canon g12 vs sony nex: Considering the size and price of the Canon G12, or even the Nikon P7000, wouldn't the interchangeable lens Sony NEX-3 or NEX-5 be a better deal?
6580
I have an S95 which has is basically similar internally to the G12. It's far better indoors and in low light than my Nex 5 which produces very dull pictures lacking color indoors without a flash. The Nex 5 18/55 has a 3.5 lens therefore let's far less light into the sensor.
963748
I am confused whether to buy G12 or SX210. Which one gives better pictures ?
1209292
No - the G12 is a fixed lens camera. You can screw a telephoto converter on the front - that, together with working at the long end of the lens, will help you create the shallower depth of field you seem to be looking for - the term is bokeh. That said 85mm-135mm (35mm equivalent) are considered to be the classic portrait lengths - the longer focal length (as compared to the 50mm you mentioned) contribute to the shallow depth of field. Be aware that if you use one of these lenses wide open you will get bokeh but you will also have to work to learn how to get the area of interest in focus. One other thought - part of the reason a DSLR (especially a full frame one) has less depth of field is the larger sensor. Basically the smaller the sensor the more depth of field - one of those immutable laws of physics things - that's why even the Canon Gx1 with its comparatively larger sense exhibits less depth of field (ie more readily creates bokeh).
262287
Without a doubt the Panasonic is a better deal and camera for the money ,I have both the G12 and the LX5 and the Panasonic wins hands down in almost all aspects. Just My op of course.
2102118
At the end of the day... its about image quality and flexibility vs. convenience. The G9 is one of the best P&S cameras out there and allows full manual control if you are so inclined. At 12MP it will have a higher on subject pixel density which will allow for cropping. On the other hand a 6mp cropped image (down from the full 12) will not look as good as a full size optically zoomed image (6mp full on the D40) The D40 also gives you 2.5 fps vs the ~1.5 of the G9. The D40 will have better low light (high iso) performance in comparison to the G9 due to its larger photosites. I personally have 4 cameras: Canon SD800IS for when it MUST to fit in my pocket. Canon G9 when weight and size is a factor but I want better image quality and faster response than the SD800 (or external flash). The D40 when I want good low light and the ability to mount a fast lens. I use the 18-200 VR as leave on lens, the 18-55 when I want to travel light and the 24-70 f/2.8 for high image quality (the lens is 3x price of the camera). I usually only take the one lens I intend to use with the D40. I have ordered the Nikon D3 for when there is no alternative than having the best, but at 4+lbs its a massive beast and certainly beyond the scope if this discussion. The G9 is with me at almost all times just in case I come across some shot I just have to take. If it is a really compelling image and I have the opportunity to go back and shoot it again I do so with the D40 and much better glass.
483938
The lens will work, but whether you can use it depends on how into doing post processing you are. If you're just looking for an easy point and shoot lens for the nex-3 I would avoid this lens.This lens needs a lot of software image correction. On the newer NEX cameras the image correction is built in and automatic. On your nex-3 (and likewise the first gen nex-5 and nex-7) you need to load the pictures you take onto the pc and do the correction yourself in software.Hope this helps!
1921975
The G6, hands down. I compared the cameras head to head and the NEX-6 had better stills but the G6 had significantly better video.
580822
I have owned both and prefer the GX7. More options, also a great sensor crop option that gives 2.4x greater zoom reach with zero degradation of image. GX7 has a newer sensor. I ended up selling the GH3 and keeping the GX7. BTW IBIS does not work with video, but with Panny lenses this is a non-issue.
247132
This is just my thoughts. If you have to buy Nikon, then get J1. If you want to get the best among all compact system cameras, then I would go with Sony Nex 5N or Pana G3 for the price range. If you can spend more than $1000, Sony Nex 7 or Fuji X100 is nice. If you want to save money but get better Image Quality than J1, I recommend Olympus E-PM1. I prefer Canon S100 over Nikon P7100
1839762
I purchased LX-3 back in March 2009 and paid less than current price. I was sold on abundant glorious reviews. I take lots of macro shots with manual control. I was expecting superior performance to my old Canon G6. To my surprise, Canon G6's image was superior to LX3. I sold LX3 on eBay with BIN and my loss was minimal because I sold LX3 when all online dealers didn't have the LX3 in stock.I am eagerly waiting for G11, sure it is bigger than LX3, but G series cameras feel solid and secure. Also LX3's annoying lens cab is a shortcoming.
