From hb at stat.berkeley.edu  Mon Jul  5 22:49:49 2010
From: hb at stat.berkeley.edu (Henrik Bengtsson)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:49:49 +0200
Subject: [Rd] arr.ind argument to which.min and which.max
In-Reply-To: <4C322408.3060206@pburns.seanet.com>
References: <4C3049C0.60101@pburns.seanet.com>
	<19505.44138.313406.770145@lynne.math.ethz.ch>
	<4C322408.3060206@pburns.seanet.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil28yqzrVns5iUmgd7Ni1RpnjHTOQ-Q4YVqFiiz@mail.gmail.com>

For what it's worth, see arrayIndex() in R.utils, e.g.

# Single index
print(arrayIndex(21, dim=c(4,3,3)))

# Multiple indices
print(arrayIndex(20:23, dim=c(4,3,3)))

# Whole array
x <- array(1:30, dim=c(5,6))
print(arrayIndex(1:length(x), dim=dim(x)))

# Find (row,column) of maximum value
m <- diag(4-abs(-4:4))
print(arrayIndex(which.max(m), dim=dim(m)))

/Henrik

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Patrick Burns <pburns at pburns.seanet.com> wrote:
> On 05/07/2010 10:56, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "PatB" == Patrick Burns<pburns at pburns.seanet.com>
>>>>>>> ? ? on Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:43:44 +0100 writes:
>>
>> ? ? PatB> ?Is there a reason that 'which.min' and
>> ? ? PatB> ?'which.max' don't have an 'arr.ind'
>> ? ? PatB> ?argument?
>>
>> well, ?help(which.min) ?tells you that they really were aimed at
>> doing their job *fast* for vectors.
>>
>> Of course you are right and a generalization to arrays might be
>> convenient at times.
>>
>> ? ? PatB> ?The context in which I wanted that was
>> ? ? PatB> ?a grid search optimization, which seems
>> ? ? PatB> ?like it would be reasonably common to me.
>>
>> well, as the author of these two functions, I can only say
>>
>> ? ? ? "patches are welcome!"
>>
>> and I think should be pretty simple, right ?
>> You just have to do very simple remapping of the 1d index 'i' back
>> to the array index, i.e., the same operation
>> you need to transform seconds into days:hours:minutes:seconds
>> {{and yes, we old-timers may recall that APL had an operator (I
>> ? think "T-bar") to do that ...}
>
> I think the exercise is just to copy the definition of
> 'which' and add four characters.
>
> If the order of the if condition were reversed, then
> possibly the slight reduction in speed of 'which.min'
> and 'which.max' would be more than made up for in the
> slight increase in speed of 'which'.
>
> Pat
>
>>
>> Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
>>
>>
>> ? ? PatB> ?--
>> ? ? PatB> ?Patrick Burns
>> ? ? PatB> ?pburns at pburns.seanet.com
>> ? ? PatB> ?http://www.burns-stat.com
>> ? ? PatB> ?(home of 'Some hints for the R beginner'
>> ? ? PatB> ?and 'The R Inferno')
>>
>
> --
> Patrick Burns
> pburns at pburns.seanet.com
> http://www.burns-stat.com
> (home of 'Some hints for the R beginner'
> and 'The R Inferno')
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] arr.ind argument to which.min and which.max
Henrik Bengtsson