Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Poorly Written, Factually Incorrect

I find it interesting that Jones has known Michael Jackson for as long as his has, yet he fails miserably in getting the most basic information about Jackson correct. The book was seemingly not edited at all, because it if was, a lot of the most glaring mistakes would have been caught. Unless that is, Jones just didn't care about this. He comes off as being a very bitter old man who wanted something for nothing. It is now clear who has been behind the Jackson rumor mill all these years.