Has anyone used this lens with the D750? Also, how does it compare to the FX 16MM Fisheye lens?
827330
It is a DX lens...works great on my D7000 & D90....sharp and beautiful color.
827331
It's a hugh difference; this is a fisheye, 16mm it's a wide lens. try it, its awesome!
464302
The spec's I've seen on this lens indicate this as compatible with FX and DX cameras. This lens is my work-horse for shooting birds in flight with a D7000 (a DX camera body).
862650
Cant answer your question because I've never tried that Nikon lens you're referring to however, I'm extremely pleased with my Sigma lens and use it 90% of the time for all situations currently.
1251772
Yes the lens is an FX lens and will work on the d700 just fine with no cropping.
692071
the dx unless you plan on moving up to a full frame camera in the future. if you're not going to go full frame don't waste the $ on the fx lens. I have both these lenses, the dx I got first when I first started out, then recently the fx when I got a full frame camera. I've used the fx version on my d7000 (dx body) and honestly I see no real difference between the dx and fx lens on a dx body. even after pixel peeping quite a bit I was really at a loss as to which one was better, they both looked really good.
826202
I have the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 and I used it on my D90. I purchased a D700 and it works great at 15mm and 16mm. Anything less there is vignetting. Incredible sharp lens, at least my copy.
1351164
I used the 55-200mm/4-5.6 lens on my DX format D200 and thought that it was an excellent lens. There are two things that would make me prefer it to the excellent 24-85mm/3.5-5.6 in your case. First, you would probably be using the lens at longer focal lengths, in which case both lenses would be operating at f/4.5 to f/5.6, so there is no advantage to having the 24-85mm in terms of low light capability. Second, the 24-85mm is designed for the FX format, so you'd be paying for a wider field lens than you need on a DX camera. If you ever go to FX format, the 24-85mm/3.5-5.6 is a real jewel to own.
1361228
It will work but the Nikon 24-85 F/3.5-4.5G is the better choice for the FX D700. The 18-70 is a DX lens.
1566273
No...this lens is terrific with DX cameras like my D7000...but since this is a DX lens could work in a FX body, but you would waste your money with this lens using in a FX body...I would recommend use an FX lens an a Dx body rather than a Dx lens in a FX body,,,in that case, you should look for a sigma DG lens that are for FX bodies or look for an FX lens from Nikon....however, the tag price for those lens will be double or triple compared with Dx counterpart....my advice...get an DG or FX lens...i keep my 17-70mm for my d7000, but in my D600 I use 50mm 1.8g, the 70-300mm Vr, the 24-85VR and the 85mm 1.8 G....FX lens in FX bodies....hpe that helps.. No...this lens is terrific with DX cameras like my D7000...but since this is a DX lens could work in a FX body, but you would waste your money with this lens using in a FX body...I would recommend use an FX lens an a Dx body rather than a Dx lens in a FX body,,,in that case, you should look for a sigma DG lens that are for FX bodies or look for an FX lens from Nikon....however, the tag price for those lens will be double or triple compared with Dx counterpart....my advice...get an DG or FX lens...i keep my 17-70mm for my d7000, but in my D600 I use 50mm 1.8g, the 70-300mm Vr, the 24-85VR... » Read More No...this lens is terrific with DX cameras like my D7000...but since this is a DX lens could work in a FX body, but you would waste your money with this lens using in a FX body...I would recommend use an FX lens an a Dx body rather than a Dx lens in a FX body,,,in that case, you should look for a sigma DG lens that are for FX bodies or look for an FX lens from Nikon....however, the tag price for those lens will be double or triple compared with Dx counterpart....my advice...get an DG or FX lens...i keep my 17-70mm for my d7000, but in my D600 I use 50mm 1.8g, the 70-300mm Vr, the 24-85VR and the 85mm 1.8 G....FX lens in FX bodies....hpe that helps.. « Show Less
826200
I have the Tokina 11-16 as well. When I mount the 11-16 on the Nikon D3, it does NOT automatically crop to DX. I can use it at 15-16mm in FX mode. Ditto with Tokina 10-17 Fisheye (doesn't crop automatically). On the other hand, when I mounted other third party DX lenses (Sigma 10-20, Sigma 50-150, Tamron 17-50 VC) on the D3, the D3 did automatically crop to DX (though of course you can select a different crop).
928326
If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're looking for an ultrawide for DX, take a look at the Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 10-24. If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're... » Read More If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're looking for an ultrawide for DX, take a look at the Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 10-24. « Show Less
161662
It works great with the Nikon D800. Nice and sharp in the middle, a little bit of softness along the corners but thats normal with a wide-angle. Just be careful with this lens since the aperture lever is prone to being bent by an impact since it sticks out.
1965863
I have used it with a D800 and it is one of my all time favorite lenses. The D700 is also a full frame camera and this lens should be stellar. I don't thinik there is a better Nikon WA for the money than the 16-35.
2016778
I use this lens on my D700 FX. The lens is not designed for an FX but the photos are beautiful. You should do just fine because the lens was made for a DX camera. It is an extremely tack sharp lens and the range is perfect for landscapes and wide angle shots.
107211
It depends upon the lens (if it's a prime), and/or the focal length (if it's a zoom).I frequently use the excellent 35mm f/1.8 DX lens in FX mode on my D700. There is certainly some fall off at the corners, but it works well for my uses (location portraits, and indoor people events).
767796
Before answering, I tried the lens on a D70s. The lens works perfectly. I would, however, bring to your attention that this is an FX lens and the D70 has a DX crop sensor. As a result, this lens has will be closer to a 35mm field of view on a DX camera. The description indicates 84 degrees FX but about 60 degrees DX. If you do not need the features of this lens (aperture ring, etc.) and are simply seeking a 35mm lens, consider the 35mm 1.8 DX for about 60% of the price. Otherwise, I use this lens a great deal and my only real frustration is its tendency to ghost. It ranges from F/2.8-f/22, is metal and is small enough to drop into your pocket. Before answering, I tried the lens on a D70s. The lens works perfectly. I would, however, bring to your attention that this is an FX lens and the D70 has a DX crop sensor. As a result, this lens has will be closer to a 35mm field of view on a DX camera. The description indicates 84 degrees FX but about 60 degrees DX. If you do not need the features of this lens (aperture ring, etc.) and are simply seeking a 35mm lens, consider the 35mm 1.8 DX for about 60% of the price. Otherwise, I use this lens a great deal and my only real frustration is its tendency to ghost. It ranges from F/2.8-f/22,... » Read More Before answering, I tried the lens on a D70s. The lens works perfectly. I would, however, bring to your attention that this is an FX lens and the D70 has a DX crop sensor. As a result, this lens has will be closer to a 35mm field of view on a DX camera. The description indicates 84 degrees FX but about 60 degrees DX. If you do not need the features of this lens (aperture ring, etc.) and are simply seeking a 35mm lens, consider the 35mm 1.8 DX for about 60% of the price. Otherwise, I use this lens a great deal and my only real frustration is its tendency to ghost. It ranges from F/2.8-f/22, is metal and is small enough to drop into your pocket. « Show Less
1519723
I've had this lens for about a year now, it's very sharp and although considered a fisheye, it has no fisheye effect, just like using a very wide angle lens. Highly recommend. Great color rendition all the way to the endges. For a more elaborate report try fredmiranda.com