New vs. old Nikon lenses: Does it make sense for me to buy the kit or simply use my existing lenses with/without supplementing what I have.
741519
If you're going to use it for mostly still subjects, portraits, etc, you would probably be fine. My only beef with manual focus lenses is that it usually takes me a lot longer to find my focus than with an AF lens - and when I'm trying to catch people interacting at a wedding reception, I lose the shot if I don't get it focused quickly. Since you've been using manuals for a long time, you're probably quicker at it than I am. A major part of the problem with using manuals on Nikon digital cameras is the "focus (not) assist" system. You don't have the same focus guide you do in most 35mm cameras; it's just a little green dot that flashes on when you're focused. Trying to get it focused can involve a lot of trial and error, and by the time you've got it, the shot is gone. I have a D70, and this may have changed for the D80, but I'm fairly certain it has not, as I've looked at one in the store and that would have been one of the first things I checked (and, had it been changed, I would have been so excited I would have remembered). If you're going to be doing much action work, I might consider getting an AF lens for it eventually, but you could probably survive for a while without them. Or, it seems like the kit lenses have a pretty good resale value if you wanted to try it and re-sell it later - they're going for around $300 on eBay. All that said, my favorite lens on my D70 is a circa-1970 50mm F/1.4 Nikkor (S series, I think) manual prime with the metal casing - it's absolutely crystal clear and the shots I get with it are positively stunning. Having difficulty trying to pick up its 28mm cousin though... everyone wants one!
1418844
> D40kit with 18-55 lens PLUS the 55-200 VR lens - 578.40Where did you get the above kit at this price? Thanks.
150887
According to various Nikon sites, they should be comparable. I'd recommend doing a search for compatibility chart for your particular lenses with the frame just to be sure. The lens included does 90% of anything you want. All in all, extremely nice combo.
1666572
My understanding is that refurbished cameras have been returned to Nikon for reasons varying from not functioning properly to the purchaser deciding they did not want the camera after all. Nikon fixes defects and returns the cameras to like new condition before reselling them. I have enjoyed my refurbished D3200 which looked brand new when I received it. I have been so pleased that I just ordered another refurbished lens for it through Amazon and am waiting for it to arrive. I think buying refurbished is a great way to save a few bucks to use on more camera gear.
790510
Dust is an issue if you plan to change lense often. I have a XTi, despite the dust cleaning system I don't plan to remove the lens much. Dust is a real problem for digital as the camera back never gets replaced unlike film. Also, D80 is $200 more than XTi. Nikon lenses are usually more expensive. Quality wise, i think, they are fairly equivalent. Your skills will probably make more difference than the equipment.
1907928
I am sorry - I did not even investigate the kit lens. I had a 24-70 f2.8 and a 70-200 f2.8 which I was going to use with the camera. (But I opted for the 24-70 2.8 rather than the f4 because I do a lot of indoor work (I am NOT a pro), and am VERY happy. I recently shot at a conference with high ISO and both these lenses, without a flash. Very pleased with the results).
487012
It may also be the case that you are looking at used or refurbished lenses. I bought one used, it is like new and an excellent lens for low price. Best regards
606466
Hi Dan, As far i know all Nikon lenses are compatible with one another there is no limitation with the model numbers like in Cannon. I hope you should be good. To be on the safer side try going our to a digital camera store and check it once.
1461400
Hi. I agree w/ the others who have provided their input to this question. Likewise, my understanding is that the Nikon warranty (one year; w/ additional 4 years when "registered" at time of purchase) is to the original purchaser of Nikon lenses...
1943323
If the old lenses as Pentak K-mount lenses; but check with the experts on Pentax Forums (which has FAQs about this).
1110276
i use to have an old lens with a new camera, it was compatible but the pictures didn´t seem correct.
1365017
Some people are not interested in the lens that comes with the kit, and would prefer to buy the body of the camera and then separately buy a different lens. That is what I did and it was an affordable way to get a higher quality camera and lens.
1590318
It seemed to. However, in your shoes, I would think long and hard about whether I need all this stuff or whether I'd be better served spending a little more and getting the more expensive kit that comes with a second lens.
662474
Yes, I believe so. I have had Nikon cameras for over 40 years. They work hard to make lens etc interchangeable.
501123
Congrats on the nice lens! I have the 17-85. It's better than my 18-55, but I would love to get the 17-55 someday. Heck, I'd like to get a lot of different lenses someday! But being completely new to dslr, I think what I have now will suffice until I get going.
418160
It means that the equipment has been repackaged by the seller, which can be done for various reasons. I purchased a "white box" lens kit that the seller claimed was brand new, removed from a larger kit to sell as separate components. What I received was a refurbished lens, worth considerably less. I was never able to get a straight answer from the seller, and returned it. Beware, be sure to ask if you are getting a new lens or a refurbished lens, then inspect it carefully upon arrival.
91302
I love this lens, but yes... I DO think you should save up for the IS version. I wish I would have. I was just a beginner not knowing what I was purchasing at the time. I am totally kicking myself now. :( Its not terrible, but I think the IS would be much better. In my honest opinion