From Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at  Tue Nov  4 15:37:33 1997
From: Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at (Kurt Hornik)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:37:33 +0100
Subject: R-alpha: Re: Separation of Program & Doc;  REQUIRING Perl5 [was: New Version]
In-Reply-To: <6ren4wg16m.fsf@franz.stat.wisc.edu>
References: <199711041052.LAA02657@sophie.ethz.ch>
 <6ren4wg16m.fsf@franz.stat.wisc.edu>
Message-ID: <199711041537.QAA07525@pc25.none>

>>>>> Douglas Bates writes:

> Regarding Perl5 availability:
>  - In the Unix world I would be surprised if people who would want to
>    install R would not also have access to perl5 or be able to install
>    it.  I would assert that the level of skill required to install R
>    is comparable to that required to install perl.

:-)

Btw, does CPAN have binary distributions as well?

>  - For Mac or Windows are you expecting that most users would install
>    from the .tar.gz file?  I would have thought that there would be
>    one compilation done to create a .zip file for Windows and a .hqx
>    file for the Mac.  The typical user would only need to install
>    these "tar-ball" files and never need to see the part that depended 
>    on perl.  If someone decides to write an R function that calls perl 
>    then it will croak but the same would happen for shell scripts, awk 
>    scripts, ...

I am confused now.  I thought the advantage of Perl is that it is
available on non-Unix platforms as well ...?

(Of course, that does not solve the `packaging' problem ...)

-k

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


R-alpha: Re: Separation of Program & Doc; REQUIRING Perl5 [was: New Version]
Kurt Hornik