From dwinsemius at comcast.net  Fri Nov 18 19:17:46 2011
From: dwinsemius at comcast.net (David Winsemius)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:17:46 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Non-free packages in R-Forge
In-Reply-To: <CAPHS2gwxcdpyYPms1DeeTQYALZBTF1KsSN+8Y_Ayf0_Rt71OUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPHS2gwxcdpyYPms1DeeTQYALZBTF1KsSN+8Y_Ayf0_Rt71OUg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <89F1DF2A-59DB-4429-9CDB-1411B92C013E@comcast.net>


On Nov 18, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:

> I'm sorry about the tone of my previous email. Let me try again in a
> cleaner way.
>
> The problem is: R or the organisation behind R via its infrastructure
> seems to be endorsing R-Forge, and R-Forge is hosting at least one
> project whose sole purpose is to link R with non-free software. This
> looks like endorsement of non-free software, which is contrary to the
> aims of the GNU project, of which R today claims to be a part.

Are you aware that R has two other major trunks besides the Linux one?  
Those of us with Mac or Windows hardware/software devices might be  
threatened with discontinuation of our access to R if your logic  
prevails.

> There are several solutions, but the only workable ones I see are to
> either sever ties with the GNU project, clearly remove the endorsement
> of the non-free project, or to make the non-free project free. Of
> these, it is my sincere hope that the last one happens.

This entire argument seems quasi-religious. You seem to be claiming  
that there is a "non-free" moral and legal sinfulness that is passed  
by way of links on websites. There do not seem to be any boundaries to  
this process that are discernable from your writings.

>
> That is all.
>
> - Jordi G. H.
>


David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT



[Rd] Non-free packages in R-Forge
David Winsemius