From tal.galili at gmail.com  Mon May 11 15:35:30 2015
From: tal.galili at gmail.com (Tal Galili)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:35:30 +0300
Subject: [Rd] Wrongly checked MD5 checksums in R 3.2.0's windows binary
In-Reply-To: <5550AC18.6080706@gmail.com>
References: <CANdJ3dU=D8qriq2wO7tZb+UYWi3oiLxmC+TdV1yLQBJAOdf5Tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<21840.24595.738590.906123@stat.math.ethz.ch>
	<70B6F453-1F65-4C23-89CB-52597D3476E4@gmail.com>
	<55507125.20100@gmail.com>
	<CANdJ3dXCh7-BxF6Xii3Wa1UuHeUCoGJOdNepEzrwzRDBRcEB6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5550AC18.6080706@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANdJ3dWSaYQJ3avnwNaoduc08wBKzpNGBga=gkMy7MsrSiyX8Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Duncan,
Thank you for the clarification. :)

I ended up removing these files from being scanned in the updated version
of installr. I would rather focus on supporting an MD5 scan that is based
on what is listed in MD5 file itself (ignoring exceptions that are not
clearly stated in the file).









----------------Contact
Details:-------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: Tal.Galili at gmail.com |
Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) |
www.r-statistics.com (English)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 11/05/2015 8:35 AM, Tal Galili wrote:
>
>> Thank you Duncan, Peter and Martin for the responses.
>>
>> Just to mention that the code is based on tools::md5sum, and the issue
>> can be reproduced (in Windows) using:
>>
>> if(!require(installr)) install.packages("installr")
>> installr::checkMD5sums2(dir=R.home())
>>
>>  I think you didn't understand my post.  It's a bug in your code: you
> need to compare the md5sum value to the ones I mentioned, not just to the
> one listed in the MD5 file.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] Wrongly checked MD5 checksums in R 3.2.0's windows binary
Tal Galili