How is it compared with the lEICA-d-lux 5 ?
1542147
I have both, and they both take excellent pictures. The d-Lux is an older camera ( I think ), and doesn't have the same resolution. Unless you're making large prints, you will not likely notice much difference. You're also paying about double for the Leica red dot as Leica produces the optics for boh cameras, and if I'm not mistaken Panasonic produces the electronics for both.
294075
Take a look at the Canon PowerShot S95 10 MP Digital Camera with 3.8x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3.0-Inch inch LCD Sometimes it's just a pain to carry my gear around, even if it's a light pack (1 body and a couple lens), so I wanted to find a lightweight and compact solution to this problem. My initial research found that the general consensus for quality point-n-shoot was between the Canon PowerShot S95 and Panasonic Lumix LX-5. After debating and more reseach, I chose the S95 based on my needs. The S95 is smaller than the LX-5, so I could easily carry it in my pocket. I also like some of it's other features: F/2.0 @ 28mm, shoots in RAW, and my guilty pleasure - tilt-shift effect. Needless to say, both cameras have solid picture quality, but of course, not as good as your DSLR. There are plenty of reviews on both cameras. I'd suggest the S95, but I'm sure you can't go wrong with either one!
157904
I've used a 5D mii and I own the 6D. Honestly, if you have the money, I would go for the miii simply because it has a bit more bells and whistles and good growing room. You'll hold onto the iii for a long time. As for the learning curve, they're both mostly the same. If you've owned a DSLR before, you'll have a good idea. If you haven't but you mostly know what you're doing and what all of the things mean, just read the manual a little and you'll get the hang of it in a day or two. And for low light, the 6D is slightly better but they're pretty close. I chose the 6D because, I needed to spend less, it's amazing with lowlight (I shoot a TON of lowlight), it's small and I have small hands, and it's basically just a 5D iii pared down. However, if I had the money, I would get the 5D iii.
1567129
I bought a D610, but it was a gift for my husband, so I really can't compare. You could ask him if you want, <smith@lightlink.com>
1232148
I have had no issues with the Leica electronic viewfinder. My most intensive use of the camera was taking 1470 photos on a two week trip to China. My only problem was the shutter. It is easy to get multiple shots if one's finger lingers on the shutter switch. I am very pleased with the camera. Raymond Powell
567353
I have the Sony. (Took 3 thousand photos and video on an international trip). It is mostly fine, but there are 2 complaints with which I agree on the message boards. 1. Blue purple tint and glare from the lens coating in bright sunlight. 2. In general, not perfectly sharp pictures usually. (I have 5 year old Kodak 5mp that is often more sharp). The good...amazing motion stabilization. 'Able to take photos in almost any light condition without the flash!! I also have some good photos from moving vehicles. Very compact and no protruding lens or lens motor. Quick startup. HD movie is ok also. Acceptable battery life. FYI. There are assorted complaints about the Canons also. I have now read enough not to expect perfect photos from ANY point and shoot, but like you, I hate to drag around that Nikon. (You might try one of the new cameras with a bit larger sensor, like 4 3rds).
525780
It's an excellent camera. But, if you are budget restrained and would like more bang for your buck. I recommend the 5D Mark III. Also a little expensive, but both are worth the price. The D5 Mark III, would allow you to purchase a lens or two and stay in the price range of the 1D-X body only. If you think you will be photographing wildlife along with other subjects. The 5D Mark III is much more wildlife friendly. It has a silent shooting mode that is really more quiet than any of the cameras I presently use. Good luck and enjoy whichever you choose.
951652
I'd get a Canon SD870 over the LX2 any day. As for the G9, I think it's a great camera, but I like a wider lens, which the SD870 has. Plus, the SD870 is much smaller and it looks as if you want something that is portable. I'd say keep the D40 and also get an SD870. You'll have a DSLR for when you need one a compact that takes great pics and fits in your pocket. I've never used the Leica so I can't comment on that.
1000208
The FZ is definitely sharper, has better color saturation and better contrast than most Point and Shoot cameras that I have encountered. Its very difficult to go wrong with a Leica lens. Additionally, this takes pictures in RAW format too, so my suggestion would be to shoot RAW and tweak the level (as one would generally do with SLR). Remember you can shoot pretty flat in SLR and then do the necessary corrections in the SW at home
488983
No idea. They are identical. Some folks think that silver is more "retro" and Leica looking so maybe that is it? I have a black one and it's excellent. The specs on the two cameras are exactly the same so color is the determining factor.
1078011
The G5 does surprisingly well in low light! I am a bit amazed at the pictures I can take with street lights as the only illumination. There is sensor noise; somewhat more than with my Nikon D600, about the same as my Nikon D7000. Noise elimination post-processing cleans it up fairly nicely. On the other hand, consider that most Micro 4/3 lenses are fairly slow. So unless you get one of the fast lenses, you'll be using the "low-light" capabilities more than you would if you had a camera with an fast lens. The lens based anti-shake system works OK, but it's not as effective as some costlier systems, so a tripod is a must for "available dark" shooting.
1964185
It is much slower than using a DSLR. I have a K-5 and still occasionally use my K100D Super, and the X-5 has a considerable delay with respect to those. But for applications such as close-ups of wild flowers, landscapes, pictures of family, etc., it's a lot lighter both in terms of the camera body and you have just one lens, and the result is decent. And you don't have to worry about having a lot of high cost gear with you. So, like everything, there are trade-offs.
1161889
It's pretty fast .I am not a camera dealer or equipment wonk .If anyone wants to send me one of each of the cameras you listed I would be happy to test and compare .Although to do a complete test we should include the Leica M-E. You should get the optional veiwfinder and as many batteries as possible I have four and that is not enough .
1338311
I second the TL500. I've owned the S90, LX3, and LX5. The LX3 & LX5 have color & WB issues (they don't even have a florescent WB setting). The S90 was great except for the previously mentioned blown highlights & 28mm. All these cameras look great on their own, but if you can compare them to a good DSLR and you'll see all their strengths and weaknesses. Good luck.
1199108
takes great pictures in low light. I find all I need to use is the "auto" mode. Shoots fast as well, no distortion. The 20x zoom is fantastic. I did own a Panasonic Lumix which was 4 years old. I researched Panasonic, Nikon, Fuji and this was the best and I have now owned it for over three months.. Also the battery lasts a long time as well!
712771
I have looked at Snapshot's review and D5300 wins here: Low Noise at High ISO 1,284 (vs 1,385 D3300) | Great image quality 84.0 (vs 82.0 D3300) | Full HD 1080p @ 60fps (Both) | Great color depth 24.2 bits (vs 24.3 bits D3300) $497 vs $396(D3300 Advantages:Lower Noise / Larger viewfinder (0.55x vs 0.51x) / Longer battery life (700 vs 500 shots) / better maximum light sensitivity (12,800 vs 6,400 ISO) / LESS startup delay (400 vs 500ms) / Lighter (430g vs 555g) / Thinner (3" vs 3.1") Cheaper @ $396 vs $497LyubakaVideo is on YouTube and Instagram
2150141
IMO this is a great street camera between the f1.8 lens, the tilt viewfinder for shooting from the waist and it's small size compared to a DLSR. There is a little noise at 1600 but the fast lens make pushing your ISO past that rarely needed. While the camera is solid the lens is what makes it great.