From dmurdoch at pair.com  Tue Jan 27 18:46:51 2004
From: dmurdoch at pair.com (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Wed Jan 28 09:14:31 2004
Subject: [Rd] Another wishlist for R
In-Reply-To: <401673AE.1090900@pburns.seanet.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401261539050.28730-100000@gannet.stats>
	<40158C9E.9060807@pburns.seanet.com>
	<p0rc10l69l3igm327l4kkjoi8eiobop64l@4ax.com>
	<401673AE.1090900@pburns.seanet.com>
Message-ID: <gr8d10pedj12p8fnv805i76v5ah52v83ad@4ax.com>

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:20:30 +0000, Patrick Burns
<pburns@pburns.seanet.com> wrote :

>I think this could be being too "helpful".  Using tail on a matrix
>may often be done in a program so I think leaving things as they
>come is the best policy.

Yes, after a couple of minutes thought, I agree.  If people want nicer
row labels when doing tail on a matrix, they should put their own
rownames in place.

I've committed the changes to head.function and tail.function. 

Duncan


[Rd] Another wishlist for R
Duncan Murdoch