From asr at ufl.edu  Wed Sep  9 20:08:54 2009
From: asr at ufl.edu (Allen S. Rout)
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:08:54 -0400
Subject: [Rd] Dependencies of  packages' CHECK....
References: <44wpf1vmp6dnn.fsf@crepe.osg.ufl.edu>
	<4059DBC9-C918-4D26-956E-C6627A1BB079@r-project.org>
	<44wpfocpqa66p.fsf@crepe.osg.ufl.edu>
	<4AA27DC3.7050500@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
Message-ID: <44wpfws482dop.fsf@crepe.osg.ufl.edu>

Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes:

>> 2) As part of the binary package build process, run CHECK
>>    with R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS = false. 


> 1, 3-5 sound fine, but I do not see why you need 2).


I suppose because it makes me feel dirty to leave the check step out
entirely, if there is some utility available from it.  But I've got a
reputation as an overengineer, so..

In any case, I agree that the earlier check doesn't add anything
except possible satisfaction by the binary-package maintainers.


- Allen S. Rout



[Rd] Dependencies of packages' CHECK....
Allen S. Rout