Why does it say that the output resolution is 1080p when it only projects 800 x 480 in reality? Is this some sort of trickery??
1515591
It can process 1080p resolution, but not project it. So, yes, it's trickery.
762583
It may be the monitor you have plugged in :) mine caps out at 1680 x 1050 ///// try plugging it into a hdmi tv :)
385703
I've been using it in my monitor native resolution, which is 1920X1080. As it is a digital cable, I see no reason why it wouldn't work at higher resolutions, but haven't tried it.
1110865
Yes, it will show a 720p because it is 720p monitor :) 1080p IPS field monitors are way more expensive.
351756
Was only able to go up 1080P@60hz by default ... I am using a gtx 670 for the test.I did a custom resolution through nv control panel and it actually go up to 2560x1440 but it didn't look good at all. DVI and DisplayPort seem to have no issues with it.
2145764
Micheal Meyer is correct. Mine works fine at 1080P over VGA from the 360. Just got to get rid of the not supported message. See my reply to the post "X-Box 360 1080p doesnt work with this TV"
1823569
1600x900 on the machine screen itself BUT if you connect it to a 1920x1080p monitor or tv through micro hdmi port on the right... it will adjust to 1080P on that monitor/tv !!! That was a surprise for me.
561931
According to the manual on Panasonic's site you can set the player's output to 720p on HDMI or Component. It also seems to have an "Auto" setting for HDMI (I gather the TV will tell the player what it supports and it will pick the "best"). I don't own this player (yet... thinking about it) but since my own projector is 720p native yet supports (ie transcodes) 1080i, I'll probably wind up trying the two options (on any player I buy) to see which looks the best... no sense transcoding those bits too many times.
1111360
Over VGA, you are limited to a maximum resolution of 1024x768. I have tried going further but have had no luck; if anyone has had success, please tell. Over DVI and HDMI you should be able to output 1080p, I think. If you are using it to just display photos, I think 1024x768 would be fine. Also note that with the fullscreen (4:3) resolutions, you will have black bars on both sides of the picture.
1119289
IT DOESN'T ! It allows the display to show video encoded as 1080p but does not display it as 1080p (1920x1080). it isn't even truelly 720p(1280x720) The display is 1080x600 so a conversion of the data from 1920x1080 is performed to downscale the video to 1080x600. On a device this small you may be able to notice the difference. But it will be quite watchable. The difference of 1080p to 720p to lesser formats are like the difference between lossless audio and mp3 for music files, most people don't notice what's missing (lost) and enjoy it all the same.
1046006
So while HD4000 is more than capable of displaying 2560x1440 the screen doesn't use the faster implementation of HDMI. This means that you can only display full resolution at 30HTz instead of the standard 60. From experience this feels very fuzzy and probably not worth the trouble. 1080P runs fine on HDMI but to get full res you need either dual-dvi or displayport.EDIT: After doing some reading I realized I gave some incorrect data. The screen is speced to be able to run HDMI1.4 which is good enough to run full resolution. If you are using a computer with HDMI1.3 you will be stuck at 30HTz like I explained above. So while HD4000 is more than capable of displaying 2560x1440 the screen doesn't use the faster implementation of HDMI. This means that you can only display full resolution at 30HTz instead of the standard 60. From experience this feels very fuzzy and probably not worth the trouble. 1080P runs fine on HDMI but to get full res you need either dual-dvi or displayport.EDIT: After doing some reading I realized I gave some incorrect data. The screen is speced to be able to run HDMI1.4 which is good enough to run full resolution. If you are using a computer with HDMI1.3 you will be... » Read More So while HD4000 is more than capable of displaying 2560x1440 the screen doesn't use the faster implementation of HDMI. This means that you can only display full resolution at 30HTz instead of the standard 60. From experience this feels very fuzzy and probably not worth the trouble. 1080P runs fine on HDMI but to get full res you need either dual-dvi or displayport.EDIT: After doing some reading I realized I gave some incorrect data. The screen is speced to be able to run HDMI1.4 which is good enough to run full resolution. If you are using a computer with HDMI1.3 you will be stuck at 30HTz like I explained above. « Show Less
2102008
It does not change the output to be 720p. It only converts the signal to HDMI. The quality is the same as a regular component cable.
2103664
To the best of my knowledge the highest resolution is 1440x1080p which when played back is reported as 1920x1080p. It's not true 1080p but it's better than 720p and honestly it looks pretty damn good, with decent lighting of course.
1856724
Hi Felicia! I think I had the same problem when I started for the first time the projector...I have windows 8 in my notebook..I needed to adjust the resolution at Control panel. Or maybe check the configurations at projetor menu. I hope you solve your problem, if not, let me know. =)
1228068
Your computer should have a better video card so that it can make an output resolution of 4K (3840x2160) and also use a HDMI cable rated for 4K. (I have not checked it)
1110868
It is supposed to display 1080p, but I have found that it is not quite that resolution, i think it is 720p. Any video is still recorded in 1080p, however. This field monitor works fine for the recording of HD video, but not for editing. If you want 1080p, get ready to empty your wallet!
1772474
Yes, to get full resolution on this display, you want to use Dual-link DVI or the display port. The HDMI port is only 1080, but... it will still look good on this display because it also displays a native 1080p resolution automatically