From Soren.Hojsgaard at agrsci.dk  Thu Oct 12 22:44:18 2006
From: Soren.Hojsgaard at agrsci.dk (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_H=F8jsgaard?=)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:44:18 +0200
Subject: [Rd] Should NA's in summary() output always be reported???
Message-ID: <C83C5E3DEEE97E498B74729A33F6EAEC0387846F@DJFPOST01.djf.agrsci.dk>

Consider
> summary(1:5)
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max. 
      1         2         3          3          4        5 
> summary(c(1:5,NA))
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.    NA's 
      1         2         3          3          4         5       1 

Wouldn't it be more stringent if "NA's" was also reported in the first case??
Regards
S?ren




[Rd] Should NA's in summary() output always be reported???
=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_H=F8jsgaard?=