Do these have more and/or better bass than the Sony xb700s?
2092792
Hi mateI had this pair to and they were ok but leaked sound and the Bass was not as effective as the xb920 The XB920 have more punch to the Bass unlike the XB700s
2092793
I have personally never owned the XB700's but they definitely have more bass than the original XB300's. I would also describe these XB920's as having more "accurate" bass.
2092794
Hi mate I had this pair to and they were ok but leaked sound and the Bass was not as effective as the xb920 The XB920 have more punch to the Bass unlike the XB700s
2092795
I think these have better bass than Sony XB700. I really like this headphone.
1752394
They are really good. The bass isn't naturally amplified, if you mess with the EQ, it responds to that really well. Not too rattly or anything. (from my son who got the headphones for a gift and knows way more about this stuff than I do.)
1534721
Look at the MDR-XB600. They don't have as much bass, but they still do the job.
1201644
I gave up quickly to be honest they were too narrow. No bass when using my iPhone. I returned them and bought a pair of ath-ad900x's :P
1641037
They don't tell you, I've searched everywhere on the internet can't find anything, but I can tell you that they sound fantastic, way better then beats. They have a deep non boomy bass and very good clear mids and highs.
284084
BOSE has better bass. I would like more bass to my DNA headphones... But def good for its price, really clear sound
1042340
These headphones sound more like a fine tuned night club. The bass is present, lush, tight, and gorgeous. An amp will only help, but isn't necessary. If there's no bass in the song, you won't hear any. If you want that "bass in your face" feeling, I'd recommend the XB500, which is far cheaper. It will make any song sound bassy, and sounds more like 2 15" juggernaut subwoofers rattling in your car. Not nearly as clean. Personally, I enjoy the XB1000's, but pick whatever one sounds like you'd be into.
932490
It all depends on the setup you want. The speakers (kenwood) pass 20hz to 22,000 i think.. Meaning they output bass but, not bass as boom boom. I tried them without the extra bass and they're good. It all depends on what you want. What do you want?
19880
yes they are. with quality sound from denon they sound very good. you don't miss nothing. you hear every little sound from it. it sounds like you are listening to surround sound. as for the bass, it got boom.
637245
Personally I rank them a bit higher, others will say these don't have enough bass (I would strongly disagree) however to be honest I haven't used these in ~9months, I gave them to my fiance and bought some ATH-A900X's which are the same driver but with aluminium housing and sound a few notches above both. Both are fantastic headphones, but the M50's have a much flatter soundstage compared to the ATH-A700X's, I would also say that they are not as comfortable. Slightly more portable.
1543733
I'm using these in a 7.2 surround setup, with my Pioneer 1123k. Just ordered 2 more for back surround, 9.2. @ 94db they should be able to handle your audio needs. They have crisp and clear highs, and mid range. The are not bassy, I use my subs for that. Just watched Captain America bluray, sound was great. Previous setup was Bose. The Bose had a tighter sound, but only 87db, I am hearing more with 94db. Yea I would EQ the bass down for these.
1453225
Blow them out of the water in every regard IMO, less bass in these though (not an issue for me as I would rather controlled bass than more bass) also depending on what you are used to they are relatively bright as far as lower mid range headphones go. They are unweildy to take out in public if you aren't using them at home though (the M50's do a good job outside) I would recommend going for the A900X's over the A700X's if you can afford the difference though, the Aluminum housing makes a rather large difference imo.
61448
They have really decent musical detail, but I would say the bass is a little lacking. Compensation with EQ helps. I haven't heard the CX 300-II earbuds, but certainly the CX-300 line has a near legendary reputation. I have no regrets getting these for the price.
564361
im not familiar with your present cans but i can tell you that i am extremely happy with these x10s i have! they sound better everyday as i break them in. i am using a headphone amp to drive them and they sound great ,lots of solid bass,great mids and crisp highs .im not sure if you will be using them portably or with a dedicated headphone amp and cd player like i am. i have a cambridge cd player and musical fidelity amp driving them so they sound really good. whatever your application i think you cant go wrong they are great cans very soft and comfortable. have fun!
1237856
I've driven a jeep liberty for a while and the stock speakers in that didn't sound terribly bad to me, but these will almost definitely have better midrange and highs, whether they'll have significantly more bass I can't say, but the bass should be better defined and less muddy. If your goal is simply "more bass", then spending your money on a sub would yield better results; however, if you want clearer, more dynamic and less muddy sound, these should be a very noticeable improvement.
894156
Not surr about q701s but if they are identical performance wise like others have said, go for the 702s. The 702s are extremely comfortable and the sound prod. is first class.
233621
i just got mine and the sound is on par with my bluebirdx , as a matter of fact im returning those and get me 140 bucks back , these are lighter and i got 7 hours continuous play and a few phone calls with them non stop , i will review them as soon as i get a few charges under my belt and really get them broke in , the bass is a bit strong so i used my eq on my phone to get more treble and they are louder than the bluebird x headset