From csardi.gabor at gmail.com  Thu Feb 25 11:40:04 2016
From: csardi.gabor at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIENzw6FyZGk=?=)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:40:04 +0000
Subject: [Rd] Two ideas / feature requests for R CMD check
Message-ID: <CABtg=Kk0gUswZ6+p0Bm-=B1CNKeLDBaUZPavyC5uEZ1wvygM4g@mail.gmail.com>

We all love R CMD check. :) In my opinion it would be even better if
it had options to

- Run all checks, even if one fails with an error. I realize this
sometimes might not make sense (e.g. if there is no DESCRIPTION file),
but often does.

- Run all examples even if an example fails. I think it would be great
to get all failing examples at once, so that a package author can
estimate the amount of breakage.

Thank you for considering there,
Gabor



[Rd] Two ideas / feature requests for R CMD check
=?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIENzw6FyZGk=?=