Ok so how many different versions are there - the 7, 8, and 25? And they all produce the same size photos? What about quality? All the same?
1509589
I believe they use the same film since theres only like one type of film available (mini). As for the model numbers, the higher the number the more "advanced" the camera is. http://instax.com/products/camera/
2068754
I bought the 24-105. IK am very happy with it because it has IS. I shoot videos sometimes and IS is a must in those occasions. Overall, pictures look GREAT!!!
1571761
I put 1751 Photos in a 8GB SD card and they all play. NOTE: if you get a red x on some Photos form the net it is because they are a NON STANDARD SIZE. You Can use FastStone Photo Resizer to Batch Resize. Just pick one of the Standard Size in the APP. Advanced Options/ Standard Size Height 600/ Filter Lanczos2 (Sharper)
1254700
Unless you are planning to print poster-size photos it is completely useless to go for more than 10MPix (it can still make sense with a limited optical zoom as it allows more "numerical zoom" that consists in cropping the photos to remove the areas surrounding the subject, but with a 20x zoom...). It is even worse than useless: the photos will take a lot more room in your hard drive (and they will also have more electronic noise).
1735668
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/photoshopextended/ It says that it is two editions thus implying two different versions. Sorry that nobody replied to this. Kind of rude isn't it?
1565643
I never compared the two versions, I used the first edition only because it's more compact, light, less expensive, has built in shade what I really like. I use only on Fuji cameras without worries. I heard the version two also have purple fringing issues with some cameras but visible only on large images, also fringing is easy to fix with the latest softwares like Lightroom. I shoot almost exclusively B&W; so color fringing don't bother me so much. V2 might be more corrected but I can't tell.
505797
I'm with YellowBug... I could have bought the 10 but I prefer the size of the 8. Sure, the bigger size gives you a larger image to manipulate, but the resolution on the 8 is really quite impressive.
2180988
Without a doubt, unequivocally, YES!I had photographer friends who thought I was insane for buying the new version (they had only seen the old), and after they saw mine and what it was putting out, I know a few of them who are seriously considering buying one.
515435
You can use what ever size you want. They all work. It just depends on how many pictures you want to take. If you take alot of pictures, and want them to load fast, this is the card for you. I love it and will get more in the future.
307707
Sounds like a great suggestion, thanks. Do you use a 8G will this camera? Would I be correct in assuming you'd get about 1700 pics at fairly standard settings?
344030
Has anyone compared the quality of stills from these cameras? I like the faster burst rates on both these cameras (I shoot a lot of sports with my kids). I rarely shoot over ISO 400 and I do not have the capability to print larger than 8x10. Which is the better output in terms of images?
437987
No ,there are so many different ones and different sizes, have you tried googling them to see if there is a photo available of all of them.
43150
Not sure. I was a Canon user. IMHO one of the biggest reasons to buy this format is the smaller lens sizes. Equal quality, less size, less cost. Win win.
1737679
I am not really familiar with version 4 but I can tell you that between Photomatix 5 and Photomatix Pro 5, about the only real difference is that pro allows you to work in batch. Each of the two can be run in either 32 bit or 64 bit. Each allow the user to make a quick photo-style selection (default, balanced, photographic, smooth ... etc) then manipulate manually from there to suit your taste. The results for the most part are generally pleasing. More recently I have added Pro Photo Editor and find that it is as easy to use but has a LOT more bells and whistles for even more pleasing results. Between that and Elements 11, There is little that can't be done to enhance a photo to exactly the shot you were looking for and are proud to publish.
682909
Marsha:I am working with Windows 7, 64 bits and works fine; however, I am a photography fan, and I got a strong frustration with the quality of the converted files. It is something like 5 Mega pixels.For that reason, I bought a 20MP converter. I will receive it next week. If you have any question, please do not hesitate in contacting me, I'll be glad to share my experiences.Best regards, Ricardo
966802
I printed an 8x10 photo of my car in the daylight and it came out great. I took a photo inside the house with not so great light and it came out a little dark and slightly grainy. This was a 5x7 picture. I just got the camera this week so I am still fooling around with it. I'm working with Photoshop Elements 4 (5 on order) to see if it can help out with the low light pics.
226763
I'm not sure. I have a 128mb in mine and I can take over 200 pics at the lowest resolution setting. I use it for work. My reports have upwards of 35 pictures each. I have to use low res settings to be able to email them to the client. Camera is good all around. The only drawback for me is the close ups are not always focused. There may be a macro seting I have not explored yet. I hope this helped.