Right now I have a NuWave. Would this be better than what I have now?
225745
I don't know for sure as I don't have the nuwave to compare it to but I love my ovente! I don't have a stove so I use this just about every day... It's very responsive to raising or lowering the temp - easy to clean - it's just great!
225746
I have no idea about a NuWave but I really love this cooktop. I used it for outdoor cooking in the summer. It works great. It takes a little longer to boil water than a gas stove but I expected that.
225747
I've never used a NuWave so I can't answer that. I bought this for our guest cottage, and the guests seem to be happy with it.
225748
i have no clue of NuWave product, but OVENTE product is good for any cookware utensils andprovide excellent service. Currently i purchased another two of this manufactured by SALT. OVENTEand SALT are made by the same manufacturer. The structures are same.
11221
I do not know what Nu Wave is, but it works fine on a regular glass topped electric range.
290362
Not sure what nuwave is?but pots akay on all types of stoves! Pots very light & cook very fast - use lower temps
771053
Thought I was ,but I ended up buying the Nu wave as well. I hope you find out because it sure was an expensive pressure cooker that way. Did use the precision as a gift but still. I use my pressure pan alot now as just a nice big pan because I don't pressure cook that much. It works great and I didn't have to go buy another big pan for chili or whatever.
1482743
That depends on what you are making. But if its like a green been casorole or something you have recipe for... follow the recipe and just adjust time to using nu wave rather then a normal oven
1650352
Weak. You should Check the cheaper model (se 215). It Will be so more fun to ear to
1319570
I was not satisfied with this unit. I sold it and now have the Pyle-Pro PDWM5500 - 4 mic system. This works a lot better. I know it's only one step up but what a difference. Better built, better sound and the difference in price is minimal.
1369700
yes you will. ipod has a wacky sound quality, perhaps the mac is better. The iBasso is great and it is a DAC meaning it can convert digital waves to analog waves. The sound is more realistic. I'm really satisfied with it.
792664
Supposedly zwave is supposed to be universal, but I would check with http://www.asihome.com/. They seem to be quite knowledgeable on zwave products.
156676
The two units are quite different designs and have different use cases, so a comparison is not really valid. If all you want is an inexpensive AptX/amp combo and you're not a highly critical listener, then the grace might be a good choice. (I haven't seen or tested the grace unit.) If you want more I/O (analog and digital, including a 96/24 USB inerface), a good hi-fi amp, solid build quality, and not having to fuss with a wall wart, then the NAD is a good choice. I'll also mention my 1970s NAD 3020 (which inspired this unit) is still working well.
1154204
If the NuWave unit is induction operated, there is no reason to believe it would not work. Good luck
308294
In think better....more bass, wider sound field, I love my Camden! we also have a soundlink in the house, and again the sound more beefy......rich!
515238
I don' know about Nuwave twister. Compatible to the old model of magic bullet and working good. Thanks.
1115057
I did lots of research on these. I did not see good things about the nuwave. I really like this one and the reviews were good.
294263
Better. No comparison. 3000 is a solid unit, hassle free. But that unit is old,there are other options in that price range now... check out the numark. Or see if you can find a used m audio xponent. Owned that one for years.... way superior to either.
966381
One reviewer states if you are replacing a Nuwave, you will not be satisfied. My experience is different. I have both, and I have had the Oyoma longer. The Nuwave is already looking shabby after just a few months. The Oyama still looks new. Both still work, and both have different construction designs. The Oyama is superior in quality and versatility, but the Nuwave has some pluses like the rack is a bit better. But on the Nuwave the drip pan now looks like an old pealed teflon pan. For your best bet, Oyama is my choice were I to choose between them. Price and durability, ease of control and heat distrabution are superior in the glass bowl model over the plastic model any day. One reviewer states if you are replacing a Nuwave, you will not be satisfied. My experience is different. I have both, and I have had the Oyoma longer. The Nuwave is already looking shabby after just a few months. The Oyama still looks new. Both still work, and both have different construction designs. The Oyama is superior in quality and versatility, but the Nuwave has some pluses like the rack is a bit better. But on the Nuwave the drip pan now looks like an old pealed teflon pan. For your best bet, Oyama is my choice were I to choose between them. Price and durability, ease of control... » Read More One reviewer states if you are replacing a Nuwave, you will not be satisfied. My experience is different. I have both, and I have had the Oyoma longer. The Nuwave is already looking shabby after just a few months. The Oyama still looks new. Both still work, and both have different construction designs. The Oyama is superior in quality and versatility, but the Nuwave has some pluses like the rack is a bit better. But on the Nuwave the drip pan now looks like an old pealed teflon pan. For your best bet, Oyama is my choice were I to choose between them. Price and durability, ease of control and heat distrabution are superior in the glass bowl model over the plastic model any day. « Show Less
1203492
Sorry Dawn. I have no idea. Knock on wood I have had mine 6+ yrs now. The dome looks terrible (not clear anymore) but it still cooks like a champ. Try googling your question. Best I saw is you may have to replace the whole head. My guess is it may be cheaper to buy another nuWave. I know I will never be without mine. Love it!