From dtenenba at fredhutch.org  Thu Mar 19 19:04:01 2015
From: dtenenba at fredhutch.org (Dan Tenenbaum)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source
In-Reply-To: <CABtg=K=BLtnBMVgOk1Px+WWjxn3qfA+o2_gLR0u7CP7BghjPEw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <679653147.678825.1426788241564.JavaMail.root@fredhutch.org>



----- Original Message -----
> From: "G?bor Cs?rdi" <csardi.gabor at gmail.com>
> To: "John McKown" <john.archie.mckown at gmail.com>
> Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:03:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source
> 
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John McKown
> <john.archie.mckown at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > OOPS, I saw the 0.6 package source, not 0.5. My mistake. Why not
> > recompile? Do you require 0.5 for some reason? I would guess that
> > CRAN
> > requires only the _current_ source, not _every_ source.
> 
> 
> Well, it seems to me that for the OSX Mavericks platform 0.5-2 is the
> current version.


Because the latest version failed to build on Mavericks:

http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-release-osx-x86_64-mavericks/Rglpk-00install.html

Possibly because a system requirement is not installed.

Dan


> 
> Gabor
> 
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] CRAN binary, but no source
Dan Tenenbaum