From landronimirc at gmail.com  Tue Aug 24 08:21:05 2010
From: landronimirc at gmail.com (Liviu Andronic)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:21:05 +0300
Subject: [Rd] No RTFM?
In-Reply-To: <62C82B39B8A85E4B95A18F7F7B852F870576DBBB72@exvic-mbx03.nexus.csiro.au>
References: <XFMail.100823032204.Ted.Harding@manchester.ac.uk>
	<1282552663.2375.26.camel@desktop.localdomain>
	<62C82B39B8A85E4B95A18F7F7B852F870576DBBB72@exvic-mbx03.nexus.csiro.au>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ZxFuASuhE6OKrWjKzPn2osM9vySF_N07q9iBe@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:17 AM,  <Mark.Bravington at csiro.au> wrote:
> ?- Also, "?glm" does come over as pretty rude,
>
Personally I've always seen the '?fun' answers as appropriate and
straight to the point. There's no need to type a nice sounding phrase
? la fran?aise just to express 'see the ?glm reference'. A
'requirement' for long phrases might deter some in a hurry to answer
at all, and in my view a quick and raw reference is better than none.

Perhaps a first time poster would be utterly clueless on first sight,
but doing a bit of homework with the key word in hands one should
quickly understand what's all about. The second sight of '?fun'
answers shouldn't be that intimidating.

Regards
Liviu



[Rd] No RTFM?
Liviu Andronic