From gunter.berton at gene.com  Fri Oct  5 03:12:48 2012
From: gunter.berton at gene.com (Bert Gunter)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:12:48 -0700
Subject: [Rd] How to build a list with missing values? What is missing,
	anyway?
In-Reply-To: <CAJoaRhbgikc=3Gpa8LAvSakjE=e95Z5akS7w5dHEND+yWHfJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJoaRhb8gq79aB3EXPeMa+n6eK6pj9NTFHFBJRUbP_=S1bbTaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1349331704206-4644965.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CAJoaRhbgikc=3Gpa8LAvSakjE=e95Z5akS7w5dHEND+yWHfJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACk-te23paBonBtKY+eNoqVVdz_0186Y-DnfaMQ4zJOsZS-Gww@mail.gmail.com>

The R Language definition manual explains all of this. Read it.

-- Bert

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Peter Meilstrup
<peter.meilstrup at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Josh O'Brien <joshmobrien at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Say I have argnames <- c("a", "b", "c").
>> >From that I want to construct the equivalent of alist(a=, b=, c=).
>>
>> Here's a one liner that'll do that for you:
>>
>> argnames <- letters[1:3]
>> setNames(rep(list(bquote()), length(argnames)), argnames)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Just so I have my mental model correct, I'm gathering that missing/``
> is a symbol that the interpreter has a special rule for -- evaluating
> it raises an error, as opposed to objects that evaluate to themselves
> or variable names that evaluate to objects.
>
> Does the same sort of thing explain the behavior of `...`? When the
> interpreter comes across `...` in the arguments during evaluation of a
> call, it trips a special argument-interpolating behavior?
>
> Peter
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



-- 

Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics

Internal Contact Info:
Phone: 467-7374
Website:
http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm



[Rd] How to build a list with missing values? What is missing, anyway?
Bert Gunter