What's the difference between the Eclipse and the original 1" ghd?
1985908
Both work great. I think the eclipse works a bit better and like the lights and sound. Fast start and comes with a rubber end protector and a better plate usedr. My original broke after 5 years, upgraded to the eclipse.
1985909
Sorry, I have no idea. I bought the eclipse after seeing how wonderfully shiny it made the hair of several of my friends that own and use it. So far I am very happy with my purchase.
1114594
The biggest difference I find is that you can use optical zoom in movie mode with the H2. Also, H2 has Carl Zeiss lens which i think H1 doesn't
1916346
These are both four-coil designs. In fact, the only difference between the 680 V.3 and the 681 V.3 is the stylus. The 680E takes the N 680 E stylus, which is a .3 x .7 elliptical stylus. The 680 takes the N 680 stylus, which is a .7 spherical. Don't pay attention to any of the other answers. The two-coil Stanton designs are the 500 series. Those stylii do not interchange between the 500 and 600 series. You can put an N 680 E stylus on a regular 680 and in that way, convert it to a stock 680E v.3 and the opposite: Put an N 680 on a 680E v.3 and you will effectively have a stock 680 v.3. You can also find aftermarket stylii for other 680/681 carts and upgrade further. These are both four-coil designs. In fact, the only difference between the 680 V.3 and the 681 V.3 is the stylus. The 680E takes the N 680 E stylus, which is a .3 x .7 elliptical stylus. The 680 takes the N 680 stylus, which is a .7 spherical. Don't pay attention to any of the other answers. The two-coil Stanton designs are the 500 series. Those stylii do not interchange between the 500 and 600 series. You can put an N 680 E stylus on a regular 680 and in that way, convert it to a stock 680E v.3 and the opposite: Put an N 680 on a 680E v.3 and you will effectively have a stock 680 v.3. You... » Read More These are both four-coil designs. In fact, the only difference between the 680 V.3 and the 681 V.3 is the stylus. The 680E takes the N 680 E stylus, which is a .3 x .7 elliptical stylus. The 680 takes the N 680 stylus, which is a .7 spherical. Don't pay attention to any of the other answers. The two-coil Stanton designs are the 500 series. Those stylii do not interchange between the 500 and 600 series. You can put an N 680 E stylus on a regular 680 and in that way, convert it to a stock 680E v.3 and the opposite: Put an N 680 on a 680E v.3 and you will effectively have a stock 680 v.3. You can also find aftermarket stylii for other 680/681 carts and upgrade further. « Show Less
686964
This 1 is the original the new 1 has self locking props which look a bit different, also the new 1 has a different battery compartment that is a lot easier to install both will accept just about any camera solution
129702
I don't know what the difference is between the two. I purchased this as a replacement for the drive in my dell inspiron laptop after it's initial drive stopped working. The outer faceplate on this one is flat where the dell's original is angled to match the laptops style. I found a video online showing how to change them easily enough. You just have to be careful when changing them since they are plastic. Then just instal the drive and all done works better than my original one did.
2216273
I've used a Saitek Eclipse II for years. I've had this Perixx now for a day and it's almost exactly the same. The main difference, aside from branding, is the lack of silver detailing, no silver bar on the spacebar, and obviously (like the picture) it is black on black. The Saitek seems to have slightly smoother key response and a glossier feel to the keys, but the differences are very slight. Oh and the Windows keys are different: no circular indexing imprint on the Perixx. If you liked the Saitek Eclipse II, then you'll be happy with this one.
1694158
In looking at both, they are essentially the same. There are definitely better graphics tablets out there that are of this size, but for the price, it does the job. It is pretty no frills. When you install the device driver, I found it best to search the CD-ROM that it came with to identify the driver and utility that controls the tablet and the stylus.
1680396
I'd go for this one over the 3E. The 3E is good, but it's a lot older. No shake to wake, charge ports top out at 2 A (this one is 2.4 max) so it's slower for devices that can take higher current. The charge display is also 4 LEDs, not 10 like this one. I had some 4 LED display batteries and I can tell you that those extra LEDs really help- they give you a much clearer idea of how much power is left (especially if it's one of the higher capacity packs, like the Astro E5). With the old 4 light display, when it gets to 25% you see one light lit... same as when it's at 1%. 25% is quite a bit of juice on something like the E5 (15,000 mAh) but 1% isn't on anything, and the thing is you can't tell which it is. The 2nd gen Astros can show you all the way down to 10% granularity which is a whole lot better.
1916344
The 680e has an elliptical stylus and the 680 has a spherical stylus. The 680e is better for high quality home playback and the 680 is better for DJ use. The 680e produces very nice sound although the tracking is a little heavy for my liking.
1646539
Edit: Sorry for misleading, they are both ficker free. The major difference is GL2760H is TN panel; GW2760HS is VA panel. And GW2760HS has 1W*2 built-in speakers; GL2760H not.Another difference is GW2760HS uses a DC (Direct Current) method for background light brightness control but GL2760H use old PWM background light brightness control. In another word, GW2760HS is flicker free but GL2760H not; that's why GW2760HS more expensive.
2092072
i cant tell the difference from this one and the one that came with it. Both have same great video images on HD.
1587854
I was wondering the same thing. I did a line by line comparison of the specs from the Pioneer site and noticed very minor differences between the two. It could be that other than for an extra connector or two they are the same under the cover.
361410
It appears that there is no functional difference. The 66E1 model is newer and costs less.
1709588
I have no information regarding the "difference" between the two cars since we have only had the special edition car. However, my grandchildren absolutely love this plasma car, as do the neighbor's kids. I don't think you would be disappointed in the purchase. Hope this helped a little.
1094765
Ive got the 10.1 model that was right before the FHD and it fits like a glove... You can always return it if it doesnt fit, but im pretty sure the form factor is the same.
1369104
More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't... » Read More More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal. « Show Less
465845
I've been trying to decide between these two products as well. The Flip UltraHD (2nd Generation) 120m and the Flip MinoHD (2nd Generation) 120m have nearly identical specs (same LCD size, resolution, light sensitivity, video engine, framerate, bitrate, aperture, zoom, etc). The biggest differences are the size (mino = 3.94" x 1.97" x 0.66" / ultra = 4.25" x 2.19" x 1.17"), weight (mino = 4.1oz / ultra = 6.0oz), battery type (mino = internal lithium-ion / ultra = AA rechargeable battery pack), battery life (mino ~ 2hrs / ultra ~ 2.5hrs), and charge time (mino = 3hrs via USB, 2hrs via power adapter, ultra = 6hrs via USB, 3.5 via power adapter). I think I am going to go with the Mino because of its slimmer profile and quicker charge time. If you don't care about the size or charge time get the Ultra. You can compare all the Flips side by side here (http://www.theflip.com/en-us/Products/specs.aspx)