How does it make you feel when you find out that Canon 5D Mark 4 is coming out this year with 36MP+, dual full frame, and better image sensor?
1467472
Canon hopefully will continue to advance the course of photography. You can only buy the best that is available to day. You buy the best body and expect leaps and bounds in the next one. It therefore is important to buy great lenses that Canon is know for. Lenses last forever. Be thankful that there is a Canon company
1467473
What is a dual full frame? It would be very nice to have - but I'm not related to Croesus. Have to make do with what I have.
1556862
I am a 5D MKIII user and I have picked Canon 2 option. it works fine for me.
1370588
Exactly. It should be noted that it's sharp and CA-free at 1.2 as well. If Canon or Nikon made a 1.8 this good, I'd be stoked.
324302
It's not bad. I come from film days. This high ISO stuff is all foreign to me. Ha. I seldom shoot faster than 400 ISO so it's fantastic. AT higher speeds you get junk and noise. But you get that in all cameras. No matter what u choose remember that photography is just writing with light, very bright light. Though digital marketing seems to say we can use less bright light... It's just marketing...
2218322
Like others have said here, much better ISO performance and the lens lineup is not even close. I've been using my XE1 more than my 5Dmk3 lately and cannot wait to use something that has improved AF.
1298988
Its a better experience in every aspect. I stepped from the K5 and the AF and clarity on all my high end lens now shines. Color depth is fantastic and the details are just better. I am glad I upgraded.
1908030
Canon recently announced that a new 50mm f2 IS will be released. Also Sigma announced the complete renewed 50mm f1.4
585578
There are many a7000 rumors and I hope it happens as I really want the a6000 but with the touch-screen of the a5100 to help touch focus shots. Without the touch screen it feels incomplete. I don't want to go to the full frame size of the a7r as I already own a Canon 6D so need a good street walk around camera. The size and grip of the a6000 is perfect for me. The 5100 feels like a toy and doesn't have the great EVF.
1687586
I think you are going to be happy with the 6d. If you can afford the 5d, indulge!! You are going to get a much better focusing system, a better build and a faster camera overall. This is assuming you don't need the wifi nor the GPS system. I love how fast the focusing system works on the 5d. It responds very well in dim light, is blazing fast and very accurate. This I believe is the main difference with the 6d
2075390
@ Ronnie Dale Frost: What do I think? I've already pre-ordered one! Yes, $5,200 is a bit steep, but I will sell my current D3 body (mint condition, should fetch $3,200 - $3,700) and use those proceeds to offset the purchase price. I want and need the extra 1-2 stops this new extended ISO range will provide. Regarding the 720P-only video, while the omission of 1080P seems both inexplicable and ridiculously short-sighted (given what is readily available elsewhere, and for far less money), it's not a dealbreaker for me--and that comment is all the more interesting when you factor in that I am an independent filmmaker. Nope, for filmmaking, I want a REAL video camera/camcorder, designed for filmmaking from top to bottom. The Canon 5D Mark II, for example--and despite that whole very impressive Laforet short--is NOT a camera I would even consider using for indie filmmaking.
1839762
I purchased LX-3 back in March 2009 and paid less than current price. I was sold on abundant glorious reviews. I take lots of macro shots with manual control. I was expecting superior performance to my old Canon G6. To my surprise, Canon G6's image was superior to LX3. I sold LX3 on eBay with BIN and my loss was minimal because I sold LX3 when all online dealers didn't have the LX3 in stock.I am eagerly waiting for G11, sure it is bigger than LX3, but G series cameras feel solid and secure. Also LX3's annoying lens cab is a shortcoming.
974226
I got camera from Amazon yesterday. I've done lots of playing with it. You can change white balance and even set it to a custom level.Auto-stitching of panoramas is quite nifty.Zoom motor very noisy during movies.Battery life is only fair and re-charging seems a bit slow.Pretty impressive stills in full sun. I bought Sony to replace Panasonic DMC-ZS3 that died and Panasonic service department has not satisfied me.
265820
They are always releasing new models. If you keep waiting for a new model, you'll never buy a camera. I got the D-10 and now the D-20, I like both.
1040304
sure, in a full frame the image it will be more extensive, the sensor is bigger.
1442807
I'm more concerned with the image quality issue. They're getting 12 MP onto a really tiny sensor. The pixel density is 43 MP per square CM. That's really pushing it. Serious cameras (like DSLRs) tend to be under 5, sometimes even under 2. They use way bigger sensors, up to the size of a 35 mm picture, for a similar or not-much-higher pixel count. On paper this camera is exactly what I need, but I'm going to wait for some reviews before I put my money down for one. (Shouldn't have to wait too long, fortunately.)
356709
I do. I upgraded from the D90 and I don't regret it for a second. I didn't want to spend the money on a D800 but I wanted a full frame DSLR. The ISO is great on this camera and puts my D90 to shame.
1771453
I really dont have any regrets with my camera, and I think dxo mark gave it a better overall rating than the K-3. The only cAmera I would have probably waited for is a full frame Pentax but dont know when that would happen.