M3D550KD or M3D550SL -- Which one is better?
1492940
I agree with M. Barnes. Probably little difference between the two. Check Vizio's webpage at http://store.vizio.com/. Compare the two models tech specs and narrow your choice that way.
1492941
I pretty much look like the same TV except 1 is a little cheaper than the other I would probably go with the cheaper 1
1492942
Check the article in PC Mag about refresh rates 240 vs 120. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2379206,00.asp
1492943
The TV's are very similar. The 2 things that make the M3D550KD slightly better is the fact that it is 240Hz instead of 120Hz. I don't know that that feature is very noticable. Both are very thin and have built in WiFi N and are loaded with apps. The M3D550KD is this year's model, the M3D550SL is last years model.
1492944
I believe the SL model has ARC so you can run HDMI out of the TV for sound.
1492945
I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to replace it. I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to... » Read More I can only comment on the M3D550KD because that's what I own. The price difference is very close, so I consider the price as not a factor. The 240MHZ refresh rate was a big deal for me and I still think it's worth having. The picture is very smooth on DVD's and Blue Ray. HDTV is really nice as well. Standard definition is noticably worse, but I guess that's why they went to HD. The 3D is really cool. I didn't buy the TV for 3D, but it's one of my favorite features now. I've owned it for several months with no problems. Bottom line, if it was stolen off my wall, I'd buy another one to replace it. « Show Less
1492946
While the increased refresh rate is nice, it may not improve preformance noticably. But for only $50 more, I'd opt for the thinner profile of the KD if for no other reason. I bought this set for my mom when her 9 yo Pioneer Elite Pro 53" RPHDTV crapped out. It continues to amazing me with every type of content we throw at it. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
687699
If that's all than it's not worth the extra price. The LN37A550 costs less than the LN32A65. I might just look at the 37A550 instead.
1789959
L412, L420, L430, L512, L520, L530, T400s, T410, T410i, T410s, T410si, T420, T420i, T420s, T420si, T430, T430i, T430s, T430si, T510, T510i, T520 Dual Core models, T520i Dual Core models, T530, T530i, X220, X230, X230i
1911711
It has a quad 4 processor vs a dual. So it loads and runs the smart tv apps faster and smoother. I love my 5500 model.
93450
It looks like the A550 is the best compromise for you since all you get in the 650 are extras you're not interested in. Go for it.
2134347
I have the N40L. I have found it to be reliable when runing Windows Home Server 2011. I have no experience with the N54L.
917375
My read of the customer reviews supports the notion that the 255W is a terrific unit. Thanks for your reply.
2172552
Honestly if you're bouncing between the 120 Samsung and the crucial 240 I would definitely go for the 240 crucial because they're all spectacular. The Samsung only has very minor bonuses comparatively speaking. Although from what I've tested Samsung has the best software combo'd with it but that shouldn't be a game changer.
742694
They both have an excellent firewall, very customizable but somewhat complex. The differences are the GL version is 10/100/1000 with 64 mb SD ram and the 750 is 10/100 with 32 MB SD ram.
1381744
Can someone compare Samsung LN40B650 to Panasonic L37G1? Pluses and minuses. Recommendation.
742695
Almost the same thing. The GL model is gigabit on each port versus 10/100 in the non-GL. Also more RAM and higher CPU speed if I recall correctly. There are other smaller differences as well, but these are the too areas that I usually utilize the GL model over the non-GL model for.
353223
Both routers look great and meet my requirements.SlikLizrd, can you specify how much is one better than the other for:- Wired and Wireless performance- Wireless Range- NAS performance- Media Server performanceThanks
742693
The GL has a more powerful processor. But the best part is the gl led lights flicker when transmitting while the 750 gust glows solid green. I highly recommend the 750gl over the 750.
1537208
I think CNET might review these soon. In the mean time, you could check their reviews of the 606 and the 1018 as a starting point, as well as Amazon reviews of those products. You can also download manuals for the 607 and 1019 (probably) to compare features and specs.
343249
Thanks! I appreciate the information. I'll probably buy the U100 (aren't lower numbers usually cheaper?), or maybe the Acer equivalent or even the Asus, though that seems to be a bit heavier. (I'd welcome opinions on the relative merits of these computers.)
2128466
i would recommend the ku345 conroe-e6600-2.4 ghz-4mb-1066 fsb -b2 or the pn416 conroe e6700-2.6 ghz-4mb-1066 fsb-b2. go to google search toms.
971761
Get the 830D; use Win7 64 bit and try to get 4 gig ram... Runs fast and cool.