Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of
  NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?   As part of growing NLP capabilities, coupled with an awareness of the ethical
dimensions of research, questions have been raised about whether particular
datasets and tasks should be deemed off-limits for NLP research. We examine
this question with respect to a paper on automatic legal sentencing from EMNLP
2019 which was a source of some debate, in asking whether the paper should have
been allowed to be published, who should have been charged with making such a
decision, and on what basis. We focus in particular on the role of data
statements in ethically assessing research, but also discuss the topic of dual
use, and examine the outcomes of similar debates in other scientific
disciplines.

6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an