Very poor construction..off balance for clacking
931355
The way the clackers are tied onto the ring makes it impossible to do the clacking motion. Very cheaply put together. We are totally disappointed.
2940243
Very weak construction.. the Velcro portion of the arm band just came off with normal removing motion just on first use
1495507
Poor construction.  Hinge is extremely fragile.  Clock body is not hanging straight from the hanging pin.  Metal is fragile and could easily break if you try to tweak it into position.  Also, one of the clockworks does not work and needs to be replaced.
1889144
I had very high expectations for this purchase.  (I paid $120 in August, 2015).
Hindsight: given the opportunity to examine this product before purchase I would have put the cost somewhere around $49.99.

#1) The frame is a series of aluminum tubes connected with plastic elbows - plastic that will crack.  The hammock consists of canvas and mesh - durable quality but pointless without a solid frame construction.  The mesh is very taught which prevents the chaise from staying flat when unoccupied.  Push down the head of the lounger to lay flat - the lower section rises, correct that - the base folds in...  Surprising for such a heavy piece of furniture.  I imagine that's why there isn't a picture showing the lounger flat with no one in it.

#2) Due to the tight hammock construction the frame is permanently askew, even folded.  So askew that the head of the lounger, when FORCED to be fully reclined, does not come in contact with the plastic bumpers, causing aluminum to rub against aluminum.

#3) I see why the biggest complaint/disappointment was with the sunshade.  The plastic mounts on the frame cracked within the first month - very poorly designed AND poor choice of materials.  Not a huge loss here, it was awkward to position while lying in the chair and akin to climbing out of a hole [feet first] when in place.

One review I read [after purchase] put it best, 'Big Hot Mess!..add to that, costly.
Hoping one more 'I hate it' review puts this product into the Amazon 'discontinue' bin, if there is such a thing.
Buyers be advised, hold onto the box.
4951818
The stand is very nice... but... it rocks side to side while sitting on a level surface.  When I'm using my phone/tablet and attempting to use the keyboard or surf the internet, my devices move all over the place.  You would think it would be rock steady since it's built solidly and the feet appear flat, but this is not the case.  Just a minute movement of the stand translates into a wobbly, and disappointing experience with my devices.  The two stars have nothing to do with the how well this is put together (material-wise), but rather for the manufacture's quality control in ensuring these things at least sit flat.

I ordered two of these, one brown and one gold.  I am awaiting receipt of the brown one today to see if it has the same problem.  This gold one is now going through a return process with Amazon.

Kudo's to Amazon, as always, for their great customer support with returns!

UPDATED:  I received the brown stand and it sits flat with no rocking.  Because of this, I recommend that if your stand rocks, you should return it for a replacement.  These things should sit rock steady on a flat surface and you should expect that.  The brown is quite nice and I like it a lot!  I'm not changing the Star rating simply because the manufacture needs to address inconsistency with their products.
3260435
Very poorly made ..not kid friendly broke on very first day
493716
Very noisy by design. One side is connected to the body mount and the other is to the inner rocker panel so there is always flex between the to. No amount of tightening seems to fix it.
1148923
Design flaw. First clamp ever seen that has  no metal swivel/rotating screw pad.  There is the thin 'non-marring' nylon screw pad, but no metal construction  inside. No, it does not 'mar' the wood. It dents the wood with a little round crater. Furthermore, the metal-against-plastic pressure bearing, which tapers to a bull-nose rounded point, will wear through the plastic in no time.  Returned as "defective/does not work properly" which really refers to defective design, rather a manufacturing defect.

If you are doing extremely light work, this may work for you, but in that case, something with even lighter weight, like 100% plastic construction will be even better. But it is not good for "general woodworking" like table or chair construction.
3477356
In the meantime, I tried a Lightspeed Zulu Pfx.  To my surprise, the noise reduction was considerably poorer than the QFR's.  The Pfx's don't have much clamping at all.  No doubt that would make them more comfortable, but as a consequence, there was a lot of wind noise that leaked around the ear pads.

