I am confused. I thought the cleaning path width for all Shark Rotator lifaway was 11.5", you are stating 15". Is it a special model. Same prob with cord length.
2080606
This model does have a 11.5" cleaning path, I measured mine. The cord length is 30' and I have to plug into 2 separate outlets to finish my entire carpeted area.
2082659
I cut to size and super glued a vacuum cleaner belt to wheels. The belt was already the right width and thickness. Works perfect. I also use swiffer wet or dry pads to clean. Just throw away when done.
1562877
The cord is long enough for vacuuming without trouble. The problem is the weird sweeper that moves only backwards not forwards!
65615
I have a couple of these - one is just the motor without a base. I am building a Pantorouter with it - and the specs there indicate it should be 3.5". Have several routers and this is my favorite.
715913
Do you mean the cleaning width? 12 inches. The actual head is 12 3/8 inches wide. The rear wheels are 7 inches wide and the vacuum itself is only 6 inches wide.
880935
My Shark Vac is the SV75. I also had the same doubt when I bought, but it fits nicely on the SV75.
2070967
This seems to be a recurring question, and I've already answered it a couple of times. It is correctly sized tor the Sharp Steam and Spray mops. I'm too lazy to go measure it again, but no worry. It's the same as original, and if you are in need of backup pad, you'll be happy with it. After hearing from Barbara again, I checked with Shark via their online chat and was told the 3101 measures 15.5 X 7. I told them they need to make it clearer for customers and potential customers. My own Shark is an SK141, and the 13.5 wide pad fits just fine. It didn't seem to shrink when I washed the original one, but I now see Judy has one that's only 10 inches wide. Oh, for the "olden days" when there were far fewer choices and no confusion. Heavy sigh.
1845411
No, it definitely does not. I just received mine and the brush attachment is the same size as the extension wand on the Shark Rotator Liftaway, so it doesn't fit inside OR outside the wand. It will not work on this vacuum. Very disappointed as Shark charges $29.95 for theirs.
1411430
I actually just measured it because I had no idea, but yes, the cleaning path is 14" wide.
2173313
I did a search for 3325 and it found it here is the urlhttp://www.sharkvac.com/productDetails.aspx?ProdID=F%2bTQ%2frBpCD0%3d
1745148
Hi: I have no idea, I returned it the next day. It is the worse Shark product I ever owned and I do have a few of them.
711495
Look at the battery pack in your Shark, if it is 4 batteries like the one shown it will fit. Mine is the Shark Pro sweeper. Sorry I do not have model #.
769007
I don't have this vacuum at this location so I'm sorry but I can't measure it for you---BUT---it is very close to the original Electrolux hose length.
536665
If you look here - http://www.bissell.com/Products/product.asp?catalog%5Fname=Bissell&category%5Fname=UprightDeepCleaner&product%5Fid=8806%2D3&variant%5Fid=&Action+Key=COMPARE&%23=Detail#Detail - it has all the specs The cord is 25 feet long
2242336
I have model #UV440 bought a few weeks ago from Costco and the owner's manual (page 17) lists XFF350 as the part number. So if the differing model numbers of the Shark navigator lift-away deluxe vacuums don't matter then according to the product description you can use this filter set as a replacement successfully. Hope this helps.
2137893
It didn't fit on my Vac-then-Steam Shark. Was disappointed with the purchase as it didn't fit my machine. Probably should contact the company and ask them before buying. Hope this was somewhat helpful. Good luck.
1986611
I own the Shark Cordless Pet Perfect II Hand Vac SC780 and it fits perfectly. I think they just came out with the 780 after they printed the info because these are made for the 780