Avoid the shoe, buy last year's model
920553
They killed this shoe from last year's model. NARROW, overstuffed and just as heavy as last year's model....regardless of the use of Flyte Foam in the 19's (which is supposed to be lighter than every EVA on the market). The toe box might be a torture device, no human foot is able to squeeze into that thing comfortable. They also run wayyyy too small, buy an entire size higher. I don't have wide feet, but I feel like I should have bought the wide shoe just to fit in these.

Avoid these at all costs, the nimbus 18's are much better and frankly you'll find them at a much more reasonable cost now, (not the absurd cost Asics is charging for these).
2570411
These shoes don't last long at all. They used to be great,but New Balance uses cheap cheap cheap materials. They constantly squeak while walking. This happens on all of them. I have exchanged several pairs and they all do this. I called New Balance again and was advised to wait for the 928V3 to be released. They claim to have made huge improvements. DO NOT waste your money on these inferior shoes.
1490555
Love Skechers. Hated the fit of this shoe. I bought it because I'm trying to replace the original Skechers GOrun, and this was on a list of top 100 minimalist shoes. I loved the zero drop and especially the arch in that orig. GOrun. This is not a suitable replacement. Guess I'm going to have to sacrifice style and bargain and go with the Brooks pure cascade 5. If anyone has found something else similar to that orig. GO run please let me know.
2495999
I am a huge Asics Gel Kinsei fan, but I must say that ASICS has gotten the design wrong with this shoe.  I have had the last three iterations of Gel-Kinsei running shoes with multiple pairs of the Gel Kinsei 4--the absolute best designed running shoe as far as fit, comfort, mobility, and durability goes that I have owned. The Gel-Kinsei 5, however, has been somewhat disappointing.  The materials seem cheap and appear to lack durability; the most problematic area of the design, however, is the narrow toe box.  I have been running 4 to 5 times a week since joining the military over 16 years ago, and this is the first time that I am getting runners' toe. I have always purchased running shoes that are at least a half size larger than my foot to ensure that there is adequate room for foot movement, but this design is causing me significant pain and the shoe is just not comfortable.  I am going to have to switch back to an older pair of Kayano's if I cannot find the Kinsei 4.

ASICS, you need to scrap this design; it is an abysmal failure.  I have never allowed price to get in the way of a good pair of running shoes, but I feel that you are charging customers too much for such a poor quality shoe.
1558502
I had been wearing the 927 for years when they said it was no longer available.  They said the 928 just looked different.  Wrong.  The toe box is much smaller as to even get in the 928 I had to go from a 2E to a 4E and they are still tight.  Less padding in the sole and side goes higher with a ridge that puts pressure on my tarsal nerve which I had surgery on a few years ago.  The 927 helped my feet but the 928 has caused the pain in the nerve to return as well as the plantar fasciitis problem for which I had surgery.  I don't know what I'll try next as most shoes don't come in my width.  I wish the shoe designers would just leave well enough alone when they have "good sellers".
3749075
The soles wore out in about six months. I work in an office and sit the vast majority of the day. I don't do nearly enough walking for this to have occurred so quickly. Other reviews show that this started occurring a few years ago with a downgrade in the quality of the materials. That seems to track with my experience, as I owned a version of these shoes that I bought in 2009 that wee fantastic and durable. Those days are gone. Stay away.
1685967
Not the same shoe,they must not have the same maker. Shoe is not as nice as before,color is different and sole is different. I loved the old model will not be buying these anymore.
3189472
I always wear an old New Balance running shoe on one foot and compare it to the new running shoe I'm considering.  In the past, the new shoe has ALWAYS felt better than the old one.  This is the first time the old shoe felt better.  My old shoes are a year old and need to be replaced.  Even after finally getting a shoe that fit (old New Balance was a size 6, new one is a size 7), I'm seriously considering returning the shoe and looking for a replacement in a different brand.  Am very unhappy with current quality of this shoe brand.  The W770V5 I tried was even more uncomfortable, with less support (flimsy).
4649558
I have been buying 2 pairs of these shoes every year for the last 10 years, rotating them for optimal wear and comfort.  I stand on concrete floors all day, 10 hours each day.  I am 59 years old and have several back issues.  I've been wearing these shoes because they had been the best shoes for comfort and support that I've found since having the back issues. They are lightweight and comfortable; cool in summer yet warm in winter.  I also wear them on the weekends for all activities and work around the yard and house. I was due for a new pair and just received them.  They are now an entirely different shoe.  They don't fit right at the top.  The tongue is too thick and does not fit right in the shoe. The shoelaces are now too short so they must be laced up tighter, making the shoe too tight around the ankles, which is very uncomfortable.  They no longer have the amount of support that they used to. I looked inside the tongue and noticed that they are now being made in China.  The two previous pairs that I still have were made in Indonesia.  I think you will find that they have always been made before in either Indonesia or Malaysia. I am sorry to see that Hi-Tec has changed their standards of quality.  The pair that I bought this past Spring were made in Indonesia and they are fine. This last pair is a big disappointment, and they will be the last pair I buy unless the quality issues are addressed.
4100913
I have worn out a dozen pairs of this model shoe in various colors in the last 18 years and have been very happy with them. I wear a 10.5 Wide. I ordered a new pair as has become routine for me and was surprised when I tried the new ones on. They are very different. The tongue is so short the knot of the shoe lace does not ride upon it. The shoe laces are at least 6 Inches shorter than my old pair. Worst of all, the sole and the uppers are measurably narrower than my old ones- I could barely get them on and there is no way I can keep them. I notice the new pair is made in India, the older ones came from VietNam IIRC. I am reordering from a different supplier hoping this particular pair is defective.
2027496
UPDATE:

This shoe is the shoe that made me look away from Asics. If you read my review below I loved my Asics, but this shoe sucks. The heel foam has a hole on both shoes, and the quality sucks. My last shoe lasted 7 years this model didn't last 7 months.

