From ccberry at ucsd.edu  Thu Jan  4 23:04:47 2018
From: ccberry at ucsd.edu (Berry, Charles)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 22:04:47 +0000
Subject: [Rd] silent recycling in logical indexing
In-Reply-To: <CABghstSnaTTfxs+f0ENUeFJF4UO998_A4xdN7wFhZcmsuHAfog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6ba8e484-bc14-bcbb-1d8a-4871909e87f2@gmail.com>
 <25B0F325-FD8D-4A43-B711-2329E4847AE9@ucsd.edu>
 <CABghstSnaTTfxs+f0ENUeFJF4UO998_A4xdN7wFhZcmsuHAfog@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C75D580C-A172-4521-9A4F-BCF1C1515450@ucsd.edu>



> On Jan 4, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Chuck: I don't see how this example represents
> incomplete/incommensurate recycling. 


It doesn't. I took your subject line to be the theme of your posting and `incommensurate lengths' to be an instance used to emphasize how silent recycling might `bite' the user. 

Chuck


[Rd] silent recycling in logical indexing
Berry, Charles