From maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch  Mon Apr 19 19:49:14 2004
From: maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch (Martin Maechler)
Date: Mon Apr 19 19:49:17 2004
Subject: [Rd] pgeom accuracy (PR#6792)
In-Reply-To: <x2pta4lzal.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
References: <20040419151220.33B8D104B1@slim.kubism.ku.dk>
	<x2u0zgm08i.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
	<200404191604.i3JG4pI9013376@robbie.rentec.com>
	<x2pta4lzal.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <16516.4378.201536.848657@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

>>>>> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk>
>>>>>     on 19 Apr 2004 18:15:14 +0200 writes:

    PD> terra@gnome.org (Morten Welinder) writes:
    >> Apologies.  Snapshot from
    >> 
    >> rsync --stats -z -rC --delete
    >> rsync.r-project.org::r-devel R
    >> 
    >> yesterday which contains the fragment pow(1-p,...) which
    >> is problematic for small p.
    >> 
    >> (If the snapshot I get with the above command has an
    >> official name I'll be happy to use that in future
    >> reports.)
    >> 
    >> Morten

    PD> The sources should be time-stamped. Take a look at

    PD>  ?bug.report
    PD>  ?version

if Morten has compiled the snapshot version,...

Otherwise, use  
	   <source>/VERSION
and	   <source>/date-stamp


[Rd] pgeom accuracy (PR#6792)
Martin Maechler