From rdpeng at gmail.com  Thu Sep  3 18:23:03 2009
From: rdpeng at gmail.com (Roger Peng)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:23:03 -0400
Subject: [Rd] force & identity
In-Reply-To: <f8e6ff050909030617u232760edh208ddc6d1f14ff13@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f8e6ff050909030617u232760edh208ddc6d1f14ff13@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <66f3bd910909030923r2c93f2ddjc21cb3b6a91e3fee@mail.gmail.com>

Given that the two functions (although identical) serve different
purposes and are in a sense unrelated, it's not clear that a See Also
is needed (and in fact might be confusing).

-roger

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Hadley Wickham<hadley at rice.edu> wrote:
> Similarly, force & identity are identical (although with different
> semantic connotations). ?Would be nice to have a see also from each.
>
> Hadley
>
> --
> http://had.co.nz/
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



-- 
Roger D. Peng  |  http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~rpeng/



[Rd] force & identity
Roger Peng