From simon.urbanek at r-project.org  Tue Jan 15 02:04:13 2013
From: simon.urbanek at r-project.org (Simon Urbanek)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:04:13 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Who does develop the R core and libs,
	and how / where is it hosted?
In-Reply-To: <C2660820-4B80-438A-B66E-E01CE5D25D20@first.in-berlin.de>
References: <20130114202932.GA1806@siouxsie>
	<828A41A8-186F-4601-8D0E-C52CCA6F5162@r-project.org>
	<20130114233221.GC26703@siouxsie>
	<B6006DD8-7079-4D6C-B64D-25074375B91E@muxspace.com>
	<C2660820-4B80-438A-B66E-E01CE5D25D20@first.in-berlin.de>
Message-ID: <72E32EE0-FAC7-4A4A-A6D8-926A862B3D64@r-project.org>

On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Oliver Bandel wrote:

> 
> 
> Am 15.01.2013 um 01:11 schrieb Brian Lee Yung Rowe <rowe at muxspace.com>:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 6:32 PM, oliver <oliver at first.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> BTW: I looked up the string "wish list" in some of the mentioned docs (mentioned in this thread)
>>>     but did not found it.
>>>     Can you please point me to it directly?
>>>     Googling for "R wish list" brings me links to a producer of toys.
>>> 
>>>     Or did you mean I should ask R users for their wishes??!
>>> 
>>>     (Some R users - on this list - asked for Julia language as a speedup alternative for R a while ago?)
>> 
>> Is this what you're looking for: http://developer.r-project.org/ (see TODO lists)
> 
> Ah, yes,there are TODO lists, thanks.
> 
> This is at least some kind of thing yi was looking for.
> But these are personell TODO lists.
> Are their any goals for R as whole project?
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> All in all it seems like no special things need to be done.
>>> The FSF for example has a page where they ask for support in certain areas,
>>> so, this looks rather urgent.
>>> R seems not to have such urgent needs for support....
>> 
>> How about cleaning up some of the documentation/wiki pages?
> 
> I'm not a friend of seperating design, coding, documentation, ...
> 
> IMHO this should be something that is not seperated.
> And I also think, that the way, R packages will be written
> (code as well as documentation together) uses the same
> kind of philosophy.
> I was very happy about this close relation between code and
> documentation,mthat is necessary to wrte a package.
> 
> I thought the same holds true for R project as a whole.
> So I maybe was wrong with this assumption.
> 

Actually, it does hold true - all R documentation is part of the R sources.

Maybe it's a sign of a relative maturity of R that we don't have a particular "milestone"-like agenda. Typically, most things can be supplied as packages - the only reason to touch the core of R itself is if it is something that cannot be done as a package, and given R's modularity that is fortunately not very often the case.

Cheers,
Simon



[Rd] Who does develop the R core and libs, and how / where is it hosted?
Simon Urbanek