820 vs 920 - does 920 support HDMI 1.3a - 820 is HDMI 1.3??? Is the HDMI support (1.3 vs 1.3a) the main diff between these two units or do they both support the same standard? I can't seem to find this spec in their descriptions.Otherwise, seems like the 820 is a better deal.Thanks for the help.Tony 820 vs 920 - does 920 support HDMI 1.3a - 820 is HDMI 1.3??? Is the HDMI support (1.3 vs 1.3a) the main diff between these two units or do they both support the same standard? I can't seem to... » Read More 820 vs 920 - does 920 support HDMI 1.3a - 820 is HDMI 1.3??? Is the HDMI support (1.3 vs 1.3a) the main diff between these two units or do they both support the same standard? I can't seem to find this spec in their descriptions.Otherwise, seems like the 820 is a better deal.Thanks for the help.Tony « Show Less
191948
So then, if I connect the cable using the compnent video cables, it should up convert the regular cable channels, correct?Is that a better trade off than using the HDMI as the connection between the cable box and the receiver?
191949
It definitley has FM and AM antenna connections. Double check this by downloading their full manual and then blow up the size of the rear panel on your screen.
191950
Does the HDMI up-conversion only convert signals that are not connected via HDMI cables?In other words, when I connect my cable box to the receiver via HDMI port, and from the receiver to the TV via HDMI port, will the receiver up-convert the non-HD cable channels?
191951
phono without preampXM radioGUI setupHDMI conversion made the difference for us...
191952
I've looked at all the SONY .PDF files for the 920 (See SONY/SUPPORT.com), and don't find any reference to HDMI 1.3 or 1.3a. Just HDMI.I ordered the 920 because it does every thing I want and much more, with lots of room to expand. I'm just using 5.1 now. It appears, from all I've read, that the 920 is the "latest and greatest" in HDMI output to date. (11/2008) so I wouldn't worry about it. But that's just me...
191953
the 820 does not up convert to HDMI. It only passes HDMI through to HDMI, Component to Component and Composite to Composite. So if you have an component with HDMI and one with Composite and another with component then you will have to run 3 cables to the tv. I have an older 360 before they started putting HDMI on it. After much research I found out it is pretty much impossible to find a working adapter for the 360. I had to return the 820 because I only want one cable going to my tv since all the components are in a cabinet.
191954
No, the upscaling only works on analog connections. It passes HDMI through as-is.
191955
Thanks A.J.I have a 5.1 setup also. Does the 920 have enough power and is it EZ to setup?I'm comparing it to the Onkyo 706 that costs a LOT more but seems to have similar specs. What am i missing other than THX with the 920?
191956
Is it true that the 920 doesn't have antenna hook-ups? I did a comparison at Sony's site and it shows the 820 with an FM and an AM antenna, but nothing for the 920. I live out in the country and I'm afraid without antenna connections I'll not be able to get an over the air radio stations. Thanks.
1209913
I just received my 5087S, and I'm pretty pleased with it. From my research, my understanding of the differences in these two models is that the 5089S features bluetooth compatibility (for wireless headphones, perhaps), USB 2.0 instead of USB 1.1, and Picture-in-Picture. The 5087 does not have those things. There are also several reports that the 5089S uses HDMI specification 1.3 (the 5087S uses HDMI specification 1.1 or 1.2). I'm not extremely up on this, but apparently the newer HDMI specification 1.3 allows for something called "Deep Color" (more finely tuned colors and hues), BUT there are not currently broadcasts or many (if any) devices that take advantage of that "enhanced color" attribute yet. Also, the device that feeds the content to the TV would ALSO have to support HDMI 1.3 specification. This is years off or never apparently, from what I have read. Something to worry about now? Not as far as I'm concerned. There is more discussion of this over at avsforum if you are interested. My opinion? For $600 or more additional cost for the 5089S, I don't need PIP (I have TiVo), I won't use Bluetooth, and the difference between USB 1.1 and USB 2.0 didn't matter to me (USB is really only there to look at pictures (or listen to music) via a flash drive, and there's not going to be a big difference in speed there between 1.1 and 2.0 -and I'll probably never use that feature).
