text: Most neural-network based speaker-adaptive acoustic models for speech synthesis can be categorized into either layer-based or input-code approaches. Although both approaches have their own pros and cons, most existing works on speaker adaptation focus on improving one or the other. In this paper, after we first systematically overview the common principles of neural-network based speaker-adaptive models, we show that these approaches can be represented in a unified framework and can be generalized further. More specifically, we introduce the use of scaling and bias codes as generalized means for speaker-adaptive transformation. By utilizing these codes, we can create a more efficient factorized speaker-adaptive model and capture advantages of both approaches while reducing their disadvantages. The experiments show that the proposed method can improve the performance of speaker adaptation compared with speaker adaptation based on the conventional input code.
  @cite_30: A trend in automatic speech recognition systems is the use of continuous mixture-density hidden Markov models (HMMs). Despite the good recognition performance that these systems achieve on average in large vocabulary applications, there is a large variability in performance across speakers. Performance degrades dramatically when the user is radically different from the training population. A popular technique that can improve the performance and robustness of a speech recognition system is adapting speech models to the speaker, and more generally to the channel and the task. In continuous mixture-density HMMs the number of component densities is typically very large, and it may not be feasible to acquire a sufficient amount of adaptation data for robust maximum-likelihood estimates. To solve this problem, the authors propose a constrained estimation technique for Gaussian mixture densities. The algorithm is evaluated on the large-vocabulary Wall Street Journal corpus for both native and nonnative speakers of American English. For nonnative speakers, the recognition error rate is approximately halved with only a small amount of adaptation data, and it approaches the speaker-independent accuracy achieved for native speakers. For native speakers, the recognition performance after adaptation improves to the accuracy of speaker-dependent systems that use six times as much training data. >
  @cite_31: Abstract This paper examines the application of linear transformations for speaker and environmental adaptation in an HMM-based speech recognition system. In particular, transformations that are trained in a maximum likelihood sense on adaptation data are investigated. Only model-based linear transforms are considered, since, for linear transforms, they subsume the appropriate feature–space transforms. The paper compares the two possible forms of model-based transforms: (i) unconstrained, where any combination of mean and variance transform may be used, and (ii) constrained, which requires the variance transform to have the same form as the mean transform. Re-estimation formulae for all appropriate cases of transform are given. This includes a new and efficient full variance transform and the extension of the constrained model–space transform from the simple diagonal case to the full or block–diagonal case. The constrained and unconstrained transforms are evaluated in terms of computational cost, recognition time efficiency, and use for speaker adaptive training. The recognition performance of the two model–space transforms on a large vocabulary speech recognition task using incremental adaptation is investigated. In addition, initial experiments using the constrained model–space transform for speaker adaptive training are detailed.
  @cite_24: 
summary: Constrained Maximum Likelihood Linear Regression (CMLLR) @cite_30 @cite_31 , also known as feature-space MLLR (fMLLR), is a widely used speaker adaptation technique for hidden Markov model (HMM)-based speech processing systems in which a speaker-dependent affine transformation is applied to source acoustic features to explain target data better. In the case of automatic speech recognition (ASR), the transformation acts as a method of normalization, whereas in the case of speech synthesis, the transformation purpose is to diverge the acoustic output to each target speaker @cite_24 . The fMLLR method can be described using the following equation: where @math is the source acoustic features, @math represents approximated acoustic features of the target speaker @math , @math is a full linear matrix and @math is the bias vector. @math and @math are transformation parameters specific to each speaker.