Hi, it doesn't show the aperture size on the third "style" option: (With 18-140mm Lens). Should I buy 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 ED" or "With 18-140mm Lens"?
1013576
I have found the 18-140 mm lens to be so versatile that I do not need multiple lens to cover this range. No fumbling for lens changes. No additional heavy pieces to carry around.
1463261
Did you ever get a lens? I'm making the same decision now. If so, what did you buy? Are you happy with your decision? Is there anything else you would add that would help me make a decision. Thanks!
2004641
hi. Do you plan to shoot more weddings or landscapes...? i think it could be the answer of your question. I think about buying this lens too. i am a wedding photographer, and wedding conditions are always dark light situations. So i need the 2.8 aperture. If you are more a nature photographer, so the 2.8 is not so needed. During wedding the IS can't help too much, because the people that you take are dancing, the low speed will be impossible to use, even with IS on.I hope it will hlep you.
1949562
Because both of these zoom lenses have a 67mm filter attachment, they should also accept the same outer lens hood. Also, I have heard from others that this does fit the 18-140mm lens.
608750
i don't understand your question. i'm guessing that you want to know which one is the best choice. the best one will depend on what you do. i got the 17-70 because i notice that most of my photos will be shoot at between 18 and 80mm. i didn't want to switch between the kit lenses all the time.. also i wanted a bigger lens diameter for holding filters. i notice that that 17-50 is 77mm when my 17-70 is only 72mm.
2122556
hi. Do you plan to shoot more weddings or landscapes...? i think it could be the answer of your question. I think about buying this lens too. i am a wedding photographer, and wedding conditions are always dark light situations. So i need the 2.8 aperture. If you are more a nature photographer, so the 2.8 is not so needed. During wedding the IS can't help too much, because the people that you take are dancing, the low speed will be impossible to use, even with IS on. I hope it will hlep you.
464455
The 18-55 is a great lens, but the 23mm prime is a magic lens. Since I've acquired the 23mm I hardly use my 18-55. Maybe it's still the honeymoon phase, but I just love the 23. It renders images in a different way than the 18-55, and the speed/DOF of 1.4 really does make a difference.
2060950
Hello... To be honest, I returned the lens because I could not figure it out and I realized I bought the wrong lens... Good luck...
1002348
It depends on your thread size. Besides the lense size 18-55 mm, there is another number on the lenses that appears something like; 052 , 055, 058,062, 072. It starts with a zero with a line through it. This is your thread size. I hope this helped.
501123
Congrats on the nice lens! I have the 17-85. It's better than my 18-55, but I would love to get the 17-55 someday. Heck, I'd like to get a lot of different lenses someday! But being completely new to dslr, I think what I have now will suffice until I get going.
1596833
The 18-135 WR lens is optional. The standard lens. Is an 18-55 WR. Chech all the details of the offer. Mine was an 18-55 mm standard lens. The 18-135 is a great lens and will be used for 80% of your photos. I recommend you purchase it with the initial purchase.
648858
It will look like a 65mm on your camera. Because of the cropped sensor. It's all up to your personal preference if you want a medium/tight lens or a wide one.
1771110
Thank you for the information.I have a 10-20mm and 18-55mm at hand. I decided to purchase 50D with a 28-135mm IS lens and 100-300mm. I will appreciate if you can share your suggestion.Thank you and best regards,GO
659560
Hi glenn: how the 105 mm compares with the 85mm f/1.4 lens for portrait shots thank you for your advice
845651
Hello!!, I'm not am expert but my lens Nikkon 18-140... I have not any trouble with it, the pictures are grate, and the best is that I don't need any other lens for my regular picture.
1192316
I have had the 18 to 200. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that lens. If you're predisposed towards it, I won't try to talk you out of it, BUT . . I really like the 18 to 140 on my daily carry D5200. Fits the job and fits my hands. VERY sharp with great contrast and saturation. BTW, my fair, civic gathering lens in my D300s is almost always the 18 to 300, so ya makes your choice and you take your chances. IMHO, as long as it says "Nikon" on, you can't go wrong. Pick one.
354389
The main reason to get the 17 Mm lens over the kit lens is the 2.8 aperture which is much better for lowlight or blurred background it is also more compact which is great for indoors when I bought my OMD I chose not to purchase the kit lens instead I bought the 17 mm 2.8 and the 14 to 150 zero lens. I have been very happy with this combination for most situations.