From rossini@u.washington.edu  Thu May 16 04:25:36 2002
From: rossini@u.washington.edu (A.J. Rossini)
Date: 15 May 2002 20:25:36 -0700
Subject: [Rd] (PR#1558)
In-Reply-To: <200205160229.EAA03603@pubhealth.ku.dk>
References: <200205160229.EAA03603@pubhealth.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <87sn4svknj.fsf@jeeves.blindglobe.net>

>>>>> "mark" == Mark Bravington <Mark.Bravington@csiro.au> writes:


    mark> As to "_": I'll be happy to sacrifice the unambiguous "_" provided that the
    mark> ambiguous "<-" goes onto the same pyre ;)

I feel completely opposite.  And I'm not terribly happy about the idea
of using "=", either, having just been bit by the = vs. == classic user
slip up.  

I actually do like "<-", but then again, I'm using ESS...

best,
-tony

-- 
A.J. Rossini				Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
U. of Washington Biostatistics		rossini@u.washington.edu	
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net	rossini@scharp.org
-------------- http://software.biostat.washington.edu/ ----------------
FHCRC: M-W: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
UW:   Th: 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX
(my friday location is usually completely unpredictable.)


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] (PR#1558)
A.J. Rossini