Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Fixing Bias in Reconstruction-based Anomaly Detection with Lipschitz
  Discriminators   Anomaly detection is of great interest in fields where abnormalities need to
be identified and corrected (e.g., medicine and finance). Deep learning methods
for this task often rely on autoencoder reconstruction error, sometimes in
conjunction with other errors. We show that this approach exhibits intrinsic
biases that lead to undesirable results. Reconstruction-based methods are
sensitive to training-data outliers and simple-to-reconstruct points. Instead,
we introduce a new unsupervised Lipschitz anomaly discriminator that does not
suffer from these biases. Our anomaly discriminator is trained, similar to the
ones used in GANs, to detect the difference between the training data and
corruptions of the training data. We show that this procedure successfully
detects unseen anomalies with guarantees on those that have a certain
Wasserstein distance from the data or corrupted training set. These additions
allow us to show improved performance on MNIST, CIFAR10, and health record
data.

14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
18
The categories of this paper are: econ