whats the big difference between the other LC 3.5 model number: LS2552-2467? There is about a $70 difference in price. is it worth the difference?
305620
i actually own both. the difference, i believe is in their shape. the cheaper one has a wider circumference and lower height. this, i find, lends itself to cooking vegetables, such as ratatouille, while the other is better for dishes in which you do not want the sauce to evaporate too quickly. the smaller diameter helps in that. i was once trying to cook something in the wider flatter pot and the recipe started with making the sauce. as the pot was wide and a larger portion of it exposed to the heat, the sauce burnt rather than cooked evenly as it would have in the other pot. i enjoy both of the pots, as well as the many others i own, but have learnt through trial and error when to use each pot. i hope tho is helpful.
2109499
I called Omega (it took a couple tries before I actually reached somebody) to ask about the 8004/6 vs 8007/8 their reply was "there aren't any differences worth mentioning." When I pressed further, "you can see from their description they're basically the same. Unless you like the different handle, i don't know why anybody would pay for the newer model." So either a) they're really bad at CS b) the person I spoke to was having a bad day or c) they're just trying to get an extra $30-40 per machine....
1985919
Hmmm, look at the pictures and model numbers. I see no difference. Somebody's confused.
722566
I refuse to make the purchase until prices drop. The LN55A950 is out as well as the LN52B750. Plus, it appears that the only real difference b/w the A750 and the 850 is that the 850 is slimmer.I will wait until Memorial Day and see if the prices drop by then...
1898950
There is no difference between the two at all... The CC is for clean and charge, which simply means it comes with the cleaning base. It's an old notation, which I believe Braun has dropped, so the model number is 9595, not 9595CC. BTW, the difference between the 9585 and the 9595 is the LCD (which is located on the back end of the unit).
1117161
I just purchased a 550 from Circuit City last week. They are one of the few stores that puts a 550 650 750 side by side. The audio on all 3 was the same, average at best. This is what I found with almost all LCD HDTV with small speakers. I bought the 550 because my eyes could see very little difference if any between the 3. Most difference was the options. The Samsung did have the best picture.
1020784
I tried both the 230 and 240 today at the local Dick's Sporting Goods store. The only 230 they have for sale is the floor model which has been badly abused. I really liked the 240 better. Better console and graphics, better seat. It's actually cheaper for me to buy the 240 locally and pay the sales tax than order from Amazon and pay shipping with the danger of having it arrive in pieces as many other reviewers have experienced. The difference in warranty doesn't really bother me.
2138094
There's a review on the LN--B750 line on CNET. Overall, it was rated as 'Excellent'. As far as the 240Hz motion is concerned, the review goes over the discernible, though slight, differences compared to 120Hz. I checked out forums about the LN46B750 and everyone had nothing but great things to say about it.I was actually able to cancel my LN46A860 with Crutchfueld even though it had already shipped (I still feel bad about this). Fortunately, customer service was exemplary and straightforward about the issue. I put in my order for the LN46B750 through Amazon with the $300-off promotion. I'll be receiving it by next mid-week. I'll let you know how it is. There's a review on the LN--B750 line on CNET. Overall, it was rated as 'Excellent'. As far as the 240Hz motion is concerned, the review goes over the discernible, though slight, differences compared to 120Hz. I checked out forums about the LN46B750 and everyone had nothing but great things to say about it.I was actually able to cancel my LN46A860 with Crutchfueld even though it had already shipped (I still feel bad about this). Fortunately, customer service was exemplary and straightforward about the issue. I put in my order for the LN46B750 through Amazon with the $300-off... » Read More There's a review on the LN--B750 line on CNET. Overall, it was rated as 'Excellent'. As far as the 240Hz motion is concerned, the review goes over the discernible, though slight, differences compared to 120Hz. I checked out forums about the LN46B750 and everyone had nothing but great things to say about it.I was actually able to cancel my LN46A860 with Crutchfueld even though it had already shipped (I still feel bad about this). Fortunately, customer service was exemplary and straightforward about the issue. I put in my order for the LN46B750 through Amazon with the $300-off promotion. I'll be receiving it by next mid-week. I'll let you know how it is. « Show Less
2240756
I'm glad I was able to help. A quick check of Braun's own site shows that there are only two current models of the Pulsonic: the 9585 and the 9595. Things do get confusing on Amazon's site since it appears that any merchant can add an item that already exists, with a sightly different title and it becomes a separate item. A search for Braun Pulsonic pulls up 4 different listings for the 9595 on the first page that are the same thing. One has the CC, one doesn't, one is cordless, another with an LCD... All the same.
1816312
Looks exactly the same. Probably different sellers putting it as different names to their models. If you go on to the web site and click on one, then open anothe page and look at the second. They are exactly the same, same size, same model, same colour.Get the cheaper one and save yourself money. If there is a new and used one, get the new one.
2240752
Thanks for the clarification. We keep ordering a 9595CC from Amazon and they keep sending us a 9595. We can't seem to find where the LCD is located. Can you help?Thanks!
1661364
Dee go to Lasko and check each of the models, i'm sure they'll explain the difference for you! Hope I was able to help you!
663164
There may be....i am conditioned to think that 20 bucks more means something a bit additional, perhaps. Maybe the other model has a bigger sound.....however, maybe they are essentially the same. If you find any info, please let me know. Thanks!
952459
I have done quiet a bit of research between the 830's and the 820's, including listening to them side by side in a retail store. From listening side by side, it was nearly impossible to discern much difference between the two. I believe the best way to determine which set to purchase is to define how you plan to arrange them. Essentially, with the Studio L line, JBL created different speaker configurations for either wall mounting or non wall mounting. If you intend to wall mount, the 820's are the way to go as they are thinner and have an additional speaker in the front (4-way), and they are designed spread the sound over a wider area. For home theater use, they are meant to be matched with the LC-2 center channel speaker (also thinner, wall mountable, and 4-way). If you do not intend to wall mount, the 830's are the way to go as they are deeper and have a rear port for best performance when positioned slightly away from a wall or cabinet. They are meant to be matched with the LC-1 center channel, which is also much deeper than the LC-2 and is 3-way/rear ported. Some people have even tried to mix/match by using the L830's as front L/R channels and the L820's as rear surround channels. JBL also offers the L810's, which are specifically meant for wall mounting as surround channels, since they are 3-way/front ported.
1591264
Sorry, I don't know if there is a difference. Maybe the prices just vary. I would compare and make sure the model #'s are exactly the same, and if not, research the model numbers.
641263
I actually would make sure that you order the LM580. I ordered the LM680C twice and both times it had the same defect so I think Amazon's inventory was bad. Don't know if they have corrected it. Hope this helps!
848894
The 24-70 is generally $300-400 more than the 17-55. There is no IS in the 24-70, and it weighs 2.1 lbs almost a pound more than the 17-55. Construction build is way better w/ the 24-70 and has a wee bit longer zoom. Those are probably the only advantages it has over the 17-55. IQ look almost identical from both lenses. I would go with 17-55 mainly for the IS and lower price.