text: Universal algebra uniformly captures various algebraic structures, by expressing them as equational theories or abstract clones. The ubiquity of algebraic structures in mathematics and related fields has given rise to several variants of universal algebra, such as theories of symmetric operads, non-symmetric operads, generalised operads, PROPs, PROs, and monads. These variants of universal algebra are called notions of algebraic theory. In this paper, we develop a unified framework for them. The key observation is that each notion of algebraic theory can be identified with a monoidal category, in such a way that algebraic theories correspond to monoid objects therein. To incorporate semantics, we introduce a categorical structure called metamodel, which formalises a definition of models of algebraic theories. We also define morphisms between notions of algebraic theory, which are a monoidal version of profunctors. Every strong monoidal functor gives rise to an adjoint pair of such morphisms, and provides a uniform method to establish isomorphisms between categories of models in different notions of algebraic theory. A general structure-semantics adjointness result and a double categorical universal property of categories of models are also shown.
  @cite_3: There are many category-theoretic notions of algebraic theory, including Lawvere theories, monads, PROPs and operads. The first central notion of this thesis is a common generalisation of these, which we call a proto-theory. In order to define models of a proto-theory in a category, we need a way of relating the arities of the proto-theory with the objects of the category. This leads to our second central notion, that of an interpretation of arities, or aritation for short. We show that every aritation gives rise to a semantics functor sending proto-theories to models. In fact this functor always has an adjoint, giving a structure-semantics adjunction. Furthermore, we show that the semantics of proto-theories generalises the classical semantics of many existing notions of algebraic theory. Another aim of this thesis is to find a convenient category of monads in the following sense. Every right adjoint gives rise to a monad on its codomain, and more generally so does any functor that admits a codensity monad. However, not all functors have codensity monads. This means that the semantics functor for monads on a category, viewed as a functor into the category of all functors into the base category, does not have a left adjoint. We seek a generalisation of monads with a semantics functor that does have a left adjoint. This can be accomplished with proto-theories, but at a cost. The classical semantics functor for monads is full and faithful; this is a kind of completeness theorem, and is highly desirable in a notion of algebraic theory. However, the semantics functor for general proto-theories is not full and faithful. Thus we seek a generalisation of monads and their semantics for which the semantics functor is both full and faithful and has a left adjoint. We show that such a generalisation is given, for suitable base categories, by a certain kind of topological proto-theory.
summary: The framework by Avery @cite_3 is relative to a well-behaved 2-category (which he calls a ). In the basic setting of @math he identifies algebraic theories with identity-on-objects functor from a certain category @math of arities, calling them . In this case, the relationship to our work may be established by the fact that (putting size issues aside) identity-on-objects functors from @math correspond to monoid objects in @math (with the profunctor composition as the monoidal structure). This way we may understand Avery's framework (with respect to the setting @math ) within ours, although for general setting probably we cannot do so. However we remark that for specific examples of settings treated in @cite_3 , it seems that proto-theories therein can be identified with monoid objects in the category of a suitable variant of profunctors.