text: Evolution Strategies (ES) have recently been demonstrated to be a viable alternative to reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms on a set of challenging deep RL problems, including Atari games and MuJoCo humanoid locomotion benchmarks. While the ES algorithms in that work belonged to the specialized class of natural evolution strategies (which resemble approximate gradient RL algorithms, such as REINFORCE), we demonstrate that even a very basic canonical ES algorithm can achieve the same or even better performance. This success of a basic ES algorithm suggests that the state-of-the-art can be advanced further by integrating the many advances made in the field of ES in the last decades. We also demonstrate qualitatively that ES algorithms have very different performance characteristics than traditional RL algorithms: on some games, they learn to exploit the environment and perform much better while on others they can get stuck in suboptimal local minima. Combining their strengths with those of traditional RL algorithms is therefore likely to lead to new advances in the state of the art.
  @cite_22: Recently, researchers have made significant progress combining the advances in deep learning for learning feature representations with reinforcement learning. Some notable examples include training agents to play Atari games based on raw pixel data and to acquire advanced manipulation skills using raw sensory inputs. However, it has been difficult to quantify progress in the domain of continuous control due to the lack of a commonly adopted benchmark. In this work, we present a benchmark suite of continuous control tasks, including classic tasks like cart-pole swing-up, tasks with very high state and action dimensionality such as 3D humanoid locomotion, tasks with partial observations, and tasks with hierarchical structure. We report novel findings based on the systematic evaluation of a range of implemented reinforcement learning algorithms. Both the benchmark and reference implementations are released at https: github.com rllab rllab in order to facilitate experimental reproducibility and to encourage adoption by other researchers.
  @cite_8: This paper presents a novel evolutionary optimization strategy based on the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES). This new approach is intended to reduce the number of generations required for convergence to the optimum. Reducing the number of generations, i.e., the time complexity of the algorithm, is important if a large population size is desired: (1) to reduce the effect of noise; (2) to improve global search properties; and (3) to implement the algorithm on (highly) parallel machines. Our method results in a highly parallel algorithm which scales favorably with large numbers of processors. This is accomplished by efficiently incorporating the available information from a large population, thus significantly reducing the number of generations needed to adapt the covariance matrix. The original version of the CMA-ES was designed to reliably adapt the covariance matrix in small populations but it cannot exploit large populations efficiently. Our modifications scale up the efficiency to population sizes of up to 10n, where n is the problem dimension. This method has been applied to a large number of test problems, demonstrating that in many cases the CMA-ES can be advanced from quadratic to linear time complexity.
  @cite_9: Uncertainty arises in reinforcement learning from various sources, and therefore it is necessary to consider statistics based on several roll-outs for evaluating behavioral policies. We add an adaptive uncertainty handling based on Hoeffding and empirical Bernstein races to the CMA-ES, a variable metric evolution strategy proposed for direct policy search. The uncertainty handling adjusts individually the number of episodes considered for the evaluation of a policy. The performance estimation is kept just accurate enough for a sufficiently good ranking of candidate policies, which is in turn sufficient for the CMA-ES to find better solutions. This increases the learning speed as well as the robustness of the algorithm.
  @cite_27: We give an overview of recent exciting achievements of deep reinforcement learning (RL). We discuss six core elements, six important mechanisms, and twelve applications. We start with background of machine learning, deep learning and reinforcement learning. Next we discuss core RL elements, including value function, in particular, Deep Q-Network (DQN), policy, reward, model, planning, and exploration. After that, we discuss important mechanisms for RL, including attention and memory, unsupervised learning, transfer learning, multi-agent RL, hierarchical RL, and learning to learn. Then we discuss various applications of RL, including games, in particular, AlphaGo, robotics, natural language processing, including dialogue systems, machine translation, and text generation, computer vision, neural architecture design, business management, finance, healthcare, Industry 4.0, smart grid, intelligent transportation systems, and computer systems. We mention topics not reviewed yet, and list a collection of RL resources. After presenting a brief summary, we close with discussions. Please see Deep Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:1810.06339, for a significant update.
  @cite_5: Policy improvement methods seek to optimize the parameters of a policy with respect to a utility function. Owing to current trends involving searching in parameter space (rather than action space) and using reward-weighted averaging (rather than gradient estimation), reinforcement learning algorithms for policy improvement, e.g. PoWER and PI2, are now able to learn sophisticated high-dimensional robot skills. A side-effect of these trends has been that, over the last 15 years, reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have become more and more similar to evolution strategies such as (μW , λ)-ES and CMA-ES. Evolution strategies treat policy improvement as a black-box optimization problem, and thus do not leverage the problem structure, whereas RL algorithms do. In this paper, we demonstrate how two straightforward simplifications to the state-of-the-art RL algorithm PI2 suffice to convert it into the black-box optimization algorithm (μW, λ)-ES. Furthermore, we show that (μW , λ)-ES empirically outperforms PI2 on the tasks in [36]. It is striking that PI2 and (μW , λ)-ES share a common core, and that the simpler algorithm converges faster and leads to similar or lower final costs. We argue that this difference is due to a third trend in robot skill learning: the predominant use of dynamic movement primitives (DMPs). We show how DMPs dramatically simplify the learning problem, and discuss the implications of this for past and future work on policy improvement for robot skill learning
summary: Evolutionary strategies, such as the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES @cite_8 ), are commonly used as a baseline approach in reinforcement learning tasks @cite_9 @cite_5 @cite_22 @cite_27 . Here, we only discuss the most recent related works, which also followed up on the work by ; in particular, we discuss three related arXiv preprints that scientists at Uber released in the last two months about work concurrent to ours.