Just want to confirm that the listing there says 26"x1.9 inch tires? Are these 19mm? I'm trying to replace some 650c for my old Peugeot PX 10 bike.
1497135
There seems to be a problem with the formatting of the pull-down. The description below it looks right. While I haven't bought this size myself, I would bet that they are 19mm. They certainly aren't 1.9 inches! That would be a really cool city tire for a high-end mountain bike, but such a thing doesn't exist.
1497136
The 26X1.9 refers to the 26 X 1.9 inch version. However I am sure this tire is of the mountain-bike variety. I own this tire in the 700X19mm tubular, and the aforementioned 26X1.9 inch is not in the same category, nor price range. I would call a high end bike shop and, or go to one in person, at least for a look over, as to get a genuine reference as to what you want. You would hate to be disappointed at getting a fat tire for your racing machine. Good luck, and take care....
838923
The english/metric conversion says it is... But I have the 20x1.75 wheels. Nice tires. I was rebuilding several bikes for charity.
662440
I would like to help, would if I could, but I don't think you could depend (i.e. bet) on my answer. My bike is 700 mm (which I think equates to 27"), the tires I bought were 700 X 38 mm (38 mm is equivalent to 1½", 35 mm = 1-3/8"). My guess is that the 700 X 32 mm would fit, but, a just a semi-educated guess.
1770803
I just checked my tires. There is not an 'o' in the listing. The size is 26x2.125. These tires require a higher psi inflation to overcome the added resistance that so much heavy tread on the pavement creates. As for durability, I have no doubt. But the tire when inflated in enough larger than the originals I've had to remove the fenders, both front and back. Whether it is the tire for your bike, or not, you'll have to decide.
1135035
the s-7 tires are made for old Schwinn bikes. schwinn had different wheel sizes than other bike manufacturers. buy 26x2.25 and not s7
397365
Really interesting hyperlink article posted by Bruce, from competitvecyclist. Personally I can't get my head around a smaller contact patch on a larger tire, but I'm no one to argue with these guys. I used to ride sportbikes. everything equal (same tire model), we assumed we were getting a larger contact patch, with the larger model. That's why we went for larger tires (same aspect ratio of course). but interesting article!!
913484
The tires are 26"x 1,9. They are about the size of a standard mountain bike tire. mine cam with Continental double Fighter tires. They have very little tread butt have held up well. continental makes a tire known as Traffic. I had these on another bike I had and they are a great all around tire, a bit bigger, 26"x2,25. Kinda pricy but well worth the money. I will be putting these on my G+ Storm when the tires on it now wear out.
133412
Good question, don't have something to measure with. But they do seem to be standard bike size wheels.
630181
I had put ~1700 miles on the stock tires before they badly needed replacing. I replaced them with 700x23C Continental tires. I forgot which type but they have been the best tires I've had. As for tubes I just get 700x23C presta with 48mm stem
1165579
Sorry - I don't have this tire to check, but Continential only lists 27 x 1 1/4 with ISO 630x32.The general rule for bicycle tires IS fractional sizes and decimal sizes DON'T MIX. It's a valid question - although I'm not aware of that problem with 27" size, I have definitely experienced problems with old 26" sizes even within the same inch size designations.I suspect someone that was unaware of the mismatch issues just used the decimal designation by mistake. Best to check the ISO numbers of the old tire ( that did fit ) if possible - look at the larger number, that's rim diameter. In this case you want 630-xx (for a 27" tire). Good source for info on most things bicycle is sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html Sorry - I don't have this tire to check, but Continential only lists 27 x 1 1/4 with ISO 630x32.The general rule for bicycle tires IS fractional sizes and decimal sizes DON'T MIX. It's a valid question - although I'm not aware of that problem with 27" size, I have definitely experienced problems with old 26" sizes even within the same inch size designations.I suspect someone that was unaware of the mismatch issues just used the decimal designation by mistake. Best to check the ISO numbers of the old tire ( that did fit ) if possible - look at the larger number,... » Read More Sorry - I don't have this tire to check, but Continential only lists 27 x 1 1/4 with ISO 630x32.The general rule for bicycle tires IS fractional sizes and decimal sizes DON'T MIX. It's a valid question - although I'm not aware of that problem with 27" size, I have definitely experienced problems with old 26" sizes even within the same inch size designations.I suspect someone that was unaware of the mismatch issues just used the decimal designation by mistake. Best to check the ISO numbers of the old tire ( that did fit ) if possible - look at the larger number, that's rim diameter. In this case you want 630-xx (for a 27" tire). Good source for info on most things bicycle is sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html « Show Less
399149
They are a 700c tire. They are closer to a 28 or 29 inch size but aren't meant for either
1941034
I tried using the 26"x2.1" tubes on these tires to try to save money. I think the tube was too big cause the tire blew up. You need the right tube. I ended up getting 26"x1.5" tubes and it worked great. I did the Trans America three years ago on these tires, and only had one flat. I still have these tires. They wear very well.
1053254
I do not believe they will fit because they have an ISO diameter of 559. 650B tires have an ISO diameter of 584. To be sure and to save you some trouble with shipping, try any 26" tire from a big box store such as Wally World. Return it when you've confirmed fit or no fit. BTW, I still love these Kwest Tires. 800 miles and still going strong.
758505
Can't say without seeing your bike. Look where the front tire goes through the fork and where the rear runs between the chainstays and under the brake bridge--that's where they'll hit if they're going to. I put them on an old (mid-'80s) touring bike that was designed for big tires, but many newer ones won't accept tires bigger than about 28mm. Your 23s are probably less than an inch wide (25.4mm=1 inch), and these are probably 1.3 or so (too cold to go out and measure).
1891293
Well these tires were designed to fit a 26 x 1.75 rim, not sure what would happen in a fat bike rim, may seat the bead well with tire beads so wide in that rim. But I would recommend the Surly Floyd of Origin8 has a good pavement 26 x 3.5 tire for fat bikes. The guy who posted earlier I don't think he knew you were talking about a fat bike, as his is a MTB.
2249641
The set I ordered was for bikes with 700C or 29" tires. You would have to get a set for 26" wheeled bikes, and it would also have to be wide enough to go over your tires whatever width they are. You probably have 1.9" tires, so I would say these probably don't come in a size that will fit, but it wouldn't hurt to look.
1572129
26" x 1.9 good tires but more for fire road or pav very simple tires I think the brand is good WTB but low profile