From fparlamis at mac.com  Thu Sep 21 23:29:38 2006
From: fparlamis at mac.com (Parlamis Franklin)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:29:38 -1000
Subject: [Rd] validity testing as part of '@<-'
Message-ID: <D30BD4FE-2F4A-4C43-BF75-A96E64121CF4@mac.com>

'methods' package feature request / discussion starter:

perhaps a call to 'validObject' should occur at part of any slot  
replacement operation (and the operation not be carried out if it  
would invalidate the object)?  this may prevent the need for  
prophylactic 'validObject' calls in other user-defined functions.  in  
the example below, the slot assignment occurs even though it  
invalidates the object.  the 'show' method then fails somewhat deep  
in a subsequently-called coercion method.

library(Matrix)
test <- Matrix(1:4+0.1, nrow = 2, dimnames = list(letters[1:2],  
LETTERS[1:2]))
test at Dimnames <- list(1:100)
test

direct slot access (without a validity check) seems an easily  
accessible loophole to S4 object "guarantees".

franklin parlamis




[Rd] validity testing as part of '@<-'
Parlamis Franklin