ZS1 vs ZS3... Has anyone done a comparison of the two?
134354
The two biggest differences between the ZS1 and ZS3 are the ZS3s ability to shoot HD video and the much higher quality LCD on the ZS3. The LCD size is only sightly higher, but the resolution of the screen is substantially higher than that of the ZS1. Also, the ZS3 will produce better videos. It can film HD and has a stereo microphone instead of a mono one. In addition, according to Cnet "The ZS3 actually uses a 12-megapixel sensor in order to maintain the same angle of view 16:9 and 4:3 aspect modes" while the ZS1 only features a 10mp sensor. All that said, Panasonic just announced the specifications and pricing of the new versions of this line of cameras so if you are willing to wait I would try to see if the price drops on these next month when the new ones arrive or just skip this model and get one of the newer ones. http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/panasonic-prices-lumix-dmc-ts2-dmc-zs5-dmc-zs7-and-dmc-zr3-cam/
1795947
I think the S01 has 8MB Ram instead only 6MB. It also has a VGA output and Microphone input. I also think the S03 is the same as the S01 and the S04 the same as the S02.
1116385
Unfortunately there are a few key difference on the phone that will probably make this skin not work. The headphone jack is center justified on the S, verses left on the Z1. And the front screen of the Z1 has the light sensor on the left and the camera on the right, but the pictures I've seen for the Z1s has those two reversed. The screens are the same size so that would probably be ok, just that your cutouts will not line up. The back appears to be the same however. All of this should be taken with a grain of salt as I am going by pictures of the Z1s I found online, as I've only used the Z1 personally. Hope this helps, Cheers
535707
Significant difference between the two cameras - if you have the opportunity exchange them. Big differences are Much improved video, Weight, Quality of photos, Options - The SL! is basically the identical camera to the T5i in a much smaller package - Basically the SL1 is 2 to 3 generations newer than the T3 - I had a T1i and When the T3 came out I did not upgrade as it offered few advantages over the T1i. I have the SL1 - Love it - a significant upgrade.
668628
Following my initial post I found a comment from Kodak explaining the differences vs the Zi8. It seems that aside from touchscreen (if you really want it), the only real differences are a wider-angle lens and supposedly better low-light performance. I think I'll wait for a few reviews from people who actually buy it before investing on this update.PS: Like the Zi8 it also takes an external mic
150513
ABSOLUTELY!! Great system works 1000 times better than zboost. Excellent system!!
1678498
Add me to the list... I've got a DMC-ZS3 and I like the price of this housing but want to make sure it fits and works well.
684718
Thanks! that's very helpful, especially the tip that the price may drop.... I'll go with the ZS3 based on your recommendation and I can definitely wait a month or two.
1832376
The S one only gives front back and the middle of the green. S3 Is more advanced and gives distance to all of the hazards as well.
844348
I was all set to buy the SX200 and have been a die-hard Canon fan for many years, but I am not ready to dismiss the ZS3. Yes the camaralabs.com review (http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC_TZ7_ZS3/index.shtml) talks about the focus issue on the ZS3 but overall the review is very favorable and it is unclear whether it is an issue in all situations or just the challenging scene in the sample video. Furthermore the Canon SX200 not only does not zoom during video, but auto focus is disabled altogether in this mode. I think I would rather have my focus hunt a little than go completely out of focus as the subject moves. I was all set to buy the SX200 and have been a die-hard Canon fan for many years, but I am not ready to dismiss the ZS3. Yes the camaralabs.com review (http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC_TZ7_ZS3/index.shtml) talks about the focus issue on the ZS3 but overall the review is very favorable and it is unclear whether it is an issue in all situations or just the challenging scene in the sample video. Furthermore the Canon SX200 not only does not zoom during video, but auto focus is disabled altogether in this mode. I think I would rather have my focus hunt a little than go... » Read More I was all set to buy the SX200 and have been a die-hard Canon fan for many years, but I am not ready to dismiss the ZS3. Yes the camaralabs.com review (http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC_TZ7_ZS3/index.shtml) talks about the focus issue on the ZS3 but overall the review is very favorable and it is unclear whether it is an issue in all situations or just the challenging scene in the sample video. Furthermore the Canon SX200 not only does not zoom during video, but auto focus is disabled altogether in this mode. I think I would rather have my focus hunt a little than go completely out of focus as the subject moves. « Show Less
2049397
A good list of differences is on the steves-digicam.com website under the S3 review, in short the S3 is one mega pixel more, a larger screen and a couple other minor things.
1621835
Hey Michael, I compared the two but wasn't able to notice any difference. I have the version II and it works great. For the record, I've used the Z finder and this one is on par with it. I'm assuming that the new one has some minor fixes or changes, but I can't really tell the difference. Best of luck!
2187666
think the changes between models are more intense than anything else, for my Ultra Z works fine, comes with an adjustable tab, I would say you could prove it to see.
515659
Get an FZ35. The control system and layout are nearly identical to the ZS7. Take away the EVF and the big zoom and it would be a ZS7. The ZS7 has the same IA, SCN, dial modes, and PASM as an FZ. If you can use a ZS, you can use an FZ.The advantage of the FZ is the EVF. If you don't intend to use it, you don't need an FZ.All the camera manufacturers have simple tutorials on their sites. Kodak, Canon, Nikon are all good for beginners.
2242856
So the crucial differences are that the SL1 has a DIGIC 5 processor, it is 4 ounces lighter, has better low light capabilities, and has high dynamic range capability. The processor is more modern in the SL1. However, the T3I has a much larger battery, and is a physically bigger camera, which may be a boon if you have big hands. Note well, I have the SL1. I am a six footer with fairly large hands, but light weight is important to me and the SL1 beat the competition.
359952
Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3... » Read More Look up "Imaging Resource" website. There is a very cool "Comparometer" (look on the left side, "Compare Sample Images). I, too, am trying to decide between the ZS7 and the HX5V. My biggest beef (in particular, with the Fuji F80, which I returned), is with over-processed images wiping out facial tone. I'm worried the Sony does that a bit, but it seems to retain some of the Fuji's low light magic. It's a shame the ZS7 went up on megapixels and therefore lost resolution in processing out noise. (Compare the house photos between the two on the Comparometer. The ZS3 clearly wins. « Show Less
752727
Buy the V3 without any question. It has 800 x 600 resolution while the V1 has 400 x 300..