Why 007M is more expensive than 010M? Both are nano MRC, 007M is "clear"only while 010M comes with "UV". 010M should be better than 007M.
1937201
UV filter coating imbues a slight color tinge, and reduces the amount of light. Clear is actually preferable. UV filtering is unnecessary with modern lenses.
1937202
Clear filter, 007M, is the prefered choice and priced higher. UV coating can slightly distort coloring and its benefits are debatable.
723560
There is no difference. Both do the same job. I called 3M and they could not tell me the difference. The general purpose cleaner is effective for removing adhesive.
502285
I erroniouslly purchased the non coated version for my wife. She is a sunrise/sunset photographer. The non coated version allowed significant lense flare when pointed into the sun. While on vacation, we met another photographer who had the coated UVA filter. She had the same problem we did, only bought the MRC and hasn't had a problem since. I have since purchased a B+W UVA MRC filter for her, among other stupidly expensive filters, but I have wasted enough money buying items "on the cheap" for her hobby to know that you get what you pay for. I buy B+W exclusively for her 5D Mk ii and L series lenses.
2204190
U429085 is better quality and thicker. It is also more expensive. The difference is not really noticeable to me as I've bought both. But some reviewers note there is less humidity with food staying good longer.
380512
My guess is that it costs a bit to get the NSF review and approval stamp(nothing is free). This knife is selling for appr. 20% less than the same model with a stamp that does nothing to improve the less expensive model's equal and thus excellent performance. The $ difference is better in my pocket than theirs.
828732
Related to Best Buy comparison specification of HDC tm55K and tm60k, It looks that tm60k is much waster than 55k.The deal is not good.
1471531
Differences are Tactical has 30mm tube vs. 1 in tube, Resettable Zero, Mill Dot reticle. Worth the price difference if you use features, But weighs 6 oz. more, Both fine scopes for the money. I have standard and wish I bought tactical but still satisfied.
1961441
Consumer level (nice for snapshots) but not as forgiving regarding exposure as Portra. Ultramax tends to be grainier. A lot of people seem to think it' s Gold 400 under another name. To me the results of Portra can't be beat especially by a supermarket brand.
2240628
I have both, as far as I can tell there is no difference. They both work the same. Buy whichever cost less. I think it's more of a style thing...
1616188
I did not use keymander. But both specification looks similar to each other compared with eagle eye. So i think the price may compared to each other comparison
860393
I believe the only difference is in the color, as I had the exact same question. Seems like some colors cost more than others.
38284
yes - the clear. I glued both opaque and I compared the clear that is better.clear here my choice.the clear - I recommend.I tried a film to paste itself it didn't turn outservice everything addressed made perfectly.
1712088
Clear vanilla is better when used in white or light colored items such as frosting. That way it doesn't tint it a dark color. Otherwise, they are the same!
1133930
I own both and the are essentially identical except in one aspect. They are the same size and capacity and made with the same parts and electronic controls. This difference is that the 700, that I bought 9 years ago, included a special KF antimicrobial filter in it that is not mentioned in the new 220. It obviously cut the mfr's cost but has no impact on the softening ability of the unit that I've now owned a few months, running flawlessly. Very easy to install and set-up so long as you provide the in and out plumbing.
1216115
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe a standard ink is 7mil and XL is 11mil. Not a huge difference but XL is cheaper per mil. I tried to look it up to confirm this but couldn't find it quickly but hopefully I'm remembering correctly.
642230
This one is regular and micro "dual" cut. So no, not nano. You can search for a nano version of it on Amazon.
845518
I'm assuming yes, MontBlank is definitely more expensive, but is a good looking pen, has a good weight to it and I don't have any issues with writing. Hope that helps