From romain at r-enthusiasts.com  Fri Jun 18 23:05:24 2010
From: romain at r-enthusiasts.com (Romain Francois)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:05:24 +0200
Subject: [Rd] nchar( NA )
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimV5wJTILsifdwPUv7ROY-WY9buNLE937IuqVAa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C1BDC89.50003@r-enthusiasts.com>
	<AANLkTimV5wJTILsifdwPUv7ROY-WY9buNLE937IuqVAa@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C1BDF94.4030808@r-enthusiasts.com>

Le 18/06/10 22:58, Sarah Goslee a ?crit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> Did you read the help for nchar?
>
> Value:
>
>       For ?nchar?, an integer vector giving the sizes of each element,
>       currently always ?2? for missing values (for ?NA?).
>
> It may be unexpected behavior, but it's *well-documented* unexpected behavior.

Oops. My scan of the help page was too quick. I did not see it.

Sorry for the noise.

> Sarah
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Romain Francois
> <romain at r-enthusiasts.com>  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is this expected ?
>>
>>> nchar( c( "", NA ) )
>> [1] 0 2
>>
>> Should not the second one be NA ?
>>
>> Romain

-- 
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://bit.ly/98Uf7u : Rcpp 0.8.1
|- http://bit.ly/c6YnCi : graph gallery collage
`- http://bit.ly/bZ7ltC : inline 0.3.5



[Rd] nchar( NA )
Romain Francois