From pauljohn32 at gmail.com  Thu Apr 18 18:16:41 2013
From: pauljohn32 at gmail.com (Paul Johnson)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:16:41 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Patch proposal for R style consistency (concerning
	deparse.c)
In-Reply-To: <5478C197-76AB-481D-A1AA-64DB63D8D122@gmail.com>
References: <CAErODj85saboM+8SaYKKVVDL6cPeX=LVR=PKwY+FZb2ky_cpBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5478C197-76AB-481D-A1AA-64DB63D8D122@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErODj_N+FCjP1zt2H4VHv28o8RDU8sQ-W4qGONkx1gLvC33pg@mail.gmail.com>

OK, I concede that.

Now, how about "} else {"

I will provide patch that does only that change.
?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 18, 2013, at 05:39 , Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> 2 & 3. I want to omit space after if and for.   Since if and for are
>> functions in R, not keywords, I suggest that there should not be a
>> space before the opening parentheses.
>
> Wrong. They are part of language constructs (and they _are_ keywords, not names, that's why ?for won't work). The function calls are `if`(fee, {foo}, {fie}) and something rebarbative for `for`(....).
>
> Besides, both constructs are harder to read without the spaces.
>
> --
> Peter Dalgaard, Professor
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
> Phone: (+45)38153501
> Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk  Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
>



-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science      Assoc. Director
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504      Center for Research Methods
University of Kansas                 University of Kansas
http://pj.freefaculty.org               http://quant.ku.edu



[Rd] Patch proposal for R style consistency (concerning deparse.c)
Paul Johnson