text: Today, full-texts of scientific articles are often stored in different locations than the used datasets. Dataset registries aim at a closer integration by making datasets citable but authors typically refer to datasets using inconsistent abbreviations and heterogeneous metadata (e.g. title, publication year). It is thus hard to reproduce research results, to access datasets for further analysis, and to determine the impact of a dataset. Manually detecting references to datasets in scientific articles is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge in the underlying research domain.We propose and evaluate a semi-automatic three-step approach for finding explicit references to datasets in social sciences articles.We first extract pre-defined special features from dataset titles in the da|ra registry, then detect references to datasets using the extracted features, and finally match the references found with corresponding dataset titles. The approach does not require a corpus of articles (avoiding the cold start problem) and performs well on a test corpus. We achieved an F-measure of 0.84 for detecting references in full-texts and an F-measure of 0.83 for finding correct matches of detected references in the da|ra dataset registry.
  @cite_13: In this paper we address the problem of dataset extraction from research articles. With the growing digital data repositories and the demand of data centric research in data mining community, finding appropriate dataset for a research problem has become an essential step in scientific research. But given the wide variety of data usage in scientific research it is very difficult to figure out which datasets are most useful for a particular research topic. To alleviate this problem, an automated dataset search engine is a powerful tool. In this work we propose a novel approach to extract dataset names from research articles. We propose a novel way of using "web intelligence" from academic search engines and online dictionaries to mine dataset names from research articles. We also show a comparison between different sources of "web knowledge" by comparing different academic search engines such as Google scholar, Microsoft academic search. The performance of this approach is evaluated using standard information retrieval metric such as precision, recall and F-measure. We get an F-measure of 80 . This accuracy is significant for an unsupervised approach.
summary: sighal2013 proposed an approach to extract dataset names from articles @cite_13 . They employed the normalized Google distance algorithm (NGD), which estimates both the probability of two terms existing separately in a document, as well as of their co-occurrence. In this formula, @math is the number of all web pages searched. @math means the number of returned pages for @math as a query term and @math represents the number of pages for the intersection of @math and @math . They used two academic search engines -- Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic Search -- instead of a local corpus.