From jeffrey.horner at gmail.com  Fri Nov  5 15:49:57 2010
From: jeffrey.horner at gmail.com (Jeffrey Horner)
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:49:57 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Will PrintWarnings remain non static?
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin9ufq=90ifN8jsSuJUey0_cBehOAuKOWiAvi6b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTin9ufq=90ifN8jsSuJUey0_cBehOAuKOWiAvi6b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTineQkJNx4gz-NGjtOyAHRnYizjM7AgNHXQ08XSf@mail.gmail.com>

Anyone have comments on this? PrintWarnings would be nice to utilize
for those embedding R.

Thanks,

Jeff

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Jeffrey Horner <jeffrey.horner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The C function PrintWarnings is currently not in the C API, but it is
> declared non static in the svn trunk as of revision 53110 . As this is
> the only function that creates the last.warning object used by the R
> function warnings(), I think it would be useful for programs that
> embed R to be able to call it.
>
> So, will it remain non static, that is callable although it's not
> declared in the public C API?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>



-- 
http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/JeffreyHorner



[Rd] Will PrintWarnings remain non static?
Jeffrey Horner