Is there a noticeable difference between using this vs the phone camera? Does anyone know where I could view photos comparision?
2072886
To be honest I only used it a few times, because the case that holds the phone to the lens started chipping at the corners when I would take the phone off.
2072887
I use the lens on my galaxy note 2. There is an amazing difference when adding this lens. The note 2 has a 4x digital zoom as well. With the 4x & 12x optical you get 48x power. But not truly 48x because the cell phone lens is a wide angle. Therefore true power versus you eyesit less. I can barely make out the craters on a partial moon, watch a person on a boat drinking coffee that is too far out for them to see you with cell. I also watch aircraft passengers approaching landing on commercial aircraft. The threads are very delicate in the lens & cover. The cover is also prone to cracking. But, for the money it will produce sharp close ups that will amaze friends. Don't forget to focus by turning the focus ring a little on the lens.
68309
Are you kidding? It's a camera....it's sole purpose is to take good quality photos, unlike the iPhone which has notoriously poor image quality.
1115350
I would do it I had the EVO 3d phone too, this phone is much faster, battery is 1000% better, and when you take pictures it captures it quickly unlike the EVO would take like 5 seconds to take a picture and it would be blurry.
1811647
Personally I don't see enough difference between my 1st generation and the last to warrant a change. If photo quality is your concern then maybe it's a difference. I have photos and they are more than good enough for me. Like I said, what are you using it for and what apps are most important to you (personal preferences). I haven't found anything that I wold consider to be a show stopper between the first and last. I prefer the first, second and third generations size and sturdiness to any after that.
243586
There is a free app for Android OS called tinyCam that works. Also, you can use the 'Mobile View' login when accessing the camera with the web browser on your phone or tablet.
1397052
I would avoid both if you care about picture quality, other than for a casual snapshot. You could of course swap them out and see for yourself, then exchange again if you find yourself of the same opinion I have. However, given many reviewers like these cameras, it could be that the quality varies.
2228810
Image quality was really not the best so i prefered to take pictures with another phone instead. Overall its just an "OK" phone
827159
I actually returned the camera. My pictures were out of focus. I tried several settings and different lighting and it was inconsistent. I didn't have that problem with the other point and shoots I've owned. I only uploaded a photo to Facebook once and it wasn't difficult. You connect with wifi.
1308207
I guess that depends on what you are used to. I had no complaints about the image quality from it... it was an enormous step up from using an iPhone and actually, it produced better pictures than my nikon d3200 (with the 18-55 kit lens). But in the end, I found myself using prime lenses instead... I enjoy the 'hand-on' a little more.
274308
Thanks for the reply. According to CNET, the shutter speeds are comparable. In addition, the cameras weigh about the same (I think one weights about 5.6 oz and the other 5.8 oz) so there is a few tenths of an ounce difference. Since I'm mostly a 4x6 or occasional 5x7 type of person, is there a difference to me at that print size between the two cameras? The price gap between the cameras is closing, so really the main feature difference for me is the optical viewfinder. And, I'm wondering if the "step ups" in the SD870 are worth it. Thanks again. Thanks for the reply. According to CNET, the shutter speeds are comparable. In addition, the cameras weigh about the same (I think one weights about 5.6 oz and the other 5.8 oz) so there is a few tenths of an ounce difference. Since I'm mostly a 4x6 or occasional 5x7 type of person, is there a difference to me at that print size between the two cameras? The price gap between the cameras is closing, so really the main feature difference for me is the optical viewfinder. And, I'm wondering if the "step ups" in the SD870 are worth it. Thanks again.
846653
If you go to cnet, they have a more detailed comparison between the two. I'll try a link here...http://www.cnet.com.au/camcorders/0,239035877,339272971,00.htm
1488613
You will get a higher resolution and a much better zoom on the galaxy than the iphone, that being said, "better" translates to whether or not you need either of those. In terms of better quality, I dont have an iphone so I cant compare the two first hand. I think because of the versatility of the galaxy, you will have more options with your shooting, and even printing (if you choose to) than you do with the iphone. Its also very easy to use and fun btw. Hope this helps.
2048033
I have not used my cell phone for this purpose but I understand you can. For info, go to www.foscam.com > Support & Help > FAQ and see question "Which kind of mobile phone can view your camera?"
2050032
I haven't tried the camera yet. I plan on trying it this weekend. It is getting easier to use the other features._
668628
Following my initial post I found a comment from Kodak explaining the differences vs the Zi8. It seems that aside from touchscreen (if you really want it), the only real differences are a wider-angle lens and supposedly better low-light performance. I think I'll wait for a few reviews from people who actually buy it before investing on this update.PS: Like the Zi8 it also takes an external mic
1312579
I know this is someone elses post but I am debating the same thing. I myself am looking for a high quality resolution with the crispest photos out there. I really dont care about any gps feature but whether its indoors or out I want crispness. Mostly I use it for taking photos of my toddler. Any suggestions or help?
601957
Google play said the device wasnt compatible with this version. I dont know if there is another version of instagram to try, but the camera quality is average. When you snap a shot it, you think it will be awful, but they always look better than expected. If it had something to help stabilise motion, I would be happier. Its alot better than than the $30 web cameras you put on your moniter. Oh and the front camera seems to take nicer pictures, but that could be because the distance is closer. Sorry, I couldnt be more help. I would say if you have fifty more dollars then get get a kindle fire hd from amazon. They are on sale right now for a $124. If $50 is all you then you cant go wrong with the Cx2. Google play said the device wasnt compatible with this version. I dont know if there is another version of instagram to try, but the camera quality is average. When you snap a shot it, you think it will be awful, but they always look better than expected. If it had something to help stabilise motion, I would be happier. Its alot better than than the $30 web cameras you put on your moniter. Oh and the front camera seems to take nicer pictures, but that could be because the distance is closer. Sorry, I couldnt be more help. I would say if you have fifty more dollars then get get a kindle fire... » Read More Google play said the device wasnt compatible with this version. I dont know if there is another version of instagram to try, but the camera quality is average. When you snap a shot it, you think it will be awful, but they always look better than expected. If it had something to help stabilise motion, I would be happier. Its alot better than than the $30 web cameras you put on your moniter. Oh and the front camera seems to take nicer pictures, but that could be because the distance is closer. Sorry, I couldnt be more help. I would say if you have fifty more dollars then get get a kindle fire hd from amazon. They are on sale right now for a $124. If $50 is all you then you cant go wrong with the Cx2. « Show Less