Not nearly as nice as Kirkland men's jeans
922127
My husband looks fabulous in Kirkland jeans.  They quit selling 34 x 36.  The longest they have is 34.  So I bought these as a substitute.  The waist is too high and the bottom is not flattering.  They are not an attractive men's jean.
3542096
My pair is my standard size, 30x30, and I found that the waist runs a little small. Typically I buy pants and jeans from Gap, Banana Republic, or Old Navy--all of which are sister companies, and it could be that I'm just too invested in and familiar with their sizing conventions. I can still easily wear these jeans, but they are a little too tight for my liking.

I also find that the leg is a little too baggy. It almost gives these jeans the appearance of flairs. I abhor skinny jeans, but these run in the opposite direction. I would consider them more relaxed fit than regular.

As far as the quality of the material and construction, these jeans appear to be reliably well made Levis. I'll still wear them occasionally, but they won't be a go-to pair (and definitely not on days when I'm feeling at all bloated!).
564983
It has been a while since I've purchased Levi's 501 jeans.  I remembered them as high quality, no nonsense...good looking jeans.  Wow, how things have changed for the worse!  The waist line is lower, I keep having to pull my pants up and I'm pretty average sized person.  Also the hem at the bottom of the legs is smaller, thus they have a tendency to roll up when washed, it looks strange and it's hard to get them to lie straight like they are suppose to.  These plus a few other things all seem like ways Levi is trying to cut cost...I'll bet on it.  Overall I'm disappointed and will not buy Levi's jeans again.
2740961
In August 2012, I purchased two pair of Levi's Mens 514 Slim Straight Jeans at $39.99 each. I note that the jeans I am submitting this review for have the designator "Jackson" while the photo indicates a slightly different style, otherwise the same jean. I don't recommend them. For starters, the crotch on both 514s I got is a bit poofy, potentially drawing attention to it. I don't need that. More significantly though, the fabric is substantially thinner than Levi's 501 Shrink to Fit Jeans I had been wearing for years. The thin denim of the 514s isn't very suitable for colder weather and has worn out much faster than it should. Not a good value.

A number of reviews on 501 Shrink to Fit Jeans indicate Levi's has gone to a thinner fabric for that model as well. Not good.
600996
What in the world will Levi's find next to cut back on?  The last time I ordered Levi's, I discovered that they reduced the number of belt loops by 1, making the jeans significantly less comfortable to wear.  I adjusted a bit, and (apparently) I went ahead and ordered more when the last ones started wearing out.

This time, when I tried on the jeans, I found that the front pockets are about two inches shorter (i.e., less deep).  I use my pockets quite a bit, and this might be a true problem.  I will try to adjust, as the jeans seem to be of the same quality, otherwise, but I am not pleased.  Whether I keep these or not, very likely these are the last pairs of Levi's I will own.  Surely, someone out there makes jeans that someone can actually wear and find useful.  Other than swimsuits and running shorts, I do not own a single pair of pants, trousers, shorts, etc. that have pockets as shallow and short as these.  Shameful.  Just shameful.

Here's the irony.  These very same (far too short) pockets brag about 140 years of quality.  Apparently, those days are over.
601877
Yeah. The rest of the reviews were right. The fabric does not feel like a good quality pair of jeans. And I don't know if they realize it but making the pants too long entails additional cost for hemming. Try something else.
3835612
When looking for carpenter jeans I'm looking for practicallity and pants that are easy to move in.  I have purchased other Lee Dungaree carpenter jeans, in the same size, still wearing them and they fit great, but something has changed and not for the better.  My requirements are, a relaxed fit through the leg, room in the seat and a higher rise, this makes for comfortable work jeans.  These didn't meet any of my requirements.  It seems as if Lee is going for a stylish jean rather than practicallity.
2285734
The quality is fine but they are WAY baggier than regular jeans. Unless you want to look like you are wearing Jared from Subways old paints, I'd stay away. That is of course unless you like looking like you just stepped out of a 90's rap video. Kris Kross anyone?

