Sony @55 or Canon t2i ? Suggestions?
327517
well, for the video option its really depends what you dont want to miss. The t2i has manual controls over video. The Sony SLT's dont have. The Sony SLT has continuos autofocus for video mode. The Canon T2i doesnt have. So you have to decide what feature is more important to you: manual controls or autofocus? If you want both, better stick to Panasonic GH1, GH2 PS: There is somerumors about sony will release a new firmware to enable some controls over video. (It will be awesome).
167457
I've got the a55 and my brother has the D5100....Both are great. Video is tons better on the a55.
2272117
I would argue that paying the little extra money for the T4i is completely worth it. It has a newer faster processor and a new touch screen that makes navigating the controls a breeze! I owned the T2i for two years and upgraded to the T4i and it has been fantastic. It's important to get a good lens to really show what your camera can do. I recommend the Tamron 28-75 2.8 lens. It's an overall pretty awesome lens. that's just a side note though. Hope this helps!
1077185
I recently was faced with the same decision. What I basically found through lots of research is that they are both very good cameras. Each has some features that are slightly better or worse, but they basically balance out. Based on the specifications, I had made up my mind to go with the Canon. However, once I got to the store, I found it did not 'feel' right in my hand when I tried to hold it. The Nikon, on the other hand, felt perfect. I ended up going with it and love it. I had a little trouble learning some functions, but was able to read the manual and get it figured out. It also came with a learning DVD. I know several other people who got the Canon and love it. Both have simplified the learning process as much as possible, but you have to be willing to do a little bit of reading or working with someone who owns one. So, you will be fine with either. My suggestion is to just try before you buy, to see which appeals to you more. I think you will LOVE either one. I have been amazed at how much better my photographs look now than ones I took with my older point and shoot.
1827550
I would recommend the 60D vs the T5i. The T5i would be decent for shooting interviews and the such but the 60D has better color depth, higher dynamic range, lower noise level at low light and a significantly better battery life. As for the T5i, it has video auto focus, a touch screen display, a higher ISO and an HDR feature built in. I see the touch screen as something that I personally wouldn't like. I like my buttons when it comes to a camera. As for the HDR, that's something you can quickly do with the 60D but in an external program. I hope this answers your questions! Sorry for it being such a late reply.
163823
Like you, I wanted a good camera for a fair price. I found a site that does side by side comparisons, you just bring up the ones you want from the list. I went for the Sony, for a couple of reasons: Long battery Life ( a friend of mine has one and he told me of that) and the other is the Zeiss lenses in it. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.asp
440169
They're both great little cameras, and each has its strengths. I'd have a hard time choosing between them. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408enthusiastgroup/page11.asp
576347
I like the Canon 50D. I would like to buy the body and buy Canon 15-85mm lens.All people told me that Canon T2i has new technology, but I don' know if the new technology will enhance the photo quality!! I googled for the past week. I couldn't find how the new technology will help me to get a better photo quality with the same lens!
61038
I only l have the T2i, but according to dpreview.com the T5i also uses the LP-E8 - Check it out.http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/slrs/canon_eos700d/specifications
833997
You'll got a lot more answers on the Digital DLR or Photography forums. Anyways, the T1i is fine. You'll need an ultra-wide angle lens like the Canon 10-22mm or equivalent, a sturdy tripod (not the $25 ones) and likely need an external flash like the Canon 430EX.
1239412
I use a Sony a57 with a 16-80mm lens. It fits with no problem. I really like the hammock across the middle pocket. You poke the lens thru the slit to suspend the camera and lens within the middle pocket area. I don't use Canonequipment so don't know hope big the T2i w/18-135mm lens would be.
2109067
I have the X-T1, so not exactly what you're looking for, but at these speeds, it's probably comparable. I had the 70-200 f4L with a 40D, but that was over 4 or 5 years ago so my recollection could be off. I'm going to say the Fuji 55-200mm is for sure slower than my 70-200 40D combo and the Fuji will hunt for focus under certain conditions. However, for practical purposes, during vacation, portraits etc... it's a comparable combo in my opinion.
1966946
I ended up going for the Sigma. So far I'm pretty happy with it; focus seems OK on my T1i, and the lens seems quite well put together. Not getting dinged extra for a bag and a lens hood is nice too.
567353
I have the Sony. (Took 3 thousand photos and video on an international trip). It is mostly fine, but there are 2 complaints with which I agree on the message boards. 1. Blue purple tint and glare from the lens coating in bright sunlight. 2. In general, not perfectly sharp pictures usually. (I have 5 year old Kodak 5mp that is often more sharp). The good...amazing motion stabilization. 'Able to take photos in almost any light condition without the flash!! I also have some good photos from moving vehicles. Very compact and no protruding lens or lens motor. Quick startup. HD movie is ok also. Acceptable battery life. FYI. There are assorted complaints about the Canons also. I have now read enough not to expect perfect photos from ANY point and shoot, but like you, I hate to drag around that Nikon. (You might try one of the new cameras with a bit larger sensor, like 4 3rds).
1442987
I had the same dilemma but settle for the canon 18-200- the zoom on the Tamron is only about 220 not 270mm- Canon better IQ- Tamron has 6 years warrenty- Tamron is very small and light- Canon about $75 less but Tamron goive out rebate once in a while- (In my opinion) canon len retain their value longerThis is pretty much all the differences
80622
Yes, I have a T2i with 2 kit lens. I purchased the 50mm f1.8 and it's a wonderful little lens, great for portraits and closeups. I recently (literally a day ago) bought the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 without VC. All I can say is WOW. For less than $500 I finally found a lens that does everything really well. Photos and videos. It's super sharp and super fast. I didn't get the VC version of this lens as I've read mixed reviews about softness. The older lens is beautiful!
347541
You're right. If I were willing to consider the extra cost, I think I would upgrade to the Canon 50D.I'm still trying to sort it all out!