how does this compare to the AAXA P300? what is the max resolution of this?
1981386
Max resolution Aaxa delivers at 16:9 aspect ratio is 1280*720 i.e. HD Ready, at 16:10 ratio resolution is 1280*800.Same goes for Vivitek Qumi Q2 lite.Both are able to play fullHD i.e. 1920*1080 (maximum resolution), but will not display more than 720p (native resolution)vivitek contrast ratio is far better. 10,000:1 compared to Aaxa 2000:1Lamp life for vivitek 30,000 hrs, Aaxa 15000 hrs. (Approx)Aaxa has a major advantage in terms of true portability ie it can also ne powered on its battery only...not sure of duration though.Prices are comparable. I cant say about how Aaxa actually measures up against Vivitek because haven't used it. I'm happy with Vivitek though, delivers crisp pictures and i use it for tv and movies. Max resolution Aaxa delivers at 16:9 aspect ratio is 1280*720 i.e. HD Ready, at 16:10 ratio resolution is 1280*800.Same goes for Vivitek Qumi Q2 lite.Both are able to play fullHD i.e. 1920*1080 (maximum resolution), but will not display more than 720p (native resolution)vivitek contrast ratio is far better. 10,000:1 compared to Aaxa 2000:1Lamp life for vivitek 30,000 hrs, Aaxa 15000 hrs. (Approx)Aaxa has a major advantage in terms of true portability ie it can also ne powered on its battery only...not sure of duration though.Prices are comparable. I... » Read More Max resolution Aaxa delivers at 16:9 aspect ratio is 1280*720 i.e. HD Ready, at 16:10 ratio resolution is 1280*800.Same goes for Vivitek Qumi Q2 lite.Both are able to play fullHD i.e. 1920*1080 (maximum resolution), but will not display more than 720p (native resolution)vivitek contrast ratio is far better. 10,000:1 compared to Aaxa 2000:1Lamp life for vivitek 30,000 hrs, Aaxa 15000 hrs. (Approx)Aaxa has a major advantage in terms of true portability ie it can also ne powered on its battery only...not sure of duration though.Prices are comparable. I cant say about how Aaxa actually measures up against Vivitek because haven't used it. I'm happy with Vivitek though, delivers crisp pictures and i use it for tv and movies. « Show Less
1981387
Max resolution Aaxa delivers at 16:9 aspect ratio is 1280*720 i.e. HD Ready, at 16:10 ratio resolution is 1280*800. Same goes for Vivitek Qumi Q2 lite. Both are able to play fullHD i.e. 1920*1080 (maximum resolution), but will not display more than 720p (native resolution) vivitek contrast ratio is far better. 10,000:1 compared to Aaxa 2000:1 Lamp life for vivitek 30,000 hrs, Aaxa 15000 hrs. (Approx) Aaxa has a major advantage in terms of true portability ie it can also ne powered on its battery only...not sure of duration though. Prices are comparable. I cant say about how Aaxa actually measures up against Vivitek because haven't used it. I'm happy with Vivitek though, delivers crisp pictures and i use it for tv and movies.
452920
I'm certain that both above mentioned cameras produce excellent images. They both have high resolution 3 inch screens, but to say P7000's images are better because they look better on the camera's LCD screen is akin to saying one blonde looks better than the other one from 100 yards out. You can't really make a meaningful comparison until you've uploaded the files to the computer and view them under magnification.
1849844
Could you clarify your question as to what specific specs you are looking for? Resolution, performance, pixelation...?
1352958
YES, the A630 produces much better pictures. If you're a fan of the A-series, like I am, you'll be disappointed by the SD600. It takes blurry pictures with granulated pixels all over and the zoom is horrendous. The macro was good, as was Indoor, but NightTime, Portrait, and any zoomed photos looked horrendous. The A630 is the route to go.
203188
the major issue sony had with the 2500 series was the clouding issues, the 3000's are free of that mess. also it depends on how far away ur siting from the display...IMO get the 3000, at 40"s you wont be about to tell the difference between the High def resolutions. not till the 50" range will that matter...o and sorry...didnt do an A & B comparision. I"m still browsing myself HAPPY HUNTING
1133214
There are substantial differences between the two. I suggest you look at the Silicon Power web site for the list. I chose the A30 based on what I needed it for and the sale price.
1442809
more importantly, how will the image quality be and will it be worth owning? reviews of the P80 were not kind. I'm hoping they have fixed this issue.
977535
If you can use an external monitor on your Apple Air laptop then you can project on the Aaxa P300 unit.
1149067
I would check out the AOC website for detailed specs. I like the 2ms response time and 20,000,000:1 contrast ratio. You can also view 4 screens at once if needed.
379907
It supports 1080p INPUT. but it's native resolution is on 1280X800 so 720p is the best you are going to get.
318985
Hi, thanks for your inquiry. There are only a bit difference between P780 and A830. You can compare their specification in the description for the details. Just buy the one which you like. Have a happy shopping! Best regards,
1312579
I know this is someone elses post but I am debating the same thing. I myself am looking for a high quality resolution with the crispest photos out there. I really dont care about any gps feature but whether its indoors or out I want crispness. Mostly I use it for taking photos of my toddler. Any suggestions or help?
84145
This model, the one with the "A", records in 60p/50p in 1080. which wasn't available in the previous versions. The PJ I think means that this product is to be sold in Japan. But it still has english interface and all that. I hope I helped :)
684030
120 basically doubles the refresh rate of the images. That is very good especially if you like sports. .. I had a Sony that I returned because it said it was 1080 pixels but it was really only 720... don't you hate being lied to? I do...
391683
Thanks for the opinion on the LX3, I think I'll wait for one of the these new Canons. Agree with your point on megapixels too, it's seems like 12mp is probably overkill for these small image sensors, so I expect I'll probably crank mine down to 10 or 8 to see if I get less noise. Digic 4 sounds pretty cool too, hopefully that will help.
777490
It is a 2 megapixel sensor giving you a 1920x1080 video resolution. It does not seem to have the same still image quality as a 2 megapixel point and shoot camera. However, I'm happy with the sharpness. Better than a 1.3Mp webcam. Much better than any analog video. One thing worth noting. The camera lens comes pre-focused for a large room. Need to focus lens for outdoor use.
962352
The A2 is an amazing media player that I fell in love with, if your really that anxious, then just buy it then return it later, you may not get the full amount back you'll get what you wanted now and get the A3 later! Cowon isin't a company to release buggy products, so I wouldn't worry about that. As far as the A3 being better... we'll just have to wait and see! If I were you though, I take a look into the Cowon Q5.