From ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de  Thu May 17 16:32:34 2012
From: ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de (Uwe Ligges)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:32:34 +0200
Subject: [Rd] test suites for packages
In-Reply-To: <CAMi=pg6MRN9BxGQz4C=t6x=s1nGKGp_nLRyRwe6zSmKfs1_whA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMi=pg6MRN9BxGQz4C=t6x=s1nGKGp_nLRyRwe6zSmKfs1_whA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FB50C02.5050803@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>



On 17.05.2012 16:10, Whit Armstrong wrote:
> Can anyone share some opinions on test suites for R packages?
>
> I'm looking at testthat and RUnit. Does anyone have strong opinions on
> either of those.
>
> Any additional packages I should consider?

Yes: R CMD check does the trick. See Writing R Extension and read about 
a package's test directory. I prefer frameworks that do not obfuscate 
failing test results on the CRAN check farm (as most other frameworks I 
have seen).

Best,
Uwe Ligges




>
> Thanks,
> Whit
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



[Rd] test suites for packages
Uwe Ligges