Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: The Linguistic Relevance of Quasi-Trees   We discuss two constructions (long scrambling and ECM verbs) which challenge
most syntactic theories (including traditional TAG approaches) since they seem
to require exceptional mechanisms and postulates. We argue that these
constructions should in fact be analyzed in a similar manner, namely as
involving a verb which selects for a ``defective'' complement. These
complements are defective in that they lack certain Case-assigning abilities
(represented as functional heads). The constructions differ in how many such
abilities are lacking. Following the previous analysis of scrambling of Rambow
(1994), we propose a TAG analysis based on quasi-trees.

5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
2
The categories of this paper are: math
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat