Very disappointing and expensive to boot.
930221
I bought this based on reviews and a bit of the buzz I saw based on its Kickstarter beginning. I expected an elegantly built "puck" that would easily hold my LG G2 in my car. It is very nicely finished, and comes in a package that looks modeled after an iPod Nano box. But the magnet is weak and will not hold my phone securely with the plate mounted behind a thin TPU case on the phone. I bought a Logitech + Drive mount earlier - and it holds the phone far better using the Neutron plate. Kinda crazy that this thing costs $30. With the phone naked (no case), the magnet strength is adequate, but hardly impressive. The Logitech is even better. If only the Logitech was less fat (!).
440850
First, I authorised the charge in my credit card of the price of that model, and someone in Amazon decides charge without any authority neither authorisation for USD 39 for shipping, when the ad said very clearly: free shipping. Well, I am now the owner of the most expensive model of Chris Craft triple cockpit Barrelback in the world.
And I'm not very happy, because this model is not that they say. It's a very very coarse, rough model, composed by very few weak wooden slats, smaller than appear and all pieces announced in metall, are plstics.
Definitelly no, I am not happy with my last aqquisition
1748416
For how much it costs, this thing is really, really ridiculous. It has two fans in it, and both sound like they're worn out and about to fall apart -- whiny and rattling and loud. What a joke. You can buy better fans for $10 at a party store. The tower design is too tall, with an inadequate base, making it unstable, especially on carpteted floor -- bump into it slightly, and you risk knocking the whole thing over. And while the Low setting is too loud & annoying to have on while trying to sleep, the High setting is INCREDIBLY noisy.

The only things that might be good about are the HEPA filters, and the Ionizer; but outside of them, it feels like it's worth about $5. I paid almost $100 for this???

AM RETURNING IT ASAP.
2776935
Is not working, very expensive and bad product
1952921
I thought I would try this coffee as it looked quite impressive and was expensive so it should be really nice. When I opened the container I noticed the grind was coarser than expected with some larger flecks in it. I then tried it in my machine at a normal tamp pressure. This resulted in a ten second shot with light and sparse crema. I then tried again with an approx 40lb tamp and a good twist to polish the top. This would usually result in nearly clogging the machine. I then got a 15 second shot with barely passable crema.
I am disappointed with my purchase and am tempted to throw the rest away apart from initial high cost, and being too tight to do it.
Back to waitrose for their own brand ground espresso.
376969
This is the second Nikon digital camera that I own, after having several Nikon film-based ones.  While I acknowledge that my experience might be unique, I have to say I am very disappointed with these products.  My first camera broke, out of the blue, despite being treated in the most cautious way.  A piece inside the lens became loose and focusing (either auto or manual) was not possible anymore.  Repair (now that Nikon does not allow private repair) would have been more costly than buying a new one.  So I did!  I bought this D5500, and I've treated it like a baby but once again a problem has appeared with the auto-focus.  For unknown reasons, the camera stopped focusing.  I've tried all remedies suggested online but unfortunately nothing worked.  It is unacceptable that a product this expensive be so poorly built and last less than two years despite the care and relatively mild use (only ~ 1000 pictures in the past couple of years).  I'm now debating whether, after all these years, I should change to Canon or anything else.  I probably will.
4695087
I bought this "cooler" several years ago. I was disappointed from the beginning. The unit is called a "Compact Refrigerated Cooler." As a consumer, it looked like a refrigerator and had the word "refrigerated" on the box, therefore, I assumed it was meant to perform like a REAL refrigerator. DON'T BE FOOLED! The compressorless technology appears to be appealing, but this unit will only cool items to 20-25 degrees below ambient temp. The manual does state this. Again, without this statement on the front of the box for the consumer to read, one is to assume it will make your drinks cold, not cool.
After about 2 1/2 years of keeping my items barely cool in my office, the unit started humming. It was the cooling fan on the inside of the back wall. I could bump the unit and make the noise stop, but it got progressively worse. Sometimes it was quiet and other times it started to get noisy on its own. I had some co-workers complain that it was making noise. I hated even attempting to open the door on this thing in fear that it would start humming again. It went from a bump of the unit to literally socking it with my fist or kicking it to get it to stop. Sometimes that did not work. A replacement fan is $30. Not worth the time and money to repair it. At about 3 years, the unit stopped working. I think it was the power board on the back panel that went bad. Now this is definitely not worth the repair. I am piecing this bastard out on eBay to recoup my money. For those people that rated this "unit" more than 2 or 3 stars, they must have low standards.
2269351
Very unimpressed. Way overpriced, and not nearly the quality that would be expected
1562834
A major disappointment, especially considering the cost.  The tone arm's balance weight is loose with no way to tighten it, I used a coupla wraps of teflon tape.  The adjustable weight feature is supposed to spin to the appropriate weight, but it not only doesn't set a weight, it usually spins the counterbalance with it.  The anti-skate control is a small weight that hangs by a thread, and the thin wire frame it hangs from is easily nudged out of position, and there are no instructions on how the weight should dangle.  With a loose counterbalance it is extremely annoying to get it all set right, and of course whatever you set it to is all guesswork.  Then to top it all off, the plastic dust cover cannot close without hitting the counterbalance weight and pushing it further in.  Stay away from this product.  Tho after lots of experimenting, I did find the cartridge that comes with it, is pretty good.
2402491
Absolutely, positively horrible product (not to mention expensive).  Tried to use these on border 16' trex planks.  Ruined $62 piece of tree; so out more than $100 between these fasteners and the plank. Even when predrilled as directed, as soon as the screw head hit the surface, it was unable to pull itself into the hole while drilling into new pressure treated lumber.  You could never get it snugged tight and removal after this happened was impossible, so replacing with a different screw was also impossible.  I ended up first using a countersink and then using bronze colored deck screw.  A solution that was $50 less expensive than these fasteners.  The look of using bronze colored deck screws for the outer board is not as good as what this product tries to promote with plugs.  But at least my second solution works (after being down > $100)
4272955
I was disappointed not only in the size being WAY off, but this boot, to me, was WAY over priced.
151125
This product fell far short of expectations and borderlines on bait and switch practices with extra user administrative charges and file fees.  In addition it uses a big, slow, outdated and cumbersome interface.  This is not a user-friendly product and certainly does not meet current standards in the tax preparation software industry.  Unfortunately, it was a colossal disappointment from a respected company.  If this product is not brought up to current standards in the near future, this pioneer in the industry will fade away.
255673
Very expensive for what they are and with disappointing sound quality.  Also surprisingly heavy.  Returned.
2684385
This was very expensive and I was shocked when it was delivered.  It just wasn't worth the money that I spent on it.
4713117
I find this laptop to be very disappointing.  I'll cover the major points:

First, this is not my primary laptop.  I purchased this as a dedicated machine for a single piece of software.  So the installed software is minimal and the dedicated software is not very intensive.  The machine is running Windows 7 (not Win 8).

1.  It is extremely slow.  For having the i7 processor everything just runs slowly.  It boots slow, updates take forever to install (not to download) and when anything is installing, the entire system is hijacked; you just can't do anything else.  Part of this is the 5200rpm hard drive but since a 7200 rpm hard drive was not an option I'm lumping it into here.

2.  The Lenovo software needs work.  Nothing seems to hijack the system like the Lenovo checkup software.  When it's running, other apps are just unusable.  Spinning disk and that's it.  Again, for a quad-core processor and 8Gb of RAM it shouldn't behave like this.

3.  The touchpad and the touchpad drivers are horrible.  I've had this now for a while and several updated drivers later it stills seems buggy.  When you click on the pad, it feels and sounds like an IBM keyboard spacebar from 2000.  What's worse is that you have to push past the click for it to register as a click. This makes the double-click worse.  When you click-and-drag using the touchpad, the mouse pointer just keeps going even after you stop moving your finger.

4.  The ergonomics are miserable.  With the number pad included it actually shifts everything to the left.  So you have a choice:  your head can be centered with the screen and your hands off-center or you can be centered to the keyboard for touch typing but now your head is off-center from the screen.  As for the wrist pad, since the touchpad is centered to the spacebar it is shifted over as well.  Your left had feels cramped; there is just not enough room and I have small hands.  There's this expanse of unused space on the right.

5.  Who thought it was a good idea to waste valuable screen space with an icon indicating Num Lock?  Just so they could remove a light from the keyboard?

6.  The backlight on the keyboard is a waste.  If it shown through the keys instead of just from the bottom of the key it's be more usable.

All in all I feel that Lenovo has ruined the Thinkpad name with this laptop.  Poorly engineered from the hardware to the Lenovo software to the drivers.  If I had to use it on a daily basis it would be gone but since it's used once in a while only I kept it.
4572764
An expensive feeder, that is difficult at best and gets moldy...beyond disappointed!
1334100
It's difficult to clean. Plastic parts are guaranteed to break. Too many parts. Difficult to reassemble. Leaks.  Leaks.  Leaks. It's a very expensive piece of pure frustration.