From kynnjo at gmail.com  Mon Oct  3 02:05:53 2016
From: kynnjo at gmail.com (Kynn Jones)
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:05:53 -0400
Subject: [Rd] On implementing zero-overhead code reuse
In-Reply-To: <CAFvQaj4SLxim=Jqi_yeOrKTRvuhWB7X-C6xXjpCw_pbmfz_=3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFvQaj4Bcd-FW_z2Sc019d9JUa_Xy3Xz0HO=Ze16ZLnGJx4JiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20161002230956.GT9995@ofb.net>
	<CAFvQaj4SLxim=Jqi_yeOrKTRvuhWB7X-C6xXjpCw_pbmfz_=3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFvQaj6=UUWafXD5asf-mtho7O1qKs9TLpWmLRdmEhGYh1exVw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Kynn Jones <kynnjo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Frederick,
>
> I described what I meant in the post I sent to R-help
> (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-September/442174.html),
> but in brief, by "zero overhead" I mean that the only thing needed for
> library code to be accessible to client code is for it to be located
> in designed directory.  No additional meta-files, packaging/compiling,
     ^^^^^^^^

Sorry, I meant to write "designated".

> etc. are required.



[Rd] On implementing zero-overhead code reuse
Kynn Jones