Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: The collider landscape: which collider for establishing the SM
  instability?   Capabilities of future colliders are usually discussed assuming specific
hypothetical new physics. We consider the opposite possibility: that no new
physics is accessible, and we want to learn if the unnatural Standard Model is
part of a vast landscape. We quantify progress in this sense via the Shannon
entropy of the multiverse, and argue that a main point would be establishing
the possible instability scale of the Higgs potential. This primarily needs
reducing the uncertainty on the strong coupling and on the top quark mass. We
show that the top quark mass can be measured well enough via a $t \bar t$
threshold scan with low $10^{33}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}{\rm sec}^{-1}$ luminosity, that
seems achievable at a `small' $e^+ e^-$ collider in the LEP tunnel, or at a
muon collider demonstrator.

22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
1
The categories of this paper are: cs
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas