Will this work to hold jewelry such as rings in an upright position in order to photograph them?
335050
I have no doubt that it will hold a ring upright, but if you get the Quakehold in the photo it will show unless you somehow cover it. It will take a fairly large piece to hold a ring up right which would make disguising it difficult. There are other ways to photograph jewelry-you might try Googling the subject. (Note: I am a photographer. I wouldn't use the Quakehold for this purpose.)
335051
I haven't used it for that purpose, but being a product photographer myself, I just tested it for future reference - it held one of my rings perfectly upright! Only thing to be aware of is that it does leave a waxy blotch wherever its placed. it wipes right off of glass and wood, but if you're using a paper background/backdrop it may leave a stain.
586403
I've used it for photographing watch faces before, and it does well at eliminating the reflections of light sources from that; however, if it could do the same for this jewelry you have is very dependent on things like the material, shape, and light control.
551442
This would depend on the size of the camera suction cups base.If it fits (must be smaller than disks) it should hold.
1050915
yes it will hold you camera as questioned. I prefer to store my camera with lens facing up. This assumes you have the standard lens attached. long telephoto lens maybe a problem.
2138523
This shouldn't be an issue, the rod used is very rigid. You may have difficulties if the camera is fitted with a heavy lense as the ball joint fitted to the end holding the camera can be difficult to tighten.
917609
Good Question! I use this kit for vintage and antique jewelry photography. The company has a really good website that might address this. However, like the other respondents, I don't know why not.
1753401
Yes it will hold these photos. Some older photos may be an odd size, so keep your scissors handy.
41180
As long as the metal rings can fit around the camera. It should be able to.
659711
Yes it would work, but it's really a ring case, you could try it, I like it very much.
1844799
I use it for jewelry. I dont imagine it will hold alot of weight and function correctly
1807093
Yes only when positioned for landscape portraits. If you turn the camera vertical the tripod does not have a wide enough base to support the camera at a vertical angle
660088
I guess that would depend on the size of the bracelet. It does have some room to hold more than just rings. If the bracelet is not a stiff shape then yes for sure.
404399
If you're talking about weight, then I have no doubt this tripod will hold any sort of camera up in its regular tripod stance.Will it hold it the weight of the camera while strapped vertically/horizontally? I can't say for sure, I use this tripod on conjunction with my iPhone and Quadlock system and it doesn't wiggle at all. I say for the money, its worth the gamble to test it out to see if it exceeds your needs.
1560857
Probably not, The two upper mounts are like the flash (shoe) mount on top of DSLR cameras. They are intended to hold 1 or 2 accessories that can attach to a shoe mount (external flash, microphone, etc.) The lower mount attaches to the camera (male thread) and a tripod (female thread). If you haven't already gotten a tripod, consider selecting one that allows the camera mount base to flip & lock 90 degrees in the portrait position.
1377043
It will work, but as others have said, it's a bit funky. I use it for telephoto lens, with a tripod I leave set up.
1564546
Should work. I did same thing with a Dolica tripod. Might have to get screw for center, other than that in theory it witks
173356
While I can't say with 100% certainty, I can't foresee a reason why this set up wouldn't work for that. This answer is based on the consideration of the durability of the product and the adjustable shoe mount width. I would assume that anything that attaches to your camera could attach to this mount. I would actually trust this mount with more weight than I would attach to my camera.