From rpeng at jhsph.edu  Mon Mar  9 13:17:49 2009
From: rpeng at jhsph.edu (Roger D. Peng)
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:17:49 -0400
Subject: [Rd] patch for 'merge' docs
In-Reply-To: <93D7EDD5-4C4F-422A-9324-DF18E37FE269@stat.berkeley.edu>
References: <66f3bd910903081820g75a3260ew1ce1c5864b17c711@mail.gmail.com>
	<93D7EDD5-4C4F-422A-9324-DF18E37FE269@stat.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <66f3bd910903090517j334ec015u99ef366cc56f668c@mail.gmail.com>

Hmm, I see what you mean, and I'd be willing to accept that logic if I
could find a single other instance in the R documentation where that
shorthand was used. But I suppose this might be the only instance
where such a shorthand is necessary.

-roger

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
<khansen at stat.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Roger
>
> (I think) L is shorthand for some logical value, ie. TRUE or FALSE. That has
> always been pretty clear to me. Your patch was stripped.
>
> Kasper
>
> On Mar 8, 2009, at 18:20 , Roger D. Peng wrote:
>
>> I've never quite understood the documentation for the 'all' argument
>> to 'merge'. I'm pretty sure using 'all = L' doesn't work but I'm open
>> to correction here. In any event, I've attached a patch.
>>
>> -roger
>>
>> --
>> Roger D. Peng ?| ?http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~rpeng/
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



-- 
Roger D. Peng  |  http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~rpeng/



[Rd] patch for 'merge' docs
Roger D. Peng