From Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch>  Tue Sep 14 10:12:11 1999
From: Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> (Martin Maechler)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 11:12:11 +0200
Subject: cin et al
In-Reply-To: <199909140850.KAA14277@fangorn.ci.tuwien.ac.at> (message from
 Kurt Hornik on Tue, 14 Sep 1999 10:50:50 +0200)
References: <199909140850.KAA14277@fangorn.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
Message-ID: <199909140912.LAA09141@sophie.ethz.ch>

In a more private mail,
>>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

    KH> Currently,
    KH>		opar <- par()
    KH>		par(opar)
    KH> gives

    KH> Warning messages: 
    KH> 1: parameter "cin" can't be set in: par(args) 
    KH> 2: parameter "cra" can't be set in: par(args) 
    KH> 3: parameter "csi" can't be set in: par(args) 
    KH> 4: parameter "din" can't be set in: par(args) 

That's why we have

      opar <- par(no.readonly = TRUE)
      par(opar)

Only last weekend, when trying to polish "p.sunflowers(),
I read a (latex) printout of ?par

and found several things that I want to add/improve.
The above example is one of them.

Martin
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


cin et al
Martin Maechler