Why did you choose the 240 over the 230?
836707
I am interested in knowing this answer as well. $100 difference in price but I don't see very little difference in features.
768725
I'm on the same wagon, i'm gonna get one of this next month, but i haven't decided yet. I like the 1201N more than the UL20A for a simple reason, everything that is going out in computer world is graphics intense, CPU is less needed everyday, and for the task that need CPU power the one in the 1201N is enough.
1649789
That significantly had an effect on the sound quality. The X-230 sounds a lot better in comparison. I get a more surround sound feel with the X-230, but I can't say the same about the X-240's. Easily X-230 &gt; X-240.
1567468
230 is just suggested retail. Many places will sell it cheaper. It is the same item. The only little difference there might be is this might be last years model. They changed the logo on the newest one, that's the only difference. Don't worry
1503517
That significantly had an effect on the sound quality. The X-230 sounds a lot better in comparison. I get a more surround sound feel with the X-230, but I can't say the same about the X-240's. Easily X-230 > X-240.
1066074
The 230 (and 231) have a step through design to get on and off. The older, and no longer made, 203 and 213 have a longer rail that the seat attaches to, that goes all the way to the pedal unit. This allows the seat to get closer to the pedals and people with shorter legs can use it. If you are sharter than 5'4" it is questionable wheather the 230 or 231 will work for you.
1732089
I am currently using the TR1200DT model. I am over 350 and it works just fine. That said, they do have a heavier duty model, the TR5000DT, but it's almost $1000 more than the 1200.
13928
You square footage is exactly what the 230ph is rated for. But I would suggest gettin the 300ph anyways because it's always better to have something doing better than the required minimum.
565816
The 202 is just the version that Sears sells of the 201. It has fewer programs and resistance levels, but is of the same build quality. These are all made by Nautilus and the ones Sears sells are not of a lesser quality. I've done several thousand miles on mine and couldn't be happier.
357721
Depends on what you shoot. If you don't need the additional speed of the 2.8, the 24-120 has a greater range. But it much heavier. I'm guessing you are looking at the Tamron.
1409496
I believe the 3000 replaces the 300. They have about the same rpm range. The 3000 has a newer design, probably some features I can't really think of right not but mostly the same
1876462
TRY ASKING THIS QUESTION ON GOOGLE. I asked the difference between 120 - 240 & found substantially that the real need for 240 is for 3D! by George
438556
They are both electric. I have the gas Q-1200. 189 sq ft. cooking area. Q-1400 is 189 sq ft. cooking area and the 2400 is 280 sq. in cooking area
1184217
The 180 has 2 nozzles. The 120 just has one. I think I'd go with the 180. It doesn't cost much more.
2209901
You can but you will probably not get as good of run times as these new Pros theoretically permit. The older 2400 XX has not only a different capacity, but a different temp range as well as different service life rating. Plus the new Pro is made to improve upon output consistency. A battery you have used for years always has a lower capacity than its initial rating, and this can result in the weak link in the chain. So ideally you want to keep batteries paired together so that they age and cycle count similar to others they are used with. Otherwise you really can't benefit from the performance improvements the Pro makes over the XX. You can but you will probably not get as good of run times as these new Pros theoretically permit. The older 2400 XX has not only a different capacity, but a different temp range as well as different service life rating. Plus the new Pro is made to improve upon output consistency. A battery you have used for years always has a lower capacity than its initial rating, and this can result in the weak link in the chain. So ideally you want to keep batteries paired together so that they age and cycle count similar to others they are used with. Otherwise you really can't benefit from the... » Read More You can but you will probably not get as good of run times as these new Pros theoretically permit. The older 2400 XX has not only a different capacity, but a different temp range as well as different service life rating. Plus the new Pro is made to improve upon output consistency. A battery you have used for years always has a lower capacity than its initial rating, and this can result in the weak link in the chain. So ideally you want to keep batteries paired together so that they age and cycle count similar to others they are used with. Otherwise you really can't benefit from the performance improvements the Pro makes over the XX. « Show Less
1020790
The 230's shipping weight is 7lbs less than the 240 so I assume it's the flywheel making the difference.
1141999
The 200 is substantially larger than the 100. If you are a female the 100 is much easier to maneuver. I like both of them, but the 100 does carry a larger amount of excrement and is harder to pull around. I like the capacity of the 200 but the ease of the 100. Hopes this helps.