Does anyone know the difference between this one and the pro 750?
1185710
I bought mine some time ago - don't know what model it is but it looks like this one. The Pro 750 seems to have more programmed modes on it. You can see both on Amazon
1185711
The 300 has the variable speed control going from 1 to 10; the Pro 750 has the the variable speed control going from 1 to 10, and in addition has 5 programmed presets: Smoothie, Frozen Dessert, Soup, Puree, and Clean.
1185712
The Professional 300 is the same as the 750 except for the presets on the dial. 300 has only numbers 1-10 -- all you really ever need :-) Awesome Blender.
680530
I need to know that as well! It seems like the 7518 is newer than the 7518xb. They were first on Amazon on 2003 and 2001, respectively. Does anyone know what specs difference do they have?
294265
Yes it is a little better. however Behringer have a terrible build and there customer support is awful. Go for a Numark or better.. The BCD3000 will break your heart...
785274
I and other members of avsforum.com have found a significant difference that isn't listed between the 650 and 750. Then 750 has the ability to play 2 HD channels at the same time using your PIP function, the 650 can't. The way to achieve this is if you have cable split the incoming wire before it gets to the box, run 1 wire to the tv hooking up with coaxil cable then run the other wire to your cable box and hook the cable box up using your hdmi/component cables. scan the channels in that are connected through the coax cable. You can also achieve 2 hd pictures by hookinh up an over the air ant. and scanning the channels in. Works great, too bad the 650 can't do it.Mosh~~ I and other members of avsforum.com have found a significant difference that isn't listed between the 650 and 750. Then 750 has the ability to play 2 HD channels at the same time using your PIP function, the 650 can't. The way to achieve this is if you have cable split the incoming wire before it gets to the box, run 1 wire to the tv hooking up with coaxil cable then run the other wire to your cable box and hook the cable box up using your hdmi/component cables. scan the channels in that are connected through the coax cable. You can also achieve 2 hd pictures by hookinh up an over the air... » Read More I and other members of avsforum.com have found a significant difference that isn't listed between the 650 and 750. Then 750 has the ability to play 2 HD channels at the same time using your PIP function, the 650 can't. The way to achieve this is if you have cable split the incoming wire before it gets to the box, run 1 wire to the tv hooking up with coaxil cable then run the other wire to your cable box and hook the cable box up using your hdmi/component cables. scan the channels in that are connected through the coax cable. You can also achieve 2 hd pictures by hookinh up an over the air ant. and scanning the channels in. Works great, too bad the 650 can't do it.Mosh~~ « Show Less
2079437
The Pro has more power. The power cord is thicker, so there is probably a bigger coil.
1516181
So is this problem specific to the 750 model, or has anyone had the same issue with the 650? The price difference now is less than $100, but I would prefer the 650 simply to stay away from the frame and halo issues.
1014221
The pro model is just built to take more punishment, it's thicker and stronger than the basic one. If you are just in your back yard plinking the basic one will work just fine, but if you want to go hiking or put any significant strain on it, I would go for the professional version. It will last for years, I think the only con with it would be it being slightly heavier than the basic model.
2185332
If you compare the two products on Asus' website, it shows no spec difference. However, the pro has one less PCI slot for one more GPU/PCI-E expansion slot. Which on the grand scheme of differences is practically nothing. Oh, and the Pro has an internal eSATA port. eSATA isn't really in use for general users, so it probably doesn't make a difference except in price.
637894
I cannot answer this question honestly because I haven't tried them all. but the 750 has worked fine for me. I have made 60 cds so far and I am very satisfied with the results.
1705743
I only own the "Professional" model. I have nothing to compare it with. But it works fine.
697431
I can't tell you the difference because I've never used the PRO- 10 , but the PRO-100 is a great printer even professional photographers use them. All I can say is if you want to use It for hobby,then you will never use Walgreens again. The picture quality is amazing & if you have Lightroom photoshop then yo got it made.
44067
One difference is that this has a 75oz reservoir vs the 60oz reservoir in the B70. I don't know if the internals are any different. I hope they have improved the durability of the machine. It is strange there are so few reviews of this new machine.
2201875
As far as I know it's only a visual difference. I have the E751, and it sounds the same as the other. I would have preferred the E-750 as I like the wood finish better, but not at that price difference.
305210
I owned the SD630 for a year and upgraded to the SD750 last week. One difference is that the 750 supports SDHC while the 630 does not (SDHC comes in 4-8GB). I also find the "macro" shots come out with more detail on the SD750. Low light pictures are so-so on both (and all other compact cameras as they lack the flash power). If the price difference is not too much, go with the 750; otherwise stick with the 630.
2054009
Both are excellent and very similar. The MDRV6 was the original design of the two and was issued a few years earlier. The components, drivers, ancillary parts of both models appear to be virtually identical. The MDR 7506 was issued by Sony at the behest of recording & mixing engineers who preferred a less pronounced bass and a more prominently enhanced mid and upper mid-range tonal balance (NOT for listening enjoyment reasons!... but to more readily detect noise and distortions in the recording and mixing process... Live DJ's also seem to prefer the 7506 model at public events because the enhanced mid-range brightness helps drown out ambient hall sounds and crowd noises). The V6 and 7506 sound quite similar to most folks. Although I can usually detect a very subtle and nuanced difference between the V6 and 7506, I can only hear a meaningful difference between the two models on less than 1 out of 10 recordings in my collection. I prefer the V6 because it has all the mid and upper mid-range "sparkle", clarity & brightness sufficient to suit my taste and (to my ears) the V6 packs a much more impressive and clean tight bass wallop on those recordings that do feature and emphasize extreme dynamic range, powerful super fast transients, excessive deep bass elements, and/or contain very loud percussive passages.
1185246
The 7500 has a quad processor, smart hub, micro dimming pro, higher clear motion rate 960, and in my opinion has a little better picture quality
1109727
I bought the 150 and the 100. Both were advertised as the pro versions and I received the pro versions.