From p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk  Wed Jun 15 11:14:28 2005
From: p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard)
Date: 15 Jun 2005 11:14:28 +0200
Subject: [Rd] R 2.1.1 slated for June 20
In-Reply-To: <1118787388.3968.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <x264wmbe6m.fsf@turmalin.kubism.ku.dk>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0506101407430.4262@gannet.stats>
	<1118773739.3126.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0506142109440.5934@gannet.stats>
	<1118781268.3126.44.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<x28y1ca985.fsf@turmalin.kubism.ku.dk>
	<1118787388.3968.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <x2y89c7zij.fsf@turmalin.kubism.ku.dk>

Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz at mn.rr.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 00:01 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> > Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz at mn.rr.com> writes:
> > 
> > > Prof. Ripley,
> > > 
> > > If my read of the config.log is correct, it would appear that g77 was
> > > used and not gfortran (which is installed):
> > > 
> > > ...
> > >   C compiler:                gcc  -g -O2
> > >   C++ compiler:              g++  -g -O2
> > >   Fortran compiler:          g77  -g -O2
> > > ...
> > 
> > Mine was
> > 
> > 
> >   C compiler:                gcc  -g -O2
> >   C++ compiler:              g++  -g -O2
> >   Fortran compiler:          f95  -g -O2
> > 
> > (and f95 is a link to gfortran)
> 
> 
> Interesting. Did you do anything different on the ./configure line?
> 
> $ ls -l  /usr/bin/f95
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 8 Jun 13 21:18 /usr/bin/f95 -> gfortran
> 
> I just tried it again (having installed some FC updates) and I still get
> g77...

I just didn't install g77... (it's listed under "back-compatibility
tools" or something like that).

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark          Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk)                  FAX: (+45) 35327907



[Rd] R 2.1.1 slated for June 20
Peter Dalgaard