The direct A/V connection produced a far better image, unfortunately
922042
The converted Playstation 2 video was SO dark that I removed this converter from my system and threw it away. The direct A/V connection produced a far better image, unfortunately, as I was hoping to run only one HDMI cable into my television using a HDMI switch box. I failed...
2692958
I wish the camera had better optics and the slow transmission (lag time) of the "Real Time Video" made it impossible for me to navigate using only the camera as an indicator of direction, pitch, trim, etc.
3245782
One of the rare cases where the picture looks better than actual product.
789381
Being a huge booster of Blu-Ray as the ideal (so far) medium for improving the sight and sound of older movies I was fairly disappointed with this and HD Cinema's concurrent release, "The Stranger".  While Blu-Ray transfers typically make details sharper, shadows blacker and faces more detailed, these two films' details seem softer and less focused despite the BD transfers.

Ironically, this can be proven by watching the short side-by-side comparison each disc offers as an extra feature.  The non-Blu-Ray half of the screen looks sharper with more relief.  First time I've seen that.
4720905
Cable barely works at all; image is extremely distorted at the best of times, and usually nonexistent at all.
143639
Significantly improved the TV resolution over composite connectors.
3408347
I got this for use with the Xbox 360 HD DVD add on for my Samsung LNS4095D to get full 1080p, but to my disappointment, this cable vastly washed out the color on my set compared to the component cable which is bright and sharp.  However it does upscale dvds fairly nicely, with exceptoin of being slightly washed out blacks compared to component as well. Im not much of an audio/videophile type but even I can see the difference clearly.

I guess I should have done more research as I have found out my set does not send the proper color output from the vga connection, which is designated PC Vga. Either M$ provides an update for my set or I will try to return this expensive cable and stick to the component.
443781
This purchase was returned due to a somewhat fuzzy display and moving fog in the display. The amount of display fuzziness may not be a problem for all users but it was too much for my application. This performance was confirmed by customer service at Rear View Safety after they examined a video and still photo. Their conclusion was that the demonstrated performance was the best one could expect from the WIFI connection. This picture quality issue is unfortunate as the range of the unit was sufficient to consistently lock on at a distance of about 45 feet inside my car. I hope the company can improve the picture quality so I can consider purchasing one in the future.
3883710
I purchased this camera in the hopes that it would be a nice upgrade for my sony a580.  Well I have to tell you that the image quality is considerably worse on the a77.  I love the new 16mm-50mm "kit" lens but I'm not so happy with the body  attached to it.  24 mp is way too much for this sensor to handle in low light.  The description touts the a77 as having superior low light/ high iso performance, but nothing could be farther from the truth.  I'm boxing it up as we speak, and I'll be purchasing the lens for 800.00 here at amazon.com.  I'll save myself 1200.00, have better image quality, and superior battery life with my a580.  I will say that the video quality is outstanding on the a77, that's just not what I was looking for.  Live and Learn.  Here's hoping that the a99 is everything that the a77 should have been.
4016665
I ordered this product to connect multiple game consoles to a TV. The video quality was noticeably degraded by the box; unacceptable, so I have returned the device. I compared the video quality of my game console (Nintendo Wii with composite video output; the yellow RCA connector) direct connect to TV versus connected through the video switch. The was a very noticeable degradation of the video resolution when connected through the video switch.  I also asked several other people to tell me which picture looked better, and they also easily identified the degradation in video quality when connected through this video switch.

Jeff
791690
degraded the sound of my first gen Beyer-dynamic Tesla 1. The resolution suffered, with this adapter the sound painted a duller image. without it, I got the " you are there experience" in resolution.
4460193
As others have stated, pretty poor image quality. You can find clearer images online.
1053803
The image quality is pretty good - definitely no more resolution than panasonic but aggressive noise reduction, so it looks a lot cleaner, though I would argue it's too smeary. Live view is laggy. FTP allows a maximum of 2fps upload. Also, there is a 4mb chip inside, but whatever it's used for, it's not to buffer images. at ~30kb each 640x480 jpg, you better have 240kbps pipe to and from your ftp server if you don't want to drop frames. Unit and wall wart get quite warm, even with wireless disabled. No external on/off switch. Must use IE to configure the motion sensor (some have reported IE tabs in FF works, but it didn't for me). Mine didn't have WPA, only WEP. Tried a firmware update and the interface claimed the FW didn't match the unit (yes I double checked).
I can't totally dog it, because it's half the price of the panasonics, and it does more or less work, though its a hassle to configure, but the panasonics are better cameras w/ a better interface. Barring an epiphany, these will be going back.
1247860
Picture is pixelated up close but looks okay from a distance
2620281
Image is distorted (squashed slightly) and sound level is very low.
71831
I bought the SONY NS775V mainly for its 12bit/108MHz video DAC.  It that respect, it did not disappoint.  The 480P video from the SONY NS775V is significantly better than the video from my Panasonic S47.

However, the (redbook CD) audio from the SONY leaves very much to be desired: it is tonally dry, texturally flat, harmonically bland and emotionally uninvolving.  Compared with the Panasonic, there is, to my ears, no contest.  (The Panasonic's 24/192 audio DACs, and its "Multi-Remaster" feature, make listening a true pleasure, giving redbook CD's an "analogue" richness, and adding believable presence to movie soundtracks.)

For me, the audio contribution is at least equivalent to the video contribution in terms of generating a satisfying
"cinematic" experience.  It seems that the Panasonic better provides the former, and the SONY the latter.

The dilemna for me is whether I am willing to make a significant (negative) tradeoff in audio quality for the sake of a better picture.  Since, on average, I use my A/V system more for music listening than for movie watching, I lean more toward sacrificing better video for a the sake of gaining (much) better audio.  If the SONY even came close in audio performance relative to the Panasonic, I would consider keeping it.  But I would say that the disparity in audio performance between the two units is greater than their disparity in video performance.  (I guess I've learned, too, through this experience that I'm more of an audiophile than I am a videophile.)

Even after 30-40 hours of break-in, the redbook CD performance of the NS775V is extremely disappointing: the music sounds choked and utterly lifeless.  The cold and distant nature of the audio while one is sitting down to watch a DVD takes a great deal of pleasure away from the movie experience, too.  In addition, during my audition, the SONY did freeze up on, and eventually was unable to play, a DVD which had been no problem at all for my Panasonic S47.

I'll probably end up getting the Panasonic S97, which is about 2x the price of the NS775V, but has Faroudja processing and an 11-bit/216MHz video DAC.  The "best of both worlds" may indeed be possible, but will necessitate my spending the extra money.

If you are restricted to the $100-125 price range, the following is advised:
(a)  If you have decidedly preferential, videophile tendencies, then get the SONY NS775V.
(b)  If you have preferential, audiophile tendencies (like me), then get the Panasonic S47.

Happy Viewing/Listening!

POSTSCRIPT:
After 50+ hours of break-in, and sustained absence of the Panasonic, the NS775V sounds better, although it is never rid of that trademark, stark and overly candid sonic signature indicative of Sony.  In addition, the SACD performance is respectable (again, after 50+ hours of break-in).  Bottom line is that the video playback on the NS775V is VERY special for the price, and makes this unit well worth its salt.  I will therefore add another star to my rating.  4-stars ****
2643470
I've been going back and forth between this and my older Pioneer blu-ray player and the Sony looks, to my eyes at least, to be applying forced undefeatable DNR to the picture image.  Kind of perplexing on Sony's part because I believe they're one of the better companies and NOT doing that.  Hopefully this is something that could be remedied with a future firmware upgrade, but how to get Sony's attention is another matter.