Does the Osprey Atmos 65 Backpack Large fit as carry-on luggage for air travel?
236046
Depends on what you have as attachments, like a bedroll etc. also the straps can get in the way. Personally I don't even try it.
838786
I can't tell you for sure because I didn't keep it - but I returned it because it was so large. I think it would fit because I remember it being a very large pack. It seemed larger than an average backpack to me.
92596
I travel for a living but I have never traveled with my pack as a carry on when flying. Judging from the size of the seats and the length of the bag I can safely assume the bag will be to long to actually fit under the seat.
817627
Yes. Its one of those backpacks that looks small, but seems to carry more then you would expect. It would fit nicely under a airline seat.
1734279
I dont remember well but definetely bigger than a carry on but it would fit one of the big standard sizes probably.
1111575
Yes, this will fit in most overheads. It's only slightly bigger than a regular backpack when fully loaded.
2258272
Not really. I believe that airline carry-ons should be no longer than 22" and this is 26" with a semi-hard bottom. I don't think this bag is designed to be a carryon.
953541
In my experience, yes. I have flown both domestic and international airlines (Southwest and United) with this bag as a carry-on (and packed pretty much full). It can get a little unwieldy and might be difficult to cram into the overhead compartments, but it does fit and I never had any trouble with the airlines or security about the size.
1908505
In fact it's perfect for flying. The backpack it's too big for daily use but appropiate for traveling
446753
Yes. Though I think it is about 2 inches longer/taller than the recommended carry - on luggage size, but I've used it as carry - on a few times without any problem
1246116
Difficult to say. It quite possibly might, as it's literally the biggest bag on the market that still fits in an airline overhead bin. It fits bigger than a normal 17.3 inch, and with some room. You might be able to squeeze an 18.4" in there, but I can't say that for certain.
574912
Yes. For example, United Airlines allows carry on's that are 22 x 9 x 14 or less. This bag qualifies!
443745
Yep! here's a picture of it looking pretty snug inside the Osprey porter 46. http://i.imgur.com/LXZsylO.jpg The porter also contained a packing folder and a packing cube underneath.
226072
I think this item would be too bulky for carry-on, probably would not meet airline size limits. I don't think I would check it, unless you can pack in large suitcase.
1619051
I have not flown with this bag but I have used it for several months. I got the smaller of the two bags and it is huge. When filled to its capacity I have to believe it would be oversized. It is a large bag.
788674
it's about the size of a medium backpack. i used it as my second carry-on. with the top folded over properly, and almost full, it was about a foot in diameter and maybe 18" long (cylindrical tube shape). so, yes. it qualifies.
570309
As normal luggage, Yes it's not larger than large suitcases. It's definitely too big as a carry on, though.