is this printer appropriate for copying watercolor art?
1948563
I've noticed much better results when printing photographs using Epson photograph paper rather than some other brand, probably because the Epson ink is specifically formulated to be used with that specific paper. Do also remember that a copy is really also a photograph. You may need to scan the piece you want to copy and then manipulate the color registration in a program like Photoshop before printing it to get the best results. If Photoshop is beyond your budget, I've also had excellent results with Corel's PaintShop Pro.
1948564
Frankly, I don't know. But I did notice that it distorts the colors more than you'd expect from an "advanced" printer. The printed image is sharp and detailed, but it's of different huge (e.g. yellowish camel instead of beige, or bluish gray instead of greenish gray). That said, I print on Hammermill 28 lb paper, not on specific Epson photo paper.
1528358
It depends on what kind printer and a app that you can find for it. I know with my printer ( Canon MX472 ) that it does fulfill all my printing needs. A shout to WolVol for a great netbook!
1124206
I have one hardwired right now to USB printing. So, yes absolutely! And for a mid price printer it's excellent!
1155774
If you are using this printer with a Mac it works fine for sublimation. You do not need to get the 3110DN. The 3110DNw is perfect. Just download the ColorSync profiles.
1472779
Depends on your definition of "quality pictures". This printer all print acceptably, but not professional photo lab quality. There are far better printers on the market for photo printing (look for one that uses more colors).
875353
yes use google cloud printing printers , http://www.google.nl/cloudprint/learn/printers.html
530995
Of course you can. This printer isn't the best because I say so, it is because of all of its features.
2075013
Of course. Use it as a regular copier - either color or black and white copies.
1280190
Yes and it does a very nice job BUT remember photo printers often have 5 to 9 ink cartridges for the finest definition and graduation in color and blacks. Most people would be very happy with a photo from this printer. To be sure I printed a photo on my professional $1400 photo printer and this printer . The print was very acceptable but not true photo quality. Most would not notice unless they were side by side. In the recent past I have owned photo all in one like the - Epson Expression Photo XP-850 - 6 color --- they do a beautiful job for photos but ate more expensive to use. It all depends just how particular you are!
1895770
It should be able too, but I bought it only for my edible images. I love the printer.
1998128
I agree with Dale W. This is a great color printer for business (pictures look really good), but I would not use it as a photo printer.
562557
I use it to print documents. This is not a good printer for photos. The ink saturates too much and the resolution is pretty bad.
1180217
The answer is yes. it also is fast and it works very well. No complaints about this printer after using it four months.
230940
I am able to print beautiful 13 x 19 prints with this printer. I only use Epson paper and inks. They frame well and are archival. I love this printer except for smaller sized paper which does not feed reliably. I thinbk you should be satisfied with the quality of the work it produces.
1031678
I don't know what 140 watercolor paper is but I have found that the Epson R3000 will load and print on almost anything. You just need to know the icc "profile" for the paper and load it in a manner appropriate for that paper.
1334144
Yes, it is. Not the fastest one (faster and sharper than any 11x17 ink-jet), but still good for printing 1/2 sets of drawings for review.
335537
Yes, but be aware of the high ink replacement costs. However, the printer does a great job of printing. I used it extensively for brochures. I ran some card stock but not a lot. It worked well for the limited times I used that type of product.