From armstrong.whit at gmail.com  Tue Dec  9 23:59:01 2008
From: armstrong.whit at gmail.com (Whit Armstrong)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:59:01 -0500
Subject: [Rd] any suggestions to deal with 'Argument list too long' for
	a R CMD check?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812092228480.20100@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
References: <8ec76080812091313q1b9cb41dyae03d46466170436@mail.gmail.com>
	<e8e755250812091323p4729692ereab8569c693eb148@mail.gmail.com>
	<8ec76080812091326qeb984a8k98882981a496a17@mail.gmail.com>
	<493EEC3E.2060202@epfl.ch>
	<8ec76080812091419s1cd838fdh32528b462c011a34@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.0812092228480.20100@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <8ec76080812091459g15dda02se0f10d8e8a10cb48@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the link, Prof. Ripley.

> What I suspect is happening is that there is a link command starting with
> 'g++' that is too long.
> One useful ref: http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/argmax

interesting...

on my system:

[whit at linuxsvr src]$ getconf ARG_MAX
131072
[whit at linuxsvr src]$

Let me try on another machine w/ a more recent kernel before I take up
more of everyone's time.

-Whit



[Rd] any suggestions to deal with 'Argument list too long' for a R CMD check?
Whit Armstrong