This or the Nagoya 701?
240523
This antenna is the same antenna that works with the Wouxon radios and will work with the Baofeng radios and performs well better than the stock antenna that came with my UV-5R. I'm very happy and pleased with this antenna purchase and I would recommend it, has you can use it with either radio as your primary or secondary antenna.
240524
This antenna works just fine, I bought 2 of them (1 for each of my Baofeng UV-82 dual band HT's) they were a vast improvement over the stock antenna's that came with the radios. I have no complaints they are good antennas.
240525
Any antenna will work on any radio as long as it has the same connector type and frequency range.
240526
It depends on the radio you will use it for. Different brand radios have different antenna connectors. Kenwood handheld have BNC female connectors and Yaesu radios use female SMA connectors. The Nagoya Antena has SMA connector.
275680
Sorry - I know nothing about the G1n. The G1on is very good, though. Intuitive, and the looper and drum patterns are a bonus. Sorry I can't he;p further. Howard.
282248
The 7000 is what you want. It has the capability to utilize larger diameter plumbing.
163474
I havent listened to k702 or k712 but the Q701 have a very electronic sound signature, best sooted to electronic music or video games
1172799
Yes, I own both! For me, I ended up preferring the Q701 over the 598. The HD598 was more comfortable in longer sessions and didn't require any modification to the band (I had to tape a piece of foam to the Q701 because the bumps in the band put pressure on the top of my head). They're both kind of minimal in terms of accessories, but the Q701 comes with some very long wires (which you can braid if they're too long!). They both leak sound, with the Q701 leaking a bit more imo. But the Q701's soundstage is noticeably wider than the 598's. The sound is what made me prefer the Q701 though; it may be because the Q701 has more treble, but I find that the details in the music are clearer than on the 598, where it sounds a little muddied. But, in the case of the 598, this makes for easier listening over time. They're both not very heavy on the bass, but it's adequate for me. The HD598 has stronger bass overall (especially in the mid bass), but the Q701 reaches further down with more sub bass. I have a separate set of headphones for bassy stuff, so I preferred taking the extra detail on the Q701.
526186
Question #2: I bought a Nagoya NA-701 for my 82X and it works great on the 2 meter band. Reception is probably twice as good. Please note that this antenna is intended for use on 144/440 MHz and not 220. Your transmitter might be damaged if you use the NA-701 on 220 MHz.
262452
The 751 is slightly bulkier and heavier, which is still negligible, and it produces more bass. I have no regrets.
1390837
I think the specs are very similar, if not the same. As I recall, the frequency response graph at the Headroom Web site shows perhaps a slight rise in the bass over the K701. Subjectively, the sonic signature is very similar, with perhaps a tad more bass. I like both 'phones, but have a slight overall preference for the K702.
1020788
I am trying to decide too....The big differences I can see are the oversized pedals, backlit display, and a "better" seat. I tried the 230 at a store today...was pretty loose..but I do not think they built it very well and it has been super abused.Decisions, decisions!
894156
Not surr about q701s but if they are identical performance wise like others have said, go for the 702s. The 702s are extremely comfortable and the sound prod. is first class.
526188
1. The extended battery is a new item recently released (late 2015) by this same seller (Baofeng Tech), so be sure to check their website www.baofengtech.com2. They should also sell the spare antennas, but there is also a better aftermarket Nagoya NA-702 specifically designed for 144/220 use. The 701 and 771 are 144/440 only so will not work well on 220.
787627
If this is your first radio, then go with this Yaesu. The menu/interface is much more user friendly and the quality of Yaesu is outstanding. Yaesu's are made in Japan while Baofung is made in China and while you may find one that last ten years, quality control is really poor in China and most likely it won't.Now if this is a secondary radio, then by all means try the Baofung out, everyone says they are a great value for what you get. Just everyone I know that has one already has a Yaesu/Kenwood/Icom, etc.
194886
I read somewhere (some product review site) that the V750 additionally includes a fluid mount kit (for scratchy negatives), and improved optics (anti-reflective coating, high reflectivity mirror) which results in "visibly better job than the V700."
1231658
If you are a ham and are using it on 2 and 70 cm bands, it might be good to invest in a reasonable dual band antenna. I picked up a Nagoya NA-771. Seems to work fine but ... since the Baofeng has no real signal strength meter, you can only get qualitative data. The only problem with the Nagoya antenna is that it is a bit long and bothersome if you are planning to be very mobile, that is carrying the radio around. If you want to use the radio in bands other than 2 meter and 70 cm, then the stock antenna might be as good as anything.
1913094
I've tried 701s with it and been quite pleased. It definitely has the tube experience and some of the tube warmth. For more, check out http://www.head-fi.org/t/685162/new-vali-schiit-amp/1575
690451
I have the QL-550 but it prints labels for postage. I don't know anything about the 70. Sorry.
44067
One difference is that this has a 75oz reservoir vs the 60oz reservoir in the B70. I don't know if the internals are any different. I hope they have improved the durability of the machine. It is strange there are so few reviews of this new machine.