From pdalgd at gmail.com  Mon Sep  2 07:37:21 2013
From: pdalgd at gmail.com (peter dalgaard)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:37:21 +0200
Subject: [Rd] [PATCH] remove a duplicate tk function definition (and
	alphabetize)
In-Reply-To: <5223C2D1.2020402@gmail.com>
References: <CAE3=dmf7XOBCJ-zNzVEH6HV4-Rz+J5om=WghfjkN4cdnSv0XVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<522382B5.40106@gmail.com>
	<6CEB142B-5088-44A0-82C6-EE1CB4380034@gmail.com>
	<5223C2D1.2020402@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20137114-5C05-48B5-B2C3-C63464EA02A8@gmail.com>


On Sep 2, 2013, at 00:42 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:

> On 13-09-01 3:53 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>> 
>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 20:08 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> 
>>> On 13-09-01 2:45 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>> 'tkcoords' is defined twice (in the same way) in src/library/tcltk/R/Tk.R.
>>>> 
>>>> Attached is a patch against r63780 that removes the duplicate
>>>> definition and alphabetizes the functions.
>>>> 
>>>> I've read that minor patches such as this should be sent to r-devel [1].
>>>> 
>>>> Scott
>>>> 
>>>> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.devel/33987
>>> 
>>> Thanks.  I would not do the alphabetization; that makes it much harder to track changes.  But if tkcoords is unnecessarily duplicated, that seems like a reasonable change.
>>> 
>> 
>> That's what I thought at first sight, but actually, the current breach of alphabetization is quite slight, so might be worth fixing after all, since it helps against putting the same function in twice... (the patch has tkpostcascade before tkpost, which is wrong, though).
> 
> In that case, go ahead.  I didn't look at the patch due to the description.  (I have committed the removal of the dupe.)
> 

OK, done. R-devel only, like your change. 

> Duncan Murdoch
> 

-- 
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk  Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com



[Rd] [PATCH] remove a duplicate tk function definition (and alphabetize)
peter dalgaard