What is the difference between these and the T20's? Are these worth the extra $$ over the T20's?
184537
Size, they are about 3.5 inches taller, depth and width are the same and a little more power from the amplifier. The low end sound is a little more fuller/reinforced compared to the T20s even though the frequency response is the same rolling off around 60hz and bottoming out around 45-50hz in term of audibility(verified using a tone generator). If you already own the T20s I wouldn't say the sound difference justified upgrading, but if you don't, you cannot go wrong going with the T40s as this is clearly the better of the two models.
184538
Probably not. The t40 is edging itself into entry level powered monitor territory. I doubt these creatives can compete.http://www.samash.com/3-cr---creative-reference-multimedia-monitors-(pair)-mcr3pairx?cm_mmc=GoogleShopping-_-Recording-_-Channeladvisor-_-Mackie+CR3+Creative+Reference+Multimedia+Monitors+(Pair)&utm;_source=GSH&utm;_medium=CSE&utm;_campaign=Channeladvisor&CAWELAID;=500002510000028057&CAGPSP;N=pla&catargetid;=500002510000028166&cadev;ice=m&gclid;=CjwKEAiA0O2lBRDOrPX4oJP3t2oSJACjpaHAPO2zYwtxeU20QYrDHXhR7zCQdv-Qw9mn6MxHO8YuOhoCoRPw_wcBhttp://www.samash.com/m/bx5-d2-5-active-studio-monitors-%28pair%29-mbx5d2pai Probably not. The t40 is edging itself into entry level powered monitor territory. I doubt these creatives can compete.http://www.samash.com/3-cr---creative-reference-multimedia-monitors-(pair)-mcr3pairx?cm_mmc=GoogleShopping-_-Recording-_-Channeladvisor-_-Mackie+CR3+Creative+Reference+Multimedia+Monitors+(Pair)&utm;_source=GSH&utm;_medium=CSE&utm;_campaign=Channeladvisor&CAWELAID;=500002510000028057&CAGPSP;N=pla&catargetid;=500002510000028166&cadev;ice=m&gclid;=CjwKEAiA0O2lBRDOrPX4oJP3t2oSJACjpaHAPO2zYwtxeU20QYrDHXhR7zCQdv-Qw9mn6MxHO8YuOhoCoR... » Read More Probably not. The t40 is edging itself into entry level powered monitor territory. I doubt these creatives can compete.http://www.samash.com/3-cr---creative-reference-multimedia-monitors-(pair)-mcr3pairx?cm_mmc=GoogleShopping-_-Recording-_-Channeladvisor-_-Mackie+CR3+Creative+Reference+Multimedia+Monitors+(Pair)&utm;_source=GSH&utm;_medium=CSE&utm;_campaign=Channeladvisor&CAWELAID;=500002510000028057&CAGPSP;N=pla&catargetid;=500002510000028166&cadev;ice=m&gclid;=CjwKEAiA0O2lBRDOrPX4oJP3t2oSJACjpaHAPO2zYwtxeU20QYrDHXhR7zCQdv-Qw9mn6MxHO8YuOhoCoRPw_wcBhttp://www.samash.com/m/bx5-d2-5-active-studio-monitors-%28pair%29-mbx5d2pai « Show Less
184539
The T-40s have an extra pair of speaker and likely more power for $20. I haven't heard to T-20 but if you think of what you can buy for $20 anymore--they're worth it.
184540
I've never had the T20s so I couldn't tell you. I bought these because they were a higher model that came highly recommended to me and they were the same price as the T20s on Amazon. They sound awesome, too.
2281278
The main difference I see is the V500 has a higher scan resolution (6400x9600) as opposed to the V300's 4800x9600 res. Also, the V300 does not have Digital ICE capabilities which the V500 has. Personally, I've been using the V500 for archiving 35mm negatives, and not having the ICE technology for removing scratches, dust, and other imperfections IS A DEAL BREAKER! You have no idea how much time you'll save by using ICE to clean up those old negatives instead of doing touching them up by hand. ICE technology works very well! The scanning software Epson ships with their scanners is very clunky and quirky to say the least, but it gets the job done. I see the V300 as a document scanner with limited photo scanning capabilities. The V500 is definitely the best photo scanner bang for the buck bar none!
768727
My take on the UL20A vs. the 1201N is as follows;If you want to pay $80 less, less battery life, less weight, but be able to play 1080P media and games, then get the 1201N.Otherwise, get the UL20A. The battery life on the 1201N isn't that bad, I can get 4.5 hours or so with medium usage, maybe 2-3 if I play 1080P media continuously. It's pretty decent for its capabilities.
501990
Yes that's the only difference and you should go with the t- r42 because the price differential is not that great.
