How would you rate the glass quality against Nightforce? Please only answer if you own both.
323130
I would say it is pretty close in terms of resolution and chromatic aberration. Maybe just a small difference between it and my Nightforce NXS 5.5-22X50 scopes. It seems to be built as well but you give up an illuminated reticle and zero stop but you are spending only half as much. I got mine from Amazon vendor LG Outdoors for just over $1200. At that price and the overall quality you can't go wrong. It is a little bit more difficult to find 34mm rings for the Bushnell than 30mm rings for the Nightforce.
323131
The glass on the NF is better but not a lot better. I use both scopes and I'm very happy with the Bushnell. If you can do the price on NF FFP F1 and your OK with 15x for your top end then I would recommend the Nightforce F1. We sale both scopes. Mike @ CSTACTICAL our # is 916.670.1103.
1702191
I tried once, the Night Vision clip looked slippery as it did not have a good hold since it was framless, the vision looked fine but you have to focus a little harder to really adjust the viewing and then it becomes normal, but I was concerned that it might break my $450 odd glasses with Crizer lens & scratch resistance. Not advisable on frameless glasses. Certainly on non frameless. I still recommend it but I haven't used it too often. Only reason I bought it, was to avoid the white light from rear.
1233379
Robin, I can't endorse these wine glasses as being any sort of sensory pleasure to experience. They are a sound investment if you don't want them to break when dropped from a picnic table on to a wooden deck or brick patio, but that's about it. They do cloud with age and washing. They also scratch if not washed with a proper soft cloth or sponge. Good luck with your search, but I don't think you're looking for polycarbonate glasses. Cheers.
1422066
I remember comparing the 2 but to me did notice glass difference to the point where I would spend the cash on the burris but people do like that scope a lot. I did notice different quality in glass when looking at the leupold 1-4 but it did not have a red dot.
1204901
I highly suggest going with the lesser known and fantastic 28-70mm F2.8. Great price, amazing glass.
1672722
I just returned one. The glass was broken. It looks really thin. Should I dare order another one. I just got my refund email. Please advise.
784695
I have both so I show how both compare in a video I uploaded, hope this helps eveyone:
1110331
It's fairly comparable. It's a little grainy, because it has the magnetic particles in it, but that's about it. The liquid glass is the "softest," but they're all pretty pliable.
1527220
I'm not sure I'm the best one to answer that question as I'm not a big follower on what is technically "right", rather I go on what I find visually appealing. That said, I can't find any fault in it. Black looks very black to me, not washed out at all. Movies look like they should and gaming is very sharp.
974043
I did a side by side comparison at Best Buy in their calibrated Magnolia center. They also had Samsung's flagship LED HDTV from 2013 right beside it (the one I originally intended to purchase.). There was no comparison, the VT just looked better in the dark room. Blacks were truly black with no noticeable light bleed like there was from the LED. The F8500 looked good as well, but the VT won me over. The white level is fine in my living room where I have it wall mounted. It's not in direct sunlight, but the overall picture quality is nice even in moderate lighting.
974665
Get it from ABC Market. It's worth the extra money, which I think is about 5.00. The person that Amazon uses sent me the wrong things (floor lamps instead of table lamps) and I had to send it back. ABC Market is very reliable. Can't remember who the manufacturer is. They are very nice though and are actual glass crystals
58772
I think its about the same at resisting fingerprints as the unprotected glass is. I can say the Moshi does tend to attract dust and, at least at first, feels somewhat less slick than the bare glass does. After a few days of using it my finger seems to glide more, but maybe I just got used to it.
876281
I have been deliberating over the choice between the two bino's also, can't find reviews for this thing ANYWHERE on the net! Do the dielectric coatings really add that much? Really hoping this thread will get somewhere. And Whitney, could you post the link for the review you found?
1638386
yes it has good day and night clarity, but I must say that I have some Mace 420 TVLs that can match these during daylight. Night time is when these perform very good you get very little hazy within its IR range, which is about 30FT. The IR range is farther then 30FT, but the clarity drops significantly pass that and facial features are not refine.
1341124
Someone else has said "behind glass" is OK. I just want to add that we use them in our regular lamps and we love them. We much prefer the "COOL" 9 watt. I think it has the same clarity for reading, crafting, etc. that my super expensive Verilux lamp provides. Hope this helps.
2019452
I just received a pair today and used a color spectrum test image (and I'd tried others as well). Here's a link to it if you're interested. https://www.paleohacks.com/sleep/will-plain-red-or-orange-lenses-block-blue-light-for-sleep-17104 These were the only glasses that showed true blue blocking. I'm thrilled as I spend way too many hours under fluorescent lighting and in front of a computer screen. At my my age I couldn't care less whether they're stylish or not. I do like the S1933X though, better for comfort... lightweight.
1091648
I've had both and I think the glass is better to touch and is a Better, clearer experience. The original is nice and offers a slightly thinner surface addition however in a matter of taste, I prefer the glass. I will only use the glass from now on.