how the picture quality of the vizio tvs
1482300
I think it is great. I mean, I am not some sort of expert on TV pictures, but I have had a lot of TVs and this one's picture looks really good to me.
1482301
My sitting position is about 12 feet away from the TV. You might think that is too close for an 80";but the picture is razor sharp at that distance. I watch a lot of Blu-Ray's and football - both areoutstanding. I really could not ask for anything better!Bob
1482302
My sitting position is about 12 feet away from the TV. You might think that is too close for an 80"; but the picture is razor sharp at that distance. I watch a lot of Blu-Ray's and football - both are outstanding. I really could not ask for anything better! Bob
1482303
Tough to compare at 80" there are only Sharp and Vizio, i am not a friend of Sharp and I think for that size Vizio has the better pictureIf you go with a tv smaller than 80" you have better choices and pictures, like Panasonic or Sony, and I think Plasma has the better picture anyway. Best to go to a store to compare yourself.
1482304
the picture quality is purely based on what signal it is getting. SD channels look like garbage, HD channels look pretty good, Blu rays will blow you away. No fault of the TV, it is a slave to what signal it is getting
1482305
I think the picture quality is real good and close to the higher price TVs I will buy more. besides it is the closest tv you can buy that atleast gives some amaricans jobs.
1926804
I believe the screen of the ST50 is as reflective as the VT50, which I own. If so, it's as reflective as the VIZIO. In overall brightness, Vizio wins, in picture quality and depth of definition in blacks and grays, the ST50 will win. That's no to say the Vizio's PQ isn't stellar. My VT50 is in a fairly bright room with no window opposite it to reflect back at the viewer. They are well off to either side. I think the brightness of my set is more than adequate in this situation.
75369
I watched the 554sv from every angle at Costco. The reflection of the overhead lights was crystal clear on this unit (as were most of the other 55" lcds) - i.e. very reflective. The 553 was slightly more matte finish so somewhat more "blurry" reflection of the overhead lights. The only one that was really matte (including Sony and Samsung as well) was the cheapest Vizio (can't recall the model number but was sub $1000 price) but it's over all picture was pixelized on motion so unacceptable to me. I'm still looking.
517928
This particular Vizio is a 120 Hz set which is fine for most viewing. The 240 Hz models gives you a bit more performance in fast action viewing as in sports and gaming. In any case you can't go wrong with a Vizio. Best bang for the buck for sure!
1644764
I'm pretty sure this is 1080p. When I checked Vizio's website it says that its 1080p. Here's the link: http://www.vizio.com/flat-panel-hdtvs/vm230xvt.html
1300069
As for reliability, this is a very reliable TV, I have had it for few months and had no issue with the TV, as for phasing out, I am not sure about that, I guess Vizio will have to answer that question. If you plan to get a reliable and affordable TV, this is it. (I am not a Vizio representative)
75368
I just got off the phone with Vizio's customer service. According to the person I spoke to the screen is matte. Who's correct, Vizio's customer service rep or the postings? I'll wait until I physically see the TV for myself.I appreciate your help.
1875464
yes, I love my TV...the picture quality is great, As long as the sun is not shining directly on it.
1431083
Here is a review from CNET on that model tv http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/vizio-e320i-a0/4505-6482_7-35471751.html
1028892
cannot compare as i dont know. All i can say is that the TV i have is fantastic, the 3D is amazing, colors amazing, vibrant white, black is intense. In my opinion the smart TV side is not so good as it freezes frequently. Screen reproduction is amazing... Its very shiny, like Glass so this has to be in a Dark room, very little light as reflections are an issue. Our living room has window shutters therfore its not an issue...
1875469
Not worth it. I got this tv to replace is cheaper 47" Sharp TV, and have to say I am disappointed in the picture quality. The picture is dim and washed out, I am wondering if the reviews here are for the right television. On scale of 1 to 10, 10 being best I'd rate my Samsung F5300 as a 5. Hopefully I can find some good calibration settings
577058
Get this tv the 65inch is edge lit tv compared to this one which full array, and compared to Sony is cheapers and vizio was rated by cnet.com for top led tv
473643
Almost instant, I have a 42 inch Vizio and have the same problem with it. Also, the Vizio is very slow starting up; the Sharp start up is a little better. I am not bothered by the slow remote response because I have cable and feed is almost instant on both with cable box.
2176377
It definitely depends on your receiver and how good the channel transmits their signal, but I would say the picture is excellent when all things are considered. I've NEVER been overly blown away by ESPN/ABC's picture quality; however, NBC has excellent HD and last Saturday's Wild Card games for NFL looked great.Keep in mind that HD receivers only transmit in 1080i...no TV is going to give you bluray quality (unfortunately) at this stage. I'd say it's definitely comparable to TVs with a higher price point and equal specs.
859218
We have had this tv in our very bright living room since November. Absolutely love the picture quality & have not experienced any glare problems. Hope this helps!
172957
What about the picture quality? My TV is coming in a few days and the HDMI ports and all the other stuff is not a problem for me. Im just concerned about the picture because the store didnt have a floor model to look at.
698741
I am extremely happy with the vizio 80. The size is amazing. Samsung has slightly better blacks