What is the difference between this model, the 9300 and the ultimate pet 9500?
1158334
I'm glad you were confused too. I didn't realize it was smaller when I ordered it. This one is fine for a small bedroom, but I needed one for a larger room.
1158335
This one is smaller. I should have ordered the 9500 as I wanted the same size as my other one, a 9000.
1158336
I can't remember but if you pay close enough attention to the details you can see the difference for what's more necessary
1158337
9300 has a washable carbin filter 5 stage air cleaning both 99.99 air particals removed
269015
The Ultimate is the newest version. It is designed well and seems to be a bit of an upgrade. Get the Ultimate, it is rock-solid and a real bargain.
2098246
The 990 is the newer model. As far as I can tell, there really isn't any difference except the price.
462687
I haven't used the solo, but I have zero complaints with the 940. Definitely paid for itself
1468303
I have both the Kodak Z915 and the Z950 cameras and they each have advantages and disadvantages. The 950 has a slightly better lens (only slightly) and more Megapixels. Having more MP is both good and bad- higher resolution in good light but more "noise" in lower light, plus somewhat longer download time to the card. I like the versatility of the 915 for power- I can use rechargable NiMH batteries or Lithium (NOT Lithium-ION). The Z915 does not have HD video, but the VGA video is just fine. The Z950 has a pointless illuminated "HD" logo on the top which is very dorky and takes away from the cameras otherwise pro-like look. Comparing price to performance, you get much more bang for your buck with the Z915. I have both the Kodak Z915 and the Z950 cameras and they each have advantages and disadvantages. The 950 has a slightly better lens (only slightly) and more Megapixels. Having more MP is both good and bad- higher resolution in good light but more "noise" in lower light, plus somewhat longer download time to the card. I like the versatility of the 915 for power- I can use rechargable NiMH batteries or Lithium (NOT Lithium-ION). The Z915 does not have HD video, but the VGA video is just fine. The Z950 has a pointless illuminated "HD" logo on the top which is very dorky and... » Read More I have both the Kodak Z915 and the Z950 cameras and they each have advantages and disadvantages. The 950 has a slightly better lens (only slightly) and more Megapixels. Having more MP is both good and bad- higher resolution in good light but more "noise" in lower light, plus somewhat longer download time to the card. I like the versatility of the 915 for power- I can use rechargable NiMH batteries or Lithium (NOT Lithium-ION). The Z915 does not have HD video, but the VGA video is just fine. The Z950 has a pointless illuminated "HD" logo on the top which is very dorky and takes away from the cameras otherwise pro-like look. Comparing price to performance, you get much more bang for your buck with the Z915. « Show Less
821730
Thanks for your question. The 9000 has significantly larger speakers and is a significantly better sounding system. These are fantastic sounding systems. World Wide Stereo is 35 years old and a very proud Samsung dealer.
869119
Sorry but I'm not know exactly the difference. I had this model and it works very well.
102750
I have both, the extreme and the Ultra. Both work great, can't tell the difference.
2031118
This is different than the 920 in that it has the potential for higher definition video, but it also is very restricted in what software will accept & broadcast that potential. Whereas the 920 is rather plug-and-play, and comes with simple software for adjusting the image, the c930e does not come with any software, and is not useable with many common streaming softwares
1822121
These were my top two choices as well. I think they are both great cameras. I ended up getting the 950 because it is pocket-size, but they share many features actually. also, the G9 has more manual controls, it's for more professional type photos, not for just casual. I mean it could be for casual also, if you don't mind the bulkiness. But I think they are both good, it just depends on what you want to use it for.
1537003
The 1020 uses much cheaper parts than the 9040, as the 9040 is the same as an Elite but without the Elite branding. The 1020 is also 80 watts x2 while the 9040 is 110 x2. The 1018 is even far superior to both the 1019
1268654
I don't smoke, but I think both models are good for removing the odor. The 9500 will cover a larger area and that would be the only difference.
497437
That is not true. I bought the 4104 and it shows the pet hair lifter, talks about it specifically on the box as well. I think customer service did not know what they were talking about. This is very confusing. Seems that the 4104 is a better buy. Perhaps they just rebranded it for walmart and it is exactly the same as the 3920. Walmart is the only one that sells the 4104.
2219050
I don't know the difference. I have the 8893 and it performs very well. I cannot imagine what more "bells and whistles" one would need.
527466
The biggest difference you would notice is the display. Also the 8300 ST has sensors that automatically adjust to the pan size. The ultra smooth surface is really great and the display is easy to read and understand along with the direction book. I am very please4d I upgraded to the 8300 ST
1912095
Hey man I have 9500 it works fine. Also 0 degradation. One thing to look for is the back covers arent that sturdy!
2001156
I meant to say Ultra. The difference is the hood and the ability to set the timer. I would also suggest getting the Teflon rake when you get the litter tray. You won't need it for awhile, but eventually you will need it.