why are your reviews word for word the same as the Strade Battery operated fan listed for $17.20?
2056840
This is mine&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Battery Operated Personal Pocket Fan, White (White) Reviewed Battery Operated Personal Pocket Fan, White (White) This is a COOL item! July 19, 2014 I am so happy with this fan. It looks like a cell phone, so when you hold it to your face it just looks like you're talking on the phone. Not a super strong breeze, but will cool you down nonetheless.
2056841
This is mine>>>>>Battery Operated Personal Pocket Fan, White (White) ReviewedBattery Operated Personal Pocket Fan, White (White) This is a COOL item!July 19, 2014I am so happy with this fan. It looks like a cell phone, so when you hold it to your face it just looks like you're talking on the phone. Not a super strong breeze, but will cool you down nonetheless.
2056842
I just looked this up and the reason is that it is the same fan but a different color. All of the reviews are the same.
1173577
it doesn't normally cost anywhere close. It's $149.99 direct from buttkicker or $129 at other outlets. Those prices are for the version 2 which fixed an issue with the power amp overheating on the version 1 (this one makes no reference to version so one must assume he is selling the first version). Some goofballs price items this way so they can make people feel that they are getting a deal by posting the amazon link and then asking $300 or some funky number.
1312451
(after my first comment) I now see the 2500 cfm fan uses an "efficient PSC motor"...and costs $10+$12=$22 more, so it is a special motor giving it high efficiency.(apparently larger blades too) Wiki says : "PSC motors (permanent-split capacitor) are frequently used in air handlers, blowers, and fans (including ceiling fans) and other cases where variable speeds are desired." ...or for improved efficiency apparently. So I now say "it's the special motor"..... I also see the numbers are misleading, so read all the details.. the "1500" moves 1300cfm for a 1850sf attic, and says 3.4 amp, but also below says 2.6 amp! the one I bought. The "1600" actually is a 1600 cfm fan so it says, for a 2400sf attic at 4.5 amp, and seems to be 15"x15". The "2500" relates not to the cfm, but to the 2500sf attic! only 100 more than the "1600" model... with amps supposedly at 2.1, but listed as 21"x21". good luck.
2080798
No this is not the outdoor version of the Original fan. You would want the 23847 Damp rated fan. I don't think Amazon has it right now.
1651676
Nautilus R514 Recumbant post: Your review is good - and not having seen these two sister products side-by-side, I would definitely say that the Schwinn display looks more updated (color, etc.) while the Nautilus looks bad. You did miss one thing: the R514 has a 'powerful fan.' Now, I like that feature, but I can get the 240 for $399 including tax and shipping. That means that for $150 I get a better warranty and a fan, but many of the reviewers on various sites have said that the fan is, in the words of Charles Barkley, TURRIBLE! So I agree with you, and am going to order the Schwinn. Using an external fan may not be chic, but it probably works better and it's free (top shelf of my hall closet :-)). Thanks for the fine review - well done.
505386
One place on amazon has it listed at 19.99 and one has it listed for $89. The item numbers and all the details are the same. Am I missing something?
85380
I am guessing that you are looking at two different suppliers. There are different prices for the same thing depending on who you buy it from.
1445330
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but yes, I'm afraid you did pay too much. Amazon has links to brand new ones for $149. I got a used one for $35 a while back. Honestly, I'm not even all that thrilled with the product. Since mine is used, it's possible it doesn't work quite right, but the fan barely blows air and the speakers don't make much difference in the sound or volume either. I was disappointed. Glad I only paid $35.
2071527
I opened one of mine and oiled the fan and motor--whine gone. Despite all the marketing about "gold standard for 60 years," blah blah, this is actually just a very small fan inside a plastic shell. Probably not worth anywhere near $50, but oh well, it's designed pretty well...
1188581
There are two versions of this fan available, check the options and you'll find the digital version which goes in your window one way and has a control for reverse. You'll spend an extra $10.00. If you want to save a little money you can choose the manual one which requires you to flip the entire unit.
1999500
Even tho the item number is RC-902XB-KKN2-AMZ, it DOES NOT come with the 200mm top case fan like it is supposed to for this item number, this might be why its being sold for less than $100.00! Your stilll coming out ahead buying this item and a 200mm case fan for $18.00!! This is a GREAT Case!
1068114
Not sure. Entire fan was cheap enough to just replace fan compared to Lowes price which was double!!!
955008
Yes it's a BitFenix branded brushless fan. I've always tossed them on my builds for Corsair fans or similar though so I can't tell you how the noise/rate is.
916
Huh... they certainly look like the same item to me. One listing is $85.00+ $5.49 shipping, the other is $89.00 & FREE Shipping. But the description of what it does (wonderfully summarized as this being a mini "Time-Base-Correcter") is identical in both listings.
642213
Hello, I'm not sure what the "older" model was, ours was a 10" 12v that we loved. The newer model has Smart Power technology. It chooses which power option is most efficient. It will run on AC, DC, has it's own rechargeable batteries and you can also use and addition D-cell batteries. That is something that is now made too clear when you are shopping for them. It has internal batteries and you can add D batterries, so you have the option of 4 power sources. The fan motor is also improved to run on less power...giving you longer run time. It has a USB port also. It is a good fan. I'd shop around, I paid more for ours, but I see you can get them under $45 now.
1487598
I don't know. I got it because it was an exact replacement for a built-in fan.
1528919
I remain confused why every time I click the link for this product a different price and seller is featured. They range from $3.01 to $28 (for new) and how are we supposed to know which is going to give us the quality battery and not? My order says the 2 batteries I ordered came from PacificCellularDistributor ($9.30) and neither one would charge past 83%. The vendor us not happy with my negative review saying their batteries are OEM and the fault must lie with Amazon and pulling the wrong stock for them because they supposedly supply only OEM batteries. I'm not the only one with a comment their battery from them did the same, so my review will not be edited. Like I said in my review, I can believe these are OEM however I doubt they are new. One has to wonder what happens to all those batteries when people upgrade their phones. I don't know, but I suspect they are sold in bulk to resellers who then sell them as "genuine OEM" batteries. The old saying "you get what you pay for" may indeed be the case here. I decided if I'm going to save some money vs a new one from the carrier phone store then I'll just take my chances on a vendor making "compatible" batteries, at least then I'm likely to get a new one. Good luck with all of you - I can't figure out the "fulfillment" process here when several vendors supply what is claimed to be the same thing and with extreme price ranges.