From j@ri@ok@@nen @ending from oulu@fi  Thu Sep 20 13:24:09 2018
From: j@ri@ok@@nen @ending from oulu@fi (Jari Oksanen)
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:24:09 +0300
Subject: [Rd] future time stamps warning
In-Reply-To: <CABtg=Kk44-iM00JHTjD8ByUuj=VTQRnHe-+hG8OFCbBd5UBcSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHm4+KDgui7QFaLNDCGZm7K9q3a3xCAC19rWjfPGZ3EEeON-sA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ee162471-a18f-e01b-7abc-1e5f8b770d4e@gmail.com>
 <CAHm4+KCEhp++HcNGpZkMK7DGed8rNe4H+1NbRv_2A4B3i1Ji5g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABtg=Kk44-iM00JHTjD8ByUuj=VTQRnHe-+hG8OFCbBd5UBcSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <88a4cd4b-ff42-cd46-971b-c442a2af75e1@oulu.fi>

Could this be a timezone issue (setting the timezone in local computer 
and communicating this to CRAN): when I look at the email in my computer 
I see:

> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:46 AM Leo Lahti <leo.lahti at iki.fi> wrote:
>> -rwxr-xr-x lei/lei        1447 2018-09-20 13:23 eurostat/DESCRIPTION

Which seems to claim that eurostats/DESCRIPTION was nearly three hours 
younger than the email. This clearly was in the future back then.

If so, waiting a couple of hours before submission could help, and there 
should be an optimal solution, too (i.e., CRAN and you communicate the 
timezone or both use the same like UTC).

Cheers, Jari Oksanen



[Rd] future time stamps warning
Jari Oksanen