From maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch  Mon May 11 09:53:55 2015
From: maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch (Martin Maechler)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:53:55 +0200
Subject: [Rd] Wrongly checked MD5 checksums in R 3.2.0's windows binary
In-Reply-To: <CANdJ3dU=D8qriq2wO7tZb+UYWi3oiLxmC+TdV1yLQBJAOdf5Tg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANdJ3dU=D8qriq2wO7tZb+UYWi3oiLxmC+TdV1yLQBJAOdf5Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <21840.24595.738590.906123@stat.math.ethz.ch>

>>>>> Tal Galili <tal.galili at gmail.com>
>>>>>     on Sun, 10 May 2015 23:13:09 +0300 writes:

    > Dear R-devel members, Several R user recently reported
    > <https://github.com/talgalili/installr/issues/30> (while
    > using the installr
    > <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/installr>package)
    > that when running MD5 checksums on a recent R installation
    > (R 3.2.0), they get that the files ?bin/R.exe?,
    > ?bin/Rscript.exe? have the wrong MD5 checksums on Windows.

    > I intend to remove the test for these files in the next
    > version of installr, but I thought this might interest
    > people to know.

Well, one could argue that this is a bug in your package.

Here is what I do on our CRAN mirror, inside the
  bin/windows/base  directory :

$ md5sum R-3.2.0-win.exe
c3f8654826ce772d0105373b85804b0d  R-3.2.0-win.exe
$ cat md5sum.txt
c3f8654826ce772d0105373b85804b0d *R-3.2.0-win.exe

and so I conclude that the MD5 sum is correct.
In case of doubt, I rather trust a human than an algorithm, but
it seems that I'm slowly becoming part of a minority .. ;-( ;-)

So the bug might be that your package code gets upset by the "*"
before the R  ?
.... and that may also be the glitch on the CRAN maintainer side..


    > With regards, Tal

    > 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I know that you know better, Tal ;-)

Best regards,
Martin



[Rd] Wrongly checked MD5 checksums in R 3.2.0's windows binary
Martin Maechler