From Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au  Thu Feb 10 00:30:46 2000
From: Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au (Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:30:46 +1000 (EST)
Subject: [Rd] (solution) Re: gnome support failure (libglade error on debian)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002090923250.16440-100000@solzhenitsyn.ens.gu.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002101029050.3307-100000@solzhenitsyn.ens.gu.edu.au>

Problem solved.
I was using dpkg -l \*glade\* to look for what I wanted instead of 
apt-cache search glade.

I installed the following packages:
libglade-gnome0-dev libgladexml-perl libglade0-dev

and everything worked fine.

On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au wrote:
> Hi,
>    I'm running debian - upgraded fully to potato at the start of the
> freeze and added latest libgnome-dev before configuring.
> 
>    I tried compiling with gnome support with
> 
> /usr/local/R/R-0.99.0/configure --with-gnome
> 
> and got the following output:
> 
> checking for gnome-config... /usr/bin/gnome-config
> checking if /usr/bin/gnome-config works... yes
> checking for orbit-config... /usr/bin/orbit-config
> checking for orbit-idl... /usr/bin/orbit-idl
> checking for working ORBit environment... yes
> checking for gnorba libraries... yes
> Unknown library `applets'
> checking for libglade-config... no
> checking for libglade... no
> configure: warning: GNOME support requires libglade version >= 0.3
> 
> According to dpkg I have:
> 
> solzhenitsyn:~/TEACHING/RSM98> dpkg -l \*glade\*
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name           Version        Description
> +++-==============-==============-============================================
> ii  libglade-gnome 0.11-2         Library to load .glade files at runtime(Gno
> ii  libglade0      0.11-2         Library to load .glade files at runtime.
> 
> According to apt-get libglade0 is the newest version, so I'm assuming that
> 0.11 is > 0.3  and there doesn't seem to be a *glade*dev* or anything, 
> or that would have shown up.

----
Robert King, Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Australia
3875 6677   Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au   http://www.ens.gu.edu.au/robertk/

          When all's said and done,                     
                a lot more is said than done.          
                                                      

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] (solution) Re: gnome support failure (libglade error on debian)
Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au