text: We develop a novel design framework for energy-efficient spectrum sharing among autonomous users who aim to minimize their energy consumptions subject to minimum throughput requirements. Most existing works proposed stationary spectrum sharing policies, in which users transmit at fixed power levels. Since users transmit simultaneously under stationary policies, to fulfill minimum throughput requirements, they need to transmit at high power levels to overcome interference. To improve energy efficiency, we construct nonstationary spectrum sharing policies, in which the users transmit at time-varying power levels. Specifically, we focus on TDMA (time-division multiple access) policies in which one user transmits at each time (but not in a round-robin fashion). The proposed policy can be implemented by each user running a low-complexity algorithm in a decentralized manner. It achieves high energy efficiency even when the users have erroneous and binary feedback about their interference levels. Moreover, it can adapt to the dynamic entry and exit of users. The proposed policy is also deviation-proof, namely autonomous users will find it in their self-interests to follow it. Compared to existing policies, the proposed policy can achieve an energy saving of up to 90 when the number of users is high.
  @cite_12: We develop a novel design framework for dynamic distributed spectrum sharing among secondary users (SUs), who adjust their power levels to compete for spectrum opportunities while satisfying the interference temperature (IT) constraints imposed by primary users. The considered interaction among the SUs is characterized by the following three unique features. First, the SUs are interacting with each other repeatedly and they can coexist in the system for a long time. Second, the SUs have limited and imperfect monitoring ability: they only observe whether the IT constraints are violated, and their observation is imperfect due to the erroneous measurements. Third, since the SUs are decentralized, they are selfish and aim to maximize their own long-term payoffs from utilizing the network rather than obeying the prescribed allocation of a centralized controller. To capture these unique features, we model the interaction of the SUs as a repeated game with imperfect monitoring. We first characterize the set of Pareto optimal operating points that can be achieved by deviation-proof spectrum sharing policies, which are policies that the selfish users find it in their interest to comply with. Next, for any given operating point in this set, we show how to construct a deviation-proof policy to achieve it. The constructed deviation-proof policy is amenable to distributed implementation, and allows users to transmit in a time-division multiple-access (TDMA) fashion. In the presence of strong multi-user interference, our policy outperforms existing spectrum sharing policies that dictate users to transmit at constant power levels simultaneously. Moreover, our policy can achieve Pareto optimality even when the SUs have limited and imperfect monitoring ability, as opposed to existing solutions based on repeated game models, which require perfect monitoring abilities. Simulation results validate our analytical results and quantify the performance gains enabled by the proposed spectrum sharing policies.
summary: Most related to this work is our previous work @cite_12 . However, the design frameworks proposed in @cite_12 and in this work are significantly different because the design objectives are different. In @cite_12 , we aimed to design TDMA spectrum sharing policies that maximize the users' total throughput without considering energy efficiency. Under this design objective, each user will transmit at the maximum power level in its slot, as long as the interference temperature constraint is not violated. Hence, what we optimized was . In this work, since we aim to minimize the energy consumption subject to the minimum throughput requirements, we need to optimize , which makes the design problem more challenging. Moreover, this work considers the scenario in which users enter and leave the network, which is not considered in @cite_12 .