For anyone who had experience with both this and the Audio technica ATH m50, which one has better sound and overall quality feel?
2064857
I have a pair of Audio Technica ATH-M50 and an array of V-Moda Crossfades. Both are good. However, if it's just listening to my audio players or home entertainment system, the V-Moda produces the detailed sound that I want more than the ATH-M50... this is where the Crossfades become my number 1 preference. If it's a recording session, tech booth monitoring or mixing task, I prefer the ATH-M50... it has a more flat response which is very ideal for monitoring and recording. So, if it's just for everyday listening pleasure with your audio/video player, for me the Crossfades win! As for overall quality feel, the Crossfades have a slight advantage.
2064858
I have both and Audio technica ATH m50 wins sound quality wise. V-Moda wins looks wise.
2064859
I have a pair of Audio Technica ATH-M50 and an array of V-Moda Crossfades. Both are good. However, if it's just listening to my audio players or home entertainment system, the V-Moda produces the detailed sound that I want more than the ATH-M50... this is where the Crossfades become my number 1 preference. If it's a recording session, tech booth monitoring or mixing task, I prefer the ATH-M50... it has a more flat response which is very ideal for monitoring and recording. So, if it's just for everyday listening pleasure with your audio/video player, for me the Crossfades win! As for overall quality feel, the Crossfades have a slight advantage. I have a pair of Audio Technica ATH-M50 and an array of V-Moda Crossfades. Both are good. However, if it's just listening to my audio players or home entertainment system, the V-Moda produces the detailed sound that I want more than the ATH-M50... this is where the Crossfades become my number 1 preference. If it's a recording session, tech booth monitoring or mixing task, I prefer the ATH-M50... it has a more flat response which is very ideal for monitoring and recording. So, if it's just for everyday listening pleasure with your audio/video player, for me the Crossfades win! As for overall... » Read More I have a pair of Audio Technica ATH-M50 and an array of V-Moda Crossfades. Both are good. However, if it's just listening to my audio players or home entertainment system, the V-Moda produces the detailed sound that I want more than the ATH-M50... this is where the Crossfades become my number 1 preference. If it's a recording session, tech booth monitoring or mixing task, I prefer the ATH-M50... it has a more flat response which is very ideal for monitoring and recording. So, if it's just for everyday listening pleasure with your audio/video player, for me the Crossfades win! As for overall quality feel, the Crossfades have a slight advantage. « Show Less
637243
I wish that I could tell you the difference, but given the fact that I've never listened to anything through the M50's, I can't comment on that headset. I can tell you that the M50's cost a lot less (at least recently given some deals on the M50's), I can tell you that there is probably a lot more quality built into the ATH-A700Xs, but whether or not you would be able to discern the difference I'm sure will come down to preference. I say spring for these (ATH-A700X) since I can comment on them and they are ridiculous. You won't be disappointed
249423
I have had both and prefer the Audio technica for comfort and noise reduction. The Bose are more streamlined and attractive.
1947717
These are an updated model. The outside material has been changed but the hardware remains the same. It still uses the same earphone driver but it is now angled. The angle produces more of a treble heavy experience. The fit is different. The 700 is a bit heavier and fits more comfortably whereas thr 700x slips and digs into your head constantly. You have to mod them to be comfortable. The old ones sound richer due to the different front facing material but the newer ones produce higher range (artificially). Either way, these are great positional audio cans with a decent amp. I use Sound Blaster Z (has a standalone amp). Personally I use mdr-v6 cans with custom fittings. These are an updated model. The outside material has been changed but the hardware remains the same. It still uses the same earphone driver but it is now angled. The angle produces more of a treble heavy experience. The fit is different. The 700 is a bit heavier and fits more comfortably whereas thr 700x slips and digs into your head constantly. You have to mod them to be comfortable. The old ones sound richer due to the different front facing material but the newer ones produce higher range (artificially). Either way, these are great positional audio cans with a decent amp. I use Sound... » Read More These are an updated model. The outside material has been changed but the hardware remains the same. It still uses the same earphone driver but it is now angled. The angle produces more of a treble heavy experience. The fit is different. The 700 is a bit heavier and fits more comfortably whereas thr 700x slips and digs into your head constantly. You have to mod them to be comfortable. The old ones sound richer due to the different front facing material but the newer ones produce higher range (artificially). Either way, these are great positional audio cans with a decent amp. I use Sound Blaster Z (has a standalone amp). Personally I use mdr-v6 cans with custom fittings. « Show Less
502705
So, the sound quality is more warmer. Compact and more comfy for your eara defently i couldnot wear the m80s over 30mins and the gap bewtween ears and the head is more closed go with them beleave me! I had alot of headphones to test and theye are one of the best.
637244
Personally I rank them a bit higher, others will say these don't have enough bass (I would strongly disagree) however to be honest I haven't used these in ~9months, I gave them to my fiance and bought some ATH-A900X's which are the same driver but with aluminium housing and sound a few notches above both.Both are fantastic headphones, but the M50's have a much flatter soundstage compared to the ATH-A700X's, I would also say that they are not as comfortable. Slightly more portable.
