What is the difference between the Nikon P 22 2-7x32 and the Nikon P Rimfire 2-7x32 scopes?
202072
The BDC in the P 22 is made specifically for a .22 LR round. Its a great scope on my Ruger .22 LR
202073
The P22 has a bullet drop compensating reticle for the 22 round. The other just has a crosshair.
202074
P22 is BDC. Also allows you to set wind a elev back to zero. The prople saying there is not a diff do not know what they are talking about
202075
nothing they are one and the same rimfire is the term describing the striking method on the shell. All .22 are rimfire method.
202076
Think the rim fire is calibrated for rim fire 22 ,such as 22 alar or mag while the other is really for 222 and similar.
202077
From what I can see just the name. The Nikon compare tool didn't show anything either. Just a guess but they are probably phasing out the P-22.
2097705
I think it would do fine o. A 10 22 but I think there are better shoes for that gun out there. I'm not a fan of bsa optics but the sweet 22 is a very nice scope and its set up for the 22 better than what Nikon is, plis its cheaper and the clearity is surprisingly just as good as nikons in my opinion. Just keep you're recipe for the bsa if you choose that rite cause that's like you're warranty slip if you would ever need it.
1821903
I have the Nikon scope for 22LR and it fits perfect, if its the same size as the Nikon 22LR scope you should have no problems, the scope I have is the Nikon ProStaff Rimfire 3-9 x 40 Black Matte Riflescope (BDC 150), thanks
2183841
It's the size of the scope it self, the scopes have different diameters. These or designed for 30. What ever scope your panning to use it should say it somewhere on the box or the manufacturers web sight
1770185
The scope will work, but not the trajectory adjustment. it's pre set for the 22lr.
202067
The 3-9x40 Rimfire BDC 150 The BDC 150 reticle provides a 22 LR specific BDC reticle and a 50 yard parallax setting for confidence and precision out to 150 yards with a Rimfire. The pro staff 3-9x BDC is designed for long range the parallax setting starts at 100 yards.I would go with the Rimfire that is what I'm shooting on my CZ 455 22 mag the 17HMR is a necked down 22 mag which is faster and shoot flatter. With a 22lr /17hmr combo this 2 very different rifles when you change out the barrels I think the Rimfire scope will give you a quicker setup.
291754
Neither. 40mm. http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/Nikon-Products/Riflescopes/P-223-4-12x40-Matte-BDC-600-------------.html
484401
I did some more looking and I think the correct P/N is 75104. Different than the stinger models because it has a larger base on the lens end.
649651
Due to the recoil of a 270 a rimfire probably wouldn't last very long.For a few dollars more you can get a nikon thats designed for a high power rifle.I use a 3. X 9 x 50 prostaff BDC on my Rem.700 in 270,and it's a deadly combo on deer.Do yourself a favor and put the right scope on your 270.you won't regret.I also recommend DNZ game reaper mounts for a rock solid fit.Spend a little more now for no regrets in the future.
333584
you would be better off getting the sight made for the MP 22. they are NOT the same sight
1943467
There's a few. The APT has a mil dot reticle while the APV is duplex style. The APV has a 1 inch tube, APT has a 30mm (30mm is larger, more light) and the APT has a 44mm objective lens over the APVs 40mm (more light again). Another difference is the APT has exposed turrets for quick windage and elevation adjustments while the APV is capped.
1347235
.i don't have access to this rail tonight but it does accept a Nikon p22 scope.
2097706
Too heavy is a subjective thing. For me and the way I use a 10/22 a full size 2-7 is too much. For 22lr distances I usually like a 1-4 or a red dot depending on the accuracy needs and who is going to be using it. Even a low fixed power is fine. Direct competition for this is the Redfield 2-7, numbers are darn close and so is price. Had a hard time choosing between the two.
1325608
Yep. Only difference is the real p22 doesn't have the Orange part sticking out. I'll try to upload a customer image of them side by side to show the size.
1184008
That was the same question I asked myself. So I bought both. The answer is yes the 3-9 X 40 scope provides a better image at low level light conditions. That is the scope I use on my gun.
1812453
This is an excellent scope.. But to much for a 22. I would go with Leupold Rimfire.I put this scope on a 270.
820201
Yes it will work fine. The Nikon P223 is set up more specifically for the AR but they are basically the same scope. Medium rings might work depending on the rifle, but high rings would probably be best.