Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Refocusing on Relevance: Personalization in NLG   Many NLG tasks such as summarization, dialogue response, or open domain
question answering focus primarily on a source text in order to generate a
target response. This standard approach falls short, however, when a user's
intent or context of work is not easily recoverable based solely on that source
text -- a scenario that we argue is more of the rule than the exception. In
this work, we argue that NLG systems in general should place a much higher
level of emphasis on making use of additional context, and suggest that
relevance (as used in Information Retrieval) be thought of as a crucial tool
for designing user-oriented text-generating tasks. We further discuss possible
harms and hazards around such personalization, and argue that value-sensitive
design represents a crucial path forward through these challenges.

21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
2
The categories of this paper are: math
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
18
The categories of this paper are: econ