besides having a 8 panel design, what are the main differences between the attack shorts vs. quest?
90314
Per specs, they both have same inseam, the Attack is 88%Nylon/12% Spandex; the Quest is 86%/14%. I purchased the Attack prior to a Century ride-the TUC in Humboldt County- I have also been on many 30, 50, 60 mile rides and will say the Attack is a very comfortable short.
90315
The Race 3D chamois on the Attack is slightly thicker than the Tour 3D chamois on the Quest. I find this adds a little more comfort. The Attack's fabric feels somewhat softer, and the flatlock seams which hold the eight panels together add an extra level of comfort too, IMO. This is my preferred pair of shorts for longer rides. I highly recommend the Attack.
2059580
A co-worker had the earlier model, but based on the description, I purchased this one. The differences are minor but significant enough for me - 1) Slightly better image, 2) More robust built-in stand, 3) Nomex carrying sleeve is included (older model did not). Both models are light in weight and auto-switch from landscape to portrait and back depending on orientation.
1046343
Not nearly as good as the Qsee models I have. Also doesn't have night vision
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.
183314
so is the difference only a usb port, same contrast ratio? panel, specs etc etc ?
1734921
I'm not familiar with the 8 or the others. Mine has been dropped at least 4 times without any marks (fumbled to tiled bar floor & sidewalk). The different shooting selections are nice & simple to go through. Battery life is long & film is better than I expected in different lighting. I'm in my 40s & didn't want to look like I was carting a toy around. The classic look was appealing, the good quality was beyond my expectations.
2176839
I'm not sure since I only have Mindware Q-bits. I assume the extreme version may be more difficult . Both my boys enjoy the regular version. We play during family home evening.
817384
charging capability, shorter than normal. it uses a separate charger and two mini hdmi ports.
24860
My arrows came with the straight Blazer vanes (the short ones), nothing like the Quick Spins which I've used in the past but came back to Blazers. The quickspins have drag and reduce your fps. They were supposed to be more accurate, But I couldn't really notice any difference. You always get some spin, but these vanes are not what contributes to that.
2018550
It's the same, with the addition of the branding. It also comes with a mousepad, but it's been folded in the box for a very long time. I've had mine for a few months, and it's still not flat. Still, it's ~$30 cheaper than the unbranded model, who cares if it comes with a bent mousepad that the more expensive model doesn't even have. Throw it away and you're still way ahead of the game. I don't play Modern Warfare and didn't care one way or the other about the markings, I just liked saving $30. Plus, the Modern Warfare markings look pretty good, even if I don't play.
605875
I think they're the same screen size, but I've never owned an original Gameboy Advance. The main attraction with the SP, for me, is the flip screen and the backlight.
458719
The compact guards are about 1/3 of the size smaller. In Width. I am tall so I actually like the longer/standard ones better. However I have a set of both. Standard-more protection if you are long armed like me.
1084029
There are a lot of differences. The basic frame is the same, but the items that go on the frame as well as the pattern of the fabric and colors are different. It looks like you have a bird instead of a cloud, and the Keyboard unit for music looks very different. The other two activity inserts look very similar/identical. This item often has new versions released of it (my brother has the Baby Einstein Jumper from 2 revisions ago... prior to the too springy Sun Recall) This may just be a revised version.
257393
The answer Janice Buckley gave is exactly what Actron's website gives for the difference between models.The additional features served me well already and I believe are definetly worth having. Dale Graefnitz
193619
Sorry my friend. I didn't make any comparisons. I just took a leap and am happy with the purchase.
1728479
I think the difference is the rounded corners and metal slide rails. See my review of this item, not worth it. Look into something better.
1356531
The A1350Q1T is a full size tripod 3 leg extendable for 174.00 180.00 one of the legs is removable and lets you convert the Tripod to a monopod. the Q1T IS BIGGER BALL HEAD and holds more weight the whole assembly is made to carry more weight. The 0T IS much smaller built to carry a lighter load the ball head is smaller although both held My Canon 7D with 24-105 L Lens and the canon 200mm on the same camera I DO OWN BOTH and depending what you want and what you will use it for price is much different one about 120 the other 180 one is smaller one is lighter two completely different systems When You look at the ad take a close look it is a little confusing to look at. I recommend looking at the tripods by number and reading the specs individually One caveat about the smaller tripod the leg locks don't take much to loosen the bottom section and will- can extend while carrying without realizing .a little plumber tape on the inside thread took care of the problem.