How is the sound in comparison to TUSQ or Ebony?
1165943
I think that, as would be expected, it's brighter, brassier. To my ears (and in different guitars-dreads, OMs, 000s) the change out of pins yields a very subtle change. They made my koa guitars more lively and brought some mids and highs back to a mahogany dread. As always, go with what sounds best TO YOU!
1165944
The sound is much more bright...think of a stereo where youd turn down the bass and up the treble a bit. I put these an an acoustic that i mostly play lead on.
1165945
Wish I could tell you, but they wouldn't hold in the bridge when tension was added to the strings. They popped right out. I was never able to play with them. Cheap pieces of Chinese junk!
1165946
The sound is a bit louder and slightly more crisp. You do,however sacrifice some of the richness to get these benefits
1165947
I really like the brass pins. They give me a brighter tone and hi end really rings. Sustain seems a bit longer too. First ones I got came with a Taylor I purchased used. Since I have ordered 4 more sets and replaced factory pins on a pair of Martins and another Taylor.
894157
The Ks have a much better soundstage and crystal clear midrange, the Qs not as clean, equalized for more mass-market appeal. Have owned both (sold the Q) and for my money it's no contest.
273402
Yes! I own both and there is a clearly discernible improvement in sound quality with the Bamboo model. The bamboo has a much crisper sound and a slight increase in bass output in my opinion.
2019601
I've owned both and they are both good headphones. The Inspiration are on the heavier side compared to the extremely light weight Momentum. I was happy with the sound with both headphones but the Momentum are definitely better at everything.
273405
I got the black and the bamboo and felt the bamboo has slightly better sound. The appearance of the bamboo alone is worth the difference in price - they look that much better!
1805015
Yes, I have compared the two. I returned the Fluance SX6's, and kept the Pioneer BS22's. The Fluance's were very dynamic, and sounded great playing trance or other electronic music, but the Pioneers have a warmer mellower sound that I really like for the long haul.
412470
Very similar. If you closed your eyes and listened to each, you would have a hard time telling the difference. I think the Tivoli has a slightly better sound, but isn't worth the extra $. However, the looks between the two are different. I think the Tivoli looks better. The Sangean has a good quality feel to it though.
1882882
I own the both of them, and honestly I prefer the goth most. The sound is at more crisp and deep. Due to the body structure there is a slight difference in the dive. But nothing noticeable. If you want my personal opinion I would go with the Epiphone iv goth. I use it for live shows and have had zero problems with it. OVERALL go with the Goth mate. Cheers!
2059220
Sorry I have not had the chance to listen to the ue 6000s, so I can not offer a comparison. What I can say is they are built like a tank and the quality and durability is exceptional. They are not the best sounding headphones I have but that is all subjective. They are natural sounding with a little added bass and I highly recommend for djing. If your looking for listening headphones I would look elsewhere and you will save some $.
2054010
Although I have heard the 7506 a few times, from what I heard the 7506 is much brighter that the V6. The V6 to some May sound a bit rolled off, but I think the highs are very detailed and accentuated just above acceptable levels for me. I also have a pair of AKG k702 and I prefer the V6 for female Jazz vocals like Dinah Washington and Billie Holiday. But these are my impressions, so you would need to listen to the cans yourself. Buy both and return one that you don't like.
702911
I haven't tried UE boom, but I have tried Big Jambox. There isn't much difference in sound quality. Battery life is more in Jambox though. But the price difference isn't justifiable. TDK won't disappoint
153820
The result is definitely different than an EQ. The bass channel is more like an overdrive that doesn't clip (hard to describe it's not distortion) and the high-end is this subtle octave harmonizer. I was very impressed with the inprovement on early 90's gangsta rap that sounds muddy. We use it for our live electronic band to make our sound less muddy and it's really be a big help. I'm not sure it would make a different on the latest music releases though.
2195849
The bass sounds great, although I do have to say that I don't use the stock music app on my phone. I use another music app from the Play Store called Poweramp, which allows me to change the bass settings & the EQ!. But honestly it has a great sound, even with the stock android music player. I'm satisfied with them.
842639
Hall effect is the only real defiance you my hear, The EH Holy Grail has a tighter sound, Behringer DR600 has a off time sound, you may find the stomp boxes disappointing the Vox may not have the flexibility, but the sound will be much the same.
1513249
I can speak directly to a Soundlink 3 comparison. In my opinion, the TDK sounds comparable. Like you, I hate tinny sound, and can attest to the fact that the TDK is not tinny at all. It is rich and full at all volumes. Actually, it is shockingly rich and full given the size and the price. If you're torn beween the Bose and the TDK, I say buy the TDK with confidence.
867859
I have one of each. I've had a bit if feedback with the anthem if I put in as much mic as possible. To my ear, Lyric better reproduces the sound of the instrument. Maybe the anthem has a bit more bass.
2255575
I own both, and yes, the SFQ-01 sounds much better than the SFQ-06. The sound quality of the SFQ-01 was surprisingly good, considering the price. I do not feel this way about the SFQ-06.