2 rights don't make a left!
934115
Love these socks, but was rather disappointed when I received two right socks instead of a left and right in my order! Would love to get the proper left sock!
76408
DAMN RIGHT.  NO RAINBOW FLAGS HERE.  LOVE TO BE ABLE TO EXPRESS MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH LIKE EVREYONE ELSE...
4361911
One left mitt. Not mitts as used in description. I am right handed and this is useless to me. Maybe a lefty who got my right-handed mitt would swap with me?
2238922
The Bill of Rights is very incorrect. History is not history when you infuse it with a political agenda. I thought they only did this in Communist nations.
4521607
Comrades! Much to my surprise I found that Amazon is still selling the flag of the revolutionary workers -- my only complaint is that Amazon is clearly profiting from the flag that stands for the abolition of private property. No matter: this will be dealt with under the dictatorship of the proletariat, as we always have done when the workers have been victorious.
1474498
This book does not contain accurate text representations of the Bill of Rights which is mis-leading to young minds and is an attempt to condition the reader to a modified, reduced personal rights view of the constitution.

- Please do not buy and show support for accurate reporting on historical documents and support for the United States of America
4038046
Mark Levin has pushed an idea forward to help our country return to a constitutional, republican form of government. Progressives are ruining America, taking away liberties and freedoms we are given by our Constitution.
The first Liberty Amendments as described by Levin is so sorely needed. Term limits. Everyone knows this is imperative. As Mr. Levin described, Congressmen used to believe it a privilege to represent  their constituents.  Now they work for themselves and could give a damn about constituents.  It is a power grab that makes them rich Washingtonians.
When I call up my Congressmen, they pinched-nose interns fight with me and even hang up(Dick Durbin),
we are no longer represented, but dictated to.
I believe it would be an uphill battle to implement the Liberty Amendments but something has to be tried to stop Washington's dictatorship. Read and be informed!
931706
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

How in the hell do you turn the founding fathers' well-crafted declaration of a people free to protect themselves from ANY tyrannical government to this ideological claptrap:

"The people have the right to keep and bear arms in a state militia".

WRONG, Mr. History Professor.  And if this is our Government's view of AP History, WRONG AGAIN.  Guess I'd better get ready to homeschool...
3129659
This book should be read in school so that we quit turning out students who have no idea of the principles this country was founded on and how they are being destroyed by our politicians. Of course those politicians get elected by ignorant voters because they are clueless about justice. Justice in this book  focuses on justice as it relates to liberty. I sent the following to the peoples forum of our local left wing rag for the Fourth of July and of course they didn't publish it.

"This country was founded because of a desire for freedom and established on 2 principles from natural law.  (1) do all you agreed to do (2)do not encroach on other persons and their property. It was implemented through scientific law. We now have political law, i.e. ever changing and growing made up by legislators, understood by no one, and enforced by political power. The difference is eloquently explained in Richard Maybury's book "Whatever Happened to Justice".
He shows how political law and political power is used by the left to encroach on your property and the right to encroach on your person. Politicians encroach on #1 above all the time.
Ayn Rand has written about many of the same ideas in her famous novel "Atlas Shrugged" and non-fiction books e.g. "The Virtue of Selfishness" and "Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal".
I'm sure that a large majority of readers and the publisher and editors of this paper have no understanding of what freedom really means, how much weve lost, and what's required to regain it. Although I prefer Rand's views, Maybury is probably more accessible to the majority and should be read by all starting in junior high. Become informed before voting!"
1894429
Mark Steyn has my vote, he shows, with FACTS, not emotion, the danger to our entire way of life that Islam brings. It is too late for Europe, they have committed suicide. We can STILL SAVE OURSELVES. Our country was based on the RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL, not so-called "civil rights". Without individual rights, you have majority rule-TYRANNY OF THE MASSES!
2034873
Oh, you mean libertarians... The primary thing I dislike is how the book puts everything into the left-right mindset. The "left" or "right" mindset is misleading because it fails to factor in "libertarianism" vs. "authoritarianism." It is a 2-D diamond, not a 1-D line. Libertarianism is nothing new; in fact, libertarianism is based in classical liberalism before the word "liberal" became synonymous with socialism. I hope it is "rising" and undoubtedly Southpark has contributed. Libertarianism does not spoonfeed morality, but it does call for limited government and economic and individual freedom.

Most libertarians hate both the right and the left, and as the Republican Party is firmly in the authoritarian quadrant and the "conservative media" blindly follows the Republican Party in the same way the "liberal media" blindly follows the Democratic Party, I don't understand why newsmedia shouldn't just strive for objectivity instead of taking sides or creating a media war. Basically, I think the book is a good read, but the approach is a bit skewed.
2394685
Reading this book, I realized for the first time that Thomas Jefferson, by creating a Republican form of government, in essence EMANCIPATED Each Individual!

The only problem is that what developed from Jeffersons original intent was that it was, and continues to be, misconstrued by the Masses. Their lack of in-depth comprehension was, and remains, insufficient to understand Jeffersons original intent, which was The explicit claim that the individual is the sovereign unit in society; his natural state is freedom from, and equality with, all other individuals.  The masses, are by nature, group oriented, and as such, do not understand the essence of individual freedom. As such, what has transpired is a Tyranny of the Masses. They have decided that they alone, being the majority, can determine American culture. No different than a despotic leader, having the power, they think only about what is best for themselves. Being free means for them the prerogative to control others.

Fortunately, Alexander Hamilton and others realized this inherent flaw and created a central government to counterbalance selfishness, which allowed Lincoln, 100 years later, to Emancipate African Americans, and then 100 years after that, in the 1960s & 70s, allowed Blacks to fight for their government promised rights, as did the hippies and their counter-culture, and as did women for their rights. And now, 50 years after that, in 2015, President Obama was able to emancipate gays, lesbians, and transgender individuals  against the wishes of the tyrannical masses.

So as America continues to become EVER MORE FREE, maybe in the not too distant future the ideal of the Actual Individual Persona will be Emancipated, as well, and the initial belief that Jefferson held so dear will be actualized.
2426992
This redacted version is driving me nuts. I'm having to trust some knuckle dragging fool in my government to decide what I can and can't read. This reminds me of the Mormon Church who, right here in my state of Utah, has decided what its members can or can't read, eat, drink or otherwise live their lives. I'll be damned if I'm going to simply accept such behavior from my secular government.
1620201
In the second paragraph on page 172, the author refers to "a right-wing phenomenon known as National Socialism".
He should have questioned using "right-wing" and "socialism" in the same sentence.  The Nazis were socialists, not right-wing.  Stalin labeled inconvenient ideas and movements that did not follow Soviet communism as fascist.  Refer to&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Liberal-Fascism-The-Secret-History-of-the-American-Left-From-Mussolini-to-the-Politics-of-Meaning/dp/0385511841/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning</a>&nbsp;by Jonah Goldberg.
4065813
Item was not as advertised and seller ignored my communications. My first review was refused by Amazon. Hmmm I thought this was a free country and I did serve eight years active duty in the US Air Force.  If they (Amazon) refuses to post this review I will find another way to let the people know. I shall not be silenced ...there is a thing called the first amendment and freedom of speech!
4085404
Socks appear great except I got 2 rights...I know I can't dance but are telling me something. Would be better if I received a left and right sock.
2894365
Ugh, I hate to give these only two stars! They sound amazing! They look great, they're super comfortable. So what's the deal? - they're imbalanced between left and right! I tried everything to make sure I wasn't just hearing things but I came to the conclusion that the right side is clearly a bit louder than the left. I purchased one pair and noticed it immediately. Checked my output, checked the cable connections at both ends multiple times, changed sources twice, flipped them around to the opposite ears, compared them with other headphones -all to no avail. So I returned them and ordered another pair and guess what? -same thing! Then I went to two separate retailers and listened to the floor samples, same thing again! I had three friends listen and verify the issue themselves. I've called Sennheiser but they think I'm crazy. They're a huge company with a great reputation so I believe they kinda blew me off about the whole thing. Anyhow, if you are ok spending $350 for a not-so-perfect product, that's your call. I wanted to love them but this is a defect I cannot live with. Perhaps a bad batch was made but until this get's confirmed by other users and sorted by Sennheiser I will not own them.