From b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk  Fri May 22 21:02:19 2009
From: b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk (Barry Rowlingson)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 20:02:19 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Scope problem?
In-Reply-To: <4A16DB38.5010803@stats.uwo.ca>
References: <d8ad40b50905220928p5235b38fi69361e4c7f7cd91d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A16DB38.5010803@stats.uwo.ca>
Message-ID: <d8ad40b50905221202n42292738q73cdec9e9db65c5e@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch at stats.uwo.ca> wrote:

> Putting force(xl); force(yl) into your interpOne definition (so they get
> executed when interpOne is called, not just when the returned function is
> called) should work.

 *sigh* yes, that looks like it. The help for "force" gives a more
concise example. What I'd posted was actually a cut-down version of my
original problem!

 I've not tested it yet, but other things I'd tried had removed the
bug without me understanding why - such as reassinging the args to
interpOne inside the function.

 Do any other languages work like this?

 Thanks

Barry



[Rd] Scope problem?
Barry Rowlingson