From p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk  Sun Dec 12 23:27:31 2004
From: p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard)
Date: Sun Dec 12 23:27:51 2004
Subject: [Rd] Re: [R] Is  k  equivalent to  k:k ?
In-Reply-To: <200412122156.iBCLumwV076334@atlas.otago.ac.nz>
References: <200412122156.iBCLumwV076334@atlas.otago.ac.nz>
Message-ID: <x26537up7w.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>

"Richard A. O'Keefe" <ok@cs.otago.ac.nz> writes:

> seq: from, to, by, length[.out], along[.with]
> 
> 	I'm about to fix this (documentation, not code).
> 	
> Please don't.  There's a lot of text out there: tutorials, textbooks,
> S on-inline documentation, &c which states over and over again that
> the arguments are 'along' and 'with'.  Change the documentation, and 
> people will start writing length.out, and will that port to S-Plus?
> (Serious question:  I don't know.)

It will.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907


[Rd] Re: [R] Is k equivalent to k:k ?
Peter Dalgaard