Main difference between this and the Rokina T2.2 other than the .2 f-stop.
838241
The t2.2 version is a cine lens, ment for shooting film. It has a de-clicked aperture ring to adjust lighting in a smooth fashion versus having preset aperture points such as 2.0, 5.6, 11... I love the f/2.0. I shoot primarily landscape shots with it, and its great for night because of the low f-stop. Hope that helps!
624550
I have the 2.8L lens, and I love it, but I wish it had IS. In my opinion, the only real advantage of the 2.8 is its greater light gathering power, to shoot inside or in deep shadows. The f4 with the IS can do most everything you want, especially if you have a camera with a high ISO. I don't know of any differences in the glass.
2043803
The main difference appears to be the aperture. The f/2.8 will work better in lower light giving you at least an extra stop of light to play with. This means shorter exposures in lower light than the f/4-5.6.
1097918
This looks similar to the TD-T4i, but it has different part number. The only difference i can tell between the written specs is that the T4i has push button illumination. I just ordered this one and do not have it on hand yet to see if this one has push button as well, but that could be the only difference.
462703
You get more bang for the buck with the XTi, however, that wasn't the reason I went with the 40d (originally purchased a 20d a few years ago). The size of a Rebel is a bit too small for my hands and it felt really uncomfortable when I held it. Also, after using a 20d/40d, I couldn't give up the two wheel selectors for speed of adjustments without going through menus. But as with any item like this, it all goes back to what you are comfortable with and what works for you.
574212
I do not own either but going by Son's info the G2 has a faster and quieter focusing motor. Check out dpreview.com for more info
6219
I honestly couldn't answer this as I did not compare the two. There were 2 similar models that I was torn between so I ended up downloading both manuals at Yamaha to compare them.
2151080
One is 3x-9x power/zoom, the other is 4x-12x power/zoom. There is no advantage as they are both vx-2, however, one of them zooms further than the other.
1163968
The 2-700 is much nicer and more functional. it also has the high back support and handle for easy moving!
1473638
The Fuze feature set is the same, it seems to be the continuation of the e200 line, the big difference is that the Fuze does pretty much everything better. The wheel is much better designed, the interface is smoother in terms of navigation, the firmware is less buggy, it uses a better video format I believe, better battery life and it has much much better sound quality (compared to the v1 e280, not sure about the v2). The only advantages of the e280 would be the easily replaceable battery and ability to load Rockbox (though this is only for the v1, not the v2).
753845
That's pretty much the only notable difference and from what I've read the Eliminator 2 is more popular. I love the 3 but could do without the windage.
956543
Main difference is the glass quality/coating. The VX-2 has crystal clear glass and the light gathering capability of the VX-2 is superior; for a 40mm glass, I was pleasantly surprised at how much light this scope draws in. Also, I believe the windage/elevation knobs are different; the VX-2 has 1/4 click MOA adjustments...can't remember what the VX-1 has, but they are different. Hope that answered your question, but Google would probably give you more info than this old school shooter ;).
1615442
The RC 2.2 is a HD stabilizer. The main rod is 1/3 bigger than the n2.o.. so for bigger tires and or a vehicle like my jeep ZJ that can develope a death wobble I chose the HD version with the 2.2
874720
There's no comparison. The 16mm with converter is as good a substitute as you will find, but cannot hold a candle to the Rokinon. The latter is better corrected across the frame, better designed (Samyang patent), and very, very sharp. But the 16mm gives you the equivalent of a 24mm on a 35mm format - which may be a more useful combination for some shooters. I have a 16-50 PZ that covers 16mm acceptably.
1343391
The best way to find all the differences is to go to Yamaha's site and download the user manual. It is for both models and you will see the features that one has versus the other.
1487924
You'll get a better f stop down to 2.8 which is essentially when taking pictures
1077310
The difference between this lens and the previous version:============================================The main update to this lens is in the Nikon mount, the AT-X 116 PRO DX-II has an internal silent focusing motor to allow the lens to AF on Nikon bodies that do not have an AF drive gear and motor. There have also been some adjustments made to the coating for slightly improved optical performance. Other than the optical coating change there are no changes to the Canon mount. The AT-X 116 PRO DX-II for Canon uses the same AF motor and AF drive system as the the previous model. The difference between this lens and the previous version:============================================The main update to this lens is in the Nikon mount, the AT-X 116 PRO DX-II has an internal silent focusing motor to allow the lens to AF on Nikon bodies that do not have an AF drive gear and motor. There have also been some adjustments made to the coating for slightly improved optical performance. Other than the optical coating change there are no changes to the Canon mount. The AT-X 116 PRO DX-II for Canon uses the same AF motor and AF drive system... » Read More The difference between this lens and the previous version:============================================The main update to this lens is in the Nikon mount, the AT-X 116 PRO DX-II has an internal silent focusing motor to allow the lens to AF on Nikon bodies that do not have an AF drive gear and motor. There have also been some adjustments made to the coating for slightly improved optical performance. Other than the optical coating change there are no changes to the Canon mount. The AT-X 116 PRO DX-II for Canon uses the same AF motor and AF drive system as the the previous model. « Show Less