From jaomatos at gmail.com  Wed Sep 20 12:41:05 2006
From: jaomatos at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Matos?=)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:41:05 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Using \u2030 in plot axis label -> stack smashing
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609191336190.21406@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
References: <1158586738.28530.52.camel@gsimpson.geog.ucl.ac.uk>
	<loom.20060918T205234-775@post.gmane.org>
	<1158614334.2277.7.camel@graptoleberis.geog.ucl.ac.uk>
	<450F608A.30508@bfro.uni-lj.si>
	<dc41e1260609182113p48a7f35dg3b27f7100f435170@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0609190746490.27751@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<1158662883.10675.11.camel@gsimpson.geog.ucl.ac.uk>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0609191150000.12225@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<x2bqpc2gf9.fsf@viggo.kubism.ku.dk>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0609191336190.21406@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <9fd2371d0609200341g754af027n2fbad3c845f1c878@mail.gmail.com>

On 19/09/06, Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Apparently FC6 will have different flags/ different default behaviour, at
> least for ld.

Just for reference I have tested the default CFLAGS in  FC-5 and FC-6.
They are equal, namely:

CFLAGS="-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4"

this is common to all three supported archs, i386, x86_64 and ppc.
(There is in addition an architecture specfic part after)

  Regarding the linker you are right as is discussed in the draft
notes for FC6 release:
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc6test2/#id3068132

-- 
Jos? Ab?lio




[Rd] Using \u2030 in plot axis label -> stack smashing
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Matos?=