Does this lens have Optical Stabilization? Thanks.
90709
Sadly it does not have... but still it is a good lens which I am happy to have one!
2280350
no image stabilisation at all . Not necessary , because this is a super-wide-angle lens .
581471
Yes. It has other problems, like causing flare (not blackened enough plastic), the autofocus never finding its mark correctly with Canon 35/2 IS, I'm not sure image stabilization even works with this lens (I see no difference between On/Off settings) -- but vignetting is not one of them.
1942155
No, this lens is not shake stabilized. I take extra efforts to steady the camera at the longer focal lengths and slower shutter speeds, just as I did back in the day using traditional film cameras and lenses. Use a tripod, monopod, beanbag, wrapping the strap, leaning against a solid surface are all good techniques. Also the new Photoshop CC has a shake-fix feature.
2155975
The 20-50 mm lens does not have stabilization; however some of the accessory lens does have that feature. I have been using my NX2000 for about a month, I like it, and the images it produces are very good. Mine does not have stabilization and I compensate by using the carrying strap around my neck, while holding the camera out in front with my arms slightly out stretched. This stabilizes the camera giving me an image that is clear and steady. Bob Kelley Jasper, Ga
686999
Yes it is. I have the same camera and the same lens. It's the lens I have on right now, and I use it quite a bit. I love it. I don't know whether it's stabilized or not, but I always try to brace my camera somehow, on something.
191715
Hi Craig J., I don't know if it has image stabilization. I returned it the same week. The closure on the lens would not open properly, after only taking one picture. I did some research and found out it was a common problem with this particular nikon camera.
264983
Well, as far as I could figure it out, it does not. But never mind, it's a great lens, worth its price, and actually you won't realize at all.
1056959
I don't recall which one I got, but the picture quality is very good for this lens. The picture stabilization on/off button doesn't show any noticeable quality improvement for me. Need to keep checking.
1669895
supposedly. it does not have anything in the menus so i don't think you can turn it off but p.148 in the manual says it has "lens-shift type optical stabilization"
2137903
No, with the dx format(40mm x 1.5) it is equivalent to a 60mm (35mm film format); which is considered a normal focal length lens. The special thing about this is lens is that you can get real close up. It is super sharp and takes great close up portraits as well as allowing you to take close ups of flowers jewelry and the usual stuff you might like to look at up close. No image stabilization :( but a bright f2.8
385279
Yes it does have an image stabilizer and a very good one too. Next to the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II, this lens is about as good as you would want it to be. Take care.
1649059
I think there are 2 - with and without optical stabilization. I have the one without OS which works just fine on a tripod for wildflowers (you don't use OS with a tripod anyway). The 150 mm focal length is a little much to use for handheld macros anyways IMHO! A very sharp optic.
658102
Hi Dennis. There is no stabilization on this lens. It's very fast and we don't have a need for it. Now, if you are shooting videos, yes they will appear a little jittery of course, but for pictures it's perfect.
1151739
Hi, thanks question. This lens does not have image stabilization. Those use the lens for Olympus compact digital camera would be lens. Thanks in advance.
1401283
This lens does not have built-in stabilization. I don't believe that NEX-7 does either.
857715
No it is not an image stabilizer lens. For the money it is a great everyday lens. I have had some trouble with it on auto focus at 250mm. I would still recommend the lens.