From andre.zege at gmail.com  Wed Apr  6 22:41:42 2011
From: andre.zege at gmail.com (A Zege)
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] S4 generic functions/methods vs enclosures
In-Reply-To: <1302101685181-3430950.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1302101685181-3430950.post@n4.nabble.com>
Message-ID: <1302122502129-3431755.post@n4.nabble.com>

This looks awesome -- it is precisely what i wanted. I have started hacking
with passing around environments  to simulate behavior of classes i was
after, but this is so much neater. Reference classes seem to do precisely
what i wanted. Thank you very much.

--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/S4-generic-functions-methods-vs-enclosures-tp3430950p3431755.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



[Rd] S4 generic functions/methods vs enclosures
A Zege