From spencer.graves at pdf.com  Wed May  3 19:29:05 2006
From: spencer.graves at pdf.com (Spencer Graves)
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 10:29:05 -0700
Subject: [Rd] as.factor: changed behaviour for Date class
In-Reply-To: <b0808fdc0604270331r400ee269q5323f117da3610e4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b0808fdc0604270331r400ee269q5323f117da3610e4@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4458E861.9010309@pdf.com>

	  Have you received a reply to this post?  I haven't seen one.
 > t9 <- 9:10
 > class(t9) <- "Date"
 > t9
[1] "1970-01-10" "1970-01-11"
 > as.factor(t9)
[1] 9  10
Levels: 9 10

	  I confirmed what you got with a slightly different example:

 > t9 <- 9:10
 > class(t9) <- "Date"
 > t9
[1] "1970-01-10" "1970-01-11"
# Apparently, 'class(times) <- "Date"' had the anticipated effect

	  As you indicated, 'as.factor' in R-2.2.1 used character string 
representations of the dates as levels, while in R-2.3.0 it did not:

 > as.factor(t9) # in R-2.3.0
[1] 9  10
Levels: 9 10

 > as.factor(t9) # in R-2.2.1
[1] 1970-01-10 1970-01-11
Levels: 1970-01-10 1970-01-11

	  R-2.2.1 and R-2.3.0 returned the same for the following:
 >  as.numeric(as.factor(t9))
[1] 1 2

 > sessionInfo()
Version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24)
i386-pc-mingw32

attached base packages:
[1] "grid"      "methods"   "stats"     "graphics"  "grDevices" "utils"
[7] "datasets"  "base"

other attached packages:
  tseries      zoo quadprog  lattice
"0.10-0"  "1.0-6"  "1.4-8" "0.13-8"

 > sessionInfo()
Version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24)
i386-pc-mingw32

attached base packages:
[1] "grid"      "methods"   "stats"     "graphics"  "grDevices" "utils"
[7] "datasets"  "base"

other attached packages:
  tseries      zoo quadprog  lattice
"0.10-0"  "1.0-6"  "1.4-8" "0.13-8"

	  hope this helps.
	  spencer graves

Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo wrote:

> Dear all,
> I have noticed a little change in the behaviour of as.factor from R-2.2.1 to
> R-2.3.0, and can't find it in the NEWS.
> 
> In R-2.3.0:
> 
>>times <- 1:5
>>class(times) <- "Date"
>>as.factor(times)
> 
> [1] 1 2 3 4 5
> Levels: 1 2 3 4 5
> 
> In R-2.2.1:
> 
>>as.factor(times)
> 
> [1] 1970-01-02 1970-01-03 1970-01-04 1970-01-05 1970-01-06
> Levels: 1970-01-02 1970-01-03 1970-01-04 1970-01-05 1970-01-06
> 
> Is this the intended behaviour?
> Note that the change is reflected on other functions which seems to use
> as.factor internally, for example 'tapply'.
> Consider the following code:
> 
> times <- 1:5
> class(times) <- "Date"
> id <- rep(times, each=2)
> vals <- rep(1:2,5)
> tapply(vals, id, mean)
> 
> Under R-2.2.1 this gives:
> 1970-01-02 1970-01-03 1970-01-04 1970-01-05 1970-01-06
>        1.5        1.5        1.5        1.5        1.5
> 
> But under R-2.3.0 the output is:
>  1   2   3   4   5
> 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
> 
> Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo.
> 
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



[Rd] as.factor: changed behaviour for Date class
Spencer Graves