From edd at debian.org  Wed Feb 27 17:08:49 2013
From: edd at debian.org (Dirk Eddelbuettel)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:08:49 -0600
Subject: [Rd] Keeping up to date with R-devel
In-Reply-To: <CAHavPHG75CH=-qiPVUp9t964RtGCrgv71aVf5C1133yvzVzRTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHavPHF06qCEqiYqvCLOEfY_Zu9d8AWkyT7jKd0RnU=NmYeqqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20782.7046.512347.600130@max.nulle.part>
	<CAHavPHG75CH=-qiPVUp9t964RtGCrgv71aVf5C1133yvzVzRTg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20782.12177.599278.108515@max.nulle.part>


On 27 February 2013 at 17:16, Renaud wrote:
| Hi,
| 
| thanks for the responses.
| Dirk I found the script you posted once. Can anyone send me a link to the?
| "beaten to death post"?

Those were Simon's words, not mine, but I think he referred to the long-ish
and painful thread here:

   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.devel/32779

Feel free to ignore the title, and most assertions by the OP which were never
replicated by anybody else.  

The "do not build in src" mantra was repeated a few times, and as I recall
also refuted once (not by me).  That is not a topic I care much about; I use
a shortcut, am aware of its (theoretical?) limits but for the casual R CMD
check use I get out of R-devel never had an issue.
 
| I am fine with these approaches and kind of already follow them.
| I imagine that after an R-devel update you have to re-install all the contrib
| packages that need to compile library objects, right?

At the R 3.0.0 juncture I had to as the ABI broke (due to the many changes),
otherwise no.  I only keep a handful of packages in the seperately managed
directory for r-devel.

Dirk 

-- 
Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com  



[Rd] Keeping up to date with R-devel
Dirk Eddelbuettel