difference between the 12lb edition? this seems cheaper!
1022101
I got this scale for that very reason haha. I'd rather need the scale to read that much weight than need it and not have one. You know? But this scale is awesome I use it for meal preps!
1022102
I love this scale. I have been dieting so it has been a great asset. Easy to read and store. Measures in different units. Love it.
1022103
I have not tried the 12lb capacity scale, but the 18lb capacity scale does not feel or act cheap. The bed may be larger (you may want to check the dimensions), but that would not be a drawback to me. I like the fact that I can see the numbers when there's a larger bowl on the scale. As far as I can tell, the difference is that this model will measure heavier objects.
2190973
I don't know. I read the info on both and no differences were indicated. Made me wonder if it was different suppliers.
1218918
From what I've seen, there is no difference between 2 and 2lb size. Just seems to be an anomaly.
1243687
defiantly the l12. bigger is almost always better. sometimes a bird might be at first uncomfortable in a large cage if they had a very small one before, but they quickly enjoy the new space. the beauty with this one is, that you can make it a L02 by not setting up the second "height section". I personally own three of them and would not trade them for anything else. you will see what I mean with the "second height extension" when you unpack it .
586131
I bought the cheaper one and found no difference I guess it is the markup the person wants and see where it is shipping from some of the cheaper ones comes outside of the USA.
273448
Thank you all! After a lot of research, I couldn't figure it out either. Jerry Wiggins is right. At amazon.com the only difference seemed to be the weight. I appreciate all of your comments.
1266271
There is no difference. I decided to purchase from Amazon because it is cheaper.
1403863
The only thing I can suggest is to check the weight and dimensions of the two and see. If they're the same, I'd say it's just the sort of price difference I notice in some products in Amazon that I can't explain... and I buy the cheaper. If different, it's likely in thickness, layers or length/width.
956241
This is a cheaper model. It is smaller and not as soft as the other one. We bought this one first trying to save a buck and ended up buying the original as well.Once word of caution with these seats. You will need to adjust you seat down or your legs may fall asleep. Both the wife and I have to either lower the seat of put a pillow under our feet if we are on an extended ride.Hope this helps.
1227772
looks like they also differ in weight the 15.00 is 5 lbs. compared to the 25.00 one being only 1 pound
2254078
I don't think they're too different, aside from weight limits. Although it's been years since I bounced on one. Hope that helps.
24391
Not sure why. But I buy the 12 lb bag, which is a much better deal per pound. The 12 lb bag was $26 in Sept, then $30 in Dec, and now it's $32. So it went up too, though not as much as the 7 lb bag. I'd recommend switching to the 12 lb bag. For $2 more you get almost twice as much! You can always put half the bag in a container to keep it fresh, so it doesn't go stale. I have a 17 lb terrier mix, and I just use the whole bag with him, closing it tight each time. Works fine.
419670
no clue the one I bought last year was different mine is bigger but when I googled the two your asking about doesn't seem to be a difference besides price! sry couldn't be of more help! :)
513918
There's a lot of discussion about the advantages of the old version in the Amazon user reviews of both versions. I bought the (more expensive) old version and am happy with it, but never tried the newer one for comparison.
737850
The product is the same. The value is much better for the six pound package, thus the higher rating!
849958
On my tub it says 12 lbs....maybe they are selling it in a smaller container now??
701084
Not for the extra money required to get it. You can go to a store and compare the difference; it wasn't big enough to impress me...:)