From pkleiweg at xs4all.nl  Thu May  5 16:11:15 2005
From: pkleiweg at xs4all.nl (Peter Kleiweg)
Date: Thu May  5 16:11:23 2005
Subject: [Rd] documenation for arrows() is backwards (PR#7839)
In-Reply-To: <x2zmv9lu49.fsf@turmalin.kubism.ku.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505051610310.1096-100000@kleigh.nl>

Peter Dalgaard wrote:

> Peter Kleiweg <pkleiweg@xs4all.nl> writes:
>
> > Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> >
> > > hoffman.mm+R-project.org@ebi.ac.uk writes:
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > Let me point out that I for one do not consider it good netiquette to
> > > use fake or mangled email addresses on bug reports! I get enough mail
> > > from the Mailer Daemon as it is.
> >
> > Doesn't look like a fake or mangled address to me. You are not
> > familiar with the user+tag mail construct?
>
> It may be formally valid, but it still bounced....

In that case, just ignore my remark.


-- 
Peter Kleiweg
http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg/


[Rd] documenation for arrows() is backwards (PR#7839)
Peter Kleiweg