From tlumley@u.washington.edu  Thu Sep  6 17:23:51 2001
From: tlumley@u.washington.edu (Thomas Lumley)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] RFC: d/p/q/rgamma
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0109061013290.4287-100000@toucan.stats>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.33.0109060923250.17872-100000@homer03.u.washington.edu>

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> BTW, I think the cleanest approach is
>
> dgamma(x, shape, rate = 1, scale = 1/rate, log = FALSE)
>
Yes, I think this is better

	-thomas


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] RFC: d/p/q/rgamma
Thomas Lumley