From pcd at wikitex.org  Mon Apr 21 06:27:57 2008
From: pcd at wikitex.org (Peter Danenberg)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:27:57 -0500
Subject: [Rd] AddComment (gram.y)
In-Reply-To: <18442.25443.49716.190470@stat.math.ethz.ch>
References: <20080419050915.GA1820@klutometis.wikitex.org>
	<4809D46D.2030308@stats.uwo.ca>
	<20080419185707.GA10684@klutometis.wikitex.org>
	<480A5A28.60302@stats.uwo.ca>
	<18442.25443.49716.190470@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <20080421042757.GB32674@klutometis.wikitex.org>

> IIRC, because there were always cases where they were attached to
> the wrong expression, and we were more or less convinced, there was
> no to do it "right" in all cases.

Doxygen and Javadoc seem to have solved the problem of comment-object
association, implying that it's not generally intractable; are there
any ambiguities specific to R (but not, say, C++ or Java) that make it
a special case?



[Rd] AddComment (gram.y)
Peter Danenberg