Instruct: Identify the main category of Biorxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: dialogi: Utilising NLP with chemical and disease similarities to drive the identification of Drug-Induced Liver Injury literature Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI), despite its low occurrence rate, can cause severe side effects or even lead to death. Thus, it is one of the leading causes for terminating the development of new, and restricting the use of already-circulating, drugs. Moreover, its multifactorial nature, combined with a clinical presentation that often mimics other liver diseases, complicate the identification of DILI-related literature, which remains the main medium for sourcing results from the clinical practice and experimental studies. In this work- contributing to the  Literature AI for DILI Challenge of the Critical Assessment of Massive Data Analysis (CAMDA) 2021- we present an automated pipeline for distinguishing between DILI-positive and negative papers. We used Natural Language Processing (NLP) to filter out the uninformative parts of a text, and identify and extract mentions of chemicals and diseases. We combined that information with small-molecule and disease embeddings, which are capable of capturing chemical and disease similarities, to improve classification performance. The former are directly sourced from the Chemical Checker (CC). For the latter, we collected data that encode different aspects of disease similarity from the National Library of Medicines (NLM) Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus and the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). Following a similar procedure as the one used in the CC, vector representations for diseases were learnt and evaluated. Two Neural Network (NN) classifiers were developed: one that only accepts texts as input (baseline model) and an augmented classifier that also utilises chemical and disease embeddings (extended model). We trained, validated, and tested the models through a Nested Cross-Validation (NCV) scheme with 10 outer and 5 inner folds. During this, the baseline and extended models performed virtually identically, with macro F1-scores of 95.04 {+/-} 0.61% and 94.80 {+/-} 0.41%, respectively. Upon validation on an external, withheld, dataset, representing imbalanced data, the extended model achieved an F1-score of 91.14 {+/-} 1.62%, outperforming its baseline counterpart, which got a lower score of 88.30 {+/-} 2.44%. We make further comparisons between the classifiers and discuss future improvements and directions, including utilising chemical and disease embeddings for visualisation and exploratory analysis of the DILI-positive literature.
22
The categories of this paper are: physiology
30
The categories of this paper are: scientific
12
The categories of this paper are: behavior
5
The categories of this paper are: cell
16
The categories of this paper are: microbiology
3
The categories of this paper are: evolutionary
25
The categories of this paper are: bioengineering
23
The categories of this paper are: immunology
29
The categories of this paper are: education
8
The categories of this paper are: genomics
26
The categories of this paper are: biochemistry
27
The categories of this paper are: pathology
17
The categories of this paper are: molecular
28
The categories of this paper are: communication
2
The categories of this paper are: biology
20
The categories of this paper are: pharmacology