I know I'll get flak for this, but I bought my last GEL-Kayano's in 2010 and just replaced them with this pair. I love this model's look and the quality is the same as in 2010. I stopped running, so that is why I never replaced them after the mile limit. Now after taking up running again I decided to come back to the same brand, and it seems like nothing has changed except the look.
3971412
I had the former model and loved it. Ordered this one thinking it would be just as good since the pair I own is discontinued or as in my thinking, the old one has been "revamped". Well I was WRONG.  Like many reviewers said before me New Balance definitely messed this shoe up. First of all the size of the shoe is at least half a size too big. I wear a size 8 and this shoe has LOTS of room. I was a little too impatient to return and order a size 7.5 as I was thinking I COULD make the 8 work...well I was wrong again. They have added some arch support to the shoe that feels very aggressive when working out. While I did notice the arch support when I initially put the shoe on, it didn't occur to me that my feet would be sliding around the arch support and by this time it was too late to return them. I work out five days a week weight lifting and do ploymetrics/ tabata/ circuit training at least 3 days a week for cardio. When I wore these shoes the arch of my feet cramped up so now I only wear these shoes when I'm going grocery shopping. Talk about a big disappointment.
2289540
So I purchased 2 pair of these in 2011 (one black one blue) because I wanted a shoe MADE IN THE USA.  They were fine until this year when I noticed a distinct cat pee smell coming from both pair.  Thought it might be my feet.. nope.. socks... nope.  Type in New balance odor issue in a google search and bingo.. I'm not alone.  Cheap glue causes the sole to fall apart and emit the cat piss smell. I didn't abuse these sneakers and since I live in california they weren't exposed to a great deal of rain or moisture.  I want to buy American Made products as often as I can and I will spend the extra money for them, but this is really inexcusable.  Get it together New Balance!
and for what it's worth, they fit fine and unlike the 990's I previously owned, they didn't blow out in the webbing area next to my pinkie toe.. which if you're interested is another issue for New Balance to solve on their USA made shoes.  Look for peoples reviews here on Amazon for that issue (mostly big toe blow outs... )
2069814
I've been buying the New Balance "1060" line of shoes for several years now. These are NB's flagship neutral running shoe line. The previous model that these 1064's replace were the 1063's. I had a pair that were nothing short of wonderful and lasted about two years of running (190lbs, 12 miles/wk). The previous model (1062?) were the same, as were the model before that. So when I realized that my 1063's needed to be replaced I was almost ecstatic to see how cheap Amazon was selling the 1064's for. And because I've had several consecutive great experiences with this particular line of shoes, I assumed that the 1064's would be superb as well. Wrong! They have an awkward fit all around. They fit very tight. I've been wearing the same size 106x shoe for years, and haven't had to go larger on my other shoes. Going with a half size larger may have alleviated some of it (but not all), but they're still not what its predecessors have always been. For one, there is some kind of padding behind the heel. It feels like there are two "things" (for lack of a better word) digging into my heel. It's not painful and wouldn't leave a blister, it's just annoying and kind of messes with my step. I can tell it's some kind of double-pronged padding, but it feels like my socks are bunched up (like I didn't pull them up all the way).

All in all, it's kind of hard to describe all aspects of how this shoe is uncomfortable and awkward feeling. By the time I realized they were a bad design and didn't just need to be "broken in", it was too late to return them. So I hopped online and searched high and low for any retailers that still had last year's 1063's in stock. I found one seller on Amazon and bought them right away. They weren't discounted but I didn't care. Buying a shoe that I KNOW will be great for running outweighed any disappointment at not getting a "last year's model" discount.

I know other people are leaving rave reviews. It's all relative though. It depends on what you're used to. If you had a horrible shoe before, then the 1064 might not feel so bad. From now on, I will never buy shoes online again. I'm relieved that I got one of the last remaining 1063's, but after this, I'm just buying my running shoes locally. If it was a casual loafer for work, I might not care that much, but when it comes to running, the shoe is vital.
4080212
This is at least my fifth pair of this particular model of Keds.  I usually have 3 pairs in various stages of wear at any time.  They have changed since the last pair I bought.  They used to have an insole that was molded to the foot and had an arch support.  I could walk in them all day with no issues.  Now they have a completely flat, stiff foam insert which has no arch support.  It is also thicker overall than the previous insole resulting in a tighter, less comfortable fit.  It's a shame.  It looks like I'll be looking for a new sneaker brand/model for the future.
2319272
great shoe to bad they don't make same shoe anymore I have heard from alot of people the shoe for 2016 is not the same the 2014 was much better!!
4451392
Last year I go these boots and they were great. I got another pair this year and it looks like they have been redesigned. They tore up both my feet. So sad I'll have to send these back.