205 and 305 differences Is the only difference between the 205 and 305 the hr monitor?
23009
The 305 supports auxilary devices with the ANT+ interface. The heart rate monitor is one such device. Other supported ANT+ interface devices are a cadence meter for biking and a foot pod for running (allows speed and distance to be calculated without GPS reception, or on a tread mill).
700288
I think so. I have owned a number of Garmin Forerunners over the years and the 220 is by and far the best. Garmin has finally gotten it right! The main differences between this watch and the 10 are 1) display- you can see more data and see it much more clearly on the 220, 2) vibration alerts- even though I do not run with an ipod, I would often not hear the audio chirp when I finished each mile (which the 10 does not have), but I can always hear the vibration, 3) pace alerts, which are extremely helpful during training, 4) battery life and 5) the 220 looks way better. Hope this helps! BTW: I am an avid endurance athlete- triathlons, marathons, running relays etc.
1447346
Garmin will tell you need the Garmin Premium Heart Rate Monitor (Soft Strap, ANT+ compatible). I am using the Garmin Heart-Rate Monitor (Regular Strap) I had from my deceased Forerunner 205 and it works fine. Some people complain the old monitor can hurt the side of the chest over the ribcage, so you might choose the new one. It seems to be a lot lighter too. The old one tends to slip when it is not tightly adjusted. Hope this helps.
1211899
I cant say for sure it will, however I have a garmin 305 and it fits pefect. Im pretty sure it will work because the 205/305 are basically the same.
1119966
The HRM-Run does come with the 620, as long as you pick the "With Heart Rate Monitor" option. The watch does not indicate the ranges, but that information is available once you upload it to Garmin Connect. The watch will only show you the point-in-time measurement, so once you have familiarized yourself with the ranges via Garmin Connect, then you can track your progress as you run.
542583
I believe the 2040 has analog controls vs. digital on the 2050. The 2050 is fully programmable in addition to preset drills.
542580
I've not owned the 2040, but that is an "analog" control, whereas the 2050 employs a digital control, with programming and options for user to design additional programs. I think the mechanisms and nets, etc., are the same. I like the 2050 options. I have enjoyed the existing settings and programs on the digital control. Those are easy to use and provide nice variety. I have not needed to design new program instructions, but it is nice to have the option.
1140569
Forerunner 305 doesn't have a barometric altimeter, but it's still able to "approximate" the elevation/grade. As CompExpert mentioned, it does do the job, but it's flaky. If elevation/grade matters to you a lot you're better off with the Edge unit that has a barometric altimeter; however you won't be able to wear the Edge on your wrist.
768615
The 5000AF has a refresh rate of 120 Hz while the 5000 has a rate of 60hz. If you are planning on playing games the higher refresh rate with give you a smoother transition and better motion. If you do not plan on playing games then don't spend the extra money, unless you think you will notice the difference while watching sports.
1767698
The one sad thing with the 220 is it can only do 3 fields per page. The 620 can do four like the 305. I don't understand why it's so difficult for these watches to have four metrics on one page. I think the 620 is the only daily wearing watch that will do four fields.
1211901
Hello Lloyd, I purchased it for the 305 and no I don't think it'll suit the 205, I purchased the JacobsParts® Bike / Motorcycle Handlebar Mount for Garmin 200W, 205W, 250W, 255W, 260W (New) for the 205
2025508
Don't believe so, advertisement shows only for the 205 or 305 models. Might be best to contact the seller and see if they make one for that model. There is a replacement for the Forerunner 10 (rubber) sold by Heart Rate Monitor USA on Amazon.
184987
I didnt find any difference. Only thing-- the monitor didnt work anyway, not because of the battery. It was ON but didnt connect to the babys room. I reccomend on getting new digital monitor. There are too many wireless lines nowadays that interfere with the monitor and this type just doesnt work well anymore.
1271255
I think the major difference is that this has dual alarms and the iH5 only has capacity for one alarm setting... but I wouldn't swear to it...
2236000
If you want a touch screen vs pushing buttons. And the 620 also somehow calculates VO2 when wearing the HR monitor. So basically you are paying the extra for touch screen. So if it is worth it to you. Go for it. And if not save the extra 150 and spend it on some new shoes!
422305
Correct, the 1909 HR doesn't incl. cadence as I spent another $30 for it. I love the computer though as it does everything, clicks on & off easily and has large digits. Right after I got it, a piece broke & I called factory. They sent me a new head free, no questions asked. I would buy again due to features and terrific factory support. If you can't afford a Garmin, look at this unit.
840651
Interesting! I am looking at buying the 405 without the strap, as I still have the one from my now stolen 305. The Garmin support website says that some versions of the 405 are compatible with the HR monitor. How can you tell if the one you are buying is compatible? Or is it just a trick to make you buy the more expensive version?