Are these suitable for colder weather hikes? Could a base layer be worn under?
246599
No my dear they are not suitable for cold weather hikes definitely you need to worn some thing under.
246600
No, no no. However, I've been wearing these pants for years. I put on a BASE LAYER underneath (Icebreaker merino wool to be exact) underneath. Skied all day in this combo and was plenty warm.
246601
Depends on how cold you're talking about. The material is slightly thicker than most of the other hiking pants I own and does keep heat in a little better but I wouldn't wear it for sub-zero temperatures hiking either without a base layer. The legs will have room for a base layer but both pairs I had were tight around the crotch region so if you are thinking of cotton long johns or smart wool that's not cut well, it may ride up a bit. Compression shorts/leggings will probably work ok though.
246602
Count on very little warmth out of the pants themselves. I have worn mine with both silk or compression long underware.
246603
They are quite thin. I was happy in the mountains in spring, but they won't work for a winter hike. They are loose fitting but not baggy - underarmor would probably be fine, but nothing bulkier than that.
186125
I don't hike or backpack because of back problems so I can't speak to that. I bought it for summer wear only. Walking my dogs in the field when the temps are in the 80s and 90s, it is very light and comfortable. I don't think it would provide warmth in cold weather. I love it's lightness and would own more colors if I could get the size I want. I bought a size that is very large on me with the idea of using it as a beach cover-up.
697278
These are neoprene "booties" and I wouldn't wear them beyond when I'm wading through water. In that case the wool wouldn't help at all. In Iceland my mode of operation was to hike to the side of the river, change hiking boots to sandals and Hydroskin, walk carefully through the icewater and then change back.
108914
They are not lined..so no. However, in our New Mexico weather of 66 to 80 degrees..yes.
1296919
These are snow pants so they may be classified as waterproof but likely at the lowest rating (given the price) which equates to a light rain. Anything more would have water slowly start to seep in.
450438
I would definitely not wear these in hiking boots. Your feet will sweat like you can't imagine then they will chill. I've worn neoprene gloves to work in very cold climates and the only time I didn't regret my decision was when I had to get my hands wet. The sweat ends up chilling my hands and the cold plus the chill makes things worse. Wicking liners and really nice thick wool based socks work best. I've augemented this with small heat packs and have been quite happy in -30F temps. I know they also make battery heated socks that work well.
19320
I bought them for hiking and paragliding in summer. Feel a bit light for colder temperatures, but very tough fabric. Maybe with respective long underwear and depending on circumstances (wind chill, still air, humidity etc.) you could use them in freezing conditions. My 2 cents :-)
164970
I have wore them and they are light and will dry right away wind resistant yes but not for cold wind.
727139
I would just have a fleece single layer on these. I would not put anything thicker as the heat from these have to penetrate through whatever you put on there.
350560
They are water proof shell pants. Thin. Kind of a tight fit. Might work layered over sweats or fleece.
19322
I wore the Propper lightweight men's pants when I was working in 30-90 degree (mountains) Fahrenheit weather. Ideally they are comfortable in the spring and fall (50-80 degree F). If you are going to wear them in constant cold weather (close to or below freezing) I would wear thermals underneath to provide protection from the elements.
1741738
Haven't worn them in real hot weather, but they are comfortable and not bulky. So, I would guess they would feel fine in any weather.
213987
i don't think they would be too hot. I live in the Pacific Northwest where winter is usually in the 40s - 50s and they are very comfortable both outside as well as in my house which is warmer than 50 degrees.
396462
I think they would be too thick for that. Look for something thinner. They are also kind of stiff and would be uncomfortable for that kind of use. They are good, I wanted a heavier pair to wear when it is colder. I forgot that once I get going the cold does not matter.
1565196
I bought them specifically as some "cheap" snow pants. We were visiting family in Chicago, and were going to go sledding. we were only out for an hour, and they didn't really keep snow out, especially the pockets, which means your top layer doesn't keep you dry and I would expect you'd eventually get cold. They worked short term, but I wouldn't use them to ski
15159
I wore these under trousers and jeans in winter in Australia so it's not usually colder than 9-10 Celsius in the morning outside.I would say 3-4 perhaps but I bought them as a buffer against cold not as a thermal. I really liked them .They are not something that will do the same as thermals 100% but for taking the chill off they're great.Keep in mind the quality is not long lasting sadly and they after 6 months had to be thrown out but they're long in the leg and higher waisted than others.
477985
Well technically you shouldn't have to because they're long underwear. It seems like they're also designed to be worn next to the skin because the seems and elastic waste band are soft. Honestly, I don't wear underwear underneath these and it's very comfortable. Also, you should consider that the wool fibers are anti microbial and therefore do not retain your body oders like cotton underwear. So it that case, wearing underwear underneath, especially cotton, would be pointless. I would however wear lightweight merino wool boxer breifs under these while backpacking.