From ggrothendieck at gmail.com  Tue Mar 27 20:36:40 2012
From: ggrothendieck at gmail.com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:36:40 -0400
Subject: [Rd] CRAN policies
In-Reply-To: <4F7204A4.9040803@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
References: <CB975D84.36D85%jeff.a.ryan@gmail.com>
	<4F7204A4.9040803@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
Message-ID: <CAP01uRnxqqOTQQ_0sh8urYX6rYHQFXyTwTwJ1cUveQ-X2bVNyA@mail.gmail.com>

2012/3/27 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>:
>
>
> On 27.03.2012 19:10, Jeffrey Ryan wrote:
>>
>> Is there a distinction as to NOTE vs. WARNING that is documented? ?I've
>> always assumed (wrongly?) that NOTES weren't an issue with publishing on
>> CRAN, but that they may change to WARNINGS at some point.
>
>
> We won't kick packages off CRAN for Notes (but we will if Warnings are not
> fixed), but we may not accept new submissions with significant Notes.

Yes, I understand that but that does not really address the problem
that one has no idea of whether a Note is significant or not so the
only way to determine its significance is to submit your package and
see if its accepted or not.

-- 
Statistics & Software Consulting
GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com



[Rd] CRAN policies
Gabor Grothendieck