Has anybody ever compared this lens with SEL16F28 + VCLECF1 combination (Sony's fisheye converter)? I wonder if this one is superior... Thanks!
874720
There's no comparison. The 16mm with converter is as good a substitute as you will find, but cannot hold a candle to the Rokinon. The latter is better corrected across the frame, better designed (Samyang patent), and very, very sharp. But the 16mm gives you the equivalent of a 24mm on a 35mm format - which may be a more useful combination for some shooters. I have a 16-50 PZ that covers 16mm acceptably.
874721
The Rokinon is much sharper, especially in the corners. But beware, if you have a Sony NEX 7, your photos/video will have a slight bluish cast in the corners. Photos can be fixed with software like Cornerfix, and video must be tweaked with editing software to remove it. But otherwise, it's a bargain and a nice performer. Definitely better than Sony's fisheye adapter, which I used to own.
874722
I have not, but i would strongly expect a converer to smear detail on the corners. This lens, when focused properly, is very sharp in the corners. I use mine on a Fuji XE1 and now issues at all.
46360
May I ask what lens you went with? I am debating the same issue. Thank you.
1756270
No personal experience with the Tamron, but sure it is excellent as well. I really like my Sigma and have no issues with it at all. Look up Matt Granger on YouTube for an excellent comparison on Nikon, Sigma and Tamron versions of this lens.
1218645
I don't specifically know the answer to this, but would expect the fixed focus 50 mm to be considerably sharper, have better contrast etc. I have the used the Sonnar 1.8 which is the best single e-mount lens of all, spectacular results, but at ove $ 1,000 I guess that is what one would expect. Generally speaking I would avoid the SELp 1650 as I think it is trying to do too much in too tiny a package. After having had five lenses for my Sony Nex 7, I now rely almost entirely on the kit lens, which for compactness and ease of use suits me fine. For fancy stuff I rely on my Canon Eos as long as I can get someone to tote it around for me I don't specifically know the answer to this, but would expect the fixed focus 50 mm to be considerably sharper, have better contrast etc. I have the used the Sonnar 1.8 which is the best single e-mount lens of all, spectacular results, but at ove $ 1,000 I guess that is what one would expect. Generally speaking I would avoid the SELp 1650 as I think it is trying to do too much in too tiny a package. After having had five lenses for my Sony Nex 7, I now rely almost entirely on the kit lens, which for compactness and ease of use suits me fine. For fancy stuff I rely on my Canon Eos as long... » Read More I don't specifically know the answer to this, but would expect the fixed focus 50 mm to be considerably sharper, have better contrast etc. I have the used the Sonnar 1.8 which is the best single e-mount lens of all, spectacular results, but at ove $ 1,000 I guess that is what one would expect. Generally speaking I would avoid the SELp 1650 as I think it is trying to do too much in too tiny a package. After having had five lenses for my Sony Nex 7, I now rely almost entirely on the kit lens, which for compactness and ease of use suits me fine. For fancy stuff I rely on my Canon Eos as long as I can get someone to tote it around for me « Show Less
1794473
Without it being available yet it's hard to say just what exactly will be different quality wise. The new one will improve bokeh out of focus highlights at a price though. You will lose T-Stops (light transmission) For example 1.2 might give you the same light as f1.8-2. This is because the filter is a type of Neutral Density filter. For me I shoot low light and having that extra stop is important. The trade off combined with price just doesn't work. So what's more important to you? Bokeh quality or low light shooting? The 56mm is a fantastic lens in either version. Highly recommended!
1218644
I don't specifically know the answer to this, but would expect the fixed focus 50 mm to be considerably sharper, have better contrast etc. I have the used the Sonnar 1.8 which is the best single e-mount lens of all, spectacular results, but at ove $ 1,000 I guess that is what one would expect. Generally speaking I would avoid the SELp 1650 as I think it is trying to do too much in too tiny a package. After having had five lenses for my Sony Nex 7, I now rely almost entirely on the kit lens, which for compactness and ease of use suits me fine. For fancy stuff I rely on my Canon Eos as long as I can get someone to tote it around for me
1200245
I'm going to suggest a different question. Do you really want a newer version? I recently bought a used 300mm F4 for 950. Its sells new for around 1300. This lens has been due for replacement for quite some time. So i had to ask myself the same question you have, when will a replacement come out, because it is certainly overdue. Problem is, when it does come out, it will be of lesser build quality, it will remove the aperature ring(G lens), add VR, and cost well over 2000. While I would like the VR on this lens, is it worth the huge proce difference, and the reduced build quality. I also used the same logic on a 17-35 i just bought. So what I would suggest, is to judge the current lens on its merits. The only gripe I would have with this lens is that it is AF and not AF-s. It will be much cheaper than a new one, probably much better build quality, and who knows when a replacement might arrive.
1875727
Good question. Although the SEL 16F2.8 has a 49mm thread size, it should fit, but best to check with Sony or your local camera store. I believe Sony offers Zeiss UV filter which is dam good. I use it on my Alpha 6000
2118676
hihave to say . for the hype and good looks of this lens i was a tad unhappy and found it a bit soft .i have since sold it on . purchased the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 ( first verdion non VR which is optically better ! ) and WOW !! this lens never leaves my camera and is tak sharp and fast with great bokeh . No competition this tamron and the new tamron 70-300 VR are simply killers . The Tamrom 17-50mm f2.8 for the money is the best out there ( in my view )
1588007
I agree. This lense is great! I also got the fisheye and wide angle lense. The pics are awesome and really good quality.
1476282
Very strange, but they have the same lens listed twice! I was wondering this too..but they're the same lens. Sorry for the late response!
1813746
Cindy, I purchased an EA1 adapter and returned it. Although it was a nicely constructed adapter it caused me to loose 1F stop from an already slow lense and it did not carry forth full auto focus capabilities, only auto exposure. I'm still searching for better options. These appear to be the differences: AE1- Converts Sony A/ Minolta mount to E mount. Auto exposure but no or limited auto focus. AE2- Converts Sony A/ Minolta mount to E mount. Auto focus, auto exposure w/ transluecent mirror. AE3- Same as AE1 but updated model. AE4- Same as AE2 but updated model If you really want an EA 1 or 2 there are other internet suppliers that still have these in stock.
579923
I love that lens it's more comparable to a Ziess 85mm. The bokeh at 1.5 is awesome! I would highly recommend it over the canon 1.8
16592
Hi! For this model of Sony Camcorder, this one does not support attachment of a fish eye lens. Ely
1831371
There is a Fotodiox or chinese adapter for this lens to a Sony E mount but there are tradeoffs. First, there is no electronic control which means no AF, no Aperture adjustment, and no lems recognition. The second and more pressing issue is heavy vignetting/ blackout due to the image circle on this lens being designed for a Micro Four Thirds sensor vs a APS-C sensor. If you can live with that, it's a great lens.
968945
The manual focus version [PK(A) - NEX] works well, even the distance indication on the manual lenses is accurate, no vignetting. Also on tamron lens with PK ring. Can't vouch for this autofocus version but imagine it too would work.
1882801
I have the same Sony Nex5 and this len works as a charm. Just to make sure, this is a prime len, so there is not zoom on it, how ever the F value is pretty better than the stock (at least in my case) 18-55mm len