From Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no  Wed Apr  1 10:57:20 2009
From: Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no (Wacek Kusnierczyk)
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:57:20 +0200
Subject: [Rd] Gamma funtion(s) bug
In-Reply-To: <18899.6503.896682.355534@lynne.math.ethz.ch>
References: <49D12D9F.1000203@stats.uwo.ca>	<XFMail.090330222854.Ted.Harding@manchester.ac.uk>	<18897.49007.275534.467989@lynne.math.ethz.ch>	<loom.20090331T150244-162@post.gmane.org>
	<18899.6503.896682.355534@lynne.math.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <49D32C70.7030005@idi.ntnu.no>

Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> Using 'bug' (without any qualifying "?" or "possible" ..) 
> in the subject line is still a bit unfriendly...
>   


is suggesting that a poster includes 'excel bug' in the subject line [1]
friendly??

vQ



[1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-March/190119.html



[Rd] Gamma funtion(s) bug
Wacek Kusnierczyk