The design of three handles would make it tedious for extended use
921882
Gets the job done for light/intermittent use. The design of three handles would make it tedious for extended use.  Also, it took me quite a while to figure out how to use this tie gun.  Better instructions and/or an online video would have earned another star.
2776068
I had to square deep dish one and the handle is very awkward it actually hurts your hand hold it it's not smooth and comfortable you have to cushion it because it feels painful to hold it it's not round the stupidest designs ever
1038188
Great- except handle is so long. Sturdy and Practical.
4820011
The case is sturdy for what I thought I originally wanted, but after using it for a few weeks, I realize that is way too cumbersome to use on a daily basis. It looks like I'm going to have to bite the bullet and purchase an expensive more streamlined case, possibly one that comes worth a keyboard.
4546767
Gave this a three rating, because the spoons are extremely awkward to  handle and managed when hooked together. Would be very inconvenient, two separate these measuring spoons to make them easier to manipulate.
The end of the measuring spoons are way too bulky.
4598504
handle is hollow. when scooping the handle edges are uncomfortable.
2902588
Kind of wastes some of the product you're trying to make a noodle with and the two handed process is awkward.
3761273
The retractable feature works fine and I like the look of it, but the difficulty of the locking mechanism ruins it for me. There is only one button to stop and/or lock the leash, and it often locks accidentally and is always a struggle to unlock. This typically happen at the very moment when my dog on a long leash and I need to quickly reign him in near a busy street. I gave this a few weeks thinking perhaps I needed to retrain myself to use this slightly different locking style, but I gave it that time and continue to struggle with it to the point that I've decide it's ultimately unsafe for my dog to be walked on this leash. The handle is also a bit small for me and I have average sized hands for a man. Not a huge deal in the grand scheme, but still worth pointing out.

I'm going back to using the Flexi brand of leashes, where the medium size has always been big enough for my hand and I've never once had a problem locking and unlocking it on the quick.
3525969
At first this product worked fantastic.  After a few months of use the clear plastic handle broke.  This is a major design flaw.  The designers should have made sure the plastic in this area was reinforced or perhaps a thicker grade of plastic in order to take the strain of repeated use.
2485034
The handles are heavy and beautiful.  The screws to install are too long.  There are two sizes in the package.  None worked to install the handles.  I had to use the screws from the handles I was replacing to do the installation plus a washer.
1461771
I work in the Art Department of a grocery chain and we need to trim signs of all different sizes, thicknesses, and materials quickly and efficiently. When our cheap old guillotine-style chopper broke, we got this with the hope that it would be an improvement.

Unfortunately there are some serious downsides that, for our purposes, make this trimmer pretty much unusable. It can't cut anything smaller than a 4-up because of the excessive safety plastic. The various other safety features make it clunky and slow to use, and the paper-lock mechanism doesn't even do a particularly good job of holding the paper in place. It's also difficult to see exactly where it is going to cut since there's no guide and the blade retracts.

This product is a frustrating, absolute displeasure to use. It might be appropriate for infrequent use on standard letter-size pages and larger, by anyone younger than 13 or older than 75. If you're an 20 or 30-something, this product WILL get in your way. The safety features are excessive and obtrusive, and the fact that it can't do smaller jobs seems like a ridiculous design oversight.

Sure, you're not going to hurt yourself, but your productivity will suffer.
3473494
The Quad Lock product is fantastic in terms of its design.

The real problem is the armband which loses it ability to stick after three months or so.

While the velcro cannot be refreshed, the armband can be adjusted so the hooks connect to a fresh patch of loops. By doing so, I've extended the life of an armband to about 9 months but the edges of the band are quite frayed by this point.

I don't like generating waste and these armbands are expensive which adds insult to injury.

If the velcro was redesigned I would not mind paying more. To my mind, the armband should last at least 1 year.
1197485
I was really excited to get this pan, however, I've been consistently disappointed with it's design for a few reasons.  Overall, the quality of the pan is pretty good, although I think the price should come down some.

Pros: Heat's up quick.  Handle is very ergonomic and works well with th eLodge ASCRHH11 Silicone Hot Handle Holder which I also purchased with it (when it is put on the right way - note that the holder has a contoured insert cavity that conforms to the handle.  If you put it on upside down you can force it on but it is very difficult to pull back off.)  The pan can be seasoned and can be made non-stick, but it takes some work.

Cons:
1) The height of the lip is too low in my opinion.  When trying to saute vegetables, onions, peppers or other small items I'm constantly knocking food out of the pan onto the stove.  Thus, I think this is a pretty significant design flaw.  The lip of the pan should have been made about a 1/2" to a full 1" higher in my opinion in order for it to be an effective cooking tool.
2) The angle of the pan lip is too low for the same reason noted above.  I'm constantly accidentally knocking items out of the pan.  They should have gone with a steep angle similar to their cast iron cookware in my opinion. It could be there are manufacturing constraints that force the angle chosen, but, all the angle is tow low and food easily slides out of the pan if you're not careful or are tilting the pan.
3) The usable area of the pan is too small.  It is a twelve inch pan, true, but that is the outer diameter from rim to rim.  The inner diameter of the cooking surface is only about 10" and it makes it a real chore to try and fry four eggs on it over easy for a simple breakfast for two.  It can be done, but you will find yourself doing acrobatics with the pan to maneuver your spatula in between the eggs without breaking them.
4) If you are coming from Teflon coated pans or even cast iron pans, prepare to alter your cooking style.  In my experience, this pan needs much lower heat, especially for eggs in order to not completely nuke them on contact.  Also, prepare to spend a good deal of time working on seasoning the pan.  The seasoning that arrives is very inadequate in my opinion.  The first thing I cooked in it were sausage links which constantly stuck and burned.  Since then, I've washed the pan well, and conducted a stove type regimen of seasoning with bacon fat.  I've done this about 8 consecutive times and it seems to be ok and I expect it will improve with age.

Overall, I've really tried to like this pan, especially at the price I've paid for it in comparison to my standard Lodge cast iron 10.25" and 12" skillets.  However, at the price, the standard Lodge cast iron cookware is a far better value and performs much better.  The low lip and it's low angle make using the pan difficult and be prepared to be cleaning food up off of your stovetop.  The design just isn't practical, but as with anything, time, practice, and skill can overcome the challenges of any tool.
618522
Ive had two of these and the handle broke off on both of them. It still works, its just inconvenient. I lost the always on feature and its not as ergonomic
680158
It's well made.  The problem is the handles are too short, forcing me to stoop over, which hurts my back after just a few minutes of use.  I am 6' tall.....it's surprising the manufacturer does not accommodate taller persons.  Clearly, a shorter person could comfortably use a longer design.  I decided to keep it, but I am going to try to jury rig some kind of handle extensions out of wood, or some kind of tubing.  It was pretty disappointing.
3900536
They are expensive....but beautiful handles.
1399262
There is a handle on the back that makes it feel quite awkward.