From Bernhard_Pfaff at fra.invesco.com  Fri Apr 27 14:42:38 2007
From: Bernhard_Pfaff at fra.invesco.com (Pfaff, Bernhard Dr.)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:42:38 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Problem with formatted xtable in R 2.5.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704271243460.16553@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
References: <E4A9111DA23BA048B9A46686BF727CF4010BCA29@DEFRAXMB01.corp.amvescap.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0704271243460.16553@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <E4A9111DA23BA048B9A46686BF727CF4010BCA77@DEFRAXMB01.corp.amvescap.net>

>I get the same behaviour in 2.4.1 with xtable 1.4-3.  Have you 
>perhaps updated 'xtable' as well as R and are blaming R for an 
>'xtable' 
>change?  As ?print.xtable says
>
>      From version 1.4-3, all non-numeric columns are 
>sanitized, and all
>      LaTeX special characters are sanitised for LaTeX output. See the
>      vignette for an example of customising the sanitization.
>

Dear Prof. Ripley,

many thanks for your swift reply and - as usual - you are dead right
about your conclusion: 
I was not aware of sanitization introduced in 1.4-3 and prior to 2.5.0 I
used an older version of xtable with 2.4.1, although it was not my
intention to blame anybody, except myself now for not having done my
homework properly - flush.

Best,
Bernhard 


>[...]
>
>-- 
>Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
>Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
>University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
>1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
>Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595
>
*****************************************************************
Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this mess...{{dropped}}



[Rd] Problem with formatted xtable in R 2.5.0
Pfaff, Bernhard Dr.