is this better than a KFC spork?
2068646
Only because it's metal and sturderier. Otherwise, it's too awkward because of its size. There are better ones out there.
2068647
This is an amazing tool! A KFC spork is made of flimsy plastic, can't withstand high heat, and can only be used for eating. This tool is quality metal that withstands heat well, it is very durable, it can be used for a lot more than just eating, and it looks freakin awesome! This is way better than a KFC spork.
1744020
The TOAKS spork is a very stiff, strong eating utensil, it will not bend easily at all. And due to titanium's inherent metal properties, it really isn't a good idea to play the "bendy" game with. When titanium fails, it fails spectacularly. That being said, it is a strong, long-lived light weight metal, well worth using for survival/camping gear - where weight is always a factor.
2282390
Honestly, it's your choice. We have a Showtime and I'll tell you it's great. We bought a competitor's rotisserie after our first Showtime broke down (it lasted for years). The competitor's rotisserie cost a lot more and did not cook as well as the Showtime! Whatever Showtime product you choose, you will be happy.
1901599
I went with this one because it has a more powerful motor. I love this thing. Can have so called ice cream now without it going to my waistline. I think well worth the extra money.
1999163
I would say- the plastic and wooden are better, in a case of stainless utensilis- the small scratches are possible.
964752
Same material, different cooking style. No better, no worse. Rather like comparing a stainless steel spoon to a stainless steel fork. You eat with both, but you really need to choose the right tool for the task. I wouldn't try eat soup with a fork, nor would I try to cook a stirfry in DeBuyer.
321335
No, get the Kbar kukri. Much thicker steel and better quality. This one is very poorly made.
2116715
Never tried this unit for "southern fried chicken", but when I do prepare that meal I always turn up the heat a minute before flipping the chicken. Otherwise it has a tendency to stick to the skillet. Might be easier to go back to a skillet for "southern fried" chicken.
1545167
I don't know if I would say it is more non-stick, but it's definitely AS non-stick as teflon. The benefit is you don't get all the chemicals that are in teflon with the green earth pan.
694993
There is no comparison. It is head and shoulders above a normal slow cooker. it does every thing better thean a normal slow cooker, plus youor stove top, plus your oven. My wife now even lets it sit ontop of her glass stove top all the time. It is what she uses for every thing. and now doesn't question the cost. Loves it!!
1151019
There are a few differences...none of them that big of a deal. The Pot, all of its electrical components, Fondue Forks and the thin, contoured aluminum fork holder that rests on the inside of the pot are all EXACTLY the same. The 3SS is basically a stripped down version of the CFO-1000. If there are 3 or more eaters, or if you have children, the CFO-1000 is a better way to go because, 1. The pot is slightly more elevated off the table (less chance of knocking over drinks and taller table items) but is considerably more stable due to its quite broad poly/plastic legs, which are securely attached to the bottom of the pot, 2. The CFO comes with the Lazy Susan and while it may look gimmicky, it is very functional and is a great place to put your meats, seafood, veggies, etc and it glides nicely on the stainless steel track(I don't recommend placing your dipping sauces in these trays as the sauces get pretty nasty and swirled up after about 4 dunks each, 3. CFO comes with a nice glass lid, which is safe so you can cover the hot liquids while not eating and is useful if you use the pot for deep-frying..., which you certainly can do. Bottom Line: Both the CFO-100 & the CFO-3SS are AWESOME fondue sets! One simply is a bit better for 3 or more eaters or if kids are eating. Enjoy!!!
2182122
I have both. The 8 qt cooks a lot of food and is probably best for a family of four.
1384937
If you already have a good six quart crock pot that shifts to warm after the programmed time, then yes, I'd save my money. This is a decent cooker but at the end of the day, it's a glorified crock pot that browns and sautes. The only advantage I see about this one is the pot is lighter so it's easier to remove and clean than the heavier crocks, but at the same time, you have to be careful not to scratch the non-stick coating.
1866913
i have the whirly pop. the cook n home popper is heavier and is made better across the top center of the lid. cook n home is just a better popper I got the cook n home for my daughter, she got the best.
1295017
The Pizzazz Plus is just the way the manufacturer is branding the newer version of the appliance, indicating that it can cook pizza "plus" lots of other things, like chicken wings, etc. The newer model has an improved timer, in my opinion-the older model that I owned years ago had kind of a touchy timer. Also, the non-stick finish seems to be better on the newer model. Get the "Plus" model, even if it's a few dollars more-it's worth it. You will use it a lot!
610309
I cannot do a comparison for you - but we are using this grill and find that it performs as stated in the ads; warms quickly and cooks perfectly. It is so sturdy and well made that we are well pleased with our purchase. No buyers remorse here. Hope this helps you. ELF
1419772
Dear C.Smith, The only difference will be the spatula. Otherwise the cooking ability is the same. Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you. Sincerely, Tonia D.