From pdalgd at gmail.com  Mon Aug  5 17:37:30 2013
From: pdalgd at gmail.com (peter dalgaard)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 17:37:30 +0200
Subject: [Rd] proposal for new FAQ entry?
In-Reply-To: <CANVKczPySuX=U7kvRrnTyQadXmeq8gZzXutzxXZNV28cRgjCTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABghstQXootK=zEH=QcSNur1JzAYF1dY_+AxBWvBSWp3gBZbXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<c0d0ad20487142e7a6b39183218c2a0a@EX-1-HT0.lancs.local>
	<CANVKczPySuX=U7kvRrnTyQadXmeq8gZzXutzxXZNV28cRgjCTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <A96CB45A-8D10-4E98-BA55-0304F1D24C8E@gmail.com>


On Aug 5, 2013, at 16:11 , Barry Rowlingson wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:53 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Does this seem FAQ-worthy? Should I e-mail the FAQ maintainer and suggest
>>> it?
>> 
>> Sure, as long as we never change the numbering of FAQ 7.31...
>> 
> 
> Not even to FAQ 7.31+1e-15 ?
> 

Why would R think those numbers are equal?

(Yes, Virginia, there _is_ an answer!)

-pd



> Barry

-- 
Peter Dalgaard, Professor
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk  Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com



[Rd] proposal for new FAQ entry?
peter dalgaard