From tlumley at u.washington.edu  Sat Sep 10 18:40:20 2005
From: tlumley at u.washington.edu (Thomas Lumley)
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in
 read.spss, package foreign?]
In-Reply-To: <971536df0509100602238abe70@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3.0.6.32.20050909015829.007bed60@pop.gmx.net> 
	<3.0.6.32.20050909145010.007c2a70@pop.gmx.net> 
	<Pine.LNX.4.63a.0509090845050.619@homer23.u.washington.edu> 
	<971536df05090910211d639ed1@mail.gmail.com> 
	<Pine.LNX.4.63a.0509091029550.5570@homer23.u.washington.edu> 
	<971536df05090910442796d89d@mail.gmail.com> 
	<Pine.LNX.4.63a.0509091250220.5570@homer23.u.washington.edu> 
	<17186.46037.468981.530188@mithrandir.hornik.net>
	<971536df050910055166ae0a14@mail.gmail.com>
	<971536df0509100602238abe70@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63a.0509100933520.17336@homer24.u.washington.edu>

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>
> And one more comment.   The DESCRIPTION file does not record the
> location or existence of the various subdirectories such as R, man,
> exec, etc. If NEWS is to be recorded as a meta data line item in
> DESCRIPTION then surely all of these should be too so its symmetric
> and they are all on an equal footing (or else none of them
> should be, which in fact I think is preferable).
>

I don't see any advantage in symmetry.  The locations of these 
subdirectories are fixed and I can't see why someone trying to decide 
whether to install an upgrade needs to know if it has an exec 
subdirectory before they download the package.

I also don't see why THANKS and WISHLIST should need to be visible before 
you download the package.  CRAN does display a URL if one is given, and if 
these are important they could be at that URL.

The changelog, on the other hand, is one piece of information that is 
really valuable in deciding whether or not to update a package, so it 
would be worth having it visible on CRAN.  Since other coding standards 
suggest different things for the name and location of this file, a path in 
DESCRIPTION seems a minimal change.

 	-thomas



[Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in read.spss, package foreign?]
Thomas Lumley