BPST02 vs. BPHT02 What's the difference? What is the difference in the BPSTO2 and the BPHT02? The only thing I can see is the 40 oz. jar for the BPST02 and the 72 oz. jar for the BPHT02. Yet, the latter cost about $20 less. Anyone know why? BPST02 vs. BPHT02 What's the difference? What is the difference in the BPSTO2 and the BPHT02? The only thing I can see is the 40 oz. jar for the BPST02 and the 72 oz. jar for the BPHT02. Yet,... » Read More BPST02 vs. BPHT02 What's the difference? What is the difference in the BPSTO2 and the BPHT02? The only thing I can see is the 40 oz. jar for the BPST02 and the 72 oz. jar for the BPHT02. Yet, the latter cost about $20 less. Anyone know why? « Show Less
1932685
I have a BPHT02 and it has a 40oz jar. In the slow speed you have to hold the pulse switch down to continue blending. Not a big deal! Checked them both out - can't find any difference!
1932686
I'm trying to get the same question answered. I noticed the difference in jar sizes also. Can someone please respond to this thread with the answer. Thanks!
397308
There's no difference, other than size. I will caution you, though, that the packaging has been a problem for me. I ordered one, and it arrived broken. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, I tried again, and again received a broken bottle.
2157065
You can buy the exact 32 oz. product (95830) with a hose end sprayer attached for $1.00 less than this one (95829). Crazy, huh? Both are supposed to cover 5,000 sf. I can't find any difference between the two. I used both today and will check the two labels tomorrow. If I find a difference in strength I will post it.
228396
I really don't know since I am still have a wee bit in the old larger sized one that I have been using daily for over a year. It is worth the extra to get the larger size. This midget one contains 1.68 oz (50ml) and the big one is 7.25 oz (215ml). I think the big one works out cheaper.
1215431
I hope that I can answer your question. I didn't see any PB2 with 12 pkgs in it. The one I bought on Amazon was for 1 pound and it arrived in 2 pkgs of half a pound in each. Yes, its suppose to be 2 tbsp of PB2 and 1 tbps of water. I use a little more PB2. I use 3 tbs of PB2 and slowly add a little more water then they say to use because I like a larger serving or the PB2 for me. (on 3 rice cakes)
672354
I'm sorry I don't really know the difference unless derived from a food source. I researched as best one can on the internet and really enjoyed J.Crow's website and that made me decide to get the Lugol's solution of this brand. The price and shipping was better than I could get locally. It is almost time again to purchase a bottle, it certainly lasted since I only take 2-3 drops in my orange juice each morning. Did it make a difference? that is debatable since I am still testing at the same levels, and my Synthroid rx dosage has not changed. http://www.jcrows.com/msds2.pdf
1157980
I've wondered the very same thing - both have 160 calories per bottle and 30 grams of protein however the 14oz has 2grams of sugar vs. 1 gram in the 11oz bottle! I always order the 14oz bottle because I like these bottles better. Sorry I don't know the answer either!
369862
It seems to be the same as the 17 oz container. It's just cheaper buying it by the gallon and refilling the 17 oz one.
232101
why is the 6 oz jar $84.99 and the 2 oz 2 pack $32.99 they both say eterna 27 with progenitin
1881621
From Taylor's list of reagents (https://www.taylortechnologies.com/products_results.asp?MarketID=-1&Type;=Reagents&SearchBy;=ALL&SearchString;=) there does not seem to be any difference from the MSD sheets (https://www.taylortechnologies.com/MSDSS/0004.PDF & https://www.taylortechnologies.com/MSDSS/0014.PDF). The residential reagent (R14-A) seems to be cheaper for the same size bottle. Ping Taylor for more details.
849053
There is no difference I can see in the 2, all I know is they help me sleep. There are always different prices for same product online, that I have noticed since I started shopping online. It can be same seller or a different seller and more than one different price. If you're looking to sleep, this product works. That's all I can tell you. Have a good evening.
456065
Not much difference except for the lid, which I think is a huge difference. The lid on the LitterLocker II is far superior to that of the Litter Genie. Easier to change too. It closes tighter and really keeps the odors away. I have not compared the bag cartridges and their capacities.
1609432
The BP-2 is just part of the Energizer part number (The 2 probably means it is a 2 pack). The packaging says "Replaces all size 2025". The Expiration date IS on the packaging. I bought mine in June 2013 and they expire on 3-2021. If you zoom into the amazon product picture the expiration date is in the lower left corner. The one pictured says "Use by 03-2018"
2232489
I don't know whether there is a difference. I bought based on size and this is rather large.... much larger than the two-quart jars I'm used to see used for canning fruit.
486652
I own both versions: gave the original to my parents and by the time I went to buy my replacement, the short version came out. Short Jar is the newer version, likely meant to mimic the newer Vitamix squat jar type. With the short jar, it barely fits under cabinets, but it does fit. Personally, I think it looks better too. Base of the units are identical, except in coloring. Short version has red accents. While I have not done a side by side comparison, I get the feeling that the tall jar blends a bit better. I think the blades are identical between the 2 jars, but the more narrow profile of the tall jar seems to suck material towards the blades a bit better. I feel like I've had to use the plunger a bit more in the squat jar, since it's wider and didn't seem to homogenize as well by itself. At the end of the day, however, for me, the short jar allows me to keep it on the counter and actually use it on a whim, vs. stuff it away and have it fall out of mind. So, in terms of living with it, I'd vote for short.
381601
That is a question that the seller has to answer, not a customer who previously ordered this product (which is very good, by the way). The per ounce cost is closer to the 22 oz. size with the cost of the 12 oz product. I'm sure it's a clerical error.
486654
I have the tall jar. Even though it holds 64 ozs vs. the 48 oz smaller jar, I am considering buying the short jar because the tall one collects and traps ground particles beneath the blades. I believe that the short jar is wider at the base so this is less likely to occur.