From tlumley@u.washington.edu  Wed Oct 10 16:37:55 2001
From: tlumley@u.washington.edu (Thomas Lumley)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] Pearson residuals (PR#1123)
In-Reply-To: <x2669noihm.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.33.0110100836200.30094-100000@homer29.u.washington.edu>

On 10 Oct 2001, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
>
> Um, right... At the very least, there's a "/" that should have been
> "*". But do we also divide by the dispersion (when it is estimated)? I
> forget what the definition says.
>

I don't think we do divide by the dispersion -- all the flavours of
residual are supposed to be the same for the normal/identity case.

	-thomas


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Pearson residuals (PR#1123)
Thomas Lumley