Does it obscure the iron sights of 10/22 ? I want to use this rail in conjunction with a Weaver see thru scope mount (model 49063) Thank you
882694
It's hard to say as I have a red dot on there now. I just looked from the barrel back towards the stock and then rail looks higher than the sight. It may block it.
200097
Are you referring to an AK dust cover? You would not be able to use any iron sights through the scope lens, as it would be very very blurry (there is no 1x power at which all things are in focus). It sounds to me like you would need extra-tall see-through scope rings, or an elevated see-through mount. (Even though I use an elevated see-through mount, it's pretty much pointless to try to use the iron sights (there's just not enough view).
2117774
you should be mounted foward of post when installed onto rail,slightly higher than sight post, I keep mechanical sight{folded down} on my Windham along with my site mark. I also have green Z site Mark mounted onto Rugar 10-22 and no obstructions, I suppose it may be different situation on some other rifles/guns types. You might ask a local dealer for their input on what you can mount onto your firearm,
427602
No harm in trying it with the front sight post - if you crank it up to 4x (or slightly less?), you shouldn't see the front sight post. I don't know at what lower power the post will appear (as anything other than a blurb), but I'd think you could adjust it @ 1x etc. (where you'll be using it as a red dot) to rest just over the front sight? Mine currently resides on a 22AR, which happens to be the first AR type rifle I've had without a fixed front sight post. I have an ACOG (4x) and the front sight post doesn't bother me a bit looking through it - the front sight post is almost translucent when looking thru the scope - I'd actually have to look for it in order to know it's there @ 4x.
73285
This Light will mount to any weapon with an MIL-STD-1913 (Picatinny) rail and/or any weapons with an Glock-style rail. So the short answer to your question is that if your 10/22 does not have a rail system you can't mounting this light.
2257673
It sits great. Problem is mine came canted. Checked on my WASR and Arsenal on both canted to the right same angle . I bought it to use with red dot so was able to fix it with that. I saw some people were complaining about rail being canted. I guess just my luck. Otherwise it sits nice and snug , very low above dust cover and holds zero. I hope that was helpful
575927
Well the rail is low, but you cannot see the iron sights like it said in the ad. I never put it on the gun, so I never got to the ring phase. I suspect any would work, it just a matter of your cheek weld and what is most comfortable.
1399451
It is a standard weaver, picatinny rail. I believe most Ruger 10-22 come with that style of rail, so it should fit fine.
1952613
Not sure, I have this mounted on a vepr 308 and it sits just left of center. However, you can still see the iron sights through the center of the rail and it DOES hold zero on my 308! Any of these type of side mounts will most likely be off to one side or the other because of the wide variety and differences in AK's but if you have a good scope that difference want matter at all. It's a great scope rail at the price, also the side rail comes off to save some weight as well.
200096
The type of rail you use will decide if the iron sights are usable. I have the Brass Stacker rail and yes, I can use the iron sights too.
935056
I don't know that I understand exactly your question, I bought two sets of these scope mounts, and put them on two Savage 64F rifles, with very little work, just basically tightening up the dovetail bolt and sighting in the scope, no other work was necessary for my set up. The see through base allows us to use the iron sights, or also use the scopes depending on the target we are using. I am happy with these mounts on the 22LR rifle, although I don't know anything about using them on a higher caliber rifle.
1011217
I have it on my 10/22 and it works well. Keep in mind it's a cheap scope, and remember to turn off the illumination.
1252852
The higher profile and hollow space beneath allow you to use the irons without having to remove the scope. Our model wasn't a takedown, but I believe those still use the same factory sights as other 10/22s.Whether your scope fits depends on the diameter of the scope. I had to wrap mine with duct tape to make up the difference because my scope tube was too small.
2002931
I don't believe you would even need the riser on the 10/22. I assume you would mount the picatanny rail or the rail which came with the rifle on top of the receiver and then the optic on top of the rail. This should give you the perfect sight alignment without the need of any riser.
871183
It should line up fine, but you need to ensure you have enough railspace and the mounts put them at the same height. However I really would not recommend putting this behind an already magnified scope. This is made for use behind a red dot or holographic, not a magnified scope. Hope this helps.
1553373
i haave a "henry" rifle ( in .22 rimfire ) that was pre drilled on top but it came with iron sights . i bought a rail with a 3/8"dovetail onit . problem was it had slots milled perpudicular on top . i purchased the accushot clamps you ask about , but the answer is yes it does . but i had to sift it forward or to the rear so the cross clamp bolts are located towards the bottom and i had to sift it so the bolts fit in the slots (slots are every 1/2" or so no troubles with eye relief . they are solid and i love them . i hope this helps .
1507541
The sights will work on Ruger 10/22. They are fantastic and shooting with them will make a difference. The rear sight is easy to install but I had to take my Ruger take down to a gun smith to have the old front sight removed and the new one installed. The cost was worth the benefits. I also installed flash suppressor on my 10/22 to make it look more militaristic. Hope that helps.