Compared to my actually used fragile gemfan 5030 the Kingkong 5040 make a more robust and better quality impression
923019
I just received them. Stable packed in a cardboard box and seperated in plastic bags cc/cw. Compared to my actually used fragile gemfan 5030 the Kingkong 5040 make a more robust and better quality impression. For the price these ones are definitly better! I am eagerly waiting for better weather to test the Kingkongs. I've been flying with many 5030 props on my DIY Racer 250, I don't like them as much as these King Kong propellers. These are superb props. The finish is very attractive, they never break, they are perfectly balanced. They even have small rotation direction markers on the hub.
1987986
Replacement for a good, old,  900mhz headphone(RCA WHP141). This is a huge improvement.
Archeer is better in sound quality. IBass is better. Inside diameter slightly too small be  'around ear', but nearly so. Still seals well and closed back means no sound leakage to annoy those nearby. Made a cell phone call with it and other end said they could hear me clearly through mic.

Doesn't fall off my head when I lean forward. Feels very sturdy, quality build. Pairing sometimes takes several attempts. Maximum distance from BT transmitter is slightly less than 900 MHZ phones, and less than my BT speaker, but this is fine with me.

I hope this item gives years of service that the RCA set did.
174069
I had a tripod with a broken head. This is better than the original!
58813
Whether the SM48-LC is the vocal microphone for you depends on your sensitivity to the ratio of quality to price and your personal taste in microphone characteristics.  It seems to be a well made instrument, so let's jump to the chase.  I spent an afternoon doing A/B comparisons between the SM48 ($30), my nearly-new SM58 ($100), and a nearly-new Chinese SM58 knock-off (Digital Reference DRV-100), which I bought on sale for $10.  I compared the three mikes through my P.A. system, with the equalizer flat and reverb settings they way I like them for the SM58, without trying to optimize them for each microphone (seemed like too much work).  In addition, I was using the P.A. line out to my Sony MDR-7506 Sound Monitor Headphones, rather than the P.A. speakers, to allow more critical listening.  For my voice, P.A., and settings, I found both Shure microphones to be quite usable for a live performance, but the DRV-100 was a distant third for vocal quality.

After many comparisons over the course of an afternoon, I found that I do prefer the sound of the SM58 enough that I will continue to use it as my live performance vocal microphone, especially since I already own it, but I would not feel  particularly inconvenienced if I had to use the SM48.  There are differences in the way they sound, but I'm not sure they would be noticeable, to the average listener, out of the P.A. speakers in a live show.  I'm pretty sure that would not be the case for the DRV-100.

I then compared the two cheaper microphones, through the same setup, when used as instrument microphones for my 60's era Martin 000-18.  Again, there was a lot of difference in the sound.  The higher efficiency of the DRV-100 required a gain adjustment each time I swapped instruments, but I kept the equalizer flat.  So far I somewhat prefer the DRV-100 as an guitar microphone, probably because I prefer a brighter sound for finger-style work and the SM48 may prove to be fine for instrument use once I fool around with the equalizer.

In summary, if it proves to be durable, the SM48-LC is a lot of microphone for the money.  It demonstrates the way of the electronic world: you can get a lot of quality for not very much money and you may have to pay a lot more to get something even a little bit better.
4512364
Compared to the 56637EG 1000gph unit, the 56635EG is a MUCH improved upgrade and well worth the extra $30.  In addition to 500gph more output, it has a timer, on/off switch, sediment plug and plunger valves. I use all of the extra features on a regular basis. The 56635EG pump is twice as loud as the 56637EG, but that's a non issue with me as I have it covered anyway which blocks most of the sound.

Even though the Intex hose fittings are threaded the pump design also allows one to just use 1 1/2 hose with a clamp if so desired.  Just for kicks I tried it and there were no leaks as the o-ring still seals.

