Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Language Oriented Modularity: From Theory to Practice   Language-oriented modularity (LOM) is a methodology that complements
language-oriented programming (LOP) in providing on-demand language abstraction
solutions during software development. It involves the implementation and
immediate utilization of domain-specific languages (DSLs) that are also
aspect-oriented (DSALs). However, while DSL development is affordable thanks to
modern language workbenches, DSAL development lacks similar tool support.
Consequently, LOM is often impractical and underutilized. The challenge we
address is making the complexity of DSAL implementation comparable to that of
DSLs and the effectiveness of programming with DSALs comparable to that of
general-purpose aspect languages (GPALs). Today, despite being essentially both
domain-specific and aspect-oriented, DSALs seem to be second-class. Aspect
development tools (e.g., AJDT) do not work on DSAL code. DSL development tools
like language workbenches (e.g., Spoofax) neither deal with the backend weaving
nor handle the composition of DSALs. DSAL composition frameworks (e.g.,
Awesome) do not provide frontend development tools. DSAL code transformation
approaches (e.g., XAspects) do not preserve the semantics of DSAL programs in
the presence of other aspect languages. We extend AspectJ with a small set of
annotations and interfaces that allows DSAL designers to define a
semantic-preserving transformation to AspectJ and interface with AspectJ tools.
Our transformation approach enables the use of standard language workbench to
implement DSALs and use of standard aspect development tools to program with
those DSALs. As a result, DSALs regain first-class status with respect to both
DSLs and aspect languages. This, on the one hand, lowers the cost of developing
DSALs to the level of DSLs and, on the other hand, raises the effectiveness of
using a DSAL to the level of a GPAL. Consequently, LOM becomes cost-effective
compared to the LOP baseline. We modified the ajc compiler to support our
approach. Using two different language workbenches (Spoofax and Xtext) we then
implemented several DSALs. AspectJ was supported out-of-the-box. We implemented
Cool to demonstrate that the non-trivial composition of AspectJ and Cool can be
accommodated using our approach. We applied LOM to crosscutting concerns in two
open source projects (oVirt and muCommander), implementing in the process
application-specific DSALs, thus providing a sense of the decrease in the cost
of developing composable DSALs and the increase in the effectiveness of
programming with them. Crosscutting concerns remain a problem in modern
real-world projects (e.g., as observed in oVirt). DSALs are often the right
tool for addressing these concerns. Our work makes LOM practical, thus
facilitating use of DSAL solutions in the software development process.

28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
2
The categories of this paper are: math
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci