From csardi.gabor at gmail.com  Wed Jun 17 02:35:34 2015
From: csardi.gabor at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIENzw6FyZGk=?=)
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:35:34 -0400
Subject: [Rd] Improving string concatenation
In-Reply-To: <5580BE4F.8060401@fredhutch.org>
References: <CAKShX4A5bVtxVAG+01QjNH0=LaVr6MH48xXs-OtbQQ2247cc_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<5580BE4F.8060401@fredhutch.org>
Message-ID: <CABtg=KmfPxZsW7Bfn8EALQb5aT03cMXt0sDzam=ECmhUydb=Sw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote:
[...]
>
> If I was to override `+` to concatenate strings, I would make it stick
> to the recycling scheme used by arithmetic and comparison operators
> (which is the most sensible of all IMO).

Yeah, I agree, paste's recycling rules are sometimes painful. This
could be "fixed" with a nice new '+' concatenation operator, too. :)

Gabor

> H.

[...]



[Rd] Improving string concatenation
=?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIENzw6FyZGk=?=