How does Kodak's Portra line compare to their Ultramax line? As in, what are the differences?
1961440
By purchasing professional film you are paying for superior (and more accurate) color reproduction (consumer films tend to over exaggerate colors in an effort to make the image "pop"), higher levels of enlargement capability due to a tighter grain, and enhanced exposure latitude (which refers to a films ability to handle over or underexposure.. with the exception of Kodak's Ektar which has a distinct sensitivity to underexposure)
1961441
Consumer level (nice for snapshots) but not as forgiving regarding exposure as Portra. Ultramax tends to be grainier. A lot of people seem to think it' s Gold 400 under another name. To me the results of Portra can't be beat especially by a supermarket brand.
132643
I am also comparing these 2 Cameras. I want to use for Snorkeling and Beach pictures on our upcoming cruise. My preference is for Quality Underwater Photos over how stylish the actual camera is. Also, I am looking for the one with the Best Zoom Capabilities.......Anyone out there own one of these cameras ???
1291322
I also bought the zd710 for $149.00 at Wal-Mart, and I was very disappointed. I have always been pleased with Kodak cameras but this one failed to deliver. I plan on returning it and upgrading to another model. Perhaps the z712? Although, $149.00 is an excellent price for this camera and it's features, I would recommended to K. Schenewerk that she also return it. In my opinion, when large sums of money are being spent, I expect to be satisfied. (Definately if it is an investment that will be with you for a while). Search until you find what pleases you.
1542716
Yes - works better than Kodak-branded batteries -- holds charge better, lasts longer. All of the cheap generic batteries work better than the Kodak-branded "original equipment -- don't worry.
2238929
Absolutely not. I would not buy this printer again. Don't think I'd buy a Kodak again. Love their cameras though.
142019
I have the black model. A close friend and a daughter-in-law have the silver. The three of us each use a SanDisk, Ultra II, 1GB card. I do all the printing on the same printer, so all comparisons are identical. That said, I see no difference in the prints from black or silver. I just think the black looks better beacause it breaks up all that silver. Interesting comment from Pger. I also agree with Fred Miller. I think it's just a matter of your color preference as the specs for both are the same.
732160
I just bought the pro-100 so I haven't used it a lot. I still can tell you a few things. It is large and heavy, not portable at all, but it can print very large pictures etc. The print quality is very good to excellent. I also have a Canon IP6700D that uses the same style ink cartrige and they are easy to refill. I have refilled these many times over several years with no problems. I can add ink without taking them out of the printer. This saves a lot of time and money. Refill kits are easy to fine on line. If the pro 100 lasts as long as the 6700D I will be very happy with it. With the rebate, I think it is a good buy. Hope this helps. I just bought the pro-100 so I haven't used it a lot. I still can tell you a few things. It is large and heavy, not portable at all, but it can print very large pictures etc. The print quality is very good to excellent. I also have a Canon IP6700D that uses the same style ink cartrige and they are easy to refill. I have refilled these many times over several years with no problems. I can add ink without taking them out of the printer. This saves a lot of time and money. Refill kits are easy to fine on line. If the pro 100 lasts as long as the 6700D I will be very happy with it. With the... » Read More I just bought the pro-100 so I haven't used it a lot. I still can tell you a few things. It is large and heavy, not portable at all, but it can print very large pictures etc. The print quality is very good to excellent. I also have a Canon IP6700D that uses the same style ink cartrige and they are easy to refill. I have refilled these many times over several years with no problems. I can add ink without taking them out of the printer. This saves a lot of time and money. Refill kits are easy to fine on line. If the pro 100 lasts as long as the 6700D I will be very happy with it. With the rebate, I think it is a good buy. Hope this helps. « Show Less
274308
Thanks for the reply. According to CNET, the shutter speeds are comparable. In addition, the cameras weigh about the same (I think one weights about 5.6 oz and the other 5.8 oz) so there is a few tenths of an ounce difference. Since I'm mostly a 4x6 or occasional 5x7 type of person, is there a difference to me at that print size between the two cameras? The price gap between the cameras is closing, so really the main feature difference for me is the optical viewfinder. And, I'm wondering if the "step ups" in the SD870 are worth it. Thanks again. Thanks for the reply. According to CNET, the shutter speeds are comparable. In addition, the cameras weigh about the same (I think one weights about 5.6 oz and the other 5.8 oz) so there is a few tenths of an ounce difference. Since I'm mostly a 4x6 or occasional 5x7 type of person, is there a difference to me at that print size between the two cameras? The price gap between the cameras is closing, so really the main feature difference for me is the optical viewfinder. And, I'm wondering if the "step ups" in the SD870 are worth it. Thanks again.
549368
I don't have enough experience with Kodak printers to give you a good answer.
344030
Has anyone compared the quality of stills from these cameras? I like the faster burst rates on both these cameras (I shoot a lot of sports with my kids). I rarely shoot over ISO 400 and I do not have the capability to print larger than 8x10. Which is the better output in terms of images?
722138
Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell... » Read More Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) « Show Less
657393
Because, in my experience, the Kodak printer was a piece of ")#($*)(*# and not worth the paper it prints on. It did a terrible job for us. We threw ours out. Piece of junk. Had many many problems with it
1730165
Hi Danilo, if you follow the link you can view a comparison of the two cameras made by Graham Houghton and you can learn so much more from his video. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdFdjloBrd8 Best of luck Sandro
643722
This is a great little camera, easy to use. However Kodak is no longer in the camera business so unless you have software from a previous Kodak camera to use (like we did), you will use whatever photo program your computer has. This camera does not use a dock and my current camera doesn't either, you just plug the cable into the camera and computer and download that way, very easy. This particular camera does not have rechargeable batteries. I am very disappointed in Kodak because I can no longer send pictures from the Kodak software, it just doesn't exist. I have used these cameras for years and next time I will have to buy another. But this particular camera takes great pictures. This is a great little camera, easy to use. However Kodak is no longer in the camera business so unless you have software from a previous Kodak camera to use (like we did), you will use whatever photo program your computer has. This camera does not use a dock and my current camera doesn't either, you just plug the cable into the camera and computer and download that way, very easy. This particular camera does not have rechargeable batteries. I am very disappointed in Kodak because I can no longer send pictures from the Kodak software, it just doesn't exist. I have used these cameras for... » Read More This is a great little camera, easy to use. However Kodak is no longer in the camera business so unless you have software from a previous Kodak camera to use (like we did), you will use whatever photo program your computer has. This camera does not use a dock and my current camera doesn't either, you just plug the cable into the camera and computer and download that way, very easy. This particular camera does not have rechargeable batteries. I am very disappointed in Kodak because I can no longer send pictures from the Kodak software, it just doesn't exist. I have used these cameras for years and next time I will have to buy another. But this particular camera takes great pictures. « Show Less
296690
Seems the Kodak site has changed, it now says "Available in May", so the May 15 release date is looking likely. Too late for me, I guess I'll have to look for a different option. :-(
473884
Without looking it up, i believe the 35 ultra is smaller in size and has blackout technology or low glow technology but dont quite me on that. I have both and reccomend. The only other camera i recommend is the plotwatcher pro.
808898
Just got D- Lux5 used, from Leica blog it is considered better camera. Better pic quality etc. Considered a magic camera by some. Don't upgrade firmware to version 2. Many feel the version 1 is better. Google to read threads.