From rrburns at cox.net  Mon Nov 15 03:44:27 2010
From: rrburns at cox.net (Ron Burns)
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:44:27 -0800
Subject: [Rd] LAPACK libraries improperly linked
In-Reply-To: <201011141712.13680.cubranic@stat.ubc.ca>
References: <4CE024E4.6080904@cox.net>
	<201011141712.13680.cubranic@stat.ubc.ca>
Message-ID: <4CE09E8B.2060001@cox.net>

Thank you for your help. With help from Dirk Eddelbuettel we found that 
I needed to explicitly install libatlas-base-dev.  After doing this 
everything worked with no further fuss.

Best Regards,
	Ron

On 11/14/2010 05:12 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> On November 14, 2010 10:05:24 am Ron Burns wrote:
>> [ 41 ]<wow>  (ron) ls /usr/lib/libatlas*
>> /usr/lib/libatlas.so.3gf@
>> [ 42 ]<wow>  (ron) ls /usr/lib/libf77blas*
>> /usr/lib/libf77blas.so.3gf@
>>
>> -------- so these are there and linked OK and there is no Rlapack.
>
> These are soft links. Could you do an 'ls -l' and see what they are
> linked to? And if it's another link in /etc/alternatives, could you
> check its target, too? My guess is that the indirection in
> /etc/alternatives somehow went awry.
>
> Davor
>


-- 
R. R. Burns
Physicist (Retired)
Oceanside, CA



[Rd] LAPACK libraries improperly linked
Ron Burns