in its minimal expression, how large is it? is it possible to carry it on a medium size backpack? please provide another objects for reference
2055340
Folded 24" long and 3" in diameter. It will easily attach to a backpack, especially one designed to carry a camera tripod.
2055341
I would say it's the size of a medium to large umbrella. It's quite lightweight and I think it would fit into a backpack. Description says it's 11 x 11 x 18 inches ; 1.9 pounds. So, it's 18" long and folds up like an umbrella.
2055342
It is about 2ft long. And has strap on side.it maybe put on top or bottom of backpack. (side ways)
2055343
I'm 5' and just tossed it over my shoulder like a purs. There is a shoulder strap and you can attach it to anything you'd like. THIS chair is the single reason I walked 6.5 miles thru Auschwitz, allowing me to sit whenever needed...quickly...BUY THE DARN THING.....
2055344
I didn't try to carry it in a back pac, my husband and I each have one and took it on a trip to Europe. It was fairly easy to cary it over the shoulder like a bag. I like the size and the seat is larger than some off them.
2055345
Probably 3-4" diameter at the seat end. It fit easily into my suitcase, and has a strap for carrying over your shoulder. It's very light!
1216476
It's about two feet or less in length & probably 5" wide/high (not exact dimensions, I just stowed it away a few days ago and it fit the width of my closet with room to spare). Definitely able to be carried around at the bottom of a backpack. Also has a strap on the case you can use to carry it as well. To me it's fairly light weight and durable.
1570092
It's probably the size of a small backpack. It was a gift so I don't have it with me, but I'd say it's not a backpacking sack. It's a bit larger than your average, warmer-weather, stuff sack.
779916
It is about as heavy as a large sweater. It will fit in a small bag or backpack
1729114
It is a very light backpack. Not more than a few ounces, I'd think. It seems to be very sturdy and has outside pockets for water bottles. It also has a pouch about 3'" x 3" that it fits into and the pouch doubles as another pocket inside the backpack when the backpack is being used. We got it to use on a sightseeing trip so we can put a water bottle, binoculars and an umbrella in it and have it be compact to carry in our luggage without extra weight.
741465
Under light to medium use and my 6th grader is still using it. The little chain with the bows has broken off but that's about it. It's about three fourths the size of a standard back pack so the big heavy stuff is put in a standard type backpack, which I'm sure would have broken the shoulder straps on this one. It's more of a shoulder bag than a backpack.
334584
Its big. Its not necessarily for backpacking. In the original compression sack the bag is about 11x6inches. Otherwise you can compress it down to about 8X5 inches. The circumference barely compresses. Its a thick bag.
159063
Personally, I wouldn't try to use it as a portable item. Granted, it is not heavy but it is bulky and takes up quite a bit of room. If you were to use a larger backpack, it might work.
87740
I have no idea of what you are talking about, but when I got it it was way lighter than other bear canisters, and it is about the size of the mid-section of an average sized backpack. I think you should get it.
2084058
Yes, it is smaller than it appears in the picture. Lots of pockets, padding could be better. I sent mine back and went back to Oakley but I needed a rugged hiking backpack.
815191
I bought it for my Husband. It is about the size of the circle made if you put your two hands together to form one. Should be pretty easy to pack/travel with - we never have though. Hope this helps.
885487
It is a basic backpack that compares to any standard Jansport or Eastpack. It is not that big, just a little sturdier. It could probably accommodate a 15 inch laptop, but not a whole lot more. I just bought it because I love the M&P; logo on it. He this helps.
2194420
A little bigger than a backpack. The key to getting it small again is to use the pump in reverse to take the air out. Then it can be folded up quite small. Hope this helps!
433503
I purchased this backpack for my son, he uses it for all his outdoor adventures (camping, hunting, etc) and also for school. I am not familiar with the backpack that you have but I can tell you that his backpack is 1400 cu.in / 23L. If you are looking for something bigger, Maxpedition has the Vulture-II 3-day backpack which has 2100 cu.in / 34L
1186861
The bag is 19"H x 12"W x 8.5"D. You would definitely be able to carry it. The bag I received is poorly made and the stitches have come apart on different areas of the bag. I would say it may be in your interest to put a few extra dollars into buying a better quality bag depending on how you value your equipment. I believe the bag is a knock off and that may be why it is poorly made. I am 6'4" and the pack fits me ok. I would guess that the way the pack fits you would be different but not difficult to carry. But to summarize, you would be able to carry a bag of this size. It is basically like a a school backpack, just with dividers for your camera equipment. The bag is 19"H x 12"W x 8.5"D. You would definitely be able to carry it. The bag I received is poorly made and the stitches have come apart on different areas of the bag. I would say it may be in your interest to put a few extra dollars into buying a better quality bag depending on how you value your equipment. I believe the bag is a knock off and that may be why it is poorly made. I am 6'4" and the pack fits me ok. I would guess that the way the pack fits you would be different but not difficult to carry. But to summarize, you would be able to carry a bag of this size.... » Read More The bag is 19"H x 12"W x 8.5"D. You would definitely be able to carry it. The bag I received is poorly made and the stitches have come apart on different areas of the bag. I would say it may be in your interest to put a few extra dollars into buying a better quality bag depending on how you value your equipment. I believe the bag is a knock off and that may be why it is poorly made. I am 6'4" and the pack fits me ok. I would guess that the way the pack fits you would be different but not difficult to carry. But to summarize, you would be able to carry a bag of this size. It is basically like a a school backpack, just with dividers for your camera equipment. « Show Less
2029155
It is not very large a bit bigger than a wallet (LxW) and a bit thicker as well. I keep mine in my backpack while in the field and it takes up relatively little room. Hope this helps.
388496
The backpack is pretty slim, although it can fit a lot of stuff, it doesn't stick out. It's on the smaller side of most backpacks.. I'd call it slightly "petite".