Will the new tamron sp 24-70mm F2.8 DI VC USD work with Nikon D610, which is a full frame?
2078774
Yes this is made for full frame cameras...make sure you purchase from a USA dealer not grey market or you will not have any warranty.
2078775
Yes, for sure. It can work with DX and FX Nikon bodies, but the focal length is more adequate for FX like D610.
1441580
Yeah absolutely it will. The only thing to keep in mind that this is a Full Frame lens.. Since D7000 is a cropped sensor, you're not going to get the 24mm view - you'll get approximately 36mm view. I've been using the lens for nearly six months now, and it's fantastic.
623573
YES, I use it on the D700, which is also a full frame, its AMAZING, I hardly remove it from the camera.
636104
According to Tamron's compatibility chart on their website, this lens is compatible with the Nikon D7000.
1958589
I wouldn't buy the 24-105 mm lens. The 70D has a smaller APS-C sensor (compared to full frame) which translates into a 1.6x crop factor of the lens' focal length. Put simple, you will lose the wide angle capability of the lens and instead have the equivalent of a ca. 36-160 mm lens. The 24-105 has certainly better quality, but to fully appreciate it you should buy the EOS 6D body (ca. $1500) or another Canon body with a full frame sensor.
213161
The Sigma 24-70 will work with full frame and crop frame cameras. You have to buy the Nikon mount version. I found the lens soft wide open. A better lens for about the same money is the sigma 17-70 OS. Sharper wide open, and the anti shake works helps in low light. My 24-70 was not sharp until 5.6, the newer sigma HSM is much better but spendy
1533866
You have 10mm more with the Tamron. You have twice the size aperture comparing 2.8 to 4. That is a huge huge difference. I tested mine in detail at the center and some spots around the corner AT THE SAME APERTURE with my Nikon 24-120, it is every bit as sharp under high magnification. I did quite a scientific comparison. If you know the outstanding optical quality of the Nikon 24-120, you'll be really impressed.
1073949
No it will be a little lower on the D610. The D610 has 33% more pixels on the same sized sensor. That said at up to iso 6400 when you compare them at the same size side by side, as in looking at the D4 at 100% and the D610 at 80% you wold be hard pushed to see the difference. The D4 will shine over the D610 in other areas being a 'pro' camera rather than a prosumer as the D610. I have the D610 and it is a cracking camera I do not really bother what ISO I am shooting at and have it set to a max of 3200. There is of course a huge difference in price.RegardsGW
791866
I have the Nikon D7000 with the 60mm Macro lens and it works great. I do not have the D610.
624614
Yes, it is a full frame lens. In fact, if you set the D610 to the DX mode, a smaller cropped section of the sensor will be used, effectively increasing the focal length to 1.5X, resulting in a 42-450mm lens.
394029
I bought the Tamron !6~300 and after 2 days testing sent it back, very disappointing, have not tried the Nikon.
469114
Yes, beautifully. I have owned the Canon 70-200L in addition to this and actually prefer the Tamron. I use it on my older original 5D as well as my 6D.
1400124
Yes this is a full frame lens. It should mount on any current Nikon Dslr camera except mirrorless. Remember, full frame lenses can go on both, a full frame body and a crop body. It's the crop lenses that can only go on crop bodies. It actually is a little better than Nikon's own 70-300 in every way except stabilization. If I remember the Nikon is about only a half stop better in stabilization. And the Tamron is less money !
2037229
I believe the 70d is a crop-sensor, so it would give you the full-frame equivalent of 56mm.
612767
Yes. The d610 has the motor drive and the standard f mount needed for this lens.
1441507
i have the d80 with the 18-70 dx, the 70-300 ed, and the 50 1.8 d nikkors, plus the tokina 12-24 and the tamron 28-75 f/2.8. what glass you put on your d80 to start with should depend on intended uses and experience level. if all you want is an all-in-one lens, go for the 18-135 kit, unless you can afford the 18-200 vr. the 24-120 VR is another sweet after-market option if you go body-only and just want one lens, but you'd probably be better off, however, with either the 18-55 or the 18-70, plus the 55-200 vr. for the size, weight, and cost, they're very good for plastic consumer lenses. the downside is they're fairly slow for (D)SLR lenses, due to narrow apertures at the long end. if low-light photography or action sports is your bag, skip the nikkors altogether unless you can afford the 17-55 2.8 and/or the 70-200 VR. get the d80 body and grab a sigma or tamron 2.8. if w/a is your thing, i'd get one of the 18s (-55, -70, -135, -200) and pair it with the tokina 12-24 or the sigma 10-20. if you're more of a telephoto person, get the 18-55 or -70 and pair it with the inexpensive 70-300 non-vr g lens. the money you save over the ed or vr versions can go toward a good tripod -- unless you really think you're gonna be doing a lot of handheld shooting at 300mm. for macro and portrait work, consider again going body-only with the d80, getting the $100 50 1.8 prime, and maybe the sigma 30, the nikkor 60, and the tamron 90 to round out your selection, which would give you a nice, sharp range. if all of this seems too complicated, look at a fixed-zoom P&S or the d40/18-55 combo.
606621
I don't think I can fully answer your question, however I wish I had watched this before spending $2000.00 on this lens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQSuexEQcgM This is a comparison of the Canon 24-70...with the Tamron 24-70... I hope this helps.