Will this fit a 300mm f/2.8 with body attached? Perhaps a second body? With a small lens attached?
300992
Yes, it will hold camera with long lens in the center with extra room on both sides.
300993
Yes. You just need to rearrange the partitions. However the back-up body would be a bit harder to access at the bottom of the pack. I arrange my 2 cameras with the main on top, lens pointing down; the 2nd camera at the bottom of the pack with lens pointing up.
300994
I don't believe this would hold a 300mm, 2.8/f lens with body. This is a great bag and I would buy another if needed. Very comfortable and easy to wear on shoulders.
300995
It's very spacious. Fits my D800 with 70-200mm F2.8 attached, and several other lenses, including 18-35mm zoom. Could easily fit another body with lens attached, yes.
300996
Yes it will fit a body with a 300mm lens attached. Another small camera or body without attached lenses. The compartments are adjustable. Good case, I love mine after a year of abuse, it's quality
869482
I don't hv a Nikon 70-300 but I believe it will fit. It hold 70-200 f2.8 well but a little tight with lens hood.
1827892
I just measured and found that the opening is around 2" and expands to about 3 1/2 with elastic around the opening, so if the lens is between those 2 measurements, it should fit.
957214
I think no problem to fit Nikon D300 with 18-200 lens. Mine is usually with Cannon 5DIII+70-200/2.8L lens, fit perfectly.
1424928
Mine is also single lens and it fits, it is about 10 mm in diameter. Usually masks have more space that that, but check yours, just in case!
498986
Don't recommend it. I have the 200mm/2.8 and two bodies and it is a squeeky tight fit. Wish I upgraded to the x300. Super awesome case though!
1637332
Hi TonyThe lens does not attach directly to body.it attaches onto the front of lens.Regards Don
175878
The body would fit without a problem with a shorter lens. Like in the 17 - 85 mm zoom range. Not a long zoom.
855656
im not sure how long the 300mm lens is. I use the T3 with the 200mm lense and there is plenty of room
1409418
Sorry, I don't own an Olympus. I have a D3000 with a 18-200mm lens and it all fits well. Aside from that it fits tiny things (memory card, cloth, battery, etc) but not another lens.
360110
The equivalent Nikon body with a 300mm lens fits in fine. The two cameras are not too dissimilar in size.
112293
I have a Nikon D3000 with an attached lens of 18-300 and the case does fit it, though it is very snug but still workable and I like it as a casual cover.
752376
I don't have that Canon body (I own a Canon EOS Rebel )but I do have a 70-300 tele. lens. I have two other lenses as well and everything fits OK.
1706038
Fits my K30 which yes is smaller but I don't think by a HUGE amount, will say lens space is pretty much set to 3 lenses, 200mm will fit unattached.
1079164
Dont know if it is attached but by them self the lens will fit seeing how its 3.8 x 8.0 and the 70-200mm is 3.4 x 8.1 and this bag is design to hold the 70-200mm f/2.8 lens by itself.. so it will hold the 80-400mm lens by itself now let me just add this in my use of this bag what you are asking my work if you dont close the top of the bag you might get it close but it wont close all the way now i do use a D7000 with a 70-300mm lens and it does close and work like that
872702
It fits on the lens not the body. You need a lens that's 58mm on the front lens if you have the kit 18-55 mm you'll be all set.
1708238
The bag can carry one mounted lens and an extra lens.I have a 70-200mm F4.0, which is slimmer but I guess has the same length (needs to be verified!), it fits as the second lens. I can't take it while mounted on the camera.I just tried it again now, just to be sure, I can squeeze it in while mounted, but I don't recommend it as it will most likely damage the zipper.