Not the build quality I expected from a $440. ...
922488
Not the build quality I expected from a $440.00 weight bench. The frame seems solid enough; I don't think I'll have any issues with that aspect of it. But, not as well put together as I though it would be. The back rest and seat do wiggle around. And the so called "pads" are every bit as firm and hard as others have stated they are.
3080982
Build quality of this case is very poor, and it suffers from several design faults that other reviewers have summarized nicely. I own several different large Corsair cases, and compared to them 900d feels very cheap, far below Corsair standards. For this kind of money you should research alternatives.
4193286
I guess I expected more from reading the reviews but I should have known better from the price. Don't get me wrong - I kept the headphones and I do use them but not for what I originally intended.

I get better sound reproduction from my urBeats

Pros:
Like the extra long cord
The over the ear style fits comfortably
Although plastic, the set feels quite sturdy

Cons:
A bit heavy (but I knew that at purchase)
Sound quality - a "hollow" sound, too much mid-range. Poor bass even on bass heavy songs. Highs are okay, a bit "tinny"
1170441
I returned this. The build quality was poor. The thin plastic threads on the eye piece cap were stripped right out of the box. The image quality wasn't nearly as crisp or bright as the binoculars I picked up at the same time:&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Tera-20x50-High-Power-Military-Binoculars-Telescope-20-times-Magnification-Zoom-with-Case-and-Neck-Strap-for-Sports-Performing-Hiking-Hunting/dp/B00YOV3TGS/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Tera 20x50 High Power Military Binoculars Telescope 20 times Magnification Zoom with Case and Neck Strap for Sports Performing Hiking Hunting</a>

I had high hopes that i could mount this in the house and use it for wildlife viewing, but the image and build quality were just subpar.
4266954
Disappointing build quality.

I ordered this case so I can use my phone for taking pictures in/around water for a family vacation without worrying about owning an expensive brick.

I didn't want to believe the reviews about the shoddy build quality but alas, my brand new case suffers the same fate. I have been blessed with the gift of large panel gaps all along the top edge (slightly less thick than that of a credit card). On an expensive premium phone case which advertises it's waterproof chops. Surely this wouldn't compromise the case's main function: keeping out water?

I immersed the prop phone in water for 30 minutes as instructed, and after fully drying off the case and removing it, there were a few small (<1mm) beads of water along the top edge. "But isn't that were the large gaps were?" you may ask... indeed! I've included some reference pictures, as I've seen gaps in other cases, but never this sloppy. It's too bad, really. I wanted to actually use my phone to take pictures underwater during my vacation, but I suppose I'll have to refrain from using it with the case as advertised.

My sound quality experience with this case seems to be common with other reviews: the sound output is a bit scratchy and there are complaints of my voice being quiet on the receiving end. If you plan on using the speakerphone or video chatting very much, be prepared to shout or not be heard. And that's with the charging port and headphone ports open. Disappointing for a case which is so difficult (and possibly damaging) to remove
3472273
The item served its use; however not the quality I thought it was priced at.
4944319
Purchased the Q111 after reading the great reviews.  I was excited when it arrived and opened it immediately.

First impressions:
Decent build quality for a tripod under $50.  There are a lot of plastic parts.  This left me with questions about its long term durability.  I test mounted a T6s with 70-300 zoom.  Overall stability was ok, but not what I would consider great.

Camera mounting:
Mount base... The swivel ring on the thumb screw can impede your ability to mount the camera quickly to the base. Fold the ring over with your finger and it falls back in the way when mounting to the head. This is a pain point.  I also tested switching from horizontal to vertical camera position which worked well.  The leveling bubble is functional and helpful. The quick release locks on the legs worked well and most adjustments were smooth and easy.  Panning was as described, fairly smooth, but not cinema quality.  Good for casual video.  Another area of concern for me was the crank arm to raise and lower the height of the head/base.  It's 100% plastic and extremely delecate.

Verdict:
In the end, I decided to return the Q111. For some (casual shooter) family portrait for the holidays it will be fine.  If you are more serious than that, I would suggest spending a little more.  I like the brand, and will stick with zomei, but have decided to step up to one of the magnesium models with a ball head. While it's more money, I feel it will be a better investment in  the long term and that I will be happier with the increased strength, durability and features.

You'll have to be the judge.  For many this will be a great above average tripod.  Used infrequently/casually it will meet most people's needs. I just decided I wanted a little bit more.  The Q111 is a nice little tripod. but didn't meet my needs.
1937685
I could have built this myself in much better quality. I'll be returning this item.
3621296
Slightly disappointed with the materials and performance.
2413522
I wanted to so badly to like this Mower.  It has an excellent cut quality but a very poor build quality.  It is very easy to assemble but, as other reviewers have noted, there is no way that this mower's handle is built for the long haul.  It appears to me that flat washers (supplied by you, the new owner) straddling both sides of the handle prior to e-clip insertion should cut down on the twisting and imprecise feel but I didn't keep the unit long enough to find out.  The unit was much harder to push than anticipated with a much higher noise level than anticipated but I believe that to be due to the contact design.  I assume the non-contact (more costly) designs to be superior in this regard but unfortunately, I have yet to find one that offers the same 20" cutting width as the Scotts.  The higher push effort seemed specific to the right wheel drive assembly.  I disassembled the drive wheel assemblies, verified adequate lubrication and re-assembled them to no avail.  I assume the issue to be a mild misalignment in the bearing pocket.  Based on the noticeable wobble in a couple of the blade holder disks in the welded reel assembly and a very rough appearance in the left side bearing retainer, imprecise welding and/or assembly is the likely culprit my mower's disappointing attributes.  Great concept.  Great price.  Great cutting width.  Great cut quality.  Cheap handle.  High push effort.  Poor noise quality.  After three cuts, it's back in the box and on its way back.  Too bad.
3280591
Sound quality on playback is good and loud!  Good bass response compared to any other of its type.  Being able to control the recording level is much appreciated. Thanks for the tone control as well.  However when recording with the built in mic there is quite a lot of machine noise that is picked up, especially when laying the machine flat on a table - for the price i was expecting better.  Its more light weight and flimsy than i was expecting, especially the buttons - I was hoping they'd be more solid and firm.  The adapter pin would have been better if it was a 90 degree, elbow type. As it is now the pin piece sticks out a little further than the actual stand which will certainly cause damage over time to the cord if using it in its upright position.  Note to folks in CANADA - be prepared for UPS upon delivery to charge a $40+ brokerage/duty fee plus taxes.  I like the machine but certainly don't think its worth the $250+ it ended up costing.

Also very disappointed to find out after just spending $$ on rechargeable 4 D
cell batteries and a charger that this machine will not record through
either internal or external mic when using batteries. playback
only with batteries. the manual makes no mention of this. had i known ahead of time i
would not have purchased this device nor the recharger and batteries which is
useless to me now and not returnable.
4023936
When I first got this unit, I immediately posted a good review but I ended up changing my mind after living with it for a few weeks.  At $800, you would expect a good build quality from B&O on this unit.  While it looks cool and sounds GREAT, the charge cord configuration is bulky and poorly designed.  The power cord port is way in the back of a compartment with a super flimsy door which when shut, stores the cords inside for travel.  Within the first 10 days of use, the port for the charger cord came lose from the housing and I could not figure out how to get in back in place.  So sadly, I returned the whole unit and will not be ordering another one.

While I wanted to keep it because of the great sound, I was very concerned that the power port would eventually rip from the wires as it was loose and moving around inside of the box every time I tried to plug the charge cord back in.

For a company so well know for GREAT design, it almost seems like the don't know what to do when it comes to portability.  I was also disappointed to see there was not a protective case available (I would have paid extra) as carrying around an $800 speaker without protection is a bit un-nerving.

Pros
1) Simple to set up and use
2) Long battery life (played it recently at high volume for 4-5 hours and still ran strong)
3) Superb sound - especially at high volume (what do you expect from a B&O product)
4) Cool looking (everyone asks what is it and who made it)
5) Airplay works well (no problems so far)

Cons
1) Power port physically broke from housing in the first week!
2) Not super rich sounding at lower volume levels
3) Cord storage door is poorly designed (flimsy structure was just waiting to break)
4) No protective travel case available
4) Expensive

Bottom line - cooler than anything else I could find on the market but the build quality is highly suspect.  Ultimately, I wanted to keep this unit but my better judgment told me not to so I'm going with another brand - too bad!
660432
NOTICE: I will be updating this review with more details but I wanted to get my initial impressions out of the way and into the world.

