What is the highest speed that it can read?
1957274
According to the Operation manual the test range is 2.5 to 99,999 rpms with a +/- (0.5% +1 digit)
1715108
If i remember reading correctly, it can only be upped to 8gb and only at a max speed of 1866.
384452
I believe the wrote speed is up to 90MB/s* and writes up to 60MB/s. Hope this helps.
995009
Up to 90MB/s read speed, 50MB/s write speed. That's what it says in the ad and it may be right. All I know is it the fastest and smoothest card I own. I have 2 12.2 Samsung Pro Tablets and I purchased one for each device. Very fast, that's all I can say. The Samsung EVO is a good card also. I have those in our smart phones. Both cards or fast and reliable. There is also another Samsung PRO card that is black and has speeds up to 70 MB/s. DO NOT buy that one. I tried one, it failed, was sent another, it failed, and after the 3rd one failed, my money was returned.
1512216
Go by the MB/s not the name of a card. This would, if you study, be exceeding most cards on the market. I have up to 80MB/s. Price will stop you from going much higher.
334818
The card readers are all USB 2.0. Running a benchmark on a Class 10 SD yielded typical transfer rates of 30-35 MB/s.
888332
It appears that the Writing speed is about 5.60 MByte/s and the reading Speed is about 7.37 MByte/s. This is based on some of the tests I was able to run on my PNY Attache III 16 GB USB 2.0.
705561
mine reads 1.7 Ghz. It appears fast because there's basically a SSD instead of a hard drive.
2267733
Sorry, I don't know. It seems fast enough. But since I use it for Time Machine it doesn't matter very much. You can ask LaCie.
1952348
From: PC: Intel Core2 CPU 6600 @ 2.4GHz (Windows 7, 64-bit) Port: USB 2.0 Card Reader/Writer: Kingston's MobileLite G3 To: SanDisk Extreme Pro 16 gb And an IMG file (2,478,505,984 bytes) I can reach 27 mb/second Note 1: maybe with a USB 3.0 port you can reach a best speed. Note 2: maybe without an adapter you can reach a best speed.
1420323
the speed on how fast the reader sends and receives info ,price, and year made 2.0 made 2000 3.0 made 2008for regular home use the 2.0 works for me . hope this helps
1052955
The spec sheet doesn't say, but almost certainly 5400 RPM. Max. data xfer over USB3 is 5GB/sec. There's a 2.5" external Hitachi at 7200 RPM but it appears to only have 750GB capacity.
76290
It is rather confusing. On the link I provided, scroll down to the "Technical Details" part of the page. It reads "Minimum 20MB/ sec sequential read/write speeds." Best of luck!
1732057
A regular harddrive reads and writes about about 80 megs per second, this drive does it at around 400 mps. Its really impressive, but you need to make sure both the drive and the computer its connected to have SSDs and thunderbolt to take advantage of the speed.
1960039
This particular drive is USB2. You'll get about 16 megabytes per second write, 20 to 30 read, depending on file size, fragmentation, etc.
1166468
Gb/s refers to the data transfer rate, 3.0 reads transfer half a gigabit more per second.
314028
A previous answer mentioned that 10/100 are not standard wireless speeds, which is correct; however, it also mentioned a 54Mbps maximum for 802.11n, which is incorrect. The 802.11n spec can handle up to 600Mbps (the actual limit will differ from device to device, depending on how it is utilized), while 802.11g has a maximum of 54Mbps. 600Mbps is the maximum link speed you can obtain and does not account for overhead such as error correction codes. Real world speeds are more likely to be in the 100Mbps neighborhood. Keep in mind also that you will be limited by the read/write speed of the HDD installed. That said, I have a 7200RPM HDD in mine, and I get a link speed of 72Mbps max with transfer rates of about about 3Mbps. That equals a little under 5 minutes to transfer a 100MB file. I tested via the samba protocol from my Galaxy S4; your mileage, of course, may vary. EDIT: Using the enclosure's Internet connection, I ran an Ookla speed test from my Galaxy, thereby bypassing the HDD as a factor. I got about 26Mbps this way, so the functional speed of the WiFi itself is definitely higher than the 3Mbps I got reading/writing files.