From izmirlian at nih.gov  Sat Feb 24 02:45:54 2007
From: izmirlian at nih.gov (Grant Izmirlian)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:45:54 -0500
Subject: [Rd]  IDE for R C++ package writing ?
In-Reply-To: <mailman.10.1172228404.11456.r-devel@r-project.org>
References: <mailman.10.1172228404.11456.r-devel@r-project.org>
Message-ID: <200702232045.54315.izmirlian@nih.gov>

On windows the currently maintained version is xemacs...the projcects split 
some time ago.
-- 
Grant Izmirlian
NCI
????? ?????????

On Friday 23 February 2007 06:00, r-devel-request at r-project.org wrote:
> [Rd] IDE for R C++ package writing ?
> Dear all,
> 
> I have to develop a (hopefully) small package for R in C++.
> I didn't code in C++ for some years, and i'm now searching
> for an adequate IDE for this task.
> 
> Some of my criterions : not proprietary, not too heavy,
> open to linux, not java gasworks, still maintained, etc
> 
> After looking on several places
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C%2B%2B_compilers_and_integrated_development_environments
> http://www.freeprogrammingresources.com/cppide.html
> + R docs
> I was thinking on code::blocks, and emacs (and perhaps vim)
> 
> Emacs seems used by some R developers as an R editor.
> So i did think on emacs because it could perhaps be interesting
> to have the same editor for R code and C++ code.
> 
> However, when looking at the last emacs windows version,
> it seems to date from january 2004 ... (dead end ?)
> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/emacs/windows/
> 
> I will be grateful for all advices on this tool topic.
> Better choosing emacs ? or code::blocks ?
> or another idea ?
> Does somebody have an idea about the most used IDEs for
> R C++ package writing ?
> 
> Thanks
> Vincent



[Rd] IDE for R C++ package writing ?
Grant Izmirlian