From S@E|||@on @end|ng |rom LGCGroup@com  Fri Aug 30 13:40:58 2019
From: S@E|||@on @end|ng |rom LGCGroup@com (Stephen Ellison)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:40:58 +0000
Subject: [Rd] ?Syntax wrong about `?`'s precedence ?
In-Reply-To: <CAEKh8ugXyz4cmkGrVDc6wxtwR6E9HbEiS3H9qVHzPF7OGyzZ2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEKh8ugXyz4cmkGrVDc6wxtwR6E9HbEiS3H9qVHzPF7OGyzZ2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7d4a921ac2594ecf83944eb594cbfe97@GBDCVPEXC08.corp.lgc-group.com>

> From: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Ant F
> Sent: 29 August 2019 12:06
> To: r-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: [Rd] ?Syntax wrong about `?`'s precedence ?
> ...
> See the following example :
> 
>     `?` <- `+`

I'm curious; What did you expect to happen if you replace the function '?' with the operator '+' ?
? is surely now being evaluated as a user-defined function and not as an operator. 
Would you expect the results of doing that to be the same as evaluation without replacement?

S Ellison




*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}



[Rd] ?Syntax wrong about `?`'s precedence ?
Stephen Ellison