how bright and clear is this scope compared to bushnell banner dusk and dawn
1186883
just got the bushnell banner 1.5-4.5 for my mini 14. Don't like it at all. The crosshairS (yes 2) make it not easy to aim. it is blurry at any magnification. will return it
1186884
I can not really answer this. I am not big on these types of scopes. This is the only one I ever bought because I am more into closer ranges. I bought an EOTech and that's all I have bought since. I can tell you it seemed like a perfectly fine scope. Only problem I had was the elevation knob is attached with a setscrew and it came loose while out shooting without a wrench to fix it. More than one lesson learned there. Sorry I could not have been more help.
1186885
I own the banner 4-16x40, 6-24x40, 6-18x50, and the 3.5-10x36. They are not all equal in clarity and brightness. The 6-24x40 is the clearest at 10x compared to the others at 10x, and the 6-18x50 is the brightest. I would say the 36mm scope is equal in brightness to this Tasco, but slightly crisper in image quality. The banner scopes with adjustable objectives are better scopes than this tasco, but they cost at least twice as much. The tasco is almost as good for a lot less cash.
1422068
Jerry, I would say something like 85%-90% as bright but very clear. Not exactly the same but very clear and bright just the same. You will notice a slight spherical aberration just at the very fringes of the lens but only when you sweep it which is typical in my experience for these types of scopes. If I didn't dislike the Burris reticle so much I would have likely gone that direction but these scope are very nice for about half the price. I don't think you will be disappointed in comparison to Burris or other similar levels of scopes. I have several Burris hunting scopes and have looked through MTAC which is definitely brighter but not hugely different. Jerry, I would say something like 85%-90% as bright but very clear. Not exactly the same but very clear and bright just the same. You will notice a slight spherical aberration just at the very fringes of the lens but only when you sweep it which is typical in my experience for these types of scopes. If I didn't dislike the Burris reticle so much I would have likely gone that direction but these scope are very nice for about half the price. I don't think you will be disappointed in comparison to Burris or other similar levels of scopes. I have several Burris hunting scopes and have looked... » Read More Jerry, I would say something like 85%-90% as bright but very clear. Not exactly the same but very clear and bright just the same. You will notice a slight spherical aberration just at the very fringes of the lens but only when you sweep it which is typical in my experience for these types of scopes. If I didn't dislike the Burris reticle so much I would have likely gone that direction but these scope are very nice for about half the price. I don't think you will be disappointed in comparison to Burris or other similar levels of scopes. I have several Burris hunting scopes and have looked through MTAC which is definitely brighter but not hugely different. « Show Less
136999
No but it's almost as good. this sight is unlike any other night sight. Its not rated as a gen 3 but its better than a gen 2. I especially like that it can be used in daylight as well. I would recommend this scope. The only negative: it could use more magnification.
39245
It is clear when you look through the scope. The lens coatings on the outside are a maroonish tint, but it's a good scope nonetheless.
109764
Yes, you can see them without illumination. I find it to be a decent scope for a decent price.
1671890
Obviously, green is going to be good for dark, but are you going to be able to see your target through the ACOG in the dark? I got the Amber. I plan on shooting during the day. If you think you will be shooting at night, you may want to invest in a laser. I love this scope and have zeroed it and the accuracy is still holding.
1775182
It is not real bright in daylight, especially sun. So I would not try it at an outdoor range at any distance. For rifles, it is best to use dim light conditions like dawn and dusk and I have used it on a rifle at about 30 yards to get the scope onto the bore. You will still need to fine tune the scope at a range but you will waste a lot less ammo. For the handgun, I have used it in daylight at about 50 feet and it was easily visible. I used it to align a clip on laser with the bore. And range testing verified that it worked well.
1035271
I purchased it for my friend for the same reason and you can see a good 200 yards with this clear even with inflated off. If you want to look in thick brush and have an eye for what you are looking for this is perfect. Out friend a hunter as well has asked to use it for the sMe reason and went and bought himself the same model. Hope this helps. Ps no clouds spots or grainy ness to the scope at all its perfect for those not looking to spend thousands of dollars.
306316
I'd say in daylight it is pretty similar to using a white bead dot.It might be slightly better as the white is surrounded by the black housing of the sight giving it good contrast, but in bright situations I wouldn't call it a significant improvement.
359084
Do not expect Leupold quality from this scope. Light gathering, anti-reflection and overall clarity could be better. The green or red dots are a great feature and having the ability to dail in intensity is a plus. Overall very pleased.
2025236
Oops I responded, but I did not keep this scope. It was not as clear and bright as the link below.http://www.midwayusa.com/product/1156168462/simmons-whitetail-classic-rifle-scope-65-20x-50mm-adjustable-objective-matte?cm_vc=ProductFinding
584749
The sight works very well and is more than sufficient to provide night capability for self defense. I've scouted my neighborhood at night with no moon and can clearly make out images at 100 yds although, this would be well beyond self defense ranges - perhaps if one were hunting at night picking off vermin this would work well. The illuminator is included in the new packages, runs of easily found batteries, has a self shut down timer and can illuminate outwards to about 50 yds on dark nights. Under half to full moon the illuminator was not required. For the money, this is a quality unit that should work under most conditions. It's got all the capability one would need in most situations, just not as crisp an image or with all the details of say, a generation III NV scope. It mounts on any weaver or mil-spec picatinny rail system and comes with a very good mount. Includes a daylight cover to use for daytime sight-in and general protection of the lens and a carry bag for when not mounted on a rifle.
858830
Get the green one. Took this on a night hunt and was incredibly impressed with ot. The animals were not bothered by it and the light created a sharp picture with my scope
381967
It's really good, this is comparable to a night force rifle scope In regards to clarity, etc
973686
The image at 1000x is dark and fuzzy. It does go that far but image quality is not that great, but for me, as a mere hobby, it is acceptable. It works best at the lower magnifications. It is still a very good scope for the money.
66639
It has illuminated crosses. And they are fabulous in low light!!!!! Cannot over sell this scope. Buy it. Took a 9 pointer at fifty yards with my Excalibur 5 minutes before legal light ended this year. Took 4 does in low light this season, too. Not like a lot of phony, cheap illuminated that light up in daylight. These just show up when you need it- low light conditions.
1725726
the eye relief is very good around or over 3inch to4, optics are crisp clear would compare it to Monarch from Nikon and or Leupold scopes, I hope this may help you, please let me know if you have any other questions.