From murdoch.duncan at gmail.com  Tue Mar 10 20:17:00 2015
From: murdoch.duncan at gmail.com (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:17:00 -0400
Subject: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not
	multilib)
In-Reply-To: <1110879639.489054.1426013789755.JavaMail.root@fredhutch.org>
References: <1110879639.489054.1426013789755.JavaMail.root@fredhutch.org>
Message-ID: <54FF432C.8030200@gmail.com>

On 10/03/2015 2:56 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
>> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
>> Cc: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:37:12 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
>>
>> On 10/03/2015 12:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:40:02 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools
>>>> (but not	multilib)
>>>>
>>>> On 09/03/2015 11:07 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>>>>> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 10:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [This is a follow-up to the "New version of Rtools for
>>>>>>> Windows"
>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>> in January, but I just subscribed and don't know how to
>>>>>>> reply to
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> old thread -- my apologies.]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am planning to put a new Rtools online today that uses a
>>>>>> different
>>>>>> build of gcc 4.9.2.  I will be concentrating on getting it to
>>>>>> work with
>>>>>> all the external libraries before the 3.2.0 release next
>>>>>> month.
>>>>>>  I'm not
>>>>>> planning to try to get it to work with R-patched, and I
>>>>>> expect it
>>>>>> won't:
>>>>>>  I needed to make a number of patches to R-devel for
>>>>>>  compatibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also worked off R-devel (I said wrongly that it was R-patched
>>>>> in
>>>>> my
>>>>> original post) and benefited from your compatibility changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I look forward to the new Rtools and will test it by compiling
>>>>> some
>>>>> packages.
>>>>
>>>> It's now on the main site at CRAN, and should propagate to the
>>>> mirrors
>>>> reasonably quickly.  I'm hoping that tomorrow's R-devel build
>>>> will
>>>> use
>>>> it, but there may be some last minute problems.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks to you and everyone who worked on this. Is there a way to
>>> tell which toolchain built a given R-devel binary?
>>> If not, can you let us know when there is one on CRAN that was
>>> built with the new Rtools?
>>
>> If you look in etc/*/Makeconf, you'll see something like this:
>>
>> BINPREF ?= $(RTOOLS)gcc492_64/bin/
>>
>> hopefully from tomorrow onwards.  If today's build was with the new
>> toolchain, you should see a hardcoded path to where I have Rtools
>> installed on the build machine, which isn't so helpful.  The previous
>> toolchain left BINPREF blank.
>>
>> If you want to use your own toolchain, just edit those files.  If you
>> want to install the standard Rtools somewhere else, set an
>> environment
>> variable like
>>
>> RTOOLS = C:/Rtools/
>>
>> (where the terminal / is required.)
>>
> 
> Thanks, that's very helpful. I also notice with the latest R-devel binary (67969, which is built with the new Rtools according to what you say above) that I need to do setInternet2(TRUE) before I can download from any URLs; I see some mention of that earlier in this thread, is this intended? If so is there a way to make this the default?

That's a bug.  I haven't tracked down what's going wrong with our
regular code.  If I can't find that and fix it soon, I'll make Internet2
the default.  For now, you can do it yourself using the instructions on
?setInternet2.

Duncan Murdoch



[Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
Duncan Murdoch