besides having a 8 panel design, what are the main differences between the attack shorts vs. quest?
90314
Per specs, they both have same inseam, the Attack is 88%Nylon/12% Spandex; the Quest is 86%/14%. I purchased the Attack prior to a Century ride-the TUC in Humboldt County- I have also been on many 30, 50, 60 mile rides and will say the Attack is a very comfortable short.
90315
The Race 3D chamois on the Attack is slightly thicker than the Tour 3D chamois on the Quest. I find this adds a little more comfort. The Attack's fabric feels somewhat softer, and the flatlock seams which hold the eight panels together add an extra level of comfort too, IMO. This is my preferred pair of shorts for longer rides. I highly recommend the Attack.
1428721
I believe the difference are the depths. I would not say the 6 qt. is bigger because it is more shallow but seems to be wider. Where the 8 qt. is less shallow and probably not as wide. I got the 8 qt. and it really is a great size for everything we use it for.
1627619
8.1 is very similar to 8. biggest difference I've noticed is the addition of a start menu button on the taskbar.
1728479
I think the difference is the rounded corners and metal slide rails. See my review of this item, not worth it. Look into something better.
384973
No. They are similar but not the same. It's also hard to tell if the opacity or privacy levels would be the same or different. It might help to take a look at the displays at the manufacturer's website at artscape-inc.com under the 'products' section. After scrolling to and clicking on the selection and pausing several seconds, the screen will shift to a close up image; or, click on the "+" at the bottom right of the first image to select other views.
85339
The biggest difference is the new X-Trans sensor which removes the optical low pass filter (OLPF)... making pics much sharper than they were in the x10. Here's more from dpreview's review (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x20/): At first glance, the X20 looks just like its predecessor (the X10), although it's now available in a very pretty silver-and-black finish, alongside the conventional all-black. But inside it offers a couple of very significant differences. The first is a brand-new sensor, a 2/3" type 'X-Trans CMOS' design that uses the same novel color filter array as Fujifilm's recent APS-C cameras. This sensor also has phase detect autofocus built right into it - not new to Fuji cameras, but a change from the X10. The second big change is an updated 'Advanced Optical Viewfinder' that includes a detailed information overlay, showing key exposure data and focus confirmation. This isn't the same as the hybrid viewfinder found in the company's X100/X100S and X-Pro1 models - there's no electronic viewfinder - but it's never been done before on a compact camera. The X20 is available in silver/black and all-black bodies Aside from this, the X20 retains most of the same features that made the X10 so appealing. It uses the same fast zoom lens, with a 28-112mm equivalent angle of view and F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture, which is operated by a mechanically-coupled zoom ring that also retracts the lens and turns the camera on and off. It has plenty of external controls, including an exposure compensation dial and two rear dials, and a hot shoe for external flash. One feature notable by its absence is a direct movie record button - the X20 is clearly designed for still photography first, and video second.
1342745
the two bodies are very very similar. they are functionally the same size, but it's a risk, as I'm not 100% sure the buttons and dials are all in the same spot. I'm trying to remember (it's been a while) but I think the jump from T1i to T2i is basically a better screen, but the same size, and a slightly faster FPS. If your willing to spend this much on a dive housing, it might make more sense to sell the t1i, and buy a t2i, to be 100% sure it works well.
1936584
The difference is the LCD screen has a 360 tilt making it so you can see yourself while you shoot. It is very convenient and easy to use!
379856
There appears to be no difference. The tactical one was more expensive at the time that I bought mine that's why I didn't get it. Get it before the price goes back up.
2084525
Here is a link to a comparison chart. http://edgecraft.com/tips_qrfman.html
257731
The extended pads are the same, just longer. You can put more dies on them to cut at one time. also, there are some dies that need the longer cutting pad. Usually the extended pads need the extended accessories to use them with varying machines. the 8 x 6 are the standard size
1046343
Not nearly as good as the Qsee models I have. Also doesn't have night vision
1535318
no differences in gameplay. just the design. it's an update from the company. that's all. the first edition will be some sort of an collector's edition now since it's out of print.
869197
I would say same as the regular except the seams are better. I use mine for magazine I get that comes with a board game in it on heavy paper and the magazine and the game all fit in the sleeve real nicely and doesn't stress the seam at all
365173
I think the main differences are a better filter and digital controls. But you can do a comparison on their website to make sure.
626006
I think the Starter Edition was more simplified. It had just what required. The Deluxe has more categories than I needed. It will work on 8 I am sure. It should tell you requirements.
183314
so is the difference only a usb port, same contrast ratio? panel, specs etc etc ?