Which sound better these 50 RMS JVC's or 180 RMS Pyle's ?
1548667
Which Pyle?Speakers are just one part of the puzzle - the overall sound is also going to b determined by the enclosure and a number of other related factors - better is also very subjective, my taste in music may differ from yours, and that can affect which sound we consider "better".Bear in mind that a higher "wattage" speaker is generally a less efficient speaker (it can handle more power, but it also requires more power to give you the same sound pressure level) and also JVC is a "mid priced, mid quality" brand, Pyle on the other hand is scraping the bottom of the barrel. Which Pyle?Speakers are just one part of the puzzle - the overall sound is also going to b determined by the enclosure and a number of other related factors - better is also very subjective, my taste in music may differ from yours, and that can affect which sound we consider "better".Bear in mind that a higher "wattage" speaker is generally a less efficient speaker (it can handle more power, but it also requires more power to give you the same sound pressure level) and also JVC is a "mid priced, mid quality" brand, Pyle on the other hand... » Read More Which Pyle?Speakers are just one part of the puzzle - the overall sound is also going to b determined by the enclosure and a number of other related factors - better is also very subjective, my taste in music may differ from yours, and that can affect which sound we consider "better".Bear in mind that a higher "wattage" speaker is generally a less efficient speaker (it can handle more power, but it also requires more power to give you the same sound pressure level) and also JVC is a "mid priced, mid quality" brand, Pyle on the other hand is scraping the bottom of the barrel. « Show Less
1548668
Pyle's just don't have the build quality that the jvc's do its better to buy quality over the amount of power a set of speakers can handle
634807
I have a pair of sony bookshelf 120w rms and it sounds incredible good. I recommend it to you
422950
I have them both. These sound better but don't clamp as hard or fit my head as well. The decreased clamping makes them more comfortable but they leak more sound out and don't isolate as well from outside sounds. I kind of like the 280's for drowning outside noises.
1511294
The reviews I've seen on Pyle don't look too good. Haven't purchased yet but am looking seriously at the QSC GX5 1400-Watt Power Amplifier.
1740693
4 chanel with a min 150 watt rms rating, should do the trick, bigger is better you can always turn the gain down
1441434
No sorry I cannot answer that question, I will tell you that you will not be disappointed with there performance, I drive 2 of them with the pyle hybrid 3000 watt amp, which actually put out about 500 watts at 4 ohms, and the sound great, actually the amp fall short of being able to deliver what they can handle
531290
I would recommend at least 2000 watts. I have a PQA4100 pyle amp running twin PADH215 at 8ohms with no EQ. I can max the volume and not distort these speakers. Unfortunately with no EQ there is more mids and highs than lows. At full volume with 4100 watts these will make ur ears bleed. I equal this out with twin 18" sub cabs and 3000 watts. Nicely balanced sound, no distortion, use as my house stereo system. Would like to add an EQ to balance out the sound, but other wise very satisfied.
979624
It all depends on how much power per channel your Pyle P2002 is outputting. I had to replace an older Pioneer VSX 322 (vintage 1998) with a new Pioneer VSX 822K (around $ 250 at Fry's Electronics) The VSX 822K outputs 80 watts per channel which drives the Klipsch's perfectly. The KHO-7 can handle power, lots of power. I didn't want to spend a whole lot on a more powerful receiver since my application is for the rear patio, and my receiver stays outdoors under the patio. I also like the fact that I can connect a sub woofer to this receiver (couldn't with the older one) so that, combined with the KHO's, makes for some dam good listening. If you have anything less than 80 watts per channel would recommend upgrading your receiver. Kind of sucks to replace a working receiver but it was well worth taking the hit.
1812615
BETTER what?? better (quality) sound, better pounding base, better quality materials, better warranty, ????? The 13.5 is larger and pushes more air. The other thing you will want to find out is, what is the RMS rating difference between te two. I never look at the "peak "watts. Means nothing to me. The RMS is the thing to look at. I only buy the best, JL AUDIO. I have NEVER had any problems! Some body may have a louder sounding system, BUT its the quality of sound that counts. I have never had American Base before. Never had any reason to try them. I ALWAYS tell everybody "you can't go wrong with JL AUDIO. BETTER what?? better (quality) sound, better pounding base, better quality materials, better warranty, ????? The 13.5 is larger and pushes more air. The other thing you will want to find out is, what is the RMS rating difference between te two. I never look at the "peak "watts. Means nothing to me. The RMS is the thing to look at. I only buy the best, JL AUDIO. I have NEVER had any problems! Some body may have a louder sounding system, BUT its the quality of sound that counts. I have never had American Base before. Never had any reason to try them. I ALWAYS tell everybody... » Read More BETTER what?? better (quality) sound, better pounding base, better quality materials, better warranty, ????? The 13.5 is larger and pushes more air. The other thing you will want to find out is, what is the RMS rating difference between te two. I never look at the "peak "watts. Means nothing to me. The RMS is the thing to look at. I only buy the best, JL AUDIO. I have NEVER had any problems! Some body may have a louder sounding system, BUT its the quality of sound that counts. I have never had American Base before. Never had any reason to try them. I ALWAYS tell everybody "you can't go wrong with JL AUDIO. « Show Less
1717298
Harmon Kardon 330c should be fine. 20 wpc thirty years ago was much more powerful than 20 wpc nowadays. Not sure why, but I am playing mine through a H/K 330b and they sound great.
720087
I chose Marantz for their reputed sound clarity and warmth, hoping to coerce impressive sound from mediocre speakers. I was not disappointed.I was also interested in video upscaling from all sources, low distortion even from speakers with a lower impedance (as even 8 ohm speakers aren't a constant 8 ohms from 20Hz - 20kHz), and the ability to output video and audio from the receiver to a capture device in my PC. The SR6008 was the lowest common denominator providing all these features.Excellent question!
1544512
The only data that i could find is on another website. It claims to be only 250 watt rms. I have them ran in a circuit bridged at 4oms with this amp Pyle PLA2378 2-Channel 2,000-Watt Bridgeable Mosfet Amplifier and they sound great for the cost. Not sure if they are only 250 watts rms that sounds low for the way they sound. Thats all i could find.
1021579
If you want sound quality get the spr60c 'cause they divide de frecuencies, if you want loudness get the spr-60 'cause they are coaxial speakers, i run them on a clarion marine amp and they are pretty loud
1138290
Obviously depends on your budget amplifier and taste... Having said that, I prefer the warm tone, my setup is Marantz amplifier with Paradigm monitor 7 floor standing speakers and the setup sounds great. Consider JBL and Infinity on the low end, consider Paradigm, PSB, Wharfedale Diamond or B&W; if you have the budget.
87410
I have a 7.1 receiver with 75 watts RMS per channel that works fine and has plenty of volume. These are base reflex (unsealed) speakers which are more efficient vs acoustic suspension speakers (sealed).
1635320
What I'd seriously do is find one in the flesh and look carefully at the back. Now I bought one of them and wasn't too keen about it so I got one from another party for my shop with an equalizer For the house I looked and got a pioneer vex 51 series because its one of he last ones with stereo jacks and maybe at the older pioneer Yamaha Sony receivers and get a Pyle pro eq like I did outstanding sound Hope this helps so let me know. Bud Lucas yerington nv
230538
They are both great, but the 315's are better sounding. I have a pair of 535's that sound good, but I use these more often than most all my earbuds. If I am listening through my home system, I use Beyerdynamic's either mt T-70's or my T-90's. Also as with all speakers and headphones there is going to be a break in period. They will sound different in a few weeks than right out of the box.