From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Mon Aug 19 14:22:34 2002
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 19 Aug 2002 15:22:34 +0200
Subject: svm seg faults (PR#1901)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0208131336280.461-100000@gannet.stats>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0208131336280.461-100000@gannet.stats>
Message-ID: <x2adnjf0f9.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>

ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:

> Which compiler is this?
> 
> I have no problems with svm() on RH7.2 compiling with either gcc 3.1 or
> gcc 2.95.3: Red Hat make a habit of supplying unreleased (and buggy)
> versions of gcc. I think this is particularly critical when C/C++ mixtures
> are used (as in svm).
> 
> PR#1178 is another non-reproducible segfault in svm on Linux.

It *is* reproducible on another stock RH7.3, though. I might try
digging a little deeper when I recover from the NY/Boston meetings. 

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


svm seg faults (PR#1901)
Peter Dalgaard BSA