I don't see in specs the accuracy percentage?
2072893
Here is the ACDelco page for this Torque adapter: http://www.acdelco-tools.com/index.php?route=product/product&product;_id=132It says "Accuracy CW ± 2%; CCW ± 3%".
2072894
Accuracy CW ± 2%; CCW ± 3% we bought it to verify our torque wrenches for ISO standards. It works good and comes with a certificate for verification
2072895
Here is the ACDelco page for this Torque adapter: http://www.acdelco-tools.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=132 It says "Accuracy CW 2%; CCW 3%".
2250101
Some say 25-30 yards brings the best accuracy. I have yet to go any further than that. Go to Pyramyd Air.com to see full reviews of thus rifle. that is the best response I can give Sir.
389498
DC, Range 400A, Accuracy + or - (1.5%+5), Resolution 0.1A ; Range 1000A, Accuracy + or - (2.0%+10), Resolution 1A ; AC, Range 400A, Accuracy + or - (2.0%+5), Resolution 0.1A ; Range 1000A, Accuracy + or - (2.5%+10), Resolution 1A
1989923
Accurate? Probably not. It's manual states that its DC current accuracy is 3% +- 2 digits. But unless you get it calibrated you can't be sure of that.What kind of accuracy do you need? If you're considering this meter, it's probably good enough.
298224
It was not very Accurate. Also... my third purchase was a bad unit. Neither the seller nor the maker would respond... not even to the BBB. Be careful. The working two have lost most battery life after a year. Good luck.
519918
if there is an item ( my case a deer or a target ) it is very accurate but a friend was looking for a distance to a spot in a field and it had nothing to bounce the signal off so it wouldn't work. the item has to be vertical and substancial.
1917744
Use what you got :), I would start by having it hooked up and take readings with my VOM to compare all hookups to verify accuracy of all readings.
2092095
I do not know. However it is as accurate as the device in my doctor's office.
920997
Not sure what you mean by accuracy tolerance but it is accurate to .01g as for the calibration weight you need 200g. As for overall tolerance I find it to be kind of flimsy and it is noticibly larger than a zippo.
1281794
I really dont know. I heard that one should use some that is at least 60% but thats all I know. I know this one seems to work great for me. Thats all I can tell you.
1826647
I can not give an accuracy measurement as I no longer have access to surface plate and height gage. However, compared to my other equipment, I would estimate within 0.001" - 0.002" for the 7" square.
1155778
My impression is that it is only accurate to tenths even though it shows a hundredth place. Since my uses do not require greater accuracy, I haven't really checked it out.
438282
Right diameter (6mm) Lighter weight than I use (.12 vs .20 g) Should fire, couldn't predict accuracy.
389500
DC, Range 400A, Accuracy + or - (1.5%+5), Resolution 0.1A ; Range 1000A, Accuracy + or - (2.0%+10), Resolution 1A ;AC, Range 400A, Accuracy + or - (2.0%+5), Resolution 0.1A ; Range 1000A, Accuracy + or - (2.5%+10), Resolution 1A
1792637
It will vary a little from scope to scope due to manufacturing variations. It really isn't important as to accuracy that they be exactly the same. The main thing is that the rifle itself is level (not canted). What I do is (using little bubble levels such as Wheeler sells) get my rifle perfectly level and then get my horizontal reticle roughly level to match (by sighting it on a target line that you know is level). Again, the most important thing by far is that the rifle is level.
560060
No information on accuracy, but the initial reading starts out higher than it ends up if you wait a few minutes. These device was suggested to me from one who is in the mold assessment business
433977
According to the specs on Amazon, the resolution is 0.05 degrees. I have the unit and the resolution is actually 0.1 degrees because there is only one decimal place on the display. The Amazon specs say the accuracy is +/- 0.2 degrees. I have no way to check this. I have checked the repeatability by putting the unit on an off a fixed surface. I've done this 5 times in a row with no change in the reading.