Whats the difference between the WX300/B, WX300/R, and WX300/W? Their prices are different but there doesn't seem to be any visible difference?
1562384
I believe the B, R, and W represent the colors of the body of the WX300. The B for black; the R for red; and the W white. I have the white and love it.
1562385
I do not know....did a comparison when purchased last summer. I recently spent 3 months in Europe, charged camera most nights, took LOTS of pics., never ran out of battery. Loved it!My husband had a similar Canon. We like that also, kept batteries charged. HOWEVER, the Sony worked better at night & had a far better zoom.
235098
If you watch a lot of SD tv you will probably want to spend the extra $600 on the XRB4 since it will up convert the signal to 1080p. I have the W3000 and my friend has the XRB4 and every time I watch SD tv on his I realize how bad mine looks on SD. However if you plan to go mostly HD I would save the $600. HD wise I can't tell the difference between W3000 and XRB4
871031
I personally believe buying the BNF and the DX6i works a lot better I had issues withe the start up of the quad copter and trimming the controls. The DX6i has a monitor that you can see the trim. Also you can store 10 models in the controller. I use the DX6i with my nano QX for practice it's a lot cheaper than wrecking the 350
2235088
I was just debating the SX20 vs SX30, so I was really glad to find this discussion. I assumed the 30 would be an improvement, but it sounds from this discussion and many customer reviews that 20 is a better choice for image quality.
938250
the only difference between the systems is the color of the receiver. the reason why the 2300 has a higher retail price is because it came out a year earlier
1577797
I've seen the W3000 side by side with XBR. I don't like the XBR. It makes movies look like stage shows. Very disconcerting if you like movies. The "3D" effect they talk about makes movies look like video -- if you know the distinction. (If you watch sports more than movies, you will probably like the XBR more.) I almost bought an XBR because "MotionFlow" sounded good... I was stunned when I saw them side by side. Also happy, because I'll save almost a grand by buying a 52W3000 rather than XBR! Do yourself a favor and find them in a store so you can look. Some people like the XBR 3D effect. I really don't.
1585558
Thank you very much for your help!I found the same headphones at the apple store online (for a lot more then here!). They show the PX 100 in two colors (white and black---no mention of a "W") and the picture they show of the white one is the same as here. It is very strange how different the descriptions are, but I'm going to have to agree with you that they are basically the same.Thanks again for your help, JoshEDIT: The Sennheiser site has the same discription for both products: http://www.sennheiserusa.com/newsite/productdetail.asp?transid=005206 Thank you very much for your help!I found the same headphones at the apple store online (for a lot more then here!). They show the PX 100 in two colors (white and black---no mention of a "W") and the picture they show of the white one is the same as here. It is very strange how different the descriptions are, but I'm going to have to agree with you that they are basically the same.Thanks again for your help, JoshEDIT: The Sennheiser site has the same discription for both products:... » Read More Thank you very much for your help!I found the same headphones at the apple store online (for a lot more then here!). They show the PX 100 in two colors (white and black---no mention of a "W") and the picture they show of the white one is the same as here. It is very strange how different the descriptions are, but I'm going to have to agree with you that they are basically the same.Thanks again for your help, JoshEDIT: The Sennheiser site has the same discription for both products: http://www.sennheiserusa.com/newsite/productdetail.asp?transid=005206 « Show Less
696041
I have no experience with the WX150, however this WX80 has been 100% except for the small battery capacity which was easy to replace for less than $30 with two high capacity batteries and multi voltage charger. At this time I have not found anything else that I would want in a camera in this catagory. I hope this helps Vic
648124
I did check out PriceMad after I posted and there are way too many negative comments. I did buy the KDL 52W3000 from Amazon, thru their dealer, J&R-----.; I checked J&R; out and comments/reviews are great. I got it for $2199 with free s&H.; and it has been shipped, so they say.Whoopee!
