Telephoto lense: If I buy a telephoto lense of 2.0x ( VCL-HA20 about $110 ), would I have a total of 2X x 10X = 20X optical zoom?
1961560
Other posts say that although 10x optical zoom is written on the camcorder body, the written documentation says the camcorder does 20x zoom without an additional lens.
537007
Thanks, Tech. Funny that teleconverters are available for so many other size lenses but not this one. I could have lived with a 1.4x. Like you said, I'll have to live with what I've got... until I can pony up $1500+ for Canon's 100-400mm zoom.I guess I'd better plan on having a good number of 8mb and 16mb cards with me and shoot JPEG and RAW so I can seriously crop and/or enlarge the best shots (which will be many if the weather is good). I want some 20" x 30" or 24" x 36" posters from what I'm shooting. A telecoverter would have helped.
2038886
The device has only 1 lens. It may be 60x, but it does not have variable magnification, only variable distance (focus).
196599
A zoom is lens that allows the focal length (magnification) to be changed continuously over a range. For example, a 25 - 100 mm zoom provides magnifications from 0.5X (wide-angle) to 2X (telephoto). A telephoto lens is one that provides magnification greater than 1X. For example, a 200 mm lens gives 4X magnification. It can be a fixed focal length or a zoom lens. A super-telephoto is one that provides high magnification. Generally super-telephoto focal lengths are in the range of 300mm (6X) to 1200mm (24X).
1076715
8x Optical Zoom and Up to 16x Clear Image Zoom... I think that is the digital zoom
457458
my unit is a 20x100x70 with a 20x zoom capability. I am well pleased with the clarity of the objects that the optics provide. It is a matter of opinion regarding the amount of area you want to focus. The only thing I suggest is a hefty tripod to hold it steady for any long periods of time. Do not get a camera tripod for it is not stable enough with this type of unit.
399354
Yes, optical zoom is now 24-70 (was 28-100) but aperture only goes from 1.8-2.8 as opposed to 1.8-4.9 on the older lens. Many enthusiasts prefer the faster aperture and 24mm wide over bigger zoom range.
1911605
I am not sure I understand the question. These are the clearest, sharpest binocs I have ever had the priveledge of owning. All across the lens they are sharp and bright. A great deal for the money. You would spend $800.00 - $1000.00 to find a pair like them.
1740489
I used a camera tripod to mount/support the scope. I am not aware of a way to use it as a telephoto lens.
206301
A lens with 2 numbers, like a 18-55mm lens, is a zoom lens. The smaller number is the wide end of the zoom range, and the larger number is the telephoto end (zooming in, like you are taking a photo of a small bird or something far away).
1371874
The 14-150 actually is the combination of 14-42 + 40-150, that means, you only have to carry one lens instead of two and also you can prevent missing the moment while you switch lens. If you shot movie, then you can enjoy the zoom from wide to tele too.Regarding image quality, the far end of 14-150 in the tele end will be come soft, so if tele photo is your shotting style, then you better keepm the two lens combine as that deliver better quality. Also your question already state the different - the two lens combo is cheaper and the saved amount can buy a prime lens already. The 14-150 actually is the combination of 14-42 + 40-150, that means, you only have to carry one lens instead of two and also you can prevent missing the moment while you switch lens. If you shot movie, then you can enjoy the zoom from wide to tele too.Regarding image quality, the far end of 14-150 in the tele end will be come soft, so if tele photo is your shotting style, then you better keepm the two lens combine as that deliver better quality. Also your question already state the different - the two lens combo is cheaper and the saved amount can buy a prime lens... » Read More The 14-150 actually is the combination of 14-42 + 40-150, that means, you only have to carry one lens instead of two and also you can prevent missing the moment while you switch lens. If you shot movie, then you can enjoy the zoom from wide to tele too.Regarding image quality, the far end of 14-150 in the tele end will be come soft, so if tele photo is your shotting style, then you better keepm the two lens combine as that deliver better quality. Also your question already state the different - the two lens combo is cheaper and the saved amount can buy a prime lens already. « Show Less
605356
The user guide says that the "field of view is fairly small. It is approximately equivalent to the field of view through the telescope when looking through a typical (i.e. not wide-field) 5mm focal length eyepiece." So maybe 200x ?
1917125
I absolutely love the 28-135mm IS f/3.5 lens from Canon. For about $400 +/- you get a moderate zoom telephoto with a 1:1.6 mag aspect on your dSLR about 44mm - 206mm in 35mm terms with an added bonus of macro capability. I use it as a 'walk around lens' and while not the BEST in construction - the optics are sharp, color rendition is super and the IS is a lifesaver when shooting scenes in low light without a tripod or monopod.For wide angle work - I've purchased the SIGMA 17-35mm f/2.8 and found the optics and color rendition above my expectations for a $225 lens. The SIGMA comes with a lens hood and pouch - for which Canon sells as accessories and expensive ones at that. I absolutely love the 28-135mm IS f/3.5 lens from Canon. For about $400 +/- you get a moderate zoom telephoto with a 1:1.6 mag aspect on your dSLR about 44mm - 206mm in 35mm terms with an added bonus of macro capability. I use it as a 'walk around lens' and while not the BEST in construction - the optics are sharp, color rendition is super and the IS is a lifesaver when shooting scenes in low light without a tripod or monopod.For wide angle work - I've purchased the SIGMA 17-35mm f/2.8 and found the optics and color rendition above my expectations for a $225 lens. The SIGMA... » Read More I absolutely love the 28-135mm IS f/3.5 lens from Canon. For about $400 +/- you get a moderate zoom telephoto with a 1:1.6 mag aspect on your dSLR about 44mm - 206mm in 35mm terms with an added bonus of macro capability. I use it as a 'walk around lens' and while not the BEST in construction - the optics are sharp, color rendition is super and the IS is a lifesaver when shooting scenes in low light without a tripod or monopod.For wide angle work - I've purchased the SIGMA 17-35mm f/2.8 and found the optics and color rendition above my expectations for a $225 lens. The SIGMA comes with a lens hood and pouch - for which Canon sells as accessories and expensive ones at that. « Show Less
615923
Yes. This measurement means that it has variable magnification. It will magnify from 20x to 60x zoom. The "x80mm" number describes the diameter of the objective lens ( the one farthest from your eye) . the larger the objective lens, the more light it captures = brighter picture.
351447
Not sure,,the threads are 52mm,,,did you read my review on the kit? Don't buy it if it isn't on sale. The tele photo lens is just a magnifying glass the is curved and really distorts the light coming in,,plus near impossible to focus,,even auto focus doesn't work with it. if you are wanting it for the filtersthen it is probably worth the money,,hope this helps
1581805
You have to weigh that against the Sony's excellent optics and continuous F2.8 minimum aperture. No 50x optical zoom is going to be worth much. I love the RX10.
526899
Truthfully there is no way to know. If I ordered a $2,000 lens and the package was even slightly bent, I'd ask for a replacement. When spending that much money on a lens, it has to be absolutely perfect!