Anyone has compared the HP50 with the PSB M4U? (I'm curious because both were designed by the same person)
27254
I've compared them and they sound similar. The HP50 has better deep sub bass extension, but the PSB M4U1 has a smoother sounding midrange. Treble is shinier on the HP50 and softer on the M4U1. I'd say it's a tossup. Both headphones sound terrific, but look geeky for wearing out and about. The HP50 has just about the oddest looking headband ever, and the PSBs are just big and bulky.
27255
You may find the reviews for both at innerfidelity.com if I remember right. I believe they were designed with different end goals in mind
308657
Cliff, think you mean PRO PMT 4, not PRO PHT04. I believe it serves the same functions.
861864
My HP has a lot of lag to it. I have PS elements 12 on mine and it works fine, but I save regularly in case it freezes up.
754926
Fostex was the very first company to introduce portable headphone dac and after reading reviews on Head-fi.org i was tempted to buy one. I am glad i didChoose Hp-p1 as it was a best sounding portable amp. Today we have better choices as other brands are introducing better amps. Also all fostex units are japan made with highest quality, i would wait for hp-v1 tube amp comming up later this year.if you want hifi music player + dual dac, you can check Astell&kern; AK120. I just bought one from korea and it is awsome.
788551
I was wondering the same thing so did some digging and found this in one of the reviews "The main difference of the MP640 over the MP560 is a larger 3" LCD, Ethernet connection and print speed."
978262
Hi Cinema Goddess,I work for HP. I would like to further discuss your problem. Please send your product and contact info to PSGSocialmedia@hp.com Attn: Scott. Please include your username.Thanks
258478
I was extremely unhappy with my HP4500. I have XP home edition and I kept losing the network. Worse is the way it goes through ink.
1545953
Oh ok thanks a lot! Im probably going to get the hfm300Thank you for your help
1045096
Yes, Robert... I already knew that... but that doesn't seem to be the difference.In fact... Both products seem to be the same:http://www.p4c.philips.com/cgi-bin/dcbint/cpindex.pl?slg=en&scy;=us&ctn;=HF3485/01vshttp://www.p4c.philips.com/cgi-bin/dcbint/cpindex.pl?slg=en&scy;=us&ctn;=HF3485/60Weird... but I can't find any difference between the 01 & the 60 (or Plus) version.If anyone can shed a light here... I'd surely appreciate.
882698
l do not own the M50s... so l cant answer your question... However, common sense tells me the PRO700MK2 should isolate better from the outside as they appear to exert a tighter pressure on your head than the M50 does. Also, take into account that the PRO700s are DJs HPs so l guess they must have been designed to provide more isolation than the M50s... Your choice!
613297
I don't have either of these items, but did took a quick look at the HP website. They have possibly two envelope feeders available for the same price. They look exactly alike in the pictures, but only one of them has information on which printers it works with. I didn't see the P3015 listed. I would call HP for the correct information on compatible printers.
1876882
I suggest you get the HP,simply because its cute,small,takes very nice photos,its touchscreen,and the HP brand is better than Samsung.The Samsung is10.2 mp,but the HP is 12.0 mp.The HP is 3 inches,but the Samsung isn't.The HP is a better bargain because it is touchscren,12.0 mp,nice color,and like i said a better brand so i reccommend you to get the Hp PB360. I hope you enjoy your beautiful nice digital camera
882699
l do not own the M50s... so l can´t answer your question... However, common sense tells me the PRO700MK2 should isolate better from the outside as they appear to exert a tighter pressure on your head than the M50 does. Also, take into account that the PRO700s are DJs HPs so l guess they must have been designed to provide more isolation than the M50s... Your choice!
1117381
Hi, You have been very informative. Which would you recommend: the p4400 or the p4460? Or is another product (under $25.00) better? I live in a delivery cost area, and am fairly careful already, so my likely savings will be less than $100 per year -- so I want to keep the cost of this item low.
438351
My pillow speaker did the same. Bought the sangean ps 300. It has worked well so far.
1351141
I am not a big bass lover so that probably answers your question. The response curve of the HP50's is fairly flat as I recall. I have never heard the B&W; P7 so I don't know if they have more bass than the HP50's. I own B&W; Nautilus speakers and I can tell you they are great. I may have purchased the B&W; P7 but I wanted to not spend over $300 and then the online reviews I read about the HP50's said for the money they could not be beat and most reviews rated them higher than the B&W;'s. The more I listen the the HP50's the more impressed I am with them. Hope this helps.
1602
I would look it up n the Hewlett Packard website to see. The one I ordered did not fit my H/P laptop.