text: The emergence of high-dimensional data in various areas has brought new challenges to the ensemble clustering research. To deal with the curse of dimensionality, considerable efforts in ensemble clustering have been made by incorporating various subspace-based techniques. Besides the emphasis on subspaces, rather limited attention has been paid to the potential diversity in similarity dissimilarity metrics. It remains a surprisingly open problem in ensemble clustering how to create and aggregate a large number of diversified metrics, and furthermore, how to jointly exploit the multi-level diversity in the large number of metrics, subspaces, and clusters, in a unified framework. To tackle this problem, this paper proposes a novel multi-diversified ensemble clustering approach. In particular, we create a large number of diversified metrics by randomizing a scaled exponential similarity kernel, which are then coupled with random subspaces to form a large set of metric-subspace pairs. Based on the similarity matrices derived from these metric-subspace pairs, an ensemble of diversified base clusterings can thereby be constructed. Further, an entropy-based criterion is adopted to explore the cluster-wise diversity in ensembles, based on which the consensus function is therefore presented. Experimental results on twenty high-dimensional datasets have confirmed the superiority of our approach over the state-of-the-art.
  @cite_27: Since a large number of clustering algorithms exist, aggregating different clustered partitions into a single consolidated one to obtain better results has become an important problem. In Fred and Jain's evidence accumulation algorithm, they construct a co-association matrix on original partition labels, and then apply minimum spanning tree to this matrix for the combined clustering. In this paper, we will propose a novel clustering aggregation scheme, probability accumulation. In this algorithm, the construction of correlation matrices takes the cluster sizes of original clusterings into consideration. An alternate improved algorithm with additional pre- and post-processing is also proposed. Experimental results on both synthetic and real data-sets show that the proposed algorithms perform better than evidence accumulation, as well as some other methods.
  @cite_23: As a promising way for heterogeneous data analytics, consensus clustering has attracted increasing attention in recent decades. Among various excellent solutions, the co-association matrix based methods form a landmark, which redefines consensus clustering as a graph partition problem. Nevertheless, the relatively high time and space complexities preclude it from wide real-life applications. We, therefore, propose Spectral Ensemble Clustering (SEC) to leverage the advantages of co-association matrix in information integration but run more efficiently. We disclose the theoretical equivalence between SEC and weighted K-means clustering, which dramatically reduces the algorithmic complexity. We also derive the latent consensus function of SEC, which to our best knowledge is the first to bridge co-association matrix based methods to the methods with explicit global objective functions. Further, we prove in theory that SEC holds the robustness, generalizability, and convergence properties. We finally extend SEC to meet the challenge arising from incomplete basic partitions, based on which a row-segmentation scheme for big data clustering is proposed. Experiments on various real-world data sets in both ensemble and multi-view clustering scenarios demonstrate the superiority of SEC to some state-of-the-art methods. In particular, SEC seems to be a promising candidate for big data clustering.
  @cite_13: Data clustering is an important task and has found applications in numerous real-world problems. Since no single clustering algorithm is able to identify all different types of cluster shapes and structures, ensemble clustering was proposed to combine different partitions of the same data generated by multiple clustering algorithms. The key idea of most ensemble clustering algorithms is to find a partition that is consistent with most of the available partitions of the input data. One problem with these algorithms is their inability to handle uncertain data pairs, i.e. data pairs for which about half of the partitions put them into the same cluster and the other half do the opposite. When the number of uncertain data pairs is large, they can mislead the ensemble clustering algorithm in generating the final partition. To overcome this limitation, we propose an ensemble clustering approach based on the technique of matrix completion. The proposed algorithm constructs a partially observed similarity matrix based on the data pairs whose cluster memberships are agreed upon by most of the clustering algorithms in the ensemble. It then deploys the matrix completion algorithm to complete the similarity matrix. The final data partition is computed by applying an efficient spectral clustering algorithm to the completed matrix. Our empirical studies with multiple real-world datasets show that the proposed algorithm performs significantly better than the state-of-the-art algorithms for ensemble clustering.
  @cite_25: Organizing data into sensible groupings is one of the most fundamental modes of understanding and learning. As an example, a common scheme of scientific classification puts organisms into a system of ranked taxa: domain, kingdom, phylum, class, etc. Cluster analysis is the formal study of methods and algorithms for grouping, or clustering, objects according to measured or perceived intrinsic characteristics or similarity. Cluster analysis does not use category labels that tag objects with prior identifiers, i.e., class labels. The absence of category information distinguishes data clustering (unsupervised learning) from classification or discriminant analysis (supervised learning). The aim of clustering is to find structure in data and is therefore exploratory in nature. Clustering has a long and rich history in a variety of scientific fields. One of the most popular and simple clustering algorithms, K-means, was first published in 1955. In spite of the fact that K-means was proposed over 50 years ago and thousands of clustering algorithms have been published since then, K-means is still widely used. This speaks to the difficulty in designing a general purpose clustering algorithm and the ill-posed problem of clustering. We provide a brief overview of clustering, summarize well known clustering methods, discuss the major challenges and key issues in designing clustering algorithms, and point out some of the emerging and useful research directions, including semi-supervised clustering, ensemble clustering, simultaneous feature selection during data clustering, and large scale data clustering.
  @cite_17: We explore the idea of evidence accumulation (EAC) for combining the results of multiple clusterings. First, a clustering ensemble?a set of object partitions, is produced. Given a data set (n objects or patterns in d dimensions), different ways of producing data partitions are: 1) applying different clustering algorithms and 2) applying the same clustering algorithm with different values of parameters or initializations. Further, combinations of different data representations (feature spaces) and clustering algorithms can also provide a multitude of significantly different data partitionings. We propose a simple framework for extracting a consistent clustering, given the various partitions in a clustering ensemble. According to the EAC concept, each partition is viewed as an independent evidence of data organization, individual data partitions being combined, based on a voting mechanism, to generate a new n n similarity matrix between the n patterns. The final data partition of the n patterns is obtained by applying a hierarchical agglomerative clustering algorithm on this matrix. We have developed a theoretical framework for the analysis of the proposed clustering combination strategy and its evaluation, based on the concept of mutual information between data partitions. Stability of the results is evaluated using bootstrapping techniques. A detailed discussion of an evidence accumulation-based clustering algorithm, using a split and merge strategy based on the K-means clustering algorithm, is presented. Experimental results of the proposed method on several synthetic and real data sets are compared with other combination strategies, and with individual clustering results produced by well-known clustering algorithms.
summary: The pair-wise co-occurrence based methods @cite_17 @cite_27 @cite_13 typically construct a co-association matrix by considering the frequency that two data samples occur in the same cluster among the multiple base clusterings. The co-association matrix is then used as the similarity matrix for the data samples, upon which some clustering algorithms can thereby be performed to obtain the final clustering result. Fred and Jain @cite_17 first introduced the concept of the co-association matrix and proposed the evidence accumulation clustering (EAC) method, which applied a hierarchical agglomerative clustering algorithm @cite_25 on the co-association matrix to build the consensus clustering. To extend the EAC method, @cite_27 took the cluster sizes into consideration and proposed the probability accumulation method. @cite_13 dealt with the uncertain entries in the co-association matrix by first labeling them as unobserved, and then recovering the unobserved entries by the matrix completion technique. @cite_23 proved that the spectral clustering of the co-association matrix is equivalent to a weighted version of @math -means, and proposed the spectral ensemble clustering (SEC) method to effectively and efficiently obtain the consensus result.