From dkoschuetzki at gmx.de  Wed Aug 24 18:55:38 2005
From: dkoschuetzki at gmx.de (dkoschuetzki@gmx.de)
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:55:38 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [Rd] kendall tau correlation test for ties: Potential error
	(PR#8076)
Message-ID: <20050824165538.4EB2F19837@slim.kubism.ku.dk>

Hello,

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:07:07 +0200, Peter Dalgaard  
<p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> wrote:

> dkoschuetzki at gmx.de writes:

>> The problem is:
>> * Either the comment is wrong because the modification should be done  
>> with
>> kendall too, or
>> * The variable PVAL has to be assigned in the kendall block.
>
> I think it is the comment that is wrong. [...]

Thanks for the clarification. I think I got the untied case and I think  
that I have an understanding of the problems of the tied one by now.  
Thanks for you comments and many thanks for the great R system. I use it  
as my daily working environment and I'm very happy with it. Thanks!

Dirk



[Rd] kendall tau correlation test for ties: Potential error (PR#8076)
dkoschuetzki@gmx.de