Is this scanner large enough for 9x12 images?
1520414
Returned ours and can't help, but it looks like others have helped you already. Oh...we returned ours because it was not compatible with our QuickBooks through our offsite server. It worked just fine, though.
1520415
The scanner glass is 8 1/2 x 12 - but I would believe it only scans 8 1/2 x 11, because the scanner needs the length of the glass for the head to scan down the image. You might get a little more than 11 inches, but I don't think it will capture a full 12 inches in the scanning, and definitely no more than 8 1/2 in the width. I really like this scanner and is serving my small business well for our needs.
1646229
I just duplex scanned 2500 3 X 5 cards with perhaps one jam. I really like this scanner. Keep it clean and you should have no problem.
1166903
You can scan pictures and depending on the size of the picture being scanned, it can work perfectly HOWEVER the picture will be bent by the roller. If the paper the picture is printed on can withstand being bent by the roller, you're good ... but a lot of photo stocks won't withstand it. I figure here than anything 4 x 6 or smaller scans very well. Anything larger than that, I use my flatbed scanner.
930633
We currently use this scanner to only scan 8x11 size pages at our office. I do believe it will scan legal size as well.
1924593
Yes it has only 12 mega pixels, All depends on what you will use it for, if is not for professional matters and to do big printings, 12 is enough.
1218646
Yes, you can feed photos for scanning up to 600dpi. Quality's in the eyes of the beholder. Perfectly satisfactory for my purposes, which are principally archival. Not a scanner for high-quality professional image capture.
489815
I just tried it with a 4" x 6" picture, it doesn't take it, scanning is from the glass only. It didn't even try to pull the picture in and I moved it around to see if it needed to be in a different place.
966948
Short answer is yes. Gray Macy had the long answer. While the glass is only large enough for 8.5x11, if you use the document feeder on top it will scan and copy legal size documents.
1673132
It will handle 8.5x11 documents ok. I was very irritated to learn that the ADF double-sided scan is NOT supported for legal size paper. I bought this almost entirely for the purpose of speeding up the scanning of double sided legal documents (which seem always to be in abundance). The rest of the printer/scanner seems to work fine, but beware if you're buying this to try and speed up the automatic scanning of legal sized documents. It won't do it.
967190
Just for kicks and grins I scanned negatives and slides at the maximum resolution and I estimate the process took about 10-15 per. I also found out that scanning at the highest resolution created files so large (some as big as 600MB) that even though I have a fairly high performance PC, (Core i7, 12GB of RAM), the files were so big I couldn't open them. I dropped down to around 2400-4800 DPI and found the files created about 1.2MB or so. I also scanned files on my MBP with 4GB of RAM and it also created files too large to open and in a few cases it even crashed. I decided the 4800 DPI range was more than sufficient for scanning for my purposes which is to burn all these treasured slides and negatives to disk and give them to family so they can enjoy them too. If you are a professional photographer or designer and you need the max resolution you will need a box with the highest performing hardware you can buy and that will be commensurate with the price. Bottom line: Test various resolutions and see what works for your purposes. I read MANY of the reviews of this scanner before I bought it and decided it would work perform the job I needed it to do and it has performed admirably.
1298887
No I don't think so. I believe those pages are too thick. I would def use a flatbed scanner for those! This is mostly for the thickness of a single print or piece of paper. I think the largest page of paper was 8-1/2x 11 but it was just standard paper thickness. I hope this helps!
1460592
Angelica B. response is correct ....the internal memory of scanner will only do maybe 10 to 12 pix...
858143
I have used it to scan in some photos and they turned out well. I think it would depend upon the type whether you wanted to run them through or not, such as old family photos, etc.
2185808
I don't see why not. I've used it to scan printed items and it works great. Only thing if it is larger than 4x6, you will need to scan in sections and use the software included to create the larger item.
1032834
You will need to set your scan for the maximum DPI possible and make sure that both the photo being scanned and the scanner glass is as free of dust / lint etc as possible. The only issue I see here is the graininess of the original photo. The larger the grain in the original the less desirable the 36 x 36 print will be.
614853
I would say no. It is not wide enough. It can only scan up to about 8.5 inches wide. I think most blue prints are wider than that. The length would not b e a problem
1226905
I actually returned it - it was barely bigger than a paper towel roll if I remember. I ended up getting a Fujitsu ScanSnap s1300i and am very pleased with it. A little more expensive, but excellent scans, it's fast, and the multi-sheet feeder is convenient.