Whats the difference between this red one ? 16 watts rms ? http://www.amazon.com/SuperTooth-0041...
213980
Color! that's all. I like these speakers they sound great connect so easy and stay connected. Just plain nice!
328641
Crutchfield has the specs as "Peak Power Output (Watts x Channels) 450 x 2". Peak wattage (in this case 900 watts) is important to be available during certain demanding parts of a song, but is not sustainable (Think of it like you're jogging and a dog starts chasing you. You can get a burst of speed to get away, but can't run that fast for a long period). The sustained/continuous wattage is what the RMS refers to. That is what the more important statistic is to look at and how most legitimate amps are rated. I have this amp and consider it very good, especially at this price point. Sorry if I got too off topic. Hope this helps!
1020395
I have no experience with Marantz products. By looking at spec., the only real difference I see is the wattage per channel. This one is less by 45w. Few other minor differences but generally the same.
1885725
I not sure if it is a constant @ 1 ohm cuz I use it at 2 ohm but even at that it still bangs. If its not 1100 watts its got to be close. Just remember you can use both channels and you should be happy. If you have any other questions, just hit me up and I'll try to help
59128
I looked for a Planet Audio 4000 Watt amp and found this, the AC4000.1D. They claim it makes 1,500 RMS, if that is the case, it will be enough to get them moving pretty good. I have a 2000 Watt soundstream on them, and it is pretty ridiculous. I think the amp you mentioned will work if it is something you already have, but if you are looking to get an amp for them, I would stay away from Planet Audio.
77942
It is "132 watt RMS" which relates to the sound and has nothing to do with the wireless that is mentioned after...I really don't get why they put the word "wireless" in when advertising the unit. It is not wireless in the least. Nice system though.
110075
Just checked manual and it refers to the website. To be honest, it sounds more like 100 W RMS than 180.
148791
the 72 has 130 watts per 7 channel@ 8 ohms. the 75 has 135 watts per 9 channels @ 8 ohms. personally, I would never use 9 channels. either one would be a good choice.
1443203
These woofers have been redesigned with great improvements overall. I used the older version with a 250 watt rms Monolithic amp with no problems @ 4 Ohms. I'm sure you will be pushing the limits at 5oo W rms @2 ohms, but the speaker will be agile and fast and you will not have problems if you don't crank it to max levels. The safer route If you will be cranking hard, will be to move to the next level which is the P2D4-12 rated at 800W @ 2 or 4 ohm, I will not be as responsive, but it can handle 800W!
597482
60W RMS per speaker. That said, JBL's like good power. Some users run more at these with good results.
351672
This page says 40w x 4 rms @ 4ohms + sub. all other info is 75w x 4 rms @4ohm. which is correct. ?
885984
Hertz vs Watts would be something you want to google. I don't know the answer.
195377
I checked the box and I was unable to find RMS. I assume Pyle would rather not disclose this. It's 100 per channel peak but I'd put it at 20-40 for rms
809242
The 737 gives you 120W of power at 8ohms on all channels, the 636 gives you 95W the extra power can really make a huge difference depending on your speakers. If you have high quality speakers that can handle the power. The speakers work more effortlessly and create a better sound, they come alive. Less distortion at higher levels. It also enables your receiver not to have to work as hard. I was looking at the 636 myself but I really wanted at the very least 100W of power. You also get the THX certification - ThxSelect2plus this is a feature that can help maximize sound for more dramatic effects. I notice a nicer smoother base effect. THX Select2 Plus is recommended for medium-sized rooms where the screen-to-seat viewing distance is about 3-4 m (10-12 ft.). I have been extremely satisfied with mine and use it every day.
387781
I've tried to find this as well but EV doesn't give that info. If I were to guess based on volume I'd say at least 500watts. To be fair JBL,Osc and most of the others don't advertise their watts rms on their powered speakers.
1707298
But you mean RMS which is how much it can handle while playing!!! which is 100W.Pwr Consumption 200W means thats how loud the speaker will play before breaking or overheating!!! it means not continous power but say for instance you turn your volume up for 1 second and back down. 200 watts will be all that you will hear in that time frame anything more than that will pop the speakers.
757851
The difference between the X and the R are pretty minor. The X depth is much deeper then the R. X has slightly different materail. But over all the X has a better all around sound quality up against the R. I've owned both. But it all comes down to your applications, what amp you are running and is it powered to its full potential, etc. I own the X and prefer it over the R.