2091245
HDMI 1.1 and 1.3 use the same cables and connectors. HDMI 1.1 can transfer enough data to do 1080p at 60Hz. There is no way this TV (or any TV currently on the market) can handle any more data than that. HDMI 1.3 is a target that TV makers will be shooting for in a couple years. Here is a press release from hdmi. http://www.hdmi.org/press/pr/pr_20060622.asp "Products implementing the new HDMI specification will continue to be backward compatible with earlier HDMI products." Don't fear, your PS3 will work great.
931527
John - I hope I am not bothersome in my quest for accurate and intelligent information, if so, please tell me you have had enough. Otherwise, I have read a lot of posts and reviews regaridng 1.3 and 1.3a HDMI cables. I also remember you advised not to go with cheap cables which I agree with despite many saying they cannot notice a difference. My receiver is hdmi 1.3 and I know the PS3 is as well. I read that you should make sure that the HDMI cable is certified as a 1.3 and have read that all HDMIs support 1.3 (which I am not sure I believe). What is the truth and what cable do you recommend that is certified as 1.3? Also, does it matter if the cable is 1.3 or 1.3a? John - I hope I am not bothersome in my quest for accurate and intelligent information, if so, please tell me you have had enough. Otherwise, I have read a lot of posts and reviews regaridng 1.3 and 1.3a HDMI cables. I also remember you advised not to go with cheap cables which I agree with despite many saying they cannot notice a difference. My receiver is hdmi 1.3 and I know the PS3 is as well. I read that you should make sure that the HDMI cable is certified as a 1.3 and have read that all HDMIs support 1.3 (which I am not sure I believe). What is the truth and what cable do you... » Read More John - I hope I am not bothersome in my quest for accurate and intelligent information, if so, please tell me you have had enough. Otherwise, I have read a lot of posts and reviews regaridng 1.3 and 1.3a HDMI cables. I also remember you advised not to go with cheap cables which I agree with despite many saying they cannot notice a difference. My receiver is hdmi 1.3 and I know the PS3 is as well. I read that you should make sure that the HDMI cable is certified as a 1.3 and have read that all HDMIs support 1.3 (which I am not sure I believe). What is the truth and what cable do you recommend that is certified as 1.3? Also, does it matter if the cable is 1.3 or 1.3a? « Show Less
448858
Quentin's right on there - the color difference is noticeable and does look better.Also, with the 120hz processor, it accepts 1080p over the component-in input, which means you'll get a much better picture from non-HDMI devices such as the XBox 360.Also, at the shops I've seen lots of banding issues (read up on this - common problem) with the 62U, but didn't see that at all with the 92Us.Locally the price differential is only $400 ($3400 at local stores, vs $3000 for the 62U). The $1k difference is probably due to price breaks on the to-be-discontinued 62U line. Quentin's right on there - the color difference is noticeable and does look better.Also, with the 120hz processor, it accepts 1080p over the component-in input, which means you'll get a much better picture from non-HDMI devices such as the XBox 360.Also, at the shops I've seen lots of banding issues (read up on this - common problem) with the 62U, but didn't see that at all with the 92Us.Locally the price differential is only $400 ($3400 at local stores, vs $3000 for the 62U). The $1k difference is probably due to price breaks on the to-be-discontinued... » Read More Quentin's right on there - the color difference is noticeable and does look better.Also, with the 120hz processor, it accepts 1080p over the component-in input, which means you'll get a much better picture from non-HDMI devices such as the XBox 360.Also, at the shops I've seen lots of banding issues (read up on this - common problem) with the 62U, but didn't see that at all with the 92Us.Locally the price differential is only $400 ($3400 at local stores, vs $3000 for the 62U). The $1k difference is probably due to price breaks on the to-be-discontinued 62U line. « Show Less
1071223
That's simple. None. Don't buy it. It's a faulty device full of firmware problems. It never switched properly between HDMI devices properly for me so I returned it.
1018739
Months ago I understood it did not support HDMI 2. when I spoke to LG executive customer service. I suggest you call them for updates. Many consumers wanted this but I don't know if the got around to a firmware upgrade or it could not be done.I purchased the Samsung 78 inch 9000 series that has it all and the one connect box makes it a better choice of a purchase.The Samsung is sensational.
