text: Visually comparing brain networks, or connectomes, is an essential task in the field of neuroscience. Especially relevant to the field of clinical neuroscience, group studies that examine differences between populations or changes over time within a population enable neuroscientists to reason about effective diagnoses and treatments for a range of neuropsychiatric disorders. In this paper, we specifically explore how visual analytics tools can be used to facilitate various clinical neuroscience tasks, in which observation and analysis of meaningful patterns in the connectome can support patient diagnosis and treatment. We conduct a survey of visualization tasks that enable clinical neuroscience activities, and further explore how existing connectome visualization tools support or fail to support these tasks. Based on our investigation of these tasks, we introduce a novel visualization tool, NeuroCave, to support group studies analyses. We discuss how our design decisions (the use of immersive visualization, the use of hierarchical clustering and dimensionality reduction techniques, and the choice of visual encodings) are motivated by these tasks. We evaluate NeuroCave through two use cases that illustrate the utility of interactive connectome visualization in clinical neuroscience contexts. In the first use case, we study sex differences using functional connectomes and discover hidden connectome patterns associated with well-known cognitive differences in spatial and verbal abilities. In the second use case, we show how the utility of visualizing the brain in different topological space coupled with clustering information can reveal the brain's intrinsic structure.
  @cite_44: The analysis of brain connectivity is a vast field in neuroscience with a frequent use of visual representations and an increasing need for visual analysis tools. Based on an in-depth literature review and interviews with neuroscientists, we explore high-level brain connectivity analysis tasks that need to be supported by dedicated visual analysis tools. A significant example of such a task is the comparison of different connectivity data in the form of weighted graphs. Several approaches have been suggested for graph comparison within information visualization, but the comparison of weighted graphs has not been addressed. We explored the design space of applicable visual representations and present augmented adjacency matrix and node-link visualizations. To assess which representation best support weighted graph comparison tasks, we performed a controlled experiment. Our findings suggest that matrices support these tasks well, outperforming node-link diagrams. These results have significant implications for the design of brain connectivity analysis tools that require weighted graph comparisons. They can also inform the design of visual analysis tools in other domains, e.g. comparison of weighted social networks or biological pathways.
summary: Extending the user task definitions presented in @cite_44 through a thorough investigation of connectome visualization projects and surveying neuroscientists that work with group studies, we have identified visual analytics tasks for clinical neuroscientists: