I have an Adaptec 19160, and outside of the PCi v PCie slots, what is the difference between the 2248700 and the 19160?
1494196
The difference in slots is probably the most significant difference. However the Adaptec 29320 (2248700) differs from your 19160 in these important ways as well: 64-bit vs. 32-bit bus system interface type; up to 320 MB/sec. vs. up to 160 MB/sec. data transfer rate; and 68-pin vs. 50-pin external connector. It also lacks the internal cable you got unless you buy the available kit which is also listed in Amazon.
1494197
The main difference would be the transfer rate. 2248700 has a transfer rate of 320 MBps as oppose to 19160's 160 MBps...
1494198
The speed of the SCSI interface is twice is capable of twice the speed. In other words, a Dat4 SCSI Drive capable of 320 can backup data twice as fast as with the 160 card.
1494199
29320LPE is U320 SCSI controller. 19160 is U160. They also have different type of external connectors.
1936700
The biggest difference is the extra cooling fan, which allows the card to work harder while still staying at a safe temperature. I personally think this is worth the extra $15
2097681
This card has a slightly higher clock speed (base/boost:1072/1137 versus base/boost:1046/1111) and better cooling. Everything else is the same performance and feature-wise.
1135292
According to http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/SABERTOOTH_990FX/#specifications, these are the expansion slots: 3 x PCIe 2.0 x16 (dual x16 or x16, x8, x8); 1 x PCIe 2.0 x16 (x4 mode, black); 1 x PCIe 2.0 x1. They also have a note on the first three listed which says "When running dual graphics cards, be sure to insert the card in the first and third PCIex16 slot to get the best performance." 1 x PCI
396379
I have (6) 1920 x 1080 {27"} running and once set up they have been running continuously since install. I've blown (7) adapters till I got a complete set for both of my machines i have two systems running the same setup at two different locations. Card seem to be working good for over four months now. Buy the adapters locally if possible if they blow your not down very long I have extras just in case. If I had gotten the I-Inc 28" I could tell you about 1920 x 1200 but they never put them on sale again when I was ready to purchase.
107236
Hi, thanks for contacting us. This card can only be used in a PCIE X16 slot. I am sorry and if there is anything else I can do for you or if you have any other questions please let me know. Sincerely, Chris Nickels Red Planet Trading
1394844
It occupies 2 slots space and you should always plug it into your PCI-E 3.0 which usually is the first full size PCI-E slot. Pretty impressive for the thiness of the card considering how good the ACX cooler is :)
223770
Barely any difference. The Base Clock differences are 1046 MHz vs. 1072 MHz, and Boost Clock of 1111 vs. 1137. That's pretty much it except for the extra fan. You can still only SLI connect a total of two of these cards if that's of any interest to you. For space and cooling efficiency, I'd opt for a dual GPU board instead. It will save you a ton of room in your tower. These cards are beasts, but effective.
2109080
They are not the same card. This is the fully factory over clocked running at a clock of 1080Mhz and men at 5600Mhz. The other card has slower clocks. The clocks are higher because the chokes are better, and the chips were binned higher on this card. Check the serials if you want to confirm this. The OC potential is thus higher on this card.
405680
Vardan, It supports the PCI express but will run at 2.0 not 3.0 like the card is designed for. Another key note is that even though it comes with a two (molex) cable to 6pin cable to support power you need to make sure you have over 600W of power to support if you are running additional drives and fans.
1868633
Actually, I used it for my old PCI Data Acqusition Board. There is no old type PCI 16 so O need it. It cannot be used for higer frequency GPU board. Because it assumed that your PCI frequency used your system bus speed. If your board cannot adapted to that frequency the bus speed goes down. However The GPU boards generally adapt that frequency to the board reduducing the internal bus speed.
2210764
Yes. One of the two PCI-E x16 expansion slots is 3.0. The other PCI-E x16 expansion slot is 2.0 but runs at x4. The PCI-E x16 expansion slot that's closest to the CPU socket is the 3.0.
1024202
Hello,well, the maximum bandwith provided by the PCI-E x16 gen 1.0 standard port; it is greater than the PCI-E x1 gen 1.0, and not having now many specifications on these standards on Wikipedia.org I have found about that for x1 slot the bandwith is 2.5 GB/s (250 MB/s) and for x16 slot it is 8 GB/s (? MB/s). I hope this is enough. Greetings,Massimo.
1860100
Here is the NewEgg site showing the card with specs http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829132013 Here is Wikipedia article on Conventional PCI bus, note the paragraph "Conventional hardware specifications" which shows hardware and plug configurations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_Component_Interconnect This should show you what you need to know.
978972
revision 1 The only difference is needing 1 8 pin and 1 6 pin(rev 1) vs needing 2 8 pin(Rev 2. 2 8 pins should give it more overclock headroom in theory.) either way it's a fantastic card:) Good luck.
1203751
PCI. I had this installed in a legacy PCI-X slot (not to be confused with PCI-e.....PCI express)
1839244
They are exactly the same card but 29320LPE includes cable and 2248700-R does not. Works great on W7/X64.