920725
per this article, http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,137429/printable.html, it is not 1.3 compatible. However, reviewers for the 50 inch version on CNET have said that it is 1.3 compatible. I am still confused as to whether it is or isn't HDMI 1.3 compatible. I have sent an email to Panasonic and will post their reply.12/10 Update:Heard back from Panasonic support and the tv is HDMI 1.3. Here is what they said:Dear MR SINGHThank you for your inquiry. The TH42PZ700 is HDMI version 1.3. Thank youfor your interest in Panasonic products.Thank You,Panasonic Consumer Support per this article, http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,137429/printable.html, it is not 1.3 compatible. However, reviewers for the 50 inch version on CNET have said that it is 1.3 compatible. I am still confused as to whether it is or isn't HDMI 1.3 compatible. I have sent an email to Panasonic and will post their reply.12/10 Update:Heard back from Panasonic support and the tv is HDMI 1.3. Here is what they said:Dear MR SINGHThank you for your inquiry. The TH42PZ700 is HDMI version 1.3. Thank youfor your interest in... » Read More per this article, http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,137429/printable.html, it is not 1.3 compatible. However, reviewers for the 50 inch version on CNET have said that it is 1.3 compatible. I am still confused as to whether it is or isn't HDMI 1.3 compatible. I have sent an email to Panasonic and will post their reply.12/10 Update:Heard back from Panasonic support and the tv is HDMI 1.3. Here is what they said:Dear MR SINGHThank you for your inquiry. The TH42PZ700 is HDMI version 1.3. Thank youfor your interest in Panasonic products.Thank You,Panasonic Consumer Support « Show Less
1813775
I'm interested in this also. I have an older Generation Samsung LNS4095 and it doesn't allow PIP if either source is HDMI. I called up Samsung after a long time and found out PIP is not available if either of the sources is via HDMI. Its in the manual, as it was pointed out to me, also. I'm looking to buy a new TV and would be curious to know if the 650 can handle it. I have a cablebox and PS3 connected via HDMI.
1803547
My STR-DN1040 has 8 HDMI inputs and they are all in use and the STR-DN1050 has no new compelling features - more like a downgrade in connections. Guess the 1040 is good for another year at least.
677137
HDMI 1.3 supports "deep color" for your TV. The audio support will be through your receiver. This TV will not support "deep color"...the 89 series will.
1490400
Hello Timmy; the new NR 636 will pass thru the singularly selected input you chose from the 7. HARDWARE SETUP&gt; HDMI&gt; HDMI THRU. It will only pass thru the selected input you indicate in this submenu.
305872
I am surprised its not HDMI 2.0. Had I known I would not have ordered because I have always been told in order to do 3D you need 2.0 and 4K you need HDDCP 2.2 so either I been misinformed or this unit cant do what it claims
71657
This one has 1.3 for sure. I think all 2007 models have 1.3. Having HDMI 1.3 is not as big as an issue as you may think it is. But if it concerns you, rest assured this HDTV has it.
143594
No, the 876 will not decode 3d content with it's 1.3v HDMI. so I went on Amazon and brought the onkyo nr3008. Nice too it just like 876 but more advanced. guess im selling the 876 on amazon.com as a seller
738939
To answer your first question, this will support Display port monitors that are from 1.0 to 1.2a. The second part is a question of the kinds of monitors being plugged in - if you only use 1.0 or 1.1 monitors, this hub will not significantly increase the throughput to require 1.2; a 1.1 graphics card should support 3-&gt;1 1.1 displays. If you have a 1.2 display, you will need a 1.2 graphics card.
1150528
I'm also looking at these two models, and would appreciate any comments as well. The DH810 is newer and will upconvert video to 1080p, while the DN1000 only upconverts to 1080i. Is this a big difference? The DH810 also supports Audio Return Channel, so you only need one HDMI cable to your tv and your tv can send audio back to the receiver Also no on-screen menu on the DH810 I'm still on the fence on this one, especially since the price of the DN1000 will continue to drop.