From tlumley at u.washington.edu  Fri Jul 30 00:09:01 2004
From: tlumley at u.washington.edu (Thomas Lumley)
Date: Fri Jul 30 00:09:08 2004
Subject: [Rd] aov for unbalanced design (PR#7144)
In-Reply-To: <20040729204320.05FE5FC04@slim.kubism.ku.dk>
References: <20040729204320.05FE5FC04@slim.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.58.0407291508260.234570@homer06.u.washington.edu>


It is not a bug. It is supposed to be that way. It is even a FAQ.

	-thomas

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 tlogvinenko@partners.org wrote:

> Full_Name: Tanya Logvinenko
> Version: 1.7.0
> OS: Windows 2000
> Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.156.125)
>
>
> For unbalanced design, I ran into problem with ANOVA (aov function). The sum of
> squares for only for the second factor and total are computed correctly, but sum
> of squares for the first factor is computed incorreclty. Changing order of
> factors in the formula changes the ANOVA table. For the balanced design, there
> is no such problem.
>
> > summary(aov(data[1,]~factor1+factor2))
>             Df  Sum Sq Mean Sq F value    Pr(>F)
> factor1      5 1524420  304884  6.4529 0.0003229 ***
> factor2      7 1447830  206833  4.3776 0.0017808 **
> Residuals   31 1464674   47248
> ---
> Signif. codes:  0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*' 0.05 `.' 0.1 ` ' 1
> > summary(aov(data[1,]~factor2+factor1))
>             Df  Sum Sq Mean Sq F value    Pr(>F)
> factor2      7 1648225  235461  4.9836 0.0007295 ***
> factor1      5 1324025  264805  5.6046 0.0008612 ***
> Residuals   31 1464674   47248
> ---
> Signif. codes:  0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*' 0.05 `.' 0.1 ` ' 1
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>

Thomas Lumley			Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlumley@u.washington.edu	University of Washington, Seattle


[Rd] aov for unbalanced design (PR#7144)
Thomas Lumley