1237472
The new M50x have a bit more bottom-end and bit less top-end than the older M50. This translates to a slightly different listening experience that in my estimation is an improvement of the new over the old.If you open each link below in a separate tab, you can switch between the tabs and watch the changes in frequency response.Here's the M50x graph:http://graphs.headphone.com/graphCompare.php?graphType=0&graphID;[]=4313&scale;=30Here's the M50 graph:http://graphs.headphone.com/graphCompare.php?graphType=0&graphID;[]=2941&scale;=30
2271818
I am sorry, I do not know. We only sell professional headphones, and the Beats are consumer products. If you search for "comparison between ATH-M50 and beats" I am sure you will find info. It seems like the Beats are popular - more for style than sound quality.
1069328
My son just bought the Audio-Technica ATHM50RD, and I give the Audio-Technica the edge sonically. It is more spacious sounding, and I find it to be more detailed. Of course the B&W; is much more beautifully built and looks far superior. But for the sounds and comfort I definitely prefer the Audio-Technica.
1379892
I have the m50s limited edition. I prefer the hm5 better just because it's more neutral sounding. M50s is abit v shape to me, where you can hear the high and bass really well but the mid abit laid back. I also think the hm5 have better soundstage. However do note you will need about 100 hours of burning time for the hm5 to get it settled and the sound will change through out the burning process. The other thing I like about the hm5 that it is quite easy to mod. Mine has a cable upgrade and a wood cup now. However if u looking for option should check out Beyer and akg as they also have good stuffs as well just not in the price range of hm5. I have the m50s limited edition. I prefer the hm5 better just because it's more neutral sounding. M50s is abit v shape to me, where you can hear the high and bass really well but the mid abit laid back. I also think the hm5 have better soundstage. However do note you will need about 100 hours of burning time for the hm5 to get it settled and the sound will change through out the burning process. The other thing I like about the hm5 that it is quite easy to mod. Mine has a cable upgrade and a wood cup now. However if u looking for option should check out Beyer and akg as they also have good... » Read More I have the m50s limited edition. I prefer the hm5 better just because it's more neutral sounding. M50s is abit v shape to me, where you can hear the high and bass really well but the mid abit laid back. I also think the hm5 have better soundstage. However do note you will need about 100 hours of burning time for the hm5 to get it settled and the sound will change through out the burning process. The other thing I like about the hm5 that it is quite easy to mod. Mine has a cable upgrade and a wood cup now. However if u looking for option should check out Beyer and akg as they also have good stuffs as well just not in the price range of hm5. « Show Less
27842
Subtle differences. The M50xbl has 3 detachable cables and of course has a different color scheme. Personally, I'd go with the M50xBL if the detachable cables are worth it to you. Otherwise, I'd save some money and go for the ATHM50RD because they both sound exactly the same.
1589278
Yes it is a bummer. You'd think with a well know brand name that has been around quite a while, their build quality would be better. I have yet to try a pair out but the Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M look very promising. You'll have to Google them as it appears Amazon doesn't carry them. I do know that Audio-Technica is a well respected brand amongst audiophiles and they are available in different colors.
341484
I can't comment on the ATH-M50, as I haven't used one yet. The AKG 240 however is a very good set, but I wouldn't use headphones to mix final masters. Especially not when you have to listen to screaming guitars. For tracking vocals you should be carefull as a sensitive mic would "listen" to the headphones too. Not always welcome when recording soft passages. Hope this helps
2268520
I also found that these headphones had very heavy bass. No matter what EQ adjustments I made I was unable to achieve an acceptible sound and returned them after a couple of days. They just sounded incredibly muddy. I purchased a set of Audio-Technica ATH-M50 headphones and am very happy with them. I don't know if they would begin to sound better in time, although I kind of doubt it. The ATs sounded great right out of the box!
1328968
If you're making musihc and want flat sound get the ATH-M50. If you want flat but with a bit more bass get the mdr-V6. If you want fun headphones with amazing bass and your want to take them everywhere get the crossfades, they isolate sound and have amazing durability. They have a good weight and look great, but it's all preference.
866023
All of the "Audio Technica" merchandise I've purchased in the past has been Class "C" type stuff. This set of headphones gives great sound. The only thing I find less-than-perfect is the weight. At times, when I look down at my keyboard, they'll fall forward, so I keep them on the back part of my head. Since I've never used the ATH M50, I can only say the the SRH840 is an excellent set of headphones.
1745774
The bass is good on the 598s. It goes deep and its very controlled, but you really need an amp to get full bass potential. However, it's nowhere near the bass amount or impact on the M50s. No Sennheiser is. Most open headphones aren't either. You'll be disappointed if you're looking for the same amount of bass. If you're looking for an upgrade to the M50, check out the ATH-A900x. I just bought a manufacturer refurbished pair on Amazon for $95. Comparable to Denon D2000 for 1/3 the price. Similar to M50 sound signature. 90% of the bass, better clarity, better soundstage.