Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Wish it was better..

The writing style is fine, the research is fair to good compared to others in the field, but he does anyone who is interested in real history a great disservice in promoting this work, because of his horribly shoddy jumps in logic.Even on points that I would agree with him on, or that have been explained and researched much better elsewhere, I can not support him on because of his almost purposeful misreadings as quotes, his constant ruling out of alternatives, and dictums that this is 'necessary' or 'obvious', when it is no such thing.Any first year philosophy or debate student could rip him and his case to shreds, which is a shame, since some of the research is on the right track and quite good.So, I'd skip this one.. his presentation style makes it too hard to be able to tell which points are ludicrous and which are valid.