From h.wickham at gmail.com  Tue Oct  6 04:00:42 2009
From: h.wickham at gmail.com (hadley wickham)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:00:42 -0500
Subject: [Rd] unit testing for R packages?
In-Reply-To: <e1fc21b0910051848m40885052s8cef5959a14a659d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c35a4fc0910051201h23e61e39o55bf1de9809bfe29@mail.gmail.com> 
	<486f230c0910051248xd9d9ab9ie3ac6358184e2989@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4ACA84AE.5050708@sciviews.org>
	<f8e6ff050910051744s2569f535nf56c34e04c9b2c3e@mail.gmail.com> 
	<e1fc21b0910051848m40885052s8cef5959a14a659d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f8e6ff050910051900w778505e9i1decdafdcebe7d13@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Peter Cowan <cowan.pd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, hadley wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Now, as Seth already told, there are several functions in svUnit that
>>> ease interactive use of the tests in an R session. What he did not told
>>> is that RUnit has some nice code coverage functions that svUnit does not
>>> have.
>>
>> What are those? I've skimmed through the documentation and couldn't
>> see anything?
>
> The R wiki has information about both RUnit and svUnit. ?I'm not sure
> that it details all of the differences. ?I have successfully used the
> methodology of the gdata package described there.

Sorry, I should have been more explicit.  I was interested
particularly in the code coverage functions.

Hadley


-- 
http://had.co.nz/



[Rd] unit testing for R packages?
hadley wickham