From Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at  Sun Jun  3 21:26:44 2001
From: Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at (Kurt Hornik)
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 22:26:44 +0200
Subject: [Rd] R-1.2.3: a small suggestion (PR#961)
In-Reply-To: <x2zobpnyqm.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
References: <15127.13646.122849.533320@mithrandir.hornik.net>
 <Pine.A41.4.33.0106010809200.138058-100000@homer09.u.washington.edu>
 <15130.29091.737153.366499@mithrandir.hornik.net>
 <x2zobpnyqm.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <15130.40324.608449.438281@mithrandir.hornik.net>

>>>>> Peter Dalgaard BSA writes:

> Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>> Interesting.  I thought this would not be the case.  What you say is
>> that a package may claim it only needs R 1.2.2 but this might not run
>> under R 1.3.0 if compiled under R 1.2.2?

> Hmm... nlme stopped working for me somewhere in the 1.2.2-patched
> series. I'm not altogether sure why, but I might have recompiled R to
> use ATLAS somewhere along the road. Not that there's any reason to try
> and figure out exactly what happened, but it reminded me that things
> like compiler and library setup might also be changed between
> versions.

Good point.  A reconfigured system might very well break things ...

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] R-1.2.3: a small suggestion (PR#961)
Kurt Hornik