would you say that the progress is smaller than the futur? I have a futur and i stopped using it because it is too big.
320920
Yes, you are correct The futur head is larger than the progress. Progress head is about 20 - 25% smaller if I had to quantify it. I have been selling merkur DE razors for over 10 years. I would say the Progress razors are becoming more popular each year.
1637273
Their Version 12 was phenomenal.But from what I understand, the company was sold and is under new ownership, so product isn't quite what it used to be.Good luck!
253693
I have noticed that when it starts to go flat in the middle you just have to reshape it and it doesn't take much. I still think it's better than the first generation.
207319
The new one has a newer, smaller ASIC chip inside that uses less power and takes up less space, therefore the whole unit is smaller. There's hardly any other difference.
2129802
buying technology is always a question of what you need or want, yes you can wait and see,but then there will be sth. faster, better everybody loves and you will ask yourself the same question again and again - should I wait...untill?research, decide upon your real needs, buy and don't check new stuff untill you feel its time for an upgrade. It helped me stay focused on having fun with the stuff I own rather than dreaming of sth. else.cheers
311191
Cant tell for sure, haven't used trphasic, but according description ,trphasic is next step up from regular one. Just try both and see which one u like it more.
2130448
I haven't noticed any slow down I have 16mb (down) both before and after... I have used one going right into the modern too.
476082
I have the smaller one and I personally think the larger one would be better because with the little one you have to scroll around on the tablet to move around on the screen on the computer. So lets say your tablet drawing space is 5"X5" and your computer work space is 10X10 so you would have to scroll a lot to get from one corner of your piece of work to the other and it's a bit awkward. Other than that I don't think there is any advantage or disadvantage with either sizes.
704728
It is better in that it is a better construction. It has separation of processing and power along with other improvements you will see. Its not a full apples to apples comparison.
593414
Mine measures the same as previous two answers...agreeing with Julie--doesn't fit--too long; but it works for now as long as the users are...thoughtful!
1867606
Yes. The manual calls for it. I used it in my installation and I cannot see going smaller.
1944204
Casio is much more intuitive Find Ti relatively clumsy. However many courses are wedded to Ti. Ti is a little faster but you would need to be very impatient to notice. Have a look at HP prime, lightning fast, cheaper, more powerful but not really tailored so well to education as the other two are and a steeper learning curve.
903172
According to HP, the Platinum editition is 6X faster than the regular one. While this might be true, it is however not worth to pay 50% more. The traditional one exceeds my expectations anyway. After all, at least for myself, an average user of this calculator would not notice the speed difference under normal circumstances. So, my suggestion would be, stick to the older one and save about $23.
1573115
I have a Garmin 255WT and TomTom 930. Two totaly different models. The 930 was or is their top unit. The 255 is more of an entry level. When traveling size can matter. A smaller unit can slip into your pocket if you decide to walk in a part of town instead of drive. The TomTom has more features (not difficult). I can view the route by text so if I lose satellite I can still read how to get there. The Garmin does not. The TomTom holds more destinations I have visited than the Garmin, which helps because I go back to some locations - but maybe not for a month or more. The lifetime traffic feature (that's why I bought that model) in the Garmin helps calculate delays. The Garmin is extremely accurate in arrival ETA but doesn't tell me how far I am from my destination, only time until I arrive. The Garmin has Bluetooth and when enabled I can get the address and phone number of POI's. The TomTom is not compatable with my mobile phone. In my area of Southern California I use the Garmin more because of ease of use and creation of Favorites. When I am travelling further from home or to a totally unfamiliar area I use the TomTom. I had to return the Garmin within a year because the battery did not hold a charge. Very good return process. Glad I had a spare. The TomTom battery went out after about a year and a half but again good return process. Both took about 10 days to get the replacement units back.
740980
I agree with the other answers. The bigger one is better! It's much more effective than the smaller one.
1511862
In my opinion it is not significant of an upgrade to change. The only real differences are an increase of 5 megapixels and an slightly increased shot rate. Not enough to ditch the older model. Neal
422544
If i had to guess i'd say it probably just takes a little less power. The circuits are a little smoother. And when i say little i mean very minute details. My 1312 performs flawlessly.. I'm pretty sure it's just a newer model so as expected they just changed a few things around and now they have a whole "new" piece of equipment.