How does the Panasonic KX-TG9391T and AT&T 86109 compare to this phone? I don't care about outlook feature
874957
Panasonic has worked out well for me. Pretty good speaker phone. Listener's never complain when I use it. I would purchase it again. Panasonic electronics are always reliable.
874958
I keep the Panasonic right next to my computer, no issues. Don't know about the answering machine, I use voice mail. I do not use the outlook feature. I am running a home based business with this phone. The cordless handset has a clip that I find very convenient.
874959
http://cordless-phones.findthebest.com/compare/106-142/AT-And-T-TL88102-vs-Panasonic-KX-TG9381T
874960
What I can tell you is that I have used this phone system for over a year without a single problem. I did a little research, and this is the system that best fit my needs at the time--and I was not disappointed. Hope this helps, Chuck
841867
I would second an answer given yesterday. I live in the US and travel extensively. This phone is awesome, but the model I bought from the pandronic store is faulty. The battery was bad, I had to purchase another. The phone shuts itself off several times a day, sometimes in the middle of a conversation, other times while I'm doing something on the internet, I find it to be incredibly frustrating. And of course, the individual from whom I purchased the phone ignored me when I tried to figure out what was happening with the phone. If you do purchase it, get it somewhere else, NOT from pandronic.
2013859
Im not sure, its a nice phone, but becoz my service is nit direct to at&t kind of wierd, but i,think if you are at&t yes ik sure you will love it,, and the battery is really bad,, just 1 day using u out already,,and im. Kt a phone person,, soo, just giving yku the idea, but its really cute phone,,
1003804
Well, I like this phone a LOT! I can't find my tape measure so I found the specs @ cnet for ya. CHeck em out. Nice phone BTW had it over a year now, no probs. and acc. are CHEAP! http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/sharp-fx-plus-at/4507-6452_7-34854664.html
909172
one big difference is visibility. Microsoft made the new version look more compatible with windows 8. flatter. cleaner. only 3 themes. all are gray and white. middle aged client complained that view ability was poor. I agree. installation leaves the old outlook in a crippled state. new outlook icon is vastly different. users don't recognize it.
452184
I would say 875, as AT&T tends to "rape" their phones - for example tethering is disabled and even if you unlock the phone or restore it with the Nokia Recovery Tool, you still cannot use that feature... If there are other specific features you want that 877 has and 875 doesn't, then that is a different story, but I'd say stay away from the Death Star...
1906988
The only noticeable difference that I know of is that the AT&T; model has an extra microphone in the back near the back flash which gets covered up by T -mobile cases.
1143401
The only noticeable difference that I know of is that the AT&T model has an extra microphone in the back near the back flash which gets covered up by T -mobile cases.
170006
Dear Elizabeth: Panasonic makes so many models I don't know about that one but mine does and I have blocked over sixty already. Several models use the same extra unit you have to order. Look on line for the model you listedand see what it tells you. The model I bought was KX-TG7841 from BJ'S. One feature I didn't mention was it can connect to two blue tooth phones so you can answer your cell phones with the home phone. I use cell #1 for friends and cell #2 for business numbers with different ring tones instead. George
1381744
Can someone compare Samsung LN40B650 to Panasonic L37G1? Pluses and minuses. Recommendation.
2106142
I know it will operate on just cell phones, but I am not sure of all the features. However, I returned this phone as being inferior to the Link-to-Cell latest version from Panasonic. This AT&T phone has a FAR inferior display, which is difficult to see, with no contrast adjustments. Also the menu system is much less intuitive than the Panasonic's. And the build quality is also inferior, with hard plastic "pseudo" buttons instead of the rubber on the Panasonic. The whole phone feels much "cheaper". I would strongly advise against this phone, and go with the Link-to-Cell Panasonic, which I have used models from them for years, and am most pleased with this latest one. I do have a land line, but think most, if not all of the features are usable with just cell phones. NOTE: if you connect a Bluetooth HEADSET to this phone, you must initiate outgoing calls from the BASE, not a handset, then hit the headset button on the base. Nowhere in the instructions does it say this, and tech support could not inform me either. Actually, AT&T support on their phone clued me in. Thought I had a non-compatible headset, but not true. Good luck.
108093
The TG6645 is a newer phone. Note that it has only 20 reviews in Amazon, whereas the TG6545 has 218 reviews. The Panasonic website lists the TG6545 as "Out of Stock," so I suspect it's been discontinued, no longer manufactured. The TG6645 has an LCD display on the base station which the TG6545 does not. The TG6645 base station is larger. The TG6645 will work during a power failure - the TG6545 will NOT work. I think that sums up the differences between the two. On the Panasonic website it's possible to create a comparison table between these two models, and that comparison table does show some additional differences. However, when I downloaded the user manuals for each phone and compared them, I found no significant differences between the two. The differences shown in the website comparison table appear to be errors. Therefore I believe the two phones function identically, except for the base station display, size, and power failure functionality. At least one user has complained that the "Eco" feature added static noise to the phone conversation. If you experience that static noise, the Eco feature (and hopefully the static) is disabled if you permanently turn on the "Clarity Booster." You can download and read the manuals for each model. Just Google KXTG6632-MUL.PDF for the TG6645 to get it's user manual, and then google KXTG6511-MUL.PDF for the TG6545.
2193246
It is definitely the Nokia 820. I have been using mine for 3 months and it seems to work fine, although I am working with the local providers to get the MMS configured properly. I can receive pictures but cannot send them. Although it is unlocked, it is really an AT&T phone. When you power it up you get an AT&T logo on the screen and it has lots of AT&T apps installed. I swap out SIM cards as I travel back and forth between Europe and US. This is a good design in that sense, you can pry off the back with your fingernails, no tools required. SIM card and memory card are easy to swap out. The battery is replaceable, unlike most newer phones that have a built in battery. It is a bit heavier than newer phones. Camera is high quality.
510214
I Just bought the panasonic last week and therefore may be biased. I have watched the plasma market for five years now and I belive panasonic is the true leader. In general I would choose overall quality versus the number of "features"---or perhaps novelties. but if they are truly features you want and will use then that may be what you need.
755105
Very similar. The Bold has 3G which is blazingly fast which is great for internet and downloads. It is also built more solid and has a more sophisticated look. The curve 8900 uses EDGE which is fine for mobile browsing, and email. Smaller, more sleek. Same operating system, etc. Try both out in the store (Bold @ ATT, Curve 8900 at t-mobile and coming soon to ATT i think.) Technically the Bold is a better phone but I prefer the curve 8900 due to its size and the cheaper t-mobile plans vs. very expensive att plans.
1760649
I think they have answered the question. it has to do with the handsets. However, I must inform you that we returned the phone. It was not user friendly, and one line would stay busy all the time. The sound quality and the buttons were not very good. I have since purchased a Panasonic expandable system, and it took 10 minutes to set up. We even called ATT and they could not figure out the problem. Good luck
359954
This is a great resource AnthonyB. I think the review clearly favors the Panasonic but I am biased ;-) I'm with you on the noise issue but all else aside the improvement over the first generation is remarkable. I especially like the macro modes. Much better (see my review).