is this knife better than the gerber mark 2 ?
1496541
The Gerber Mk II is a much stronger design with better ergonomics. That said, the MkII's made in the 60s (I owned one) were much better than the current lot. The V-42 is an interesting historical artifact and quite lethal. Both are limited-purpose knives with little non-combat application.
1496542
I dont think that its a better blade than a Gerber Mark 2. ....they are both excellent knives each in its own right.
1496543
"Better" is not the right question-different knife, different purpose. The V-42 has a remarkable war record. The design itself placed fear in the enemy. The Gerber Mark 2 to a lesser degree. Read the history. Hopefully none of us will have to use them for what they were intended. Rather, the question to ask yourself is, "What is the task the knife is to accomplish?" Function dictates design, resulting in beauty. Buy both knives and enjoy them both for what they are as individual expressions of lethal intent.
1496544
I purchased the V42 to replace one i was given in the military which had been lost during a move. It is a high quality knife and is very sharp. In comparing it to the MKII, they are roughly equal in weight, length and balance. The major differences are; the striking pommels are different (the V42 is more for fighting), the V42 has a leather handle and hilt guard, where the MKII is all metal with a "rough" surface, the MKII has a serrated sections which is better for some applications. Ultimately, the V42 is a beautiful knife, however, it is pricey and hard to replace in comparison to the MKII (as Gerber's can be found anywhere). I purchased the V42 to replace one i was given in the military which had been lost during a move. It is a high quality knife and is very sharp. In comparing it to the MKII, they are roughly equal in weight, length and balance. The major differences are; the striking pommels are different (the V42 is more for fighting), the V42 has a leather handle and hilt guard, where the MKII is all metal with a "rough" surface, the MKII has a serrated sections which is better for some applications. Ultimately, the V42 is a beautiful knife, however, it is pricey and hard to replace... » Read More I purchased the V42 to replace one i was given in the military which had been lost during a move. It is a high quality knife and is very sharp. In comparing it to the MKII, they are roughly equal in weight, length and balance. The major differences are; the striking pommels are different (the V42 is more for fighting), the V42 has a leather handle and hilt guard, where the MKII is all metal with a "rough" surface, the MKII has a serrated sections which is better for some applications. Ultimately, the V42 is a beautiful knife, however, it is pricey and hard to replace in comparison to the MKII (as Gerber's can be found anywhere). « Show Less
1496545
I do not have a Ferber mark 2, so I do not know if it is better or not. However, it is a nice nice.
1496546
They are two different kind of knives. The original V-42 was designed as strictly a killing knife. Designed to be used by the First Special Service Force - joint US & Canadian unit formed during WWII. Other than using it for display or something like that it is really not that good. Original V-42 knives are rare and are very expensive. A version/replica of the V-42 is awarded to all Special Forces Soldiers when they complete and graduate from the Special Forces qualification course.
1404692
This is a little quicker and leaner than the Kramer knife. If the Kramer is what I am familiar with, the Reserve is easier to care for since it is not carbon steel. The carbon steel will rust " patina" if you don't wash immediately.
1495009
I find it to be better. This utility knife is very easy to use. Each blade lasts a long time...you use one side of the blade until it wears out and then turn the blade around to use the fresh side. I've neen using this brand for years.
2272869
Ive had no problems with the TAC force knife and is less expensive its also the right size for me. The assisted open is ok also works fine and hasnt fallen apart. I dont own a kershaw but have checked them out and id rather buy a Gerber if im going to pay money for a real good knife, but i have 3 tac force knives and they all work for me.
589043
If your worried about the price tag I'm guessing you don't know much about knives. Gerber, kershaw Buck ect are trash compared to this knife. If you dull it you can send it back and they will refinish the blade. Watch some youtube videos on this knife. Once you hold it in your hand you will know you made the right choice. I take mine with me when I go hunting. It's the nicest fixed blade knife I've ever owned. For the price tag how can you not buy it? Look at some other high end fixed blade knives. Not the junk they have at walmart.
1481004
I prefer it.it seems to hold an edge longer. If your in the fence about this or the 561 I would go south the die-hard as an edc. The 561 is mainly if you want a self defense knife.
229749
The only reason I would spend an extra $50 or so on a Reeve is because I can spare the money to buy the "best". I recently lost my Sage, the clip lost some of its strength over time and I believe that is the reason it fell out of my pocket somewhere. Point being that I am glad it was a spyderco and not an expensive REEVE that I lost. As far as function goes, I would rather buy the sage for actual usage and maybe a reeve as a glorified gentlemans knife to be used sparingly.
1627431
I like Spyderco - very good knife and may actually carry better when wearing dress slacks. For me, comes down to personal preference. I carry my ZT more often because I prefer the speed opening and it fits my hand better. Either knife is a great choice IMHO.
811477
Yes iv this is my second one and I love the sog knives. And on here there about 30 dollars cheaper.
1141509
Honestly, I think it's the same knife from different sellers. The picture looks the exact same. In any case, it's a pretty good knife, a little tight to open, but that's better than too loose. I don't think Gerber offers the same style knife in different steel qualities. I bought the one certified by Amazon just in case it was wrong and I had to return it. That's usually the safest bet. Good luck!
1007633
Since I have both I would say the E-tool is better when it comes to utility. It is more versatile. Given my experience with Gerber though it probably is more durable and higher quality. The e-tool typically lasts me a year and then I have to replace it. I do tend to abuse it though and usually will opt for the cheaper knock-off version as opposed to the branded version which is a little more expensive and is probably better made.
1054306
in my experience carrying all extensively the Gerber dime is more durable than the Leatherman style series and just as durable as the squirt series.
2281244
I didn't find the warrantly either, I returned the knife because it's not as sharp as my Gerber. For $65, I expected more.
853908
I own three 1095cv Beckers including the BK 14. They sharpen really easily. D2 is known to be more difficult to put an edge on it (once it's on, it's there for a while). If you have to maintain your knife in the field 1095cv is the better (and cheaper) option. Wet, damp conditions will give the D2 the advantage (and less maintenance-based on other D2 knives I have owned)
1382491
A search of either leads you to the same knife. The knife is awesome. I own one and have give two as gifts.
1706892
Although I have both, I prefer the 102 is it is smaller, its blade is thinner and narrower which in my mind makes it a more useful and versatile knife. The 119 is a cool knife also but it is very large and stout. I do love the brown handle versus the black, it is worth the extra cost in my view.
1019216
I believe it is. I purchased this to replace the same knife and found no difference.