From dusa.adrian at gmail.com  Thu Apr  5 13:27:01 2012
From: dusa.adrian at gmail.com (Adrian Dusa)
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:27:01 +0300
Subject: [Rd] "NA" vs. NA
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20120405122203.Ted.Harding@wlandres.net>
References: <CAJ=0CtBXsC22CW8_UnyYvsi-w9PJc=iXYQbW6srC0d3VYs0O2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<XFMail.20120405122203.Ted.Harding@wlandres.net>
Message-ID: <CAJ=0CtAur8KCFNx+bWoj_-sM6q17eW+Giki1HgqPJh=z_jgzYA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ted,

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:22, Ted Harding <Ted.Harding at wlandres.net> wrote:
> On 05-Apr-2012 11:03:15 Adrian Dusa wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Hi Adrian,
> The default in read.table() for the "na.strings" parameter is
>
> ?na.strings = "NA"
>
> So, provided you have no "NA" in the data portion of your file
> (or e.g. any missing values are simply blank) you could use
> something like:
>
> read.table(zfile, header = TRUE, as.is = FALSE, na.strings="OOPS")

Sure, that solves the problem on reading the data from R, but the
point was it "creates problems on using this data within a package".

The error is thrown by:
R CMD check --as-cran /path/to/my/package

(and I have no direct control over it...)

Best,
Adrian

-- 
Adrian Dusa
Romanian Social Data Archive
1, Schitu Magureanu Bd.
050025 Bucharest sector 5
Romania
Tel.:+40 21 3126618 \
? ? ? ?+40 21 3120210 / int.101
Fax: +40 21 3158391



[Rd] "NA" vs. NA
Adrian Dusa