From p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk  Tue Mar  7 19:48:24 2000
From: p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Date: 07 Mar 2000 20:48:24 +0100
Subject: [Rd] lm(rnorm(1000)~rnorm(1000)) kills rw1000 (PR#476)
In-Reply-To: Thomas Lumley's message of "Tue, 7 Mar 2000 11:39:47 -0800 (PST)"
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0003071134290.27319-100000@mail.biostat.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <x2aekah88n.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>

Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes:

> A patch is
> 
> 1649,1652c1649
> <       if (j == rhs_response) {
> <           INTEGER(count)[j]=0;  /* need this initialised */
> <           continue;
> <       }
> ---
> >       if (j == rhs_response) continue;

Hmm, this wouldn't happen to cure the update(.~.-whateveritwas) case
by jfox, would it? (darn nasty one that one...)

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] lm(rnorm(1000)~rnorm(1000)) kills rw1000 (PR#476)
Peter Dalgaard BSA