Is it possible to use this bipod while keeping the bayonet attached?
1519144
No, You must remove the baynet to install the bipod. There is not room for both.
1519145
No. The bipod attaches with the screw that would have previously connected the bayonet blade to the stud on the barrel.
1519146
No the bayonet needs to be removed. it installs between the lugs. may require some filling for proper fit. meaning, all the holes line up.
1323910
In a word yes. The tripod will allow far greater stability then a bipod. As for ease of adjustment and uneven ground, I have used this for several tactical matches and it works perfectly.
1552638
Sure is. I have two Arisaka type 99's in mine. No bipods or scopes, but if it will safely hold two without them touching, then one Russian piece should fit easy.
395320
There is not enough room for a bipod or practical handle however there are offset attachments for the rail that would bring the rail back to a usable position. Im not really sure how practical it would be considering a tree limb or boulder you may be able to use during your excursion.
1334858
Yes, you can mount the bi-pod in either direction, so the legs will fold forward or rearward, whichever is better for the weapon.
1765470
It's a bit awkward with the bipod extended and might take some practice getting used to. easier to break and cock against a hard surface.
433812
No, it does not have any options to attach a picatinny rail, so you would NOT be able to attach a bipod
1135267
Not a bayonet that belongs on it. You would have to make your own. The bayonet that goes on this rifle does not fit. You would have to do some serious modifications in order to make that happen and would probably ruin the rifle.
533595
Mounting a bipod can definately be accomplished with this, but obviously not in the battle stock.
2088165
This bipod mounts to the rail with no attachnents needed. I would not recommend using this bipod on a 7.62x39. The bipod will not stand up to the pressure of the round. One of the legs on the bipod would become loose and cause me to make am inaccurate shot
433813
You could but it would affect the barrel dynamics. Gamo sells one with a built in bipod
570370
Hello Don, If you're referring to the lever shield on the bayonet side, yes. That shield will touch the bottom of the adapter before it's allowed to mount. There are ways to modify either the lens or the adapter, feel free to contact us directly for more suggestions. Thank you!
974769
W don't think so. Great sling attachment point, with a quick tool-less detach, but I dont think they would support even the lightest bipod. IMHO, a sling is of much greater value than a bipod, if you are prone or on a bench, you don't usually need a bipod, and it does add weight and cut mobility...Good Luck, (your mileage may vary!)
1906118
yes, but i used the barrel attachment for the bipod. the insert that goes in the handguard would attach the bi pod, so forward of the hand guard if you have a sling ring you can hook your sling to that.. i did not attach to the bipod.
1806456
Yes you can, but not like an Atlas bipod. There little to no movement in this bipod when installed correctly.
1423834
No and yes. The bayonet lug is slightly too thick for a bayonet to fit. I have not tried to put a bayonet on mine (remember this is made of zinc or some similar weak metal) but I saw on a forum that some one had filed some of the bottom of the lug off and a bayonet fit and latched fine. I would not try this with the longer M-1 bayonets because the leverage from the longer length plus the extra weight might break the lug off. I think I searched Denex and forum to find the reference.
66389
The bipod attaches to the bayonet lug. If you have the lug you are in business.