Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: When none of us perform better than all of us together: the role of
  analogical decision rules in groups   During social interactions, groups develop collective competencies that
(ideally) should assist groups to outperform average standalone individual
members (weak cognitive synergy) or the best performing member in the group
(strong cognitive synergy). In two experimental studies we manipulate the type
of decision rule used in group decision-making (identify the best vs.
collaborative), and the way in which the decision rules are induced (direct vs.
analogical) and we test the effect of these two manipulations on the emergence
of strong and weak cognitive synergy. Our most important results indicate that
an analogically induced decision rule (imitate-the-successful heuristic) in
which groups have to identify the best member and build on his/her performance
(take-the-best heuristic) is the most conducive for strong cognitive synergy.
Our studies bring evidence for the role of analogy-making in groups as well as
the role of fast-and-frugal heuristics for group decision-making.

5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
2
The categories of this paper are: math
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin