From tlumley at u.washington.edu  Wed Jan 11 00:50:48 2006
From: tlumley at u.washington.edu (Thomas Lumley)
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:50:48 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Rd] Issue with c++ .C call
In-Reply-To: <BFE98EA5.36AA%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
References: <BFE98EA5.36AA%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601101549120.25401@homer24.u.washington.edu>

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Sean Davis wrote:

>
> Thanks, Thomas.  That did fix the initialization issue (or apparent one).
> Unfortunately, the reason that I started debugging was for segmentation
> faults, which have not gone away.  However, it now looks like the problem is
> internal to the C++ code and not with the way the arguments were being
> passed.

If you can get access to a Linux machine then it's worth trying Valgrind, 
which is very helpful for this sort of thing.

 	-thomas



[Rd] Issue with c++ .C call
Thomas Lumley