What is the difference between the IHT 5000 and the 6000, other than bluetooth on the 5000?
2080362
Looks like the 6000 is longer (lengthwise) and has 4 speakers, 40 watts each, and no bluetooth. The 5000 is shorter, has 2 speakers, 80 watts each, and bluetooth, also, subwoofer is slightly smaller.
96862
I like my 2500bt a lot. I looked at the 3500bhs as well and am glad I chose the 2500bt. I have used 3 different Android phones with it and they all work perfectly with it. The bluetooth autoconnect is a great feature that all radios should have! Everything about the radio is awesome. I also stream music with bluetooth and it is pretty clear as well. Most apps stream the song info as well which is awesome!
517092
This is good as I am also trying to decide between the two of these models. Bluetooth means nothing to me, But I do like having the lanes shown better so that leans me more towards the 1490LMT. But again, I am also concerned that the 1490 LMT has worse reviews than 1450LMT..maybe because of Bluetooth??
1968270
The bluetooth is barely an issue. You just have to restart the speaker it takes 5 seconds. Also the sound quality is worlds better than the big jambox and much louder. However, the tdk is bigger.
364099
The 6000 keyboard is an older version of the 5000 keyboard. They are essentially the same product, but one reviewer said the older one was a bit more difficult to connect to a computer. I bought the 5000 model a year ago and it has worked fine for me.
478989
I have the E4, and a friend who wanted one like mine ended up with the E5 as it was only $6 more. All the features are the same. They are both working great months (mine 7, his 3 or 4) later. Unfortunately the only device we have in common is the phone, and his laptop is even a smaller screen, so we really can't tell if the extra 2000 makes much difference.
559922
I have ATT 2-line 6.0 that is Bluetooth and the ATT bluetooth does work. It is a little bulky and heavy for my ear (I use a motorola bluetooth for my cell phone and it is so light I forget I have it in, but the ATT is pretty heavy compared, but still not real heavy). The better news is that the ATT bluetooth headset has a much longer range. I can roam around my office (a 2-story brick building) with the bluetooth in and still answer phones from 50' away, upstairs, or in the parking lot. It works nicely, just not as trim as most cellphone bluetooth devises. Another good thing, it is NEVER lost. Take it out of your ear and simply put it back on the stand to charge. I have ATT 2-line 6.0 that is Bluetooth and the ATT bluetooth does work. It is a little bulky and heavy for my ear (I use a motorola bluetooth for my cell phone and it is so light I forget I have it in, but the ATT is pretty heavy compared, but still not real heavy). The better news is that the ATT bluetooth headset has a much longer range. I can roam around my office (a 2-story brick building) with the bluetooth in and still answer phones from 50' away, upstairs, or in the parking lot. It works nicely, just not as trim as most cellphone bluetooth devises. Another good thing, it is NEVER... » Read More I have ATT 2-line 6.0 that is Bluetooth and the ATT bluetooth does work. It is a little bulky and heavy for my ear (I use a motorola bluetooth for my cell phone and it is so light I forget I have it in, but the ATT is pretty heavy compared, but still not real heavy). The better news is that the ATT bluetooth headset has a much longer range. I can roam around my office (a 2-story brick building) with the bluetooth in and still answer phones from 50' away, upstairs, or in the parking lot. It works nicely, just not as trim as most cellphone bluetooth devises. Another good thing, it is NEVER lost. Take it out of your ear and simply put it back on the stand to charge. « Show Less
604952
I took a look at the 7 in 1 on QVC and they appear to be the same except the 7 in 1 mentions that it has Bluetooth Technology. In fact in QVC s description it calls the unit a 5 in 1 then lists the features which are the same as the 5 in 1 except for the mention of Bluetooth. Hope this helps.
1119090
Hello client, Thank you for your contact. Yes, the item is a 6000mAh one, the 5000 mAh one is the first generation. We are so sorry that we haven't updated the pitcure in time. Sincerely sorry for all inconvenience brought. Best regards, Levin team
1154322
This is my wife's watch. Never had the 220. Her 610 was stolen so bought the 620. She likes it better. Blue tooth is easier to upload and it locates a satellite much faster. Plus a little smaller & lighter. The 620 was 399 vs. 299 for last year's 610 model
270987
The 6000 is capable of 2 full plus a half charges for my phone. It seems that 2500 is needed for for a full charge so figure that the 9000 is good for 3 charges and change. Choosing between the 6000 or the 9000 depends on how many times you need to charge for a given time away from an outlet. Also size and weight is something to consider.
554146
Actually Its (i4) I4s and I4. I4 is bluetooth 2.0 and has raised option buttons on the device for play, stop, etc,. I4s is bluetooth 3.0 ( better range, better battery life, faster data transfer if your using it for such a task) and is backwards compatible with 2.0 devices. Also the option buttons are flat and flush with the device which makes for a seamless and smooth look and feel.
1983877
Mine is actually the the mc200. And it is a plug in only. They both have to be plugged in. They are pretty close the 200 has the wi-fi though. Hope this helps. With Bluetooth you maybe limited to range. I am sure the sound the same though also. There are better sounding ones but the price is more than double. I am happy with this choice. We listen to country, soft rock, rock, easy listening stuff and all of them sound perfect. It is pretty loud if you want it to be.
1044329
The difference is the display. 5010 has a red line thru speakers while 5000 doesn't and i think 5010 gets a little more distance for blue tooth devices
894673
I could not find any info either on the differences. My guess is that the only difference in the im600USB is the ipod dock charging connection. Starting with the new iPod Nano 4th Gen., Apple changed the way they charge, USB only, no firewire, I believe. So, the original im600 is not able to charge the new Nanos, it plays them fine though.
524533
Let me list you some:1) The price; 6200 is more expensive. 2) 5300 is newer;3) Sound quality is subjective, but 6200 should be better by its wood sound box. 5300 has plastic sound box.
1287011
There is a blue tooth version, the Edifier Exclaim BT (E10BT). It's about $10 more and I've seen it in my Amazon search results.