From geoffjentry at hexdump.org  Wed Aug 28 23:19:43 2013
From: geoffjentry at hexdump.org (Geoff Jentry)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:19:43 -0700
Subject: [Rd] Minimum requirements for package submission
In-Reply-To: <loom.20130828T225613-593@post.gmane.org>
References: <CAPrRzuyMDh64qTw=DSEAunVfjG5AFY=aMHr5NrE9L+f5RmZNkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABdHhvGt184JfHZAw1k_GpGmiGgaK-XnCLqRofOvU9=WUgUuGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKFxdiRjTE6avW9An2_X6HDV63f+Sv8LsO6FESrY0MzGKdHOLg@mail.gmail.com>
	<21022.2225.867873.997588@max.nulle.part>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1308281115520.22063@cardinals.dreamhost.com>
	<loom.20130828T225613-593@post.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1308281418290.8964@cardinals.dreamhost.com>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Ben Bolker wrote:
>  It may be suboptimal/there may be better ways, but what I would do in 
> your situation would be to save the real twitteR results to a .Rdata 
> file (e.g. put it in inst/vignetteData) and then 'fake' the twitter 
> call: add a non-eval'd but echo'd chunk that appears to run the command, 
> and an eval'd but non-echo'd chunk that loads the results of having run 
> the command.

Interesting, I'll look into doing that.

Thanks
-J



[Rd] Minimum requirements for package submission
Geoff Jentry