From edd@debian.org  Sat Jan 26 17:17:50 2002
From: edd@debian.org (Dirk Eddelbuettel)
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 11:17:50 -0600
Subject: [Rd] R-1.4.1 scheduled for Jan 30
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0201241529450.5827-100000@auk.stats>
References: <20020124144829.GA3676@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
 <Pine.GSO.4.31.0201241529450.5827-100000@auk.stats>
Message-ID: <15442.58558.687176.829313@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>


  "Brian" == Brian D Ripley <Prof> writes:
  Brian> I really don't know how much independent evidence Debian's different
  Brian> architectures provides, but my guess is that no else will be able to
  Brian> check a 64-bit Linux.

As an interim result, R-patched-2002-01-24 compiled fine on the i386, hppa,
ia64, powerpc. sparc, arm. It failed (just as previously) on mipsel (see
below). The m68k box was out of diskspace and postponed, others haven't tried
yet.

Full logs at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=r-base

The mipsel failure is in:

running code in `arith-true.R' ... OK
comparing `arith-true.Rout' to `./arith-true.Rout.save' ...161c161
< [1] FALSE
---
> [1] TRUE
190,193d189
< 
< n= 1006 : quantile(rErr, c(.95,1)) = 0.002086 0.0495 
< 
< n= 1039 : quantile(rErr, c(.95,1)) = 7.645e-14 3.195e-07 
198c194
< [1] FALSE
---
> [1] TRUE
make[4]: *** [arith-true.Rout] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/r-base-1.4.0.cvs20020124/tests'

If anybody here is motivated to look into this in detail, let me know.

Dirk

-- 
Good judgment comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgment. 
							    -- F. Brooks
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] R-1.4.1 scheduled for Jan 30
Dirk Eddelbuettel