Tamron vs. Sigma vs. Canon Superzoom Lenses? Does anyone have experience with these lenses that can shed some light on the situation?
293668
www.dpreview.com has rated all three lenses over the years and the site gives detailed reviews of every aspect of the lens and shows sample pictures using each lens. Bottom line on that site is the Tamron is highest rated of the three. I know you're looking for hands on experience (which you can find in the Amazon reviews above - 63 of 78 reviewers rated the Tamron 4-or 5-stars), but I tend to lean toward the professional reviews first, and then check my enthusiasm by seeing what the reviewers on amazon, cnet and the various internet Canon forums say.
1927445
Jen, I don't recommend this lens. I owned it for a short while when I was new to photography, and was disappointed with its IQ. Zoom lenses that cover this long of a focal length generally sacrifice image integrity to do so. This lens was no exception with heavy barrel distortion on the wide end, and it was very soft when zoomed even when stopped down. I would recommend getting a lens that does less, but does it better. This lens would not be any better than your kit lens. I would recommend the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 for its value and IQ.
1756269
As a professional photographer myself, I weighed both options heavily prior to purchasing the Sigma 70-200 which I absolutely love! The quality is amazing. I did ask other photographers who owned the tamron lens and paid the cheaper price but defined the sigma lens as the better deal. One of the main reasons is construction of the lens. They reported the tamron lens having more problems after a few years and going 'soft' due to the plastic casing whereas the sigma didn't-making it a better choice for the money. I think the sigma lens will pay for itself this year.
900131
I don't own a Canon. However, this lens has worked well with my Sony A100. Check out Bob Atkins review at this link. http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/tamron_70-300_vc_review.htmlHe has a good comparison between this lens and the Canon EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM. This will probably give you a good idea as to what you can expect out of the Tamron lens as opposed to the Canon lens.
606621
I don't think I can fully answer your question, however I wish I had watched this before spending $2000.00 on this lens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQSuexEQcgM This is a comparison of the Canon 24-70...with the Tamron 24-70... I hope this helps.
2072327
Hi, I apologize but I cannot find the dialogue from the seller where we spoke of this. I believe this lens worked for both full frame and those with a crop factor. I tried to verify via Tamron's site direct, but can no longer find the lens. You would need to find one with a mount that fits your Canon, or find an adapter.
1397993
I have some Sigma lenses that work seamlessly. Just make sure the mount matches when you shop.
1584173
Tamron lenses come with different mounts. Make sure you buy it with the Canon mount. Obviously this is a much shorter lens with a wider field of view at 18mm and the same as the other lens at 55. It will not zoom in nearly as much. The reason to buy this lens is the wide f2.8 maximum aperture which is maintained at all focal lengths. This allows pictures in dim light.
1825169
I agree as well with the others. I own the Tamron and love the lens. Very sharp and works great for general use but the 50 I have heard is a great lens. If you don't mind using your feet instead of a zoom you should be good starting with the prime.
1276205
The IQ of the Tamron lens is typical of super-zooms, that is, a compromise at all focal lengths. The Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85 is generally well-regarded and is probably sharper over much or all of its range. I would recommend adding the Tamron to your kit for its unbeatable versatility but keep the Nikkor for its better optics.
1526812
I had the Tamron first. I got it because it had good reviews, a lower price, and IS. Bottom line: it was very soft and had AWFUL back focusing issues over 50 mm. I sent it to Tamron for calibration and it came back worse. I ended up returning it and instead of getting another copy of the Tamron, got the Canon. Best decision I ever made. This is the sharpest lens I own, including all my primes. I was told by Tamron that 20% of their 24-70s have focus issues on the Mark III (which I have) due to the Mark III's focusing system and the Tamron not being totally compatible with it. I have a 60D as well and the Tamron also had back focus issues with that body as well, although slightly less. I would not hesitate to recommend the Canon, bar none.
747381
A fixed lens will always have superior performance and a larger aperture than a zoom lens- this is a given. I have used the Tamron zoom as my normal lens for over two years and have been quite happy with it. It has no egregious flaws. If you plan to use it only as a 14mm lens, you should buy a fixed lens. If you plan to use it for a variety of things, the Tamron should do well.
1249479
I have the Canon 50mm 1.4. The Bokeh is not very good. not a good choice for macro. I'm now looking for a macro lens.
1398395
On a scale of 1-10 to match its equivalent its a 9. Unless you are a serious professional photographer who does serious editing and makes a ton of money then go with the Canon, but if this is not the case BUY THE TAMRON LENS you wont see or feel the difference. friend has the canon 70-200 lens and boy does he regret buying it.
24768
I have both lenses and the real question is how close can you get? Both lenses are great, the Nikon is a little sharper and will focus a little faster on my 5200, but the reach of the Sigma is really nice. another option is the new Tamron 150 to 600 when you can get it with the Nikon mount. So if you can get close the Nikon, if you need more reach the Sigma or the Tamron!
1966949
I almost decided in favor of Sigma, but then I realized that Sigma is made for a crop camera only. While I'm not looking to buy an FF one any time soon, when I do, it will be costly, so I wouldn't have the money to follow it up with expensive lenses, not to mention that a good prime is a good prime, which I expect to last me a long while... So that is becoming a big drawback for me...
1526811
The tamron is supposed to be good, but if you got the money, I'd suggest buying the canon. It is spectacular. The only thing I don't like about it is that the inner barrel is plastic, though I guess this is also true for the tamron.