Wait for XTi or buy 30D now I am looking into a digital slr for as a gift. The person I am buying for has a 35mm Film Canon SLR, but is starting to get wieghed down by the costs of developing film. Could someone help explain to me why the 30D is more than this camera? Wait for XTi or buy 30D now I am looking into a digital slr for as a gift. The person I am buying for has a 35mm Film Canon SLR, but is starting to get wieghed down by the costs of developing... » Read More Wait for XTi or buy 30D now I am looking into a digital slr for as a gift. The person I am buying for has a 35mm Film Canon SLR, but is starting to get wieghed down by the costs of developing film. Could someone help explain to me why the 30D is more than this camera? « Show Less
105685
I used XTi for 3 weeks and exchanged with 30D. with no hesitation buy 30D.1. 30D is way better than XTi2. Does well in low light3. Feels good in hand, where as XTI is small, to many controls in too little space4. 30D build quality is good, worth the price5. Quality of the pic is also good6. Don't worry about 10MP of XTi7. I love 5frames per sec and quality of each pic in burst mode8. At room light, 30D did very good, kit lens did better than XTI w/ 17-85 IS
105686
The 30D, as noted by others, is a much sturdier camera. In addition, keep in mind that it shoots at a faster rate (5 fps), has a more ergonomic set of controls, and shoots better in low light-- ranging all the way up to 3200 ISO after expansion.I wouldn't be surprised to see Canon offer a similar jump to 10.1 MP or higher in this price range soon, more to compete with Nikon's D80 and D200 than to compete with their own product.That said, I'm adding the XTi as a backup to my existing 20D.
105687
If you go to your camera store and feel both cameras you can see the reason. The 30D looks and feels like a professional camera. It is much heavier and not only looks more sturdy but in fact it is more sturdy than the xti. The xti feels rather cheap in your hand when compared to holding the 30D. The 30D is also a faster camera for shooting sports or weddings when you need to focus and shoot fast before the moment is gone. Depends what you need it for; $500 more for a more sturdy camera with 2million less pixels, although if the largest pic you are going to print is an 8X10 you probably will not be able to tell the difference. Go for the xti or wait for the new version of the 30D called the 30D Mark II If you go to your camera store and feel both cameras you can see the reason. The 30D looks and feels like a professional camera. It is much heavier and not only looks more sturdy but in fact it is more sturdy than the xti. The xti feels rather cheap in your hand when compared to holding the 30D. The 30D is also a faster camera for shooting sports or weddings when you need to focus and shoot fast before the moment is gone. Depends what you need it for; $500 more for a more sturdy camera with 2million less pixels, although if the largest pic you are going to print is an 8X10 you probably will... » Read More If you go to your camera store and feel both cameras you can see the reason. The 30D looks and feels like a professional camera. It is much heavier and not only looks more sturdy but in fact it is more sturdy than the xti. The xti feels rather cheap in your hand when compared to holding the 30D. The 30D is also a faster camera for shooting sports or weddings when you need to focus and shoot fast before the moment is gone. Depends what you need it for; $500 more for a more sturdy camera with 2million less pixels, although if the largest pic you are going to print is an 8X10 you probably will not be able to tell the difference. Go for the xti or wait for the new version of the 30D called the 30D Mark II « Show Less
31109
At this point, I'd say the 30D really doesn't have a lot of discernable advantages over the prosumer XTI model, besides availability. Historically, the higher end cameras have had sturdier chassis (which I would assume is still the case) as well as more configurable features and functions. Oh and resolution. Duh. Now that the XTI has been significantly improved, it seems only logical that the 30D is next in line for upgrades, probably before the actual release of the XTI. Or maybe the 30D will be killed entirely. I'm waiting for the XTI.
