What does PT-65 do that merits much larger price than PT-70?
282879
I have the PT-65 and I have had it for years. I cannot see that it is any better than the PT-70. I only paid about $15.00 for it years ago. It does not have a charger, uses 3 AA batteries only. I was shocked at the price here. I would not pay that much for it.
282880
I have no idea. I bought the PT-70 when it was on sale for $12.99 - I have no idea what is different about the 65..... perhaps it has the option of using a charger, rather than purely battery-operated, like the PT-70
1117381
Hi, You have been very informative. Which would you recommend: the p4400 or the p4460? Or is another product (under $25.00) better? I live in a delivery cost area, and am fairly careful already, so my likely savings will be less than $100 per year -- so I want to keep the cost of this item low.
2268684
If your PT609 Pro uses a double-stack magazine, this ProMag loader won't work. My PT709 uses single-stack magazines and the loader works very well with them. I hope this is of some help.
880344
I just bought the 45 and the only difference I saw between the two at the store was that the 65 has a digital display. I'm really happy with the 45 and I don't think it is worth the extra money. Also, check at your local stores before you order because I got mine from Kohls and there was a $50 rebate included.
1980516
I used to have a DCP7060D but I returned it pretty quick and chose a DC7065DN instead. These two printers are pretty similar, but there are 3 (big) advantages going with 7065DN: 1. Network capabilities (simply plug it in your home router and voila, you have a network printer for whole your household) 2. Multi-page scan/copy capability (with 7060D you have to feed one by one the pages you want to copy) 3. Slightly faster than 7060
183624
As mentioned by others, the differences are the screen size and the replaceable battery. As a 705 user, the big advantage of the larger screen is when you want to set the unit on a table, or hook it on the back of a car seat, and sit back and watch it. It is probably also an advantage as a Web browser (although I would not buy either unit if Web browsing is the priority - get a PC). However, if you mainly want to use it as a DVR and MP3 player, or a hand-held video viewer, the 605 may be a better choice.
1167902
I would guess the 65 quart size is not selling as well as the 45 quart. Discounted price.
186361
I sent the unit back because it contained PTFE. I know this doesn't help with your question but maybe it gives you something to consider.
1154271
There is a difference. The standard Platinum (3m 1171) will be more runny and have more pinholes and takes much more effort sanding than the Platinum Plus (3m 1131).
1005667
1040. I put it in the garage sale pile after one use. I switched to the Presto 1440 as well. FAR superior.
544661
No, Cambridge Audio states that the 651P has higher quality internal components, enhancements to the circuit design & there is a 'rumble' (LF) filter. However, both of these units are for the casual enthusiast, and I doubt the 651 is worth the extra $$$ if you will be staying with a moving magnet cartridge. For a sophisticated playback system and discerning ears, I'd pass on both, for casual listening, the less expensive model should be fine.
1009838
The difference is with the PFC being active or passive but I'm honestly not sure which has which. I've read elsewhere that the 450p has active pfc, but cannot officially confirm that.
2109796
YES. The price fluctuates quite a bit. I'm guessing $169 is very close to cost.
1763078
80 PLUS Platinum is only 2% more efficient at 50% load over Gold. Gold being 90% efficient, and Platinum sitting at 92%. Gold is fine for all situations I can think of. Platinum is reserved for all but the most enthusiast of rigs, and those who are willing to pay top dollar for peace of mind for their expensive components.
1186232
I bought the 70716 because it has a 5500rpm motor as opposed to the 5300rpm on the 70711. My other reason was I preferred the colored markings on the base that are easier for me to read.
1936013
I think that the difference is the hard drive in the 720. If I compare the specifications from both players is that the only thing I have no experience with the 720 but own a 700 and is working fine
2203044
In my opinion the additional $70 for the Gold over the Silver is worth it. Basically, what the Gold has that the Silver does not is the LCD timer, the larger work table and the charcoal bin. These are all simply convenience items but I use them all.