Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: CLASH: Joint Analysis of Strong-Lensing, Weak-Lensing Shear and
  Magnification Data for 20 Galaxy Clusters   We present a comprehensive analysis of strong-lensing, weak-lensing shear and
magnification data for a sample of 16 X-ray-regular and 4 high-magnification
galaxy clusters selected from the CLASH survey. Our analysis combines
constraints from 16-band HST observations and wide-field multi-color imaging
taken primarily with Subaru/Suprime-Cam. We reconstruct surface mass density
profiles of individual clusters from a joint analysis of the full lensing
constraints, and determine masses and concentrations for all clusters. We find
internal consistency of the ensemble mass calibration to be $\le 5\% \pm 6\%$
by comparison with the CLASH weak-lensing-only measurements of Umetsu et al.
For the X-ray-selected subsample, we examine the concentration-mass relation
and its intrinsic scatter using a Bayesian regression approach. Our model
yields a mean concentration of $c|_{z=0.34} = 3.95 \pm 0.35$ at $M_{200c}
\simeq 14\times 10^{14}M_\odot$ and an intrinsic scatter of $\sigma(\ln
c_{200c}) = 0.13 \pm 0.06$, in excellent agreement with LCDM predictions when
the CLASH selection function based on X-ray morphological regularity and the
projection effects are taken into account. We also derive an ensemble-averaged
surface mass density profile for the X-ray-selected subsample by stacking their
individual profiles. The stacked mass profile is well described by a family of
density profiles predicted for cuspy dark-matter-dominated halos, namely, the
NFW, Einasto, and DARKexp models, whereas the single power-law, cored
isothermal and Burkert density profiles are disfavored by the data. We show
that cuspy halo models that include the two-halo term provide improved
agreement with the data. For the NFW halo model, we measure a mean
concentration of $c_{200c} = 3.79^{+0.30}_{-0.28}$ at $M_{200c} =
14.1^{+1.0}_{-1.0}\times 10^{14}M_\odot$, demonstrating consistency between
complementary analysis methods.

37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
2
The categories of this paper are: math
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org