These underwear have pros and cons: Pro - When ...
923491
These underwear have pros and cons:

Pro - When you put these on you're going to the gym because unless you're a mannequin every body flaw you have below your belt is going to be so repulsive you'll want to go to the gym

Con - They ride up your inner thighs.  I don't care if you staple them in place, they'll ride up.

Pro - No need for ED medication with these soft, smooth undies... and no pesky four hour limitations either!

Con - You will feel much sexier than you really are leading to embarrassing interactions and long winded emails to Kate Beckinsale noting all your virtues.
983162
These are excellent exercise briefs, as long as you don't do any exercise that uses glutes - squats, lunges, biking, trail running, etc.  Or if you're into Brazilian cut bikini briefs.  Otherwise, you may well find yourself cursing wedgies and not-discretely-enough trying to adjust your undies in back.

Really, they give you an *ample* amount of fabric in front (unless you're a porn star), but the back is too narrow unless you're a swimmer.  If you actually use your glutes they'll be a bit big for these briefs.  Looking forward to them falling apart in the wash or something...
2630855
When I first received these Hanes Classics Men's 4-Pack Multi-Color Boxer Brief Underwear, I was pleased with their fit and comfort. After a couple of washes ( on gentle cycle in cold water and without over drying) I noticed that the there were little strings coming out around the waistband on a couple of pair. Not long after this the stitching continued to come apart and the waistband began separating from the boxer briefs.

I therefore cannot recommend these. I can however recommend the&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Hanes-CSWB-Boxer-Briefs/dp/B003H31QYQ/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Hanes CSWB Boxer Briefs</a>. They are comparably priced and seem to be better made with a nice comfortable fit.
985258
Aside from the weird sizing differences, these are basically the same underwear as the UA Boxerjocks - minus the adjustable drawstring pouch.  The drawstring lets you cinch up the pouch to be more snug, which I did like.  The one problem, is that the drawstring is pretty long, and even when not tightened, there is too much length that you have to stuff down your pants.  By the end of the day, the loose drawstring had fallen down further between my legs and felt weird wedgie.  Otherwise they are great.  As I mentioned before, they are basically the same as the under armour boxerjock boxerbriefs, same material feel, same pouch fly, maybe a better softer waistband though.
1685795
Pros:

(1) Don't ride up;

(2) Wide waistband keeps them from rolling over on themselves;

(3) Breathes well;

(4) Comfortable for all day wear;

(5) 9 inch inseam a plus for colder weather climates.

Cons:

(1) No fly is inconvenient and makes you look like a fool when trying to pee.

I'll definitely consider another pack of these for more gym-wear, but I'm sticking to something with a fly for regular use.  I have tried: Jockey, Calvin Klein, Under Armour, Fruit of the Loom, Hanes, Adidas, and other boxer-briefs that I can't even remember the names of anymore and keep coming back to Champion.  The reasonable prices and quality products keep me coming back.
2926891
I needed some new, everyday underwear - nothing lacy and sexy, not thongs - just some comfortable, affordable, everyday underwear with a full seat.  I wanted to spend at or around $10 for a multi-pack package.  Given those details, I spent a ridiculous amount of time reading dozens of reviews for various multi-pack underwear choices on Amazon, and spent a couple of days before I finally chose to purchase this package.  I wasn't expecting the best underwear in the world for around $10, but I had read so many reviews where people said different products weren't even worth $1 a pair, that I was very concerned that I would choose a package that would end up being so cheap it was a totally wasted purchase.

Overall, I like this underwear ok.  When I first opened the package I thought that I had ordered them in a size too large, because they looked larger than the underwear I normally wear, but once I put them on, they fit pretty well, just a tiny bit big.  I assume that they will shrink a little in the wash, and so the sizing seems like it will be just right.

I thought I would be receiving underwear in the "heather" colors shown in the product photograph (black, purple, teal, light blue, pink, and grey), but unfortunately I did not.  The underwear I received came in solid pink, solid light blue, solid light green, solid purple, patterned purple, and patterned light blue.  The colors are ok, but they are quite juvenile, something I would expect in a package of girl's underwear, but not adult women's underwear.  I'd much rather have these somewhat childish colors/patterns than receiving a package of all white underwear, but still, the ad should indicate that you're not going to receive the product shown in the ad photograph.  Also, I very much dislike that inside each of the underwear in the crotch area, is a section of white fabric sewn on top of the crotch.  What the heck is the purpose of bright white fabric in the crotch?  As others have mentioned in their reviews, one of the reasons I purchased these underwear is to use during that time of the month - and during that time I definitely do not wear white underwear, so certainly don't want a weird strip of white fabric in the crotch of these colored underwear.  I mean what is Fruit of the Loom thinking here?  There should be double fabric in the crotch, yes, but it should be the same color as used for the rest of the underwear, that's totally logical.  I really don't want to be reminded that these underwear are for that time of the month by having to worry about the white crotch getting soiled/stained.

I do like that the underwear are a low rise style, so they don't peek out of my low cut jeans.  And the waistband is comfortable.  I haven't washed them yet so don't know how they will hold up in the wash.

Overall, for less than $10 for a package of 6 underwear, these are decent.  But you have to be ok with not having any idea of what colors they are going to send, and ok with the confusing white fabric in the crotch.
3688744
I don't love these underwear. They look nice and they are smooth. They will have minimal (if any) panty lines when you wear them. They are nicely made and they seem like they would last a long time. They are also really soft and would be comfortable if the fit is right for you.

Unfortunately, the fit just does not work for me. They are cut weird on the legs and don't lay as I would like around the waist. They start off not being too bad, but after I wear them for a few minutes I want to change them out for a different pair. It is mostly the leg cut that bothers me. It just doesn't work for me. This may be a personal preference and they might work for you which is why I am not docking more stars. I just personally do not like the cut. Other than that, they are really nice underwear.
3998251
The waistband fits snug but these boxer briefs don't have much support. They're almost like loose boxers. However, they do work as advertised and I use these every day to keep me dry.

