From murdoch at stats.uwo.ca  Fri Oct 27 01:21:07 2006
From: murdoch at stats.uwo.ca (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:21:07 -0400
Subject: [Rd] how to determine if a function's result is invisible
In-Reply-To: <4540C635.1010604@sciviews.org>
References: <971536df0610251714u451cf80fy80bf38cb2f130734@mail.gmail.com>	<454023EA.4020403@stats.uwo.ca>	<971536df0610252002s46ef72b2n32df3e180a49e990@mail.gmail.com>	<45403561.1000808@stats.uwo.ca>
	<971536df0610260226o55726354j8cbdfa5af07ae508@mail.gmail.com>
	<45408DDB.6060308@sciviews.org> <45409176.5040105@stats.uwo.ca>
	<4540C635.1010604@sciviews.org>
Message-ID: <454142E3.5000207@stats.uwo.ca>

On 10/26/2006 10:29 AM, Philippe Grosjean wrote:

> But, please, do not give credit for "first idea" to someone else on such 
> a topic... It is long enough that I fight for better R GUIs (for 
> instance, http://www.r-project.org/GUI), that this looks offending to me!

Sorry, I didn't mean to claim that he's the first one to think of this, 
just that he did bring it up recently, and that it's an excellent idea.

I think the fact that we don't have a GUI API is support for my 
statement that it's a difficult project.  Not all the difficulties are 
technical.

Duncan Murdoch




[Rd] how to determine if a function's result is invisible
Duncan Murdoch