how is this different then DSP-400 without digital enhancement?
1192988
Can't say...but what I can say is that using Dragon 11.5 and a fast six core processor with 10gb of ram, the accuracy is amazing. I narrate my novels from notebook first drafts, and I can say that there is no lag, and the accuracy is as advertised.
1091297
I honestly don't know. I have several audio cards and have never bothered to use any of their digital features. I bought this card only because my onboard audio failed and I needed something to use in place of it. Sorry.
1529391
The actual -3dB bandwidth is 4.4MHz. You can check the schematics, there is a lowpass filter on each of the two analog channels. For inspecting a digital signal, the analog bandwidth needs to be at least 5x the shortest clock frequency, and 10x is better. After all, if you look at a 2MHz digital signal with 50/50 duty cycle, it requires at least the 3rd and 5th harmonic to approximate a square wave. If the duty cycle is different than that, the spectral content goes up and the frequency required to display it goes up. If you are looking at a digital signal on an analog scope, you are likely looking for things like overshoot, ringing, transient pulses, and glitches. All of those are going to have frequency content -way- above that of the square wave. So with this 4.4MHz real bandwidth scope, I don't think I'd use it for a digital signal above 100kHz. For similar reasons, I consider it barely adequate for audio troubleshooting.
1056508
that would be a strange thing to do. for the same price, you can get a pretty good analog microphone, and skip the two digital conversion steps.
1958270
No, This is an analog to digital conversion not the digital to analog that it sounds like you require.
227686
Not that I have found. I still have an old copy of the Pinnacle software that came with an analog to digital converter that I use for this; I am quite sure this Sony Suite 13 does not have that function. If I get proven wrong, please let me know.
1853438
It has remote control model sound smaller than other non remote model CDP. and other wide It depend on CD recording types. Thanks.
1136301
Leonard, I gifted the Audio Technica turntable to a friend, thus, I cannot specifically answer your question with any authority. However, I have read that "purists" swear by a virgin vinyl recording played through an excellent turntable (into a very high quality amplifier with top signal-to-noise specs), as having superior dynamic range - as compared to a digital rendition of the same musical selection. To my untrained ears, the digital rendition, captured at the right sample and bit rate, will ALWAYS sound superior to any analog playback. This is simply due to things like wow, flutter, low frequency rumble, and other such artifacting that is unique to the analog playback process using a turntable. Then there is always the ever-present noise that can often be introduced in (both vacuum tube and solid state) preamps and routine audio frequency amplifier signal processing. Just my humble opinion, but I could be wrong!
1085833
I agree that no XLR out is odd but I just patched around that. Not sure about the 1086 comparison. Never used one. I bought it for narration purposes and its gating capabilities so limiting is something I add in post production. For the money, it's a bargain. If you want to spend some bucks though, Aphex Channel Master is much more versatile. Hope that helps.
102895
I believe the only difference is the ability to transmit 36-bit color(otherwise known as deep color) and at 1440p
1984101
barely any difference. Unless your a music nerd and love your vinyal warmth and can tell those aspects of digital conversion - you might notice somethings. but i love it. I have bought 2
1104030
Carefully read the specs! Some units will specify new electronic processing to almost virtually eliminate the blur you are concerned about; I noticed it right away in the perceptual clarity...you pay a little more but the difference is worth it.
1420214
I have JRiver Media Center and with latest drivers and compatible outputs, I was able to bitsteam 7.1 DTS-HD Master Audio from a Zotac GPU. I believe it is the Intel CPU that decodes the DTS-HD MA signal. I must say that there is a significant improvement in the sound across all audio sources over the hardware that I had before.
427913
The DacMagic has digital inputs but no digital outputs. You run stereo analog cables from its output into either a dedicated headphone amp or a set of corresponding inputs on your receiver.
2207077
The unit does have the capacity the frequency contour the sound and has a large variety of settings to control the sound but I don't know what you mean by digital voice enhancement. My own hearing is far from what it once was and I find the voice coming from the unit to be much clearer then my TV. As others have recommended, I suggest you contact Yamaha to a better answer.
1904762
From what I can tell, it is the physical knobs for each of the controls. Also when I did the research I was looking at the Compact and the Producer, and they only had 16 XLR input channels and from what I could tell, you had to purchase the S16 digital snake. I opted for the full board as everything is available right in front of you and there are less "layers" that you have to scroll through (IE on the Compact or Producer I believe that you have 4 separate buttons with 8 channels each and with the full board you only have 2 buttons with 16 channels each. I am no doubt a professional yet, but I wanted to learn on a full board with as much in front of me as possible and that why i chose this. Was it right, that I do not know but i LOVE the board and so does the band that I mix for. On the rack mount version - I really know nothing about it. I would assume that its the same and maybe controlled by the X32 control software available. The large board hooked up perfect to my DAW (Studio One) and connected pretty easy with my MAC. I ran into a little trouble with the LAN because I connected a wireless router to a wireless router, but after I figured this out it works like a champ. Another reason I went with the X32 versus digital boards is how many youtube videos I could find on training. Excellent selection - many of which are from Church perspectives but its a band they are mixing - and usually have more to deal with than straight mixing music. Hopefully that is a little explanation - but if I was to spend the money for the Compact, Producer or the Full board, hands down I would purchase it again. While it might be $100-1500 difference, the full board for me works great.
174377
Thanks for your question. You may come out of the digital out to an external DAC of significantly better quality than the internal one to improve the sound quality of the machine. This is a fantastic sounding player. World Wide Stereo is 35 years old and a very proud Yamaha dealer.