What is the main difference between the II and III?
2078053
Send a note directly to the vendor. I asked the same question, but didn't save the response. I believe the 3 has a better doorway. It's worth it. Built well, packaged well. Weathered a few nice rainstorms, but have not gone thru the winter yet.
2078054
The III has a zipper all the way across the bottom of the flap door. The tent is completely sealed from outer elements. II is open at the bottom of flap door. For the money, I would buy the Yard Stash III.
2078055
The Yardstash.com has a "Resources" link at the top. Scrolling to bottom of that page, there's a comparison chart of the 2 and 3. One difference not mentioned here is the tent material.
2055853
They are different types of mounting poles. The 3000 is more of a straight pipe with and offset for wall or gable mounting, it is alos longer than the 2000. The 2000 is more of a pole mount type with a heavy offset.
704390
The T3i is a better camera with more features and a better, more modern sensor. The T3 is a budget model which uses older generation technology and leaves out a number of features. Plus the 75-300mm lens isn't very good -- you'd be better off with the 55-250mm IS lens which has IS Image Stabilization useful for fighting blurring.
753845
That's pretty much the only notable difference and from what I've read the Eliminator 2 is more popular. I love the 3 but could do without the windage.
274979
These two cameras are very similar. The advantages of the T3i: It has a flip-out screen, and a battery with a longer life than the SL1. But the SL1 is "newer" than the T3i, and therefore it has some tech advantages: (1) It is 30% lighter and smaller than the T3i (and this is a significant advantage when you carry the camera all day); (2) It provides continuous auto-focus for videos (which the T3i does not provide); (3) It has a "touch screen" for enlarging and shrinking shot playback; and (4) It offers in-camera HDR. Since technology is constantly improving the quality of cameras and sensors, I would opt for the "newer" vs. the "older" DSLR releases. These two cameras are very similar. The advantages of the T3i: It has a flip-out screen, and a battery with a longer life than the SL1. But the SL1 is "newer" than the T3i, and therefore it has some tech advantages: (1) It is 30% lighter and smaller than the T3i (and this is a significant advantage when you carry the camera all day); (2) It provides continuous auto-focus for videos (which the T3i does not provide); (3) It has a "touch screen" for enlarging and shrinking shot playback; and (4) It offers in-camera HDR. Since technology is constantly improving the quality... » Read More These two cameras are very similar. The advantages of the T3i: It has a flip-out screen, and a battery with a longer life than the SL1. But the SL1 is "newer" than the T3i, and therefore it has some tech advantages: (1) It is 30% lighter and smaller than the T3i (and this is a significant advantage when you carry the camera all day); (2) It provides continuous auto-focus for videos (which the T3i does not provide); (3) It has a "touch screen" for enlarging and shrinking shot playback; and (4) It offers in-camera HDR. Since technology is constantly improving the quality of cameras and sensors, I would opt for the "newer" vs. the "older" DSLR releases. « Show Less
687032
I had the same question - if you google it, you can find a video explaining the differences. In brief, the 3 is the newer model. It looks better, and it's got some minor updates that are mostly cosmetic. Just like the one before it, performance will vary based on type and age of milk you use.
1977439
Type 3 is for full-frame sensors, such as those on the D3, D800, D700, and D600. Type 2 is for smaller sensors, such as those on the D7000.
1492158
I am in the process of purchasing one or the other. I am not sure what the differences are. Can someone help me out too:F. Jackson
1974034
Not sure exactly what you are asking. I ordered three of them and dont see any difference between them. If you could be more specific with
512893
While it is true it's three models behind, I would add that (as far as I know) the differences between the original and the II are all cosmetic. There is a more significant difference between the first two and the STM model, as it has a different type of motor, but the original and II should give you the same image quality and functionality.
164435
Dont' really know the difference between the two...by reading their articles it seems moonbox III is the latest version. i did returned the HD version because the software inside was not up to date and also failed to update.
1964651
I don't know but have heard that the II is slightly smaller. It does fit the III easily and perfectly.
674745
The 603 IIs have slight improvements over the first generation. The 603IIs have a lock to keep your flash in the hotshoe in the transceiver, the original 603 does not. The 603 IIs also have the switch for the power and to set transmit or receive on the side. The original 603 had the on off switch on the top which people complained was blocked once you put the flash in the transceiver 'a hotshoe. Other than those physical differences, I'm not sure about any other differences but there may be others.
1993962
Dear S. Hara, I'm not sure if there is a difference in the auto focus features, but I believe that the II allows you to use it in either a manual focus setting or an auto focus. But I'd check with a local camera shop or photographer to get the distinct differences.
1631921
Here is a great link that should answer your question:http://www.golfgps1.com/Garmin-Approach-S2-vs-S3-Difference-Between-Review.html
656207
The difference is the FFP ( first focal plain ) The FFP is more expensive and you can look it up for an explaination
1705019
XS is a 6 year old product. T3i is three generations ahead of it. T3 is a much better and faster camera than Xsi. The processor and sensor are much much faster than the previous generation products. If you can shell out, just go for T2i. You will get much better low light performance.