24p vs 60i The above discussion says that they create 24p from 60i recordings. Is that really possible? Interlaced format creates odd numbered lines at a different time from even numbered lines. Example: 30i captures odd frames 1/60th sec after even lines. Progressive format captures the whole frame at once. That's why it's better for rapid motion and conversion to stills. The factory spec says there is a 24p mode that captures in 24p and another 24p mode that records in 60i. I don't get it! How can you make 24p out of 60i? 24p vs 60i The above discussion says that they create 24p from 60i recordings. Is that really possible? Interlaced format creates odd numbered lines at a different time from even numbered lines.... » Read More 24p vs 60i The above discussion says that they create 24p from 60i recordings. Is that really possible? Interlaced format creates odd numbered lines at a different time from even numbered lines. Example: 30i captures odd frames 1/60th sec after even lines. Progressive format captures the whole frame at once. That's why it's better for rapid motion and conversion to stills. The factory spec says there is a 24p mode that captures in 24p and another 24p mode that records in 60i. I don't get it! How can you make 24p out of 60i? « Show Less
216931
I've done it the other way around. I shot something using a canon XAH! in SD mode using 24fps.I went into Premiere and created a new project using settings with 24fps. Captured the footage off the camera. Then I brought the video clip into the timeline. I then exported the workspace to media file,avi, with the setting 30fps. Came out good.
216932
I use adobe premiere pro software. If you bring in footage shot in 30fps and the export it to a media file such as avi in 24fps would that give you the same results as far as quality, etc?
216933
Thanks for the response. I'm not really interested in the 24p aesthetic. I am interested in taking video of quarter midget race cars racing. I have a HV10 now that has two problems (as I see it). One is that it's HD format is 1080i and the other is that the HD video is compressed to the same bit rate as SD video. It looks like the native 24p mode of the HV40 could solve one of these problems. It boggles my mind that so few camcorders offer progressive recording. Nearly all the still cameras that take video do it in progressive format.
742380
24p is possible on 60hz LCD's but note that 60 is not a multiple of 24, but 120hz is a multiple. So when 24p is being pulled down, it will not be pulled exactly 5 times per frame but some weird combination like : 1st frame 2x, second frame 3x, 3rd frame 2x and so forth. Not that you will ever notice. Anyway, that is what I saw somewhere.
2140409
you can adjust it on the menu based on what you need, 120,240, 480, and1000 frame per s. the faster you got the lower resolution of film you had. i usually use 120 and 240 frame per second to capture running. and it s pretty
1345040
I'm afraid I don't quite understand the question. I have used this to record Blu-Ray disks with no difficulty without having to modify the recording other than to choose the recording speed which I set at slow. Sorry I can't help more - but I am very pleased with this unit. No troubles of any kind as opposed to others I've had.
2059603
anyone care to elaborate on the codec differences in gritty detail? H.264 and AVCHD Lite are both relatively knew. It would appear the Lumix can capture comparable PQ at a lower bit rate (-3 to 4mbps) but anyone have any real world results of what this translates to in terms of file size difference on a given clip?
