From jerome at hivnet.ubc.ca  Thu Apr  3 03:37:43 2003
From: jerome at hivnet.ubc.ca (jerome@hivnet.ubc.ca)
Date: Thu Apr  3 02:38:00 2003
Subject: [Rd] [R] (PR#2720)
Message-ID: <200304030037.h330bhn9014679@pubhealth.ku.dk>


I apologize for cross-posting.

In the reproducable example below, I fit the same model with lme() and 
nlme(). However, I get 12 degrees of freedom with lme() and 2 df with 
nlme().

library(nlme)
set.seed(14)

a <- 2
x <- rep(rnorm(3),rep(5,3))
id <- rep(c("a","b","c"),rep(5,3))
y <- a+x+rnorm(15)
data <- data.frame(y=y,id=id)
initx <- matrix(x[c(1,6,11)],dimnames=list(c("a","b","c"),"x"))

summary(fit.lme <-
              lme(y ~ 1,data=data,random=~1|id,method="ML"))
summary(fit.nlme <-
              nlme(y ~ a + x, fixed= a~1, random=x~1|id,
              data=data, start=list(fixed=c(a=2),
              random=list(id=initx)),method="ML"))

When I try the same thing with set.seed(18), I get 12 df for both.

I have submitted a bug report on that issue on Dec 20th and I have tried 
to find the source of the problem, but no success. You can check what I 
found so far at:
http://r-bugs.biostat.ku.dk/cgi-bin/R/Add-ons?id=2384

Can anyone help find the source of this problem?

Sincerely,
Jerome Asselin

R 1.6.2 on Red Hat Linux 7.2
Package: nlme 3.1-38

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help


[Rd] [R] (PR#2720)
jerome@hivnet.ubc.ca