From h.wickham at gmail.com  Fri Feb 24 15:29:25 2006
From: h.wickham at gmail.com (hadley wickham)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:29:25 -0600
Subject: [Rd] Links to non-vignette documentation
In-Reply-To: <43FEF2E3.3070609@stats.uwo.ca>
References: <f8e6ff050602230853l7eb9cfe6n7458e718ce7934b3@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0602232010470.17594@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<f8e6ff050602231237j12689b32i511425b6948766a1@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0602232044190.25797@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<f8e6ff050602231323m7a0779bdrb694f85758df6f3d@mail.gmail.com>
	<43FE3453.6020405@stats.uwo.ca>
	<f8e6ff050602231449l187478f1mcb166915b02c4f3e@mail.gmail.com>
	<43FE66A5.3090103@stats.uwo.ca>
	<f8e6ff050602231902i6b999b8m952a58ff459e6914@mail.gmail.com>
	<43FEF2E3.3070609@stats.uwo.ca>
Message-ID: <f8e6ff050602240629j2f31d4e7g23dd726472010114@mail.gmail.com>

> No, there's no automatic building after the promptPackage call.  It's up
> to you to decide which functions need to be mentioned to users.  In
> large packages it usually doesn't make sense to list all the functions,
> so the package writer needs to use judgement here.  There are other
> mechanisms (e.g. ls("package:XXX") for a list of names, the help index
> generation for a list of names and titles) to get a list of everything.

Ok, that seems reasonable, but perhaps promptPackage (or
documentation) could make this more clear.

> There aren't any immediate plans to change help(package=XXX), but I
> think in the long run, if package?XXX receives wider support than it has
> now, it would make sense to make that change.

When was this form of package documentation created?  How are users
supposed to know it exists?  I couldn't find any pointers to it from
?help, ?library or from help(package=XXX).

Hadley



[Rd] Links to non-vignette documentation
hadley wickham