Very functional but smaller than advertised
932793
I just got this rack and have used it once inside a pressure cooker, to steam rice (using the bowl-in-pot technique). It worked really well.

The three legs that support the rack can be removed to accommodate shallower pots and pans, which provides additional flexibility. The item is very thin and lightweight, which might be a downside for some, but it likely is fine for its intended purpose (i.e., there's no real need for it to be that much heavier/sturdier unless one is wanting to put very heavy bowls or the like on top of it).

The rack itself is closer to 7-3/8", a tad smaller than advertised. Also, there is no Amico label anywhere to be found -- instead, my rack came with a label that had Chinese characters on it.

All in all, I'm glad I got this - it works much better than the v-shaped wire racks that many pressure cookers come with these days.
1274701
A little  smaller than expected but gets the job done.
1510894
The bag is a little smaller than it seems from the pictures, but it works very well.
3396073
Good quality, however a little smaller than what it appears online
4606553
I thoroughly enjoyed this product although it was much smaller than I expected.
539749
This works well, but is smaller than I anticipated (my fault).  This assembles in literally minutes and stands well.
543197
It's smaller than it looks online but it does the job....basically.
4074302
A little smaller than I expected but it's and does the job.
318993
I purchased this for my custom built behemoth of a computer, expecting that it would slide into one of the front docks like a CDRW, but it was WAY too small. I didn't realize it at purchase, but this thing is actually about the size of a SATA drive. I was able to get it installed okay by sliding it into one of my computer's free HD slots, but to use it I have to take my computer's side panel off... which is awkward.

With that said, it works beautifully on both Winders & CentOS Linux so I'm happy. I may end up building a new, smaller computer to migrate this thing over to because the side-panel thing is annoying.
938233
I can use it, but a lot smaller in than the picture
3372086
A bit smaller than I expected, but it's doing the job for now
987637
Arrived on time as tracking stated. Extremely smaller than anticipated for the cost of the item. I expected something double or triple the size for what I paid. However, the material is heavy duty, and still is functional for my purposes.
1525755
Simple and very useful, smaller than anticipated but still very helpful.
4138452
Just a little smaller than I hoped for, but looks and works great!
3580841
It's much smaller than I thought it was- but still nice- and frankly I should have been more careful about reading the description. But overall, I'm pleased with the aesthetic of this item and it will serve the purpose I intended it for- and it appears to be sturdy and well constructed.
3412802
Good product, works just fine with the 3.0 USB port. It's a small device, easy to carry and looks actually great. The only detail is that the capacity it is not 4TB as the product description says but only 3.6 TB, which means you are loosing almost 400GB of storage capacity. This is actually a complain I read before buying thanks to other amazon buyers who wrote a review as well, but I can live with it. 4 of 5 stars because of that.
1995994
Great buy for the price but it is deceivingly small.