text: We propose a concept system termed distributed base station (DBS), which enables distributed transmit beamforming at large carrier wavelengths to achieve significant range extension and or increased downlink data rate, providing a low-cost infrastructure for applications such as rural broadband. We consider a frequency division duplexed (FDD) system, using feedback from the receiver to achieve the required phase coherence. At a given range, @math cooperating transmitters can achieve @math -fold increase in received power compared to that for a single transmitters, and feedback-based algorithms with near-ideal performance have been prototyped. In this paper, however, we identify and address key technical issues in translating such power gains into range extension via a DBS. First, to combat the drop in per-node SNR with extended range, we design a feedback-based adaptation strategy that is suitably robust to noise. Second, to utilize available system bandwidth, we extend narrowband adaptation algorithms to wideband channels through interpolation over OFDM subcarriers. Third, we observe that the feedback channel may become a bottleneck unless sophisticated distributed reception strategies are employed, but show that acceptable performance can still be obtained with standard uplink reception if channel time variations are slow enough. We quantify system performance compactly via outage capacity analyses.
  @cite_4: 
  @cite_3: 
  @cite_24: We describe a fully-wireless prototype of distributed transmit beamforming on a software-defined radio platform. Distributed beamforming is a cooperative transmission technique that can achieve orders of magnitude increases in range or energy efficiency of wireless communication systems. However, this technique requires precise synchronization of the radio frequency signal from each transmitter. The significance of our prototype is in demonstrating that this requirement can be satisfied using digital signal processing methods on commodity hardware with low-quality oscillators. Our synchronization approach scales to large numbers of transmitters: each transmitter runs independent algorithms based on periodically transmitted feedback packets from the receiver. A key simplification is the decoupling of the algorithms for frequency locking and beamsteering at each transmitter, even though both processes use the same feedback packets. Frequency locking employs an Extended Kalman filter to track the local oscillator offset between a transmitter and the receiver, using frequency offset measurements based on the feedback packet waveform, while the phase adjustments for beamsteering are determined using a one-bit feedback algorithm based on the feedback packet it payload. Our prototype demonstrates that distributed transmit beamforming can be incorporated into wireless networks without requiring hardware innovations, and provides open-source building blocks for future research and development.
  @cite_2: Distributed transmit beamforming with N cooperating nodes, each with fixed transmit power, provides a received power scaling with N2, corresponding to a “power pooling” gain of N and a beamforming gain of N. Prior work has shown that the optimal beamforming solution can be attained using a decentralized, iterative algorithm based on one bit (per iteration) feedback broadcast from the receiver to the transmitters. The algorithm is provably convergent in a noiseless setting, and is the basis for several successful prototypes. In this paper, we develop a framework for providing analytical insight into the effect of receiver noise, with the following key question in mind: can we bootstrap the algorithm from the incoherent power-pooled solution to operate in a regime in which the received SNR per node can be made arbitrarily small as we scale up the number of nodes N? Our analytical computations, validated by simulations, yield a somewhat negative answer: while the power-pooling gain guarantees a linear increase in received power with N, the per-node SNR cannot be scaled down with N if we wish to attain a quadratic increase in received power. Specifically, the fraction of the ideal beamforming gain attained using the one-bit algorithm is asymptotically independent of N, and depends only on the per-node SNR. However, the one-bit algorithm provides significant performance gains in practical regimes with a moderate number of cooperating nodes: the per-node SNR required for attaining a substantial fraction of the beamforming gain is low enough (e.g., − 5dB for 65 of the beamforming gain) to provide significant extension in operation regimes, while providing aggregate SNRs which permit reliable communication at high spectral efficiency: for example, starting from −5 dB per-node SNR, we obtain about 11 dB aggregate SNR with 10 cooperating nodes, and 17 dB SNR with 20 cooperating nodes.
  @cite_34: Distributed beamforming is a form of cooperation among nodes in a wireless network to efficiently deliver a common message to a distant receiver. The critical requirement to achieve electromagnetic coherence is to synchronize the initial phases of all local oscillators, introducing minimal overhead and complexity. In the paper we introduce random, deterministic and hybrid algorithms, all based on feedback from the common receiver as the driving force, but with different phase update strategies. Our numerical results show that these algorithms achieve faster convergence time than previously proposed approaches.
  @cite_12: We propose and demonstrate a scalable architecture for distributed receive beamforming. In a receive cluster of N + 1 nodes receiving a message from a distant transmitter, N nodes are designated as amplify-and-forward relays and one node is designated as the receiver. The relay nodes apply a phase shift to their received signal and forward it such that their forwarded signals add up constructively at the receiver, with received SNR scaling linearly with N. This approach transforms a distributed receive beamforming problem on the "long link" from transmitter to receive cluster into a distributed transmit beamforming problem on the "short link" from relays to receiver, so that the number of degrees of freedom on the short link need not scale with N. A key simplification relative to distributed transmit beamforming is that, for stable oscillators, relay frequency synchronization is not required. For oscillators with drift, we provide a simple rule of thumb for when explicit frequency synchronization can be avoided. Explicit timing alignment can also be avoided by exploiting the timing of the message received on the long link. That leaves the problem of phase adjustment at the relays, and we employ an algorithm originally invented for distributed transmit beamforming for this purpose, using one bit (per iteration) feedback from the receiver. Experimental results with software-defined radios (whose oscillators have significant drift) demonstrate that the expected gains in received signal strength are obtained with the proposed architecture.
  @cite_17: In this paper an improved iterative algorithm is proposed for distributed transmit beamforming to achieve carrier phase alignment at the receiver. The transmitters adjust their phase offsets based on one-bit feedback from the receiver in each time slot. The proposed algorithm has an improvement in the convergence speed of phase alignment compared to a previously proposed algorithm in the literature by exploiting one-bit feedback information more efficiently. Simulation results show that the improved algorithm on average has a 20 faster convergence speed. The minimum number of time slots required to achieve specified beamforming gains and the corresponding perturbation steps are obtained by Monte Carlo simulations.
summary: A simple example of distributed beamforming with aggregated feedback is the one bit feedback algorithm @cite_4 @cite_3 , in which transmitters use small random phase perturbations to perform stochastic ascent on the received signal strength, based on the receiver feedback, broadcast to all transmitters, of one bit per iteration. This approach is simple and has formed the basis for several prototypes @cite_24 @cite_12 . The relatively slow convergence of the original algorithm (e.g., @math iterations to reach 75 knowledge of previous perturbations @cite_17 , or using knowledge of channel statistics at the receiver @cite_34 . However, the method is fundamentally mismatched to low per-node SNRs @cite_2 , roughly speaking, because noise masks the effect of small phase perturbations. This motivates our approach, in which the transmitters employ large phase perturbations during a training phase, rather than attempting to make small adjustments while beamforming.