Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: Ordering stakeholder viewpoint concerns for holistic and incremental
  Enterprise Architecture: the W6H framework   Context: Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a discipline which has evolved to
structure the business and its alignment with the IT systems. One of the
popular enterprise architecture frameworks is Zachman framework (ZF). This
framework focuses on describing the enterprise from six viewpoint perspectives
of the stakeholders. These six perspectives are based on English language
interrogatives 'what', 'where', 'who', 'when', 'why', and 'how' (thus the term
W5H Journalists and police investigators use the W5H to describe an event.
However, EA is not an event, creation and evolution of EA challenging.
Moreover, the ordering of viewpoints is not defined in the existing EA
frameworks, making data capturing process difficult. Our goals are to 1) assess
if W5H is sufficient to describe modern EA and 2) explore the ordering and
precedence among the viewpoint concerns. Method: we achieve our goals by
bringing tools from the Linguistics, focusing on a full set of English Language
interrogatives to describe viewpoint concerns and the inter-relationships and
dependencies among these. Application of these tools is validated using
pedagogical EA examples. Results: 1) We show that addition of the seventh
interrogative 'which' to the W5H set (we denote this extended set as W6H)
yields extra and necessary information enabling creation of holistic EA. 2) We
discover that particular ordering of the interrogatives, established by
linguists (based on semantic and lexical analysis of English language
interrogatives), define starting points and the order in which viewpoints
should be arranged for creating complete EA. 3) We prove that adopting W6H
enables creation of EA for iterative and agile SDLCs, e.g. Scrum. Conclusions:
We believe that our findings complete creation of EA using ZF by practitioners,
and provide theoreticians with tools needed to improve other EA frameworks,
e.g., TOGAF and DoDAF.

12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
24
The categories of this paper are: dg-ga
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
6
The categories of this paper are: astro-ph
30
The categories of this paper are: q-alg
17
The categories of this paper are: q-fin
14
The categories of this paper are: math-ph
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
8
The categories of this paper are: hep-ex
5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
36
The categories of this paper are: cmp-lg
31
The categories of this paper are: ao-sci
15
The categories of this paper are: nucl-ex