What was the impact of Citizens United vs FEC on the impact of corporations funding politicians in the United States?
Citizens United vs Federal Election Commitee (FEC) was critical in enabling corporate funding from poorly disclosed sources under the 1st amendment. The Supreme Court blocked the motion from the FEC to restrict Citizens United on releasing a 90 minute documentary that was funded by corporate interests with a perspective and directive of voting against Hilary Clinton. The proximity to the election coming up made the FEC weary of large monied interests having a stake in public discourse and electioneering.

Citizens United ultimately won this case, and it has opened the floodgates for Billionaires to fund certain Super PACs (Political Action Committees) and has made it very hard to get large corporations out of Washington DC and Congress, which ultimately has undermined the will of the American public across the political spectrum.
Qual foi o impacto do caso Cidadãos Unidos vs. FEC no impacto das corporações que financiam políticos nos Estados Unidos?
A Cidadãos Unidos contra o Comitê Eleitoral Federal (FEC) foi fundamental para permitir o financiamento corporativo de fontes mal divulgadas sob a 1a emenda. A Suprema Corte bloqueou a moção da FEC para restringir o lançamento de um documentário de 90 minutos que foi financiado por interesses corporativos com uma perspectiva e diretriz de votar contra Hillary Clinton. A proximidade da eleição fez com que a FEC ficasse cansada de grandes interesses monetizados tendo uma participação no discurso público e na campanha eleitoral.