Took the leap for Nikon's P100: I have a friend with the Canon equivalent and I bought my daughter the Olympus with IS and zoom, by reading the reviews, I think I will be better suited with the Nikon P100 and I am waiting for it to ship, anyone with...
331702
Want to buy this type of camera for our trip to Italy in the next 30 days. Would like to know more of your experience
1595862
I was also on the fence between these cameras. Tried both out at the local camera shop. I will probably be doing a fair amount of video too, and the Nikon P500 had the worst image stabilization I have ever seen. The FZ100 was rock solid in comparison. I also recently found out that the FZ100 can have filters and telephoto extensions added to the lens. I'm going to wait a few weeks to see if it gets upgraded, but if not the FZ100 seems the way to go. The Nikon felt cheap in comparison.
792518
I have been wondering the same thing & still can't decide. I was wondering if you have decided yet & if so which way you went? I have a Pentax Optio A10 right now & I love everything about it except the shutter speed so I have been looking for a new one & can't decide between the Sony DSCW80 & the Canon SD1000.
1030213
I believe you can already find reviews on the coolpix P100. Cnet.com has a review posted, and I was dissappointed with what they came back with. It could be that people are expecting too much of these tiny sensor, super zoom compacts.
1418840
Nikon d40, which just arrived today and looks a little daunting! I was persuaded that the pictures would be far superior and that the auto modes produce good pictures (unlike the Canon Rebel I had a few years ago), BUT it is much more of a "camera" than the stick in your pocket G9. I already have a very portable Canon elph, but it has minimal zoom--so rather useless at my son's soccer games.Not sure I made the right choice, but seems like I now have cameras at both ends of the spectrum whereas the G9 might be in the middle.
1222640
I have searched online for the same comparison b4 i bought both of the two. The thing is, because these two cameras have a lot of features, it takes a while to write or make a video to fully compare the two cameras. I did find some that tried to compare the two camers, but the reviews seemed bias to me. Overall, i like the Fuji over the Canon, but i like the Canons zoom over fuji's. One can still get the same results as the other.
1642163
Looking at the Sony and the Powershot myself - Looks like the Sony excels in speed of taking pictures but has less of a zoom and canon has a better viewfinder and takes an add on flash- maybe someone could comment on the quality of photos and other features...
326232
I am in the same boat, I loved my Powershot but ... I am trying NOT to buy a Canon because of terrible Customer Service I received when it got damp and the lens gasket dropped off. But my Coolpix takes awful pictures 80% of the time. I thought it was me but have since found out it's the camera. I will now look at the Lumix since my nephew also recommended it. Thanks
1220928
I just went through the same battle, although I have different needs. I have to say either is a great choice but I went with the Canon due to the zoom being a little less, a compromise in hopes that it will have better low light response. I also had a Canon before, so the operating system was a more familiar. Can't tell you yet if that was a wise choice of not. I have had the camera for three days and have had little time to play with it. Here is a comparative review that I found helpful: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q110superzoomgroup/ I saw another review but can't find it again that really played up the Nikon as a much better choice. But it seemed to be written by people reading specifications rather than actually using the camera. I don't think you can wrong with either. The Canon is bulkier and uses 4 double AA batteries which add to the weight. The nice thing about the double AAs is that you have a far easier time getting batteries if you run out of power, but at the cost of weight. If you do get the Canon, get at least 8 Sanyo Eneloop rechargeable NIMH batteries Sanyo Eneloop 4 Pack AA NiMH Pre-Charged Rechargable Batteries w/ Charger. They hold their charge when not used much better than normal NIMH batteries. As the link indicates you can get them here at Amazon. With 8 Eneloops you should never run out of power (providing that you keep them charged of course). If you buy the Nikon, I would recommend looking into a spare battery and a charger. Good luck with your new camera, which ever one you choose!
1375624
We bought the P7100 for my wife who wanted a better point and shoot and wanted a view finder.. She hasn't read any of the manual and the 600+ photos from our recent cruise are just great. On the other end, I've started using it because it has some features my older SLR digital lacks!
