From @purd|e@@ @end|ng |rom gm@||@com  Thu Mar 28 06:19:06 2019
From: @purd|e@@ @end|ng |rom gm@||@com (Abs Spurdle)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 18:19:06 +1300
Subject: [Rd] default for 'signif.stars'
Message-ID: <CAB8pepwzwgQ80b-sZOrx__b1Dhhh6AQs8gyztnx_8MbJ86YEdQ@mail.gmail.com>

I read through the editorial.
This is the one of the most mega-ultra-super-biased articles I've ever read.

e.g.
The authors encourage Baysian methods, and literally encourage subjective
approaches.
However, there's only one reference to robust methods and one reference to
nonparametric methods, both of which are labelled as purely exploratory
methods, which I regard as extremely offensive.
And there don't appear to be any references to semiparameric methods, or
machine learning.

Surprisingly, they encourage multiple testing, however, don't mention the
multiple comparison problem.
Something I can't understand at all.

So, maybe we should replace signif.stars with emoji...?

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] default for 'signif.stars'
Abs Spurdle