How does "Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Standard AutoFocus Lens" differ from "Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens?"
1993961
They are both the same. The seller probably didn't put the name vs the other seller.
1993962
Dear S. Hara, I'm not sure if there is a difference in the auto focus features, but I believe that the II allows you to use it in either a manual focus setting or an auto focus. But I'd check with a local camera shop or photographer to get the distinct differences.
1993963
From my understading they are both the same an have autofocus but you have to zoom out by either moving away or zoom in by getting close to the subject.
870298
Canon's is a fixed 40mm lens. This is a 14-42mm motorized zoom.And it's not a fixed focus lens, it has a fixed focal length with a constant aperture. Their 40mm is autofocus. There really shouldn't be a battle on which is better. Both serve a purpose. If you're going for one lens to walkaround with, a fixed 40mm is a bit limited.
1095348
The model you have flagged here clearly says for Canon mounts. You need the one for Nikon mounts. The Nikon version will work with autofocus on a Nikon camera and is a fantastic multipurpose lens.
2229916
Everyone is right, these lenses are interchangeable. I have had a great experience with this lens. It has been very smooth and of quality construction. It may not be as sharp as the 2.8, but for the price, it is a very usable lens. I have used it on professional shot and the clients have been very happy with the results I have gotten from it.
1704108
The II is the newest version. The Canon version is roughly identical in the DX & DX II, however the Nikon version has added functionality from the DX to the DX II, I believe by making auto focusing is now functional on all Nikon Cameras
838886
I find the 85mm a bit faster in focusing *if* you're a fair amount of distance from your subject, as is intended with what's essentially a portrait lens. If you try to squeeze a macro shot out of it, the auto-focus just grinds back and forth trying to get a lock. That said, I have an older model 50mm 1.4 and never found the speed of focus (with a D3S and D800) to be outrageously slow, so take that into consideration with my answer.
2184845
I do not know which other lens you are talking about. My guess is it has the same specs as this one also by Canon. They are versions of the same lens. The one whose page you are on is newer. The old one has a 67 mm diameter the new one 72 mm. New one has updated focal elements but it's roughly the same.
1734187
I have one of these for a canon mount. Mine does have autofocus. http://www.sigmaphoto.com/product/8mm-f35-ex-dg-circular-fisheye They do not show any new lenses replacing this model. Is yours for a canon? If not then maybe some models for different mounts do not have autofocus.
433203
On the D5100 the Nikon 50 mm f/1.8D will not autofocus. You will need to purchase the "G" version for autofocus on the D5100. Only lenses with the designation AFS will autofocus on the D5100 which does not have a motor in its body. With respect to 50mm vs 35 mm you may find that the 50 has too much reach for normal use on the D5100 which is not a full frame DSLR. On the other hand it will work reasonably well as a portrait lens since it will have an equivalent reach of 75 mm on the D5100. Both the 35mm and 50 mm "G" lenses will produce images of roughly equal sharpness. On the D5100 the Nikon 50 mm f/1.8D will not autofocus. You will need to purchase the "G" version for autofocus on the D5100. Only lenses with the designation AFS will autofocus on the D5100 which does not have a motor in its body. With respect to 50mm vs 35 mm you may find that the 50 has too much reach for normal use on the D5100 which is not a full frame DSLR. On the other hand it will work reasonably well as a portrait lens since it will have an equivalent reach of 75 mm on the D5100. Both the 35mm and 50 mm "G" lenses will produce images of roughly equal sharpness.
