I lost my 5D Mark III (left it at IHOP *sigh*) and thinking of replacing it with the 6D. I shoot for fun, mostly my kid. Would I be satisfied?
1952745
It's a great buy for the money, especially if you don't want to spend on a new MKIII. Things to note... No integrated flash - though the sensor does a decent job in low light situations. there are only 5 manual focus points, which may or may not be an issue depending on how you like to compose your shots. The built in wi-fi lets me pair the camera with my android devices, so I can take pictures without having to hold the camera to my face. This sometimes comes in handy with children to capture "non posed" shots (when my nieces and nephews see me taking a picture they tend to clam up or pose). It's a great buy for the money, especially if you don't want to spend on a new MKIII. Things to note... No integrated flash - though the sensor does a decent job in low light situations. there are only 5 manual focus points, which may or may not be an issue depending on how you like to compose your shots. The built in wi-fi lets me pair the camera with my android devices, so I can take pictures without having to hold the camera to my face. This sometimes comes in handy with children to capture "non posed" shots (when my nieces and nephews see me taking a picture they tend to clam... » Read More It's a great buy for the money, especially if you don't want to spend on a new MKIII. Things to note... No integrated flash - though the sensor does a decent job in low light situations. there are only 5 manual focus points, which may or may not be an issue depending on how you like to compose your shots. The built in wi-fi lets me pair the camera with my android devices, so I can take pictures without having to hold the camera to my face. This sometimes comes in handy with children to capture "non posed" shots (when my nieces and nephews see me taking a picture they tend to clam up or pose). « Show Less
1952746
I think so. Some say the 5D is better for video but I shot video at Christmas with the 6D and was very satisfied. I love my 6 D and have shot maybe 2000 images and really like the the ability to shoot at higher ISO
1952747
It totally depends on the most used features of the 5D Mark III that you used. The AF is much more basic on the 6D. The build isn't as solid feeling, the sensor is a hairs smaller, and the buffer is smaller. Other than that, the sensitivity of the sensor and the processor speed great. Are you doing a lot of HDR raw? 6D doesn't do HDR Raw. Are you monitoring any filming of your kid wi headphones? The 6D doesn't have an additional monitoring jack. I got a 6D and haven't looked back and would have not qualms about shooing a client with it. I hope this helps. If needed, go to a local camera store and get your hands on one for the feel. Good Luck. It totally depends on the most used features of the 5D Mark III that you used. The AF is much more basic on the 6D. The build isn't as solid feeling, the sensor is a hairs smaller, and the buffer is smaller. Other than that, the sensitivity of the sensor and the processor speed great. Are you doing a lot of HDR raw? 6D doesn't do HDR Raw. Are you monitoring any filming of your kid wi headphones? The 6D doesn't have an additional monitoring jack. I got a 6D and haven't looked back and would have not qualms about shooing a client with it. I hope this helps. If needed, go to a local camera... » Read More It totally depends on the most used features of the 5D Mark III that you used. The AF is much more basic on the 6D. The build isn't as solid feeling, the sensor is a hairs smaller, and the buffer is smaller. Other than that, the sensitivity of the sensor and the processor speed great. Are you doing a lot of HDR raw? 6D doesn't do HDR Raw. Are you monitoring any filming of your kid wi headphones? The 6D doesn't have an additional monitoring jack. I got a 6D and haven't looked back and would have not qualms about shooing a client with it. I hope this helps. If needed, go to a local camera store and get your hands on one for the feel. Good Luck. « Show Less
1952748
It is a great camera with lots of high-end features- GPS and WIFI are just a few. If that is important, I would say go for it. If it isn't, than I would say go with a less expensive model.
1952749
It totally depends on the most used features of the 5D Mark III that you used. The AF is much more basic on the 6D. The build isn't as solid feeling, the sensor is a hairs smaller, and the buffer is smaller. Other than that, the sensitivity of the sensor and the processor speed great. Are you doing a lot of HDR raw? 6D doesn't do HDR Raw. Are you monitoring any filming of your kid wi headphones? The 6D doesn't have an additional monitoring jack. I got a 6D and haven't looked back and would have not qualms about shooing a client with it. I hope this helps. If needed, go to a local camera store and get your hands on one for the feel. Good Luck.
447426
I don't own the 5D. Shot with it in the past. As far as I know, there shouldn't be any issues at all. Sigma 85mm is spot on.
469114
Yes, beautifully. I have owned the Canon 70-200L in addition to this and actually prefer the Tamron. I use it on my older original 5D as well as my 6D.
1746411
That is what I needed to hear! I have the Canon EOS 7D and love it, But...as you said by the time you carry around all the gear for "sight seeing", I'm exhausted. I too am looking for that mid level (super zoom) companion to go along with my Canon when called of. I was a little hesitant to go with a Panasonic but everything I have read about this camera has been positive.I have yet to actually find a store who has one on display, looks like I will have to order it blindly and pray!
