Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Towards Evaluation of Autonomously Generated Musical Compositions: A
  Comprehensive Survey   There are many applications that aim to create a complete model for an
autonomously generated composition; systems are able to generate muzak songs,
assist singers in transcribing songs or can imitate long-dead authors.
Subjective understanding of creativity or aesthetics differs not only within
preferences (popular authors or genres), but also differs on the basis of
experienced experience or socio-cultural environment. So, what do we want to
achieve with such an adaptation? What is the benefit of the resulting work for
the author, who can no longer evaluate this composition? And in what ways
should we evaluate such a composition at all?

31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
2
The categories of this paper are: math
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph