From tlumley at u.washington.edu  Wed Apr 12 17:14:59 2006
From: tlumley at u.washington.edu (Thomas Lumley)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] Stack checking, core dumps, and embedding R
In-Reply-To: <1abe3fa90604111312x177f6e4ds4e66b813c9833a00@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1abe3fa90604110234v1b4958c0w1e51e2b49f7ff9c5@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0604111121440.30083@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<1abe3fa90604111312x177f6e4ds4e66b813c9833a00@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604120813440.31004@homer21.u.washington.edu>

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, A.J. Rossini wrote:
>
> (This is under SBCL, i.e. satisfying Duncan's conjectures -- as soon
> as I fix a few things (i.e. undoing CommonLispStat/R's threading which
> is a bit SBCL specific, I'll try under CLISP, ECL, and CMUCL to
> verify/check).
>

Also, according to
   http://www.cyrusharmon.org/cl/blog/display/49
SBCL uses SIGSEGV as an internal signalling mechanism, which might 
conflict with the new segfault catcher.

 	-thomas

Thomas Lumley			Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlumley at u.washington.edu	University of Washington, Seattle



[Rd] Stack checking, core dumps, and embedding R
Thomas Lumley