From ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk  Mon Aug 19 14:23:35 2002
From: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk (ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:23:35 +0100 (BST)
Subject: svm seg faults (PR#1901)
In-Reply-To: <x2adnjf0f9.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0208191423130.13749-100000@gannet.stats>

On 19 Aug 2002, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:

> ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
>
> > Which compiler is this?
> >
> > I have no problems with svm() on RH7.2 compiling with either gcc 3.1 or
> > gcc 2.95.3: Red Hat make a habit of supplying unreleased (and buggy)
> > versions of gcc. I think this is particularly critical when C/C++ mixtures
> > are used (as in svm).
> >
> > PR#1178 is another non-reproducible segfault in svm on Linux.
>
> It *is* reproducible on another stock RH7.3, though. I might try
> digging a little deeper when I recover from the NY/Boston meetings.

I still think it is the compiler.


-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


svm seg faults (PR#1901)
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk