text: A basic problem in spectral clustering is the following. If a solution obtained from the spectral relaxation is close to an integral solution, is it possible to find this integral solution even though they might be in completely different basis? In this paper, we propose a new spectral clustering algorithm. It can recover a @math -partition such that the subspace corresponding to the span of its indicator vectors is @math close to the original subspace in spectral norm with @math being the minimum possible ( @math always). Moreover our algorithm does not impose any restriction on the cluster sizes. Previously, no algorithm was known which could find a @math -partition closer than @math . We present two applications for our algorithm. First one finds a disjoint union of bounded degree expanders which approximate a given graph in spectral norm. The second one is for approximating the sparsest @math -partition in a graph where each cluster have expansion at most @math provided @math where @math is the @math eigenvalue of Laplacian matrix. This significantly improves upon the previous algorithms, which required @math .
  @cite_4: There has been much progress on efficient algorithms for clustering data points generated by a mixture of @math probability distributions under the assumption that the means of the distributions are well-separated, i.e., the distance between the means of any two distributions is at least @math standard deviations. These results generally make heavy use of the generative model and particular properties of the distributions. In this paper, we show that a simple clustering algorithm works without assuming any generative (probabilistic) model. Our only assumption is what we call a "proximity condition": the projection of any data point onto the line joining its cluster center to any other cluster center is @math standard deviations closer to its own center than the other center. Here the notion of standard deviations is based on the spectral norm of the matrix whose rows represent the difference between a point and the mean of the cluster to which it belongs. We show that in the generative models studied, our proximity condition is satisfied and so we are able to derive most known results for generative models as corollaries of our main result. We also prove some new results for generative models - e.g., we can cluster all but a small fraction of points only assuming a bound on the variance. Our algorithm relies on the well known @math -means algorithm, and along the way, we prove a result of independent interest -- that the @math -means algorithm converges to the "true centers" even in the presence of spurious points provided the initial (estimated) centers are close enough to the corresponding actual centers and all but a small fraction of the points satisfy the proximity condition. Finally, we present a new technique for boosting the ratio of inter-center separation to standard deviation.
  @cite_6: Aiming to unify known results about clustering mixtures of distributions under separation conditions, Kumar and Kannan[2010] introduced a deterministic condition for clustering datasets. They showed that this single deterministic condition encompasses many previously studied clustering assumptions. More specifically, their proximity condition requires that in the target @math -clustering, the projection of a point @math onto the line joining its cluster center @math and some other center @math , is a large additive factor closer to @math than to @math . This additive factor can be roughly described as @math times the spectral norm of the matrix representing the differences between the given (known) dataset and the means of the (unknown) target clustering. Clearly, the proximity condition implies center separation -- the distance between any two centers must be as large as the above mentioned bound. In this paper we improve upon the work of Kumar and Kannan along several axes. First, we weaken the center separation bound by a factor of @math , and secondly we weaken the proximity condition by a factor of @math . Using these weaker bounds we still achieve the same guarantees when all points satisfy the proximity condition. We also achieve better guarantees when only @math -fraction of the points satisfy the weaker proximity condition. The bulk of our analysis relies only on center separation under which one can produce a clustering which (i) has low error, (ii) has low @math -means cost, and (iii) has centers very close to the target centers. Our improved separation condition allows us to match the results of the Planted Partition Model of McSherry[2001], improve upon the results of [2006], and improve separation results for mixture of Gaussian models in a particular setting.
  @cite_12: We motivate and develop a natural bicriteria measure for assessing the quality of a clustering that avoids the drawbacks of existing measures. A simple recursive heuristic is shown to have poly-logarithmic worst-case guarantees under the new measure. The main result of the article is the analysis of a popular spectral algorithm. One variant of spectral clustering turns out to have effective worst-case guarantees; another finds a "good" clustering, if one exists.
summary: One of the first spectral clustering algorithms with worst case guarantees was given in @cite_12 for the graph partitioning problem assuming certain conditions on the internal versus external conductance. The problem of finding a @math -partition so as to minimize the spectral norm was first introduced by @cite_4 in the context of learning mixtures of Gaussians. The best known approximation factor is @math due to @cite_6 .