Was Thanos right ?
In the 2018 sci-fi movie Avengers : Infinity war , the main protagonist “Thanos”, was obsessed with the idea of resource management . In a flash back to his story, he revealed that his planet suffered from overpopulation and hence lacked the necessary resources to maintain that society. The society and planet had subsequently ceased to exist. Thanos then believed that only by population control can you better manage the resources.  He set about to exterminate ½ the population of the galaxy. 

Thanos did succeed and as the 2019 blockbuster Avengers : Endgame and subsequent TV shows suggested , there were some positive environmental benefits to a reduced population. The issue is , and without stating the obvious that genocide is wrong , is that even with a reduced population, that rate that which humans would repopulate the world in the next one hundred years,  as a consequence of such staggering loss, would be exponentially faster than the last hundred years. Thereby defeating Thanos, plan for resource management. Instead Thanos should have explored technology for maximizing the longevity of those resources or looked at more sustainable solutions.
O Thanos tinha razão ?
No filme de ficção científica de 2018 Vingadores: Guerra Infinita, o protagonista principal, Thanos, estava obcecado com a ideia de gerenciamento de recursos. Em um flashback de sua história, ele revelou que seu planeta sofria de superpopulação e, portanto, não tinha os recursos necessários para manter essa sociedade. A sociedade e o planeta haviam, posteriormente, cessado de existir. Thanos acreditava que apenas pelo controle populacional você pode gerenciar melhor os recursos. Ele começou a exterminar 1⁄2 da população da galáxia. Thanos conseguiu e, como o blockbuster de 2019 Vingadores: Final de jogo e programas de TV subsequentes sugeriram, havia alguns benefícios ambientais positivos para uma população reduzida.