Why is this better than the $60 or cheaper models? What's the advantage, noise?
1976222
This booster fan is much more powerful-- the cheaper fans use something similar to what you would find in a desktop computer. It isn't that loud either. I ended up returning mine. It didn't really make any difference for the room we were trying to regulate. However, this wasn't the fault of the fan, it was due to poor HVAC design.
1976223
I don't know to what $60 model you refer? If it is those computer fans, they make way too much noise for a bedroom, and don't move that much air. I returned the one I tried. This is a squirrel cage, and relatively quiet. I like it.
1976224
The RB10 seemed to have an overall better quality rating. It is not silent, but the noise level is okay if you are comfortable with "white noise" i.e. the hum of a refrigerator compressor. Purchased over a year ago and it continues to function.
1976225
Better air flow. I needed the best air flow I could get and this one was rated the best and has done a good job. I use it in the summer in an upstairs bedroom that's too warm. I run this unit 24/7 during the summer months to force more AC cooled air into the room and lower the room temp about 3 degrees. No more complaints from the occupant.
1976226
No noise - Tjernland has great ruputation in industrial market - work completely to solve my air flow problem
1976227
This model happens to have lasted the longest and is the most quiet. One thing, I use these at the outer edge of my heating system, the farthest vents from the furnace.Noticed that used in vents near furnace there was no advantage in higher output.
1976228
We did not chevk any others but like thid one.it is not totally quiet but the noise does not bother us
663164
There may be....i am conditioned to think that 20 bucks more means something a bit additional, perhaps. Maybe the other model has a bigger sound.....however, maybe they are essentially the same. If you find any info, please let me know. Thanks!
973283
Quality-wise, the SX1000 is as good as it gets at this price and this form factor. As far as better than the 712, I can't say as I haven't heard one of those, but this one has a limiter and a low-cut filter, which will save your life sometimes in certain situations (i.e. you have manually set the recording level for a live band in a club, but they get a little bit louder sometimes and you don't find out till later). And as Jay Jay Jay said in one of his replies to a question about lectures, the stereo mode with appropriately-set mic sensitivity was far superior to trying to use the monophonic and directional lecture mode with this device. Quality-wise, the SX1000 is as good as it gets at this price and this form factor. As far as better than the 712, I can't say as I haven't heard one of those, but this one has a limiter and a low-cut filter, which will save your life sometimes in certain situations (i.e. you have manually set the recording level for a live band in a club, but they get a little bit louder sometimes and you don't find out till later). And as Jay Jay Jay said in one of his replies to a question about lectures, the stereo mode with appropriately-set mic sensitivity was far superior to trying to use the... » Read More Quality-wise, the SX1000 is as good as it gets at this price and this form factor. As far as better than the 712, I can't say as I haven't heard one of those, but this one has a limiter and a low-cut filter, which will save your life sometimes in certain situations (i.e. you have manually set the recording level for a live band in a club, but they get a little bit louder sometimes and you don't find out till later). And as Jay Jay Jay said in one of his replies to a question about lectures, the stereo mode with appropriately-set mic sensitivity was far superior to trying to use the monophonic and directional lecture mode with this device. « Show Less
606034
No way haha. TBH this thing is a piece of crap. It's got TONS of inherent noise. You're better going and getting an expensive one. They might cost 2-4 times as much, but at least they won't be buzzing like a beehive.
1756978
I, too, had to choose between the RC Micro and the Classic. I worried the the RC Micro's were too small to provide a full sound. I ended up choosing the RC MIcro's. Here's why: 1. I scoured the different audio forums to get the opinion of people who knew more than me. In the AVS forum (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1153061), I found a posting by a member who posted frequently and who seemed to be highly respected by other forum members. This is what he wrote, "RC-Micro are smaller, with higher build quality and better drivers (than the Classic). They will have a more "refined" sound. The sub is a little better also. Whether it is "worth it" is strictly up to you and how critical you are in your bedroom listening. If you can afford the extra and are seeking the maximum sound quality from the smallest possible package, the RC-Micro will be great. If you aren't super critical and will only be doing casual, moderate volume listening, the Take Classic will probably be fine." 2. I called the tech help at Energy Speakers (they're very helpful, by the way). I told them I could buy the Classic or the RC Micro for the same price. Their tech guy said absolutely take the RC Micro's. 3. They sound better, they look better. I'm really happy with the RC Micro's. Hope that helps!
