Whats the major difference between this tactical model and its non tactical counterpart other than price?
1943467
There's a few. The APT has a mil dot reticle while the APV is duplex style. The APV has a 1 inch tube, APT has a 30mm (30mm is larger, more light) and the APT has a 44mm objective lens over the APVs 40mm (more light again). Another difference is the APT has exposed turrets for quick windage and elevation adjustments while the APV is capped.
1943468
Check their web site,i believe it,s the mil-dot recticle, and no illumination,these are a great scope for the money,i do wish they would offer it with side focus parallel adjustment.
1943469
I wish I knew about the primary arms one when I got this, but font regret my purchase at all.
1943470
The major differences seem to be the reticle and and the turrets. The reticle on the APT (tactical scope) is a mil-dot. On the APV (hunting scope) is more like a traditional crosshair. The APT has exposed target turrets, so it is easier to make adjustments to the windage and elevation settings. The APV has capped turrets. You have to remove the cap change the settings and recap the turret when you are done.
1943471
Among other things APT has mil-dot, windage and elevation adjustment knobs are different APT has fully exposed turrets, the APV has capped finger, APT has 30mm tube, APV 1" (not sure it translates to anything really, or just marketing gimmick for more expensive version).Check here http://muelleroptics.com/mapv451440 and http://muelleroptics.com/mt451440
605309
they are the same knife. the only differences are the color and the sheath. But i have seen some price differences as well. But as functionality goes they are the same. I choose this one simply because it has a more natural color.
1885849
I agree with Rocco's answer. The handle on the Ka-Bar is leather wrapped. It looks nice with the leather sheath that it comes with. This model is more of a hunting style than "tactical". Ka-Bar does make quality tactical knives if that's what you're looking for.
1306538
The noise reduction with these is better than the tactical sport version. I have compared them side by side as a friend has the TS model. I regularly shoot at an indoor pistol range and the Pro model works very well. My friend "doubles up" using foam ear plugs in addition to the TS model shooting indoors. I think the extra cost is worth the additional protection.
2016825
they're both the same. just different prices. go for the less expensive. i have this one and paid only $262.00.
1160247
Hi Xander :) great choice on the Surge,it's my EDC and I love it,I also purchased it from Proto Sales as you appeared to do.they were excellent with me,the price was the best hands down (51 dollars cheaper than Home Depot etc).I asked them the same question and they werent sure,but yes I did recieve what is listed at the bottom of the page the 830278 updated model,the one in the picture is slightly different,you can watch videos on YouTube to see the differences,the old model was great and this one is even better! I sent and called Amazon and have been asking them to update the picture,hopefully they will and If your experience is like mine you will get the 830278,one way to tell is the old one had a diff. model #,you can try and email proto Sales if you want,but you should be allset,hope it works as well as it did for me and your new surge is very useful and enjoyable!
1471531
Differences are Tactical has 30mm tube vs. 1 in tube, Resettable Zero, Mill Dot reticle. Worth the price difference if you use features, But weighs 6 oz. more, Both fine scopes for the money. I have standard and wish I bought tactical but still satisfied.
1556569
If you go to the Suunto website you will see the differences you can compare models by features, it has to do with the features. I remember doing the same. The Suunto Core does all of them or it has more features in regards to what I needed. I think the Military does one thing though the Core doesn't. Hope it helped.
269829
Ya know, you gotta weigh out the differences! If $30 is all you can spend, then the UTG isn't bad (I guess) (I own it, and I'm not very impressed with it....but you get what you pay for) The TRS-25 is completely worth it! The guys at the range mentioned they had the UTG and were complaining about how LARGE the "dot" is in the reticle. The TRS-25 is a MUCH smaller dot allowing higher accuracy at the same given range. Just my $.02 Take it or leave it. Later... -Korie G.
18379
I wish I could help you out brother. I ordered it while I was in Afghanistan, and it was shipped to my house. I haven't been able to check it out yet, but I was under the impression it is a FFP. I believe you have the option in this model to choose a FFP or a SFP.
