Which siphon is the best one
340477
They are the same. Replace the terrible hose with 1/2" id quality hose, and it will work. Heat the hose with a hair dryer to install.
340478
I use this one to transfer water out of my aquarium during water changes and it works great.
340479
"Which siphon is the best one"..........Your question is too vague....I have found the "Super Siphon" works as advertised and works very well.
340480
Hopkins 10801 FloTool Shaker Siphon with 6' Anti-Static TubingGreat siphon and great price, shipped direct from Amazon.
1365061
I don't know the best, but I replaced mine for my 16' with the 1500 and it's way more pump than it came with. This mother moves some water! And the amount of suction it provides for the vacuum is amazing.
936251
Ur choice, its the strongest hose i have ever had. 2 is always better than one,..
643450
I thought it was a model number too, until I saw the conflicting answers. 'ASSE-1019-A' is an industry standard for freeze-proof anti-siphon sillcocks: www.jrsmith.com/uploads/docs/engcom7.11.pdf It's not a model number. Now I need to go back and look for a model number....
694651
First off you need the Python unit that applies suction for this unit to work (another answer has the link to it). It is not meant to operate as a siphon unit by itself. The Python unit has a switch over to fill rather than remove water. I don't use that feature because the water quality where I live is not great. For cleaning the gravel and water change this longer tube is great. I went to a big box store and bought an inexpensive charcoal filter and hose fittings to adapt, after vacuuming I take out the Python splitter and insert the filter for refill. I think the housing was about 25 and the cartridge about 15. I still use a chlorine removal chemical just to be sure. First off you need the Python unit that applies suction for this unit to work (another answer has the link to it). It is not meant to operate as a siphon unit by itself. The Python unit has a switch over to fill rather than remove water. I don't use that feature because the water quality where I live is not great. For cleaning the gravel and water change this longer tube is great. I went to a big box store and bought an inexpensive charcoal filter and hose fittings to adapt, after vacuuming I take out the Python splitter and insert the filter for refill. I think the housing was about 25 and... » Read More First off you need the Python unit that applies suction for this unit to work (another answer has the link to it). It is not meant to operate as a siphon unit by itself. The Python unit has a switch over to fill rather than remove water. I don't use that feature because the water quality where I live is not great. For cleaning the gravel and water change this longer tube is great. I went to a big box store and bought an inexpensive charcoal filter and hose fittings to adapt, after vacuuming I take out the Python splitter and insert the filter for refill. I think the housing was about 25 and the cartridge about 15. I still use a chlorine removal chemical just to be sure. « Show Less
868565
Interestingly: lower. This goes against conventional siphoning logic, but these work on a different principle. The water doesn't have to be much lower, as long as the surface of the water is slightly lower than the base of the spike you're good.
2223261
The close to the edge one. My dad likes that because it captures any liquid that spills back onto the lid.
788310
The Leland soda charges may not fit your Cuisinart siphon--Leland's cartridge measures 2.5" length, .75" at the widest part, and the nipple part is 10/32" or 5/16 in length from the neck to the tip. it is 8 gr and non threaded. I hope this answers your question
352746
Python is usually ass with bigger tank, i think just siphon would do the job in 5 gal bucket .
735510
Weer, There is no way to tell for sure. In theory it needs a decent amount of water flow for the siphon to work but I've seen some drip systems that were flowing enough to use it. Still, it's on an individual basis for sure so there is no way we can be more direct with a yes or no.Cheers,JonathanCustomer CareU-Spray Bugspray
534844
This is smaller than the other aluminum iSi siphons that I have. It seems to work just as well, with the advantage that it doesn't develop any metallic taste in the water. I've found that to be an issue with the aluminum ones. I've had the stainless steel one for about a year now, and no metallic taste. On the negative side, it is smaller than the aluminum ones (at least the ones I have) so you don't get as much seltzer for each C02 cartridge.
479053
I found it just about the same as the Python but with less water leakage from the tap. To answer your question, yes, I would get it especially if it alleviates from having to use an extension.
847422
This one has more pressure than the squeeze-bottle versions and the flow of water is continuous until it runs out. If you have a bidet at home and you want a similar "experience" when traveling or when out of home, then I will strongly suggest to invest on this one. It is worth the investment.
1639229
There are several that have been discontinued and a few different application tips. Go with Silver there are some ceramic ones on there. I personally would go with the Arctic Silver 5 that comes with the two cleaning bottles. As long as it says Arctic Silver 5 you are good to go, as far as the 12g and 7g goes that is just the amount held in the syringe.
1271040
Those who said "by the side" "as long as it is below the water level" are correct. On the one hand, a simple siphon (1 tube) has more flow the lower it is. OTOH, the higher a pump needs to elevate the water (in a 1 tube device) the more power it needs. It is difficult to "restart" cannister filters that sit next to tanks, but the flow is the same.
694650
Python has this siphon kit with a device that attaches to the faucet. This allows you to use the same clear tube to refill the tank with water. I used that setup with a 75 gal tank. Worked great.25 Foot - Python No Spill Clean and Fill Aquarium Maintenance System
846318
I think it works great for siphoning water from the tank. I highly recommend it. I don't have a fish tank any more, but I used mine a lot when I did.