Does the lens have built-in image stabilization, like the Sony 35mm E-mount lens? Thanks!
23699
No, that's one of the reasons why the costs of the lens is lower. In general use image stabilization may not be so important with such a short focal lens ... in normal lighting conditions. Fortunately the Sony's do pretty well in higher ISOs.
23700
I use this lens on both my Olympus OM-D em 10 and my OM-D em 5 markII. Both these camerars have built in stabilization. The Oem 5II is stabilized in 5 directions. Very nice lens for the money and close ups are great. Great for outdoors and fmily as well as scenic shots.
23701
No it does not, but for the price the image sharpness and low light capability is great. I certainly do not regret my purchase.
191715
Hi Craig J., I don't know if it has image stabilization. I returned it the same week. The closure on the lens would not open properly, after only taking one picture. I did some research and found out it was a common problem with this particular nikon camera.
454179
Sony camera bodies have built in stabilization and hence provide stabilization to all lenses fitted to the camera. As a result you do not need lens stabilization for lenses fitted with the Sony mount, so missing this feature in the lens for a Sony camera should not affect performance in this respect.
1596677
Image stabilization is only found in some Canon Lenses. "IS" is not a Canon Camera feature. All EOS Canon Cameras support lenses that have the "IS" feature.
525458
No, all lenses designed for Minolta/Sony cameras don't have stabilization of any sort because that takes place in the camera. As such, all lenses are stabilized.
427199
Read this review it does mention that this lens does have "image stabilization".....hope this helps... http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron-18-270mm-3p5-6p3-vc-pzd
1906271
Yes, the camera does not have "In Body" image stabilization, but the lens included in this kit does have image stabilization (called OSS by Sony). In fact, most Sony E lenses for this camera have image stabilization (the Zeiss ones do not have OSS).
1862319
No stabilizer on this lens. You will need a tripod capable of about ten lbs. lens is very heavy.
1942155
No, this lens is not shake stabilized. I take extra efforts to steady the camera at the longer focal lengths and slower shutter speeds, just as I did back in the day using traditional film cameras and lenses. Use a tripod, monopod, beanbag, wrapping the strap, leaning against a solid surface are all good techniques. Also the new Photoshop CC has a shake-fix feature.
341413
Hi, this lens does not have image stabilization. I bought it because I needed a wide angle lens and the Sigma brand is a very good alternative to the expensive Canon lenses. Hope this helps answer your question.
2212260
No image stabilization or UM--it is a plain jane lens, my wife decided to stick with her 250mm IS lens instead--she loved the camera and kit though
1416425
Usually Sony says to use their over the lens, but you can turn off stabilization through the menus. By Default it stays on. I actually like the Sony stabilization better then my signma lens' but that's personal preference.
1221901
Hi Austin, Yes It has image stabilization. It has Pan Smoothing, stabilization amount and rolling shutter correction. Hope this helps. Randell
953613
This lens is designed for cameras with Image Stabilization built in to the camera body. The lens has not Image Stabilization of its own.
1401284
Hi Lieu, this lens does not have the Optical SteadyShot feature. Thanks_Mitch
1481700
this lens does not have image stabilization. however, the canon 100mm f2.8l (make sure you're looking at the "L" series one) has great image stabilization. however, it's $1,000.00. :-(
1209307
No it does not because it's a cinema camera but it does have amazing focus peaking features that work with every lens. Popular opinion is get the MFT mount but I disagree - you can never underestimate what Image Stabilization with lenses helps achieve.