Can they piggyback off of each other like, A &gt;router. B&gt;A. C&gt;B etc. or does it all have to be on A?
1912233
You can connect AP-1 via wire to a Router or a Switch. Connect AP-2 to AP-1 via up-link (without wire). Then you can use the port in AP-2 to connect PC, Device or a Switch. I would recommend only one wireless hop. It will not allow AP-3 to connect to AP-2. You could put a switch on AP-2 and then Connect AP-3 to that Switch and AP-4 via uplink. What are you trying to achieve?
890346
This works that way when using a router from Century Link. I think the Century Link router has a built in filter that allows this to work this way. I have not tried this with any other router.
295863
I'm pretty sure that it shouldn't be able to function simultaneously on two seperate networks. I believe the two ports are for redundancy. But if it IS possible, then the networks would have to share IP space because you can only assign the terastation one single IP address
1691878
No, this is a 'switch' which splits the signal from your router to multiple wired devices...
1087324
Yes, that is called daisy-chaining. We recommend that you do not do more than two unit though as the network speed will decrease with every unit you add to the chain.
1401200
No this won't work. You would need 2 of these to go to a router/switch if you wanted to share a single Ethernet line.
1624847
I wouldn't. The router won't be tied back to the same controller as the Unifi's will.
198025
Think of it more like a "wireless hub". Any address assignment or other intelligent functions would be handled by the main router.
532228
I don't think that matters. We have three units, one where the router is and two others all on different circuit breakers. Network works fine.
352500
Yes, you can connect two separate extenders to the main router, but ideally you would do this if you have two low coverage areas in the home that are separate from each other. You cannot "chain" two extenders together to extend the coverage distance.
141784
Brian, you would need two of these to reroute wires in 2 different directions. Happy wiring!
1551470
The router can handle this many connected devices, but the actual number of concurrently active clients will depend on what those clients are doing. i.e. 100 devices can be connected to the Network at the same time, but there wouldn't be enough bandwidth to support them simultaneously downloading/transfer/etc. data at the same time.
1177813
Any time you mix brands you get into unsupported territory. That said as long as the upset settings are the same on both ends you should be ok but no promises. Fortune should have a Soho router similar to this though, why not go that route and have one throat to choke for tech support?
561644
One of the ports will go through to the router, but the other will not. It requires one on each end of the connections to support two separate connections (in this case, one at the router and one at the computers).
210607
Well, I've never used it that way. This is not a router, but I suppose you could make 2 perpendicular cuts ans it might work.
969377
I remember reading at the time I bought the device, that it was possible to connect more than one unit on a network. I believe there are some steps that have to be taken for it all to work.
1347710
This is a modem and wireless router built in. This would be redundant. what is the point?