I noticed that this programmer is listed as supporting atmega168 but not the atmega328. Has anyone tried this with the 328? Does it work with it?
260879
no roger do not work , i just got one and the atmega328p and it says that works but dont , do not waste your money and time. i tried everything wasted 10 hours on it and nothing .
260880
I tried it on a HobbyKing KK2.1 Flight Control Board (should be the atmega you're asking about) and could not get it to work. If that's what you're after it would be better to not waste your money on this, but instead purchase one of the 6-pin AVR programmers that specify the chipset you're using as compatible.
260881
I had created a circuit board where I could plug into IC sockets the ATTiny 44, 85, and the 328, I would then plug in the ISP to that board. I was successful in programming the other chips, but not the 328. So I abandoned trying to use the ISP with the 328 and instead program it with an Aruduino UNO board from a breadboard. The steps on how to do this are out on the web. Of course, you can always remove the chip on the Arduino UNO board and replace it with the chip you want to program, but I found this very risky in that you might damage the pins.
260882
I tried to use it on a kk2.0 flight control board. I believe it has a Atmega 324 it would not work. I don't know if it will work for you. If it is in the product list it should work. The Atmega 324 was in the list but I could not get it two work. hope this will help.
260883
I've tried it and it works with all similar processors, I've tried it with atmega 168 processors with the ESC, and also with the Atmega 328P of the brushless controllers ... fits all ...
1865593
I install it while running Mavericks and it worked fine. I updated to Yosemite when it was released, and it's still working for me without any updates from inateck. Mac Pro (Early 2008) 2 X 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon.
1780329
No i've only tried it with an Uno, but you should be able to make it work with a Due, sample code can be downloaded near the bottom of this page: "http://www.sainsmart.com/sainsmart-1-8-spi-lcd-module-with-microsd-led-backlight-for-arduino-mega-atmel-atmega.html&q;uot; and an incredibly helpful tutorial shows the pinout and libraries you need to download here: "http://www.tweaking4all.com/hardware/arduino/sainsmart-arduino-color-display/" This tutorial uses the sample code provided by Sainsmart.
1192441
The programming doesnt have much to do with equipment compatability. The programming us used mainly for setting trims,balances and curves of the user interface (controller) and the output signal (PWM) of the reciever. The controller can be bonded to different recievers that work on 2.4.. so long as your reciever plays well with your current equipment, I doubt you will have much trouble. It all depends on what your aiming to do
1865594
I install it while running Mavericks and it worked fine. I updated to Yosemite when it was released, and it's still working for me without any updates from inateck.Mac Pro (Early 2008) 2 X 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon.
220362
Merchant Matching is correct in saying that you should always check with your processor before changing out any type of equipment. Your external PIN Pad should have no issue working with this model IF...IF your processor file supports it. 99% of the time, you can program the VX520 and then just make sure that you plug in the PIN pad into the external port BEFORE plugging in the terminal to power. If you plug in the external PIN pad into the terminal after it is plugged in and turned on, you can blow out the key injected encryption in the PIN pad rendering it useless.
329450
Searching on the web I couldnt find any reference for this compatibility, yet, you must try searching on users guide because this controller seems to be very flexible about compat. Luck
718339
I havent been able to find any good software for my hackintosh i am running 10.7 but there was some software solutions but i have not been able to get any of them to work. It was much easier to get it to run on windows and with mac that of course is possible as well.
1590978
It's not the exact one but will work for programming the KK2 flight board and flashing custom firmware on the hobby king ESCs as well! To answer your question this IS the programmer you want!
2276583
This product works beautifully with my Mac (2012 Mini running 10.8.5.) Oddly it didn't work for me when I first tried to use it and I don't know why that is. It could have been a bug that was fixed when I upgraded from 10.8.3 to 10.8.5. I think you will like the product, it is working really well for me now.
29325
I tried to use it, but it did not work. Now I think that it has something to do with the chip, because of you question. I'll check again.
413178
I use it with an Arduino Mega 2560 and a UDOO board (Linux +Due). The processor is almost irrelevant; its a setting in the IDE, really. The key is the additional signals available from the new headers on the third edge -- a Uno only has headers on two edges.
2028109
&lt;http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-20043524-263.html&gt; Go read this good article. Turns out Apple caused some confusion (but in a good way as far as functionality) by making the newer Thunderbolt port the exact same physical connection type as the older Mini Display port. But here is the good news, for newer Macs for which this port is advertised as Thunderbolt, the port is "backwards compatible" as a Mini Display port. It is also useable as strictly a Thunderbolt port. So yes, this cable will work for hooking up your Mac Mini 2012 to a HDMI TV via the Thunderbolt port. Thank God Apple did this. Especially since the 2012 Mac Mini uses the Intel 4000 GPU which has a flaw that manifests itself in the Mini's HDMI output. This cable provides a nice workaround until Intel/Apple issue new drivers to fix this problem (which has been publicly acknowledged by Intel/Apple). Enjoy!!!
1480481
Well I can't address your particular vehicle issue, but when first got the same programmer for my Chrsyler 300 SRT8 it would say the same thing, can't find Vin. I went on line and download the correct program for this vehicle cause when you first get the programmer it's used for many different applications. You must program the programmer to see your vehicle. In my case, the SRT8 obll connector didn't have the power pin to communicate with the programmer. I called their support people and they told me that after I took a picture of the connector and told them which pins were active. I believe they use #8 pin to communicate with. They told me it won't work with my vehicle and no programmer would. Well they were wrong cause I returned this programmer and purchased a Bully Dog programmer that works just fine. But I called Bully Dog first and talked with there Tech line before I purchased the programmer and them which pins were active. But you must first down all the updates first on any programmer to match your vehicle. If you don't do it right, it can really mess your computer up. Good luck.
2243173
All indications are that yes, this monitor works with the Display port (1.2) input BUT I have been reading in the Dell forums that these monitors may have a bug from dell manufacturing. While using display port 1.1 all seems find but when trying to daisy chain displays and enable display port 1.2, the monitors become undetectable. Here is the rub, I am NOT using display port, I am using DVI cables supplied by dell and I get the same issue where intermittently a monitor(s) disappear and just can not be detected until the dvi cable(s) are removed from said monitor(s) and replaced - This is terrible. Finally the monitor in question just died and will not power on. I now have to send the monitor to dell to be fixed. Finally, I switched back to one of my older 22" LED monitors to use with the second working 27" Dell and now IT is exhibiting the same behavior - God help me.... In sum, Is the monitor worth it? OH My, yes it is! It looks Fantastic! BUT make sure your purchase some luck and patience because it looks like there are firmware issues on these monitors and the fixes are slow in coming and may require that the third party video card developers may need to tweak their drivers to fully work with these monitors. In the development/manufacturing world this would be considered as a debacle and now I am in the middle of it. Sheesh...
1736287
I'm running version 3.56 and It works. I had problems when I first bought the camera. I don't know what version I was running then but it took a lot of tweaking to get it to work. Since that time I had to rebuild my server. Had a hard drive failure. With the new, much larger, storage and the latest version of the software.... Yeah, it works.
2146545
I'm using the 4-port version of the card and it works fine with Yosemite. Not sure why Inateck is saying otherwise...