What is the difference between the fd-80, FD-80A and the FD-80P?
1462223
No sure. Check descriptions and specs for each model. Google each one and see what you can find. The FD-80P is a newer model than the FD-80.
538961
There are several differences in features and paper capacity. Check this website for details: http://thetonerexpert.blogspot.com/2013/03/canons-new-mfp-printers-imageclass.html
1133213
The primary difference between the two is that the a80 is a little more durable in design and the ability to take abuse. The Military 810F rating indicates greater durability under harsher conditions vs. the 810G. This refers to testing against extreme pressures, temperatures, humidity, collision, etc. Additionally, the a80 is touted as "waterproof". If you work in rainy climates or near water, the waterproof option may work better for you. Aside from that, both hard drives offer the same capacity and USB 3.0/2.0 standards. and the same, simple USB to USB connecting cable, which doubles well as a transfer cable for migrating information between PC's. Hope this helps.
791366
Dito on Breaux's answer. More light, heavier, bigger. The 80 works fine for me.
157773
I believe the KC-860U also has a humidifier function whereas the FPA is just an air purifier..
1281346
I really don't know, I think there's only two kinds the 60 and the 80, sorry I couldn't give you a better answer ,....
665177
I am having the same debate for a gift. And, i agree that the only difference is the base/cleaner. I believe the 8243A is a newer model but am not 100% about that. I read that the 43A is easily cleaned by rinsing under water. I also read the 8109 does not hold as long of a charge as the 43A. If you find out anything, let me know.
674460
There is no difference in flavors, they are the same product, just different packaging. "FFP" stands for Frustration-Free Packaging and it a type of packaging that makes for easy opening when you get it and keeps your product safe from damage. It is the best! I always look for FFP products, I have yet to be disappointed! Hope that helps...
1797902
They are basically designed for the same uses. The different models are just different quality.
1327857
I don't know the difference between the two--only that one is a newer model than the other. You should research the model numbers.
1908499
Short answer: They won't compare.Long answer: These are not "mil-spec". The rear aperture will not accept an A2 replacement, so forget tritium or fiber optic upgrades. The front sight post has wiggle, which means that a long range zero is impossible, even though the FSP detent is spring loaded. There is just too much slop. The FSP also doesn't move well using a standard A1/A2 adjustment tool. The hardware is not Grade 8, and the aluminum is not 7075-T6. Hell, even the "anodizing" is not Type III; more like paint. If these will be used for HD, duty, war, or carbine courses, forget it! If these will be used on your backyard dirt clod plinker, then go for it. Short answer: They won't compare.Long answer: These are not "mil-spec". The rear aperture will not accept an A2 replacement, so forget tritium or fiber optic upgrades. The front sight post has wiggle, which means that a long range zero is impossible, even though the FSP detent is spring loaded. There is just too much slop. The FSP also doesn't move well using a standard A1/A2 adjustment tool. The hardware is not Grade 8, and the aluminum is not 7075-T6. Hell, even the "anodizing" is not Type III; more like paint. If these will be used for HD, duty, war, or... » Read More Short answer: They won't compare.Long answer: These are not "mil-spec". The rear aperture will not accept an A2 replacement, so forget tritium or fiber optic upgrades. The front sight post has wiggle, which means that a long range zero is impossible, even though the FSP detent is spring loaded. There is just too much slop. The FSP also doesn't move well using a standard A1/A2 adjustment tool. The hardware is not Grade 8, and the aluminum is not 7075-T6. Hell, even the "anodizing" is not Type III; more like paint. If these will be used for HD, duty, war, or carbine courses, forget it! If these will be used on your backyard dirt clod plinker, then go for it. « Show Less
1204234
I originally ordered the BDP-80 but returned it and traded up to the 83. The reason, however, had nothing to do with sound quality. My reason had to do with a lack of certain BluRay-related video features. As far as I know the sonic capabilities of all the OPPOs are excellent. My 83 is superb, and from what I read the 80 was essentially sonically identical. However, I understand that the later models have less mechanical noise than the older ones. My 83 isn't actually noisy unless you stand close to it, and then you can hear some low-level mechanical rumbling. I would assume the 80 is similar. But from what I've read, the later models are totally silent. I originally ordered the BDP-80 but returned it and traded up to the 83. The reason, however, had nothing to do with sound quality. My reason had to do with a lack of certain BluRay-related video features. As far as I know the sonic capabilities of all the OPPOs are excellent. My 83 is superb, and from what I read the 80 was essentially sonically identical. However, I understand that the later models have less mechanical noise than the older ones. My 83 isn't actually noisy unless you stand close to it, and then you can hear some low-level mechanical rumbling. I would assume the 80 is... » Read More I originally ordered the BDP-80 but returned it and traded up to the 83. The reason, however, had nothing to do with sound quality. My reason had to do with a lack of certain BluRay-related video features. As far as I know the sonic capabilities of all the OPPOs are excellent. My 83 is superb, and from what I read the 80 was essentially sonically identical. However, I understand that the later models have less mechanical noise than the older ones. My 83 isn't actually noisy unless you stand close to it, and then you can hear some low-level mechanical rumbling. I would assume the 80 is similar. But from what I've read, the later models are totally silent. « Show Less
1328180
Hi, in this link you can see a comparison of both models: http://www.samsung.com/ve/consumer/cameras-camcorders/smart-cameras/productcompare?prda=EC-DV150FBPWPA&prdb=EC-DV300FBPRPA Basically have the same features, the only difference I see is the physical design
1226292
Here are the difference. 1. F887 is corespond to high resolution sound. 2. The battery of f887 is 10 hours longer than f807. 3. The display size is changed into 4 inch from 3.5 inch.
2188415
There are a few very technical differences. Here you go: http://www.ehow.com/info_8521422_differences-lp-2844-lp-2844z.html#page=0
1431419
As far as I can tell, there is no difference. All of the specs are identical - I thought maybe it was just an "updated" version. Hope this helps!
32402
do not know - FD-80 is wrong shape but it may work - the product is flexible enough that you could trim out the center to fit if necessary