From Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at  Sat Jul 14 18:46:05 2001
From: Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at (Kurt Hornik)
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 19:46:05 +0200
Subject: [Rd] data(package = "..") gives extraneous warning (PR#1024)
In-Reply-To: <x2wv5bwq1g.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
References: <200107131409.QAA01600@pubhealth.ku.dk>
 <15184.5029.853899.526774@mithrandir.hornik.net>
 <x2wv5bwq1g.fsf@blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <15184.34141.300494.134280@mithrandir.hornik.net>

>>>>> Peter Dalgaard BSA writes:

> Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>> Don't think that this is a new feature ...
>> 
>> Anyway, fixed now.  Nevertheless, the idea of also looking for data sets
>> in the working directory needs rethinking.  Do we really want this?  If
>> so, then e.g. we need to fix warnings if there is a data dir but no
>> index (the working dir is not simply a `package' ...).

> Yup. (I have one of those in one of my builddirs, so get reminded
> about that from time to time. Just now I can't seem to reproduce it
> though.)

> I think we do want this feature but then I think I proposed it in the
> first place.

Are you happy with the current rules?  If so, I could modify the code to
be more reasonable with its warnings ...

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


[Rd] data(package = "..") gives extraneous warning (PR#1024)
Kurt Hornik