text: It is well known that size-based scheduling policies, which take into account job size (i.e., the time it takes to run them), can perform very desirably in terms of both response time and fairness. Unfortunately, the requirement of knowing a priori the exact job size is a major obstacle which is frequently insurmountable in practice. Often, it is possible to get a coarse estimation of job size, but unfortunately analytical results with inexact job sizes are challenging to obtain, and simulation-based studies show that several size-based algorithm are severely impacted by job estimation errors. For example, Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT), which yields optimal mean sojourn time when job sizes are known exactly, can drastically underperform when it is fed inexact job sizes. Some algorithms have been proposed to better handle size estimation errors, but they are somewhat complex and this makes their analysis challenging. We consider Shortest Processing Time (SPT), a simplification of SRPT that skips the update of "remaining" job size and results in a preemptive algorithm that simply schedules the job with the shortest estimated processing time. When job size is inexact, SPT performs comparably to the best known algorithms in the presence of errors, while being definitely simpler. In this work, SPT is evaluated through simulation, showing near-optimal performance in many cases, with the hope that its simplicity can open the way to analytical evaluation even when inexact inputs are considered.
  @cite_18: Previous job scheduling studies indicate that providing rapid response to interactive jobs which place frequent but small demands, can reduce the overall system average response time [1], especially when the job size distribution is skewed (see [2] and references therein). Since the distribution of Internet flows is skewed, it is natural to design a network system that favors short file transfers through service differentiation. However, to maintain system scalability, detailed per-flow state such as flow length is generally not available inside the network. As a result, we usually resort to a threshold-based heuristic to identify and give preference to short flows. Specifically, packets from a new flow are always given the highest priority. However, the priority is reduced once the flow has transferred a certain amount of packets.In this paper, we use the MultiLevel (ML) feedback queue [3] to characterize this discriminatory system. However, the solution given in [3] is in the form of an integral equation, and to date the equation has been solved only for job size distribution that has the form of mixed exponential functions. We adopt an alternative approach, namely using a conservation law by Kleinrock [1], to solve for the average response time in such system. To that end, we approximate the average response time of jobs by a linear function in the job size and solve for the stretch (service slowdown) factors. We show by simulation that such approximation works well for job (flow) size distributions that possess the heavy-tailed property [2], although it does not work so well for exponential distributions.Due to the limited space available, in Section 2 we briefly describe the queueing model and summarize our approximation approach to solving for the average response time of the M G 1 ML queueing system. We conclude our paper in Section 3.
  @cite_34: Recent studies of Internet traffic have shown that flow size distributions often exhibit a high variability property in the sense that most of the flows are short and more than half of the total load is constituted by a small percentage of the largest flows. In the light of this observation, it is interesting to revisit scheduling policies that are known to favor small jobs in order to quantify the benefit for small and the penalty for large jobs. Among all scheduling policies that do not require knowledge of job size, the least attained service (LAS) scheduling policy is known to favor small jobs the most. We investigate the M G 1 LAS queue for both, load ? < 1 and ? = 1. Our analysis shows that for job size distributions with a high variability property, LAS favors short jobs with a negligible penalty to the few largest jobs, and that LAS achieves a mean response time over all jobs that is close to the mean response time achieved by SRPT.Finally, we implement LAS in the ns-2 network simulator to study its performance benefits for TCP flows. When LAS is used to schedule packets over the bottleneck link, more than 99 of the shortest flows experience smaller mean response times under LAS than under FIFO and only the largest jobs observe a negligible increase in response time. The benefit of using LAS as compared to FIFO is most pronounced at high load.
  @cite_17: 
summary: While many works have studied scheduling for single-server queues, most of them focused on the extreme cases where job size is either completely unknown ( algorithms) or known perfectly. When the job size distribution is skewed---meaning that resources are occupied most of the time by a minority of large jobs---algorithms such as Least Attained Service (LAS) @cite_34 or multi-level queues @cite_17 @cite_18 can still perform well by prioritizing new jobs. LAS is evaluated experimentally in this work; for more details about it, see .