What is the difference between the clear model and the clear lenses model?
243569
I don't think there is a difference. I'd recommend getting the yellow tinted ones however if you're going to be shooting outside. I've got em and they work great
243570
I am not sure. I have some with clear lenses that I really like. The lens is optically good and has very little distortion
243571
I don't think there is a difference in my opinion but if your going to be shooting outside any I would recommend yellow tinted lens they work great inside and out
1011661
Hi thomyi, you may try checking on the link below for the direct comparison between the two lenses. -Elyhttp://store.sony.com/gsi/webstore/WFS/SNYNA-SNYUS-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProductCompareService-Show?CategoryID=on0KmUBxnZQAAAFEYhlScEcW
1679788
I use the clear UV filter to protect the lens from any contact that would harm the first lens element. Lenses have coatings that can get worn away from numerous cleanings and improper handling. The polarizing filter would protect the lens, but I wouldn't want to use it for every shot. I use mine to reduce reflection in glass, darken the sky and modify contrast, depending upon the situation.
992357
Although I have both Tamron and Sigma lenses, I prefer using Sigma. Better clarity, better constructed.
1476282
Very strange, but they have the same lens listed twice! I was wondering this too..but they're the same lens. Sorry for the late response!
1931840
The glasses are clear because they're made to look like regular glasses, not sunglasses. When you wear it, nobody will suspect that it records because they look like typical prescription glasses (without the prescription of course).
1805272
Don't really know the answer to that. I know my son-in-law had one of those little lenses and had a problem with it, but don't know if that is the same one. Sorry.
883998
Main difference is sensor. Both are exactly the same size and will probably fit in jacket pocket with lens such as 27/2.8. You should also look at Fuji x100s which has a shallow profile due to build in lens
1532467
I don't specifically know the answer to your question... all i can say is that the one i purchased works as advertised. The only thing you could do is purchase a pair of both and have then assessed for quality lense grinding by your eye profesdional. Research Amazon products... they show several... then read all of the ratings. Hope these friendly suggestions are helpful.
1140119
It has been sometime since I made the side-by-side review of the two models. Suggest that you view web site: dpreview.com to compare. Except for more mpixels, the real difference will be the choice of the highest quality lens to meet your intended use.
1911605
I am not sure I understand the question. These are the clearest, sharpest binocs I have ever had the priveledge of owning. All across the lens they are sharp and bright. A great deal for the money. You would spend $800.00 - $1000.00 to find a pair like them.
1691795
The set I got came with clear, smoked/dark, and amber lenses. Though some of the earlier reviewers mentioned not having these included with their purchase.
233937
It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g))- Most of other features are the same.I hope this will be helpful. It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb.... » Read More It looks like the "#883-101" is a newer version for the same model. You may not be able to buy "#880-101". I did a comparison of these two versions and here are differences [values for #883-101], (values for #880-101):1. Angle View: [69.3° - 5.7°], (76.5° - 6.5°)2. Minimum Focus Distance: [13.8" (35.05 cm)], (1.48' (45 cm))3. Elements/Groups: [13/16], (18/14)4. Filter Thread: [62 mm], (72 mm)5. Dimensions (DxL): [Approx. 2.9x3.5" (7.37x8.89 cm)], (Approx. 3.1x4.0" (7.87x10.16 cm))6. Weight: [1.04 lb. (470g)], (1.39 lb. (630g))- Most of other features are the same.I hope this will be helpful. « Show Less
776494
Glass is sharper, and the sharpness is broader in the middle Vs. the plastic one only being very sharp almost completely in the center. The glass lens also has less of the barrel distortion. I'ts simply about preference, typically people purchase the holga cameras for the distortion ability...
1937201
UV filter coating imbues a slight color tinge, and reduces the amount of light. Clear is actually preferable. UV filtering is unnecessary with modern lenses.
363033
Neither. Mine came in a plastic sack, with the lenses cracked. Horrible packaging.
1588421
I purchased the 1.4X, after doing research on the results of both products. From what I read, the images stay "sharper" at the edges, with the 1.4x. I have used the 1.4X, and have been very pleased with the results. I do intend to purchase the 2x, understanding that the clarity may not be as good.