Is this better than the atlas id
1492515
I have heard complaints that the Atlas ID has issues with both the touch screen sensitivity and with the touch ID function. This case has fewer issues with the touch screen as has the standard thick screen protector that Otterbox users know and love from the Defender, and the touch ID works better than in the Atlas.
1492516
Hi,. I'm sorry, this was gift so I'm not sure. Sorry I couldn't be of more help
1844990
The short answer is that the 810 is better. The 510 lacks the ability to display maps for your course and do true turn by turn navigation. It does show you courses downloaded onto the unit but doesn't show precisely where you are if you decide to go somewhere off that course. If you're carrying a smart phone it's less of an issue since you can link both the 510 and 810 to maps on your phone. Both units are about the same in terms of looking at your route post-ride. The Garminconnect site, or others like mapmyride will let you slice and dice the data and let you see where you were. The websites are also where you will plan your route. You can't practically plan a route on the 810 itself. I've had the 810 for quite a while now and all-in-all I'm quite satisfied.
2283131
Very good question.. I just tried it and it scanned my license flawlessly! Hope that helps.
2150387
I have both the Harris and the Atlas. The Harris is a good basic bi-pod for bench rest or prone shooting under controlled conditions. In short, the Atlas is extremely heavy duty, rugged, and made of superior materials. I have also had the GG&G; extreme duty bi-pod, which I would rank 2nd after the Atlas. Bottom line, the Atlas and the GG&G; are built to endure military combat duty while the Harris is not. Hope this helped.
1294498
Im not sure. But i do not recommend this one. I put so much info on it and one day it just wouldnt work. It woukd spin but no lights or anything on the screen. Had to pay 50$ to get the files off if it. I say spend that extra 50 now and buy a WD passport. Works like a charm.
929491
I use my nuvi 2797 instead of my car gps. It is much easier to use and better. Plus free updates for life whereas my car gps wants 250 bucks to upgrade. The nuvi can also show weather in the area you are traveling. I have logged over 3000 miles with my nuvi and it is great. Now, in some mountain areas it was slow and lagged a bit in showing your location especially if you make a quick change off of the route, but it will still get you where you want to go and will not get you lost. My car gps sucks.
1734802
That I don't really know. I was considering the Rand McNally but wanted to stay with Garmin
1086162
My subscription ran out this spring so if the areas I saved were updated I didn't notice an improvement. I can still view maps I had saved during my subscription. The quality isn't as good as googlemaps.com but considering the price I paid I felt they were worth it. It does make things better than looking at a plan topo map.
1597411
Not sure, I'm a beginner with experience with a cheaper brand. After using this model I must admit my old metal detector "toraso cultus" is much easier to use and detects just as deep. I'm not certain the price gives me that much more of a detector. I'm still learning it but am becoming a little frustrated.
2041090
I actually returned this HD. Wasn't reliable and would read on and off. I had a Mac though.I prefer the passport 2TB. Much smaller/more reliable
336334
I had the TomTom ONE 3rd edition and got the Nuvi 200 today. The TomTom's graphics are crappy but thats about it. In short, everything else is much better in the TomTom. Buy the TomTom. Nuvi 200 is missing a lot of things that the TomTom has.
518108
That was the easy part for me. The scan worked well, but the retrieval of it for filing is slow slow slow. Honestly, I have gone back to my Epson GT-S50 - its fast and I scan to my gmail drive so it puts it in the cloud. I do have the small NeatConnect scanner and I like that for travel, but the NeatConnect - I would save your money
1621835
Hey Michael, I compared the two but wasn't able to notice any difference. I have the version II and it works great. For the record, I've used the Z finder and this one is on par with it. I'm assuming that the new one has some minor fixes or changes, but I can't really tell the difference. Best of luck!
1710946
It does but you will have to have an sd card (not included) to install both us and canada. 1 or the other will fit on the built in memory but not both. Btw, hang onto your atlas. It's not bad for the price but you can't trust it 100%. I always double check the route.
2220138
If you live in a rural area, I've found the Tele Atlas maps in TomTom products to be much more accurate. Metropolitan areas are a toss-up between the two, depending on which city you're in, but my TomTom definitely works better in rural settings. GPS reception seems to be a bit better as well.
2215917
If you have a free topo map you like, there is no reason to spend the extra money.Now the 650 is a Great upgrade as it has rechargeable batteries and an 8 mp camera.
1470417
It takes a subscription to those maps. My Tom Toms have not had those. I have use them now for four or five years on myservice truck fleet without any trouble Then I had one go bad in less than a year and wrote a less than favorable review. Tom Tom then answered with instructions to maybe take care of this and after sending the info I never heard from them again. This confirms some of the nightmares I read in the Amazon reviews. I have since purchased a Garmin that I like much better. My advice don't buy a Tom Tom.