From cgenolin at u-paris10.fr  Thu May  2 16:17:52 2013
From: cgenolin at u-paris10.fr (cgenolin)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 07:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] Comments in the DESCRIPTION file
In-Reply-To: <40677854-5CFC-4FA1-B1F6-E27C3CEBF772@r-project.org>
References: <509A2942.3050004@u-paris10.fr>
	<1367402475396-4665892.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<C4C6B669-E9A6-4D2F-AC55-4968F3CBE764@r-project.org>
	<1367477919284-4666017.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<40677854-5CFC-4FA1-B1F6-E27C3CEBF772@r-project.org>
Message-ID: <1367504272704-4666058.post@n4.nabble.com>

So it IS curently accepted, but may NOT be in the futur. Thanks for your
answer.

So I guess that using 
--- 8< -------------
%%%%%%%%%1: 
%%%2: Section 1
%%%3
...
--- 8< -------------

is correct, isn't it?

Christophe



--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Comments-in-the-DESCRIPTION-file-tp4648678p4666058.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



[Rd] Comments in the DESCRIPTION file
cgenolin