From ggrothendieck at gmail.com  Fri Jun 12 16:30:09 2009
From: ggrothendieck at gmail.com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:30:09 -0400
Subject: [Rd] bundle deprecation
In-Reply-To: <4A3259F4.4090003@cam.ac.uk>
References: <4A3259F4.4090003@cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <971536df0906120730r6c014934kcc0875b502ebe66f@mail.gmail.com>

Perhaps you could have a package called BACCO
with no contents rather but lists the components of the
bundle as dependencies.  Then package.install("BACCO")
would still install all the components.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Robin Hankin<rksh1 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I read that bundles are to be deprecated in 2.10.
>
> The BACCO bundle contains three packages
> (emulator, calibrator, approximator) which I
> am happy to unbundle.
>
> But the 'BACCO' moniker has some considerable
> cachet for me in terms of recognizability (eg
> with grant-giving bodies), as it has become an umbrella
> term for a whole bunch of related statistical
> functionality of which the three packages are examples.
>
> I make heavy use of the word "BACCO" in my publications.
>
> If bundles were to be supported indefinitely, I
> would add further packages to the BACCO
> bundle from time to time and their relationship
> with the other packages would be clear.
>
> What is the best way to preserve the 'BACCO'
> name in a non-bundled world?
>
> Perhaps adding a 'FormerBundle' line in the DESCRIPTION file?
>
>
> best wishes
>
> Robin
>
>
>
>
> --
> Robin K. S. Hankin
> Uncertainty Analyst
> University of Cambridge
> 19 Silver Street
> Cambridge CB3 9EP
> 01223-764877
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] bundle deprecation
Gabor Grothendieck