From ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk  Tue May 30 11:31:39 2000
From: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk (Prof Brian D Ripley)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:31:39 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [Rd] Documentatio: typo in Writing R Extensions (PR#557)
In-Reply-To: <200005300939.LAA08854@pubhealth.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10005301126380.5585-100000@auk.stats>

On Tue, 30 May 2000 stephen@anc.ed.ac.uk wrote:

> Full_Name: stephen eglen
> Version: 1.0.0
> OS: Unix (OSF/1)
> Submission from: (NULL) (129.215.238.26)
> 
> 
> Hi,
> in the documentation `Writing R Extensions', the section 3.6.1  (handling the
> effects of garbage collection) has the following typo:
> 
>  Protecting a SEXP pointer protexts ...
> 
> Should  that be `protects'?

It is already `protects' in the current sources (R-devel): I didn't check
1.0.1.  Not sure why you submitted this twice (PR#557 and PR#558)?

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] Documentatio: typo in Writing R Extensions (PR#557)
Prof Brian D Ripley