Are there differences between this and the SSC-1000A and the SSC-1500A besides charge rate? Why are they SSC and this only SC?
1487966
There a few small differences with these three chargers. The SC-1200A is the lowest end then the SSC-1000A is in the middle with the SSC-1500 as the highest end. The SC model is a speed charger and will charge at a selectable rate of 3A or 12A. And the battery types it will charge is STD and AGM. The SSC models are a Ship n Shore Speed chargers. They will charge 3 types of batteries, STD (low maintenance/ maintenance free), AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat construction) and GEL (very deep cycle application batteries). The 1000 model will charge at 2A, 6A, or 10A as a selection choice. Where the 1500 model will charge at the rate of 3A or 15A, whichever is selected. Hope this answers your questions.
1487967
There a few small differences with these three chargers. The SC-1200A is the lowest end then the SSC-1000A is in the middle with the SSC-1500 as the highest end. The SC model is a speed charger and will charge at a selectable rate of 3A or 12A. And the battery types it will charge is STD and AGM. The SSC models are a Ship n Shore Speed chargers. They will charge 3 types of batteries, STD (low maintenance/ maintenance free), AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat construction) and GEL (very deep cycle application batteries). The 1000 model will charge at 2A, 6A, or 10A as a selection choice. Where the 1500 model will charge at the rate of 3A or 15A, whichever is selected. Hope this answers your questions. There a few small differences with these three chargers. The SC-1200A is the lowest end then the SSC-1000A is in the middle with the SSC-1500 as the highest end. The SC model is a speed charger and will charge at a selectable rate of 3A or 12A. And the battery types it will charge is STD and AGM. The SSC models are a Ship n Shore Speed chargers. They will charge 3 types of batteries, STD (low maintenance/ maintenance free), AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat construction) and GEL (very deep cycle application batteries). The 1000 model will charge at 2A, 6A, or 10A as a selection choice. Where the 1500... » Read More There a few small differences with these three chargers. The SC-1200A is the lowest end then the SSC-1000A is in the middle with the SSC-1500 as the highest end. The SC model is a speed charger and will charge at a selectable rate of 3A or 12A. And the battery types it will charge is STD and AGM. The SSC models are a Ship n Shore Speed chargers. They will charge 3 types of batteries, STD (low maintenance/ maintenance free), AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat construction) and GEL (very deep cycle application batteries). The 1000 model will charge at 2A, 6A, or 10A as a selection choice. Where the 1500 model will charge at the rate of 3A or 15A, whichever is selected. Hope this answers your questions. « Show Less
1487968
i got the Sc 1200 model very good charger , also can EQ. all cells . this charger only good for 12 vol. car and boat too.
1487969
Looks like its just the output amps, the SC-1200A/CA doesnt do Gel cell batteries but the SSC-1000A and 1500A do. I got the 1200 as that fit my needs and I must say its an awesome charger.
552348
The LC-s is a spin casting rod while the LC-c is a bait casting rod. Both good rods its just your preference on bait or spin cast
1652913
I'm not an authority, but I think you are right. I looked at other sites that sell it. ASUS site was no help, as it does not separate the sub-models. As far as I can tell, the DS02 is just the DS03, but at a price difference. Maybe there is some small internal change that is invisible to the end user, but justifies a slightly different model number.
679197
Don't know if you are asking me or amazon, but if you read my review, there is an answer. I noted that I did not buy my sc 79 thru amazon. Pioeneer states they do not honor elite warranty thru online retailers, so that would be your answer
57918
Full disclosure: I sell La Crosse products as well. The La Crosse BC-700 has been sold in it's present form for well over a decade. The La Crosse BC-1000 has come from other chargers but is the same basic charger with higher current capability and packaged with accessories. They have been tested in the market place and have good customer acceptance. They do have some issues however. Both can miss full charge condition with some cells and continue to overcharge. This is in my opinion due to the lack of resolution in the -dV detection circuits, most probably related to ADC resolution. The BC-1000 can overheat when charging 4 cells at maximum current of 1000 mA each. Those are the two biggest issues that I see with those chargers. From testing I tell tell you that the C2000 charger never misses -dV full charge detection. Now having said that I am sure someone somewhere will be able to find a cell to charge that will cause it to miss full charge detect but I have never seen it in all of the testing done. This charger does not have any heat issues charging 4 cells at maximum current 1000 mA. It does not even come close to thermal limits in that situation. Couple that with an easy to use interface, large back lighted display, and extra capabilities to do C & D cells as well. My choice is the OPUS C2000 between those chargers. For more information read the excellent reviews posted by some very knowledgeable posters.
