This product claims to have a 1500 grain capacity which is equivalent to 97.1983 grams, so why would they provide a 100 gram calibration weight?
2003976
I tried the weight, did not help me. I used Lee Dippers, which I checked on my beam scale. For me, the results are within .1 to .2 grains. good enough for me 'cause I load 90% Max.
2003977
I worked years ago in an electronic test dept. The most accurate way, short of multiple check points is to zero the scale. (exactly what it sounds like) then adjust for the highest reading on the scale. (100 percent) In this case it's 100 grams. For the sake of salesmanship, they say 1500 grains instead of 1543.23(which is what 100 grams equals - I Googled it) It's not "strange," it's the correct way to do it.
2003978
I'm really not sure of the relevance here, the scale is very accurate at all ranges up to 1500 grains. It has a lot of features and functions great for the money that it costs.
2003979
If you look at the face of the scale it says it weighs to 100g (grams). It is strange that it would calibrate at the far end of its range though rather than somewhere near the middle.
2003980
I asked myself the same question and I come here to see you asking the same question. Only Hornady can answer that. It certainly does not make any sense.
1100495
Linda: The target tips supplied are 150 grain and for good reason: I've taken 3 deer with this excellent crossbow so far and all with 145-150 grain broadheads. This is the most accurate and hard hitting weight to use for this crossbow. I've added weight to my 125 grain broadheads to make them a 145-150 grain broadhead and they will not fail you! Some say go lightweight (100-125 gr) for more speed but you are then only achieving about 6 to 8 feet per second faster but have less penetration. Also the heavier tip weights are much easier on the crossbow itself. Trust me, stick with 145-150 grains for these tip weights! Linda: The target tips supplied are 150 grain and for good reason: I've taken 3 deer with this excellent crossbow so far and all with 145-150 grain broadheads. This is the most accurate and hard hitting weight to use for this crossbow. I've added weight to my 125 grain broadheads to make them a 145-150 grain broadhead and they will not fail you! Some say go lightweight (100-125 gr) for more speed but you are then only achieving about 6 to 8 feet per second faster but have less penetration. Also the heavier tip weights are much easier on the crossbow itself. Trust me, stick with 145-150... » Read More Linda: The target tips supplied are 150 grain and for good reason: I've taken 3 deer with this excellent crossbow so far and all with 145-150 grain broadheads. This is the most accurate and hard hitting weight to use for this crossbow. I've added weight to my 125 grain broadheads to make them a 145-150 grain broadhead and they will not fail you! Some say go lightweight (100-125 gr) for more speed but you are then only achieving about 6 to 8 feet per second faster but have less penetration. Also the heavier tip weights are much easier on the crossbow itself. Trust me, stick with 145-150 grains for these tip weights! « Show Less
1754741
I guess the answer should be yes. I have not used it for gn, but it is stated that it will, I was using for gm. The following is listed "Capacity unit & Readability (accuracy to)". /200 g capacity & 0.01 g/7.055 oz capacity & 0.001oz/6.4300 zt capacity & 0.0010 zt/128.60 dwt capacity & 0.01/1000 ct capacity & 0.05 ct/3086.0 gn capacity & 0.2 gnMaybe I should have just listed the grains, but thought I would include all stated weights. Auto shut off after 60 seconds of inactivity(I wish it would be 2 minutes) WORKS GREAT FOR MY NEEDS!
1139679
From the way the ad was worded it appears it is grams only, but it does switch to ounces. Mine is accurate and I highly recommend it.
1422236
You are correct in that the nutritionals are confusing. Suggest you check www.hoosierhillfarm.com for more information. Or attempt to do the math based on the information provided on the back of the container-still confusing.
2207704
I'd does weigh grains. I didn't use it for grains though. I do know it weighs to .001 grams.
450339
I purchased a 100g calibration weight which I use once every month to ensure that the unit is measuring accurately. Since this is not a high end scale, I would recommend doing it.
1332303
Hello,There are very little nutrional facts listed on the packaging, but you can find a ton of facts just by Google searching maca root. 100mgs is equivalent to 1 gram. So if you have a scale measure out 5 grams which equals to 500mgs.Hope this helps...
1771295
I don't really know, but size of the grains in the box are comparable to the original formula, so I suspect the overall contents are about the same
2189981
This measure can be adjusted from 0.1 grains to over 100 grains with no extra parts needed.
1665340
It seems like the nutrition information printed on this product's label is completely off -- for example, my label says that a 13-gram serving of the powder contains 225 grams of cholesterol, which makes no sense (it doesn't even make sense if you change the grams to mg).However, I would have no reason to believe that this powder is nutritionally any different from regular whole milk, if diluted properly.
610135
MaricelliGoogle http://www.awscales.com/portable-precision-scales-01-gram/217-ac-100-digital-pocket-scale and you will find all the information.If you don't want to google here is the specs for weight ranges limits for an AWS ac 100, 100g / 3.528oz / 500ct / 1543gn (Grams, Ounces, Carets and Grains)I use mine for reloading. It will zero wander a bit but re zeros easily. I'm waiting for the 100 gram test weight to calibrate (must order, not included with this scale) but it matches up with a beam scale when checked.Jim
854293
The calibration weight may vary by the model of the scale. Mine is a Blade - 1KG. It uses a 500g calibration weight. Look in your owners manual. If yours specifies 500 and it's "asking" for 1000, it may be defective.
1814006
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd say 95g is the net weight (with liquid drained). That sounds about right to me. The nutrition is definitely that of a 120g can or sardines :)
926445
Yes, 1,543.2 grains is the maximum grain weight. There is a + or - of 0.1 grains. If using grams, it is 100.0 grams max. + or - 0.01 grams.
854291
I don't recommend M. Gonzalez' solution. I calibrated to 1000g. My 500g weight then says 667g. Calibration is not linear.
926443
Yes, 1500 grs max. Accuracy to 1/10 gr. I mostly use grams for now.. found to be accurate to within .05 grams. Hope that helps.