The picture in this Q&amp;A section is an X9, but the picture on the main product page, including the zoomed view is an X0, which is misleading.
881889
I thought the same thing and emailed the seller. Go by the description. It is indeed a Type II X9
462296
Maybe due to focal length they are classifying it as fixed zoom but I would disregard. Focal length is equivalent to 45mm on FX.
1468276
yes - exactly the same except, for example, the X shows XIF data as an aperture of 4.0 instead of 2.8 which is the actual lens f stop loss of a 1.4 teleconverter. The X wasn't out when I bought mine but I'm not sure I would have cared anyway. Take care.
464920
Markus Twain,There is no attempt to mislead customers. The 1GB reference in the lower section is a typo, which will be corrected, nothing more. Thank you for bringing it to our attention!
192219
Its a mild wide angle. If that makes sense. Its enough to capture a wide angle without looking like an xgames fisheye.
332039
Yes, I noticed this as well. The picture gives a bit of false advertising. I purchased mine over a year ago so they really have no excuse if the product changed to update that photo.
1636716
Great. Thank you! Did you get a chance to ask them why L32D1120 is now shown on their website? It's weird.
473009
Sorry but I have one SMX-F34 (PAL) and to my disappointment it is not true 16:9. It is 4:3 streched horizontaly and it notices a lot.
972915
There is a indentation about mid way through the device. You'll see a series of parallel vertical striations of sorts moving from left To right. That is your magnification knob. It's really my only complaint about the device. It should've been a digital zoom.
58845
I am assuming you are referring the the current model of this product pictured- as this is an ancient picture and amazon should update to the modern picture current version. There is only one original being produced - only old pictures and listings on amazon.
1442648
nope. that is another model, this one is jus intended for XC, so the travel is only 100mm
307769
I'm guessing it's ntsc or pal, meaning that it is 480 pixels by 640 pixels, which is .9 mp, but it could be lower.
352005
The specs is right and the seller is wrong. It's a 1440x1080 and not 1920x1080. by the way the camera is just a joke. i don't even use mine.
397848
I bought mine last week; it has "a high-res full color graphical display". The greater portion of the information displayed is orange or white against a black background.
216655
Just to clarify (no pun intended) the box is clearly labeled 3.5X magnification. THE DESCRIPTION IS WRONG!
895954
Looks like one of the vendors (the one currently the cheapest) uploaded invalid imagery that does not match the product being sold.. and actually that looks like a used T9 as well. The real product is the 8FG with a receiver.
1229999
As other posters have said, the "B+" model is 1920x1080, but I believe Amazon's "comparison" table does incorrectly state that this model is 1920x1080 when in fact it is 1366x768