1013232
The BK-22 has a different, much better IMO, sheath and may have a different coating. The main difference is the sheath though, unless you plan on getting an after market sheath I would go for the BK-22 if at all possible.
1749361
This is not the stealth version , but there is little difference between the two
2029391
As far as individual units , and specs-wise , no difference at all . Apparently ,only difference between the 2 sets is the carrying case on the TS model, which seems to quite convenient and accomodating .
244371
There's nothing modular about this pack at all. There's "molle" on the outside to attach small pouches but nothing breaks down...well other than the integrity of the gear itself. Dont buy a Rothco for anything serious. If you're looking for a real pack you can truly depend on I'd look at maxpedition, kelty, tactical tailor, eagle and most of them will have "molle" attachment points. There are plenty of tier one options...Rothco is never one of them. Trust me, I bought this pack for civilian uses and it couldnt keep up with me. I returned it to them held together with 550 cord, 100mph tape and a grimlock.-Former 11bravo There's nothing modular about this pack at all. There's "molle" on the outside to attach small pouches but nothing breaks down...well other than the integrity of the gear itself. Dont buy a Rothco for anything serious. If you're looking for a real pack you can truly depend on I'd look at maxpedition, kelty, tactical tailor, eagle and most of them will have "molle" attachment points. There are plenty of tier one options...Rothco is never one of them. Trust me, I bought this pack for civilian uses and it couldnt keep up with me. I returned it to them held together with 550... » Read More There's nothing modular about this pack at all. There's "molle" on the outside to attach small pouches but nothing breaks down...well other than the integrity of the gear itself. Dont buy a Rothco for anything serious. If you're looking for a real pack you can truly depend on I'd look at maxpedition, kelty, tactical tailor, eagle and most of them will have "molle" attachment points. There are plenty of tier one options...Rothco is never one of them. Trust me, I bought this pack for civilian uses and it couldnt keep up with me. I returned it to them held together with 550 cord, 100mph tape and a grimlock.-Former 11bravo « Show Less
1668680
Sorry I really don't know the difference between the two but this case is well thought out and made. Actually ordered another one of these for my other AR-15. Plenty of storage space for the rifles and the side pouch with the pistol holster and mag holders are a nice touch. Been looking at the Black Hawk Discrete carry bags they are now making but I don't like the idea of the weapon having to be broken down to fit. The UTG case will give you more bang for the buck and it's made of heavy material and your rifle wont profile. I carry an AR-15 in mine plus there's enough room to carry my Rem. 870 tact. shotgun. Sorry I really don't know the difference between the two but this case is well thought out and made. Actually ordered another one of these for my other AR-15. Plenty of storage space for the rifles and the side pouch with the pistol holster and mag holders are a nice touch. Been looking at the Black Hawk Discrete carry bags they are now making but I don't like the idea of the weapon having to be broken down to fit. The UTG case will give you more bang for the buck and it's made of heavy material and your rifle wont profile. I carry an AR-15 in mine plus there's enough room to carry my Rem.... » Read More Sorry I really don't know the difference between the two but this case is well thought out and made. Actually ordered another one of these for my other AR-15. Plenty of storage space for the rifles and the side pouch with the pistol holster and mag holders are a nice touch. Been looking at the Black Hawk Discrete carry bags they are now making but I don't like the idea of the weapon having to be broken down to fit. The UTG case will give you more bang for the buck and it's made of heavy material and your rifle wont profile. I carry an AR-15 in mine plus there's enough room to carry my Rem. 870 tact. shotgun. « Show Less
1059348
I am not 100% sure since I do not own both systems, but when I was looking I bought the military one for the price just in case it fell apart on me right away. I also noticed, I think, the width of the strap and the trap color. Other than that I do not really believe there are too many differences. I enjoy mine and use it three times a week and it still looks like I took it out of the box.
782194
The Pocket Bushman, which I have owned previously, is not even in the same ballpark as the Recon 1 which is the finest tactical folder I've even come across. I own 2 if them and you will not be disappointed in your purchase. The Bushman, although a durable knife, is not comfortable to use and is more of a throw away knife; which is why I gave mine away a long time ago.