which is better the 2.4GHz or 900MHz set?
6544
I actually had both sets. First the 900mhz, then upgraded to the 2.4GHz. THe 900 is ok for indoor use with a couple speakers in one room. Note that with two speakers you will not have stereo sound, just two speakers playing mono. The 2.4 ones are really much better. The sound quality is way better, especially if you like to crank them up at all. Two will fill a normal back yard well and are more than you will need inside. They can operate independently as mono speakers (we sometimes have one inside and one on the patio) or as a stereo set for when you have them both together. Unless you actually cannot afford the price difference, go with the 2.4s.. Just know that the effective range seems to be more like 80-90 feet, at least with the transmitter inside and the speakers out, not 150.
2081513
2.4GHZ. As per http://www.edimax.com/en/produce_detail.php?pd_id=378&pl1_id=1&pl2_id=5 2400~2484MHz 802.11b: CCK, DQPSK, DBPSK 802.11g: 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK, DSSS 802.11n: 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK
749009
There's two systems 4702 or 4712. 2.2Ghz vs 2.3Ghz. The former is $1774 and latter is $2199.$1774 is great price. Price has probably been lowered to clear inventory. It's possible there may be hardware issues with 4702 that we're fixed in 4712 ( just speculation on my part ). $1774 is really good price. I paid $2199 for 4712.
245636
Hi. I've used on 144 mhz with no problem at all. I believe it will work fine at 900 mhz also. Have fun.
1015765
Please see the technical spec link from Intel http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/support/highlights/dsktpboards/dg965ms
2019346
It's only 2.4ghz I would buy a 2.4 5.8ghz dual antenna so router works at 100% efficiency
138810
It's really your preference. I myself prefer 6000k the 8000k is noticeably more blue. But it isn't too bad, On a 55w system it does bleed out alittle bit.
1277341
The Asus WL-ANT-157 will improve the 2.4 GHZ signal coverage. How ever it will NOT boost your signal. To boost your signal you need to buy better quality router-any brand! And of course high speed high cost optic fiber will improve the speed.
858965
Depends on if you're OC or not... I'm using a Zalman 9700 and clocking @ 4Ghz and it does a great job. It's a rather large fan, so you'll need room in your case for it.
867416
Actually, the K800 operates at 900MHz, whereas the K790a operates at 850Mhz. The K790 for European/Asian markets is the K790i.
375830
I have no idea , I bought the beast just because it was the first one to come for the best price. Did you compare the stats on them besides MHz? Mine work fine, and have had no problems with them. Just remember to have a 64 bit OS or you will not be able to to get the full speed out of them
1593868
Yes but, its better if you bought the 1600 mhz version to balance the speed, since your system already uses 1600, and this module only runs at 1333. Sometimes systems become unstable with modules running at two different speeds.
230205
Both of these have similar TDP's and they use the same amount of volts, and this one uses the Richland vs the trinity architexture, but both are FM2. I think it comes down to preference. If you get this, you should have enough cores and clock speed to process games and whatever for 2-5 years, and if you're into upgrading in a year or so, the 750k will be awesome!
1472956
This memory looks great, is very stable, and personally I love the stuff. For gaming, this set is more than enough, but if you plan do to content creation, then go with the 2400MHZ.
232019
It depends on the RAM chipsets supported by your processor(core 2 duo/P4/i3/i5). Search about it online and i guess u will get better and faster (better frequency) options than this one. I had an old system so bought this as my only option.
475918
If you are referring to the refresh rate, this set is above average at 240hz. I looked at it a brick & mortar retailer before buying on Amazon
1751398
The new one comes with Allwinner 1.2Ghz. I heard it is better the PIPO MAX M6, because the Cotex A9 Quad Core 1.6GHz is better than Allwinner.