From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Wed Dec  8 17:33:55 1999
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 18:33:55 +0100 (MET)
Subject: pch==NA (PR#366)
Message-ID: <199912081733.SAA22746@pubhealth.ku.dk>

Try this:

plot(1:3,pch=c(1,2,NA))

The 3rd point is plotted as if pch were 1. This seems completely wrong
to me. Similar issue with cex= (you get the minimum size plotting dot
for the NA case there). With col= the point disappears, as I tend it
should in the other cases as well.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


pch==NA (PR#366)
p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk