Is this lens similar to the Canon 14mm? What sets the Canon apart from this Sigma besides being 1mm wider?
236736
I honestly don't know what the difference may be between the two lenses. I do not own the canon 14mm lens to compare them. I am very happy with this Sigma lens. It takes a nice full wide angle shot.
236737
The difference is very significant, 15 mm from the edges a rounded effect, it distorts enough, depending on your angle you can even warp the person. I quite like the effect. The 14mm does not distort anything. Sorry for the english but I'm using the google translator. I'm from Brazil! Hope it helped!
236738
The Sigma is a fish eye (180 degrees diagonal viewing angle) , while the Canon is an extreme wide angle (no fish eye distortion) and therefore much more expensive.
632572
I own the 18-250mm and it is really sharp and a good lens. I was very surprised. Not sure of the Sigma but I know with the Tamron it is a bargain at that price.
132381
Hi, I have no experience with The Zeiss 85mm 1.4 and can't make a comperasion, but The Sigma 85 mm 1.4 is a perfect lense and I am glad I bought it. Regards...
766703
Decent, but not as good as the 14-24mm f/2.8 Having one stop better means the difference between ISO 6400 or ISO 12800. It could mean the difference between 1/15th of a second and 1/30th of a second. I think the purpose of this lens is more of landscape than a low light performer.
725614
This is a very nice lens, and yes, this lens is great for wedding photography. I don't have a canon, sorry can't afford it, and that's why I chose Sigma for its affordability . All in all it's a great lens.
386984
I have Canon D60 and T3i and this lens is fantastic on both at all settings. I would contact sigma and talk to them about it.
751818
i hear alot of good things about the sigma 17-35 1.8 all though it would depend on what sort of photography you do!i like to keep in the family,so thats why i went with canon 85 1.8 witch is a vary good lens,also its a prime lens and would work well on your t4i and most other canon cameras.
1249481
Yeah, Diverhank nailed it - two very different lenses. Important to note that the 50mm 1.4 is NOT a macro lens and that was something you mentioned in your initial post. I used the 50mm on my T2i and absolutely loved it, though I eventually upgraded (and much preferred) the Sigma 30mm 1.4 for the "normal" focal length on the crop-sensor. I now shoot a full frame and primarily use the 50mm but will likely get the 100mm shortly. Be sure to take a look at the Sigma 30mm before buying the 50mm Canon but if Macro is what you're looking for, you can't go wrong with the 100mm L.
134988
This lens outperforms sigma in a lot of areas. This lens is optically as good as Nikons version, just a tad slower on focus, but only noticeable if you are a pro shooting sports. Build quality is outstanding, mostly metal. Goes head to head with Nikon in almost every category.
725617
I use my Sigma religiously! It has actually become my favorite lens! As far as a comparison, I do not own a Canon version and have not tried one. Many reviews here http://reviews.cnet.com/lenses/sigma-apo-70-200mm/4505-13038_7-35643871.html
354386
I wouldn't say that it is a wider angle than the low-end 14mm, but the image clarity is higher than a zoom lens at 17mm being a dedicated prime. It is certainly more compact.
160523
I wasn't aware Sigma made this same lens in a "macro" version? Becarefull believing the discriptions as some "used" products are misrepresented. Any how, macro will allow for a shorter minimum focus distance. Good luck
1329011
The newer version with the C is the contemporary line of lens, sigma also came out with a art line. Basically it's much better then all of sigma previous lenses and some of the art line can even beat Canon's L glass at a fraction of cost. Quality control is also better so less bad apples make it pass inspection. Just read the reviews, you can't go wrong with a lens from the contemporary or art line.
1857982
I have no idea as I have never used a Sigma lens. I know with my Tamron... I do get good shots with it. Only problem is using it runs my battery down faster. Sorry couldnt help, but I love mine.
579923
I love that lens it's more comparable to a Ziess 85mm. The bokeh at 1.5 is awesome! I would highly recommend it over the canon 1.8
543324
My copy of the Sigma was horrendous. I had to send it back. Ended up buying the 35mm version of the Sigma (the new Artisan series) and that one's MUCH sharper than the equivalent Canon 1.4.
171954
I believe Sigma makes a Canon version of this lens, but if you're looking at this particular ad, then you are looking at a Nikon mount and -NOT- Canon.