Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: See what I'm saying? Comparing Intelligent Personal Assistant use for
  Native and Non-Native Language Speakers   Limited linguistic coverage for Intelligent Personal Assistants (IPAs) means
that many interact in a non-native language. Yet we know little about how IPAs
currently support or hinder these users. Through native (L1) and non-native
(L2) English speakers interacting with Google Assistant on a smartphone and
smart speaker, we aim to understand this more deeply. Interviews revealed that
L2 speakers prioritised utterance planning around perceived linguistic
limitations, as opposed to L1 speakers prioritising succinctness because of
system limitations. L2 speakers see IPAs as insensitive to linguistic needs
resulting in failed interaction. L2 speakers clearly preferred using
smartphones, as visual feedback supported diagnoses of communication breakdowns
whilst allowing time to process query results. Conversely, L1 speakers
preferred smart speakers, with audio feedback being seen as sufficient. We
discuss the need to tailor the IPA experience for L2 users, emphasising visual
feedback whilst reducing the burden of language production.

36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex