Is there any nutritional difference between the "quick" and "slow" versions of these oats, or is it just a matter of convenience and taste/texture?
310928
The quick version of the steel cut oats is just cut into smaller pieces, allowing them to cook faster than the regular steel cut. The nutritional value is the same, to my knowledge. Hope this helps!
888528
Thanks for that; that's something Amazon should correct as it's confusing, if not misleading. Old-fashioned oats are my favorite and I too would not be overjoyed with the Quick type.
1979037
It is odd that oats are not listed which makes me think it is a labeling error. Since MCT is listed first, then that should be the primary ingredient but the fat content is listed at 3.2g per serving while the carb content is much higher at 26.4g. I agree that it would be best to contact the company for an answer. If you do, please let us know what you find out.
392825
Having tried both in the last two months, I can confirm that there are differences. My kids like the taste of both equally, but the standard Animal Parade vitamins taste a little better to me. (But I prefer the Xylitol of the Gold, nutritionally.) More importantly, the Gold vitamins are definitely firmer, less "crumbly," and tougher to chew. I had no worries about my three-year-old's ability to chew the standard Animal Parade, but she definitely has trouble with the Gold version, so these won't work for her.
432689
Hi Sandra, the quickness of your results depend on your specific diet and lifestyle. If you'd like more info or to contact me I'm happy to help you. www.facebook.com/autumn.nicole.olson
292218
My new recipe:1 cup of steel cut oats, 3 1/2 cups water (or slightly less), a handful of dried cranberries or dried cherries (the cheapest that I've found are at Aldi), 1 tbs sorghum molasses, 1 tsp vanilla, a big pinch of cinnamon, a small pinch of nutmeg, a small pinch of allspice, a small pinch of ginger, and a sprinkle of salt (all to taste).Put it all in at bedtime and set the timer for at least an hour before I get up using the "soup" setting. Stir before eating.
1979038
They blatantly lie. I had the same question. The nutrition facts are close to what oats are but it doesn't contain any actual oat powder. That would be okay if it was not labeled "oat powder"
1104797
I purchase the golden as the taste is milder. If there is a nutritional difference, I am unaware.
737088
I vacillate between 105 and 109 pounds so I never bothered to look at the calories. All I can tell you is that the flavor is much richer to me than other oatmeal and I like the texture better.
999602
Oat flour is a finer grain size, I think. It certainly dissolves in water better than the powder. I've since stopped using oat powder, and now use oat flour.
554445
Looks like the difference is more protein in the complete. I see this is for people to get some weight on them. I really like the milk chocolate one . It has the same vitamins as the complete. It is good for a lunch substitute when you can't or don't want a big meal.
1731573
Yes, they are different. Can't put a finger on it, put would say they don't hold up to crispy and fresh as before. I also noted the supply isn't readily accessible as in past as well as the 'Low Sodium' box. Is this a distribution issue or is it discontinued?
1563117
For the flavored packets (which are Maple & Brown Sugar, Apples & Cinnamon, and Cinnamon & Spice) serving size is one packet and there are 160 calories (20 from fat), for the plain "Original" it is 100 calories and (20 from fat). I just read the response from "Dragon Lady". I agree. The nutrition you gain by eating this product is far healthier then most of the other cereals out there, plus its oats which is healthier for your heart. Plus it is delicious, easy to make and convenient. Yes, sometimes I prefer cold cereal so you may not want to use this exclusively but I believe it is an excellent and healthy food choice to add to your pantry. For the flavored packets (which are Maple & Brown Sugar, Apples & Cinnamon, and Cinnamon & Spice) serving size is one packet and there are 160 calories (20 from fat), for the plain "Original" it is 100 calories and (20 from fat). I just read the response from "Dragon Lady". I agree. The nutrition you gain by eating this product is far healthier then most of the other cereals out there, plus its oats which is healthier for your heart. Plus it is delicious, easy to make and convenient. Yes, sometimes I prefer cold cereal so you may not want to use this exclusively but I... » Read More For the flavored packets (which are Maple & Brown Sugar, Apples & Cinnamon, and Cinnamon & Spice) serving size is one packet and there are 160 calories (20 from fat), for the plain "Original" it is 100 calories and (20 from fat). I just read the response from "Dragon Lady". I agree. The nutrition you gain by eating this product is far healthier then most of the other cereals out there, plus its oats which is healthier for your heart. Plus it is delicious, easy to make and convenient. Yes, sometimes I prefer cold cereal so you may not want to use this exclusively but I believe it is an excellent and healthy food choice to add to your pantry. « Show Less
1496559
Yes and Yes. The nutritional benefits of steel cut oats are better than tat of quick oats. Essentially quick oats are cut smaller and flash steamed in the factory so you get less fiber and there are more processed, albeit still very good for you. Steel cut is just the pure grain cut up into larger chunks and not steamed, they take longer to cook but it is worth it. They taste different as well, I think they have more flavor, but all of your favorite oatmeal toppings will work well with them.
772449
Takes quite a bit longer to cook, in my experience (possibly as long as twice as much). This has more fiber than pearl barley and that does affect the texture a little bit, although I have successfully substituted it in many dishes that call for pearled barley. Taste I find to be pretty similar.
1263385
Yes and no. They are more berry like and firmer. Not so regular oats and mushy.
140211
I prefer the sugar free for the obvious health reasons. If you're uncertain, you can try a one serving size pack of the sugar free.