Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: full of misinformation

This book is very well written, which perhaps explains all the good reviews it has recieved. Unfortunately, this means that all those people who gave the book a good review are now walking around with incorrect information in their heads. The preferred use of artillery of the period was counter-battery fire? Wrong. Counter-battery fire was only used very rarely, and then only as a last resort when one's own artillery was significantly weaker than the enemy's, and even then only when the enemy infantry or cavalry was under cover and there were NO other targets. The fact that the author states such an obvious untruth repeatedly, as if it were gospel shows he has little understanding of his topic, and is just repeating something he read somewhere.This is just one of many mistakes, given as an example. There are plenty of well-researched books on this topic. Buy one of those.