From mdsumner at gmail.com  Thu Apr 20 11:33:52 2017
From: mdsumner at gmail.com (Michael Sumner)
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:33:52 +0000
Subject: [Rd] ask.yes.no() function
In-Reply-To: <135e266b-1f00-e305-74f2-8fe310ea8e55@gmail.com>
References: <135e266b-1f00-e305-74f2-8fe310ea8e55@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAcGz9-qtJR7vJu9m=mq70=owr7+Yo-hpFhOTQOpdq6c2_R3hg@mail.gmail.com>

Perhaps worth pointing out "yesno" as a candidate:


https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=yesno
<https://cran.r-project.org/package=yesno>

Cheers, Mike



On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at 21:55 Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
wrote:

As described in
<https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17242>, R base
functions are currently inconsistent in asking interactive "yes/no" type
questions. One solution to this is to have a function to do it, and to
use it consistently.




Rather than just writing such a function and possibly missing some
desirable feature, I'd like to ask if anyone can point to an existing
one that is perfect (or nearly perfect, and point out what changes would
be desirable)?

Duncan Murdoch

______________________________________________
R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
-- 
Dr. Michael Sumner
Software and Database Engineer
Australian Antarctic Division
203 Channel Highway
Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] ask.yes.no() function
Michael Sumner