From bates@stat.wisc.edu  Fri Jul 13 17:59:12 2001
From: bates@stat.wisc.edu (Douglas Bates)
Date: 13 Jul 2001 11:59:12 -0500
Subject: [Rd] AnonCVS
In-Reply-To: <87ofqoztp9.fsf@jeeves.blindglobe.net>
References: <200107131607.JAA18455@cramer.stat.ucla.edu>
 <87ofqoztp9.fsf@jeeves.blindglobe.net>
Message-ID: <6rwv5cahpb.fsf@franz.stat.wisc.edu>

rossini@blindglobe.net (A.J. Rossini) writes:

> Looks like it nearly in sync with the main mirror, only 30 minutes of
> of (a mirror of the???) main archive.
> 
> The modules and the timing of the sync I know; the rest is strictly
> conjecture. 

Are there reasons for using anonymous cvs when anonymous rsync access
is available?  Quite frankly I don't understand why one would use
anonymous cvs instead of anonymous rsync.

(I do realize that with anonymous cvs you can read the CVS logs and
you can't do that with anonymous rsync but we make the logs available
in another form on developer.r-project.org.)
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] AnonCVS
Douglas Bates