From murdoch.duncan at gmail.com  Wed Nov 26 23:49:50 2014
From: murdoch.duncan at gmail.com (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:49:50 -0500
Subject: [Rd] testing dontrun  examples
In-Reply-To: <54761FC6.3090007@gmail.com>
References: <54761FC6.3090007@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5476590E.1040804@gmail.com>

On 26/11/2014, 1:45 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run by 
> default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the Internet. 
> If I wrap them in try() then they can be skipped if the Internet is not 
> available, but may not be tested in cases when I would like to know 
> about the failure. (Not to mention that the example syntax is ugly.)
> 
> If I mark them \dontrun or \donttest then they are not tested. I could 
> mark them \dontrun and then use example() but for this, in addition to 
> run.dontrun=TRUE, I would need to specify all topics for a package, and 
> I don't see how to do this, missing topic does not work.
> 
> Wishlist: what I would really like is R CMD check --run-dontrun   pkg


We have that in R-devel, so everyone will have it next April, but there
will possibly be bugs unless people like you try it out now.

Duncan Murdoch



[Rd] testing dontrun examples
Duncan Murdoch