Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Are we done with ImageNet?   Yes, and no. We ask whether recent progress on the ImageNet classification
benchmark continues to represent meaningful generalization, or whether the
community has started to overfit to the idiosyncrasies of its labeling
procedure. We therefore develop a significantly more robust procedure for
collecting human annotations of the ImageNet validation set. Using these new
labels, we reassess the accuracy of recently proposed ImageNet classifiers, and
find their gains to be substantially smaller than those reported on the
original labels. Furthermore, we find the original ImageNet labels to no longer
be the best predictors of this independently-collected set, indicating that
their usefulness in evaluating vision models may be nearing an end.
Nevertheless, we find our annotation procedure to have largely remedied the
errors in the original labels, reinforcing ImageNet as a powerful benchmark for
future research in visual recognition.

6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph