What's the difference between this device and the "Xplod" device? Thanks.
866885
I bought one in December. This is the xplod device. You can't go wrong with it. With it, you can play old collections, present collections, and mp3 selections. This machine gives you all
866886
Kathy:It seems that Sony uses this trade name "Xplod" on several of their different products including this one. My personal philosophy is to not be concerned about the trade name, but more focused on the right product attributes that I am looking for and not to buy extra features which I don't need or don't want to pay for. The brand name also means something to me and Sony is a pretty good brand.Jim
2003621
I really recommend to you Sony xplod, I have one and it's awesome for all kind of music!!!!
1750738
I don't know since I don't know what the difference is between them. I just know I have a SD micro card. Sorry I can't be of more help.
397444
The difference between the two is the Zen Nano Plus has direct cd recording. I don't know for sure why there is such a big price difference but my guess would be that the Zen Nano isn't produced anymore (the Zen Nano Plus is an upgrade) and so there's a limited quantity.
2257165
I don't know the difference but I was not able to get this device working at all. I pitched mine in the trash after trying to get it working with the software for weeks.
2017560
I found an article that said the Element has 8Gb buffer while the Passport has 2Gb. The Element would therefore transfer and locate files faster. This was an older review thought that only compared the USB 2.0 so not sure how accurate it is today.
1439246
Most xd are generic difference is some have more memory than others look at gig capacity and you get what you want
737335
I don't know there to be a difference however if you are planning on using the mobile app for it beware. I purchased mine only to find out the app for iPhones is unavailable for an unspecified time. It's quite a hassle to track every meal on the computer for me rather than on phone on the go. Also see no need for the blue tooth aspect if can't use on the go. I have to plug mine into computer several times to see where I'm at. A lot of effort without the app. Also suppose to link with other apps like my fitness pal however that is down too for unspecified time. Disappointed to say the least. I don't know there to be a difference however if you are planning on using the mobile app for it beware. I purchased mine only to find out the app for iPhones is unavailable for an unspecified time. It's quite a hassle to track every meal on the computer for me rather than on phone on the go. Also see no need for the blue tooth aspect if can't use on the go. I have to plug mine into computer several times to see where I'm at. A lot of effort without the app. Also suppose to link with other apps like my fitness pal however that is down too for unspecified time. Disappointed to say the least.
143428
Its USB interface. Used RT2870_USBmodule.exe driver. Don't recall where I downloaded it from. But it is on myGoogleDrive so I can give anyone a link/download address who need XP driver set.
925851
they both work. The only difference is the XR which means extended run time. The regular ones usually come with the tool, but the XR is preferable. They really do last longer and have more power. My favorite cordless drill is discontinued, and have worn out multiple batteries over the years, but drill is still going.
1353295
First, you know this, but deserves repeating XP is no longer supported by MS and soon by others. With that said. Plugable has a 3.0 USB that works (USB3-E1000), I think it will revert to USB 2.0 speed - 100MB, but mine runs at 1GB Also any USB to Ethernet that supports XP will work, has nothing to do with the system and all about USB You can also put a wireless board, but I personally don't use it any more because the USB is faster and doesn't use my wifi bandwidth.
285035
Hi, I found no difference whatsoever! I alternate between the 2 of them depending on which one is cheaper! Hope that helps! :)
2023902
I'll be able to do a direct comparison soon, as I've got a PX312 coming in, after purchasing the VN-302PC. The specs and features are very nearly clones of each other, but I've found that the Olympus lacks some rather basic abilities that the Sony covers, such as a means of moving files between the 5 folders for organization. Also, the files recorded on the internal memory can't be moved over to the external memory card through the recorder; though it's easy enough to do when connected to a PC. It shows up as two separate drives on the PC, and the files remain uniquely named whether recorded on internal or external memory, so it's a simple matter to just copy them over. (If they reused file numbers on int vs ext memory then there would be an added complication of renaming before copying). I'd rather that the file names included the timestamp, like some other recorders do, but neither of these do that. Record quality of the Olympus is fine, so if the Sony does just as well, the Sony has more comprehensive features. The file erase process is better on the Sony as well, because it plays back the recording you're about to erase for confirmation before recording. With the Olympus you have to stop the playback on the target file first and be careful that it didn't advance to the next file, and watch the screen for the sequence of prompts to follow through with the delete process. I think the Sony method for deleting is better because it can be initiated while the target file is playing, and the playback of the recording as confirmation has less potential for inadvertently deleting the wrong recording. I believe the Sony also retains the time for at least a minute during battery changes, while the Olympus loses an hour or two and needs to be reset. It's not very significant since the batteries last so long, but so far, all the pros have been on the Sony side. When I get the Sony in hand I'll see if it actually performs as well as the Olympus
1324260
The "Plus" is a newer version of the x8 and in fact may actually use a different Firmware so, be aware. So, all things being equal go with the "Plus" but if you find a better deal on the regular x8 then why not? I still have the regular x8 and it's serving me well.
1103916
Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely whatever you use to edit/burn your video will encode the video upon output. So a bit more versatile but also a bit bulkier camera.Bryan Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely... » Read More Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely whatever you use to edit/burn your video will encode the video upon output. So a bit more versatile but also a bit bulkier camera.Bryan « Show Less
734291
The link below is a PDF that explains the differences http://www.nuvodirect.com/media/nuvo-Specifications-eVersion.pdf
479160
OK Thanks. That info helps. I did not know monoprice sold a device like that.