From thomas.friedrichsmeier at ruhr-uni-bochum.de  Fri Nov  5 16:44:11 2010
From: thomas.friedrichsmeier at ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Thomas Friedrichsmeier)
Date: 5 Nov 2010 16:44:11 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Will PrintWarnings remain non static?
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTineQkJNx4gz-NGjtOyAHRnYizjM7AgNHXQ08XSf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTin9ufq=90ifN8jsSuJUey0_cBehOAuKOWiAvi6b@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTineQkJNx4gz-NGjtOyAHRnYizjM7AgNHXQ08XSf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201011051644.15003.thomas.friedrichsmeier@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

On Friday 05 November 2010, Jeffrey Horner wrote:
> Anyone have comments on this? PrintWarnings would be nice to utilize
> for those embedding R.

I had missed your previous post.

Rf_PrintWarnings is pretty useful when embedding R, indeed. We do use it in 
RKWard. So I would certainly appreciate if it could be promoted into the 
public C API.

Regards
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20101105/8deaaf3f/attachment.bin>


[Rd] Will PrintWarnings remain non static?
Thomas Friedrichsmeier