From ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk  Thu Oct 13 17:42:29 2005
From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk (Prof Brian Ripley)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:42:29 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [Rd] Installing R-2.2.0 package
In-Reply-To: <434E7DD0.9030208@statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <599089EF29304C44AF1D84B1C223AC63032EF461@groamrexm03.amer.pfizer.com>
	<434E7955.4090108@statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
	<434E7AEB.7030801@bank-banque-canada.ca>
	<434E7DD0.9030208@statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510131641160.5818@gannet.stats>

It works on Solaris 8 for me, and this is checked as part of the 
alpha/beta process.

The code is the same on Linux and Solaris, after all, so this would have 
to be a Solaris shell bug.

On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Uwe Ligges wrote:

> Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Uwe Ligges wrote:
>>
>>> Dean, David P wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dear list,
>>>>
>>>> I've just installed R-2.2.0 under Solaris and have a question about
>>>> installing packages. If a package fails to install for any reason and
>>>> I go
>>>> to install another package, I get this message:
>>>>
>>>> $ R-2.2.0-64bit --vanilla CMD INSTALL
>>>> ~/srca/cran/RSQLite_0.4-0.tar.gz ERROR: failed to lock directory
>>>> '/app/openpkg/lib/R-2.2.0-64bit/lib/R/library' for modifying
>>>> Try removing '/app/openpkg/lib/R-2.2.0-64bit/lib/R/library/00LOCK'
>>>>
>>>> I can remove the lock directory by hand, and then the next package
>>>> installs,
>>>> but this makes it quite difficult to download and install a batch of
>>>> packages from CRAN or Biocondctor! Is this lock directory a new
>>>> feature with
>>>> R-2.2.0? Is there a work around in the R build itself or the
>>>> installation
>>>> scripts?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No, not a new feature in R-2.2.0, it has been there for some time now.
>>>
>>>
>> I have the impression the feature behaves slightly differently as of
>> R-2.2.0. Now the 00LOCK file is not removed in Solaris when there is an
>> unsuccessful install. (In Linux I think it does get removed.)
>
> Yes, under both Linux and Windows it is removed.
>
> Can anybody else check on Solaris, please? Or can David Dean debug on
> his machine?
>
> In particular, we need exact system information, because it seems to be
> an OS/platform specific problem.
>
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>
>> Paul Gilbert
>>
>>> After a *successful* installation, the 00LOCK directory should be
>>> deleted by the installation tools themselves.
>>> After an unsuccessful installation, the installation tools should
>>> restore the stuff in the 00LOCK directory.
>>> Do you abort the installtion manually (this is the only way I figured
>>> out how not to remove 00LOCK automatically)?
>>>
>>> Uwe Ligges
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Much thanks!!!
>>>> --------------------- David P Dean
>>>> Research Informatics
>>>> PGRD Groton Labs
>>>> (860)-441-5053
>>>> david.p.dean at pfizer.com
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> LEGAL NOTICE\ Unless expressly stated otherwise, this
>>>> messag...{{dropped}}
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>>
>>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595



[Rd] Installing R-2.2.0 package
Prof Brian Ripley