Is there more than 1 version of this lens? I am looking to purchase one from CL, and no mention is made of "ATX-Pro", so Is this an older version?
1006479
There was an earlier version of the lens. It was called AT-X M100 AF. The older lens does not focus 1:1 but rather 1:2. It does not focus as close as the Pro D and does not have the multi-coating the new lens has for digital sensors. I don't know who "CL" is that you might purchase from. I would assume that any copy of the old lens would be a used copy. Look at http://www.nikonians.org/reviews?alias=tokina-atx-m100pro-d-100mm-macro-lens-review for more info. I am very happy with my Pro D and use it for portraits too.
1006480
Tokina's website (tokinalens.com/tokina/products/atxpro/) calls this lens "AT-X M100 AF Pro D". That's the only name I've seen applied it. I've used this lens for about two years and I'm very happy I bought it. It's equal to, or better than the Nikon version and is only half the price. You can't go wrong.
692355
Great lens man, its very stable and fluid; I find it to be incredibly helpful for wides as well as shots in tighter. No buyers regret at all. Get this lens!! It is far more versatile with a full frame for sure. And good luck on your project! Would love to hear about it! Connect with me through facebook at facebook.com/ryan.monolopolus . Take care!!
833868
I may very well be in this very situation. I have ordered this lens used from a private seller thru Amazon.com. It was sold under the heading of being an OS system lens. However I have reason to believe it is not. I believe that 'Pastor Aguiar' has purchased the older model of this lens which is sold thru Amazon.com with no AF listed in the posted add. However it does have AF. I am guessing that the lens only has a limiting switch on the side and no OS or AF switches. Judging from the date or your posted question, I bet that I am a little late with this answer.
91766
There are two different versions. I assume by "the $200 one" you mean the LA-EA1 or LA-EA3. These lens have extremelyt limited and slow autofocus, they do, however, support the rest of the lens electronics, so they are better then a dumb adapter. They are not something you want if you plan on using autofocus, however.The LA-EA2 and LA-EA4 both support full speed (DSLR speed) autofocus with almost every single A-mount lens. They even have a drive motor for the older lenses that do not have one built in.The difference between the LA-EA1/2 and LA-EA3/4 is that the 3/4 are built with full frame sensors in mind (like the upcoming A7 and A7R). If you have an NEX-7, you can use the E1 or E2 without worry. There are two different versions. I assume by "the $200 one" you mean the LA-EA1 or LA-EA3. These lens have extremelyt limited and slow autofocus, they do, however, support the rest of the lens electronics, so they are better then a dumb adapter. They are not something you want if you plan on using autofocus, however.The LA-EA2 and LA-EA4 both support full speed (DSLR speed) autofocus with almost every single A-mount lens. They even have a drive motor for the older lenses that do not have one built in.The difference between the LA-EA1/2 and LA-EA3/4 is that... » Read More There are two different versions. I assume by "the $200 one" you mean the LA-EA1 or LA-EA3. These lens have extremelyt limited and slow autofocus, they do, however, support the rest of the lens electronics, so they are better then a dumb adapter. They are not something you want if you plan on using autofocus, however.The LA-EA2 and LA-EA4 both support full speed (DSLR speed) autofocus with almost every single A-mount lens. They even have a drive motor for the older lenses that do not have one built in.The difference between the LA-EA1/2 and LA-EA3/4 is that the 3/4 are built with full frame sensors in mind (like the upcoming A7 and A7R). If you have an NEX-7, you can use the E1 or E2 without worry. « Show Less
1285630
This is a question that should be answered by the manufacturer, unfortunately, they are hard to find. I have known several people to try other lens. Most tell me that it was not worth the try. One even damaged the main board in the effort. All said that there were some aberrations.
2117503
It looks like they used the wrong image when they did the ad. They seem to have 2 or 3 ads for that lens. I do love mine it OS a great walk around lens.
1558942
Sachin is correct. There is only one version of this lens, and that version already had VRII. I got this lens in 2008 (my review is from August 19, 2008), so it has been out quite a while. There is no other version of the 16-85mm, just this one that goes from 3.5 to 5.6.
575221
I agree and have noticed that as well. I bought the older version and have been pleased with it. I have also not read complaints about the newer version. It may be as simple as supply and demand or something we are not aware of. You might check review sites just to make sure the version 2 is well rated and then go for it if it's cheaper. The 20MM has been a great lens, I have received compliments about my photo's and 9 times out of 10, it's taken with the 20mm.
2097650
I personally got the version that came with the 12-50, and it's a great little lens. Can take it out in the rain, does decent macro without having to buy a separate lens, and takes good video.
1329011
The newer version with the C is the contemporary line of lens, sigma also came out with a art line. Basically it's much better then all of sigma previous lenses and some of the art line can even beat Canon's L glass at a fraction of cost. Quality control is also better so less bad apples make it pass inspection. Just read the reviews, you can't go wrong with a lens from the contemporary or art line.
1300768
Hello Efrain, let me add that the only problem found with this lens is that it blocks the down left angle of the light when using the included flash, there's no problem with the pro flash, is a very good lens for general use, and with f4 in all the range you can use it with normal artificial lighting, have a good enough booke too.
1840072
Yes. Well not me...yet. A guy at my work has this lens for his A7ii. I'll be purchasing it very soon for my A7.
1451391
Matthew, Sigma has released information of a replacement lens which will hit the market towards the end of March. the lens is priced at $499 and boasts significant upgrades to almost every aspect of the lens. With that being said the price of this version of the lens has been slashed (lucky people like me found it for $289). I would consider your need for this type of lens. Most of the bad reviews come from earlier models of this particular version (matted black Vs smooth black). The defective lens's rightfully so get poor reviews, however the functioning models get high praise. I have tested the sharpness and autofocus and my unit is perfectly fine. I decided that $500 was too much for a new lens and $289 was a bargain for its older brother. If you look around you may still find that clearance price. I hope this helped!
160523
I wasn't aware Sigma made this same lens in a "macro" version? Becarefull believing the discriptions as some "used" products are misrepresented. Any how, macro will allow for a shorter minimum focus distance. Good luck
1611417
I've owned this lens for a couple of years now... And honestly I would've liked to save up for the IS.. No mistake it is an excellent lens for no motion images.. Things get blurry when capturing movement in low light.Thinking on selling it as soon as I save up for the IS version
1463261
Did you ever get a lens? I'm making the same decision now. If so, what did you buy? Are you happy with your decision? Is there anything else you would add that would help me make a decision. Thanks!
2058094
Hi There! Sorry, but I haven't used this lens indoors and I am new to photography. I bought this lens for my trip to Africa and for my daughter's outdoor sports. I live in the Pacific NW where it rains often so that's the main reason I bought this lens is because of the weather proofing. So far I have been extremely happy with it's performance. I shoot with with the K5 IIS. Sorry I can't really comment on the numbers or stats of my pictures. All I know is the pictures I've taken have been pretty amazing. Cheers!