2271063
Thats a tough question. The vibration is pretty good but the audio is better for me.
441586
I feel that it is better than on-board sound cards.(Actually, I'm a Laptop user.)Clearer and more abundant sound is available.Of course, it can not be better than an expensive built-in sound card, I think.But with an inexpensive price, I could enjoy better sound.
582616
It's plenty loud for household use and doesn't distort.Not a BOSE unit.FM radio in a rural area stinks, no antenna. ..But! If you want volume without distortion you want, buy a cheep used guitar amp (20/30 bucks) with a 8 or 10 in speaker..Then buy an adapter wire with a male 1/8 in. stereo plug on one side and a 1/4 inch. mono plug on the other side .Plug the 1/8 stereo plug into your source and the other mono into the input of the amp. be sure not turn up the volume on the source so loud or it will distort..Then use the amp. volume to play it as loud as you wish.I used that hook up in my garage.. MUCHO LOUD and cheap It's plenty loud for household use and doesn't distort.Not a BOSE unit.FM radio in a rural area stinks, no antenna. ..But! If you want volume without distortion you want, buy a cheep used guitar amp (20/30 bucks) with a 8 or 10 in speaker..Then buy an adapter wire with a male 1/8 in. stereo plug on one side and a 1/4 inch. mono plug on the other side .Plug the 1/8 stereo plug into your source and the other mono into the input of the amp. be sure not turn up the volume on the source so loud or it will distort..Then use the amp. volume to play it as loud as you wish.I used that hook up in my... » Read More It's plenty loud for household use and doesn't distort.Not a BOSE unit.FM radio in a rural area stinks, no antenna. ..But! If you want volume without distortion you want, buy a cheep used guitar amp (20/30 bucks) with a 8 or 10 in speaker..Then buy an adapter wire with a male 1/8 in. stereo plug on one side and a 1/4 inch. mono plug on the other side .Plug the 1/8 stereo plug into your source and the other mono into the input of the amp. be sure not turn up the volume on the source so loud or it will distort..Then use the amp. volume to play it as loud as you wish.I used that hook up in my garage.. MUCHO LOUD and cheap « Show Less
1468740
By no means definitive here, since I went through the same questions before I bought these. These are open, vs. closed on the 170's. So the 170's will keep out more of the ambient noise in your environment than these will. These also will be audible easier to other people in the area, depending on the volume that can be VERY much so. Even at low volume you can hear it fine four or five feet away. I preferred the open though since I am a single parent with a 9 year old son, so I like hearing if he hollers out during the night when I'm doing something else. But for me the clincher was the far more comfortable velour ear pieces. They breathe, so your skull around your ears won't get as sweaty and wet like the fake leather stuff on the 170's will do. Now, you CAN buy the velour ear covers for the 170's, but they ran like $45 and I only found them overseas so the price difference would've been lost by the time I went that route anyway. Spec-wise, they're pretty identical with a similar feature set. I could find nothing that would push me for one over the other on a purely sound level aspect.
1306538
The noise reduction with these is better than the tactical sport version. I have compared them side by side as a friend has the TS model. I regularly shoot at an indoor pistol range and the Pro model works very well. My friend "doubles up" using foam ear plugs in addition to the TS model shooting indoors. I think the extra cost is worth the additional protection.
1020911
For the extra 35$, you get a 1.25" bigger sub with a higher wattage which allows for heavier and deeper bass. Also, the wattage to the speakers is higher and that along with the wider range for frequency response allows for more notes to be hit as well as clearer sound. The 3908 speakers are fantastic, I've had them for nearly 6 months now and they're still superb.
1030546
1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for, its kind of hard to go wrong. 1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for,... » Read More 1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for, its kind of hard to go wrong. « Show Less
2058164
To elaborate on my previous post, and to answer the question, it sounds fine at low volume if you're looking for clean sounds. I needed a louder amp which is why I chose this model. Best thing to do is find one locally and take it for a test drive.
