text: Advances in CMOS-compatible photonic elements have made it plausible to exploit nanophotonic communications to overcome the limitations of traditional NoCs. Amongst various proposed nanophotonic architectures, optical crossbars have been shown to provide high performance in terms of bandwidth and latency. In general, optical crossbars provide a vast volume of network resources that are shared among all the cores within the chip. In this paper, we present a fair and efficient admission control mechanism for shared wavelengths and buffer space in optical crossbars. We model buffer management and wavelength assignment as a utility-based convex optimization problem, whose solution determines the admission control policy. Thanks to efficient convex optimization techniques, we obtain the globally optimal solution of the admission control optimization problem by using simple and yet efficient iterative algorithms. We cast our solution procedure as an iterative algorithm to be implemented a central admission controller. Our experimental results corroborate the gain that can be obtained by using such an admission controller to manage the shared resources of the system. Furthermore, they confirm that the proposed admission control algorithm works well for various traffic patterns and parameters, and evinces a tractable scalability with increase in the number of cores of the crossbar.
  @cite_53: The many cores design research community have shown high interest in optical crossbars on chip for more than a decade. Key properties of optical crossbars, namely a) contention free data routing b) low latency communication and c) potential for high bandwidth through the use of WDM, motivate several implementations of this type of interconnect. These implementations demonstrate very different scalability and power efficiency ability depending on three key design factors: a) the network topology, b) the considered layout and the c) the injection losses induced by the fabrication process. In this paper, the worst-case optical losses of crossbar implementations are compared according to the factors mentioned above. The comparison results has the potential to help many cores system designer to select the most appropriate crossbar implementation according, for instance, to the number of IP cores and the chip die size.
  @cite_21: 
  @cite_25: Although silicon optical technology is still in its formative stages, and the more near-term application is chip-to-chip communication, rapid advances have been made in the development of on-chip optical interconnects. In this paper, we investigate the integration of CMOS-compatible optical technology to on-chip cache-coherent buses in future CMPs. While not exhaustive, our investigation yields a hierarchical opto-electrical system that exploits the advantages of optical technology while abiding by projected limitations. Our evaluation shows that, for the applications considered, compared to an aggressive all-electrical bus of similar power and area, significant performance improvements can be achieved using an opto-electrical bus. This performance improvement is largely dependent on the application?s bandwidth demand and on the number of implemented wavelengths per optical waveguide. We also present a number of critical areas for future work that we discover in the course of our research.
summary: The architecture proposed by K @cite_25 is an instance of an optical crossbar where several Single Write, Multiple Read (SWMR) busses provide full connection among nodes. Each SWMR bus is dedicated exclusively to one node for sending data to others, whereas all other nodes can read data from all busses. A comparison study of worst-case optical losses for various crossbar implementations is presented in @cite_53 . @cite_21 introduce , which is a hybrid crossbar with nodes partitioned into clusters. While intra-cluster communication is done using smaller electrical crossbars, inter-cluster communication is realized by a SWMR optical crossbar. Unlike the architecture proposed in @cite_25 , optical packets are not broadcast to all nodes, but rather, the intended receiver is selected by auxiliary prior to each communication.