Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Understanding User Perspectives on Prompts for Brief Reflection on
  Troubling Emotions   We investigate users' perspectives on an online reflective question activity
(RQA) that prompts people to externalize their underlying emotions on a
troubling situation. Inspired by principles of cognitive behavioral therapy,
our 15-minute activity encourages self-reflection without a human or automated
conversational partner. A deployment of our RQA on Amazon Mechanical Turk
suggests that people perceive several benefits from our RQA, including
structured awareness of their thoughts and problem-solving around managing
their emotions. Quantitative evidence from a randomized experiment suggests
people find that our RQA makes them feel less worried by their selected
situation and worth the minimal time investment. A further two-week technology
probe deployment with 11 participants indicates that people see benefits to
doing this activity repeatedly, although the activity may get monotonous over
time. In summary, this work demonstrates the promise of online reflection
activities that carefully leverage principles of psychology in their design.

29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
2
The categories of this paper are: math
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn