Would a Canon Digital Rebel XSi 12.2 MP Digital SLR Camera be a good choice camera for a beginner that will be shooting pictures at concerts?
99922
It would depend on the lighting available and lens being used. Is it possible to shoot at a concert with this camera, the answer is yes. But to give a concise answer i would need additional information to provide a more complete explanation (Type of concert, how close to stage, lens type etc....) Know that the maximum ISO is 1600 on the XSi.
99923
It depends. It's kind of a big and expensive camera for concerts (assuming these are just pleasure shots) and the real variable is going to be the lens. You'll probably need to get a pretty expensive lens that has the capacity to shoot photos that will capture action without being blurry, particularly under the strange lighting conditions of a concert.
99924
Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just ordered one for a student of mine that is a Tamron for a Canon for $170. Not bad at all. Hope that helps. Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just... » Read More Honestly, probably not...don't get me wrong, I absolutely love my XSi! But for concerts, you want something that is very light and small. Also, the standard lens on an XSi has a slight wide angle to a slight telephoto, but has a very limited range and you will need to be able to pull your subject in close unless you have awesome seats. So you will need a long zoom; probably a point and shoot with a 10X or more...If you do decide you want to use a DSLR at a concert, then get very familiar with your camera AND get yourself a longer lens. If you can spend the $$, go for an 18-200. I just ordered one for a student of mine that is a Tamron for a Canon for $170. Not bad at all. Hope that helps. « Show Less
99925
I found the Canon Rebel XSi a fairly easy to use. Of course I had used this type camera before so it was not very difficult for me to immediately pick up and use. The lens that comes as standard with it should be adequate; however lens are interchangeable and a different focal lens may in line to adapt for different occasions. I think just off the shelf the camera will suffice. This Rebel is one tough one for every use with the proper lens.
1008023
In my humble opinion, I think Canon is still the Queen of point and shoot while Nikon is the King of SLR. There are some cheapish Nikons good for entry level, but the D90 is worth the extra money and is cutting edge for what it offers (HD video, etc.) but you may want to look at spending even a little more for a better lens instead of the one that comes with the kit. Yes, indeed, if you are a beginner it can be intimidating, but they all have full auto functions. And just a bit of reading and experimenting can teach you the basics of f-stop (aperture), ASA, shutter speed, and you can go on from there. In my humble opinion, I think Canon is still the Queen of point and shoot while Nikon is the King of SLR. There are some cheapish Nikons good for entry level, but the D90 is worth the extra money and is cutting edge for what it offers (HD video, etc.) but you may want to look at spending even a little more for a better lens instead of the one that comes with the kit. Yes, indeed, if you are a beginner it can be intimidating, but they all have full auto functions. And just a bit of reading and experimenting can teach you the basics of f-stop (aperture), ASA, shutter speed, and you can go on... » Read More In my humble opinion, I think Canon is still the Queen of point and shoot while Nikon is the King of SLR. There are some cheapish Nikons good for entry level, but the D90 is worth the extra money and is cutting edge for what it offers (HD video, etc.) but you may want to look at spending even a little more for a better lens instead of the one that comes with the kit. Yes, indeed, if you are a beginner it can be intimidating, but they all have full auto functions. And just a bit of reading and experimenting can teach you the basics of f-stop (aperture), ASA, shutter speed, and you can go on from there. « Show Less
2009035
I really enjoy my D3200. It takes great pictures. I think it would take great concert pictures, but lighting could be a problem depending on your proximity to the stage. I don't think the built-in flash would work well at a distance. However, there are times when I turn the flash off for indoor photos because it takes great photos in low light. You could take pics in manual mode also. This camera takes great video, also.
424367
I'm also trying to decide if the Canon XS or XSI is right for me. I own the original 6.1mp Canon digital Rebel slr and am wondering if now is a good time to upgrade? I used to shoot primarily landscapes while traveling, but am doing more portraits now that I have kids. The Digic III processor definitely caught my attention, but I'm wondering how much of a difference in the cameras will I notice?
143981
I bought my SX120IS a month ago, and I think it is a great camera for the money, a sure "best value" choice. The zoom lens is a key feature, as even 10x telephoto images look flawless. Note that the range of shooting distance of this camera is more than three times that of 3x zoom, and so very far away subjects can be photographed. What is more, the SX120IS is a camera for a beginner to grow on, because it can be used in several automatic modes or in manual mode. The latter has gives the photographer control of ISO, shutter speed, aperture, white balance, flash output, burst shooting rate, exposure bracketing, ISO/aperture/shutter setting priority modes, image stabilization, and more. In addition to manual mode, there is a Program mode that enables the photographer to save any configuration of settings for future use, such as one created for a particular indoor location where the the lighting does not vary. In short, the SX120IS is a very versatile camera that suits the beginner as well as the seasoned amateur and one that will produce about any photograph a non-professional may be inclined to attempt. It does not succeed at the extremes of fast motion or low light. Compared to professional-grade cameras, the SX120 has a relatively small CCD photocell, and this makes for images that are more coarse-grained at high ISOs. The greatest limitation of this camera is the absence of the RAW format option for recording photos, and this reduces the range and precision of effects when manipulating the digital image with Photostop or other software. Still, a lot can be done with 10 megapixel images saved in JPG which is how the SX120IS records them. Needless to say, it does not have all the features of a $1000 camera, but the SX120IS sure beats all others for sale at a discount price of around $200.
