I want to order this. Is the compact or original better?
1313116
I'm using the original and have it clipped to the temples of my glasses. I found the distance between the mirror and my eye perfect, getting a good view of what's behind me. However, I tried moving it back to simulate a compact, I found it quite impossible to view the mirror. Might work if clipped to some part of your helmet visor though. I don't want to have it on my helmet as I'm usually quite rough with it.
1313117
I have the Original and I use it on glasses or on helmet visor. I believe that the compact model is specifically for use with a helmet, since the mounting point will be further forward than on glasses. However I have never used the compact model
1528259
I love mine with the original mini. I personally think it's better than the apple case.
1781757
I would also go with the former model. This one has less thicknesses. It is sturdier because of what it is made of, but it doesn't do everything I would want it to.
1788680
I don't know which one is the best since I only own and use the original size. However, if I traveled more frequent I would invest in the travel size to take up less space in me bag.
374552
ok so which one is better? this states that this is the real deal as opposed to generic counterparts?
1716161
Same thing. Newer model is a little larger and has a full USB. The old one I believe is better because it's smaller. Both of them should be equally as durable
203146
Its not very compact. In fact it is a bit cumbersome. Tame on has a comparable one that is more compact.
486652
I own both versions: gave the original to my parents and by the time I went to buy my replacement, the short version came out. Short Jar is the newer version, likely meant to mimic the newer Vitamix squat jar type. With the short jar, it barely fits under cabinets, but it does fit. Personally, I think it looks better too. Base of the units are identical, except in coloring. Short version has red accents. While I have not done a side by side comparison, I get the feeling that the tall jar blends a bit better. I think the blades are identical between the 2 jars, but the more narrow profile of the tall jar seems to suck material towards the blades a bit better. I feel like I've had to use the plunger a bit more in the squat jar, since it's wider and didn't seem to homogenize as well by itself. At the end of the day, however, for me, the short jar allows me to keep it on the counter and actually use it on a whim, vs. stuff it away and have it fall out of mind. So, in terms of living with it, I'd vote for short.
1064864
Definitely go with the larger version. We have two and it will last for a while.
2010905
Myself I got the original instead of the mini. The reason I decided to go with the original is because its bigger but not as big as a crib. As far as the mini I didn't see getting much use out of it because in size its comparable to the size of a standard bassinet I. Couldn't see paying twice as much for basicly the same thing. As far as the original goes it can be used for a playpen or when baby starts sitting up you can lower the bed part and with the mini it does not have this option. As far as price the orginal cost a little more but overall I thought it was a better choice. Best wishes.
1382812
Not sure what you mean by "compact version". The shield is S&W;'s since stack pistol. If you mean the M&P; Compact, then no. You would want the standard APEX DCAEK, not the one specifically for the Shield.
2126498
Absolutely. It's very compact. I was concerned they had sent me wrong thing. Pleasant surprise
205177
I wouldn't suggest this one, in any case. It's simply a novelty and not as nice to carry around. If you already own the 10th doctors, good on you. But I would suggest it over both. It's more compact, easier to fit in your hand, has a pen built in, and requires a lot less effort to activate than the 11th doctors. If you do already own 10s, get 11s. It's spring action is quite fun to use.
71433
I too looked at both of these netbooks and both would serve my purposes. But I think I am going to choose the toshiba mini 205. My biggest reason is the negative reviews on the asus 1005ha concerning the batteries and ac adapters scared me a little. While the complaints with the toshiba appears to be more fixable. Poor sound quality is fixable with the use of headphones since the headphone jack is stereo, not monoaural like the speaker, and trackpad issues can be fixed with the use of a mouse.
1454145
I can tell you that the one I received is of very high quality and comes highly recommended. The box it came in certainly seemed to be genuine. You should go ahead and order it with a good feeling.I hope that helped.
1514506
I got mine at the $198 price, but I thought I was taking a risk. I need not have feared. The original is equal to tablets selling for twice the price, and is of undeniable quality. Now the model II is near release I've taken the step to pre-order it and I expect it will also exceed expectations. Consider this: you will get a honeycomb tablet soon to be upgraded, a processor running at 1.5 Ghz, four times the internal storage of the original and twice the RAM, all for about $60 more than the original. I think its a no-brainer.
311001
Hi. I like the one I bought, but it looks like the other one has a few more features. I'd go with that one.