Is this ideal for birthday invitations and such? I used 32lb and it is ok, but not thick enough and I'm looking for something thicker.
235851
I've never sent birthday invitations, but I would lean toward yes. It's thick and durable enough for me to use as packaging labels on my soaps, but is not quite card stock heaviness.
235852
Yes, it's pretty good for cards. I've used it a few times for that. This 60lb weight is also sturdier than some "delicate" cards found in a stationery or grocery store.
19259
It's not very thick. The thickness is very similar to bubble wrap. We had to double layer it for our use around the house.
2217281
There isn't a huge amount of room in the "brackets" on the board. I'm guessing no thicker than 9/32. Foam board or corrugated plastic board will fit. We use solid heavyweight poster stock.
837812
It may be a little stiff. It is not thin, it has to be stiff enough to put though the printer. I made a queen size quilt using the wedding pictures and the brides color skim. It was beautiful. I have since brought more for memory quilts.
815314
They come with sheets pre printed with basic party info, time place RSVP etc... That you may fill in. A 4x6 would be to big to fit. I wouldn't go any wider than 3" and that may be pushing it. Besides if the paper is too big you won't be able to see the other fun stuff inside.
1864804
In response to Eva's answer, I'm surprised, cause I didn't need any extra postage! But that might be because I didn't include any kind of reply card in my invitations (didn't need them.) I bet that's the cause of the added weight, rather than the bump from the ribbon.Which, by the way, reminds me! The reply cards are just basic, standard cardstock weight in a beige color.
1303751
Actually, it is really too heavy for greeting cards. I use it for tent cards for the table for holidays, etc. I much prefer a lighter weight for greeting cards. I like 67lb. for greeting cards. The 110lb. is good for cover stock.
1758341
I feel it would be to thick. It is good quality photo paper. Hope this helps.
1369400
Hello I would think that it's a little too thick for fragile things . An excellent kitchen tool for nearly everything !!! I suggest using a silicone cooking sheet . Everything slides off of ours . Good luck
2194752
Yes. I got this thickness because they are still thin enough not to be considered "rigid" by the USPS, but thick enough to keep a certificate from being too bashed up. I use a 9x12 envelope, and 2 of these would fit easily.
1616849
Really is not for cards invitations purposes, is a photographic paper not to be folded, is thick but I'll not recommended for cards.
1074284
I do fine art printing and I love using this as reference: http://www.paper-paper.com/weight.html The paper is noting 110 lb Index, which is about a 9 pt. thickness and matching the picture, 199 gsm. I wouldn't exactly recommend this for professional business card printing, but the extra weight is definitely pretty good to have. If you can get 12 pt. or higher (1pt. or 1 mil represents a thousandths (0.001") of an inch), it'll definitely do better for you.
1543060
The thickness won't collapse on itself. It is a nice thickness. If you buy clear stamps it is similar to what the stamps come on.
2210774
No it is not thick at all....it is about the thickness of a piece of copy paper or a tad thicker. I have had great luck with this product and would recommend it.
865332
This is a thick paper. It is commonly used for invitations. Feel free to email us if you want a sample of it. Thanks
838324
Not too thin,it doesn't tear easily but the one sent to me does not have the days of the week printed for each day. Hope this helps
1559369
Oh, what a great idea! I purchased it for a tuling project and I know it'd be perfect for gift tags as well. Definitely, thick enough.