text: Recently, a parametrized class of loss functions called @math -loss, @math , has been introduced for classification. This family, which includes the log-loss and the 0-1 loss as special cases, comes with compelling properties including an equivalent margin-based form which is classification-calibrated for all @math . We introduce a generalization of this family to the entire range of @math and establish how the parameter @math enables the practitioner to choose among a host of operating conditions that are important in modern machine learning tasks. We prove that smaller @math values are more conducive to faster optimization; in fact, @math -loss is convex for @math and quasi-convex for @math . Moreover, we establish bounds to quantify the degradation of the local-quasi-convexity of the optimization landscape as @math increases; we show that this directly translates to a computational slow down. On the other hand, our theoretical results also suggest that larger @math values lead to better generalization performance. This is a consequence of the ability of the @math -loss to limit the effect of less likely data as @math increases from 1, thereby facilitating robustness to outliers and noise in the training data. We provide strong evidence supporting this assertion with several experiments on benchmark datasets that establish the efficacy of @math -loss for @math in robustness to errors in the training data. Of equal interest is the fact that, for @math , our experiments show that the decreased robustness seems to counteract class imbalances in training data.
  @cite_18: Many of the classification algorithms developed in the machine learning literature, including the support vector machine and boosting, can be viewed as minimum contrast methods that minimize a convex surrogate of the 0–1 loss function. The convexity makes these algorithms computationally efficient. The use of a surrogate, however, has statistical consequences that must be balanced against the computational virtues of convexity. To study these issues, we provide a general quantitative relationship between the risk as assessed using the 0–1 loss and the risk as assessed using any nonnegative surrogate loss function. We show that this relationship gives nontrivial upper bounds on excess risk under the weakest possible condition on the loss function—that it satisfies a pointwise form of Fisher consistency for classification. The relationship is based on a simple variational transformation of the loss function that is easy to compute in many applications. We also present a refined version of this result in the...
  @cite_9: We present @math -loss, @math , a tunable loss function for binary classification that bridges log-loss ( @math ) and @math - @math loss ( @math ). We prove that @math -loss has an equivalent margin-based form and is classification-calibrated, two desirable properties for a good surrogate loss function for the ideal yet intractable @math - @math loss. For logistic regression-based classification, we provide an upper bound on the difference between the empirical and expected risk for @math -loss by exploiting its Lipschitzianity along with recent results on the landscape features of empirical risk functions. Finally, we show that @math -loss with @math performs better than log-loss on MNIST for logistic regression.
  @cite_0: In many classification procedures, the classification function is obtained by minimizing a certain empirical risk on the training sample. The classification is then based on the sign of the classification function. In recent years, there have been a host of classification methods proposed that use different margin-based loss functions. The margin-based loss functions are often motivated as upper bounds of the misclassification loss, but this cannot explain the statistical properties of the classification procedures. We show that a large family of margin-based loss functions are Fisher consistent for classification. That is, the population minimizer of the loss function leads to the Bayes optimal rule of classification. Our result covers almost all margin-based loss functions that have been proposed in the literature. We give an inequality that links the Fisher consistency of margin-based loss functions with the consistency of methods based on these loss functions. We use this inequality to obtain the rate of convergence for the method of sieves based on a class of margin-based loss functions.
  @cite_2: The machine learning problem of classifier design is studied from the perspective of probability elicitation, in statistics. This shows that the standard approach of proceeding from the specification of a loss, to the minimization of conditional risk is overly restrictive. It is shown that a better alternative is to start from the specification of a functional form for the minimum conditional risk, and derive the loss function. This has various consequences of practical interest, such as showing that 1) the widely adopted practice of relying on convex loss functions is unnecessary, and 2) many new losses can be derived for classification problems. These points are illustrated by the derivation of a new loss which is not convex, but does not compromise the computational tractability of classifier design, and is robust to the contamination of data with outliers. A new boosting algorithm, SavageBoost, is derived for the minimization of this loss. Experimental results show that it is indeed less sensitive to outliers than conventional methods, such as Ada, Real, or LogitBoost, and converges in fewer iterations.
  @cite_10: The goal of binary classification is to estimate a discriminant function y from observations of covariate vectors and corresponding binary labels. We consider an elaboration of this problem in which the covariates are not available directly but are transformed by a dimensionality-reducing quantizer Q. We present conditions on loss functions such that empirical risk minimization yields Bayes consistency when both the discriminant function and the quantizer are estimated. These conditions are stated in terms of a general correspondence between loss functions and a class of functionals known as Ali-Silvey or -divergence functionals. Whereas this correspondence was established by Blackwell [Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. Probab. Statist. 1 (1951) 93-102. Univ. California Press, Berkeley] for the 0-1 loss, we extend the correspondence to the broader class of surrogate loss functions that play a key role in the general theory of Bayes consistency for binary classification. Our result makes it possible to pick out the (strict) subset of surrogate loss functions that yield Bayes consistency for joint estimation of the discriminant function and the quantizer.
summary: For binary classification, where @math , it is common to use classification functions of the form @math such that the classifier, for any given @math , outputs the hypothesis (hard decision) @math @cite_18 @cite_0 @cite_10 @cite_2 @cite_9 . A classification function corresponds to the certainty of an algorithm's prediction (e.g., SVM). Examples of loss functions that act on classification functions include logistic loss, hinge loss, and square loss.