what size would you recommend for eyepiece outside diameter is 1.69 in/43mm and Objective diameter is 1.57 in/40mm? Thank you
826427
If you look at the size chart and you see that your objective and ocular is close to a size. Some people will go to the size smaller or size larger. If you go smaller you can heat the rubber up in water and slide it on for a tight fit. If you go a size larger then you put a strip or two tape around it for a good fit as well for your ocular with a 1.69 you would either go size 18 or 19 size 18 is 1.67 and 19 is 1.70. Hope this helps. Here is two size charts for butler creek http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/07/21/butler-creek-scope-cover-chart-convenience/ And another awesome chart. http://www.brownells.com/aspx/learn/learndetail.aspx?lid=15840
826428
If you're looking at Butler Creek Flip Up Scope Covers, for your eye piece they have one that is 42.5 mmm (size 17) and one that is 43.2 mm (size 18). As for the objective, they have a 39.6 mm (size 15) and 40.9 mm (size 17). For me, I prefer scope covers that are a bit smaller so they fit snug on the scope. I don't want them falling off while using my rifle. Hope this helps.
826429
I'd recommend getting the **Vortex** lens covers size 5 and size 4, respectively.Vortex Flip Cap cover Size 5: Fits 40x46mm (1.6"-1.8")Vortex Optics Flip Cap Optic Cover, Size 4The Butler Creek covers are junk which breaks, and the Vortex cup is rubber, not plastic. Much better product.
826430
I had mixed luck with my order, the objective piece fits well but the eye piece was just a tad loose. I would go with smaller size.
826431
If you look at the size chart and you see that your objective and ocular is close to a size. Some people will go to the size smaller or size larger. If you go smaller you can heat the rubber up in water and slide it on for a tight fit. If you go a size larger then you put a strip or two tape around it for a good fit as well for your ocular with a 1.69 you would either go size 18 or 19 size 18 is 1.67 and 19 is 1.70. Hope this helps. Here is two size charts for butler creek http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/07/21/butler-creek-scope-cover-chart-convenience/ And another awesome chart. http://www.brownells.com/aspx/learn/learndetail.aspx?lid=15840 If you look at the size chart and you see that your objective and ocular is close to a size. Some people will go to the size smaller or size larger. If you go smaller you can heat the rubber up in water and slide it on for a tight fit. If you go a size larger then you put a strip or two tape around it for a good fit as well for your ocular with a 1.69 you would either go size 18 or 19 size 18 is 1.67 and 19 is 1.70. Hope this helps. Here is two size charts for butler creek http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/07/21/butler-creek-scope-cover-chart-convenience/ And another awesome... » Read More If you look at the size chart and you see that your objective and ocular is close to a size. Some people will go to the size smaller or size larger. If you go smaller you can heat the rubber up in water and slide it on for a tight fit. If you go a size larger then you put a strip or two tape around it for a good fit as well for your ocular with a 1.69 you would either go size 18 or 19 size 18 is 1.67 and 19 is 1.70. Hope this helps. Here is two size charts for butler creek http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013/07/21/butler-creek-scope-cover-chart-convenience/ And another awesome chart. http://www.brownells.com/aspx/learn/learndetail.aspx?lid=15840 « Show Less
2254250
I would consider these more along the line of medium. I currently have a Nikon Prostaff in 4-12 x 40 on a 700 in 7mm Rem Mag, and could probably install a 50 with no problem. Ocular height is very comforable and there is no need to crowd the eyepiece because the scope sits too far up or down. My stock is traditional walnut with a regular butt, not a Monte Carlo style stock.
1565297
Some good eyepieces, not with too small focal length (no less than 10mm) and a Barlow lens. The ultima duo eyepieces are quite good.
2116944
Don't know but I would strongly recommend the Celestron 10X42 Outland binoculars instead of the 8X42. The extra magnification with the wide 42° field of view is worth.
