From @ko@ty@h@k @end|ng |rom u||@edu  Sun Jan  5 05:08:23 2020
From: @ko@ty@h@k @end|ng |rom u||@edu (Scott Kostyshak)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 23:08:23 -0500
Subject: [Rd] [patch] add sanity checks to quantile()
In-Reply-To: <a445f4ee-04cb-7746-58c9-37982a327cf2@gmail.com>
References: <20190531052855.5zzdb2x7i4et3vyb@boogie>
 <20200104213523.xl4v4772qtiqbe7o@tallinn>
 <a445f4ee-04cb-7746-58c9-37982a327cf2@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200105040823.egrytyujuq6rtj4h@tallinn>

On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 06:32:15PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> 
> On 04/01/2020 4:35 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:28:55AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > The attached patch adds some sanity checks to the "type" argument of
> ...
> > Bump. For this type of patch proposal, is it better to use the
> > bug tracker?
> 
> For almost any patch proposal it is.  Certainly if you don't get action
> (or at least discussion) within a few days, any other proposal will be
> forgotten.
> 
> Duncan Murdoch

That makes sense. Thanks for the quick reply and advice. Here is the
ticket:

  https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17683

Scott


-- 
Scott Kostyshak
Assistant Professor of Economics
University of Florida
https://people.clas.ufl.edu/skostyshak/



[Rd] [patch] add sanity checks to quantile()
Scott Kostyshak