What's the difference between Sigma BC16.12 STS and Sigma BC1609 STS? If you could buy one of them, which would you choose?
1013790
It just has a couple more features that really are not that impressive, and it has more issues than the 1609. The 16.12 can show the temperature, but does that really matter? The 1609 had everything I needed and I am a sponsored triathlete and picked this up for my road bike. Almost 3 years later it still works great.
1013791
Based on other users reviews, the 16.12 is a newer version of the 16.09 and both have the same functions. I don't use a docking station so the fact that the 16.12 uses a different one than the 16.09, doesn't matter to me If you want to utilize that feature, buy the 16.09 and dock. The computer is great but I haven't been able to get the cadence feature to work. One thing, don't lose the key tool for changing the battery or you will destroy the unit trying to open it.
901099
hello. not sure about the sigma, but i've been able to use the tamron pro SP X1.4 TC w/ the Nikon 300mm, F/4 lens w/ good results.
543320
I had the 1.8 and switched to the sigma and LOVE IT!! My pictures are more colorful and sharper plus I love the depth of field!!!
199949
I will look it up when I get home, but typically there are different models for each major brand type, especially from Sigma. You can cross check with adorama or B & H
1587855
Thanks. So if the 1120 and the VSX-31 are almost exactly the same price, it sounds like I should go for the 1120.
1914501
sorry i cannot help you, i bougth the wrong station, i cannot use it with the computer i have (BC 1609), by the way i think you should consider other computer brands, im not happy with this Sigma brand, the support is not very good, the software sucks, and the buttons are flimsy.
2103068
Its really a budget decision. Both produce sharp images and good in low light, but with the sigma your packing more focal range without having to swap lenses.
632567
hi .. had the same choice to make.. but finally went with the sigma.. 50mm shorter but i think the OS capability will eventually make the sigma a more worthwhile purchase.. I live in Singapore.. Price for the tamron is about $750 and the sigma at $840 (singapore dollars). hope this helps
1756269
As a professional photographer myself, I weighed both options heavily prior to purchasing the Sigma 70-200 which I absolutely love! The quality is amazing. I did ask other photographers who owned the tamron lens and paid the cheaper price but defined the sigma lens as the better deal. One of the main reasons is construction of the lens. They reported the tamron lens having more problems after a few years and going 'soft' due to the plastic casing whereas the sigma didn't-making it a better choice for the money. I think the sigma lens will pay for itself this year.
2219372
I've researched this unit for my wife & found these Brother machines a similar series: Sixty-stitch BC 1000/CP 6500/CS 6000I/CS 6000T/EX 660 Seventy-stitch HS 2500/CP 7500/XR 7700 Seventy-seven-stitch ES 2000 Eighty-stitch XR 9000 It seems cosmetics, number of stitches, and low price variations are the only differences
1313304
I have owned both and they are great lenses with fantastic results. The Tokina will increase in length as you change focus, whereas the Sigma moves the glass when focusing within the body of the lens. If you plan to shoot insects or really up close, you may prefer to go with the Sigma (as I did). Another reason to go with the Sigma over the Tokina is if you plan to use a lens-mounted ring flash or similar. Although you can use these on the Tokina, I was concerned about extra stress on the plastic part of the lens that extends. Otherwise, you can't go wrong either way. I suggest visiting your local photography store that has these in stock to test out, or renting the lenses to try out and see which one you like before purchasing from Amazon. Good luck!
538816
yes , but i would still contact sigma usa before you spend your hard earned $$$
327908
Not sure, check Sigma site, they have all the info you could possibly need.
1897849
I do not know the difference, but I love my EPC 1200. I would not trade it in either.
75253
http://www.flickr.com/groups/d40slr/discuss/72157602509321717/?search=sigma+vs.+nikoni know it's been a while but that may give some insight.i have the sigma version and it's great value for the price paid.
134989
I am very happy with this lens. I have not tried the Sigma. I have the tamron 28-75 and the 70-200 VC both outstanding lenses - fast and sharp. Tamron is slightly more expensive and reviews always slightly higher. Sorry I could not give you more info about the Sigma
1587853
I bought the VSX-31 from Best Buy and they price matched Amazon at $516. Now BB has the 1120 on sale for $519. It looks like the 1120 has a more advanced video scaler and more power than the Elite. So if they are the same price I am wondering if I should go with the 1120 instead of the Elite.