EM10 for $699 or EM5 for $599?
1468768
Both are superb still cameras. There are only 2 advantages that the E-M5 has over the E-M10. It is weather resistant (note I did NOT say Weather PROOF), and it has the first generation 5 axis image stabilization. However, if those things aren't important to you, I would say the E-M10 is the wiser purchase. My reasons are that the 10 has a slightly better image processor. It isn't a huge improvement in image quality but it IS ever so slightly better. And while the 5 axis image stabilization is better than 3, many people feel the 5 axis IS is most useful for video rather than stills. And frankly if you are interested in video, neither is the camera for serious videography. Both, however are adequate for the sort of video snapshots I do. So for me, I think the only REAL advantage of the E-M5 is the weather resistance, and THAT will only function if you have weather resistant lenses as well. Otherwise, you are as unprotected as the E-M10 user. Only you can decide if the 5's slightly reduced image quality is worth $100. Personally, I would (and did) spend an extra $100 and buy the E-M10
1468769
Good question. I still have my EM10 and added an E-M1. Pretty tempting on the EM5 for that price. Wish I could be of more help.
1468770
If splash and dust resistance is important, it has to be the EM5. It also has slightly better shake reduction and you can add a battery grip.I chose the EM10 since it had focus peaking. WIFI was a bonus. Good luck.
1614179
correction to my previous answer, there is one out there now used from emusic for 249. Buy it now if you really want one. EMUSIC is great and the price is the best.
478989
I have the E4, and a friend who wanted one like mine ended up with the E5 as it was only $6 more. All the features are the same. They are both working great months (mine 7, his 3 or 4) later. Unfortunately the only device we have in common is the phone, and his laptop is even a smaller screen, so we really can't tell if the extra 2000 makes much difference.
1059674
Both are pretty good. When I was in the market, I got a deal where I could 5005 for the price of 3005 so just bought them.
586476
I had this in my wishlist for some time now. But even with the price drop to $549, it was a bit too rich for my blood. Today, I saw that it was further reduced to $449 and I hit the order button without thinking about it. For $449, I think this is an excellent deal (especially with XP license and a 6 cell battery).
384886
I would get the latest version that you can get. It probably not wort the hassle for the few dollars difference between the &#699;Old Version" and newer versions. Any way, it&#699;s an excellent product and has saved my sanity several times and actually saved me money on repairs, without any hassles.
779721
I believe supply and demand the mk005 was popular and supply is low hence the high price. Frankly there is no justfication for the high markup. I own both; The mk001 has lights that warn about battery death on the top if anything that should be more.The buttons are bigger on the mk005 I do not know if that justifies the higher price.Sheer greed is my best guess I reckon.
544661
No, Cambridge Audio states that the 651P has higher quality internal components, enhancements to the circuit design & there is a 'rumble' (LF) filter. However, both of these units are for the casual enthusiast, and I doubt the 651 is worth the extra $$$ if you will be staying with a moving magnet cartridge. For a sophisticated playback system and discerning ears, I'd pass on both, for casual listening, the less expensive model should be fine.
1121585
Thank you so much for your detailed reply. I am unable to find the EH150 for a cheap price unless what you consider cheap is not so cheap for me. Can you please tell me exactly which model you meant is cheap?
800233
I can see no difference in the two models. Don't know what the E designation means.
115217
10bII+ has more equation functions than the standard 10bII. If you are going to use it for a basic fiance class you will be fine with either, but I think they are they same price so you will just get more with 10bII+, also rumor has it that the 10bII+ runs a bit faster, however that is what my professor told me, as I didn't really get to compare that theory.
931045
We have 2, 1 free, other paid $99 plus $36 activation fee. Both work fine. Get the 2.5+.
517092
This is good as I am also trying to decide between the two of these models. Bluetooth means nothing to me, But I do like having the lanes shown better so that leans me more towards the 1490LMT. But again, I am also concerned that the 1490 LMT has worse reviews than 1450LMT..maybe because of Bluetooth??
1885323
I got 10% discount from here------ http://amzn.to/23q5WmG -------- Docheck out!!!This one is better than monster I think as per my experience!
538409
I do know JNH makes zero EMF rated units that are about double in price of these units. I am still trying to decide which brand to buy. Some brands, like MPS Global are $4000 to $8000. What to do??
507269
I'm leaning towards the 2159M for the following reasons:Max Resolution2009M = 1600 x 9002159M = 1920 x 1080 Pixel Pitch:2009M = 0.277mm2159M = 0.248mmConnectors:2009M = D-Sub, DVI-D2159M = D-Sub, DVI, HDMI Bottom line, for a bit for cash there's a sizable increase in real estate with the increase in resolution. I'd check em out in person first [should be able to find them all at Best Buy right now]. And I was considering the 2009M until I did see them side by side and realized the 2159M was the better selection [for me].Hope this helps. I'm leaning towards the 2159M for the following reasons:Max Resolution2009M = 1600 x 9002159M = 1920 x 1080 Pixel Pitch:2009M = 0.277mm2159M = 0.248mmConnectors:2009M = D-Sub, DVI-D2159M = D-Sub, DVI, HDMI Bottom line, for a bit for cash there's a sizable increase in real estate with the increase in resolution. I'd check em out in person first [should be able to find them all at Best Buy right now]. And I was considering the 2009M until I did see them side by side and realized the 2159M was the better... » Read More I'm leaning towards the 2159M for the following reasons:Max Resolution2009M = 1600 x 9002159M = 1920 x 1080 Pixel Pitch:2009M = 0.277mm2159M = 0.248mmConnectors:2009M = D-Sub, DVI-D2159M = D-Sub, DVI, HDMI Bottom line, for a bit for cash there's a sizable increase in real estate with the increase in resolution. I'd check em out in person first [should be able to find them all at Best Buy right now]. And I was considering the 2009M until I did see them side by side and realized the 2159M was the better selection [for me].Hope this helps. « Show Less
516196
Mine did on my EM5 and on a separate flash-only order. You could try to inquire of the vendor.