From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Fri Feb 11 23:36:57 2000
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 12 Feb 2000 00:36:57 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Compilation Failure on Linux/Intel (PR#434)
In-Reply-To: h089@mth.uea.ac.uk's message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2000 00:14:36 +0100 (MET)"
References: <200002112314.AAA08548@pubhealth.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <x27lgb9uqu.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>

h089@mth.uea.ac.uk writes:

> I consistently get a sig11 on one file:
> 
> gcc -I. -I../include -I../../src/include -I../../src/include/R_ext 
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -mieee-fp -g -O2 -c fft.c -o fft.o
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
> make[3]: *** [fft.o] Error 1
> 
> However, other files and parts of the tree compile still.  (When I had a sig11
> being 
> caused by a memory fault, once it sig11'd, it would sig11 again.)   I can even

C compilers can do that all by themselves occasionally. Which version
are we talking about? Does it work to change the optimisation level
for the file?

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Compilation Failure on Linux/Intel (PR#434)
Peter Dalgaard BSA