From pgilbert at bank-banque-canada.ca  Mon Sep 25 15:27:09 2006
From: pgilbert at bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Gilbert)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:27:09 -0400
Subject: [Rd] alpha, portable use
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609202202560.21267@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
References: <4511A685.6030509@bank-banque-canada.ca>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0609202202560.21267@gannet.stats.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4517D92D.1000707@bank-banque-canada.ca>

I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta).
Writing R Extensions suggests I need a Makefile or Makevars in my
package,  but that has not been the case previously.  Is there now a
requirement that all packages need Makefiles or Makevars if there is 
fortran to be compiled?  This is only happening on one of my systems. 
Building R and make check work fine on that system, but it seems that 
not all the information gets passed along to package compiles.

(BTW, this is just a warning, but Kurt suggested we try to eliminate 
warnings.)

Paul Gilbert

Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> 
>> When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting
>>
>> * checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING
>> apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)'
>>
>> Is this something I should worry about?  (Possibly I got this before and
>> didn't notice.)
> 
> Yes, please do check Writing R Extensions ....
> 
====================================================================================

La version fran?aise suit le texte anglais.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email may contain privileged and/or confidential inform...{{dropped}}




[Rd] alpha, portable use
Paul Gilbert