text: In cloud computing environments, multiple tenants are often co-located on the same multi-processor system. Thus, preventing information leakage between tenants is crucial. While the hypervisor enforces software isolation, shared hardware, such as the CPU cache or memory bus, can leak sensitive information. For security reasons, shared memory between tenants is typically disabled. Furthermore, tenants often do not share a physical CPU. In this setting, cache attacks do not work and only a slow cross-CPU covert channel over the memory bus is known. In contrast, we demonstrate a high-speed covert channel as well as the first side-channel attack working across processors and without any shared memory. To build these attacks, we use the undocumented DRAM address mappings. We present two methods to reverse engineer the mapping of memory addresses to DRAM channels, ranks, and banks. One uses physical probing of the memory bus, the other runs entirely in software and is fully automated. Using this mapping, we introduce DRAMA attacks, a novel class of attacks that exploit the DRAM row buffer that is shared, even in multi-processor systems. Thus, our attacks work in the most restrictive environments. First, we build a covert channel with a capacity of up to 2 Mbps, which is three to four orders of magnitude faster than memory-bus-based channels. Second, we build a side-channel template attack that can automatically locate and monitor memory accesses. Third, we show how using the DRAM mappings improves existing attacks and in particular enables practical Rowhammer attacks on DDR4.
  @cite_23: Research on cache attacks has shown that CPU caches leak significant information. Proposed detection mechanisms assume that all cache attacks cause more cache hits and cache misses than benign applications and use hardware performance counters for detection. In this article, we show that this assumption does not hold by developing a novel attack technique: the Flush+Flush attack. The Flush+Flush attack only relies on the execution time of the flush instruction, which depends on whether data is cached or not. Flush+Flush does not make any memory accesses, contrary to any other cache attack. Thus, it causes no cache misses at all and the number of cache hits is reduced to a minimum due to the constant cache flushes. Therefore, Flush+Flush attacks are stealthy, i.e., the spy process cannot be detected based on cache hits and misses, or state-of-the-art detection mechanisms. The Flush+Flush attack runs in a higher frequency and thus is faster than any existing cache attack. With 496i¾?KB s in a cross-core covert channel it is 6.7 times faster than any previously published cache covert channel.
  @cite_17: Multi-processor systems are becoming the de-facto standard across different computing domains, ranging from high-end multi-tenant cloud servers to low-power mobile platforms. The denser integration of CPUs creates an opportunity for great economic savings achieved by packing processes of multiple tenants or by bundling all kinds of tasks at various privilege levels to share the same platform. This level of sharing carries with it a serious risk of leaking sensitive information through the shared microarchitectural components. Microarchitectural attacks initially only exploited core-private resources, but were quickly generalized to resources shared within the CPU. We present the first fine grain side channel attack that works across processors. The attack does not require CPU co-location of the attacker and the victim. The novelty of the proposed work is that, for the first time the directory protocol of high efficiency CPU interconnects is targeted. The directory protocol is common to all modern multi-CPU systems. Examples include AMD's HyperTransport, Intel's Quickpath, and ARM's AMBA Coherent Interconnect. The proposed attack does not rely on any specific characteristic of the cache hierarchy, e.g. inclusiveness. Note that inclusiveness was assumed in all earlier works. Furthermore, the viability of the proposed covert channel is demonstrated with two new attacks: by recovering a full AES key in OpenSSL, and a full ElGamal key in libgcrypt within the range of seconds on a shared AMD Opteron server.
summary: Attacks targeting the last-level cache are cross-core, but require the sender and receiver to run on the same physical CPU. Gruss al @cite_23 implemented cross-core covert channels using Prime+Probe and Flush+Reload as well as a new one, Flush+Flush, with the same protocol to normalize the results. The covert channel using Prime+Probe achieves 536 ,Kbps, Flush+Reload 2.3 ,Mbps, and Flush+Flush 3.8 ,Mbps. The most recent cache attack by Irazoqui al @cite_17 exploits cache coherency mechanisms and work across processors. It however requires shared memory.