From jmount @end|ng |rom w|n-vector@com  Sat Oct  5 16:59:27 2019
From: jmount @end|ng |rom w|n-vector@com (John Mount)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 07:59:27 -0700
Subject: [Rd] should base R have a piping operator ?
In-Reply-To: <CAEKh8uidcEWA4tzmkpQxpF=q7r93qjf-HtiWLfbT91TFGOSzFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEKh8uidcEWA4tzmkpQxpF=q7r93qjf-HtiWLfbT91TFGOSzFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <859F02FC-2DCF-4FFA-A941-1A7285B5F362@win-vector.com>

Actually, base R already has a pipe fairly close to the one you describe: ->.;

	iris ->.; head(.) ->.; dim(.)
	# [1] 6 5

I've called it the Bizarro pipe ( http://www.win-vector.com/blog/2016/12/magrittrs-doppelganger/ <http://www.win-vector.com/blog/2016/12/magrittrs-doppelganger/> ), and for some reason we chickened out and didn't spend time on it in the dot pipe paper ( https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2018/RJ-2018-042/index.html <https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2018/RJ-2018-042/index.html> ).

For documentation Bizarro pipe has the advantage that one can work out how it works from the application itself, with out reference to a defining function.

> On Oct 5, 2019, at 7:34 AM, Ant F <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear R-devel,
> 
> The most popular piping operator sits in the package `magrittr` and is used
> by a huge amount of users, and imported /reexported by more and more
> packages too.
> 
> Many workflows don't even make much sense without pipes nowadays, so the
> examples in the doc will use pipes, as do the README, vignettes etc. I
> believe base R could have a piping operator so packages can use a pipe in
> their code or doc and stay dependency free.
> 
> I don't suggest an operator based on complex heuristics, instead I suggest
> a very simple and fast one (>10 times than magrittr in my tests) :
> 
> `%.%` <- function (e1, e2) {
>  eval(substitute(e2), envir = list(. = e1), enclos = parent.frame())
> }
> 
> iris %.% head(.) %.% dim(.)
> #> [1] 6 5
> 
> The difference with magrittr is that the dots must all be explicit (which
> sits with the choice of the name), and that special magrittr features such
> as assignment in place and building functions with `. %>% head() %>% dim()`
> are not supported.
> 
> Edge cases are not surprising:
> 
> ```
> x <- "a"
> x %.% quote(.)
> #> .
> x %.% substitute(.)
> #> [1] "a"
> 
> f1 <- function(y) function() eval(quote(y))
> f2 <- x %.% f1(.)
> f2()
> #> [1] "a"
> ```
> 
> Looking forward for your thoughts on this,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

---------------
John Mount
http://www.win-vector.com/ <http://www.win-vector.com/> 
Our book: Practical Data Science with R https://www.manning.com/books/practical-data-science-with-r-second-edition <http://www.manning.com/zumel/>





	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] should base R have a piping operator ?
John Mount