504961
Almost nothing. Put it this way: if you found them for sale at the same price then might as well get the T5i. The T5i MSRP is slightly lower than what the *original* MSRP for a similar kit was for the T4i, but we all know that you don't pay MSRP. Even here on Amazon a nice package in my cart shows the T4i to be nearly $200 cheaper than the T5i. That's because of the Canon discount that ends (this time) March 30th (it has been extended several time since November 2011). Essentially, they are clearing out the T4i and the Canon lineup will continue to have T3i and T5i, but no more T4i. Here's the opening paragraph from CNET's review, which highlights the only actual differences between the two models: "No, your eyes aren't deceiving you: the only significant difference between the now-discontinued Canon EOS Rebel T4i and its replacement, the T5i, is the price and the kit lens options. There are some small enhancements, including a new finish; 360-degree rotation mode dial plus the addition of scene mode; a return of digital zoom during movie recording (which had disappeared in the T4i "upgrade" from the T3i); and real-time preview of creative filters in Live View. But ultimately, it's the same camera." -CNET
1986462
I have a Canon XTi and have been pleased with this purchase.. I am not sure what you need for the newer camera.I generally go for larger capacity so that I con't have to worry about running out of space in the middle of a shootespecially since I shoot in raw.
58503
I also have the XSi (and LOVE it)... It's my first DSLR and I have learned so much with it. I ordered it with the kit lens (18-55mm) and also bought the 55-250mm. Both are great, inexpensive beginner lenses, but I have found that I am now out-growing them. The 55-250mm isn't as sharp as I would like (when the image is viewed at 100%) and, as Saleh AlMutawaa mentioned, the EF-S lenses are not compatible with the full-frame DSLRs. So, if you think you might upgrade, you might want to keep that in mind. The Rebel XSi, 18-55 and 55-250 are a great starter package.
305388
Thanks for your review and great job on the research. I need your opinion on something. Although, the current price of the XT and and XTi is less than $200.00. difference, the List price is the XTI is twice as much as the XI. I kind of agree that the XTi isn't really much of an upgrade over the XTi and some of the superior features of the XIT I'm not really to concern about except the 8MP and 10MP. I'm not a proffesional or anything like nor I plan to do large prints, but should I pay those extra bucks just for 10MP? Please help anyone.
127430
Chances are if it IS cheaper anywhere else, it's being sold from an unreliable retailer. I had a rather frustrating experience with one such retailer in buying my Rebel XT -- they pulled a bait-and-switch on me. If you want to look for a retailer selling for less, I would advise you to read the reviews for that retailer, sorted by lowest rating first.
1866175
I was able to find a D40 kit for $400 a year ago. If you are going to pay $650 you might as well get a D3000, or even better a D40, a second lens, and maybe some accessories. The XS is a decent camera as well, it really depends on what ecosystem you want to get into. Both Canon and Nikon make nice cameras, I think you'll be happy with a camera from either.
69004
As a novice photographer should I start with XSi to see if I will really get into photography? Or would you recommend T1i to be my first dSLR?
996596
Everything I see for Rebel xti is an EOS type camera. Being a 10.1 Megapixel, it probably would have to be formatted on your computer as a Fat32 format, as a lot of the older Canon would only format 4 GB or maybe 8 GB sticks. The only other issue could be that this memory is a type u2 which is a little wider than the type 1. I do not know which type memory yours uses, but the Canon cameras I have seen will work with the thicker type II memory. So if you can format the memory on your computer, you should be able to use it. If you are just totally unsure, buy a 8 gig or smaller CF card marked as Type I, as it will work in either slot and the camera will be able to format it. Everything I see for Rebel xti is an EOS type camera. Being a 10.1 Megapixel, it probably would have to be formatted on your computer as a Fat32 format, as a lot of the older Canon would only format 4 GB or maybe 8 GB sticks. The only other issue could be that this memory is a type u2 which is a little wider than the type 1. I do not know which type memory yours uses, but the Canon cameras I have seen will work with the thicker type II memory. So if you can format the memory on your computer, you should be able to use it. If you are just totally unsure, buy a 8 gig or smaller CF card marked... » Read More Everything I see for Rebel xti is an EOS type camera. Being a 10.1 Megapixel, it probably would have to be formatted on your computer as a Fat32 format, as a lot of the older Canon would only format 4 GB or maybe 8 GB sticks. The only other issue could be that this memory is a type u2 which is a little wider than the type 1. I do not know which type memory yours uses, but the Canon cameras I have seen will work with the thicker type II memory. So if you can format the memory on your computer, you should be able to use it. If you are just totally unsure, buy a 8 gig or smaller CF card marked as Type I, as it will work in either slot and the camera will be able to format it. « Show Less
122902
There is no "correct" choice, it is all up to you. The 30D is a good camera at a lower price, but uses previous generation technology. The 40D is the 30D's replacement and has the latest technology and higher cost. If your more concerned with money, go with the 30D. If you are more concerned with having the latest technology, get the 40D. Beyond that, look at each model and choose based on the features you want or need most.
