From dmurdoch at pair.com  Tue Jul 13 03:09:06 2004
From: dmurdoch at pair.com (Duncan Murdoch)
Date: Tue Jul 13 03:09:16 2004
Subject: [Rd] Re: tail(<matrix>) column numbers
In-Reply-To: <40F2E63C.3010509@pburns.seanet.com>
References: <D7A3CFD7825BD6119B880002A58F06C20C521708@groexmb02.pfizer.com>
	<40F2E63C.3010509@pburns.seanet.com>
Message-ID: <9dd6f01tj99mcko0g66ui5hfmqpn0j59fv@4ax.com>

Sounds like most are in favour, so I'll go ahead with this change in
r-devel (to be 2.0.0 in the fall).

Duncan Murdoch

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:27:56 +0100, Patrick Burns
<pburns@pburns.seanet.com> wrote:

>I give it my vote as well.
>
>Pat
>
>
>Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
>
>>I also vote for the 'helpful' addition on row numbers based on the original
>>matrix when no row names are present, with an optional argument to prevent
>>this behaviour.

 ....


[Rd] Re: tail(<matrix>) column numbers
Duncan Murdoch