From h.wickham at gmail.com  Mon Oct  6 15:02:17 2008
From: h.wickham at gmail.com (hadley wickham)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:02:17 -0500
Subject: [Rd] why is \alias{anRpackage} not mandatory?
In-Reply-To: <48E9FF28.6060207@tu-dresden.de>
References: <48E9DE58.6070303@tu-dresden.de> <48E9E9E3.90905@stats.uwo.ca>
	<48E9FF28.6060207@tu-dresden.de>
Message-ID: <f8e6ff050810060602i29b68595u2e5cf7064475d11@mail.gmail.com>

> You are right, .Rd has its limitations, but as you say, there is nothing
> better available in the moment. (BTW: I heard rumours at useR! about
> discussions on a meta documentation format? Is there any public information
> about this??)

What do you mean by meta documentation format?  Do you mean roxygen -
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/roxygen ?

Hadley

-- 
http://had.co.nz/



[Rd] why is \alias{anRpackage} not mandatory?
hadley wickham