Which is a good monitor to use with this on the canon D5 mark 3?
1935766
Hello. I've only got the one Liliput monitor, but it should work well with your camera. It has multiple types of outputs including HDMI, Component, RCA composite. Also has audio, too. It displays in true HD, up to 1080, if I recall correctly. Here's the link to it on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0041I8UAO/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1
1935767
Hello. I've only got the one Liliput monitor, but it should work well with your camera. It has multiple types of outputs including HDMI, Component, RCA composite. Also has audio, too. It displays in true HD, up to 1080, if I recall correctly. Here's the link to it on Amazon. Lilliput 7-inch LCD monitor with HDMI, YPbPr interface, dedicated high-definition video camera
1935768
Any one that has the required plugs. I use a Lilliput 7" monitor, purchased here...http://www.amazon.com/Lilliput-monitor-interface-dedicated-high-definition/dp/B0041I8UAOand it works well
1935769
I use an android app called "DSLR Controller". It will control many functions of the camera and act as a monitor. I bought a 10ft USB cable for this particular usage. Very handy.
1935770
That really depends upon what you are looking for in a monitor and what your budget allows you to spend. Here is my recent review of a ProAm monitor that was published on the www.kenstone.net and www.lafcpug.org film and editing websites...http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/proam_7_hd_lcd_monitor_douglas.html
1645973
Thanks Conway, I was so happy to see your post it gave me the push to order the Nikon D700 today from B&H.; This is my first full frame camera and I just wanted to make sure that I was making the right decision. I was mostly leaning toward the Nikon but had to consider the Mark 2. Thanks again for your help.
473015
I do not think that you will be disappointed with either camera as Canon and Nikon both make great cameras. I actually compare the DR XT to the D70s for features. The best thing to do is go to a camera store and handle each camera. Check out the menu settings, how easy it is to change settings while you're shooting, etc. I purchased the XT last August and couldn't be happier with it. It is a great camera. The 8MP sensor in this camera should be good enough unless you want to shoot extremely large pictures. An 8MP sensor can produce images as good or better as 35mm film. I have printed flawless 8x10 images and I have plenty of resolution to play with for larger pictures. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
614869
DxOMark's scores, unfortunately, just don't predict real world performance very well(there are many examples of this, e.g., Nikon D5000 vs. Canon 7D). Specs look very good, though, and I'm looking forward to reading the professional reviews to see how it stacks up.
628942
Yes it will work with a 5D Mark3. If it were me I would purchase the canon 100mm L thought.
1774591
I would suggest a Nikkor lens. I have heard Signa are good. As long as you buy a DX lens it should work.
2160583
Not suer what the issue is. A very good used D3 should cost no more than $2,500. Since that's less than half of the as-new price and it was a working-pro camera back in the day, I found the D3 a great buy. Of course, the D4 is better in many ways but since it's $6,000 and out of reach for me at this time, I am happy with the performance of the D3 for magazine and motorsports coverage. In fact, within one month of making my purchase, I shot a magazine assignment and made more than half of my purchase price.
17384
http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III-vs-Canon_EOS-1Ds_Mark_III
1658707
This will only monitor what's on your screen. If your camera can hold at 100% zoom, yes. But you're not going to get a different zoom on the screen vs what would be on the camera display, no. This also does not offer false colors/peaking/zebra/etc. This is an entry level field monitor. That said, it is a well built entry level field monitor. For those reading with DSLRs be aware that though this is a 7" display most cameras will not output video to fill that seven inches. Canon for example outputs a black border that utilizes about 1" total top/bottom/left/right for display of camera controls/settings. Your actual viewable space is more like 5.5-6" inside this black frame. Some cameras output better, some add-ons to firmware like Magic Lantern will allow you to modify this border. But all said and done, this does it's job... increasing the viewing area of your screen or working as a second screen for focus puller.
846254
It comes down to what you want to do with the camera. Really high quality prints are done at about 300 DPI (dots per inch) and "good" prints are usually more like 200 DPI...Nikon's 12.2MP is roughly 3000x4000 pixels, so you should expect top quality prints at up to about 11"x14", and "good" prints at about 16"x20". Of course, at the limits, things like lens quality, noise, etc count too - so what Nikon has done is to create a well balanced camera that should meet the needs of most people wanting this sort of camera. Keep in mind that just a few years ago, the Nikon D3 - a true workhorse of many professionals - was only capable of 12MP. It comes down to what you want to do with the camera. Really high quality prints are done at about 300 DPI (dots per inch) and "good" prints are usually more like 200 DPI...Nikon's 12.2MP is roughly 3000x4000 pixels, so you should expect top quality prints at up to about 11"x14", and "good" prints at about 16"x20". Of course, at the limits, things like lens quality, noise, etc count too - so what Nikon has done is to create a well balanced camera that should meet the needs of most people wanting this sort of camera. Keep in mind that just a few years... » Read More It comes down to what you want to do with the camera. Really high quality prints are done at about 300 DPI (dots per inch) and "good" prints are usually more like 200 DPI...Nikon's 12.2MP is roughly 3000x4000 pixels, so you should expect top quality prints at up to about 11"x14", and "good" prints at about 16"x20". Of course, at the limits, things like lens quality, noise, etc count too - so what Nikon has done is to create a well balanced camera that should meet the needs of most people wanting this sort of camera. Keep in mind that just a few years ago, the Nikon D3 - a true workhorse of many professionals - was only capable of 12MP. « Show Less
1368768
The solo5 is a much better choice. It is 5 megapixels over 3, has auto focus and and a larger shooting area. Actually, the solo8 just came out! For 349 dollars NOTHING comes close to that.
1556862
I am a 5D MKIII user and I have picked Canon 2 option. it works fine for me.
1699312
Would love it if someone could comment on this. I am at the same decision point. Was also looking at the Sigma EF-530 DG Super, which is cheaper than the Canon 430. I am working with a Canon EOS Rebel XT and am an amateur. Translation, automated functionality is very desirable where possible ... but I'm also looking for a reasonable price. I'd really appreciate it if someone could share their advice. Thanks in advance for your help with this.
602318
Have used this LCD Screen Viewfinder with my Canon Mark3 for almost a year now. It doesn't clip the screen and serves the purpose. You won't be disappointed. Good luck. Gene D. Scottsdale,AZ
839465
Hi Joe, do you use this as an intervalometer? Is it any good? Or do you have any recommendations with the 70D? Many thanks.
1511861
The 5D Mark III is a better upgrade in my opinion. I was never happy with my 1Ds. I love my 5D Mark III.
487508
No compatible, for the D3x00 or D5x00 get the G dx lenses or sigma with IF focus...Internal Focus