From Muriel.Comblain@ulg.ac.be  Mon Dec  8 15:58:45 1997
From: Muriel.Comblain@ulg.ac.be (Comblain muriel)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 16:58:45 +0100
Subject: R-alpha: Bug in tapply in the Windows version of September
In-Reply-To: <199712081130.MAA00841@sophie.ethz.ch>
References: <3.0.1.32.19971208121337.008f44a0@pop3.mailst.ulg.ac.be>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19971208165845.009538c0@pop3.mailst.ulg.ac.be>

At 12:30 08/12/97 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
>Dear Muriel,
>
>the current Unix version of R, 0.60,
>has the following definition of  tapply(.).
>
>Can you check if it works for your examples?
>If not, please send us a complete example (i.e. with input data, we can
>regenerate).
>Thank you for your report!
>
>...

I checked this form of the tapply function coming from the current unix
version (0.60) on my examples and it worked perfectly as well as the fix I
proposed. Sorry if my mail was not completely clear, I will try to do
better next time and thank you for your help.

=20
Muriel Comblain
M=E9thodologie Quantitative
Facult=E9 de Sociologie
Universit=E9 de Li=E8ge=20
Bvd du Rectorat, 7
B4000 Liege, Belgique


Tel: +32 4 366 30 91
E-mail: Muriel.Comblain

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


R-alpha: Bug in tapply in the Windows version of September
Comblain muriel