From pauljohn32 at gmail.com  Thu May  3 19:09:08 2012
From: pauljohn32 at gmail.com (Paul Johnson)
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 12:09:08 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Proposal: model.data
In-Reply-To: <1336063009.29163.39.camel@brian-rcg>
References: <CAErODj8fUQW85O6hMzU40ACH3Nvzk7fBa2OnV=mx_MnNwqDC5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1336063009.29163.39.camel@brian-rcg>
Message-ID: <CAErODj8DhfYfn7y0kwWcUfKWCRVc-MZbEBTAuW_mEfQhnwfLSg@mail.gmail.com>

Greetings:

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian G. Peterson <brian at braverock.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:51 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> If somebody in R Core would like this and think about putting it, or
>> something like it, into the base, then many chores involving predicted
>> values would become much easier.
>>
> Why does this need to be in base? ?Implement it in a package.
>>
> If it works, and is additive, people will use it. ?Look at 'reshape' or
> 'xts' or 'Matrix' just to name a few examples of widely used packages.
>

I can't use it to fix termplot unless it is in base.

Or are you suggesting I create my own "termplot" replacement?


> Regards,
>
> ? - Brian
>
>



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science ? ?Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504 ? ? Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas ? ? ? ? ? ? ? University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org ? ? ? ? ? ?http://quant.ku.edu



[Rd] Proposal: model.data
Paul Johnson