text: A basic problem in spectral clustering is the following. If a solution obtained from the spectral relaxation is close to an integral solution, is it possible to find this integral solution even though they might be in completely different basis? In this paper, we propose a new spectral clustering algorithm. It can recover a @math -partition such that the subspace corresponding to the span of its indicator vectors is @math close to the original subspace in spectral norm with @math being the minimum possible ( @math always). Moreover our algorithm does not impose any restriction on the cluster sizes. Previously, no algorithm was known which could find a @math -partition closer than @math . We present two applications for our algorithm. First one finds a disjoint union of bounded degree expanders which approximate a given graph in spectral norm. The second one is for approximating the sparsest @math -partition in a graph where each cluster have expansion at most @math provided @math where @math is the @math eigenvalue of Laplacian matrix. This significantly improves upon the previous algorithms, which required @math .
  @cite_6: Aiming to unify known results about clustering mixtures of distributions under separation conditions, Kumar and Kannan[2010] introduced a deterministic condition for clustering datasets. They showed that this single deterministic condition encompasses many previously studied clustering assumptions. More specifically, their proximity condition requires that in the target @math -clustering, the projection of a point @math onto the line joining its cluster center @math and some other center @math , is a large additive factor closer to @math than to @math . This additive factor can be roughly described as @math times the spectral norm of the matrix representing the differences between the given (known) dataset and the means of the (unknown) target clustering. Clearly, the proximity condition implies center separation -- the distance between any two centers must be as large as the above mentioned bound. In this paper we improve upon the work of Kumar and Kannan along several axes. First, we weaken the center separation bound by a factor of @math , and secondly we weaken the proximity condition by a factor of @math . Using these weaker bounds we still achieve the same guarantees when all points satisfy the proximity condition. We also achieve better guarantees when only @math -fraction of the points satisfy the weaker proximity condition. The bulk of our analysis relies only on center separation under which one can produce a clustering which (i) has low error, (ii) has low @math -means cost, and (iii) has centers very close to the target centers. Our improved separation condition allows us to match the results of the Planted Partition Model of McSherry[2001], improve upon the results of [2006], and improve separation results for mixture of Gaussian models in a particular setting.
summary: Perhaps the simplest case of is when there is a gap between the @math smallest eigenvalue of Laplacian matrix, @math , and @math of the form ( k+1 1 . ) One might think of this as a stability criteria: It implies that all @math -partitions with maximum expansion @math are @math -close to each other. To put it in another way, approximating the optimum @math -partition is at least as easy as finding a @math -partition with minimum possible expansion among all its clusters. For the case of @math , it is trivial to show that thresholding the second smallest eigenvector of Laplacian yields @math -close partition to the optimal one. On the other hand, when @math , the best prior result is due to @cite_6 , which can find a @math -partition that is @math -close to the optimal one. In other words, when @math , there is no algorithm known to find a non-trivial approximation of the optimum @math -partition.