From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Sun Feb 28 20:45:45 1999
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:45:45 +0100
Subject: lty=0 -- shouldn't it give an invisible line? (PR#130)
Message-ID: <199902282045.VAA04952@biostat.ku.dk>


Currently, it seems that setting lty=0 gives a solid line in most
contexts (lines(), e.g.) but a strangely dotted-dash line in others
(axis()). This shows up on barplots, and looks fairly odd:

x<-c(a=1,b=2,c=3)
barplot(x)

barplot() is doing an axis(...,lty=0), presumably with the intention
of plotting the labels, but not the actual axis.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


lty=0 -- shouldn't it give an invisible line? (PR#130)
p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk