mine is SD9VE, what is the difference between 15, 17, 20 and 22 lb? more number means less recoil?
60157
It can also mean that there is too much spring tension and may cause issues with the ejection of the shell cartridge. I would go either the standard recoil spring weight and recommend nothing else. Unless you shoot 147gr rounds only then the spring weight may be raised up from oem tensions.
60158
You have to consider the physical weight and spring weight of the rod. These rods aren't that heavy and doesn't feel to add any weight towards the front end. I would go with 17 lb spring. Not too much stress to mess up any parts, not too little for failure2feed. Hope this helped.
60159
The spring corresponds with the load. If you're loading weak target rounds, you can use a light spring so the action still cycles. Similar with the heavy weight spring for hot loads. If you're shooting standard factory rounds, use the recommended standard weight.
60160
Yes. There is a trade off though . . . the slide will be harder to rack, and if you are shooting lighters loads, you may have a failure to eject or feed. Put a 22lb on my 40 - much more fun to shoot. Added bonus is it's steel and not some cheap plastic piece.
60161
Not entirely sure, but I ordered the wrong lbs originally and experienced issues with the slide locking back, it just depends on the ammo and grain
60162
If I remember correctly the 17lb spring is the same as the factory, or very close. The other spring weights while affecting recoil I think are really to match the bullet weight of the cartridge, i.e., the heavier the bullet the stronger the spring. I have the 17lb spring and use a cartridge with a 115gm bullet and it works fine so far.
963081
I use 25 lbs on each side and the recoil from a 7mm winchester short mag does not move the bench. I would guess that two 20 lb weights would probably do As well as the 25's.
1809659
The Sweet 17 is calibrated for .17 HMR ammo. The Sweet 22 is calibrated for 22 ammo. Read up a little more at BSA.com it will tell you the difference.
805843
Is it a magnum or light A5? If it is a light, then since it didn't come with a recoil pad already, it would make the length of pull really long. I would think, though, that if it already has a recoil pad, the contour of the stock should be the same.
2037989
I looked and couldn't find the Part number 306495 listed by Remington. What type of weapon are you trying to find a recoil pad for? Send me the Model number ie. Model 700 or 870 etc. I'll also need to know if it has a wooden stock or synthetic and if it is a standard length or youth model. Give me that information and I can help you out.
408226
Hi timothy I would use .20 gram with this gun it makes the gun a lot more accurate and the bbs shoot father I hope this helps u and have a nice day
650043
No noticeable recoil difference, I personally feel the monte carlo stock is more padded, which is a little more comfortable to shoot, the added weight gives you a little more control, recoil is the same bc u have same barrel and same round, felt recoil is about the same as well, it just doesnt beat ur shoulder up as much, 30 rds in will still be sore though
265516
Victor, Contact Galloway directly, they have excellent service and want to make sure you get the proper parts to meet your need. But per their website: "Direct replacement for the stock 9lb unit from the factory. Will fully cycle full power ammo and help reduce felt recoil and muzzle flip." Based on that, I would presume it would add ~4 lbs of spring loading to what you have now. This is meant to tame the recoil, but may make it a tad more stiff to manually cycle the slide. I replaced the spring in my LC9 (from 16lb to 20lb), and I cannot say its any more difficult to operate the slide. Galloway's site is http://gallowayprecision.com/ - their phone number can be checked there. Victor, Contact Galloway directly, they have excellent service and want to make sure you get the proper parts to meet your need. But per their website: "Direct replacement for the stock 9lb unit from the factory. Will fully cycle full power ammo and help reduce felt recoil and muzzle flip." Based on that, I would presume it would add ~4 lbs of spring loading to what you have now. This is meant to tame the recoil, but may make it a tad more stiff to manually cycle the slide. I replaced the spring in my LC9 (from 16lb to 20lb), and I cannot say its any more difficult to operate the... » Read More Victor, Contact Galloway directly, they have excellent service and want to make sure you get the proper parts to meet your need. But per their website: "Direct replacement for the stock 9lb unit from the factory. Will fully cycle full power ammo and help reduce felt recoil and muzzle flip." Based on that, I would presume it would add ~4 lbs of spring loading to what you have now. This is meant to tame the recoil, but may make it a tad more stiff to manually cycle the slide. I replaced the spring in my LC9 (from 16lb to 20lb), and I cannot say its any more difficult to operate the slide. Galloway's site is http://gallowayprecision.com/ - their phone number can be checked there. « Show Less
870846
.030 or .035 are both fine. Gun comes with rollers to fit both sizes. The 030. will have a smaller puddle with slightly less heat but i use 035 as well. Either is fine.. Both sizes are usually in stock at rural king or a similar store. Strait argon gas.
930197
Stock is 16lb. I upgraded to 20lb to negate cycling issues. If you're "gentle" when chambering, the bigger spring truly helps.
2065776
A .22 cal will not accommodate a .17 cal or vice versa. I don't why the box says what it says.
1656063
The .177 version has a higher fps pellet speed , but the .22 version has a higher pellet weight. when you combine the pellet speed and its weight you get what is called ft./lbs The .22 version actually has a higher ft./lb rating over the .177 version. ft./lbs is the force of the pellet when it hits the target. Therefore I would say the .22 version is more powerful.
1656062
I bought the .22 for myself , and gave my 30 yr old .177 to my son. The .22 seems to have more "punch", and penetrating power... but I am comparing it to a 30 year old pistol. The .177 has more muzzle velocity, but the .22 has a heavier projectile(and it does seem easier to load with the larger projectile) You can't go wrong with either. No regrets with my .22 purchase. hope this helps
2163619
I've had issue with it holding zero on my mini 14 so would be hesitant to put it n anything with more recoil.
1463562
Mine is mounted on an M&P; 15-22, doesn't move from recoil, but it does move from transporting it in a soft case. Reviews vary greatly, must just be inconsistent quality. Very happy with mine.
502208
Yes. They recommend the 6lb during pin spring for the 20 & 21. my kit came with a 4 and 6. I left mine stock, so it's not the lightest it can be, but damn good. http://www.ghostinc.com/product/GHO_RIK/Rocket-Trigger-Installation-Kit-for-Glocks-GEN-1-4.html If you're mechanically inclined and have a bit patience, you can do it yourself. TAKE your TIME. File slowly and test, over and over, to get it right. Or take it to your gunsmith. I have this in a G20 and a G35.
707905
Though I do not have the Sweet .22 I do have the sweet .17. The simmons is a much lighter and smaller scope. I have the sweet .17 on a ruger .17hmr and the simmons on a benjamin pcp pellet rifle. I like both for what they are set up on. I really like how light and compact the simmons is.