Better than Under Armour
931729
Had a UA helmet first.  Installing the face guard was a NIGHTMARE!  This helmet and face guard's design are so much better!
824083
Find myself wearIng it more than my under armor for crossfit workouts. Now, just need to find a longer version and will buying a couple. It is a lot cooler than UA. Definitely recommend.
2734651
Under Armours just might possibly be the best line of athletic apparel.  All their workout clothes are well-designed and engineered to help your body function even when the ambient temperature is extreme.  They have a line of clothing especially engineered to be worn during hot weather.  This line of workout gear is designed to help sweat and moisture evaporate from your body.  Basically, the material wicks perspiration from your skin, like what a towel does to water.  However, unlike a towel that will absorb and retain the water, the fabrics used in this series are designed to help that moisture evaporate.  It doesn't hold moisture, therefore the garment never feels heavy.  More importantly, the evaporation of the moisture helps keep your body cool.

They also have another line of clothing that is designed for cold weather activities.  This line also helps perspiration evaporate from your body.  However, the thicker material also helps your body retain heat.  Interestingly, helping sweat evaporate quickly is just as important during cold weather as it is during hot weather.  Some of the clothing in the cold gear series are designed to be work together.  For the inner layer, usually you will wear one of their moisture-wicking long sleeve shirt.  These usually have a tight fit.  And over that, you wear some sort of wind shell.

The fleece pants that are the subject of this review belong to their all-weather line of clothes.  Basically, they can be worn as long as the temperature is not hot.  The inner material is fleece, however, the outside has a smoother and shinier look than your old sweatpants.  The bottom is not banded.  And the fit seems to be slightly loose.  It has a more casual appearance and fit than your traditional sweatpants.

These are my favorite pair of workout pants.  They are expensive, but so far, I have not found a better alternative.  Also, they are probably best for indoor workouts.  They are not designed to be wind resistant.

Over the years, I have tried many line of workout wear.  I started out with Nike's Dri-Fit line.  Nike's workout clothes are also well-made.  But they are even more expensive than the Under Armour brand.  A typical Nike Dri-Fit T-Shirt will cost atleaast $30.  The same style in Under Armour would be a few dollars cheaper.  Please keep in mind that we are not talking about the Nikes that you can buy at the various shoe retailers.  We're comparing the Under Armours to Nike's more serious line of clothing.

I have been pleased with the Under Armours.  The only thing about them that I'm not happy with is that they do not make those super sexy athletic wear for the girls.  Maybe that's why the UAs are not as popular with women.  Your friend and humble reviewer, Citan, is a guy.  But he does appreciate his eye candy at the gym once in a while.  And sadly, the UA line does not contribute to that passion.

I can recommend these sweatpants for just about any indoor workout.  They are superior to those old, grey sweatpants that you've been wearing.  C'mon, be kind to yourself.  Ditch those old sweats and upgrade to these.
3106257
Fits better than his Duluth long sleeved shirts, and these have a better neck that does not show his under shirt.
1819332
Comfortable, and cool in warmer weather.  Under Armour  produces quality products.
4106146
Awesome! More comfortable than a cotton undershirt for everyday wear.
3083009
Way better than the inzer wraps I had to buy for a lifting meet coming up. Wish I could have worn these. Usapl is a monopoly on its sponsors.
3906086
Much better product than Carhartt and a lower cost. These have lasted longer than the similar Carhartt version.
200141
This is definitely my favorite set of running tights.  I have 2 other pair from Under Armor, one fitted and one compression.  The Mizuno's are far better.  They are tight in the thighs and looser around the knees and calf.  The fact that they zip up makes them easier to put on and take off than the Under Armor's.  They also have a zippered key pouch which is good, except I keep mine in my jacket (still a great feature for warmer days where you may only wear a shirt.) Wish I bought this before I bought my fitted Under Armor tights.  I would much rather have 2 pair of the Mizunos.  Hopefully these will work out well for biking too.
1241799
Great quality and fit.  Not sure what all the hoopla is about Under Armor!

This one was less than half the price and same or better quality!
1457837
Fits well and the material is good and beefy, which ensure warmth.  I wear them over my Under Armour when I run on extremely cold days in the winter time.
887794
Way better than the ones that are way to expensive name brand stuff . fit very well . Tan is more brown but its fine with me .
4872499
Saved a lot over the names like nike and under armour. Don't get me wrong I like a name brand but when a product comes around costing less than 50% and does the same thing well. I'm Sold.
1702058
These shorts provide excellent support and compression. They're a little pricey, but better than the 2XU pair I tried and a league above the mass-produced compression shorts like UnderArmour. I even wear them after working out by way of recovery. So far holding up after multiple times through the laundry cycle.
1909624
Like these better than my previous under armour shorts. Have been wearing them under my gi for bjj for months 2-4 classes a week with no issues.
223620
Im comparing these to the significantly more expensive Tommy John underwear.  After getting extremely frustrated with Tommy Johns wearing out after 8 months I decided to try something new.  These are a little bit shorter (in the legs) but way softer.  The primary fiber is cotton, not cotton/spandex split.  Its more absorbent and softer.  The downside is That they are more prone to slide up your legs due to the shorter length.  Its not often, but more common.  If they were and inch or so longer I would rate them 5 stars.  These are a great alternative still, Im just an underwear snob.  The benefit to the extra spandex is that they cling more and don't slide up or move.  The downside to spandex is that it doesnt absorb sweat and if you don't like that clingy feeling you won't be happy.  Plus, it seems like spandex is less durable.  I grew up wearing Hanes and Fruit if the Loom junk not knowing what real boxer briefs were.  These are not comparable.  They are far superior, softer and more comfortable.  I will never go back.
4435854
Fabric is very similar in feel (compression and breathing) to the less expensive Sub Sports RX fabric. Like Sub RX, these are second-skinnish, breathable, properly compressive when right-sized, and OK to wear alone by those not very concerned about showing the shape of body details.  (They aren't see-through in front or back.)  The waist is low so there can be a "plumber's crack" effect unless worn with a long shirt.

The legs of these "shorts" are very short, like boxer briefs.  If you want thigh compression, use the "half tights" version.  I like this shorter length myself because it gives flexibility for choice of coverup shorts.  The longer leg version may be necessary to feel the advertised benefits of compression for circulation and muscle recovery after sports.

Four stars because the competition is 25% cheaper while still excellent.  Compare to the longer-legged:
<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/SUB-Sports-RX-Mens-Graduated-Compression-Shorts-Base-Layer-Underwear/dp/B0085KO7S8/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">SUB Sports RX Mens Graduated Compression Shorts - Base Layer Underwear</a>