From cyc||cgroup-z1 @end|ng |rom y@hoo@com  Mon Sep  2 20:38:35 2019
From: cyc||cgroup-z1 @end|ng |rom y@hoo@com (Cyclic Group Z_1)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 18:38:35 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Rd] Feature request: non-dropping regmatches/strextract
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ5NycHctjtNee0uWFKDyGehzWBC6-WXJbe4QxTkOQZ=k=3Xg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2012653205.221487.1565848601638.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <2012653205.221487.1565848601638@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CALK03d2cCoAboDBmr5dhR9+kjGh5=Eg5QAHmKc-qJYm_iGO5mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <102772513.32513.1567113562904@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CAOQ5NydKtocPcz-3zVfZMo5K0jkbsF+R2iBvzzPO7fiP=+ZHQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1828482902.51488.1567117617120@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CAOQ5NycHctjtNee0uWFKDyGehzWBC6-WXJbe4QxTkOQZ=k=3Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <262664965.1504987.1567449515858@mail.yahoo.com>

I think that's a good reason for not including this in regmatches; you're right, its name is somewhat suggestive of yielding matches. Also, that sounds like a great design for strcapture with an atomic prototype.

Best,
CG



[Rd] Feature request: non-dropping regmatches/strextract
Cyclic Group Z_1