klipsch vs polk question-dont hear a huge difference-why? hi, so i am relatively new to the speaker scene. I have some polk tsi400s and just got some klipsch rf-52 thinking I would hear the highs much more in the klipschs-but i dont. The klipschs sound better on some songs but not significantly so. Am i supposed to be hearing a significant difference or is just a small difference. thanks klipsch vs polk question-dont hear a huge difference-why? hi, so i am relatively new to the speaker scene. I have some polk tsi400s and just got some klipsch rf-52 thinking I would hear the highs... » Read More klipsch vs polk question-dont hear a huge difference-why? hi, so i am relatively new to the speaker scene. I have some polk tsi400s and just got some klipsch rf-52 thinking I would hear the highs much more in the klipschs-but i dont. The klipschs sound better on some songs but not significantly so. Am i supposed to be hearing a significant difference or is just a small difference. thanks « Show Less
1981436
tsi 400s are comparatively better than tsi 300. Klipsch is little over priced, but will give the same performance. I would go with Polk speakers especially tsi400's(not that I own them)
481429
They're basically the same, except with a (built in) lower cross-over point from mid range a high range. So, these (depending on how you look at it) are either "bassier," or "have less treble." Although I believe the cross-over point isn't much different. So essentially the same speaker.
873940
Dear Dammika,Thank you for your inquiry. Everyone's hearing is different. Some will notice a significant difference when bi-wiring, and others will only notice a very subtle difference. My recommendation is to try both to see what you like better!Regards,Eric CohenWorld Wide Stereo
1751819
I think the largest difference is power and sub size. Both the 12 and 15s lack more of a high end, particularly if you don't have a dedicated subwoofer and crank the bass on these to compensate for more bass - this will drown out the high's even more. Another important thing is powering them properly; if you're sacrificing money on larger speakers instead of better power on amp/receiver, I'd get better power and get the 12s instead of 15s. I run these on a 100W/ch Yamaha receiver and find it very lacking. These speakers are meant for more power, and I have a decently small room. They still bump, but the receiver is holding them back severely. I think the largest difference is power and sub size. Both the 12 and 15s lack more of a high end, particularly if you don't have a dedicated subwoofer and crank the bass on these to compensate for more bass - this will drown out the high's even more. Another important thing is powering them properly; if you're sacrificing money on larger speakers instead of better power on amp/receiver, I'd get better power and get the 12s instead of 15s. I run these on a 100W/ch Yamaha receiver and find it very lacking. These speakers are meant for more power, and I have a decently small room. They still... » Read More I think the largest difference is power and sub size. Both the 12 and 15s lack more of a high end, particularly if you don't have a dedicated subwoofer and crank the bass on these to compensate for more bass - this will drown out the high's even more. Another important thing is powering them properly; if you're sacrificing money on larger speakers instead of better power on amp/receiver, I'd get better power and get the 12s instead of 15s. I run these on a 100W/ch Yamaha receiver and find it very lacking. These speakers are meant for more power, and I have a decently small room. They still bump, but the receiver is holding them back severely. « Show Less
1189249
I only have a klipsch subwoofer so I dont have a way to compare but the polks sound great even a high volume
2007442
I have always need partial to Klipsch, plenty of stamina to handle the peak outputs when you want to feel the music. For the living room I stay with Polk, great quality throughout the listening range for a pleasant experience. If I already had the JBL's I would look for complementary JBL's to finish the setup. Speaker choice really depends on what you listen to, the acoustics of the room, your budget and how it sounds to you. Find a store that will let you try out different speakers or at least exchange without a fee.
795198
The tower speaker may have larger speaker and that generally means better bass response. I use a subwoofer with mine and am quite pleased with the sound quality. The receivers ability to set speaker types will also be a factor. In a nutshell you ' hear them just fine but how much do you also want to feel the music and effects.
