Is this product made with lead? Is there a California prop 65 warning label on it? Thanks!
1454059
There is no mention of lead or any other content on the product. There is no CA Prop 65 label...only one that says it was made in Mexico.
322866
Hi Thomas It is a long explanation about California's law! California is required by law to put the sticker on the bottle if they contain lead. Also if you go on Nature's Plus website, it tells you that lead is in the vitamin. You can e-mail them and they will explain it to you. I did a lot of research about the vitamins but ended up coming off of them! They really are an excellent vitamin but because of the lead mainly and I found out that according to my age and the required amounts of certain ingredients I needed, the amounts of their ingredients were way too high!! So I went back to my Centrum and got a supplement of b-12. That's really where all the energy they provide comes from!! They have a very high level of b's in their vitamins! Just pull up the ingredients, compare and do your homework! Hopes this helps!
751706
look up prop 65 and it will tell you that there is a list of chemicals that have been known to cause birth deffects and cancer it does not just pertain to lead it is a very long list this is probably why the warning is there not just lead is being warned
1893850
When I emailed them, the manufacturer stated that the brass valve on the bottle contains a small amount of lead. They ship these out of California so by law they have to print the warning on the bottle.
2214605
Great question. I wasn't aware that it may contain lead. I'll be getting rid of it if that's true.
639307
The holding case says stainless steel. I believe it. Not sure about the CA prop 65. Then again, California is a whole diff planet. Hope this helps.
1696489
I checked the bottle and YES there is the Prop 65 warning, but said nothing about lead content.
524732
The box I got for my great grandkids said "made in USA" so I can only assume there is NO lead paint. It's the crap made in China that I do not buy that might be a danger. Hope this helps you.
1885772
Yes, this product does have a warning label. I just received my 1lb maca Powder and saw a warning label on it. I read what Healthworks wrote about Cal Prop 65. We already consume so much lead throughout our daily intakes, so "0.5 mcg/day" using this particular Maca powder adds up to a toxic level. I will return this product. I purchased this before Healthworks post their answer. Since others answered that they did not see a warning label, I purchased it. I should have closely read the small print on the image.
48317
I don't recall seeing a warning. I believe it is just porcelain coated. It works great but let us know if there is a lead issue.
2214604
I was not aware that this product may contain lead. I will have to check the potential of hazard.
1915765
Mine doesn't have that warning labeled on it. From what I just googled that label is a California requiredment. I honestly am not familiar with much of the cancer causing ingredients in anything. I personally will look further into this subject. Good question. Good stuff.
969496
I don't know, but I do not recall seeing the lead warning on the packaging with is a requirement in my state (CA).
677688
I believe it has to do with trace amounts of lead in items grown in soil, which is practically unavoidable. Google Prop 65 and try calling Vibrant Health for clarification. You probably got a container meant for California.
158208
Hi Patricia, the glass has been 3rd party tested for lead and other harmful contaminants according to California's Proposition 65. All samples tested, passed with less than .100 micrograms per milliliter for lead content. Hope this was helpful!
104815
I don't know. Possibly. I don't think the package says lead free. Ask the manufacturer.
928834
All the information I've been able to find on Proposition 65 is pretty vague. It it supposed to warn consumers of "chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm" As far as I can tell, there is no thought given to the amount of these chemicals - some of which you can't escape in the manufacturing process. More info can be found here: http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/p65faq.html Although the most helpful line from the faq seems to be: "To request more information regarding the chemical exposures that are the basis of the warning, contact the manufacturer of the product." If I had to guess what chemical warranted the proposition 65 warning, I would guess cadmium.