text: We propose a novel causal coding scheme with forward error correction (FEC) for a point-to-point communication link with delayed feedback. The proposed model can learn the erasure pattern in the channel, and adaptively adjust its transmission and FEC rate based on the burstiness of the channel and the feedback. We investigate the throughput, and the in-order delivery delay of the adaptive causal coding algorithm, and contrast its performance with the one of the selective repeat (SR) ARQ. We demonstrate via an experimental study of the protocol that our model can double the throughput gains, and triple the gain in terms of mean in-order delivery delay when the channel is bursty, while keeping the difference between the maximum and mean in-order delivery delay is much smaller than SR ARQ. Closing the delay gap along with boosting the throughput is very promising for enabling ultra-reliable low-latency communications applications. We validate the performance of data delivery under the traces of Intel.
  @cite_5: Future 5G systems will need to support ultra-reliable low-latency communications scenarios. From a latency-reliability viewpoint, it is inefficient to rely on average utility-based system design. Therefore, we introduce the notion of guaranteeable delay which is the average delay plus three standard deviations of the mean. We investigate the trade-off between guaranteeable delay and throughput for the point-to-point wireless erasure links with unreliable and delayed feedback, by bringing together signal flow techniques to the area of coding. We use tiny codes, i.e., sliding window by coding with just 2 packets, and design three variations of selective-repeat ARQ protocols, by building on the baseline scheme, i.e., uncoded ARQ, developed by Ausavapattanakun and Nosratinia: (i) Hybrid ARQ with soft combining at the receiver; (ii) cumulative feedback-based ARQ without rate adaptation; and (iii) coded ARQ with rate adaptation based on the cumulative feedback. Contrasting the performance of these protocols with uncoded ARQ, we demonstrate that the HARQ performs only slightly better, the cumulative feedback-based ARQ does not provide significant throughput while it has a better average delay, and the Coded ARQ can provide gains up to about 40 in terms of throughput. The Coded ARQ also provides delay guarantees, and is robust to various challenges such as imperfect and delayed feedback, burst erasures, and round-trip time fluctuations. This feature may be preferable for meeting the strict end-to-end latency and reliability requirements of the future use cases of ultra-reliable low-latency communications in 5G, such as mission-critical communications and industrial control for critical control messaging.
  @cite_6: Reducing the in-order delivery, or playback, delay of reliable transport layer protocols over error prone networks can significantly improve application layer performance. This is especially true for applications that have time sensitive constraints such as streaming services. We explore the benefits of a coded generalization of selective repeat ARQ for minimizing the in-order delivery delay. An analysis of the delay's first two moments is provided so that we can determine when and how much redundancy should be added to meet a user's requirements. Numerical results help show the gains over selective repeat ARQ, as well as the trade-offs between meeting the user's delay constraints and the costs inflicted on the achievable rate. Finally, the analysis is compared with experimental results to help illustrate how our work can be used to help inform system decisions.
summary: Systematic codes have been proposed in @cite_6 , which are coded generalizations of selective repeat ARQ, and the adaptive coded ARQ model with cumulative feedback as in @cite_5 .