I have 18-300mm, lens Starfish works with me?
868095
I don't see why it would not work with your lens. My lens is a 70-200 mm. So with the Teleconverter on it, it extends out to 300 mm. So I want to say yes in your case. Good Luck!!!!
1637264
Your 55mm lens will require a 58mm filter size and your 300mm lens will require a 77mm filter size, both can be found here on amazon
1052624
See Amazon ad for lens bundle:http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B008DGO7Y8/ref=pd_aw_sbs_9?pi=SL500_SS115They have Canon EOS mount. Have fun.
672480
Quite possibly. It all depends on what kind of photography you do. It is the lens I use most, but I also have a long telephoto (500mm) and a Nikon 105mm micro lens, both of which I use for nature photography. The 18-300mm would probably more than cover what most people would need. Its quality and ease of use are first rate. The only down side is its size and weight which really aren't that bad, but should be kept in mind. It is considerably bigger and heavier than the "kit lenses" often sold with camera bodies.
2217647
The focal length is only 35 max, you don't need IS at this point. The further the focal length goes, the more you need IS. Don't worry.
44854
The focal of the lens (18-55mm) does not help you buy choose a filter. You need to get the OD (diameter) of your lens
175988
you want the 18-270 for a 1.6 crop camera...anyway that's what I'd recommend. I have an old 28-300 for a 1.6 Canon beautiful lens but no VC I don't know if they make this anymore but I took a lot of award winning shots with it email me if your interested :-)
1273541
I accont provide you with a catalogue number but you need a heavy dutty one. The lens is heavy and you need a stable platform to get clear pictures. Took some Moon shot using a borrowed tripod as my basic one was not useful
1270622
The 18-140mm lens is a very good lens. I did trade mine for a 16-85mm lens that fit my work better. Also I have used the18-200mm lens which is also a very good lens. I don't think you could go wrong with any of these lens. The choice remains on what you want from your lens.
916481
I have been very happy with the 18-200mm. It was my first lens and remains a workhorse. I have since acquired a 28-135mm as part of a used setup and have yet to try it - there's been no need as the 18-200mm exceeds it in range.
437147
Jose, I have a SX30 IS (52mm) and the kit came with the 52 to 58mm adapter. All the lens and filters are 58mm. I love my lens kit! Lat night I took a extreme close up shot of the beautiful full moon thanks to the HD Telephoto lens!
411602
the lens should work fine but it doesn't have o.i.s. if that will be important to you
2277703
Hi Kenneth, I am so sorry, but I don't know. Perhaps it might be good to enter your camera model in a search bar followed by eyepiece extender. I apologize if my response is very basic, but I'm hoping it might help.
1929219
Yes. To help you in the future, you have an "eos" , mount for your lenses. Anything that says eos mount will work.
1077496
You attach the lens to the canon lens already attached to your camera. I put the 18-55 lens on and screwed the fish eye lens onto that. It took me a while to figure it out! It's cool too.
1591360
Due to the size difference and the shape of the lense- I'm pretty sure it will not work.You need slightly bigger one.
1668186
Well, if you do not have the Tamron telephoto lens. I would say yes to 16-300MM but upgrade from 18-270mm is not worth it due to different is not day and night.