From spluque at gmail.com  Fri Jul 14 22:53:29 2006
From: spluque at gmail.com (Sebastian Luque)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:53:29 -0500
Subject: [Rd] chron vs. POSIX
References: <87psg8rn75.fsf@arctocephalus.homelinux.org>
	<17591.64287.118524.251828@basebud.nulle.part>
Message-ID: <87hd1jvrg6.fsf@arctocephalus.homelinux.org>

Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:


On 14 July 2006 at 14:38, Sebastian Luque wrote:
| If Gabor's recommendations are to be followed, wouldn't it make sense to
| include chron in base R?  Given that flexibility for handling time

Future historians will provide a fuller account of the extended debates, but
my reading of these discussions here over the last few years leaves me with
the impression that Gabor is arguing for chron in a manner that is
simultaneously informed, polite, persistent and yet ... utterly isolated.

Date and POSIXt have served me well over the last few years. They are
maintained and being extended [ 1 ]. Chron, to the best of my knowledge, is
dead code so I'd bet against it appearing in core R any time soon.

Regards, Dirk

[ 1 ] I had some pleasant exchanges with Brian Ripley where I was able to
suggest a few extension relative to the new millisecond granularity in POSIXt
and its interfaces. 

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
                                                  -- Thomas A. Edison

-- 
Seb



[Rd] chron vs. POSIX
Sebastian Luque