From wo||g@ng@v|echtb@uer @end|ng |rom m@@@tr|chtun|ver@|ty@n|  Mon Jan 11 11:41:03 2021
From: wo||g@ng@v|echtb@uer @end|ng |rom m@@@tr|chtun|ver@|ty@n| (Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP))
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:41:03 +0000
Subject: [Rd] URL checks
In-Reply-To: <24572.8111.414992.898239@stat.math.ethz.ch>
References: <86862a3d-ee6b-4511-7207-e7a655ba3565@mailbox.org>
 <da33c7f9-d3da-d5c5-8307-ebb5d723ef07@mailbox.org>
 <4abf9069-cfef-c933-3fbc-5e2f1b77b919-5849@normalesup.org>
 <a4b67099-b7c1-1c4b-e3f1-61ba1bb1fdd6@prodsyse.com>
 <5fe854d5f3c64941806dbc8f0004fff6-1303@UM-MAIL3214.unimaas.nl>
 <24572.8111.414992.898239@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <4d52fd5a060f4cabbe42cfdce86a07b5@UM-MAIL3214.unimaas.nl>

>>>>>> Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
>>>>>>     on Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:50:14 +0000 writes:
>
>    > Instead of a separate file to store such a list, would it be an idea
>to add versions of the \href{}{} and \url{} markup commands that are skipped
>by the URL checks?
>    > Best,
>    > Wolfgang
>
>I think John Nash and you misunderstood -- or then I
>misunderstood -- the original proposal:
>
>I've been understanding that there should be a  "central repository" of URL
>exceptions that is maintained by volunteers.
>
>And rather *not* that package authors should get ways to skip
>URL checking..
>
>Martin

Hi Martin,

Kirill suggested: "A file inst/URL that lists all URLs where failures are allowed -- possibly with a list of the HTTP codes accepted for that link."

So, if it is a file in inst/, then this sounds to me like this is part of the package and not part of some central repository.

Best,
Wolfgang



[Rd] URL checks
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP