From jmc at research.bell-labs.com  Thu Nov 20 16:11:23 2003
From: jmc at research.bell-labs.com (John Chambers)
Date: Thu Nov 20 16:10:34 2003
Subject: [Rd] Was: setValidity and "initialize" method conflict ?
	[inR-help]
References: <3FBBAD6C.2000803@uni-bayreuth.de>
	<3FBCD582.F70EAC2B@research.bell-labs.com>
Message-ID: <3FBCD99B.16F63F39@research.bell-labs.com>

John Chambers wrote:
.....................
> 
>
> 
> By the way, in the validity method you should not return a call to
> warning() as in your example.  The validity method just returns a
> character string describing the problem.

Sorry, I misread the example, the "warning" was just in the character
string.  Still, might be confusing since the result is normally an
error, rather than a warning.

John

> 

-- 
John M. Chambers                  jmc@bell-labs.com
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies    office: (908)582-2681
700 Mountain Avenue, Room 2C-282  fax:    (908)582-3340
Murray Hill, NJ  07974            web: http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/~jmc


[Rd] Was: setValidity and "initialize" method conflict ? [inR-help]
John Chambers