From h.wickham at gmail.com  Thu Feb 25 19:37:59 2010
From: h.wickham at gmail.com (hadley wickham)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:37:59 -0600
Subject: [Rd] proto and baseenv()
In-Reply-To: <20100225181316.GA10184@klutometis.wikitex.org>
References: <20100225043854.GA26106@klutometis.wikitex.org> 
	<20100224233350.4e3da5db.misc7@emerose.org>
	<4B8666E0.4070808@TU-Dresden.de> 
	<20100225075038.79ca9b63.misc7@emerose.org>
	<f8e6ff051002250657o7be15ab9ia24b5be410e80e9c@mail.gmail.com> 
	<20100225181316.GA10184@klutometis.wikitex.org>
Message-ID: <f8e6ff051002251037l5a3424cdic9d58020783b34e@mail.gmail.com>

> Hey, Hadley; I remember your prototype stuff from DSC 2009. I saw some
> slides of yours that discussed proto, and was wondering whether mutatr
> was still maintained.

Yes, it's maintained, and I've even written a package that uses it
(testthat - both it and mutatr are available on cran).  It's still
mainly an experiment, and I don't currently have any plans to give up
using proto.  However, my entirely personal perspective is that my
code seems to be cleaner when I use mutatr instead of proto (this
probably reflects that I wrote the package though!).

Hadley

-- 
Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/



[Rd] proto and baseenv()
hadley wickham