what´s the different between this kit and the "Fotodiox Canon EOS Macro Extension Tube Set for Extreme Close-Ups" without autofocus and auto exposure
993013
The set without auto focus & auto exposure do not have the sensors to detect the light conditions etc. At this close range focusing is best done manually, however, the auto exposure detection is a very helpful tool. I'd recommend the one with autofocus & autoexposure
176770
You can always buy some automatic extension tubes. I use them all the time with my Olympus lenses. Neewer, Fotasy, and Fotodiox makes them.
166892
Thanks for the info on a potential new Canon with autofocus, DigitalHecht. I'll hold off as well to see what comes available. No rush, although I intend to purchase my first SLR in the next few months. The video autofocus is a must for me.
1627784
Rather than this, if I want to get closer than my macro ring allows I use some extension rings. They allow closer focus but add no extra glass to go through. I have a different brand I purchased for the same amount, so something like this Movo Photo AF Macro Extension Tube Set for Micro 4/3 Mount Mirrorless Camera System (Compatible with Olympus PEN, Panasonic Lumix, Blackmagic Cinema Camera) with 10mm, 16mm & 21mm Tubes
2200566
Personally, I chose the Tonika lens over the canon. I've taken it to Southeast Asia, done a wedding, and a few photoshoots and I have to say that I've been extremely impressed with the len's range as well as speed. It's definitely produced some amazing shots and I have zero regrets! I can say that it's done more for me in portrait photography vs landscape. If you're looking to get a wide angle for landscape than go with the canon simply for its extra mm.
1372689
This will work fine for macro photography with your D3100. This is a very simple set of tubes - not much can go wrong with them short of mishandling them. Be aware that you will have to manually focus your lens with this set. The low price for this tube set is good if money is a very important issue. If - after using it - you enjoy this and wish to upgrade to a set of auto-focusing set of tubes you can then justify the higher cost - from $60 to $200.
1025073
Because the tubes fit between the camera and lens, they disrupt the auto-focus capabilities of the lens. The camera should be on Manual and you must manually focus. It will say that no lens is attached, but you still should be able to capture images, but it takes some practice. If you do an internet search on the topic, there are instructions on how to accomplish this. I've found that these tubes are great for close-up macro photography, but only the center portion of the frame will be in focus. The outer edges of the image will be blurry. Returning the tubes would depend on how useful they would be to you, but I wouldn't send them back until you get the hang of using them first....then decide if they are something that you would use often.
1976216
Just mount the extension tube on camera body then fit your standard zoom lens, and you are good to shot. This is a cheaper alternative to try taking macro shots. After buying a real macro lens I stopped using these extension tubes.
1436404
I really don't know the answer to this. We only have the snaptricity. You could get a comparison by researching several different websites and get specifics about what comes in each kit. Sorry I couldn't help.
2050378
You will have better images if you use the Canon EF 100mm (without IS) Lens with a tripod. Infact, both lenses have the same colour quality at all. The only differences are "IS" and "PRICE". Thanks
800497
Use iA and as close as 1cm. Use a tripod or hold still. Do not block the light. This is the equivalent to a $1000 DSLR macro lens(not counting other lenses for mid and telephoto); not including the body which would be at least a D90 body, to get similar camera features. There are many pros and cons but MACRO is a FZ28 strength.
1940572
I only shoot RAW, and am very pleased with it and Lightroom 4. The automatic exposure and auto white balance are generally OK to start from, but I usually make adjustments. In extreme lighting I bring down highlights and increase the light in the shadows. There is a lot of detail captured - I can often get two stops of extra information in post processing, and seldom want more than that. I don't own a DSLR, so can't make a direct comparison, but I would expect it to be similar to APS-C DSLRs. I am an amateur, and would not want to make my recommendation the basis of your decision. The dpreview NEX-6 review includes a RAW Mode page, and they have some examples you can download and examine before deciding. I only shoot RAW, and am very pleased with it and Lightroom 4. The automatic exposure and auto white balance are generally OK to start from, but I usually make adjustments. In extreme lighting I bring down highlights and increase the light in the shadows. There is a lot of detail captured - I can often get two stops of extra information in post processing, and seldom want more than that. I don't own a DSLR, so can't make a direct comparison, but I would expect it to be similar to APS-C DSLRs. I am an amateur, and would not want to make my recommendation the basis of your decision. The... » Read More I only shoot RAW, and am very pleased with it and Lightroom 4. The automatic exposure and auto white balance are generally OK to start from, but I usually make adjustments. In extreme lighting I bring down highlights and increase the light in the shadows. There is a lot of detail captured - I can often get two stops of extra information in post processing, and seldom want more than that. I don't own a DSLR, so can't make a direct comparison, but I would expect it to be similar to APS-C DSLRs. I am an amateur, and would not want to make my recommendation the basis of your decision. The dpreview NEX-6 review includes a RAW Mode page, and they have some examples you can download and examine before deciding. « Show Less
201531
As far as I understand the extension tube acts in proportion to the lens it's used with. Using the tube with a longer lens essentially just decreases the focal point. The best macro results I've had were with the 18-55 mm lens, I tried my 55-250 but it basically just made that lens more like the 18-55 without an extension. Hope this helps answer your question. I'm clearly not an expert.
1526145
Short answer: Probably not. I have never used this product personally; but I regularly use a similar product in a smaller 32" size really like it. I also take lots of macro shots with and without extension tubes. It is difficult for me to imagine doing both at the same time. For macro shots you are working very close to your subject and trying to shoehorn such a large reflector or diffuser into such a small space seems very impractical. For macros in the field, I hold the camera with my right hand and a wireless strobe in my left hand. Perhaps a ten or twelve inch version of this product could be useful if you have enough hands or support brackets to hold it and still work the camera.
1967329
The EF 12 and EF 25 are mainly used for close up macro work. The EF 25 will get your lens closer to the object. Most people that do a lot of macro work have both. This gives you 12 25 and 37 if mounted together. It's your choice. I understand there are kits that contain two or more tubes, but I have no experience with them.
1021286
I used the extension tubes in my 60D with 60mm macro and even on the 70-200 L lens. They do increase the close up ability. But the AF is somewhat functionless, and I have to move my camera back and forth manually to get the best focus. Hope this will help you.
219289
Yes, you won't have any autofocus or powered f-stop, this is for manual lenses only.