458369
according to the UK website (ww.panasonic.co.uk) below, this sd600 camcorder is 50p "1080/50p recording (Full-HD, 1920 x 1080, 50 progressive recording) conveys about twice the information of 1080i (interlace) recording to produce the ultimate beauty in image quality, exceeding even conventional Full-HD images. It minimises afterimages and moir patterns caused by subject motion and renders crisp, detailed images. 64GB SDXC Card can record approximately 27 hours and 30 minutes of 1920 x 1080i high-definition video in HE mode and approximately 5 hours and 20 minutes of 1920 x 1080p full high-definition video in 1080/50p mode"
2049178
The manual says 320 minutes for 1080, 480 minutes at 720/60 and 620 minutes at 720/30. I would go with what the manufacturer says (60 minutes). It records in cycles of 1 minute or 5 minutes, now keep in mind this is continuous in a sense. I keep my cycles to 1 minute, this way it won't take forever to upload to YouTube. Now I play them all back at once on my PC, the one minute clips let me cycle through a trip a lot faster. Searching through 5 minutes at a time could prove more tedious. My advice is to set and on one minute and leave it. I do delete my micro sd each day, even though it's not necessary, since it will cycle back around and over you oldest clips first. The manual says 320 minutes for 1080, 480 minutes at 720/60 and 620 minutes at 720/30. I would go with what the manufacturer says (60 minutes). It records in cycles of 1 minute or 5 minutes, now keep in mind this is continuous in a sense. I keep my cycles to 1 minute, this way it won't take forever to upload to YouTube. Now I play them all back at once on my PC, the one minute clips let me cycle through a trip a lot faster. Searching through 5 minutes at a time could prove more tedious. My advice is to set and on one minute and leave it. I do delete my micro sd each day, even though it's... » Read More The manual says 320 minutes for 1080, 480 minutes at 720/60 and 620 minutes at 720/30. I would go with what the manufacturer says (60 minutes). It records in cycles of 1 minute or 5 minutes, now keep in mind this is continuous in a sense. I keep my cycles to 1 minute, this way it won't take forever to upload to YouTube. Now I play them all back at once on my PC, the one minute clips let me cycle through a trip a lot faster. Searching through 5 minutes at a time could prove more tedious. My advice is to set and on one minute and leave it. I do delete my micro sd each day, even though it's not necessary, since it will cycle back around and over you oldest clips first. « Show Less
1051046
This is an international model, so it allows you to choose either NTSC or PAL for the video recording and output in the menu settings. In AVCHD format the options are: 1080/50i recording with output option of 50p or 25p; 1080/24p recording/output; 720/50p recording/output.
1072606
The 85's DVD 24P conversion is excellent, as is its upscaling w/24P. Just make sure you have 24P turned on in the Setup menu and then you will have to manually turn on 24P via the Display menu for DVD's you wish to playback in 24P. This manual setting is done because not all DVD's are 24Fps and it causes bad artifacts if played at the wrong frame rate. So, each DVD must be set to 24P manually, although Blu-ray is a native progressive format and so 'knows' the frame rate the disc was encoded in and plays it appropriately if 24P is set in the Setup menu. Even now, in 2013, many BD players are not good at converting DVD to 24P, or won't do it at all, so the BD85 is still superb for DVD's at 24P. Its BD picture quality is still state-of-the-art and unless you need 3D, nothing produces a better image - plus it has discrete 7.1 RCA audio outputs, which is a rarity on players today, but a must for those with older receivers that dont support TrueHD ot DTS-HD audio but do have multichannel inputs - if they don't wish to upgrade their receiver the BD85 will allow them to experience the modern lossless audio formats without being downsampled and reencoded to standard lossy Dolby Digital or DTS formats for compatability.
1400815
Beware the Sony "cineframe" options -- they look terrible. I have a Sony HC3 and while it's a fine little camera in 1080i 60i mode, the pseudo-24p stuff looks awful. The HV20 promises TRUE 24fps recording, plus a cinematic gamma curve, plus OIS, plus manual audio level controls, plus better lowlight performance. I wasn't even planning on buying a new camera, but I'm buying an HV20. At $1099, it's a great deal!
213219
no, this camcorder is not High Definition. It does not record in either 1080i or 720p. It does say however that it is high resolution, which is where I think it gets almost misrepresented. Here is the confusion.. Widescreen HR Recording The FS200 records true High Resolution Widescreen for picture perfect video. Canon's Widescreen HR Mode uses the entire width of the image sensor, capturing true 16:9 widescreen. What difference does it make? It's simple. The more pixels captured, the better your final image quality is. Notice that it does not say High DEFINITION, it says high RESOLUTION. Easy way to truly know is that In order for something to be high-def it has to be 1080i or 720p!
246155
It depends. Technically 60p is a better image as far as it is cleaner for green screen work and special effects. Broadcast TV is in 60i. If your eye is trained to a pro level there is a difference. If this is a camera for family vacations, you can't tell a difference. I use it as a "B" camera for paid work and it is great. Plus I shoot in 24p which is what most cinema and pro video is shot at. 60 frames is for broadcast or slow motion.
