text: Subjective questions such as does neymar dive', or is clinton lying', or is trump a fascist', are popular queries to web search engines, as can be seen by autocompletion suggestions on Google, Yahoo and Bing. In the era of cognitive computing, beyond search, they could be handled as hypotheses issued for evaluation. Our vision is to leverage on unstructured data and metadata of the rich user-generated multimedia that is often shared as material evidence in favor or against hypotheses in social media platforms. In this paper we present two preliminary experiments along those lines and discuss challenges for a cognitive computing system that collects material evidence from user-generated multimedia towards aggregating it into some form of collective decision on the hypothesis.
  @cite_12: 1. Introduction 2. The problem of sentiment analysis 3. Document sentiment classification 4. Sentence subjectivity and sentiment classification 5. Aspect sentiment classification 6. Aspect and entity extraction 7. Sentiment lexicon generation 8. Analysis of comparative opinions 9. Opinion summarization and search 10. Analysis of debates and comments 11. Mining intentions 12. Detecting fake or deceptive opinions 13. Quality of reviews.
summary: @cite_12 . The validation of natural language claims on arbitrary properties does not seem to suit well sentiment analysis techniques. We show why by means of an example from our collected web claims. The sentence '' receives positive sentiment, while the author clearly does not appreciate his perceived Neymar's behavior. So claim polarity detection taken as sentiment detection is misleading here.