What's the difference between Hoya's Pro 1 UV(O) and Hoya's UV(C)?
357773
UV(C) passes much more ultraviolet light than UV(0) filters. Additionally, the Pro 1 coating is a little more transparent and easier to clean. Finally, the Pro1 rim is higher quality. See hoya's website below: http://www.hoyafilter.com/hoya/products/generalfilters/uvcslimframe/
1611805
X-Pro 1 has a hybrid optical + electronic view finder whereas X-E1/E2 only has an electronic viewfinder. The X-E1/E2 has a built-in flash and the X-Pro 1 does not. X-E1/E2 is also smaller than the X-Pro 1. Finally, X-E1/E2 is about $200 less.
301742
The best value in a protection filter is the Hoya 58mm DMC PRO1 Clear Protector Digital Filter. I can't believe that price. I recently purchased a used Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 it came with a Sunpack UV filter, which destroyed the image quality of the lens. I took a couple pictures with no filter, to make sure I was going to keep the lens, then promptly ordered a Hoya Pro1 Clear filter for it. The larger 67mm filter for the Tamron, is 3 times what the 58mm is selling for, but, well worth it. There is NO degradation in image quality using the Hoya Pro1 Clear filter. The best value in a protection filter is the Hoya 58mm DMC PRO1 Clear Protector Digital Filter. I can't believe that price. I recently purchased a used Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 it came with a Sunpack UV filter, which destroyed the image quality of the lens. I took a couple pictures with no filter, to make sure I was going to keep the lens, then promptly ordered a Hoya Pro1 Clear filter for it. The larger 67mm filter for the Tamron, is 3 times what the 58mm is selling for, but, well worth it. There is NO degradation in image quality using... » Read More The best value in a protection filter is the Hoya 58mm DMC PRO1 Clear Protector Digital Filter. I can't believe that price. I recently purchased a used Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 it came with a Sunpack UV filter, which destroyed the image quality of the lens. I took a couple pictures with no filter, to make sure I was going to keep the lens, then promptly ordered a Hoya Pro1 Clear filter for it. The larger 67mm filter for the Tamron, is 3 times what the 58mm is selling for, but, well worth it. There is NO degradation in image quality using the Hoya Pro1 Clear filter. « Show Less
727742
They are for completely different purposes. UV filter is more transparent; polarizer--among many other things--darkens skies and removes reflections.
264897
There are two types of UV light...you want the short wave not the long wave. The long wave UV is for disco dancing and makes you look silly--the short wave kills bacteria. UVc kills bacteria--it is short wave.
1369901
Hi, I bought these filters in Amazon Hoya 49mm Digital Filter Kit With UV(C), Circular Polarizer & NDx8 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00374SVEI/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc;=1). Those works and fit perfectly.
304582
I would google ultraviolet vs led and read the answers. A good one was this one www.nsinails.com/.../led-vs-uv-by-rise'-c... Hope that helps!! Crystal
1497574
Hi Sam, I owned the 58mm set of these filters and was not happy with them. They are listed as "Japan Optics" but are actually made in China. The warming filter is plastic, not glass. The CP has a minimal polarizing effect at best. And, from what I can tell compared to my Hoya filters, these are definitely not coated optics. I sent mine back yesterday. YMMV. Cheers, SB
187072
I was not sure when I first looked, then I realized the different models had different temperature capabilities, and if I recall some of them had different focus ratio as well.Keeping this in mind, Read descriptions carefully, the differences will be more apparent!
895923
hi,there are some differences. the tamron has Image stabilization--has 17 Elementsalso tamron has3 LD (Low Dispersion) elements, 2 XR (Extra Refractive Index) elements, 3 glass molded aspheric elements , 1 hybrid aspherical elementspec and quality wise the tamron is better.
347748
This is the 77mm Hoya filter. The product I received specified "Hoya HMC multicoated filter UV(C)" and is made in Philippines. I'm happy with its quality.
1462618
Hi, according to dirt genius the 280w uv led light is for flowering ,and the 280w HO is for vegging. Hope this helps.
1676649
I have no personal experience with either of those models, but Baofeng hasn't changed this since the UV-2, so I would guess it would be fine. In any case, it's not a big investment...
157367
It is basically the same, but the One is a better, improved product. I understand they do not make the Ultra anymore. The Ultra is not as accurate as The One
810045
There is no difference. Baofeng ( pronounced "BO-fung", I am told) is the manufacturer; Etekcity and Sain, et.al. are distributors of the Baofeng products. A UV5R from one will be pretty much like a UV5R from another. There are some units with minor differences in the case, but they will have different numbers ( e.g., UV5R and UV5RA).
1471439
I have just checked on this by ordering both. The first difference is that I received a paper with a product key for an image restoration software with the regular one. The other difference is in the packaging. The AFFP arrived in a small amazon envelope, whereas the regular one arrives in a SanDisk box. Also, one of the photos shows these cards with a rating of "U1" and one with "U3". When I ordered mine they both arrived as "U3" cards.
274839
No difference from what i can tell, both have the G2 retical, wich is great by the way, only thing different is one of them have the sun shade mounted.