Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Extracting and Analyzing Hidden Graphs from Relational Databases   Analyzing interconnection structures among underlying entities or objects in
a dataset through the use of graph analytics has been shown to provide
tremendous value in many application domains. However, graphs are not the
primary representation choice for storing most data today, and in order to have
access to these analyses, users are forced to extract data from their data
stores, construct the requisite graphs, and then load them into some graph
engine in order to execute their graph analysis task. Moreover, these graphs
can be significantly larger than the initial input stored in the database,
making it infeasible to construct or analyze such graphs in memory. In this
paper we address both of these challenges by building a system that enables
users to declaratively specify graph extraction tasks over a relational
database schema and then execute graph algorithms on the extracted graphs. We
propose a declarative domain-specific language for this purpose, and pair it up
with a novel condensed, in-memory representation that significantly reduces the
memory footprint of these graphs, permitting analysis of larger-than-memory
graphs. We present a general algorithm for creating this condensed
representation for a large class of graph extraction queries against arbitrary
schemas. We observe that the condensed representation suffers from a
duplication issue, that results in inaccuracies for most graph algorithms. We
then present a suite of in-memory representations that handle this duplication
in different ways and allow trading off the memory required and the
computational cost for executing different graph algorithms. We introduce novel
deduplication algorithms for removing this duplication in the graph, which are
of independent interest for graph compression, and provide a comprehensive
experimental evaluation over several real-world and synthetic datasets
illustrating these trade-offs.

0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc