From murdoch.duncan at gmail.com  Sun Sep 28 15:09:24 2014
From: murdoch.duncan at gmail.com (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:09:24 -0400
Subject: [Rd] Using requireNamespace() instead of require()
In-Reply-To: <077E31A57DA26E46AB0D493C9966AC730DCCF99AE3@UM-MAIL4112.unimaas.nl>
References: <077E31A57DA26E46AB0D493C9966AC730DCCF99AE3@UM-MAIL4112.unimaas.nl>
Message-ID: <54280884.6050700@gmail.com>

On 28/09/2014, 8:47 AM, Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT) wrote:
> Suppose I have a function funcA() in package pkgA that requires function funcB() from another package pkgB under certain circumstances. Those circumstances are rare though, so I put package pkgB under 'Suggests', and use this in funcA() when those circumstances do arise:
> 
> if (require("pkgB", quietly=TRUE)) {
>    pkgB::funcB(...)
> } else {
>    stop("Please install package 'pkgB' to do this.")
> }
> 
> I understand that using requireNamespace() would be preferable and I would also prefer to do that. But funcB() depends on funcC() from pkgC that it lists under 'Depends'. So, with require("pkgB"), both namespaces (of pkgB and pkgC) are loaded and attached to the search list and things run. But with requireNamespace("pkgB"), only the namespace of pkgB is loaded, so funcC() can't be found. So, I figured, I also use requireNamespace("pkgC"), but that's not sufficient, since funcB() calls funcC() and not pkgC::funcC().
> 
> Is there any solution to this?

The solution needs to be implemented by the maintainer of pkgB.  It
probably doesn't really need pkgC on the search list, and could be
modified to import funcC or explicitly call pkgC::funcC.

If you aren't the maintainer of pkgB, and the real maintainer is
unresponsive, then you're stuck using require().

Duncan Murdoch



[Rd] Using requireNamespace() instead of require()
Duncan Murdoch