From djsamperi at gmail.com  Fri Oct 29 06:37:14 2010
From: djsamperi at gmail.com (Dominick Samperi)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:37:14 -0400
Subject: [Rd] [Rcpp-devel]  must .Call C functions return SEXP?
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikz10gR6ThFAy-=p0tJMRqcti34eT8Nb89qsfkf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20101027234347.GA69179@piskorski.com>
	<1E6722DD-D3E2-4BDD-A9BE-C07271B3D1FC@r-project.org>
	<20101028134821.GA49312@piskorski.com>
	<77EB52C6DD32BA4D87471DCD70C8D7000393FB14@NA-PA-VBE03.na.tibco.com>
	<AANLkTi=wz8pbUJ4JNWToOQWaSQ5Zk2NxC6M+Gbm-4+kf@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikz10gR6ThFAy-=p0tJMRqcti34eT8Nb89qsfkf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=oLmrYLPW31F+pgR6ZE1SkcNWCfNrUW=GshLpb@mail.gmail.com>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20101029/28eebbc0/attachment.pl>


[Rd] [Rcpp-devel] must .Call C functions return SEXP?
Dominick Samperi