From dmurdoch at pair.com  Sun Feb 22 13:11:50 2004
From: dmurdoch at pair.com (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Sun Feb 22 13:11:50 2004
Subject: [Rd] R CMD versus Rcmd
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402220814310.3972-100000@gannet.stats>
References: <40382223.5090104@debian.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0402220814310.3972-100000@gannet.stats>
Message-ID: <uj4h301tuth1jvc76ep0gts10mkm8dg9ld@4ax.com>

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:19:21 +0000 (GMT), Prof Brian Ripley
<ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

>There was no problem with version 1.68, and I believe this was an error
>(as otherwise the call would be infinitely recursive, R CMD calling R 
>CMD).
>
>I have reverted the change (in R.sh.in) to 1.68.

Sorry about that error, and thanks for the fix.  That file isn't used
in Windows, and I shouldn't have touched it.

Duncan Murdoch


[Rd] R CMD versus Rcmd
Duncan Murdoch