From ggrothend|eck @end|ng |rom gm@||@com  Wed Dec  9 18:46:57 2020
From: ggrothend|eck @end|ng |rom gm@||@com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:46:57 -0500
Subject: [Rd] [External] Re: New pipe operator
In-Reply-To: <CAD4oTHE+6q5S11tJRvEiH1ZPjDFGwJ+s5WyyRCAsPrTxjLSwrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e55c2093-0bb5-5f9b-5521-0ca8bdf35953@gmail.com>
 <CALyqOb8c1hHOSaMV+fqXTwpeOsP--KJ_t-oeqMYYafVXeNpqZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <7586e034-e287-0970-6480-f82d747b5445@gmail.com>
 <CADfFDC7bT58_+52uvmpHuMMQRNbbmqV3_7t_fc4sgJ_Esw=xag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJmOi+PO_8XDC23=rT=pQ76ENL=gx2V-41ax2fHSVs87xURcEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2012051203250.3003@luke-Latitude-7480>
 <CAOO9MKU7LD9JkX3XK3NpqzzpiTirvRxdqJBbX0D=W3ik+Fw0bw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1e755fbb-f18f-227e-3477-6467fc255cbf@gmail.com>
 <CAP01uRnVnPws==rAAvumKeV0HMqMA3SRWvdyvTA6MXohbLuCXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD4oTHE+6q5S11tJRvEiH1ZPjDFGwJ+s5WyyRCAsPrTxjLSwrw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAP01uRn=__=bM323e7_O0w_f444WczRc4=oxyaYBB3epeTAWcA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:36 PM Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote:
> I mean, I think the bizarro pipe was a pretty clever piece of work. I was impressed by what John did there, but I don't really know what you're suggesting here. As you say, the bizarro pipe works now without any changes and you're welcome to use it if you prefer it to base's (proposed/likely) |> and magrittr's %>%.
>

If  |> exists then it will be impossible to avoid it unless the only
software you ever use is your own.
It's about the entire R ecosystem and what gets used because it is in the base.

It would still be possible to implement \(x)... without |>  so I would
go with that and rethink
the pipe situation.



[Rd] [External] Re: New pipe operator
Gabor Grothendieck