802303
Actually I agree with the above poster. The MDR-ZX600 are a great step up in terms of richer sound, more clarity, and nicer bass, mids, and highs. They also have much better isolation. I previously posted that the sony mdr 7506's would be a good step up, but I must retract this comment as after months of use they are just too trebly and bright. They become extremely fatiguing within 20 minutes or so, whereas the mdr-zx600's are perfectly balanced and overall a fantastic choice.Thanks...
322077
I love the 558. Since you are asking, I assume you are new to hi-fidelity headphones. If so, I suggest you start there. Once you have experienced them, you can develop an appreciation that might direct you to the 598s later, or in another direction entirely. Until you find out what your preferences and biases are, I wouldn't spend the money, because the 558s I have handle every improvement in source I provide. I would spend money to upgrade to the best cables you can use. I would also spend money to purchase higher fidelity music. There is a lot of discussion about range when you buy better music. That is not the issue. It is how much noise turns into additional music as the quality of your music files improves. It's like arguing about pixel size or frame rate wrt your eye's capability to see. Higher quality pictures look better, even if you can't see the pixels or the flicker from the frame rate. Anyway, the HD 558 give very good performance.
1584982
I did not hear 60Hz hum or buzz when using my Fuze+. Many other inexpensive MP3 players (eg Panasonic, Cobe) have very conspicuous electronic noise from the unit processor (aka interrupt noise). I find the SanDisks Sansas better shielded from internal noise than cheapter products, but it is not perfect. AC hum hasn't been one of my complaints. Another idea you could try, if you happen to be in a high-noise area, is to get a length of wire, connect it to a metal coffee can and plug the wire into the ground outlet of a three-pronged outlet. That should create a Faraday cage which should absorb that 60Hz signal. I did not hear 60Hz hum or buzz when using my Fuze+. Many other inexpensive MP3 players (eg Panasonic, Cobe) have very conspicuous electronic noise from the unit processor (aka interrupt noise). I find the SanDisks Sansas better shielded from internal noise than cheapter products, but it is not perfect. AC hum hasn't been one of my complaints. Another idea you could try, if you happen to be in a high-noise area, is to get a length of wire, connect it to a metal coffee can and plug the wire into the ground outlet of a three-pronged outlet. That should create a Faraday cage which... » Read More I did not hear 60Hz hum or buzz when using my Fuze+. Many other inexpensive MP3 players (eg Panasonic, Cobe) have very conspicuous electronic noise from the unit processor (aka interrupt noise). I find the SanDisks Sansas better shielded from internal noise than cheapter products, but it is not perfect. AC hum hasn't been one of my complaints. Another idea you could try, if you happen to be in a high-noise area, is to get a length of wire, connect it to a metal coffee can and plug the wire into the ground outlet of a three-pronged outlet. That should create a Faraday cage which should absorb that 60Hz signal. « Show Less
1622177
Not sure why the price difference. I have used the e6 in the past for speaking. Is it nicer.... Yes. Are there better technical advantages.... Yes. On the other hand, can anyone in my church tell the difference? Nope, expect the one guy who has done professional sound and he says it is minimal. If you have a good person working the board, this mic is great. I do not worry if something happens to it. I bought two to guest speakers have one and don't mess mine up. The sermon recordings come out clear and crisp. Only do the e6 if the $300+ is no big deal or you will be outside a lot. Other than that this mic has been great since day one. Not sure why the price difference. I have used the e6 in the past for speaking. Is it nicer.... Yes. Are there better technical advantages.... Yes. On the other hand, can anyone in my church tell the difference? Nope, expect the one guy who has done professional sound and he says it is minimal. If you have a good person working the board, this mic is great. I do not worry if something happens to it. I bought two to guest speakers have one and don't mess mine up. The sermon recordings come out clear and crisp. Only do the e6 if the $300+ is no big deal or you will be outside a lot. Other... » Read More Not sure why the price difference. I have used the e6 in the past for speaking. Is it nicer.... Yes. Are there better technical advantages.... Yes. On the other hand, can anyone in my church tell the difference? Nope, expect the one guy who has done professional sound and he says it is minimal. If you have a good person working the board, this mic is great. I do not worry if something happens to it. I bought two to guest speakers have one and don't mess mine up. The sermon recordings come out clear and crisp. Only do the e6 if the $300+ is no big deal or you will be outside a lot. Other than that this mic has been great since day one. « Show Less