1483038
The battery. The 1000 has a ni-cad battery. The 2000 has a li-on. The chargers are not cross compatable. Go with the 2000. The battery are so much better.
896372
The difference are the batteries, the charger has the same model # BQ-CC17.The "pro" batteries have a capacity of 2450mAh but only 500 recharge cycles, the "non pro" batteries have a capacity of 2000mAh but the famous ____2100____ recharge cycles. The charger is slow, but that is the method Panasonic uses to get 2100 cycles. So it is a trade off, more power for the same time period, 25% more, (or same power for 25% longer) but at 500 recharge cycles versus 2100 cycles. Hope that helps CC
1898950
There is no difference between the two at all... The CC is for clean and charge, which simply means it comes with the cleaning base. It's an old notation, which I believe Braun has dropped, so the model number is 9595, not 9595CC. BTW, the difference between the 9585 and the 9595 is the LCD (which is located on the back end of the unit).
1357277
I have the spec-01 and i'd been looking at the 02 , but from what I can tell, the only differences are that the spec-02 has an extra front USB 3.0 jack,a dust filter on the bottom for the power supply and built in support for slim SSD's(this can easily be fixed on the spec-01 with a 3.99 ssd adapter. If you can spare the extra 10 dollars you might as well go for the spec-02 , But i am extremely happy with the 01
610950
The SC-600A is the one I have and is a great slow charger take a while to charger a dead battery. The one you have is good so I would keep it.
990530
Not much difference as this charger charges Ni-Cad as well as lithium ion batteries also. This charger is only available with some combo kits as Sears does not sell this one individually. Works great though!
1508033
I have used the Schumacher SSC-1000A Speed Charger and it works fine -- costs about $45 from Amazon. It is a 12 volt charger with different amp settings for how fast you need to recharge.Richard O answered on March 1, 2015
1693258
I could never tell the difference from product descriptions and even an online chat session with a CS rep. I ended up buying the 895 since it was a but less expensive than the 870 and it has a charging station and travel case that the 870 doesn't have. I have been happy with it so far.
1336411
In my experience they have about the same range. They both use the same motor and battery. The only difference is that the SS motor is factory set to run up to 28 mph. If you were to put both bikes on a flat surface and run them at max you would go a few miles further with the SS. But rarely do you run at full throttle all the time when riding normally. Kind Regards Jack
2209806
One difference is the battery location. The battery charger is different. Other than that any other differences are so minimal that it is not even worth mentioning. If you have used the wg150 model you will be happy with the wg152 model.
193119
the one I got is the old SCC-100C. I lost my charger and can't use it - only used it once, a year ago! lol....guess I'll buy another, but I'll look for that new model. thanks
215176
Thanks for your good question. If you order an SCNC3706 directly, it comes from our inventory at Amazon. Amazon gets such good discounts from UPS, FedEx, and USPS that the shipping cost is insignificant, and for items over a certain price nothing is charged to the customer. (Free shipping, yay!) When you order the SCNC3606, we can only provide the free upgrade to the newer SCNC3706 by shipping it from our own warehouse, because there is no easy way to tell Amazon to provide a free upgrade to the next higher model. The difference in shipping method causes the $10.87 difference in shipping cost. In summary: it is the same new camera, and it's best to order the SCNC3706 directly to take advantage of Amazon's discounted shipping. We wish we could simply put a link in the listing for the SCNC3606 to direct customers to the new model, but Amazon listings don't work that way, so we're trying to provide the best value to our customers with the tools that Amazon provides. Does this make sense ?