text: In a steady-state evolution, tournament selection traditionally uses the fitness function to select the parents, and negative selection chooses an individual to be replaced with an offspring. This contribution focuses on analyzing the behavior, in terms of performance, of different heuristics when used instead of the fitness function in tournament selection. The heuristics analyzed are related to measuring the similarity of the individuals in the semantic space. In addition, the analysis includes random selection and traditional tournament selection. These selection functions were implemented on our Semantic Genetic Programming system, namely EvoDAG, which is inspired by the geometric genetic operators and tested on 30 classification problems with a variable number of samples, variables, and classes. The result indicated that the combination of accuracy and the random selection, in the negative tournament, produces the best combination, and the difference in performances between this combination and the tournament selection is statistically significant. Furthermore, we compare EvoDAG's performance using the selection heuristics against 18 classifiers that included traditional approaches as well as auto-machine-learning techniques. The results indicate that our proposal is competitive with state-of-art classifiers. Finally, it is worth to mention that EvoDAG is available as open source software.
  @cite_5: Five alternative methods are proposed to perform multi-class classification tasks using genetic programming. These methods are: (1) binary decomposition, in which the problem is decomposed into a set of binary problems and standard genetic programming methods are applied; (2) static range selection, where the set of real values returned by a genetic program is divided into class boundaries using arbitrarily-chosen division points; (3) dynamic range selection, in which a subset of training examples are used to determine where, over the set of reals, class boundaries lie; (4) class enumeration, which constructs programs similar in syntactic structure to a decision tree; and (5) evidence accumulation, which allows separate branches of the program to add to the certainty of any given class. The results show that the dynamic range selection method is well-suited to the task of multi-class classification and is capable of producing classifiers that are more accurate than the other methods tried when comparable training times are allowed. The accuracy of the generated classifiers was comparable to alternative approaches over several data sets.
  @cite_51: We propose a new approach for designing classifiers for a c-class (c spl ges 2) problem using genetic programming (GP). The proposed approach takes an integrated view of all classes when the GP evolves. A multitree representation of chromosomes is used. In this context, we propose a modified crossover operation and a new mutation operation that reduces the destructive nature of conventional genetic operations. We use a new concept of unfitness of a tree to select trees for genetic operations. This gives more opportunity to unfit trees to become fit. A new concept of OR-ing chromosomes in the terminal population is introduced, which enables us to get a classifier with better performance. Finally, a weight-based scheme and some heuristic rules characterizing typical ambiguous situations are used for conflict resolution. The classifier is capable of saying "don't know" when faced with unfamiliar examples. The effectiveness of our scheme is demonstrated on several real data sets.
  @cite_17: Abstract This paper introduces a two-stage strategy for multi-class classification problems. The proposed technique is an advancement of tradition binary decomposition method. In the first stage, the classifiers are trained for each class versus the remaining classes. A modified fitness value is used to select good discriminators for the imbalanced data. In the second stage, the classifiers are integrated and treated as a single chromosome that can classify any of the classes from the dataset. A population of such classifier-chromosomes is created from good classifiers (for individual classes) of the first phase. This population is evolved further, with a fitness that combines accuracy and conflicts. The proposed method encourages the classifier combination with good discrimination among all classes and less conflicts. The two-stage learning has been tested on several benchmark datasets and results are found encouraging.
summary: Loveard and Ciesielski @cite_5 proposed different techniques for representing classification problems in GP; one of them assign the class based on a range, there were as many intervals as classes. Muni @cite_51 proposed to evolve a tree for each class following an equivalent strategy of one-vs-all approach. Jaben and Baig @cite_17 developed a two-stage method, the first one evolves a classifier for each class, and the second phases combine these classifiers.