From m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch  Fri Mar 29 09:29:03 2019
From: m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch (Martin Maechler)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:29:03 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Bug in the "reformulate" function in stats package
In-Reply-To: <9409b485-7a3b-0f2c-201e-7ef2bde1de86@ist.ac.at>
References: <ac491662-1aad-3775-1936-9e2694da50e6@ist.ac.at>
 <9409b485-7a3b-0f2c-201e-7ef2bde1de86@ist.ac.at>
Message-ID: <23709.55119.213555.244342@stat.math.ethz.ch>

>>>>> Saren Tasciyan 
>>>>>     on Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:02:10 +0100 writes:

    > Hi,
    > I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I 
    > was wondering, where I can submit it?

    > Best,
    > Saren


Well, you could have given a small reproducible example
depicting the bug, notably when posting here: 
Just a prose text with no R code or other technical content is
almost always not really appropriate fo the R-devel mailing list.

Further, in such a case you should google a bit and hopefully
have found
		https://www.r-project.org/bugs.html

which also mention reproducibility (and many more useful things).

Then it also tells you about R's bug repository, also called
"R's bugzilla" at https://bugs.r-project.org/

and if you are diligent (but here, I'd say bugzilla is
(configured?) far from ideal), you'd also find bug PR#17359

   https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17359

which was reported already on Nov 2017 .. and only fixed
yesterday (in the "cleanup old bugs" process that happens
often before the big new spring release of R).

So is your bug the same as that one?

Martin

    > -- 
    > Saren Tasciyan
    > /PhD Student / Sixt Group/
    > Institute of Science and Technology Austria
    > Am Campus 1
    > 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria

    > ______________________________________________
    > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
    > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



[Rd] Bug in the "reformulate" function in stats package
Martin Maechler