I am 5'2" would the Fiskars 28" be a better choice for me than the 36" ? I want to split firewood into smaller pieces for my fire pit.
296437
How's your coordination? If you are coordinated enough to swing an axe accurately, the 36" provides a lot more leverage. Just stand further away from your objective. If you have good upper body strength perhaps the 28" will suffice.
296438
That seems like it would be the better choice. I'm not sure if there's a weight difference between the 25 and the 27 but seems in your case the 25 would be better suited for you.
296439
In my opinion the 36 inch is best for taller people or someone that is used to a longer splitting ax. The 28" still works just as good and may be easier for you to handle and aim at the logs.
296440
They recommend the 28" for anyone under 6' tall. However, I'm 5'9" and much prefer the 36". At 5'2" I would guess you might prefer the 28". None of us are under 5'9" so I have no personal experience from which to tell you.
296441
The fiskars 28 inch would be better suited for you ; this will give you more power in your swing in we're you stand to the timber you are splitting; awesome bit of gear happy splitting!
296442
If you are splitting wood that's already been quartered from rounds I think the shorter version might be the better choice. On the other hand my sister in law is 5'4 and she uses my brothers 36" splitter quite regularly with no complaints...
296443
The 28" would definitely be a better fit for you than the 36". I'm 5'8", and had always used a 36" ax. We get cord wood delivered, but the firebox in our fireplace is small so I would use the old ax to split the larger pieces. I always had a fair number of misses or poor strikes and just figured it was my skill level. In short, the old ax is good enough to get the job done. In contrast, the 28" ax makes splitting wood fun. My swing feels more natural, I'm rarely missing, and I can split more wood in less time.
951728
I have a 36" and it took up all the space. I do not think I would try it with a 33".
1793614
Despite the other answers handle length really has nothing to do with your height. The longer handle of the X27 will give you increased head speed (think golf) resulting in easier splitting. The (light) Fiskars head will feel slightly heavier at the end of the long handle but it shouldn't present a problem for anyone of average strength. A longer handle will give you less head accuracy but that shouldn't be a problem either. Unless portability or swing clearance presents a problem go with the longer X27.
271840
I agree with Dave I bought the estwig because it's a solid shaped piece of metal it will last forever..don't know about fiskars
568699
Go to sears and compare the 30" bagger to the 42" in baggar would probably be your best bet. Husqvarna makes the Sears, Poulan and Husqvarna lawn tractors
833087
I purchased both the 29" Crusher and the 34" Smasher; they are both wonderful but each has its advantages. The Crusher is shorter and lighter, which makes it easier to swing in the house. The Smasher is longer and heavier, which gives more reach and power. I am 6'0" and weight 200 lbs and if I needed a bat for self defense in the home I would definitely reach for the Crusher. If for some reason I was outside and needed self defense protection, then I would prefer the Smasher for the extra reach. I hope that helps.
359148
Buy a three or four - you won't be sorry and can always use it in the future. It will make such a difference and is so good for the wood, you will be glad to have it on hand and not wait for a reorder.
1443988
I have used both and I definitely prefer the straight shaft. I think your height and any back issues may have play a big part in the decision. I am 6'2". I also agree with the statement that the straight shaft keeps debris farther from the operator. For me it is also easier to control and work around and under bushes, trees or any shrubbery.
1924028
I don't know what you mean by this question but I am a 61 yr old single woman and I love this log splitter. I had 6 ash trees cut down, trunks anywhere from 6 inches to 18 inches and this splitter handled splitting the trunks without a problem. I did one log after another, it was slow but I would work for maybe an hour or so at a time, eventually I split one and a half face cords. This is a great splitter to have on hand. I have more wood to split this spring.
1762252
This is my second fire pit, and it's smaller and allows for less fire than the last. Beautiful and cross-functional with the table, and allows for a nice sized fire (12" to 14" logs ideal), but if your primary objective is heating a large area in very cold weather this may not be your best option.
2134777
Those are two different concepts. Yes, it's a perfect size bushcraft axe. It's not a felling axe, so dropping a 9" tree is more up to your tenacity :) if your plan is to regularly drop trees that size, I would bump up to a full size axe.
396713
I would definitely go with the shorter one for sitting that is the one I have and it is perfect for sitting and kneeling. The other can work but kinda a pain because you have to spread legs out so far.
396708
i have the shorter version, and it serves me well , the longer one did not closed down enough for my hunting style, lots of hiking and shooting down steep canyons, sit down and measure the height from the ground to your comfortable shooting position, that should give you an idea which one will work for you. but i do endorse this product
262952
Not sure the square footage of your fireplace, but I used it for my fire pit and 10lbs was not enough. I would go with twenty to be on the safe side
1394256
It might be best to go for the smaller one. Although, the only harm the taller one will do is raise your feet more; it is a matter of your personal comfort.
1823470
The one with the legs would be more stable, but you can use this one. I recommend building a little "tripod" with stones for it to stand on above the wood of the fire, just to help keep the heat even. I've used mine inside a fire pit and it was great.
1009384
If the pieces of wood were greater than 6' in diameter (or width if they're triangular) i would go with the X27. Smaller wood would be fine with this axe but up to about 2" only. If the wood is smaller than 2" and not too knotty, then I would look into a knife for wood processing via that method; I use a Spyderco Schempp Rock for "batoning".