does monster mc 200f-2m performance better thin monster mc 200f-1m
311968
The 2m stands for the length of the cable, which is 2 meters=7feet vs 1m=1meter=3feet, as far as performance is concerned they are the same. Hope this helps
311969
The only difference is the length of the cable. As for performance wise it really would not make any difference. It is a very good cable, excellent to say the least. Great construction on the cable and it performs very well. And yes there is a difference on the video end or tv display. It is solid copper, not copper clad cable. I have used monster cables for quite a while, mainly for my tv & home theater set-up. From HDMI Cables & fiber optic cables. And also the monster cable < cat 6 > for my internet to my pc & as i have AT&T; U-verse i have the monter cat 6 from the moden to the u-verse set top box. And the picture & audio is excellent. Go ahead and use monster cable, as you will not regret it... The only difference is the length of the cable. As for performance wise it really would not make any difference. It is a very good cable, excellent to say the least. Great construction on the cable and it performs very well. And yes there is a difference on the video end or tv display. It is solid copper, not copper clad cable. I have used monster cables for quite a while, mainly for my tv & home theater set-up. From HDMI Cables & fiber optic cables. And also the monster cable < cat 6 > for my internet to my pc & as i have AT&T; U-verse i have the monter cat 6 from the moden to the... » Read More The only difference is the length of the cable. As for performance wise it really would not make any difference. It is a very good cable, excellent to say the least. Great construction on the cable and it performs very well. And yes there is a difference on the video end or tv display. It is solid copper, not copper clad cable. I have used monster cables for quite a while, mainly for my tv & home theater set-up. From HDMI Cables & fiber optic cables. And also the monster cable < cat 6 > for my internet to my pc & as i have AT&T; U-verse i have the monter cat 6 from the moden to the u-verse set top box. And the picture & audio is excellent. Go ahead and use monster cable, as you will not regret it... « Show Less
311970
Just my opinion. I would think that the 1 meter would perform better or that they would both be about identical in performance.
311971
They should perform the same. They are the same cable just different length.
311972
In all honesty unless your goin to have a much longer cable it will make no difference performance wise. So far this give crisp clear signals for me. That length should not be able to make a difference in the performance
999377
http://www.storagereview.com/buffalo_drivestation_ddr_review_hdgdu3 Look under the performance heading on this website.
544811
The minimal i would run with and currently do run with is the corsair h100i. Anything less will overheat quickly as this chip is a heat beast.
734248
Yes MLC, 128GBit. The newer m550 uses 64GBit MLC, slightly higher performance
786311
I have the newest macmini and it worked perfectly. Everything is tighter than it seems in the video, but all works well.
1593868
Yes but, its better if you bought the 1600 mhz version to balance the speed, since your system already uses 1600, and this module only runs at 1333. Sometimes systems become unstable with modules running at two different speeds.
375831
The predator memory can be overclocked to a higher frequency 2666 as opposed to the beast which claims 2400. Benefit would be for an imdividual that wants to overclock their computer
438502
XMC has higher cold cranking amps, and is heavier. It is the stronger of the two.
1644293
Go to monigramwizard.com and look for specs or call them. I have brother machines
244441
My data tag says 10.8/7200 mAh T60The amp hrs only really matter if your looking for more run time in a laptop 6600 vs 7200 is miniscule now compared to a six or even a 3 cell is quite significant
1992486
If all you can go by is the model number MD096LL/A then yes it is the thinner version. the only things that may be different is the amount of RAM in the machine and the CPU speed. there was options in this model to add a 3.5 i5 processor or even a 3.6 i7 processor.
2272949
M57 appears to have a larger capacity, is heavier (more metal parts I believe). I switched from the M53 to the M57 with no problem in the sump pit in my basement. I figured the bigger capacity might make it last longer. Both are very quiet and efficient.
855456
My roommate uses the M60 Ive got the M65. Ive used both and hardly notice any difference in acceleration. I have ZERO complaints about the M65 and would recommend it for gaming any day.
1760260
Absolutely perfect for it. You can pick out the various components to suit your wallet and needs, but do NOT skimp on the RAM! And, install a second drive if possible. They're both very inexpensive if you you know where to buy them. I have always used http://www.transintl.com/macupgrades/index.cfm for my HDs and RAM.
2053385
This in my experience is one of the best around as long as you don't have an aluminum IHS, etc. Here's a great review of coolaboratory paste and 28others. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-performance-benchmark,3616.html
2279655
I know you already have received a few answers, so I hope this is just additional confirmation. the mCover doesn't really add any "bulk" to your MBP, so to agree with all of the answers below, I would say yes.
1484109
Thank you for your inquiry, we are sorry but we do not make a case for your model. Please continue to check our website for updates on new releases. Our mCover cases per our listing are model specific