From henrik.bengtsson at ucsf.edu  Mon Sep 21 21:41:06 2015
From: henrik.bengtsson at ucsf.edu (Henrik Bengtsson)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:41:06 -0700
Subject: [Rd] Long vectors: Missing values and R_xlen_t?
In-Reply-To: <66923C02-7DFA-4E8C-8AA4-53019B7EDF34@r-project.org>
References: <CAFDcVCSaXrXVLNq1jSaxhs4yJhHsqSSNEGnihebUY_wjBs=Vcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<66923C02-7DFA-4E8C-8AA4-53019B7EDF34@r-project.org>
Message-ID: <CAFDcVCSVVCGPXX=YdJyTkAtGiLX4e03H5aQKxsK0YA-DE7nS9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Simon Urbanek
<simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2015, at 3:06 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at ucsf.edu> wrote:
>
>> Is there a missing value constant defined for R_xlen_t, cf. NA_INTEGER
>> (== R_NaInt == INT_MIN) for int(eger)?  If not, is it correct to
>> assume that missing values should be taken care/tested for before
>> coercing from int or double?
>>
>
> R_xlen_t is type of the vector length (see XLENGTH()) and as such never holds a missing value (since there is no such thing as a missing length). It is *not* a native type for R vectors and therefore there is no official representation of NAs in R_xlen_t.
>
> Although native R vectors can be used as indices, the way it typically works is that the code first checks for NAs in the R vector and only then converts to R_xlen_t, so the NA value is never stored in R_xlen_t even for indexing.
>
> --- cut here, content below is less relevant ---
>
> That said, when converting packages from "legacy" .Call code before long vector support which used asInteger() to convert an index I tend to use this utility for convenience:
>
> static R_INLINE R_xlen_t asLength(SEXP x, R_xlen_t NA) {
>     double d;
>     if (TYPEOF(x) == INTSXP && LENGTH(x) > 0) {
>         int res = INTEGER(x)[0];
>         return (res == NA_INTEGER) ? NA : ((R_xlen_t) res);
>     }
>     d = asReal(x);
>     return (R_finite(d)) ? ((R_xlen_t) d) : NA;
> }
>
> Note that this explicitly allows the caller to specify NA representation since it depends on the use - often it's simply 0, other times -1 will do since typically anything negative is equally bad. As noted above, this is not what R itself does, so it's more of a convenience to simplify conversion of legacy code.

Thank you Simon,

all this helped clarify it for me.  It's in line with what I
suspected, but it is really useful to hear it from the "officials".

Cheers,

Henrik

>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>



[Rd] Long vectors: Missing values and R_xlen_t?
Henrik Bengtsson