What is the exact weight of this wok?
842754
not quite sure. But I can lift the wok with stir-fried vegetable in it using left hand only.
842755
It weighs 4lb. 7and 3/4 oz.---weighed on my food scale which is accurate to an eighth of an oz.
1760047
It weighed close to 3 pounds. I liked this pan at first, but soon after the coating came off and I had to throw it away. I bought the cuisinart Griddler and I love it. The pans go in the DW and I use it a lot.
28011
its some lightweight metal. i think its aluminum. personally, i don't really care about the lid cuz the wok itself is superb. i think the lid is some type of cheap aluminum or metal. what is important to me is the cooking surface/pan. that has been superb for me. hope this helps.
780456
I agree, about 5 lbs. I used it while living through a major kitchen remodel for 3 months. That, an electric skillet and a crock pot were priceless! Easy to clean, heats up quickly, easy to store. Worked well with my calphalon pans. I have small children and it has a lock and that was a great feature.
1655709
Weighed it on two different scales and it weighed 3.2 lbs on both. Also, one of the best non-stick pans I've ever owned.
1616899
Cannot state actual weight but it is quite heavy (and very sturdy). I have arthritis in my hands and always use both hands to lift it. I love it and always use it more than other lighter weight pots
431659
It is fairly heavy. It is as good as most steel cookware, maybe heavier. Used it on a gas stove.
969305
It;s a medium gauge, like 14 0r 16. The model by the same company with the long wooden handle and the short wooden helper handle (classic home wok) has a thick pad of steel on the bottom that holds heat very well (and that this pow wok lacks), and I highly recommend it over this all metal pow style wok (and it's cheaper too). I've owned and seasoned and worked with both, and the more classic wooden handle is a better wok with its heat retaining thicker padded bottom. You can find it here:http://www.wokshop.com/store/detail.php?show=23
1271859
it's a couple of pounds just enough to put the weight onto meat to sear it. I love mine, use it all the time.
1781776
I haven't weighed it but it is not heavy. I love mine because it cooks evenly and retains heat well. I have several pieces of All Clad and love all of them.
1415646
I put it on my scale and it says it weighs about 2.3 lbs. It is certainly sturdy, my cat knocked it down off my dishwasher a couple of times and it didn't even dent which is more than I can say for my other pans that now have flat edges : )
667941
When I got your question, I checked it. It's about 2 kg. I think it is appropriate weight for cooking.
925502
It's about 2.5 pounds, box and all (blades, handle). It says it's "18/10 stainless still construction', whatever that means. It is sturdy. It's like the one we had growing up (in the 60's). I use mine to make tomato puree (pass cooked tomatoes through it). I really like mine. One of the best purchases I've made.
771552
Sorry I was quite wrong. I used a pair of calipers and it mikes out at 1mm exactly. This seems correct for a wok though. 2mm+ would be more a "skillet" and too heavy to lift. It is not flimsy, pretty solid. Sorry I hope this is helpful.
1055999
I don't know the precise weight, but it is heavy. I carried it through the backyard while placing it on the base. If I had to guess I would say 80-85 lbs, maybe more.
1655710
I have weighed the frypan and it's 3lb 4oz. The Vollrath is the best non-stick frypan I'v owned-it is on the heavy side thou.
1506437
It's similar to a wok. I would estimate the bottom to be 6 or 7 inches circumference