From ggrothendieck at gmail.com  Mon Nov 23 18:25:00 2009
From: ggrothendieck at gmail.com (Gabor Grothendieck)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:25:00 -0500
Subject: [Rd] CRAN Server download statistics (Was: R Usage Statistics)
In-Reply-To: <19210.49951.325550.851709@wap01.stat.uni-muenchen.de>
References: <C8F304C52E72EF4EBD6CBEF0A2DE1BAA08DC4B9C68@MBX2.AD.UCSD.EDU> 
	<f8e6ff050911230612t29831938w6c049a4de52f2ac@mail.gmail.com> 
	<971536df0911230643k464379f0xa05c7e13cd3c068@mail.gmail.com> 
	<19210.46156.807867.395652@wap01.stat.uni-muenchen.de>
	<971536df0911230834j7dd6ba87ta2f9e4c9661b4ed4@mail.gmail.com> 
	<19210.49951.325550.851709@wap01.stat.uni-muenchen.de>
Message-ID: <971536df0911230925y43238630p98c51ab852ad87a5@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Friedrich Leisch
<friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
> IP address plus time will always allow sysadmins to recover
> identities. For static adresses or in combination with mail headers
> etc it is also not exactly rocket science for others.

I had not suggested that identifying information be posted.  In fact,
quite the contrary -- I pointed out that it would be easy to code them
to preserve privacy.



[Rd] CRAN Server download statistics (Was: R Usage Statistics)
Gabor Grothendieck