From konrad.rudolph+r-devel at gmail.com  Fri Dec 11 15:33:40 2015
From: konrad.rudolph+r-devel at gmail.com (Konrad Rudolph)
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:33:40 +0000
Subject: [Rd] How do I reliably and efficiently hash a function?
In-Reply-To: <CABdHhvGzA9atxR2Mrei_T+0h9L3u2LKaDu3GwAi5tr71Q0=Omw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM2gKPbSZjLUpVW87iaKczF-2eDHiT6GReu28SBJ98mSt8Djcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABdHhvGzA9atxR2Mrei_T+0h9L3u2LKaDu3GwAi5tr71Q0=Omw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAM2gKPbMVdu89LMqP5JPcho5Vq=2SYk0ZAbwof3vpEGbzSp57Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not use your own S3 class?

Yes, I?ll probably do that. Thanks. I honestly don?t know why I hadn?t
thought of that before, since I?m doing the exact same thing in
another context [1].

[1]: https://github.com/klmr/decorator/blob/2742b398c841bac53acb6607a4d220aedf10c26b/decorate.r#L24-L36



[Rd] How do I reliably and efficiently hash a function?
Konrad Rudolph