From pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca  Wed Mar 29 21:07:21 2000
From: pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Gilbert)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:07:21 -0500
Subject: [Rd] R CMD build
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10003291935170.23270-100000@auk.stats>
Message-ID: <38E26279.BC2A6400@bank-banque-canada.ca>

>Well, are there \alias entries in the Rd files?
No. I guess that would be it. Should I have an empty \alias entry if the
object does not have an alias, or should should I just live with the
warnings?

>The convention is to put a \alias for the method in the help file for
the generic.
Ok, but I guess this won't work if the generic is the base and my method
is in my library?

>If (as your comment suggests) there is a need to build other bundles,
we
>can look into extending `build'.
No, I don't think it is a priority. I was just point it out in case it
was suppose to work with bundles and I was hitting a bug. I'll run it to
test the packages in the bundle and roll up the bundle after.

>> 4/ Checking for undocumented objects fails with an ERROR when
checking
>> an (undocumented) assignment object ( "input.series.names<-" ).
>I think it works if you document it, though, and the error is correct,
>surely?  Do you mean it gives ERROR and then stops rather than warns?

Yes, it should warn me about this, but it gives ERROR and stops. (If I
run it with my makefile it returns code 1.) The message is:
in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : couldn't find function
"input.series.names<-"

Thanks,
Paul




-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] R CMD build
Paul Gilbert