From Friedrich.Leisch at ci.tuwien.ac.at  Fri Sep 12 10:59:08 2003
From: Friedrich.Leisch at ci.tuwien.ac.at (Friedrich.Leisch@ci.tuwien.ac.at)
Date: Fri Sep 12 09:58:41 2003
Subject: [Rd] potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex
In-Reply-To: <85u17j70ui.fsf@blindglobe.net>
References: <854qzkjms3.fsf@blindglobe.net> <x2brtsi6b6.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
	<85znhci61s.fsf@blindglobe.net>
	<16224.12382.97450.735140@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
	<x2n0dbwwuo.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
	<16224.14749.151458.714484@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
	<20030911155758.GA29838@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
	<85u17j70ui.fsf@blindglobe.net>
Message-ID: <16225.31948.183341.695198@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>

>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:21:09 -0700,
>>>>> A J Rossini (AJR) wrote:


  > Fritz, where is "Blue" and "Red" defined in your distribution?

Hard to say ... seems like graphics/dvipsnam.def contains a couple of
name definitions, all starting with uppercase
letters. graphics/color.sty contains lowercase definitions for the
primary colors, though. So maybe we should simply try

	Red -> red
	Blue -> blue

and see whether that survives the upcoming testing cycle?

.f


[Rd] potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex
Friedrich.Leisch@ci.tuwien.ac.at