50338
The Canon 50D and the XSi are actually two different classes of cameras, even so you can't go wrong purchasing either camera. Both can take fantastic photos, with the right lens. Some differences the Xsi is smaller and lighter. The 50D is larger, heavier duty, and has better weather sealing. The 50D comes with a better kit lens. The Xsi is less expensive so it leaves more money to buy better lenses for it. The 50D has a higher frame rate which makes it a better camera for sports photography. But, again you can't go wrong with either camera, it really depends on your budget and what you want to photograph and which camera feels better in your hands.
1026443
I too have wanted to buy a T2i for a while, ever since I noticed the announcement in February. Then, it was seemingly always out of stock at Amazon. Perhaps I haven't waited long enough, or maybe it just wasn't meant to be. Although I have bought 5 Canon cameras over the years, and I considered myself a Canon loyalist, I am beginning to wonder if maybe I should buy a Nikon as my first digital SLR.
751703
Just bought the D40x two weeks ago, and spent the weeks before that researching the D40x vs. the XTi. I'd go with the D40x... you can't go wrong with a Nikon, and the kit lens that comes with the XTi is terrible. I bought the D40x, and have since added a few accessories. I feel like I made the right decision and I am totally thrilled with the purchase... No regrets at all. Plus, Nikon makes a longer-lasting camera. D40x!!!
462699
Get the 40D kit. The 28-135 is an excellent lens; I used it for years. The 40D is an outstanding camera; we sold the XTi after owning the 40D a week. Worth every penny-you will love it. By the way, I paid considerably more than what it is selling for now and I don't regret buying it when I did as I got that much extra use out of it.
2075390
@ Ronnie Dale Frost: What do I think? I've already pre-ordered one! Yes, $5,200 is a bit steep, but I will sell my current D3 body (mint condition, should fetch $3,200 - $3,700) and use those proceeds to offset the purchase price. I want and need the extra 1-2 stops this new extended ISO range will provide. Regarding the 720P-only video, while the omission of 1080P seems both inexplicable and ridiculously short-sighted (given what is readily available elsewhere, and for far less money), it's not a dealbreaker for me--and that comment is all the more interesting when you factor in that I am an independent filmmaker. Nope, for filmmaking, I want a REAL video camera/camcorder, designed for filmmaking from top to bottom. The Canon 5D Mark II, for example--and despite that whole very impressive Laforet short--is NOT a camera I would even consider using for indie filmmaking.
847183
I'm no expert, but during my research on the same question I found the following: 1) The difference between The 8MP on the XT and 10MP on the XTi is virtually undetectable until you attempt very large prints. At standard sharp resolution (300 DPI) even a 7.2 MP camera will give you an excellent 8X10 print. You really need 12MP over an 8MP camera to see results in smaller prints. Unless you think you'll print larger than 12X16, your eye likely won't detect any difference in quality between the XT and XTi. 2) The XTi has more Megapixels on the same sensor - this can add more noise at higher ISO settings and from my research it seems the XT may actually take a sharper picture in many cases. But for your own opinion - here is a head to head XTi - TX picture comparison: http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=732 3) Opinions on the noise levels of the XTi vary, here is a good conversation on the subject, some here own both XT and XTi: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=20548088 4) The XTI's dust cleaning system is as yet unproven - meaning that many owners of the XTi (professional and otherwise) are not exactly convinced the dust removal feature does what its supposed to. Over all, I found that some people were rather irritated with Canon - theorizing that Canon simply put out an XTi 10-mega pixel model with a few bells and whistles to compete with the other manufacturers. In effect, canon created technologically superior camera that may take inferior photographs. The XTi is an excellent camera, but perhaps not a clear upgrade over the XT. On the upside, the XTi does have a bigger LCD screen and a 9-point auto focus. The XT has a 7-point system that some say can have issues auto focusing with faster lenses. Those faster lenses are typically very expensive and professional grade so the majority of amateur / semi-pro XT users have no complaints. After my research, I went with the XT. Hope this helps
506470
I have a 30D & love it. Never had a Nikon. I would be hard pressed to give it up.