Is anyone using this for sideline sports photography? (Second camera on sling strap to back up a 70-200mm on a monopod)
1484429
I have used this with some tests shots in traffic, testing the tracking features of the Canon 7D Mark II. It did ok some of the time, but the camera said it lost communication with the lens at other times. I haven't seen this with my other cameras (70D and 6D), and only with the 7d in high speed burst mode. I used it once with either the 6D or the 70D (don't remember) to take a lot of pictures during a high school volleyball game with no obvious problems. And I've used the lens a lot with both cameras for other purposes. I don't find that it does really well in IQ below f/3.5. So I avoid shooting wider than that. The VC is great.
1484430
Very good lens but you better be close because 24-70 on a full frame camera is jut that. If you are on an APSC censor that's about 36-105 but is the camera fast enough to frame a capture the image(s)? As a back up it would suffice but not as a principle lens. I use mine on a Nikon 750 as a walk around lens for candid photos and street photo along with landscape and it could not be a better lens.
1484431
I have used this with some tests shots in traffic, testing the tracking features of the Canon 7D Mark II. It did ok some of the time, but the camera said it lost communication with the lens at other times. I haven't seen this with my other cameras (70D and 6D), and only with the 7d in high speed burst mode. I used it once with either the 6D or the 70D (don't remember) to take a lot of pictures during a high school volleyball game with no obvious problems. And I've used the lens a lot with both cameras for other purposes. I don't find that it does really well in IQ below f/3.5. So I avoid shooting wider than that. The VC is great. I have used this with some tests shots in traffic, testing the tracking features of the Canon 7D Mark II. It did ok some of the time, but the camera said it lost communication with the lens at other times. I haven't seen this with my other cameras (70D and 6D), and only with the 7d in high speed burst mode. I used it once with either the 6D or the 70D (don't remember) to take a lot of pictures during a high school volleyball game with no obvious problems. And I've used the lens a lot with both cameras for other purposes. I don't find that it does really well in IQ below f/3.5. So I avoid... » Read More I have used this with some tests shots in traffic, testing the tracking features of the Canon 7D Mark II. It did ok some of the time, but the camera said it lost communication with the lens at other times. I haven't seen this with my other cameras (70D and 6D), and only with the 7d in high speed burst mode. I used it once with either the 6D or the 70D (don't remember) to take a lot of pictures during a high school volleyball game with no obvious problems. And I've used the lens a lot with both cameras for other purposes. I don't find that it does really well in IQ below f/3.5. So I avoid shooting wider than that. The VC is great. « Show Less
605002
I wouldn't say this strap is overkill. It's all about convenience and comfort. Even someone with a point-and-shoot could use this strap if they're going to be doing a lot of shooting in a day. It just depends on your preference. I didn't like having my camera hanging around my neck with the standard strap; over time my neck and shoulders would start to ache and I found myself fumbling around when trying to get my camera up and ready quickly. With this sling style strap, I literally just reach my right hand down and it grabs the camera in the same position I will be holding it when I bring it up to shoot. Up to you, but at this price point, it may be worth getting even if you only use it occasionally.
1939843
Hello,My apologies about the late response. This bag is too small for your gear. It is not deep enough.Regards,RoozbehOC camera
540124
That depends..... I would not risk it. If all you intend to do is highly controlled studio work, with little chance of untoward events, perhaps. I wanted something to use in covering college sports, to get a different angle of view, and am happy. However, I use mine exclusively for micro four-thirds cameras, and it works very well. The suction cup on the bottom of the center post is an extra stabilizing factor, but my big Nikons were too large for me to trust one to this.
2148233
I've taken some nice shots of football players with this lense, but they were day games. It's a bit dark when fully extended (300mm), but if your camera handles ISO's of 400 - 800 well, it can be used. IMHO, it's as good as any in this price range. Idealy you would want a faster lense for sports, and that speed will cost you.
1173511
It doesn't really work for me. I don't use it mainly because I thought I'd use it with my shoulder mount but it doesn't work whtat way. I can see it working more if I shot outside on my tripod which I don't with my work. So I bring it along just in case one day I need it. In that sense, it works.
