Does anybody know how these compare to the Monitor70 Series II ?
2004348
The polk 75t are a new version of the 70 series and there 4-way so the cross-over is better in these speaker and they sound great
2004349
When I purchased the 75T's, I had the same question. The most detailed comparisons I found said that the low frequency range was slightly larger for the 75T's and that the highs are somewhat muted. The overall consensus was that it is very difficult to hear any difference between the two speakers; both are great pieces of equipment.
2097428
I do not have the 27inch model but use the 21 inch for all my photography as well as AutoCAD and Solidwork design work and can say it is a great monitor and I would buy again. I have the monitor color profiled with X-rite iPhoto2 pro software (easy to do software makes all the adjustments for you) for all my photography work and find the color and contrast to be excellent.
1648200
I bought 2 of these monitors a week ago and I'm blown away by the quality of the picture compared to the other 5 AOC monitors in my studio. I have had no problems thus far but will repost in a few weeks after I've put them to the test.
1389712
I have had my two for over a year with no issues. Gaming, Video Editing and photography are my main uses and it hold up pretty well. AOC did a good job on this monitor.
1802806
Compared to an IPS the BenQ is ugly; the colors are washed out, etc. 2 things: 1) this is a gaming monitor pure and simple--and THE BEST monitor for gaming (other then old CRTs). It has 120hz, black equalizer, the fastest response time, etc and 2) you can calibrate the colors (see http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/icc_profiles.htm) which makes a significant improvement! But sitting next to an IPS benq will always fall short in picture quality.
1521980
I have a PX2710MW and it is AWESOME! NO bad pixels ever; just fine colors and a great and bright display. I wondered about them since it was an unknown beck then but it is as good or better than my previous Samsung monitors.
894156
Not surr about q701s but if they are identical performance wise like others have said, go for the 702s. The 702s are extremely comfortable and the sound prod. is first class.
3349
I had the exact same monitors I was debating between xD lol the RL is specially designed for consoles and has 2 HDMI ports. Whereas the GL was designed moreso for PC's and only has 1 HDMI port. The only thing honestly holding me back was the HDMI thing. But I would honestly suggest getting the GL because it's $40 cheaper (at least when I bought it), the bezils are thinner, and it overall just looks a lot cleaner. The 1ms difference isn't even noticible honestly, and you save yourself $40 to sacrifice an HDMI port. In all honesty I'm going to get 2 more of these later down the line. They work FLAWLESSLY on the Xbox One and 360 and you don't truly realize how much input lag you had until it's gone lol
551889
The MX I believe is focused more towards console gaming. The truth is that both of these monitors looks good but if you have a dual monitor setup it is not wise to pair these. The reason being that the color profiles vary slightly. I noticed the yellows on the MX were not as vibrant and crisp as the VX. Sadly, I even tried to color correct to get them to match and it didn't work. I chose two VX279Qs. I do a bit of photo editing but, to be completely honest, neither one has the color range needed to be proper work monitors. If your end goal is multimedia use then I highly recommend both. The color are a little more muted on the MX but you would hardly know the difference. I also believe the MX has speakers built in if you are into that kind of thing. Either way you are getting damn near the same monitor. There may be some issues with support as well with the MX.
1492942
Check the article in PC Mag about refresh rates 240 vs 120. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2379206,00.asp
1895230
I looked at both and bought the 750....for the price (and difference) you are really looking at how important a super thin TV is to you, if saving $2 a month on your energy bill makes that big of a difference, or if you are that nuts about LED, for $800 I wasn't. 200,000 to 1 as a Dynamic contrast ratio is more than enough (you can't really tell much more of a difference). If you really wanna get the LED and are willing to spend that kind of money get the 8000 (even thinner and edge lit led). Because of the models above and below it, and price differences I don't see the 7000 making much sense unless you find a unique deal that only has that set on sale.
2094860
Sorry I have no baseline for comparison. It appeared the same as another monitor on the same computer using a standard VGA connection.
1170586
I use two for gaming. No it isn't the highest-end monitor and yes with the impending 4k rush it will become obsolete, but it is hard to beat the price point and any artifacts present don't inhibit me or my ability to enjoy gaming ;)
2275260
Don't know why the difference in reviews. My wife is a retired nurse & this monitor is working with no problems. It is used daily.
1700737
I think Luger got it right. It's 60Hz (and still fine for passive 3D), and I would agree about the glossy screen. I had mine facing a window and when the sun shined in, it was very reflective.Don't get me wrong, though; I still really like this monitor (as per my review).
1816906
More important than the size difference will be the weight difference between the two monitors. While size will mean they won't line up well, they should be fine as long as there's not too large of a weight difference between the two. If you're mounting the monitor to the desk, weight difference won't matter at all. Even with the stand, you should be okay unless the 23" is incredibly heavy or the 17" remarkably light.
1170584
I got good service when I returned mine because it wasn't as good as my current monitor.If you're on a tight budget I guess it may work. For me the difference was too significant to keep it. I was amazed because it was lauded as a great monitor, but when I got it, I was very disappointed