From ucfagls at gmail.com  Wed Aug 28 18:29:44 2013
From: ucfagls at gmail.com (Gavin Simpson)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:29:44 -0600
Subject: [Rd] =?utf-8?b?4oCYOjo64oCZIGNhbGw=?=
In-Reply-To: <521E221E.3020107@gmail.com>
References: <521E221E.3020107@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAHES9wtYSFMDj_2vK0WNaAaHnT=EmaF5=B9nq28KWbe-mLCCg@mail.gmail.com>

Paul, this was discussed at length only a couple of days ago. See this thread:

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.devel/34100

If I follow you, I think a change has been made that doesn't NOTE if
the use of `:::` is to packages for which you are also the maintainer.
But read the thread as the change is mentioned in there somewhere.

HTH

G

On 28 August 2013 10:15, Paul Gilbert <pgilbert902 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a package (TSdbi) which provides end user functions that I export,
> and several utilities for plugin packages (e.g. TSMySQL) that I do not
> export because I do not intend them to be exposed to end users. I call these
> from the plugin packages using TSdbi:::  but that now produces a note in the
> checks:
>
> * checking dependencies in R code ... NOTE
> Namespace imported from by a ?:::? call: ?TSdbi?
>   See the note in ?`:::` about the use of this operator. :: should be
>   used rather than ::: if the function is exported, and a package
>   almost never needs to use ::: for its own functions.
>
> Is there a preferred method to accomplish this in a way that does not
> produce a note?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



-- 
Gavin Simpson, PhD



[Rd] =?utf-8?b?4oCYOjo64oCZIGNhbGw=?=
Gavin Simpson