How may quarts would it hold? (Trying to replace a large non-stick pan.) All these skillets provide dimensions, but no volume.
339639
It holds 3 quarts. But 2 comfortably, I would say, depending on what you're cooking. 3 quarts of liquid puts it within a half inch of the top of the pan.
1817721
I have one that I just put in storage and have the box, I can check later if you could wait. It looks like about 3 quarts or so, seems roomy enough. I bought it and never thought I needed the all in one cooker to go with it so waiting to order that. I can check soon for you!
1842457
This pan holds 2-1/2 quarts filled to the brim. It is only 10 inches wide and 2-1/2 inches deep. I replaced a similar pan but it was much deeper. I wish my new pan was bigger.
1611507
I do not believe this pan comfortably holds 2 or more quarts. The pan can sit surrounded by water however boiler is used for cooking delicate ingredients that have a tendency to seize or separate over direct heat. You would not want to cook that high or fast. Also water that surrounds would boil out over onto your stove and/or into your pan. I'm not sure this is the type of pan you are looking for.
620447
The sizes (capacity, I should say) are listed in the description (one quart, etc). I realized that I had the original set instead of the set II, and mine includes a 3-quart sauce pan instead of 2-quart, which is the only difference I can see. If you want measurements by the inch, you might check online for actual physical size of the pans.
2035546
I'm sorry I can't help. I haven't had to use it yet. I plan to use it with a smaller pan with a lid on it.
1397274
Sorry, can't help. Bought it in hopes it would fit a square cast iron skillet we've had in the family for years - didn't fit, so, don't use it in the oven. crf
1419844
This is a 3 qt capacity skillet. It's small and narrow, but just the right size for cooking for 2 people, or a small amount of food. For example, you can only fry two cutlets at a time. I use mine at least once a week, and save my large 16" electric pan for much bigger jobs.
1204336
It fits my 2 - quart and 4 - quart saucepans. Not sure what it's actual volume is.
1133188
The cooking surface is 6.25" x 6.25". My 8" skillet fits perfectly. Ditto for the 2qt saucepan I use. I don't think anything larger than the footprint of a 10" skillet would be feasible. Anything with the footprint of an 8" skillet or smaller would be the way to go/ideal.
74354
It will hold 4 quarts to the very top, but with 3 quarts there is about an inch to spare from the top. If you have something boiling, you would not want more than 2.5 quarts. I just love this skillet! It is so easy to clean, and I really like that extra handle to hold the skillet when removing from the stove. It is well worth the buy!
472629
It is 12" across the top. It is rounded on the sides and only about 1.5" deep, so it does not hold as much as the 12" skillet I was replacing. It is great, as nothing seems to stick to it!
78428
It is about 3" deep. I have had no trouble cooking large meals in this skillet. I love this skillet. I also bought the stir pan. Loving this pan too. The lid from the skillet fits the stir fry also.
1097510
Ms. Mary, it will hold 10 to 12 quarts max. It would be almost to the top. You may want to go to the next size magnetite pot. The Magnalite is a great choice of pots. The next size would do every thing you want to do. Hope this is of some help......Dale in Port Allen, Louisiana
228567
yes, I measured the capacity...3 qts. comes up to the top of the pan, with no room to spare, so if you have to stir it, you would have to take care not to go over the side of the pan...good luck, Howard
93289
I got a Swiss Diamond 12" skillet as a gift, and I loved it! It stayed flat and never warped, and the non-stick lasted pretty well. I used it so much I wore it out in 2 1/2 years. I want to buy another, but it's $130 so I'll have to save up.
1970316
I think I have the same skillet and I use it with no problems. A good pan like the All Clad should radiate the heat all over the pan's surface.