Why are these reviews 3-4 years old? Aren't more recent reviews?
188958
I recently ordered a pair of Sloggers. Love them. Nice to get what you expected on an order
534147
Video game ratings should be taken seriously. There's a reason why a kid under 17 cannot buy this game at a retail store. It's not about opinion. It has a rating. Pay attention to it.
771246
I guess the new version is supposed to be better constructed...I am on my 3rd old version and don't expect it to last more than 6 months...I won't buy the new version until it is out for a while...
1303358
Hi C., thanks for asking. We are new to Amazon but to the best of my knowledge the last review (4 stars) from Ronald Richman is. The others are from purchasers from our retail operation - we are asking every customer to give us reviews. Hope that helps.
302108
I don't know either, but I wish we could get that info. I would be disappointed to find out it was older or outdated product.
1345707
If Amazon doesn't start to police the gaming of their reviewing system (which is rampant, IMHO) being done by authors and third party sellers, they may as well stop with the reviews. I've been burned a couple of times by products that have 5 star reviews that ended up in my trash bin upon delivery. Sure, there are good 3rd party sellers out there, but how can I tell the good from the bad? I'm done with 3rd party sellers. It's either Amazon selling it or I don't buy it.
1575350
This gets asked frequently and I'm happy to say there is a positive answer! Mine were dated at least a year out and I've seen others post the same response. Hope that helps!
524012
I think it depends on the child. Our daughter was 6 when we got hers, but I'm sure she would have been fine earlier. I agree with the other response, not sure I'd go much below 4 years.
1299740
No it is not. I wrote that review quite awhile ago. It may be the date I did the review. I am buying and using the product.
1170454
Only change I see is the box design (says ages 7+ instead of 5+ now)...instruction card might've changed too (old one mentioned a website that is now defunct & had the age listed as 5+ too).
1883458
You got me thinking.i just looked it's good till 3/2016. I guess you where thinking this might be out of date. I still haven't open it because I still have to finish up the bag i got.
1597124
This question was answered in a review of the product that was written more than a year ago. Most askers of that question want to reject the product or give a low rating if the answer is "no". Check the one star reviews.
2240621
Hi Anne. We got this for our granddaughter - 6 years old. It turned out her older brother - 9, enjoyed it more than her. I do think 12 might be a bit "old" for it. Plus, as already commented the quality is not the best. The big thing seems to be scooters. I think they have made a comeback. Hope this helps.
1425442
I assume it is because it's from 2012 despite this is the latest version. Just ignore it please,I guess someone made a mistake.
36352
Some of the reviews are posted by larger customers and they haven't reported any difficulties. Good luck with it!
2257851
I have not read the 2006 review, but I purchased this for my granddaughter in 2012. It is still one of her favorite toys and has help up remarkably well considering the abuse and almost everyday use. Hope this helps. amount of abuse her friends have
1037215
I personally don't think Amazon should let people review a product unless they bought it from them. The fake reviews can really skew a product's ratings. To second what Matt said, look for a trend in the ratings from verified purchasers vs. ratings from random people. :-)