1115219
I tried both in store and there wasn't much difference between them with noise cancelling next to an enormous fan. The QC15 have better quality sound reproduction due to the larger drivers, but honestly I have no problem with my QC20s. They sound great, the noise cancelling is amazing and I've slept for 10 hours straight on a flight from LAX to SYD sitting over the wing next to the engines.
51750
I have the T3000 coin op and the Warrior so I can do a direct compare between the two from a Warrior vs Tornado perspective. The Warrior does have counter-balanced men. The table as a whole plays well. The big difference being that the Warrior plays much slower than a Tornado (or in this case the T3000 since that is what I'm familiar with). Of course I'm sure you're aware the ball the Warrior uses is much tackier. I spend about 90% of my time on the Tornado and when I do get on the Warrior, my ball control is leaps and bounds better. The walls on the Warrior also don't seem to be as responsive as on the Tornado ie, when bouncing the ball off of them. Not sure if its the walls or the ball. Overall, the Warrior is good table for the price pt. However, you can also find good used Tornado coin-ops (craigs list) for the same if not less. Surprisingly enough, the Warrior is actually a pretty sturdy table for what it weighs. Rods are nice, grips are practically identical to those on the T3 (just different colors). Playing field is good. I would suggest however that if you plan on playing in local tournaments, or even just out and about and want to be competitive, to look into a descent used Tornado coin-op. If just looking for a home table for friends and family to have fun on, the Warrior will serve that purpose without a doubt. (Edit) Occasionally, balls will get stuck in the goal box on the Warrior. You can just reach in and grab them or knock em around a little til they go down the ball return tube. Also the back plating inside the goals is LOUD!
377162
I don't know how much more the T3 is - I really do like mine. You have to be careful to keep the air intake clear of fuzz because that will cut your air flow dramatically and, I would think, shorten the life of the motor. So do think about that. Price is relative. I say buy the best you can afford and take care of it so it lasts. It's a beautiful dryer also.
1306538
The noise reduction with these is better than the tactical sport version. I have compared them side by side as a friend has the TS model. I regularly shoot at an indoor pistol range and the Pro model works very well. My friend "doubles up" using foam ear plugs in addition to the TS model shooting indoors. I think the extra cost is worth the additional protection.
1259399
Go with the 20. I owned both, and kept the 20. It takes super photos, and is much less shake-sensitive with max telephoto. The 30 advertises more MP, but the sensor's the same size, and crowding does NOT improve resolution. That's why full frame sensor unitrs cost $3K+.
2235088
I was just debating the SX20 vs SX30, so I was really glad to find this discussion. I assumed the 30 would be an improvement, but it sounds from this discussion and many customer reviews that 20 is a better choice for image quality.
822718
AS far as I could tell the T40's are a little larger and may offer fuller sound. I say may because I haven't heard them. Based on the dimensions and speaker profile, I chose the T20's as most bang for the buck. I use them in a large very high ceilinged warehouse type space where I train and I very pleased with the sound. Don't get me wrong, they can't replace a real full size set up, but they take up little room, are very cheap, and sound good. My recommendation is the T20's.
361876
The 1810T has in addition:- HDMI,- Bluetooth,- Gigabit ethernet,- Extra 2GB RAM for a total of 4GB.- It is also 0.2lbs lighter.I would still go for the UL20A though because of ASUS build quality, metallic cover and overall design if it had the first two, i.e. HDMI and Bluetooth. For now I'm waiting...
1805734
We are very satisfied with the G20! I don't know what I would have to have to justify the added cost of the G30. My daughter just returned from her 10 day trip to Italy with some awesome footage and stills taken with G20. She loves it!
471881
Hello and thanks for writing. The T30s feature bigger drivers which will produce better sound. Its safe to say that they will sound better, but the significance varies from person to person.
85341
The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to... » Read More The X20 has a slightly different sensor that is suppose to be slightly sharper but the differences are very small, as to be virtually undetectable. Some people like the X10 better then the 20 because it has a more sophisticated and feature rich Contrast Control setting. The lens is exactly the same. I was dissapointed that there wasn't more of a difference. Oh ... the X20 displays some of your exposure settings in the optical view finder. But a lot of folks don't even use the optical view finder and instead just use the excellent monitor. It was pretty much of a waste for me to "upgrade" from the 10 to the 20 ... but my son enjoys inheriting the 10. :-) « Show Less
2096573
I have the 18-200 and have enjoyed it. If you are absolutely sure you will never go FX, the 18-200 is a good choice. For less money, I would prefer the 28-300 instead of 18-300, if you ever want to move to FX.
830667
i find they have very true sound. I would buy them again. I also have the bowers wilkens p3's but i like the t51's a little better. I am not a fan of extra bass. Hope this helps.