Can I use it for Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8g AF-S ED VRII?
2065864
Hello,This monopod has a 22lb load capacity. It will handle the 70-200mm2.8 lens without a problem.Regards,RoozbehOC camera949-347-1276
2065865
Hello, This monopod has a 22lb load capacity. It will handle the 70-200mm2.8 lens without a problem. Regards, Roozbeh OC camera 949-347-1276
2065866
The tripod is not dependent by the lens and is compatible with any camera which has the standard tripod screw attachment.
2065867
Not sure why you asked the question but you can use any monopod with any camera. A difference will only be quality, price, and height. This is a quality monopod but it is a little heavier than my previous Manfrotto pod, it is also taller. NOTE; You will need to buy a head attachment to mount your camera to this monopod.
2065868
I have bought two of these ( wife & I) and we love them. Use them with all our zoom lens and tele photo lens, but don't have the 70-210 lens, but don't see why it would be any different. Highly recommend the monopod. You can get stable sharper pics and faster than a tripod and more mobile.
1387270
Probably if the connection ring size is the appropriate 'mm' size, I use it on a D70 to convert to a couple older lenses.
1074198
It depends what lens you are using. The 18-200mm is a 72 so I don't see why these wouldn't work
677223
Short answer from me is no! I purchased the extender for my 70-200 f2.8 and it works perfectly. I tried it on my 100-400 4-5.6 lens just out of curiosity and the auto focus did not work. I did not play with it much on the 400. Perhaps others have made it work but not me. Hope this helps you...
929667
Yes it should work just fine! As long as your camera has the fine tuning ability and to the best of my knowledge all of the higher end nikons have that ability.... My d7000 has it... Works great. Made a nice difference in a couple of my lens's.
723200
hello Mr HickeyI would believe so, since it is interchangeable with the Canon lenses. (it is not system specific) all it does is let you get closer to the subject (ring, jewelry, flowers, etc) Close up lenses comes in different magnifications.If you are planning to use this to get up close to far away subjects like birds - you need the "extender" instead. Extenders comes in 1.4X and 2X, which makes your 200mm long-end into a 400mm f/5.6 (you loss two stops of light)hope that help.
1657402
This one will. I have one with my D7000 and both my D7000 Digital SLR Camera Body with 18-55mm VR Lens + 55-200mm VR Lens + Cleaning Kit. http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/171111877805?lpid=82
664212
I don't think this'll be long enough for your lens, though I don't have a 70-200 f/4 to check. I have a 28-300mm which is listed as 4.5" long and only has a little room to spare (height-wise). The 70-200mm is listed as 7" long, and I don't see how another 2.5" would fit. An alternative may be: http://www.amazon.com/Tamrac-M-A-S-Medium-Lens-Black/dp/B00009UTQL/ref=pd_bxgy_p_text_y I bought the Large for my lens (which is a perfect fit, without any attachments), and the Extra Large may be a good option for you.
559589
A 70D with an 18-135 lens should fit, but I doubt that a 200-550 will fit. In my opinion you should look for a bigger bag if you want it to fit all of your gear.
2211351
Personally I don't see why it wouldn't work for your lens. I bought mine for a Nikkor AF-S VR Micro 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED. Both of these lenses use a 62mm filter. That said, this is a quality filter. Don't go with cheaper filters. I have done it and am now replacing them with the B+W filters. Your photos will only be as good as what the lens and filters allow to be seen by the camera / film.
643581
No this may not work and may even damage the lens due to the construction of it. It is supposed to go with 70-200 2.8 VR / VRII and similar PRIME lenses that has the built and structure to accept it. Event if it can go with Nikkor 18-300 VR practically it will become useless due to the multiplication factor and how dark it gets after applying the TC and the image will be soft as an end result.
263537
Yes, it can. Any camera that has a built in motor can run a lens with autofocus. 70-200 vs 80-200? 70-200 has vibration reduction or vr, lighter, very sharp... Cons, it is expensive... VR1 starts from 1369 USD. 80-200 is the cheaper option, but it does not have vr, is heavy. Nevertheless, it is very sharp, and a favorite of many Photographers.
1948637
The 24-70mm lens which I used on D7000 was 5.2 inches in length. The 18-200 lens is 3.8 inches in length. It should fit like a dream.
1084839
Always check Canon Compatibility list would be my suggestion on this! I use this on a 70-200 mm and a 400mm Canon L lens with no problem. Always make sure your battery is off before connecting it and removing it. Other than that it is fairly simple to install!
1927442
if you have the typical 18-55mm that comes with the camera I don´t think you loose quality and will gain significant range of use with the 18-200. I have used this lenses extensively with relevant endurance tests. It is a very resistant. Have not use the 70-300mm
1337806
The first question that I would need an answer to in order to respond would be, for what camera is the Kalimar f2.8 - 200mm lens mounted? What camera does it originally fit onto? Once I know the answer to that, I can tell you if it will work for your lens and if not, I can direct you to the adapter that it will fit with.
1777220
Not sure. Try going to Amazon.com and see the filter offered when you shop for the Nikkor 18-140mmG ED VR. I use CANON so I'm not to savvy regarding Nikon, but this would be my suggestion.