From ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk  Tue Oct  4 15:27:43 2005
From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk (Prof Brian Ripley)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:27:43 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [Rd] Option "installWithVers" seems to impact new.packages()
 badly?
In-Reply-To: <1abe3fa90509300151i641e4408y9e74f728fe681785@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1abe3fa90509300151i641e4408y9e74f728fe681785@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510041406460.5316@gannet.stats>

Hard to know what you expect here.  There is no recent change that I can 
see.

I removed ash and then installed it with version.  new.packages() showed 
it as new in both 2.1.1 and 2.2.0-beta.

The issue is that installed.packages() has never been taught about 
versioned installs, and you might like to take that up with your BioC 
colleagues who added the idea.

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, A.J. Rossini wrote:

> In Rdevel, SVN version built this morning around 10am central european
> time, it looks like
>
>   install.packages(new.packages(),installWithVers=TRUE)
>
> seem to ignore the version information -- that is, it reinstalls
> current versions of packages.

I believe it always did: it certainly does in 2.1.1 for me.

> This did not happen before I used "installWithVers=TRUE" option, that is
> I could use
>
>   update.packages()
> and
>   install.packages(new.packages())
>
> to keep a current, platform-complete, installed base of CRAN.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595



[Rd] Option "installWithVers" seems to impact new.packages() badly?
Prof Brian Ripley