might be great for straight ahead view i
928882
Couldn't point it down at my work surface, might be great for straight ahead view i.e. biking . saw good quality
1730788
This is lightweight & seems like a great design. Unless your eyes are the exact width of the eyepieces, it is uncomfortable to try to use. The area you are viewing through is too small. Several of us tried this at the Lion King, but it was just ok for a quick look.
1708743
I posted a photo above you can look at to see the objective glass element on this lens - it has some severe curvature to obtain the near 90 degreee field of view without distortion.  I also plan to mount it in my linearity tester when finished using it for a customer and will post a photo of its overall resolution.

This lens would be IDEAL for a realator who takes "curb apeal" shots of homes, and interior shots where it is difficult to see floor to ceiling and wall to wall.  At 11 MM there is no fisheye effect and all lines are straight.  Unfortunately, even though this can focus down to about 11 inches, it can not mount the flash ring because it has a 72mm filter size instead of the 67 mm on the other lenses which can use the ring flash.  This is really a shame too, because at close distances, the wide field of view of this lens will cast a shadow from the built in flash on the camera that may take up 1/8 of the picture.  Using a flash off the camera for closeup work is one option, a bounce flash and a card is another option, but direct lighting will alsmost certainly show up in the picture due to the wide viewing angle.

Outside during daylight the lens really shines.  I used it to take a photo of my house from the curb and got the entire lot (75' wide) from 50 feet away on the sidewalk, with the grass in front in focus, as well as the sky above, and parts of my neighbor's homes.  This would give a realator alot of flexibility to either zoom in or crop the picture in photoshop for a front on view for flyers.
3448111
I like the fisheye optic a great deal, but I've not  yet had the change to experiment much with it as yet.  On a cropped sensor one gets an ultrawide image with heavy vignetting (see attached example).  One can get very close to the subject but the "sweet spot" pronounced as with other Lensbaby Optics.  If you're looking for a full circle for a cropped sensor camera, you'd be better off saving your money for their dedicated (and expensive) Circular Fisheye lens, which will deliver a full circle even on a cropped sensor camera.  If you have a full frame camera (and I don't) you will get the full circle effect.  If you have the Composer or Composer Pro you are better off not trying to do tilt-shift with this optic.  So who is this for; if you want to play with fisheye and ultra-wide effects and not spend a ton of money this is worth the bucks.  I think you'd be happier with this then Lensbaby's wide angle filter. My ultimate goal is to purchase all, or almost all the Composer optics and this just gives me more creative options.  The drop in aperture disks are a pain because they have to be placed under the optic, but other than that this optic is fine.  My advise is to evaluate your shooting situation and pick an aperture that will best suit your artistic vision and not try to change them often during a shoot.
1376747
The binoculars appear well made and durable.  You can hold them steady without a tripod.  They are however hard to adjust to get a proper field of view and focus.  I had the chance to compare them to a lower power pair of Vortex binoculars.  The Vortex seemed much clearer and it was easier to pick out detail at a greater distance.  I would save my money for a better model the next time.
4575291
The field of view is not large enough to see the hitch plus whats behind you. If you just want to see your hitch, it works great.
495345
Got as a gift off of my wish list... Not bad for close in viewing, but can't get to focus well at any distance.
4852392
Over view will work for now. I'll come back and review when I've had time to do a thorough read. It looks good on first review.
4427531
I agree with most of what the previous reviewer said. What I dislike most is the are extremely narrow viewing angle and the lack of antireflective coating. Otherwise, it is a generally good device.

My wish list for the next version includes built-in Wi-Fi and the ability to browse the network neighborhood and pull media files from any machine on the local wireless network, and an internet browser :-)
512682
The reason for the three stars, and for sending the Pebble back, the pedometer is not working very well.  As this was one of the main reasons I wanted this watch it was an important enough problem to me that I no longer wanted the watch.  Another drawback, I found it hard to read the steps. Even on the highest contrast it just wasn't very clear.  if you have perfect vision it might work for you.
However, if these issues are not important to you, it's a nice watch, it sync'd flawlessly with my iPhone 7 plus and it's very user friendly.  The interchangeable watch faces are another plus.  It just wasn't right for me.
862375
Sleek profile, small footprint, quick recharge, and crystal clear images on a generous screen that swivels with ease.  Why three stars?
If the player has a fast forward, I cannot find it.  It will advance from trailer to trailer, and from scene to scene, but there is no control I can find to move rapidly backward or forward, a feature I consider essential. The player that this one was purchased to replace had a 2x, 4x, 8x, and 16x fast forward that displayed the video while it advanced.  This allowed quick replays of dialogue and/or action missed .
4117464
There seems to be an optimal speed at which the image is shown steadily. If you go too fast or too slow, the image won't show as clearly.
377134
After laughing about the absurd looking device I adjusted it to my face, nose and eyes and gave it a try. Its obvious that you cant focus both of the eyepieces toward a single object 3 inches from your face, (that's the focal length for such a powerful eyepiece). Simply roll one of the eyepieces up out of the way for viewing your work space for reference and use the device for very close viewing of small features. The eyejpiecescan be removed and you have two single very strong viewers.
999923
They are great for old eyes. Fast to acquire but I'm looking for something a little more precise at distance. I may try putting a dot with Sharpie on the front sight.
1819537
Great angles of views, nice slim frame. I use it in a dual monitor setup with an iMac. If you need very dim lighting, you might be out of luck with this one. It cannot get very dim without turning down contrast separately from brightness.
2919474
great at measuring. but are they serious with the lousy display.

my eyesight ?  pretty good i got the 40s eyes, but 1.5 reading glasses sort that out easy....
The display has POOR CONTRAST ,  and the fractions can be very hard to see.  Now consider this tool is intended to be used on site with varying light levels and conditions!  sometimes bright and sunny and sometimes dull or dark. (yep i know the rep says interior use)

So knowing this  What were they thinking?  the ease of reading the display under varying circumstance is absolutely vital to making this tool an efficient tool.

i just can't see how this got out into the wild,  surely they must have had staff who  knew the display was poor???  do they even have usability people on staff.
382675
Purchased the 16x50 version of these Bushnell binoculars (primarily for star gazing).  While the optics seem fine (for the money) the rocker style focuser is easily jarred out of position, even simply by pressing the eyepieces to your eyes when gazing upward or by trying to adjust the diopter.

Probably good for terrestrial use but be prepared to wrestle with the focus when gazing skyward.