From ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk  Sun Nov 23 15:53:21 2003
From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk (Prof Brian Ripley)
Date: Sun Nov 23 15:53:39 2003
Subject: [Rd] make check reg-tests-3
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311231507060.1337-100000@kleigh.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311231431001.20395-100000@gannet.stats>

Note that differences are allowed in reg-tests-3.Rout (it even says so in
the output you sent!).  The supplied version is right and yours is wrong
(the theoretical answer is 0/0, as I am sure you had checked).

You might like to investigate why your system is getting the wrong answers
for your own peace of mind, as many other `i686-linux-gnu' systems give
the correct answers.  This is not a new test, there being no change since
1.8.0 in either the test or the code it is testing.  So it is a fair
assumption that *all* the various Linux distros for which binary packages
are produced worked correctly -- and that is a large range of current and 
not-so-current systems.

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Peter Kleiweg wrote:

> Should I submit this as a bug report?

Why did you ask?

> --- reg-tests-3.Rout.save	Thu Jul  3 09:55:40 2003
> +++ reg-tests-3.Rout	Sun Nov 23 13:10:57 2003

[...]

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


[Rd] make check reg-tests-3
Prof Brian Ripley