From berwin@maths.uwa.edu.au  Wed Aug  2 11:08:11 2000
From: berwin@maths.uwa.edu.au (Berwin Turlach)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:08:11 +0800 (WST)
Subject: [Rd] Installing R-1.1.0 (PR#612)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10007211128590.19846-100000@auk.stats>
References: <14712.8366.469912.970376@bossiaea.maths.uwa.edu.au>
 <Pine.GSO.4.05.10007211128590.19846-100000@auk.stats>
Message-ID: <14727.62219.589371.855349@bossiaea.maths.uwa.edu.au>

Dear Brian,

>>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian D Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:

  >> My system is essentially a RedHat 6.0 with a 2.2.10 kernel.
  >> 
  >> I am using the Pentium GCC (http://www.goof.com/pcg/)
  >> 
  >> bossiaea:/opt/R/R-1.1.0$ which gcc /usr/local.own/bin/gcc
  >> bossiaea:/opt/R/R-1.1.0$ gcc --version pgcc-2.91.60

  BDR> I suspect a bug in that compiler, as you had problems with NAs,
  BDR> and that is the only thing that seems different from known
  BDR> working setups.  My suggestion would be to use gcc-2.95.2,
  BDR> which I compiled from source and works well for us on RH6.0.
  BDR> Or even try the compiler that comes with RH6.0 (egcs-2.91.66, I
  BDR> believe).
I finally got around to download the sources of gcc-2.95.2 and
installing it.  R-1.1.0 (and all packages that I install on my system)
compiled with gcc-2.95.2 now pass `make check'.  So I guess your
suspicion was correct.

Thanks for the help.

Cheers,

        Berwin
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Installing R-1.1.0 (PR#612)
Berwin Turlach