Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A
  case study using data from PLOS (altmetrics) and F1000Prime (paper tags)   Purpose: Whereas citation counts allow the measurement of the impact of
research on research itself, an important role in the measurement of the impact
of research on other parts of society is ascribed to altmetrics. The present
case study investigates the usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader
impact of research. Methods: This case study is essentially based on a dataset
with papers obtained from F1000. The dataset was augmented with altmetrics
(such as Twitter counts) which were provided by PLOS (the Public Library of
Science). In total, the case study covers a total of 1,082 papers. Findings:
The F1000 dataset contains tags on papers which were assigned intellectually by
experts and which can characterise a paper. The most interesting tag for
altmetric research is "good for teaching". This tag is assigned to papers which
could be of interest to a wider circle of readers than the peers in a
specialist area. Particularly on Facebook and Twitter, one could expect papers
with this tag to be mentioned more often than those without this tag. With
respect to the "good for teaching" tag, the results from regression models were
able to confirm these expectations: Papers with this tag show significantly
higher Facebook and Twitter counts than papers without this tag. This
association could not be seen with Mendeley or Figshare counts (that is with
counts from platforms which are chiefly of interest in a scientific context).
Conclusions: The results of the current study indicate that Facebook and
Twitter, but not Figshare or Mendeley, can provide indications of papers which
are of interest to a broader circle of readers (and not only for the peers in a
specialist area), and seem therefore be useful for societal impact measurement.

32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th
28
The categories of this paper are: alg-geom
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
35
The categories of this paper are: mtrl-th
22
The categories of this paper are: chao-dyn
11
The categories of this paper are: hep-lat
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con