I have a 105~ watt per channel sony reciever and was thinking about bi-amping them. Is there a noticeable difference between that and just one wire?
844780
If the Sony receiver is capable of being a bi-amp then yes, bi-amp will give more sound separation
844781
I can tell you, yes. If ur reciever can handle it then always Bi-amp. Does it use a lot more power? hell yea...just a fair warning.
844782
Assuming the sony reciever is capable of being a bi-amp, then yes ......bi-amp will give more separation of sound.
949804
Yes. You can use the 6th and 7th surround channels to bi-amp the fronts. I haven't done this but I've read that's how you do it. You'll need a couple Y adapters.
1639366
I am using a Denon AVR-2313 rated at 105 WPC and bi-amping the RTi-A7s (one pair of wires to the mids/tweeters, the other pair of wires to the woofers). I have no complaints.
2127671
You will need two Amps then. 1 won't be hitting them that hard. 4 to 1 amp for a 1200 watt amp. If you get a bigger amp you will need to buy a compositor and much more and bigger wire.
669659
if your not running any crazy wattage then no problem. this wire is plenty beefy. i have a yamaha 115/channel surround and i have no issues.
267844
Yes. I am running two amps in my system. you must split the RCA outputs with a Y (splitter) to get seperate channels for the amps. Works fine.
949807
Yes, the bi-amp capability really comes from the receiver/pre-ampIt does not bridge if that is what you are wanting to do.
1108021
No, I believe the Sony Xplod your talking about is 185 Watts x 2 rms. Two woofers with this amp would be under powered at the same time strain your amp.
884956
I don't know either for sure, but if you want to bi-amp and remove the internal x-over would mean that you have an external x-over. This sounds kind of strange to me. I had mine bi-amped and also tried bi-wired, but didn't hear a difference. I'm no audiophile, but got fairly good equipment and with the efficiency of the Klipsch you won' t have a big issue anyway.
1139295
How do you bi-amp a speaker from one source? Can you give an example of a receiver with this feature? Does one need to buy an extra amp?
1440456
That depends on the impedance and make up of your speakers. The amp has only one channel but also allows you to bridge your load to recieve max power..
1886483
My receiver has had no problems. They produce about 140 watts. Sounds like your speakers can handle a lot more. Look for a bigger amp!
789181
Your welcome. If your gonna run two subs, you might have to turn up the output to the subs if the subs are over a 1000 watts max each. Adjust to your liking.
1851516
The XPA-5 is a 200 watts per channel (all channels driven at the same time) the amp is heavy duty Audiophile quality. However the UPA is only 80 watts ( average use) in my opinion . save your money and buy a good quality AV Receiver like a Onkyo TX-NR838, Denon AVR-X4000 or Yamaha RX-A2030 all below $1000. will deliver Audiophile quality performance. I bought a top of the line Yamaha A3040 FOR $1600 DIRECTLY FROM ONE CALL SHIPPED FREE when I called about a "like new unit for the same price...call them
1229949
Yes, that would work out fine. That's actually what I'm running also. BUT! this is thee second Pyle amp I have ordered and boy does it hum BAD on the one channel. Both did it!
1648128
@ 215 watts per channel at 8 ohms or 350 watts per channel at 4 ohms, its fine for a home stereo. Thanks.
540986
well the 4 channel actually gives (bridged to 2 channels) only gives you true watts of 110 watts peak power per channel. if you get the 2 channel if bridged only gives you 150 watts peak. Spend more money and get a better amplifier.