Not bright, good color. Horrible focus & spread points
924009
Installed on a 2007 Toyota tundra
If you are looking for only appearance preferences to match a led or hid conversion kit these are perfect but if you are looking for something that would be functionable these put out very little light in front of the vehicle vs holgens. The light spread is horrible there is no focus point. My biggest con is the light projects upwards into the tree line which concerns me for incoming traffic. So far I have not been high-beamed for them but I would recommend an all in one led conversion or led pod conversion over these bulbs for functionality.
689994
Projector quality is not good enough. Focus doesnt work correctly: If you focus the center of the image the borders are unfocused.
I lost USD80 because the cost of returning the product would be expensive.
4628501
Misses focus, produces blurry or soft focus images.
602841
Not a good, clear picture.  Definition and Lumens are way too low for 96" screed.  Also, no 'Trigger' to talk to the screen.
4787532
The light is to yellow. Does not flatter any picture at all.
If I could, I would return it
1814933
Not overly impressed. I was excited to try these out because a fellow artist raved about the color quality. Maybe her set is different than mine or her batch had more pigment than mine. But honestly for the money go with Staedtler Watercolor Pencils, Box of 36 Colors (14410ND36) they are $13 bucks cheaper the colors are more vibrant. Also I really really hate it when they don't color the outer pencil the color of the color core. Its a HUGE pet peeve of mine. I knew these were that way but I thought if they had superior color then that would even out.

Alas my $20 Staedtler's win out yet again.

My understanding is that Prisma quality has really dropped in the last few years. If you look at the pencil you will notice a lot of the pencils core's are not perfectly centered. I had not noticed this until Lachri (youtube) pointed this out. This is one reason why you will have some pencils that really break over and over again and are extremely hard to sharpen. This applies to all their pencils. And if you find defective pencils and report it to the company they won't do anything about it. So word of warning there.
628144
I didn't know Vortex made junk, but this proves the rule.  Hard to focus anywhere and will not focus at infinity.  Color aberration in images is awful.  I bought this to replace my son's cheapie 10x32, but the old one kills this one in all respects.
4053404
Like the other reviewer said, this lamp does NOT look like the image on the box, color-wise. And one of the images shown here on Amazon shows it going from purple at the top down to pink. In reality, the color starts at pink at the top and ends on purple. Also, the colors are nowhere near as nicely spaced as the images show. I'd say the lamp is about 50% red and pink and then there are very narrow band of yellow, green and blue. I have a *very* hard time believing anything about this globe is "hand painted".

Lava Lite has a long history (esp since moving production to China in 2003) of quality issues and product images that are deceptively deceiving. You'll almost never see a real image of the product being used on their packaging. There's a reason for that. Most common issues you'll encounter (so save your receipt) are: cloudy/hazy liquid that never clears, gunk/dark bits in the metal coil at the bottom, wax sticking to the bottom of the globe and poor flow. I can almost guarantee any lamp you buy from Lava Lite post-2003 will have at least one of these issues. How do I know? I've bought over 20 of them (and returned/sold/gave away 75% of them). I'm a collector of lava lamps and if you truly want a beautiful lamp that will last, buy a pre-2003 off eBay.

The Rainbow Grande looks better off than it does on. When the lamp is turned on, you can see just how poor the spray job is. Not only is the saturation of the spray lighter than I'd like, but you can see how spotty it is. My globe had several spray smudges/defects towards the bottom of the globe.

The lamps takes about 2-3 hours to flow with the provided bulb in a house that's about 78 degrees.

The base and cap are nothing exceptional. For a lamp this vibrant, a black or white base would have been nice. My base came with one small ding in it. Otherwise, it's decent.

I ran the lamp for a few weeks before I decided to return it. The flow was good, but the main attraction - the rainbow part - wasn't as vibrant as I'd wanted. Every time I turned it on, I noticed the poor spray job and was disappointed. For this cost, it just wasn't as stunning as I'd hoped. The colors are un-evenly spaced and the spotty spray job was hard to ignore. I'd pass on this one.
797651
Light is bright but at zoom has a the terrible square center. This led also has "stripes" in it that really distracts and makes it annoying to use. The zoom/flood bezel is loose and rattles. Wouldn't recommend this light for someone using it daily or for serious work
2628864
Based on other reviews, I thought I'd give this a try on my Canon XSi.  What's the problem with the pop-up flash?  Aside from the lack of power, it's directional and harsh.  In portrait orientation, the pop-up flash will produce dark shadowing to the side.

