I haven't yet found the difference between S900 and S1000 (other than price) What have I missed?
337056
I own the S1000. I have never owned an S900 but my understanding is that the S1000 has the following additional features: 1) warm air dryer 2) automatic deodorizer 3) nozzle sterilization and 4) nozzle oscillation
940343
I have done just that; upgraded from the S90 to the S120 for the faster AF, brighter lens, and touch screen. Been quite happy with my decision since I upgraded without cost (employee incentive program).
1813533
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_Coolpix_S8000-vs-Nikon_Coolpix_S8100http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1283918475.htmlhttp://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/digital-cameras/nikon-coolpix-s8100/11326.htmlSeems the major upgrade is to the sensor, allowing for improved low-light pictures. I'm looking forward to getting this one as well.
15749
By the way, the S100 has been released that improves on just about every aspect of the S95. And it has 1080p video as well.
722138
Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell... » Read More Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) « Show Less
1803810
That retailer might have some left in their pipeline - I doubt Sony has any left - the unit's not even listed on the sony web any longer. You may consider choosing something else or a refund. The Sony ES2400 is about the nearest unit you will find close to the 920 specs and capabilities.
776939
I guess the difference between the hfs100 and the hfs10 is that the hfs10 has built in 32gb of memory meaning that even if you don't have an SD card you can record footage just like that in the hfs10. The hfs100 however doesn't have built in memory therefore you have to buy an SD if you wanna record footage.
826637
Anyone have ideas? I'm looking at either the newer 810 or last year's 1000 as well. Specs looks similar.Thanks.
1620523
not much difference. its the same thing. the reason why EP100 isn't listed is because it is a new product and will soon be posted on their website when a new software update is available for the device.
1077279
I've read the S95 and S100 had significant lens error defects. That was the main reason I waited for this new version to come out which had supposedly fixed those problems.
23163
Mr. Scholten,Since you represent the mfr, may I suggest you work with Amazon to present this information on the listings for each product. I thought that the 110 might be a replacement for the 100. Your comment explained the single difference.
779655
You can find some rumors about dates here: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=8438.0 And given that the RX100 costs 40% more than the S100, I'm not sure comparing them makes any real sense.
1601360
Warren,I cannot decipher any difference between the 2 models listed. I think they are one in the same. That said, if the merchant told you that it is better than its predecessor, that may indeed be true--if he is comparing it the 61/71 series or the 65 series from last year's model line. But even Samsung's website doesn't mention the S2F being any sort of an upgrade or anything like that.I've been looking at the A860 for a while. The slim depth plus its couple extra features make it a bit more attractive than the 6 or 7 series lines.
1077275
They share the same sensor size (not type), and look similar; however, there have been a number of updates since 2010. The processor and wide angle lens might be a couple of the more dramatic differences. S95 vs S120 Max resolution: 3648 x 2736 vs 4000 x 3000 Effective pixels: 10 megapixels vs 12 megapixels Sensor photo detectors: 10 megapixels vs 13 megapixels Sensor type: CCD vs BSI-CMOS Processor: Digic 4 vs Digic 6 ISO: Auto, 80 - 3200 vs Auto, 80 - 12800 Focal length (equiv.): 28-105 mm vs 24-120 mm Optical zoom: 3.8 vs 5 Macro focus range: 5 cm (1.97&#8243;) vs 3 cm (1.18&#8243;) Screen dots: 461,000 vs 922,00 Touch screen: No vs TFT PureColor II G Touch screen Maximum aperture: F2.0 - F4.9 vs F1.8 - F5.7 Maximum shutter speed: 1/1600 sec vs 1/2000 sec Flash range: 6.50 m vs 7.00 m Exposure compensation: 2 (at 1/3 EV steps) vs 3 (at 1/3 EV steps) Video Resolution: 1280 x 720 (24 fps) vs 1920 x 1080 (60 or 30 fps) Wireless: Eye-Fi Connected vs Wireless LAN (IEEE802.11 b/g/n) Weight (inc. batteries): 195 g (0.43 lb / 6.88 oz) vs 217 g (0.48 lb / 7.65 oz) Dimensions: 100 x 58 x 30 mm (3.94 x 2.28 x 1.18&#8243;) vs 100 x 59 x 29 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.14&#8243;) GPS: None vs via mobile (linked to compatible smartphone)
1270903
As far as I can tell, the only difference is the SB6180 has slightly higher theoretical speeds and couple extra security features. I doubt most people would notice a difference the two of them.
876663
Brad - I don't think you can go wrong with either camera. Add to for your consideration the Sony HX5 - it's on a par with these two.I looked long and hard at all 3 of these, researching specs and comments, as well as trying them out in camera stores, etc. I finally chose the S8100, although only coming out in September the amount of reviews is sparse - but even compared to the S8000 earlier model the improved S8100 proves to be a great camera. One thing I really like is the heft and feel of the camera, as well as the professional and high quality look and detail of the camera. It's a joy to take photos with this camera. The photos from it are stunning. Brad - I don't think you can go wrong with either camera. Add to for your consideration the Sony HX5 - it's on a par with these two.I looked long and hard at all 3 of these, researching specs and comments, as well as trying them out in camera stores, etc. I finally chose the S8100, although only coming out in September the amount of reviews is sparse - but even compared to the S8000 earlier model the improved S8100 proves to be a great camera. One thing I really like is the heft and feel of the camera, as well as the professional and high quality look and detail of the camera.... » Read More Brad - I don't think you can go wrong with either camera. Add to for your consideration the Sony HX5 - it's on a par with these two.I looked long and hard at all 3 of these, researching specs and comments, as well as trying them out in camera stores, etc. I finally chose the S8100, although only coming out in September the amount of reviews is sparse - but even compared to the S8000 earlier model the improved S8100 proves to be a great camera. One thing I really like is the heft and feel of the camera, as well as the professional and high quality look and detail of the camera. It's a joy to take photos with this camera. The photos from it are stunning. « Show Less
1014695
The too-expensive S1000 has gizmos you don't need. Zoom in on the remote to compare. If you buy one do not throw the box away. When something goes wrong you'll have to send it to a CA site. Good luck.