1202022
I personally have the FT-6T fronts with a F12 sub, FH65bs for rears, matched with the FH6-LCR center. In my opinion I haven't heard the DV-64s but it all depends on the system you are using when I used a nice onkyo stereo movies sounded good but music was way to bright almost a tunnel sound then I switched it up to a sunfire processer and carver amp and I was amazed with the difference, now my speakers sound perfect for music and movies, a quality sound you can be proud of. But like I said it depends on your other components, every review I have read people have said they had to tweak with the settings for both sets of speakers. But if you have good components you shouldn't have to. I personally have the FT-6T fronts with a F12 sub, FH65bs for rears, matched with the FH6-LCR center. In my opinion I haven't heard the DV-64s but it all depends on the system you are using when I used a nice onkyo stereo movies sounded good but music was way to bright almost a tunnel sound then I switched it up to a sunfire processer and carver amp and I was amazed with the difference, now my speakers sound perfect for music and movies, a quality sound you can be proud of. But like I said it depends on your other components, every review I have read people have said they had to tweak with... » Read More I personally have the FT-6T fronts with a F12 sub, FH65bs for rears, matched with the FH6-LCR center. In my opinion I haven't heard the DV-64s but it all depends on the system you are using when I used a nice onkyo stereo movies sounded good but music was way to bright almost a tunnel sound then I switched it up to a sunfire processer and carver amp and I was amazed with the difference, now my speakers sound perfect for music and movies, a quality sound you can be proud of. But like I said it depends on your other components, every review I have read people have said they had to tweak with the settings for both sets of speakers. But if you have good components you shouldn't have to. « Show Less
1581284
I've been looking into this for a few weeks now and decided to take the plunge. I have heard such good things about it and can't wait for it to arrive tomorrow. I'm only hooking up to it a PS3, my 42" plasma, and my Verizon FIOS box. I can't wait to use it with my new Polk Audio TSI 400s and 200 speakers. How is Polk's audio quality? It must be pretty good since you are still using your antique Polk speakers.
2268518
I do hear the longer you listen to them they sound becomes better quality....I have not noticed much of a change for the time I have used my klipsch headphones......
2252344
Well, you asked the right person, since I own and use both. While I love Klipsch generally, and regard it as overall the top value brand, (5.1 home theater, etc.) I was really blown away by the performance of the A2+. The only handicap I have in answering you is I've used the A2 with a sub controlled by an inexpensive but wonderful preamp (the gemini pa-7000) since day one. But this is revealing-- I had to reduce the crossover to only 80 cycles -- that's real speaker territory. So, I'd call the addition of a sub a nice add-on but far from necessary. If anything, I find these little guys a bit bassy if anything. Naturally, a lot depends on your environment. Mine's a kitchen -- very flattering acoustically. Bottom line is the A2+ is more the 'real deal' since you have the option juice it up, making it a 'system,' later. There's no hint of being 'just a computer speaker.' Overall, while I like my 2.1's fine, I love my A2s.
2048907
While I hesitate to give answers on these types of questions because there are some serious audio snobs out there but here we go... I have the entire set (center and rear surrounds as well as fronts) and I love them. They are crisp and clear. A good friend has the Bose speakers and we both prefer the sound of my system. That said, the rooms are different and speaker wire and receiver... are all different. I assume you're pairing them with a sub because they lack deep punch on their own. Long story short - I love mine. I compared them at electronics stores as well to Polk and Bose - and they sounded better to me, as well as the sales guys there. Hope it helps.
435254
I was disappointed in the Klipschs due to a thumpy bass sound. Both speakers have a pronounced peak at 70Hz with the bass turned up. Turning down the bass on the Logitechs eliminates this peak while turning it down on the Klipschs doesn't. Otherwise the frequency responses are very similar except that the Logitechs also have a another peak around 40Hz with the bass turned up. While I haven't heard the Logitechs, the specs suggest that one should be able to get a flatter bass response by adjusting the control.
435252
I Have both and they both sound great! Klipsch go a little louder, but I have no complaints with either. My Klipsch are about 8 years old and still playing, Logitechs about 2. Go by price.
1756978
I, too, had to choose between the RC Micro and the Classic. I worried the the RC Micro's were too small to provide a full sound. I ended up choosing the RC MIcro's. Here's why: 1. I scoured the different audio forums to get the opinion of people who knew more than me. In the AVS forum (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1153061), I found a posting by a member who posted frequently and who seemed to be highly respected by other forum members. This is what he wrote, "RC-Micro are smaller, with higher build quality and better drivers (than the Classic). They will have a more "refined" sound. The sub is a little better also. Whether it is "worth it" is strictly up to you and how critical you are in your bedroom listening. If you can afford the extra and are seeking the maximum sound quality from the smallest possible package, the RC-Micro will be great. If you aren't super critical and will only be doing casual, moderate volume listening, the Take Classic will probably be fine." 2. I called the tech help at Energy Speakers (they're very helpful, by the way). I told them I could buy the Classic or the RC Micro for the same price. Their tech guy said absolutely take the RC Micro's. 3. They sound better, they look better. I'm really happy with the RC Micro's. Hope that helps!
1686238
Although most would consider these a good match...you should try to listen before you buy. Klipsch uses a horn tweeter. While most like the "bright" highs some...esp on the Music side find them too "bright". Klipsch are very efficient if not, the most efficient in the industry. Meaning less power the speakers still sound fantastic. Hope that helps.
1894377
I think the tsi is newer but when I called they said the sound difference is negligible and my stereo is legit and sounds aweaone. Call polk audio they will give you ab honest answer