Which tripod should I buy for these binoculars? I have read the reviews about it being heavy..
1968793
1st, there is an adapter you will need to mount them on a tripod. More specific to your question, we have been using them with a very cheap tripod that came free with a camera purchase, our heavy-duty tripos being tied up with a small telescope at the moment. The cheap tripod holds the binoculars just fine (well, as steady as that cheap tripod will allow for at least), no weight issues. I would say you can spend as little as you'd like on a tripod for these. We have found that the stability of the tripod head is really the only issue...you can buy a step up or so in quality to alleviate that issue, but the cheap little one we're using allows us to just grab it an go...and, we have no issues with weight of the binoculars.
1968794
I wouldn't repurchase these binoculars. They shipped defective. They replaced them and the same part broke again in a matter of weeks. Now they are monoculars
1229759
The weight and stability would be fine. I used them for hunting and holding them for extended periods of time. The viewing area I don't think would be great for the fast action of football. Depending on the stadium the 300 level would be the only area I would attempt using these binos.
442558
TRIPOD: Recommended tripod must take at least 4 lbs and upwards, I'd recommend this tripod; http://www.amazon.com/66-inch-Heavy-Duty-Tripod-Bag/dp/B00EVC9PQI/ ADAPTER: The adapter included with the binoculars will work but to me its a bit too flimsy. I'll recommend http://www.amazon.com/Barska-AF10546-BARSKA-Binocular-Adaptor/dp/B000BYH8EQ/ SCREW HOLES: The screw holes on the binoculars is located between the two outer objective lens and is covered with a cap which has the Celestron logo. Just unscrew the cap and you'll see the 1/4 inch hole where you'll attach the tripod adapter. The tripod adapter will now be attached to the tripod plate with 1/4 inch 20 screw, then you attach the tripod plate to the tripod and you can now enjoy your viewing.
2069621
I am using the Really Right Stuff TVC-33 and a Wemberly gimble head. The tripod is heavy enough for my 800 mm lens also but not excessively heavy for short carrying in the field. I like the variable leg endings for rock placement and it still will reduce in height for macro pics in the field.
1066004
I think either one would do fine, IF you have a good tripod mount. You need to get one specifically designed for binoculars and for stargazing, not terrestrial viewing. The weight of the binoculars will get tiring fast. :-( Personally, if I were a beginner stargazer I would get a telescope. Better magnification and, due to the size of the optics, more light.
1951608
Thanks for asking.... I'd have a sturdier tripod for any/all telephoto lens. Just not good enough. The extra weight makesthe tripod "slide" downward.
734206
Yes they will be great for that, very clear binoculars. I would also suggest the strap that holds it close to your body and not the one that comes with these binoculars.Regards,Terry L. shook
1777821
I'm an "entry level" bird watcher. I'm very happy with the binoculars. They are very good even in low light situations. They weigh 22.4 ounces.
708982
That really depends on what you are going to use them for. I bought the Orion Paragon-Plus XHD Extra Heavy-Duty Tripod Stand for Binoculars (Black) for my set. I originally got the binoculars for checking out the moon and some entry level astronomy. But I mostly use them for bird watching on the pond in my backyard. That tripod works pretty well for both - much better for the birds than planets.
2183878
They are normal size binoculars and are not very heavy. If, you want more lightweight ones, these may not be right for you. Also you need to hold them very steady as they are very sensitive to movement. Or you need a tripod.
378846
For portability I like the flexible Gorillapod which can wrap around poles or tree branches. For on-the-floor tripods look for one the best height for you. They come in a variety of lengths and if you are very tall the 61" will be uncomfortable and/or annoying for long shooting sessions.
51245
I have no idea what you're talking about with all the numbers. I use the tripod for a spotting scope (wt. 2 lbs) It's not terribly sturdy but, since I carry it in my pack while hunting, light weight is a necessity. It's sturdy enough to handle the spotting scope.
1671435
I'm using the tripod - and have some reasonably heavy equipment on it ( digial camera + telephoto lens ) and i took some long exposures that were fine. Clearly one of the main factors is weight but i have had no stability concerns.
734203
I haven't used mine much,they are to heavy and any little movement you lose what you are viewing.I should have bought a lighter binocular.
1188071
The tripod is very sturdy. It's kinda heavy so I would say it probably will hold that much weight.. I bought a huge lens & keep it attached at all times.
821434
I don't think they are too heavy. An issue might be that they are very powerful and are on the large side. My hands shake a lot, so when I use these to look at things other than stars and planets I usually sit my elbows on a rail or something similar so that my view is steady. On the plus side, they are crazy durable, the carrying case is very adequate, and they are easy to collimate if the images don't align perfectly on delivery (which happens on many new binoculars).
1162810
Manfrotto (formerly Bogen) makes the best tripods. The specifics will depend on the use; for example, if you are birding, weight will matter more than if you are stargazing because you'll have to carry it a lot. All things being equal, get the most solid tripod you can afford. For a scope at this price point, spend as much or more on the tripod as you did on the scope. A great scope that shakes is worse than the naked eye. You can reuse your awesome tripod for photo, video, your next scope, etc.