From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Thu Dec 20 00:24:47 2001
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 20 Dec 2001 01:24:47 +0100
Subject: [Rd] dots and ldots in R 1.4.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112200113580.429-100000@kleigh.nl>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112200113580.429-100000@kleigh.nl>
Message-ID: <x2u1umg2ls.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>

Peter Kleiweg <kleiweg@let.rug.nl> writes:

> > > Am I doing something wrong?
> >
> > Not really, the checks got stricter. You just need to supply a
> > line describing what the "..." arguments are for.
> 
> That is what I did, in \arguments, using \item{\ldots}{}.

Sorry, misunderstood.

It wants \dots. \ldots are for the triple-dots in running text that
get set in the text font.


-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] dots and ldots in R 1.4.0
Peter Dalgaard BSA