Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Not the case it claims to be

Kitcher's book continues the unfair diatribes against any scientist who questions the sacred cow of evolutionary theory. His so-called case against the creationist model fails to establish its case because the plain fact is, as more and more evolutionary scientists are privately admitting, the case for evolutionary theory continues to crumble in the face of ever increasing legitimate scientific knowledge. As is the case with all anti-creationist books, Kitcher attempts to settle the question by defining science only within the framework of naturalistic philosophy. Evolutionists hate it when this fact is pointed out; nevertheless, it has been sufficiently documented by such writers as Phillip Johnson. If Kitcher feels so strongly that creationism "abuses" science, he should debate a top-notch creationist such as Kent Hovind, Duane Gish, or Johnson.