From ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk  Sun Nov  4 09:02:49 2007
From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk (Prof Brian Ripley)
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 08:02:49 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Rd] Strange behavior of pretty
In-Reply-To: <472CF1EB.9020703@stats.uwo.ca>
References: <13566672.post@talk.nabble.com> <472CF1EB.9020703@stats.uwo.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711040800580.12590@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>

On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

> On 03/11/2007 4:34 PM, Ulrike Gr?mping wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I got stuck with a weird behavior of pretty:
>>     pretty(c(-1,1),n=1)
>> yields -2, 0, 2 instead of the desired result -1 1.
>> Likewise,
>>     pretty(c(-2,2),n=1)
>> yields -5, 0, 5 instead of the desired result -2 2.
>
> I don't think pretty() should ever return -1 1 or -2 2.  It should
> always return multiples of some round number, so it would have to
> include 0.  But I don't see why it is expanding the range.  It doesn't
> do that when the results are non-negative, e.g.
>
> > pretty(0:1, n=1)
> [1] 0 1
> > pretty(0:2, n=1)
> [1] 0 2
>
>> With n=0, the result is the same, while with n=2 everything is as
>> documented.
>>
>> This behavior nastily messed up some of my cube plots. Is there any chance
>> that this can be fixed?
>
> The documentation has been sitting for 8 years with "FIXME" notes in it,
> so I wouldn't hold my breath.

The way to make the 'chance' appreciable would be to contribute a 
(high-quality) patch.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


[Rd] Strange behavior of pretty
Prof Brian Ripley