From Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at  Thu Feb 14 07:16:28 2002
From: Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at (Kurt Hornik)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:16:28 +0100
Subject: [Rd] R-patched and R-devel
In-Reply-To: <51C449F9-20F4-11D6-927D-000393860F3C@stat.ucla.edu>
References: <51C449F9-20F4-11D6-927D-000393860F3C@stat.ucla.edu>
Message-ID: <15467.25676.681887.923785@mithrandir.hornik.net>

>>>>> Jan de Leeuw writes:

> If I configure in R-patched and R-devel, with the same options to
> configure, then R-patched says

> checking for ATL_xerbla in -latlas... yes
> checking for cblas_dgemm in -lcblas... yes
> checking for dgemm_ in -lf77blas... yes

> which R-devel says

> checking for ATL_xerbla in -latlas... yes
> checking for cblas_dgemm in -lcblas... yes
> checking for dgemm in -lf77blas... no

> This is on the same computer and using the same libraries. Observe
> in R-patched we check for dgemm_ and in R-devel for dgemm. Is that
> what is intended ?

Don't think so :-)

The code in r-devel runs the BLAS tests before it has figure out the
characteristics of the Fortran compiler.  Argh.  Will fix.

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] R-patched and R-devel
Kurt Hornik