The WaterChef U9000 seems similar to the Multi-Pure MP1200EL exept that the WaterChef does not have a long, proven track record. How do they compare?
1546966
I have not owned or used the Multi-Pure MP-1200EL before and therefore will not be in able to answer your question.
1479799
The newer mcp has a different handle and that is the way to differentiate between the two. I know very little about the product other than that. I do know that I purchases the original mcp when it first came out. I love the product so much that I bought sets for my mom and both adult sons. The older version si probably so evpensive because it is on par with other professional cookware.
1417354
I'm hoping the PK1200SS replaced the FCP412. The FCP412 seems, from looking at reviews everywhere, to have had a flaw with the heating element, which would fail after a year or two. If that's the case, let's hope they got that problem fixed this time around.
1658932
I can't answer specifically however; you can go onto either the WaterChef site & get the data sheet from the testings (a performance data sheet does come with the unit itself but, I couldn't find your specific question) from the NSF or you can go directly to the NSF site for the information. Just make sure you put in WaterChef Premium Countertop Filtration System Model: C7000 I do have to say, chemical reduction percents were listed between 94.3% - 99.99%
1470109
I have the U8000, bought it in 1995 or '96 and still using it, and loving it. The only difference I could see between the U8000 and U9000 is the color.
1328724
probably not. Although I purchased the waterchef U9000, I contacted waterchef for replacement of a battery and sticky pad. Waterchef shipped those items to me rapidly with no additional charge. It has been more than four months now since I purchased the item, the product works great.
1690482
This is only a wild guess, but I imagine it's the labor that goes into the finish. I bought the less expensive for my husband last Christmas (he loves to cook) and have been very satisfied. We use Barkeeper's Friend to polish it up now and then and it looks great. He has a few pieces of the more expensive type, but other than a small difference in weight, I can't tell any difference in the cooking ability. If you are a real gourmet chef, you probably won't be happy with any but the most expensive cookware. However, if you are like most of us, the less expensive will serve you well for many years. :)
488564
It depends on what you want to cook, I think both do similar things, the Rmertopf is bigger, more traditional, the glazing makes cleaning the chef a bit more easier.
386117
I could be wrong, but as far as I can tell the only difference is you're paying $10 more to set the time digitally instead of by a knob, which to me just means less user friendly and more likely to break. Edit: Just watched two Youtube videos from Euro Cuisine demonstrating the two units. Based on the videos, it would appear the other differences are that the YMX650 has the silver band around it as shown in the pictures here (I wasn't too sure of this because in some pictures it looks white) and the cover can store the lids while in use, whereas the YM100 cover cannot. So $10 more for a little nicer looking unit with a little more convenience, but you have to push the button multiple times to reset the cook time every use and it may be less reliable. Edit #2: Ok, after more comparison, another difference is the date function on the lids for this model is not on the lids of the YM100. Of course, this could be just as easily accomplished with a grease pencil, and I can't help but wonder if the lids would not dry out well and get moldy. If that's not an issue, I suppose it could be worth spending the extra money if you plan on leaving it out on the counter and would find the dating system useful. Of course, if you're leaving it on the counter, odds are that's because you're using it fairly often, so the dating isn't likely all that important.
1097512
My neighbors have a pretty new Vitamix (not sure which model) so when I bought the Oster Versa I invited them over for a "blender challenge". We spent an afternoon making identical recipes in both blenders. The results were identical except that the Versa heated the soup recipe faster than the Vitamix. The only other difference I noticed is the Vitamix's lowest speed is much slower.
1709401
I considered both the NH-U12S and the h100i to cool an i7-4790k @ 4.7GHz. The difference on paper was 8-10 degrees, but the cost was another $40 for the water rig. My PC runs 24/7 and I have yet to see the CPU over 40C, whether gaming or doing digital forensic work on it. Other than being able to say "it's water-cooled." I really see no reason to spend the extra money. The NH-U12S does an excellent job cooling and runs very quietly, even on one fan.
1295017
The Pizzazz Plus is just the way the manufacturer is branding the newer version of the appliance, indicating that it can cook pizza "plus" lots of other things, like chicken wings, etc. The newer model has an improved timer, in my opinion-the older model that I owned years ago had kind of a touchy timer. Also, the non-stick finish seems to be better on the newer model. Get the "Plus" model, even if it's a few dollars more-it's worth it. You will use it a lot!
64420
Your experience highlights one major flaw in the marketing of the Fagor 12 quart oven. No detailed information on temperature and other cooking requirements. In all honesty my experience has been through trial and error. Fagor's main competitor in the US is Nuwave. Their oven has much more specific directions on cooking procedures. I would suggest you contact Fagor on their customer support number in the manual and query their food prepartion rep. Sorry I can't help you with more specific information but I can thorougly sympathize with your experience as it mirrors my experiences too. When I do get satisfactory results I note the rack/temperture/time in a notebook that I keep near the oven for future reference. Good luck!
352601
I assume you're asking for a comparison, or opinions on the two? My mother has the 1200 so I am very familiar with it. I bought the 2600 because it improves on the 1200 in two areas. One is that it's easier to see the water level as you're pouring. With the 1200, there are notches inside the water reservoir, but it's a very small opening and hard to see into it while pouring. The second one, and most important, is that the 2600 eliminates the 'backwash' effect of opening the lid. On the 1200, water condenses and sticks to the lid. When you then open the lid, water often dribbles down the back of the maker and onto the counter. The 2600 fixed this design so that the water drains back into the reservoir. Other than that, as far as I can tell, the two are relatively equal.
505630
I have used both the Miele and the Panasonic. I actually own a Panasonic. I could not see much difference between the Miele and the Panasonic as far as how well they cleaned. They look very similar. Perhaps the Miele is heavier than the Panasonic. For the difference in price, I would buy the Panasonic. I really like the one I have.
1124209
what is the main differences between cafe and profile micro/convection ovens?
46125
I have pieces from both lines, and love them both! The insides are about identical, with a super smooth stainless finish that nothing (and I mean nothing!) has ever stuck to for me. These are great for sauce. The Unlimited has a darker (non-stainless) exterior that does not show water spots, fingerprints, etc. But that is about the only difference I've found. They both cook the same, with no hot spots. And both go through the dishwasher just fine.