DIfference between this and the RL2455HM beside the 1ms response time?
3349
I had the exact same monitors I was debating between xD lol the RL is specially designed for consoles and has 2 HDMI ports. Whereas the GL was designed moreso for PC's and only has 1 HDMI port. The only thing honestly holding me back was the HDMI thing. But I would honestly suggest getting the GL because it's $40 cheaper (at least when I bought it), the bezils are thinner, and it overall just looks a lot cleaner. The 1ms difference isn't even noticible honestly, and you save yourself $40 to sacrifice an HDMI port. In all honesty I'm going to get 2 more of these later down the line. They work FLAWLESSLY on the Xbox One and 360 and you don't truly realize how much input lag you had until it's gone lol
1431419
As far as I can tell, there is no difference. All of the specs are identical - I thought maybe it was just an "updated" version. Hope this helps!
626771
I don't know, I use it more or less as I digital photo frame. So I haven't considered response time but I don't think it will matter. The viewing angle is not as good as standard computer screens from for instance Samsung and Eizo, I think that is the biggest difference I have noticed. The advantage is that it doesn't need external power.
261091
I really don't now the differents between the two. I read about the model #52244only and bought it. Sorry Iccan't help you.
1906608
Really the only difference is the frequencies, (and the antenna is tuned for those frequencies). As to why, I bought the 2m/1.25m (144/220) because there is almost no activity in my area on the 70cm band (440) but there is a 1.25m repeater nearby that we (my wife is also a Ham, and also has a UV82x) can talk to each other on from just about anywhere in our area. So the one you want depends on the bands commonly used in your area. And in case you didn't know, this is a FCC Part 97 Ham Radio, as well as a Commercial FCC part 90 radio, both uses requires a FCC license to legally use. This radio is NOT part 95 legal (MURS and FRS/GMRS) Really the only difference is the frequencies, (and the antenna is tuned for those frequencies). As to why, I bought the 2m/1.25m (144/220) because there is almost no activity in my area on the 70cm band (440) but there is a 1.25m repeater nearby that we (my wife is also a Ham, and also has a UV82x) can talk to each other on from just about anywhere in our area. So the one you want depends on the bands commonly used in your area. And in case you didn't know, this is a FCC Part 97 Ham Radio, as well as a Commercial FCC part 90 radio, both uses requires a FCC license to legally use.... » Read More Really the only difference is the frequencies, (and the antenna is tuned for those frequencies). As to why, I bought the 2m/1.25m (144/220) because there is almost no activity in my area on the 70cm band (440) but there is a 1.25m repeater nearby that we (my wife is also a Ham, and also has a UV82x) can talk to each other on from just about anywhere in our area. So the one you want depends on the bands commonly used in your area. And in case you didn't know, this is a FCC Part 97 Ham Radio, as well as a Commercial FCC part 90 radio, both uses requires a FCC license to legally use. This radio is NOT part 95 legal (MURS and FRS/GMRS) « Show Less
1911583
Yeah, this is seems common, they aren't exactly a "high speed sync" solution. 1/160 seems to be the best speed for reliability
405843
Received my two and it is in fact 1.6GHz... I guess it was just amazon as usual not taking the time out to get these little details corret. Go ahead and buy and remember it only has 2gb ram so if ya buy two like i did you can just grab an 8gb kit and sell back one with 4gb... no brainer.
2198587
I think the better option would be to go with bluetooth, although with all the correct components you could use RF24L01.
1367678
Response time is pretty much instantaneous. No issues under light use for my tablet and phone.
306297
The device I have received definitely came with 1.1 GHz, Celeron 847. Both lscpu and lshw reveals results consistent with this.
674066
The performance of the SB6180 and SB6141 are virtually identical if you compare their spec sheets; both modems support 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The SB6141 supports AES, GigE, Auto MDIX, and has a "1 GHz Low Pass Filter at tuners input," same as the SB6180. The only technical difference I can find is the "Downstream Capture Window," with the SB6141 utilizing "Dual 96 MHz Capture Windows," and the SB6180 using "Two independent 32 MHz Wideband Tuners." All that said, I think what it comes down to is that the SB6141 is targeted towards retail consumers, while the SB6180 is targeted towards businesses or OEM use.
529358
I own the 4069. One other difference is that the 4069 has a better response time of 6ms vs. 8ms in the 4071. I don't know what benefit that gives ya though. :)
47980
This item nor does the slightly cheaper and smaller model operate at Gigabit speeds (1,000 Mb/s). However, unless your WAN and LAN connections operate at this speed you won't see much of a difference. For that operational functionality you will have to purchase the TP-LINK TL-ER5120 model. It is currently available on Amazon.com, it is however a bit more expensive then the R480T+ model.
1386890
The main difference is the one with 3 antennas gets more Mbps (bits per second). I think it also has a little heaver encryption. Not sure about the range but I would assume it is better.
130095
According to this reputable answer, 14ms should be fine:http://video.stackexchange.com/questions/8137/how-do-i-decide-if-14ms-response-time-in-ips-lcd-monitor-enough
777466
There appears to be no difference in their specs. They are listed together. I suggest you call them directly. Sorry I could be so little help
1688461
The response time is 6ms. I watched netflix on it without any problem. I'm not sure about playing games