What camera body would you recommend to work with this FX lens that isn't an arm and a leg? :)
886539
The FX body that you can afford is the best to work with this FX lens. LolBut if you want a brand new body, the D600 is the cheapest body you can get, although the image quality is great, I don't really like how the auto focus points are all bunched up in the middle (because it uses the same auto focusing system as the D7000, A crop sensored camera) the other hand, if you're willing to get used, you can get a D700 for pretty cheap (just make sure the actuation count isn't too high). The auto focusing system isn't as good but is spread out throughout the viewable area, which I like. I personally use this lens with my D700 and strap my 85 1.4 to my D800. Good combo for me. :) The FX body that you can afford is the best to work with this FX lens. LolBut if you want a brand new body, the D600 is the cheapest body you can get, although the image quality is great, I don't really like how the auto focus points are all bunched up in the middle (because it uses the same auto focusing system as the D7000, A crop sensored camera) the other hand, if you're willing to get used, you can get a D700 for pretty cheap (just make sure the actuation count isn't too high). The auto focusing system isn't as good but is spread out throughout the viewable area, which I like. I... » Read More The FX body that you can afford is the best to work with this FX lens. LolBut if you want a brand new body, the D600 is the cheapest body you can get, although the image quality is great, I don't really like how the auto focus points are all bunched up in the middle (because it uses the same auto focusing system as the D7000, A crop sensored camera) the other hand, if you're willing to get used, you can get a D700 for pretty cheap (just make sure the actuation count isn't too high). The auto focusing system isn't as good but is spread out throughout the viewable area, which I like. I personally use this lens with my D700 and strap my 85 1.4 to my D800. Good combo for me. :) « Show Less
886540
Since its an fx lens it would be best to get a full frame camera. The cheapest (and still very good) is the Nikon d600. If you can't swing the cash for that, getting an fx lens might not be worth it since it'll be cropping every shot.
886541
I recommend using only full frame aka FX camera. The cheapest is d600. If you can get a good deal for a used d700, that would be great too.
1254979
N8TE - Thanks for the advice. I will look into the AF-S (especially the 70-300 VR) but it's good to know my old lens is still an option.
1156617
The 18-140 lens I have is made for DX (small image) cameras. It might cover the FX image area (which is 1.5 times bigger) at focal length of 50mm or longer, but at wider zoom settings in the FX the image would be a little round picture - with all the corners cut off. You need lenses specifically designed for FX cameras, but some of the older 35mm film camera lenses might work. However, if you are recycling film camera lenses, make sure you try them on your FX first. If it functions well AND does all the things you want it to do on your FX, then you may save a few bucks, but I would suggest you stick with lenses designed for FX - particularly if you are new to SLR digital photography. The 18-140 lens I have is made for DX (small image) cameras. It might cover the FX image area (which is 1.5 times bigger) at focal length of 50mm or longer, but at wider zoom settings in the FX the image would be a little round picture - with all the corners cut off. You need lenses specifically designed for FX cameras, but some of the older 35mm film camera lenses might work. However, if you are recycling film camera lenses, make sure you try them on your FX first. If it functions well AND does all the things you want it to do on your FX, then you may save a few bucks, but I would suggest... » Read More The 18-140 lens I have is made for DX (small image) cameras. It might cover the FX image area (which is 1.5 times bigger) at focal length of 50mm or longer, but at wider zoom settings in the FX the image would be a little round picture - with all the corners cut off. You need lenses specifically designed for FX cameras, but some of the older 35mm film camera lenses might work. However, if you are recycling film camera lenses, make sure you try them on your FX first. If it functions well AND does all the things you want it to do on your FX, then you may save a few bucks, but I would suggest you stick with lenses designed for FX - particularly if you are new to SLR digital photography. « Show Less
1139013
Yes, this lens is an FX lens and will work with full frame or cropped frame sensors.
1773171
I agree with Patrick as far as the tilt and shift lens goes and I would agree that it would be a good idea to rent it rather than buy it. I have the 28mm. in question and I love it although it is a bit long on a DX body. For me it is fine on a FX body. The optical quality of the lens is superb as is the clarity and color saturation.I have had several 28's and this is by far the best I have owned.
107208
Yes you can use a DX lens in FX mode, but depending on the lens, you will have moderate to severe vignetting. There woould be no point use the 35mm DX in FX mode because you would have to crop your picture to the size of a DX shot, but the excellent Tokina 11-16mm lens works quite well at 16mm in FX mode.
1773174
If you are shooting full frame the new Sigma 35mm f1.4 ART lens would be a better lens for architecture. If you are shooting crop-sensor then the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 ART lens would be a very good bet.
107213
It depends upon the lens (if it's a prime), and/or the focal length (if it's a zoom). I frequently use the excellent 35mm f/1.8 DX lens in FX mode on my D700. There is certainly some fall off at the corners, but it works well for my uses (location portraits, and indoor people events).
1016560
I'm not sure what FX or DX is. YOu should be able to find out all you want about the K20D at www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk20d Good Luck
467110
Li,What does a longer lens excel at shooting? I'm almost a complete neophyte, and can't google up the answer to this one.
464300
This is a full frame (FX) lens. Of course it can also be used on DX if you like, where the crop factor makes it equivalent to 120-600mm.
405
Thanks everyone for your help. You've explained a lot and it really helps. After your explanations, I looked at my past photos. I'm thinking that maybe the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 will fill my needs. Thanks again.
725026
With an fx lens on a do body the lens will kinda be a 300 lens . And you would have to Manuel focus this lens on the d5000
855771
The lens you have would be perfect for the family portrait. I use my 35mm for most of my work.
1597223
Find with that lens you have to get very close and use tripod or be steady. Use a shorter lens.
175878
The body would fit without a problem with a shorter lens. Like in the 17 - 85 mm zoom range. Not a long zoom.
1590731
Hello, That would be an impressive move with this lens! Considering it weighs about 40 pounds it would require some serious upper body strength! Thanks for the interest, UsedPhotoPro