What is the difference between the 790 and the 799? On paper they are identical, for an extra $100 it should dance and sing!
216355
yes your skin may swell under the hot water in the shower but your beard is much softer, the shower shave is the closest shave you will ever get
216356
See my review; only substantial difference is that the 799cc is completely sealed from water, and can be used safely with shaving gel or foam, or used in the shower; otherwise the shavers are virtually identical. About the shower thing, which seems to be prominent in some of the Braun ads (notably for the CoolTec shavers), I'm trying to imagine using an electric shaver in a hot shower with a presumably fog-free mirror, or mirror-less, and trying to avoid dropping it when covered with water or soap. Different strokes I suppose, but I don't think I would find a great utility in shaving while showering as opposed to the 5 or 10 minutes I spend over the sink before showering.
216357
See my review; only substantial difference is that the 799cc is completely sealed from water, and can be used safely with shaving gel or foam, or used in the shower; otherwise the shavers are virtually identical. About the shower thing, which seems to be prominent in some of the Braun ads (notably for the CoolTec shavers), I'm trying to imagine using an electric shaver in a hot shower with a presumably fog-free mirror, or mirror-less, and trying to avoid dropping it when covered with water or soap. Different strokes I suppose, but I don't think I would find a great utility in shaving while showering as opposed to the 5 or 10 minutes I spend over the sink before showering. See my review; only substantial difference is that the 799cc is completely sealed from water, and can be used safely with shaving gel or foam, or used in the shower; otherwise the shavers are virtually identical. About the shower thing, which seems to be prominent in some of the Braun ads (notably for the CoolTec shavers), I'm trying to imagine using an electric shaver in a hot shower with a presumably fog-free mirror, or mirror-less, and trying to avoid dropping it when covered with water or soap. Different strokes I suppose, but I don't think I would find a great utility in shaving while... » Read More See my review; only substantial difference is that the 799cc is completely sealed from water, and can be used safely with shaving gel or foam, or used in the shower; otherwise the shavers are virtually identical. About the shower thing, which seems to be prominent in some of the Braun ads (notably for the CoolTec shavers), I'm trying to imagine using an electric shaver in a hot shower with a presumably fog-free mirror, or mirror-less, and trying to avoid dropping it when covered with water or soap. Different strokes I suppose, but I don't think I would find a great utility in shaving while showering as opposed to the 5 or 10 minutes I spend over the sink before showering. « Show Less
216358
I actually just purchased the 799 - haven;t received it yet. I believe the only difference is that the 799 is waterproof - so it can be used in the shower or washed off in the sink. I got it at BB&B; for $199 + tax - so the price of the 799 is comparable to the 790!
216359
I bought this one a week ago and have really liked the wet shaving improvement. In my experience, if using foam, the shaving time is much reduced - perhaps by 25% when compared with the 790. The wet shave itself is much closer than a dry one too. So on these two counts at least the 799 scores way above the 790.
216360
Big difference, the 790 can be used plugged in, but the 799 can only be used if it is recharged.It's on the Braun website (US site for 790, Euro site for 799)
216361
See my review. There is a world of difference, in my opinion. When I finish my dry shave cycle my shave is close, but a wet shave (I use hot water, no foam) makes a significant difference in closeness and comfort. The 799 is worth every penny.
216362
no major difference except for some minor externals such as a different read out for battery life and when a cleaning is needed.
216363
No difference except marketing. I own the 720 (identical to the 790 but no cleaning station) and use it with shaving gel. There's nothing to tell me I shouldn't. The manual itself suggests I can wash off the shaver under the sink. The 799 MIGHT be more waterproof, but unless for some strange reason you like shaving in the shower, trust me this is all about marketing. Shame on Braun.
977630
I'm in the same boat. I'm trying to decide between the 7411 & the 5914. I've seen the reviews, both seem to be good. It's my assumption that the 7411 is a newer model and it's only $20 more. Is it worth the extra or will the 5914 be just as good?
1830868
As far as i can tell, this one is just the older version that's been discontinued. The 931014 is newer, maybe has a few small visual changes but all the bits are the same.
