These Talley Rings are very good but because of the structure of the CZ base ...
930842
My previous experience with QD rings is with Warne and those were outstanding.  These Talley Rings are very good but because of the structure of the CZ base they're not as quick as the Warne.  They require actually rotating more than the quarter turn the Warne's needed.  That's a fact of the base design not the fault of Talley.
1871645
Warne makes top notch rifles bases. I have 3 of them. I am very pleased with the steel construction of them. I won't go back to aluminum rails or rings.
1516326
Made by Seekins Precision.  Excellent rings.  Have them on two of my higher end rifles.
3962849
To start off with they look awesome they all look show accurate and they come in a cool looking box i bought these for my friends because there like family to me so i want to make them my guardians in a sense but my only problem my ring th3 sky ring is spining so i had to glue it and from the seems of it its fairly common and this isn't the proper ring that goes with the VONGOLA GEAR set of rings so i had to buy the vongola gear sky ring seperately which was more money (plus hoping it fits) and btw if u have big fingers these should fit u decently if not a tiny bit tight but i will be giving these to my guardians i hope there all happy
1804019
These seem to be well-made rings, but the Leupold system is weird in that it requires a separate mounting 'base'.  You have to attach the base to your gun, then the rings to the base, so buying the rings alone is worthless.  An important point to be aware of.  It's pretty tough to find good information on Amazon regarding this and I couldn't find my make of rifle on the Leupold website, so despite looking nice, these rings are of no use to me.
4865609
Says medium height, not medium height, and they were mounted on  bolt action with a 0 moa rail with a 56mm objective lens optic. Sit way to high above the bore center line. Other than that, they're very beefy rings.
793570
These are solid, solid rings. They are also seriously heavy. Your scope isn't going anywhere, but don't put these on your mountain rifle.
279189
Well. It's heavy and hard. It survived my bar shifts and I even opened a few beer bottles with it. This ring is my secondary ring but I like it. My wife isn't crazy about the high polish.  It's a cool ring.
1690082
Beautiful, fashionable "X" or "Criss
Cross Ring".Good value. Unlike others, the CZs go all the way around both circles
2808971
I don't like the main ring, but I like using the smaller rings on all my keychains. They are a good shape for preventing rings from slipping off larger rings randomly
1141569
I ordered this item before I purchased a Ruger 10-22.  I wasn't expecting the Ruger to have a base included.  The Ruger base did not work with a set of standard Weaver scope rings that I had, not wide enough.  The Barska base was slightly narrower than the Ruger base.  I was not interested in using the .22 dovetail mounting feature due to the height of the scope under that setup.  I finally found a set of Weaver rings that would work with the Ruger base.
1809758
I was looking for a 67-70mm step-up ring for my&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/B-W-77mm-XS-Pro-HTC-Kaesemann-Circular-Polarizer-with-Multi-Resistant-Nano-Coating/dp/B00OK6YSAS/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">B+W 77mm XS-Pro HTC Kaesemann Circular Polarizer with Multi-Resistant Nano Coating</a>.

First, I bought the&nbsp;<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Breakthrough-67mm-to-77mm-Step-Up-Ring-CNC-Machined-Brass/dp/B01CZ91RE6/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Breakthrough 67mm to 77mm Step-Up Ring CNC Machined Brass</a>. But that $30 brace ring binds with my filter badly. It was almost impossible to separate them.

Then, I returned the Breakthrough ring and bought this Goja ring for $6.09. It works much better with my filter, though not perfect, still a bit too tight. That's the reason I deduct one point.

Overall, I am quite happy with my purchase.
2713276
I went over to tikka performance and I wanted to purchase their bases for a cheaper price but the shipping was even more once added together. Well price wasn't the reason I didn't purchase from them: they were out of stock. The only reason I wanted to purchase from them is because they had integrated a lug underneath the base to hold the base in place - I thought that was such a novel idea until I purchased these and thinking to myself "Rem 300 and 300 ultra mags don't even have a lug such as the tikkas and perform just fine!". I still like tikka's idea vs others anyhow because others usually pin their bases in if (which I thin unnecessary).

These bases are stout and serves it's purpose well. It comes with torx screws which i happen to think are far more superior than hex. I had to cut an inch off from the front b/c it simply was way too long. I've always liked Talley products and this product is no different. 20 inc lbs for these bases. I shoot a 308 and the the bases from EGW all deform under recoil. I hope these don't.
143843
I really liked this ring but after having it for about a month one of the CZ stones fell out.
4725127
I bought the bases along with Warne's Quick Detachable Rings and they work great.  I take off the scope after each shooting session and next time I put them back on they are within 1" from perfect zero.  They work great.
1934606
Perfect ring set for CZ 455 American with 11mm dovetails.  Be careful that you get the proper width.  I had to call CZ to make sure as there was conflicting info on the web and downloadable catalogs.  Typical Leupold quality.  This is my second set, also have the 13mm version for my CZ452 Style.  Newest version has Leupold logo stamped on top of rings.  I could do without this.  I have medium hieght ones and they are fine for 4x and 2-7x rimfire scopes.  You might need the high version for scopes with larger objectives.
4381258
absolutely beautiful ring , definitely a high quality CZ ring ,without special knowledge about diamonds ,there is no way to say this is CZ not a diamond.