Beginning to take photography classes, wondering about buying this polarizer versus Hoya (which is double the expense).
646576
I am a professional photographer and I use the Tiffen polarizer and it works great. My advice to you is while you are learning get the Tiffen polarizer because at the end of the day either one cant promise a great shot thats on you. But I have used the product and it is a big difference when I don't use one.
646577
In days past Tiffen was a good quality middle of the road (cost) filter. They've cheaped them up to point I wouldn't own one. Hoya is a similar filter. The best filter's I've used over last 45 years are by B + W.
646578
When seeking opinions on anything I find it best to Google with the word "...review". You are afforded a plethora of opinions some which may be exactly what you are looking for. Example, I "Googled" "Hoya Review" and am sending this one (of many) links that returned: http://www.photographyreview.com/cat/lenses/filters/hoya/general-filters/prd_85055_3133crx.aspxHope this helps not only for this query, but all future queries.
646579
Either one will do the job. The Hoya is the better unit, but cost vs usage has to be looked into. As a beginning user, take the Tiffen to learn how it works, and save the money for a better use. Once the usage is mastered, then move up to the Hoya. Hoya supplies the optical world with glass for their products.
646580
I did not buy a Hoya polarizer, but I do have the tiffen, which I would definitely not recommend. Because when I looked thru the polarizer to see a LCD screen and rotated, there is no change of the strength of the light, which means there is no or minimum polarizing effect. It can only to be used as a protect glass. I would recommend a B+W or Hoya. Do not waste money.
646581
Looks to me that Hoya is the same price ($20). Unless you get the multi-coated hardened glass Hoya, which was $40, and as a beginner unneeded imo.
575221
I agree and have noticed that as well. I bought the older version and have been pleased with it. I have also not read complaints about the newer version. It may be as simple as supply and demand or something we are not aware of. You might check review sites just to make sure the version 2 is well rated and then go for it if it's cheaper. The 20MM has been a great lens, I have received compliments about my photo's and 9 times out of 10, it's taken with the 20mm.
120700
I believe at the short end, the lens is too wide for a polarizer. Do not buy it. Do not let the big name fool you. If you still want a polarizer, I recommend the Nikon CP II. Polarizing effect and color are beautiful. Good luck.
328794
Thanks for the info. I don't think I'm quite ready to pay that kind of money for a lens for a camera that I paid $600.00 for. May as well upgrade the camera and keep the lens. I do appreciate the reply.
499920
Thanks I appreciate your input. My main reason for asking was because the price difference between them is only 100 bucks which wouldnt be too much in the long run. I can fully appreciate that the D3100 is more beginner friendly. I just don't want to regret spending an extra $100 once I become less of a beginner. The swivel out LCD seems like it could be useful. Maybe not, what do I know. Anyway, thanks for the input. I do appreciate it.
251603
Just one, honestly if you really want to do Polaroids it will be cheaper to buy a fuji instax because you can get twice the film for half the price. But at the same time it is really fun to use a camera that's 40 years old (:
1896554
Hello HowardIf you are purchasing the Hoya NDX 400, you will be looking at a 9 stop reduction. The filter is used very effectively in long exposure photography.Dave
1441020
Since you are new to SLRs... in order of importance: 1. A decent class 6+ sd memory card or two or three (sandisk is a good company to go with) 2. A good camera bag that will fit everything that you want to carry along. (Lowepro makes good ones) 3. A extra battery (splurge on a canon battery, or risk it with a third party battery, your choice) 4. 50mm 1.8 prime lens (Good, cheap lens that can handle indoor and low light photography, almost universally useful) 6. Lens Blower (to blow dust off of lenses, avoid actually cleaning the lenses with a cleaner unless you really have to, a few flecks of dust isn't going to effect your picture) Depending on who you ask, the 7th generally will be a good Multicoated UV filter for each of the lenses you use to protect the lens (Hoya makes good ones), however some people say that it isn't worth it to put a 50-60 dollar filter in front of their several hundred dollar lenses, it's up to you. These are all that are pretty much needed from the get go. The rest depends on what types of photography are you planning to use the camera for. Tell me what you are planning to do and I can come up with some extra suggestions.
398336
I would say a mirrored or polarized lens would be best. Aquasphere have come out with new options for mirrored and polarized. Let us know if you have more questions.
1862430
Hi the only thing I use is the Adapter Ring and the lenscap and the filters are fine for me..I bought extra close up filters Neewer and another set of filters from polaroid no expensive all from Amazon and do the job prefectly for me depends what you want..I have no Hoya..ad I share the filters between my Canon Bridge and Canon 1100d dslr.I also bought 58mm star filter fantastic effects hope that helps, you couldjust buy seperatly and cheeper an adapter ring dont make the mistake I did and bought from Amazon USA you will end up paying customs duty of 16 x
774987
Hi Mr. Hewitt (I wonder if we have any relation?) Anyway, for a true beginner (as in you've never used anything but a point-and-shoot) I'd recommend you get a Nikon D40 and an 18-200 VR. Keep the 18-55 kit lens, you'll find it lighter when your just taking snapshots of the family or whatever. The D40 is an excellent starter camera, it has almost all the tweaks of this much more expensive camera without the weight and cost. The D300 has many advantages over it, but I really feel you'll learn a lot faster with a simpler camera, and step up to this when your ready. I actually started out with a D40 a bit over a year ago, it made starting out quite fun. The 18-200VR will follow you as a great lens on the D300 too, and you can use any newer AF-S lenses on it. If you have older AF-D Nikon lenses lying around that you want to use, a D80 is also a good place to start. It's easier to make the custom tweaks you'll learn about in your photography classes on the D80, but it still has Auto modes as well to get you started. Checkout www.kenrockwell.com, especially his recommended camera page. He's a bit more eloquent than I am. And I wouldn't be so fast to recommend the D60 to anyone, it's just the D40x's guts (plus active D-Lighting, but without the other enhancements of the D300/D3) with a different name stamped on it. I wouldn't recommend the D40x or D60 to anyone, they exist to fill a price point to compete with Canon. If your eyeballing either, jump to the D80 and don't look back.
