From edd at debian.org  Thu Sep 11 11:57:58 2003
From: edd at debian.org (Dirk Eddelbuettel)
Date: Thu Sep 11 17:57:28 2003
Subject: [Rd] potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex
In-Reply-To: <16224.14749.151458.714484@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <854qzkjms3.fsf@blindglobe.net> <x2brtsi6b6.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
	<85znhci61s.fsf@blindglobe.net>
	<16224.12382.97450.735140@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
	<x2n0dbwwuo.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
	<16224.14749.151458.714484@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
Message-ID: <20030911155758.GA29838@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:00:13AM +0200, Friedrich.Leisch@ci.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
>   > We'd probably want to take a closer look at what the issue really
>   > is,
> 
> yes, definitely

Yep.

> My system has:
> 
> galadriel:Leisch$ dpkg -l tetex*
> ii  tetex-base     2.0.2-4.1      basic teTeX library files
> ii  tetex-bin      2.0.2-4.2      teTeX binary files
> ii  tetex-doc      2.0.2-4.1      teTeX documentation
> ii  tetex-extra    2.0.2-4.1      extra teTeX library files

Sure, that was public knowledge as we know you run testing. What we need is
some 'meta diff' over tetex, just like Peter suggested.

Tony:  Is there a changelog entry somewhere in tetex which reveals anything?

Dirk

-- 
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
                                                -- Groucho Marx


[Rd] potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex
Dirk Eddelbuettel