From john.archie.mckown at gmail.com  Thu Mar 19 16:54:12 2015
From: john.archie.mckown at gmail.com (John McKown)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:54:12 -0500
Subject: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source
In-Reply-To: <CABtg=K=hjuVSqciab-4WRBVhpjJQRg-H6+R9MGw74QpjY3n_4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABtg=K=hjuVSqciab-4WRBVhpjJQRg-H6+R9MGw74QpjY3n_4A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAJSdjiWvxRmu5pgEgN+sGi1waAKLwFsHD2ipC1h5K20mN51HQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> this is a CRAN question, so I am sorry if this is not the appropriate forum.
>
> I noticed that there is at least one CRAN package that has a binary (OSX
> Mavericks) for a version, that does not have any source package on CRAN. Or
> at least I am unable to locate it. The package is Rglpk:
> http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rglpk/index.html

I went there and say a source package:

<quote>

Downloads:

Reference manual:Rglpk.pdf
Package source:Rglpk_0.6-0.tar.gz  <<<!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SOURCE !!!!!!!!!!!>>>
Windows binaries:r-devel: Rglpk_0.6-0.zip, r-release: Rglpk_0.6-0.zip,
r-oldrel: Rglpk_0.6-0.zip
OS X Snow Leopard binaries:r-release: Rglpk_0.6-0.tgz, r-oldrel: Rglpk_0.6-0.tgz
OS X Mavericks binaries:r-release: Rglpk_0.5-2.tgz
Old sources:Rglpk archive
</quote>

Or: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Rglpk_0.6-0.tar.gz

>
> It offers a binary for 0.5-2, but there is no 0.5-2 source package
> anywhere. Is this simply a mistake, or it is OK to have binary-only
> packages on CRAN?
>
> Thanks much, Best,
> Gabor
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Please, no HTML, per forum rules.


-- 
If you sent twitter messages while exploring, are you on a textpedition?

He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

Maranatha! <><
John McKown



[Rd] CRAN binary, but no source
John McKown