Whats the difference between this and the 13HD
285892
Companion Hybrid is an Android Tablet that you can also plug into your computer and use as a monitor (standard Cintiq style). It has a touch screen so you can take advantage of touch controls (the 13HD doesn't have touch).It can work independently as a mobile sketching tool in Android mode, but you have to find Android applications that meet your needs. Sketchbook Pro for Android and Photoshop Touch are two options.
285893
The difference between these products is this is the one you want. They both work as a smaller cintiq plugged into your computer but the 13HD came out before, and can not work independently as a mobile sketching tool. Also, there are some things about the functionality that people with the 13HD have complained about regarding the looseness of the cable which links to the monitor which can cause the screen to go black as you shift around while drawing. I should also note that if you go to the wacom store like I did, this product starts at 1200, with free shipping. So after taxes was about 1400, only about 400 more than the 13HD.
285894
The difference between these products is this is the one you want. They both work as a smaller cintiq plugged into your computer but the 13HD came out before, and can not work independently as a mobile sketching tool. Also, there are some things about the functionality that people with the 13HD have complained about regarding the looseness of the cable which links to the monitor which can cause the screen to go black as you shift around while drawing. I should also note that if you go to the wacom store like I did, this product starts at 1200, with free shipping. So after taxes was about 1400, only about 400 more than the 13HD. The difference between these products is this is the one you want. They both work as a smaller cintiq plugged into your computer but the 13HD came out before, and can not work independently as a mobile sketching tool. Also, there are some things about the functionality that people with the 13HD have complained about regarding the looseness of the cable which links to the monitor which can cause the screen to go black as you shift around while drawing. I should also note that if you go to the wacom store like I did, this product starts at 1200, with free shipping. So after taxes was about... » Read More The difference between these products is this is the one you want. They both work as a smaller cintiq plugged into your computer but the 13HD came out before, and can not work independently as a mobile sketching tool. Also, there are some things about the functionality that people with the 13HD have complained about regarding the looseness of the cable which links to the monitor which can cause the screen to go black as you shift around while drawing. I should also note that if you go to the wacom store like I did, this product starts at 1200, with free shipping. So after taxes was about 1400, only about 400 more than the 13HD. « Show Less
381103
they do not have any difference... both do not have a digital display ... only the oldest model has.
591362
Looks like they are either the same, or very similar. It is big and heavy (the Aura HD is no lightweight either), so together the package becomes quite unwieldy. I have this, but don't use it.
331639
There's a different chassis & the newer intel processors are basically the main differences. The new alw14 also came with some additional GPU options, 660m instead of the 650m
1606169
The 13.1" refers to the length of the semi rigid cable that plugs into the cigarette lighter. The cable then has the display mounted on it for your viewing. What I did was put the cable in an "s" curve to reduce the distance it juts out from the connection
1855829
well the hd models are pretty close to the price of the non hd, so go for the hd
1035398
the newer model has 1080p HD, and looks a lot cheaper. The old one is 720. They updated it 2 weeks after I got mine. still love it 2 years later. even though I have the 720 I don't need an upgrade. hope this helps
1206906
This is the latest model... 2013 was the manufacturing year, I have had no major issues with it. Its not a computer so you will need to allow for a initial efficient load time for smooth function off the bat. It has a lot of programs to boot. Install firmware update immediately, improves functions a lot... Love it!
1993736
i think the main difference between 400 and 500 is the amount of GB the RAM and HHD has. Oh and the processor is lower in the 400 model than the 500. If you dont need 6gb of ram, dont need a bigger screen, and dont need the extra GB on the HHD, I would get a 400. If you do need those options get the 500, and if you need an optical drive (cause 500 series and below dont have them) The 550 would be my recommendation.
406704
I had both versions, they both function the same. No new features on he panels. The newer version uses a 4g gsm card vs the older version using a 3g gsm card. Both panels operate a same speeds and no. Changes. I installed head panels for years as a technician.
2236305
It works perfectly with 8652 HDC. Iwould guess that it would work with 8300HD since they are so similarH. Haffner
1480906
The one in your link is a newer version, higher power, difference design. Anyhow, it is depends, which design you like.
1218018
Biggest difference is HDMI 2.0 and the speakers. Both definitely worth it. But for the record, I was able to get the 2014 model for the advertised price of the 2013 model. Once I saw that the 2013 model didn't come with 2.0, I cancelled my order. The vendor then said they would give me the 2014 model for the same price if I didn't cancel. TV came a few days later and I've been in love ever since!
1606170
The 13.1" refers to the length of the semi rigid cable that plugs into the cigarette lighter. The cable then has the display mounted on it for your viewing.What I did was put the cable in an "s" curve to reduce the distance it juts out from the connection
1993735
I agree with Mr. Viernes response - the main difference between the two is the RAM and HHD. And of course the screen size. But you can never have enough RAM so I'd upgrade to at least 6GB, or even 8 if your budget allows. The i5 processor seems to be standard on the 400, as it is on my 500, and it's plenty fast. You do have the option of upgrading to the i7, which is great if you're running multiple graphics. Otherwise the i5 should be fine. Of course the 400 has a smaller screen than the 500 but that may be a good thing if you travel often and space is a problem. The 500 isn't heavy, and it's very slim, but it fits tight in a standard sized computer bag.
200908
The major difference is the pjd 5134 is not full H.D. If you go to amazon and search electronics , type in the 5134 and search you will see some reviews on that page , one review said " this is not true H.D. far from it , but the picture quality is very good. When you have a broadcast signal from your provider and or blue ray or any true H.D signal you need true H,D to receive the signal and display true H.D which is 1928x 1080 only that "native resolution is true H.D. AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE , i TESTED 3 OR 4 OTHER PROJECTORS , THAT WERE GOOD ,BUT NOT TRUE H.D. For eg. I watched the world cup in true H.D. phenomenal . The key is "native resolution " the one you are asking about is 600x800 the other one is 1928x1080 -true H.D. there is a big difference , that is why you pay more for the one compared to the other , but it is definitely worth it , it depends on how good you want your picture to be , if you want true H.D. get the 7820 true H.D. .AS GOOD AS A MOVIE THEATER OR BETTER ,Mark 850-696-9519 , call if you want to discuss further
536988
I actually switched from the 226bw to the w2207. I like the HP better because of the vivid colors and the swivel monitor. Also has additional usb ports on side and better menu layout and customization. Overall quality is the same, but the HP has more to offer.