From dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro  Mon Jun 16 07:22:47 2014
From: dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro (=?UTF-8?B?QWRyaWFuIER1yJlh?=)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:22:47 +0300
Subject: [Rd] index.search
In-Reply-To: <A2C88BCF-C710-4EA4-A947-9C88A948678B@muxspace.com>
References: <CAJ=0CtANJ8UALh8bwv+CceC75+sAmm-SEhNsFiqd=XUjpbs_tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwqtCNrh5v1vgMtoJWW7Pd+m+xs4n0diXC8mZA=qeqbngLFiw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ=0CtCuZZF2d7eWZzv96myB8cd88Pyks=uFdNiJdcxzbcnzhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<A2C88BCF-C710-4EA4-A947-9C88A948678B@muxspace.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ=0CtD7Or20+F_NSX+3p2cYVWA6Zkj2=3MV35zB=OEV5wGKhQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Brian Lee Yung Rowe <rowe at muxspace.com> wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> You might consider using a unit testing framework such as RUnit or testthat,
> which does this but in a more structured manner. Essentially you codify the
> behavior in a set of tests as opposed to comparing with a previous version.

Right... I knew there was a better way to handle this.
Will take a look on those and try to build something on them.

Best,
Adrian

-- 
Adrian Dusa
University of Bucharest
Romanian Social Data Archive
1, Schitu Magureanu Bd.
050025 Bucharest sector 5
Romania
Tel.:+40 21 3126618 \
        +40 21 3120210 / int.101
Fax: +40 21 3158391



[Rd] index.search
=?UTF-8?B?QWRyaWFuIER1yJlh?=