From pdalgd at gmail.com  Fri Mar 18 08:07:54 2011
From: pdalgd at gmail.com (peter dalgaard)
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:54 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Standardized Pearson residuals
In-Reply-To: <87hbb1fs2m.fsf@stat.ufl.edu>
References: <325E2604-06E3-4C1A-9D2B-08A42A894025@anu.edu.au>
	<87hbb1fs2m.fsf@stat.ufl.edu>
Message-ID: <46A5CFAE-BD90-42D4-9ECF-EF6E81A57C27@gmail.com>


On Mar 17, 2011, at 20:46 , Brett Presnell wrote:

> 
> John Maindonald <john.maindonald at anu.edu.au> writes:
> 
>> One can easily test for the binary case and not give the statistic in
>> that case.
>> 
>> A general point is that if one gave no output that was not open to
>> abuse, there'd be nothing given at all!
> 
> Thanks John.  I've been reluctant to push too hard for this on r-devel,
> but this is more or less the point I made to Peter in a private email.

Well, r-devel is the discussion club. If you push people there, they can move away.... 

Anyways, I have committed the new rstandard(); to r-devel for now, if nothing falls on its face, we can move it to R 2.13.0 alpha before it goes to beta on March 30.

	-p
-- 
Peter Dalgaard
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk  Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com



[Rd] Standardized Pearson residuals
peter dalgaard