From i.ucar86 at gmail.com  Thu Nov 30 11:37:02 2017
From: i.ucar86 at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtpIMOaY2Fy?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:37:02 +0100
Subject: [Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form
In-Reply-To: <CAPtbhHy4=U8V-XRtg63=eS4PAWgqQM6=-xnSmVSgdPFbuv8dxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5A1EF8DB.6080401@fredhutch.org>
 <CAPtbhHzXe3=EBW6wwyx1Hh158qjBrC0vfFbh4+o3bRZTC+c5Kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5A1F0EB3.7090508@fredhutch.org>
 <CAPtbhHws5Fydk0AHeq3Urh9qEZ4XM0C-BJtoRvUpnStb33G=mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5A1F1C60.9080506@fredhutch.org>
 <CAPtbhHy4=U8V-XRtg63=eS4PAWgqQM6=-xnSmVSgdPFbuv8dxw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALEXWq3yQadGRyhUmcJ9p7kG=2Jf55=8v-U6tNukRWnZ6_Tpdw@mail.gmail.com>

2017-11-30 3:14 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>:
> My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does what it
> claims, from the documentation:
>
> ?is?: With two arguments, tests whether ?object? can be treated as
>           from ?class2?.
>
>           With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this
>           object's class.

Note that this is not in the documentation since a year ago.

I?aki



[Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form
=?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtpIMOaY2Fy?=