From ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk  Thu Dec 27 11:28:46 2001
From: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk (ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:28:46 +0100 (MET)
Subject: [Rd] scale in stars() is not as documented (PR#1230)
Message-ID: <200112271128.MAA16486@pubhealth.ku.dk>

R 1.4.0

?stars has

   scale: logical flag: if `TRUE', the columns of the data matrix are
          scaled independently so that the maximum value in each column
          is 1 and the minimum is 0.  If `FALSE', the presumption is
          that the data have been scaled by some other algorithm to the
          range [0,1].

but the code has

    if (scale) {
        x <- sweep(x, 2, apply(x, 2, max), FUN = "/")
        x[is.na(x)] <- 0
    }

and so just linearly (not affinely) scales the maximum to one. The result
is very different star plots from the S original.  Try

stars(state.x77[, c(7, 4, 6, 2, 5, 3)])

compared to

stars(state.x77[, c(7, 4, 6, 2, 5, 3)], byrow = T) # in S

I suspect we should fix the code, but does anyone rely on it?


BTW, it is hard to think of a more inefficient way to write that
scaling!

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] scale in stars() is not as documented (PR#1230)
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk