the big difference from the 150 and 200?
204298
the 200 is made for treestand and groundblind applications, I think it has a boost mode. the 150 is for groundblind use only.
204299
The 150 is used for hunting out of a blind. The 200 is used for hunting in a tree stand. The 200 has a "boost" mode.
204300
200 covers larger area, much more effective in wind, can actually be carried and used on the move.
1435064
If someone can answer definitively, please do. My guess would be that you won't see much of a difference between the two in an S100. But like I said, that's a total guess.
836707
I am interested in knowing this answer as well. $100 difference in price but I don't see very little difference in features.
1163968
The 2-700 is much nicer and more functional. it also has the high back support and handle for easy moving!
20405
I had trouble with the 100, so I can't answer for the 200.I liked the look and feel of the case, but I just couldn't get to fit properly...probably my fault.
590562
I think the only difference between the 2 are the preprogrammed games, recipes, etc. on the 750. And the touch of color which borders all sides on the 750 but only the top and bottom of the 650.
1201933
Id say the 150 would be fine. Could also go 200 and it wont have to work as hard. Just my opinion and it will get cold were I live
1141999
The 200 is substantially larger than the 100. If you are a female the 100 is much easier to maneuver. I like both of them, but the 100 does carry a larger amount of excrement and is harder to pull around. I like the capacity of the 200 but the ease of the 100. Hopes this helps.
1106643
Tube size. The 350 has larger diameter tube resulting in higher air volume, but lower force(mph). If you're blowing leaves in a yard, air volume is best. if you're blowing heavy stuff, the 150 gives more blast, but lower air flow. That's my understanding. I leave the end piece of of my 150 off when I need higher air volume and it works great. You can have the option of high volume or mph that way. Both are probably comparable, i'd go for the best price.
1901592
My guess it is because the 200 has a Leica lens. Actually I believe that the Leica lens is much better than the one in the 270 but I enjoy having the 60 x optical zoom. I have an older Panasonic with the Leica lens and I believe the pictures are much sharper. If you don't need the distance, I would choose the 200 for its better lens and clarity.
768726
Thanks for your continued helpful replies - I've also been comparing these two for my son who's headed off to Afghanistan, and we wanted something lightweight for Skyping - do you think there will be a big difference in graphics and processor capabilities between the two, and are there any other real apparant differences? I also read that the batteries for the two are interchangeable, and that the UL20A battery (higher wattage and longer charge) could be used in the 1201N, thus mitigating one of the biggest downsides of this model???
1141998
Model 100 is the smaller of the 2. It is 24 inches tall and the 200 is 31 inches tall. The 200 holds more manure.
1478026
The only real reason that I can see to buy the 300 over the 150 for me was to have more inputs for guitars and microphones. Otherwise, I think they are about equal soundwise. So save some money.
728430
Copied from a ruger forum. As stated make sure you get the adjustment tool. It depends. If you want a lot of adjustability then go with the 200 as you can adjust for Windage and elevation with the rear sight and elevation with the front. With the 100 all your elevation is adjusted at your front sight and Windage is done with the rear sight. If you want changeable apertures then go with the 200. Basically go with the 200 unless you are painstakingly broke. But then if you are painstakingly broke there are better things to spend your money on. I love my tech sights. I also would like a scoped .22 just for fun though.
1109727
I bought the 150 and the 100. Both were advertised as the pro versions and I received the pro versions.
2236001
There is a description right on the Garmin website that compares the two models (http://sites.garmin.com/forerunnerCoach/). With the 620 you get a LOT more information about how you run - cadence, vertical oscillation, ground contact time, V02 max, etc. It also helps coach you on how much rest time you should get and what your different race speeds should be.I bought the 220 because I don't want all of that extra information but I can see why other people would find it interesting. The 220 is an incredible watch, way better than my old Forerunner 405 - I can see the 620 being worth just $150 more if you want to dissect all of that data. There is a description right on the Garmin website that compares the two models (http://sites.garmin.com/forerunnerCoach/). With the 620 you get a LOT more information about how you run - cadence, vertical oscillation, ground contact time, V02 max, etc. It also helps coach you on how much rest time you should get and what your different race speeds should be.I bought the 220 because I don't want all of that extra information but I can see why other people would find it interesting. The 220 is an incredible watch, way better than my old Forerunner 405 - I can see the 620... » Read More There is a description right on the Garmin website that compares the two models (http://sites.garmin.com/forerunnerCoach/). With the 620 you get a LOT more information about how you run - cadence, vertical oscillation, ground contact time, V02 max, etc. It also helps coach you on how much rest time you should get and what your different race speeds should be.I bought the 220 because I don't want all of that extra information but I can see why other people would find it interesting. The 220 is an incredible watch, way better than my old Forerunner 405 - I can see the 620 being worth just $150 more if you want to dissect all of that data. « Show Less
567814
I'm guessing you meant the 18-200 DC OS II? I don't think a 18-250 DC OS II exists yet. The main differences are longer zoom in the 250, while the 200 uses a new lens layout and materials. Overall quality is negligible and the extra cost is all about whether or not that extra 50mm is worth it to you.