How do these compare to Dominants?
1461862
Oh, I am so sorry. It was so many years ago. But what I remember about ALL aluminum wound core strings is that the aluminum is grabby, even when oiled, and that the aluminum windings flake off in just a week's hard practice. I went to steel strings. Cheaper, and they last forever. I'm sorry I could not be of more help.
1453225
Blow them out of the water in every regard IMO, less bass in these though (not an issue for me as I would rather controlled bass than more bass) also depending on what you are used to they are relatively bright as far as lower mid range headphones go. They are unweildy to take out in public if you aren't using them at home though (the M50's do a good job outside) I would recommend going for the A900X's over the A700X's if you can afford the difference though, the Aluminum housing makes a rather large difference imo.
541373
I have HE-400s driven by a Shiit Lyr Amp. The 400s as well as the 500s are not bass heavy headphones. This is one of many reasons I got the 400s. I don't like heavy bass. I did find that after a break-in period, the bass was very nature and sounded close to live music. What I really like is that the bass is clear and not muddy which nearly all bass heavy headphones sound like. The Lyr is designed to drive orthos such as the 400s and 500s. I had looked at the EF-5 but I didn't think it drove the headphones enough. They do need a bit of power. If you like heavier bass, I'm afraid you may have gotten yourself the wrong headphones. The beauty of these is that they are nearly flat responding which make them sounds closer to live music which is what I am looking for. I will tell you that with the 500s and the Lyr combo, you will hear stuff in your music you haven't heard before but you will also hear mistakes made by the recording engineer as well as the limitations on MP3 files if you play those. These headphones don't like to be forced too hard on the bass end. Their design doesn't do well with that. Be careful if you do try to send more bass through them.
840283
More ported I'd say to be honest. They'd hit harder, give you more of that deep rich bass sound. Although if you have them in a sealed box they still hit really well. I have 3 in a sealed box and they smack but I'm switching to a ported box.
1558303
hands down i would recommend the monster turbine pro gold for you. I personally own the coppers and i like them better. not to assume you are Indian, but if you are: indian music will def sound better on the pro coppers. The coppers have a wide sound stage (they still have plenty of bass that you can feel) vs. the golds. I personally don't like all my music blocked out by to much bass. I love the coppers and i would highly recommend them for overall music. But all you want is just bass then go gold. Also remember before you return either of them, i recommend a 50 hour burn in period (that really helps to bring out the music). hands down i would recommend the monster turbine pro gold for you. I personally own the coppers and i like them better. not to assume you are Indian, but if you are: indian music will def sound better on the pro coppers. The coppers have a wide sound stage (they still have plenty of bass that you can feel) vs. the golds. I personally don't like all my music blocked out by to much bass. I love the coppers and i would highly recommend them for overall music. But all you want is just bass then go gold. Also remember before you return either of them, i recommend a 50 hour burn in period (that... » Read More hands down i would recommend the monster turbine pro gold for you. I personally own the coppers and i like them better. not to assume you are Indian, but if you are: indian music will def sound better on the pro coppers. The coppers have a wide sound stage (they still have plenty of bass that you can feel) vs. the golds. I personally don't like all my music blocked out by to much bass. I love the coppers and i would highly recommend them for overall music. But all you want is just bass then go gold. Also remember before you return either of them, i recommend a 50 hour burn in period (that really helps to bring out the music). « Show Less
2000107
I personally use Martin SPs lights. I find them reasonably easy playing and I like the sound. Mediums would sound louder but are harder to play. Martin makes a silk and steel string that is supposed to be easier to play than standard strings. They also have a new string out they call flexible core that bends easier and is also supposed to be easier on the fingers. I've not used either kind so couldn't say from personal experience, but I think they'd be worth a try, especially if ease of playing is your goal and not maximum volume. I find the lights are a nice compromise.
1405352
The GR07s are far superior in every regard. The sound signature is more U-shaped, with more bass and treble. Mids are about the same, treble is more sparkly. Sound stage is larger. Clarity is much better all across the board.
305076
The pros hurt my head. I liked the bass signature better than the M50s, but I sent them back. If your looking for a good, standard HIFI, neutral can, then the M50s are really good. Frankly, you can't go wrong with them. I was going to buy them, then I found another set that I fell in love with (Phillips Fidelio L1s).
886747
This is a spl sub, that said they also sound great. They are quite under rated. I'm running a pair of 12's on a SAZ-2500d and they are the most hard hitting subs I've had so far.
2030259
The Strings are what they say they are. Sometimes they put all the strings in one packet instead of individually. Pirastro Gold E is a better string than the normal E string that comes in Dominant.
222955
They definitely do sound better. It's like a richer and fuller sound. The difference in the lower frequencies can be heard most significantly. For sound quality, I recommend highly.
2059220
Sorry I have not had the chance to listen to the ue 6000s, so I can not offer a comparison. What I can say is they are built like a tank and the quality and durability is exceptional. They are not the best sounding headphones I have but that is all subjective. They are natural sounding with a little added bass and I highly recommend for djing. If your looking for listening headphones I would look elsewhere and you will save some $.
2037309
TERMINATORS are better Bass and all but the Duals look amazing the only real question is how often do you look into your trunk to look at your sub box if you have a hachback the duals would be my personal choice (I did) but if you want better LOUDER Bass go for the MTX
573428
Clarity is superior, bass is cleaner, comfort is simmilar, although i have not worn the beats for extended periods of time. The M-100's get more comfortable the more you wear them, after months of use i hardly notice them anymore. The difference is big enough to warrent an easy choice if you had not bought the beats first. I would definitly try to test both on the same song. With that said you will not be disappointed with the switch if you choose to. The only downside is where i live no one knows who v-moda is or if they are even nice headphones, untill i let them listen.
1160606
Sonically, they are no different from the US version. They are distinctly a higher end set of headphones, with very neutral tonalities. You'll enjoy listening to them. As far as the instructions are concerned, I did the same thing as others here, did. I downloaded the English version of the instructions.
524797
Probably the higher one, but difference is negligible. If you want the loudest, most noticeable sound, get both of them.
481429
They're basically the same, except with a (built in) lower cross-over point from mid range a high range. So, these (depending on how you look at it) are either "bassier," or "have less treble." Although I believe the cross-over point isn't much different. So essentially the same speaker.