Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Reply to "Comment on Phi memristor: Real memristor found",
  arXiv:1909.12464   In this reply, we will provide our impersonal, point-to-point responses to
the major criticisms (in bold and underlined) in arXiv:1909.12464. Firstly, we
will identify a number of (imperceptibly hidden) mistakes in the Comment in
understanding/interpreting our physical model. Secondly, we will use a
3rd-party experiment carried out in 1961 (plus other 3rd-party experiments
thereafter) to further support our claim that our invented Phi memristor is
memristive in spite of the existence of a parasitic inductor effect. Thirdly,
we will analyse this parasitic effect mathematically, introduce our
work-in-progress (in nanoscale) and point out that this parasitic inductor
effect should not become a big worry since it can be completely removed in the
macro-scale devices and safely neglected in the nano-scale devices.

21
The categories of this paper are: adap-org
2
The categories of this paper are: math
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
19
The categories of this paper are: eess
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
27
The categories of this paper are: comp-gas
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat