From J.C.Rougier@durham.ac.uk  Fri May 19 10:11:00 2000
From: J.C.Rougier@durham.ac.uk (Jonathan Rougier)
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:11:00 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [Rd] variance of a scalar (PR#546)
In-Reply-To: <200005190904.KAA22592@toucan.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0005191006140.10176-100000@laplace>

On Fri, 19 May 2000, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> > I thought that might be the reason.  There is no mention of using n-1
> > rather than n in the denominator on the help page.  Perhaps that might be
> > added?
> 
> Um. What professional statistics package uses n, then?  Are you
> suggesting that there is serious room for doubt?

Well, I may not be the gold standard for statisticians but I just called
var(x) when x was the population, not a sample.  Unfortunately I did this
without thinking as it corresponds closely to my notes.  So although a
statistics package might use n-1 without question, I think a statistical
computing environment could be a little more flexible, at least in its
documentation.

Jonathan Rougier                       Science Laboratories
Department of Mathematical Sciences    South Road
University of Durham                   Durham DH1 3LE
http://www.maths.dur.ac.uk/stats/people/jcr/jcr.html

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] variance of a scalar (PR#546)
Jonathan Rougier