Is this WUXGI 1920x1200??
1566327
The model carried by ToughRuggedLaptops includes a 15.4-inch 1920 x 1200 WUXGA Display, Intel Core i5-540M 2.53GHz, 2GB DDR3 RAM, 250GB Storage and ATI Discrete Graphics
1096676
It says in the description 1920x1080. This deal looks too good, my order is in.
972730
Your information is correct with one small correction. The output is fixed 1920x1080/60i It does not do /30p natively, although it can be deinterlaced in software.
452388
Yes, it really is 1920 x 1200. Beautiful screen. Just don't expect Android updates from Acer for this tablet.
706491
According to a PC Magazine review, "It has native WXGA (854-by-480) resolution." The ASUS website doesn't actually say, as far as I can tell.
1746054
Not 100% sure but since the resolution is 48k I believe it's 24 bit (half the resolution)
1987560
I know this is old but I just bought the same card. Did you ever get an answer or use the card? I have a 24" LCD that needs 1920x1200
1328928
When I go to Windows display properties, it says the display is se for 1920x1080 (recommended) . I don't know a way to check if its's true or not other than the Windows swtting. I do know that the display is VERY sharp and detailed.
201465
Yes it is, it's a VGA connection, 1600x900 maximum resolution and it works great.
1781612
That is the native resolution of this monitor, so it is what I am using after having killed my previous monitor by forcing it into a higher resolution. I watch Hulu and other streaming media on my monitor at 1920 X 1080 as well as everything else I do. This monitor looks great, and I agree with others who say they would buy this monitor again.
1307583
I'm running at 1920x1080. It has a full HD screen. The viewing angles are great as well.
1434968
1920 x 1080 5ms (GTG)http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001794&Tpk;=S27C230B
707044
Yes, but I wouldn't recommend it. The text is not as sharp as running native 1440p. You could tell, unless you can't. Which is good if you want to run it at a lower res. But I could tell and it was annoying too me.
722970
In my experience, probably not. I've tried watching Hulu on a 21" external monitor, and the image is only ever jumpy and freezy all the time. I don't think it's my internet connection, because I do not have the same problem when I hook up a computer with a more powerful graphics card. I just don't think the graphics card in this computer is designed to handle high resolution on a large screen.
1587364
I was misled by some of these answers, at least for macs ... if you use the DVI cable in the box with a standard minidisplay port to DVI adapter (less than $20), you won't be able to go over 1920x1200. You need a mini display port to display port cable or a mini display port and DUAL LINK DVI adapter (about $90+) to get this to work at 2560x1440 resolution on os x.
1701826
I'm using mine with an AMD W7000 graphics card. The only time I get 2560x1600 is with a straight through Display Port cable. Any otherl configuration, even with the best adapters (even DVI-D), gets 1920x1080 displayed. No disc required with Windows 7 or Windows Server 2012 R2. After a couple of boots it picked the device itself. Not sure how many though as I was installing all the other drivers required and those needed a lot of reboots.
2279025
The viewable resolution is 680 x 480, so you could always do that. The sample album pics are 688 x 488, but I would imagine that its a 4 pixel buffer around the edge.