Is a Canon Vixia camcorder too heavy to use with this? I have an older model Canon Vixia HF20.
1450624
Well, yes and no. When you think of a camera on a tripod standing up on three legs, yes it is too heavy. It will sink down. However, if your purpose is to stabilize the camera or wrap the tripod legs onto a bar or other object you couldn't just sit the camera on, then the gorillapod would work great. I have used my gorillapod for a small Kodak Zi8 (similar to a flip camera) and it supports that just fine, but larger cameras do cause the tripod to sag a bit. This hasn't stopped me from using it much, though! I use it all the time. It stabilizes the camera wonderfully with the flexibility of its legs. And the magnetic feet have helped me stabilize it on railings and other odd places.
1450625
I looked up that model camera an it looks like its fine for the size of the tripod, I have a FS300 and its balanced.It does help to tighten the tilt screw with a flat blade screwdriver. But the magnets help keep it stable but wont hold it sideways unless its a really small point N shoot camera.
1450626
Well, yes and no. When you think of a camera on a tripod standing up on three legs, yes it is too heavy. It will sink down. However, if your purpose is to stabilize the camera or wrap the tripod legs onto a bar or other object you couldn't just sit the camera on, then the gorillapod would work great. I have used my gorillapod for a small Kodak Zi8 (similar to a flip camera) and it supports that just fine, but larger cameras do cause the tripod to sag a bit. This hasn't stopped me from using it much, though! I use it all the time. It stabilizes the camera wonderfully with the flexibility of its legs. And the magnetic feet have helped me stabilize it on railings and other odd places. Well, yes and no. When you think of a camera on a tripod standing up on three legs, yes it is too heavy. It will sink down. However, if your purpose is to stabilize the camera or wrap the tripod legs onto a bar or other object you couldn't just sit the camera on, then the gorillapod would work great. I have used my gorillapod for a small Kodak Zi8 (similar to a flip camera) and it supports that just fine, but larger cameras do cause the tripod to sag a bit. This hasn't stopped me from using it much, though! I use it all the time. It stabilizes the camera wonderfully with the flexibility of... » Read More Well, yes and no. When you think of a camera on a tripod standing up on three legs, yes it is too heavy. It will sink down. However, if your purpose is to stabilize the camera or wrap the tripod legs onto a bar or other object you couldn't just sit the camera on, then the gorillapod would work great. I have used my gorillapod for a small Kodak Zi8 (similar to a flip camera) and it supports that just fine, but larger cameras do cause the tripod to sag a bit. This hasn't stopped me from using it much, though! I use it all the time. It stabilizes the camera wonderfully with the flexibility of its legs. And the magnetic feet have helped me stabilize it on railings and other odd places. « Show Less
1450627
I suggest that you check the weight of the Vixia, which should be listed in your owners' manual, then check the maximum weight recommended for the GorillaPod.
259854
hi I use a sony mx2000 camera weighs about 6 pounds and its no problem for it, but this is the important thing to know, the dolly does not allow for easy tracking. Unless you have manually set the wheels in the direction of travel it is very jerky as the wheels try to line up. its fine to just move the camera around from a to b but not any god for tracking shots. i do love it as a way to move without having to lift etc. its also good for lighting, perfect for that actually. hope this helps. john
754096
This compact monopod is too small. I would not put no more than three pounds on this monopod. My Canon PowerShot SX20IS works well with this. You should look at Manfrotto 680B Monopod 4-SCTN I think this will work better for you.
202376
my camera only weighs 19.8 oz and isn't really considered a dslr .........thanx so much for your input though :)
1204680
no without it ,but you can balance it ,its simple and easy,you don't need weight if your camera is DSLR but in case your camera is heavier you can create weight from anywhere and add it in the end of it,up to you
1997333
Hey there, right now I'm running a D800 with a 24-70mm and there is still a weight left so it should be ok. I am assuming the 80-200mm should be similar in weight. That being said, if size and portability is not a concern I would suggest a glide cam for smoother gliding. Else the steadicam is unbeatable for travelling.
18917
I used with Sony HDRCX240 video camera which is light and well worked, I think your heavy camera will not be so stable with this, and this does not have adjustable hight. This is very compact and very easy to fold and light, so I like carry it in my bag.
1757266
I use my tripod for my Professional Sony MC2000 series its pretty heavy camcorder and it does well to stabilize it and I EVEN USE IT AT TIMES ON A DOLLY NO ISSUES.
436353
It will NOT support the weight though, I already tried it with that camera and the plastic leg locks broke. Don't risk your camera on this cheap tripod.
1778476
I'm not familiar with the weight of those cameras...I'm sure Google is BUT...I use it with my Sony FS700 and it's borderline. I need to fully extend the rear arm to help the balance and only with smaller lenses does it work. But even so, I still like it for the price. I usually use it with shorter lighter lenses so for me, it works.
610159
Hi. I ended out returning the Manfrotto and purchasing a Carbon Fiber Gitzo based on the difference in weight, though the Manfrotto didn't weigh that much more (+ 1LB?). I am using a Sony RX1R, so even the 1 LB difference in weight was important since my camera is so compact. Unfortunately though, I cannot remark on your camera and lens from experience, since your carrying heavier equipment from the start, but it was a nice tripod and ball head for the price, rated to hold that weight, and seemed pretty portable over all. Hope that helps
296951
I use it with a Panasonic 170 as well as Canon DSLR'S the heavier the camera and battery the smoother the ride. Keep zoom lens in one focal length to achieve and keep static and dynamic balance
1926716
Look I have on this mi canon rebel t3i and a tascam recorder with a light on the top I don't now how much weight is but I can tell is heavy and the opteka moon grip still strong very secure and I don't have too much trouble with the weight but obvious all the tree items I carry on this is very light except for the recorder. But for sure is more than 5 pounds.
1480988
31 pounds is too heavy I think. My Nikon D800+70-200 2.8 is about 6-7 pounds.
2235559
I'm away from home now, so can't say you exactly how much weight. However I can tell you that is big!! So, in case you don't own several camera accesories, I suggest you a smaller one.
404400
I would go with something larger for a DSLR. I think it would support the weight but something a little larger would be more steady with the camera attached, especially at any sort of an angle.
1972049
I am using this with a Sony fs 100 and it works great. It takes a lot of practice to become comfortable with the extra weight but it is truly worth the money. I think it will be a great asset with your canon camcorder.