From ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk  Fri Jul 23 13:22:07 1999
From: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk (ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:22:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Subject: reluctant to read win95 directory (PR#231)
Message-ID: <199907231222.OAA26619@pubhealth.ku.dk>

On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, John Peters wrote:

> Firstly a workaround (fix?):
> 
> Disable McAfee VirusScan 4.0.2/4.0.4032.  If this means it could 
> be described as more an incompatibility than a bug I apologise. 

Yes, I would put that down to a system problem. The reason for being 
picky is that bug reports need to be written up, ...

It looks to me as if McAfee has replaced the Windows `search for
executables' routine and uses that to go for a virus search.
Not much we can do about that.


> Try shell():
> Both the following cause the same behaviour as with "system()":
>   shell("dir c:\\tmp\\9907","c:\\windows\\command.com",intern=T)
>   shell("dir","command.com",intern=T)


It will do as it too has to search for an executable.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


reluctant to read win95 directory (PR#231)
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk