Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: A Systematic Literature Review of Modern Software Visualization   We report on the state-of-the-art of software visualization. To ensure
reproducibility, we adopted the Systematic Literature Review methodology. That
is, we analyzed 1440 entries from IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library
databases. We selected 105 relevant full papers published in 2013-2019, which
we classified based on the aspect of the software system that is supported
(i.e., structure, behavior, and evolution). For each paper, we extracted main
dimensions that characterize software visualizations, such as software
engineering tasks, roles of users, information visualization techniques, and
media used to display visualizations. We provide researchers in the field an
overview of the state-of-the-art in software visualization and highlight
research opportunities. We also help developers to identify suitable
visualizations for their particular context by matching software visualizations
to development concerns and concrete details to obtain available visualization
tools.

27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
2
The categories of this paper are: math
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th