From pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca  Wed Jun 17 18:58:16 1998
From: pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Gilbert)
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 13:58:16 -0400
Subject: bug in functions of form "mcpar<-"
References: <XFMail.980617162415.plummer@iarc.fr>
Message-ID: <98Jun17.141830edt.13505@mailgate.bank-banque-canada.ca>

The light came on. I was thinking the problem with mcpar was that the argument
had the same name as the function, but it is that the argument must be called
"value".  If R is intended to be like this it seems like a pretty serious
incompatibility with S (not to mention that I will have to make a lot of
changes).

Paul Gilbert

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


bug in functions of form "mcpar<-"
Paul Gilbert