Instruct: Identify the main and secondary category of Arxiv papers based on the titles and abstracts
Query: "Predicting" after peeking into the future: Correcting a fundamental
  flaw in the SAOM -- TERGM comparison of Leifeld and Cranmer (2019)   We review the empirical comparison of SAOMs and TERGMs by Leifeld and Cranmer
(2019) in Network Science. We note that their model specification uses nodal
covariates calculated from observed degrees instead of using structural
effects, thus turning endogeneity into circularity. In consequence, their
out-of-sample predictions using TERGMs are based on out-of-sample information
and thereby predict the future using observations from the future. We conclude
that their analysis rest on erroneous model specifications that render the
article's conclusions meaningless. Consequently, researchers should disregard
recommendations from the criticized paper when making informed modelling
choices.

5
The categories of this paper are: gr-qc
32
The categories of this paper are: atom-ph
33
The categories of this paper are: plasm-ph
13
The categories of this paper are: quant-ph
9
The categories of this paper are: nlin
12
The categories of this paper are: nucl-th
26
The categories of this paper are: bayes-an
34
The categories of this paper are: chem-ph
18
The categories of this paper are: econ
20
The categories of this paper are: acc-phys
10
The categories of this paper are: q-bio
23
The categories of this paper are: solv-int
3
The categories of this paper are: physics
37
The categories of this paper are: supr-con
29
The categories of this paper are: funct-an
7
The categories of this paper are: hep-th