From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Thu Dec 20 00:10:34 2001
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 20 Dec 2001 01:10:34 +0100
Subject: [Rd] dots and ldots in R 1.4.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112200034510.429-100000@kleigh.nl>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112200034510.429-100000@kleigh.nl>
Message-ID: <x2y9jyg39h.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>

Peter Kleiweg <kleiweg@let.rug.nl> writes:

> I have a package with in the documentation:
>  in \usage :    \dots
>  in \arguments: \ldots
> 
> This is how I interpreted "Use \dots for the dots in function
> argument lists ..., and \ldots for ellipsis dots in ordinary
> text"  in "Writing R Extensions".
> 
> When I did `R CMD check' in R version 1.3.1 all was fine.
> With R version 1.4.0 I get :
>   * checking for undocumented arguments in \usage ... WARNING
>   Undocumented arguments in documentation object `FOO':
>   [1] "..."
> 
> Am I doing something wrong?

Not really, the checks got stricter. You just need to supply a
line describing what the "..." arguments are for. 

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] dots and ldots in R 1.4.0
Peter Dalgaard BSA