First off, if you are looking for an affordable 144hz Freesync Monitor this is it. For the price, however, there are some things this monitor falls short on. The monitor honestly feels rushed and I wonder if they do not intend to sell many and just want to be able to say they made High-Refresh Rate Monitor with Freesync. I'm sure that they will get enough sales but about equal amount of semi-satisfied customers.

Build Quality is great, the design is mostly matte and the screen is Pixel Perfect. The Headphone holder and cable guide are lackluster but the stand is sturdy and the movements feel good. The cable included (DP and Power) are rather short for me but YMMV. The box is also really big. The worse part is the power indicator LED. This monitor is RED all over, the accents the UI, but the LED power light is a lazy blue.

The color seems fine for a TN panel. I still need to tweak it but I did turn the Brightness down to near the lowest setting. It is extremely bright and I was getting headaches from the brightness. It took a while to get Freesync to register to 48-144hz. It initially only read 48-120hz but since the new Radeon software is missing features, I had to get into the Windows Monitor Settings to switch to 144hz. This wasn't available at first because I had to enable the DP 1.2 option on the Monitor. What's even more strange is that I had Freesync enabled without the DP 1.2 option enabled, I thought Freesync only worked with 1.2 so it was odd that it was on before doing so, I'll need to double check that. I will be testing the Flicker Free classification of this monitor to ensure those headaches were from Brightness and not PWM Flickering.

The UI is horrible!!! I'm putting together some videos to showcase this but the UI is pretty bad and there is no user manual to help explain what these settings do. Three settings for Reponse Times with no indication of how much lower does it get and what the tradeoffs are. The worst mistake they made is on the buttons, The #2 button is on the right and the #1 button is on the left, confusing enough. The UI makes its worse by showing the action of #1 and the left and #2 on the right, opposite on the physical buttons (See Image). I hope but doubt a firmware fix will come along to fix this. The rest of the UI has issues which I will get more into dept later.
2439284
Where to start....This product is not worth the 2 dollars it took to build.  Feels cheap,is very cheap qualitiy and noisy as ..... It was noisy right out of the box. Made sure all screws were tightened only to find 2 of the screw holes were stripped mainly due to the cheap plastic it is built from.  Honestly if the price for this wa around $5 it would be a fair deal.
294922
Our unit lasted a little less than a year with daily use. Before breaking (more on that later) it performed only... okay. Certainly better than the whirly-blade grinders, but don't think that you'll get the equivalent performance of a $200 machine. Grounds are less uniform and the poster that mentioned the fine powder, no matter the setting, is absolutely right.

Build quality is certainly not top-notch, which is expected at this price point. Build quality is to blame for the failure of our unit - there is a column at the bottom of the bean reservoir and the top plate of the grinding mechanism is attached to the bottom of that column. Beans flow from the reservoir, through the column and in to the grinder. While the top grinding plate is metal, the column that it is attached to is plastic - this is the part that broke on my unit, rendering the unit completely useless.

Buy this unit if you don't want to spring for something four times as expensive, but be aware that it'll have less than 1/4 of the life-span of the more expensive unit and it'll be outperformed by a noticeable margin.
2684589
Well, I was expecting a bit more from this one.  I have paid 350 USD for it, for the same price I was able to take Luminox, but somehow decided to continue with G-shock, Big mistake. The build quality seems ok, but there is a moisture in it and on quick temperature change ( fast ride on a bike or even air conditioner steam directly pointed on the wrist), in the middle of the screen I get some fog. Wanted to use the International warranty ( mentioned in the owners manual) but I got answer from the seller, that I have to send the watch back and wait for eventual replacement. I took the watch to a local repair shop and the problem was fixed ( 20 USD )... for a month. After that, the same fog on the screen. Again, another certified CASIO repair shop with another bill of 20 USD, problem solved for two months. And again... and again. I gave up.
Conclusion - this is a summer watch, it it get's on the cold, you will have some fog inside. The problem was not only mine, found the same topic on few casio owners forums, so it seems, that the build quality is not as good as expected. Many functions, great design, but low quality. Do not take this one.
3236786
Very poor build quality... my ring was shaking/rattling... and its extremely prone to attracting dust... gives u decent amount of contrast... probably u get what u pay for i guess....

apart from that the biggest problem was the treads are too tight and rough... was a pain putting it on and getting it off my lens...

but as i said its really really affordable and give u fair amount of contrast in ur pics... just wish build quality was a bit better.