text: We consider the problem of inferring the topology of a network with M sources and N receivers (an M-by- N network), by sending probes between the sources and receivers. Prior work has shown that this problem can be decomposed into two parts: first, infer smaller subnetwork components (1-by- N's or 2-by-2's) and then merge them to identify the M-by- N topology. We focus on the second part, which had previously received less attention in the literature. We assume that a 1-by- N topology is given and that all 2-by-2 components can be queried and learned using end-to-end probes. The problem is which 2-by-2's to query and how to merge them with the given 1-by- N, so as to exactly identify the 2-by- N topology, and optimize a number of performance metrics, including the number of queries (which directly translates into measurement bandwidth), time complexity, and memory usage. We provide a lower bound, [N 2], on the number of 2-by-2's required by any active learning algorithm and propose two greedy algorithms. The first algorithm follows the framework of multiple hypothesis testing, in particular Generalized Binary Search (GBS). The second algorithm is called the Receiver Elimination Algorithm (REA) and follows a bottom-up approach. It requires exactly N-1 steps, which is much less than all (2N) possible 2-by-2's. Simulation results demonstrate that both algorithms correctly identify the 2-by- N topology and are near-optimal, but REA is more efficient in practice.
  @cite_39: We consider the problem of inferring the topology of an M-by-N network by sending probes between M sources and N receivers. Prior work has shown that this problem can be decomposed into two parts: first, infer smaller subnetwork components (i.e., 1-by-N's or 2-by-2's) and then merge these components to identify the M-by-N topology. In this paper, we focus on the second part. In particular, we assume that a 1by-N topology is given and that all 2-by-2 components can be queried and learned using end-to-end probes. The problem is which 2-by-2's to query and how to merge them with the 1-byN, so as to exactly identify the 2-by-N topology, and optimize a number of performance metrics including measurement traffic, time complexity, and memory usage. We provide a lower bound, ⌈N 2⌉, on the number of 2-by-2's required by any active learning algorithm and we also propose a greedy algorithm that is nearoptimal and efficient in practice. It follows a bottom-up approach: at every step, it selects two receivers, queries the corresponding 2-by-2, and merges it with the given 1-by-N. The algorithm requires exactly N - 1 steps, which is much less than all (N:2) possible 2-by-2's, and it correctly identifies the 2-by-N topology.
summary: Relation to the conference version. This journal paper builds on our conference paper in @cite_39 . In addition to revisions and elaborating on parts of the writing, new materials contributions in this paper include the following: the formulation of the problem in the GBS framework as well as the performance evaluation of the GBS algorithm via simulation, and its comparison against REA.