What is the difference between Garmin model 40 and Garmin model 40ml?
2000345
I think you mean model LM. The LM stands for Lifetime Maps. You register the GPS with Garmin, download an app called Garmin Express, and use it to check for updates. The updates to the firmware and maps are free for life, whereas you have to pay for updates if you don't buy the LM model. I have owned mine 2 1/2 months, and done 2 firmware updates I would have had to pay for without LM
1150213
No difference. One just omits the mm and the other includes it. Same exact time size.
1774877
Yeah, I see what you're talking about. I think they are just introducing the 40 as a smaller, lighter, model of the 55, in the description area. The item pictured looks like my 55, though I bet we couldn't tell the difference unless they were side by side.
2193306
I'm not sure, but if you go to the Garmin website, you can download the manual and it should have the answer.
1762407
It works for the Nuvi 40, as long as your Garmin has a slot for a Micro SD card it should work.
687028
Mark, this is Steve over at Aqua Products. Both are fine units with similar qualities. The S2-40 is a newer model with a horizontal vs. vertical pump. This allows for both a sleeker design and the filter bags are accessed from the top vs. the bottom. So I give a slight edge to the S2-40, but you will find that they perform about the same.
255726
The Garmin 2757LM is the same size as the 2797LMT according to the specs given. There's room in the top of the case for the Garmin Device, and the other side of the case will hold the clip that attaches the screen to the mount and the power cord.
1844990
The short answer is that the 810 is better. The 510 lacks the ability to display maps for your course and do true turn by turn navigation. It does show you courses downloaded onto the unit but doesn't show precisely where you are if you decide to go somewhere off that course. If you're carrying a smart phone it's less of an issue since you can link both the 510 and 810 to maps on your phone. Both units are about the same in terms of looking at your route post-ride. The Garminconnect site, or others like mapmyride will let you slice and dice the data and let you see where you were. The websites are also where you will plan your route. You can't practically plan a route on the 810 itself. I've had the 810 for quite a while now and all-in-all I'm quite satisfied.
1167001
They both fit the same equipment so there is really no huge difference. Of course a 40 volt will last longer than a 36 volt. Is it significant? Probably not. So for me it would be a matter of price and availability.
2047062
LM: Free Life Time Map Updates. Garmin GPS units with LM on its model number means once you buy the device, you will also get a free life time map updates service, which can always keep our map update-to-date. and LMT, means Life Time Map and Traffic Updates. You will have free life time map and traffic updates service when you buy Garmin GPS with LMT signed. LMT vs LM, the better one is LMT, because LMT adds free traffic updates. I googled it.
336335
Scott, I appreciate that you asked this, because I am doing the same comparison. I have not made a choice, but I am leaning toward the TomTom one because of price, and it (currently) has the most up-to-date map. I also found this comparison article here: http://www.sciuridae.co.uk/tomtom_one_v3_vs_garmin_nuvi_200.htm - A plus for the TomTom is price for the features, but it has a short battery life and does not come with an A/C charger, only the cigarette lighter thingy. The Garmin is higher priced, but has better graphics. From what I have read so far, both are excellent choices.
1907393
There is no difference in functionality as far as I can tell. The only thing that I can think would be the difference would be the market in which the device was originally intended or perhaps the year it was manufactured, but I could not even find the 400l on casio's website when I was looking at purchasing mine. I purchased the 400l because it was significantly cheaper than the straight 400 model when I was looking. I would say pick up the cheaper of the two if you are trying to decide between the two. The one I purchased has worked magnificently, and has done the job I needed it to. I purchased mine to for use in my upper level math and electronics courses at school (University), the only caution I would take is to make sure that your school (assuming that is what you are buying it for) allows the use of CAS calculators. Some do not, and it would suck to purchase such an advanced calculator and not be able to use it on tests or in class.... Though I guess it would still make doing homework easier.
2001359
I have the same question. Garmin's version is 2013.10. Some reviews here were complaining about the maps being out of date. Could this be the reason this one is so cheap?
700289
It is for me. The 220 has a longer battery life (10 hours versus 5 hours) and has a built-in accelerometer so you can track pace and distance indoors as well as outdoors. That's helpful because then Garmin Connect has all of your running information, not just the data for the outdoor runs. Also, you can track your running cadence (number of steps per minute) which I find very helpful. All that said, the Forerunner 10 is probably fine if you always run outdoors (or don't care about Garmin Connect having all the data) and just want to know how far you run and track it later on a map.
1283345
I have a Garmin 255W and a TomTom XL340S. I am giving my daughter the Garmin and keeping the TomTom. Both are great units but the TomTom blows away the Garmin with useful features. The Garmin's voice is better as the TT has ploblems with Spanish street names. If I were to choose I would choose the TT but the Garmin is very good so whatever you choose, you will be happy.
2252808
I do not know. The only thing you would not have though is the verbal instructions but the visual (which are great) would not change. Numerically it can be set to metric measurements if that would help. Perhaps the Garmin site could give you a better answer.
981907
Haven't used the "20" so, the only difference I can see is the grey PVC siphon tube and a "beefed up" vacuum chamber. We like these pumps. Only complaint is the discharge tube. We live in the desert and the sun destroys the discharge tube and they don't make replacements for these models. We wrapped the tube with vinyl tape to protect it. Don't know that there is $2-$3 difference in the two pumps but, we just went with the "30" model.