What's the difference between this one and the other one is one better are they both 1080p 3d http://www.amazon.com/ViewSonic-PJD51...
200908
The major difference is the pjd 5134 is not full H.D. If you go to amazon and search electronics , type in the 5134 and search you will see some reviews on that page , one review said " this is not true H.D. far from it , but the picture quality is very good. When you have a broadcast signal from your provider and or blue ray or any true H.D signal you need true H,D to receive the signal and display true H.D which is 1928x 1080 only that "native resolution is true H.D. AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE , i TESTED 3 OR 4 OTHER PROJECTORS , THAT WERE GOOD ,BUT NOT TRUE H.D. For eg. I watched the world cup in true H.D. phenomenal . The key is "native resolution " the one you are asking about is 600x800 the other one is 1928x1080 -true H.D. there is a big difference , that is why you pay more for the one compared to the other , but it is definitely worth it , it depends on how good you want your picture to be , if you want true H.D. get the 7820 true H.D. .AS GOOD AS A MOVIE THEATER OR BETTER ,Mark 850-696-9519 , call if you want to discuss further
1220466
I have about 6 ViewSonic PJD projectors. I had active shutter glasses that worked for except the 3D blu ray on my PJD 5234L which is "Blu-Ray ready. The other glasses worked on 3D through this projector but not on blu ray.. The SainSonic 3D glasses worked on everything including the Blu-Ray. Not even earlier ViewSonic glasses worked with the Blu-Ray on this projector. I'm under the impression that all of the PJD 5 series are similar and I would expect the SainSonic Rainbow series to work on them, but I do not have the specific PJD5533. For the low price I would certainly give at least on pair a try - I think you'll like the features!
581084
I happen to use both every day - the apple 27 inch at work, and the viewsonic at home.I prefer the viewsonic for the non-glossy finish, adjustable stand, and aesthetic. I'd buy it again in either case. The image quality is great on both monitors, so that wasn't a difference to consider here.
1484841
Is a great tv for it's price but I'm a huge fan of 3D and the passive format divides the resolution in one half for each eye. For a truly enjoyable experience get a tv with active shutter format. It's the closest to real 3d.
866028
I am am mainly interested in this unit as a 3D gaming monitor for a new PC (for Guild Wars 2/SW:ToR/Diablo 3 etc) the closest I can find is this ViewSonic V3D245 24-Inches LED 3D-Ready Monitor - Black So, so far the SONY is looking the better deal, I would appreciate as much comparison shopping data as possible if anyone has more specs etc, thank you.
2010283
The one I bought last summer was 720p. But the resolution is great. I don't have a blue ray player though. And they are optimal with 1080 p I've been told.
509529
Guys, the glasses and TV's may be cheaper, but passive 3DTV's are at 540 resolution in 3D, compared to 1080 that active TV's offer. This is a huge difference that I was able to confirm myself by trying both at a Best Buy store. Remember that before making a decision.
1450128
Haven't used the $189 model. The SP model is claimed to have better image quality.
441497
It was my understanding that PS3 produced 720p or 1080i images. The Pana BD85 is 1080p. As far as accuracy of color, the BD85K is much better than my brother's PS3. We both have 720p sets, but to be fair, he's on a 40" Samsung 60hz LCD, whereas I have a Pana Viera 600hz plasma. No comparison there, so that could be the difference.
1347454
There a couple of clear differences between these to projectors. If you are going to buy either the Optoma GT720 or the Optoma HD66 which are the two I prefer you have to choose based on features. First of all, they are both 720p which means you will get a pretty good image (if you want the best bang for the buck pay a little more and get the Optoma HD20 which has the best picture quality since its 1080p). The Optoma GT720 has no zoom lens which means if you are going to mount it on the ceiling you have to measure the exact distance from the screen. It also has a short throw lens which means you can get a 100 inch screen with 4 or 5 feat of distance. Finally, it has a 16:10 aspect ratio which means it is more for gaming and less for movies but there is a minimal difference in the picture size and the bulb on the GT720 in economy mode is rated 5000 hours. The Optoma HD66 is rated on to 4000 hours, has a 16:9 aspect ratio which is better for watching movies (with the black border), has a throw range of 10-11 feet for a 100 inch screen, and finally does have a zoom feature which lets you calibrate the distance with the zoom.
1428277
I use the Optoma glasses that are 80ish $. Not sure if the Sainsonic are exactly the same quality and sync well with the projector but being a brand new product (when I got the projector in September) I wanted to make sure they are perfectly compatible. I have to say I too have an issue with the 3D but it is only happening on certain movies (Iron Man 3 so far but only tried 3 3D movies). The 3D seems to occasionally "de-sync" causing the image to be blurry. The glasses are however connected. It isn't my receiver as I tried with the PS3 plugged directly into the projector and the same happened. Given it did not happen with all the movies I'm inclined to think the problem was with the movie itself but I still thought it's good to give you a heads up.
1298945
V1 had a TN screen the V2 has an IPS screen. Better viewing angles. That's the primary difference I believe.
2028791
I studied that one as an option as well and it was well reviewed but the Epson is LCD and also does 3D. Also the Epson is the leading brand in the category so I went with it.
311001
Hi. I like the one I bought, but it looks like the other one has a few more features. I'd go with that one.
752733
The v3 is the better one because it will work on any 3d tv. The v3 is also compatible with the finepix v3 camera
838811
I'm not sure what the differences are between the two. But my experience with the wireless part was it was basically useless. Video was not watchable at 720p or above. However the wireless function was ok for PowerPoint presentations and slides I did not test slides with audio. The picture was good and clear as well as bright. But the video was a deal breaker for us.
1657444
I imagine it's the same camera. One is listed as fulfilled by Trivision, the other fulfilled by Amazon.