From p.dalgaard@kubism.ku.dk  Mon Sep  8 16:37:20 1997
From: p.dalgaard@kubism.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 08 Sep 1997 17:37:20 +0200
Subject: R-alpha: Re: lwd, cex and par(.) issues [was "... windows quirks .."]
In-Reply-To: Ben Bolker's message of Mon, 8 Sep 1997 10:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
References: <Pine.SUN.3.95.970908103318.15321A-100000@paca>
Message-ID: <x27mcr24wf.fsf@bush.kubism.ku.dk>

Ben Bolker <ben@eno.Princeton.EDU> writes:

>   I agree with the gist of the discussion here ("par(lwd)" to change lwd
> globally, otherwise it just affects lines).  One detail worth thinking
> about is that a global linewidth change in PostScript (setlinewidth) will
> also affect the linewidths used, e.g., in drawing plotting characters
> (which could get very ugly as a result).

Hm. After seeing the W95 plots on a 600dpi laser, I tend to say that
the above *is* the desired behaviour. The default plotting circles
were hardly visible at all. A global lwd setting should set the
natural (i.e. neither fat nor barely visible) line width for a plot. 
Another question is whether one should set a *relative* width unit
(like SAS's 'goptions lfactor=...'), so that all lines are made
fatter - or thinner.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


R-alpha: Re: lwd, cex and par(.) issues [was "... windows quirks .."]
Peter Dalgaard BSA