I am a perfect size 33''. Should I go to a 32'' or a 34''? If I went with a 32'', would there be room in the waist if I needed it?
82505
I am also have a 33" waist, fairly thin (cyclist) build. I ordered the 32 and it was way too tight around the hips. The fabric stretches, so you could wear them, but I did not feel that they would be appropriate to wear to the gym due to the extra bulge in front. I returned and ordered the 34. A little big, but a much better fit around the hips. The drawstring keeps them from slipping down at the waist.
82506
I bought these for my husband. He is a perfect size 31. I bought him a 30. His was a bit worried the first time he put them on but wears them all the time for Crossfit and Casually. So I'm guessing the size worked out great, otherwise they'd be folded away somewhere. The sizing recommends going down if your between sizes. It worked for him!
82507
They are pretty true to size. I would order a 33". They have a draw string to make them tighter. I purchased a 38" and have recently dropped one waist size to a 36", I'm still able to wear them and make them tighter. These shorts are really comfortable.
1794848
I have a 38" waist and ordered large, which are fine for me. I think for a 36" you might want medium. They have an elastic waistband so they are pretty adaptable. Tom
1627808
If your waist size is less then 32 I would go with a small. For a larger waist I would go with a medium stout.
888706
I would choose the Large. I am 32x34 and I chose the Large/Long. But I wear a drop leg holster and drop leg mag pouches which tend to make my pant legs rise a bit. I love these pants.
165118
I have a 32" waist and originally bought the small. The medium for me was the way to go. Plenty of room and I gave the small away. I would rather have a littler larger belt than too small. Buy the large and if its a hair too big it will still stick to the velcro.
1101253
I'm pretty sure a s/m should fit a 34" waist, I bought the l/xl with a 38 inch waist and I think it would go as small as a 36 inch. But that would be pushing it,any smaller and it would not be tight enough for support. I hope I was able to help, but it's really hard to tell without actually trying the belt on.
67383
I wear a 34" waist pant, and the medium fits me perfectly. I have no experience with the small, but I would guess that to be the right size for a 28" waist. FYI, I need a large in the matching top, the medium is too tight.
1887454
U can select the size via click box of size. It has size conversion.. i select medium as my waist is 32-34'
1799882
I'm 5'10" and a 32" waistline and I got a medium, they fit great. So I would say a medium would work for you also.
391761
I'm 33" and with a medium there is some wiggle room. I guess with a 34" it will still fit but with not much wiggle room. However the material stretches.
633314
My waist is between 32 and 33. M fits but is a bit loose so I need to tighten up the belt. Surprisingly, S fits me too and also need to tighten the belt a little. So I don't know. Also, I notice the leg on the M is a bit baggy than the S. So I chose the S.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
534994
A medium size would be best for the 33 inch waist. As the medium size fits up to a 34 1/2 inch waist. The range in waist size on a medium is between 30 and 34 1/2 inch. I bought a medium for my son and he has a 32 inch waist and his fit fine.
268006
I'm a 32" waist and the 36-38" fits just fine, so I'd recommend going up to the next size.
851728
They seem to run a little big. My hubby has a 29 inch waist and I ordered the XS which worked for him. As far as length goes, I know on the Prana website, you have a choice between 30, 32 an 34 inch inseams. Don't seem to have that same choice here. Good luck.
2114628
It depends on how snug you want them. I'm a 33" and ordered the large. If I had to reorder, I would get an XL.
434279
Hi, I think small would be too tight for u. I bought the small I am 32 waist. It has fit perfectly for me. 33/35 waist would be too small in my opnion.