Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Nonlocality and Bohr's Reply to EPR   David Mermin's recent paper with the same title as this one makes it clear
that his claim to have found a gap in my reasoning rests on his claim that my
argument violates a criterion for meaningfulness of counterfactual statements
that I myself had set down. I set down no such requirement. But I am willing to
accept it as a conservative sufficient condition. This already entails, within
my proof, that nature must have a deep structure that extends beyond what
actually occurs. It imposes, without appeal to the notion of determinism or
hidden variables, constraints connecting, at the macroscopic level, what did
occur to what would have occurred if certain quantum choices had gone
differently. All the statements in the proof have natural meanings within the
context of an examination of that deep structure.

3
The categories of this paper are: physics
4
The categories of this paper are: cond-mat
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
0
The categories of this paper are: hep-ph
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
25
The categories of this paper are: patt-sol
16
The categories of this paper are: stat
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
1
The categories of this paper are: cs
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin