How about the 120GB 7th Generation - latest one. Will it fit? all i can see is it will fit 160GB, how about the 120GB?
2008135
It comes with 2 front parts, so you can try any so it fits correctly, I'm pretty sure it does fit.
2008136
Only have 160GB, so don't know. It did come with a fatter back piece as well.
271999
sorry it can't fit 6th gen classic 160gb, if you need 6th gen classic 160gb housing, you could buy this 7th gen housing and we will ship 6th gen housing to you thanks
2000924
I usually get the 32 gig when I order a new device. I find with a 64 gig card, 32 to me is enough. I never use a lot of space. I play games and shop and do a bit of writing and use maybe 8-10 gigs on the entire device. I'm not waiting! Its not worth the extra$$$$$
2279279
Yes I have 160 gb classic. Great product. Although my hold button no longer works since I replaced it. But that could just be mine
1482273
I'm pretty sure 32gb is the largest it will take. They make a WB110 now also. It may take a 64gb, but I'm not sure.
2000925
$100 more bucks for an extra 28~gigs? ouch. might as well just buy the 32gb edition and then pick up a Sandisk 128gb SD card that comes out soon (yes, it's compatible) and get more for your money. just my opinion though!
1354963
Mine is working flawlessly and was sealed and pristine condition. It is 2GB and I upgraded mine from the same configuration. Installing it isn't too difficult either. Enjoy.
1194763
Supposedly the ones that state they are only for the 30GB models will also fit the 60GB models... These are easily found here on Amazon now (via 3rd party sellers) either in black, clear/white or pink. You can also either get just the case, or get some kind of combo bundle for various prices...
2251121
Yes, I have both the 120GB (red) and the 60Gb (black), it's all compatible.
857982
Mine is the 120gb version and the connectors are the same, so it should work fine.
1822808
Yes, I upgraded mine. Just remember it's a memory hog so hopefully you don't have a 16GB device with little storage. I have a 32GB device.
1527455
Guy - Thank you for your response. Is it possible that it was the size (64G) as opposed to it being an SDHC? I read that it will only support up to 32G. Also I believe it needs to be formatted to FAT, but I could be wrong. It seems somewhat pointless if it only works with SD cards without the High Capacity as almost all of them are SDHC these days.
650963
Actually if you look at that same specs page you'll see it mentions a dock adapter coming in the box so it shouldn't be a problem either way. For me the ipod touch is everything that I was looking for. Sure it could have been given a power hungry disk drive with more capacity, but flash is the better option hands down. Lower energy consumption with that nice slim form factor and better battery life for the size (look at specs on the classic 160 and you'll see the difference). I don't know why you would need 16gb of music and videos on there at any one time anyways, manual sync people...use it
190034
Sorry, I can't answer your question. I don't have the 120GB. Call Amazon's customer service, they can help you.
650962
I absolutely agree with the OP.This is the most advanced MP3 player on the planet, and to ship it with 16GB Flash instead of an 80 or 160GB microdrive, like the classic has, was stupid IMHO.It would have also been considerably cheaper with a 160GB drive instead of 16GB of Flash.I have a 2nd Gen iPod and a 1st gen 4GB Nano, both still in perfect condition. The Touch was to be my next purchase, but now I'm just not so sure any more.To be totally honest, the 160GB iPod Classic is a FAR better buy. It's cheaper, has 10 times the storage, has the same new interface and OS, and lasts 40 hours per charge.Apple has made my decision WAY too hard. I absolutely agree with the OP.This is the most advanced MP3 player on the planet, and to ship it with 16GB Flash instead of an 80 or 160GB microdrive, like the classic has, was stupid IMHO.It would have also been considerably cheaper with a 160GB drive instead of 16GB of Flash.I have a 2nd Gen iPod and a 1st gen 4GB Nano, both still in perfect condition. The Touch was to be my next purchase, but now I'm just not so sure any more.To be totally honest, the 160GB iPod Classic is a FAR better buy. It's cheaper, has 10 times the storage, has the... » Read More I absolutely agree with the OP.This is the most advanced MP3 player on the planet, and to ship it with 16GB Flash instead of an 80 or 160GB microdrive, like the classic has, was stupid IMHO.It would have also been considerably cheaper with a 160GB drive instead of 16GB of Flash.I have a 2nd Gen iPod and a 1st gen 4GB Nano, both still in perfect condition. The Touch was to be my next purchase, but now I'm just not so sure any more.To be totally honest, the 160GB iPod Classic is a FAR better buy. It's cheaper, has 10 times the storage, has the same new interface and OS, and lasts 40 hours per charge.Apple has made my decision WAY too hard. « Show Less
1076046
Actually this product didnt work fine for me.. They issued refund for it. This show as 32gb but we can't even save 2gb in it. Donno wats d issue was.
1419571
Please clarify: The product/technical details on this product consistently says 8gb but in the comparison section all the way at the bottom it says 4gb. Which is it? Thanks in advance for your prompt reply.