From rossini at blindglobe.net  Thu Sep 11 10:21:09 2003
From: rossini at blindglobe.net (A.J. Rossini)
Date: Thu Sep 11 18:20:38 2003
Subject: [Rd] potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex
In-Reply-To: <20030911155758.GA29838@sonny.eddelbuettel.com> (Dirk
	Eddelbuettel's message of "Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:57:58 -0500")
References: <854qzkjms3.fsf@blindglobe.net> <x2brtsi6b6.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
	<85znhci61s.fsf@blindglobe.net>
	<16224.12382.97450.735140@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
	<x2n0dbwwuo.fsf@biostat.ku.dk>
	<16224.14749.151458.714484@galadriel.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
	<20030911155758.GA29838@sonny.eddelbuettel.com>
Message-ID: <85u17j70ui.fsf@blindglobe.net>

Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:00:13AM +0200, Friedrich.Leisch@ci.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
>>   > We'd probably want to take a closer look at what the issue really
>>   > is,
>> 
>> yes, definitely
>
> Yep.
>
>> My system has:
>> 
>> galadriel:Leisch$ dpkg -l tetex*
>> ii  tetex-base     2.0.2-4.1      basic teTeX library files
>> ii  tetex-bin      2.0.2-4.2      teTeX binary files
>> ii  tetex-doc      2.0.2-4.1      teTeX documentation
>> ii  tetex-extra    2.0.2-4.1      extra teTeX library files
>
> Sure, that was public knowledge as we know you run testing. What we need is
> some 'meta diff' over tetex, just like Peter suggested.

501$ dpkg -l tetex*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
un  tetex          <none>         (no description available)
ii  tetex-base     2.0.2-4.2      Basic library files of teTeX
ii  tetex-bin      2.0.2-4.3      The teTeX binary files
pn  tetex-brev     <none>         (no description available)
un  tetex-dev      <none>         (no description available)
pn  tetex-doc      <none>         (no description available)
pn  tetex-eurosym  <none>         (no description available)
ii  tetex-extra    2.0.2-4.2      Additional library files of teTeX
un  tetex-french   <none>         (no description available)
pn  tetex-frogg    <none>         (no description available)
pn  tetex-frogg-do <none>         (no description available)
pn  tetex-lib      <none>         (no description available)
un  tetex-nonfree  <none>         (no description available)
pn  tetex-src      <none>         (no description available)


> Tony:  Is there a changelog entry somewhere in tetex which reveals anything?

Looking over the Debian changelogs reveals nothing -- just maintainer
stuff.  

Fritz, where is "Blue" and "Red" defined in your distribution?

best,
-tony

-- 
A.J. Rossini     			
rossini@u.washington.edu            http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ 
Biomedical and Health Informatics   University of Washington
Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN          Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
UW   :              FAX=206-543-3461 | moving soon to a permanent office
FHCRC: 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachme...{{dropped}}


[Rd] potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex
A.J. Rossini