Can anyone upload some photos. I want to see how curved the image will be. Thanks. I want wide angle but not serious cured image.
179552
No photos. Like all fisheyes, there can be serious curvature at the edges. Not always, depending on the exact angle, position, and subject. All ultra wide-angles distort at the edges. This lens is a fisheye and is designed to distort. However, you can correct much of the distortion if you use Adobe Lightroom and select the Nikon 16 mm fisheye lens correction. (16 mm full frame is nearly the same as 7.5 x 2 =15 mm equivalent) This lens correction will convert fisheye distortion into ultra wide-angle distortion.
2284920
Here is Aleksandr K. again. Look at some pictures I made using Celestron 5 MP (their sizes were reduced).https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.586148731439698.1073741832.100001337299954&type;=1&l;=b176410e3f
252021
I just uploaded them on Flickr, from Yahoo. http://www.flickr.com/photos/64585937@N03/
702197
here you go! If anyone knows how to post a photo please let me know and I'll upload them here. https://plus.google.com/113766660784785656307/posts/imEwZU8r4oX
1361736
Yes, that would get you some curvature but how the picture matches may be a problem though. 2 different picture sizes.
101124
Thank you for replying. I am having a photographer look at the camera today. Maybe he can point me in the right direction. I just havent been happy at all with the photos.
1742091
Thanks to the comments here I now know why I was getting blurry photos. My lens gives unacceptable results in portrait mode, but does very well in landscape mode. Therefore it's leaving my collection and getting replaced with a 70-200mm f/4.
1461488
Go on there site and download the pfd. file for the camera. page 2 shows angle.
1209480
Hi Jane, I returned it, the metal was to thin/flimsy.I did get a Sharper Image model, love it, cost more but it was worth it. -Joe
1191292
Hi Ella - Yes, we will post a picture of the backside. It will show up within 1 day. Thanks for your interest.
2043748
Dear carguy. Thanks for your contacting. Sorry to tell you that due to our after sell dpt is not close to our warehouse. So we could not take a back side photo to you. Sorry to tell you that. We will improve this later. Top-Rated Shipping Mall.
1163204
Thanks for the extra information, interesting about the rectangular pixels. This seems like a much bigger project than I thought it was going to be. I tried a lot of resolutions and found one that appears to leave only one column of pixels on the right side unused. It's 430x222. Funny how a single digit can make a significant difference.
968166
Okay M.I got my camera last night. I took a couple of pictures on my in to work this morning. I am going to post them after I make this post. I don't know what people are complaining about when they complain that the pictures are blurry. The pictures I took were extremely sharp. For the sample picture go the listed item. I will post more pictures by Sunday. Feel free to email me if you have any questions (superat06@gmail.com)Sean
707043
Hi. Sorry. This seems not representation exactly a low-resolution.Thank you.
164115
Can't answer question, without knowing what exactly your looking at. Send a pic with arrow or high lighted area your referring to. davebasssvt@gmail.com
1846031
Well let me put it this way, you are blowing up the image to fit with no more data available. That said SD willalways look like crap on a larger screen, that is a fact of life. I dont find this tv to be any worse or better then my Sharp or my Panny. Bottom line, blow up a 35mm negative and a 8 x10 negative to a poster and guess which will look better, same thing here.
968164
Hey Sean,I am eager to see your new posts about your camera. Since the prices are dropping dramatically here, I will order one soon myself. On another site, someone said that one of the issues with people... not the camera is that they keep expecting it to do what a DSLR (I think that is right/ I am inexperienced here) does. What are soft images?