Will a 24-70 2.8 fit in the bag, or is that lens too wide? I use both throughout the day and want one pouch so I can change out the lenses.
853151
24-70/2.8 fits in the bug perfectly (even with the hood attached - the bug can be extended for this purpose). Even the "Big Mama" - 50-500 fits in this bug (w/o hood)
853152
I just upgraded from the 24-70 f/2.8 L to the 24-70 F/2.8L II. I'm not sure which version you are asking about, but the new version of the lens fits just fine with the lens hood on. The new version of the lens has a filter size of 82 mm and the original version has a Filter size of 77 mm, so if the new one fits, the old one should fit as well. I know the lens hood on the original is larger, but primarily it is longer, and there is some width to spare given the change in diameter.
853153
Yes. I have the Nikkor AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8G ED sitting in one of those bags right now.
1386165
I have a 75-300mm lens and it just fit. I'm a bicyle rider so this bag works great for me... as long as you only want one lens.. No room for more. I love it!
225429
I don't the dimensions of those particular lenses. Given their focal lengths, it seems they would be long. With one of the longer lenses attached to the camera, I don't think you would have a problem. I was surprised by how much I can fit in this bag. I really like it.
1778353
Not exactly sure but I easily fit 5diii, 50 1.2, and 85 1.2. I still have room for one more lens. I keep the 50 1.2 on the camera and that goes in sideways into the main compartment I have created with the dividers. I put it in that way for easy access and keep the lens cap off. The 85 1.2 is in a compartment beside that which also has a small divider that comes with it so that you can stack lenses one on top of the other. Beside that is another divider where I can put the 25-105mm if I want. I can easily fit 3 to 4 lenses in this bag. I am not sure about a 70-200 it would be tight with that. Not exactly sure but I easily fit 5diii, 50 1.2, and 85 1.2. I still have room for one more lens. I keep the 50 1.2 on the camera and that goes in sideways into the main compartment I have created with the dividers. I put it in that way for easy access and keep the lens cap off. The 85 1.2 is in a compartment beside that which also has a small divider that comes with it so that you can stack lenses one on top of the other. Beside that is another divider where I can put the 25-105mm if I want. I can easily fit 3 to 4 lenses in this bag. I am not sure about a 70-200 it would be tight with that.
2101639
Tried it and there's no room for a second lens. This is more for when you're using a single big walk-around lens like a Tamron 18-270mm and want something not so huge to carry it and a few batteries/SD cards around in.
1010903
I have the base t3, which AFIAK is has an almost identically sized body. The standard cheapo Canon regular lens fit within the case with room to spare. When I upgraded to a Sigma 17-70mm which is about a half inch longer, it still fit within the case perfectly fine. Just a bit more snug which honestly I prefer so it doesn't jolt about. It's a solid holster to get started with; I've taken mine hiking and it's held together very well.
1116971
I have a 7D (and formerly a 50D) with a 70-200 f/2.8L II IS mounted to it in the center of the pack and there's still room for a 24-105 at the bottom. When the pack is laying flat the body/lens is sitting base down, and the extra lens is sitting on its lens cap. Maybe that's what the other reviewer meant? I just have to rotate the tripod ring 180 degrees so the foot is on the top of the lens when stored in the bag. You MIGHT squeeze a 60D with grip in there like that. I leave Manfrotto Rapid Connect plates on each of my bodies (and the tripod ring of the 70-200), which adds a little extra height to them. I tried my 5DII with grip in one of the side pockets and it is slightly too tall, even without the Manfrotto plate attached, so I leave the grip in a box in the trunk of my car until I need to attach it to the body for a shoot. I don't have a grip for the 50D which I recently upgraded with the 7D, and haven't tried the grip for the 7D to see if it will fit in the bag. I also carry a 430EXII, a 28-135 (Don't ask me why, it rarely gets used), a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 (great lens on the crop bodies), a 50 f/1.4, an extra bodycap/rear lens cap set and a "rocket" type blower in the main compartment. There's plenty of room in the other pockets for batteries, CF cards, spare lens caps, cleaning supplies, etc. I've had mine almost two years and it is still in great shape. I've been VERY pleased with it.
884977
Yes. I've got a 5D2 with a 24-105 in the bag, along with 2 more lenses and various odds and ends.
797229
I only been able to fit a 1DX with a 70-200 towards the right of the bag, then fit 24-70 & 15mm fisheye towards the upper left side (2 dividers). U may have to put the flash in the top pocket. plenty of space there.
1094038
Hi - I actually have the bag that matches the above picture exactly. I ended up getting one as a gift, so I had two. I really like it because the camera fits inside and it has enough room for an additional lens.
884974
It will fit but very tight. I used to carry 24-105 and Sigma 70-200 F2.8. But now a day I carry Sigma 18-35 F1.8, Canon 24-105, and Canon 60D.
53646
Will fit, I have a 5D mark ii with battery Grip and a 18-135 and fits with space for another lens in vertical. I see no problem with the 70-200mm but If you give me the night I will measure The backpack tonight. Just forget about the side door with the grip..... Just noticed you didn't ask for the grip too XD. Let me measure the inside pocket size
1501896
I have a 24-105 in the main compartment and I could probably fit a small prime lense in with it as well. You could put the other lens in the main pocket but it wouldn't be very secure. My main use for this bag is when I want one bigger lense and maybe a small prime lens when I go hiking/mountain climbing. If you are looking for something with more storage, I would go with a different bag that gives up a little bit of of the hiking space storage for more lens compartments.
43426
The bag has a compartment for an extra lens and extra space for accessories ... In my case I have an extra 55-200 lens other than my 18-55.
1998362
It fits my gripped Mark and 24-70 with the lens loaded. The pack would carry both but would only house the set up ready for shooting if you remove the top extra velcroed storage compartment. It's a great pack with plenty of room if you play with the space. I carry 2 lenses, my flash, a light box, charger, duster, grip, spare batteries, etc etc.
100735
No! It would fit the 6D 24-70 attached with maybe a cell phone and keys, and that would be tight! 70-200 attached is way to big for this bag!
1490100
Yes. I also have a Nikon DSLR that normally has the 18-55 lens attached and a 55-200 in one compartment. I also have two chargers with extra batteries, a Magellan geochache device, as well as all the charging cords. Plenty of room for all of it! I get lots of compliments on the bag, and my husband isn't embarrassed to be seen with it on his shoulder! I could not be happier with the wear, as it has been on several beach vacations, reunions, and is the permanent storage for my beloved camera! One of my best purchases ever from Amazon.