From edd at debian.org  Mon Oct 30 00:35:54 2006
From: edd at debian.org (Dirk Eddelbuettel)
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:35:54 -0600
Subject: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched
In-Reply-To: <x2vem3m0vu.fsf@turmalin.kubism.ku.dk>
References: <OF599FE263.0859234B-ON86257214.0066E214-86257214.0067FEAB@mmm.com>
	<x2wt6l8ksw.fsf@turmalin.kubism.ku.dk>
	<17731.23422.758314.211918@basebud.nulle.part>
	<17731.47718.276693.860730@stat.math.ethz.ch>
	<17732.55008.463758.127507@basebud.nulle.part>
	<17732.59464.767865.803543@basebud.nulle.part>
	<x2vem3m0vu.fsf@turmalin.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <17733.15066.908222.866691@basebud.nulle.part>


On 29 October 2006 at 19:29, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes:
| 
| 
| > ... unless of course all those checkins went to trunk/ aka R-devel.
| 
| ... which "svn -r 39733:BASE" on the branch would have told you:

At that point it "couldn't have" as I was quoting from the web-log as I wrote
(quoting from my email now)

| then happen to have been 2006-10-27?  Not according to the top of the svn log
| from http://developer.r-project.org/R.svnlog.2006: (and cut down to dates

I am now proud owner of (partial) svn checkrout (of 2.4-patched only) so I
take the hint with re the svn usage with nodding approval.

Thanks, Dirk


-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
                                                  -- Thomas A. Edison




[Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched
Dirk Eddelbuettel