From cowan.pd at gmail.com  Tue Oct  6 03:48:42 2009
From: cowan.pd at gmail.com (Peter Cowan)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:48:42 -0700
Subject: [Rd] unit testing for R packages?
In-Reply-To: <f8e6ff050910051744s2569f535nf56c34e04c9b2c3e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c35a4fc0910051201h23e61e39o55bf1de9809bfe29@mail.gmail.com>
	<486f230c0910051248xd9d9ab9ie3ac6358184e2989@mail.gmail.com>
	<4ACA84AE.5050708@sciviews.org>
	<f8e6ff050910051744s2569f535nf56c34e04c9b2c3e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e1fc21b0910051848m40885052s8cef5959a14a659d@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, hadley wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Now, as Seth already told, there are several functions in svUnit that
>> ease interactive use of the tests in an R session. What he did not told
>> is that RUnit has some nice code coverage functions that svUnit does not
>> have.
>
> What are those? I've skimmed through the documentation and couldn't
> see anything?

The R wiki has information about both RUnit and svUnit.  I'm not sure
that it details all of the differences.  I have successfully used the
methodology of the gdata package described there.

<http://wiki.r-project.org/rwiki/doku.php?id=developers:runit>

Peter



> Hadley
>
> --
> http://had.co.nz/
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] unit testing for R packages?
Peter Cowan