DSLR with Image stabilization in camera body or the lens ?? which is better Hi all,I am a novice in the DSLR field and on the brink of buying my first DSLR. I see some brands(Sony, Pentax, Olympus) having Image Stabilization included in the body of the camera (I think so) and Cannon has ImageStabilization in the lenses. The lenses with IS cost more than the ones without IS.So is it better to buy camera body with IS and save some money with lenses as camera already has IS or invest more for lenses with IS??Thanks... DSLR with Image stabilization in camera body or the lens ?? which is better Hi all,I am a novice in the DSLR field and on the brink of buying my first DSLR. I see some brands(Sony,... » Read More DSLR with Image stabilization in camera body or the lens ?? which is better Hi all,I am a novice in the DSLR field and on the brink of buying my first DSLR. I see some brands(Sony, Pentax, Olympus) having Image Stabilization included in the body of the camera (I think so) and Cannon has ImageStabilization in the lenses. The lenses with IS cost more than the ones without IS.So is it better to buy camera body with IS and save some money with lenses as camera already has IS or invest more for lenses with IS??Thanks... « Show Less
133469
Just as NLee said -- in general, the in-camera stabilization is cheaper while optical lens stabilization is more effective. Canon and Nikon have released some relatively inexpensive optically stabilized consumer lenses, however, and various third-party lens manufacturers have also started adding OS to their more popular lenses as well as some longer telephotos. In-lens optical stabilization technology is starting to get cheaper and more common.
133470
NLee and Technology Guy,Thank you very much for the clear information... makes my choices much more clearer than before.Appreciate it
133471
NLee,Now I know what each exactly is, makes it better for me to be ok with the choice I make knowing exactly what is whatThanks
133472
I should also add that for a point-and-shoot camera, in-body image stabilization is relatively effective. This is because:1. The image sensor is very tiny at only 10% that of a full-frame sensor. This means less mass to move around, and hence less inertia.2. The physical focus length is much shorter at about 5-15mm. This means a smaller travel at the sensor is sufficient for IS.
206684
The image stabilization is through the lens. I shoot without a tripod however for best use of the lens or for shooting for longer periods of time, use a tripod or monopod.
528653
Does that lack of image stabilization in the 20 mm lens factor in against choosing it over the 14-45 lens? I think I'm all set to get the 20 mm lens after doing my research and reading these comments, but that was one area I was still questioning.
435056
The only image stabilization you need is a high shutter speed. This is a great all-around lens for a new photographer.
1817488
I use both Olympus and Panasonic lenses, and Panasonic lenses both with and without OIS, with my GX7 (and E-M5). If there's a difference in the way it handles stabilization with the different lenses, I haven't noticed it.
51544
Olympus lenses do not have image stabilization. All the stabilization takes place within the camera body.
1611414
I have had both versions of the lens and definitely preferred the one with IS. With that said, the difference in price is significant and the non-stabilized version produces superb images. If you are shooting outdoors with plenty of light it is perfect. If light is an issue when shooting I would definitely save up for the IS version.
2270254
Hello,The current Olympus bodies have 3 axis stabilization built into the body. Additionally this camera has a maximum IOS of 25600, although the maximum acceptable setting for most people is 6400 in regards to noise levels. Lastly you cannot use both stabilization systems simultaneously, one of them has to been turned off. We recommend faster lenses, lenses which have more light gathering ability, rather than lenses with stabilization. Besides, Running both systems simultaneously will most certainly compromise the ability to hold things steady, not to mention cause damage to one or both of the IS systems. Regards,RooozbehOC camera949-347-1276 Hello,The current Olympus bodies have 3 axis stabilization built into the body. Additionally this camera has a maximum IOS of 25600, although the maximum acceptable setting for most people is 6400 in regards to noise levels. Lastly you cannot use both stabilization systems simultaneously, one of them has to been turned off. We recommend faster lenses, lenses which have more light gathering ability, rather than lenses with stabilization. Besides, Running both systems simultaneously will most certainly compromise the ability to hold things steady, not to mention cause damage to one or... » Read More Hello,The current Olympus bodies have 3 axis stabilization built into the body. Additionally this camera has a maximum IOS of 25600, although the maximum acceptable setting for most people is 6400 in regards to noise levels. Lastly you cannot use both stabilization systems simultaneously, one of them has to been turned off. We recommend faster lenses, lenses which have more light gathering ability, rather than lenses with stabilization. Besides, Running both systems simultaneously will most certainly compromise the ability to hold things steady, not to mention cause damage to one or both of the IS systems. Regards,RooozbehOC camera949-347-1276 « Show Less
1974760
No stabilization. However, you would not really need it unless you are planning on shooting with very small apertures, in which case I'm not sure why one would buy this lens. This is an absolutely phenomenal lens BTW.
