From @wnydick @ending from gm@il@com  Wed May  9 15:25:11 2018
From: @wnydick @ending from gm@il@com (Steven Nydick)
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 13:25:11 +0000
Subject: [Rd] unlist errors on a nested list of empty lists
In-Reply-To: <a6285602-b54d-4420-88a8-3cc2de367006@gmail.com>
References: <CAJMBSp1UX5z1Ou3bPdc0Nk4GT1Q1oqdqWEfs3wHH_r130ettrw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5947f0e5-ab4e-4ded-2605-01f2c1733ddc@gmail.com>
 <1e9bec47-0ff0-16fc-a41d-cded04955ff4@gmail.com>
 <CAJMBSp0W0AYR1Tr4h75O+ozC_78kBmgi7oypE82h6ipz0SkzLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <a6285602-b54d-4420-88a8-3cc2de367006@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJMBSp0FjoCbfiOeoMGveJfuHw_e83fC6MxxKVab7K7VpE4dvA@mail.gmail.com>

I do not have access to the bug reporting system. If somebody can get me
access, I can create a formal bug report.

The latter issues seem like duplicates of:
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12572 (with slightly
different output), but as that bug was reported nearly 10 years ago, it
might be worth creating an update under R version 3. I could not find the
first issue when searching the bug reports (which I ran into when trying to
parse JSON files), which is why I posted on r-devel.

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:51 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 08/05/2018 4:50 PM, Steven Nydick wrote:
> > It also does the same thing if the factor is not on the first level of
> > the list, which seems to be due to the fact that the islistfactor is
> > recursive, but if a list is a list-factor, the first level lists are
> > coerced into character strings.
> >
> >  > x <- list(list(factor(LETTERS[1])))
> >  > unlist(x)
> > Error in as.character.factor(x) : malformed factor
> >
> > However, if one of the factors is at the top level, and one is nested,
> > then the result is:
> >
> >  > x <- list(list(factor(LETTERS[1])), factor(LETTERS[2]))
> >  > unlist(x)
> >
> > [1] <NA> B
> > Levels: B
> >
> > ... which does not seem to me to be desired behavior.
>
> The patch I suggested doesn't help with either of these.  I'd suggest
> collecting examples, and posting a bug report to bugs.r-project.org.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:22 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com
> > <mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 08/05/2018 2:58 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> >      > On 08/05/2018 1:48 PM, Steven Nydick wrote:
> >      >> Reproducible example:
> >      >>
> >      >> x <- list(list(list(), list()))
> >      >> unlist(x)
> >      >>
> >      >> *> Error in as.character.factor(x) : malformed factor*
> >      >
> >      > The error comes from the line
> >      >
> >      > structure(res, levels = lv, names = nm, class = "factor")
> >      >
> >      > which is called because unlist() thinks that some entry is a
> factor,
> >      > with NULL levels and NULL names.  It's not legal for a factor to
> have
> >      > NULL levels.  Probably it should never get here; the earlier test
> >      >
> >      > if (.Internal(islistfactor(x, recursive))) {
> >      >
> >      > should have been false, and then the result would have been
> >      >
> >      > .Internal(unlist(x, recursive, use.names))
> >      >
> >      > (with both recursive and use.names being TRUE), which returns
> NULL.
> >
> >     And the problem is in the islistfactor function in src/main/apply.c,
> >     which looks like this:
> >
> >     static Rboolean islistfactor(SEXP X)
> >     {
> >           int i, n = length(X);
> >
> >           switch(TYPEOF(X)) {
> >           case VECSXP:
> >           case EXPRSXP:
> >               if(n == 0) return NA_LOGICAL;
> >               for(i = 0; i < LENGTH(X); i++)
> >                   if(!islistfactor(VECTOR_ELT(X, i))) return FALSE;
> >               return TRUE;
> >               break;
> >           }
> >           return isFactor(X);
> >     }
> >
> >     One of those deeply nested lists is length 0, so at the lowest level
> it
> >     returns NA_LOGICAL.  But then it does C-style logical testing on the
> >     results.  I think to C NA_LOGICAL counts as true, so at the next
> level
> >     up we get the wrong answer.
> >
> >     A fix would be to rewrite it like this:
> >
> >     static Rboolean islistfactor(SEXP X)
> >     {
> >           int i, n = length(X);
> >           Rboolean result = NA_LOGICAL, childresult;
> >           switch(TYPEOF(X)) {
> >           case VECSXP:
> >           case EXPRSXP:
> >               for(i = 0; i < LENGTH(X); i++) {
> >                   childresult = islistfactor(VECTOR_ELT(X, i));
> >                   if(childresult == FALSE) return FALSE;
> >                   else if(childresult == TRUE) result = TRUE;
> >               }
> >               return result;
> >               break;
> >           }
> >           return isFactor(X);
> >     }
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steven Nydick
> > PhD, Quantitative Psychology
> > M.A., Psychology
> > M.S., Statistics
> > --
> > "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and
> > finds himself no wiser than before, Bokonon tells us. He is full of
> > murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by
> > their ignorance the hard way."
> > -Kurt Vonnegut
>
>

-- 
Steven Nydick
PhD, Quantitative Psychology
M.A., Psychology
M.S., Statistics
--
"Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds
himself no wiser than before, Bokonon tells us. He is full of murderous
resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their
ignorance the hard way."
-Kurt Vonnegut

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] unlist errors on a nested list of empty lists
Steven Nydick