I write both fiction and nonfiction. Can this software handle the insertion of photos for my nonfiction books or is this best for straight-text files?
1536688
You got me there. I write fiction. I might suggest writing your paper chapter by chapter, or section by section, whatever the case might be, and then export your finished work to word at as RTF file. That's how I edit my writing. I like WWP because it's easy to move around paragraphs and chapters. JTR
1202923
Well, I think you can use the Kobo ebook reader software, but if it won't read text files, then maybe you can download a .txt reader program from either Amazon or the Sam 4.0 site. I personally didn't like this unit because it crashed on me about 6 or 7 months after getting it and Sylvania would not respond to my inquiries about getting the 2.2 Android OS reinstalled again. Get yourself something else like an AGPtek TP718JQ instead and for less money. It has 1.5GH quad-core processor, Dual cameras, dual speakers, 8GB of memory and a 4.1.1 Android OS.
1742012
Depends on the book. For textbooks not always. There isn't enough space in the book between the text and the binding so the words on the left get cut off. That or the scanner is slightly too big and wide so the scanner doesn't capture all the text. I would say for most books it's not suitable and you'd be better off with a flat bed book scanner which is much better quality and easier to use but more expensive.
1881122
I have never done anything as big as that, but I believe you should be able to do that with PagePlus X6 or X7. I have done essentially the same thing with much smaller articles. Breaking it down into chapters may help. VR, Jim Nolan VR
2185866
I bought hard cover and made photo book. It works well. To make strong bind use staple (personally recommend). It works better.
1367110
The app gives you the option of transferring either JPG or RAW or both. It can push either Canon or Nikon raw files just fine.
28902
It works just fine. You would place the scanner on the book, with the top taken off and move it around the book page. Depending on how big the old book is will determine how many times you have to move the scanner. One thing I learned the hard way was that I didn't overlap the scanned pieces enough at the beginning and the stitching software couldn't put it into a whole piece. Otherwise I have taken this with me on my genealogy quests with great satisfaction. Only problem, as I've mentioned before is the battery dependence. Bring extra memory cards or have the ability to download from the little card. Without a card or battery, it doesn't work. It works just fine. You would place the scanner on the book, with the top taken off and move it around the book page. Depending on how big the old book is will determine how many times you have to move the scanner. One thing I learned the hard way was that I didn't overlap the scanned pieces enough at the beginning and the stitching software couldn't put it into a whole piece. Otherwise I have taken this with me on my genealogy quests with great satisfaction. Only problem, as I've mentioned before is the battery dependence. Bring extra memory cards or have the ability to download from the... » Read More It works just fine. You would place the scanner on the book, with the top taken off and move it around the book page. Depending on how big the old book is will determine how many times you have to move the scanner. One thing I learned the hard way was that I didn't overlap the scanned pieces enough at the beginning and the stitching software couldn't put it into a whole piece. Otherwise I have taken this with me on my genealogy quests with great satisfaction. Only problem, as I've mentioned before is the battery dependence. Bring extra memory cards or have the ability to download from the little card. Without a card or battery, it doesn't work. « Show Less
766914
I didn't know, so I gave it a try just now. It took me seconds to transfer a PDF file I had received in email. When you go to move it the iflashdrive comes up immediately as one of the choices to transfer to. Very easy!
1821392
Yes. I've loaded and used this software on my windows 7 computer for over a year. every feature that I've needed functions seamlessly. I use it to edit photographs for engineerinig and metalurgy work. I have not used the more "artsy" features, but I'm confident in what I have done, that it will perform as designed. No worries, no regrets Good software.
2248051
Yes. It is very easy to use. Good for BASIC documentation and storage. Don't know if it will hold up to today's school work.
534417
Call ABBY on this one - FR works with word and dff files. No OCR program is perfect but FR does do a great job.
1630459
I concur with you; I was able to find a formatter program that did the job quick and easy - thank you for your advice.
1223615
I have used my version with every program except Vista. I still love this program. I have used mine exclusively for old photos. This program probably would not suit someone who does professional photography.
315989
I bought it for the same reason and it didn't work. I'm sure it's great if you write your paper right into it, but alas, not useful if you need to import already written documents.
1930173
templates you use: adding your personal photos, text are burned to your disk.I find this unit works as well as hose installed on my desk top.Unbeatable quality for the price.absolutely no complaints.
1780864
I use the paper primarily for CD inserts, which usually include text and photos. It's far better for that purpose than photo paper because (1) you can print on both sides, and (2) it's not as thick...and if you're doing a booklet with 8 or 12 pages, that's important.
1976746
I actually use photo corner tabs to attach photos. It works nicely without ruining the pages or the photo.