why do image move in "tiny steps" instead of fluid movement...
2057586
Epsilon, Have you been able to resolve this problem with your SONY flat screen tv. Please let me know.
1265974
Use the wave maker mode, other settings are not very strong and would give almost no movement
336052
I'm not sure how that's happening to you. There's a photo button you have to press to take stills. Maybe you are pressing that because it's on top.
1887774
The function of the converter are fluid in motion but I ordered the wrong size I didn't send it back but will order another one but the right size.Advise order the right converter !.... I hope this helps .Mb
1606533
Yes, that's probably the image stabilization unit. It has some free movement when camera is not powered on - that's normal behavior. Don't know how robust this is on the long term, but from the little I tested it seemed fine. I'd be more concerned about battery life, which is relatively short.
273859
I believe you need to move the projector closer for the image to get smaller or farther away to get larger. I really haven't used this projector yet, so you might want to contact tech support at Artograph.
840319
There are no moving parts. It is in effect a 1tb flash drive using USB 3.0 technology
157024
It's rounded on the bottom thus will move in any direction. It's small diameter makes balancing a challenge.
1903037
I only tried it once many years ago and it was boring. You can hardly notice it change. But try it and see. Any form of movement will effect it, but it was built for machine movement I believe. Not reading the prior posts I answered the request. My model is quite old and if it has a pedestrian mode, I don't know it. Will check further, but being unable to walk any great distance, do not need the feature. Will try and find the booklet and update it in my mind.
972116
I would say yes but due to unsteady images(dancing) I returned this product.
1532922
I'm having a similar problem. I've noticed it most in low light, when the subject moves. I don't think I've experienced it much outdoors in bright light. I've not taken the time to research it yet. I'd say I've been somewhat disappointed in the camera.
452140
They move very little, a few inches up or down and side to side. If you are looking to move them a lot for style, do not buy this lamp. But spread out and left alone, makes a beautiful lamp. I am very happy with this lamp.
803780
Not sure on that one. I try to rotate my pics and save how I want before loading onto memory disk for frame. Sorry.
2050010
Sorry, image has mistake. Image has been updated.You need to skip tracks by control your cell phone, tablet or computer.
1127597
Not exactly sure, but I think it will make it quite small. My needs were to make things larger. The glass where you place your image is only 7 inches, then you go up or down from there. Hope this helps
1253794
You will love this thread---- I got so much info out of it:http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1012&message;=38927399Towards the end of the thread he posts his post processing work flow as well as full size images both before and after.
489798
I believe you (ranthon007) are operating under a false assumption. Regardless of what image size you choose to use, the actual physical pixels on the sensor must necessarily remain the size they are, and if that's too small to let in the ideal amount of light, well then you're stuck. I'm not sure whether smaller output sizes are done by rescaling or by simply using fewer of the pixels (i.e. not the whole sensor), but while you MAY be gaining some reduction of noise, there is NOT an actual increase of detail.(Anyone please correct me if any of the above is in at all incorrect!)