From deleeuw at cuddyvalley.org  Fri Jan 26 17:02:03 2007
From: deleeuw at cuddyvalley.org (Jan de Leeuw)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:02:03 -0800
Subject: [Rd] i may have missed something ..
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701261547230.1773@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
References: <3A6441C3-CD8C-4672-86F2-B4088D2CC21C@cuddyvalley.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0701260853410.2972@auk.stats>
	<A33730DE-566E-4D91-8B63-E1E15DE36203@cuddyvalley.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0701261547230.1773@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <21F01D97-57C7-4B3F-B56F-C9BD807B99A3@cuddyvalley.org>

Yes. No such problem with the pair gcc/ifort. I'll try
less aggressive optimization with icc on deriv.c (I
also have to do that for regex.c).

-- Jan

On Jan 26, 2007, at 07:52 , Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> Ouch.  It does look like a compiler over-optimization sort of problem.
>
> I presume that is the ix86 icc, with which we have not had much  
> success on either Linux or Windows. I've just checked x86_64 icc on  
> Linux, and that is working correctly.
>
> Brian
>
>

==========================================================
Jan de Leeuw, 11667 Steinhoff Rd, Frazier Park, CA 93225
home 661-245-1725 skype 661-347-0667 global 254-381-4905
.mac: jdeleeuw +++  aim: deleeuwjan +++ skype: j_deleeuw



[Rd] i may have missed something ..
Jan de Leeuw