Would these fit under work pants for my bike commute? I usually wear the Levi's Commuter pants, so they're a little bit tighter fitting than normal.
180533
It should. Also, my previous comment about the padding. The padding is thin but enough for 40-50 miler. Not recommend for a century ride (100 miler)
180534
I'm not familiar with the Levi Commuter pants, but these shorts are skin tight and I wear them comfortably under my thermal cycling tights.
180535
The bike shorts are skin tight so I think they would, but the padding in them would not make them comfortable to wear all day.
137344
I wear about a 38 waist & bought a size large. The fit is good except while biking. My thighs take up the entire pant leg and stretch it just slightly. They fit fine in the waist and for walking around, though I would only call them baggy relative to lycra bike shorts. Next time I will buy and XL. Hope this helps.
34148
They are low in grotch so length. On bike is going to be short I wear 38 an fit over clothes is correct I would so large or med read reviews more to get exact
1759477
No - they would be too large. I would suggest you visit a bike shop to locate an appropriate size.
146642
Dont know about sizing; but you might want to consider a full bike pants for cold weather instead of these. I find mine tend to ride down my thighs when I am riding
680561
I do believe they are too big. I use them on our bootcut levis. I wear size #2 and my husband is a 34-36, so I don't think they would fit in your slacks.
369801
It's not a natural fit, but I wear them over mine. I like to wear them when I drive :)A larger pair would fit better ,but you can make it work if you don't mint a tight fit
328103
I wear a 32" Levi's for reference. I got the large and they fit just as I want. However, they have a lot of elastic and adjustable velcro tabs on the side that can make them tighter so I think large could work for everything from 30" to 35". My point is that you can be a little off and they should be fine, but you should probably be looking at the xl.
1515242
Yes. They are slightly lighter than denim jeans, but warmer than traditional cargo/hiking pants. (If in doubt, take a pair of footless tights - but unless it gets into the sub-freezing temps, I don't think you'd need any under layer. )
1135685
They should not be to loose either. If your legs are thick then XXL but then waist might be to big. See my other note.
621093
Only if ur wearing stretchy pants, not jeans, because of the fit of the pants... They are fitted at waist.
128251
I bought these in XXL for a man who is 5' 10" ,240lb and 40 inch waist. The fit is a bit relaxed which he likes. I hope that helps you. He is new to biking and has not tried Pearl Izumi.
487208
I think they run a little small. My husband wears size 34 pants and wears the larger size.
20302
They do fit below the waist, not super low though. I think it's a nice comfortable fit.
82505
I am also have a 33" waist, fairly thin (cyclist) build. I ordered the 32 and it was way too tight around the hips. The fabric stretches, so you could wear them, but I did not feel that they would be appropriate to wear to the gym due to the extra bulge in front. I returned and ordered the 34. A little big, but a much better fit around the hips. The drawstring keeps them from slipping down at the waist.
464373
If it is cold I would buy XXL so you can layer. The trousers are designed for the US cruiser rider and there is fabric on the inside of the shins. Rain will get into your lower legs and run into your boots on a long ride. I suppose that is better than burnt plastic. In warm weather the gear is very hot but I only wear it on short rides.
623850
You will need loose fitting pants. The item is relatively bulky and not designed to be worn under pants.