What's the difference between the VLF410 and the VLF510
288044
I emailed Sanus before about that. Their response was: "The VLF410 and VLF510 are the exact same mount. If you are shopping for them I would just go with the cheapest option and both are the exact same mount with the same features." Don't know why they have 2 model numbers for the same thing.
288045
I emailed Sanus before about that. Their response was: "The VLF410 and VLF510 are the exact same mount. If you are shopping for them I would just go with the cheapest option and both are the exact same mount with the same features."Don't know why they have 2 model numbers for the same thing.
288046
This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or operation on a 40 and 50" unit, but I did buy a different one for a 65" plasma, which is close to the max weight for the 410. This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or... » Read More This is a mystery of science. Mechanical drawings show virtually no difference that I can see, but 410 is advertised for TVs 37-84 and 510 for 51-80. The actual drawing numbers from Sanus are different, usually indicating a truly different product. The limiting factor is the max width between the two vertical arms which attach to the back of the TV. Both are the same value, as well as max weight. Somehow the spec for the max distance to the wall is slightly different. I have two VLF410s, and it's considered the "do all" mount from Sanus. I've had no issues with the install or operation on a 40 and 50" unit, but I did buy a different one for a 65" plasma, which is close to the max weight for the 410. « Show Less
288047
The only difference I can tell is that the VLF 410 has a greater range of television sizes it can accommodate. they both have the same tilt angle and extension from the wall and are both "slim". I am super happy with how easy it to level the TV after it is installed. you can pretty much not get the bracket exactly level and then level up the TV once you get it mounted on the bracket. The build quality of the VLF 410 that I purchased was very nice. Built in Minnesota I believe.
2078879
I just received a v4 as a replacement for a GS108 v2 that died. I have not found any info yet on what the differences are. The major change in this product, from what I can see, was the transition from V1 to V2.
1327857
I don't know the difference between the two--only that one is a newer model than the other. You should research the model numbers.
1198455
The 4600 is the latest model. Difference that I can tell is that the 4600 has three specific levels to choose the amount of vapor produced. The 4500 has an infinitely variable controller. I have had the 4500 and now have the 4600. Of the two, I prefer the 4500 vapor controller because in my application I don't want much vapor. On the other hand, it is nice to have three specific levels. Another difference is the form factor. The 4600 is a little higher and not as deep as the 4500. Either way you cannot go wrong.
1470324
Actually the M510 is not infrared but a laser mouse (as I found out). The infrared are the so called optical ones.And as some say, the laser ones are better for accuracy (more DPI), and the optical are better for gamers.Dan
1521606
From a connectivity stand point, there are no differences between the units. I have found the descriptions posted by Amazon can be very vague. I find myself needing to do more research before buying and usually on the mfg. website.
15295
You did not note the complete first model number. I'm assuming you mean the Sony KDL-40S5100. This is the same as the KDL-40SL150. Only difference is that the second number is unique to Costco (and perhaps, other warehouse stores like BJ's and Sam's if they carry it).
1227394
For the Coolpix P520, very little has changed from the P510. Nikon put in a new 18-megapixel backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, but it has the same lens. The bulk of its other features remain unchanged, too. I believe the difference is the Wifi capability (if you buy the Wifi adapter). http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P520-vs-Nikon-P510
1134965
It seems as if the SB5101U has an Optional 1.1 USB data port available. That may be the only difference between the two. I just bought one from Best Buy yesterday and if works just the same. It was a replacement for my old and broken SB5101, which was made approximately on Dec 23, 2004. (I took it apart and looked at the circuit board. Part number - 512841-003). I like to take apart broken electronics to see how they work.
834111
The DVT3000 and -3200 look identical, and the user manual lumps all of the 3000 series together. So the user interface is identical in both. I suspect the only difference in the 3200, which is no longer listed on Philips' site, is the Dragon software. I have not used my 3000 a lot, but it does a pretty good job picking up sound - the playback is about as clear as your ear hears the original if there is not a lot of background noise, such as in a restaurant. I have recorded my mom with the 3000 on the table in front of us, and the clarity is very good. My wife's boss uses one for dictation at work, and it works great for that. If there are any technical differences in specs between the 3000 and 3200, I doubt you could tell the difference when using it.
2214612
I just bought this for a gift took back home, no idea sorry. Consult with an IT guy/gal to show u the difference.
1027017
The only difference I can see is the expanded range. More distant between the base and the handset on the 158 model. We are using it for our business and it working very well.
1765339
According to my owner's manual, which describes both the VN-7100 and VN-7200... VN-7100: HQ mode: 39 hours. SP mode: 100 hours. LP mode: 573 hours. VN-7200: HQ: 78.5 hours. SP: 202 hours. LP: 1151 hours. "Available recording time may be shorter if many short recordings are made."
1517945
I think that the Sony 32LL150 and L5000 are identical models, about to be discontinued. The LL150 seems to be sold at wholesale clubs, such as BJ's and Costco. I just bought the LL150 online from Costco for a deep discount - free shipping, should get it by next weekend. Hope this helps.
2127296
Both are bag less. The DC41 is the newer model. I don't know how it was changed.
2152225
The SB5101 and SB5101N ARE different modems. The N edition is a revision of the 5101 series. It has different hardware, stripped down (i.e. the lack of USB), and is not compatible currently with most ISPs in the US. I highly recommend going with the SB5101 instead.
74752
What the difference is, I do not know. I have the 511AX and I am extremely pleased with it.