How does this FA version of this lens compare to the DA version on a k5iis
331506
DA is f1.8, FA opens up to f1.4 (so you can only compare from f1.8) From 1.8 the sharpness is very similar but FA has smoother bokeh (much better in my opinion) FA also is compatible with full frame (which Pentax is releasing soon). I own K-5iis and have FA copy and have tried DA copy as well. Hope that helps.
91302
I love this lens, but yes... I DO think you should save up for the IS version. I wish I would have. I was just a beginner not knowing what I was purchasing at the time. I am totally kicking myself now. :( Its not terrible, but I think the IS would be much better. In my honest opinion
746999
Hi Ben, I just ordered this camera, but currently have the k100d. I did use an older lens with my k100d a while back and I had to press the a/e button for about a second to get it to stop down, the camera won't know what the aperature is set at, but it is still usable. I find dpreview.com is really helpful for those sort of questions. Just type in your query in the 'search' area and any discussion about it will come up. Good luck.
1787789
35mm f2.4 does not need an adapter for K30 and doesn't doesn't come with a lens cap.I recommend the metal leens hood that costs about $8.00. I use that to protect the lens and I also have a uv filter screwed ontothe lens cap but probably not necessary. I absolutely love this lens. This lens and the DA55-300 are superb matches to the K30. You will be blessed with a great photo setup with these three items. The 35mm works for me as a wide angle so it is great to shoot photos in your living room or even landscapes. I got some really nice fall foliage shots with the 35mm. Freddy
667267
The letters stand for the quality of the glass and the assembly of the lens. The "AL" lens is the lowest quality, and is the slowest (f/2.4) lens. Slowest because the aperature only opens to 2.4, so at a given ISO, you will have to use a slower shutter speed. The DA f/1.8 is a great lens for everyday use and is fast. The "FA" is for full frame cameras. If you have a crop sensor camera (Pentax K- series) you don't need a full frame lens. The f/1.4 is larger (faster) than the f/1.8, but you don't need the full frame option if you are using a crop sensor camera. If you have a full frame camera (35mm sensor) you need the FA lens, the others will not work. The letters stand for the quality of the glass and the assembly of the lens. The "AL" lens is the lowest quality, and is the slowest (f/2.4) lens. Slowest because the aperature only opens to 2.4, so at a given ISO, you will have to use a slower shutter speed. The DA f/1.8 is a great lens for everyday use and is fast. The "FA" is for full frame cameras. If you have a crop sensor camera (Pentax K- series) you don't need a full frame lens. The f/1.4 is larger (faster) than the f/1.8, but you don't need the full frame option if you are using a crop sensor camera. If you have... » Read More The letters stand for the quality of the glass and the assembly of the lens. The "AL" lens is the lowest quality, and is the slowest (f/2.4) lens. Slowest because the aperature only opens to 2.4, so at a given ISO, you will have to use a slower shutter speed. The DA f/1.8 is a great lens for everyday use and is fast. The "FA" is for full frame cameras. If you have a crop sensor camera (Pentax K- series) you don't need a full frame lens. The f/1.4 is larger (faster) than the f/1.8, but you don't need the full frame option if you are using a crop sensor camera. If you have a full frame camera (35mm sensor) you need the FA lens, the others will not work. « Show Less
386551
I have the K5 and I didn't order the 18-55 lens with it because I had one, and it works very well with it
1634147
What exactly don't you like about the K-5 autofocus? Accuracy? Speed? Maybe your K-5 needs some repairs?I use the K-5 & K-5II with the center focus points, or manual select, never the auto-select points. Both cameras have about the same speed and accuracy in good light, but in low-light is where the K-5II shines. It's way better in locking focus where the K-5 would just give up. Since I shoot a large percent of my photos in low-light, the K-5II has served me well.
1428392
Like Chris, I have no experience with D series lenses. On G series lenses, they work fine. But there are a couple of caveats to be aware of: First, if you stack the tubes for greater magnification, you may find that your connection becomes intermittent or stops completely. That is because the Kenko tubes are not completely rigid, and will flex when stacked. This is especially problematic with heavier lenses. Second, AF is not all that useful with high magnification. Your depth of field gets very, very shallow. If you are doing true macro work, you will probably want to manually focus. The AF can get you started, but you will probably want to fine-tune the focus manually. The best way to do that is to use Live view and magnify the image once you've composed the basic shot. Focusing rails are very useful for this focus fine-tuning. FWIW
1374545
Hi, thanks question. This lens is K Mount lens for K5 K7 K3 etc... Thanks in advance.
54704
It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has: - better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic) - Weather sealing - Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price. - More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3 - Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode) - Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6) - A deeper frame buffer - 100 grams heavier - A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC) For me the build quality and weather sealing are probably the main differentiators. If those are not important, then the k-50 sounds like a great deal.
1116907
I too came from the MK II and can say, as others have pointed out, that the AF has been greatly improved in the MK III and there is a noticeable difference from MK II to MK III. The AF is responsive, snappy, and consistent. MK III's AF performs very well in low light, which is one area I found the MK II had trouble at times.
792322
It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the build quality and weather sealing are probably the main differentiators. If those are not important, then the k-50 sounds like a great deal. It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the... » Read More It depends on what things you value. Image quality wise, the K-5ii and K-50 are nearly the same. The K-5ii has:- better build quality (magnesium alloy vs plastic)- Weather sealing- Faster max shutter speed (1/8000 vs 1/6000) although 1/6000 is very good for that price.- More exposure bracketing options: 5 frames vs 3- Mirror Lockup mode (but you can simulate on the K-50 using liveview mode)- Slightly faster fps (7 vs 6)- A deeper frame buffer- 100 grams heavier- A hair better sensor (14-bit vs 12-bit ADC)For me the build quality and weather sealing are probably the main differentiators. If those are not important, then the k-50 sounds like a great deal. « Show Less
935597
It's very close in quality to its 1.4 counterpart. The L version has a very slight edge in contrast and sharpness. I opted for the 35mm f2 IS because the difference wasn't large enough for me to justify spending twice as much for the 1.4.Hope this helps!
1048466
I would maybe look at the Tamron 70-200 f2.8. Folks who shoot it on the K3 are pretty satisfied with the auto focus speed, it is sharp wide open and probably the cheapest you will find in that range.
1881212
I own the K5 and the K5IIs. There is very little reason to upgrade from the K5 to the K5II as the differences were just to minimal. So my answer is to go for the IIs. As far as moire concern, I have found very little, under only extreme circumstances where it even showed up and it was correctable with careful use of software. I use * and limited lenses only, and the results are fabulous. Of course my portrait style is to use shallower depth of field, so the moire for that wouldn't be much of an issue anyway.Good luck with your decision.
1253597
Strictly image quality, Nothing a non professional would notice. The lens is much more sturdy and the IS has saved me on more than one occasion, especially in low light. The IS version is worth it IMHO
1979641
this works fine on the k20d. I have it on my k20d and it is a fine lens. great to have if you want a good prime lens.