2079455
It's definitely a great camera and I too would replace it with the same. (I'm actually on my 3rd one - the last two purchased very used)Does anyone have a suggestions for the natural progression to the line?
1782978
I can't pre-order... Too little faith in canon cameras when they are released. I will probably get it down the road (feb-march) if their aren't any issues.Would upgrade from mkII.Would be nice if canon could release the 1d and 1ds as one camera, and just allow us to switch between high fps and high MP.But alas, I'll refrain.
1570389
The 7D may have a better AF system, but there is nothing wrong with the 6D AF. With practice and skill, you can work around any 6D AF deficiencies for your application. But the 7D will not get you the low-light indoor shots that the 6D will. I upgraded from a 40D basically because of the high quality high ISO. It is amazing how the indoor shots of my grandchildren come out.
1570384
If you have money to get 6D, don't even look at 7D. 6D is full frame while 7D is crop. While 7D is faster technically, 6D in my opinion will still outperform due to its bigger sensor and better low light capability. 7D could be better to shoot real action sports in good light. For kid's action/sports and low light, 6D is what i would purchase
1298992
I am very happy with the k3. It works well with the light I get inside. It was a good upgrade from the 5d mark II and 7d I had. I hope to buy another one soon. I thought about the k50 or k5IIs but there's no need to go back to a lesser brand when the new one is only $1000 right now. Unless you like the color of the k50. The k3 has everything that they both have plus more.
109777
Most definitely ! I have the mkII and my wife has the 6d. The 600 flash is the best for this application with a tt5 times two or a tt5 and tt1 combo. Pocket wizards customer service is top notch btw, if you have specific application questions. Cheers,John
1452661
I don't know much about the 6d as I have the mark III. But from I understand the 6d is full frame as is the mark III. If that's the case it should work very well with it. Keep in mind the Len is manual only which is really good when making a film/movies as the focus ring eases into the film. However since you said you will be outdoor, getting precise focus will be more challenging in sunlight as it will depend on your "eye". So it requires you to slow things down and taking your time when taking a picture as opposed to doing the half shutter to get it in focus. In terms of color and the image, the lens really is superior but only if you get things right. If it's not right, you are more likely to be upset because it then becomes a missed opportunity. So because of this some people have a love/hate relationship with the lens. Hope that helps
57120
Works fine in the 6D. has the coulomb counter chip, so the 6D will give %charge.
8521
K. Bennett,Thanks very much for your info about these two cameras. I started with the model 30, had them for a year, sold them and got two 40D's, then last March I sold those and bought two 7D's. I had thought about getting a 5D, but a friend who just bought it said there are a lot of problems with the focusing, he said he gets around 20% out of focus, a number I find unacceptable. He advised me to skip the 5D and go to the Mark IV, and I was not sure if the better and sharper images, especially at high ISOs would be worth the extra $3000 a Mark IV would cost. What I might do is rent a Mark IV body for a weekend and see how I like it.Thanks for taking the time to post your comments. K. Bennett,Thanks very much for your info about these two cameras. I started with the model 30, had them for a year, sold them and got two 40D's, then last March I sold those and bought two 7D's. I had thought about getting a 5D, but a friend who just bought it said there are a lot of problems with the focusing, he said he gets around 20% out of focus, a number I find unacceptable. He advised me to skip the 5D and go to the Mark IV, and I was not sure if the better and sharper images, especially at high ISOs would be worth the extra $3000 a Mark IV would cost. What I might do is rent... » Read More K. Bennett,Thanks very much for your info about these two cameras. I started with the model 30, had them for a year, sold them and got two 40D's, then last March I sold those and bought two 7D's. I had thought about getting a 5D, but a friend who just bought it said there are a lot of problems with the focusing, he said he gets around 20% out of focus, a number I find unacceptable. He advised me to skip the 5D and go to the Mark IV, and I was not sure if the better and sharper images, especially at high ISOs would be worth the extra $3000 a Mark IV would cost. What I might do is rent a Mark IV body for a weekend and see how I like it.Thanks for taking the time to post your comments. « Show Less
712708
Not sure about a 6D. I bought one for a t3i and it does not work. From everything I have read it only really works for the t2i.
940337
S120 ;) (sorry don't know anything about the Nikons so I really have nothing objective here, but, I love this camera, love it). This camera is worth it's weight in my pocket for what it does when I need it to. Unreal quality and speed, and the video is on par with my 6D if not better in the same conditions.
356703
I do. The camera is incredible and has helped pushed the limits in tough shooting situations like only a full frame can do. The ONLY 'flaw' has been a dusty sensor in the beginning. Cleaned myself and all is well. In the age of DSLR any serious photographer should be comfortable in cleaning the sensor as it comes with the territory eventually. I love my D600 and dollar for dollar I personally would choose no other body on the current market.
1863598
This should because a 6D is basically the same as a t3i which is what I have and I use it with mine.