From gavin.simpson at ucl.ac.uk  Thu Dec 23 13:32:59 2010
From: gavin.simpson at ucl.ac.uk (Gavin Simpson)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:32:59 +0000
Subject: [Rd] License statement
In-Reply-To: <EC90680B-2B36-466F-A269-D1D7D5D1ADA9@aitrus.org>
References: <4D127D3F.4030503@auckland.ac.nz>
	<EC90680B-2B36-466F-A269-D1D7D5D1ADA9@aitrus.org>
Message-ID: <1293107579.2415.8.camel@desktop.localdomain>

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 18:04 -0800, Scott Gonyea wrote:
> Heh.  That's annoying.  The R Mailing List should really set the
> "reply-to" header.

No it shouldn't, if you mean set the list as the reply-to address that
i. If I want to reply to a message you sent, I Reply to you. If I want
that reply to go to all recipients of *your* message I Reply-All
instead. Users should think about where their messages go not blindly
click things in their mailer.

I am on one list where the Reply-To header *is* set (to the list) and
you would not believe the amount of crap, personal replies we get there
because users click Reply without thinking and send their stuff to the
list.

G

> I wrote two e-mail, so here they are:
> 
> 
> There's a 'source' command in R, so I should not use that word.  If
> you're not copying out chunks of code and inserting them, you own the
> code itself.  No one can somehow take that away from you, unless they
> paid you to write it and your contract does not say that you own it.
> 
> The big issue is "bundling."  ie, creating a .tgz with all of the R
> packages AND your stuff (source code OR binary), IF your licenses are
> incompatible AND you intend to distribute your new "package"--that is,
> distribution external from whichever entity claims ownership.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> Which was a correction to:
> 
> 
> The issue is the bundling of the code, contained inside those
> packages.  As long as you're not sourcing material from inside them,
> license it how you want.  If you want, your license should be stamped
> at the top of your source files with something like:
> 
> # [COMPANY] CONFIDENTIAL. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS SOURCE CODE IS
> PROHIBITED. [HR POLICY]
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> Scott^3
> 
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 2:35 PM, David Scott wrote:
> 
> > I am writing a package for a company for its internal use only.
> > 
> > What is an appropriate license statement for the DESCRIPTION file?
> > 
> > I would like a statement which reflects the private and proprietary nature of the package, giving copyright to the writer and the company. I also don't want to violate the licensing of R and the packages I am using (RODBC, ggplot2, zoo).
> > 
> > David Scott
> > 
> > -- 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > David Scott	Department of Statistics
> > 		The University of Auckland, PB 92019
> > 		Auckland 1142,    NEW ZEALAND
> > Phone: +64 9 923 5055, or +64 9 373 7599 ext 85055
> > Email:	d.scott at auckland.ac.nz,  Fax: +64 9 373 7018
> > 
> > Director of Consulting, Department of Statistics
> > 
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

-- 
%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%
 Dr. Gavin Simpson             [t] +44 (0)20 7679 0522
 ECRC, UCL Geography,          [f] +44 (0)20 7679 0565
 Pearson Building,             [e] gavin.simpsonATNOSPAMucl.ac.uk
 Gower Street, London          [w] http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfagls/
 UK. WC1E 6BT.                 [w] http://www.freshwaters.org.uk
%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%



[Rd] License statement
Gavin Simpson