Comfortable but misleading adcopy
920257
These are advertised as having a "debris shedding gusseted tongue" and have nothing of the sort. The tongue is only sewn in at the base which means the tongue will tend to migrate away from center and expose your sock. If any debris or water hits the top of the shoe prepare for wet socks.
4900618
The labeling of this item (<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/SanDisk-Ultra-II-16-GB-SDHC-card/dp/B0012W7HQK/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">SanDisk Ultra II 16 GB SDHC card</a>) is very confusing. On the front side it claims a maximum speed of 15MB/sec. At the same time, it is marketed as 'Class-4' (which means a minimum read/write speed of just 4MB/s). To move up to a 'class-6' card from the same manufacturer, you have to buy the&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/SanDisk-16gb-Extreme-III-SDHC-card/dp/B001EDTL52/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">SanDisk 16gb Extreme III SDHC card</a>&nbsp;which costs 2-3 times more.

I decided to take a chance with this Ultra II card, even though my new&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Canon-EOS-Rebel-T1i/dp/B001XURPQI/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Canon EOS Rebel T1i</a>&nbsp;explicitly requires a 'Class-6' card for video capture. I'm happy to report that the card is fast enough to keep up with my camera, even in burst mode and in 1080 HD video mode.

My own benchmark (see 'Customer Images') revealed that the read speed of this card is consistently fast at 18-19MB/s. But its write speed is strongly dependent on the data file size:
- For small files of 1MB each, the card is only able to write at about 6MB/s. That means it qualifies as a borderline 'class-6'.
- For typical photo files (4-6MB each), the write speed is much faster at around 10MB/s.
- When writing a huge file of 1GB, the card can actually achieve the claimed maximum speed of 15MB/s.

The SanDisk Ultra II may not be a good choice if you want to use it as a ReadyBoost device (frequent writing of smaller file). But when used in digital cameras, this 'class-4' card is just as fast or even faster than other brands of 'class-6' cards (such as the&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Transcend-16-GB-SDHC-Class-6/dp/B001ECQVTM/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Transcend 16 GB SDHC Class 6</a>, which levels off at 11MB/s for large files). This makes the Ultra II a great value - especially for those people who prefer to stay with a trusted name brand.

[Update on Nov 18, 2011]
At the time of my original review, this Sandisk Ultra card was marketed as a 'class-4', while the Extreme card was called a 'class-6'. But now the Ultra is called 'class-6' while the Extreme is 'class-10'. I strongly suspect it is just marketing people playing tricks with definitions of 'class-4/6/10'.
4538014
I put these on and they are as soft as butter. The only problem I have is the false advertising.
2699800
CON - I gave this one star because of the item misrepresentation this is not, I repeat not a tube top bra. The fabric is extremely thin and you can see by the photos listed that it is see through it in light it would look tacky with a bra so that's the reason for one star, however read on for the pros.

PROS - the fabric is very soft and comfortable and while I would not wear it out in public I have elected to keep both the Navy and purple tops that I ordered because they are good for wearing around the house with PJ bottoms or skirts besides they would cost more to return than I paid for them. As for the fit I ordered a purple and a Navy in a XXX large because I assume it would run small like most off-brand items and I was right. That said I normally wear a large or extra large or a 16 to 18 depending on the cut in tops. This fits excellent for comfort so I would suggest ordering at least one size larger since this is a XXX and I'm usually 1X.
1636458
The image in the advertisement shows a much shorter ankle than what the product has.  If you're okay with that, then these socks are excellent.  I, however took the picture at face value without reading the description...totally my fault, but not what I wanted.
4613917
I was surprised to a stamp on underwear of the manufacturer instead of tag which I normally get as proof of authenticity
1044696
A high quality sweatshirt! Very soft and comfy. The print looks very cheap and blurry though. There is white paint marks on the arm of the sweatshirt and random white wording like under the word friends that isn't in the picture. It looks the the image was stamped twice because the word friends is written twice really close together making it look really blurry. Would return it but too much of a hassle and its soft so I can lounge in it.
1298583
It actually fits as it should, but since I was diligent in looking up the sizing, I knew to order a size larger than I needed. The large fits like a medium (I'm 5' 2" @ 130lbs., but have wide shoulders & 34C).