768118
I'm kind of in the same situation Hamlet. They both look great, and I can't decide which one to pull the trigger on. I have a Canon XTi DSLR that I use and love but I want something smaller for travel and one of these seems to fit the bill. Did you make a choice yet? If you have what one did you pick up? I'm also looking at the Sony HX5V.
1222503
Yes, this is an excellent camera! Instead of purchasing the $500 Canon compact camera I was planning to purchase, I bought the E-PL3 at around $260 and got much more beyond what I was looking for (i.e., RAW files, flash hot shoe, total flexibility with shooting modes such as P, A, S, and Manual), such as interchangeable lens capability with a wide range of excellent, available lenses! I then was so hooked on the micro 4/3 format, that I upgraded after only two months to the E-PL5, and then after only a few weeks to the OM-D E-M10! Not because the E-PL3 was inferior, but because the Olympus cameras were so good and I wanted the best! Go for it! Yes, this is an excellent camera! Instead of purchasing the $500 Canon compact camera I was planning to purchase, I bought the E-PL3 at around $260 and got much more beyond what I was looking for (i.e., RAW files, flash hot shoe, total flexibility with shooting modes such as P, A, S, and Manual), such as interchangeable lens capability with a wide range of excellent, available lenses! I then was so hooked on the micro 4/3 format, that I upgraded after only two months to the E-PL5, and then after only a few weeks to the OM-D E-M10! Not because the E-PL3 was inferior, but because the Olympus... » Read More Yes, this is an excellent camera! Instead of purchasing the $500 Canon compact camera I was planning to purchase, I bought the E-PL3 at around $260 and got much more beyond what I was looking for (i.e., RAW files, flash hot shoe, total flexibility with shooting modes such as P, A, S, and Manual), such as interchangeable lens capability with a wide range of excellent, available lenses! I then was so hooked on the micro 4/3 format, that I upgraded after only two months to the E-PL5, and then after only a few weeks to the OM-D E-M10! Not because the E-PL3 was inferior, but because the Olympus cameras were so good and I wanted the best! Go for it! « Show Less
2234811
Yeah the biggest complaint for the SX200IS was the automatic flash every time. I'm gonna wait to see if that has been fixed in the SX210IS before I go ahead an order. Looks like a great improvement in every other area!I'm glad I held out on getting my super-zoom point and shoot! Within the last few weeks Nikon, Fujifilm, Canon, and Panasonic all announced their Spring 2010 models. There are some real good options out there!
1365221
Nikon vs. Canon is a preference thing mostly. I was raised on Nikon (and Leica) so have lenses, and it just feels right. You may have a different background, or opinion, so get to a camera store and play with some. Also, Canon is better at video. I do stills mostly so do not care as much and prefer the way Nikon shoots stills, but that is important.
989749
I have the Olympus E510 kit, so i'm biased. But I love my camera. It has all the features you could want in a DSLR, amatuer or pro. However, I don't think you can go wrong with the Canon or Nikon either. They all take great pictures, so it really boils down to ergonomics and personal preferences. I chose the Olympus.
2257172
I'm a Nikon girl, but the Olympus Pen E-PL3 has quickly become my favorite camera. In fact, I just went on a quick trip to Paris and this was the camera I brought and came home with the same quality of shots that I would have gotten with my (much heavier) Nikon equipment. I also have to say - it's SO MUCH FUN!!! Scott Bourne named it his 2011 camera of the year - take a look at his site and search for the E_PL3, he really has a thorough review and follow-ups.
1077185
I recently was faced with the same decision. What I basically found through lots of research is that they are both very good cameras. Each has some features that are slightly better or worse, but they basically balance out. Based on the specifications, I had made up my mind to go with the Canon. However, once I got to the store, I found it did not 'feel' right in my hand when I tried to hold it. The Nikon, on the other hand, felt perfect. I ended up going with it and love it. I had a little trouble learning some functions, but was able to read the manual and get it figured out. It also came with a learning DVD. I know several other people who got the Canon and love it. Both have simplified the learning process as much as possible, but you have to be willing to do a little bit of reading or working with someone who owns one. So, you will be fine with either. My suggestion is to just try before you buy, to see which appeals to you more. I think you will LOVE either one. I have been amazed at how much better my photographs look now than ones I took with my older point and shoot.