Is the trio 20 comparable to a ultra light?
2061312
I use a 20lb braided line, so the Trio20 does great with that and light tackle.
2061313
The Trio 20 is a ultra light, but you may like the Trio 30S better. It's small but stronger the then average 30 size which makes it more versatile.
2061314
I realize that this question was asked a long time ago. But, here's my answer: Some people might consider the Trio 20 to be ultra-light because it is designed to hold 4, 6 & 8 lb line. But to me, it's more of a light to medium-light reel...good for crappie, trout, smaller bass, smaller cats, etc. In my opinion, the Trio 20 is not a true ultra light reel. But it's close.
2061315
The 30 is what I would call a standard sized bass fishing reel so I'd say a 20 would be perfect for ultra light applications.
2061316
It is heavier than an ultra light reel. Just need to see if it balances well with the rod your using.
2235088
I was just debating the SX20 vs SX30, so I was really glad to find this discussion. I assumed the 30 would be an improvement, but it sounds from this discussion and many customer reviews that 20 is a better choice for image quality.
1116741
No. It's a ripoff. You ab buy one that's just as good from China for less than $20. Light is just as bright, sub has a cover and also has a built in watch. I have both. Boy I got ripped off on the sure fire model!!!
2052971
I had a similar decision to make. The EF-X20 is a much more balanced device for the X100 series. Plenty of extra power. However, I specifically wanted to rotate the flash toward a side wall for creative portrait shots - the EFX20 only rotates up toward the ceiling. So, generally, I find the built-in flash is more than adequate, but when doing indoor portraits with controlled shadows and lighting, I deal with the top-heavy EF-42 combination, sometimes with a tripod. Hope this helps.
547670
The PD35 is noticeably cheaper, but doesn't have the illumination intensity that the UC40 does, and has one less level of light intensity to choose from (i.e., the brighter intensity). The PD35 is a bit smaller and lighter. I got one of those just to put in my car for emergencies.
304235
I have been told/read that the original has a "whiter" light, and that the light fall off is more fluid, where as the ultra has "rings" people say. Not having the original I can not say for sure beyond that.
1289365
As far as my experience goes the Duracell Ultra Lithium CR17345 - 3V is different than the Duracell ultra photo 123 - 3V. Although they look similar.
736621
I am not familiar with the Cree light either but I ride early in the morning and find the Cygolite to be more than adaquate. The steady plus pulse mode make the bike very visable from quite a distance.
1696479
Thanks, I have arthitis and my current daily set is too heavy so I am looking forsomething light.
1220769
I could only find that the BT20N is 3 grams heavier than the BT30N. Otherwise, looking at LG's website, they seem to be identical spec wise. The BT20N has been performing great for me; I have already burned several BD-25 & BD-50 discs and it's fast enough.
2032172
I got the light and a holster. I have to disagree with William - I noticed no difference between Ultrafire 26650 and Samsung 18650 (I guess Ultrafire overstates its capacity). Also no increase in brightness by using 3 batteries - just more heat.
2241778
For light homeowner use I like the homelite better. For larger jobs, probably the poulan would be preferable.
1373472
I my opinion there is not an advantage. I purchased the PW 3 because I can use them with studio strobes and non Nikon flashes without TTL capability.
1847922
I believe the ultra is just the newest one to come out. I have had both. No difference I could tell
78179
No the triod is very small but is useful keep camera steady on a table or cabinet. Taller tripods are not that expensive if you search online for one.
551072
The entire J- series is great so ou can't go wrong with either. The differences are subtle, but may be important -- depending on what you like. The J1 has a metallic body as opposed to the J3's plastic, and the J3 is a little thinner, so the J3 wins on lightness. The J3 has a bit fast lens, but it may not even be noticeable in practice. The J3 has few buttons on the back and you must go into the menu to access things that are easily accessible on the J1, but the back looks more streamlined. The one thing I absolutely do not like about the J3 is that the flash pops up automatically and must be stopped from doing so through the menu, whereas the J1 is only activated if you pop up the flash manually. I hardly ever use th flash so I hate having to de-activate it every time I shoot with the J3. So, while both cameras are superb, the J1 can be had for half (or less) than the J3. I am not sure the small improvements on the J3, and a little extra weight on the J1, are worth such a price differential.
1549650
The 301 has only 3 led lights and is not nearly as bright. That was my original purchase, I then bought the 9 light 308 and am MUCH happier with it. You get what you pay for. It is extremely bright.