Needless to say , I am returning them.
3395969
The size was not similar to the same size I have purchased in local stores. The jeans were not so much stonewashed as regular blue jeans. Ordered a second pair of jeans different size and they did fit better but still much more blue than the typical stonewashed jeans. Even though the first size did not fit and was certainly not the correct color the return was easy through Amazon.
2394729
I bought these for my dad and had to return them because he didn't like the button fly closure. I would say stick to Levi's that have a zipper.
1105245
Unfortunately I was disappointed in the fit and the poor quality of the wool.  I have purchased a similar pair a few times from Costco (Kirkland brand) for a fraction of the price and frankly they are much better in quality and comfort. I will be sticking with Kirkland brand in the future for obvious reasons.  For the record I have purchased many, many pairs of Uggs in the past and have never been disappointed as I am with this particular pair.  Perhaps this is not an actual Ugg brand as a few people had mentioned in previous reviews. That'll teach me not to purchase an expensive item sight unseen in the future I suppose.
3091153
Oddly enough I ordered these jeans after reading reviews about Levi's Loose 569's, which is really what I wanted. I own a pair of old Loose 569's that I've had for years that I really like, but they're finally falling apart. I read reviews about current 569's that said they're fit is nothing like the loose fit from several years ago, so I didn't order them. One reviewer said he bought and recommended going with these Dickies Loose Fit jeans instead, so I ordered them. The material is ok but sorry the fit doesn't compare with the fit of my old 569's, so I returned them. To answer the question "How does this product fit?" prior to writing this review, I chose "Somewhat large" but that isn't exactly accurate. The Dickies 36 x 34 have a large waist band, short crotch, and tight thighs compared to my old 569's and are just not comfortable. Strange but that is also similar to the description I read of the newer 569's. Oh well, I guess I'll look for other loose fit jeans in stores, where I can try them on until I find something I like
651906
The color is not what is shown above. It is definitely more dark of a color, almost mauve. The fit is certainly small, which I figured because of the brand so I sized up. I don't like the straight leg on the jeans so I'm going to have them taken in. The material is also not as soft as these jeans normally are.
712393
Quality is not the problem here. The problem is that since I last bought these in 2014 and now (2017), Levi has altered the style. These jeans are much roomier than previous and, in my mind, look baggy and shapeless. I tried them on, took them off and re-bagged them. Not a good look. When I took them off I put an old pair on and the difference is very clear. Maybe Levi is allowing for the world's growing profile? Who knows but, these are no longer for me.
I ended up with:&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Wrangler-Men-s-Retro-Slim-Fit-Straight-Leg-Jean-Dark-Knight-36x32/dp/B006GJTVCW/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Wrangler Men's Retro Slim Fit Straight Leg Jean, Dark Knight, 36x32</a>&nbsp;which fit me as I expected. Much better.
4268335
These were disappointing for two reasons: First, they fit way tighter around the waist than they should have for a 32. Barely usable. Second, although they seem sturdy, they don't seem as tough as the usual Arbor Wear pants and something about the material (the polyester no doubt) puts you in mind of gas station wear. Not up to Arbor Wear standards.
AW used to make a cotton twill tree pant and I thought these would be like those, which were great. No way.
4013677
I have another older pair of these jeans and they fit well however this pair has a significantly more generous cut - not what I needed nor wanted.
4193719
We ordered these jeans in the Blue Devil wash and although the wash and weight looked and felt like quality... The fit was a bit strange.

I guess by Modern Fit I should have known my husband wouldn't like them as he doesn't like slim fit styles in general. I hear thats what they're calling slim fit now, lol...

In any case, these fit fine around his waste and I thought looked great from behind, haha... But they were slim around the thighs and crotch and just weren't comfortable for him.

Gave them 3 stars for color and look of quality being okay. Returned the jeans.

Likely better for those with a slimmer physique. For reference, my husband is between a 36 and 38 waist X 32 inseam. Hope this is helpful!