Any difference between "Remote Smoker" and "Wireless BBQ" units?
1501825
Yes. The Remote Smoker and sensors for both the MEAT & the SMOKER. Wireless BBQ is just for meat.
1882893
Doesn't matter. Unit crapped out within 6 months. Trying to figure out how to convert it to a smoker :-)
198666
As I recall, just the mounting hardware. This is an enterprise product so it would generally mounted high on a wall or ceiling (which is why it has the design shape it does), It is (quite reasonably, IMHO) assumed that it is going to be a permanent, wired-in solution and in that case you would most likely be running a long Cat5/6 cable to it from your router thru the walls and/or ceiling. If you do not have the ability to do this, a simpler shelf mounted unit might be better for your use. Worth the effort if you can install it as getting access points up high results in better coverage in most places. It also looks cool, like a large smoke detector with a glowing blue ring.
663166
oh--i think the difference is one has a remote. the one pictured does. mine doesn't & i don't need one. ss
69409
The only difference is the adapter for the smoker. The 110 comes with a plastic threaded piece and the 120 comes with a metal bowl looking one.
1751598
The wireless is from the transponder to the remote you keep with you. The three foot cords are from the base unit to the meat and to the BBQ.
906088
The maze-n tube works great and works in either a regular bbq or a smoker. It develops smoke not heat. A smoker provides heat and smoke. I use in both and it augments the smoke in my smoker for a little extra smoke.
2240452
From the Kidde website it appears that they only make a wireless smoke detector. But First Alert makes a wireless combined smoke and CO detector (sold at amazon - search for SCO500, it's available in 1 or 2 pack). Note that the Kidde wireless detector is ionizing, whereas the First Alert wireless is photoelectric. Ionizing is better for open flame detection, but photoelectric is better for smoldering fire detection.
125601
I have trouble getting the meat temperature to above 170 F. I don't think it is a power issue but a controller issue. Whatever the cause, the smoker is best suited to long time cool smoke. I plan to rebuild the temperature control when I have spare time.
1571447
I agree you'll need the bottom view model. You'll also want the wireless Xtreme Life QUAD System because your video files need to be easily accessible. The model you're looking at has a built in DVR which will require periodic removal of the internal SD card. The Xtreme Life QUAD Wireless Bottom View Smoke Detector would be a better overall fit for your situation because the video is transmitted to a separate device called a receiver. In the case of the QUAD Wireless, the DVR and SD card are built in the receiver. This will make your life easier in terms of video collection.
572993
Don't know. I would avoid choosing this one since it never really gets hot enough in there to smoke meat.
1440000
Sorry , dont know why U would use a wire (vs) wireless remote that comes with unit. have unit in 22 foot boat Saltwater use works great !
1549259
no,this will not effect flare ups. wifi version is just an easier way to monitor the cook. all CyberQ works the same in the way they manage temp sensing and fan control. I have the standard CQ, just upgraded to the wifi version, love it. Flare ups are more from drippings from the meat getting to the heat source, shouldn't be an issue on smokers unless your coals are directly under the meat. if so, put a drip pan with some water in it to catch the drippings and also add moisture to the cook. good luck
1818368
Yes, I just got mine a few weeks ago. This is my first smoker. The digital controls and the ability to add chips without opening the door make this a great choice. And don't forget that it is an insulated unit which makes it perform better.
238685
Two different ways of cooking buddy. There is no way to sear your meat with a smoker but your meats will come out just out of this world
993168
The Bradley Smoker has a fully automated 'conveyor' system purposely made to feed the biscuits to the burner element. It will not work using regular chips. Each biscuit burns in approx. 20 min and the burner is too small to fit enough chips for any more than a short period of time. It is not made for it. The smoker works perfect with the biscuits. A great product.
1294826
I looked at a picture of the 2828 model to confirm that this is what i have. It is and I have the 2424 attached to it. The smaller unit great for smoking and making additional grilling space if needed. I couldn't put it on myself, because I'm not strong enough to bash out the knock out between the two units that lets the smoke the smoke circulate into the large cavity. (Hey , I'm a 69 year old grandmother. You can probably do it. I hired a body builder.) These units are amazingly high quality for the price, but do keep them protected from rusting. Enjoy.