Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Evaluating Ontology Matching Systems on Large, Multilingual and
  Real-world Test Cases   In the field of ontology matching, the most systematic evaluation of matching
systems is established by the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI),
which is an annual campaign for evaluating ontology matching systems organized
by different groups of researchers. In this paper, we report on the results of
an intermediary OAEI campaign called OAEI 2011.5. The evaluations of this
campaign are divided in five tracks. Three of these tracks are new or have been
improved compared to previous OAEI campaigns. Overall, we evaluated 18 matching
systems. We discuss lessons learned, in terms of scalability, multilingual
issues and the ability do deal with real world cases from different domains.

7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
2
The categories of this paper are: math
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio