5'8" 190 med. lg? or xl? Are these real long? Can they be cut for shorter folks?
1542259
I would go with XL. The XL size is not that much larger than the ML size in terms of length. You may not have to cut an XL/XXL size. It would just bunch up at the bottom a little. You might want to cut some of the threads if they get in the way when you walk.
1243995
I'd suggest adult short as well. I am 5'9" and adult long was perfect for me. -dr
223603
I'm 5'8" and 175 lbs and the Adult Medium works great for me. The pants are high waisted for a female but the length is still good.
1601815
I'm 5'10" and 200lbs and I opted for the large size and they are just barely large enough. I think a regular should work for you just fine.
115944
I'm only 5'2, but my daughter who stole them from me is around 5'5. They're more than long enough for her, but the XL is more of a size 10-12 American sizing rather than the usual standard XL American sizes of 16-18. They appeared to be about the same length of the American Apparel leggings I usually buy, which ARE long enough for a 34 inseam, but I'm not sure. Sorry!
29988
I think they would be a little long for you. I'm 6'0 and they are perfect for me.
42714
Anthony , I am 5'7 with 32"-33" waist . I got a large, and they fit great,but just a little long for me. So you being 6'5 , you might want to go XL, for the lengh .
91748
I am 6'2" 175 give or take, and a large works perfectly on me--in fact I am wear them right now--and probably have been for a little too long. They are great-- a little pricey, but worth it-- he won't want to take his pair off till they need to be peeled off and burnt.
2034764
Mine are XL regular with a 10" inseam; which puts them just below the knee on a 5'-10" person when standing up and worn low. Since they have a zipper fly, I would say they are men's. Wearing them baggy with the dark colors and many pockets could be unisex. After an agressive battle with a giant rose bush while chasing my RC helicopter, I suffered a ripped leg, arm, and a huge black eye. These shorts protected my upper legs 100% and survived without a blemish - - - very tough and indestructible I would say.
545914
I didn't look for one - if it's any help- I'm 5'8 and 200# - 33" inseam - thes fit great - not tight - very comfortable - I bought an XL.
417142
No! Stick with the medium....I sm 5'6" 155 and thick legs....looking at tbe medium just out of the package, I thought No way!!! Glad I stuck with the mediums - they are perfect!!!
10745
Yes, they're not "fitted" and don't have seams down the sides like some (including Under Armour) fitted shirts. They're not too loose either - a great fit in my opinion. I'm 5'11" and 160 and size Large is a nice comfortable fit for me, but not skin tight.
1959724
When I ordered mine, I was 5'8" (still am) and about 235 and I ordered an XL. They were tight, as they're supposed to be, but not uncomfortable and I never felt like I was straining them. Here's a link to their contact page to talk to Customer Support: http://store.skins.net/usa/contact-us/
171116
I'm 5'9" at 150lbs. Based on the length you would need A2. My gi did not shrink too much. YMMV.
380627
I'm only 5'6" but yes I do think they would be long enough. Eddie Bauer used to sell silk long johns in longs not sure if they still do.
34011
Im 5'8 I prefer 5 for the length and room, with is weight they will seem a bit baggy
1484831
I am 6' 3" and bought the XL. They fit fine, not as tight as the L, and they go a little higher than I like. Will likely stick to toLarge going forward as I prefer the tighter fit. I don't compare various compression metrics.