From Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no  Wed Apr  1 10:20:27 2009
From: Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no (Wacek Kusnierczyk)
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:20:27 +0200
Subject: [Rd] duplicated.data.frame {was "[R] which rows are
	duplicates?"}
In-Reply-To: <18899.3826.723018.652559@lynne.math.ethz.ch>
References: <0F1D79E9-7146-48FB-95E9-3CD95DBD18E8@gmail.com>	<Zen-1LoF5b-0003BD-Rf@smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk>	<49D0BA70.3090005@idi.ntnu.no>	<18898.6300.26434.413865@lynne.math.ethz.ch>	<49D222A0.7020601@idi.ntnu.no>	<18898.15610.610205.300523@lynne.math.ethz.ch>	<49D275FC.9000204@idi.ntnu.no>
	<18899.3826.723018.652559@lynne.math.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <49D323CB.1070005@idi.ntnu.no>

Martin Maechler wrote:
>
>     WK> i attach the patch post for reference.  note that you need to fix all of
>     WK> the functions in duplicated.R that share the buggy code.  (yes, this was
>     WK> another thread;  i submitted a bug report, and then sent a follow-up
>     WK> post with a patch).
>
> Thank you; yes, in the mean time I have also seen your bug
> report and patch.  
> Interestingly (or not), I have myself patched identically to
> what you propose, withOUT even having known about your bug report + patch.
>   

this means, the solution has greater chances to be correct.

> ....
>
> { hmmm, it seems your thinking can be very close to mine, so why
>   can't you like R properly  ;-b }
>   

actually, i think i *do* like r properly.

vQ



[Rd] duplicated.data.frame {was "[R] which rows are duplicates?"}
Wacek Kusnierczyk