397447
1.25 inch outside diameter will work with any brand of telescope with a 1.25 inch eyetube opening.
1077160
The last number is the size of the objective lense in millimeters. Bigger objectives gather more light, but can result in a large scope. 50mm is about 2 inches.
2278938
The equipment has three fittings, 45mm, 42mm and 40mm. The smaller dimensions are created by rubber rings that fit inside the main adapter, so, depends on the scope eyepiece measurement
2269847
At first blush, it appears your Celestron has an eye piece of .98 inches in diameter. The Barlow you are looking at is designed to fit an eye piece of 1.25 inches. If you can find an adapter possible. But may not be the purchase for you.
720577
This replaces your 1.25" eyepiece. It can still be used with a Barlow lens or focal reducer.
1484117
I'm sorry I don't understand your question. They are too large and I had to cut to size. Difficult to measure now.I use the bottom 1/3 of lense in my sunglasses.
933877
Dont know eyepiece diameter. I found the entire unit too flimsy to use...cannot keep it steady and it is jerky changing position... buy a better one!
1243564
Any 1.25 inch eyepiece should be compatible. A search indicates that series is 1.25", so yes. Should work fine.
1722780
I don't know what size the exit pupil is. I do know that for the price you are getting some damn good glass. The quality of these binos are amazing. So don't let the size of the exit pupil keep you from buying these.
326740
This is the Bulter Creek Size Chart for the flip-up covers.. http://www.blackbearsportinggoods.com/v/vspfiles/files/reference/butler_creek_scope_ref.pdfFind your brand & model. This chart gives you the exact size(s) for the eyepiece & objective.. If your scope is not on the chart I would recommend using the manufacturer's website to cross reference their measurements for the scope with your own. Chances are if you're measuring 1.98", 1.96 will be your size. You would want the more snug fit to keep rain & other elements out. Too big & it will slip & rotate off the objective. Sorry for the long answer.. Good luck! This is the Bulter Creek Size Chart for the flip-up covers.. http://www.blackbearsportinggoods.com/v/vspfiles/files/reference/butler_creek_scope_ref.pdfFind your brand & model. This chart gives you the exact size(s) for the eyepiece & objective.. If your scope is not on the chart I would recommend using the manufacturer's website to cross reference their measurements for the scope with your own. Chances are if you're measuring 1.98", 1.96 will be your size. You would want the more snug fit to keep rain & other elements out. Too big & it will slip & rotate off the... » Read More This is the Bulter Creek Size Chart for the flip-up covers.. http://www.blackbearsportinggoods.com/v/vspfiles/files/reference/butler_creek_scope_ref.pdfFind your brand & model. This chart gives you the exact size(s) for the eyepiece & objective.. If your scope is not on the chart I would recommend using the manufacturer's website to cross reference their measurements for the scope with your own. Chances are if you're measuring 1.98", 1.96 will be your size. You would want the more snug fit to keep rain & other elements out. Too big & it will slip & rotate off the objective. Sorry for the long answer.. Good luck! « Show Less
692445
Start with lower magnification eyepiece(20mm). During the day practice on focusing on large objects. It's also the way to align the red dot finder. I bought this scope for my grandson . He loves it
1570502
It can indeed be used--just about any 1.25-inch eyepiece will physically fit, but I presume you're asking about the optics. This will Barlow Shorty will work fine--just be warned that using a 2x barlow will decrease the brightness of the image significantly. For planetary viewing, that won't be an issue, and for photography, also not an issue as you can use longer exposure times. But for viewing nebula or deep sky objects, this wouldn't be an advantage.
605355
Guessing you meant 127EQ?? Not familiar with 127Q, but for a 1M focal length, would be about the same field of view as a 6mm eyepiece. About 150-175 x. Probably a pretty good match for the 127 EQ. Do you already have the scope? Do you have a 4mm eyepiece? Assuming it is 127 EQ, it will be a little more stable and crisp than the 4mm that comes with a 127EQ