1971344
Dear Anderson,Thank you very much for your e-mail.It can support 24FPS, 23.97, 29.97, and 30FPS.More details as follows,please check it.System Total lines Active lines Frame rate Scanning Aspect ratio575/50I(PAL) 625 575 25 2:1 interlace 16:9/4:3 480/60I(NTSC) 525 483 30 2:1 interlace 16:9/4:3 576/50P 625 576 50 Progressive 16:9/4:3 480/6P 525 483 60 Progressive 16:9/4:3640*480/60P 525 480 60 Progressive 4:31080/50I 1125 1080 25 2:1 interlace 16:91080/60I 1125 1080 30 2:1 interlace 16:9720/50P 750 720 50 Progressive 16:9720/60P 750 720 60 Progressive 16:91080/50P 1125 1080 50 Progressive 16:91080/60P 1125 1080 60 Progressive 16:9Best regards,Rickey Dear Anderson,Thank you very much for your e-mail.It can support 24FPS, 23.97, 29.97, and 30FPS.More details as follows,please check it.System Total lines Active lines Frame rate Scanning Aspect ratio575/50I(PAL) 625 575 25 2:1 interlace 16:9/4:3 480/60I(NTSC) 525 483 30 2:1 interlace 16:9/4:3 576/50P 625 576 50 Progressive 16:9/4:3 480/6P 525 483 60 Progressive 16:9/4:3640*480/60P 525 480 60 Progressive 4:31080/50I 1125 1080 25 2:1 interlace 16:91080/60I 1125 1080 30 2:1 interlace 16:9720/50P 750 720 50... » Read More Dear Anderson,Thank you very much for your e-mail.It can support 24FPS, 23.97, 29.97, and 30FPS.More details as follows,please check it.System Total lines Active lines Frame rate Scanning Aspect ratio575/50I(PAL) 625 575 25 2:1 interlace 16:9/4:3 480/60I(NTSC) 525 483 30 2:1 interlace 16:9/4:3 576/50P 625 576 50 Progressive 16:9/4:3 480/6P 525 483 60 Progressive 16:9/4:3640*480/60P 525 480 60 Progressive 4:31080/50I 1125 1080 25 2:1 interlace 16:91080/60I 1125 1080 30 2:1 interlace 16:9720/50P 750 720 50 Progressive 16:9720/60P 750 720 60 Progressive 16:91080/50P 1125 1080 50 Progressive 16:91080/60P 1125 1080 60 Progressive 16:9Best regards,Rickey « Show Less
843561
Hi Fred, the DP-24 is not easy to use unless you have experience using different digital recorders and/or software. I have used quite a few different devices and software, and still occasionally I need to refer back to the manual when using my DP-24. It gives great quality recordings if you are willing to invest the time learning how to use it. If you're looking for something simple, I would recommend starting with one of their smaller portastudios (see http://tascam.com/applications/musician/mtr_digital_portastudio/). A lot depends on how many channels you want to record at a time. If it's just you, and you want to record 1 or 2 channels at a time, go with one of their smaller devices, it will be simpler, and you will probably find no difference in sound quality and you will save hundreds of dollars.
2111134
I'm not certain what the context of the question is (there's no reference to either on this product page), but in video technology, i and p refer to interlaced and progressive, two different formats for sending video data over a cable. Interlaced is the more traditional format, and it sends half of the total lines per frame, then sends the other half the next frame, with the two sets interlaced, so that your eyes blend the two lines together to form one picture at any given point in time. Interlacing conserves bandwidth. Progressive sends every line progressively (in order from top to bottom) with every frame. Progressive results in a higher-quality image.
1278882
It's the dvd recording technology -R was developed by Pioneer the other by DVD Forum long time ago it mattered what equipment you had whether it was for -R or +R but now the machines (computers dvd recorders etc) can record & play back any of the two, same quality same speed, myself I've used both nowadays i go for the cheaper one, hopefully I've answered your question.
2059108
Still Pictures JPGE, Movies MTS. (From the manual Most of the Sony users will choose 1080/60p as the format for recording since it can provide twice the information than 1080/60i do so that the MTS/M2TS files recorded as 1080/60p is clearer and more vivid.)