2091791
I'm a semi-professional photographer, I can't recommend either one. The 2600 is just the 1300 with a doubler. BUT the "Nikon" connector fell apart before I could even try it. It fell apart in such a way as to be irreparable. It is cheap for a reason, it's junk. The lens length and WEIGHT would make it embarrassing to use when anyone is around and I doubt the quality of the image would be acceptable. I didn't send it back because I put it on a shelf with my good lenses to remind that you don't get something for nothing. If you buy it and it works...great...but my money is on "Fail," Sorry!Larry Kelsey I'm a semi-professional photographer, I can't recommend either one. The 2600 is just the 1300 with a doubler. BUT the "Nikon" connector fell apart before I could even try it. It fell apart in such a way as to be irreparable. It is cheap for a reason, it's junk. The lens length and WEIGHT would make it embarrassing to use when anyone is around and I doubt the quality of the image would be acceptable. I didn't send it back because I put it on a shelf with my good lenses to remind that you don't get something for nothing. If you buy it and it works...great...but my money is on... » Read More I'm a semi-professional photographer, I can't recommend either one. The 2600 is just the 1300 with a doubler. BUT the "Nikon" connector fell apart before I could even try it. It fell apart in such a way as to be irreparable. It is cheap for a reason, it's junk. The lens length and WEIGHT would make it embarrassing to use when anyone is around and I doubt the quality of the image would be acceptable. I didn't send it back because I put it on a shelf with my good lenses to remind that you don't get something for nothing. If you buy it and it works...great...but my money is on "Fail," Sorry!Larry Kelsey « Show Less
1582486
Brandon. It doesn't say when you asked this question but I figured the answer out. First, I just purchased the last one that a storefront had for $289, so i'm sorry if I stole the lens from you :X. Second, the price is going to be interesting on this lens from here on out. It has been discontinued due to a recently announced new model. The question is how much will this new model cost? To my knowledge that hasn't been answered. I decided to snag it at this price because if the new model is upwards of $400 then it out of my price range anyway. If the new model comes out sub $400 this older model might tank in price. Supply and demand will dictate based on that information. As for big stores, I don't see you having much luck. Most did firesales and liquidated their stock already to mitigate the price risk. I can tell you that this is my first fixed lens for general photography. It hasnt even arrived yet, but when it does I plan to test it out. If its not to my liking I can resell it to you at the price I purchased + the tax I paid + shipping. I would generally just return it but that lowers your chance of it ending up in your hands. If this was a recent post just come back to me and I can show you proof that it hasn't even arrived yet :). Take care!
609270
I would do it again without hesitation, I've had zero issues with this so far. There is difference in the feel vs Nikon's battery grip but no where near the difference in price! Small price to pay in my opinion - Hope this helps
645063
I bought this and think a polarizer is a good idea, just not this brand. As far as the comparison with a UV filter, it is not is that league. These filters turn on a collar. You turn them until you see the least reflection. You can reduce light reflection from glass, water, and it can deepen color by eliminating glare from light coming from different angles.The bad thing about this filter is that it is a little cheap, and they put it in a stupid square plastic case with a lot of slop. The filter slides all around in it, unlike a good tight round case. Get a better brand. Will it fit your lens? Yes, if it's 55 mm. I bought this and think a polarizer is a good idea, just not this brand. As far as the comparison with a UV filter, it is not is that league. These filters turn on a collar. You turn them until you see the least reflection. You can reduce light reflection from glass, water, and it can deepen color by eliminating glare from light coming from different angles.The bad thing about this filter is that it is a little cheap, and they put it in a stupid square plastic case with a lot of slop. The filter slides all around in it, unlike a good tight round case. Get a better brand. Will it fit... » Read More I bought this and think a polarizer is a good idea, just not this brand. As far as the comparison with a UV filter, it is not is that league. These filters turn on a collar. You turn them until you see the least reflection. You can reduce light reflection from glass, water, and it can deepen color by eliminating glare from light coming from different angles.The bad thing about this filter is that it is a little cheap, and they put it in a stupid square plastic case with a lot of slop. The filter slides all around in it, unlike a good tight round case. Get a better brand. Will it fit your lens? Yes, if it's 55 mm. « Show Less
989895
Funny you would ask that! Not quite one. I'm quite satisfied though because this is a replacement for an $80 polarizer that came off my lens the second day that I owned it. It came off once the first day and I found it, and figured I'd better be extra careful to make sure it doesn't come off again, and if it does, that I notice right away. As careful as I was, I still lost it. Ended up buying this one, and it's never come off. It's less than one complete thread, but I guess it has a good amount of friction. And for less than $20, it's still not a huge deal if you do lose it.
1296629
There is 300 USD difference for a start!You are correct about the mirror. The video auto-focus is far faster and 10fps is the fastest you'll get at that price.