Is this product better than Alpha GPC? Which one is more effective?
39865
Hi Britt! I found True Focus to be more effective for my 18 year old son! The moment I knew this was making a difference for him was one day he came home from school and he said, he mom today I felt like a light bulb went on in my brain, like all of a sudden I didn't have a foggy brain anymore! Well get this! I switched him without even saying a word because I literally was opening the capsules into his protein shakes for almost a week before I got that amazing review from him! Then I told him what I had been doing for a week, leading up to this wonderful moment! Please don't hesitate and give this product a chance! Yes it is definitely better that Alpha GPC.
889327
The more expensive one has MSM in it which is for joint health. I use one or the other and cannot see any difference. I decided I'd rather purchase the less expensive one because of that. There doesn't appear to be any difference in the lotion as far as texture or thickness. I get good results from both as far as the magnesium in them. It helps leg cramps at night.
1317536
This is anecdotal, but I found the raw powder to be more effective. I find the capsules to be much more convenient however.
891216
Car antifreeze already has built in antimicrobial properties. If your using this in a PC. Assuming your not doing sub ambient cooling and not mixing aluminum and copper, straight distilled water is better. Glycol can leave deposits and gunk. Plus it will stain your lines. I have even heard of it breaking down acetl top blocks.
1393065
Sorry. Just not sure which is better. Both have worked well for me in the past.
600730
Sure, the disadvantage to the 21 ga. Vs the 23 ga. is that you are trying to make your fastening as invisible as you can. And I don't think you can do better than Grex.
1145379
To my surprise, these liquid softgels seem to work better and faster than the powder brands. I've previously used a powder brand before and prefer the results I am getting from taking this one. My skin is starting to look great after a short period of time. I hope this helps you in your selection.
124354
I did not use solution to get started, but used it later and it was in range. I found the True2Go to be 30 points off NovaMax Plus, which I also tested with its appropriate control solution. After comparing to Lab results, True2Go was correct, and NovaMax was wrong, despite reputation for being accurate. Apparently there is little to regulate accuracy. Nevertheless, I still prefer True2Go.
748777
I've only used the Loctite Gel Control (blue) and never the Ultra , but from the sound of it, it works every bit as good as the Ultra Gel Control. I'm not sure what the difference is to be honest. I've used the Loctite Gel about 300 times over the past year and I don't even wipe the tip anymore and it has never clogged even once! I am astounded. And I don't even rush to replace the cap anymore, sometimes I leave the cap off for 30-60 minutes. Never a problem. Amazing!
1071878
We searched and did not find a direct comparison of the PeriACTIL Precondition Kit to Periogen by any Amazon customer. If you search for 'Periactil Precondition White Paper' you will find an evaluation online showing, by using PeriACTIL, a 59.0% reduction in plaque index, 94.6% reduction in 6 mm perio pouches and a 58.41% improvement in the gingival index. The study was via PeriACTIL alone. Even better results could be anticipated by using the Preconditioner as well. Again, however, we do not have data comparing this to Periogen. We could not locate a white paper on Periogen. The PeriACTIL Precondition Kit does not contain fluoride, a controversial chemical. PeriACTIL contains xylitol, which Periogen does not. If you decide to use both, we recommend you use them at totally separate times and use PeriACTIL at least at bedtime for protection throughout the night. Please feel free to contact Med-Actil directly for one-on-one attention to your particular oral health issues. Patricia McGrew, Owner/Manager, Med-Actil LLC, Galveston TX
1496793
There are a lot better products available from my experience opalescence is a pretty good choice. I have tried quite a few and most don't work as reviewed
1749530
The Advanced-C is oil-free and used once per day. The High Potency is used twice per day. I have been using the Advanced-C for nearly two decades (I am 59) and honestly cannot remember why the aesthetician recommended the Advanced-C for me. Advanced-C seems to absorb into my skin more readily than the High Potency. You can read about both products on the Cellex-C website for more technical information than I've offered. I can tell you that I would give up other things from my discretionary spending before I'd give up the Advanced-C.
128813
My sister recommended opti to me. That's what she and all her friends use and have gotten great results. I don't mind paying little more if it's better product. I am not familiar with now. Hope this helps you to make a decision.
1077334
I like the gel better. It seems to absorb faster and leave no residue. Love it.
2149523
I've taken super HD, oxyelite pro, Ace products and various brands of hydroxycut.... Super HD made me feel like absolute garbage- jittery, heart raced- I couldn't even do mild-moderate cardio when taking it. Vintage Burn in comparison, provides a much "cleaner" and natural energy and is made from natural ingredients. Old School Labs also lists their ingredients and you won't find a "proprietary blend" of mystery contents. As far as results go- I've lost 16 pounds with Vintage Burn and I feel great. Awesome product and a great sense of community as well. Hope that helps!!
1305327
The EWL-30 is for places where you really want the lube to stay. If regular EWL is working fine for you, probably not worth the extra cost. YMMV. It doesn't appear to "gunk" up faster.
1315348
I have used both and agree with the smell of the hydrate. The pure volume smells a lot better, more of a floral/ perfume scent.