From vqnguyen at uci.edu  Thu Sep 24 21:09:01 2009
From: vqnguyen at uci.edu (Vinh Nguyen)
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:09:01 -0700
Subject: [Rd] R + C + Lapack toy regression example
In-Reply-To: <8068FC73-551E-421A-992F-FE769A7FD143@r-project.org>
References: <13c5a0ae0909230039w28389d5ch72f63ce5065d0e1d@mail.gmail.com> 
	<40e66e0b0909240550g363efe4ajfa49e8bfb5a6c3ae@mail.gmail.com> 
	<13c5a0ae0909240947j9b30247j731e1486d45b86e@mail.gmail.com> 
	<8068FC73-551E-421A-992F-FE769A7FD143@r-project.org>
Message-ID: <13c5a0ae0909241209i253ece47h6bcedac086fc76bf@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Simon Urbanek
<simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote:
> As Doug pointed out you don't want to be using .C(). As for matrix
> manipulations - they are usually done directly on the objects which are
> vectors stored in column-major order.

i meant .Call().   also, sorry for the poor word choice, i meant
matrix computations, not matrix manipulations.  i guess i just want
some recommendations for future references on what C library to use if
i were doing something like re-implement linear regression
(hypothetically speaking).  i assumed it would be lapack.  is this the
recommended approach?

vinh



[Rd] R + C + Lapack toy regression example
Vinh Nguyen