From h.wickham at gmail.com  Tue Sep  9 15:03:58 2008
From: h.wickham at gmail.com (hadley wickham)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:03:58 -0500
Subject: [Rd] package "signal", function "filter" (PR#12752)
In-Reply-To: <20080909073016.91F822834154@mail.pubhealth.ku.dk>
References: <20080909073016.91F822834154@mail.pubhealth.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <f8e6ff050809090603o7a0615edxa726be0cd73fa825@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:30 AM,  <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> Package 'signal' is not the responsibility of the R developers, so you
> need to follow the FAQ and report this to the maintainer, rather than
> clog up R-bgs with an inappopriate report.
>
> You might find that R's own function filter() is better written.
>
> The FAQ also asks you not to report on long obsolete versions of R.

Perhaps if these frequently "asked" questions were actually displayed
on the bug reporting page people would notice them.

Hadley

-- 
http://had.co.nz/



[Rd] package "signal", function "filter" (PR#12752)
hadley wickham