From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Wed Nov  8 00:53:37 2000
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 08 Nov 2000 01:53:37 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Re: [R] .Last.value or % or ANS or ... (was unix)
In-Reply-To: "Charles C. Berry"'s message of "Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:41:42 -0800 (PST)"
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10011071028180.317-100000@tajo.ucsd.edu>
Message-ID: <x27l6f5lny.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>

"Charles C. Berry" <cberry@tajo.ucsd.edu> writes:

> Admittedly, this is NOT the same as having a stack of objects...

It would be no big deal to create a stack of objects resulting from
the last N expressions. What I'm not too sure about is whether you'd
really want that. Notice that it could imply keeping several copies of
a data set in memory. E.g. the value of an assignment like "data <-
transform(data, logx=log(x))" is the value of the RHS.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Re: [R] .Last.value or % or ANS or ... (was unix)
Peter Dalgaard BSA