From ken.sensei at gmail.com  Thu Feb 25 17:14:46 2016
From: ken.sensei at gmail.com (Mohit Dayal)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:14:46 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Fwd:  Two ideas / feature requests for R CMD check
In-Reply-To: <CABtg=Kk0gUswZ6+p0Bm-=B1CNKeLDBaUZPavyC5uEZ1wvygM4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABtg=Kk0gUswZ6+p0Bm-=B1CNKeLDBaUZPavyC5uEZ1wvygM4g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ1ju9uc5ZPSpDo6G9fp-8=C4h4eCPZEMV4x7zehBahLr-qc_w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi All,

One thing that I've encountered with R CMD check is that if your package
uses some functions from a base package, then the corresponding NAMESPACE
imports do not seem to be automatically suggested. It might possibly an
issue with how one's system is configured, but say, with the --as-cran
switch this thing should be picked up on.

Like I felt this was something else that could be looked into :)

Thanks!
Mohit
------
mohitdayal.strikingly.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com>
Date: 25 February 2016 at 05:40
Subject: [Rd] Two ideas / feature requests for R CMD check
To: "r-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org>


We all love R CMD check. :) In my opinion it would be even better if
it had options to

- Run all checks, even if one fails with an error. I realize this
sometimes might not make sense (e.g. if there is no DESCRIPTION file),
but often does.

- Run all examples even if an example fails. I think it would be great
to get all failing examples at once, so that a package author can
estimate the amount of breakage.

Thank you for considering there,
Gabor

______________________________________________
R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] Fwd: Two ideas / feature requests for R CMD check
Mohit Dayal