From tlumley at u.washington.edu  Sat Sep 10 18:32:29 2005
From: tlumley at u.washington.edu (Thomas Lumley)
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in
 read.spss, package foreign?]
In-Reply-To: <17186.39393.136602.297141@celebrian.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <3.0.6.32.20050909015829.007bed60@pop.gmx.net>
	<3.0.6.32.20050909145010.007c2a70@pop.gmx.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63a.0509090845050.619@homer23.u.washington.edu>
	<971536df05090910211d639ed1@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63a.0509091029550.5570@homer23.u.washington.edu>
	<17186.39393.136602.297141@celebrian.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63a.0509100931060.17336@homer24.u.washington.edu>

>
> Standard location or a mechachanism like the one you describe are both
> similar amount of work (and not much at all), the HTML pages are
> generated by perl and I have the parsed DESCRIPTION file there, i.e.,
> using a fixed name or the value of the Changelog field is basically
> the same.
>

In which case a Changlog entry in DESCRIPTION would be a very nice 
addition, and would have the advantage of not requiring changes to 
packages.

 	-thomas



[Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in read.spss, package foreign?]
Thomas Lumley