From h089@mth.uea.ac.uk  Fri Feb 11 23:42:27 2000
From: h089@mth.uea.ac.uk (MJ Ray)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 23:42:27 +0000
Subject: [Rd] Compilation Failure on Linux/Intel (PR#434)
In-Reply-To: <x27lgb9uqu.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>; from Peter Dalgaard BSA on Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 12:36:57AM +0100
References: <200002112314.AAA08548@pubhealth.ku.dk> <x27lgb9uqu.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <20000211234227.A36585@mth.uea.ac.uk>

On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 12:36:57AM +0100, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> h089@mth.uea.ac.uk writes:
> > I consistently get a sig11 on one file:
> > gcc -I. -I../include -I../../src/include -I../../src/include/R_ext 
> > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -mieee-fp -g -O2 -c fft.c -o fft.o
> > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
> > make[3]: *** [fft.o] Error 1
> C compilers can do that all by themselves occasionally. Which version
> are we talking about? Does it work to change the optimisation level
> for the file?

markj@oplex$ gcc -v
Reading specs from
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-slackware-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)

Reducing the optimisation to O1 compiles it, but O3 still does
the sig11.  Thanks.  Problem cured if not explained.

MJR
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Compilation Failure on Linux/Intel (PR#434)
MJ Ray