What are the key differences between this and the "Hotel" model, if anyone has tried both?
1953008
The hotel model which I used at the Dunes Manor in Ocean City, Md. had more punch. However, I found out that they used a water pump to add more pressure to the shower head and water supply. Bottom line, my Speakman is a step better than my old waterpic but not anywhere as good as the hotel model. Still happy with it, but a little disappointed. I would give it a 3 1/2 to 4 star rating out of 5.
1728479
I think the difference is the rounded corners and metal slide rails. See my review of this item, not worth it. Look into something better.
1819689
LOL I have both of them. I use the Crane in the bedroom and this in the living room. The top voted answer is very on point and covers a lot of the differences. Although they do miss some of the more.. general differences. 1) Filling up: The crane is a bigger hassle to fill. The opening is at the bottom of the "tear" shape and it's not really all that easy to balance everything while filling it (it's not made to sit on the top..). The Honeywell is extremely simple by comparison. 2) capacity: The honewell has a much larger capacity and is great if you don't want to continually refill it. 3) output: They both do really well on this front, but you can literally see the vapor shooting from the crane. Although you can't see the vapor, I've noticed that the Honeywell pushes out cooler air. 4) Maintenance: Honeywell has this hands down. It's just easier to change a filter than to let soak in white vinegar every week. However, if price is a big factor than white vinegar is cheap (I still use it on the honeywell about once a month) and the time might not be as big of a deal for you. I've never noticed any "white film" on either of them, but I'm pretty good about changing the water and only use filtered water..
1627744
How would someone know how to compare 2 different models. A person would have to own both to give you an actual answer here... I can tell you that I was disappointed with the product. It was heavy and awkward. I returned it
804863
Hello, I remember choosing between the two as well. What I found out is it was the same (tray load). Its lower price is due to the fact that it doesn't come with the Multimedia Suite, which I didn't want anyway.
1419662
I doubt there is any difference. I bought this one and really like it. Would reccommend.
956241
This is a cheaper model. It is smaller and not as soft as the other one. We bought this one first trying to save a buck and ended up buying the original as well.Once word of caution with these seats. You will need to adjust you seat down or your legs may fall asleep. Both the wife and I have to either lower the seat of put a pillow under our feet if we are on an extended ride.Hope this helps.
2187386
Brian, I have no idea if there is any difference, as I have only experience with the "other" model. I just really like the one I bought from Amazon.
2077374
They are basically the same; it is your preference as to the functions you wish to have. Check their web site for details.
1878186
I can't tell you what the differences are as I am not acquainted with those models. However I love the one I have. It has plenty of power and is very user friendly. Switches easily for different cleaning needs. I have no regrets with this vacuum.
344126
For me, when I connect it a the hotel's wired network connection, creates a wifi hotspot that I then connect all my devices to, much like your wireless network at home. I find it more reliable than using the hotel's wifi and can control my personal security much easier.
1853048
I think the difference I models is the extra rinse option. The inside drum is pretty large but as with all washing machines you don't want to overload it. I have had the one with the extra rinse option for 6 months and absolutely love my washer.
1849548
I do not know what the difference is. The one I bought was a waste of money! I bought it to be used in our second home should we have more guests than beds, but it did not work, your body sinks down to the carpeted floor. I was very disappointed for I something similar at this home and it works wonderfully!
513918
There's a lot of discussion about the advantages of the old version in the Amazon user reviews of both versions. I bought the (more expensive) old version and am happy with it, but never tried the newer one for comparison.
441292
They're very similar -- they just have minor hardware revisions. I wouldn't recommend this one, as I've had nothing but problems with it.
1094816
The main differences that I see are that this model has adjustable roller pads for your feet and the optional (sold separately) preacer curl and leg extension attachments. it also has a better seat adjustment IMHO.
1024007
I own both models, I find the newer one to be sturdier and a little more thought out. It feels a little bigger too. The wiring is more secure, the control is lighter so puts less stress on the wires should the clip come off your clothing. The storage case protects the AfterShokz when not in use. The charger is by micro USB and not plugging it into the old USB connector. I feel overall it is an improvement.