From friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de  Fri Nov 16 11:43:54 2007
From: friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de (friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:43:54 +0100
Subject: [Rd] NEWS file (was  faqs)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711161011570.23566@auk.stats>
References: <D4F43809-6D74-4FA4-92AB-0A9248072A1A@ysidro.econ.uiuc.edu>
	<971536df0711141753r5753c3c5i6faf438bd65ebc03@mail.gmail.com>
	<473BB9E1.4020001@stats.uwo.ca>
	<971536df0711142055t652a618jbac4b5f23af48652@mail.gmail.com>
	<4ACB4F00-5E33-4ADD-B6BD-80324ACAAFCA@r-project.org>
	<473C6B78.5090605@stats.uwo.ca>
	<80BEBDD4-6222-499D-A9E8-AC091DC91278@r-project.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711161011570.23566@auk.stats>
Message-ID: <18237.29802.854939.260829@lxh5.stat.uni-muenchen.de>

>>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:20:36 +0000 (GMT),
>>>>> Prof Brian Ripley (PBR) wrote:

  > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Simon Urbanek wrote:
  >> 
  >> On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
  >> 
  >>> On 11/15/2007 9:57 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
  >>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
  >>>>> inst/NEWS would have the advantage of consistency with R itself
  >>>>> which also has a NEWS file.
  >>>>> 
  >>>> I vote for NEWS for reasons above plus because that's what I use in
  >>>> my  packages already ;).
  >>>> IMHO it should be installed automatically if present, i.e. it
  >>>> shouldn't be necessary to have it in inst/NEWS, just plain NEWS
  >>>> should  suffice.
  >>> 
  >>> And you're volunteering to make that change?
  >>> 
  >> 
  >> Yup, in R-devel now (43464). However, there are other candidate files
  >> as well and we don't do anything with the NEWS file just yet ... any
  >> further ideas?

  > We've recommended inst/NEWS for some time (some people are late to this 
  > party), and tens of packages have it. However, a further tens of packages 
  > have a top-level NEWS, and I would assume that (at least some of) the 
  > authors were deliberately not installing it and so will now need to rename 
  > it.

  > I think the writeup needs to make clear what happens if you have both NEWS 
  > and inst/NEWS (some packages do).

As most having both are by me I also checked the rest: In all cases
on CRAN they are identical copies. I have a soft link in all my
packages from inst/NEWS to top level (such that it gets installed, but
it is also easily found in the sources).

If we install the top-level NEWS file I would remove the link (but as
Brian said, we've been there before).

Best,
Fritz



[Rd] NEWS file (was faqs)
friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de