From m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch  Fri Feb 22 12:15:57 2019
From: m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch (Martin Maechler)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:15:57 +0100
Subject: [Rd] Proposed patch for ?Extract
In-Reply-To: <6BDB33C2-D787-4C6A-8308-E5249AFABFCE@me.com>
References: <6BDB33C2-D787-4C6A-8308-E5249AFABFCE@me.com>
Message-ID: <23663.55789.466736.909116@stat.math.ethz.ch>

>>>>> Marc Schwartz via R-devel 
>>>>>     on Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:39:45 +0100 writes:

 >   Hi,

> In follow up to the thread on R-Help yesterday:
>    https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2019-February/461725.html

> I am attaching a proposed patch against the trunk version of
> Extract.Rd, with wording added to the "Matrices and arrays" section, to
> note that indexing these object by factors behaves in a manner
> consistent with vectors.
> Regards,
> Marc Schwartz

Seems reasonable to me: some redundancy is allowed even in the
reference manuals (:= union of all help pages).
{good useRs knowning that 'matrix' and 'arrays' are atomic
 vectors, too .. as was mentioned.}

Martin



[Rd] Proposed patch for ?Extract
Martin Maechler