483939
The lens will work, but whether you can use it depends on how into doing post processing you are. If you're just looking for an easy point and shoot lens for the nex-3 I would avoid this lens. This lens needs a lot of software image correction. On the newer NEX cameras the image correction is built in and automatic. On your nex-3 (and likewise the first gen nex-5 and nex-7) you need to load the pictures you take onto the pc and do the correction yourself in software. Hope this helps!
483788
I do not think you should purchase this lens for NEX3. The standard zoom which comes with this camera will give you much more flexibility. I purchased it for NEX7 which has a much higher resolution. The standard zoom is just firne for NEX3. Save your money. Good luck.
2055505
I am trying to decide between these 2 cameras too (G7 and A710). I take lots of photos of pets - both inside and out, but cats are strictly inside, so I avoid a flash with them. I am looking for great quality photos and something easy to use. I have been using a Canon G2 (3MP) for a loooong time and I need a better camera (plus the G2 has been acting up). I have also historically had trouble with black dogs and cats, so any advice regarding that dilemma and the better camera would be appreciated. Also, why is a G7 more expensive than a G9? Thanks.
1338307
The size of the lx5 is a deal breaker for me, I just sold my g11 because it was too big to fit in my pockets and I would never bring it anywhere. Though I love the look of the lx5(the s95 looks so cheap and consumer-y) and wanted to give another brand a try, the s95 seems like the smallest camera with a decent sized sensor, there really aren't any other options.
841685
I have a Sony A77 (was going to get the A99, but needed a built-in flash) and use the Zeiss 24-70. I chose the Zeiss after VERY extensive research on it and the A77 and bought them at the same time. In most internet reviews the Zeiss is as good or slightly better than the best Canon and Nikon lenses. It's not cheap, but the pictures are incredible. When sharing photos, people assume they were taken by a professional. Close-up headshots in portrait or auto+ mode are amazing. You can probably get good quality with the higher end Sony lenses, but if you can handle the price, you won't regret the Zeiss.
1823884
the lx7w it seems a very good compact camera but, the gf5 is dslr! that is a advantage over de lx7w, other thing is the gf5 has more megapixels 12.1 vs 10.1, but the lx7 has other advantages... for example 1.7f but this in gf5 means another lens, ... in my opinion is better the gf5 because of the compact size and the Interchangeable lenses.
1796824
The Canon G12 is a nice camera but it appears it will be allowed to fade away (prices remain high, easily available, no one buying). I've noticed many cameras (including Nikons) have reduced build quality --- even the Elph 310 vs. the Elph 300. So, don't wait for the G13 or G1a. Get this or the Fuji (I also like the viewfinder). (The Fuji is better built, costs more, and is made by a company with no customer service.) The G12 has been replaced by the SX40 --- so say even Nikon techs. Want a 5x lens (with great video thrown in) and a non on the mantle camera --- get the Elph 300 (in black) for $149. (Just live without the viewfinder and have a beer first.) :-) The Canon G12 is a nice camera but it appears it will be allowed to fade away (prices remain high, easily available, no one buying). I've noticed many cameras (including Nikons) have reduced build quality --- even the Elph 310 vs. the Elph 300. So, don't wait for the G13 or G1a. Get this or the Fuji (I also like the viewfinder). (The Fuji is better built, costs more, and is made by a company with no customer service.) The G12 has been replaced by the SX40 --- so say even Nikon techs. Want a 5x lens (with great video thrown in) and a non on the mantle camera --- get the Elph 300... » Read More The Canon G12 is a nice camera but it appears it will be allowed to fade away (prices remain high, easily available, no one buying). I've noticed many cameras (including Nikons) have reduced build quality --- even the Elph 310 vs. the Elph 300. So, don't wait for the G13 or G1a. Get this or the Fuji (I also like the viewfinder). (The Fuji is better built, costs more, and is made by a company with no customer service.) The G12 has been replaced by the SX40 --- so say even Nikon techs. Want a 5x lens (with great video thrown in) and a non on the mantle camera --- get the Elph 300 (in black) for $149. (Just live without the viewfinder and have a beer first.) :-) « Show Less