From thomas.baumann@ch.tum.de  Tue Feb 27 15:53:47 2001
From: thomas.baumann@ch.tum.de (thomas.baumann@ch.tum.de)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:53:47 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [Rd] Patch to coplot.R
In-Reply-To: <15003.48947.624227.304611@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Message-ID: <200102271553.f1RFrm808369@norvel.ws.chemie.tu-muenchen.de>



On 27 Feb, Martin Maechler wrote:
> ---------- end of excursion --------------------

sorry for any inconvenience, the next patches will definitely be against
the real source.

> you have all boxes gray which I don't necessarily prefer.
> (and you should say that you were changing this, too...).
> One could consider using two different kinds of gray for the two,
> very light gray for factors, darker one for `shingle bars'.
> 
> I'm a bit reluctant to change this; R has been a `ripe' piece of software
> for a while and people don't necessarily want to see changes that they
> can't easily revert.  Hence, the two bg colors (bar backgrounds) would
> become function arguments as well....
> 
> opinions?

I fully agree with your opinion, since I do not like having all the
automatically generated diagrams looking different after an update. But
an easy option would be nice...

Thomas


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Patch to coplot.R
thomas.baumann@ch.tum.de