507 vs 607: So what would be the better receiver in this situation?
293158
A key difference is in video processing. The 507 passes each type of video signal through without modification. The 607 can upscale composite/component inputs to HDMI. This can reduce the number of cables going to the TV and make it a little easier to switch input sources, although it might not completely eliminate the need to fiddle with TV settings (aspect ratio/overscan, picture mode). Also, I have read that the upscaling on the predecessor 606 wasn't that good, and the 607 might be the same. If all your sources are HDMI, then this feature is not needed and the 507 might be good enough. Without knowing what input sources you have, it's hard to be more specific. Other brands will have similar distinctions at some point in their model lineup.
1321181
What I would do - is get an older receiver off of fleabay or crglst. But these will take up a lot of desk space. Once you get away from the top of the line models - some old stuff sells for quite cheap. One quick check on crglst for me locally gets - http://raleigh.craigslist.org/ele/4876097189.html
160337
I have the 606. I have my Blu Ray on Through, and I see no degradation of the signal. This is one incredible receiver. I recommend it highly.
1407387
You can't go wrong with either of these. These were my top 2 contenders when I was building my home theater system about 9 months ago. I've been a huge of Denon gear (3 receivers over the last 15 years) which IMO has better build quality and slightly better sound than equivalent amps from Onkyo. However, I went with the Onkyo TX-705 because it offered more features for less money (at the time). In particular, the Onkyo has 3 HDMI inputs, more advanced audio decoding (irrelevant as that's handled by my PS3) and the setup and menus are much more user friendly (modern Denon systems are a nightmare in this regard). The 705 replaced a Denon 1605 (I think) and I believe I stepped up from 70w/channel to 100w; not surprisingly, and the Onkyo sounds noticeably better than the 5 year old Denon (of course, we ain't exactly comparing apples here). I have absolutely zero regrets on the Onkyo purchase and it's top quality performer and setup was easy. That said, right now Amazon has the AVR-888 for about 85 bucks less than the Onk, so if I were buying today, I 'd get the Denon. For either one of these, plan on upgrading to a decent universal remote control - the included remotes for both units are terrible.
1676384
I've read great reviews about Onkyo as a brand for receivers. Although i have a samsung 46" that i'm simply loving right now. the Samsung HT-BD1250 sucked so bad that i'm reluctant to trust Samsung for audio gear. It sure looks good though the new system.The 5300 Onkyo looks more upgrade friendly. But the SR608 is overkill for me so i'm not even going to bother drooling over it.
507442
most of our information was obtained from the net can't remember what site. What you need depends on what type of receiver you have. Sorry couldn't be of more help
2138169
Sorry, can't give you a reply on this. I purchased in case I needed it for my 322 receiver but didn't have to use.
486931
Boy there is a lot going on in that receiver isn't there. I'lld like to see that work. Maybe I'll find it on youtube somewhere. But you can check with Weaver and see what they have.
462824
RG6 would be better, especially if you have a long distance from your antenna to your TV. Shorter distance should be ok with RG59.
1642996
I was considering these as well. Interested to see what others post. Here is my research has yielded for 7.1 systems with Dolby True HD and DTS HD audio. A lot of people worry about upscaling, I only have blu ray player, so not much need for upscaling. Few do upscaling very well according to my research. Sony STR-DN1000: Nice HDMI connectivity, cleaner look, 100 watts per channel at 1% THD. I've heard upconversion is poor. $330 Sony STR-DH800: Does not upconvert analog sources. 100 watts per channel at 1% THD $250 Onkyo RC-160: Upconverts only to 1080i. 80 watts per channel at .08% THD $330 Onkyo SR-607: Upconverts to 1080p with okay quality, 90 watts at .08% THD $400 Pioneer VSX-919AH-K: .05% THD at 120 watts per channel, just 3 HDMI inputs, no upscaling capability $400 I realize these are Audio/Video Receivers, but it seems to me the main goal of most of them is for superior audio. After all, many TVs do a decent job making SD sources look better, even if you have to run an additional cable or two. To me, everything is going to be HDMI based, so I am leaning toward the Pioneer due to better power and less THD. $400 is very much on the high side of my budget. So if I decide to go with a cheaper receiver, I'll probably go with the Sony STR-DH800.
70027
The only major differences between the 507 and 607 is that the 507 is 5.1 while the 607 supports 7.1. Also, the 607 has a Faroudja chip for video upscaling...but most professional reviews recommend using the passthrough feature and letting the tv do the work. The Faroudja chip was revolutionary when it came out about 10 years ago...but time has passed it by and most tv's these days do a better job of processing. If you don't need 7.1 then I would say the 507 is a better value..
1519285
It depends on your TV. But most likely it is not recommended and the results not very good. Receivers can be cheap and they make huge difference.
874839
Its a push. Go with the one substantially cheaper. Dont consider any surround receiver from another manufacturer.
34096
lol..... Battle: you are under 30 right? Paul is probably a baby boomer like me. "Receiver" is a synonym for TV- in this context, he means your Samsung LCD. You can connect your DVD to your LCD via the 2nd HDMI with no prob. I can't answer the 1.0 vs. 1.1 question though- I definitely recommend you get it clarified before you buy the XA2.
2259417
If your speakers can handle it the 700 is awesome. I replaced a 30 year old kenwood and my old vinyl has never sounded better. I love this receiver.
116553
It's the extra wattage, THX certification and sound modes (Cinema, Music, Game), Audyssey MultiEQ (6 positions vs 3 [on the 606]), 1080p HDMI and analog upconversion. I own both the 606 and 806. If you're looking for a more capable receiver that does indeed sound better than the other, get the 806. If you're okay with settling on something that fits your needs and don't need more, get the 606.
1537206
Check out Lindich "On Sound". He is syndicated in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette and the Minneapolis Star newspaper. He also has a blog with the same name. He rates both of these receivers with pros and cons.