For Madagascar trip should I use the CPP300 or 100?
219630
In asking other people when I was shopping I found that the 300 is the latest model. Some said the 100 took too long to charge devices. Good Luck.
1526068
I think the SC300 upgrade has different pieces than SCJR-100, that make up the difference between 100 and 300 project kits. For individual parts you would be better off getting the p/n from the booklet and contacting customer service listed in the book, in my opinion. List of all parts in the kit should be listed somewhere on the mfg website, if you want to compare the content, or call the 800# and ask to email/fax you content/list of both kits.
1386404
We have used Mobile one 10w-30 which works well. It's a little more expensive but probably explains why he takes such good care of it. This is an affordable way to get into the hobby.
372693
You probably already made up your mind by now, but if you haven't I think you should just pick between this one or the Belkin 2.1 amp/10 watt. The older Belkin (1 amp/5 watt) is practically useless in terms of its USB ports (way too underpowered for today's devices). &#10004; Keep in mind that the Belkin 2.1amp is split between the two USB ports (i.e. combined they can output 2.1 amp, and if both are used simultaneously then it will be less for each port). So you can charge a tablet at full speed if that's the only thing plugged into the USB ports, or two devices as slower speed. &#10004; Also know that the Belkin is also a "surge protector" so you have protection against surges, while the Monster strip is simply a splitter. &#10004; The Monster strip is rated for 110v-220v. The Belkin is technically rated for ONLY 110v (US), BUT reviewers have state they've successfully used it internationally. I have the older Belkin and am also having trouble deciding between this Monster strip or the newer Belkin (2.1 amp). If you need/want the surge protection then the Belkin is the only way to go. Otherwise the smaller size of the Monster strip is nice, but it's bright blue light can be annoying (but you can tape over that). I'm also considering getting the 4 outlet version of the Monster strip and just forgoing the USB port (since it's only 1.5 amp). Really a judgement call at this point. Hope this helps.
1758725
Both will zoom during video, however, the 100 is only digital zoom and the 300 is optical and digital zoom.
1394409
I believe the pro-100 replaces the pro9000. I purchased the pro-100 and returned it because it did print envelopes well and the rear feed for extra thick stock did not seem to be set up well although i did not test that function. I do now know how well it works with plain paper or photo reproduction for for my needs it was not good. For that it may be a fine machine.
515400
I don't have the 100 or the 300. My last one was the 500HS. It is smaller now and lighter. The night picture without the flash are all nice. I took lots of them during the Holiday lights event, and they all very clear. Also it has anti shaking mode, it snaps and processing very quick so much less blurry when moving. I think that is a major difference for this camera. Battery life is very short that is the only draw back to me. I like it overal all but be sure to get extra battery.
1108173
In concur with BOTH answers! The 600 is a good starter but I prefer this one (but I still kept the 600 for travel purposes).
1717396
Go with the 300! I believe it goes faster than the 200. I bought mine for my 8y/o and 11y/o boys. Glad I got the faster ones! I use them too - super fun!!
722141
Frank, thanks a million for your comparison review of the SR100 vs SR300. I am dissapointed in the low light video's of my SR100 and thought the SR300 would be better as the low light lux specs are better. After reading your review of the low indoor video quality of the SR300 I will stay with my SR100. I shoot mostly indoors so the quality of indoor video's are important to me. Dean M.
2213007
Both the SB300 and the D80 support i-TTL so you'll be fine. I keep the SB300 and a 50mm 1.4 on my spare camera body for personal shots of my family. I keep everything on automatic so everyone can use it. I like the SB300 because it is small and it is perfect for bouncing a little light off the ceiling. I have a couple of SB900's and they're too big for others to use. I do wish the SB300 rotated side to side, but its little size is a good trade off.
408891
I tried the HS 20 not once, but twice -- because I thought the first had to be a bad copy. It wasn't. Both provided a nightmarish experience, leaving me with the feeling that anything would be better than the HS20. In that context, I'd opt for the 7000. But in the broader, more realistic context of the year 2014, you should rule out both the 10-year-old 7000 AND the HS20. Immediately, and irreversibly. Even if they cost you nothing, you'd still be wasting time, energy, and precious moments.
73532
I don't have the SR100 or SR200, for outdoors, the SR300 gets an 8 (it really is good outdoors), indoors I give it a 6. It's a bit unfair to include an HD unit in the scale, so 8 might be a bit much, but I'm going to say it's fair.
1267837
I'm not sure since I have never used the p100 but it does have editing tools on the camera where you can edit the pictures.
2236000
If you want a touch screen vs pushing buttons. And the 620 also somehow calculates VO2 when wearing the HR monitor. So basically you are paying the extra for touch screen. So if it is worth it to you. Go for it. And if not save the extra 150 and spend it on some new shoes!
1655342
Don't know what you mean by 'function limits'. Casio CG10 is best if you've been using the CG83 or 991 before as it works in the same way. The Nspire CX is probably better but is much harder to get started with.
1635375
like many said go with AB800 or if you can afford it go with Einstein and you may not need to upgrade, ever. google einstein and you will see why. it is also made by Paul buff