I like the way the infomative is presented as unbiased as ...
926728
This was a very inormative book. The media hype and spin on this incident is unbelievable. I like the way the infomative is presented as unbiased as possible and it is left up to the reader to form their own opinions. Well done.
2553774
I would recommend this book to some of my friends whose motto is "Israel! Right or wrong.  It is the most unbiased account I have read, with the exception of Thomas Friedman's From Beirut to Jerusalem".
4928503
This is a well-organized, well-presented picture of the news.
The basic stories are not biased. The weather section is very good.
It's a good way to keep up with what's new.
455148
A balanced reporting of all points of view.  While the author's view is transparent, it shows a huge effort to present all positions as they would see the issues.  He shows his hopes and fears in a sensitive yet clear writing style.
I enjoyed his varied styles.  I was not as aware as I should have been of all the varieties of responses to the issue. I find his critique of American Ministry valid but sad.
2357097
The articles are informative and interesting. Most of the time they are objective. I enjoy different opinions and viewpoints so this paper does that. I also like the WSJ magazine and the financial markets section of the paper. The app itself doesn't work very well on the kindle as others have said but it's more of a nuisance having to manually upload the latest version of the paper, nothing major. Overall I think it's a good and informative addition to my reading list. I receive both the paper and digital versions. It is expensive in my opinion and I will not renew.
2089444
Generally books that deals with issues of importance, and qualify as good journalism, are expected to be objective.  But in the recent past, such objectivity has been set aside to pursue what the author percieves as the greater good.  This phenomena has presented itself on both the right and left in the last general election in the Swiftboat Veterans for Peace and Farenheit 911.  This book clearly follows that basic subjective model.  That being said, the factual content of the text seems to be close to bullet proof.  I prefer a writing style that leads the reader to the edge of the cliff but refuses to kick him/her over the edge.  This presentation is somewhat unsubtle in its use of a cattle prod to do what the factual info should be adequate to invoke.  But it does provide facts that are extremely relevant to the current debate, shortens the research path for any serious observer, and crucial to be in the posession of every voter.
3789881
I was given this product free of cost for my unbiased opinion. This was a very quick read and extremely informative!
323330
Sanders provides a balanced voice to the quest for the historical Jesus, neither too skeptical to be unbiased nor too faithful to adhere to historical method. He does a good job of providing the facts discernible by that method, which are neither threatening to the believer nor crushing to the agnostic. Moreover and most importantly, Sanders writes well, sensibly and in a way that is fun to read - at least for the more academically minded.
1836125
It gives a good overall report of the daily news.  So far I have not noticed any bias.  Enjoy reading it every morning.
3755173
So refreshing to see an author maintain neutrality during such a politically charged time!!  Great unbiased information that sheds light on a relatively unknown public figure.  Thanks!
1269448
I like the no nonsense approach the author uses to walk the reader through the steps of reconciliation with a former partner. I like hoe it is easily broken down by topic, but most importantly, I like the way the information holds the user accountable for doing their own work, safeguarding against returning to negative behaviors that caused the rifts in the first place. Well done.
2571320
This book is well written and flows nicely and is convincing.  Only problem is that it is VERY one sided and gives no credit to marxist dictators that have ruled these countries for so many years. I gave 1 star because the book makes the intention that this is unbiased facts and is a history lesson.  It is not that but rather propaganda.  True history tells all the facts and lets the reader make up his/her own opinion.
2846087
Okay, perfect book...no, but I liked it much more than I disliked it, and here's why:  The  information was presented in a palatable, consistent manner.  For example, the development of the Jerry Lewis partnership seemed  reasonable in light of the aloof, distant qualities that Martin  demonstrated from his early days 'til the end, and the interviews with  Lewis, himself, seem to support the author's view.  The glimpses into his  personal life seem grounded in facts and substantiated by ex-wives and  others who reinforce the insights.  While the entire book was heavy on  movie details, no apologies are really necessary since the accompanying  musical information was appropriate and useful (if not equal to the film  info.)  The often understated details of the television program seem  reasonable given Martin's apparent lack of interest in the medium (devoting  roughly one day a week to a TV show represents a moderate--if not  minimal--effort.)  And when it's all said and done, the picture that  Schoell paints of a charasmatic, easy-going talent who preferred a  "night in" versus a "night out" sits just fine with me.  I feel like I've seen an even, fair, and unbiased portrayal of an  imperfect man's imperfect life.  It was certainly worth my time.
4259052
It reads like it is coming straight off a news wire, just the facts without literary pretense. In othervwprds, pure story. Well done.
95
This newspaper will give me both conservative and liberal viewpoints as well as giving me neutral news items without prejudice.
1276465
It's very difficult to write a book about some of the toughest political and moral issues of our day, and come out pleasing many people.
I like this book for the intelligent approach it takes to examining the historical facts of an issue, making an honest attempt to see different perspectives on it, and then showing how the disagreement itself can be helpful.
Surely, even the most sophisticated moral reasoning tends to reflect temperamental biases, emotional needs, and background more than it brings us to any sort of universal agreement.  However, at least taking stock of the different sides of an issue and the priorities they reflect helps us understand our own position better.
I appreciate that a previous reviewer found this book bascially a rehash of predictable left-wing arguments that reflect the author's politics.  It is interesting that this was the basis for such a terrible rating, since the author's predictable left-wing opinions actually are a very small part of the content and message of the book, and seem to serve more an example than anything else.  Presumably all that background information on each issue is viewed either as trivial or overly biased, and I didn't find either to be true.
Ironically, the fact that many people will have such a strong knee-jerk reaction to opinions that differ with their own is part of the rationale for the way the book is organized; to show how sometimes examining the disagreement itself is useful rather than just choosing a side because it coincides with our previous thinking.  Especially with such important and emotionally charged issues as these.
3612325
I don't understand how people could complain about this book being too complex, poorly-written, or poorly organized. Everything is presented clearly and logically, and the case studies are relevant and interesting. I found it simple to read, informative, enlightening, and actually fun for the most part. My only criticism is that the authors don't, in my opinion, give an entirely neutral treatment of some of the politically-charged issues raised in their book. It seemed as though they would sometimes more heavliy emphasize one point of view (their point of view, quite obviously) over others.