834111
The DVT3000 and -3200 look identical, and the user manual lumps all of the 3000 series together. So the user interface is identical in both. I suspect the only difference in the 3200, which is no longer listed on Philips' site, is the Dragon software. I have not used my 3000 a lot, but it does a pretty good job picking up sound - the playback is about as clear as your ear hears the original if there is not a lot of background noise, such as in a restaurant. I have recorded my mom with the 3000 on the table in front of us, and the clarity is very good. My wife's boss uses one for dictation at work, and it works great for that. If there are any technical differences in specs between the 3000 and 3200, I doubt you could tell the difference when using it.
75873
There is no difference, the E325 and the E300 are the same size and the same motor, they are packaged differently for certain retailers.
1792967
The XBR5 has a 120Hz refresh rate whereas the W3000 has a 60Hz refresh rate which really makes a difference when you are watching sports or fast action movies in which movements will appear blurry with the 60Hz refresh rate. You can really tell the difference with the 120hz refresh rate!!
648126
Yes, the 52w3000 was at $2499 just a few weeks ago. Suddenly the price jumped to $2608, now I am waiting for the price to drop again...
478391
Even I had the same confusion which out of 3 to buy. I called up the Sony Customer Care and compared all the features of all the 3 Cameras. I would feel 290 woud be best choice as it has 5x zoom but it doesn;t have viewfinder which may not be required also. Difference between 290 ans 300 is it has a viewfinder but has few scenic modes compared to 290 and less zoom too (3X). Apart from touch screen functionality , all the other features are same in T900 . I talked to the Best Buy guys too. According to them the lens in W series is much better than T series. Hence I have ordered W290 pack from amazon.
2104518
Hi Ann! Well the main differences are that the 25 uses AA batteries and the 30 requires a proprietary battery. This means that if you run out of battery power with the 30 you either have another (expensive) proprietary battery or you wait until the battery recharges( a couple of hours) before you get to shoot again. With the 25 you just pop into your local convenience store, buy a set of AA's and you are back shooting again. Me, I carry three sets of hybrid rechargeable batteries so it is unlikely I will ever run out of power, but if I do... The RAW option is good if you like spending hours and hours behind your computer screen making the "perfect" picture. I do not so I opted for the 25( I have had three cameras with RAW and have learned that shooting and tweaking is more fun than the drudgery of manipulating and converting RAW files). The only other difference is that the 30 has a slightly larger viewfinder which would be nice if I did not have to buy the extra proprietary battery(nearly 25 percent of the cameras purchase price each-and I would need three total i.e. and extra hundred bucks) instead of the three sets of set of four hybrid AA's(way less than the price of one of the 30's batteries). So if lots of extra work-time, extra expensive back-up batteries to make sure you never run out of power on a shoot and a slightly bigger viewfinder are worth it to you then the 30 is the better camera. Oh, did I mention the 30 also costs thirty percent more to buy than the 25? So the Hs25EXR is the choice for a fun camera that will do 99 percent everything the HS30EXR will do AND it will do it for less money to buy, be less work( i.e. more fun!), cheaper to power(I get 500 plus shots per set of fully charged Hybrids-mostly using the eye-level finder). The HS25EXR is the one I bought for all those reasons and more. Either way they will both be fun and that is after all the whole point of a Super duper super zoom, right?
400049
I have the SX1IS ad SX30IS. Going to sell one of them. I did a comparison of what I called final image quality. http://www.cameramike.com/cameramike/MEDI_1./Pages/SX30is_compare_SX1is.html Yes - RAW output is an advantage but when you reduce the noise of the SX30 image it is of equal or maybe better quality of the RAW SX1 image. Using my simple non technical setup. I did look at other setting but both like iso 80 the best. I do not need a high definition video - so that difference is not important.
1255608
Hi, in the gray and the white don't exist any difference, this cameras are the same. The camera with wifi is the reference WA30, is more espensive, the camera WA03 don't have wifi. WA03 Very good so far.