Is the over all length of the shorts, shortens when waist line is decreased in size? Meaning 30 and a 32 in have the same length?
327089
Mine are a little shorter than I usually like. They stop right at the knees and I would like them to go just a little past. But since they are really meant to be tactical it makes sense that they would allow for better running and such. I think the length is proportional to the waist number.
327090
I only got the one size so I don't know for sure...sorry. These are good looking shorts with high quality zippers/snaps. But they are a little pricey. If you can get them for a good price you will not be disappointed.
327091
Yes, they are all the same length. There is also a longer version that is 11". Great shorts, have bought many pair.
645105
Since you wear a normal size 32, if I were you, I'd get the Large size: waist size 34 to 36. Here's why: The outer belt is the same length as the inner one and even though you wear the inner belt the same way that you do with a regular belt; lapped in front, right side over left, the outer belt, that has the holster and mag pouches already on it, has to fit over the inner one, thus, by itself, making it less of a lap. Also, the outer belt should be set up so that it laps in back, thus going left side back over right side back with the 'keeper' fastened. The reason it is done this way is so that when you bend over to pick up dropped mags or brass, if you don't have a small nut harvester (a football shaped wire basket that rolls on the ground over the brass, so that the brass pops through the flexible wires and is usually trapped inside - Dillion Precision sells them for ~$45 + tax and shipping), that extra thickness of belt lap will interfere with you bending over. Also if you were to lap the outer belt in front, it has much more of a tendency to open up or spread open and possible come unattached, when bending over. You have to try it both ways to see what I mean; that it's much preferred to have the outer belt lap itself in back of you. Hope this answers your question. If you save brass, be sure to check out the 'nut harvester' wire baskets: It sure beats the heck out of all of that bending over to pick up brass!!!
3608
Sorry, I read your info wrong. However, I went from a 36 to a 33-34 and these shorts are one material and the Velcro makes up the flexible size you'll need. I will say a 30 in this short will definitely work.
2054830
It's a V going down so doesn't adjust around the waist. So no real size issues I sell a TON of these to contractors. They find them a little short sometimes if they are tall. But otherwise, all different people wear them! Hope that helps!
154342
It seems to be the smaller the pant, the shorter the inseam. I started out with a large and the inseam was good but I need the pant to go over jeans as I am using them as rain riding pants for my motorcycle. Now I have an extra large and if I am walking they are too long.
1120166
Hi, I am also short, I am 5' 6" and 30 waist in US. The short fit good, I thought the front lid/tongue was a bit bulky. All in all the short is very comfortable. I hope I helped you.
3611
Yes. I think you will be ok with 30 waste. I am a 32-33 waste and wear the size 32. You won't be disappointed they are a good pair of shorts.
542863
These shorts will easily fit 38 to 40 inch waist size ( men ). There's some leeway if the man has a " big tummy " since they can slip down a bit or you can pull them up a little.
98982
Haven't measured it, but the inseam on the "Pace" shorts is on the short side - probably about 3.5". These are racing and speedwork shorts, so they show a lot of leg. I don't care and wear them for daily training anyway. If you're looking for something like a bathing suit or longer, these are probably not the shorts for you. However, they are super comfortable for running.
1463971
Jack,I am a 32" waist.I bought a medium.I have the shorts adjusted to the smallest possible fit.To me,it seems the adjustable straps on the sides would go up to a 36" waist.
4722
That will be hard for me to answer. I have a 30" waist but I wear this support around my hip/low back area. I have a large just for that reason. They have double Velcro so it will pull nice and tight. These work great for my back!Hope this helps as much as possible.
770252
Not sure. I wear a Medium and I have a 32 inch waist. I could probably wear a small but it would probably be tighter than I want. I would say wear small up to 31-21 inches.
633313
According to the prAna fit guide a 32 is a Small. I am a 31 in the waist and ordered the Small... it is a bit big in the waist for me, but I like it a bit low on my waist. I would recommend a Small, but you might be OK with a Medium. Note: there are no belt loops (but there is an adjustable cinch which could help tighten the pants but I wouldn't rely on it).
269104
Size is selectable when you order. I have a 32" waist and the Medium fits me just fine, as it should from the size indication of 30" to 36".
1201551
They both change. I've got a 32" waist...and used to have a large. It was OK, but when I really cinched it up? I had about 3 inches of velcro BEYOND the length of the adhesion strip. So now I have a medium, and it's perfect. You can cinch this thing up like a corset...it's so good that way. I love it!!! Buy the smallest one you can.
31509
I don't think that they are offered in different lengths, I'm short and the waist is extremely long on me, but because they are very thin they fold over easily. Perhaps this is to benefit taller individuals.
164102
The shorts I have go slightly above the belly button if you pull them all the way up. But, you don't have to extend them all the way up and can find a comfortable position.