This looks like the original formulation of Nitrix, not the 2.0 formula. Is this correct? Thanks.
30523
Yes. This is the original formula. To this day, still the best supplement I have ever taken.
30524
yes this is the old version, but still works. but i prefer the now formula now.
1497561
It appears that it is a typo from Amazon, but it indeed does sound like a miscalculation! If you have any other concerns please let us know.
328072
I am not sure about those formulas. I don't use this one anymore unfortunately. I use an organic formula
573665
I use system 3 (fine, thining hair). In my experience, YES the formula changed when Nioxin was sold and moved to Mexico. Most ingredience are the same, but not listed in the same order. (%of each is different). I didn't know this until I was looking to see why my hair was falling again. I bought all I could find "made in Georgia".
1658168
The vanilla has 0/0, and I think they're all the same. You can also visit the syntrax website.
591191
It looks to be the revision designation. I bought the B1, Sanus seems to be selling the B3 as the most current iteration. I'm sure they are nearly identical for all practical purposes.
1158212
Here it is New Year's Eve and I just saw your post. I am running exactly the same system you have and have the same questions. Looks like noone has the answers. Kathy
1470434
Optimax the company that makes this product ran into some issues, so the stock at various suppliers have dropped off. I just spoke with the office of Optimax and they stated that new iodoral will be sent out the end of this month. They also stated they have not changed the prices. This supplier is simply being naughty, price gouging and taking advantage of the situation. I truly hope no one supports them.
1391981
I think it is the same as well. I think it is sold as Macuhealth in the staets and Macushield in the UK, where it was formulated. if you are using this for AMD, look into Macushield Gold. it has the additional copper and zinc that the AREDS formula has----and which has proven to be helpful to many.
1555846
Yes it does. It is a more concentrated formula. Check out the Youngevity webpage, it will detail all the differences in the updated formula.
619044
Since I do not have a sample of the 70th formula it is difficult to tell if it is identical since it cannot be compared. The only thing I can say is that it is most like the original version.
2903
where does this model say that it is 2:1? I've read it over and over and even did a "find" search on the page and cannot find it.
608357
I don't know. I responded to the NIA product which is great but expensive. This is good as well and much cheaper.
1000174
As long as correct architecture only difference I can see is 1.5 to 2x price multiplier. I bought these for an old optiplex I made into a server and worked fine but took out and put in parents dimmention. It needed it more. No problems. Like a shot of b12 to the old desktop
301358
I think they would only do 2.4. Other products advertise both so I'm fairly confident this one only does 2.4. But I don't know the science behind it to be able to answer definitively, sorry.
914805
I wrote Noixin a few years ago (2 1/2) and they actually were in the process of updating this product and the shelf life of the old product has expired. They we're suppose to start selling the new formula in 2012, but they are still working to update and release the new version.
95387
I almost bought into this until I found out it was developed by 'Dr. Medinger' (w.medinger@iirec.at). Please be reminded the EarthCalm website claims the product was 'tested' by IIREC, the same organization/person who developed this. His website is a joke so go check it out yourself www.iirec.at