Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Response to "Feasibility of 3D reconstruction from a single 2D
  diffraction measurement"   We present our response to Pierre Thibault's article, titled "Feasibility of
3D reconstruction from a single 2D diffraction measurement" [1], in which he
commented upon our recent ankylography paper [2]. While we appreciate
Thibault's efforts in promoting further reflection on our paper, we found
serious errors both in his understanding and analysis of ankylography: he
inaccurately presented the oversampling scheme in ankylography, incorrectly
described our reconstruction algorithm and our experiment, and formulated
arguments based upon a flawed and overly-restrictive theoretical analysis.
Therefore, we conclude that his main claims are either scientifically invalid
or a misrepresentation of our claims about ankylography. Below is our detailed
point-by-point response to his criticisms.

30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph