From Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch>  Mon Aug  4 14:10:50 1997
From: Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> (Martin Maechler)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 15:10:50 +0200
Subject: R-alpha: Re: pow_dd & pow_di [was f2clib.c  etc..] --  yes, please !
In-Reply-To: <199708041135.NAA21247@aragorn.ci.tuwien.ac.at> (message from
 Kurt Hornik on Mon, 4 Aug 1997 13:35:42 +0200)
Message-ID: <199708041310.PAA28457@sophie.ethz.ch>

>>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

>>>>> Thomas Lumley writes:
    >> On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Kurt Hornik wrote:
    >>> Thomas,
    >>> 
    >>> Could you add the "-lf2c" at the end of the line @$(LD)
    >>> $(SHLIBLDFLAGS) -o $(LIBNAME).so $(OBJS) in acepack's
    >>> src-c/Makefile?
    >>> 
    >>> I ran across an identical pow_dd problem recently with another
    >>> package.  Did we always need the "-lf2c", or is this a feature of
    >>> the new version?
    >>> 

    >> This is very strange.  My copy works ok as is, in all the versions
    >> of R I have installed (including 0.50a1). On the other hand, using
    >> nm reveals that R0.50 has replaced pow_dd and pow_di by f77_pow_dd
    >> and f77_pow_di respectively.  It looks like the builtin subset of
    >> libf2c has vanished.  This is a problem, as we should not require
    >> people to have f2c in order to run the C version of the library --
    >> after all, if they had f2c they could run the FORTRAN version.
yep
    Kurt> You're right, see also one of my previous mails.  They now have
    Kurt> POW_DD and f77_pow_dd (where does this come from, anyway).  I
    Kurt> think that in the ``old days'' we were lucky that everything was
    Kurt> based on C, so FORTRAN was converted using f2c and compatibility
    Kurt> functions were provided by the distribution proper.  Of course,
    Kurt> in general one cannot expect that ALL functions needed after
    Kurt> using f2c would be in a compatibility library, unless it was
    Kurt> identical to libf2c ...

    Kurt> But clearly, pow_dd and pow_di should exist again ...

Even more: I think it's just these two which should 
	'officially' part of the R binary, i.e., their sourc should be in
	src/main/  or src/math/  rather than in appl  or somewhere.

I think there are several instances in the current  R source tree, where
the code could be improved by using  pow_d{d|i}(..).

-- Martin
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


R-alpha: Re: pow_dd & pow_di [was f2clib.c etc..] -- yes, please !
Martin Maechler