Shouldn't it say "2mm reduction" instead of "0.2mm reduction"?
336731
Yeah, now that I think of it it may need to be cm for the 0.2 . They are really thin, but not a fraction of a millimeter.
336732
i haven't measured it, but note that the travel reduction is NOT equivalent to the toroidal diameter; only the inside edge of the o-ring makes contact with the stem. (and anyway, the o-ring isn't even 2mm thick, so a 2mm reduction is totally impossible.)
810297
Yep. Don't know why the 2mm discrepancy, but the one I ordered works like a champ in my 6-cup stovetop model. (And the price is right...)
1251879
I found a chart by searching 42hs4013a4, it seems to indicate 5mm, with a tolerance of 0 to -0.012.
1668780
My guess would be that a new "pattern" was made fairly recently that did away with the indents. Perhaps the newer castings are thinner? I think that would be a good thing, otherwise, they just didn't consider it necessary to put in the indents for structural or aesthetic reasons. I guess all that really matters is how it works, and I bet it works great! Mine does!!
47990
It's either a typo or someone was heavy handed with a pair of calipers for measurement. I've ordered 100' sections to 1000' spools from them and everything has been exactly what I expected. 3/8 sounds a little big for a measurement to me but I haven't ever actually checked the diameter. Either way it's the same diameter as all other 550 paracord I've worked with and seemed better quality than some others I've found.
1000077
The dial face at it's widest point is a fraction over 2&1/2 inches. They must be referring to the length.
1150213
No difference. One just omits the mm and the other includes it. Same exact time size.
1905020
yes, the decimal is in the wrong place..... it is a little thing 4.13 x 1.2 x4.13 is more like it..... although i did check another website and they how the dimensions as 4.72 x 1.2 x 4.72 but both are close enough.
889618
bro, I have no clue. :( it's pretty small. I mean if anything just meet in the middle and make 2.0?
1077516
In the copy screen it has both reduction and enlargement. I have never used them, so I can't comment on how well they work.
1313743
The in let is 1" and out let is 1". I installed reduce from 3/4 to 1" in and 1" out to a 3/4 lines
2047150
It was easiest to measure in metric, sorry. The #1 and lowest settings on the trimmer is just a bit less than 2mm. The #2 setting is just a bit above 2mm. The #3 is 4mm, and every settings after that is an additional 2mm, up to #9 at 18mm.
644159
My guess is that it's not 15mm, but rather an inch size. As the other poster mentioned, 15mm is an unusual size. Coarse or fine makes a huge difference. The term coarse and fine is the same as pitch. For example, 1.0 would be a coarse pitch, and 2.0 would be a very fine pitch. So instead of looking for coarse, make sure the one you buy is a 1.25 pitch.
1497561
It appears that it is a typo from Amazon, but it indeed does sound like a miscalculation! If you have any other concerns please let us know.
506595
you got it. looks like we need to edit this. on our amazon store we don't offer the 7mm because it would just be too confusing. thanks for catching our mistake.
723717
Yes it is 1.2, it says so in the item description page. About halfway down on the left. Under 'Connection Notes'.
376129
No! It's 1.25 male on one end and 1.25 female on the other. Anymore, if something is made to a .965 spec, it will be stated that way. Hope this helps.