From wsimpson@uwinnipeg.ca  Thu Mar 12 17:46:45 1998
From: wsimpson@uwinnipeg.ca (Bill Simpson)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 11:46:45 -0600 (CST)
Subject: "`R notes' should be better"
In-Reply-To: <199803121717.SAA13033@sophie.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.980312114023.3505A-100000@io.uwinnipeg.ca>

Hi Martin et al.,

Well I started this BUT I didn't say "'R Notes' should be better"!!
I think the Notes are great!

> Maybe I should ask again for volunteers, or maybe even a discussion 
> on what could / should be done.
I would be happy to make the changes to this nonlinear fitting section,
once I know how to do nonlinear fitting with nlm.  However I use LyX
(which doesn't read *.tex files), and I would characterize myself as a
novice with R, with unix, with LaTeX, etc.

> In the case of "R notes upgrading, 
> it'd make sense if someone first works thru the current notes 
> and makes them (somewhat) ``compatible'' with the  Rd.sty that we
> currently use for the help-manual (i.e. the  doc/manual/... things).
I wouldn't be able to do this, due to ignorance.

Bill Simpson

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


"`R notes' should be better"
Bill Simpson