From ggrothendieck at gmail.com  Sat Sep 10 04:04:37 2005
From: ggrothendieck at gmail.com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 22:04:37 -0400
Subject: [Rd] R.version.string (Re: MikTeX will be assumed in R 2.2.0 in
	Windows)
In-Reply-To: <43223809.7000306@stats.uwo.ca>
References: <43223809.7000306@stats.uwo.ca>
Message-ID: <971536df050909190441a98acb@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch at stats.uwo.ca> wrote:
> I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
> MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
> Unfortunately, the changes are not compatible with other TeX packages,
> so if you're not using MikTeX you'll need to edit a couple of the config
> files (or set an environment variable).
> 
> I'd appreciate hearing of any problems during the alpha or beta test period.
> 
> A binary build containing the changes should be on CRAN tomorrow or the
> next day.  Look for revision 35546 or higher.

Note that R.version.string in R 2.2.0 2005-09-03 does not give
this sort of version information.  If we are going to use this style
I suggest we modify R.version.string accordingly.



[Rd] R.version.string (Re: MikTeX will be assumed in R 2.2.0 in Windows)
Gabor Grothendieck