Why is this model (AUS6) more expensive than the AUA2 (which is adjustable)? I would think that the adjustable one would be slightly more expensive.
890520
I can't answer that, but I can tell you that for digging post holes it beats the heck out of traditional post hole diggers. Try calling Seymour meg.
890521
It's stronger and/because it is welded to form a cup which holds the clump together better, very little falls out and it is solid. The adjustable one has a little bar that is riveted to both plates at the bottom and allow it to change diameter, but the rivets and bar wear out very fast after a couple dozen holes and has to be refitted to function anew.
890522
Chris it appears that they are from different sellers. This probably accounts for the price difference.
890523
Hi, I just checked Amazon and at this moment, the AUA2 adjustable auger is $68.14; the AU-S6, the non-adjustable is $58.45. So the adjustable auger IS more expensive than the non-adjustable. Good luck!
890524
I use the Aus6, IT is good, enouhgt, i had drilled 41 Post hole (12 ft Deepth). I really Sony know about the reason.
1872735
NO. This model is not. Stanley does make an Adjustable model, about $58/pair. Amazon carries it. Remember, only one side of the adjustable model's legs is movable. Use Caution with it extended. Remember too, both types are plastic. Adjust accordingly. DEWinit.
1169326
I prefer the BTH6s to these, which I just returned to Amazon. The BTH3s have smaller ear cups so they press on my ears rather than surround them; since I wear glasses, the pressure ends up hurting the sides of my head after 30 minutes. Plus, the ear padding is much cushier on the BTH6s. That said, I wish the BTH6s would fold up like the BTH3s so that the storage case was flat rather than football-like. The cups on the BTH3s also rotate "left/right" so if your head would benefit from that kind of adjustment, bonus. On the other hand, the cups on the BTH6s rotate "up/down." I also prefer the aesthetics of the BTH3s since chrome isn't really my thing, especially when that "chrome" is plastic. The BTH6s sound nicer than the BTH3s. I'm being intentionally vague because I'm no audiophile; the best I can say is the sound is more substantial. (Though that may be because of the ear cup fit.) Ultimately, comfort trumps everything else for me. It doesn't hurt that the BTH6s dropped from $79.95 to 49.95, which makes them $10 less than the BTH3s. =)
192568
It's the aus8. They just came out with new line, so I'm fairly sure it's not on Amazon yet. Look for sku 27TLCS. The old aus8 sku I think was 27TLS
424151
No, they're not. They're different standards. If you look at the Steel Types on BladeHQ.com (http://www.bladehq.com/cat--Steel-Types--332) it really explains the difference. I prefer the AUS-6 as it has a slightly higher carbon content so it holds an edge better. It really doesn't matter unless you're going to sharpen the blade. Trust me, unless you are holding back mongol hordes or orcs, you won't want to sharpen this sword.
856563
The 6 is excellent...so is the 10. I've heard both as well. I think the real magic is happening in the bass module. I think it's the same for both the 6 and 10. If money is not a factor I would let the size of your entertainment space dictate your choice. You won't regret either choice.
1908822
nope, and personally I wouldn'tget the large one. I had the medium one and sold it to go smaller. the movements your arm has to make just to move the curser is enourmus. and it takes up a lot of desk real estate. people could rebuff this by saying you can tailor the active area to suit your needs. but then why would you pay for the big one when your just going to make it smaller anyway.
1083131
Hi De, I realize I had the name wrong of the one I just recommended to you. It's Aus Vio. Check it out.
578244
Hi, Hunter, I'm assuming we're talking about the ANC off situation.The overall SQ, UE 6000 is better than ATH-M50S in my opinion. The bass is actually slightly emphasized, but it's tighter and deeper compares with M50S. It's spacious and has clearer soundstage to me.By the way, it is surprisingly comfortable for long session listening. For the price on Amazon right now, I'll say it's a great timing to buy UE 6000.
1257505
I don't think they do price adjustments but you maybe could order it at the current price and return the more expensive one? I suggest contacting customer service first.
774784
They were built as a luxury set of headphones. The materials in the newer model are not as nice for the sake of making them cheaper. If cost is no issue, these are better, if you car about the $100, then the other set is nearly identical.
1407357
If you compare prices you'll find you can buy this upgraded unit for around the same price as the older unit if you're including shipping. In my case I didn't need $35 worth of stuff at this time... and this unit actually wound up costing me $2 less than the older one by the time shipping was paid. Pro-shopping... it's almost an artform. :D
47366
Can't say that I know, but I can tell you that it is not performing as well as the original, nor is it adjustable as the original one was. I'll probably be looking for a replacement soon! Regards, Susan
1403864
The more expensive model has two different firmness levels. The side with smaller cubes is more firm than the side with larger cubes. I find it helpful to switch when driving very long days.
28160
I still haven't seen a satisfactory answer to this question. All the comments suggest the UE is equal or superior to the Squeezebox yet no one has explained why the latter, an older model, is triple the price. You don't see a price drop this huge without some tradeoffs.
1369104
More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't... » Read More More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. « Show Less
1894900
I have no idea why the price difference. I have used mine quite a lot ,no signs of wear yet. I would say it is well made . Hope this helps you.