From rdiaz02 at gmail.com  Wed Dec 30 20:07:21 2015
From: rdiaz02 at gmail.com (Ramon Diaz-Uriarte)
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:07:21 +0100
Subject: [Rd] URW Fonts Description in Installation and Administration
	Manual
In-Reply-To: <22147.50077.339178.776971@max.nulle.part>
References: <SN1PR0101MB1439CEE17F9BA8237DD00B51CDFD0@SN1PR0101MB1439.prod.exchangelabs.com>
	<22147.50077.339178.776971@max.nulle.part>
Message-ID: <87d1tn3gd2.fsf@gmail.com>




On Wed, 30-12-2015, at 12:44, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> On 30 December 2015 at 05:00, Dario Strbenac wrote:
> | Good day,
> | 
> | In section A.2, the manual advises "Linux users will want the urw-fonts package". However, this package only seems to be available for RedHat Linux and Fedora Linux. What about for Debian or Ubuntu ? There is no urw-fonts package for them. Are there any other packages not mentioned that are important for these two distributions ?
>
> edd at max:~$ apt-cache search urw | grep texlive
> texlive-fonts-recommended - TeX Live: Recommended fonts
> texlive-fonts-extra - TeX Live: Additional fonts
> edd at max:~$ 

Humm... on a Debian system (mix of unstable and testing) that shows
nothing.  But


ramon at Bufo:~$ apt-cache search urw | grep tex
fonts-texgyre - OpenType fonts based on URW Fonts
tex-gyre - scalable PostScript and OpenType fonts based on URW Fonts
python-urwid-satext - collection of urwid widgets
ramon at Bufo:~$


shows two possibly relevant packages.


(Maybe this is a Ubuntu/Debian difference? I think Dirk has some machines
running Ubuntu).

Best,

R.


>
> Both packages list URW fonts promimently in their Description:
>
> Dirk


-- 
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25
Facultad de Medicina
Universidad Aut?noma de Madrid 
Arzobispo Morcillo, 4
28029 Madrid
Spain

Phone: +34-91-497-2412

Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
       ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es

http://ligarto.org/rdiaz



[Rd] URW Fonts Description in Installation and Administration Manual
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte