I&acute;d like to know the pros and cons when comparing the Olympus Stylus 1 vs. Olympus E PL5. Thanks
848991
-Olympus E-PL5 has a much larger imaging sensor than the Stylus 1. Better low-light performance, able to make larger prints, and it resolves far-away details in landscape photos better (however this is only really noticeable when viewing photos at large sizes). However if you aren't blowing up your photos to huge sizes or do critical low-light work, you may not notice much of difference between the two. -The Stylus 1 can only close down to F8 when shooting manually (although it does have a Neutral Density filter to cut the light by an extra three stops). While the E-PL5's aperture can close down much farther than that. -The Stylus one has a bigger screen, built in EVF, and built in flash...which the E-PL5 does not. E-PL5 comes with a clip on flash for the hot shoe and you can buy an add on EVF at extra cost. -The lens of course on the Stylus 1 is much more versatile. You cannot get a constant aperture 28-300mm lens for the E-PL5 and if you were able to...it would substantially increase the size of the camera. While the E-PL5 is the technically superior of the two, most people I think would probably enjoy shooting with the Stylus 1 more due to the reasons I just mentioned above.
529975
PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price;PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor;X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it:* is a dust trap,* prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare),* delays startup time, and* needlessly consumes battery power.That said, I still favor the X1.I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4, after having had many LUMIX models.Available light performance should be great.I will tell you if I'm happy later. PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price;PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor;X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it:* is a dust trap,* prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare),* delays startup time, and* needlessly consumes battery power.That said, I still favor the X1.I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4,... » Read More PEN pros are interchangeable lenses, HD video capure, now available, sane price;PEN cons: smaller sensor... others?X1 pros are aperture and shutter-speed dials, Leica optics, larger sensor;X1 cons are high price point, and it's not yet available.Also, I don't care for a lens that retracts on shutoff, because it:* is a dust trap,* prevents use of lens filters and hoods (shades against flare),* delays startup time, and* needlessly consumes battery power.That said, I still favor the X1.I greatly enjoy the D-LUX 3 and 4, after having had many LUMIX models.Available light performance should be great.I will tell you if I'm happy later. « Show Less
1416190
Sorry I have a Olympus stylus 7010 - Maybe check the Olympus website for compatable pic card type - Good Luck - Happy Holidays!
1187705
I have a Gh1 and three Olympus ep1, ep3, and an Omd, regarding photography all this Cameras are better than Panasonic, on video part always Panasonic is better! But you said slower what do you mean by that? Focusing speed in OMD is very fast but it is not like a DSLR camera!, it is fast engh for street photography beside it has in body stablizer which is amazing and it is dust and weather resistant ( body and the kit lens ) read more about them in many photo blogs and pick the one which is better for your need!.
446580
I am not sure. I am not familiar with the Olympus Stylus 820. I think a camera website can better advise you like B and H, or Adorama. Any luck from the Olympus website?
989748
I guess you could go with any of the mentioned but the olympus in my opinion gives you more bang for your buck. Olympus also has the BEST self cleaning system which is important. The lens line up from olympus is also better price wise and they give you great lenses. The e 510 is also easy to use in my experience. The battery life is also one of the best. Try them out and see which fits best in your hands. Comfort is important.
1365589
I have that exact model, the Olympus E510, purchased right here from Amazon about 4 months ago and I LOVE it. It is an excellent camera. The live view works quite well (though in certain modes you can't use it...but that's ok..you don't always want to use "live view" mode and there are reasons for that which will become apparent when you get it and start learning the camera.) One of the selling points it had for me was the four thirds sensor. It allows the lenses to be shorter (and lighter!) and it also is a closer ratio to standard paper sizes such as 5x7 and 8x10. the four thirds ratio doesn't require zealous cropping to fit that ratio whereas a two thirds does. The four thirds also gives a greater depth of field compared to it's two thirds kin. It's a responsive, sturdy camera with plenty of features to keep you busy for a long, long time. I hope you love yours as much as I love mine. I am an artist an I purchased this camera to take reference photos. I have multiple sclerosis so I cannot work from life since I can't stand long enough to paint a picture plein aire or with a live model. I CAN, however, walk around and take lovely pictures for use in my comfortable studio later. I am also a portrait painter and I wanted a camera that would take beautiful portraits without washing out and dramatic lighting (which digital cameras tend to 'want' to do). So, an affordable, very well constructed camera that is capable of everything from beautiful scenic landscapes, dramatic portraits including under candlelight or at night, and even some macro work for some fun semi-absract paintings...it does them all terrifically. You will want to invest in some better lenses, though, if you got the kit. Not because they are bad, mind you. The two lenses it comes with are quite decently made and solidly constructed just like the camera body. It's just that once you get the camera's basics down and play you're going to be so tempted to go out and get those more expensive lenses because you will be having so much fun with it.
1748284
I am partial to Canon and am excited to see they are introducing a model in the rugged, waterproof class. I previously used the first generation waterproof Olympus Stylus and after it broke moved to the Pentax Optio W series. It has been a good camera as far as durability, but it just doesn't produce photos like our Canon Powershot SD1000. As far as the post question, I can't wait to see some product reviews/comparisons. Based on my previous experience with the Stylus line, I am ruling out the Olympus. Although right now I am leaning towards the Canon based on previous experience with their products and superior photos. However, the Panasonic offering higher video quality in HD format is enticing. I am partial to Canon and am excited to see they are introducing a model in the rugged, waterproof class. I previously used the first generation waterproof Olympus Stylus and after it broke moved to the Pentax Optio W series. It has been a good camera as far as durability, but it just doesn't produce photos like our Canon Powershot SD1000. As far as the post question, I can't wait to see some product reviews/comparisons. Based on my previous experience with the Stylus line, I am ruling out the Olympus. Although right now I am leaning towards the Canon based on previous... » Read More I am partial to Canon and am excited to see they are introducing a model in the rugged, waterproof class. I previously used the first generation waterproof Olympus Stylus and after it broke moved to the Pentax Optio W series. It has been a good camera as far as durability, but it just doesn't produce photos like our Canon Powershot SD1000. As far as the post question, I can't wait to see some product reviews/comparisons. Based on my previous experience with the Stylus line, I am ruling out the Olympus. Although right now I am leaning towards the Canon based on previous experience with their products and superior photos. However, the Panasonic offering higher video quality in HD format is enticing. « Show Less
383520
While both of these are so called "bridge" cameras the Olympus SP-100 has one huge advantage over *all* other cameras in the class including the Fuji FinePix S1. The Dot Sight. At high zooms it is very difficult to frame the subject with any other camera. This can be very very frustrating. The Dot Sight eliminates that frustration. Once you are familiar with it you just put the illuminated reticle on the subject while keeping both eyes open. This makes tracking moving subjects very easy and intuitive. I just works better than any other camera. Otherwise the photos and everything else are pretty equal across the entire class.
118656
I have an Olympus E420 and I had no issues with it. It just took some time to get used to the proper technique. I can't speak for your model though.
628321
I highly recommend the Olympus Stylus Tough models. I own two. The first one I bought about 10 years ago. still works like a champ. And my new one I bought 4 years ago. I am not easy on my cameras. I take them to the beach ever weekend, camping, in the rain and I use them a lot in our pool. I have even dropped mine when riding my motorcycle. Sure it's a little scratched hear and there. I even have a deep nick on her but the camera still works like a champ.
461404
Read these both. http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2009/12/26/the-olympus-e-p2-digital-camera-review/ and http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/05/the-leica-x1-digital-camera-review/note he is not using a kit lens with the oly - he's using the 20mm pancake from the gf-1. May help!
1124277
Sue, if you plan to stick to one system, you will want to buy the Olympus. The in-body stabilization allows it to work with any m4/3 lens, and the Olympus and Panasonic lenses are terrific. Buy the 45mm lens - open the aperture and begin taking pro quality portraits after a short time. Also, the Panasonic 20mm can't be beat for quality and size (though the Oly 17mm is great too, and smaller) and if you want the best zoom, get the 14-150mm Oly for the perfect travel set-up (which provides your wide-angle spectrum). Even a pro could get by with the 20mm, the 45mm, and the 14-150 (and you could always add the 12mm Oly later if you save your pennies!). The E-M5 will never be obsolete. Initial reviews and image samples allow it to challenge flagship, full-size competitors in many situations. I currently own the E-P3 and chose it over the Sony because of the huge gap in lens quality - and I don't regret it for a minute. The E-M5 is just a better all-around choice than any other small system.
584257
Here is a very good review of the features you're asking about: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-epl5/olympus-epl5VIDEO.HTM
1968703
I wasn't familiar with the Stylus 300 and had to look up. I would say that they are not comparable. Even though the XZ-10 is the lower-end version of the XZ-2 model, it is classed as an "enthusiast" camera. It is more expensive than a fairly simple point-and-shoot camera such as the Stylus 300 because you're paying for a much better lens and a lot more functionality. The thing to consider is that to make use of these additional functions and features, it may require a significant learning curve. If you're not prepared to spend the time and effort, this can be information overload and leave you frustrated. While you can set the XZ-10 in its iAuto mode and let the camera do almost all of the work, well, then you're just wasting your money. Do some more research on whether an "enthusiast" camera is right for you or whether you're better off getting something more mainstream (and cheaper).
1852971
Nothing works with the E-PL1. It has a non-functioning USB remote connection, deliberately disabled by Olympus. It is the only Pen/OM-D that will not accept any remote cable/trigger.
838795
I'd guess that it refers to the fact that the display is not ultra-high res (Retina, true to output, what have you); I've also heard that there's some sort of down sampling issue with older bodies. That said, the VF-4 display has been more than adequate in my use on a E-PL5. I haven't had an issue composing with this at all, and it's far better than the VF-2 I had prior. I actually prefer the removeable rangefinder, as the M43 format is ideal to often shoot without- but it's great to be able to clip one on when doing certain types of shooting. The only compromise I've found with this isn't the resolution, but more that when you do use it vs a built-in rangefinder, it takes over the hotshoe, so you have to use external flash. Hope that helps a bit.