Does anyone know how this scope compares to the similar cost Barska CO11502 20-60x60 ?
259666
I own the Firefield, my shooting friend has the Barska. We both agree mine is clearer, and a little sharper 300 yards, and farther. His lens has a yellow cast when viewing thru the lens.
824196
It is more expensive because it has the RMR. Hands down this is the scope to get, you will love it!
1356339
I returned the first Redfield I got because there appeared to be multiple red dots when looking through the scope. The seller sent me a second one, so I sold it before I ever opened the package. I purchased the Nikon P-223 BDC 600 Riflescope with Rapid Action Turret, Black, 4-12x40 from Amazon and am really happy with it. I've actually used it to hit plates at 200 m (at about 6X) standing without support in a competition, and it worked great on my Tavor.
1925119
u can thank OBMA for that.Try putting a sighn that say[IF U CAN READ THIS YOUR IN RANGE] ive found that it works and is cheper than barska spotting scope.HAVE GUNS WILL TRAVEL HATE HORSE THIVES.LOL 338 LUPA GOOD OUT TO A MILE
2217900
Looks like the Nikoplex to me. I have the M-308 with the BDC and I would hold out for that, especially since they're selling it to you full price. The undiscounted price is greatly inflated over retail. Not a bargain unless you get what you want. BTW, this is an awesome scope, and the BDC is a great tool when teamed with the Spot-On software. Good luck!
482122
I can tell that I used the Barska mount that came with the scope and mounted it just fine on my AR-15 (223) and there was plany room for adjusting it back and forth on top of my AR.
104817
To whom it may concern. Do not buy this scope. Despite what I said in other reviews I have come to find this thing to be a POS. It broke very soon after a few rounds. I sent it back and they replaced it and that one broke as well. You will need to spend at least $140 to get a long eye relief scope that will stand up to the Mosin. Hope this helps.Doc
402030
Hi, this scope has great resolution and zooming. However, I've not shot at that range and cannot speak to that. The thing I will say is that the optics are great but the tripod might not be robust enough for a steady image at the range. The slightest movement would cause image problems at that far a rand. The Barska manufacturer and website are an excellent resource with great customer service. Hope that helps. I'd like to come shoot with you and maybe we can test it out?! Best, Vincent vcareri at gmail dot com
1809658
I sent mine back. I didn't like the scope at all. I would look into Mueller scopes. You can get a 24x or 32 x for a few bucks more. I have these relatively inexpensive scopes on all my asault rifles Remington 700 and .22 rifles. They are great. Look into them, do a little research. Hope I helped you out. If can't get them here try optics planet.
1713666
No idea..my scope lasted one full hunting season..then pft..found out why it was priced so low
511489
It is a great scope on my CO2 rifle. The blogs mention springers are are hard on all all scopes. Discuss with UTG. They have excellent cutomer support.
615951
Quite frankly, I wouldn't buy one. Actually I bought 2 and returned both and bought Millett 4-16x50 Illuminated Tactical Rifle scope. You get what you pay for in this case. The Barskas could not hold on target from one shot to the next. Wasted time, money, and rounds trying to get it right but was a waste of our time. The Milletts (never heard of the company before) I believe is manufactured by Bushnell and is an excellent scope in my opinion. I hope this helps. PS: I hate to bad mouth a product, but this was my experience.
1088072
Josh, I was foolish and made a poor choice in going with Barska. The scope off the rifle looks great, but once installed and fired all kinds of issues became apparent. Barska Customer Service is awful and and wouldn't even meet Amazons one star standard. Tread carefully my friend.
654260
George, I have two cantilever mounts and neither fit it. To be truthful even if one did I would not use the scope as I found it did not magnify properly nor did it focus sharp. It geives a real bad tunnel vision effect. I bowxed it up and threw it in my junk box of scopes rings and mounts. Did not cost enough for me to get upset over but I will not be ordering a BARSKA scope any time soon. good luck, Daniel
1388471
Im not sure, but my friend was trying to adjust it while I was shooting and the eye piece just popped off and we could then see the prism inside and there was fingerprints on the prism and inside the tube was very dirty. The image was not clear at all at 100 yards. I also had a Barska scope on my PTR91 and the optics inside of the scope just exploded. I will never buy a Barska product again. Wish I could get my money back on this spotting scope.
1945371
I have the 3X9 on a Rock river AR 15 with a 20" Bbl. The scope is sighted in at 200 yards and the BDC works very well. I think it is a great scope for the $$$.
858055
Pietro, I do not believe it is an Etched Glass Reticle, I have actually returned this scope and ended up going with a Vector Optics 10-40X50, it is Illuminated and Etched Glass Reticle, the ZOS after a certain magnification it would become quite foggy and does not have the feeling of the construction on it being all there, also the elevation knob kept spinning after I tried adjusting the elevation on it and it did stop any more. It is visually pleasing but I don't think you just want a paper weight on your rifle. I shoot Benjamin Marauders both .177 and .22 caliber and I have the Vector Colossus 10-40X50 on my .22 and a Barska 6-24X50 on the .177, I am taking shots from 75 Yards (67meters) out to about 120 Yards (105meters) or so, with either one of my optics I can take accurate shots at those distances, they both have etched glass reticles and have SF also IR, these two scopes are roughly about the same price if not maybe a bit more, but they are worth it. I hope this helps you make a wise investment.