From Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at  Tue Jul 13 17:02:41 1999
From: Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at (Kurt Hornik)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:02:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: 0.65/AIX
In-Reply-To: <199907131333.PAA14854@sophie.ethz.ch>
References: <199907131307.JAA29236@infiniti.ece.cmu.edu>
 <199907131333.PAA14854@sophie.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <14219.25377.308702.802943@aragorn.ci.tuwien.ac.at>

>>>>> Martin Maechler writes:

ToV> Sorry, but why do you need _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED to be defined?  And
ToV> why does -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=2 work, albeit noisely?

> This is used to be the only flag (from the many I tried about a year ago) 
> for which
>      1/0  
>      is.finite(1)
>      atanh(1)
> worked .

Hmm ... Compilation-wise it seems that -D_ALL_SOURCE works o.k. for me.
Now, this gives

> 1/0 + 1/0# Inf
[1]INF
> 1/0 - 1/0# NaN
[1]NaNQ

which is only sort of o.k.???

For the time being, I'll commit this version ...

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


0.65/AIX
Kurt Hornik