From ggrothendieck at gmail.com  Fri Aug 26 23:25:24 2005
From: ggrothendieck at gmail.com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:25:24 -0400
Subject: [Rd] RFC: "loop connections"
In-Reply-To: <denvc0$eag$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <dedndn$daj$1@sea.gmane.org> <denvc0$eag$1@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <971536df05082614254465b8c6@mail.gmail.com>

OK.  I guess you want one of the core people to respond but in the
interim can you explain the terminology "loop"?   
Also, do you have any prototypical applications in mind?

On 8/26/05, dhinds at sonic.net <dhinds at sonic.net> wrote:
> I accidentally left one small change out of my previous patch.
> 
> So... no response to my request for comments.  Does that mean no one
> has an opinion about whether this is a good idea or not?  I'd
> appreciate a response from an R core member one way or the other; if
> this is not the right way to get a response, should I email people
> instead?
> 
> -- David Hinds
> 
> 
> --- src/include/Internal.h.orig 2005-05-20 05:51:37.000000000 -0700
> +++ src/include/Internal.h      2005-08-22 15:46:48.968190600 -0700
> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@
>  SEXP do_pushback(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
>  SEXP do_pushbacklength(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
>  SEXP do_clearpushback(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
> -SEXP do_textconnection(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
> +SEXP do_loopconnection(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
>  SEXP do_getallconnections(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
>  SEXP do_sumconnection(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
>  SEXP do_download(SEXP, SEXP, SEXP, SEXP);
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] RFC: "loop connections"
Gabor Grothendieck