Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Conclusion unwarranted

Fox can't decide whether to write an academic book on the politics of archeology, or a mystery novel, so it makes for slow reading. He makes factual errors about Albert Glock's religious affiliations--makes me wonder what other factual errors he includes.If I were a member of Glock's family, I think I would regret giving Fox access, as he paints yellow-journalism's sensationalist and negative portrait of this good man. Then after shifting through a lot of complicated evidence, he draws a silly conclusion: Hamas did it. Please!--how politically convenient! The preponderance of the evidence he himself offers supports the more plausible view that Israelis did it--either army or Mossad-like agents--as Palestinian archeology is a basic threat to the Israeli state's official narrative of who has claims to the land.Most disappointing. Fox, you took on an admirable and courageous task, but dropped the ball in the end.