From Brandon.J.Whitcher at gsk.com  Thu Aug  6 15:50:09 2009
From: Brandon.J.Whitcher at gsk.com (Brandon.J.Whitcher at gsk.com)
Date: Thu,  6 Aug 2009 15:50:09 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [Rd] Inconsistent documentation in Writing R Extensions (PR#13876)
Message-ID: <20090806135009.777592831FE0@mail.pubhealth.ku.dk>

Greetings,

I think there is an inconsistency in the Writing R Extensions document. 
Please let me know if I am right or wrong on this one.

Working from the PDF document (R-exts-2.9.1.pdf)

  - page 9 states that the file <pkg>-Ex.Rout.save should be placed in 
tests/Examples in order to check against the current set of examples.
  - page 17 (item 16) states that the file <pkg>-Ex-Rout.save should be 
placed in tests/Examples.

I have checked in one of my packages, and I believe the first case 
<pkg>-Ex.Rout.save is correct.  Is this true?

cheers...

Brandon


-----------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a 
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The 
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
-----------------------------------------------------------

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] Inconsistent documentation in Writing R Extensions (PR#13876)
Brandon.J.Whitcher at gsk.com