Bjørn Lomborgs artikler i aviser som The Wall Street Journal og The Telegraph er gentagne gange blevet kontrolleret af [[Climate Feedback]], et verdensomspændende netværk af forskere, der kollektivt vurderer troværdigheden af den indflydelsesrige mediedækning af klimaændringer. I alle tilfælde lå den videnskabelige troværdighed mellem "lav" og "meget lav". Climate Feedbacks forskere konkluderer, at Lomborg i ét tilfælde "practices cherry-picking"<ref>https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/wall-street-journal-bjorn-lomborg-alarming-thing-climate-alarmism/</ref>, i et andet tilfælde, at han "had reached his conclusions through cherry-picking from a small subset of the evidence, misrepresenting the results of existing studies, and relying on flawed reasoning"<ref>https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/bjorn-lomborg-overheated-climate-alarm-wall-street-journal/</ref>, i et tredje tilfælde, at "[his] article [is in] blatant disagreement with available scientific evidence, while the author does not offer adequate evidence to support his statements",<ref>https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/the-telegraph-bjorn-lomborg-in-many-ways-global-warming-will-be-good-thing/</ref> og i et fjerde tilfælde, at "The author, Bjorn Lomborg, cherry-picks this specific piece of research and uses it in support of a broad argument against the value of climate policy. He also misrepresents the Paris Agreement to downplay its potential to curb future climate change."<ref>https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/sea-level-rise-those-non-disappearing-pacific-islands-bjorn-lomborg-wall-street-journal/</ref>
Levende_personer Politik Historie Kommunikation Kultur Vegetarer Hobby Organisationer Uddannelsesinstitutioner