52" Sony KDL52W4100 vs. 52 Samsung LN52A650
324079
I have the same problem. The followings is what I found out about these two TVs. Samsung has darker black level than Sony's and has a swivel stand while sony doesn't. Both have excellent pictures and colors. Samsung got Editor's Choice on Cnet.
1666495
I've had both TV's. The B550 replaced my A550 which was broken. The PIP was on A550 but the screen was so small it wasn't worth it. The sound on the B550 is supposed to be better but I'm unconvinced. I think it's worse. But I do admit that the accident that broke my A550 could have caused a problem on the HDMI port on my cable box. I'm not ready to blame Samsung yet. But I have also read reviews where sound was mentioned as an issue. But the picture on the B550 is a lot better.
130320
The difference is in the TV's refresh rate. The 32l4200u is at 60Hz while the 32l1350 is at 120Hz. The difference between these refresh rates dictate how much you can see in a set amount of time. So, if there is movement on the screen, the 120Hz TV will show the motion a little more smoothly (a little less blurry) than the 60Hz TV. Hope that helps.
1908157
I was down to the same two. I found the sony for the same price as the samsung and went for it. I think I made the right choice of the two. I only have Comcast Digital due to them not offering HD in my area. I think the picture is great with DVD's and good if not very good with SD Cable. Some of the reviews I saw did not like the sound but I think it sounds very good without external speakers. My only complaint is the blur on fast moving sporting events. I hope it improves when I get HD but I can live with it. If I had the money I would have went for the 120 MHZ on the sony xbr or samsung 4071 but could not swallow a $2000 nut for a TV. I don't think you can wrong, when I have a good signal the picture looks great. I have only had the TV for 3 weeks but find myself watching a PBS show on birds flying around for hours. I looked for 6 months before I bought the KDL-40V3000, my wife asked me what I was going to do with all my free time. I told her I was going to watch it! FYI: I bought it at Circuit City for $1299 on sale and received an additional 10% off discount from the entertainment book. Good Luck
2039845
Can't make up my mind between Sony KDL-32L4000 for $474.53 or Sony KDL-40S4100 for $858.83 out the door. Will be for master bed room or for "fitness" room (incentive...). Any recommendations? Which one is a better deal?-This depends upon how far your equipment is from the television. 8 more inches for $400 seems like a big jump. There has to be better values if you want a bigger television. However, the price for the 32" is a great deal.
465311
The one at Sam's: Samsung 52" 60hz is for 1598. Great picture. No problems with audio.
722566
I refuse to make the purchase until prices drop. The LN55A950 is out as well as the LN52B750. Plus, it appears that the only real difference b/w the A750 and the 850 is that the 850 is slimmer.I will wait until Memorial Day and see if the prices drop by then...
354927
I'm also trying to decide between the two. Only difference seems to be that the 52b750 is 240hz instead of 120hz for the 55b650. I think that has something to do with response time. Hoping that we can get responses indicating whether or not the average person can notice the difference when watching tv. I would rather spend an extra $100 for a larger tv but wonder if I would be missing out on a better picture with the 240hz.
238308
Since both have the same resolution/pixel count, the 46" TV should theoretically have a more dense group of pixels than a larger 52" TV. BUT, under normal viewing distances, you will notice the size difference much much more than the pixel spacing. If your viewing distance is 8 feet or less, the 46" may be a good option, but beyond 8 feet, I think you will be much happier with the 52".
1483377
I wondered the same. From what I gather, the 30B is 47" and the 32B is 42" but otherwise the same, I believe. The 32B with my 65" Tv works great for such a price savings. I wouldn't notice any difference of 5 inches for twice the price. I believe, at the time, I made the right call but see the price has lowered for the 30B. So moot point now. I wouldn't pay for the above price for either, keep searching.
508177
I have the samsung un55-8000, i think it is great event though sony as a little less ghosting but there isn't much of a difference between the two
1950689
I have the 40 inch and the 48 inch and both have a great picture and with Smart TV features a lot of options to watch streaming programs. Great prices as well.
1664662
I bought the Samsung 52" LNT5265F and got this stand from IKEA. Looks great.http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/40117673
119291
after spending 2 weeks of research both on the internet and in store, i decided to pull the plug on the same sung 55b650 for both picture quality and price. you can buy either one of the 2 above tv's and you won't be disappointed with the picture quality. but for the current deal at beachcamera.com, you can have the 55b650 for $ 1479.00 shipped with the use of coupon code " ln55b650". you can't go wrong with this price and tv deal. sdechpross
1381744
Can someone compare Samsung LN40B650 to Panasonic L37G1? Pluses and minuses. Recommendation.
474191
IMHO, this one is a no brainer if price isn't the issue. You have plenty of distance for the 52. Hell, my living room is 21 ft., so I put the couch in the middle of the room so I can be close enough for the "full effect".Also, if you wall mount, it won't take up too much of your living room space. The only thing that's throwing me is the viewing angle you mentioned. Is there no way to look at this head on?
1152299
Barry....I have the Sony KDL-40EX700 TV and I am waiting for the BDV-E770W that I just purchased last night. Did you ulimately buy these two? How have they been?Brian