are these good cameras for taking indoor close-up pictures
879689
it takes good pictures indoors for close up pictures. it comes with a flash but the pictures come out good even with room lighting.
1869270
If you make sure to use the "Night Snapshot" mode and not the usual "Auto" mode, it's takes shots that are quite good. Also, I find that if you set the camera to "Manual" and have the ISO set to 200 and the +/- set to -2/3 with the colour setting on "Vivid" and the exposure set to "Center weighted", with a slightly steady hand, you can take good indoor shots without a flash.
293891
Yes they are color cameras, actually quite good in daylight conditions. At night infrared sensors take over and black and white images are captured. If there is a near enough light source some colors can be detected at night.
130731
This is one of the best cameras out there. This is a professional level camera, so you can do just about anything with it. Now if you want to take really close-ups buy a micro lens...the details will blow you away....
407527
My wife thinks this is an awesome camera, and I'm such a good husband for getting it for her. She is using it indoors for her eBay pictures, so to answer your question directly, yes we find it suitable. I've taken closeup pictures of things just a couple of inches away, thus it has a macro capability for very close work. My wife is very pleased with her FinePix, and had been grabbing it instead of her Canon SLR frequently.
31708
Dear Sir, really I didn't check it enough yet, but any way the non professional cam is little good indoor. Have a nice photos
1420052
I'm a neophyte but I've found it easy to use. I just redecorated my home and it took crisp shots of my interior. Buy a large memory card for it and a case as they're not included and you'd be good to go.
2156789
Any indoor video is relatively poor unless ample window light is present. I would say it is sufficient for capturing family moments but not for quality video. Personally I like the little camera.
682871
If you have a f/1.8 lens and decent lighting, yes, this thing is a beast indoors. Failing that, high ISO performance is good but not great, I wouldn't recommend going above 1000 if you can avoid it. I love this camera and for the price you can't do much better.
1382112
With much regret, this camera is not really suitable for high speed photography with flash. To take indoor, high speed pictures with flash requires an external flash unit that can flash the same brightness for each shot. In addition, the camera must be able to process the shot to the card. Assuming you may want 8 x 10's with reasonable sharpness, would require a camera in the $850 plus range, with a flash unit in the $350 plus range and shooting cards in the class 6+ range. However, this camera does take good quality, high speed pictures outdoors in bright light. As you increase the fps, the megapixels are reduced. For 30fps, it will take a good quality 4 x 6 picture.
653990
I found that it took better pictures in bright light or outside. Low indoor light provided the most challenges, when trying to get a good shot. I found the closer I was to the subject, the better the picture. There are modes you can use on the camera to compensate and enable you to get a good indoor photo. Good luck.
869834
If you're sure you need a reflex camera, then yes it's a very good choice. If you're not sure about it, see the compact cameras.
527677
This camera works well if you take some time to experiment with it, and learn how to adjust the settings for what you need. The "indoor" mode works much better for indoor photos than the auto mode. If you are outdoors, using Tv (shutter speed priority) can help solve many of the problems with capturing fast-moving subjects. Switching to aperture priority mode can help in cases of low light. The auto mode works great, if you are outdoors or in a very well-lit location and photographing subjects that don't move very quickly. This camera takes good (but not great) photos as far as IQ is concerned. If that is the main thing you are looking for, you might return this camera and choose one that has a larger sensor, such as the Canon S90 or S95, or even the G11/G12 or a Rebel. If you bought the camera primarily to take photos of fast-moving subjects indoors or in low light, the SX210 is not the best camera for the job. For this type of photography you should look at the Canon S90 or S95, or possibly even the SD4000, assuming you are only interested in a very small camera.
2086234
Well I do have this camera. And unlike the other review, one week after I got it, I had a wedding to go to in Florida. My pictures came out pretty darn good. In the reception hall, there was a couple of red eye pictures and some were darker than I liked, but overall I was satisfied. Plus, at the time I was still learning to use it. I've owned a Sony, Kodak, and now a Canon camera and I have to say the Canon is the best thus far. Indoor pictures are always tricky because of the lighting. I don't know how soon your wedding is, but my suggestion is to buy the camera, take a couple of pictures indoors with it see how they come out, and decide whether or not if you want to keep it. You can always return it if you don't like it.
286075
Yes, for all practical purposes the camera is for real. Look at the reviews. They are reflective of the camera. Sometimes people have a bone to pick about certain products.
930358
You can use pretty much any camera that has a BNC/RCA composite connection that is 720x480 resolution or less. Decent cameras for home use can be found for $50.00 or less. Do some research and pick cameras that fit your budget and needs best. Just remember, the old saying applies here... you get what you pay for.
585771
Good question. Unfortunately, I've only used it for a short period of time and that was always outdoors. It's probably enough wide angle for indoors, but not so sure how good it would be in low light situations like indoors, especially if you're using them for something so important like real estate photos. Wish I could be more help.