text: Many real-world networks are prohibitively large for data retrieval, storage and analysis of all of its nodes and links. Understanding the structure and dynamics of these networks entails creating a smaller representative sample of the full graph while preserving its relevant topological properties. In this report, we show that graph sampling algorithms currently proposed in the literature are not able to preserve network properties even with sample sizes containing as many as 20 of the nodes from the original graph. We present a new sampling algorithm, called Tiny Sample Extractor, with a new goal of a sample size smaller than 5 of the original graph while preserving two key properties of a network, the degree distribution and its clustering co- efficient. Our approach is based on a new empirical method of estimating measurement biases in crawling algorithms and compensating for them accordingly. We present a detailed comparison of best known graph sampling algorithms, focusing in particular on how the properties of the sample subgraphs converge to those of the original graph as they grow. These results show that our sampling algorithm extracts a smaller subgraph than other algorithms while also achieving a closer convergence to the degree distribution, measured by the degree exponent, of the original graph. The subgraph generated by the Tiny Sample Extractor, however, is not necessarily representative of the full graph with regard to other proper ties such as assortativity. This indicates that the problem of extracting a truly representative small subgraph from a large graph remains unsolved.
  @cite_0: Summary: Biological and engineered networks have recently been shown to display network motifs: a small set of characteristic patterns that occur much more frequently than in randomized networks with the same degree sequence. Network motifs were demonstrated to play key information processing roles in biological regulation networks. Existing algorithms for detecting network motifs act by exhaustively enumerating all subgraphs with a given number of nodes in the network. The runtime of such algorithms increases strongly with network size. Here, we present a novel algorithm that allows estimation of subgraph concentrations and detection of network motifs at a runtime that is asymptotically independent of the network size. This algorithm is based on random sampling of subgraphs. Network motifs are detected with a surprisingly small number of samples in a wide variety of networks. Our method can be applied to estimate the concentrations of larger subgraphs in larger networks than was previously possible with exhaustive enumeration algorithms. We present results for high-order motifs in several biological networks and discuss their possible functions. Availability: A software tool for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs (mfinder 1.1) and further information is available at http: www.weizmann.ac.il mcb UriAlon
  @cite_17: A recurrent challenge for modern applications is the processing of large graphs. The ability to generate representative samples of smaller size is useful not only to circumvent scalability issues but also, per se, for statistical analysis and other data mining tasks. For such purposes adequate sampling techniques must be devised. We are interested, in this paper, in the uniform random sampling of a connected subgraph from a graph. We require that the sample contains a prescribed number of vertices. The sampled graph is the corresponding induced graph. We devise, present and discuss several algorithms that leverage three different techniques: Rejection Sampling, Random Walk and Markov Chain Monte Carlo. We empirically evaluate and compare the performance of the algorithms. We show that they are effective and efficient but that there is a trade-off, which depends on the density of the graphs and the sample size. We propose one novel algorithm, which we call Neighbour Reservoir Sampling (NRS), that very successfully realizes the trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency.
summary: A more rigorous but different approach to random subgraph sampling has only recently been attempted in @cite_17 which evaluates a number of different strategies including Random Vertex Expansion @cite_0 . However, while the subgraphs sampled in the methods proposed in @cite_17 achieve a sampling of subgraphs uniformly at random, they do not actually extract a single subgraph that is most representative of the full graph with respect to any given property. As a result, random sampling of subgraphs do not readily help us discern properties of the full graph, especially since the sampling of subgraphs uniformly at random leads to an over-representation of properties from dense portions of the graph.