From kevin.hendricks at sympatico.ca  Sun Mar 10 16:54:10 2013
From: kevin.hendricks at sympatico.ca (Kevin Hendricks)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:54:10 -0400
Subject: [Rd] question on why Rigroup package moved to Archive on CRAN
In-Reply-To: <513CA446.8040005@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
References: <BLU0-SMTP1663AF8838B6E599BDF19787E70@phx.gbl>
	<CAFDcVCSpBzh0hm0_C=SfYTVekrZ7iSckuDg5wFwd5f2N0bGbSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BLU0-SMTP30278138E54E7526966E2187E70@phx.gbl>
	<BLU0-SMTP472512ED1388C9E8DDB39B87E70@phx.gbl>
	<CAF42j23teS7eq9Qj-CqqOTyUC-GKxvy5OLoRwG0Rkcw9VOf52w@mail.gmail.com>
	<BLU0-SMTP32DDDC2FAFD538C33A193287E00@phx.gbl>
	<CAF42j23sooTLrLo_+werPDh25MCrMdxe7GrySi8EG=osOCH_wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BLU0-SMTP89E4EB1F1CB967D93FF4CC87E00@phx.gbl>
	<513CA446.8040005@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP891BCC4E88285CE2DC5B1087E00@phx.gbl>

Sorry if you considered this a waste of bandwidth.  I did not know CRAN had its own mailing list.  The reason I never responded to any mail is that I never received any message in January  (I searched my inbox for it and found nothing).   It probably was stripped out by the sympatico mail server as spam.    

The reason I asked here was that my package seemed to pass all tests on the current version and I was honestly confused as to why it was removed.   In addition, I thought others in a similar situation may benefit.   Years ago people here were quite helpful when I first designed the package (and from the responses many still are).  My question was not meant as an attack on you or your processes, it was honest confusion as to why it was removed.
 
Kevin

On 2013-03-10, at 11:18 AM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote:

> I wonder why you do not ask on CRAN at ...? List members here cannot know the answer. And we typically do not discuss such matters in public.
> 
> I wonder why you do not read the e-mail message you get from the CRAN team?
> 
> Please see the message with subject line "Registering .External entry points" you got on January 20. You never answered nor fixed the package, hence the package has been archived.
> 
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10.03.2013 02:43, Kevin Hendricks wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> 
>> In case this catches anyone else ...
>> 
>> FWIW, I found the issue ...  in my Rinit.c, my package uses the .External call which actually takes one SEXP which points to a "varargs-like" list.
>> 
>> Under 2.15.X and earlier, I thought the proper entry for an .External call was as below since it only does take one pointer as an argument:
>> 
>> #include "Rigroup.h"
>> 
>> /* Automate using sed or something. */
>> #if _MSC_VER >= 1000
>> __declspec(dllexport)
>> #endif
>> 
>>    static const R_ExternalMethodDef R_ExtDef[] = {
>> 	{"igroupFuns", (DL_FUNC)&igroupFuns, 1},
>> 	{NULL, NULL, 0},
>>    };
>> 
>> void R_init_Rigroup(DllInfo *info)
>> {
>>  R_registerRoutines(info,NULL,NULL,NULL,R_ExtDef);
>> }
>> 
>> 
>> But now according to the latest online docs on building your own package it says:
>> 
>> "For routines with a variable number of arguments invoked viathe .External interface, one specifies -1 for the number of arguments which tells R not to check the actual number passed. Note that the number of arguments passed to .External are not currently checked but they will be in R 3.0.0."
>> 
>> So I need to change my Rinit.c to change the "1" to a "-1" and that error should go away.
>> 
>> Thanks again for all your help with this.  I will update my package and resubmit it once version 3.0 gets released and I get a chance to verify that this does in fact fix the problem.
>> 
>> Kevin
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> 
> 



[Rd] question on why Rigroup package moved to Archive on CRAN
Kevin Hendricks