628841
Yes, I bought the system for about the same reason. I carry 200 to 500 attached to my camera on one side and a smaller lens with my camera on the other side. So that the lens extends down I placed the pin, without anything else, on the camera rather than on the support of the lens. For long hikes it can get heavy having both there but is great for switching back and forth between the two cameras.
856540
BTW if you use mount accessories, make sure its warm when first mount and wait 24 for a good bound, i use mine skydiving, and also dirt biking, i feel dirt biking and the fall ripped the camera off the side of my helmet, btw it not as bulky as go pro
1669170
I shoot a canon mark III, and a very heavy, canon 300mm. It works like a dream. I shot sports and have to roam around a lot!
1169155
I returned my Sling in favor of a Lowepro Toploader Zoom 55 AW, which I feel is structurally more sound for larger format SLR cameras/lenses. I used the sling when I had a small format Olympus P & S and I threw in other paraphernalia. When I moved to the SLR, I did not consider it sufficient.
724505
Hey Barbara, I would definitely try one a little sturdier. I have this one now on a lighter Nikon (D7000) and primarily use a smaller lens (18-105) and I think it is about at capacity and maybe a little under-qualified. Just one man's opinion but I think something more robust would suit your very nice set up better.
881594
I would say there is probably too much zoom if you wanted to used it exclusively for football. My uncle uses canon image stabilized binos for football games which might be easier to use depending on where you sit. I do loves these binos and would purchase them again in a second.
1605795
Yep! Very well actually. I prefer this style of shoulder mount for DSLR cameras over the handle-bar based RedRock style shoulder rigs. It allows you to keep one free hand on the lens for manual focus or zooming. REALLY great for steadying during action and incredibly helpful to free up your hands during guerilla doc. Even better - concocted correctly with a few more small parts, you can Frankenrig this thing to hold audio recorders as well as lights. Unbeatable for the price! I made mine work for nearly 3 years before a piece broke.
1127983
I'm not as big but it is long enough to still have the camera hang at you side. It is a great strap. I also have the wrist strap that goes with the same attachment you put on the camera. But, It barely fits me and others have said it is too tight. That might not work for you.
656062
It just getting some used to. I usually just hook up to one side and feels plenty secure with my camera. When I need to pull it up to shoot, I can use one hand to hold my camera and the free hand to release the catch and extend the strap.
1480328
It is very possible to use the sling-strap, however the camera will be upside down and become exposed because that's the opening of the rain-sleeve where your hands enter. A nice suggestion is to have something to tie the sleeve closed so your gear isn't easily exposed to the elements. I hope this helps.
259529
JasonI have been using my Gitzo for over a year and it comfortably holds my Nikon D800 with my 70-205 F2.8 lens (both weigh about 7.5 pounds together) also with the Nikon wireless flashes as well as the 950 flash. I have also used it several times with my Canon XH-A1 and SF 300 HD video cameras. The only issue I would comment on is that if you try tracking a moving object such as someone running you will have to maintain a firm grip on it. It is great in stationary shots but clearly it is not made to do the same thing that a normal video tripod does because it lacks the handle. The ball gives great flexibility in most applications. I love the light weight of this tripod!!! Very sturdy!! Highly recommend. JasonI have been using my Gitzo for over a year and it comfortably holds my Nikon D800 with my 70-205 F2.8 lens (both weigh about 7.5 pounds together) also with the Nikon wireless flashes as well as the 950 flash. I have also used it several times with my Canon XH-A1 and SF 300 HD video cameras. The only issue I would comment on is that if you try tracking a moving object such as someone running you will have to maintain a firm grip on it. It is great in stationary shots but clearly it is not made to do the same thing that a normal video tripod does because it lacks the handle.... » Read More JasonI have been using my Gitzo for over a year and it comfortably holds my Nikon D800 with my 70-205 F2.8 lens (both weigh about 7.5 pounds together) also with the Nikon wireless flashes as well as the 950 flash. I have also used it several times with my Canon XH-A1 and SF 300 HD video cameras. The only issue I would comment on is that if you try tracking a moving object such as someone running you will have to maintain a firm grip on it. It is great in stationary shots but clearly it is not made to do the same thing that a normal video tripod does because it lacks the handle. The ball gives great flexibility in most applications. I love the light weight of this tripod!!! Very sturdy!! Highly recommend. « Show Less