Why do I see the same lens on Amazon with a price tag at 1100 dollars compared to this price?
1935828
This question is answered in the Q&As; on Amazon. This is a 'white box' unit, which means it was separated from a camera combo pack. I registered mine at Canon for warranty and had no problems. As I understand it from reading other Q&As; and comments, this is the same high quality, new lens. I have no reason to question that, mine was new.
1935829
Many reasons. In this instance, this lens is part of a "split kit." Here is a link to some good information about Canon cameras and lenses, authorized, unauthorized USA, Import and grey market items. http://www.canonpricewatch.com/blog/authorized-unauthorized-dealers-and-grey-market-explained/
1935830
This lens is probably a "white box" lens - it was likely part of a kit for a camera. Canon is packaging this lens with the 6D, so it's possible that the camera was sold body-only or with another lens and this lens was leftover. I bought one and was able to register it with Canon for warranty - so no problems with my purchase at all. It's a really great deal on a pretty solid lens - cheaper than I have seen them on sale used - so even if you can't get a warranty, it's a good deal.
1935831
Different vendors sell items at different prices depending on their inventories. I am satisfied with the lens it came repacked in a box with all the labeled items and it is brand new. I would buy it again at $700 any day if i needed another one. Best of luck on your decision. :)
1345982
I'm starting to think Sony has something to do with this. It is my understanding that Sony owns a piece of Tamron, and Tamron makes some lenses for Sony (55-200 and 18-250). It may be that Sony does not want this lens to compete with it's 70-300 G since the Tamron is nearly half the price. I was looking for this lens to replace the 70-300G, after two bad copies I got rid of it, it's not worth $800.
659299
Trust the box. There are focusing motors in bodies and lenses that differ so I would go by what the box says. Too bad because it is a good lens.
778943
This is a USA lens. Amazon price was competitive (for a Nikon, which I consider somewhat overpriced... But, honestly, it is a much better lens than the competition, based on the comments in reviews on sites such as this AND various photography 'enthusiast' sites (such as photo magazine sponsored sites). I have NOT personally, physically compared to the competition, but I'm happy with the purchase.).
417541
Hi Christy, I am firm on the price. I am having a hard time parting with this lens. -- Ralph
729914
The white box one mentions list price as $499, while this one says $800. I checked at Canon web site. The list price for this lens should be $499. So any clues why Amazon has it listed as $800 on this page? Are there two versions of the same lens - i.e. is this the newer version compared to White Box offer? This is all too confusing as there are listings for seeming the same product. I understand the reason behind White Box etc., but why difference in list price???
1878461
The lens I purchased from Amazon was the US version. I don't think Amazon sells any grey market lenses.
1235806
My best guess is that it's a grey market lens. Several of those companies sell them at very low prices. Be careful as they don't have US warranties. A quick google of the business name will usually tell you what you need. A good price just as long as you never need service. If you do, you're screwed.
2158494
Most likely a price below $1499 is from a vendor that is not an authorized Tamron dealer. This means you may not be eligible for any rebates or the 6 year warrantee offered by Tamron. Most authorized dealers are going to set the price at MSRP ($1499). It is up to you if a discounted price is worth giving up any rebates and (more importantly) the 6 years of coverage. Go to http://www.tamron-usa.com/dealers.php to see if the dealer who is selling the lens is an authorized dealer of Tamron. If the cheapest price on Amazon is not from an authorized dealer go to the list of all dealers selling the lens on Amazon and find one that is authorized according to the Tamron website. I just bought this from Murphy's Camera because the rebate and warrantee were more important to me than saving a couple bucks. This is especially true when you consider the lens is not cheap and it would really bum me out if I needed to get it fixed out of warrantee.
501844
Amazon tends to raise their price autmatically (?) if there is more interests for the item. e.g. more clicks and page views increases the price.I think the price drop for a bit due the rumor that waterpoof version of this lense is going to be out soon. This is not a water-proof lense but a great one indeed.
827779
If it is sold directly by Amazon, I don't believe you have an issue. If it's a 3rd party (even selling through Amazon), you should check. Usually it'll say something like "USA Warranty" in the description. And if a lens is significantly cheaper than at the usual places, be doubly suspicious.It's a great lens, but its strength is in the 16-24 range, not as much in the 24-35 range. Since I have the 24-70, that's not such a big deal -- but be aware.
498786
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II is listed for $2250. Read the feedback and you will see it is preferred over the older model. Check Canon website for details.thanks, Dave
992072
It's a prime lens and a faster lens. It also comes with the view finder, which sold separately, is retailing for $100.
1086504
Hi, thanks for your question.I see that this lens is available from the seller, A&R; PHOTO VIDEO INC. Sellers on our website are allowed to sell items at any price they feel is fair. The other reviewers may have purchased their cameras from other sellers.I hope this helps!
245017
If it's from Amazon or Adorama (where I got mine) and I'm sure B&H; and other big US dealers, it will definitely NOT be gray-market. Great lens too btw.
1753828
I have no idea.. but hey, may as well save $49 and go for the one with the lens (:
1476282
Very strange, but they have the same lens listed twice! I was wondering this too..but they're the same lens. Sorry for the late response!