From edd@debian.org  Sat Sep 21 02:47:34 2002
From: edd@debian.org (Dirk Eddelbuettel)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:47:34 -0500
Subject: R-1.6.0; BLAS and friends
In-Reply-To: <x2ptv85r0k.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209202211180.27036-100000@tal.stat.umu.se> <x2ptv85r0k.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <20020921014734.GA8056@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:45:47PM +0200, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> G?ran Brostr?m <gb@stat.umu.se> writes:
> 
> > R-1.6.0 beta on Debian Linux:

Did you build it yourself, or did you grab the (currently weekly) .deb?

> > Is this a bug in R-1.6.0?
> 
> Not in general: I have this on RedHat 
> 
> [pd@blueberry BUILD]$ bin/R
> 
> R : Copyright 2002, The R Development Core Team
> Version 1.6.0 beta (2002-09-20)
> 
> ...
> > is.loaded("dtrmm_")
> [1] TRUE
> 
> 
> but not on Debian. On Solaris, I get FALSE with both 1.5.1 and 1.6.0beta.

Using the Debian package I prepared on Monday:

edd@chibud:~/src/debian> R

R : Copyright 2002, The R Development Core Team
Version 1.6.0 beta (2002-09-16)
[...]
> is.loaded("dtrmm_")
[1] TRUE


Dirk

-- 
Good judgement comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgement. 
							    -- Fred Brooks
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


R-1.6.0; BLAS and friends
Dirk Eddelbuettel