematics. Abstract
mathematics and theoretical physics have established many breathtaking
results, while
condensed matter physics has devised many systems that behave as
two-dimensional, some of which have great impact on our society.

Of course, despite these two-dimensional applications, many
physicists have argued that `our universe' could not have been
two-dimensional, that life could not have existed in two dimensions,
and that three dimensions is the minimal 
feasible dimensionality for our world. In particular,
S. Hawking in talks and M. Kaku in his best-seller
\textsf{Hyperspace} have argued that the digestive system of living beings
would separate them in two disjoint sets in two dimensions and,
therefore, even this simple argument can rule out a universe in
two dimensions. However, this argument is too quick and facile (although
it does point out that evolution on Earth has selected a digestive system
suitable to three dimensions, and inappropriate for Flatland). 
Indeed, if one puts one's mind to it, a model for life in two spatial
dimensions can be developed, as is done quite thorougly in 
A. K. Dewdney's
book \textsf{Planiverse} \cite{Dewdney}.

So, after all, life in two dimensions might be possible. And there may
even be other universes out there that realize such a possibility. 
We may never discover such places. 
But we can certainly study them. And we will be glad that we did so!


\newpage

\begin{center}
  {\bf\Large CJE'S ORDINARY  PREFACE}
\end{center}

\vspace{5mm}

In contrast to Warren Siegel \cite{Siegel}, when I was a graduate student
I used to love books that contained in the title ``Introduction  to ...".
This is probably because, by the time I was a graduate student,
many good books delivering on this promise\footnote{This has already
become better with the creation of the LANL
archives by P. Ginsparg. Many beautifully written articles
which include ``Introduction  to ..." in their titles
are posted there frequently in a variety of fields. Papers of all
flavors are available there for virtually any taste.}
had been written. 

Even as an undergraduate student,
I recall (with some kind of nostalgia for those years)
that I was lucky enough to read some great introductory
books. Written on the standard  core of physics, those  books usually
would not include in the title the previous phrase.
Among these books, I especially liked 
 \textsf{Problems in Quantum Mechanics} by Constantinescu and Magyari.
The book is nicely written and printed.
It contains a number of problems on Quantum Mechanics (QM), divided thematically
into chapters. Each chapter contains a brief summary of the theory,
a collection of problems, and finally their solutions. I have been influenced
so greatly by this book, that the
architecture of the present
document is modeled after it --- although I 
can only hope that we approach the
quality of that book's presentation.

Although the subject of the present document is distinct
from the subject of its stylistic sibling, the two are
not completely unrelated. What one learns in \cite{CM}, can be used
here. After all,
QM is 1-dimensional Quantum Field Theory (QFT); 
the present document explores
the developments in 2-dimensional QFT.

During the last two decades, we have witnessed an amazing explosion
in the progress of mathematical physics.
String Theory\footnote{According to the standard lore of naming theories
in Field Theory, the name \textit{Quantum Nematodynamics}
(QND) is more appropriate. Perhaps the name \textit{String Theory}
should be used only at the classical level. Another possible
name, given the recent developments 
regarding branes, is \textit{Quantum Branodynamics}
(QBD); however, I personally would vote in favor of QND as I find
\textit{Quantum Nematodynamics} the most euphonic choice.}
has emerged as the
leading candidate for the Theory of Everything (TOE), and has led to
revolutions in our understanding of the principles underlying fundamental
physics. In conjunction with the rise of string theory,
we have witnessed the
discovery of and advancements in many other areas of mathematical
physics:  Conformal 
Field Theory (CFT), Integrable Models (IMs), 2-Dimensional Gravity,
Quantum Groups (QGs),
and Dualities in QFT, to name just a few areas.
The developments in each field have influenced the developments in
the other fields, at times in profound and radical ways, at other times
in subtler and more controlled fashion.


Thus, I embarked on the preparation of this collection of problems,
for those who wish
to study mathematical physics and want to see some solved problems
to whet their appetite.
I hope that people who learn the subjects treated in this
collection of problems will find it
useful. In this sense, it might also
prove useful to people who teach material related to the subjects
explored herein.


In his book, Siegel also writes,
``It is therefore simultaneously the best time 
for someone to read a book and the worst  time  for someone to write one."
This sentence remains true for this collection as well. 
Recent times have proven so
fertile for mathematical physics that many
results are considered `common knowledge' just a few days after they
are posted on the LANL archives. 
As a result, no review or book can cover 
completely such a vast terrain. The present
document is certainly no exception. It covers only a 
fraction of the relevant subjects, and even for those
covered, only a limited number of possible
themes have been touched. 
However, depending on the interest, we hope that in a later edition,
more topics will be added, and more exercises within each area.

