Any reason why this wouldn't work on a 4:3 3-inch non-DSLR point-and-shoot like a Canon SX-500?
894064
None I can think of aside from making sure the tripod screw is near center. There is some room for lateral adjustment but if it were too far to one edge, it may not work.
894065
It works pretty good on my Canon SX-10, although it makes it a little difficult to press the Record button when in Movie Mode.
754096
This compact monopod is too small. I would not put no more than three pounds on this monopod. My Canon PowerShot SX20IS works well with this. You should look at Manfrotto 680B Monopod 4-SCTN I think this will work better for you.
1505566
Actually, I have a D5000, and I think I understand what you are saying. Sounds like You want to mount just your camera, and not a telephoto to the to the Gimbal. Looks like you would have to use a longer rail plate than the one which comes with the Gimbal.That's the only remedy I can see.
1976287
I have an SX40HS, and it's a matter of taking the plastic cover above the view finder off so that you can insert the feet into the holder. Read your camera manual for more specifics. Overall, the 430EX II itself is a nice overall flash system. I found the other paraphernalia in the package was cheapo and of limited usefulness.
1590034
Nope - you can use a 4/3 lens on micro 4/3 with an adapter, but not the other way round.
646281
I don't have any experience with those cameras, but if they don't have a hotshoe on top and the distance from that to the LCD screen is not within a certain range, it won't work. In any case I don't think this item is designed for anything other than DSLRs. Hope that helps.
1323778
Hi! I would suggest you use a monopod made for DSLR cameras, this most likely would not cut it....
487368
I have a Canon, and didn't have a problem. Maybe try googling your problem, someone probably has a solution already out there.
2077737
I would think that this is suitable for a point and shoot camera, but not a heavier SLR
195357
I cannot answer, I have a Canon T3i, and it is fine. Sorry, no solid answer.
1284742
Absolutely not compatible with any camera with lenses that has weight. My 1DX with 200 f1.8, or even the lighter 400mm f2.8 II IS, the monopod flat plate comes loose with the heavy torque, and the segments cannot be adjusted while shooting unless you lift the weight on the stick. Not something you want to do when trying to record moments.
535514
I'm pretty sure it would work quite well with the 500mm lens itself, but if you use the included 2x extension plus the 1.4x extension for a 1400mm focal length, I suspect the image quality might leave something to be desired.
1375011
I use mine on my Canon 100-400 and am very pleased with the results. I'd suggest that you first visit a local camera store andf ask if you can try it.
1562328
As long as the Canon DSLR you are using has an EF mount (which *should* be all DSLR's by Canon) you should be good to go. I just checked the box for my adapter and there was no paperwork with it, but I'm assuming that if the lens was for Hassy 500 or 503's bodies (V) you should be all set. I don't have that lens, so I can for certain say yes or now. All signs point to "most likely"
2084731
I have a Cannon EOS1100D and a Pentax Mount 750mm telephoto lens (I think, I have had it for so long that I don't remember the details). The adapter works with no issues when both the lens and camera are hand held. When the lens is mounted on a tripod, fitting the camera is a bit more difficult but not impossible. This is mainly due to lack of practice.
1842253
The D3100's rear LCD screen is a different aspect ratio (4:3) compared to the screens found on Canon's xxxD line of cameras (3:2). This, combined with the Canon LCD screen being positioned slightly higher on the camera body, means that if one were to successfully attach the metal frame for the viewfinder, it wouldn't cover all of the D3100's rear screen (probably leaving a gap at the bottom). Another consideration would be the tripod mount this attaches to: it's likely the position of the mounts is slightly different between each camera, increasing the likelihood the frame wouldn't be positioned correctly. So, it's unlikely the frame would successfully cover the whole screen. If you're okay with not having full coverage, you could consider it but, personally, I would recommend against buying this for the D3100. (It might be a good idea to search around online for others that may have tried it out before, too.)
555781
Not an issue for me. Are you sure you have the standard U.S. tripod mount threads? If not, you may need an adapter available from most camera supply stores.