From ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de  Tue Dec 19 08:44:40 2000
From: ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de (Uwe Ligges)
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:44:40 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Help: StatXact
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012181948430.22869-100000@artemis.imbe.med.uni-erlangen.de>
Message-ID: <3A3F1FF8.1710657B@statistik.uni-dortmund.de>

Torsten Hothorn wrote:
> 
> > # Data from the StatXact-4 manual, page 221
> > treat <- c(94, 108, 110, 90)
> > contr <- c(80, 94, 85, 90, 90, 90, 108, 94, 78, 105, 88)
> >
> > My results:
> 
> Upps, sorry, those results where totally non-sense. I'm to tired ;-)
> 
> here are the results of my current implementation for the dataset above
> (but data were correct!):
> 
> > wilcox.exact(treat, contr)
> 
>          Wilcoxon rank sum test
> 
> data:  treat and contr
> W = 35, p-value = 0.0989
> alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0
> 
> > wilcox.exact(treat, contr, alternative="l")
> 
>          Wilcoxon rank sum test
> 
> data:  treat and contr
> W = 35, p-value = 0.9648
> alternative hypothesis: true mu is less than 0
> 
> > wilcox.exact(treat, contr, alternative="g")
> 
>          Wilcoxon rank sum test
> 
> data:  treat and contr
> W = 35, p-value = 0.05568
> alternative hypothesis: true mu is greater than 0
> 
> Sorry again,
> 
> Torsten


Sorry, I cannot help Torsten:

1. Only StatXact 3 is available here.
2. I am too stupid to produce any output, which doesn't look like
nonsense....

Is another volunteer out there? ;-)

Best regards,
Uwe
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Help: StatXact
Uwe Ligges