From hadley at rice.edu  Tue Sep  4 04:59:59 2012
From: hadley at rice.edu (Hadley Wickham)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 21:59:59 -0500
Subject: [Rd] if(--as-cran)?
In-Reply-To: <20548.49118.496081.738932@max.nulle.part>
References: <50444374.50709@prodsyse.com>
	<CAFDcVCTF9xCqpo-1rUiKaooHf43-V_zfkUOi2k+0jzogW+xNXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20548.49118.496081.738932@max.nulle.part>
Message-ID: <CABdHhvHLWwBxz03z2CAxnfuBC=RNYvnXMam3nsCXycr5pe7-Kg@mail.gmail.com>

> | Hi, see thread "[Rd] Proposal: Mechanism for controlling the amount of
> | testing 'R CMD check' performs" on April 8, 2012:
> |
> |   https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2012-April/063809.html
>
> Good proposal, somehow I missed that at the time.  Something like this ought
> be to implemented in R proper.
>
> In Rcpp, I am now using a similar environment-variable-based approach, and it
> doesn't scale particularly well if every (large) package does its own thing.

Is there any approach that's going to be particularly better than
scaling out CRAN's build servers?  As a particularly profuse package
author, I'd be happy to pay for the computing time that it takes to
run a full set of tests on my package (and this seems feasible in the
era of on-demand cloud computing).

Hadley

-- 
Assistant Professor
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/



[Rd] if(--as-cran)?
Hadley Wickham