From murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com  Sun Jan  5 00:32:15 2020
From: murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 18:32:15 -0500
Subject: [Rd] [patch] add sanity checks to quantile()
In-Reply-To: <20200104213523.xl4v4772qtiqbe7o@tallinn>
References: <20190531052855.5zzdb2x7i4et3vyb@boogie>
 <20200104213523.xl4v4772qtiqbe7o@tallinn>
Message-ID: <a445f4ee-04cb-7746-58c9-37982a327cf2@gmail.com>

On 04/01/2020 4:35 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:28:55AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> The attached patch adds some sanity checks to the "type" argument of
...
> Bump. For this type of patch proposal, is it better to use the
> bug tracker?

For almost any patch proposal it is.  Certainly if you don't get action 
(or at least discussion) within a few days, any other proposal will be 
forgotten.

Duncan Murdoch



[Rd] [patch] add sanity checks to quantile()
Duncan Murdoch