We have partitioned the material in \ref{CountChapters}
\space chapters. Although there
are not always sharp boundaries among these chapters, this 
approach was taken to enhance the pedagogical value of this
work. 


Finally, we would like to say that for such a subject,
it is impossible to give an exhaustive
list of references. We  primarily cite
review papers and books, as those may be of great help for
the reader who would like to study the material.
However, we have also included many significant
original papers in the bibliography
that might not be cited in the text.
In this spirit, we would like apologize to all people whose works are not
cited; there is no way to be exhaustive, nor have we attempted to be,
and in some cases such omissions are doubtless a result of our ignorance.
If this document serves as an introduction to the field of two-dimensional
physics and its literature, it will have served its purpose. 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newpage

\begin{center}
  {\bf\Large DAS'S ORDINARY  PREFACE}
\end{center}

\vspace{5mm}

The very first paper I published offered new demonstrations of
the integrability
of some non-linear sigma models, with and without supersymmetry, in two
spacetime dimensions.  While that paper predates (by just a little bit)
the revolution in 2-dimensional physics that this manuscript addresses,
I am struck by how much the topics of that paper are echoed here.

If I trace my own personal history of interest in the topics covered
here, there are two pivotal moments, beyond that first paper of mine.
The first moment is the ICGTMP (International Colloquium on
Group Theoretical Methods in Physics) held in Montreal in 1988.  
Those were
heady times.  The conference itself was a cornucopia of string theory, 
conformal field theory, and 
quantum groups, held in a political context that allowed
attendance by an extensive collection of physicists and mathematicians from
around the globe.  How could one not be hooked?

The second moment was my decision to pursue a career in a liberal arts
institution.  These are places not well-understood outside the USA; they
are colleges with no graduate students or postdocs, but that does not mean
that they are void of research.  On the contrary, my colleagues are some
of the most vibrant minds I know.  But it does mean that many of us do
not have the benefit of spending time each day, bumping into colleagues in
the hallway or seminar room, and learning things almost by osmosis.
The value of such a pedagogical document as the present one of course
transcends my own personal context; but this context has made clearer to me
what the value of such a manuscript is.

My co-author Costas Efthimiou has been the driving force behind this
project, and the rationale he presents above is indeed the same rationale
that drew me into this project, and I am glad to have been drawn in.
There is no need for me to repeat the
ideas Costas has expressed above.  But I will express
my hope that this document will find multiple uses, from students
beginning their
explorations of theoretical physics in graduate school, to established
scientists trying to
move into new areas of research, to faculty seeking inspiration for their
courses.


\newpage

\begin{center}
 {\bfseries\Large ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS}
\end{center}

This manuscript and our approach to the topics therein
has benefited from discussions on various occasions
with C. Ahn, M. Ameduri, S. Apikyan, P. Argyres, S. Chaudhuri,
J. Distler, B. Gerganov,
B. Greene, Z. Kakushadze, Y. Kanter, T. Klassen, A. LeClair, G. Shiu, and
H. Tye.  CJE thanks A. LeClair 
in particular, for providing an introduction to
some of the subjects discussed in this document, and
would especially like to thank M. Ameduri who typed some of the problems
from handwritten notes,  providing the momentum needed to
continue on this project. Last, but not least, CJE thanks the Florida
Southern College where some of the final details were written, and in particular
Professor M. Jamshid who gave him the opportunity to visit the college,
while DS acknowledges the support of
NSF Grant PHY-9970771.


\vspace{1cm}
\begin{center}
{\bfseries Comments and criticism are welcomed and greatly encouraged.}
\\  costas@phys.columbia.edu
\\  spector@hws.edu
\end{center}



\newpage

\small
\begin{flushright}
\begin{minipage}{3in}
\textsf{Other mistakes may perchance...await the penetrating glance of
some critical reader, to whom the joy of discovery, and the intellectual
superiority which he will thus discern, in himself, to the author of this
little book, will, I hope, repay to some extent the time and
 trouble its perusal
may have cost him!}
\rightline{\textsc{Lewis Carroll}}
\end{minipage}
\end{flushright}
\normalsize

\vspace{2.5cm}

\centerline{\bf\Large COMMENTS}

\begin{enumerate}
\item
  When you read this document, please keep in mind that the document
  is still in its infancy. Most sections are brief, and the presentation
  at times somewhat abbreviated.
  The reader is also warned that, despite our best efforts,
  no doubt many typos remain. We apologize, too, that different
  conventions may still be used in different parts of the document!
  This is due to the fact that several sections have their origins
  in projects undertaken before conceiving the plan to prepare one comprehensive
  pedagogical collection.  (Some would say this might even be valuable,
  preparing the reader for the array of conventions in the published
  literature!)
  We hope that the reader nonetheless finds this work valuable and
  beneficial.
  If all proceeds according to our
  expectations, when the document reaches its adult stage, it will
  have been cured of all these childhood diseases!