2026947
The Nikon 50mm f/1.8D does not have an autofocus system built within the lens. The Nikon D5100 does not have an autofocus motor inside the camera body. So this leaves you stuck without autofocus in general. This lens is to be used with a camera with an autofocus motor inside the body of the camera (i.e. D90, D7000). If you wanted a lens just like this or better, check out the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G lens. It does have a motor inside the lens which enables you to have autofocus in use with your D5100. I myself have the D5100 and have the 1.8G lens. It has awesome performance with relatively quick autofocus. Hope this was helpful. The Nikon 50mm f/1.8D does not have an autofocus system built within the lens. The Nikon D5100 does not have an autofocus motor inside the camera body. So this leaves you stuck without autofocus in general. This lens is to be used with a camera with an autofocus motor inside the body of the camera (i.e. D90, D7000). If you wanted a lens just like this or better, check out the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G lens. It does have a motor inside the lens which enables you to have autofocus in use with your D5100. I myself have the D5100 and have the 1.8G lens. It has awesome performance with relatively quick... » Read More The Nikon 50mm f/1.8D does not have an autofocus system built within the lens. The Nikon D5100 does not have an autofocus motor inside the camera body. So this leaves you stuck without autofocus in general. This lens is to be used with a camera with an autofocus motor inside the body of the camera (i.e. D90, D7000). If you wanted a lens just like this or better, check out the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G lens. It does have a motor inside the lens which enables you to have autofocus in use with your D5100. I myself have the D5100 and have the 1.8G lens. It has awesome performance with relatively quick autofocus. Hope this was helpful. « Show Less
1293198
The primary difference between the Canon EF 100 mm f /2.8L IS USM Macro Lens and the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro Lens is the IS. This refers to Image Stabilization. The IS in that lens is good to 4-stops (really probably 2 or 3) meaning it can compensate for the shake in the image from a longer exposure. This is a benefit for macro photography as it allows for a longer exposure with a smaller aperture, allowing for a greater depth of field in your image. You can search for macro photos on Google images and you will notice the small depth of field in most of the photos, which frames the subject well when used correctly, but when it is too small, only a small part of the subject will actually be in focus. Secondarily, the Canon EF 100 mm f /2.8L IS is a "L" or "Luxury" lens. Although partially a marketing gimmick by Canon, this means that the lens will be higher quality, have at least partial weather sealing, have a better outside lens coating, and generally be of higher build quality. As an owner of the less expensive of the two, and having used both, I would recommend buying the cheaper one if you just want to get started in macro photography, and maybe spend some money on extension tubes or a macro flash. If you are still curious about both these lens, I always recommend renting the lens in question before a purchase or going out and finding them in a photography store. I personally use lensrentals.com for my rentals, but there are several excellent renters on the web.
1503543
I'm using this with canon ef 85mm f/1.8 USM and canon ef 35mm f/2 works fine even with auto focus just a little bit slow on focusing so mostly I use manual focus also worked with sigma 18-250mm
1807942
This lens only fits FD Mount Canon AE-1, A-1 and F-1 MANUAL focus FILM cameras. It does NOT fit the digital DSLR Canon cameras which require EF or EF-S Canon mount type. One can only use this MANUAL focus camera on a Digital Camera if one buys a separate special ADAPTER. Adapter is NOT listed as included in the base Amazon description. If the buyer orders this lens and expects it to fit onto a Canon Digital DSLR camera, they are mistaken. THIS IS WHY THE PRICE DIFFERENTIAL. You are trying to compare this 1980's era lens to a 2000's era lens (DIFFERENT LENS!)
1346884
The 50mm f/1.4 doesn't offer enough of an image quality boost over the 50mm f/1.8 to justify buying it. The 85mm f/1.8 offers faster ring type USM focusing, the 50mm f/1.8 does not. The 85mm f/1.8 has a rich and creamy bokeh that is as good or better than the 50mm f/1.4. While still being a great traditional portrait lens, the extra reach of the 85m f/1.8, makes it great for concerts, plays, and gymnasium sports. I like to say the 85mm f/1.8 is the lens that every parent should own (and anyone who wants to sell photos to parents too).
1716986
All the reviews that compare this lens with the Canon 24-70 F/2.8 Mark I, state there is very little differance betwen the two lenses. I own the Canon 28-70 F/2.8. It is a very sharp lens. I can't see paying the more expensive price for the Canon 24-70 F/2.8 Mark I if they perform the same. However, the Canon 24-70 F/2.8 Mark II appears to be the better of the three lens. It is more expensive of course. In my opinion, the price differance between the Canon 28-70 F/2.8 and the Canon 24-70 F/2.8 Mark II doesnt match the small improvement in image quality, unless you are shooting professionally and need the best quality possible. You can't go wrong with the Canon 28-70 F/2.8 for the price, just keep in mind it is an older lens and if it needs repaired, Canon probably won't repair it.
1346891
i have both, i prefer the image quiality of the 85 F1.4, the 50mm is a little bit overexposed.Both have similar construction quality and USM autofocus system, but after 4 year of normal use the barrel system of the autofocus mechanims in the 50mm got deformed and stop to work.
735073
I have both the 50mm f1/8 and 40mm f2.8 lens. Both have very short DOF so you have to be careful of your focus. The 50 mm is slightly cheaper but I would rate the 40mm a 4.4 out of 5 and the 50mm 4.2 out of 5.