which the extent of pants M
208497
I'm not sure what you're asking, Vanessa. If you're wondering about size, I found that these ran true to size based upon my other bike shorts.
303059
I carry a 642 everyday with jeans, dockers and suit pants. It's almost invisible. If you take the time and are observant enough to know what you are looking for (very very slight fold or bump in pant leg), then yes one may be able to tell that something is concealed under there. Fifteen years and it's never been an issue.
708132
Fits me well. I have a 30" waist. That is over my pants and belt. I also wear a tactical flashlight and multi tool on my belt
621093
Only if ur wearing stretchy pants, not jeans, because of the fit of the pants... They are fitted at waist.
468591
It is definitely outside the waistband, when placed correctly on the hip makes for fast access. Inside you may want a kingtuck.
433712
The material is similar to Army ACU uniform pants. Similar to ripstop material. It's not stretchy.
7056
The ones I already had fitted okay without excess fabric, but I'm not sure of their measurements.
2079779
5'11" here with a 33 inch inseam. I removed two large 1/2 inch thick rubber stop washers from the two main tracks for enough clearance. A 38 inch inseam may likely be too long for a full extension.
168029
Probably 5 or 6. Probably 5. The pants with seem very baggy be they will shrink when you was them and put them in the dryer. Don't put the top in the dryer.
788564
Not sure what color you are looking for? Also it might be listed as just small if the length is a regular cut. Also you can try out the long length if tthy have that available. The pants have drawstrings at the bottom that work well
2161805
I have size 14 pants and a medium belt that has plenty leftover. You may need a small but don't think they have. Pretty belt though
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
614164
Hello, yes, it is. (At least on mine anyway) I really like the pants. If you get a pair, I recommend going one size larger in the waist. For example, if you wear a 34, the 36" will fit you better from my experiences.
409975
Don't have the exact measurement, but I am a pretty thick guy, 38" waist and it still has room to extend comfortably.
249201
20 pants, my friend. Unless your pants are really thick like futon, this can easily hold 20.
145110
In the pocket. I adjust perfectly at the pocket size. I did not have to do anything. was adapted to perfection
96491
I'm not sure exactly, but my son-in-law who is probably a 50+" inch waist was able to wear it.