From sgiannerini at gmail.com  Mon Sep 12 15:03:47 2005
From: sgiannerini at gmail.com (Simone Giannerini)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:03:47 +0200
Subject: [Rd] A question on R memory management in .Fortran() calls
	under Windows
In-Reply-To: <4325691E.7020509@stats.uwo.ca>
References: <3c12769c0509091004555400f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4321CBB4.3090805@stats.uwo.ca>
	<3c12769c05091201305a31f10f@mail.gmail.com>
	<4325691E.7020509@stats.uwo.ca>
Message-ID: <3c12769c05091206037ec06e3f@mail.gmail.com>

> I think it's far from the best optimizing compiler, but the Fortran that
> comes with MinGW (g77 currently in Windows) is the one used to build R,
> so it's the one that will is most likely to work with it without
> fiddling.  But I don't use Fortran, so I don't know what else is available.
> 
> Duncan Murdoch
> 

Thanks a lot anyway,
 in a comparative review I've come through recently 
(http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/compare.html)
 the Salford compiler seems to be one of the most protected against
errors but also one of the slowest. Intel compiler seems to be one of
the fastest but not the best on protection.

Simone Giannerini



[Rd] A question on R memory management in .Fortran() calls under Windows
Simone Giannerini