If you use Bio oil or any other products around this area, use it with caution because the oil can give the waistband a shriveled appearance. I contacted the company from the website and they offered a free exchange for my damaged boxer briefs.
1971527
These Vanity Fair Women's Perfectly Yours Seamless Briefs are a bit smaller than I would like. The leg holes seem tighter than other brands. Other than that, they were comfortable in the waist and I like that they are made of breathable material. The jacquard print is also nice. One thing that I absolutely did not like is how easily they snagged. I kept feeling them snag on my fingernails and on my feet and heels. With my hands, I cannot feel very much abrasion on my nails and skin, but the briefs sure could! In this day and age, you should not have to hand wash your undies either.
2250414
This is a bit like rating toilet paper.  The task assigned to underwear is pretty specific, and in my opinion one that's pretty tough to screw up.  They do what they're supposed to do.  I don't regret making the purchase, but I don't recall ever regretting buying briefs.
402017
These fit well.
My waist is a little lower than most people, so the waistbands of the mid-rise briefs don't fold over like full-cut, if you don't have 6-pack abs.

Unfortunately, this is the bottom-of-the-line Hanes. I guess mid-rise isn't popular enough to warrant making them in the higher quality Premium Cotton or ComfortBlend lines.

The underwear material is rough. When I first opened the package I was shocked at how it felt just in my hands. The waistband is very rough, too, with (an admittedly weird-sounding) sharp edge. You *know* you're wearing these briefs.

By far the most disappointing feature is the stitching that joins the underwear to the waistband. It is stitched so tightly, that there is no stretch, as opposed to Hanes' higher-quality lines. What's the point to having an elastic waistband if the bottom edge is stitched solid? I've had lower quality briefs like this before; and if I'm not careful putting them on and taking them off, the stitching will break and they'll have to go straight to the trash.

I'm definitely in the market for softer mid-rise briefs with soft, more elastic waistbands.
740279
Unfortunately, I've been on the hunt for cotton underwear again, since my excellent Dockers disappeared.  Good briefs never stick around for more than a couple of years.  I had to try four brands until I found a good one this time.  I wear size 29 pants and medium briefs are my best fit.

Joe Boxer briefs (Medium): 5 stars - regular briefs, though somewhat high rise and baggy, comfortable, big enough, good containment, the plastic packaging said it was from Kmart but I don't know if you can actually find it at Kmart stores

Kronis: 3 stars - boxer briefs but very short leg, feels like wearing shorts rather than underwear, but they have a roomy package, provide good containment, and are fairly comfortable

LUK briefs (black): 2 stars - bikini style, not low rise, comfortable but waistband dips down too far in front, not enough room for package, and some issues with containment

David Archy Pouch briefs: 2 stars - bikini style, definitely too tight for comfort, good containment, might be excellent if you buy a size larger
909899
I seem to have not the greatest luck buying underwear. I'm not a small man and it can be frustrating when ordering online and estimating size between 2x & 3x. Many underwear makers mark their clothes 2x but are more like larges or XL. Anyway, these are sized correctly to fit the size they are advertised at. I also like the mixed colors within each package. I think you can get all one color, but I don't mind having them grey, black, white and red. I will buy these again.
1769567
I wear these things as underwear, they feel comfortable, and provide comfort when sitting down. Guys know how uncomfortable it is to sit and be constrained by cotton made underwear.
879827
I try to regularly update my underwear, and I'm always interested in trying new brands to get an even better fit.  I prefer a bikini or hipster style with good seat coverage to prevent that "wedgie" feeling when wearing.  Usually, I find that underwear that contain a bit of spandex are helpful in this regard, but I was hoping that this product, a 50/50 cotton/polyester blend, would also be comfortable.

The first thing to note is that I did NOT receive the colors pictured in the product description.  The colors are described as "assorted," but no where on the product description page does it mention that the assorted you receive might be different!  Two of my pairs were prints, one a dark blue/gray and the other a dark pink.  I also received solids in dark pink, light pink, light gray, and purple.  However, they are the cotton/poly blend (one part of the product description actually says "100% cotton," which is incorrect).

I washed these before wearing.  I then held them up to a pair of Hanes bikini underwear.  In comparison, these new Fruit of the Loom underwear seemed to have larger leg openings, less fabric at the hips, and less fabric for the seat.  This made me concerned that when wearing the underwear, they would not have adequate bottom coverage and/or would feel uncomfortable.  Luckily, I have not found this to be the case!  These bikinis are actually quite comfortable to wear, and I have had no issues with them so far.  So long as they don't shrink (which I don't expect given the fabric blend), I would repurchase this product, and I would recommend these underwear.
1621935
Without realizing it, I ordered these again and the two new pair are the  most comfortable underwear I've worn in years.  True, under tight pants, the lines would show but I'm not worried about that.  What I love is the lack of cutting and irritation of the leg bands and the lack of noticing that I have them on.  Apparently the manufacturer or distributor doesn't care which panties go into which packages because the first order was extremely ugly but this order lovely in two pastel colors.

Undoubtedly the ugliest underwear that has ever been in my house.  I have no idea how they fit since immediately tossed them out of my sight.  Guess might be that there's some discomfort here since bound seam running from mid-back all the way under and up the front and certainly could feel that while sitting.

The striped pair have very intense dark pink, intense orange, and light pink stripes that are not matched at seam.  The other pair is solid dark pink.
2923663
The underwear fits as expected, but the desired look wasn't accomplished.  Wish they didn't loosen up after wearing for a period of time.