How crisp and clear are stamped images with these dew drops? If not these, any other suggestion for super clean images?
2059509
I think they are good and will give you a nice variety of inks. I have enjoyed using them.
259304
We took them on a 10-day African Safari and they worked great. Amazingly clear sharp images. Lots of bouncing around on dirt roads. Never rained so can't comment on waterproofing.
1057447
This camera picture is crisp. The image is bright enough. The only problem I have with it is that whenever water touches it it becomes so blurred u can't see a thing. But when it's dry, it becomes bright again. I hope this helps.
2194988
I have had no issue with dust and small water spots. I use a "pen." One end has a fine brush to remove anything that is loose, and the other end a fine dry pad that is used to polish. There are several brands. I have been lucky so far and have not gotten a greasy fingerprint or major goop like salt air from the beach. They are trouble no matter what! But then, that is what this filter is for. Mess it up too bad, and just accept replacing it. Better than replacing a lens!
1118343
A word about the D800. I downloaded the 20 megabite sample jpeg image files nikon provides and tried my hand at working with them in photoshop and Topaz filters. I see some color banding in the shadows, hmm? Has any one else tried working them?The other thing is that I noticed is with 36mp images at 20MB's your post processing times to slow to a crawl.
543896
They are quite glossy, so you would most likely have smearing with stamp ink. Try a matte version.
1606759
Brian - Actually I've used it a couple times to do just that and was surprised with the results. Obviously, it all depends on your definition of "quality images". Unfortunately, Amazon does not allow me to attach images here, but I could send you a couple of files (one from yesterday's solar eclipse...) so you would be able to judge. Just send me an email (leitejl at yahoo) and I'll reply back. Thanks!
1464599
They are rather translucent. But really you don't want to iron blank areas onto your fabric. I cut around my image the best as I can to remove any of the "unused" transfer, before I begin to iron. If the blank areas are "within" your image, or not very large, I would not worry about them and just iron over them. But do remove any blank transfers around the edge of your image. I hope this helps
11708
I don't know ... what I do know is they work for me, but I don't do "high detail" or "fine art" printing. Mine is just family photos ... and the quality pleases some very picky family members. I'm satisified.
1275495
The two orders I've received have been almost clean. There is an almost undetectable logo and a few words printed with disc info. at the very edge of the disc. You will almost miss it unless the light hits it just right. Hope this helps.
1403690
I bought the clear/frosted one. I think you'd be able to see them fine. If they're tiny stickers they may appear slightly fuzzy, because it is 'frosty'. I think you'll be fine though.
1279249
Yes Scott, any additional filter you add to a lens will affect the sharpness, but dependent upon the number of stacks, the effect may not be detectable on the photos with the naked eye.
1368374
The ones I just got are lightly diffused. Not much, but not crystal clear either. Number on the package is SKU H512.
120624
Thank you very much, ALT, I really appreciate your feedback. Yesterday I ordered the Fuji S1000fd instead. For $231 the 10MP and 12X optical zoom was just unbeatable. Now I've got to find out if I can use filters on it, too. Thank you!
1695190
No, it's not dust in lens. It is moisture condensation. Now, the camera is dry. Every picture it took is great without the ghostly translucent round spots. Guess the problem I have is different from yours.
917658
IMHO.....the issues you mention are lens and not filter issues. I use my star filters on one of Nikon's sharpest lenses, the 35mm f 1.8 DX which according to some reviewers, has a boatload of barrel distortion. Who knew? All I ever get are razor-sharp contrasty, colorful images. For all practical purposes, unless you're making huge crops, none of the above "imperfections" are even remotely noticeable, and none are caused by the filters.
2253012
I don't see why they would not be crisp and clear. This printer is used for critical fine-art photography. However, I think, this printer might be an overkill for such use. The ink that this printer uses is for producing archival quality prints with extremely accurate colors. Would you be printing on photo papers? If you are going to be printing on photo papers, and the color accuracy is important, this printer should be able to print, in my opinion - although I have no experience with CAD files and such.