From ggrothendieck at gmail.com  Sat Apr  8 00:04:03 2006
From: ggrothendieck at gmail.com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 18:04:03 -0400
Subject: [Rd] Should demo files be run as part of R CMD check?
In-Reply-To: <f8e6ff050604071420g7f97d56cn6c4fe772002f8f5f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f8e6ff050604071420g7f97d56cn6c4fe772002f8f5f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <971536df0604071504s404d9369ua407156355532c91@mail.gmail.com>

I didn't realize this either but it might be useful in situations
where the package depends on other software which might
not be on CRAN.

On 4/7/06, hadley wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was a bit suprised to note that demo files are not run as part of R
> CMD check.  This seems out of keeping with the philosophy of running
> all code contained in the package (in the source, in examples etc).
>
> Should demo files be checked as part of R CMD check?
>
> Hadley
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] Should demo files be run as part of R CMD check?
Gabor Grothendieck