text: This paper describes an experimental comparison of three unsupervised learning algorithms that distinguish the sense of an ambiguous word in untagged text. The methods described in this paper, McQuitty's similarity analysis, Ward's minimum-variance method, and the EM algorithm, assign each instance of an ambiguous word to a known sense definition based solely on the values of automatically identifiable features in text. These methods and feature sets are found to be more successful in disambiguating nouns rather than adjectives or verbs. Overall, the most accurate of these procedures is McQuitty's similarity analysis in combination with a high dimensional feature set.
  @cite_24: Previous work [Gale, Church and Yarowsky, 1992] showed that with high probability a polysemous word has one sense per discourse. In this paper we show that for certain definitions of collocation, a polysemous word exhibits essentially only one sense per collocation. We test this empirical hypothesis for several definitions of sense and collocation, and discover that it holds with 90--99 accuracy for binary ambiguities. We utilize this property in a disambiguation algorithm that achieves precision of 92 using combined models of very local context.
  @cite_23: This paper presents an unsupervised learning algorithm for sense disambiguation that, when trained on unannotated English text, rivals the performance of supervised techniques that require time-consuming hand annotations. The algorithm is based on two powerful constraints---that words tend to have one sense per discourse and one sense per collocation---exploited in an iterative bootstrapping procedure. Tested accuracy exceeds 96 .
summary: While @cite_23 does not discuss distinguishing more than 2 senses of a word, there is no immediate reason to doubt that the one sense per collocation'' rule @cite_24 would still hold for a larger number of senses. In future work we will evaluate using the one sense per collocation'' rule to seed our various methods. This may help in dealing with very skewed distributions of senses since we currently select collocations based simply on frequency.