From renaud at mancala.cbio.uct.ac.za  Mon Oct 31 13:44:11 2011
From: renaud at mancala.cbio.uct.ac.za (Renaud Gaujoux)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:44:11 +0200
Subject: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110311225400.19333@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
References: <4EAAC0DF.7060704@cbio.uct.ac.za> <4EAAC1F3.8020505@gmail.com>
	<4EAAC96A.2020803@gmail.com> <4EAE90FC.7010200@cbio.uct.ac.za>
	<4EAE926B.6040102@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
	<4EAE9345.5000209@cbio.uct.ac.za>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1110311225400.19333@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4EAE981B.2090101@cbio.uct.ac.za>

Thank you very much Duncan, Uwe and Peter.
Sorry if I missed the announcement, I follow more r-devel than r-help, 
which I find a bit hard to quickly read.
Will try now on the 2.14.0.

Renaud

On 31/10/2011 14:28, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
>
>> I do not see it on main CRAN home page.
>
> No, but see the announcement on R-announce this morning:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-October/294203.html
>
> Things which need human intervention can take some hours: the CRAN 
> front page and binary distributions are two of those.
>
>> Do you mean 
>> http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz ?
>>
>> On 31/10/2011 14:19, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31.10.2011 13:13, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
>>>> Thank you Duncan.
>>>>
>>>> I tried with:
>>>> * using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 r57417)
>>>> * using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
>>>>
>>>> But I still get the errors for verbatim multiline and the strange 
>>>> error
>>>> if an error occurs in \Sexpr.
>>>> Is your patch included in this version? I will try now with
>>>> R-rc_2011-10-27_r57452.tar.gz.
>>>
>>> Try R-2.14.0, it is already released. Or R-devel.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Uwe Ligges
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Renaud
>>>>
>>>> On 28/10/2011 17:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>>> On 28/10/2011 10:53 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/10/2011 10:49 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs
>>>>>> in an
>>>>>> > \Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > * checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ... OK
>>>>>> > * checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS) 
>>>>>> ... OK
>>>>>> > * checking examples ... ERROR
>>>>>> > Error in paste(before, x, after, sep = "") : object 'exfile' 
>>>>>> not found
>>>>>> > Execution halted
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > To reproduce, put a call like this in an Rd section:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > \Sexpr[results=verbatim, stage=render]{x<- 1; stop("sexpr error")}
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The strange thing is that it occurs at the example checking step.
>>>>>> > Not sure why it does not break before.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thank you.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Renaud
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > PS: I am on R version 2.13.2 (2011-09-30) - x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>>>>>> (64-bit)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would update to 2.13.2 patched, or the release candidate of 
>>>>>> 2.14.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops, sorry, 2.13.2 is "final", so I didn't backport the patch. 
>>>>> 2.14.0
>>>>> is what you should get.
>>>>>
>>>>> Duncan Murdoch
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
>



[Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file
Renaud Gaujoux