Are the reviews raving about both versions? Which one is the best? (Refresh &amp; Sensitive)
169328
Sensitive seems to be a tad better shave. Smell is good. If you use the sensitive posts have balm it is very good. The green stripe in a shaving creme tube is my preference, the smell of that eucalyptus is intoxicating in the morning. The green aftershave is just as good. So try both to see your preference.
766159
I do not know the difference between gentle and standard; I use the standard version and it is perfect for me. Sorry that's all I can offer.
1932944
The slow version moves very little, just enough for most system to realize that there's movement and it doesn't really impact normal use. You can see the cursor jerk back and forth by just a few pixels when you're watching it. The fast version moves a lot and makes it very difficult to use the computer when the jiggler is active, but some systems need the extra movement.
770885
Hot is definitely newer, sleeker but my diablo serves the function perfectly, my only complaint would be the view seems a little blurry compared to some others i have tried, but i dont see anything on the Hot that would fix that. to sum up, by last years model and save the $, or pay the extra for the newest model
1313017
Had to look up what stick and refresh is, looks like the only difference is set and refresh sits on a surface and stick and refresh 'sticks' to a surface! Bet the set and refresh fits both!
1864398
From friends of mine who've had both (and also advised me to purchase this product. The number of upgrades are quite numerous and some of the best ones are subtle (like huge improvements to the interaction of strokes to emulate a real brush/pen feel for example.) From where I am sitting, I would say that it is very much worth the upgrade. In case you're still curious as to what all is actually different, here's a link to a list of what each version has. http://manga.smithmicro.com/comparison.html
45924
Go for the + - it is the updated and expanded version and you should be able to buy it for about $299 if you shop well. It has everything the original has and MORE!
285035
Hi, I found no difference whatsoever! I alternate between the 2 of them depending on which one is cheaper! Hope that helps! :)
1670898
I wish I could be of help, taking into consideration that I have only used the developer edition and not the standard version, I cannot say which is better, but if your not into high tech app software development, I don't you will be needing the developer edition and I don't you would even notice the difference, hope this helps.Cheers.
1118342
David, you should keep an eye on nikonrumors [dot] comThey monitor all of the word on the street. Current consensus is that there is not going to be a refresh for the D700 this year.I have owned one for a year and a half, and am absolutely thrilled with it. I will keep it for a very long time. The overall sensor performance (low-light, etc.) is still one of the best in the world. see dxomark [dot] com
551559
UPDATE TO THIS ISSUE: I went to Acer's Store (it's on your desktop unless you've deleted it), clicked on Tech Support and then Email Support. If you complete the form there and write a brief message, the site will come up with suggestions on the erratic cursor. I forget how it was labeled but it shows in a different window just how to adjust the sensitiviity settings to eliminate the issue most of us are experiencing! Try it, I think you'll be happy with the results.
283083
I use it on my touch screen PC and really like it. So many people love to whine about how difficult it is....not really, it is just different and a person needs to learn it. There is a free 8.1 upgrade available through Microsoft to take care of some of the concerns out there. I personally have not noticed a big difference. The way you access a Start screen is a little different and the graphics page allows access to anywhere you want to go, but it is very easy to get to the desktop you are used to. I am still learning all the features.
2269901
Yep, the old interface works just fine. I was just hoping to get the new hardware for the turn arrow, faster screen refresh and the zoom buttons both on the right side of the screen which is easier to use IMHO. No problems acquiring sats, I think the old hardware is just as sensitive. Thanks
1617974
Wow I never have Spoken to an actual goddess before. So I better get this right:)To be very honest I'm not sure of everything. But I know it has higher resolutions and more points of aim. The high speed shutter rate is faster. Reading some of the other reviews people have said that the motion tracking is much better on this one. But I've never used the 65.Hope it helps.
277463
I saw the lower numbered models at Frys this weekend. They didnt have the L117FX/B. I played around with it briefly and the touch screen was more responsive than the HP all-in-one model. All the HP's had Vista and DVD drives for about the same price as the Sony, which had blu-ray and Windows 7. Although I dont think I would use the touch screen much (don't like the smudged screens), I did like the look and build of the Sony. Everything seemed to be built a bit better than the HP. I can't wait for the reviews to come out...
1565643
I never compared the two versions, I used the first edition only because it's more compact, light, less expensive, has built in shade what I really like. I use only on Fuji cameras without worries. I heard the version two also have purple fringing issues with some cameras but visible only on large images, also fringing is easy to fix with the latest softwares like Lightroom. I shoot almost exclusively B&W; so color fringing don't bother me so much. V2 might be more corrected but I can't tell.
804863
Hello, I remember choosing between the two as well. What I found out is it was the same (tray load). Its lower price is due to the fact that it doesn't come with the Multimedia Suite, which I didn't want anyway.