does anyone know what the difference is berween the mgd formula and the cmc formula Thanks
1484994
I'm not sure of the difference, but this product worked for a couple of weeks, and then the problem returned. FINALLY, my primary doc, NOT the eye doc realized all my problems were allergy related. So, I don't take this product anymore.
1484995
The mgd is oil based. & the other is not is how they explained it to me. the mgd REALLY helped me. SO much better than anything else I have tried for my dry eyes.
1484996
The MGD is for people with MGD problems, which is where the tear evaporates too quickly due to not having enough oil in your tears. The CMC doesn't contain the oil as the MGD does. If you've tried standard eye drops for 'dry eyes' and they don't work, I would try the MGD.
135476
I'm awfully sorry to say that I do not know, for I bought this for a friend of mine. But if you check online, you will find the complete specifications of the formula.
280247
Hello Irina, both formulas are very strong and very potent. Each one uses different thermogenics ( main ingredients that enhance your metabolism and suppress appetite). Also All In One Weight Loss Pill have supply that would last you for two months ( 60 pills in the bottle- one pill/day)
1505948
Hi Maria, Yes the wording is correct 1mg. If you check other B12 products they are noted in mcg, not mg, so you will see values like 800mcg, 500mcg etc, in that case you have to note this product is 1000 mcg. There are products showing 5000mcg, which is 5mg however if they are not MethylCobalamine then your body will not absorb them so they are basically pointless. B12 is not like vitamin C, or D its only required in low quantities. I hope this helps clarify
767782
I have not used the original formula before. I understood that it was the same 1 ounce per 1 inch circumference, only the formula lasted a full twelve months, rather than the shorter duration of the original formula. Sorry.
656215
Sorry I would be of no help, I bought it but never ended up using it. I just use 1 magnesium supplement every day. 500 mg.
1461356
Hi Herman, Yes, that's correct, we have updated the formula. We are always looking to improve and offer an even better experience for our customers. I'm not sure I follow, though, are you asking if if the new formula is dangerous? Or stating that it is dangerous? Either way, it's not. The formula has taken some small tweaks, but by and large is the same formula, just stronger. We took a few of the smaller ingredients and worked in more of the stronger ingredients, plus added D-Aspartic Acid. The new formula is now even stronger and more potent. Thanks, Matt
219326
My guess would be that 64 o. of magnesium goes into a 64 oz. bottle. My bottle says : Magnesium Chloride. Happy Autumn! :)
1321670
Marci C.......... thank you ever so much for the answer...... I was so hoping it was..... now to get the money and actually get to use this formula. Again thank you so much.
639250
I called the company a couple of months ago and asked the same question. If I remember correctly, they told me the bottles contain the same amount of product, both count and volume. I think that the dosage is a personal decision that you make for yourself, as it seems to me that the label dosage was lowered, perhaps as a measure to make it seem that the product will last longer. Actually, there is no real set dosage as there is no daily requirement involving the RMA+ mineral supplement. Since the label change I have been taking the same four capsules daily that I began taking last November. Nothing has changed, and the product still works just as good as it ever did! I know it appears confusing, but nothing except the label has changed, and unless you think taking a lesser dose will work just as well for you, it is really only a matter of economics and performance. What I found out that concerns me more, is that the price went up! That made me search for a better price, and I did find it substantially cheaper elsewhere on the internet! Try overstock.com!
554445
Looks like the difference is more protein in the complete. I see this is for people to get some weight on them. I really like the milk chocolate one . It has the same vitamins as the complete. It is good for a lunch substitute when you can't or don't want a big meal.
509039
Glycinate chelate is more absorbable in your body. The common one magnesium oxide is what's in milk of magnesia which you know what that does. Hope this helps.
1396378
You need to ask the vendor for a specific mineral content data analysis. Most companies who are providing products suggested for human consumption, lab work, or field work have this information as it is essential for control mechanisms to be in place while using the product. My application is much simpler, it is a filler and as such the chemistry is not an important component. My suggestions is to ask the provider for the MSDS (material safety data sheet) and or just pose your specific compounding question to the vendor.
511026
Label on bottle says 20mg magnesium and 70mg msm per 1 ml. Conversion to fluid oz 3 tsp. = 15 ml so 1tsp=5ml best equivalent would be 1 tsp=100mg magnesium and if my math is correct, 350mg msm. The regular bottle doesn't have msm. The label reads 33mg mg per1 ml along with shea butter and other emollients. Hope this helps.
328072
I am not sure about those formulas. I don't use this one anymore unfortunately. I use an organic formula
437433
Constant? That's probably the Magnesium SRT. It takes the body a while to get use to. Their SRT formula tries to counter that. Actually it seems that's what the brand is most known for. I had 2 (sometimes 3) a day compared to the normal 1 (sometimes 2) movements each day. My body regulated back out. I'd be little worried if there was too much of a spike. Magnesium is pretty beneficial & most people are significantly deficient compared to the recommended daily amount.
1342953
No major difference in Active Ingredients. The inactive ingredients may have slightly different formulas.