The 86205 seems identical to the 86200 but with more adjustment functions. And the price is a bit lower. Am I mistaken?
261765
Yeah I believe the 205 is the newer model. Not really sure why it's cheaper but I won't complain. It is a great chair. The adjustments are seat height, sliding the seat forwards and backwards, and you can lock the back into a few angled positions. There is also tilt tension on the bottom.
261766
That's what I could grasp from reading different sources on the internet. I have a 86205 and I'm very happy with it. 2 months and counting. I'm a big guy - 6'5 and 230lbs. No sign of sagging or ruining the seat or back. Working from home almost on a daily basis and the chair is comfortable to spend all day in it.
1606296
I've had both. They both have the same light gathering abilities, but the version II is smaller and is a bit better optically the the original 14-42, although I think you'd be hard pressed to see the difference in most situations. The version II is a smoother lens, mechanically.
1288625
I own th extreme 2. The main differences I could see were NO cable adjustments are needed on the extreme model, and the addition of middle pulleys on the extreme. I viewed both of these as significant upgrades, and opted for the more expensive machine. I have not been dissatisfied.
185972
The 861 is the improved model. 3 main differences: 1. Flat blade screws for depth guide have been replaced with hex head screws. 2. The clamping wing screws have been joined with a bar...to provide more secure clamping of the workpiece. 3. A round knob handle has been added to each end...to improve functionality when using with a router table. Other than above, they're functionally identical.
1848625
I have actually found that the 905 does not work (very choppy) in my basement and the 860 no problem using and 8866 so if range is a concern then I would pay up for the more expensive 860.
1643488
I got the 200... It had better features and a very nice design. This unit is great for the price, you get the same features of units that cost in the 800 to 1000.00 range. It's worth getting. The units very lite, designed well, (looks cool) and has been extremely actuate for me, the gps function is also very handy in finding your way back to a good spot.
2109499
I called Omega (it took a couple tries before I actually reached somebody) to ask about the 8004/6 vs 8007/8 their reply was "there aren't any differences worth mentioning." When I pressed further, "you can see from their description they're basically the same. Unless you like the different handle, i don't know why anybody would pay for the newer model." So either a) they're really bad at CS b) the person I spoke to was having a bad day or c) they're just trying to get an extra $30-40 per machine....
1192318
I am extremely pleased with my 18-140. I do not own the 18-200, but I have handled it. The 18-140 is a bit lighter, and handles a bit quicker. It is sharper than my 18-105, especially at the wider focal lengths, where most pictures are taken.
2213772
A big difference for me was that the 8620 has duplex scanning. The 8610 does NOT have duplex scanning
979769
Yes, I noticed that as well. There are a few other differences that I personally noticed- cord length- hose length- floor surface settings- one looks better than the otherI ended up going with the 3920 just because it was what was available, plus because of what the cust serv rep told me. But I'm not sure it was worth the extra $20-$30 that I paid.I ended up going with the 3920
1416417
As others have said it's the DE86 - However the head is the same on the 89 and 86 - handle is the difference. The 89 is the chrome handle. The chrome handle comes in a lined and smooth version. It's all a question of which look you prefer, the razor portion is identical.
1020912
Yes, it was definitely worth the $35 upgrade. I went from a 3602 I had for four or five years and could tell an immediate difference. Do it!
1407746
Thanks for your response. Yes, I still need to know why the price is more for the 880. May be, someone else can answer that.
618846
The differences I see in their write-ups are size and speed control. The 7323 is single speed and smaller.
1236911
I researched both before I purchased mine and determined that there wasn't a significant difference. I'm currently happy with this (but I guess I wouldn't know if something large enough to be damaging has occurred since I installed it). The specs and ratings looked functionally similar, however the more expensive one has a lifetime limited vs 10 year warranty and the $25k equipment coverage.
1629764
I know this is much later than the original post, but in case anyone else is wondering the same I thought I'd answer it. I tried both, and ended up sticking with the ES8249S. However, there is not much of a difference at all. They have the same volume when shaving, they have the same comfort level, same close shave, the cleaner unit is the same, the display on the razor is the same.... The only difference is the 4th blade. I do think because of that the 8249S is just a bit quicker to shave my whole face, but it was not much of a difference at all. They were priced the same after Christmas due to steep Amazon price cuts and a 20 dollar rebate, so I got a great deal on the 8249S, otherwise I'd be perfectly fine with the ES8109S for a cheaper price.
173035
I can only answer for the WorkForce 635, where it worked extremely well. Assuming it is the correct cartridge for the 845, I can't imagine why there would be a difference.