If you add this Opteka diffuser on, it does NOT reduce the shadowing noticeably (maybe 5% improvement at most).  What's worse is that the color turns more yellowish/brownish, and very ugly color at that.  I've played with the white balance settings, but those won't yield acceptable results for me either.  Perhaps a custom white balance might, but I didn't try that.

The diffuser will marginally soften the light on your subject, but due to no improvement in shadowing and negative effect on color, my opinion is that you're better off without it.

It's also very cheaply made.  It's simple thin plastic.  The back has a tab that is folded and used to slide into the hot shoe to hold it in place.  But this it feels like it'll rip at the crease, so I'm extra careful with it.

A better solution that using this diffuser is to get an external flash.  That will improve your lighting options and quality by leaps and bounds.  But if your budget doesn't allow for an external flash, then you shouldn't let waste on this either.  It's really useless.

I have only tried using this diffuser indoors for casual family photos, so maybe it may work better for some other uses (macro, outdoor fill).
581138
Had to return mine as no matter what, I could not get it to focus clearly. Included software was pointless and severely outdated. In order for software to run it uses Legacy CPL which is a slow way to communicate with the camera. Find another that is more modern and can use standard drivers.
416308
The outer reflective coating is rich and colorful, but the view through the lenses is terrible.  The coating is applied in a way that makes you think you're looking through an oil slick, and the bright Fire colored lenses are really like looking through blue lenses.  Where a gray lens would just reduce light transmission without altering the colors your eye sees, these color everything in a strong blue tint that is very distracting.  Genuine Oakley lenses of this same color finish (Fire) enhance colors in the Red/Orange spectrum enhancing contrast slightly (the complete opposite of these lenses).

These lenses are of almost no use to me, and have already been replaced with Oakley VR28 Black Iridium lenses instead.

If you value more than their outward appearance to others, save your money for genuine lenses.
2396928
These lights are not nearly as bright as advertised. They do not project light on surfaces for more than 5-7 feet, and even then the colors are not bright.

In addition, the color controls leave a lot to be desired. For example, you cannot select a color and then have it flash, strobe or fade by itself - it automatically reverts to cycling through all of the colors instead of just the colors you selected.

I would have returned them except I wasn't able to really test them out until the 30-day return window had passed.
2118489
Basic monitor. That is it. No adjustment and the color is simply bad. Do not buy for anything other than seeing spreadsheets on.
4046076
Compared this monitor to my old Samsung T24C550ND (same specs) and the 24M47H-P colors are inferior.  The presets are awful and even trying every parameter in custom settings, I couldn't get the vivid colors and dark blacks I'm used to (took me about 4 clicks to get the T24C550ND perfect) . Using the HDMI port, the 24M47H-P screen just looks a little dull and every configuration has a somewhat washed-out blue tint.  The LED bleeding through the screen edges on black screens isn't bad...but there is some.

I also don't believe this has only 5ms response time.  Just scrolling through webpages leaves slight ghosting.

Disturbingly light and cheaply built monitor and AC adapter.  When you attach cables, the ports in the back literally bend into the holes (they couldn't afford one more screw?). The wall adapter cables are thin and block gets very hot, so I'm guessing it won't last very long (my T24C550ND adapter stays relatively cool).

I would only recommend this to someone on an extreme budget, who only uses their computer for light internet and word/number processing...not photo/video editors or gamers.
1220543
Blues are almost flourescent. Not suitable for photos. OK for everyday use
4364058
All dark and dreary, 2 of 6 have enough color/variation that I can make pendants from if the necklace cord and wrap are very colorful.
3 it will be luck if I can convince someone to buy.

Non of mine where worth buying for resell.  Note customers won't be wearing these under bright spot lights to bring out the colors.
Barely get two to show color in the window, but not clear enough in center for even window art.