From h.wickham at gmail.com  Mon Mar 10 00:51:30 2008
From: h.wickham at gmail.com (hadley wickham)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:51:30 -0500
Subject: [Rd] [patch] add=TRUE in plot.default()
In-Reply-To: <971536df0803091547m526c144s47647f10f725def4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20080309031119.GC23544@econ.upenn.edu>
	<47D40C41.1000202@stats.uwo.ca>
	<20080309164639.GF23544@econ.upenn.edu> <47D442B8.10501@stats.uwo.ca>
	<20080309215833.GH23544@econ.upenn.edu>
	<f8e6ff050803091527j1e09dbe6qf298ef9e131e27ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<971536df0803091547m526c144s47647f10f725def4@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f8e6ff050803091651q19aea05bg36126f7a562fef88@mail.gmail.com>

>  > But what about when the new data is outside the range of the current
>  > plot?
>
>  plot/lines/points already works that way so this is just an interface issue.

That may be the way it is, but I don't see how you could argue that
it's desirable behaviour.

Hadley


-- 
http://had.co.nz/



[Rd] [patch] add=TRUE in plot.default()
hadley wickham