Is this better then the Blue Yeti microphone?
26533
I've never had the blue yeti but this microphone is amazing. With the shock mount and pop filter it's the ideal purchase
470509
It will only hold the blue yeti if you get the blue microphone radius shockmount. The standard yeti mic stand screws into the sides of the mic. The shock mount is made specifically for the yeti as the bottom mounting hold is only half an inch deep and nearly an inch wide and is not a standard size at all. However the radius shockmount has the standard mic boom sized holes at its base. The yeti is meant to hang upside down in the shockmount. From personal experience, the yeti is very heavy but this mic stand is incredible. However, it will only give a steady platform if the boom arm is online with the length of the base to act as a counter weight. Also if you do this, the radius shock mount has 2 plastic o-rings and a screw that allow you to angle the mic and shockmount up or down. The only way to keep it level is to replace those plastic o-rings with the rubber o-rings that are in the standard yeti mic stand where it screws into the sides of the mic.
1984627
Not at all. It seems to only fit a traditional size microphone. The yeti is too thick.
1485432
I would guess the cordless mics would be better but also MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE. I have since added a couple other EXACT mics like the Audio-Technica ATR 3350's for other guests on my program. We are NOT singers but for clear speaking audio, I have NO COMPLAINTS..
680506
Personally I use a Blue Snowball with this pop filter. I have a friend who also uses the pop filter with a yeti mic. Id assume it would work well with mics of similar size.
1284842
the size is for a normal condenser microphone, and do not know how big the blue yeti is in compare to a condenser microphone
1069026
This mic is highly directional. Therefore it does not pick up as much extraneous sound (i.e. mouse clicks, fan noises, etc). The downside is that you must speak right into it. I work about five inches away form it and find it a bit quieter than my Blue Yeti. Sound quality is very good.
614847
I don't believe so. The Blue Yeti has it's own side mounts for a stand but not the screwed retained connection that is required for this shock mount. I don't own a Yeti so I'm not sure but if it does have a standard external threaded section then you could connect the mic into the female threads at the bottom of the shockmount -Ned
749706
I've been using it for years with the blue yeti, no problems. However, I'm also using this brass converter piece and I don't remember where I got it from or if it came with my mic/stand.
352448
No. I boaght this becuase i heard good things about it. After only 3 uses it shorted out started getting static noise and 0% voice pick up. Even when it did work, it could barely pick up any thing. My advice: skip it, spend the extra money get a good mic so it will be worth your money at the end of the day and you won't be disappointed like me.
1425381
If you have an audio interface, you'd be better off getting a ribbon mic if the violin is where your issues lie. The yeti is a condenser, most of which sound unflattering on strings. Condensers tend to hype the "scratchy" frequencies of violin, and remove the "lush" frequencies. Ribbons tend to tame the scratchiness, and preserve the lushness for a very sweet sound. You can find a much better violin mic than this for well under $1000. Look up cascade microphones, they make great ribbons on the cheap. Only then you need an interface if you don't have one. It's probably time to get one anyway, if you're searching for higher quality recordings. Side note - be aware that ribbons are generally low output so you will likely experience some noise with quiet sources, unless you have nice mic pres.
1400616
I have the Rode video mic pro, purchased before I bought the Shure VP83 (without the on-board recorder - I have a pro camcorder that records uncompressed audio). The Shure has much less handling noise. All around, the Shure is a better mic. It's worth double the price considering its meaningful and significant advantages over the Rode. Finally, as an Amazon purchaser, you have the back up of a stellar on-line retailer for return purposes.
1932347
If the Microphone needs phantom power of 48vdc to run the microphone this will not work. Also impendence is part of the answer as well. If the microphone is high impedance going into a low impedance input you may get an in accurate match for frequency response. This would sound tinny or very low volume. You may have to get preamp or cheap mixer to put between the microphone and your recording device that has phantom power. This is a less than 100.00 fix that will give you the best flexibility as well as keep the noise level down that could come from having to turn your input source up to much. Also looking at other comment if Blue Yeti is USB this would not work.
2182941
Yes! Simply unscrew the microphone from the default Blue Yeti base and then screw it onto the Mic Stand
2210389
The Platinum edition lists as being 0.5 lbs heavier than the Silver, despite having the exact same features. Additionally, the a slightly more gun metal, or anodized color tone, seeming just a bit sepia-like. The Silver is a much cleaner looking silver color. Both have a deep matte finish. You can compare them at their amazon page: Blue Microphones Yeti USB Microphone - PlatinumJust use the color selection tool right below the list price to see the very subtle difference.
428190
The blue yeti is a USB mic & this is an xlr mic with an interface/preamp ... In all honesty better quality comes from this and the headsets are nice too.
1744932
I've owned both and used them with several microphones, including the V01A and a higher end Neumann. In every case, I've preferred the MicPort Pro. The sound is cleaner and warmer, there's almost no hiss, and the thing's durable. I've had my MicPort for several years and still use it as a back up when I travel. I donated the Micmate to a high school drama program. The cord's short on the MicPort Pro and the Phantom Power button is tiny. Still, those are minor complaints. I would, however, invest in a longer cable if you're trying to keep your computer (and computer noise) away from the microphone. I've owned both and used them with several microphones, including the V01A and a higher end Neumann. In every case, I've preferred the MicPort Pro. The sound is cleaner and warmer, there's almost no hiss, and the thing's durable. I've had my MicPort for several years and still use it as a back up when I travel. I donated the Micmate to a high school drama program. The cord's short on the MicPort Pro and the Phantom Power button is tiny. Still, those are minor complaints. I would, however, invest in a longer cable if you're trying to keep your computer (and computer noise) away from... » Read More I've owned both and used them with several microphones, including the V01A and a higher end Neumann. In every case, I've preferred the MicPort Pro. The sound is cleaner and warmer, there's almost no hiss, and the thing's durable. I've had my MicPort for several years and still use it as a back up when I travel. I donated the Micmate to a high school drama program. The cord's short on the MicPort Pro and the Phantom Power button is tiny. Still, those are minor complaints. I would, however, invest in a longer cable if you're trying to keep your computer (and computer noise) away from the microphone. « Show Less