How deep is this wok and its's thickness.
1194902
About 4" at the deepest part of the well. I would say it is about 1/4" thick. I use mine more than I expected and really like it.
1194903
The pan is not as deep as a traditional wok (say from Joyce Chen) however, I have made both main and side dishes and there is enough room to comfortably move things around.....not quite like they do at a restaurant, but it works. Thickness ? Definitely thicker than some aluminum units I've had and no thinner than an average good piece of cookware. The non stick feature is also a benefit especially for the gooier (?) dishes and also at the end when you add your cornstarch slurry, everything comes out of the pan so effortlessly. I'm quite happy with it.
1635680
It's 8 1/4". I wish Circulon still makes the old style wok which I still using it now for the time being even though the bottom of the wok is no longer nonstick & can't find the infor how to fix it :( does any body knows?
875323
Hey, John, this is my favorite pan! I just washed it from supper. It is about 2 1/4 inches deep. And War Eagle! egt
578888
Don't know the exact diameter and I don't have it with me anymore. I remember it being a very nice wok with good size.
2031338
A little over 3". Seems deeper than your normal saute/fry pans. I find this pan very useful.
901808
Hey, Kathy, I bought this wok to roast coffee beans outside, so I can not attest to its real cooking qualities, but I did measure it for you. The bottom of the pan as you can see peaking out in the Amazon pic is a raised disc that measures 5 1/2 inches in diameter and is about 1/2 inch thick in addition to the main body of the wok bowl that is 1/8 inch thick. Making it 12 inches across, inside to inside, diameter and 12 1/4 inch outside wall to outside wall diameter, the handle adding another 5 1/2 inches to the outside measurement. The inside of the bowl is perfectly round with no flat spot. Of course this is a single casted piece (incase my description leads one to believe it is attached components, which it is not). It blacked up really fast from the untreated gray iron on my gas stove before I took it outside to ruin it with coffee beans. Works great for coffee roast at higher temps by the way. Hope I was helpful.
639137
It has a very heavy handle and the bottom is thick. I recommend getting a wok ring to stabilize it while cooking though.
2200917
If I remember right is is around 3 inch deep. This was a gift for my dad and we were both very please with the depth of this pan. The othe pan is around 2 inch.
1264971
Its about 6-7 inches deep... I wouldn't, it has a large King Kooker logo on bottom and may scratch your stove
847276
Sorry I cannot help :( I had to return this wok 3 times due to a cracked handle when it arrived. I really wanted to use this wok since I already purchased the lid and waited too long to return it.
1056900
Its about 3 inches.. its very deep..almost like a casserrole pan. It's nice..
579791
I think the bottom diameter and the depth of this wok are just right for me ! not too big, not too small... it's a very good wok, vegetibles won't get overheat easily... just a little too heavy though
55224
varying thickness up to about 3/4". We love it. I suggest ordering several sample pieces.
858685
Medium thickness, I'd say.... quite sturdy, though. Outstanding design and engineering allows it to boil water quicker than other kettles.
1876871
I purchased it for a Christmas gift and no longer have it in my possession. However, I would estimate the board is from 1/2" to an inch thick. The bowl is pretty shallow so that the Ulu knife fits in it so it can rock back and forth in the bowl as it cuts. I would guess 1/4" to 1/2" deep.
1179047
I havent measured the depth of the pan but IMO it is pleanty deep enough for a "deep dish" pizza.. very good and sturdy pan!
462192
I love this pan. It is deeper than my previous lasagna pans, but I never actually measured it. I'm guessing it's about 2.5" deep. And it cleans up so easily. It's very sturdy, and I highly recommend it. It's a winner.