From khansen at stat.Berkeley.EDU  Wed Nov  8 04:24:14 2006
From: khansen at stat.Berkeley.EDU (Kasper Daniel Hansen)
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:24:14 -0800
Subject: [Rd] Chi-squared test (PR#9350)
In-Reply-To: <20061108014133.89AAE3F006@slim.kubism.ku.dk>
References: <20061108014133.89AAE3F006@slim.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <906937A7-85B7-4ABB-BF31-C0387D04B833@stat.berkeley.edu>

(not cc'ed to R-bugs)

If this is not a bug why do you abuse the bug report system to ask a  
simple question? Now a member of R-core has to use valuable time to  
handle this bug report, time that could be far more profitable spent  
making improvements to R (or spend it otherwise). This is incredible  
selfish behavior.

Kasper

On Nov 7, 2006, at 5:41 PM, sarkar at mail.utexas.edu wrote:

> Full_Name: Sahotra Sarkar
> Version: 2.2.0
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (128.83.34.44)
>
>
> This is not a bug: I'm just wondering why chisq.test does not allow  
> the
> specification of the degree of freedom (df).
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



[Rd] Chi-squared test (PR#9350)
Kasper Daniel Hansen