A real quality pump for the money.  Now we'll see just how long it lasts.

kd
4651442
I also bought the Pelican 1700 which is a similar size. The SKB is hands down much better quality.

The latches close securely. Handles have a rubber finish and are thick enough so when the case is loaded, it's not uncomfortable to grip. The best part is the roller blade style wheels and that it stands up vertically. The Pelican has hard plastic wheels and you can not stand it up verically. So if you are rolling the SKB, you can stop and leave it standing. With the Pelican you can't. This SKB has the pressure valve, as well does the Pelican.

Overall, the SKB is solid built and definitely beats my Pelican 1700.
609760
Equal to if actually not better than the STANLEY competitor I feel in terms of plastic quality and gauge and feel!
3704229
I was pleasantly surprised at the build quality.
249642
High quality, very pleased, better than average
2273758
I bought this after ordering and returning a Wilton 14600 which is Wiltons version of this vise. I sent the Wilton back mainly because the pipe jaws had no actual teeth,the casting was so poor the teeth were rounded and smooth like a pencil viewed from the side. Right out of the box the difference in quality was obvious. The casting is smoother and the pipe jaws are steel and replaceable and actually have gripping teeth. Side to side play is almost non existent at about .016 compared to about .070 on the Wilton. Also the Yost has notched main jaws for holding small tubing or bolts as small as 1/4 inch. Finally,the Yost is stronger and made with 65,000 psi Ductile iron versus 30,000 psi for the Wilton. The main screw has "0" play. The jump in quality was well worth the extra $60 for the Yost.
4282135
I don't have much to compare to, but it sure is nicer than my old hand pump!
I like the form factor and it pumped up my mtb tires easily. Love having the gauge right on the pump.
4695632
The first time I held this I realize the solid build quality this thing has full magnesium alloy with a nice grip on your right hands that gives you utter confidence especially when your shooting one handed, something that it's archival the Nikon Coolpix A doesn't have and commands a $300 premium. Interesting to note the Ricoh GR opted to use the highly regarded Sony sensor 16 MP that is used on the Nikon D7000, Pentax K5/K5II, Sony NEX series and Olympus OMD, Nikon Coolpix A so there are no surprises when it comes to the image quality although the GR truly shines is Monochrome mode, Ricoh has hands down tuned it well that it still has the nostalgic film like that the other camera companies can't match.

For some that ask why is there no zoom, blah blah, folks this is a 28mm focal length prime lens, when it comes to prime lenses you're the one that is going to do the zooming not the camera. The rationale behind it is that it forces you to be more creative and to focus on the composition of your photos if you can live with a fixed focal length the GR will reward you.

Although it's tough to get your hands on this one right now, it's truly worth the wait because no other APS-C compact camera can match the features it offers for the solid asking price Ricoh/Pentax asks.
4937591
Much better quality and lighting performance than I expected. Considering buying another as a spare
4568105
I bought the original version off kickstarter a few years ago and now have the new, GravityFlow second generation version.  I would have given the first version a 4 out of 5 stars but now with the new parts it's way higher quality.  One major improvement is the reservoir.  The original design came with a clear plastic reservoir part that sort of broke down over the years while the new one is made of silicone and seems way more durable.  I bought the upgrade kit they recently launched to convert my old tank into the new version and my Betta fish LeRoy and I are very happy with it.
874828
I broke my first one that had the lower resolution 720 x 480 camera. I was able to fix the flight but couldn't get the camera working again after a bad crash. The video on this one has a lot less "jitter" (picture has horizontal artifacts as the craft tries to gain altitude) and clearer picture - definitely worth the small price difference. It was good to have the cheaper one to learn how to fly though.

No this isn't a super stable, quality drone like a DJI Phantom or anything, but for the price it is more fun than a barrel of monkeys.
2576313
i love this brand, but the slightly stronger version is better to me.
2168782
Very solid... very secure.  Lifeproof case cracked and split in half the time.  This is a way more robust and superior product in my experience