How does this compare with ASUSS400CA-DHS1T for usefulness?
1993735
I agree with Mr. Viernes response - the main difference between the two is the RAM and HHD. And of course the screen size. But you can never have enough RAM so I'd upgrade to at least 6GB, or even 8 if your budget allows. The i5 processor seems to be standard on the 400, as it is on my 500, and it's plenty fast. You do have the option of upgrading to the i7, which is great if you're running multiple graphics. Otherwise the i5 should be fine. Of course the 400 has a smaller screen than the 500 but that may be a good thing if you travel often and space is a problem. The 500 isn't heavy, and it's very slim, but it fits tight in a standard sized computer bag.
1993736
i think the main difference between 400 and 500 is the amount of GB the RAM and HHD has. Oh and the processor is lower in the 400 model than the 500. If you dont need 6gb of ram, dont need a bigger screen, and dont need the extra GB on the HHD, I would get a 400. If you do need those options get the 500, and if you need an optical drive (cause 500 series and below dont have them) The 550 would be my recommendation.
1993737
Hi, the VivoBook S500 is my first Asus netbook, so I can't compare it with another model. Sorry
1993738
I agree with Mr. Viernes response - the main difference between the two is the RAM and HHD. And of course the screen size. But you can never have enough RAM so I'd upgrade to at least 6GB, or even 8 if your budget allows. The i5 processor seems to be standard on the 400, as it is on my 500, and it's plenty fast. You do have the option of upgrading to the i7, which is great if you're running multiple graphics. Otherwise the i5 should be fine. Of course the 400 has a smaller screen than the 500 but that may be a good thing if you travel often and space is a problem. The 500 isn't heavy, and it's very slim, but it fits tight in a standard sized computer bag. I agree with Mr. Viernes response - the main difference between the two is the RAM and HHD. And of course the screen size. But you can never have enough RAM so I'd upgrade to at least 6GB, or even 8 if your budget allows. The i5 processor seems to be standard on the 400, as it is on my 500, and it's plenty fast. You do have the option of upgrading to the i7, which is great if you're running multiple graphics. Otherwise the i5 should be fine. Of course the 400 has a smaller screen than the 500 but that may be a good thing if you travel often and space is a problem. The 500 isn't heavy, and... » Read More I agree with Mr. Viernes response - the main difference between the two is the RAM and HHD. And of course the screen size. But you can never have enough RAM so I'd upgrade to at least 6GB, or even 8 if your budget allows. The i5 processor seems to be standard on the 400, as it is on my 500, and it's plenty fast. You do have the option of upgrading to the i7, which is great if you're running multiple graphics. Otherwise the i5 should be fine. Of course the 400 has a smaller screen than the 500 but that may be a good thing if you travel often and space is a problem. The 500 isn't heavy, and it's very slim, but it fits tight in a standard sized computer bag. « Show Less
32329
I have been using the HC6000 for the last 6 months, the same thing basically but with two sensors to control when to start and stop pumping instead of the smarts to turn off the pump using a single sensor and current sensing like the HC8000. The HC8000 didn't work for me as it didn't sense when to stop pumping correctly and would only pump the pit out halfway before quitting. That being said, while it was pumping it was drawing ~850 Watts (measured with killawatt power meter) running my Utilitech 0.5 HP sump, pushing up about a 4 foot head over a 110 foot run. That works out to ~7.5 amps. Most of the stamps on all electronics that state current draw overstate the actual need, so I bet you will be safe with the Zoeller. BTW, I had a great experience with the vendor. I had to return the 8000 to get the 6000 and process was easy. I wish the 8000 had worked for me because I loved only having a single wire, but not for me. Something about my setup must have confused it's internals. . . good luck
1020415
thx, I guess i'll stick with 540TM :-) I am upgrading from old Garmin that had no map updates and traffic and hopefully it would be worth it at this price. I did use one of the TOM TOM models (smaller one) for a 2600 miles trip in the west coast and routing was really good.
2242428
We have been very happy with the unit and are considering getting another one. I haven't used other makes/models so I can't give you a comparison.
462654
Yes, it is the same. It lacks all of the digital features you see on the RC model, but is also $150 less expensive than the RC. The CD model's temperature control might be nice, but it's $50 more and lacks a rating. That would be a worthy feature. But again, no rating; and considering the RC model has a digital display, the SH might prove a better unit. It really does not take that long to the get the hang of the heat-control, which is around back. You'll find it needs to be adjusted in small steps, which why I said the CD might be nice, with its temperature display. Still, it's not that big of a deal to set the control. Take care, Allen. Hope all of this makes sense. It's just that the digital-features of the RC and CD models might prove problematic and account for lower rating of the RC unit.
