From ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de  Mon Sep 24 23:17:43 2012
From: ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de (Uwe Ligges)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:17:43 +0200
Subject: [Rd] license
In-Reply-To: <CAC2h7uusMhf9B4JaROucvqGUr1FyitSoZvRgVLoHz9yMgCT2yQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC2h7uusMhf9B4JaROucvqGUr1FyitSoZvRgVLoHz9yMgCT2yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5060CDF7.70701@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>



On 24.09.2012 19:30, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
> R-devel now gives a warning for a non-standard license (this may have
> happened for a while).

Yes, for several years now.

> In Rgraphviz we include the Graphviz source code, which is under
> Eclipse.  But the rest of the R package is under Artistic-2.0 or at
> least contains code from past contributors which were licensed under
> Artistic-2.0.

If it is possible to mix these two at all (I do not know the details)...

>
> The standard licenses does not really give an option for this
> situation, apart from using 'file LICENSE' (with details on this).

Yes, that's why it has been introduced: Describing non trivial license 
situations.

Best,
Uwe Ligges


> However, this situation - including an external piece of software -
> seems to me to be increasingly common.  It may be worthwhile to have
> the possibility of specifying this in a more machine readable way.
> But it may also be too complicated.  I just wanted to bring attention
> to the issue.
>
> Kasper
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



[Rd] license
Uwe Ligges