Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Designing Stable Elections: A Survey   We survey the design of elections that are resilient to attempted
interference by third parties. For example, suppose votes have been cast in an
election between two candidates, and then each vote is randomly changed with a
small probability, independently of the other votes. It is desirable to keep
the outcome of the election the same, regardless of the changes to the votes.
It is well known that the US electoral college system is about 5 times more
likely to have a changed outcome due to vote corruption, when compared to a
majority vote. In fact, Mossel, O'Donnell and Oleszkiewicz proved in 2005 that
the majority voting method is most stable to this random vote corruption, among
voting methods where each person has a small influence on the election. We
discuss some recent progress on the analogous result for elections between more
than two candidates. In this case, plurality should be most stable to
corruption in votes. We also survey results on adversarial election
manipulation (where an adversary can select particular votes to change, perhaps
in a non-random way), and we briefly discuss ranked choice voting methods
(where a vote is a ranked list of candidates).

34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin