From patrick at burns-stat.com  Fri Dec  9 21:34:56 2005
From: patrick at burns-stat.com (Patrick Burns)
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:34:56 +0000
Subject: [Rd] weights in nls
Message-ID: <4399EA70.5040000@burns-stat.com>

It would probably be more polite to give a warning
in 'nls' that the 'weights' argument is ignored.  Something
like the following should do:

if(missing(weights)) warning("weights are not currently implemented")

 > version
         _                          
platform i386-pc-mingw32            
arch     i386                       
os       mingw32                    
system   i386, mingw32              
status   Under development (unstable)
major    2                          
minor    3.0                        
year     2005                       
month    12                         
day      07                         
svn rev  36656                      
language R                 


Patrick Burns
patrick at burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")



[Rd] weights in nls
Patrick Burns