From 2005.morgan at gmail.com  Mon Jun 12 10:21:00 2017
From: 2005.morgan at gmail.com (Morgan)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:21:00 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Question about R developpment
In-Reply-To: <e803893f-1f7c-8869-dd8f-417ac326c53b@gmail.com>
References: <CAOSKuBTvjXs3j4+XeMtK1twenvJEHJzdUEjTGdYk95izm7X7pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBTYHP_FRnSbbjv7Y=ypPWN+aL+8S7pnspks=J+jbzBi4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBQF9dE6138uQcPDfnqxG5LAGHnr1R+1TCdNkEfw=F_fkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBQc9UE+UuqVEtYURyq-qOwxm=q2W1SBaCqbpKDrk661Aw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBSi4M3SwnNd0BaXpCO8YtJ8s-me5BzW41JrNO3Qon6_Fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBQMuah7jeXjocdOFGZJGbAR91mMJmnB+boZHbSbMX435g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBSpWrz_LNS=fAm8ZG0SyhiVqavwTZLtBcNwzw7DQQMefg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBRUrJdK6zLwU39YMfGYzhYaPvNbeYJV8BbmP3RSYVdonQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOSKuBQdbCBRd6P_DdvH6u+BTQTWJTKF2gWPWN+j8K=2HKNS1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <427cb72f-6d61-c334-f7ba-92e904c0bfac@gmail.com>
 <e803893f-1f7c-8869-dd8f-417ac326c53b@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOSKuBRazt4EvzyVfhesV_3euPuwzM=r-Sybhm6wVJcX8Uo7_A@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you all for these explanations.
Kind regards,
Morgan

On 11 Jun 2017 02:47, "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10/06/2017 6:09 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/2017 2:38 PM, Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had a question that might not seem obvious to me.
>>>
>>> I was wondering why there was no patnership between microsoft the R core
>>> team and eventually other developpers to improve R in one unified version
>>> instead of having different teams developping their own version of R.
>>>
>>
>> As far as I know, there's only one version of R currently being
>> developed.  Microsoft doesn't offer anything different; they just offer
>> a build of a slightly older version of base R, and a few packages that
>> are not in the base version.
>>
>
> Actually, I think my first sentence above is wrong.  Besides the base R
> that the core R team works on, there are a few other implementations of the
> language:  pqR, for instance.  But as others have said, the Microsoft
> product is simply a repackaging of the core R, so my second sentence is
> right.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] Question about R developpment
Morgan