Nikon D3100 vs D5100 Can anyone advise me which camera is better?
1998389
Jim, just a suggestion, a 3100 is definitely not the right upgrade path. the D80 has way more manual controls than either a 3000 or 5000 series camera. Of the newer cameras the 7000 is the only one with more manual controls than a D80. I would suggest your daughter takes some classes and learns more about her camera. A D90 also has better controls than a D80, I have one and love it, but it is being phased out at this point and replaced with the D7000
1998390
This was just the post I was looking for. My daughter has the D80 (I think) and wants to step up to more manual features, rather than simply point and shoot. Already familiar with Nikon layout - she selected the 3100 for her next step up but I was wondering what the differences were with the 5100. I agree with the swivel ability of the screen. She does a lot of self and group portraits that I think is needed for such situations. Anyhoo, I am glad I found you two talking about this.
1998391
what's about the D3000 vs D3100. Currently amazon has a package deal for the D3000, case and other stuff??
1998392
Well the D5100 cost more so it is a better camera. The main thing is the D5100 use the D7000 sensor, which is best in high ISO and lowlight over any other APS-C dslr (that include any canon like the T3i 60d, even 7D which all used the same old sensor). It has a swivel screen over the D3100. It is a little faster in continuous shooting at 4 fps vs 3 of the D3100, not really a big deal. Otherwise from the major reason here it is the same in a lot on most other specs.http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond5100/page22.asp
971917
Depending on ur brand, Nikon or Cannon. But me and my went into Best Buy to get an opinion on which camera we should buy. And my wife is also an amateur looking to take sport photos and portrait photos. Which led us to get the Nikon D3200. We decide to buy on amazon because of the price and buddle. I think this camera is a good amateur starter to use.
356707
The D5000 is a very good camera. If you want a full frame the D600 is great. What you gain, in my opinion, is better high ISO performance. The picture quality is mainly up to uou no matter what camera upu use. If I were you, I wouldn't spend much time researching and agonizing over it. If you want higher ISO performance, the D600 is a good choice. Just buy it. Then, go out and take lots of pictures. Have fun!
398737
I'm also thinking about those cameras and I don't know which one to get. I was leaning towards the Nikon d90 because of the HD video but I don't know.
1866178
D40; better built. takes very good pictures. canon is too plasticky; higher-end canons are very good; but in this price range, Nikon is better; but this is a personal opinion.
440169
They're both great little cameras, and each has its strengths. I'd have a hard time choosing between them. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408enthusiastgroup/page11.asp
1684348
I can't answer for Nikon but if it's anything like the Canon DSLR, the Sony is far superior in low light shooting. The quality of the still shots are excellent and the high definition video is spectacular. I hope this helps.
1866179
My friend has both... I asked her which one she likes better and she said that the Rebel is easier to use, but the Nikon takes better pictures. I am going to get the Nikon. It is cheaper too.
11397
Hi Jana,Here a site that provides comparison information: http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-D3200-vs-Nikon-D5200(just copy and paste the link into your browser) The format on the site is easy to understand and very complete. I chose the D5200 because it seems to be a little closer to a "pro" camera but still within my budget, and I'm very happy with my choice. Be prepared to go through the learning curve because this camera(s) have a lot of features (fun). Blessings to you. ~ Michael
1935411
dear friendfrom my experience Nikon d3100 is much better than sony a390 I have the both camera and I am more satisfied with nikon
1530195
See http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80400vr.htm and http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-400mm.htmThey describe respectively the older one which won't autofocus on your d5100 and the new, more expensive one, which will --- diff abt 1k
444930
Greg...thanks for the great comments on the E510. You have confirmed my own research. Seems to pretty much be the best value in the DSLR group at this level. I really appreciate you taking the time to help us out. Based on your comments and some others, we have ordered the E510 from Amazon. We will check out the pics you took. Great help! regards Dar
753579
I don't think it is a concern. I am an amateur photographer. I have had the D5100 for about 8 years and now the D5300 as well. Barring a rain storm I have taken the D5100 in all kinds of environments without a problem.
451808
Nikon D3100 is an excellent camera with great layout for easy use and wonderful image quality. The Nikon 18-300 lens is exceptional as an All in One choice and would give fantastic image quality with this camera. "However" I would not recommend this pairing because of weight in this lens. I am using with a D7100 that I believe is more compatible. The 70-300 lens is lighter ,as is, the18-200. Try to get them all in Your hand to get Your best assessment.
1120723
I agree with Aaron on the Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 lens. Beautiful results at the cheapest cost you could possibly ask for. I have the D5100 body as well, and after I got the 35mm lens, it didn't leave my camera for months!
50654
What mode are you shooting in because i have a d5100 as well and it works perfectly
165052
Check out the D300s - if it's beyond your budget, get the D90, not the D300- It's outdated. The D90 is an awesome camera. I have it. With the extra cash left, you can buy a lens ;)