Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Explaining Adversarial Vulnerability with a Data Sparsity Hypothesis   Despite many proposed algorithms to provide robustness to deep learning (DL)
models, DL models remain susceptible to adversarial attacks. We hypothesize
that the adversarial vulnerability of DL models stems from two factors. The
first factor is data sparsity which is that in the high dimensional input data
space, there exist large regions outside the support of the data distribution.
The second factor is the existence of many redundant parameters in the DL
models. Owing to these factors, different models are able to come up with
different decision boundaries with comparably high prediction accuracy. The
appearance of the decision boundaries in the space outside the support of the
data distribution does not affect the prediction accuracy of the model.
However, it makes an important difference in the adversarial robustness of the
model. We hypothesize that the ideal decision boundary is as far as possible
from the support of the data distribution. In this paper, we develop a training
framework to observe if DL models are able to learn such a decision boundary
spanning the space around the class distributions further from the data points
themselves. Semi-supervised learning was deployed during training by leveraging
unlabeled data generated in the space outside the support of the data
distribution. We measured adversarial robustness of the models trained using
this training framework against well-known adversarial attacks and by using
robustness metrics. We found that models trained using our framework, as well
as other regularization methods and adversarial training support our hypothesis
of data sparsity and that models trained with these methods learn to have
decision boundaries more similar to the aforementioned ideal decision boundary.
The code for our training framework is available at
https://github.com/MahsaPaknezhad/AdversariallyRobustTraining.

13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
2
The categories of this paper are: math
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin