From deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com  Thu Jan  5 19:21:50 2006
From: deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com (Deepayan Sarkar)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:21:50 -0600
Subject: [Rd] extending lattice to S4 classes
In-Reply-To: <43575CA0.9060807@ipimar.pt>
References: <434F88B9.1020600@ipimar.pt> <434FD8C2.205@ipimar.pt>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0510150758480.27345@gannet.stats>
	<4354D388.9000209@ipimar.pt>
	<eb555e660510191045s5de87a89p714e5fa8929a053b@mail.gmail.com>
	<43575CA0.9060807@ipimar.pt>
Message-ID: <eb555e660601051021w30ea1754ge3b9763af7c570f4@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/20/05, ernesto <ernesto at ipimar.pt> wrote:

[...]

> Hi Deepayan,
>
> I see that there are alternatives, I found one my self that works and
> it's transparent for the user.
>
> I don't want to implement solutions that force the user to use lattice
> methods differently from your implementation.
>
> The cleanest solution as you say is to add a data argument to xyplot but
> I can't do it so I would not propose it.

FYI, I have added the 'data' argument to high level generics in
lattice_0.13-1, available for r-devel (of course this causes the
current version of FLCore to fail).

Deepayan
--
http://www.stat.wisc.edu/~deepayan/



[Rd] extending lattice to S4 classes
Deepayan Sarkar