From huber at ebi.ac.uk  Sun Jul  9 23:04:29 2006
From: huber at ebi.ac.uk (huber at ebi.ac.uk)
Date: Sun,  9 Jul 2006 23:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [Rd] Unexpected difference in Bounding Box of PDF graphics between
	2.3.1p and 2.4 (PR#9070)
Message-ID: <20060709210429.40D63507AF@slim.kubism.ku.dk>

Full_Name: Wolfgang Huber
Version: R version 2.4.0 Under development (unstable) (2006-07-09 r38523)
OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu     
Submission from: (NULL) (62.253.128.15)


There appears to be unintentional behaviour in the size of the bounding box for
PDF graphics produced with the current R2.4, compared to 2.3.1. I posted two PDF
files, both produced with the same R script below, but different versions of R:
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~huber/pub

The code is here:


pdf(file=sprintf("test-%s.pdf", version$"svn rev"), width=4, height=4)
par(mai=par("mai")[rep(1:2,2)])
x = seq(0, 10*pi, length=3000)
plot(x*cbind(sin(x),cos(x)), type="l", col="mistyrose", lwd=3)

sink(textConnection("s", "w"))
options(width=40)
print(sessionInfo(), width=30)
sink()

text(-30, 30-4*seq(along=s), s, adj=c(0,0.5), cex=0.7) 
dev.off()



and one of the differences between the resulting PDF files is:
test-38323.pdf: /MediaBox [0 0 288 288]
test-38523.pdf: /MediaBox [0 0 595 841]

The former corresponds to 4x4 inches, the latter to 21cm x 29.67cm.



[Rd] Unexpected difference in Bounding Box of PDF graphics between 2.3.1p and 2.4 (PR#9070)
huber at ebi.ac.uk