What is the rise on these pants? They look low on the model.
4852
These pants are great. They sit at the waist and they have an elastic waist band. They run a little long. I'm 5'3" and had to hem them an inch. I'm also 63yrs. old so I understand about low rise pants and don't wear them myself. Hope this helped! Zumba on!!!
4853
If this makes sense, they are fine when you are upright, but they reveal to much when you do any bending or exercising.
4854
I think the rise is pretty average. At least, it they fit me that way. I do have a somewhat higher rise than average, though.
4855
I think they fit the waist ok not exceptionally low. Make sure you buy a size smaller though. I found they run big.
2040654
They are SLIGHTLY raised. You can feel them a little puffy when you run your fingers over them.
1935638
Nope. They don't go all the way up like they are supposed to either. That happened right after purchase.
205978
They are actually about 1/64th" under, if that means anything. I just have a Chinese special but they seem to fit very well.
2201353
as shown... however, beware that the chairs are Lower than Normal... short-legged Orientals??
994467
I cant really tell you as I returned them because they were to large, as in the possibility of a pinch flat is high!
2037598
I really didn't know they were adjustable, Mine went in one permanent spot. You did put on the plastic feet didn't you? New is best, they are much thicker than old wore ones. With those on I can't see how it could be too low. Hope that helps.
2106315
I have mine packed away so I can't measure exactly but maybe like 4-5 inches off the ground. They are low.
1969523
Sonya...I never bought these so I don't know. They look lower case to me just by thepicture. Peggy
1027291
They seem to be keeping the color fine. I have a few pair of the navy ones I've had for a few years and they've done fine. They aren't as good as say the Arc'teryx or Massif pants I have... But they're not $300... For the price point they're at, I haven't found anything as good or better.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
1389733
Helen, I'm no expert, so I don't know. Mine look a little thinner and taller.
1799296
They work great for me at 5' 9"... and I don't even have them at the highest setting. guess it depends how low you squat...
753022
My stools matched the pictures of the stools when I ordered them. Maybe they changed the style. I would check with the manufacturer.
2273774
They are way to low to the ground for me. I would pass on these and get a higher one.
1313872
they should be plump . i did get my package and they were so skinny. no order nothing . i contacted the store i had bought them from . they gave me a big run around as to they should still work. and were to refund me my 16 dollors. i never saw that and the beans were not useable . i do see others have ordered from other sights and have reported they were good. they seem to be vac. packed maybe that is why they look as they do. as you read my revew you will see the store i did order from. i would say order from some store that has posted better of the store. saling the beans.
1307588
I just measured them. Since the insert "cups" the heel, the overall height lift is just less than 1/4 inch. Sorry!