686763
I was using a older Linskys, but recently replaced it with the much faster new ASUS AC-68U router. This one has the adjustable 80 to 200 mw WiFi power that you can adjust or turn-off if you want. I'm using the same four Cat-5 cables I used on the old setup so I don't use the wireless feature due to the other 2.4 interference I get from my other equipment. The ASUS router was simple and fast to set up. This one includes the easy to connect Wireless WPS button as i'm sure most of the new brands of routers includes this feature. I also like this one as it has a WiFi shutoff button when your not using it's wireless feature. I was using a older Linskys, but recently replaced it with the much faster new ASUS AC-68U router. This one has the adjustable 80 to 200 mw WiFi power that you can adjust or turn-off if you want. I'm using the same four Cat-5 cables I used on the old setup so I don't use the wireless feature due to the other 2.4 interference I get from my other equipment. The ASUS router was simple and fast to set up. This one includes the easy to connect Wireless WPS button as i'm sure most of the new brands of routers includes this feature. I also like this one as it has a WiFi shutoff button when your... » Read More I was using a older Linskys, but recently replaced it with the much faster new ASUS AC-68U router. This one has the adjustable 80 to 200 mw WiFi power that you can adjust or turn-off if you want. I'm using the same four Cat-5 cables I used on the old setup so I don't use the wireless feature due to the other 2.4 interference I get from my other equipment. The ASUS router was simple and fast to set up. This one includes the easy to connect Wireless WPS button as i'm sure most of the new brands of routers includes this feature. I also like this one as it has a WiFi shutoff button when your not using it's wireless feature. « Show Less
1689586
The 4930 cost more, is 5" smaller, and the controls are arranged differently. Other than that, I don't see much of a difference in the two. If you are looking for a model that will circulate the air in the room with some efficiency, keep it cool, and has simple to understand buttons, the cheaper of the two will work for you. I use mine in my masterbed room and that's a good 11' x 19'. Mine has kept my room well cooled during the hot summer months and keeps it cool. It works best in an area on the floor that it won't get knocked over by rowdy kids or out of control pets. Though my cats bumped me into mine and I knocked my over and no damage done. Works perfectly like the day I bought it. You just don't want to knock over any fan no matter what and place it on a firm level surface for best stability. Just my words of wisdom there, or call it the voice of experience. Save the extra cash and go for the model #4443 I'm sure you won't be terribly disappointed with the purchase.
329685
The TH8320WF1029 has an S1/S2 on the board that you connect the outdoor sensor wires to. The response from Manny G on Dec 31 is accurate.I initially bought a model from Home Depot which did not have the S1/S2....so returned and upgraded to the 1029 which is considered professional. If you contact the Honeywell site the will not work with you with the 1029 and will direct you to using an installer because this unit is for professionally trained wiring. Basically, except for the S1/S2 additional contacts, both units are exactly the same and wire the same way. I was able to wire the 1029 and I'm not a technician, just a home-owner. The TH8320WF1029 has an S1/S2 on the board that you connect the outdoor sensor wires to. The response from Manny G on Dec 31 is accurate.I initially bought a model from Home Depot which did not have the S1/S2....so returned and upgraded to the 1029 which is considered professional. If you contact the Honeywell site the will not work with you with the 1029 and will direct you to using an installer because this unit is for professionally trained wiring. Basically, except for the S1/S2 additional contacts, both units are exactly the same and wire the same way. I was able to wire the 1029... » Read More The TH8320WF1029 has an S1/S2 on the board that you connect the outdoor sensor wires to. The response from Manny G on Dec 31 is accurate.I initially bought a model from Home Depot which did not have the S1/S2....so returned and upgraded to the 1029 which is considered professional. If you contact the Honeywell site the will not work with you with the 1029 and will direct you to using an installer because this unit is for professionally trained wiring. Basically, except for the S1/S2 additional contacts, both units are exactly the same and wire the same way. I was able to wire the 1029 and I'm not a technician, just a home-owner. « Show Less
1302641
I also use the PRS3100 and it works great. It also has the added benefit of having the ability to shut off the router with your leg or knee in the event of an emergency.
1117379
Cate, If you are good with numbers, I would recommend the p4400 over the p4460 (which I find more confusing). Another choice is the Belkin Conserve power monitor, which is very simple. It has the advantage of a remote display reducing the need to crawl behind things to see the data. One significant disadvantage is that it does not have a KWH number. You can see more about that in my review of that product.But I would recommend the p4400 and putting it on a power strip so that you can have it out where you can see it.I reduced my electricity consumption by 74% and a significant part informed by my monitoring using the P4400. Cate, If you are good with numbers, I would recommend the p4400 over the p4460 (which I find more confusing). Another choice is the Belkin Conserve power monitor, which is very simple. It has the advantage of a remote display reducing the need to crawl behind things to see the data. One significant disadvantage is that it does not have a KWH number. You can see more about that in my review of that product.But I would recommend the p4400 and putting it on a power strip so that you can have it out where you can see it.I reduced my electricity consumption by 74% and a... » Read More Cate, If you are good with numbers, I would recommend the p4400 over the p4460 (which I find more confusing). Another choice is the Belkin Conserve power monitor, which is very simple. It has the advantage of a remote display reducing the need to crawl behind things to see the data. One significant disadvantage is that it does not have a KWH number. You can see more about that in my review of that product.But I would recommend the p4400 and putting it on a power strip so that you can have it out where you can see it.I reduced my electricity consumption by 74% and a significant part informed by my monitoring using the P4400. « Show Less
1921434
What did the vendor recommend. Personally I have not purchase or tried SHSP718. Cant comment sorry.
1477840
DOD LS300W is really just a DOD LS430W without the GPS clip and the speed display function. For video quality, you can check out this review video for DOD LS430W: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLFZuKSYiZs&list=PLFB79814F24001328&feature=c4-overview-vl (I do not own this video)
102677
The ES is over a year old and the UN55F7500 is much faster and better all around.You won't like the response time of the ES.
1473513
I'm not familiar with the unit you're comparing to, but I bought this one, use it constantly and love it. Recently went full time in an rv, and couldn't be w/o it!
1539499
I've never used the c31. The c41 is really no different than the main Genie hr44 speed wise. It was easy to set up too Just plug it in and give directv a call to set it up via phone. Hope this was helpful.
365362
you sir can find your answer in this link, i hope it helps: http://www.hkvstar.com/technology-news/whats-difference-between-d1-and-cif-for-dvr.html
2278073
I have no idea of comparisons. Would suggest contacting a medical technician.