From ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de  Sat Sep 18 16:53:38 2004
From: ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de (Uwe Ligges)
Date: Sat Sep 18 16:54:08 2004
Subject: [Rd] Covergence FLAG in glm (PR#7235)
In-Reply-To: <20040918021040.A130B1160D@slim.kubism.ku.dk>
References: <20040918021040.A130B1160D@slim.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <414C4BF2.5090604@statistik.uni-dortmund.de>

daniel.jeske@ucr.edu wrote:

> Full_Name: Daniel R Jeske
> Version: 1.8.1
> OS: Windows 2000
> Submission from: (NULL) (138.23.228.79)
> 
> 
> We have just noticed that when you use glm() it seems the logical
> output 'converged' is always TRUE.  The same data set that shows
> FALSE in version 1.7.1 shows TRUE in 1.8.1.  And I know that FALSE
> is the correct answer...so it seems like we cannot trust the 'converged'
> flag for glm() in version 1.8.1 ?????

Please try again with a recent alpha version of R-2.0.0 (R-1.8.1 is 
quite outdated).
If it still happens, please specify a reproducible example and explain 
why converged=FALSE is expected.

Uwe Ligges


> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] Covergence FLAG in glm (PR#7235)
Uwe Ligges