Should i get this one or the v1.2? Is it worth the $50 extra? I'm planning to use this with a Audio-Technica ATH-M50
240281
If you value the sound quality over the functionality the answer is yes, but the differences are subtle sound refinements. The V1.2 has sound subtleties or refinements that puts the Dragonfly on par with the competition like HRT Microstreamer, witch is said to posses the smoother sound and also the most detailed, but that it is also slower and a bit less exiting. The V1.0 has a sound that has been qualified as a bit harsh. It has "attack", its fast and this is good for rock or jazz but produces more fatigue on longer sessions. The V1.2 is smoother and this can be heard with the ATM50.
1296665
I actually have 2 connected and I can't tell a difference. It still sounds good actually. Unless your an audio connoisseur, then you might be able to tell a difference but I certainly can't. Hope this helps. They may sell a longer one too though.
2077570
I have m50s as well. In comparison the m-100's have a significantly better sound on the low end. The bass respond you get with these are really good. The highs are also better than the m50s. To me, they do not "pierce" the ears as much when I turn it up a bit. Finally, the mids are about the same in quality, however since the vmodas have those two other strengths, you will probably notice the mids to be better with m50.
1146012
I do own the Audio Technica M50 and it dose have a great impact on the sound. I recently returned the fiio because to me I hear no difference listening through my Galexy S5. The built in DAC in the phone sound good as with the Fiio. To me the only advantage the Fiio has is the built in amp alone. Other then that it sound the same. One thing I notice is that when you use it with the smart phone and listen like Pandora, you will get EMI interfaces from time to time, especially when recieving signal. Again, recommended head phones? M50 OR M50X you will be impressed with the sound. Beats is all cosmetic and its not detailed when it comes to sound quality. I do own the Audio Technica M50 and it dose have a great impact on the sound. I recently returned the fiio because to me I hear no difference listening through my Galexy S5. The built in DAC in the phone sound good as with the Fiio. To me the only advantage the Fiio has is the built in amp alone. Other then that it sound the same. One thing I notice is that when you use it with the smart phone and listen like Pandora, you will get EMI interfaces from time to time, especially when recieving signal. Again, recommended head phones? M50 OR M50X you will be impressed with the sound. Beats is all... » Read More I do own the Audio Technica M50 and it dose have a great impact on the sound. I recently returned the fiio because to me I hear no difference listening through my Galexy S5. The built in DAC in the phone sound good as with the Fiio. To me the only advantage the Fiio has is the built in amp alone. Other then that it sound the same. One thing I notice is that when you use it with the smart phone and listen like Pandora, you will get EMI interfaces from time to time, especially when recieving signal. Again, recommended head phones? M50 OR M50X you will be impressed with the sound. Beats is all cosmetic and its not detailed when it comes to sound quality. « Show Less
185403
the v2 is very exposed and it had 2 heat sinks compared to v1 has 4, so it will be hotter and the plexy will warp over time, aluminum can handle the heat and it protects all the components, will it sound the same, i would think so, its the same stuff just compacted, it matters in the headset you connect, my dt770 are 80ohms and thats a lot of draw power, while small headsets with 20ohms would draw less and cause less heat
2064857
I have a pair of Audio Technica ATH-M50 and an array of V-Moda Crossfades. Both are good. However, if it's just listening to my audio players or home entertainment system, the V-Moda produces the detailed sound that I want more than the ATH-M50... this is where the Crossfades become my number 1 preference. If it's a recording session, tech booth monitoring or mixing task, I prefer the ATH-M50... it has a more flat response which is very ideal for monitoring and recording. So, if it's just for everyday listening pleasure with your audio/video player, for me the Crossfades win! As for overall quality feel, the Crossfades have a slight advantage.
1350232
Differences between the A2+ and original A2.USB digital-to-analog converter (DAC) Variable audio output (connect a sub or one of our wireless adapters) Upgraded speaker connectors Standard 1/4" threaded inserts for wall mounts Upgraded power supply Upgraded accessory cablesIn my opinion, not worth 50 bucks! I have been using my A2 everyday in my office, and they have been extremely durable! Hope it works.
