I have the Sony 35mm/1.8f OOS lens now. How does this compare? Is this wider angle?
1011660
Yes, it's wider angle since it's a 24mm vs. a 35mm lens giving you a wider field of view. Compared to your 35mm f1.8 OSS, it doesn't have OSS.
1011661
Hi thomyi, you may try checking on the link below for the direct comparison between the two lenses. -Elyhttp://store.sony.com/gsi/webstore/WFS/SNYNA-SNYUS-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProductCompareService-Show?CategoryID=on0KmUBxnZQAAAFEYhlScEcW
1011662
This lens is of course wider angle. The main advantage resides inside the Zeiss lens. In fact, with the 24f1.8 you can take really great shots with an uncomparable sharpness. I moved from the 35mmf1.8 to the zeiss one, i do not regret the choice but, in contrast, i am really happy of that.
19332
Thirding the question. Is there any new element and is the optical quality the same? How would a better lens be cheaper than the previous version?
1394322
I had the X100 and now own the XT1 and 56mm f1.2. While it's not exactly what you're looking for I'll say that I am 100% happy w/ the 56mm and find the XT1 a huge upgrade from the X100. Not just in terms of image quality and bokeh but flexibility as well since you can change out the lenses.
39229
If your are deciding between a 35mm and this lens.. I would ask.. What do you plan to shoot? If you need a wide lens for landscapes I suggest the 18 - 50... If you are looking for a portrait or low fstop fixed lense for close ups I say go with the 1.8 35mm. If your asking Nikon versus sigma.. I would say you get what you pay for. As far as the sigma performance... I use the lense quite often. I shoot in low light bars and venues and the lens is covered in beer..The lens is great for low light shooting at 18mm. I usually switch to a 50mm if I need a closer shot.
1922080
I love my 35 but my 50mm 1.4 was what I started with and I still love it.:)
1065199
I don't like the 50mm 1.4. I do have the 35mm 1.4 and I love this one much better.
433202
I got the 40mm Micro lens over the 35mm and I am really happy with the purchase. It cost about $80 more but it does more. That being said, I have the 35mm on the wish list even though it will be horribly redundant. The 40mm Micro has so drawbacks but it does get you in close. I don't know how the 35mm could be sharper but lots of reviews comparing the two indicate it can be depending on subject matter. This is probably a topic people make themselves crazy with so I will probably buy some peace for $200 by getting the 35mm lens sooner than later.
1620736
It is a f 3.5-6.3 lens and as such, performs as well as it should within those peramiters. If your camera has great high ISO with low digital noise, you should be happy with this lens as it also has lense satbilization except with Sony's A mount version.
1566532
The lens is quite sharp at f2.8, I have no hesitation to use it wide open. If it will work for your purposes will depend more on your lighting conditions and the maximum ISO you feel comfortable using on your camera gear. If the light level is really low, you might be better off with the Olympus 75mm f1.8, but the cost of that lens is much higher. The other question that only you can answer: Is this focal length long enough, at 120mm equivalent for 35mm, long enough for your sports needs? The Sigma is a terrific value for this focal length, very happy with mine.
1936778
Mine is excellent. I'd never read anything where this particular lens is bad. Wide open you'll get purple fringe. But you'll get that on most 85mm lenses. Stopped down at a lower f stop is clean. You can always get rid of the fringe in Photoshop if you prefer to shoot wide open. But you may not need to, seeing that the lens is a low light shooting lens. Beautiful lens and a steal compared to the Sony Zeiss version.
79947
First, I have the NEX-7; an older generation of the A6000, but very similar being a 24mp camera. I love this Lens. I believe it's the best of the lenses for any of Sony's APS-C Cameras. If you're willing to ante up for a priceyLens, you will not be disappointed. The Optics are Professional grade with a nice wide f/1.8 aperture delivering really nice Bokeh. Excellent corner to corner sharpness. Being Zeiss, the build quality is superb. Nice quiet operation for both photos and video. I have to believe you'll be as happy with this Lens on your A6000 as I am on my NEX-7. If money is not a consideration, Go For It !!!! First, I have the NEX-7; an older generation of the A6000, but very similar being a 24mp camera. I love this Lens. I believe it's the best of the lenses for any of Sony's APS-C Cameras. If you're willing to ante up for a priceyLens, you will not be disappointed. The Optics are Professional grade with a nice wide f/1.8 aperture delivering really nice Bokeh. Excellent corner to corner sharpness. Being Zeiss, the build quality is superb. Nice quiet operation for both photos and video. I have to believe you'll be as happy with this Lens on your A6000 as I am on my NEX-7. If money is not a... » Read More First, I have the NEX-7; an older generation of the A6000, but very similar being a 24mp camera. I love this Lens. I believe it's the best of the lenses for any of Sony's APS-C Cameras. If you're willing to ante up for a priceyLens, you will not be disappointed. The Optics are Professional grade with a nice wide f/1.8 aperture delivering really nice Bokeh. Excellent corner to corner sharpness. Being Zeiss, the build quality is superb. Nice quiet operation for both photos and video. I have to believe you'll be as happy with this Lens on your A6000 as I am on my NEX-7. If money is not a consideration, Go For It !!!! « Show Less
998314
I have an a6000 with the same kit lens. The SELP1650 max apperture @ 16mm F3.5 is sharper than the SEL16F28 @ F3.5. I think the kit lens OSS is helping give sharper results while the the SEL16F28 is just horrible at F2.8 to F5.0. I'm dissappointed with this lens. Stick with the kit lens otherwise maybe the Sony 20mm F2.8 is better.
749846
It also depends on the camera the 85mm will allow a closer shot. But the 35mm will be wider angle.
879554
It is a more versatile wide lens. It isn't super wide, just really wide. There is no fish-eye effect. It is far too wide for most portraits. However, it isn't quite sharp enough for landscape in my opinion. It is nothing more than an affordable lens that gives you a somewhat quality product for the price.
2136546
Mine was the same way, thought I'd gotten the wrong lens. I contacted Olympus and they said it shouldn't be like that and to exchange it if I wanted. I didn't want to mess with it and it has become easier to put on and take off without making the mounting too loose for my other lens. It worked itself out.
591604
I have that exact combo and absolutely love it. Unfortunately, I can't compare it to the Olympus 17mm, but I can tell you it is a fantastic lens!
843976
You are absolutely right on that Scott. The 35 1.8 is also a Chinese made lens. Same here ... that 35 1.8 was the first lens on my D90 (which is made in Thailand) and is still my go-to prime lens. I feel like this 85 mm is definitely more a portrait lens given the effective focal length on the D90. It performs superbly tho. I think the only two Japanese lenses i own are Toknia's. I don't understand why its important where a lens is made tho? Is it about the QC??