From c@@rdi@g@bor @ending from gm@il@com  Thu Jul 12 15:30:42 2018
From: c@@rdi@g@bor @ending from gm@il@com (=?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIENzw6FyZGk=?=)
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:30:42 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
In-Reply-To: <b03ecf4b-f59b-eed6-ddb2-4788a4cd98ef@gmail.com>
References: <CABtg=KkE7gNvho-PLvsS-48yOR5nVTTSsekf35uLS4JJiZmjjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <eaf1c672-fb4c-5327-9b5a-4349ef75eec7@gmail.com>
 <CABtg=KkNXXPBg+6yzQZ2FOdWsUqZj0xnbUAaOu=-ZG7pGUOvHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <b03ecf4b-f59b-eed6-ddb2-4788a4cd98ef@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABtg=KkH8UO93RggxZwtKgJxcN+5JS-HQ0NBQX0yYrLNi5PEXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I found the bug.  The tools::checkRd function only processes
> \Sexpr's with "stage=render".  I think the author (who might have been
> me, I forget) assumed that would imply all the earlier stages as well,
> but apparently it doesn't.
>
> So you could use that as a workaround.
>
> I'll do some more checking, then submit a bug report and patch to Bugzilla.
>
> Duncan Murdoch

Thanks much! I tried using stage=render, but then I get an error at
install time:

Warning: /private/var/folders/59/0gkmw1yj2w7bf2dfc3jznv5w0000gn/T/RtmpCG4Qz9/R.INSTALLec4743ba8cf4/ps/man/ps_handle.Rd:45-48:
Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped

And indeed the whole section is dropped.

Seems like there is no clean workaround here.

Thanks again,
G.



[Rd] Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
=?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIENzw6FyZGk=?=