From david.meyer@ci.tuwien.ac.at  Mon Feb 25 15:44:55 2002
From: david.meyer@ci.tuwien.ac.at (david.meyer@ci.tuwien.ac.at)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:44:55 +0100 (MET)
Subject: [Rd] delete.response() incorrectly handles terms-objects (PR#1327)
Message-ID: <200202251544.QAA12655@pubhealth.ku.dk>

Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:
> 
> Thanks, fixed now.
> 
> Why were you calling delete.response on an object with no response, BTW?

I used it in predict.svm(), and the terms-object contained in the svm
model just happens to have no response for the ``one-class
classification'' if svm was called e.g. by:

m <- svm(~a+b).

Because of the second line in delete.response()

    if (length(f) == 3) 
        f[[2]] <- NULL

handling the no-response case, I believed I was allowed to use
delete.response() without checking for this.

> I wonder whether delete.response should not be a no-op in that case (it is
> in S), if there is any reason to handle it at all.

So people will have to check for it before using delete.response() -
this is probably more secure indeed.

-d
> 

-- 
	Mag. David Meyer		Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10
Vienna University of Technology		A-1040 Vienna/AUSTRIA
       Department for			Tel.: (+431) 58801/10772
Statistics and Probability Theory	mail: david.meyer@ci.tuwien.ac.at

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] delete.response() incorrectly handles terms-objects (PR#1327)
david.meyer@ci.tuwien.ac.at