1771822
There is no difference, just no amazon sellers offering a good price right now, I paid 349 on amazon for mine, be patient they will come back... good luck
598818
In my search for a shaver, I also had a question about that. What I found were basically three things: the finish color and style, 760 is black while the 790 is a nice silver finish. In terms of performance features, the 790 utilizes an LCD display for battery status and hygiene information. The 760 uses an LED display with just indicator lights to differentiate battery level; no hygiene status. One more thing, the 790 has a quicker clean cycle. Other than these three things, no other differences. Personally, I have the 760 and I am very happy with it. I think either would do a great job. Aesthetics and slight feature differences. Good luck. In my search for a shaver, I also had a question about that. What I found were basically three things: the finish color and style, 760 is black while the 790 is a nice silver finish. In terms of performance features, the 790 utilizes an LCD display for battery status and hygiene information. The 760 uses an LED display with just indicator lights to differentiate battery level; no hygiene status. One more thing, the 790 has a quicker clean cycle. Other than these three things, no other differences. Personally, I have the 760 and I am very happy with it. I think either would do a great job.... » Read More In my search for a shaver, I also had a question about that. What I found were basically three things: the finish color and style, 760 is black while the 790 is a nice silver finish. In terms of performance features, the 790 utilizes an LCD display for battery status and hygiene information. The 760 uses an LED display with just indicator lights to differentiate battery level; no hygiene status. One more thing, the 790 has a quicker clean cycle. Other than these three things, no other differences. Personally, I have the 760 and I am very happy with it. I think either would do a great job. Aesthetics and slight feature differences. Good luck. « Show Less
1172431
the 929, 939,949 all use the same instruction booklet. otherwise you'll have to contact the manufacturer for a booklet. Also, try the third-party company you bought it from as they may be able to help you. Good luck brother.
1516117
970 (I had to look) I have the original that's 1000. It's been fabulous though --I wasn't sure which one was even the new one until I looked for you -- they are interchangeable. I bought a knock off brand once and it was terrible. It had maybe 1/4 of the life. This one, as I said I couldn't even tell the difference.
1758120
After reading the other 2 responses, I have to agree with them. The 1240 is just a better turntable. I don't think you'll be disappointed.
1200688
I recommend that you scan some of the user reviews for both headphone sets on Amazon.com. That way you can get many versions of people's thinking on the pros and cons of each headphone. You may even find some reviews that compare the 990's to the 598's. For me, I love both of these headphones. They are as good as one can find especially considering their reasonable price. I bought the Beyerdynamic 990-Pro-250 in December 2013, and paid about $70 less than what I paid for the Sennheiser 598s which I purchased one year earlier. Since both sets of headphones are very comparable in quality and sound, I consider the Beyerdynamics the better buy. Also, the Beyerdynamics is a little more comfortable if you plan to use them for prolonged periods of time. On the other hand, the Sennheisers are one good looking headphones and sound great, just like the Beyerdynamics. If you can get the Beyerdynamics for $50-$70 less than the Sennheisers, I would recommend you go with them instead of the Sennheisers. However, I consider both sets of headphones a real bargain. I might also mention that the Sennheisers have a very long cord (about 10ft or so), while the Beyerdynamics has a much shorter coiled cord).
819319
Not sure it you have purchased the product already. Wanted to replay as the 500s are on 'Today's deal' and the difference is 30 now. hope you get email for this reply. I compared both the system when I bought them year ago and chose 500. The difference was not 200 for me in a local electronics store. If you listen to lot of music, I guess the difference is justified.
2031118
This is different than the 920 in that it has the potential for higher definition video, but it also is very restricted in what software will accept & broadcast that potential. Whereas the 920 is rather plug-and-play, and comes with simple software for adjusting the image, the c930e does not come with any software, and is not useable with many common streaming softwares
1832979
Thanks for the input. I constantly have to tell my kids they can't play with my $2,000 Mac laptop when I'm not there with them and the price is definitely right on these. Amazing what they manage to put in these little things for the money. I decided to go with the 900 since the smaller keyboard will probably actually be easier for them. Found one with the same hard drive as the 904. I hope they can make it last. I know they will love it as long as they do.
1465684
I agree with the other answers, the 869 has the dual core atom processor for about $1000 cheaper than the 879 which has the I3 processor. Maximum hard drive with current firmware is 4TB/drive. Big price difference between the 869 and 879. Also comes with 1 gb memory. I added the SO-Dimm and it saw the extra two gig but it doesn't need it and won't use it. Also I find the Qnap 869 fast on my gigabit network. I typically move data just under 100MB/s. I can move a 6gb movie in about a minute...Fast....
1770931
From what I've read, the little one sounds exactly like mine, the one for $132. I would buy the cheaper one. I use it every day and love it!!
1403134
No, Both deliver video at 1080 progressive scan, so the video will be the same. I forgot to mention that the 3690 does provide Karaoke, if that is an issue,. Again not something I'd use
687310
Yeah, Amazon's got this info really messed up...I can't figure out what the difference is between this model and one $40 cheaper, as apparently they're both Atoms with 2GB and 64GB storage. The price difference would make sense if one of them had more storage (or SOMETHING), but I can't figure out what the difference is.
627365
No. 920 is longer than the 900. I do think they make one now for the 920 though.