1444807
Published specifications are available on Audio-Technica's website. The ATHM50x's published frequency response is 15 to 28,000 Hz. Virtually all of the Sennheiser HD series from, let's say, the 580s and beyond are 'Open-Back' compared to the ATH-M50x 'Closed-Back' design. So the difference is very audible in the fact that sound stage on the high end HD model is much larger with airy dynamics. By design, open back has no isolation and allows for full-blown leakage. Generally all of the Sennheiser HDs are amp dependent. Some of their earlier models do quite well in the portable realm but the sound is quite lack luster due to lack of power, especially with the HD598, HD600, and HD650 that I've toyed some few years ago. They become infinitely better once they are driven with good power. The ATH-M50x also benefits from a good DAC/AMP source, but it is not amp-dependent. Sonically, the ATH-M50 are astoundingly good. As you go into open-back designs like the ATH-W5000, you go into much more neutral realms (not completely flat, mind you) where bass gets less emphasized (this is normal) and the mid-ranges become more present with higher instrumental separation. Despite that, I could never take any of the open-back designs into studio as the microphones will easily pick up the leakage from these headphones during recording sessions. This is why there is a market for closed-back design. ATH-M50 is really good in the studio setting. If I were you, try and find out if there's any local store near you that can allow you to audition these headphones so you can judge for yourself whether or not you like open-back vs close-back headphones.
1863651
Try the S1 model. It's way lighter than the S2. Microphonics is hardly present on both models. Before you make a purchase, consider changing se215 eartips first.
2021299
I just bought a Mcintosh MHA100 DAC/AMP and it is brilliant with the HD600. It completely changed the performance and took it to a level that in my opinion was better than $1800 cans I tried. If you like tubes Woo Audio WA7 has some excellent feedback
2263998
If you already have the M50, it will depend on how much you value the the updates.If you don't have the M50 I think it's worth it for the removable cable plus 3 cables to choose from. Reviews have stated the the ear cups are a bit more comfortable.
901749
Thanks, Billy, from me, too!I'm ready to replace my 1st gen Touch. (I'm slow.) I actually have $10 Sony earphones, and I use them with all my audio devices.
249370
I have this on my SRH440's and it is a wonderful addition. Took a bit of stretching to get all the snaps snapped, but it is very comfy compared to the stock hard band. The Brainwavz HM5 ear pads are also an excellent upgrade for $19. They are a deeper cup and they really expand the sound stage. Improve both highs and lows. I just bought another 440 and will buy both of these items for them as well. Makes them compare very favorably with the much more expensive cans for a lot less money.Good Luck.
1119635
I'll go out on a limb here and say yes. I bought the right amplifier and wear in in my right ear. I does not fit in the left ear. FWIW, I have found it to be very beneficial. I did read today a new CS50 is being released in April but have not seen what is being upgraded.
1185564
Well the sound quality on these is great and tight I wouldn't ever use them without a dedicated headphone amp like the mayflower objective 2. So I don't think you will benefit from such an expensive pair of headphones. I think you will get better price/performance from something in the audiotechnica M** series. Drastically cheaper and will match the hardware in the iphone better. This is unless you have a decent audio setup at home and plan to use it for both. On the go you should go for the cheaper option more suited for the kind of audio hardware in your phone. At home with a decent headphone amp the sennheisers will shine. Well the sound quality on these is great and tight I wouldn't ever use them without a dedicated headphone amp like the mayflower objective 2. So I don't think you will benefit from such an expensive pair of headphones. I think you will get better price/performance from something in the audiotechnica M** series. Drastically cheaper and will match the hardware in the iphone better. This is unless you have a decent audio setup at home and plan to use it for both. On the go you should go for the cheaper option more suited for the kind of audio hardware in your phone. At home with a... » Read More Well the sound quality on these is great and tight I wouldn't ever use them without a dedicated headphone amp like the mayflower objective 2. So I don't think you will benefit from such an expensive pair of headphones. I think you will get better price/performance from something in the audiotechnica M** series. Drastically cheaper and will match the hardware in the iphone better. This is unless you have a decent audio setup at home and plan to use it for both. On the go you should go for the cheaper option more suited for the kind of audio hardware in your phone. At home with a decent headphone amp the sennheisers will shine. « Show Less
658195
It's a totally different headphone experience with the open-backed AKG's. I don't have the M50s, but I do have the ATH M40fs, and the K 701's are noticeably superior in sound reproduction quality. I've loved my M40fs's for years, but they sound compressed when A/B'd with the K 701's. When I mix with the AKG's and then re-listen through my monitors, the translation is very close across the entire frequency range. YMMV of course. I hope this was some help.
1404937
No, sound is fine in both models. The second has a good microphone that didn't work on the first type.