From S@E|||@on @end|ng |rom LGCGroup@com  Mon Sep  2 15:33:37 2019
From: S@E|||@on @end|ng |rom LGCGroup@com (Stephen Ellison)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:33:37 +0000
Subject: [Rd] ?Syntax wrong about `?`'s precedence ?
In-Reply-To: <CAF8bMcYxu+iuKyDZeYbtczimd+1nGBO-VjbTjkv9Va-eBnUhKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEKh8ugXyz4cmkGrVDc6wxtwR6E9HbEiS3H9qVHzPF7OGyzZ2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <7d4a921ac2594ecf83944eb594cbfe97@GBDCVPEXC08.corp.lgc-group.com>
 <CAF8bMcYxu+iuKyDZeYbtczimd+1nGBO-VjbTjkv9Va-eBnUhKw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <970c4046ed274d53893517da2709b947@GBDCVPEXC08.corp.lgc-group.com>

> From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdunlap at tibco.com]
> Precedence is a property of the parser and has nothing to do with the
> semantics assigned to various symbols.  

Yes, but output depends on evaluation as well as precedence.  Seeing different things wasn't an immediate surprise.

Your own parse() examples are much clearer; thanks for that.

S


*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use, copying or
disclosure other than by the intended recipient is unauthorised. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender 
immediately via +44(0)20 8943 7000 or notify postmaster at lgcgroup.com 
and delete this message and any copies from your computer and network. 
LGC Limited. Registered in England 2991879. 
Registered office: Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK


[Rd] ?Syntax wrong about `?`'s precedence ?
Stephen Ellison