From daniel.jeske at ucr.edu  Sat Sep 18 04:10:40 2004
From: daniel.jeske at ucr.edu (daniel.jeske@ucr.edu)
Date: Sat Sep 18 04:10:42 2004
Subject: [Rd] Covergence FLAG in glm (PR#7235)
Message-ID: <20040918021040.A130B1160D@slim.kubism.ku.dk>

Full_Name: Daniel R Jeske
Version: 1.8.1
OS: Windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (138.23.228.79)


We have just noticed that when you use glm() it seems the logical
output 'converged' is always TRUE.  The same data set that shows
FALSE in version 1.7.1 shows TRUE in 1.8.1.  And I know that FALSE
is the correct answer...so it seems like we cannot trust the 'converged'
flag for glm() in version 1.8.1 ?????


[Rd] Covergence FLAG in glm (PR#7235)
daniel.jeske@ucr.edu