From g@bembecker @end|ng |rom gm@||@com  Sun Oct  6 14:00:16 2019
From: g@bembecker @end|ng |rom gm@||@com (Gabriel Becker)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:00:16 +1100
Subject: [Rd] Strange "no-echo" in place of "slave"
In-Reply-To: <2074176959.2758422.1570362954895@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <2074176959.2758422.1570362954895@mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAD4oTHEo0KqtEiSNhzc9CeEjAmrt3ieHe3=Na2yMsUhMKK37UA@mail.gmail.com>

As far as I know, not being involved with the effort at all, they are
removing the term 'slave' and replacing it with 'no-echo' which is intended
to be fully synonmyous with the meaning of the old 'slave' term.

~G

On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 10:56 PM suharto_anggono--- via R-devel <
r-devel at r-project.org> wrote:

> SVN revision replaces "slave" with "no-echo" in R devel.
>
>
> In each of the following, "no-echo" is rather strange to me.
>
> - src/gnuwin32/README.Rterm
> 3) As a no-echo process for ESS mode in NTEmacs with flag --ess.
>
> - src/library/grDevices/src/qdCocoa.m
> /* the no-echo thread work until this is NO */
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] Strange "no-echo" in place of "slave"
Gabriel Becker