From jlindsey@luc.ac.be  Wed Nov 12 13:29:39 1997
From: jlindsey@luc.ac.be (Jim Lindsey)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:29:39 +0100 (MET)
Subject: R-alpha: batch
In-Reply-To: <x290uuxtv9.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk> from "Peter Dalgaard BSA" at Nov 12, 97 11:57:14 am
Message-ID: <9711121329.AA12443@alpha.luc.ac.be>

  Following on Peter's suggestion, if there is going to be a recognized
batch mode that does not save the .RData, then why not just change the
default option in the C code? Only one number has to be changed.
  Up until this version, I systematically did this. But now I am
developing R code to go on a CD for the second edition of my repeated
measures book so I have to be using a standard R, not a specially
compiled one to my tastes.
  As to wanting an .RData if the terminal disappears. Basically, I
never want an .RData. I have the input and hopefully the output files.
If I am working on an article, I keep all relevant data sets and
analyses in the same directory. If I am working on one of my books, I
keep data analyses by chapter. If I am doing consulting, I often have
several distinct analyses of a data set, all in the same directory.
None of these is conducive to using .RData. I just don't like the
S-Plus habit of automatically and silently loading in what you last
did when you may not even remember what it was a couple of weeks ago.
  I have lost too many hours trying to figure out why analyses are not
calculated correctly when it was just a hidden .RData from a batch
job.
  Jim
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


R-alpha: batch
Jim Lindsey