text: Achieving optimal transmission throughput in data networks in a multi-hop wireless networks is fundamental but hard problem. The situation is aggravated when nodes are mobile. Further, multi-rate system make the analysis of throughput more complicated. In mobile scenario, link may break or be created as nodes are moving within communication range. Route Discovery' which is to find the optimal route and transmission schedule is an important issue. Route discovery entails some cost; so one would not like to initiate discovery too often. On the other hand, not discovering reasonably often entails the risk of being stuck with a suboptimal route and or schedule, which hurts end-to-end throughput. The implementation of the routing decision problem in one dimensional mobile ad hoc network as Markov decision process problem is already is discussed in the paper [1]. A heuristic based on threshold policy is discussed in the same paper without giving a way to find the threshold. In this paper, we suggested a rule for setting the threshold, given the parameters of the system. We also point out that our results remain valid in a slightly different mobility model; this model is a first step towards an open' network in which existing relay nodes can leave and or new relay nodes can join the network.
  @cite_9: Early simulation experience with wireless ad hoc networks suggests that their capacity can be surprisingly low, due to the requirement that nodes forward each others' packets. The achievable capacity depends on network size, traffic patterns, and detailed local radio interactions. This paper examines these factors alone and in combination, using simulation and analysis from first principles. Our results include both specific constants and general scaling relationships helpful in understanding the limitations of wireless ad hoc networks. We examine interactions of the 802.11 MAC and ad hoc forwarding and the effect on capacity for several simple configurations and traffic patterns. While 802.11 discovers reasonably good schedules, we nonetheless observe capacities markedly less than optimal for very simple chain and lattice networks with very regular traffic patterns. We validate some simulation results with experiments. We also show that the traffic pattern determines whether an ad hoc network's per node capacity will scale to large networks. In particular, we show that for total capacity to scale up with network size the average distance between source and destination nodes must remain small as the network grows. Non-local traffic-patterns in which this average distance grows with the network size result in a rapid decrease of per node capacity. Thus the question “Are large ad hoc networks feasible?” reduces to a question about the likely locality of communication in such networks.
  @cite_8: When n identical randomly located nodes, each capable of transmitting at W bits per second and using a fixed range, form a wireless network, the throughput spl lambda (n) obtainable by each node for a randomly chosen destination is spl Theta (W spl radic (nlogn)) bits per second under a noninterference protocol. If the nodes are optimally placed in a disk of unit area, traffic patterns are optimally assigned, and each transmission's range is optimally chosen, the bit-distance product that can be transported by the network per second is spl Theta (W spl radic An) bit-meters per second. Thus even under optimal circumstances, the throughput is only spl Theta (W spl radic n) bits per second for each node for a destination nonvanishingly far away. Similar results also hold under an alternate physical model where a required signal-to-interference ratio is specified for successful receptions. Fundamentally, it is the need for every node all over the domain to share whatever portion of the channel it is utilizing with nodes in its local neighborhood that is the reason for the constriction in capacity. Splitting the channel into several subchannels does not change any of the results. Some implications may be worth considering by designers. Since the throughput furnished to each user diminishes to zero as the number of users is increased, perhaps networks connecting smaller numbers of users, or featuring connections mostly with nearby neighbors, may be more likely to be find acceptance.
summary: Gupta and Kumar studied throughput of static wireless networks, @cite_8 . They have considered protocol model and physical model for the studying of impact of interfering transmission on SNR. They observed that in a network comprising of @math identical nodes, each of which communicating with another nodes, the throughput per node under protocol model is of order @math if placement of nodes is random. The throughput per node becomes @math if node placement and communication patterns is optimal. The later result is valid for physical model as explained intuitively by @cite_9 . While the overall on-hop throughput of the network grows as @math , the average path length grows as @math , which makes the throughput per node to vary as @math .