When the noise cancellation worked well in the PFX's, they were great.  However, there was considerably popping and changes in the cancellation as I moved my head around in the cockpit.  The build construction was fabulous, and I really wanted to like these headsets, but they needed to be flawless for the price.  Unfortunately, they were not even close.
2525192
Son got me these for Xmas. GREAT sound. But extremely shoddy construction. they lasted all of 10 minutes before the left earpeice broke.
Great sound! I mean really REALY nice sound

BUT
Totally inferior  as in cr@p construction of the rest of it.
the problem is the earpieces themselves seem well constructed But are too heavy for the headband they are attached to which looks bulkier then it actually is. This becomes evident the first time you pick them up. which is too thin for the weight and bulk they are expected to support at the point where they connect to the headband itself.

I put them on. was impressed by the sound. Got called away for a phone call. then went back and put them on again and the left earpeice just cracked and came apart where it connects to the headband. total elapsed time. 10 minutes

Sad thing is they sound great. And had they put as much thought into the construction of the band as they did the speakers and earpeices themselves these would be a really nice headset. As they are constructed now they aren't worth a $10 pricetag let alone $100

In searching reviews on other websites I am finding this is more the norm then the exception.

We will be looking for a full refund rather then a replacement set as I have seen far too many reviews all complaining about the same problem
2679616
This is why I never buy anything online!  Clamp is on the wrong side.  Very, very low budget oversight on their part!  Should have read reviews.
4659475
Seems great in theory, but if your parts are bent and not balanced from the start actually makes things worse. Don't buy
2290827
Definitely not worth the money spent......very cheap aluminum material, and very poor support design.  Considering the price, giving this a one star is a bit much.  It deserves 1/4 of 1 star.  Yeah folks. Reconsider if your thinking about buying this table.  The quality is indicative of something that you'd get from a cheap fabrication shop out of CHINA.....and a dent in one of the chairs to boot
2051065
I have a replacement on the way the one originally sent started making clacking sounds within a few minutes of use! i will write another review of the replacement!
270534
This is not very well balanced, it fell over after only two months use, and a few of the "arms" cracked off.  While it looks nice, it's not very sturdy nor well built.  If I have to weigh each of my coats and place them just so in order for this to work, then it's a poor design.
2975399
Frankly, at the price point, I knew I wasn't going to get the bet slab of hardware in the world, but I honestly didn't expect to to break within the first 10 minutes of normal use. After attaching the clamp to my stand, I spent a few minutes trying to adjust the filter's position when suddenly, the filter just fell to the floor. The plastic screw head that holds the filter to the gooseneck, which didn't even appear to have been glued together, just detached. As I tried to find a way to reconnect them with a pushing and twisting motion that really wasn't going anywhere, the other unglued plastic screw head on the clamp end fell off in exactly the same way. This is to say nothing of the warping that happened to the hole the gooseneck goes into on the filter. So on build quality, this thing fails wonderfully.

So lets assume for a moment that I did replace the gooseneck or glue the plastic together myself, did it improve the sound quality? That's the important bit, right? Well, in my very limited testing both speaking loudly in a normal voiceover tone, as well as singing, there was no noticeable quality difference when comparing the uncompressed tracks through a a pair of high end JH-16 in-ear monitors. While this thing looks like it should work in theory, I was unable to actually prove that out.

In the end, this was a good idea, that was poorly executed on. I'll be returning my broken one and won't be going after a replacement.
1734506
Very poor design!!!  I know what you are thinking...:What do you expect for $15??"...but really to correct the design problems it would not make the item any more expensive.

The retaining ring that holds to plastic/elastic band around the end of the drum is totally inadequate.  It pops off easily, then the diapragm detaches rendering the toy useless until you streach it back on to the drum....only to have it happen again after 3 more uses.  The plastic ring that retains the plastic/elastic diaphragm is too narrow and weak and the tabs that retain it are not deep enough to hold.  I tried fixing it in place with Epoxy while holding it with clamps, but the glue popped off after 5-10 uses.  Then after a few more uses the plastic retaining ring snapped in two!!!!!

Tons of fun....can shoot at window blinds from across the room (20 feet!) and see the air hit the blind slats.  Just needs to be better made...bought for Christmas, was broken by the next day!!