What's the different between the cv-2P10sc 10,500 and the sharp 10,500 ?
895644
I do not think they are different. Only the difference is possibly older model and newer model. With my experience, I satisfy on all Sharp models. They run very quietly and they are very reliable, except the new one, New SHARP CV10CTXB 10,000 BTU that I do not have experience.
626653
The camera has the exact same image sensor as the D80 and A100, so the 'native' image quality is the same, as you will find if you shoot RAW and process in the same converter (e.g. Adobe Camera Raw). Thus, any differences are simply in the built-in JPEG processor and its settings. What Phil Askey at DPReview.com found is that the K10D's image processor chooses to not apply that much sharpening to the image in its default 'Natural' setting. Even turning the sharpening parameter to its maximum in this mode does not produce a very sharpened image. However, the K10D also has another mode, 'Bright'. This mode boosts the saturation and sharpening to provide pleasing consumer-quality JPEGs 'out of the box'. On Pentax' cheaper cameras, 'Bright' is the default. I think Pentax expects that more serious photographers prefer a less enhanced image that's more suitable for post-processing, so that's the default mode. If you'd rather have a consumer-type bright, sharpened image, 'Bright' mode is available. As far as I can tell, 'Bright' images are comparable to out-of-the-camera JPEGs from Sony Alpha and Nikon. As to image noise, the K10D JPEG processor controls noise better than the A100 but not as much as the D80. However, it also retains more detail. From what I've seen, the K10D exceeds the A100 in JPEG quality; whether you prefer the D80 or K10D depends on your noise-handling preference. The XTi has a sensor that's a little better at ISO 1600 than the Sony sensor used by the others. However, I personally prefer the color and overall image look of the other cameras, and the build quality of all three Sony-sensor cameras is better than the XTi.
722135
The DCR SR300 has a CMOS sensor, the DCR SR100 has the CCD. That could account for the difference. I doubt that quality is as bad as Frank seems to find it. I am waiting on a camcorderinfo.com review before I buy but with the Lux rating being better for the DCR SR300 there is no reason why it should be so disappointing.
2134283
I'm sorry I do not know. You can compare the two brands. I like the Nikon for my Nikon camera myself and found a refurbished one (with a warranty) for a good price and it has been just fine! Actually now that I think about it, I did have the Bower for a while or one similar before I bought the Nikon. it was OK. Did what it was supposed to do. And it was cheaper than the Nikon. But I sold the Bower and got the Nikon. I just like it better but doesn't mean the Bower isn't good. Just your choice of course! Hope this helps!
259060
I am not 100% positive but from what little research I have done it appears that the stands are identical. The difference in the two packages is that the sp5000 includes a green screen whereas the sp2000 is support only with no green screen included.
224165
http://www.5min.com/Video/Portrait-Photography-Tips-72416664 The main difference is the working distance from the subject. The video I posted will help you better understand. The 85mm has better bokeh also.
155370
From what I have read, the only difference is the zoom ability and a tripod. This is what I read on another website so I really don't have any conclusive information.
1309340
The 3100 is the first version of the tool. The 3100c is actually better than the 3100 was. This is the latest version.
153438
I think the 4490 is the predecessor of the V500. Spec-wise, the 4490 is more similar to the V300. Spend the extra few bucks and save yourself the headache of not having ICE to scan your negatives.
2140676
If that was the only difference between the two versions, I would say the answer would be 'no' - but I believe that the VC lens has a better (up-to-date) lens elements than its older version.
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.
1418436
Suggest you call 1-800-237-4277 for Sharp Customer information. They've answered all my questions so far and I'm sure they will help you. I find that it's more powerful than my previous Sharp, but am liking it a lot.
141614
I am looking at the same two televisions. Unfortunately I can't help you with your question because it's mine too! Have you made a decision yet? I am going to check with Sharp, I will post the info for you if I get anywhere. Good Luck.
1438108
I don't think there is any difference, or any such camera. I ordered the D3 and received the D2 apparently. I hadn't noticed that until you asked. Some PT cameras pan around endlessly without having to reverse. This one does not. There is a blind spot in the rear where the camera mounts. There is no D3 listed on their website Loftek.com, but the D1 is without the IR lights.
834111
The DVT3000 and -3200 look identical, and the user manual lumps all of the 3000 series together. So the user interface is identical in both. I suspect the only difference in the 3200, which is no longer listed on Philips' site, is the Dragon software. I have not used my 3000 a lot, but it does a pretty good job picking up sound - the playback is about as clear as your ear hears the original if there is not a lot of background noise, such as in a restaurant. I have recorded my mom with the 3000 on the table in front of us, and the clarity is very good. My wife's boss uses one for dictation at work, and it works great for that. If there are any technical differences in specs between the 3000 and 3200, I doubt you could tell the difference when using it.
900440
Hi, I recently bought a Nikon S9100 and it brought a small paper starting guide, but the real manual came as a PDF 200-page document in a CD, so I printed it both sides at home and now I have a very complete and well designed manual which I'm reading slowly chapter by chapter in order to take most advantage of this camera. I owned a Sony Cybershot P-73 for 7 years and now I have a lot of new functions to learn (face detection, focus moving subjects, 18X optical zoom, stabilizing image, and so on). Regarding the functions, this camera is in the midway between a small P&S; cameras and it's worth to carefully read the manual and practice, practice and practice a lot!! Hi, I recently bought a Nikon S9100 and it brought a small paper starting guide, but the real manual came as a PDF 200-page document in a CD, so I printed it both sides at home and now I have a very complete and well designed manual which I'm reading slowly chapter by chapter in order to take most advantage of this camera. I owned a Sony Cybershot P-73 for 7 years and now I have a lot of new functions to learn (face detection, focus moving subjects, 18X optical zoom, stabilizing image, and so on). Regarding the functions, this camera is in the midway between a small P&S; cameras and it's... » Read More Hi, I recently bought a Nikon S9100 and it brought a small paper starting guide, but the real manual came as a PDF 200-page document in a CD, so I printed it both sides at home and now I have a very complete and well designed manual which I'm reading slowly chapter by chapter in order to take most advantage of this camera. I owned a Sony Cybershot P-73 for 7 years and now I have a lot of new functions to learn (face detection, focus moving subjects, 18X optical zoom, stabilizing image, and so on). Regarding the functions, this camera is in the midway between a small P&S; cameras and it's worth to carefully read the manual and practice, practice and practice a lot!! « Show Less
350716
There are both optical and mechanical improvements in the new model. I wish I had the new one, but there isn't enough of a difference to justify the cost to me. The CPC1100 does the job I need.