D42U versus D43U Anyone know the differences between these two models?
1544481
JEM - I spent some time searching for the same thing. While you can check out the link below as well and which shows product specifications listed by Sharp, in short the 42U is listed as having Multi-Pixel Technology where as the 43U does not. Aside from this everything else is exactly the same. http://www.sharpusa.com/files/tel_dow_AQUOS_Full_Line_0107.pdf
1544482
Sorry, this is not true. From Sharp's own web site, the 42U has 4 RCA L/R inputs and no S-Video input. The 43U has 2 RCA L/R inputs and 1 S-Video input:42U: http://www.sharpusa.com/products/ModelDetailedSpecs/0,1161,1782-,00.html43U: http://www.sharpusa.com/products/ModelDetailedSpecs/0,1161,1798-,00.html
1162549
Nothing except for the ds713+ is faster. Depends on what your going to be using it for if it's work the extra money on the d2713+.
2253948
I also have the D5300 and I believe it's a bit smaller than the D3200.. I'm hesitant to purchase.
199905
if money is no object , buy the d5300 , i had the d3200 and it was a great camera you can routinely make really nice 20-30 size pictures ,specially with the prime lenses like the 50mm 1.8g , i bought the d3300 because the new sensor is scarper and the new lens is really much more portable and last but not least the included lightroom 5 software was in a refubrished package deal, between the 5200 or the 3300 the 5200 with its swiveling screen might be more camera to grow into , how ever if you only are doing basic photograhy the the d3300 or d3200 are more then enough for any photografer
1447681
I didn't see any difference. I am very happy with mine, it woulds like I believe it should. There was only one issue with the viewfinder which in my opinion become too easily detached, but I am sure that's only my model. I would say do more research on this 1d in comparison to others. You can always buy and return it to if you don't mind spending a few bucks on shipping it back if you don't like it.
1322297
If I look at the specs on that one, it appears that the difference is the Intel Quick Sync Video for fast video encodingand the Display Port for driving 4k displays. This might be a newer model. I would go with the NUC D54250WYK if you plan on getting a 4k tv.
1324959
I would have considered it a starter camera possibly 2-3 years ago..but now since the firmware is at it's highest revision the camera is limited to older SD cards up to 4GB, no further. Those are becoming harder to find. I have gone from a D50 to D80 to a D7000 currently. The D80 or D90 would be good choices to learn on. I hope this helps!!
442319
David, you should keep an eye on nikonrumors [dot] com They monitor all of the word on the street. Current consensus is that there is not going to be a refresh for the D700 this year. I have owned one for a year and a half, and am absolutely thrilled with it. I will keep it for a very long time. The overall sensor performance (low-light, etc.) is still one of the best in the world. see dxomark [dot] com
440169
They're both great little cameras, and each has its strengths. I'd have a hard time choosing between them. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408enthusiastgroup/page11.asp
730278
I was trying to make this very desicion, I did tons of research and found that the 40D was the better option. Repeatedly I read that the upgrades to the 50D just didn't justify the cost upgrade.
2171075
I have two SB-910's, no problems. Much better refresh time than the SB-700 I have. I will keep up with the D800 fps with no problem.
218999
i have't used the Lumix D so I don't know if there's any difference. If you read Leica's website, they seem to indicate that add their software tweaks to the camera plus a strong Leica warranty. In Auto mode, my pictures have been stunning. I hope this helps?
1982526
thank you very much for the advice... SU-800 is very interesting unit indeed. at adorama Sb-800 is about $330 and the SU-800 is $245. and the SB-600 is $176I find it more feasible if I order the SU-800 with another SB-600 by just adding only extra $90 instead of buying the SB-800 and mount it always on my D40.this will give me room for more creative light control.which is a better choice for an amature with a D40?buy SB-800 only? or, SU-800 with SB-600 for extra $90?
122905
I just bought a 40D and I think it is a great camera. As posted, there is not best choice but I am sure if the extra (few) bucks is not an issue, we should go for the 40D. It is also the latest sensor and I found it to be really good. Took some shots and it is great.
462702
In a nutshell, the 40D is a bit more rugged and has a faster 6.5 frames per second burst rate compared to the Xsi's 3.5 fps. The Xsi's construction and burst rate are still quite respectable and may be quite adequate for your applications. Spending a bit more on a lens such as a fast f2.8 telephoto lens (necessary for freezing action in bad light) vs. the camera body will probably make a much bigger difference in your results.
1120989
Nikon MB-D11 for the 7000 is rock steady for me. Also gives me more mass to keep the camera steady. It also uses the same 9000mAH Li-ion as the D-800 so I have 6 sets of batteries that I keep charged up for a trip for both cameras. I shoot only NEF (raw) so both cameras use a lot of juice. The D-7000 has 16.2mp and the D800 has 32.3mp so you can see why I need the screw-on battery pack for both. Ken Kitajima- San Jose, CA.
2124328
To my knowledge, the only difference is color. Since it is the same model, I doubt Nikon made any other significant changes.