Which card gets higher FPS in Battlefield 3 on ultra settings @1080p? HD7870 or GTX 660ti?
880698
It seems to run around ~5-10 or so frames faster. Source: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-660-ti-benchmark-review,3279-4.html
2063550
yes, but i have 2 gtx770 4gb versions running on mine and the performance is awesome im getting around 100 fps to 200 fps in BF4 on ultra, I am also using a intel 4770k, 16gb ram corsair vengence 4x4, and have a corsair 850 power supply
1413416
It's a GeForce 860m not a GeForce GT 840m. 2 GB. But I'll tell you straight, I can run almost every game on high settings, but the frame rate does suffer. I don't care that much though. BF4 runs Superb on high settings. It's about a Xbox 360 graphics GPU. It's a good computer. I would recommend it.
222544
Well, using the AMD Catalyst center, what is the speed you have? Mine runs 50-60% and is not that loud. It also depends on the case you have, remember that loudness depends on how intensive the game is, and in BF3 it is considered normal. The dual fan card will be quiet, because it has double dissipation.
305950
Excellently. My old 560ti runs BF4 well, this will blow it out of the water.
2128791
Yes, that's what I installed it on. There is almost no reduction in performance between 2.0 and 3.0. Apparently no video card currently out can actually outperform 2.0 at this time. Well, I haven't confirmed that with the newly released GTX 700 models.
682684
have never tried rome 2 but it does battlefield 4 dayz stuff like tha at high settings 1080p above 60 fps ive used it for almost a year now.. very good card.. thinkin bout getting another one.. dont know bout what price u have but u can get other 7850s for 100 buckish
45635
OK those two cards should be destroying wow, this card cannot out perform two 7870's. There is something wrong with your graphics configuration, perhaps trying switching off crossfire when you play wow. Either way, both cards should be getting at least 60+ fps in most areas on ultra if paired with a decent processor.
1044788
Depends what you're playing, I am running one of these and can run bf4 on ultra at about 80 fps on windows 8 with an i5 and 16 gigs of ram but if i were you, i would get one 780 not two 770's
1089933
My average FPS on Counter-Strike Global Offensive is about 200 fps.Battlefield 3 on High settings (Not Ultra) 60 fpsIts not too loud, but you can hear it, doesn't annoy me thoughI have had no heating problems with this graphics cards, its a litle old but still has the latest technologies, (CUDA etc...)very cheap, very good :)
1218711
It will work with your video card, and you may know this, but I have to say it: don't expect to be playing games like BF3, BF4, Crysis 3, etc. with it at 2560x1440 resolution using dual DVI with a 660 without huge turn downs in quality settings which will defeat the purpose of enjoying higher resolution (dual DVI cable is included...it MUST be a dual DVI cable which is thicker than a single DVI cable and the connector is slightly different). It takes a very powerful single card (or two less powerful in SLI) to run games on this monitor in full resolution at high quality settings. I'm running a single GTX 680 and it does fine in older games like F1 2013, Grid 2, Crysis 2, and BF3 at full resolution and high quality settings (average 50+ FPS). But it would take two 680s or a 780 Ti to run this at comparable frame rates in newer games like Crysis 3 and BF4. If you do not game, your 660 video card performance will not be a problem. Warranty depends on the seller it appears. Mine died within 30 days of purchase and the seller (Stylebang) refused to give me a replacement monitor or refund and instead offered to send me a board from the manufacturer. I rejected that offer of course and filed a claim with Amazon, which they granted my money back after a drawn out process of back and forth emails with the seller, including sending them video of my problem. These are great monitors, but know that they are inexpensive for a reason and you are taking a risk. Also, i would strongly urge spending a little more on a "pixel perfect" version. Mine had two stuck pixels but they were out of central view and didn't bother me. Hope this helps and good luck! I decided to drop a few hundred more on a Dell 27" UltraSharp U2713HM and get not only a better monitor but one with a 3-year warranty. And no dead pixels either. I lucked out and caught it on sale for $550 back in April...it's normally a $700 monitor. You truly get what you pay for.
1081143
I can run BF4 on Ultra on my 2560x1080 60 Hz ultra-wide monitor, and average 55-60 fps. I typically run BF4 on high to ensure I don't get any performance dips. This is a great graphics card for gaming.
1373865
Oh man that card is so freaking awesome. BF4 with 200% resolution upscale 1080 ultra setting and you get 70 fps. This card is a damn beast. With 100% upscale is slamming 160 fps and am running 2 screens
236375
This card is a beast. Can play almost every game on max settings. Of course this is gonna be better than the 660
1202986
The closest I could find on the benchmark site I use most often shows a Radeon HD 5750 benchmarks at 1394 and the HD 6850 almost 1K higher rated at 2237 and every thing else should be fine with your PC. There are *always* faster, more expensive cards; but I am pleased with my two purchases!
1894862
It works amazingly with planetside and battlefield 3! I can set both to ultra and get 40 fps away from the battle and 20-30 fps while in the fight! Definatly works well with other games like Skyrim, Xcom, Starcraft 2, World of Warcraft and Total War: Sogun 2. But it also depends on your proccesor, ram, cache and OS. But in general, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 2gb runs pretty well on most games.
1459233
Best was to compare the two cards. 660 less then 600 Cudas. 65oTiBoost 790 Cuda's and a higher processing rate then the 660. basically take the 660 and multiply all its defaults by 1.85 and you get the 650Ti Boost. boost tech is whats now in all the current gen as the 2nd Gen tech there using to make them run faster and stronger then before.