From ifellows at ucsd.edu  Fri Apr 24 18:48:38 2009
From: ifellows at ucsd.edu (Ian Fellows)
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:48:38 -0700
Subject: [Rd] Closed-source non-free ParallelR ?
In-Reply-To: <d70c15d40904240841u523e77d7s4ec7e45a870ee601@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <80B0457F6F3843A49AC7EA5ABFC34CC0@gpbdmx>


>Still, if they have code that is compiled and linked to R at running
>time, then that code must be under the GPL. Again, this is the FSF
>?interpretation and certainly not R-core's, not even mine.
>[...]

Well, not quite. R.h RDefines.h and RInternals.h are LGPL, so as long as the
hooks go through these headers, then all is kosher is it not? Otherwise,
what is the point of having them be LGPL?

ian



[Rd] Closed-source non-free ParallelR ?
Ian Fellows