From ggrothendieck at gmail.com  Wed May 31 17:11:08 2006
From: ggrothendieck at gmail.com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:11:08 -0400
Subject: [Rd] Bitmap device available for R CMD check?
In-Reply-To: <71257D09F114DA4A8E134DEAC70F25D3053486CE@groamrexm03.amer.pfizer.com>
References: <71257D09F114DA4A8E134DEAC70F25D3053486CE@groamrexm03.amer.pfizer.com>
Message-ID: <971536df0605310811k7aed3471vd668cf7efa5568d4@mail.gmail.com>

Others may have better ideas but
if you have a problem getting your vignette to pass R CMD check
then you could process it yourself using Sweave to create a .tex
file and then have a mypkg.Rnw file that just contains the SweaveOpt,
%Vignette statements and an \input statement to input the .tex file that you
generated yourself.  That way you can generate it in a known
environment.



On 5/31/06, Kuhn, Max <Max.Kuhn at pfizer.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package that I'd like to submit to CRAN that does Sweave-like
> processing on Open Document format files from Open Office.
>
> If I remember correctly, there is a machine that automatically R CMD
> checks CRAN packages. I have two questions about how that system is set
> up:
>
> 1. Is the bitmap device available? The example produces a file using
> this device and I'd like it to pass R CMD check on your system (as it
> does on my machines).
>
> 2. Are there any restrictions on the Latex packages called in the
> vignette? This is not a big deal, but it would be good to know how much
> flexibility I have in producing that document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Max
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> LEGAL NOTICE\ Unless expressly stated otherwise, this messag...{{dropped}}
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] Bitmap device available for R CMD check?
Gabor Grothendieck