From ||or@@|@un@@gerber @end|ng |rom gm@||@com  Thu May  2 21:35:41 2019
From: ||or@@|@un@@gerber @end|ng |rom gm@||@com (Florian Gerber)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 13:35:41 -0600
Subject: [Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working
 with parent environments
Message-ID: <45fd1e7c-fffa-11b1-3a62-08d086fcbd78@gmail.com>

Dear all,

when using optim() for a function that uses the parent environment, I
see the following unexpected behavior:

makeFn <- function(){
??? xx <- ret <- NA
??? fn <- function(x){
?????? if(!is.na(xx) && x==xx){
?????????? cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (memory)", fill=TRUE, sep="")
?????????? return(ret)
?????? }
?????? xx <<- x; ret <<- sum(x^2)
?????? cat("x=", xx, ", ret=", ret, " (calculate)", fill=TRUE, sep="")
?????? ret
??? }
??? fn
}
fn <- makeFn()
optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="L-BFGS-B")
# x=10, ret=100 (calculate)
# x=10.001, ret=100.02 (calculate)
# x=9.999, ret=100.02 (memory)
# $par
# [1] 10
#
# $value
# [1] 100
# (...)

I would expect that optim() does more than 3 function evaluations and
that the optimization converges to 0.

Same problem with optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="BFGS").

Any ideas?

See also my related post:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53826521/r-optim-unexpected-behavior-when-working-with-parent-environments
???
platform?????? x86_64-pc-linux-gnu????????
arch?????????? x86_64?????????????????????
os???????????? linux-gnu??????????????????
system???????? x86_64, linux-gnu??????????
status????????????????????????????????????
major????????? 3??????????????????????????
minor????????? 6.0????????????????????????
year?????????? 2019???????????????????????
month????????? 04?????????????????????????
day??????????? 26?????????????????????????
svn rev??????? 76424??????????????????????
language?????? R??????????????????????????
version.string R version 3.6.0 (2019-04-26)
nickname?????? Planting of a Tree?????????

Best,
Florian



[Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments
Florian Gerber