From h@w|ckh@m @end|ng |rom gm@||@com  Sat Sep 12 15:07:11 2020
From: h@w|ckh@m @end|ng |rom gm@||@com (Hadley Wickham)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:07:11 -0500
Subject: [Rd] Including full text of open source licenses in a package
In-Reply-To: <CAJmOi+OGeQZR1HCAYTPSqTaWiAbXwY7=zz67YC98d1oMqCMBYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABdHhvF+daTK6T1f7W3T+6qXpZt1H140ekSh2F5t+f=20=x1gA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJmOi+OGeQZR1HCAYTPSqTaWiAbXwY7=zz67YC98d1oMqCMBYA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABdHhvGcsz7g0ZB+spe7XHmU8gRJC8yf73OQf-Q06J2A0Xnk1Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday, September 12, 2020, Hugh Parsonage <hugh.parsonage at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Perhaps I have misread that excerpt from WRE, but my read is that
> package authors should not duplicate GNU COPYING, since it is present
> in all R distributions already when using GPL-2 and friends.  It
> doesn't apply to packages distributed with other licenses.
>
>
The directory to which it refers, https://www.r-project.org/Licenses/,
includes many open source licenses, not just those used for R. I?m also
pretty sure I?ve had a package fail CRAN submission for this problem in the
past.


> It should be noted that in GPL FAQ just below the part you quoted it says
> > A clear statement in the program's README file is legally sufficient as
> long as that accompanies the code, but it is easy for them to get separated.
>

That question (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LicenseCopyOnly) is
about whether a copy of the license in a file is sufficient, or whether you
must also include a statement at the top of every source file.

Hadley


-- 
http://hadley.nz

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



[Rd] Including full text of open source licenses in a package
Hadley Wickham