What's the difference between the "Genio" and this model besides water capacity?
1178192
I own the circolo, and I don't know much about the Genio...but the circolo heats up quickly, has a decent water capacity, and works well overall. We chose the circolo because of the style...it is a beautiful machine.
1178193
THe water capacity is one issue, the heating element is probably the other ... less wait time between cups and a hotter cup of coffee
671364
I have a lot of knowledge about these devices and here are the main differences: * GEN 1 only monitors amps (you supply it your approximate voltage). GEN 2 monitors Amps, Volts, and power factor, making it more accurate. * GEN 1 runs on either battery power, or USB wall wart, or both. GEN 2 runs on the MAINS. My 1st edition is accurate enough for my needs, and at 1/3 the cost, I chose that one to get me started with ZWAVE.
2215418
Sorry, am only familiar with the one we own and which we like we like very much. Not familiar with the other model so can't offer a comparison.
1105196
The junio is really only appropriate for one tap like a shower. I would recommend upgrading to the standard size for multiple taps.
1695855
For the kid version: - the machine size is smaller, the handle is bit smaller - has no cover top! So you may need to wash it first before filling it with water - has less choice on the water pressure that can be selected (3 speed vs. 10 speed) - has less 'accessories' - the water cannot be stopped from the handle so the only way to stop the water from flowing is by turning off the machine - you cannot rotate the tip from the handle - has dual voltage - appears a bit flimsy I have tried both and decided to return the kid version because the adult version is so much better for me.
235532
This one has a bigger motor and higher rpm, it is slightly heavier and has a slightly larger capacity, it would be consider more heavy duty then the nina which is smaller, lighter, and more portable. IMO this one is a better buy for the money. Mine works great!
1583395
Hi Michele, Thanks for asking. There is a HUGE difference between this Straw and the H2O survival straw. Their straw appears to be built for a much lighter use application. It has a extremely limited capacity according to its specs of a possible max of 56 gallons compared to 400 gallons+ capacity use with the H2o Survival straw. It doesn't have back flush plunger which is essential for cleaning out the filter and increasing its use, It doesn't have a included water bag or any way to attach a water bag or bottle to carry water. It doesn't have any protective end caps to help keep the ends clean. It doesn't have any pre-filter for turbid water. Which is absolutely essential if you are ever encounter a muddy or debris filled stream or lake. Frankly there really is no comparison between the two straws. The H2O survival straw is really intended for a heavier duty use by serious hikers and and emergency Preppers. You really would rather have this straw when the going gets rough. Whats nice about it also is that it isn't really that big and it easily fits in your pocket or pack pack. I see the Xtreme straw more for vacationers that need a light weight straw that is very small and convenient to use while traveling. I cant vouch for how well it works. But it appears to remove many for the nasties from the water. But I feel it is very limited in capacity and missing some key essential extras included in the H2o Survival straw and for the difference of a couple bucks. Why wouldn't you buy the H2o Survival Straw, the clearly superior straw? I hope I have addressed all your questions.
240301
I don't believe there is any difference, I think it is a rebrand thing. Hope this helps...would never be without mine ...will use it for life.
1658117
Functions are the same. The only difference is the color of water tank. If any additional question, please contact us at 1-800-330-0388 or initiate another question. Amazon system doesn't allow us to reply comments if any.
1859866
I have no idea about the difference. I just know that the simple one suits me. It works well in the shower and travels with me well.
892425
The only difference in the models of BotVac (70e, 75, 80, 85) is the supplies (brushes and filters) packed in the box. You can always buy the least expensive BotVac now, and get the supplies later. Compared to the older model XV, the Botvac runs a lot longer on one charge, covers a lot more territory, moves faster and more efficiently and is about 10 db quieter. Unlike the XV, it navigates my open floor plan without getting stuck in a continuous loop. I have only had the BotVac for a week, and use it on a combination of hardwood and carpeting. Now that the batteries are fully conditioned, the BotVac runs two hours, then it recharges for about an hour, then it runs for one more hour to finish my whole place of 2500 square feet. The old model ran for 45-50 minutes per charge and would never finish my whole place in three runs. I had to have two Neato XVs running at the same time to do the job, (starting from opposite ends of my floorplan). So one BotVac does the job of two XVs, and does a better job of picking up crumbs as well.
2256182
I have no idea, too technical for me to say. It pushes a lot of water and does a good job consistently.
1878186
I can't tell you what the differences are as I am not acquainted with those models. However I love the one I have. It has plenty of power and is very user friendly. Switches easily for different cleaning needs. I have no regrets with this vacuum.
671362
I have a lot of knowledge about these devices and here are the main differences: * GEN 1 only monitors amps (you supply it your approximate voltage). GEN 2 monitors Amps, Volts, and power factor, making it more accurate.* GEN 1 runs on either battery power, or USB wall wart, or both. GEN 2 runs on the MAINS.My 1st edition is accurate enough for my needs, and at 1/3 the cost, I chose that one to get me started with ZWAVE.
2242428
We have been very happy with the unit and are considering getting another one. I haven't used other makes/models so I can't give you a comparison.
787960
The Apec RO-90 has a much higher flow rate. I can fill a pitcher of water in seconds not minutes. For me it was well worth the extra cost. I had a$1,500 Kenetico system before buying the RO-90. The RO-90 is much better. Water quality is running about 20tds and tastes great.
1886653
It looks like they are very similar; however, you should check out infantino.com to really compare them. I love my ecosash and use it all the time. It's comfortable and easy to use, even by yourself.