From simon.urbanek at r-project.org  Sun Feb 17 17:57:37 2013
From: simon.urbanek at r-project.org (Simon Urbanek)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:57:37 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Passing R code from webpage
In-Reply-To: <1361118637555-4658839.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1361058494221-4658800.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<BB2254CE-CB16-4960-8D69-1064A0762BD2@r-project.org>
	<BLU166-W43C98BB734A61880F46C4ABE0C0@phx.gbl>
	<18E32626-BA32-4AF4-BDBC-52289F370FEC@r-project.org>
	<1361118637555-4658839.post@n4.nabble.com>
Message-ID: <149DD500-EA7F-488F-855A-A9078F5646E3@r-project.org>

On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Matevz Pavlic wrote:

> Hi , 
> 
> thanks for all the replies. 
> I'll have a good look at this FastRWeb.  Just one thing. My pages are done
> with Razor *.CSTHML. Could this be a problem for FastRWeb (and me) ;)?
> 

R doesn't care how you generate the pages - it will be just processing requests that you define on such pages. Think of it as serving R scripts by a web server - it doesn't matter how you construct the URLs/requests that reference it.

BTW: since you mentioned CSHTML  --- you'll lose a lot of benefits on Windows, so if you think of using Windows as a server, think twice ;). Pretty much all scalable solutions assume you are using unix. On Windows you'll need a pool of R instances if you want to have some illusion of scalability so it's a lot more involved and wasteful.

Cheers,
Simon



> regards, m
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Passing-R-code-from-webpage-tp4658800p4658839.html
> Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> 
> 



[Rd] Passing R code from webpage
Simon Urbanek