687000
I believe that the Image stabilization is in the lens for Panasonic cameras. It is the opposite for Olympus. If this is correct, this lens will not work for you.
191715
Hi Craig J., I don't know if it has image stabilization. I returned it the same week. The closure on the lens would not open properly, after only taking one picture. I did some research and found out it was a common problem with this particular nikon camera.
1293196
IS (Image Stabilization with this lens gives you two extra stops of light, enabling faster shutter speeds. I have one and I love it.bob
775711
sorry, did not see this until now. Hope you bought the lens - awesome. It has image stabilization 3 choices off and 2 on's. one for vertical and one for horizontal movement. Here are some butterflies I photo'd with it. www.patricialamphotography.com/flowers/flowers (yes twice on flowers) first 3 photos. very sharp. Wish my Canon 85 mm f1.4 and 24-70 f2.8 had image stabilization. Sorry for the delay
1416425
Usually Sony says to use their over the lens, but you can turn off stabilization through the menus. By Default it stays on. I actually like the Sony stabilization better then my signma lens' but that's personal preference.
297888
Thanks! A lot of specific info.Yeah, I knew the NEX series can't handle the Maxxum lenses.I probably wouldn't be buying any more lenses cause that's why I want the Sony BODY, cause I already HAVE several Maxxum lenses. PLus I really like how they have the IS in the body, not the lens.I don't often shoot sports so that's not a problem to me.I did NOT know that Tamron was associated with Minolta/Sony. To be honest, the original reason I went with Maxxum was that I had trouble seeing well enough to manually focus (took me forever). So I'd probably let the camera do that, and just change the speed/opening.My daughter has a Canon 30D but BOY is that a heavy body!Well, thanks again. I'll prob be buying the A33 body next month. Thanks! A lot of specific info.Yeah, I knew the NEX series can't handle the Maxxum lenses.I probably wouldn't be buying any more lenses cause that's why I want the Sony BODY, cause I already HAVE several Maxxum lenses. PLus I really like how they have the IS in the body, not the lens.I don't often shoot sports so that's not a problem to me.I did NOT know that Tamron was associated with Minolta/Sony. To be honest, the original reason I went with Maxxum was that I had trouble seeing well enough to manually focus (took me forever). So I'd... » Read More Thanks! A lot of specific info.Yeah, I knew the NEX series can't handle the Maxxum lenses.I probably wouldn't be buying any more lenses cause that's why I want the Sony BODY, cause I already HAVE several Maxxum lenses. PLus I really like how they have the IS in the body, not the lens.I don't often shoot sports so that's not a problem to me.I did NOT know that Tamron was associated with Minolta/Sony. To be honest, the original reason I went with Maxxum was that I had trouble seeing well enough to manually focus (took me forever). So I'd probably let the camera do that, and just change the speed/opening.My daughter has a Canon 30D but BOY is that a heavy body!Well, thanks again. I'll prob be buying the A33 body next month. « Show Less
1577268
This was my second DSLR and before this I had Nikon. Picture quality is better then Nikon and it has Image stabilization (IS)although most of lenses now a days have vibration reduction (VR) but it is not same ( IS is better then VR). And also it is water resistant so I believe it is ideal for your need.I love my camera.
42099
The Lumix 42.5 is an amazing lens with optical stabilization. Other lens listed not as good. Others may disagree, but I've used more high end lenses than most people, and this one is a gem.