From ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk  Sat Jan 28 08:29:36 2006
From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk (ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:29:36 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [Rd] Your false remark on PR#1654
Message-ID: <20060128072936.D4BD0103E9@slim.kubism.ku.dk>

The comment says

`Works in 2.3.0: BDR fixed inline [xy]axp'

and 2.2.1 is not 2.3.0.

Your example is not reproducible, so we cannot check.  If you get a copy 
of R-devel (as the FAQ and posting guide ask you to before posting) you 
can check for yourself.

Please do study the FAQ and avoid time-wasting.


On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 cain at u.washington.edu wrote:

> Full_Name: Kevin Cain
> Version: 2.2.1
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (128.95.124.144)
>
>
> In the following command, R ignores the xaxp command - it places tick marks at
> 1, 1.5, 2.0, etc regardless of what the third argument is (I want them only at
> integer values).
>
> plot(x=c(min(time),max(time)),y=c(min(y-se),max(y+se)),type='n',xaxp=c(1,4,3),
>  xlab='Measurement Time Point',
>  ylab='Accelerometer Mean VMU/min')
>
> A prior bug report says this problem has been fixed (Graphics-fixed/1654), but
> it looks like that referred to the unix version.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595



[Rd] Your false remark on PR#1654
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk