From cowan.pd at gmail.com  Tue Oct  6 04:06:00 2009
From: cowan.pd at gmail.com (Peter Cowan)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:06:00 -0700
Subject: [Rd] unit testing for R packages?
In-Reply-To: <f8e6ff050910051900w778505e9i1decdafdcebe7d13@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c35a4fc0910051201h23e61e39o55bf1de9809bfe29@mail.gmail.com>
	<486f230c0910051248xd9d9ab9ie3ac6358184e2989@mail.gmail.com>
	<4ACA84AE.5050708@sciviews.org>
	<f8e6ff050910051744s2569f535nf56c34e04c9b2c3e@mail.gmail.com>
	<e1fc21b0910051848m40885052s8cef5959a14a659d@mail.gmail.com>
	<f8e6ff050910051900w778505e9i1decdafdcebe7d13@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e1fc21b0910051906q50600d92pf84766fce1281ce7@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:00 PM, hadley wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Peter Cowan <cowan.pd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, hadley wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Now, as Seth already told, there are several functions in svUnit that
>>>> ease interactive use of the tests in an R session. What he did not told
>>>> is that RUnit has some nice code coverage functions that svUnit does not
>>>> have.
>>>
>>> What are those? I've skimmed through the documentation and couldn't
>>> see anything?
>>
>> The R wiki has information about both RUnit and svUnit. ?I'm not sure
>> that it details all of the differences. ?I have successfully used the
>> methodology of the gdata package described there.
>
> Sorry, I should have been more explicit. ?I was interested
> particularly in the code coverage functions.

Those are the inspect and tracker functions of the RUnit package.
I've only played with these functions, how do other developers use
them?

> Hadley

> http://had.co.nz/
>



[Rd] unit testing for R packages?
Peter Cowan