Carbon Fiber. Real thing vs. Vinyl or Di-Noc
991931
a real carbon fiber part is lighter than the actual part it can replace, much lighter AND more rigid. it also has a cool factor. whereas the vinyl just has the cool factor.
20153
Well the exact difference is one is carbon fiber and the other is aluminum. Aluminum tanks are much cheaper than carbon fiber so may be better for a player without the $ for carbon fiber. Aluminum is also heavier, so you see them more with woodsball players who run a remote. Generally they only fill to 3000psi so you get "less" air each fill. If you're starting out, on a budget, running a remote, etc. Aluminum may be a good choice. If you're going to be playing speedball competitively, its more $ for a lighter, longer lasting carbon fiber tank.
2035339
In my opinion, the micro suede fiber would probably be more durable wear-wise. Velvet on the other hand has a tendency to become matted and shiny over time.
840762
For pros combined weight of all photography gears is a factor. If you are planning to carry them in air it costs money too. Thats where carbon fiber wins over aluminum. If you don't care weight it does not matter.
2261919
Check the Vanguard web site. We do not currently offer a carbon fiber model of the Alta Pro.
1556081
Additional thought. Gentle, Yes ..... chemical comparability is the question. Film is plastic, laptop monitors are ????
952615
The Props are not carbon fiber, just grey in color. The props are balanced and work great. Seem to be OEM. have been flying them for a couple months with no issues
1993311
I have a similar concern as well. I just purchased this & don't have it yet. Even though the tech specs here doesn't say so, Newegg (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16889102345) says: Composite A/V 2 (shared rear and side) Component Video 2 In For composite, by "shared", I assume the component video inputs can be used as composite instead. This customer-submitted image seems to confirm that:
764107
If u get the carbon fiber model it is seriously lighter. But wait the dell startup apps brings the performance down.
1393824
From 3M's website it is approximately 210-220 micrometers or 0.00827 to 0.00866 inches thick.The link to their page is: http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en_EU/architectural-markets-EU/home/products/~/3M-DI-NOC-Architectural-Finish-CA-1170-Carbon-1-22-m-x-12-m-?N=5002510+4294966743&rt;=d
932103
I have this tool and the cutting edge of each die is pretty sharp. Works well on typical gasket material. Not sure about carbon fiber. I would say if you can cut the material with shop scissors this tool will cut it.
374552
ok so which one is better? this states that this is the real deal as opposed to generic counterparts?
857557
Looks the same as far as what's includedBut the pictures of the scosche don't reveal if it's more insulation vs. wiringI personally use the knukonceptz OFC kit and it's perfect and the materials are high quality and the audio cable is perfectly built based on what's provided through amazon as far as presentation I'd go with knu because the evidence of what your getting is right there
523013
Daniel :DFound this on a corvette forum hope this helps :PThis person spoke to a rep from 3m :D Scotchprint 1080 CF has the same durability as the Di Noc. Di Noc is indoor AND outdoor use. Both have the same warranty 1yr horizontal 3yr vertical, both products are too new to have a better warranty (ie limited testing time period).The 1080 CF looks more like CF than the Di Noc as it is not as perfectly symmetrical as the Di Noc design.1080 is the newest product line and easier to work with than the Di Noc for larger areas.
2152610
In my opinion, yes, it would be better---probably brighter, with better treble and more detail---if that's what you're looking for. Audio Technica cartridges are an excellent value---even the inexpensive models sound great. You might also want to check out reviews of the Audio Technica AT-3482 p-mount cartridge, which features a rare carbon fiber cantilever (said to dampen lingering resonance from pits & scratches.) A lot of people, including me, like that one, too. It's slightly cheaper and might be perfect for your purposes. Actually, I don't think you could go wrong with any of the Audio Technica models. Good Luck---I hope that helps! In my opinion, yes, it would be better---probably brighter, with better treble and more detail---if that's what you're looking for. Audio Technica cartridges are an excellent value---even the inexpensive models sound great. You might also want to check out reviews of the Audio Technica AT-3482 p-mount cartridge, which features a rare carbon fiber cantilever (said to dampen lingering resonance from pits & scratches.) A lot of people, including me, like that one, too. It's slightly cheaper and might be perfect for your purposes. Actually, I don't think you could go wrong with any of the Audio... » Read More In my opinion, yes, it would be better---probably brighter, with better treble and more detail---if that's what you're looking for. Audio Technica cartridges are an excellent value---even the inexpensive models sound great. You might also want to check out reviews of the Audio Technica AT-3482 p-mount cartridge, which features a rare carbon fiber cantilever (said to dampen lingering resonance from pits & scratches.) A lot of people, including me, like that one, too. It's slightly cheaper and might be perfect for your purposes. Actually, I don't think you could go wrong with any of the Audio Technica models. Good Luck---I hope that helps! « Show Less
511973
http://www.avsforum.com/t/830877/quad-shield-or-not Appears to be some differences in opinion as to the differences in the shielding. Here is a reference to a discussion -- should give you a little guidance amongst the confusion - -
2002022
Both the driver/hybrid are graphite. The irons are steel, which is better in my opinion, especially to learn off of.