1736590
I have never taken pics at a concert with this camera. However, all pics taken inside in different lighting conditions have turned out fine. The camera will tell you if flash is needed, which I think it would be if at a concert.Hope this helps.
1275273
Let me start with a few obligatory questions: how much experience do you have with photography, what do you want to photograph, and how much are you willing to spend?? The Rebel XT is a great camera. You can start learning on it, and continue with it for a long time. I currently use one. The biggest limitations this camera has are: Slow fps (3) Extremely small buffer if one shoots RAW (I shoot RAW exclusively, and the buffer only holds 4 shots) Small(ish) screen - the 2.5 on the 30d makes me drool... Rear wheel on higher canon models seems more efficient than four buttons Smallish, and plastic construction. Don't let these turn you away - I am a sports shooter, and that is very demanding on the equipment. You said you want to do a little semi-pro; for that reason, I would reccommend the canon 30d for you if you can afford it. The higher fps, bigger screen, larger buffer, better build quality, and rear wheel would all be of benefit. But if you don't want to splurge on the 30d, the rebel makes a fine choice. Don't forget that the newer 400d has come out - it is an upgraded version of this camera. And most of all, remember that the camera can only capture what a lens sees. Invest in some good glass.
1077278
I'm not sure because this is my first canon. I typically am a Nikon customer. So far I am extremely happy with this camera. It photographs very well in low light situations which is what I wanted it for so I'm guessing the well lit pictures will also be excellent.
2071623
Yes, it is a good starter camera. It has flexible settings and options without the expense of a digital slr. The zoom is excellent (optical 20x - equivalent to a 200mm lens (old school)). It has good low light features for taking pictures which can be a mixed blessing on how not to use flash. It takes also good video as well. It has auto setting and several settings to make taking pictures easy. The only limit on the auto setting is it does not pick up fast objects in sports mode (blurred images). It changes the setting you press the button for focus (besides the picture screen).There is no view finder with the camera just the picture screen to frame the picture you want. Yes, it is a good starter camera. It has flexible settings and options without the expense of a digital slr. The zoom is excellent (optical 20x - equivalent to a 200mm lens (old school)). It has good low light features for taking pictures which can be a mixed blessing on how not to use flash. It takes also good video as well. It has auto setting and several settings to make taking pictures easy. The only limit on the auto setting is it does not pick up fast objects in sports mode (blurred images). It changes the setting you press the button for focus (besides the picture... » Read More Yes, it is a good starter camera. It has flexible settings and options without the expense of a digital slr. The zoom is excellent (optical 20x - equivalent to a 200mm lens (old school)). It has good low light features for taking pictures which can be a mixed blessing on how not to use flash. It takes also good video as well. It has auto setting and several settings to make taking pictures easy. The only limit on the auto setting is it does not pick up fast objects in sports mode (blurred images). It changes the setting you press the button for focus (besides the picture screen).There is no view finder with the camera just the picture screen to frame the picture you want. « Show Less
1385600
I'd say it depends on how much money you have. If you have a gazillion dollars, and like to upgrade your electronics every time a newer version comes out, then yes. If not, then wait ~2 years and upgrade from the XT to the SuperDuper XTi++ Championship Pro Extreme. (The Canon digital SLRs seem to have about a 1.5 year life span before being upgraded.)
1186022
Its a good camera for novice photographers. If you have experience, there are better buys.
4761
YES ! I take a lot of indoor taking at 1600 and 3200 ISO. The phots are great! This camera is made for low light situations.For portrait, i try it but less than museum and concert. But i am sure that it good for indoor portrait too.
2073016
Yes, your words are elegant. All I did was point to a fine review where you can compare the inferior images from the Rebel to SX1. If you want the real benefits of an SLR with video then go to a fine machine like Nikon D90. http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_SX1_IS/
192596
My opinion is this would be a excellent camera for a starter. It has all the features of a proffesional camera at a low price.
1869222
i wanted this one because it has dslr qualities and the use of a dslr is prohibited at shows unless you have a photo pass. So i thought this would be ideal . I shoot shows with my Panasonic DMC-TZ5.
192594
I apologize for taking so long to respond to this - it got lost in my Inbox. Yes, I would highly recommend this as a great beginner camera. Spend a bit of time and study the manual and practice with the different settings, and you will be amazed at the pictures you take!
1401677
If I had a choice of the 70D or the T4i, I would definitely get the 70D. It is a much better camera. As a beginner, upgrading to a D-SLR is a big step with a learning curve, but the 70D is user friendly and a better quality camera than the Rebels. I bought it on sale during the holidays with the 18-135mm lens kit for little more than the Rebel and am loving it! If you have the choice, go with the 70D. I have had a Rebel T1i for 5 years now, and decided that I wanted a nicer camera. This camera shoots and feels like a real camera!