How does it compare to the Primary Arms 1-6X Gen 2? I&acirc;&#128;&#153;m having a hard time deciding within the two. Any help will be appreciated, thanks!
334653
I have the Burris and one of my co-workers has the primary arms. They are both about the same clarity, but his has a little more magnification. But at full magnification my Burris is a touch clearer. I really like my scope, but honestly you can't go wrong with either one.
1422285
Yeah, i just searched the part number and then hit images, pulled up both. "What made you return them"? If you don't mind me asking. I was entertaining the idea of putting them on my Sig 522.
2176988
Occasional muzzle flash for me but I have only used one type of ammo so far. Concussion and sound are pretty amazing. Sounds like a cannon at an indoor range. I would say a major plus for it would be the reduced recoil and muzzle rise. Definitely worth the money.
194936
I am an amateur photographer and do not plan on going to an FX sensor. I plan on shooting from both a monopod and free hand. I do enjoy having the best but only when it makes sense. I have not had much luck shooting my son's hockey games with my current lense and need the 2.8 to get the low light, high speed shots. A friend has the VI and she is able to get some great shots. That was the lens I was orignally looking at until this one came out. Can you point me to a site that has the comparison shots. In light of ths information, what would you go with. Thanks again for your response.
78926
I would go to Ebay to look at a picture. Even if you look at the new EOS-1D X, the basic look is the same excepting the buttons and re-alignment of dials and buttons. But, the basic body is still very much the same. Better yet, B&H; still has a pic of it because the have one for sale for $649 @ 8+. It was a great camera at the time, but a 5D or later version is a better camera with a full frame sensor which the Mark II N did not have.Yes, I bought mine new from Amazon, at the time.
1680396
I'd go for this one over the 3E. The 3E is good, but it's a lot older. No shake to wake, charge ports top out at 2 A (this one is 2.4 max) so it's slower for devices that can take higher current. The charge display is also 4 LEDs, not 10 like this one. I had some 4 LED display batteries and I can tell you that those extra LEDs really help- they give you a much clearer idea of how much power is left (especially if it's one of the higher capacity packs, like the Astro E5). With the old 4 light display, when it gets to 25% you see one light lit... same as when it's at 1%. 25% is quite a bit of juice on something like the E5 (15,000 mAh) but 1% isn't on anything, and the thing is you can't tell which it is. The 2nd gen Astros can show you all the way down to 10% granularity which is a whole lot better.
1091221
I have the gen 3 models but I believe that the slide and trigger area is the same size in the gen 3 & 4. The major change is the grip which is not effected by the king tuk. Hope it helps
430639
I'd pass on this unit, mine works quite well however my brother in law bought one as well as a neighbor & both of them are soo poor you honestly can't make out anything, just general shapes. However on a daytime scope, an ATN or equiv. Gen. 2 monocule works quite nicely, the problem is by the time you add the scope swing arm & Ir light you right at the price of a PS22 which is far & beyond any duel purpose monocule. If a Gen. 2 is out your budget, I'd consider a high focus spot LED gun mount with a pressure switch, it's on&off instantly. You can train & make your shot in less than 3-4 secs. Just some options....
1952586
Should be the 1st gen. It works well. Only gripe is it always developes a crack in the 2mm space between the bottom microphone hole and the bottom. Could be my phone, but its happened twice.Its also saved my phone twice too though. So its definitely worth it.
1943469
I wish I knew about the primary arms one when I got this, but font regret my purchase at all.
2268102
I have the base but use it only on the original RX-100 as I don't have the Mark II. I liked the base a lot - it was of high quality and the manufacturer seemed excellent - but no longer use it. No reflection on the base but I now use a screw-in handle similar to the Clic Stic CIAK-0010 Universal Camera Handle. It gives a firmer grip and keeps my fingers away from buttons I constantly hit by mistake. Just sayin'.
514284
I dont know for sure. I do know that i bought mine after they were unavailable for quite a while. If you can tell me how to distinguish gen 1 from gen 2, Id be happy to check for you. I can tell you that im a really happy camper. I like these. I use them for spectator sports mostly. Also tried the Minox and these were a better fit.
522423
I'm not familiar with the particular descriptions, but it sounds like they are different product listings for the same item. (Are they from different sellers?) My only advice would be to make sure that whatever product you select matches the model and generation of the Glock you own (in this case, a Gen4 Glock 19). I hope that helps.
515353
I just got into the Glock game because HKs have gotten wayyy to expensive for me now so I only have the new Gen 4 mags. But they do have a notch on each side at the base of the mag and a slot on each side of the mag plate for the notches. Sorry I don't know much about the gen 2 mags. I have these base plates on g19, 17, 22, and g21 mags (uses different plates for the 21) and they work well.
382110
Well I actually was the one who did a review of E2 and comparison, if you go to E2 this would be the most popular review. Please note though that more than 6 months passed, and I think Sanyo have updated E2 with yet another model, WH1. I have not tried WH1 so I have no idea about how it stucks up to E2 and E1.
981139
The new one seems to have a bunch of different backing options, this is just white. Frankly if you are like 99% of folks you have a cover so doesn't matter. From what I recall the gen 2 has higher chip speeds, functionality... but we don't have one. I can say my 15 year old loves the gen 1 - developer edition. Has not noticed nor complained about this being slow in any way - so this one is totally good. And much cheaper as I recall. And unlocked / no bloatware (which means it can be faster even with a slower chip). Not having the Gen 2 its hard to say its worse than this - its probably better but this is great, particularly for the price. The new one seems to have a bunch of different backing options, this is just white. Frankly if you are like 99% of folks you have a cover so doesn't matter. From what I recall the gen 2 has higher chip speeds, functionality... but we don't have one. I can say my 15 year old loves the gen 1 - developer edition. Has not noticed nor complained about this being slow in any way - so this one is totally good. And much cheaper as I recall. And unlocked / no bloatware (which means it can be faster even with a slower chip). Not having the Gen 2 its hard to say its worse than this - its probably... » Read More The new one seems to have a bunch of different backing options, this is just white. Frankly if you are like 99% of folks you have a cover so doesn't matter. From what I recall the gen 2 has higher chip speeds, functionality... but we don't have one. I can say my 15 year old loves the gen 1 - developer edition. Has not noticed nor complained about this being slow in any way - so this one is totally good. And much cheaper as I recall. And unlocked / no bloatware (which means it can be faster even with a slower chip). Not having the Gen 2 its hard to say its worse than this - its probably better but this is great, particularly for the price. « Show Less
1866063
Don't know about the predecessor. Size is that of Glock 17. Weight and balance are different; most of the weight is from the magazine. Trigger resets without having to rack the slide. The slide doesn't move. Trigger reset is like Glock trigger. T you can get one model that does not have a trigger reset indicating light. Pprobably not a big deal if you don't have it.