My only disappointment is the size of the print. The offered image shows the graphic to cover most of the front of the shirt - which is what I wanted. The provided image is misleading because the actual printed area of the shirt is actually half that size. Still, the fabric is super-soft and the shirt fits well. Also, for what I paid, I guess I can't be too disappointed. I do wish the print was as large as shown, though.
2662278
Comfortable pillow but split at the seams where the label was
532873
Product is comfortable and quality but colors mailed to me were not as advertised. I was hoping to receive the colors in the photo, but instead, I received black, lavender, grey and white. Completely white underwear is not my thing; I really wanted colors. If I had received the advertised colors, I'd have given 5 stars, because overall, this underwear seems to be very good quality and is very comfortable.
1034902
I thought I was buying a modern typeset of Chesterton's work, and was VERY irked to receive a OCR scan of a public domain printing, with brand new typos. This was a present for my daughter, who wants to keep it -- otherwise it would be returned. I've seen similar scams -- uh, scans -- labeled as available in public domain by Amazon, and can only assume I wasn't paying sufficient attention. Other buyers, beware.
737860
I bought the black/black/white colorway. You'll need to check the shoe for authenticity.  The shoes I received are not the NEO shoes that are advertised: no cloudfoam NEO insole and logos are different (see photos of authentic shoes). Slight differences, but enough to help others spot the same issue. Fits somewhat small for wide feet, upper denim does not feel like denim fabric at all.
3082211
these shoes fit the purpose, and keep my feet dry. They are comfortable to wear. My main complaint is that I bought them because the picture showed very pronounced paw prints, and yet when I got them, only 1 print between the 2 shoes actually looks like a dog print, the others are blurred. If I would have known that, I would have bought the red ones with bright flowers instead!
3986477
This is a wonderful shoe at an unbeatable price. It fits as if specifically make for my foot, grips well, and remains comfortable during extended wear. My only complaint is that the photo on the website looks like brown leather with off-white mesh, but the actual shoe is gray leather with gray mesh. I'll get over it, but that was a disappointment.
3110406
I have several pair of Haines ComfortFit boxer briefs and wanted to increase my collection. I saw these on the site, and decided to order them. Overall, I like them, but two issues:

First, I am disappointed all three pair are not black as indicated in the photograph. Nowhere in the description did it indicate there were 2 black and 1 dark-grey pair. From the product description I expected to receive three pair of black, which was really what I wanted. I guess I will live, but I am disappointed.

Second, I find these run a little small compared to my Haines ComfortFit. Again, not a big deal, but I probably would have ordered 1 size larger had I known (my ComfortFit fit me perfectly, not too snug, not too loose). As such these are a little snug, but they do stretch quite well.
841891
For most purposes these are a great value, but beware these are probably factory defects.  These are the "full adhesive" notes, and are supposed to have a narrow "un-coated" edge along the ROUNDED sides of the pads... the ones I received had the "un-coated" edge along the squared edge, They come in nondescript shrink-wrapped packs of 10 (three packs to total 30) with zero branding on the outer wrappers.  I felt this needed to be said, as I had mentioned for most purposes, the defect is a non-issue, but for certain arts & crafts usages, it may make a difference.
3837935
I ordered a pack of pink/green/purple and then also ordered this pack of blues... and both the packs I received were the pink/green/purple. Which sucks, because I waited longer for the blues pack and then it turned out to be exactly the same as the first pack I ordered. I could have just ordered two of that pack and received them both last week. But still, they're nice good quality underwear and my daughter says they are comfortable. That's all that really matters. Giving just four stars simply because it's false advertisement and should be disclosed that you will be sent a pack at random.