Are there major difference between the Natural and the Oxbridge model that is more expensive!
1014524
I have a natural and love it. Don't know anything about Oxbridge. I would guess if it is more expensive , its timer/console may track pulse rate or do more thatn my console does.
1014525
As far as I know not in any functional sense, just the wood from which it's made which does affect the color
284371
The more expensive one is, in fact, larger than the less-expensive one. The cheaper one is Model 1312-00. The more expensive one is Model 1312-50. There IS a difference!
1980571
The difference is most likely going to be material quality. I use the Vermont American all the time and it does the job right on the spot, like a pro without it that has everything set into muscle memory. They look the same but one is going to last longer than the other, so go by the one that has better reviews by people.
503607
There is no difference. Not sure why you are seeing it as more expensive. I'd just try to get the larger one at the lowest price you can find.
1097514
That is the real question This vs Vitamix or BlendTecLooks like most of the reviewers in the Amazon Vine program have not used/bought high end blenders like Vitamix/Blendtec and give their glowing reviews comparing to a typical <$100 low powered blender, typically a $40-$60 Oster blender. Hence most of the Vine reviews are useless since they got a high end blender for free and compare their experience to a $50 blender. The real useful review would come from an existing owners of one of those high priced blenders who paid real money to get this and the other one, do not benefit from sales commissions for marketing the other ones, and have ability to compare them side by side. That is the real question This vs Vitamix or BlendTecLooks like most of the reviewers in the Amazon Vine program have not used/bought high end blenders like Vitamix/Blendtec and give their glowing reviews comparing to a typical <$100 low powered blender, typically a $40-$60 Oster blender. Hence most of the Vine reviews are useless since they got a high end blender for free and compare their experience to a $50 blender. The real useful review would come from an existing owners of one of those high priced blenders who paid real money to get this and the other one, do not benefit from... » Read More That is the real question This vs Vitamix or BlendTecLooks like most of the reviewers in the Amazon Vine program have not used/bought high end blenders like Vitamix/Blendtec and give their glowing reviews comparing to a typical <$100 low powered blender, typically a $40-$60 Oster blender. Hence most of the Vine reviews are useless since they got a high end blender for free and compare their experience to a $50 blender. The real useful review would come from an existing owners of one of those high priced blenders who paid real money to get this and the other one, do not benefit from sales commissions for marketing the other ones, and have ability to compare them side by side. « Show Less
374250
I can't say that I've used the electric model, as we purchased the manual one. But honestly, its super easy to use. We made nearly 200 programs for a charity event and it didn't take that long. I don't believe the advantage of an electric model justifies the extra cost.
704682
I have the $270 model for my large bge and it works great!!! I cannot say if it is betterborvworse than the BGE model but they look a lot alike and like I said the cheaper one from Digi Q works wonderful on my egg
2013509
I didn't realize there was a difference. I just ordered the same ones that came with the new aid's. I may try the closed next time if what the Pamela South answer says is true. Good luck! Rodney G.
1339501
I think there is no difference. It depends on the price. You will be able to choose better one for you. Good luck.
1448675
Descriptions are the same. Go with the less expensive one. Difference in price is significant.
1803010
I have had the "standard" MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 for 3 years. In the bottom it shows v.1.0I just purchased the more expensive "Business" version. After carefully examining the new business version, I see NO DIFFERENCE whatsoever. The other reviewer states the "X" key shows 'cut' on the same key but that is the SAME on my out standard keyboard. Additionally, the new 'business' version shows it is also v1.0This is another scam that Microsoft is pulling allowing them to charge about $10. extra from unsuspecting consumers. I don't trust Microsoft at all!! I have had the "standard" MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 for 3 years. In the bottom it shows v.1.0I just purchased the more expensive "Business" version. After carefully examining the new business version, I see NO DIFFERENCE whatsoever. The other reviewer states the "X" key shows 'cut' on the same key but that is the SAME on my out standard keyboard. Additionally, the new 'business' version shows it is also v1.0This is another scam that Microsoft is pulling allowing them to charge about $10. extra from unsuspecting consumers. I don't trust... » Read More I have had the "standard" MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 for 3 years. In the bottom it shows v.1.0I just purchased the more expensive "Business" version. After carefully examining the new business version, I see NO DIFFERENCE whatsoever. The other reviewer states the "X" key shows 'cut' on the same key but that is the SAME on my out standard keyboard. Additionally, the new 'business' version shows it is also v1.0This is another scam that Microsoft is pulling allowing them to charge about $10. extra from unsuspecting consumers. I don't trust Microsoft at all!! « Show Less
1025348
None. They are the same unit. The extra costs at Amazon is due to their referral fees.
1251482
Slight advantage to the Oshlun over the Freud 208, mainly due to having more teeth. The Oshlun isn't quite as clean as the DW/Delta 7670 though, which tends to run a bit higher in price. Any of those will have significantly better performance than the $30-$50 sets from Avanti, HF, Mibro, Vermont American, Promax, and others. However, none of these entry level sets do as well as the premium sets from Infinity, Freud, Forrest, Systimatic, Ridge Carbide, etc @ $200+, mainly due to the design and quality of manufacture...there really is a notable difference, but the better ~ $90+ sets can be "good nuff". It all boils down to need, usage, economics, and priorities. Slight advantage to the Oshlun over the Freud 208, mainly due to having more teeth. The Oshlun isn't quite as clean as the DW/Delta 7670 though, which tends to run a bit higher in price. Any of those will have significantly better performance than the $30-$50 sets from Avanti, HF, Mibro, Vermont American, Promax, and others. However, none of these entry level sets do as well as the premium sets from Infinity, Freud, Forrest, Systimatic, Ridge Carbide, etc @ $200+, mainly due to the design and quality of manufacture...there really is a notable difference, but the better ~ $90+ sets can be... » Read More Slight advantage to the Oshlun over the Freud 208, mainly due to having more teeth. The Oshlun isn't quite as clean as the DW/Delta 7670 though, which tends to run a bit higher in price. Any of those will have significantly better performance than the $30-$50 sets from Avanti, HF, Mibro, Vermont American, Promax, and others. However, none of these entry level sets do as well as the premium sets from Infinity, Freud, Forrest, Systimatic, Ridge Carbide, etc @ $200+, mainly due to the design and quality of manufacture...there really is a notable difference, but the better ~ $90+ sets can be "good nuff". It all boils down to need, usage, economics, and priorities. « Show Less
1521621
I have no definitive answer for this question, but I suspect it is just natural. I would expect organic to be much more expensive.
2059815
The difference is about 100.00! My hair dresser uses the Babyliss that is 200.00..I have this one..half the price . I would love to have the 200.00 one, but this one works absolutely fine!!! I love mine.
817161
I am not a chemist so I cannot answer as an expert, just as a user of Enada NADH for more than a decade who switched to Source Naturals brand when Enada's patent ran out and others began producing it cheaper. Neither I nor my husband have noticed any difference. Both deliver the energy, memory power, and sense of well-being for which we are looking. I chose Source Natural as they have an excellent reputation for quality. It is what we sent to my husband's brother to take right after he was diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease. He went from not being able to walk, talk, write, nor feed himself very well to improvement in days (10 mg per day) and then on to doing all those things effectively again in weeks. I think those results, which would be expected from the Enada brand, speak well of the Source Natural's brand. I hope that is helpful.
146679
I've actually owned both of them and the more expensive one is much more effective at cleaning your teeth. You get what you pay for in this case? The batteries do run down quickly on the cheaper version. I usually carry the cheaper version on vacation so that I don't have to bring my charger for my more expensive toothbrush. It's more convenient. :)