Anyone ever compare this to Royal Oak Hardwood lump charcoal? Prefer one over the other?
877574
I sure have. I actually use both. The Royal Oak leaves a nicer flavor on the food, but the Stubbs lays down a better base of coals and lasts longer. I think it depends on what your using it for and how long you need the coals to last. ...or you could do what I do. Use a mix of both.
877575
I have switched to lump charcoal. The lump charcoal holds the heat longer so you are not constantly adding charcoal to the fire especially when you are smoking meat for several hours.
877576
Haven't used Royal Oak specifically, but have used several lump hardwood charcoals for both grilling and smoking in a weber smokey mountain. Stubbs is a 95% hardwood briquette, whereas the lump charcoal are actual pieces of hardwood in various shapes and sizes. The lump will burn well, but due to the various sizes, it'll have several hot and cool spots that, for me, were very inconsistent and not adequate for grilling. It's not too bad for a smoker, but I still prefer Stubbs simply because the uniform briquettes burn evenly every time. I used Stubbs, tried several lump hardwoods, and came running back to Stubbs! Haven't used Royal Oak specifically, but have used several lump hardwood charcoals for both grilling and smoking in a weber smokey mountain. Stubbs is a 95% hardwood briquette, whereas the lump charcoal are actual pieces of hardwood in various shapes and sizes. The lump will burn well, but due to the various sizes, it'll have several hot and cool spots that, for me, were very inconsistent and not adequate for grilling. It's not too bad for a smoker, but I still prefer Stubbs simply because the uniform briquettes burn evenly every time. I used Stubbs, tried several lump hardwoods, and came... » Read More Haven't used Royal Oak specifically, but have used several lump hardwood charcoals for both grilling and smoking in a weber smokey mountain. Stubbs is a 95% hardwood briquette, whereas the lump charcoal are actual pieces of hardwood in various shapes and sizes. The lump will burn well, but due to the various sizes, it'll have several hot and cool spots that, for me, were very inconsistent and not adequate for grilling. It's not too bad for a smoker, but I still prefer Stubbs simply because the uniform briquettes burn evenly every time. I used Stubbs, tried several lump hardwoods, and came running back to Stubbs! « Show Less
877577
I'm not sure about the Royal Oak Hardwood lump charcoal but I really liked Stubbs. Very long lasting and very hot burning. They essentially last as long as Kingsford but with a much better flavor and all natural. I have found that lump charcoal burns too quick for my taste.
92184
Oak typically is a more porous wood. For cutting boards a tighter grain wood such as ash, maple is better. Oak will work though.
1587283
not positive, but i think the charcoal is there less to filter the impurities from tap water and more to filter the water as it sits and gets used-like from your pets' saliva, tiny hairs, dust, etc. So it can remain fresher longer and gets less buildup. just my opinion.
216616
I can't tell the difference. I compared prices, etc. I thought maybe the finish but they both say walnut. Also, the dimensions are almost identical. Having not owned both, I cannot say for sure.
385303
I didn't actually time the burn but it is shorter than firewood but longer than I had anticipated. I mix woodchips/saw dust with shredded paper to about a 50/50 mix and I haven't noticed any extra or unwanted smoke. I want to try and make enough bricks this spring and summer to get me through next winter. If you don't mind a little work then it's worth it, FYI I fill up a 50 gallon trashcan with my mix and it usually makes about 32 bricks.
1466147
I use the Cowboy lump charcoal. I use about half of the 8lb bag in a 12 hour cook.
419441
I've had my unit for several months and I've had no problem with a variety of hardwoods - many much harder/denser than oak. I'm happy with this tool.
395616
Funny you should ask.....I have been experimenting with different types of wood as well as charcoal mixes, this biolite is simply incredible! Try it and let me know! Hope it works out!
2164570
South American hardwoods...check their website...it's quite informative. Great product, by the way, very big chunks...sometimes I have to split 'em up to fit in my chimney starter. I've ordered several bags.
1283521
Starwest Botanical is the brand that makes this activated charcoal. I looked on their site and it says that it is a wood based charcoal. They use sawdust to make it. Which is a renewable resource. Hope this helps. :)
983900
Yes, we have used hardwood lump charcoal and have added soaked hardwood for smoking, both with excellent results.
1712926
I would say it IS "orangier" than oak, I would maybe call it a dark maple. It's even redder and darker than a pecan. We love ours, I matches our woodwork exactly!
2164569
This charcoal is made in South America so not sure of what wood they use. They have a website that shows the process. It may mention the species. I can say it works well and has good flavor. High heat low ash.
931446
Lump charcoal burns very hot. I would STRONGLY suggest the old standbye, Kingsford. Works for me and should for you too! :)
888431
I was also impressed with the Weber Genesis and would recommend it. I can't compare to your charcoal experience since I was never very good at using a charcoal grill and prefer gas.
931444
I use the Kingsford competition briquettes. They work great. I strongly discourage using lump charcoal for this device. It burns VERY hot and VERY quickly... sort of the opposite of what you are trying to accomplish with a smoker setup.
1769642
I have had both and I can honestly say I think the wood is sturdier. It seems much more secure!