A few questions: Is the Kit lens adequate for everyday use?
158700
I'm somewhat new to this too, but I'll try to be accurate. First, this is a "Micro 4/3", not a dslr. Call it a point and shoot that "thinks" it's a dslr. As a user, "you" decide which you want it to be. The 14-45 lense included is 28-90mm in 35mm terms. This is comparable to a typical P&S compact with a 3x zoom. Most dslr user's would consider this a "walkaround" lens. Very useful and versatile for the type of shots common with a simple compact or entry level dslr. This camera has a unique feature called Extended Zoom (EZ) that allows an increase in "zoom" if you find the need on occassion. The camera has a functional pop-up flash as well as a "hot shoe" for using a specialized flash unit if you prefer. You must open the flash when needed, it doesn't pop-up automatically. Amazon has a 30 day return policy I think, and I think the warranty is 1 year, but check Panasonic.com to be sure. In years, most cameras will last indefinitely. In "shutter clicks" that is probably an unknown at this time. "I" am assuming that 50,000 clicks is certain and expect 100,000 or I will be sorely disappointed. At my rate of 2000 per month that buys me 2 to 4 years, but for most people that is a lot. That is roughly the range of a good dslr. That's probably 10 years for someone "normal".
1907929
I did not buy the kit lens. I already have a full range of L lenses by Canon and did not need it. In general I find I prefer not to use kit lenses as they are of lower quality and do not suit my needs. For someone just starting in SLR photography, the kit may make sense, but if possible I think it's better to spend more and get a really good general purpose lens such as the 24-70 or 24-105.
1815191
Absolutely, it goes to 105 so you are going to have more zoom (and a little less wide angle), it's a very good lens, I use it with my a6000 and work very good for every day use and casual photography, fast enough (f4), good quality (G badged), much more versatile than the kit lens, better bokeh. If you want faster and crispier lens have to go prime..!Cons: Block down left angle of included flash light(in a6000 camera), no problem with pro flash, and little heavy and big. Good enough to recommend it, go for it.
32352
If money is a concern, try the "fantastic plastic" or sometimes called the "nifty fifty". That's the Canon EOS 50mm f/1.8. Great lens. Best optics per dollar, for sure. Only complaint people have had has been about the quality of background blur when shooting wide open. I haven't had an issue personally, it's acceptable for the price. It IS rather ugly compared to the quality of bokeh on the f/1.2L .. But you can buy 15 of the 1.8s for the price of the 1.2, so that's to be expected.The 1.4 has had some great reviews as well.
1398788
It is a great lens for portraits. That's what I primarily use it for. Another good option is an 85mm.
1966850
It is a good lens, manual + auto-focus, image stabilization. It is not an exceptional lens (costing $1,500-2,000) but for $249 it is a good deal. It has become the lens of choice to "kit" a body, so lots are manufactured which might be the reason for a lower-than-expected price.
702149
I use the Canon 18-200 mm - a good carry around lens for day to day use. Not very expensive either.
2023896
Yes, Please be aware that the depth if field is very limited with the longer lenses. I would almost recommend a prime lens or the kit with it. Be sure to use a tripod and play with settings and you will enjoy macro shots on a budget.
313060
The first two answers are spot on. I bought this lens because it is far less expensive and I use a tripod most of the time.
582699
Okay, thanks a lot, new at this and I wasn't sure if the lens quality is the same. I appreciate everyone's help!
719928
Not bad to me :-)I mostly use MF lenses adapter on it and the peak value is very useful!
672483
It's the only lens you'll need for travel and general use. The only time I remove this lens is for portraits or for macro shots, for each of which I have dedicated lenses. Outside of that, I use this lens for everything. There are times when I wish I had more power for nature or sports photography, but that's a matter of my budget, as I'm sure it is for many amateurs like myself.
699880
Ah, the Rebel XT -- I had one of those for a while. Small LCD screen did make it a bit hard to check if something was in focus or not. The Canon 100-300mm USM isn't a bad lens. But you might consider upgrading the 28-80mm USM -- even the newer kit lens, the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, is an improvement. You might also enjoy working with a fast prime lens for the background blurring it can provide. Something like the the Canon 50mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.4 or 85mm f1.8 are excellent lenses. Cool images, by the way!
1784358
Yes, absolutely. I find the autofocus to be a bit sluggish, and prefer to focus manually, but you'll find that to the case with just about any long zoom in this price range.
599074
Do almost everything hand held. No IS is not a problem as long as your above 180 range but ideally you want to be in good light above 500 IMO. Depending on your camera low light can be decent with ISO cranked up. Overall great lens but not ideal for low light.
876153
No problem :) Have a nice day, if you get the lens, enjoy it!! O love it :)
1045087
Yes - no problem. Just keep in mind it's not a high-quality lens - more of cameraphone quality.