From MSchwartz at MedAnalytics.com  Tue May 25 18:01:32 2004
From: MSchwartz at MedAnalytics.com (Marc Schwartz)
Date: Tue May 25 18:01:41 2004
Subject: [Rd] binary R for Fedora Core 2 e tcl
In-Reply-To: <x27jv0ldu6.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
References: <1085483099.3969.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<1085488894.6310.90.camel@nemo>
	<1085497467.7195.120.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<x27jv0ldu6.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <1085500891.7195.127.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 10:35, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz@medanalytics.com> writes:
> 
> > I think that Martyn's consideration of waiting on a FC2 RPM for R 1.9.1
> > is reasonable, since that would be an official R release with the FC2
> > related fixes.  Otherwise, it becomes to an extent, an arbitrary
> > decision as to which R patched tarball to use as the basis for a R
> > 1.9.0.X FC2 RPM. That could complicate support.
> 
> I suppose the right way to do it is to take the official R-1.9.0.tgz
> and put the relevant patch set in the spec file. Wouldn't worry too
> much about support since Martyn's version is effectively the official
> one. However, with 1.9.1 less than a month into the future, there's
> not much point in messing with it now.


True on all accounts.

Marc


[Rd] binary R for Fedora Core 2 e tcl
Marc Schwartz