NOT WORTH THE SAVINGS
935488
One battery never worked and charger stopped working. Do yourself a favor and buy the DJI brand batteries.............
1027355
I bought these about 6 months ago and the first cartridge went in and worked without a hitch. Then I needed to replace a 2nd. That color, yellow, wouldn't print right. Then the 1st cartridge wasn't "recognized." All the head cleaning drained the cartridges so I needed to replace every one of them with these Office World cartridges. And now my yellow won't print correctly, all the colors are off as a result. So my printer essentially is useless.

DON'T BUY THESE!! I read a lot of the reviews before and thought, well, it's worth a try. Look at the savings!! Now I have no printer and need to buy new Epson cartridges and pray they work so I don't need a new printer as well. Stupid way to save money and what a waste of time.
2268239
My black toner didn't last thru printing my federal taxes!  Not worth what you THINK you are saving
Very very disappointed.
3859060
I just purchased my Keurig 2 weeks ago and bought these to go right along with it.  To date I am very mixed when it comes to this product.  Yes, it is a money saver to some extent.  I expected that these cups and lids would be more than a one time use item.  For me approx. 50% of the cups and about 75% of the lids are splitting and cracking when trying to reuse.
The 2nd use cups are splitting when I am putting the lids on and the 2nd use lids are breaking around the inner rim upon brewing.  The filters could be cut to fit better also. I would not buy these again, my next try is going to be the ekobrew cups.  By the time I pay for a box of these, I have one lifetime filter purchased with no hassle.  Good idea but it can get pricey if these only can be used one time.  I have used the store bought K cups and refilled 3-4 times with no splitting, and these lids fit the store bought cups better than they do the very cups they were packaged with.
1293096
I first tried a compatible brand, but it was not worth the savings.  Had to return it and lost some valuable time
77871
I am a professional installer and thought I would try to save a bit of money on these. I use a Klein Tools compression tool. 4 out of the first 5 broke when trying to compress them. It broke both the inner ring on the connector as well as the end ring. I was only successful in having 1 halfway work before giving up completely on these. I then went to home depot and picked up a pack of ideal BNC compression fittings and had no issue as usual. I can tell you, they are not worth the money.
1270833
I purchased the Kodak C310 because the box advertisement stated it saved ink. We use a lot of ink and thought the combination of Kodak quality and ink savings, this would be a suitable purchase. I gave this a 2 star rating for the following reasons:

1. The printer broke the first week after it was purchased. It would not print.

2. The printer was returned (Thankfully I had not thrown away the box yet or it wouldn't have been able to be returned.) I received an exact model and set it up again.

3. Within the first 2 months, the piece that holds the ink cartridges in place didn't print ink properly, again. I replaced the ink numerous times trying to fix the problem and the ink would streak as it printed and wouldn't print at other times. In the end, the continued ink costs ended up costing as much as if I had purchased a lot higher cost of printer. I took the printed back again for replacement (Still saved the receipt and box on this printer too because of what happened to the last printer.) Upon return of the printer, the C-310 model had been discontinued and replaced with the C315 model. There was an additional $20 costs I had to pay between the two models.

4. The C315 model was ditto as the C310 model other than a few minor exterior changes. Same problems.

5. Although the printer did print quality pictures, the ink did NOT save money as stated. The printer uses two cartridges. A black ink cartridge and a combination color cartridge. If either of the cartridges run out of ink, the other cartridge also stops working even if you set it to  black ink only. Also, even though this printer can be set to black ink only through the computer mode, it still uses both cartridges to print black only, which wastes a lot of money in ink costs.

6. The C315 model broke within the first 4-5 months. I then purchased a Kodak esp 3.2 and it worked a lot better and has not had the mechanical problems as the other computers although it still uses a lot of ink and also the ink replacement light comes on way before the ink is actually eliminated from the cartridge. Due to high ink costs with any ink-jet printer and since the initial cost of laser printers is now affordable for home use, I will be purchasing a laser printer for my next home printer.
2106443
We decided to try this coffee because it was a little cheaper than the kind we were buying at our local coffee shop.  The difference in the smoothness and taste far outweighed the savings.  We will not buy this again.
1751646
They are not that great.  I have spent less and had better quality in the past.  Not recommended.
3537855
I use this pressure cooker weekly.  Already the seal is starting to loosen and the finish around the top has eroded.  I would not spend the big money for this again and would look for a less expensive version.
4056844
I ordered this glass replacement and chose to have a repair shop install it for me. I figured that I would save money by bringing the glass to the shop and just paying for labor (saved $50). The glass replacement looked good out of the box but the repair guys told me it was definitely generic and inferior in quality to what would be considered "original". The result after the repair is slight streaking at bottom of glass and a thin "glass" face.

Just had it repaired today (3/14/2014) and, for now, the $6 I paid for the item seems worth it in the savings but we'll see.... I wish the product description wasn't deceiving as I would have paid more for true "original" "Samsung" glass.
1542257
This product didn't last through 2 batches of nuts.  Save your money and keep looking.  Even for sub $10 this is not worth the money.
4472919
A local shop offered to fix the glass for $85. I thought I'd save some money so I spent $20 and waited 6 weeks for what turned out to be a defective unit. Inserting the unit ruined my phone so I wound up buying a used IPhone for $165.
263821
These lights do not stay inside the bare recessed can so as a result, cannot be used.  They are not worth the savings on better versions from Home Depot for around $5 more each.
371477
The cheap price matches the cheap quality.  I bought some and they didn't even last 9 months. So I had to replace them. I would rather have saved that money and put it towards better ones. Nothing is more frustrating than replacing something that couldn't even last one (1) year. Save your money & spend more on better.
2536257
Not worth the money. Save your money and buy something better.
1288884
Until these folks come up with a longer life bulb, any energy savings will be lost on the cost of replacement of a very short lived bulb and expensive bulb replacement. NOwhere in the literature is the anticipated life of the bulb stated, listed, specified , or advertised. Why? because thats where the savings end. At between $10-13 replacement per year, over 50% of the total fixture cost, the green idea translates to reducing the green in your wallet. Other fluorescent tube types such as T12 and T8 are built for lengthy service with similar ,now digital ballasts. Not so , with this LOA product. Its designed to put the green in their pockets...not yours. So, once again its Caveat Emptor. A great idea soured by the greed for profit. For me, its back to the dependable and long lived sodium halide 75Watt by Regent or others. Those savings by not having to frequently climb the dusk to dawn ladder for frequent replacement outweigh any potential upfront savings. Energy like this comes with a price you must pay for in terms of high replacement costs.