\item
  On the cover page, a release number
  $$
   \mbox{RELEASE $N.n$}
  $$
  is given (see on the cover).
  It should be interpreted as follows. A higher  release number
  of course signals a newer version. A larger $n$ means that 
  \emph{simple} typos
  have been corrected, wording may have been improved,
  conventions and notation may have been uniformized,
  additional references may have been added, but 
  \emph{no essential}
  changes have been made. Reprinting the document is in this
  case \emph{strongly discouraged} --- save the forests!
  A larger $N$
  number means that new material has been added (e.g. new problems
  in previously existing sections, new sections in previously
  existing chapters, or even new chapters) or 
  \emph{conceptual or other important}
  mistakes have been corrected. 
\item
  Of course, there are many topics that could be added
  to the present document. A list of topics that would appear
  as natural extensions to our work would include (see the list
  of abbreviations on page \pageref{table:PRO1}): 
  \begin{itemize}
  \item Background Material in QFT and in Mathematics
  \item Supersymmetric CFT
  \item Higher Genus CFT
  \item CFT in $D>2$ Dimensions
  \item IMs in QM
  \item Classical IMs 
  \item Quantization of Classical IMs 
  \item Bethe Ansatz
  \item Form Factors for IMs
  \item Boundary IMs
  \item Vertex Models
  \item Applications to Condensed Matter
  \item Knot Theory
  \item Matrix Models
  \item Topological Field Theories 
  \item String Theory
  \item Seiberg-Witten (SW) Theory and IMs
  \end{itemize}
  As the release number increases, this list of missing
  items should shorten until it \emph{dissappears} (what
  optimism!!!). However, even if this occurs, it would by no
  means imply that we had achieved a complete coverage of 
  these topics; it should
  be only interpreted as a completion of \textit{our} target, which is to allow
  the reader a foundation for indulging in the
  exploration of mathematical physics and physical mathematics. 
\item
  
Abbreviations are in general defined at the place of 
their first occurrence.
However, especially if you do not read this document sequentially, 
relying on this for definitions may be somewhat
cumbersome.
Certain well-known abbreviations may even not be
expanded in any place
in the document.
Therefore, 
we have included a table of abbreviations (Table \ref{table:PRO1}),
which appears on the following page.
\end{enumerate}


\newpage
\thispagestyle{empty}


\begin{table}[hb!]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}\hline
{\bfseries Abbreviation} & {\bfseries Explanation}\\ \hline\hline
BCFT & Boundary Conformal Field Theory \\ \hline
CFT & Conformal Field Theory \\ \hline
CBC & Conformal Boundary Condition \\ \hline
CGC & Coulomb Gas Construction	 \\ \hline
CGF & Coulomb Gas Formulation \\ \hline
DSZ & Dirac-Schwinger-Zwanziger \\ \hline
GUT & Grand Unified Theory \\ \hline
IM & Integrable Model \\ \hline
LANL & Los Alamos National Laboratory \\ \hline
l.h.s. & left hand side \\ \hline
MM & Minimal Model \\ \hline
OPE & Operator Product Expansion \\ \hline
QCD & Quantum Chromodynamics \\\hline
QED & Quantum Electrodynamics \\\hline
QFT & Quantum Field Theory \\\hline
QG & Quantum Group \\\hline
QM & Quantum Mechanics \\\hline
RCFT & Rational Conformal Field Theory \\\hline
reg & Non-Singular Terms in Operator Product Expansion \\\hline
r.h.s. & right hand side \\ \hline
RSOS & Restricted Solid-on-Solid \\ \hline
SCFT & Supersymmetric Conformal Field Theory \\ \hline
SG  & Sine-Gordon \\ \hline
S-matrix & Scattering Matrix \\ \hline
SOS & Solid-on-Solid \\ \hline
SUSY & Supersymmetry \\ \hline
SUGRA & Supergravity \\ \hline
SW & Seiberg-Witten \\ \hline
TOE & Theory of Everything \\ \hline
UMM & Unitary Minimal Model \\ \hline
W-matrix & Wall (or Reflection) Matrix \\ \hline
w.r.t. & with respect to \\ \hline
WZWN & Wess-Zumino-Witten-Novikov \\ \hline
YBE & Yang-Baxter Equation \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Table of abbreviations and acronyms used in this document.}
\label{table:PRO1}
\end{table}




\newpage













