text: Neural Machine Translation (NMT) in low-resource settings and of morphologically rich languages is made difficult in part by data sparsity of vocabulary words. Several methods have been used to help reduce this sparsity, notably Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and a character-based CNN layer (charCNN). However, the charCNN has largely been neglected, possibly because it has only been compared to BPE rather than combined with it. We argue for a reconsideration of the charCNN, based on cross-lingual improvements on low-resource data. We translate from 8 languages into English, using a multi-way parallel collection of TED transcripts. We find that in most cases, using both BPE and a charCNN performs best, while in Hebrew, using a charCNN over words is best.
  @cite_10: Character-based neural machine translation (NMT) models alleviate out-of-vocabulary issues, learn morphology, and move us closer to completely end-to-end translation systems. Unfortunately, they are also very brittle and easily falter when presented with noisy data. In this paper, we confront NMT models with synthetic and natural sources of noise. We find that state-of-the-art models fail to translate even moderately noisy texts that humans have no trouble comprehending. We explore two approaches to increase model robustness: structure-invariant word representations and robust training on noisy texts. We find that a model based on a character convolutional neural network is able to simultaneously learn representations robust to multiple kinds of noise.
  @cite_3: Neural machine translation (MT) models obtain state-of-the-art performance while maintaining a simple, end-to-end architecture. However, little is known about what these models learn about source and target languages during the training process. In this work, we analyze the representations learned by neural MT models at various levels of granularity and empirically evaluate the quality of the representations for learning morphology through extrinsic part-of-speech and morphological tagging tasks. We conduct a thorough investigation along several parameters: word-based vs. character-based representations, depth of the encoding layer, the identity of the target language, and encoder vs. decoder representations. Our data-driven, quantitative evaluation sheds light on important aspects in the neural MT system and its ability to capture word structure.
summary: A few papers have worked with the charCNN and analyzed its performance. @cite_3 show that the hidden states of the charCNN can classify morphology better than standard seq2seq models at the word level. @cite_10 show that charCNNs are sensitive to various types of noise. Our analysis complements this line of work, supporting the conclusion that the charCNN is learning morphology better than standard seq2seq models and explores additionally how its strengths interact with BPE.