From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Tue Aug 20 22:41:32 2002
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 20 Aug 2002 23:41:32 +0200
Subject: PR#1914
In-Reply-To: <x2wuql1y8j.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
References: <200208192221.AAA21461@pubhealth.ku.dk>
 <x2wuql1y8j.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <x2znvhcinn.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>

Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk> writes:

> RML27@cornell.edu writes:
> 
> > (2) I see no request in either the RWinFAQ or the RFAQ for a post-mortem
> > dump. I also see no link in the R-Bugs page to the either of these FAQs,
> > nor a list of bugs that should not be reported. If you wish users to
> > follow a specific protocol for reporting bugs (and the RFaq section 9
> > does not request port-mortem dumps, or list bugs nots to report),
> > specifying this protocol on the R-Bugs page will expedite matters.
> 
> I think that was a typo: Brian meant "..shows you how to..", not
> "..have to..". We wouldn't require that in general. However, I can't
> find any description in there of how to use dr.Watson et al. either. (??)

It's "Dr.Mingw" and it's in sec.7.4 (thanks and sorry, Brian). It's
not for the faint-hearted, but it is about the only way to really get
to the bottom of this sort of problem.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


PR#1914
Peter Dalgaard BSA