text: Metric graphs are meaningful objects for modeling complex structures that arise in many real-world applications, such as road networks, river systems, earthquake faults, blood vessels, and filamentary structures in galaxies. To study metric graphs in the context of comparison, we are interested in determining the relative discriminative capabilities of two topology-based distances between a pair of arbitrary finite metric graphs: the persistence distortion distance and the intrinsic Cech distance. We explicitly show how to compute the intrinsic Cech distance between two metric graphs based solely on knowledge of the shortest systems of loops for the graphs. Our main theorem establishes an inequality between the intrinsic Cech and persistence distortion distances in the case when one of the graphs is a bouquet graph and the other is arbitrary. The relationship also holds when both graphs are constructed via wedge sums of cycles and edges.
  @cite_18: 
  @cite_9: As graphical summaries for topological spaces and maps, Reeb graphs are common objects in the computer graphics or topological data analysis literature. Defining good metrics between these objects has become an important question for applications, where it matters to quantify the extent by which two given Reeb graphs differ. Recent contributions emphasize this aspect, proposing novel distances such as functional distortion or interleaving that are provably more discriminative than the so-called bottleneck distance, being true metrics whereas the latter is only a pseudo-metric. Their main drawback compared to the bottleneck distance is to be comparatively hard (if at all possible) to evaluate. Here we take the opposite view on the problem and show that the bottleneck distance is in fact good enough locally, in the sense that it is able to discriminate a Reeb graph from any other Reeb graph in a small enough neighborhood, as efficiently as the other metrics do. This suggests considering the intrinsic metrics induced by these distances, which turn out to be all globally equivalent. This novel viewpoint on the study of Reeb graphs has a potential impact on applications, where one may not only be interested in discriminating between data but also in interpolating between them.
  @cite_6: Metric graphs are ubiquitous in science and engineering. For example, many data are drawn from hidden spaces that are graph-like, such as the cosmic web. A metric graph offers one of the simplest yet still meaningful ways to represent the non-linear structure hidden behind the data. In this paper, we propose a new distance between two finite metric graphs, called the persistence-distortion distance, which draws upon a topological idea. This topological perspective along with the metric space viewpoint provide a new angle to the graph matching problem. Our persistence-distortion distance has two properties not shared by previous methods: First, it is stable against the perturbations of the input graph metrics. Second, it is a continuous distance measure, in the sense that it is defined on an alignment of the underlying spaces of input graphs, instead of merely their nodes. This makes our persistence-distortion distance robust against, for example, different discretizations of the same underlying graph. Despite considering the input graphs as continuous spaces, that is, taking all points into account, we show that we can compute the persistence-distortion distance in polynomial time. The time complexity for the discrete case where only graph nodes are considered is much faster.
  @cite_0: The Reeb graph is a construction that studies a topological space through the lens of a real valued function. It has been commonly used in applications, however its use on real data means that it is desirable and increasingly necessary to have methods for comparison of Reeb graphs. Recently, several metrics on the set of Reeb graphs have been proposed. In this paper, we focus on two: the functional distortion distance and the interleaving distance. The former is based on the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, while the latter utilizes the equivalence between Reeb graphs and a particular class of cosheaves. However, both are defined by constructing a near-isomorphism between the two graphs of study. In this paper, we show that the two metrics are strongly equivalent on the space of Reeb graphs. Our result also implies the bottleneck stability for persistence diagrams in terms of the Reeb graph interleaving distance.
  @cite_5: We propose a metric for Reeb graphs, called the functional distortion distance. Under this distance, the Reeb graph is stable against small changes of input functions. At the same time, it remains discriminative at differentiating input functions. In particular, the main result is that the functional distortion distance between two Reeb graphs is bounded from below by the bottleneck distance between both the ordinary and extended persistence diagrams for appropriate dimensions. As an application of our results, we analyze a natural simplification scheme for Reeb graphs, and show that persistent features in Reeb graph remains persistent under simplification. Understanding the stability of important features of the Reeb graph under simplification is an interesting problem on its own right, and critical to the practical usage of Reeb graphs.
summary: In the context of comparing the relative discriminative capabilities of these distances, Bauer, Ge, and Wang @cite_5 show that the functional distortion distance between two Reeb graphs is bounded from below by the bottleneck distance between the persistence diagrams of the Reeb graphs. Bauer, Munch, and Wang @cite_0 establish a strong equivalence between the functional distortion distance and the interleaving distance on the space of all Reeb graphs, which implies the two distances are within a constant factor of one another. Carri ere and Oudot @cite_9 consider the intrinsic versions of the aforementioned distances and prove that they are all globally equivalent. They also establish a lower bound for the bottleneck distance in terms of a constant multiple of the functional distortion distance. In @cite_6 , Dey, Shi, and Wang show that the persistence distortion distance is stable with respect to changes to input metric graphs as measured by the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. In other words, the persistence distortion distance is bounded above by a constant factor of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. Furthermore, the intrinsic distance is also bounded from above by the Gromov-Hausdorff distance for general metric spaces @cite_18 .