From dsamperi at DecisionSynergy.com  Thu Jul 27 15:33:39 2006
From: dsamperi at DecisionSynergy.com (Dominick Samperi)
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:33:39 -0400
Subject: [Rd] % symbol in .Rd files?
In-Reply-To: <17608.48230.329381.121464@stat.math.ethz.ch>
References: <44C4FE51.1070306@DecisionSynergy.com>	<17608.33665.900040.416162@stat.math.ethz.ch>	<44C8A904.2020408@DecisionSynergy.com>	<17608.46622.450008.260194@stat.math.ethz.ch>	<44C8B6D6.50202@DecisionSynergy.com>
	<17608.48230.329381.121464@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <44C8C0B3.6070508@DecisionSynergy.com>

Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> "Dominick" == Dominick Samperi <dsamperi at DecisionSynergy.com>
>>>>>>     on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:51:34 -0400 writes:
>>>>>>             
>
>     Dominick> Martin Maechler wrote:
>     >> Hmm, actually I now start wondering: Why did we ever start
>     >> talking about this at all?  Isn't this something you have to settle
>     >> with Kurt, Fritz, or whomever.. ?
>     >> Regards,
>     >> Martin Maechler
>     Dominick> Sorry if I was unclear, but yes, it was settled with the help of Kurt. As I
>     Dominick> said, the latest r-devel includes some new type checking (to be sure that
>     Dominick> STRING_ELT is applied where it makes sense, for example), and this
>     Dominick> is why CRAN was picking up problems that I was not seeing.
>
> but not related to "%" ???
>
> Also, with R-devel "as of last night"
> I (i.e., "R-devel CMD check")  don't see any problems in
> RcppTemplate or its help files.
>
>     Dominick> I guess I missed that fact about the '%' character in the docs.
>   
This is a somewhat old post, and I didn't mean to suggest that there are 
any remaining
problems (the package wouldn't have been released otherwise). The 
trivial topic about
'%' signs never would have come up if it wasn't mixed up with the other 
unrelated
and non-trivial problem that is now resolved.

Thanks for the feedback.

ds



[Rd] % symbol in .Rd files?
Dominick Samperi