Online I see this lens as part #880-101 and part #883-101. Does anyone know the difference?
233937
It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g))- Most of other features are the same.I hope this will be helpful. It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb.... » Read More It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g))- Most of other features are the same.I hope this will be helpful. « Show Less
233938
there is a 62mm & 72 mm Hard to find the differences here. I have a 62 mm and would like to get the newer one.
233939
The Sigma 880-101 is an older lens and does not have Macro capabilities. Several websites say it's no longer available as new. The Sigma 883-101 is the replacement for the 880-101 and is Macro capable. I just received this lens for Christmas and have put it through it's paces at Zoo Miami.It's a great lens for amateurs who want quality photos.
233940
It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101): 1. Angle View: [69.3 - 5.7], (76.5 - 6.5) 2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm)) 3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14) 4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm) 5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm)) 6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g)) - Most of other features are the same. I hope this will be helpful.
659299
Trust the box. There are focusing motors in bodies and lenses that differ so I would go by what the box says. Too bad because it is a good lens.
605825
that's replacement part for 18-105 lens. Has nothing to do with camera you have.
734193
Yes I replaced on the same lens. It is not easy to install. If your not careful you can ruin the lens. Unfortunately the part is plastic like the original
524087
If you are buying the one in the photos then no!!Their should be a d after the 2.8 on the lens
191803
I no longer have the lens.That said, I suggest that you test it thoroughly within the 30 day return window. This lens is not cheap.
1666431
Hi Kristi, you can provide us what is the exact model number of the lens you are pertaining to so that we can assist you further. Thank you. -Ely
705680
It IS an autofocus lens. I suppose some vendors just don't include that in the description. Hope that answers your question.
84701
Thank you for your time. In regards to your inquiry, this lens is compatible with the AW1 series. If you have any additional questions please feel free to contact us directly at 800-991-3350.
900501
It seems to be a misprint. I own the lens and a D7000 and they work great together.
298991
This particular one is for the older lens that takes 72mm filters, not the current one that takes 62mm filters. They are not interchangeable, so you really do need to check to be sure. The newer one has "Macro" in the naming.
376779
I have a Nikon and I really like this lens, especially at this price. I just checked the Amazon listing for the lens and your camera is not listed so you might need a special adapter or T ring. I recommend you call 47th street photo @ 800-304-2510 or 718-998-6666 to see if they have it. They're closed Sat & Sun. Good Luck.
582699
Okay, thanks a lot, new at this and I wasn't sure if the lens quality is the same. I appreciate everyone's help!
426453
We now include an O-ring with our lens to take up extra thickness if needed.This question references the MJ-880 but I'm sure they meant the MJ-808.
44748
I bought this as a replacement for the one that came with the lens. I'm not sure if Sigma made it but... it fits exactly, looks exactly and the material seems exactly the same as the original. I can't tell the difference. Been using it for about a year now.
163448
Hey! If you're like us, you'll be pleased to know the 5-1/2" X 8-1/2" X 1-3/4" is correct. We had the same puzzlement about the bizarre, inaccurate "12X10" dimension, and rolled the dice based on the part number match from NuTone's website. We were delighted to find the product was a perfect replacement for our old lens of these dimensions. Good luck!
1588008
Im not selling this, lens. I recently purchased one and it was new. I think somehow this link got sent to the wrong person.