What is the difference between difference between CX 300B MK II and CX 300 II? are both same? which one is good?
1505274
Hello Subhakar, the difference between this two senheiser, well both are the same, both sound amazing, great bass response. Check the senheiser webpage, you will find the details. For me, both models are the same in sound. try the cx 300b mk ii. Take care, rock on.
1505275
They're the same, "B" is the designation for black (the other color available at one point was silver).
1423913
As others have answered, yes, as far as I can determine, these are simply different ways of noting Sony's RX 100-M2 (or Sony RX100-2, or RX-100-II) This is the second version of the Sony RX 100, with some nice improvements. Enjoy it!
871031
I personally believe buying the BNF and the DX6i works a lot better I had issues withe the start up of the quad copter and trimming the controls. The DX6i has a monitor that you can see the trim. Also you can store 10 models in the controller. I use the DX6i with my nano QX for practice it's a lot cheaper than wrecking the 350
933268
The Sennheiser CX 300 II is much much much better quality. From the number, it is different...LOL (and 300 is version "2", unlike 215 :l)If you were to buy 215 from Sennheiser, you pay 39.95If you were to buy 300 II from Sennheiser, you pay 59.95.http://en-us.sennheiser.com/earbuds-in-ear-headphones-cx-215http://en-us.sennheiser.com/noise-cancelling-earbuds-headphones-cx-300-ii-precisionOnly reason CX 300 ii is cheaper here is cause Amazon is nice :)CX 300 ii is the way to go for under 30 dollars ^^ (a bit more is Soundmagic, Klipsch, Shure and the like but ehh xD ) The Sennheiser CX 300 II is much much much better quality. From the number, it is different...LOL (and 300 is version "2", unlike 215 :l)If you were to buy 215 from Sennheiser, you pay 39.95If you were to buy 300 II from Sennheiser, you pay 59.95.http://en-us.sennheiser.com/earbuds-in-ear-headphones-cx-215http://en-us.sennheiser.com/noise-cancelling-earbuds-headphones-cx-300-ii-precisionOnly reason CX 300 ii is cheaper here is cause Amazon is nice :)CX 300 ii is the way to go for under 30 dollars ^^ (a bit more... » Read More The Sennheiser CX 300 II is much much much better quality. From the number, it is different...LOL (and 300 is version "2", unlike 215 :l)If you were to buy 215 from Sennheiser, you pay 39.95If you were to buy 300 II from Sennheiser, you pay 59.95.http://en-us.sennheiser.com/earbuds-in-ear-headphones-cx-215http://en-us.sennheiser.com/noise-cancelling-earbuds-headphones-cx-300-ii-precisionOnly reason CX 300 ii is cheaper here is cause Amazon is nice :)CX 300 ii is the way to go for under 30 dollars ^^ (a bit more is Soundmagic, Klipsch, Shure and the like but ehh xD ) « Show Less
1700501
the 330 got much better reviews than the 340- I was going to buy the 340 but instead bought the 330 which I love so much I bought a second one as a spare- pics are awesome!
1116912
Yes. I've been shooting a Mk II since December '08. When I fired up my new Mk III a few months ago, the difference was quite evident. The Mk II was ok for tripod portrait work, but it offered a challenge, partly my fault, when shooting flying crows with AI-Servo.
2060350
i can not give you the best answer here because i have not used the px 200 ii i but looking at a picture and the technical specs, the look like a closed ear design as opposed to my px 100 ii i which are open air design. I think the px 200 ii i might not sound as good at the higher frequencies or may sound muffled compared to the px 200 ii i, and looking at the frequency ranges of the two headphones, px 100 ii i looks like it can reach higher frequencies than the px 200 ii i. The closed design of the px 200 ii i should provide better noise isolation though
695886
I have them both. The 300 is a bit quieter, however, it requires filter replacements much more often (3-5 year vs 1 year). Therefore, which is more important to you?
1185712
The Professional 300 is the same as the 750 except for the presets on the dial. 300 has only numbers 1-10 -- all you really ever need :-) Awesome Blender.
956545
VX-2 has a different coating inside and is a better product. VX-3 has an even better coating.
695887
Have them both,each is good, filters are high on the50250-s, 300 takes less room, like the 300 better
2151080
One is 3x-9x power/zoom, the other is 4x-12x power/zoom. There is no advantage as they are both vx-2, however, one of them zooms further than the other.
394405
The only difference is that the UFM 222 BL is made of a heavy duty nylon, while the UFM 300 BX is pleather/leather---not really sure. Both are weighted, have adjustable snaps for a better view, slits for charger and the Velcro type attachment...
1394408
Having owned both, I can say that the Mark II has a better ink management system (uses less of it) as well as other physical refinements. I think I get more accurate color with it as well. It is a better printer, in my opinion.
1707170
I could not find a difference so I went with the cheaper lens and it has been very good. Since I don't have the II to compare I can't say for sure.. My only complaint on this lens is that the focus motor is noisy when shooting video On the canon 5i.. that could be a problem with all the lens.
1466614
Yes. I like this model because it takes up less counter space than the 300 model. If you don't apply the kiddie decals, the only real difference between models is that the 300 is blue & white...this one is green & white.
1116908
I can't make a comparison with the Mk II since I've never owned one but I've used a 7D for three years and the Mk III AF is noticeably faster plus is has the availability of more focus points.