From bates@stat.wisc.edu  Tue Oct 27 14:59:33 1998
From: bates@stat.wisc.edu (Douglas Bates)
Date: 27 Oct 1998 08:59:33 -0600
Subject: EGCS optimizer bug?
In-Reply-To: Peter Dalgaard BSA's message of "27 Oct 1998 11:58:09 +0100"
References: <x2r9vwl1uh.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk> <87iuh8rl7k.fsf@d-128-95-21-205.dhcp2.washington.edu> <x2pvbfzn8x.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk> <x21znu2rwe.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <6r7lxm82zu.fsf@verdi.stat.wisc.edu>

>>>>> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk> writes:

  PD> Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk> writes:
  >> Anyone tried egcs1.1b?

  PD> Apparently not... But now I have, and it appears to be OK at
  PD> -O2.

  PD> Pity that it's 11 MB source and that the defunct 1.0.2 is what
  PD> ships on RedHat CD's. [There are binaries on contrib.redhat.com,
  PD> though. You could probably make do with 2.8MB (C + g77) of
  PD> those]

Is 1.0.2 shipped on RedHat 5.2 CD's or are you referring to RH 5.1?

The numbering of egcs under Debian is different.  The version that
will be in Debian 2.1, that release that is currently frozen and being
tested, is numbered 2.91.57 to avoid conflicts with release numbering
in gcc.  It appears that 2.91.57 was derived from a 1.1-prerelease
version of egcs.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


EGCS optimizer bug?
Douglas Bates