the size is right, the fit is not
920275
These are OK.....they are a cushy, soft walk, but the right sandal fits much looser and kind of flops on my foot, so at the end of the day, my right leg cramps. There is no arch support and the fit is odd, in that, it has an bi-level fit, meaning, the heel feels high and then  the rest of the foot is on another level. It takes some time to get used to. I'll keep them, but I wouldn't buy them again.
1201555
They are what they are but if the sizes had been specified better I wouldn't have bought them.
4218367
I ordered this Monday and got it Wednesday, thanks to my Prime subscription.

However, I am sorry I ordered it because the fit is really not even close to my other three chef's coats, all from different manufacturers; they are not "women's" chef's coats.

The size I ordered was medium.  I am 5'1 and at a normal body mass index for my size and shaped like a woman. The width across the underarms and upper back is tight, actually too tight for comfort.

And there is not enough room on the upper torso to fit a woman (yes, it does say, "Women's") in proportional relationship.

BUT, the sleeves are so spacious in relation to the rest of the body of the garment; it seems like it would fit a body-builder (almost; I feel I could use these to fly :-) or fill with air and go for a float.

Around my hips, it is tight.  I cannot imagine whether this will shrink or not, but if it does, it will be a tight fit over a blouse.

The biggest part of this whole garment the waist.  It fits.

Overall, I am quite disappointed. When on, it's a bit stupid looking.

I will end by saying the color is lovely, the seams are well done, and the fabric is quite nice.
140261
The fit was the right size but the cardigan seems to not look as it does in the photo.  It does not gather in the waist.  It goes straight down. Not too crazy to the fit.
236817
the items seem to be running tighter than the size indicated
3100841
The fit doesn't feel quite right, but it's good for the money
2055126
It fits well, as I expected it to. However, it's not near as wide as it looks in the picture.
285662
I had hoped they would have fit a little more snug than they do, but it works
1301709
I should have known to order a size bigger, but they are serving the purpose.
3860220
The size is ok and they look nice when my wife wears them. There is not way to make adjustments to the elastic for better comfort.
891191
It fits, but the waist is made to sit around your waist. Not your hips. Other than that, they are comfortable
3644260
I really like the boot but am somewhat disappointed with the fit. I bought these because I have size 9.5 4E feet. the left boot iwide enough, the right is a bit tight, wearable but barely. For a 5E there should be plenty of room. There isn't. Both are longer than a size 9.5 should be, more like 10. Overall these are usable, but I am unlikely to purchase this brand again.
3523987
Pleased with the quality, but disappointed with the fit. Too small.
2402507
The size is a little snug for the measurement. The shirt is for slimmer individuals.
2336495
I'll fit into it eventually. Size chart on this item was not correct.
471501
finding a boot that fits is always difficult and is more difficult when attempting to buy over the phone, internet, catalog, etc. Usually I try to go to Payless because they have large sizes. I was pleasantly surprised to find size 12ww boots that didn't look hideous and were stylish. I should have listend to the other reviewers who said that the boot was a not as wide as the label wide wide would have you believe. All in all, I'd give it 3 and 1/2 stars if possible.
3143034
I got the size that fits me for most clothing, and the fit is way off.  The bottom fits great (tight but not too tight), but the top is huge and saggy, so altogether not much support is being given, if any.  The bottom also likes to roll up, and doesn't hold pants up well.  Material is soft and comfortable,  would make a decent layering price to keep belly covered.