From groemping at bht-berlin.de  Wed Mar 27 22:13:40 2013
From: groemping at bht-berlin.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Ulrike_Gr=C3=B6mping?=)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] sysdata.rda vs. rda files in data directory
In-Reply-To: <514DE296.2040605@beuth-hochschule.de>
References: <514DE296.2040605@beuth-hochschule.de>
Message-ID: <1364418820352-4662661.post@n4.nabble.com>

Dear all, 

for everybody's benefit, here is a brief summary of what I learnt from Uwe
Ligges. There is a convincing reason against combining a data directory with
a datalist file only (the way for retrieving a list of the data available
without the package loaded) with a sysdata.rda file in the R directory (the
only way for achieving a small installed size): the command data(filename)
will not work on the names listed in the datalist file (I thought
otherwise), which would be sort of odd and unexpected. Therefore, I will go
for the small installed size (=sysdata.rda file) without a data directory.

Best, Ulrike



--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/sysdata-rda-vs-rda-files-in-data-directory-tp4662302p4662661.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



[Rd] sysdata.rda vs. rda files in data directory
=?UTF-8?Q?Ulrike_Gr=C3=B6mping?=