Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Assessing the Helpfulness of Review Content for Explaining
  Recommendations   Despite the maturity already achieved by recommender systems algorithms,
little is known about how to obtain and provide users with a proper rationale
for a recommendation. Transparency and effectiveness of recommender systems may
be increased when explanations are provided. In particular, identifying of
helpful argumentative content from reviews can be leveraged to generate textual
explanations. In this paper, we investigate the reasons why a review might be
considered helpful, and show that the perception of credibility and
convincingness mediates the relationship between helpfulness and the perception
of objectivity and relevant aspects addressed. Our findings led us to suggest
an argumentbased approach to automatically extracting helpful content from
hotel reviews, a domain that differs from those that best fit classical
argumentation theories.

11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
2
The categories of this paper are: math
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph