From Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at  Wed Jul 21 11:19:35 1999
From: Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at (Kurt Hornik)
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 12:19:35 +0200
Subject: R-0.64.2 on AIX
In-Reply-To: <001e01bed1cb$b2f7c0a0$7b0c86c0@brouard.ined.fr>
References: <14226.53973.189207.201686@aragorn.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
 <001e01bed1cb$b2f7c0a0$7b0c86c0@brouard.ined.fr>
Message-ID: <199907211019.MAA00723@aragorn.ci.tuwien.ac.at>

>>>>> Nicolas Brouard writes:

> I am new on your list...

> S language source code again available and in the Public Domain was a
> great hope for me.

> I remember that parts of S code was written in Ratfor. Now there are
> still Fortran routines. Would they stay as is? I have nothing against
> Fortran but it adds another compiler which is not as available as C
> and which exists on too various forms (g77, f2c at least). For example
> my g77 (2.7) compiler on AIX 4.1 did not know what a "save" was.

That's a long story, and I should maybe add something on this to my FAQ
eventually.  In a nutshell, the point was that whereas we could use f2c
for creating a C-only version and provide the necessary run-time version
of libf2c along with the base R distribution, the problem is that MANY
add-on packages, in particular the ones that can be ported from statlib
S versions, but also others, come with Fortran sources.  So eventually,
you either need a full-featured Fortran compiler or all of f2c.

And this is what we have now.

> ...

> I am not sure to have the time necessary to compile 0.65 and to be
> "with you" but at least I will look at your mailing list and give you
> information on AIX if I can.

That would be great.

-k

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


R-0.64.2 on AIX
Kurt Hornik