What is the true speed, 3.4 or 2.9????
890593
3.4 because your computer will recognize it right off the back use it to its full potential.
890594
3.4 runing thew 2 cores i think 1.8 bankswitched thew memory and what ever the video card you are using to set up the real timing or speed look up the specs on amd web site,,, the one i use is in a video mpeg4 storage computer and it works fine for that,,,
890595
3.4ghz and one thing you should know before buying is the l2 cache size is only 2mb but its an amazing cpu
890596
3.4 runing thew 2 cores i think 1.8 bankswitched thew memory and what ever the video card you are using to set up the real timing or speedlook up the specs on amd web site,,, the one i use is in a video mpeg4 storage computer and it works fine for that,,,
97229
I've had no issues with the speed of the unit. It really depends on the drives you use.
718437
It really doesn't matter, because no CD/DVD drive is going to send or receive data faster than USB 2.0 can comfortably handle. Having a USB 3.0 connection would not speed up the drive's performance. (As pointed out elsewhere, USB 3.0 ports are backward-compatible with USB 2.0 peripherals, so the drive will work whether the port you connect it to is USB 2.0 or 3.0.)
1596494
I have the prior 800/400/usb 2.0 version and it is 7200rpm. I can't imagine they went backwards..
1194808
The one I got is 1.8... From experience that is not the only factor for device performance. I am still happy with this one way more than other more expensive device that I got later! Did not try to update or upgrade the os yet.
1656627
You bet! USB 3.0 supports exponentially faster transfer rates, but it's also backwards compatible to work with 2.0 device connections.
783084
4gb x 2sticks. Seems to clock to 1333 Mhz by default for me but does 1866 easily. Haven't tried 2000+ yet.
650441
I don't know if the headers for 2.0 and 3.0 are the same, but if they were the same the I/O rate will be 2.0, Google for the headers.
796517
if you have the proper connection, 3.0, its pretty quick. I mainly use it for military documents, and a few movies. But it is def a very good deal
891771
the difference between usb 2.0 and usb 3.0 is the data transfer speed. 3.0 is can be 10x faster than 2.0, the other difference is 3.0 has 9 pins, 2.0 has 4pins a usb 3.0 drive can be plugged into a computer that has 2.0 but the drive will operate at 2.0 speed
1240672
3.9 Ghz is the accepted max turbo speed out the processor, it can be clocked faster than that, but it's native speed is 3.5.
1821252
Read/Write speed, how fast you can transmit your files from/to the flash drive
979015
Old post, I know, but I thought I would point this out to anyone reading this in the future.It's important to note that 10/100 Ethernet is 100 Mbps (Megabits per second), which is NOT the same as MB/s (Megabytes per second).That boils down to 10/100 Ethernet being slower than USB 2.0.1 MB = 1024 kB, 1 kB = 1024 bytes, 1 byte = 8 bitsGigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) can be faster than USB 2.0 but it is hard to actually get gigabit, you need a computer that can handle it at that speed, a router that can, the NAS itself, and the cables themselves matter.5 MB/s is still slow for 10/100 though, that's about 42 Mbps. Old post, I know, but I thought I would point this out to anyone reading this in the future.It's important to note that 10/100 Ethernet is 100 Mbps (Megabits per second), which is NOT the same as MB/s (Megabytes per second).That boils down to 10/100 Ethernet being slower than USB 2.0.1 MB = 1024 kB, 1 kB = 1024 bytes, 1 byte = 8 bitsGigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) can be faster than USB 2.0 but it is hard to actually get gigabit, you need a computer that can handle it at that speed, a router that can, the NAS itself, and the cables themselves... » Read More Old post, I know, but I thought I would point this out to anyone reading this in the future.It's important to note that 10/100 Ethernet is 100 Mbps (Megabits per second), which is NOT the same as MB/s (Megabytes per second).That boils down to 10/100 Ethernet being slower than USB 2.0.1 MB = 1024 kB, 1 kB = 1024 bytes, 1 byte = 8 bitsGigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) can be faster than USB 2.0 but it is hard to actually get gigabit, you need a computer that can handle it at that speed, a router that can, the NAS itself, and the cables themselves matter.5 MB/s is still slow for 10/100 though, that's about 42 Mbps. « Show Less
405395
I'm not 100% tech savvy, but I think the major difference would be speed, if I'm not mistaken. 3.0 is the latest standard, isn't it? I think the transfer speed makes the difference, in which case I don't mind this one because I don't have any 3.0 USB items....I'm not much help in this matter, I just needed extra ports because I've downsized from a desktop to a laptop temporarily, so when I saw this I just grabbed it. It works quite well for what it's worth. I'm sorry if it this doesn't help.
177646
Idk about your first half of the question, but as for 2.0 vs 3.0, there really isnt any noticeable difference between the 2. Obviously the bandwith is faster on 3.0, but its a very minor performance increase that maybe hardcore overclockers and modders would be concerned about. You will NOT notice any difference betweeen the 2. Happy gaming!
1808146
Usually a 64. Depends, does your PC/Desktop have a USB 3.0? If it doesn't then it may remain the same normal speed, but if it does it's a better choice and fit.
1420323
the speed on how fast the reader sends and receives info ,price, and year made 2.0 made 2000 3.0 made 2008for regular home use the 2.0 works for me . hope this helps